Efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in three specific populations with sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Outcomes of continuous kidney replacement therapy in pediatric patients: the impact of timing and predictors of mortality

BACKGROUND

While critically ill children receiving continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) are at increased risk of mortality, few studies have examined the predictors of mortality in this population. This study aimed to evaluate CKRT outcomes, focusing on predictors of mortality.

METHODS

This cohort study included children aged 0-14 years who received CKRT. It collected baseline, clinical, and laboratory data. Descriptive analyses were performed. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the best predictors of mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed and validated with 1000 bootstraps.

RESULTS

This study included 113 children who received CKRT, of whom 83 (73.5%) survived and 30 (26.6%) died. Children admitted to the intensive care unit with a higher Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score, sepsis, longer intubation, or hypoalbuminemia (< 30 g/dL) were more likely to die. Multifactorial acute kidney injury was more common in those who died than in those who survived (83.3% vs. 31.3%, p < 0.01). As the exclusive indication for CKRT, fluid overload was more common in those who died than in those who survived (26.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.01). LASSO and multivariable regression models identified hemodynamic instability, as evidenced by inotropic support use, and abnormal coagulation, as evidenced by not using heparin anticoagulation, as independent predictors of mortality. Initiating CKRT late (> 48 h) was associated with mortality in the univariate but not the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodynamic instability was the best predictor of mortality in critically ill children receiving CKRT.

Efficacy and safety of antithrombin or recombinant human thrombomodulin in the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Multiple organ damage is a hallmark of the highly lethal condition known as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The efficacy and safety of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM) and antithrombin (AT) in DIC is still debatable. Therefore, we used a fixed-effects model to conduct a comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis to examine the safety and efficacy of AT or rhTM administration for treating DIC.

METHODS

Up until September 2024, the databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for pertinent papers that satisfied the inclusion requirements. Following the researchers' review of the literature, data extraction, and quality assessment, RevMan 5.4 software was used to conduct meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The AT group included two randomized controlled trials with 95 patients, 47 in the test and 48 in the control groups. The test group's DIC resolution rate was higher than the control group's (OR = 5.21 [2.10, 12.90], P = 0.0004), while the 28-day mortality and bleeding-related adverse events did not differ significantly (OR = 0.45 [0.16, 1.31], P = 0.14; OR = 1.02 [0.22, 4.74], P = 0.98). Of the 1105 patients in the rhTM group, 554 were in the trial group and 551 were in the control group across four randomized controlled trials. The trial group showed a greater rate of DIC resolution than the control group (OR = 1.76 [1.34, 2.30], P < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the 28-day mortality rate or bleeding-related adverse events. (OR = 0.79 [0.59, 1.05], P = 0.11; OR = 1.08 [0.63, 1.86], P = 0.78).

CONCLUSION

Both AT and rhTM therapy improved the rate of symptomatic relief in patients with DIC without increasing the risk of bleeding, but there was no benefit in terms of their mortality.

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy and Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome: Pathophysiology, shared pathways, and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Disseminated Intravascular Coagulopathy (DIC) and Persistent Inflammation, Immunosuppression, and Catabolism Syndrome (PICS) are critical care syndromes that frequently coexist in critically ill patients, but mechanisms underlying their shared pathways are not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

This review discusses the pathophysiology of DIC and PICS and explores the shared mechanisms behind DIC and PICS and their implications for clinical management.

FINDINGS

DIC and PICS share a common pathophysiological foundation of endothelial dysfunction, coagulation dysregulation, and inflammation, leading to a vicious cycle of microvascular injury and systemic inflammation, culminating in organ dysfunction. DIC has also been identified as an independent risk factor for PICS. Anticoagulation therapies such as antithrombin, recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM), and heparin attenuates inflammation, a mechanism underlying both syndromes, thereby improving outcomes in PICS.

CONCLUSION

DIC and PICS share critical pathophysiological pathways that exacerbate outcomes in critically ill patients. Recognizing these interconnections is essential for developing targeted therapies. Standardizing PICS definitions and advancing research to clarify mechanisms, interplay, and causality between DIC and PICS are crucial next steps.

Effects of heparin on venom-induced consumption coagulopathy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Venom-induced consumption coagulopathy (VICC) is a serious complication of snakebites, potentially leading to life-threatening bleeding. Despite efforts to determine effective treatments other than antivenom, such as heparin, the evidence supporting their use remains insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to examine the effects of heparin on VICC. On 11 August 2024, a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of heparin on VICC was conducted using eight online databases. Six RCTs were included in this study. The meta-analysis revealed that heparin did not significantly reduce the mortality rate (risk ratio, 0.65; 95% CI 0.39 to 1.10). Additionally, the meta-analysis showed no significant differences in various clinical outcomes between the heparin group and control group. The TSA indicated insufficient evidence to conclude the effects of heparin on VICC mortality, and a sample size of 741 patients may be needed for further RCTs. In conclusion, our findings indicate that heparin may not significantly affect VICC outcomes. Although the current evidence is inconclusive because of the limited sample size, it highlights the need for future trials to provide more precise insights.

