Pneumococcal vaccine in aboriginal children--a randomized controlled trial involving 60 children

Australia's Role in Pneumococcal and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Evaluation in Asia-Pacific

Australian researchers have made substantial contributions to the field of vaccinology over many decades. Two examples of this contribution relate to pneumococcal vaccines and the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, with a focus on improving access to these vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). Many LLMICs considering introducing one or both of these vaccines into their National Immunisation Programs face significant barriers such as cost, logistics associated with vaccine delivery. These countries also often lack the resources and expertise to undertake the necessary studies to evaluate vaccine performance. This review summarizes the role of Australia in the development and/or evaluation of pneumococcal vaccines and the HPV vaccine, including the use of alternative vaccine strategies among countries situated in the Asia-Pacific region. The outcomes of these research programs have had significant global health impacts, highlighting the importance of these vaccines in preventing pneumococcal disease as well as HPV-associated diseases.

Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality globally. Whilst pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPVs) have the potential to prevent disease and death, the degree of protection afforded against various clinical endpoints and within different populations is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and effectiveness of PPVs in preventing pneumococcal disease or death in adults. We did not assess adverse events.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL 2012, Issue 6, MEDLINE (January 1966 to June Week 2, 2012) and EMBASE (1974 to June 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in adults, provided the study outcome met the definition of the outcome considered in the review. We also considered non-RCTs in adults, where the study assessed PPV effectiveness against culture-confirmed invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), provided the study controlled for important confounding factors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors assessed trial quality of RCTs and three review authors extracted the data. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model. Two review authors assessed study quality and extracted data for non-RCTs. We calculated ORs and 95% CIs using a random-effects model following the conversion of each study outcome to a log OR and standard error (SE).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five studies met our inclusion criteria (18 RCTs involving 64,852 participants and seven non-RCTs involving 62,294 participants). Meta-analysis of the RCTs found strong evidence of PPV efficacy against IPD with no statistical heterogeneity (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.45; random-effects model, I(2) statistic = 0%). There was efficacy against all-cause pneumonia in low-income (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.67, I(2) statistic = 19%) but not high-income countries in either the general population (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.12, I(2) statistic = 93%) or in adults with chronic illness (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.19, I(2) statistic = 10%). PPV was not associated with substantial reductions in all-cause mortality (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.09; random-effects model, I(2) statistic = 69%). Vaccine efficacy against primary outcomes appeared poorer in adults with chronic illness. Non-RCTs provided evidence for protection against IPD in populations for whom the vaccine is currently utilised (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.61; random-effects model, I(2) statistic = 31%). This review did not consider adverse events as it was outside the scope of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the recommendation for PPV to prevent IPD in adults. The evidence from RCTs is less clear with respect to adults with chronic illness. This might be because of lack of effect or lack of power in the studies. The meta-analysis does not provide evidence to support the routine use of PPV to prevent all-cause pneumonia or mortality.

Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae(S. pneumoniae) continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Whilst pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPV) have the potential to prevent disease and death, the degree of protection afforded against various clinical endpoints and within different populations is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of PPV in preventing disease or death in adults. Adverse events were not assessed.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2); MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2007); and EMBASE (1974 to June 2007).

SELECTION CRITERIA

A) Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PPV with placebo, control vaccines, or no intervention.B) Non-RCTs assessing PPV effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A) RCTs: trial quality assessment was conducted by two review authors and data extracted by three authors; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using a random-effects model.B) Non-RCTs: study quality, including measures to control for confounding, was assessed and data extracted by two review authors; OR and 95% CI were calculated using a random-effects model following the conversion of each study outcome to a log OR and standard error.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met our inclusion criteria (15 RCTs involving 48,656 participants and 7 non-RCTs involving 62,294 participants). Meta-analysis of the RCTs found strong evidence of PPV efficacy against IPD with no statistical heterogeneity (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.46; random-effects model, I-squared (I(2)) = 0%). Efficacy against all cause pneumonia was inconclusive with substantial statistical heterogeneity (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.97; random-effects model, I(2) = 87.3%). PPV was not associated with substantial reductions in all-cause mortality (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.10; random-effects model, I(2) = 75.3%). Vaccine efficacy against primary outcomes appeared poorer in adults with chronic illness but the difference was not statistically significant. Non-RCTs provided evidence for protection against IPD in populations for whom the vaccine is currently utilised (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.61; random-effects model, I(2) = 31.4%).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the recommendation for PPV to prevent IPD in adults. The evidence from RCTs is less clear with respect to adults with chronic illness. This might be because of lack of effect or lack of power in the studies. The meta-analysis does not provide compelling evidence to support the routine use of PPV to prevent all-cause pneumonia or mortality.

