Rasch-ionale for neurologists

Rasch validation of the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire in a Spanish population with keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a methodologically complete validation of the Spanish version of the Keratoconus End-Points Assessment Questionnaire (KEPAQ) in a Spanish population with keratoconus.

METHODS

Analytical, prospective study, including patients with keratoconus without previous surgical history, in which a measurement of quality of life was performed using the KEPAQ questionnaire, a complete exploration of the anterior pole and a corneal elevation topography with the Galilei G6 topographer. The evaluation of the psychometric characteristics of the scale in the studied population was carried out using Rasch modeling.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients with keratoconus were included, with a median age of 26.0 years, the majority (57.6%) being men. For the KEPAQ-E subscale, the median score was 69.3, with a reliability of 0.85 and an eigenvalue of the first contrast of 2.34. For the KEPAQ-F, the median score was 56.4, with a reliability of 0.88 and an eigenvalue of 2.00. All infit and outfit parameters were within normal limits for both subscales. A significant evaluation was found between the evaluations of both subscales (rho = 0.696; p < 0.001). The evaluations of the subscales and various clinical and tomographic characteristics showed a significant classification between them (p value between 0.048 y 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The KEPAQ is a psychometrically robust and valid scale to evaluate quality of life in the Spanish population with keratoconus. This questionnaire can be easily used for both clinical and research aims.

Bridging the gap between statistical significance and clinical relevance: A systematic review of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds of scales reported in movement disorders research

Background

Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is the smallest change in an outcome measure that is considered clinically meaningful. Using validated MCID thresholds for outcomes powers trials adequately to detect meaningful treatment effects, aids in their interpretation and guides development of new outcome measures.

Objectives

To provide a comprehensive summary of MCID thresholds of various symptom severity scales reported in movement disorder.

Methods

We conducted systematic review of the literature and included studies of one or more movement disorders, and reporting MCID scales.

Results

2763 reports were screened. Final review included 32 studies. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment showed most studies were of good quality. Most commonly evaluated scale was Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (11 out of 32). Four studies assessing MDS-UPDRS had assessed its different sub-parts, reporting a change of 2.64,3.05,3.25 and 0.9 points to detect clinically meaningful improvement and 2.45,2.51,4.63 and 0.8 points to detect clinically meaningful worsening, for the Part I, II, III and IV, respectively. For Parts II + III, I + II + III and I + II + III + IV, MCID thresholds reported for clinically meaningful improvement were 5.73, 4.9, 6.7 and 7.1 points respectively; while those for clinically meaningful worsening were 4.7, 4.2, 5.2 and 6.3 points, respectively. MCID thresholds reported for other scales included Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSRS), and Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Scale (BFMD).

Conclusion

This review summarizes all the MCID thresholds currently reported in Movement disorders research and provides a comprehensive resource for future trials, highlighting the need for standardized and validated MCID scales in movement disorder research.

Interpreting results from Rasch analysis 1. The "most likely" measures coming from the model

Purpose: The present article summarises the characteristics of Rasch's theory, providing an original metrological model for persons' measurements. Properties describing the person "as a whole" are key outcome variables in Medicine. This is particularly true in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, targeting the person's interaction with the outer world. Such variables include independence, pain, fatigue, balance, and the like. These variables can only be observed through behaviours of various complexity, deemed representative of a given "latent" person's property. So how to infer its "quantity"? Usually, behaviours (items) are scored ordinally, and their "raw" scores are summed across item lists (questionnaires). The limits and flaws of scores (i.e., multidimensionality, non-linearity) are well known, yet they still dominate the measurement in Medicine.Conclusions: Through Rasch's theory and statistical analysis, scores are transformed and tested for their capacity to respect fundamental measurement axioms. Rasch analysis returns the linear measure of the person's property ("ability") and the item's calibrations ("difficulty"), concealed by the raw scores. The difference between a person's ability and item difficulty determines the probability that a "pass" response is observed. The discrepancy between observed scores and the ideal measures (i.e., the residual) invites diagnostic reasoning. In a companion article, advanced applications of Rasch modelling are illustrated. Implications for rehabilitationQuestionnaires' ordinal scores are poor approximations of measures. The Rasch analysis turns questionnaires' scores into interval measures, provided that its assumptions are respected.Thanks to the Rasch analysis, accurate measures of independence, pain, fatigue, cognitive capacities and other whole person's variables of paramount importance in rehabilitation are available.The current work is addressed to rehabilitation professionals looking for an introduction to interpreting published results based on Rasch analysis.The first of a series of two, the present article illustrates the most common graphic and numeric outputs found in published papers presenting the Rasch analysis of questionnaires.

