Ascitic fluid total protein, a useful marker in non-portal hypertensive ascites

Hypoalbuminemia contributes to ascites formation via sodium and water retention: Evidence from clinical date and albumin deficient mice

Albumin infusions improve circulatory and renal function in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. However, there is no convincing evidence that hypoalbuminemia contributes to ascites formation in liver cirrhosis. The aim of our study is to determine the exact role of hypoalbuminemia in the formation of ascites caused by liver cirrhosis and its underlying mechanism. Clinical profiles of patients with liver cirrhosis retrospectively analyzed. The details of albumin involved in ascites formation were investigated in rat model and murine model. Statistical analysis demonstrated hypoalbuminemia was an independent risk factor for ascites formation in patients with liver cirrhosis (OR = 0.722, P < 0.001). In carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)-induced rat model of liver cirrhosis, a significant reduction in serum albumin was observed in rats with ascites (13.37 g/L) compared with rats without ascites (21.43 g/L, P < 0.001). In thioacetamide (TAA)-treated mice, ascites amount of heterozygous albumin (Alb+/-) mice (112.0 mg) was larger than that of wild-type (Alb+/+) mice (58.46 mg, P < 0.001). In CCl4-induced chronic liver injury, ascites amounts of Alb+/- or Alb+/+ mice were 80.00 mg or 48.46 mg (P = 0.001). Further study demonstrated 24-h urinary sodium excretion in Alb+/- mice was lower than that of Alb+/+ mice in TAA/CCl4-induce murine models of liver cirrhosis. Additionally, serum sodium concentration of Alb+/- mice was lower than that of Alb+/+ mice. In cirrhotic mice, higher level of antidiuretic hormone was observed in Alb+/- mice compared with the control; and renal aquaporin (AQP2) expression in Alb+/- mice was significantly higher than that of WT mice. These revealed hypoalbuminemia contributed to the occurrence of ascites in liver cirrhosis through sodium and water retention.

Differential diagnosis of ascites: etiologies, ascitic fluid analysis, diagnostic algorithm

Ascites is the pathological accumulation of fluid within the peritoneal cavity. It often occurs as results of liver cirrhosis, malignant neoplasia, tuberculous infection, cardiac insufficiency, renal diseases, etc. Determining the etiology is an essential step in the management of patients with new-onset ascites. Abdominal paracentesis with appropriate ascitic fluid analysis is probably the most cost-effective method of determining the cause of ascites. We performed a literature search of PubMed and identified articles published in the field of ascites, to evaluate diagnostic values of various parameters in defining the etiologies of ascites and then provides diagnostic algorithm for patients with new-onset ascites. In patients with ascites, the constituent ratio of underlying etiology varies between developed and developing countries. It is a challenge to define the etiologies of ascites in developing countries. Routine ascitic fluid analysis should include the serum ascites albumin gradient (SAAG), total protein concentration, cell count and differential. Optional ascitic fluid analysis includes cholesterol, fluid culture, cytology, tumor markers, lactate dehydrogenase, adenosine deaminase (ADA), triglyceride, amylase, glucose, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), etc. Our review evaluated diagnostic values of the above parameters in defining the etiologies of ascites. Diagnostic algorithm established in this review would provide a practical and convenient diagnostic strategy for clinicians in diagnosing patients with new-onset ascites.

Diagnostic algorithm based on ratio of ascites-serum tumor markers is superior to tumor markers in the differentiation of benign ascites from malignant ascites

BACKGROUND

Differential diagnosis between benign ascites and malignant ascites remains challenging in clinical practice, the aim of our study is to determine the differential value of the ratio of ascitic-serum tumor markers between benign ascites and malignant ascites.

METHODS

418 patients with new-onset ascites were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The pertinent data of patients enrolled were collected; diagnostic value of tumor markers, ascites-serum tumor marker ratio, and diagnostic algorithm based on ascitic tumor markers and ascites-serum tumor marker ratio in patients with ascites were investigated.

RESULTS

81.25.% of the patients with benign ascites had low (<1) ratio of ascites-serum tumor markers (Max [A/S CEA, A/S CA15-3, A/S CA19-9]); and 91.88% of patients with benign ascites had the ratio of ascites-serum tumor marker less than 1.5. On the other hand, 94.96% of the patients with malignant ascites had high (≥1) ratio of ascites-serum tumor markers; and 97.29% of patients with malignant ascites had the ratio of ascites-serum tumor markers more than 0.67. Finally, diagnostic algorithm based on ascitic tumor markers and ascites-serum tumor marker ratio showed 96.37% of the sensitivity, and 94.37% of the accuracy in the diagnosis of malignant ascites, while ascitic tumor markers with a sensitivity of 78.29%, and an accuracy of 84.93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic algorithm based on ascitic tumor markers and ascites-serum tumor marker ratio exhibited an excellent performance in distinguishing benign and malignant ascites, which should be recommended in patients with new-onset ascites in clinical practice.

