Validation of five hepatic steatosis algorithms in metabolic-associated fatty liver disease: A population based study

Fatty liver index as an independent predictor of all-cause and disease-specific mortality

PURPOSE

This study aims to assess the prognostic value of the fatty liver index (FLI), a noninvasive tool for hepatic steatosis assessment, in predicting all-cause and disease-specific mortality.

METHODS

We linked data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III (1988-1994) with Public-Use Mortality Files, forming a cohort of 11 297 participants with a median follow-up period of 26.25 years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between FLI and all-cause mortality, while Fine and Gray's models assessed the relationship between FLI and disease-specific mortality.

RESULTS

The FLI ≥ 60 was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.24, P  < 0.001), as well as mortality from malignant neoplasms (hazard ratio = 1.18, P  = 0.048), diabetes (hazard ratio = 2.62, P  = 0.001), and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) (hazard ratio = 1.18, P  = 0.018), compared to FLI < 30. No significant associations were found with Alzheimer's disease, influenza and pneumonia, chronic lower respiratory diseases, or renal disorders. Subgroup analyses indicated that individuals who were females aged 40-60 (hazard ratio = 1.67, P  = 0.003), non-overweight (hazard ratio = 1.75, P  = 0.007), or without abdominal obesity (hazard ratio = 1.75, P  = 0.007) exhibited a stronger association between FLI ≥ 60 and all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

These findings support the prognostic value of the FLI for predicting mortality from all causes, malignant neoplasms, diabetes, and CVDs. Targeted attention is needed in postmenopausal women, non-overweight, and non-abdominally obese populations.

Glycaemic control is a modifiable risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related mortality in patients with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Optimal glycaemic control has well-established health benefits in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). It is uncertain whether optimal glycaemic control can benefit liver-related outcomes.

AIMS

To examine the association of optimal glycaemic control with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality.

METHODS

In a population-based cohort, we identified patients with newly diagnosed DM between 2001 and 2016 in Hong Kong. Optimal glycaemic control was defined as mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) <7% during the 3-year lead-in period after DM diagnosis. By applying propensity score matching to balance covariates, we analysed glycaemic control via competing risk models with outcomes of interest being HCC and liver-related mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 146,430 patients (52.2% males, mean age 61.4 ± 11.8 years). During a median follow-up duration of 7.0 years, 1099 (0.8%) and 978 (0.7%) patients developed HCC and liver-related deaths. Optimal glycaemic control, when compared to suboptimal glycaemic control, was associated with reduced risk of HCC (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.79). The risk of HCC increased with incremental HbA1c increases beyond >7% (SHR 1.29-1.71). Significant associations with HCC were also found irrespective of age (SHR 0.54-0.80), sex (SHR 0.68-0.69), BMI <25 or ≥25 kg/m2 (SHR 0.63-0.75), smoking (SHR 0.61-0.72), hepatic steatosis (SHR 0.67-0.68) and aspirin/statin/metformin use (SHR 0.67-0.75). A lower risk of liver-related mortality in relation to optimal glycaemic control was also observed (SHR 0.70, 95% CI 0.61-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

Glycaemic control is an independent risk factor for HCC and liver-related mortality, and should be incorporated into oncoprotective strategies in the general DM population.

Comparison of Non-invasive Liver Fat Scoring Systems as Markers of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Liver Disease