Systematic Comparison of Muscle Ultrasound Thickness in Polyneuropathies and Other Neuromuscular Diseases

BACKGROUND

We have aimed to assess whether muscle thickness ultrasound (US) shows differences between patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), chronic axonal polyneuropathy (CAP), and other neuromuscular (NM) diseases compared to controls and to each other.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study from September 2021 to June 2022. All subjects underwent quantitative sonographic evaluation of muscle thickness in eight relaxed muscles and four contracted muscles. Differences were assessed using multivariable linear regression, correcting for age and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of 65 healthy controls, and 95 patients: 31 with CIDP, 34 with CAP, and 30 with other NM diseases. Both relaxed and contracted muscle thickness in all patient groups were lower than in the healthy controls, after controlling for age and body mass index (BMI). Regression confirmed that the differences persisted between patient groups and healthy controls. Differences between patient groups were not apparent.

CONCLUSION

The current study shows that muscle ultrasound thickness is not specific in NM disorders, but shows a global reduction in thickness compared with healthy controls after corrections for age and BMI.

Development of a Rasch-Built Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Impairment Multidomain Scale to Measure Disease Progression in ALS

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Current scales used in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) attempt to summarize different functional domains or "dimensions" into 1 overall score, which may not accurately characterize the individual patient's disease severity or prognosis. The use of composite score risks declaring treatments ineffective if not all dimensions of ALS disease progression are affected equally. We aimed to develop the ALS Impairment Multidomain Scale (AIMS) to comprehensively characterize disease progression and increase the likelihood of identifying effective treatments.

METHODS

The Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) and a preliminary questionnaire, based on literature review and patient input, were completed online by patients from the Netherlands ALS registry at bimonthly intervals over a period of 12 months. A 2-week test-retest, factor analysis, Rasch analysis, and a signal-to-noise optimization strategy were performed to create a multidomain scale. Reliability, longitudinal decline, and associations with survival were evaluated. The sample size required to detect a 35% reduction in progression rate over 6 or 12 months was assessed for a clinical trial that defines the ALSFRS-R or AIMS subscales as a primary endpoint family.

RESULTS

The preliminary questionnaire, consisting of 110 questions, was completed by 367 patients. Three unidimensional subscales were identified, and a multidomain scale was constructed with 7 bulbar, 11 motor, and 5 respiratory questions. Subscales fulfilled Rasch model requirements, with excellent test-retest reliability of 0.91-0.94 and a strong relationship with survival (p < 0.001). Compared with the ALSFRS-R, signal-to-noise ratios were higher as patients declined more uniformly per subscale. Consequently, the estimated sample size reductions achieved with the AIMS compared with those achieved with the ALSFRS-R were 16.3% and 25.9% for 6-month and 12-month clinical trials, respectively.

DISCUSSION

We developed the AIMS, consisting of unidimensional bulbar, motor, and respiratory subscales, which may characterize disease severity better than a total score. AIMS subscales have high test-retest reliability, are optimized to measure disease progression, and are strongly related to survival time. The AIMS can be easily administered and may increase the likelihood of identifying effective treatments in ALS clinical trials.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Neurological Conditions: Review of Concept and Methods

The concept of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) emerged from the recognition that statistical significance alone is not enough to determine the clinical relevance of treatment effects in clinical research. In many cases, statistically significant changes in outcomes may not be meaningful to patients or may not result in any tangible improvements in their health. This has led to a growing emphasis on the importance of measuring patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical trials and other research studies, in order to capture the patient perspective on treatment effectiveness. MCID is defined as the smallest change in scores that is considered meaningful or important to patients. MCID is particularly important in fields such as neurology, where many of the outcomes of interest are subjective or based on patient-reported symptoms. This review discusses the challenges associated with interpreting outcomes of clinical trials based solely on statistical significance, highlighting the importance of considering clinical relevance and patient perception of change. There are two main approaches to estimating MCID: anchor-based and distribution-based. Anchor-based approaches compare change scores using an external anchor, while distribution-based approaches estimate MCID values based on statistical characteristics of scores within a sample. MCID is dynamic and context-specific, and there is no single 'gold standard' method for estimating it. A range of MCID thresholds should be defined using multiple methods for a disease under targeted intervention, rather than relying on a single absolute value. The use of MCID thresholds can be an important tool for researchers, neurophysicians and patients in evaluating the effectiveness of treatments and interventions, and in making informed decisions about care.

Italian version of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS): validation and longitudinal performance

OBJECTIVE

To validate an Italian version of the Rasch-Built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) in a broad population of patients and assess its longitudinal performance over time.

METHODS

270 ALS patients referring to the Motor Neuron Disease Clinic of the University of Padova and Modena (Italy) accepted to compile the Italian version of the ROADS and results were correlated with the ALSFRSr and ALSAQ-40 scores, FVC values, and creatinine or albumin blood levels. To verify test-retest reliability, patients were asked to fill in a second copy of the scale within 5-7 days. Thirty-nine patients compiled a further copy of questionnaire during the follow up visit (after 133 days on average) which allowed us a longitudinal assessment of the scale.