Assessing vaccine efficacy for the prevention of acute otitis media by pneumococcal vaccination in children: a methodological overview of statistical practice in randomized controlled clinical trials

Acute otitis media (AOM) is the most common bacterial infectious disease among children. Vaccination is proposed to prevent otitis and several clinical trials were performed to assess the efficacy of pneumococcal vaccines. The way vaccine efficacy is analysed varies among trials. However, the clinical meaning of an estimate of vaccine effect and its statistical test depends on the applied statistical method. We aim to bring the meaning and validity of statistical trial results to the attention of researchers. We consider all methodological approaches for analysing vaccine efficacy applied in pneumococcal vaccination trials included in a recent Cochrane Review. We demonstrate how different methods address different scientific questions on the effect of vaccination, how they can complement each other and why some methods can produce misleading results.

Current issues regarding the use of pneumococcal conjugate and polysaccharide vaccines in Australian children

OBJECTIVE

To present the results of child pneumococcal vaccination studies in the setting of current Australian disease epidemiology and immunization policy, and issues that clinicians should consider in discussions with families.

METHODS

This paper includes a narrative review of randomized, controlled, double blind studies and systematic reviews which evaluated the efficacy of child pneumococcal vaccination.

RESULTS

7PCV is expected to prevent > 80% of childhood invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD, includes meningitis, septicaemia/bacteraemia) and the associated mortality. 7PCV may prevent 6% of all pneumonia, 18% of radiographically-defined pneumonia, 6% of all otitis media (OM) and 20%-40% of tympanostomy tube procedures. It may also reduce IPD due to antibiotic-resistant pneumococci, and prevent IPD in unvaccinated individuals. The impact of replacement disease caused by non-vaccine serotypes is not yet known. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines given to 2-year-old children may prevent approximately 19% of all and 26% of recurrent OM.

CONCLUSION

The Australian Standard Vaccination Schedule recommends universal infant immunization with seven-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7PCV). Universal infant 7PCV will prevent pneumococcal diseases and deaths. The potential for its impact to be reduced in the long-term by serotype replacement must be closely monitored. Information concerning disease epidemiology, vaccine efficacy and safety, disease risk perception and national costs may prove useful in discussions with families.

Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines for preventing vaccine-type invasive pneumococcal disease and pneumonia with consolidation on x-ray in children under two years of age

BACKGROUND

Pneumonia, most commonly caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pnc), is a major cause of morbidity and mortality among young children especially in developing countries. Recently, the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Pnc has increased worldwide such that the effectiveness of preventive strategies, like the new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) on rates of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and pneumonia, needs to be evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of PCV in reducing the incidence of IPD due to vaccine serotypes (VT) and x-ray confirmed pneumonia with consolidation of unspecified etiology in children who received PCV before 12 months of age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2004), MEDLINE (1990 to March 2004) and EMBASE (1990 to December 2003). Reference list of articles, and books of abstracts of relevant symposia, were hand searched. Researchers in the field were also contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PCV with placebo, or another vaccine, among children below two years with IPD and clinical/radiographic pneumonia as outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently identified eligible studies, assessed trial quality, and extracted data. Differences were resolved by discussion. The inverse variance method was used to pool effect sizes.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four trials assessing the efficacy of PCV in reducing the incidence of IPD, two on x-ray confirmed pneumonia as outcome, and one on clinical pneumonia, with or without x-ray confirmation. Results from pooling HIV-1 negative children from the South African study with the other studies were as follows: the pooled vaccine efficacy (VE) for vaccine-type IPD was 88% (95% confidence interval (CI) 73% to 94%; fixed effect and random effects models), the effect measure was statistically significant (p <0.00001) and there was no heterogeneity (p = 0.77I2 0%); the pooled VE for all-serotype IPD was 66% (95% CI 46% to 79%; fixed effect model), the effect measure was statistically significant (p <0.00001) and there was no statistical heterogeneity (p = 0.09, I2 51%); the pooled VE for x-ray confirmed pneumonia was 22% (95% CI 11% to 31%; both fixed effect and random effects models) and there was no statistical heterogeneity (p = 0.80, I2 0%). Analyses that included all the children in the South African study (HIV-1 negative and HIV-1 positive children) and pooled with data from the other studies gave very similar results.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

PCV is effective in reducing the incidence of IPD from all serotypes but exerts a greater effect in reducing VT IPD. Although PCV is also effective in reducing the incidence of x-ray confirmed pneumonia, there are still uncertainties about the definition of this outcome. Additional randomised controlled trials are currently in progress.

Pneumococcal vaccines for preventing otitis media

BACKGROUND

Acute otitis media (AOM) is one of the most common diseases in early infancy and childhood. Long term effects of recurrent episodes of otitis media, rapid emergence of drug resistant bacteria associated with AOM worldwide and huge estimated direct and indirect annual costs associated with otitis media have emphasized the need for an effective vaccination program to prevent episodes of AOM.