Utility of Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy among Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Diagnostic Criteria: A Multicenter Retrospective Validation Study

The criteria for diagnosing sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) may overlap with those of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This study determined if the diagnostic criteria of SIC overlap with JAAM DIC diagnostic criteria for identifying patients with DIC according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria and whether the patients diagnosed with these criteria have the same prognosis.This multicenter retrospective study included patients with sepsis diagnosed using the JAAM and ISTH DIC and SIC criteria on days 1 and 4. The established ISTH DIC criteria was the reference standard for primary outcome that compared the characteristics of SIC and JAAM DIC. Secondary outcomes were multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), ventilator-free and intensive care unit-free days, and in-hospital mortality.A total of 1,438 patients were included in this study. On day 1, the JAAM DIC and SIC criteria diagnosed almost all patients with ISTH DIC (98 and 94%, respectively), predicting ISTH DIC (area under the receiver operating curve [AUC]: 0.740 versus 0.752, p = 0.523) and MODS (AUC: 0.686 versus 0.697, p = 0.546) on day 4 and progressing to ISTH DIC in the same proportion (28.6 versus 30.1%, p = 0.622). There were no differences in survival probabilities (p = 0.196) or secondary outcomes between patients diagnosed using JAAM DIC and SIC criteria on day 1.SIC and JAAM DIC diagnoses were equal among patients with sepsis, suggesting that SIC criteria add little to current DIC scoring systems.

Beyond the Beat: A Multifaceted Review of Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis: Risk Factors, Management Strategies, and Economic Impact

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia in critically ill patients. The objective of this narrative review is to evaluate the characteristics of patients who develop new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) because of sepsis, current management of NOAF in sepsis patients, special consideration in different populations that developed NOAF, health economic and quality of life of patients. We conducted a literature search on PubMed to find research related to NOAF, sepsis and critical illness. Nineteen studies were analyzed for risk factors and outcomes. The incidence rate ranges from 0.53% to 43.9% among these studies. There were numerous risk factors that had been reported from these articles. The most reported risk factors included advanced age, male sex, White race, and cardiovascular comorbidities. The management of septic patients is significantly challenging because of the unfavorable cardiovascular consequences and thromboembolic hazards associated with NOAF. There are comprehensive guidelines available for managing AF, but the effectiveness and safety of therapies in patients with sepsis are still uncertain. Various approaches for managing newly diagnosed AF have been explored. Sinus rhythm can be restored through either pharmacological or non-pharmacological intervention or combination of both. In addition, thromboembolism is a complication that can occur in patients with AF and can have a negative impact on the prognosis of sepsis patients. The use of anticoagulation to prevent stroke after NOAF in sepsis patients is still controversial. Extensive prospective investigations are required to have a deeper understanding of the necessity for anticoagulation following NOAF in sepsis. Beside the treatment of NOAF, early detection of NOAF in sepsis plays a critical role. The prompt initiation of rhythm control medication following a clinical diagnosis of AF can enhance cardiovascular outcomes and reduce mortality in patients with AF and cardiovascular risk factors. Additionally, NOAF in the intensive care unit can prolong hospital stays, increasing hospitalization costs and burdening the hospital. Therefore, preventing and managing NOAF effectively not only benefit the patients but also the hospital in financial aspect. Lastly, to address the existing gaps in knowledge, future research should focus on developing machine learning models that can accurately anticipate risks, establish long-term follow-up protocols, and create complete monitoring systems. The focus is on early intervention and personalized approaches to improve outcomes and quality of life.