RESULTS

We found a good external construct validity between ROADS and either ALSFRS-R (correlation coefficient = 0.85) or ALSAQ-40 (correlation coefficient = - 0.84). Test-retest reliability was excellent with a concordance-correlation coefficient of 0.93. Yet, we observed a significant correlation between changes over time of the ROADS normalised sum score (- 2.18 point loss per month) and those of both the ALSFRS-R (positive correlation; Rho = 0.64, p ≤ 0.0001) or the ALSAQ-40 (negative correlation; Rho = - 0.60, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of ROADS proved to be a reliable marker to monitor overall disability in ALS patients. Further studies are necessary to assess its longitudinal performance.

Psychometric evaluation of modified spinal muscular atrophy functional rating scale (SMAFRS) in adult patients using Rasch analysis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

The Spinal Muscular Atrophy Functional Rating Scale (SMAFRS) was first developed as a secondary functional outcome measure to detect changes over time in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in clinical trials. Its modified version evaluates 10 activities of daily living. The aim of the study was to analyze modified SMAFRS data using item response theory psychometric models.

METHODS

A total of 253 responses from 41 adult patients with ambulatory and non-ambulatory SMA types 2, 3, and 4 were analyzed. Rasch analysis was used to explore item-person targeting, fit statistics, category response functioning, dimensionality, and differential item functioning.

RESULTS

Most items had good fitting with the exception of "toileting" and "respiratory." There were no major floor or ceiling effects, and most items covered a good range of disability with only a negligible breech of uni-dimensionality from eating, dressing, and respiratory items. Differential item function highlighted differences in toileting, turning, transferring, walking, and respiratory items between ambulatory and non-ambulatory populations.

DISCUSSION

Despite subtle misfitting of certain items, mainly related to respiratory and bulbar function, overall modified SMAFRS remained a psychometrically stable and unidimensional outcome measure. There were some differences in measuring properties of certain functional items between ambulatory and non-ambulatory items that need to be taken into consideration in clinical trial design. Overall, the modified SMAFRS is a psychometrically reliable tool in assessment of adult patients with SMA.

Longitudinal comparison of the self-entry Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-RSE) and Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) as outcome measures in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Improved functional outcome measures in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) would aid ALS trial design and help hasten drug discovery. We evaluate the longitudinal performance of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) compared to the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale Revised for Self-Entry (ALSFRS-RSE) as patient reported outcomes of functional status in people with ALS.

METHODS

Participants completed the ROADS and the ALSFRS-RSE questionnaires at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12- mo using Research Electronic Data Capture as part of a prospective, longitudinal, remote, online survey study of fatigue in ALS from 9/2020 to 12/2021. The scales were compared cross-sectionally (at baseline) and longitudinally. Correlation coefficients, coefficients of variation, and descriptive statistics were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 182 adults with ALS consented to the study. This volunteer sample was comprised of predominantly White, non-Hispanic, non-smoking participants. Consented participant survey completion was approximately 90% at baseline and greater than 40% at 12 mo. The ALSFRS-RSE and the ROADS had high, significant agreement at 3 and 6 mo by Cohen's kappa ≥71% (p < 0.001); the number of functional increases or plateaus on the two scales were not significantly different; and the coefficient of variation of functional decline was similar at the 6-month mark, though higher for the ROADS at 3 mo and lower at 12 mo.

DISCUSSION

Although the ROADS performed similarly to the ALSFRS-RSE in an observational cohort, it has psychometric advantages, such as Rasch-modeling and unidimensionality. It merits further investigation as a patient reported outcome of overall disability and efficacy outcome measure in ALS trials.

Saving time and effort: Best practice for adapting existing patient-reported outcome measures in hepatology

It is increasingly recognised that collecting patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) data is an important part of healthcare and should be considered alongside traditional clinical assessments. As part of a more holistic view of healthcare provision, there has been an increased drive to implement PROM collection as part of routine clinical care in hepatology. This drive has resulted in an increase in the number of PROMs currently developed to be used in various liver conditions. However, the development and validation of a new PROM is time-consuming and costly. Therefore, before deciding to develop a new PROM, researchers should consider identifying existing PROMs to assess their appropriateness and, if necessary, make adaptations to existing PROMs to ensure their rigour when used with the target population. Little is written in the literature on how to identify and adapt the existing PROMs in hepatology. This article aims to provide a summary of the current literature and guidance regarding identifying and adapting existing PROMs in clinical practice.

Development and validation of the patient-reported "Facial Function Scale" for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

PURPOSE

Facial weakness and its functional consequences are an often underappreciated clinical feature of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) by healthcare professionals and researchers. This is at least in part due to the fact that there are few adequate clinical outcome measures available.