OBJECTIVES

The object of this review was to assess the effect of pneumococcal vaccination in preventing AOM in children up to 12 years of age.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (issue 2, 2003) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infection Group's specialised register (30th June 2003), MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2003), EMBASE (January 1990 to June 2003) and reference lists of all studies and review articles retrieved. We also contacted two vaccine manufacturers and first or corresponding authors of some of the included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials of pneumococcal vaccination with prevention of AOM as outcome in children aged 12 years or younger and a follow-up of at least six months after vaccination.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Five reviewers independently assessed trial quality and two reviewers extracted data. Two study authors were contacted.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials on 8-to 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV) and four trials on 7-to 9-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) were included. The highest efficacy of PPV was found in children aged 24 months and older: the rate ratio was 0.779 [95% CI: 0.625-0.970]. PPV has little effect on the prevention of AOM in children without documented prior episodes of AOM and only a moderate effect in the group of children with documented AOM episodes prior to vaccination. Pooled results of the four PCV trials in infants vaccinated as early as two months of age and toddlers attending daycare and toddlers with recurrent AOM showed only a small effect on prevention of AOM (rate ratio 0.921; 95% CI: 0.894-0.950).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Based on the currently available results of the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination for the prevention of AOM, a large scale use of pneumococcal polysaccharide and conjugate vaccination for this specific indication is not yet recommended. So far, pneumococcal conjugate vaccinations are not indicated in the management of recurrent AOM in toddlers and older children. The results of currently ongoing trials of 9- and 11-valent conjugate vaccines should provide more information as to whether pneumococcal vaccines are more effective in specific high-risk populations like infants and older children with recurrent AOM or immunodeficiency.

Review of randomized controlled trials on pneumococcal vaccination for prevention of otitis media

BACKGROUND

Increasing resistance to antibiotics of the pathogens causing acute otitis media (AOM) emphasize the need for effective methods to prevent episodes of otitis media in young children.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination for prevention of AOM in children age 12 years and younger.

METHODS

Systematic review of 11 randomized controlled trials including 46 074 children in whom pneumococcal vaccination against AOM was compared with a control treatment. Vaccine effect was estimated as a rate ratio (RR): AOM episodes per child month in pneumococcal vaccination group divided by the AOM episodes per child-month in control group.

RESULTS

A moderate effect of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination was found in children 24 months of age and older [RR 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63 to 0.97]. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine had little effect on prevention of AOM in children without previous documented episodes before vaccination (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.99). Better efficacy was seen in those children with documented prior AOM before vaccination (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.91). Pooled results of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine trials in infants vaccinated as early as 2 months of age and in toddlers attending day care showed only a small effect on prevention of AOM (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.85 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, a large scale pneumococcal vaccination program for a primary indication of preventing AOM in infancy is not indicated. The results of ongoing trials should provide more information whether the conjugate vaccine is effective in high risk (otitis-prone) children after 1 year of age.

Vaccines for preventing pneumococcal infection in adults

BACKGROUND

Diseases caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) continue to cause substantial morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines have been developed for over 50 years and may have the potential to prevent disease and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccination in preventing disease or death in adults.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Trials were identified by electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) issue 2, 2003 (which includes the Cochrane ARI Group's specialised register); MEDLINE (January 1966 to June 2003); and EMBASE (1974 to June 2003). We searched existing literature. The bibliographies of all newly revealed studies were read in order to identify further studies. The vaccine manufacturers, the lead authors of newly identified studies not included in existing meta-analyses were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

A) Prospective, randomised or quasi-randomised studies comparing pneumococcal vaccines with placebo, control vaccines or no intervention.B) Case-control studies (including indirect cohort studies) assessing pneumococcal vaccine effectiveness against invasive pneumococcal disease. Cohort studies are excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A) Randomised studies. Trial quality assessment was conducted by two reviewers (JH and DT). Data extraction was done by three reviewers (JH, DT, KD). There were many instances of unclear or incomplete data in the trial reports, and the final dataset was arrived at after much deliberation and discussion, including comparison with the data used in two previous reviews of this question. Due to the age of the trials (dating back to 1954 in one case) it was not generally possible to obtain clarification from the authors, though a partial clarification was achieved in one case.B) Non-randomised studies. Study quality was assessed by two reviewers (RA and KD).

