Evaluating diagnostic performance of Truenat MTB Plus for gastrointestinal tuberculosis

Truenat MTB assays for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Accurate and rapid diagnosis is crucial for ending the tuberculosis epidemic. Truenat assays are World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended rapid molecular diagnostic tests that detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and rifampicin resistance.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To assess the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays (MTB, MTB Plus, and MTB-RIF Dx) for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults and adolescents with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis. Secondary objectives To compare the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra for detecting pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance and to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity (e.g. HIV status and smear status).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index and Biosis previews, Global Index Medicus, SCOPUS, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov for published articles and trials in progress on 16and 17 October 2023. We searched ProQuest Dissertations & Theses A&I for dissertations. We contacted tuberculosis experts for ongoing and unpublished studies. A WHO public call for data was made between 30 November 2023 and 15 February 2024.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included cross-sectional and cohort studies that evaluated Truenat assays in sputum samples from adolescents and adults (aged 10 years and older). The microbiological reference standard for identifying pulmonary tuberculosis is culture. The reference standard for rifampicin resistance is a culture-based drug susceptibility test. Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts, and assessed the full texts of potentially eligible articles. A third review author resolved any disagreements.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We tailored and applied the QUADAS-2 and QUADAS-C tools to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Two review authors independently extracted data for each included study, and a third review author resolved any disagreements. We performed meta-analyses to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities using a bivariate model. We assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADEpro GDT tool.

MAIN RESULTS

Of nine eligible articles, one contributed two distinct participant cohorts, which we considered as separate studies. Thus, we included 10 studies; three assessed Xpert Ultra. Most studies were set in low- and middle-income countries with a high tuberculosis burden. Six studies (4081 participants, 1379 with tuberculosis) assessed Truenat MTB, and four studies (3073 participants, 750 with tuberculosis) assessed Truenat MTB Plus. Two studies (966 participants, 111 with rifampicin resistance) assessed Truenat MTB-RIF Dx. Overall, the risk of bias in the included studies was low. Three of the 10 studies were judged to have high applicability concern in the patient selection domain. Detection of pulmonary tuberculosis The summary sensitivity of Truenat MTB was 87.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 81.6 to 91.8; high-certainty evidence), and the summary specificity was 86.1% (95% CI 70.1 to 94.3; moderate-certainty evidence). For Truenat MTB Plus, the summary sensitivity was 90.6% (95% CI 83.7 to 94.8; high-certainty evidence), and the summary specificity was 95.7% (95% CI 94.7 to 96.5; high-certainty evidence). Based on the three comparative studies, the summary sensitivity of Truenat MTB was lower (81.0%, 95% CI 72.8 to 87.2) than that of Xpert Ultra (93.7%, 95% CI 90.4 to 95.9), while the summary specificity of Truenat MTB (97.0%, 95% CI 91.9 to 98.9) was marginally higher than Xpert Ultra (95.3%, 95% CI 90.9 to 97.7). Detection of rifampicin resistance The sensitivities from the two studies were 53% and 85% (moderate-certainty evidence) and specificities were both 97% (high-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Truenat MTB Plus had higher sensitivity and specificity than Truenat MTB. The high false-positive rate for Truenat MTB is a concern. The sensitivity of Xpert Ultra was significantly higher than that of Truenat MTB, while specificity was slightly lower. Evidence on the accuracy of Truenat MTB-RIF Dx was limited.

Mistakes to avoid in the management of abdominal tuberculosis

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis and management of abdominal tuberculosis, i.e Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis (GITB) and tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) is challenging. Abdominal tuberculosis, presenting usually with abdominal pain, intestinal obstruction, and constitutional symptoms, is typically a paucibacillary condition. The diagnosis hinges on a correct interpretation of clinical, radiological, histological, biochemical, and microbiological findings as also appropriately assessing response to therapy.