Laboratory investigation of peritoneal fluids: an updated practical approach based on the available evidence

Even though analysis of peritoneal fluids (PF) is often requested to medical laboratories for biochemical and morphological tests, there is still no mutual agreement on what the most appropriate way is to manage PF samples and which tests should be appropriately executed. In this update, we tried to identify the most useful tests for PF analysis to establish best practice indications. We performed a literature review and examined available guidelines to select the most appropriate tests by an evidence-based approach. Accordingly, the basic PF profile should include (1) serum to effusion albumin gradient and (2) automated cell counts with differential analysis. This profile allows to determine the PF nature, differentiating between 'high-albumin gradient' and 'low-albumin gradient' effusions, which helps to identify the pathophysiological process causing the ascites formation. Restricted to specific clinical situations, additional tests can be requested as follows: PF lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and glucose, to exclude (LDH) or confirm (glucose) secondary bacterial peritonitis; PF total protein, to differentiate ascites of cardiac origin from other causes; PF (pancreatic) amylase, for the identification of pancreatic ascites; PF bilirubin, when a choleperitoneum is suspected; PF triglycerides, in differentiating chylous from pseudochylous ascites and PF creatinine, to detect intraperitoneal urinary leakage.

Interferon-γ secreted by recruited Th1 cells in peritoneal cavity inhibits the formation of malignant ascites

Type 1 T helper (Th1) cells generate an efficient antitumor immune response in multiple malignancies. The functions of Th1 cells in malignant ascites (MA) have not been elucidated. The distribution of helper T cells in peritoneal fluid and peripheral blood was determined in patients and animal models with malignant ascites. The effects of Th1-derived interferon-γ (IFN-γ) on the formation of malignant ascites were investigated. The mechanism underlying the recruitment of Th1 cells into peritoneal cavity was explored. In patients with malignant ascites and animal models of malignant ascites, the percentage of Th1 cells increased in peritoneal fluid compared with peripheral blood. Next, our experiment demonstrated that Th1 cells inhibited the growth of tumor cells by secreting IFN-γ in vitro. In murine models of malignant ascites, increased peritoneal fluid and shorter survival time were observed in IFN-γ^-/- mice compared with wild-type (WT) mice. Then, the levels of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9/10 and the ratio of CXCR3⁺ Th1 cells indicated the involvement of CXCL9, 10/CXCR3 axis in the recruitment of Th1 cells into peritoneal cavity. As expected, in murine models of malignant ascites, the gradient between ascitic Th1 ratio and blood Th1 ratio decreased in CXCR3^-/- mice compared with WT mice. IFN-γ secreted by recruited Th1 cells in peritoneal cavity inhibits the formation of malignant ascites. Hence, manipulation of Th1 cells or IFN-γ will provide a therapeutic candidate against malignant ascites.

Novel clinical biomarkers in blood and pleural effusion for diagnosing patients with tuberculosis distinguishing from malignant tumor

Pleural effusion (PE) is a common manifestation of tuberculosis (TB) and malignant tumors but tuberculous PE (TPE) is difficult to distinguish from malignant PE (MPE), especially by noninvasive detection indicators. This study aimed to find effective detection indices in blood and PE for differentiating TB from a malignant tumor. A total of 815 patients who were diagnosed with TB or cancer in Hubei Shiyan Taihe Hospital from 2014 to 2017 were collected. Amongst them, 717 were found to have PE by thoracoscopy. Clinical characteristics, patients' blood parameters and PE indicator information were summarized for analysis. Patients with MPE had higher percentages to be bloody and negative of Rivalta test in PE than those with TPE. For clinical indicators, comparison of the specific parameters in blood showed that 18 indicators were higher in the TPE group than in the MPE group. By contrast, 12 indicators were higher in the MPE group than in the TPE group (P < .01). In addition, in PE tests, 3 parameters were higher in the TPE group, whereas other 4 parameters were higher in the MPE group (P < .01). Then, for clinical diagnosing practice, ROC analysis and principal component analysis were applied. The top 6 relevant indicators with area under curve over 0.70 were screened out as follows: hydrothorax adenosine dehydrogenase (pADA, 0.90), hydrothorax high-sensitivity C reactive protein (0.79), percentage of blood monocyte (sMONp, 0.75), blood high-sensitivity C reactive protein (sHsCRP, 0.73), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (0.71) and blood D-dimer (0.70). Moreover, logistic regression model revealed that a specific combination of 3 biomarkers, namely, pADA, sMONp and sHsCRP, could enhance the distinguishment of TB from malignant tumor with PE (area under curve = 0.944, 95% confidence interval = 0.925-0.964). The diagnostic function of the top single marker pADA in patients from different groups was analyzed and it was found to maintain high specificity and sensitivity. The 6 indicators, namely, pADA, hydrothorax high-sensitivity C reactive protein, sMONp, sHsCRP, sESR and blood D-dimer, showed significant diagnostic value for clinicians. Further, the combination of pADA, sMONp and sHsCRP has high accuracy for differential diagnosis for the first time. Most interestingly, the single marker pADA maintained high specificity and sensitivity in patients with different statuses and thus has great value for rapid and accurate diagnosis of suspected cases.