METHODS

We developed the Facial Function Scale, a Rasch-built questionnaire on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD. A preliminary 33-item questionnaire was created based on semi-structured interviews with 16 FSHD patients and completed by 119 patients. For reliability studies, 73 patients completed it again after a two-week interval. Data were subjected to semi-automated Rasch analysis to select the most appropriate item set to fit model expectations.

RESULTS

This resulted in a 25-item unidimensional, linear-weighted questionnaire with high internal consistency (person separation index = 0.92) and test-retest reliability (patients' locations ICC = 0.98 and items' locations ICC = 0.99). Good external construct validity scores were obtained through correlation with the Communicative Participation Item Bank questionnaire, examiner-reported Facial Weakness Score and facial weakness subscale of the FSHD evaluation score (respectively r = 0.733, r = -0.566, and r = 0.441, all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a linear-weighted, clinimetrically sound, patient-reported outcome measure on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD, to enable further research on this relevant topic.Implications for rehabilitationFacial weakness and its functional consequences are an often underappreciated clinical feature of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), both in symptomatic treatment and in research.To enable the development and testing of therapeutic symptomatic interventions for facial weakness, clinical outcome measures are required.This study provides a linear-weighted, clinimetrically sound, patient-reported outcome measure on the functional disabilities relating to facial weakness in FSHD patients.

Development of novel clinical examination scales for the measurement of disease severity in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

OBJECTIVE

To use a robust statistical methodology to develop and validate clinical rating scales quantifying longitudinal motor and cognitive dysfunction in sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) at the bedside.

METHODS

Rasch analysis was used to iteratively construct interval scales measuring composite cognitive and motor dysfunction from pooled bedside neurocognitive examinations collected as part of the prospective National Prion Monitoring Cohort study, October 2008-December 2016.A longitudinal clinical examination dataset constructed from 528 patients with sCJD, comprising 1030 Motor Scale and 757 Cognitive Scale scores over 130 patient-years of study, was used to demonstrate scale utility.

RESULTS

The Rasch-derived Motor Scale consists of 8 items, including assessments reliant on pyramidal, extrapyramidal and cerebellar systems. The Cognitive Scale comprises 6 items, and includes measures of executive function, language, visual perception and memory. Both scales are unidimensional, perform independently of age or gender and have excellent inter-rater reliability. They can be completed in minutes at the bedside, as part of a normal neurocognitive examination. A composite Examination Scale can be derived by averaging both scores. Several scale uses, in measuring longitudinal change, prognosis and phenotypic heterogeneity are illustrated.

CONCLUSIONS

These two novel sCJD Motor and Cognitive Scales and the composite Examination Scale should prove useful to objectively measure phenotypic and clinical change in future clinical trials and for patient stratification. This statistical approach can help to overcome obstacles to assessing clinical change in rapidly progressive, multisystem conditions with limited longitudinal follow-up.

Semi-automated Rasch analysis using in-plus-out-of-questionnaire log likelihood

Rasch analysis is a popular statistical tool for developing and validating instruments that aim to measure human performance, attitudes and perceptions. Despite the availability of various software packages, constructing a good instrument based on Rasch analysis is still considered to be a complex, labour-intensive task, requiring human expertise and rather subjective judgements along the way. In this paper we propose a semi-automated method for Rasch analysis based on first principles that reduces the need for human input. To this end, we introduce a novel criterion, called in-plus-out-of-questionnaire log likelihood (IPOQ-LL). On artificial data sets, we confirm that optimization of IPOQ-LL leads to the desired behaviour in the case of multi-dimensional and inhomogeneous surveys. On three publicly available real-world data sets, our method leads to instruments that are, for all practical purposes, indistinguishable from those obtained by Rasch analysis experts through a manual procedure.

Chinese validation of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS) was developed using Rasch methodology. This scale has been demonstrated as a reliable outcome measure of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) trials. To date, there are no similar interval-weighted scales to assess disability in ALS patients. The current study aimed to validate a Chinese version of the ROADS via Rasch methodology.

METHODS

The Chinese version of the ROADS was obtained through a standardized forward-backward translation and cultural adaptation. ALS patients were recruited from the Department of Neurology of Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing, China to complete the ROADS and the revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R). Overall, 254 participants with ALS finished the Chinese scale. Rasch analysis was performed on the ROADS for validation and the ALSFRS-R for comparison.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the ROADS was modified according to the statistical results. A final 28-question scale was constructed that fulfilled all the requirements of the Rasch model with proper validity and reliability. Furthermore, the ROADS showed improved item targeting compared to the ALSFRS-R. Conversely, the ALSFRS-R did not fit the Rasch model expectations due to misfit values and disordered thresholds for all 12 items.