AREAS COVERED

The authors review potential missteps that could occur in managing GITB and TBP sourced from published literature and clinical experience. These include avoiding excess use of tests with limited accuracy, understanding limitations of ascitic adenosine deaminase (ADA) and granulomas, avoiding empirical antitubercular therapy (ATT) where possible but also understanding that microbiological tests may not always be positive, and finally not to bank solely on subjective clinical responses but to use objective markers in assessing response to therapy. In addition, diagnosis of predisposing immunosuppressed states, attention to nutrition, appropriate management of sequelae with endoscopic dilatation/surgery, and early surgery when indicated are some of the additional issues discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

In future, a more secure diagnosis banking on the use of better microbiological tools, multiparameter-based models, artificial intelligence-based approaches, and use of advances in -omics-based approaches can improve diagnosis and avoid some missteps.

Diagnostic accuracy of truenat MTB plus for the detection of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of Tuberculosis (TB) has been a challenge till the advent of rapid molecular diagnostic tests. The traditional diagnostic tests have its own limitations with regard to its performance or the turnaround time. Truenat MTB Plus assay, a battery-operated molecular assay developed in India has been introduced for its use in pulmonary TB (PTB). However, the diagnostic accuracy of the assay is not well studied in comparison with Mycobacterial culture, especially for extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).

AIM

We aimed at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat MTB Plus assay for both PTB and EPTB comparing with culture for adult population.

METHODS

The specimens from presumptive PTB and EPTB patients were processed for Truenat MTB Plus assay, solid or liquid culture and AFB staining. The electronic data of all the specimen reports collected retrospectively were analysed for the sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Out of the 736 samples which had valid culture reports, 364 (49.4 %) were respiratory and 372 (50.6 %) were extrapulmonary specimens. The test positivity rate for smear microscopy, Truenat MTB Plus assay and culture was 3.7 % (27), 8.2 % (60), 7.1 % (52) respectively. Of the 60 Truenat MTB Plus positive patients with TB, 33 (55 %) were PTB and 27 (45 %) were EPTB. We estimated overall sensitivity and specificity of Truenat MTB Plus as 90 % (95 % CI: 73.4-97.8) and 98. 2 (95 % CI:96-99.3) respectively for the detection of PTB. The overall sensitivity and specificity for EPTB was 81.8 % (95 % CI: 59.7-94.8) and 97.4 % (95 % CI: 95.1-98.8) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Truenat MTB Plus assay has comparable diagnostic accuracy with other molecular assays. The Truenat MTB Plus assay can be used for the diagnosis of PTB and EPTB, especially in resource limited settings.

Evaluating Truenat Assay for the Diagnosis of Ocular Tuberculosis and Detection of Drug Resistance

BACKGROUND

Truenat MTB Plus assay was evaluated for diagnosing ocular tuberculosis (OTB) and detecting multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extremely-drug resistant (XDR) OTB.

METHODS

A total of 75 vitreous fluid specimens [five confirmed OTB, 40 clinically suspected OTB and 30 controls] were subjected to Truenat MTB Plus, multiplex PCR, and Xpert Ultra. Chips of Truenat were used for detecting rifampicin, isoniazid, fluoroquinolone and bedaquiline resistance. The performance was compared against culture, composite reference standard, and gene sequencing.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity of TruePlus, MPCR, and Ultra in diagnosing OTB was 66.6%, 73.3%, and 55.5%, respectively. Out of six cases with mutations in rpoB gene, RifR was detected in five by TrueRif and four by Ultra. Three MDR and one XDR-OTB were reported by Truenat.

CONCLUSION

Truenat assay along with its strategic chips is a rapid and reliable tool for diagnosis of OTB and detection of drug resistance, including MDR and XDR-OTB.Abbreviations: OTB: Ocular tuberculosis; XDR: Extremely drug resistant; Ultra: Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra; Xpert: Xpert MTB/RIF; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; NAATs: Nucleic acid amplification tests; MDR: Multi Drug Resistant; NSP: National Strategic plan for elimination of tuberculosis; FqR: Fluoroquinolone resistant; BdqR: bedaquiline resistant; TrueRif: Truenat MTB Rif Dx; TruePlus: Truenat Plus; INH: Isoniazid; DST: Drug susceptibility testing; MGIT: Mycobacterial growth indicator tube; CRF: Composite reference standard; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; EPTB: extrapulmonary tuberculosis; VF: vitreous fluid; DNA: deoxyribonucleic acid; ATT: antitubercular therapy; RifR: Rifampicin resistance; RifS: Rifampicin susceptible; RifI: Rifampicin indeterminate.