The transition of the criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation and the targeted patients in randomized controlled trials over the decades: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a severe complication in septic patients. The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW)-DIC criteria, the first DIC criteria, were established in 1983, and several other criteria have been proposed since then, including the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)-overt DIC criteria and the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) DIC criteria. This study aimed to look into the transition of DIC criteria used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for sepsis-induced DIC.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for English-language studies published through September 30, 2023. Two reviewers looked through citations that assessed the DIC criteria used in RCTs and their secondary analyses. Data on DIC diagnostic criteria, patient characteristics, interventions, and results were gathered.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies (thirteen RCTs: JMHW-DIC in 5, JAAM-DIC in 4, the sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) in 2; and eight secondary analyses: ISTH-overt DIC in 3, single parameter in 5) were eligible for inclusion. Most RCTs were conducted in Japan, using the criteria of JMHW-DIC, which were followed by JAAM-DIC. Recently, SIC has been used in international RCTs. Meanwhile, other countries tended to conduct RCTs that focused on sepsis, with secondary analyses for DIC using the ISTH-overt DIC criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The criteria used in RCTs have changed over decades, from the JMHW-DIC to the JAAM-DIC criteria, and the ISTH-overt DIC criteria were retained in the secondary analysis. Based on these findings, additional research is needed to determine the best criterion for diagnosing septic patients.

Bleeding, stroke, and mortality risk of patients with septic shock receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on the effects of therapeutic anticoagulation (AC) on stroke and bleeding risk in patients with sepsis-induced atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect of therapeutic AC on the development of inpatient strokes and significant bleeding in hospitalized patients with septic shock and AF.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study examined 604 patients with septic shock and AF. The total AF population was further subdivided into new-onset AF. Propensity score matching was used to match patients with similar comorbidities who received and did not receive AC. The risks of bleeding, in-hospital stroke, increased length of stay, and mortality were compared between propensity score-matched cohorts.

RESULTS

Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 2 and 3a bleeding events were the most common. After propensity score matching, the relative risk of bleeding on AC was not significantly higher in either group (AF, 1.33 [95% confidence interval, 0.81-2.17]; new-onset AF, 1.60 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-3.54]). AC also did not decrease the number of ischemic strokes (AF, 1.34% with AC vs 1.34% without AC [P = 1]; new-onset AF, 0.89% with AC vs 1.79% without AC [P = .56]). There was significantly reduced mortality of patients who received AC (AF, 52.35% with AC vs 66.44% without AC [P = .01]; new-onset AF, 46.43% with AC vs 66.07% without AC [P = .04]).

CONCLUSION

In patients with septic shock and AF, AC was not associated with a higher incidence of bleeding or lowering of in-hospital strokes but was associated with decreased mortality, potentially protecting against disseminated intravascular coagulopathy or other embolic phenomena.

Novel nomogram for the prediction of sepsis-induced coagulopathy in the PICU: A multicentre retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a severe complication of sepsis, characterized by poor prognosis and high mortality. However, the predictors of SIC in pediatric patients have yet to be identified. Our aim was to develop a user-friendly and efficient nomogram for predicting SIC in sepsis patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We screened 948 sepsis patients admitted to the PICU in three hospitals located in Shandong, China. Least absolute shrinkage and selector operation (LASSO) regression was used in the training cohort for variable selection and regularization. The selected variables were utilized to construct a nomogram for predicting the risk of SIC among sepsis patients admitted to the PICU.

RESULTS

Overall, SIC was observed in 324 (40.3 %) patients. The morbidity of SIC in sepsis patients is associated with age, fibrinogen, prothrombin time, C-reactive protein, lactate and the pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score. We developed a nomogram for the early identification of SIC in the training cohort (area under the curve [AUC] 0.869, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.830-0.907, sensitivity 75.7 %, specificity 84.8 %) and validation cohorts (validation cohort 1: AUC 0.854, 95 % CI 0.805-0.903, sensitivity 72.0 %, specificity 86.9 %; validation cohort 2: AUC 0.853, 95 % CI 0.796-0.910, sensitivity 70.1 %, specificity 87.8 %). The calibration plots of the nomogram demonstrated a high level of concordance in the SIC probabilities between the observed and predicted values.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel nomogram showed excellent predictive performance for the morbidity of SIC among sepsis patients admitted to the PICU, potentially assisting healthcare professionals in early identification and intervention for SIC.

Heparins May Not Be the Optimal Anticoagulants for Sepsis and Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

Historically, heparin has had the longest historical use as an anticoagulant and continues this day to be the primary therapeutic option for preventing thrombosis and thromboembolism in critically ill hospitalized patients. Heparin is also used to treat sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in various countries. However, the efficacy and safety of heparin for this indication remains controversial, as adequately powered randomized clinical studies have not demonstrated as yet a survival benefit in sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC, despite meta-analyses and propensity analyses reporting improved outcomes without increasing bleeding risk. Further, activated protein C and recombinant thrombomodulin showed greater improvements in outcomes compared with heparin, although these effects were inconclusive. In summary, further research is warranted, despite the ongoing clinical use of heparin for sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Based on Japanese guidelines, antithrombin or recombinant thrombomodulin may be a preferable choice if they are accessible.