CONCLUSIONS

The Chinese adaptation of the ROADS is a linearly weighted scale that specifically captures overall disability in ALS patients. This scale indicates a wider range of item difficulties and better responsiveness than the ALSFRS-R. The ROADS could be used as a valuable tool for use in ALS trials and in the clinic in Chinese settings.

Rasch analysis to evaluate the motor function measure for patients with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy

Patient-relevant outcome measures for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) are needed. The motor function measure (MFM) is an ordinal-based outcome measure for neuromuscular disorders, but its suitability to measure FSHD patients is questionable. Here, we performed Rasch analyses on MFM data from 194 FSHD patients to assess clinimetric properties in this patient group. Both the total scale and its three domains were analyzed (D1: standing position and transfers; D2: axial and proximal motor function; D3: distal motor function). Fit to the Rasch model, sample-item targeting, individual item fit, threshold ordering, sex- and age-based differential item functioning, response dependency and unidimensionality were assessed. Rasch analysis revealed multiple limitations of the MFM for FSHD, the most important being a large ceiling effect and suboptimal sample-item targeting, which were most pronounced for domains D2 and D3. There were disordered thresholds for most items, often resulting in items functioning in a dichotomous fashion. It was not possible to remodel the MFM into a Rasch-built interval scale. Remodeling of domain D1 into an interval scale with adequate fit statistics was achieved, but sample-item targeting remained suboptimal. Therefore, the MFM should be used with caution in FSHD patients, as it is not optimally suited to measure functional abilities in this patient group.

Development and Validation of the Rasch-Built Overall Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Disability Scale (ROADS)

Importance

A new outcome measure for overall disability level with improved responsiveness is needed for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials.

Objective

To describe the creation and development of a new self-reported ALS disability scale with improved item targeting and psychometric properties that used a mathematically rigorous Rasch methodology.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A preliminary ALS disability questionnaire with 119 questions was created based on literature review, clinical judgement of an expert panel, and patient input. Patients with ALS were recruited from January 2017 to June 2019 from the Emory University and Atlanta VA Medical Center ALS clinics, both in Atlanta, Georgia, during regularly scheduled clinic appointments to complete the draft questionnaire and standard ALS outcome measures. All consecutive patients seen at the Emory University and Atlanta VA Medical Center ALS clinics during the recruitment period with a diagnosis of ALS who were able to provide informed consent were invited to participate in the study. Rasch analyses were performed, and items were systematically removed based on missing data, model fit, disordered thresholds, item bias, and clinical judgment. A total of 509 patients with ALS were seen at the 2 sites during the recruitment period, and 264 patients provided informed consent.

Interventions

Participants completed the draft Rasch questionnaire and the revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Rasch analyses and standard scale metrics were performed to create the new scale, and Rasch analyses were performed on the ALSFRS-R for comparison.

Results

Overall, 243 participants with ALS completed the draft questionnaire, and 230 participants were included for Rasch analyses. The mean (SD) age for study participants was 61.9 (11.1) years, 146 (60.1%) were men, and site of onset was 23.0% bulbar (n = 56), 36.2% upper extremity (n = 88), and 39.5% lower extremity (n = 96). A 28-question Rasch-Built Overall ALS Disability Scale (ROADS) was constructed with each item scored 0, 1, or 2. The ROADS fulfilled Rasch model requirements, demonstrated improved item targeting compared with the ALSFRS-R, and had test-retest reliability of 0.97. Individual question fit statistics demonstrated infit values from 0.68 to 1.37 and outfit values from 0.66 to 1.43. The difference between the empirical variance explained by the measures and the modeled variance was 0.1%. The ALSFRS-R violated Rasch model expectations and demonstrated disordered thresholds for 9 of 12 questions; 13 of 48 answer choices on the ALSFRS-R were never the most probable answer choice for any overall disability level.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this study, the 28-question, self-reported ROADS, which is linearly weighted, had improved item targeting compared with the ALSFRS-R, had high test-retest reliability, and was validated. ROADS may serve as a valuable and easily accessible outcome measure for use in ALS trials and in the clinic with improved responsiveness compared with the ALSFRS-R.

Diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome in childhood and adolescence: An evidence- and consensus-based guideline

This evidence- and consensus-based practical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) in childhood and adolescence has been developed by a group of delegates from relevant specialist societies and organisations; it is the result of an initiative by the German-Speaking Society of Neuropediatrics (GNP), and is supported by the Association of Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften). A systematic analysis of the literature revealed that only a few adequately-controlled studies exist for this particular age group, while none carries a low risk of bias. For this reason, the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations largely rely on findings in adult patients with GBS, for which there are a higher number of suitable studies available. Consensus was established using a written, multi-step Delphi process. A high level of consensus could be reached for the crucial steps in diagnosis and treatment. We recommend basing the diagnostic approach on the clinical criteria of GBS and deriving support from CSF and electrophysiological findings. Repetition of invasive procedures that yield ambiguous results is only recommended if the diagnosis cannot be ascertained from the other criteria. For severe or persistently-progressive GBS treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is recommended, whereas in cases of IVIG intolerance or inefficacy we recommended treatment with plasmapheresis. Corticosteroids are ineffective for GBS but can be considered when acute onset chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (A-CIDP) is suspected due to a prolonged disease course. The full German version of the Guideline is available on the AWMF website (https://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/022-008.html).