Evaluation of truenat assays for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health concern, necessitating accurate and timely diagnostic methods. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of Truenat assays for both pulmonary TB (PTB) and extrapulmonary TB (EPTB).

METHOD

PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies comparing Truenat assays to Mycobacterium tuberculosis confirmation methods.

RESULTS

Comparing Truenat MTB assay with the Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI: 79-91%) and 86% (95% CI: 82-90%), respectively. For Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) culture comparison, pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 82-92%) with a specificity of 79% (95% CI: 57-92%). Compared to smear microscopy, Truenat assays displayed pooled sensitivity and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 78-98%) and 86% (95% CI: 64-95%). In comparison to Xpert MTB/RIF, Truenat assays exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 92% (95% CI: 80-97%) and a pooled specificity of 92% (95% CI: 56-99%) for PTB detection, and a pooled sensitivity of 94% (95% CI: 81-98%) and a specificity of 77% (95% CI: 32-96%) for the diagnosis of EPTB.

CONCLUSION

This study underscores the potential of Truenat assays as valuable tools for diagnosing both PTB and EPTB.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42024526686.

Assessing the utility of Truenat in extrapulmonary tuberculosis diagnosis - A NRL's experience

Background

Diagnosis of extra pulmonary TB (EPTB) remains a big challenge. While data on utility of Xpert testing in EPTB diagnosis is enormous, there is limited data on Truenat MTB testing.

Aim

In this study we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of Truenat in EPTB diagnosis.

Materials and methods

The study included patients suspected and/or treated for EPTB located from Chennai district during the year 2021-2022. All processed EPTB samples were subjected to smear microscopy, culture and Truenat MTB testing.

Results

Of the 195 samples tested, 38 (19.4%) samples were positive for EPTB by any one of the diagnostic methods (smear, culture, microscopy). Out of these 38, 16 (42.1 %) were positive for MTB by Truenat and negative by Culture, 12 (31.5%) were positive by culture but negative by Truenat and 8 (21%) were positive by both Truenat and/or smear and culture. The sensitivity and specificity of the test was calculated with the composite reference standard (Culture (exclusion of colonies as positives), clinical conditions, and smear) and was found to be 60% and 100% respectively.

Conclusion

Truenat MTB test is a cost-effective rapid molecular test that can be used only for the diagnosis of presumptive EPTB and not on follow-up samples.

Recent advances in microbiological and molecular biological detection techniques of tuberculous meningitis

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most common type of central nervous system tuberculosis (TB) and has the highest mortality and disability rate. Early diagnosis is key to improving the prognosis and survival rate of patients. However, laboratory diagnosis of TBM is often difficult due to its paucibacillary nature and sub optimal sensitivity of conventional microbiology and molecular tools which often fails to detect the pathogen. The gold standard for TBM diagnosis is the presence of MTB in the CSF. The recognised methods for the identification of MTB are acid-fast bacilli (AFB) detected under CSF smear microscopy, MTB cultured in CSF, and MTB detected by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Currently, many studies consider that all diagnostic techniques for TBM are not perfect, and no single technique is considered simple, fast, cheap, and efficient. A definite diagnosis of TBM is still difficult in current clinical practice. In this review, we summarise the current state of microbiological and molecular biological diagnostics for TBM, the latest advances in research, and discuss the advantages of these techniques, as well as the issues and challenges faced in terms of diagnostic effectiveness, laboratory infrastructure, testing costs, and clinical expertise, for clinicians to select appropriate testing methods.