Heparin therapy in sepsis and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition that affects 49 million people annually. Managing sepsis-associated coagulopathy poses a significant challenge due to its high mortality rates in intensive care. Recent reports suggest that administering heparin may offer potential survival benefits in sepsis and coronavirus disease cases. However, there is currently no established evidence supporting the use of heparin for sepsis. Thus, in this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of heparin administration in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The searches included MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Japanese databases up to January 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of randomized control trials (RCTs) involving adult sepsis patients receiving heparin. The risk of bias was assessed using RoB2, and the data extraction included 28-day mortality and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

Out of 1733 initial articles, only three studies met the inclusion criteria. The analysis, which included 426 patients, showed no significant difference in 28-day and in-hospital mortality between the heparin and control groups (risk ratio [RR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.24). Subgroup analysis of sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) patients (n = 109) also did not show a significant reduction in mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.51-1.38). Heterogeneity was zero, and no publication bias was observed. Additionally, there was significant difference in bleeding complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.24-0.99, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a survival benefit of heparin administration in patients with sepsis and sepsis-associated DIC. Further investigation into the potential benefits of heparin is warranted. Moreover, the analysis revealed no increase in bleeding risks with heparin administration; instead, a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding was noted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This review was preregistered with PROSPERO (registration: CRD42023385091).

Efficacy of unfractionated heparin in patients with moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in sepsis. However, observational studies suggest that anticoagulants as a whole may benefit severely ill sepsis patients with coagulopathy, but the optimal targets of unfractionated heparin remain unclear. This study investigated which sepsis patients could most benefit from unfractionated heparin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we identified adult sepsis patients requiring urgent hospitalization from 2006 to 2019 using a large-scale Japanese medical database. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving unfractionated heparin within 72 h of admission and those who did not. We compared in-hospital mortality, major bleeding complications, and thromboembolic events between these groups using a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for patient and treatment variables. Additionally, we assessed the association between heparin administration and in-hospital mortality across various subgroups.

RESULTS

Among 30,342 sepsis patients, 2520 received early heparin administration, and 27,822 did not. Multivariate logistic regression revealed a significant association between heparin and reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR: 0.735, 95 % CI: 0.596-0.903) but no significant association with major bleeding and thromboembolic risk (adjusted OR: 1.137, 1.243; 95 % CI: 0.926-1.391, 0.853-1.788, respectively). Subgroup analyses suggested significant survival benefits associated with heparin only in the sepsis patients with moderate coagulopathy and sepsis-induced coagulopathy scores of 3 or 4 (adjusted OR: 0.452, 0.625; 95 % CI: 0.265-0.751, 0.410-0.940, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Early heparin administration upon admission is associated with lower in-hospital mortality, especially in moderate sepsis-induced coagulopathy, and no significant increase in complications.

Practical approach to thrombocytopenia in patients with sepsis: a narrative review

Thrombocytopenia frequently occurs in patients with sepsis. Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) may be a possible cause of thrombocytopenia owing to its high prevalence and association with poor outcomes; however, it is important to keep the presence of other diseases in mind in sepsis practice. Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), which is characterized by thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and complement-mediated HUS, is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, and organ damage. TMA has become widely recognized in recent years because of the development of specific treatments. Previous studies have reported a remarkably lower prevalence of TMA than DIC; however, its epidemiology is not well defined, and there may be cases in which TMA is not correctly diagnosed, resulting in poor outcomes. Therefore, it is important to differentiate DIC from TMA. Nevertheless, differentiating between DIC and TMA remains a challenge as indicated by previous reports that most patients with TMA can be diagnosed as DIC using the universal coagulation scoring system. Several algorithms to differentiate sepsis-related DIC from TMA have been suggested, contributing to improving the care of septic patients with thrombocytopenia; however, it may be difficult to apply these algorithms to patients with coexisting DIC and TMA, which has recently been reported. This review describes the disease characteristics, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment, of DIC, TMA, and other diseases with thrombocytopenia and proposes a novel practical approach flow, which is characterized by the initiation of the diagnosis of TMA in parallel with the diagnosis of DIC. This practical flow also refers to the longitudinal diagnosis and treatment flow with TMA in mind and real clinical timeframes. In conclusion, we aim to widely disseminate the results of this review that emphasize the importance of incorporating consideration of TMA in the management of septic DIC. We anticipate that this practical new approach for the diagnostic and treatment flow will lead to the appropriate diagnosis and treatment of complex cases, improve patient outcomes, and generate new epidemiological evidence regarding TMA.