Balance, risk of falls, risk factors and fall-related costs in individuals with diabetes

AIMS

Sensory loss and impaired balance are considered risk factors of incident falls. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between degree of foot sensation and balance, risk of falls, incidence of fall-related injuries and costs in a cohort of patients with diabetes.

METHODS

(Non)-neuropathic subjects participating in the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study were followed prospectively. Subjects underwent sensory testing of the feet (39 item Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery (RDF-39)); balance was assessed at the second follow-up (Brief-BESTest) as were data on incident falls. Medical records and financial data were abstracted to estimate fall-related morbidity and in-hospital costs.

RESULTS

A higher RDF-39 score, cerebral artery disease, type 2 diabetes, height and age were predictors of the Brief-BESTest total score. 41/296 patients (13.9%) reported two or more falls during follow-up. Predictors for recurrent falls were a higher RDF-39 score (aOR: 1.124, p < 0.0005), male gender (aOR: 0.319, p = 0.016), age (aOR: 0.938, p = 0.003) and type 2 diabetes (aOR: 3.157, p = 0.100). Thirty-one patients used medical resources (median US$ 440.45 (IQR: 179-1162).

CONCLUSIONS

Degree of sensory loss correlates significantly with an increased imbalance and risk of falls. The RDF-39 may be used as stratification tool in medical decision-making and patient information.

How do we assess musicians' musculoskeletal symptoms?: a review of outcomes and tools used

Recent reviews of musicians' musculoskeletal symptoms (MSS) have reported heterogeneity in the outcomes reported and data collection tools used, making it difficult to compare and synthesise findings. The purpose of this present review was to improve the consistency of future research, by documenting the outcomes reported in recent studies of musicians' MSS and the data collection tools used. All English language, peer-reviewed studies, published 2007-2016 that reported musicians' self-reported MSS outcomes were identified. Details of the types of outcomes reported and the tools used were extracted, and synthesised descriptively. A range of MSS outcomes were reported, including MSS with a temporal relationship to activities performed, and the consequences of symptoms. Only 24% of studies used standardised questionnaires, with the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) being the most commonly used. To improve the homogeneity of outcomes and data collection tools when investigating musicians' MSS, we recommend using the NMQ, where appropriate. Recall periods of 12-months and 7-d are the most appropriate for prevalence, and 7-d recall periods for ratings. Importantly, outcomes and the tools used to collect data should be reported in sufficient detail to ensure that the study can be replicated, critiqued, and accurately interpreted.

Development of grading scales of pedal sensory loss using Mokken scale analysis on the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery data

INTRODUCTION

Loss of sensation due to diabetes-related neuropathy often leads to diabetic foot ulceration. Several test instruments are used to assess sensation, such as static and moving 2-point discrimination (S2PD, M2PD), monofilaments, and tuning forks.

METHODS

Mokken scale analysis was applied to the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study data to select hierarchies of tests to construct measurement scales.

RESULTS

We developed 39-item and 31-item scales to measure loss of sensation for research purposes and a 13-item scale for clinical practice. All instruments were strongly scalable and reliable. The 39 items can be classified into 5 hierarchically ordered core clusters: S2PD, M2PD, vibration sense, monofilaments, and prior ulcer or amputation.

DISCUSSION

Guided by the presented scales, clinicians may better classify the grade of sensory loss in diabetic patients' feet. Thus, a more personalized approach concerning individual recommendations, intervention strategies, and patient information may be applied.

The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take

Over the past decades in modern medicine, there has been a shift from statistical significance to clinical relevance when it comes to interpreting results from clinical trials. A concept that is increasingly being used as a surrogate for clinical relevance and effect size calculation is the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). In this paper, an overview is presented of the most important aspects of the MCID concept used in research trials and a discussion of what this means for the neurological patient in clinical trials and daily practice is given. Is the MCID the best outcome measure cut-off to be implemented?