Background Metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is hepatic steatosis along with increased weight or obesity, type 2 diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation and without significant alcohol consumption. The clinical prediction of MASLD using simple, non-invasive indices like Fatty Liver Index (FLI), NAFLD Liver Fat Score (NAFLD LFS), Visceral Adiposity Index (VAI), Steato Test and Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) yielded heterogeneous results in different populations. Aim  We aimed to compare five scores (Fatty Liver Index, NAFLD Liver Fat Score, Visceral Adiposity Index, Steato Test, Hepatic Steatosis Index) for prediction of liver steatosis. Method Patients with metabolic syndrome and alcohol intake less than 20 grams per day were included in the study. Patients with alcohol intake greater than 20 grams per day and known history of liver or biliary disease, infections, muscle injury, autoimmune diseases, thyroid disorders, underlying secondary diabetes mellitus, secondary hypertension, familial dyslipidemia, intake of medications like steroids, hepatotoxic drugs, chemotherapy or drugs altering liver function tests were excluded. The presence of fatty liver was confirmed on ultrasound. Five indices (Fatty Liver Index, NAFLD Liver Fat Score, Visceral Adiposity Index, Steato Test, Hepatic Steatosis Index) were applied to predict liver steatosis. The correlation of each index with presence of fatty liver was analyzed. Based on the sensitivity of the five scoring systems and prevalence of MASLD as observed in existing literature, with a 95% confidence interval and 20% allowable error, the minimum number of positive cases required is 24 and minimum sample size required is 77. Results Among 100 (100%) patients with metabolic syndrome, MASLD was seen in 65 patients (74% males, 56% females). The mean age of patients with MASLD was 59 years. Fatty Liver Index, NAFLD Liver Fat Score, Visceral Adiposity Index, Steato Test had statistically significant (p<0.005) correlation with fatty liver on ultrasound of abdomen. Fatty Liver Index had the highest Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.65 (Sensitivity=63, Specificity=62.9%), followed by NAFLD Liver Fat Score (AUROC=0.63, Sensitivity=64.4%, Specificity=62.9%), Visceral Adiposity Index (AUROC=0.628, Sensitivity=50.8%, Specificity=65.7%) and Steato Test (AUROC=0.61, Sensitivity=46.2%, Specificity=77%). Cut-offs for Fatty Liver Index, NAFLD Liver Fat Score, Visceral Adiposity Index, and Steato Test were 42, 0.5, 4, and 4.5 respectively. MASLD was present in 71.4% (N=35) of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and 58.8% (N=30) without type 2 diabetes mellitus. Conclusion Fatty Liver Index, NAFLD Liver Fat Score, Visceral Adiposity Index, and Steato Test were comparable as early markers to predict liver steatosis in patients with metabolic syndrome.

Alanine aminotransferase as a risk marker for new-onset metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chen et al. Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a global public health burden whose incidence has risen concurrently with overweight and obesity. Given its detrimental health impact, early identification of at-risk individuals is crucial. MAFLD diagnosis is based on evidence of hepatic steatosis indicated by liver biopsy, imaging, or blood biomarkers, and one of the following conditions: Overweight/ obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or metabolic dysregulation. However, in large-scale epidemiological studies, liver biopsies are not feasible. The application of techniques such as ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance spectroscopy is restricted by their limited sensitivity, low effectiveness, high costs, and need for specialized software. Blood biomarkers offer several advantages, particularly in large-scale epidemiological studies or clinical scenarios where traditional imaging techniques are impractical. Analysis of cumulative effects of excess high-normal blood alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels of blood ALT levels could facilitate identification of at-risk patients who might not be detected through conventional imaging methods. Accordingly, investigating the utility of blood biomarkers in MAFLD should enhance early detection and monitoring, enabling timely intervention and management and improving patient outcomes.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Evolution of the final terminology

The medical term nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was coined in 1986 for a condition that has since become the most prevalent liver disorder worldwide. In the last 3 years, the global professional community launched 2 consecutive efforts to purge NAFLD from the medical dictionary and recommended new terms based on disease pathophysiology rather than distinction from similar conditions featuring liver steatosis. A consensus by renowned clinical scholars primarily residing in the Asian-Pacific region introduced metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) as a new name to replace NAFLD in 2020. In 2023, a nomenclature and classification resulting in the term metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) was developed by a large expert panel under the auspices of leading liver societies from Europe and Americas. These marked and rapid shifts in nomenclature have garnered the attention of many researchers and clinicians across the globe due to the multilevel impact of a frequent and potentially progressive chronic liver disease in both adult and pediatric populations. The proposed terminologies differ in several ways but they have more in common than differences. They both capture key features of liver disease associated with cardiometabolic risk factors and with significant impact on all-cause and liver-related mortality. The framework of MASLD has incorporated many innovative aspects of MAFLD and while several conceptual disparities remain a work in progress, global efforts should focus on new insights into disease pathogenesis, outcome trajectories, prevention, and treatment. Here, some of these challenges are discussed to facilitate this process.