Differentiating gastrointestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease- a comprehensive review

Gastrointestinal Tuberculosis (GITB) and Crohn's disease (CD) are both chronic granulomatous diseases with a predilection to involve primarily the terminal ileum. GITB is often considered a disease of the developing world, while CD and inflammatory bowel disease are considered a disease of the developed world. But in recent times, the epidemiology of both diseases has changed. Differentiating GITB from CD is of immense clinical importance as the management of both diseases differs. While GITB needs anti-tubercular therapy (ATT), CD needs immunosuppressive therapy. Misdiagnosis or a delay in diagnosis can lead to catastrophic consequences. Most of the clinical features, endoscopic findings, and imaging features are not pathognomonic for either of these two conditions. The definitive diagnosis of GITB can be clinched only in a fraction of cases with microbiological positivity (acid-fast bacilli, mycobacterial culture, or PCR-based tests). In most cases, the diagnosis is often based on consistent clinical, endoscopic, imaging, and histological findings. Similarly, no single finding can conclusively diagnose CD. Multiparametric-based predictive models incorporating clinical, endoscopy findings, histology, radiology, and serology have been used to differentiate GITB from CD with varied results. However, it is limited by the lack of validation studies for most such models. Many patients, especially in TB endemic regions, are initiated on a trial of ATT to see for an objective response to therapy. Early mucosal response assessed at two months is an objective marker of response to ATT. Prolonged ATT in CD is recognized to have a fibrotic effect. Therefore, early discrimination may be vital in preventing the delay in the diagnosis of CD and avoiding a complicated course.

Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by GeneXpert MTB/RIF Ultra assay

INTRODUCTION

Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is an arduous task owing to different anatomical locations, unusual clinical presentations, and sparse bacillary load in clinical specimens. Although GeneXpert® MTB/RIF is a windfall in TB diagnostics including EPTB, it yields low sensitivities but high specificities in many EPTB specimens. To further improve the sensitivity of GeneXpert®, GeneXpert® Ultra, a fully nested real-time PCR targeting IS6110, IS1081 and rpoB (Rv0664) has been endorsed by the WHO (2017), wherein melt curve analysis is utilized to detect rifampicin-resistance (RIF-R).

AREA COVERED

We described the assay chemistry/work design of Xpert Ultra and evaluated its performance in several EPTB types, that is, TB lymphadenitis, TB pleuritis, TB meningitis, and so on, against the microbiological reference standard or composite reference standard. Notably, Xpert Ultra exhibited better sensitivities than Xpert, but mostly at the compensation of specificity values. Moreover, Xpert Ultra exhibited low false-negative and false-positive RIF-R results, compared with Xpert. We also detailed other molecular tests, that is, Truenat MTBTM/TruPlus, commercial real-time PCR, line probe assay, and so on, for EPTB diagnosis.

EXPERT OPINION

A combination of clinical features, imaging, histopathological findings, and Xpert Ultra are adequate for definite EPTB diagnosis so as to initiate an early anti-tubercular therapy.

MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl for simultaneous diagnosis of gastrointestinal tuberculosis and detection of first-line and second-line drug resistance

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Emergence of drug resistance, especially to second-line drugs, hampers tuberculosis elimination efforts. The present study aimed to evaluate MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl assays for detecting first-line and second-line drug resistance, respectively, in gastrointestinal tuberculosis (GITB).

METHODS

Thirty ileocecal biopsy specimens, processed in the Department of Microbiology between 2012 and 2022, that showed growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on culture were included in the study. DNA, extracted from culture, was subjected to MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany), following manufacturer's instructions. Their performance was compared against phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and gene sequencing.

RESULTS

Out of the 30 specimens, 4 (13.33%) were mono-isoniazid resistant, 4 (13.33%) were multidrug resistant (MDR), 2 (6.67%) were pre-extensively drug resistant (pre-XDR), and 2 (6.67%) were mono-fluoroquinolone resistant. The results were 100% concordant with pDST and gene sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

In the wake of growing drug resistance in all forms of extrapulmonary tuberculosis, including GITB, MTBDRplus and MTBDRsl are reliable tools for screening of resistance to both first-line and second-line drugs.