A machine learning model for early and accurate prediction of overt disseminated intravascular coagulation before its progression to an overt stage

Background

Recent studies suggested an expected survival benefit associated with anticoagulant therapies for sepsis in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). However, anticoagulant therapies for overt DIC are no longer assumed to regulate pathologic progression as overt DIC is a late-phase coagulation disorder. Therefore, methods for early prediction of sepsis-induced DIC before its progression to an overt stage are strongly required.

Objectives

We aimed to develop a prediction model for overt DIC using machine learning.

Methods

This retrospective, observational study included adult septic patients without overt DIC. The objective variable was binary classification of whether patients developed overt DIC based on International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) overt DIC criteria. Explanatory variables were the baseline and time series data within 7 days from sepsis diagnosis. Light Gradient Boosted Machine method was used to construct the prediction model. For controls, we assessed sensitivity and specificity of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria for subsequent onset of overt DIC.

Results

Among 912 patients with sepsis, 139 patients developed overt DIC within 7 days from diagnosis of sepsis. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting onset of overt DIC within 7 days were 84.4%, 87.5%, and 0.867 in the test cohort and 95.0%, 75.9%, and 0.851 in the validation cohort, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity by the diagnostic thresholds were 54.7% and 74.9% for Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria and 63.3% and 71.9% for ISTH sepsis-induced coagulopathy criteria, respectively.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional DIC scoring systems, a machine learning model might exhibit higher prediction accuracy.

The role of thromboinflammation in acute kidney injury among patients with septic coagulopathy

Inflammation and coagulation are critical self-defense mechanisms for mitigating infection that can nonetheless induce tissue injury and organ dysfunction. In severe cases, like sepsis, a dysregulated thromboinflammatory response may result in multiorgan dysfunction. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a significant contributor to patient morbidity and mortality. The connection between AKI and thromboinflammation is largely due to unique aspects of the renal vasculature. Specifically, the interaction between blood cells with the endothelial, glomerular, and peritubular capillary systems during thromboinflammation reduces oxygen supply to tubular epithelial cells. Previous studies have focused on tubular epithelial cell damage due to hypoxia, oxidative stress, and nephrotoxins. Although these factors are pivotal in acute tubular injury or necrosis, recent studies have demonstrated that AKI in sepsis encompasses a mixture of tubular and glomerular damage subtypes. In cases of sepsis-induced coagulopathy, thromboinflammation within the glomerulus and peritubular capillaries is an important pathogenic mechanism for AKI. Unfortunately, and despite the use of renal replacement therapy, the development of AKI in sepsis continues to be associated with high morbidity, mortality, and clinical challenges requiring alternative approaches. This review introduces the important role of thromboinflammation in AKI pathogenesis and details innovative vascular-targeting therapeutic strategies.

Persistent and Late-Onset Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Are Closely Related to Poor Prognosis in Patients with Sepsis

BACKGROUND

 Septic-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is heterogeneous regarding prognosis and responsiveness to anticoagulant therapy.

OBJECTIVES

 To investigate the relationship between the timing of development and recovery of DIC, its prognosis, and the difference in response to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-associated DIC patients.

METHODS

 This study was performed with a dataset from a multicenter nationwide retrospective cohort study (J-Septic DIC registry) in Japan between 2011 and 2013 to reveal the subgroup "high risk of death in DIC" and investigate the relationship between anticoagulant use and mortality. Patients were assigned to four groups based on the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis-overt DIC status at days 1 and 3: non-DIC (-/-), early-recovered DIC (+/-), late-onset DIC (-/+), and persistent DIC (+/+).

RESULTS

 A total of 1,922 patients were included. In-hospital mortality in persistent and late-onset DIC patients was significantly higher than in patients with non-DIC and early-recovered DIC. This finding indicates that persistent DIC and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognosis subgroup, "high-risk" DIC. Meanwhile, patients with high-risk DIC treated with anticoagulants had significantly better outcomes than those without anticoagulants after adjusting for confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

 This study showed that individuals with a high risk of death, persistent DIC, and late-onset DIC were a poor-prognostic subgroup in septic DIC; however, high-risk DIC is also a subgroup that can obtain more benefits from anticoagulant therapy.

Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Management Strategies

Physiological hemostasis is a balance between pro- and anticoagulant pathways, and in sepsis, this equilibrium is disturbed, resulting in systemic thrombin generation, impaired anticoagulant activity, and suppression of fibrinolysis, a condition termed sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC). SIC is a common complication, being present in 24% of patients with sepsis and 66% of patients with septic shock, and is often associated with poor clinical outcomes and high mortality. 1 , 2 Recent preclinical and clinical studies have generated new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of SIC. In this article, we analyze the complex pathophysiology of SIC with a focus on the role of procoagulant innate immune signaling in hemostatic activation--tissue factor production, thrombin generation, endotheliopathy, and impaired antithrombotic functions. We also review clinical presentations of SIC, the diagnostic scoring system and laboratory tests, the current standard of care, and clinical trials evaluating the efficacies of anticoagulant therapies.