Socioeconomic status and health disparities drive differences in accelerometer-derived physical activity in fatty liver disease and significant fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The cornerstone of clinical management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are lifestyle changes such as increasing physical activity (PA) aimed at improving cardiometabolic risk. To inform NAFLD prevention and treatment guidelines we aimed to: (i) quantify the role of PA on lowering the risk for NAFLD and fibrosis; (ii) characterize NAFLD and fibrosis association with PA in the context of socioeconomic environment.

METHODS

A sample of 2648 participants from the NHANES 2003-2006 was selected to develop survey weighted multivariable logistic regression models for predicting NAFLD and significant fibrosis, diagnosed non-invasively via fatty liver index (FLI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. The PA measures were obtained from a hip-worn accelerometer.

RESULTS

The predictive model for NAFLD showed AUC of 0.687 and a decrease of 43% in NAFLD risk with moderate vigorous PA (MVPA) (OR = 0.569, p < 0.001). The predictive model for fibrosis had AUC of 0.755 and there was a 48% and a 70% decrease in significant fibrosis risk with MVPA (OR = 0.518, p = 0.022) and total log activity count (TLAC) (OR = 0.296, p = 0.017), respectively. Participants with NAFLD and NAFLD with fibrosis engage in declining PA. Despite having jobs with higher level of PA and participating in more moderate-to-vigorous PA, a larger proportion of Hispanics participants had NAFLD and significant fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings demonstrate the role of PA as a protective factor against the presence of NAFLD and significant fibrosis. Protective levels of PA in NAFLD differ by races.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in older adults is associated with frailty and social disadvantage

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The burden of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is growing rapidly, as is the number of older adults globally. However, relatively few studies have been performed evaluating the prevalence and risk factors for MASLD in older adults. As such, we aimed to identify the prevalence of MASLD in older adults, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, functional and biochemical associations.

METHODS

The study population included older adults without a history of cardiovascular disease, dementia or independence-limiting functional impairment who had participated in the ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE) randomised trial. MASLD was defined using the Fatty Liver Index (FLI). Associations were identified using Poisson regression with robust variance for FLI ≥ 60 vs FLI < 30.

RESULTS

9097 Australian participants aged ≥70 years had complete biochemical and anthropometric data to identify MASLD. The study population had a mean age of 75.1 ± 4.3 years and was 45.0% male. Almost one-third (33.0%) had prevalent MASLD, and the prevalence decreased with increasing age (adjusted RR [aRR] 0.96, 95% CI: 0.96-0.97). MASLD was also negatively associated with social advantage (aRR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.99) and exercise tolerance and was positively associated with diabetes mellitus (aRR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.16-1.29), hypertension (aRR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.22-1.41), male sex (aRR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.57-1.74), pre-frailty (aRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.82-2.12) and frailty (aRR: 2.36, 95% CI: 2.16-2.56). MASLD and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) results were 100% concordant.

CONCLUSION

This study in a large cohort of relatively healthy community-dwelling older adults shows that MASLD is common, decreases with age and is associated with poorer metabolic health, social disadvantage and frailty.

