Static cut-points of hypertension and increased arterial stiffness in children and adolescents: The International Childhood Vascular Function Evaluation Consortium

A proposal to simplify the definition of pediatric hypertension: bridging the gap between perception and action

BACKGROUND

The importance of routine hypertension screening in children and adolescents is now well recognized. However, it is often undiagnosed in clinical practice, partly due to the reliance on a complex blood pressure (BP) percentile-based table with hundreds of cutoffs by age, sex, and height.

MAIN TEXT

Many studies have explored simplified tools for screening hypertension in children and adolescents, such as simplified formulas, simplified BP tables by age and sex group, by age group, or by height group, and the BP to height ratio. Nevertheless, validation studies have demonstrated that these simplified tools are prone to yielding many false-positive cases or remain inconvenient to use in primary pediatric care settings and large-scale screening surveys. To address this issue, we propose adopting static BP cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children aged 6-12 years and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents aged 13-17 years to simplify the definition of hypertension. Our proposed static BP cutoffs have shown comparable performance to the complex BP percentile-based table in predicting subclinical cardiovascular damage in both childhood and adulthood.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend using static BP cutoffs (120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents) to facilitate the screening of pediatric hypertension in clinical practice, thereby bridging the gap between perception and action.

Pediatric Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Health in Adulthood

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review summarizes current knowledge on blood pressure in children and adolescents (youth), with a focus on primary hypertension-the most common form of elevated blood pressure in this demographic. We examine its etiology, progression, and long-term cardiovascular implications. The review covers definitions and recommendations of blood pressure classifications, recent developments in measurement, epidemiological trends, findings from observational and clinical studies, and prevention and treatment, while identifying gaps in understanding and suggesting future research directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Youth hypertension is an escalating global issue, with regional and national variations in prevalence. While the principles of blood pressure measurement have remained largely consistent, challenges in this age group include a scarcity of automated devices that have passed independent validation for accuracy and a generally limited tolerance for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. A multifaceted interplay of factors contributes to youth hypertension, impacting long-term cardiovascular health. Recent studies, including meta-analysis and sophisticated life-course modelling, reveal an adverse link between youth and life-course blood pressure and subclinical cardiovascular outcomes later in life. New evidence now provides the strongest evidence yet linking youth blood pressure with clinical cardiovascular events in adulthood. Some clinical trials have expanded our understanding of the safety and efficacy of antihypertensive medications in youth, but this remains an area that requires additional attention, particularly regarding varied screening approaches. This review outlines the potential role of preventing and managing blood pressure in youth to reduce future cardiovascular risk. A global perspective is necessary in formulating blood pressure definitions and strategies, considering the specific needs and circumstances in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries.

High free sugars, insulin resistance, and low socioeconomic indicators: the hubs in the complex network of non-communicable diseases in adolescents

BACKGROUND

Noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) predominantly affect adults, but pathophysiological changes begin decades earlier, as a continuum, with initial events apparent in adolescence. Hence, early identification and intervention are crucial for the prevention and management of NCDs. We investigated the complex network of socioeconomic, behavioral, and metabolic factors associated with the presence of NCD in Brazilian adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study nested within the São Luís segment of the Ribeirão Preto, Pelotas, and São Luís (RPS) cohort's consortium, focusing on 18-19-year-olds (n = 2515). Data were collected prospectively, from which we constructed a complex network with NCD-related factors/indicators as nodes and their co-occurrences as edges. General and sex-based models analyzed: socioeconomic status, behavioral (smoking, alcohol, and other drugs use, unhealthy diet, poor sleep, physical inactivity), and metabolic factors (overweight/obesity, elevated blood pressure, poor lipid profile). We also looked for NCDs in adolescence like asthma, abnormal spirometry, depression, suicide risk, and poor oral health. The network was characterized by degree, betweenness, eigenvector, local transitivity, Shannon entropy, and cluster coefficient.

RESULTS

The adolescents had an average age of 18.3 years, 52.3% were female and 47.7% male. 99.8% of them have a diet rich in free sugars, 15% are overweight/obese and 72.3% had an elevated TyG index. High free sugar emerged as the central hub, followed by high TyG index (an early marker of insulin resistance) and low socioeconomic class. In males, low fiber intake and a high triglycerides/HDL ratio highlighted cardiometabolic concerns; in females, sedentary behavior and poor sleep marked metabolic and psychological challenges, along with caries in both sexes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings provide insights into central health challenges during adolescence, such as high free sugars, insulin resistance, and low socioeconomic indicators, suggesting that interventions targeted at these central hubs could have a significant impact on their NCD network.