MAIN RESULTS

The combined results from the randomised studies fail to show that the polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine is effective in preventing either pneumonia (outcome 6: odds ratio = 0.77, confidence interval 0.58, 1.02, number = 14) or death (outcome 8: odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.76, 1.07, number = 11). Despite encouraging data from some very early trials, pooling trials published from 1977 on suggests there is no effect (outcome 6; odds ratio = 0.96, confidence interval 0.80, 1.15, number = 12; outcome 9: odds ratio = 0.98, confidence interval 0.88, 1.09, number = 10). The available data cannot distinguish whether this heterogeneity in results is due to improvements in trial methodology and reporting, to differences in trial setting or to real loss of efficacy over time. This is because the early, poorly reported trials were conducted in high-risk healthy populations where the expected benefit is greatest. The case-control studies show significant efficacy in preventing invasive pneumococcal disease: OR 0.47 (CI 0.37, 0.59) corresponding to an efficacy of 53%.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

While polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccines do not appear to reduce the incidence of pneumonia or death in adults with or without chronic illness, or in the elderly (55 years and above), the evidence from non-randomised studies suggests that the vaccines are effective in the reducing the incidence of the more specific outcome, invasive pneumococcal disease, among adults and the immunocompetent elderly (55 years and above). Surveillance data suggest that infection rates vary widely between and also within countries, but a typical figure in developed countries is 0.01%, or 10 per 100,000 per year. Efficacy of 50% then corresponds to a number-needed-to-treat (NNT) of 20,000 vaccinations per infection avoided, and perhaps 50,000 per death avoided.

Differing serologic responses to an haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide-neisseria meningitidis outer membrane protein conjugate (PRP-OMPC) vaccine in australian aboriginal and caucasian infants - implications for disease epidemiology

This study compared Hib antibody responses to a single lot of PRP-OMPC vaccine given at 2, 4 and 12 months to 57 Aboriginal infants in rural areas of the Northern Territory and 56 Caucasian infants in Sydney, Australia. The Aboriginal infants had lower levels of antibody in cord blood (P>0.05), which were significantly lower (P<0.02) by 2 months of age. Antibody responses to one or two doses of vaccine, measured at 4 and 12 months of age, were similar but the geometric mean titre following the booster dose in Aboriginal infants was significantly lower (1.98 vs. 6.04 mcg/ml, P = 0.002). Low preimmunisation antibody is consistent with the early onset of Hib disease in Aboriginal infants before immunisation. Lower responses to boosting could correlate with persistence of Hib colonisation in indigenous populations.

A systematic review of clinical research addressing the prevalence, aetiology, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of otitis media in Australian Aboriginal children

The objective of this review was to systemically identify and summarize all the clinically relevant evidence available from studies addressing the prevalence, aetiology, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of otitis media in Australian Aboriginal children. Electronic searching of Medline, the Australian Medical Index and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Bibliographic Index was performed. This was supplemented by hand searching the Menzies School of Health Research otitis media collection, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Information Bulletin and Aboriginal Health: an annotated bibliography. Data were extracted and placed in a series of evidence tables relevant to clinical practice. There were 59 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The majority were surveys, and only 19 addressed diagnosis, prognosis or therapy. Severe otitis media in rural Aboriginal children does not occur in isolation but as part of a spectrum of chronic bacterial infections of the respiratory tract. Although the aspects of poverty that result in this condition remain to be clarified, exposure to other young children with chronic nasal discharge is likely to be important. Whilst there is a considerable amount of literature on otitis media in Australian Aboriginal children, the number of studies most relevant to improving health outcomes is small. A systematic approach to disease surveillance, diagnosis, and application of medical interventions is required urgently. Future medical research should be concerned with the evaluation of interventions and the generalisabilty of studies from different populations.

Streptococcus pneumoniae carriage and penicillin/ceftriaxone resistance in hospitalised children in Darwin

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (SP) is increasing world-wide. Pneumococcal prevalence and susceptibility patterns are not known for children in the Top End of the Northern Territory.

AIMS

To determine the prevalence of nasopharyngeal carriage of pneumococci in children hospitalised in Darwin, and the extent of penicillin and ceftriaxone resistance in these isolates.

METHODS

Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected on admission from 85 children who had not received antimicrobials for their admission illness. Antimicrobial resistance was determined following selective culture for SP isolates. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for penicillin and ceftriaxone were determined using the E-test method.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of nasopharyngeal SP carriage was 44%. Carriage occurred more often in Aboriginal children from rural areas (56%) than in urban children (24%) (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.35-11.78, p < 0.01). Thirty per cent of isolates were penicillin resistant, 35% were ceftriaxone resistant, and 49% were resistant to at least one of these. One isolate showed high-level resistance to both antimicrobials; all other resistant isolates were of intermediate-level resistance. For the same isolate, MICs for ceftriaxone were more often higher than those for penicillin. Five isolates had intermediate resistance to ceftriaxone whilst remaining sensitive to penicillin.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of pneumococcal resistance to penicillin and ceftriaxone in hospitalised children in Darwin is much higher than previously reported in Australia. This has implications for future antimicrobial management and highlights the need for regular regional surveillance of SP resistance. The development of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines for children under two years is a priority.