Identifying inflammatory bowel disease patients at risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: usefulness of non-invasive steatosis predictive scores

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have a higher risk of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) compared with the general population. However, it is not known whether available non-invasive hepatic steatosis scores are useful in predicting MAFLD in IBD patients. We aimed to analyze the performances of MAFLD screening score (MAFLD-S), Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index (HSI) and Clinical Prediction Tool for NAFLD in Crohn's Disease (CPN-CD), in identifying MAFLD in IBD patients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out including consecutive adult IBD outpatients submitted to transient elastography (TE). MAFLD criteria were assessed, and hepatic steatosis (HS) was defined by a controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) >248 dB/m using TE. MAFLD-S, FLI, HSI, and CPN-CD were calculated and their accuracy for the prediction of MAFLD was evaluated through their areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (AUROC) curves.

RESULTS

Of 168 patients, body mass index ≥25, type 2 diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and arterial hypertension were present in 76 (45.2%), 10 (6.0%), 53 (31.5%), 20 (11.9%), respectively. HS was identified in 77 (45.8%) patients, of which 65 (84.4%) fulfilled MAFLD criteria. MAFLD-S (AUROC, 0.929 [95% CI, 0.888-0.971]) had outstanding and FLI (AUROC, 0.882 [95% CI, 0.830-0.934]), HSI (AUROC, 0.803 [95% CI, 0.736-0.871]), and CPN-CD (AUROC, 0.822 [95% CI, 0.753-0.890) had excellent discrimination in predicting MAFLD.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFLD-S, FLI, HSI and CPN-CD scores can accurately identify MAFLD in IBD patients, allowing the selection of those in whom hepatic steatosis and metabolic risk factors assessment may be particularly beneficial.

Validation of fatty liver index as a predictor of hepatic steatosis in Asian populations: Impact of alcohol consumption and sex

AIM

This study was undertaken to investigate the utility of the fatty liver index (FLI) as a noninvasive tool for predicting hepatic steatosis based on alcohol consumption and sex in a large Asian population.

METHODS

We carried out a single-center observational cohort study at the HITO Medical Center in Japan and enrolled 1976 Asian subjects. The subjects were categorized into nondrinkers and light drinkers (0-19 g/day) and moderate drinkers (20-59 g/day) based on their self-reported alcohol intake. We used physical examinations, laboratory tests, and a questionnaire to collect information on various factors related to the FLI, including body mass index, waist circumference, and levels of γ-glutamyl transferase and triglycerides.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy of the FLI was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and optimal cut-off values were determined using Youden's index. The FLI had an acceptable performance index of >0.7 both overall and in all subgroups, with an overall AUROC of 0.844. The AUROCs were higher in women and moderate drinkers of both sexes. We also compared the cut-off values obtained in the present study with the previously reported values of 30 and 60. Optimal cut-off values for the FLI were calculated for the total population and subgroups and were found to differ from the previously established values in other countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the FLI is a useful noninvasive marker for predicting hepatic steatosis in a large Asian population, irrespective of alcohol consumption and sex.

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of twelve noninvasive scores of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

BACKGROUND

The absence of distinct symptoms in the majority of individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) poses challenges in identifying those at high risk, so we need simple, efficient and cost-effective noninvasive scores to aid healthcare professionals in patient identification. While most noninvasive scores were developed for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), consequently, the objective of this study was to systematically assess the diagnostic ability of 12 noninvasive scores (METS-IR/TyG/TyG-WC/TyG-BMI/TyG-WtHR/VAI/HSI/FLI/ZJU/FSI/K-NAFLD) for MAFLD.

METHODS

The study recruited eligible participants from two sources: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2020.3 cycle and the database of the West China Hospital Health Management Center. The performance of the model was assessed using various metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), decision curve analysis (DCA), and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7398 participants from the NHANES cohort and 4880 patients from the Western China cohort were included. TyG-WC had the best predictive power for MAFLD risk in the NHANES cohort (AUC 0.863, 95% CI 0.855-0.871), while TyG-BMI had the best predictive ability in the Western China cohort (AUC 0.903, 95% CI 0.895-0.911), outperforming other models, and in terms of IDI, NRI, DCA, and subgroup analysis combined, TyG-WC remained superior in the NAHANES cohort and TyG-BMI in the Western China cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

TyG-BMI demonstrated satisfactory diagnostic efficacy in identifying individuals at a heightened risk of MAFLD in Western China. Conversely, TyG-WC exhibited the best diagnostic performance for MAFLD risk recognition in the United States population. These findings suggest the necessity of selecting the most suitable predictive models based on regional and ethnic variations.