Comparison of five different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in predicting mortality in patients with sepsis

OBJECTIVE

Even though patients with sepsis and DIC have a higher mortality rate compared to those without DIC, screening for DIC is not currently part of sepsis management protocols. This may be due to a lack of literature on the frequency of DIC occurrence in sepsis patients, as well as the absence of evidence on the optimal DIC criteria to use for identifying DIC and predicting mortality among the five criteria available. To address this gap, this study investigates the predictive value of five different criteria for diagnosing DIC and its relationship to patient outcomes in our population of sepsis patients.

METHODS

In the Medicine department of Aga Khan University Hospital, a retrospective observational study was conducted, enrolling all adult patients with International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) coding of sepsis and clinical suspicion of DIC between January 2018 and December 2020. To diagnose DIC, five different criteria were utilized, namely the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH), the Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (KSTH), the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM), the revised-JAAM (RJAAM), and the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW). The study analyzed the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy of these five criteria, as well as the overall prediction of mortality.

RESULTS

Of 222 septic patients included in this study with clinical suspicion of DIC, 94.6% of patient had DIC according to KSTH criteria, followed by JAAM (69.4%), ISTH (64.0%), JMHW (53.2%) and lastly R-JAAM (48.6%). KSTH had sensitivity of 95.4% in diagnosing DIC and predicting mortality with a positive predictive value of 70% but specificity of 7.3% only. JAAM had sensitivity of 75.9%, positive predictive value of 75.9% with a specificity of 45.5%. ISTH had sensitivity of 69.4%, positive predictive value 75.3% and specificity of 48.5%.

CONCLUSION

DIC can impose a significant burden on septic patients and its presence can lead to higher mortality rates. Early detection through screening for DIC in septic patients can potentially reduce mortality. However, it is necessary to identify the most appropriate diagnostic criteria for each population, as various criteria have demonstrated different performance in different populations. Establishing a gold standard for each population can aid in accurate diagnosis of DIC.

Oral anticoagulants increased 30-day survival in sepsis patients complicated with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective analysis from MIMIC-IV database

Background

The severity of sepsis is associated with systemic clotting activation. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly observed arrhythmia in patients with sepsis and can lead to a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to elucidate the association between oral anticoagulants and survival from septic patients complicated with AF.

Methods

The data of 8,828 septic patients, including 2,955 AF and 5,873 without AF, were all originated from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database. Patients with sepsis and AF are divided into OAC- group (n = 1,774) and OAC+ group (n = 1,181) based on OAC therapy. Septic patients with no AF were considered as the control group (n = 5,873, sepsis and no AF group). The main outcome endpoint was the survival rate of 30 day. The secondary outcome endpoint was the length of stay (LOS) from intensive care unit and hospital. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust the influence of superfluous factors, and a restricted mean survival time (RMST) analysis was used for calculating the benefit of survival time and survival rate. Analysis including univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to find prognosis-related predictors.

Results

After PSM, the OAC+group had a higher 30-day survival rate compared to the OAC- group (81.59% vs. 58.10%; P < 0.001) in the ICU. Despite the higher survival, the hospital LOS (14.65 days vs. 16.66 days; P = 0.15) and ICU LOS (6.93 days vs. 5.92 days; P = 0.02) were prolonged at OAC+ group than OAC- group. No difference was found in survival rate of 30 day between the sepsis patients using warfarin and patients using NOAC (85.60% vs. 79.84%, P = 0.12). The sepsis patients using warfarin had a prolonged LOS in ICU and hospital compared with the sepsis patients using NOAC. In the vasopressor subgroup, patients who received NOAC therapy were associated with a reduced 30-day survival rate (73.57% vs. 84.03%; P = 0.04) and reduced LOS in ICU and hospital than those on warfarin therapy.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that oral anticoagulants may increase the 30-day survival rate of patients with sepsis and AF.

Efficacy and safety of heparin for sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (HepSIC): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) occurs in 30-50% of septic patients and contributes to high mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, there are few proven interventions for coagulation disorder management in sepsis. Experimental and clinical data have demonstrated that sepsis could benefit from unfractionated heparin (UFH) treatment. To date, there are no large multicenter trials to determine the safety and efficacy of UFH in septic patients with suspected DIC.