Utility of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase for differential diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis

Background

Differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis remains challenging in clinical practice; thus, in-patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled, and diagnostic values of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase were determined.

Methods

Consecutive patients diagnosed with tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis were retrospectively enrolled. The pertinent data of 169 patients enrolled were collected.

Results

A panel of ascitic tumor makers (CEA, CA15-3, CA19-9) had high specificity (96.83%) and accuracy (94.67%) in the differentiation of peritoneal carcinomatosis from tuberculous peritonitis; and ascitic ADA was a good discriminator between these patients, with an accuracy of 91.72%. Combined use of ascitic tumor makers and ADA (ascitic ADA < 22.5 IU/L or ascitic CEA > 3.65 ng/mL or CA15-3 > 42.70 U/mL or CA19-9 > 25.10 U/mL) performed high sensitivity (99.06%) and accuracy (94.08%) for the diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. In addition, combined ascitic ADA and tumor marker (positive ascitic tumor makers and ADA < 22.50 IU/L) had 100% of the specificity in diagnosing peritoneal carcinomatosis.

Conclusions

Combined use of ascitic tumor markers and adenosine deaminase showed excellent efficiency in the differential diagnosis between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis, thus these two simple and cost‐effective parameters should be determined when tuberculous peritonitis or peritoneal carcinomatosis was suspected in clinic practice.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02480-x.

MS275 as Class I HDAC inhibitor displayed therapeutic potential on malignant ascites by iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis

Background

Malignant ascites is a manifestation of end stage events in a variety of cancers and is associated with significant morbidity. Epigenetic modulators play a key role in cancer initiation and progression, among which histone deacetylases (HDACs) are considered as one of the most important regulators for various cancer development, such as liver cancer, ovarian cancer, and pancreatic cancer et al. Thus, in this paper, we sought to explore the therapeutic effect of HDAC inhibitor on malignant ascites.

Methods

In this report, we tested the therapeutic effect of different isoform selective HDAC inhibitors (Class I HDACI MS275, Class IIa HDACI MC1568, pan-HDAC inhibitors SAHA) on malignant ascites in vitro and in vivo. We further used proteome analysis to find the potential mechanisms for malignant ascites therapy.

Results

Among the different isoform-selective HDAC inhibitors, the class I selective HDACI, MS275, exhibited preferential inhibition on various ascites cells. MS275 could induce cell cycle arrest in G0/G1 phase and promote apoptosis on ascites cells. Through proteome analysis, we found MS275 could downregulate proteins related to cell cycle progression, such as CDK4, CDC20, CCND1; MS275 could upregulate pro-apoptosis proteins such as PAPR1, LMNB2 and AIFM1; in addition, MS275 could change the expression of tumorigenic proteins related to the specific malignant ascites bearing tumors, such as TSP1 and CDK4 for bladder cancer. We then confirmed that abemaciclib (CDK4/6 selective inhibitor) could inhibit the proliferation of ascites cells, and the combination of abemaciclib and MS275 had synergistic anti-tumor effect. Finally, we found that MS275 could in vivo inhibit malignant ascites progression (ascites volume: 2.9 ± 1.0 mL vs 7.5 ± 1.2 mL, p < 0.01), tumor growth, and prolong 66% of the life-span when compared with the untreated group.

Conclusion

This present research revealed that the class I selective HDAC inhibitor, MS275, could effectively inhibit malignant ascites development and tumor growth via multiple pathways. These results indicated that HDACI could have great potential for clinical therapy of malignant ascites.

Development and validation a simple model for identify malignant ascites

The differential diagnosis of benign ascites and malignant ascites is incredibly challenging for clinicians. This research aimed to develop a user-friendly predictive model to discriminate malignant ascites from non-malignant ascites through easy-to-obtain clinical parameters. All patients with new-onset ascites fluid were recruited from January 2014 to December 2018. The medical records of 317 patients with ascites for various reasons in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were collected and reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-six parameters were included and selected using univariate logistic regression, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses to establish a mathematical model for differential diagnosis, and its diagnostic performance was validated in the other groups. Age, cholesterol, hypersensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in serum, ascitic fluid adenosine deaminase (AF ADA), ascitic fluid lactate dehydrogenase (AF LDH) involvement in a 5-marker model. With a cut-off level of 0.83, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the ROC of the model for identifying malignant ascites in the development dataset were 84.7%, 88.8%, 87.6%, and 0.874 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.822-0.926), respectively, and 80.9%, 82.6%, 81.5%, and 0.863 (95% CI,0.817-0.913) in the validation dataset, respectively. The diagnostic model has a similar high diagnostic performance in both the development and validation datasets. The mathematical diagnostic model based on the five markers is a user-friendly method to differentiate malignant ascites from benign ascites with high efficiency.