Utility of waist-to-height ratio, waist circumference and body mass index in predicting clustered cardiometabolic risk factors and subclinical vascular phenotypes in children and adolescents: A pooled analysis of individual data from 14 countries

AIMS

The clinical utility of waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) in predicting cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) and subclinical markers of cardiovascular disease remains controversial. We aimed to compare the utility of WHtR with waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) in identifying children and adolescents (youths) at risk for cardiometabolic outcomes, including clustered CMRFs, high carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), and arterial stiffness (assessed as high pulse wave velocity, PWV).

METHODS

We analyzed data from 34,224 youths (51.0 % boys, aged 6-18 years) with CMRFs, 5004 (49.5 % boys, aged 6-18 years) with cIMT measurement, and 3100 (56.4 % boys, aged 6-17 years) with PWV measurement from 20 pediatric samples across 14 countries.

RESULTS

WHtR, WC, and BMI z-scores had similar performance in discriminating youths with ≥3 CMRFs, with the area under the curve (AUC) (95 % confidence interval, CI)) ranging from 0.77 (0.75-0.78) to 0.78 (0.76-0.80) using the modified National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) definition, and from 0.77 (0.74-0.79) to 0.77 (0.74-0.80) using the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definition. Similarly, all three measures showed similar performance in discriminating youths with subclinical vascular outcomes, with AUC (95 % CI) ranging from 0.67 (0.64-0.71) to 0.70 (0.66-0.73) for high cIMT (≥P95 values) and from 0.60 (0.58-0.66) to 0.62 (0.58-0.66) for high PWV (≥P95 values).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that WHtR, WC, and BMI are equally effective in identifying at-risk youths across diverse pediatric populations worldwide. Given its simplicity and ease of use, WHtR could be a preferable option for quickly screening youths with increased cardiometabolic risk in clinical settings.

Relative Contribution of Blood Pressure in Childhood, Young- and Mid-Adulthood to Large Artery Stiffness in Mid-Adulthood

Background Blood pressure associates with arterial stiffness, but the contribution of blood pressure at different life stages is unclear. We examined the relative contribution of childhood, young- and mid-adulthood blood pressure to mid-adulthood large artery stiffness. Methods and Results The sample comprised 1869 participants from the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study who had blood pressure measured in childhood (6-18 years), young-adulthood (21-30 years), and mid-adulthood (33-45 years). Markers of large artery stiffness were pulse wave velocity and carotid distensibility recorded in mid-adulthood. Bayesian relevant life course exposure models were used. For each 10-mm Hg higher cumulative systolic blood pressure across the life stages, pulse wave velocity was 0.56 m/s higher (95% credible interval: 0.49 to 0.63) and carotid distensibility was 0.13%/10 mm Hg lower (95% credible interval: -0.16 to -0.10). Of these total contributions, the highest contribution was attributed to mid-adulthood systolic blood pressure (relative weights: pulse wave velocity, childhood: 2.6%, young-adulthood: 5.4%, mid-adulthood: 92.0%; carotid distensibility, childhood: 5.6%; young-adulthood: 10.1%; mid-adulthood: 84.3%), with the greatest individual contribution coming from systolic blood pressure at the time point when pulse wave velocity and carotid distensibility were measured. The results were consistent for diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and pulse pressure. Conclusions Although mid-adulthood blood pressure contributed most to mid-adulthood large artery stiffness, we observed small contributions from childhood and young-adulthood blood pressure. These findings suggest that the burden posed by arterial stiffness might be reduced by maintaining normal blood pressure levels at each life stage, with mid-adulthood a critical period for controlling blood pressure.

Impact of the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics' Clinical Practice Guideline on the Identification and Risk Stratification of Youth at Increased Cardiovascular Disease Risk

The updated clinical practice guideline (CPG) published by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2017 introduced significant changes to the diagnostic and evaluative approach towards children with elevated blood pressure. The goals of this review were to summarize the current evidence regarding the impact of the new CPG on the identification and risk stratification of children at increased cardiovascular disease risk. Universally, the new CPG definitions of abnormal blood pressure led to more children classified as having a hypertensive blood pressure when compared with alternative definitions. Youth who moved to a higher blood pressure stage with the CPG typically had worse cardiometabolic profiles and more comorbidites. The association of CPG-defined hypertension and concurrent intermediate cardiovascular disease outcomes such as left ventricular hypertrophy and increased pulse wave velocity remains unclear; however, longitudinal data suggests an improved identification of those at greatest risk for adult cardiovascular disease with the CPG definitions. The majority of studies reviewed used blood pressure from one encounter, not replicate blood pressures from multiple visits, to define an abnormal or hypertensive blood pressure. Therefore, future studies investigating the prevalence of confirmed hypertension and the association between confirmed hypertension and outcomes are needed to optimally characterize the performance of the new CPG on identifying children at cardiovascular disease risk.