Grading the loss of sensation in diabetic patients: A psychometric evaluation of the rotterdam diabetic foot study test battery

Introduction: Static‐ and moving 2‐point discrimination (S2PD, M2PD), 10‐g monofilaments‐ and tuning fork are validated outcome measures of clinical manifestations of diabetes‐related neuropathy. No modern statistical techniques have been used to investigate how well these instruments combine to measure sensory loss. Methods: To grade sensory loss at the feet, we fitted parametric forms of Item Response Theory models to the data of these instruments. Results: The fit statistics indicate that the loss of sensation is gradable, with readily available instruments. S2PD and M2PD are lost first, followed by vibration sense, the 10‐g monofilament and the ability to feel a cold stimulus. Conclusions: This test battery appears to provide sound measurement properties in a group of diabetic patients with diverse amounts of sensory loss. This approach may be used in clinical practice to grade sensory loss reliably and quickly, with instruments that are easy to use. Muscle Nerve58: 559–565, 2018

Cognitive behavioural therapy with optional graded exercise therapy in patients with severe fatigue with myotonic dystrophy type 1: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 is the most common form of muscular dystrophy in adults and leads to severe fatigue, substantial physical functional impairment, and restricted social participation. In this study, we aimed to determine whether cognitive behavioural therapy optionally combined with graded exercise compared with standard care alone improved the health status of patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

METHODS

We did a multicentre, single-blind, randomised trial, at four neuromuscular referral centres with experience in treating patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 located in Paris (France), Munich (Germany), Nijmegen (Netherlands), and Newcastle (UK). Eligible participants were patients aged 18 years and older with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of myotonic dystrophy type 1, who were severely fatigued (ie, a score of ≥35 on the checklist-individual strength, subscale fatigue). We randomly assigned participants (1:1) to either cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care and optional graded exercise or standard care alone. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, stratified by study site. Cognitive behavioural therapy focused on addressing reduced patient initiative, increasing physical activity, optimising social interaction, regulating sleep-wake patterns, coping with pain, and addressing beliefs about fatigue and myotonic dystrophy type 1. Cognitive behavioural therapy was delivered over a 10-month period in 10-14 sessions. A graded exercise module could be added to cognitive behavioural therapy in Nijmegen and Newcastle. The primary outcome was the 10-month change from baseline in scores on the DM1-Activ-c scale, a measure of capacity for activity and social participation (score range 0-100). Statistical analysis of the primary outcome included all participants for whom data were available, using mixed-effects linear regression models with baseline scores as a covariate. Safety data were presented as descriptives. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02118779.

FINDINGS

Between April 2, 2014, and May 29, 2015, we randomly assigned 255 patients to treatment: 128 to cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care and 127 to standard care alone. 33 (26%) of 128 assigned to cognitive behavioural therapy also received the graded exercise module. Follow-up continued until Oct 17, 2016. The DM1-Activ-c score increased from a mean (SD) of 61·22 (17·35) points at baseline to 63·92 (17·41) at month 10 in the cognitive behavioural therapy group (adjusted mean difference 1·53, 95% CI -0·14 to 3·20), and decreased from 63·00 (17·35) to 60·79 (18·49) in the standard care group (-2·02, -4·02 to -0·01), with a mean difference between groups of 3·27 points (95% CI 0·93 to 5·62, p=0·007). 244 adverse events occurred in 65 (51%) patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 155 in 63 (50%) patients in the standard care alone group, the most common of which were falls (155 events in 40 [31%] patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 71 in 33 [26%] patients in the standard care alone group). 24 serious adverse events were recorded in 19 (15%) patients in the cognitive behavioural therapy group and 23 in 15 (12%) patients in the standard care alone group, the most common of which were gastrointestinal and cardiac.

INTERPRETATION

Cognitive behavioural therapy increased the capacity for activity and social participation in patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 at 10 months. With no curative treatment and few symptomatic treatments, cognitive behavioural therapy could be considered for use in severely fatigued patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1.

FUNDING

The European Union Seventh Framework Programme.

All metrics are equal, but some metrics are more equal than others: A systematic search and review on the use of the term 'metric'

OBJECTIVE

To examine the use of the term 'metric' in health and social sciences' literature, focusing on the interval scale implication of the term in Modern Test Theory (MTT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search and review on MTT studies including 'metric' or 'interval scale' was performed in the health and social sciences literature. The search was restricted to 2001-2005 and 2011-2015. A Text Mining algorithm was employed to operationalize the eligibility criteria and to explore the uses of 'metric'. The paradigm of each included article (Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), Item Response Theory (IRT) or both), as well as its type (Theoretical, Methodological, Teaching, Application, Miscellaneous) were determined. An inductive thematic analysis on the first three types was performed.

RESULTS

70.6% of the 1337 included articles were allocated to RMT, and 68.4% were application papers. Among the number of uses of 'metric', it was predominantly a synonym of 'scale'; as adjective, it referred to measurement or quantification. Three incompatible themes 'only RMT/all MTT/no MTT models can provide interval measures' were identified, but 'interval scale' was considerably more mentioned in RMT than in IRT.