METHODS

A multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial is designed to recruit 600 patients who met sepsis 3.0 criteria and suspected DIC. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to receive UFH or saline via continuous intravenous administration for 7 days within 6 h of enrolment. The primary outcome is ICU mortality. The secondary outcome includes 28-day all-cause mortality, the improvement of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores, and the incidence of major hemorrhage. Investigators, participants, and statisticians will be blinded to the allocation.

DISCUSSION

The HepSIC trial is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UFH on sepsis-related DIC across different areas of China. The small dosage of UFH administration would offer a new potential approach for treating sepsis-related coagulation disorders.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was granted by all the ethics committees of 20 participant centers. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presented at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02654561. Registered on 13 January 2016.

COAGULOPATHY PARAMETERS PREDICTIVE OF OUTCOMES IN SEPSIS-INDUCED ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE TWO PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER COHORT STUDIES

ABSTRACT

Background: Although coagulopathy is often observed in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its clinical impact remains poorly understood. Objectives: This study aimed to clarify the coagulopathy parameters that are clinically applicable for prognostication and to determine anticoagulant indications in sepsis-induced ARDS. Method: This study enrolled patients with sepsis-derived ARDS from two nationwide multicenter, prospective observational studies. We explored coagulopathy parameters that could predict outcomes in the Focused Outcome Research on Emergency Care for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Sepsis, and Trauma (FORECAST) cohort, and the defined coagulopathy criteria were validated in the Sepsis Prognostication in Intensive Care Unit and Emergency Room-Intensive Care Unit (SPICE-ICU) cohort. The correlation between anticoagulant use and outcomes was also evaluated. Results: A total of 181 patients with sepsis-derived ARDS in the FORECAST study and 61 patients in the SPICE-ICU study were included. In a preliminary study, we found the set of prothrombin time-international normalized ratio ≥1.4 and platelet count ≤12 × 10 4 /μL, and thrombocytopenia and elongated prothrombin time (TEP) coagulopathy as the best coagulopathy parameters and used it for further analysis; the odds ratio (OR) of TEP coagulopathy for in-hospital mortality adjusted for confounding was 3.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66-8.87; P = 0.005). In the validation cohort, the adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality was 32.99 (95% CI, 2.60-418.72; P = 0.002). Although patients without TEP coagulopathy showed significant improvements in oxygenation over the first 4 days, patients with TEP coagulopathy showed no significant improvement (ΔPaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio, 24 ± 20 vs. 90 ± 9; P = 0.026). Furthermore, anticoagulant use was significantly correlated with mortality and oxygenation recovery in patients with TEP coagulopathy but not in patients without TEP coagulopathy. Conclusion: Thrombocytopenia and elongated prothrombin time coagulopathy is closely associated with better outcomes and responses to anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-induced ARDS, and our coagulopathy criteria may be clinically useful.

Efficacy of antithrombin administration for patients with sepsis: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression

Aims

There have been inconsistent reports regarding the effect of antithrombin on sepsis; furthermore, there are limited reports on how dosage affects therapeutic efficacy. Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of antithrombin for sepsis and a meta-regression analysis of antithrombin dosage.

Methods

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies of adult patients with sepsis who received antithrombin. Outcomes included all-cause mortality and serious bleeding complications. Statistical analyses and data synthesis were performed using a random-effects model; further, meta-regression and funnel plots were used to explore heterogeneity and biases.

Results

Seven RCTs and six observational studies were included. Most patients in the RCTs and observational studies had severe sepsis and septic-disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), respectively. A meta-analysis using RCTs showed no significant differences in mortality between the antithrombin and control groups. However, the meta-analysis of observational studies indicated a trend of decreasing mortality rates with antithrombin administration (odds ratio [OR], 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.92; p = 0.002). Bleeding complications were significantly higher in the antithrombin group than in the control group in both study types (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.52-2.37; p < 0.01). The meta-regression analysis showed no correlation between antithrombin dosage and mortality.

Conclusion

A meta-analysis of RCTs confirmed no survival benefit of antithrombin, whereas that of observational studies, which mostly focused on septic DIC, showed a significant beneficial effect on improving outcomes. Indications of antithrombin should be considered based on its beneficial and harmful effects.