Two years on, a perspective on MAFLD

To provide clarity for research studies and clinical care, a set of positive criteria for adults and children with metabolic (dysfunction) associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) was recently published and has subsequently been widely endorsed. The development and subsequent validation of the criteria for MAFLD has created a positive momentum for change. During the course of the ongoing discussion on the redefinition, some concerns have surfaced that we thought needs clarification. In this review, we provide a perspective on MAFLD and bringing clarity to some of the key aspects that have been recently raised.

Validation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) related steatosis indices in metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and comparison of the diagnostic accuracy between NAFLD and MAFLD

BACKGROUND

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a new term of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), with newly proposed diagnostic criteria. The applicability of common noninvasive testing for screening NAFLD is unclear for the detection of MAFLD and requires reevaluation. We aimed to validate the effectiveness of traditional NAFLD-related steatosis indices for diagnosing MAFLD and to determine the optimal cutoff values as well as compare their accuracy between NAFLD and MAFLD diagnosis.

METHODS

This study enrolled 1866 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database (2017-2018). The diagnostic performances of fatty liver index (FLI), Framingham Steatosis Index (FSI), Zhejiang University index (ZJU), lipid accumulation product (LAP), hepatitis steatosis index (HSI) and visceral adiposity index (VAI) were evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve and the optimal cutoff points were calculated according to maximum Youden's index.

RESULTS

FLI had the highest AUROC (0.840) for predicting MAFLD in the whole population, with a cutoff value of 56.93. The AUROCs of FLI, FSI, ZJU, LAP, HSI and VAI for predicting MAFLD/NAFLD were 0.840/0.812, 0.833/0.811, 0.826/0.811, 0.826/0.799, 0.814/0.803 and 0.747/0.729, respectively. The AUROC values of all indices decreased in the subgroup of the population with overweight or diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The NAFLD-related scores would be equally useful to screen MAFLD and seemed to be more compatible with MAFLD. The FLI was optimal in both MAFLD and NAFLD diagnoses. However, a new predictive indicator suitable for various characteristics of the population is worth further development in the future.

Association between daidzein intake and metabolic associated fatty liver disease: A cross-sectional study from NHANES 2017-2018

Background

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has become the most common liver disease globally, yet no new drugs have been approved for clinical treatment. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between dietary intake of soy-derived daidzein and MAFLD, to find potentially effective treatments.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 1,476 participants in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) from 2017 to 2018 and their associated daidzein intake from the flavonoid database in the USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies (FNDDS). We investigated the relationship between MAFLD status, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), AST/Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4), liver stiffness measurement (LSM), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS), hepatic steatosis index (HSI), fatty liver index (FLI), and daidzein intake by adjusting for confounding variables using binary logistic regression models and linear regression models.

Results

In the multivariable-adjusted model II, there was a negative association between daidzein intake and the incidence of MAFLD (OR for Q4 versus Q1 was 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.46-0.91, p = 0.0114, p for trend was 0.0190). CAP was also negatively associated with daidzein intake, β = -0.37, 95% CI: -0.63 to -0.12, p = 0.0046 in model II after adjusting for age, sex, race, marital status, education level, family income-to-poverty ratio (PIR), smoking, and alcohol consumption. Stratified by quartiles of daidzein intake, trend analysis of the relationship between daidzein intake and CAP remained significant (p for trend = 0.0054). In addition, we also found that HSI, FLI, and NFS were negatively correlated with daidzein intake. LSM was negatively related to daidzein intake but had no statistical significance. The correlation between APRI, FIB-4, and daidzein intake was not strong (although p < 0.05, β values were all 0).