CONCLUSION

'Metric' is used in many different ways, and there is no consensus on which MTT metric has interval scale properties. Nevertheless, when using the term 'metric', the authors should specify the level of the metric being used (ordinal, ordered, interval, ratio), and justify why according to them the metric is at that level.

Regarding the past, what is the trial you have always been dreaming of in CIDP?

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is an orphan disease of poorly understood cause. While first line treatments with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange have at least short-term efficacy, no trial has shown that immunosuppressants work. In our dream, we will take advantage of the recently improved EU regulations to launch a Europe wide trial which will investigate the cause of the disease. It will compare three parallel groups, the anti-B cell agent rituximab, the anti-T cell agent abatacept and usual care. The trial will not be blinded and the design will be very simple. The primary outcome measure will be improvement from baseline of the overall neuropathy limitations scale (ONLS) score by 1 or more grades at 12 weeks without increase in concomitant corticosteroids or IVIg or use of plasma exchange. There will be an option to substitute improvement in the Rasch-built overall disability scale depending on future experience with that scale as the primary outcome measure. The trial will require 3 groups of 60 participants to detect an increase from 20% in the usual care group to 30% with one of the other agents with a power of 90% and P-value of 5%. It will be larger than any trial of an immunosuppressant agent so far performed in CIDP. However, recruitment will be easier because inclusion criteria will be broad and allow randomisation of any patient in whom their neurologist wishes to introduce an immunosuppressant. Avoidance of blinding and use of simple monitoring with facetime will simplify running the trial and reduce expense. The trial will follow participants and measure outcomes at 12 months. Other outcomes will consist only of grip strength, time to walk 10 m and Euroqol, the last allowing us to estimate the cost per QALY of rituximab or abatacept. Even including central analysis of key biomarkers, the trial will only cost 3 million euros, a fraction of the cost of the usual phase III pharmaceutical company trial.

Impairment measures versus inflammatory RODS in GBS and CIDP: a responsiveness comparison

This study aimed to 'define responder' through the concept of minimum clinically important differences using the individually obtained standard errors (MCID-SE) and a heuristic 'external criterion' responsiveness method in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). One hundred and fourteen newly diagnosed or relapsing patients (GBS: 55, CIDP: 59) were serially examined (1-year follow-up). The inflammatory Rasch-built overall disability scale (I-RODS), Rasch-transformed MRC sum score (RT-MRC), and Rasch-transformed modified-INCAT-sensory scale (RT-mISS) were assessed. Being-a-responder was defined as having a MCID-SE cut-off ≥1.96. Also, the correlations between patients' scores on each scale and the EuroQoL health-status 'thermometer' (external criterion) were determined (higher correlation indicated better responsiveness). In both diseases, the SEs showed a characteristic 'U'-shaped dynamic pattern across each scales' continuum. The number of patients showing a meaningful change were higher for the I-RODS > RT-MRC > RT-mISS and were in GBS higher than CIDP patients. The MCID-SE concept using Rasch-transformed data demonstrated an individual pattern of 'being-a-responder' in patients with immune-mediated neuropathies, and the findings were validated by the external criterion responsiveness method. The I-RODS showed greater responsiveness compared with the MRC and INCAT-sensory scales, and its use is therefore recommended in future trials in GBS and CIDP.

Outcome measures in neuromuscular disease: is the world still flat?

Valid, responsive, and meaningful outcome measures for the measurement of the impairment, activity limitations, and quality of life in patients with neuromuscular disease are crucial to identify the natural history of disease and benefits of therapy in clinical practice and trials. Although understanding of many aspects of neuromuscular diseases has advanced dramatically, the development of outcome measures has received less attention. The scales developed from Rasch theory by the PeriNomS Group represent the biggest significant shift in thought in neuromuscular outcome measures for decades. There remain problems with many of them, and further developments are required. However, incorporating them into our outcome sets for daily use and in clinical trials will lead to the more efficient capture of meaningful change and will result in better assessment of individuals and groups of patients in both clinical trials and neurological practice.

Novel immunotherapeutic strategies in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) is a chronic immune-mediated neuropathy: it is clinically heterogeneous (relapsing-remitting form, chronic progressive form, monophasic form or CIDP having a Guillain-Barré syndrome-like onset), but potentially treatable. Although its pathophysiology remains largely unknown, CIDP is considered an immune-mediated neuropathy. Therefore, many immunotherapies have been proposed in this peripheral nervous system disorder, the most known efficient treatments being intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids and plasma exchange. However, these therapies remain unsatisfactory for many patients, so numerous other immunotherapeutic strategies have been evaluated, based on their immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory potency. We have performed a large review of the literature about treatment in CIDP, with a special emphasis on novel and alternative immunotherapeutic strategies.