Conclusion

We found that MAFLD prevalence, CAP, HSI, and FLI, all decreased with increased daidzein intake, suggesting that daidzein intake may improve hepatic steatosis. Therefore, dietary patterns of soy food or supplement consumption may be a valuable strategy to reduce the disease burden and the prevalence of MAFLD.

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Steatosis Indices for Discrimination of CT-Diagnosed Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was redefined as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in 2020. Due to this, further validation of the non-invasive tests used in NAFLD diagnosis is required for MAFLD. There are five known steatosis indices for computed tomography (CT)-diagnosed MAFLD. These indices include the fatty liver index (FLI), the hepatic steatosis index (HSI), the lipid accumulation product (LAP), the visceral adiposity index (VAI), and the Zhejiang University index (ZJU). We aimed to analyze the diagnostic abilities of these five widely known steatosis indices for CT-diagnosed MAFLD. From March 2012 to October 2019, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical information and images of 1300 adults aged ≥19 years who underwent CT scans at our institution. To compare differences, the Chi-square test and independent t-test were used for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve was used to validate the diagnostic accuracy of MAFLD. Of the five indices, FLI was the best at predicting MAFLD, with the highest AUROC (0.791). The sensitivity and specificity of FLI for diagnosing MAFLD were both 70.9%. The optimal cut-off value was 29.9. FLI is a useful surrogate index for screening MAFLD in clinical practice.

Changes in Indices of Steatosis and Fibrosis in Liver Grafts of Living Donors After Weight Reduction

Background

A short-term weight reduction program for potential living donors was introduced to reduce the extent of hepatic steatosis prior to liver transplantation. We aimed to investigate changes in non-invasive hepatic steatosis and fibrosis indices among those who completed the program.

Methods

Among 1,950 potential living liver donors between January 2011 and May 2019, 160 living donors joined the weight reduction program. The prospectively collected clinical data of these potential liver donors were analyzed retrospectively. Hepatic steatosis and fibrosis scores were determined using the fatty liver index (FLI), hepatic steatosis index (HSI), and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) and compared to MR spectroscopy (MRS) fat fraction results before and after weight reduction.

Results

Thirty-nine potential living donors who had undergone MRS both before and after weight reduction were included in the analysis. Their body weight decreased from 78.02 ± 10.89 kg to 72.36 ± 10.38 kg over a mean of 71.74 ± 58.11 days. FLI, HSI, and MRS values decreased significantly from 41.52 ± 19.05 to 24.53 ± 15.93, 39.64 ± 3.74 to 35.06 ± 3.82, and 12.20 ± 4.05 to 6.24 ± 3.36, respectively. No significant decreases in NFS were observed. There was a significant correlation between the extent of HSI change and the extent of MRS change (R2 value = 0.69, P &lt; 0.001), although there was no correlation between MRS and FLI.

Conclusion

The weight reduction program significantly improved non-invasive indices of hepatic steatosis over a short period. HSI may allow for prediction of simple decreases in hepatic steatosis.

Epidemiology, natural history, and diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: a comparative review with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide - with an estimated global prevalence of 37%. Different from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is an exclusion diagnosis, MAFLD is defined by a set of positive criteria. This recent change in terminology is challenging because MAFLD and NAFLD denote two similar, albeit not identical, clinical populations. When the diagnostic criteria for MAFLD are applied, liver histology appears more severe and clinical outcomes are less favorable. However, the clinical management of MAFLD and NAFLD remains similar. While liver biopsy is still the reference standard for achieving a final diagnosis, noninvasive imaging- or biomarker-based diagnostic modalities are currently gaining momentum. However, liver biopsy should be recommended when diagnostic challenges exist. In this review, we compared the epidemiology, natural history, and diagnosis of MAFLD with respect to the traditional NAFLD definition.