Decoding Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Comprehensive Review of Existing and Emerging Therapies

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a recurrent complication of sepsis. Since DIC not only promotes organ dysfunction but also represents a strong prognostic factor, it is important to diagnose DIC as early as possible. When coagulation is activated, fibrinolysis is inhibited, blood thinners are consumed, and a condition is created that promotes blood clotting, making it more difficult for the body to remove fibrin or prevent it from being deposited in the blood vessels. This leads to microvascular thrombosis, which plays a role in organ dysfunction. Despite efforts to understand the underlying mechanisms of sepsis-induced DIC, healthcare providers worldwide still face challenges in effectively treating this condition. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of the available strategies for sepsis-induced DIC, considering their effectiveness, limitations, and potential for future advances. Corticosteroids (CS), recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM), vitamin C, fibrinolytic therapy, and platelet transfusion are among the treatments discussed in the review. In addition, we are specifically addressing immunomodulatory therapy (IMT) by investigating treatments such as granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon gamma (IFN-γ), and mesenchymal stem cell therapy (MSC). Finally, we also examined how these therapies might affect COVID-19 cases, which often present with sepsis-induced DIC. The review suggests that targeted experiments with randomization are needed to verify the effectiveness of these treatments and to discover novel approaches to treat sepsis-induced DIC. By increasing our knowledge of sepsis-induced DIC, we can develop targeted treatments that have the potential to save lives and improve outcomes.

Bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial activation and dysfunction: a new predictive and therapeutic paradigm for sepsis

BACKGROUND

Lipopolysaccharide, a highly potent endotoxin responsible for severe sepsis, is the major constituent of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria. Endothelial cells participate in both innate and adaptive immune responses as the first cell types to detect lipopolysaccharide or other foreign debris in the bloodstream. Endothelial cells are able to recognize the presence of LPS and recruit specific adaptor proteins to the membrane domains of TLR4, thereby initiating an intracellular signaling cascade. However, lipopolysaccharide binding to endothelial cells induces endothelial activation and even damage, manifested by the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and adhesion molecules that lead to sepsis.

MAIN FINDINGS

LPS is involved in both local and systemic inflammation, activating both innate and adaptive immunity. Translocation of lipopolysaccharide into the circulation causes endotoxemia. Endothelial dysfunction, including exaggerated inflammation, coagulopathy and vascular leakage, may play a central role in the dysregulated host response and pathogenesis of sepsis. By discussing the many strategies used to treat sepsis, this review attempts to provide an overview of how lipopolysaccharide induces the ever more complex syndrome of sepsis and the potential for the development of novel sepsis therapeutics.

CONCLUSIONS

To reduce patient morbidity and mortality, preservation of endothelial function would be central to the management of sepsis.

Management of patients on antithrombotic therapy with severe infections: a joint clinical consensus statement of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis, the ESC Working Group on Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, and the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Patients with severe infections and a pre-existing indication for antithrombotic therapy, i.e. antiplatelet agents, anticoagulant drugs, or their combinations, require integrated clinical counselling among coagulation, infectious disease, and cardiology specialists, due to sepsis-induced coagulopathy that frequently occurs. Bacterial and viral pathogens constitute an increasing threat to global public health, especially for patients with ongoing antithrombotic treatment who have a high risk of thrombotic recurrences and high susceptibility to severe infections with increased morbidity and mortality. Similarly, sepsis survivors are at increased risk for major vascular events. Coagulopathy, which often complicates severe infections, is associated with a high mortality and obligates clinicians to adjust antithrombotic drug type and dosing to avoid bleeding while preventing thrombotic complications. This clinical consensus statement reviews the best available evidence to provide expert opinion and statements on the management of patients hospitalized for severe bacterial or viral infections with a pre-existing indication for antithrombotic therapy (single or combined), in whom sepsis-induced coagulopathy is often observed. Balancing the risk of thrombosis and bleeding in these patients and preventing infections with vaccines, if available, are crucial to prevent events or improve outcomes and prognosis.

Low-molecular-weight heparin therapy reduces 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-3 by improving inflammation and coagulopathy

Background and aim

Sepsis is a syndromic response to infection and is associated with high mortality, thus imposing a significant global burden of disease. Although low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been recommended to prevent venous thromboembolism, its anticoagulant and anti-inflammatory effects in sepsis remain controversial. Owing to the modification of the Sepsis-3 definition and diagnostic criteria, further evaluation of the efficacy and benefit population of LMWH is required.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess whether LMWH improved the inflammation, coagulopathy, and clinical outcomes against Sepsis-3 and to identify the target patients. All patients diagnosed with sepsis at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (the largest general hospital in northwest China) from January 2016 to December 2020 were recruited and re-evaluated using Sepsis-3 criteria.

Results

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 88 pairs of patients were categorized into the treatment and control groups based on subcutaneous LMWH administration. Compared with the control group, a significantly lower 28-day mortality was observed in the LMWH group (26.1 vs. 42.0%, p = 0.026) with a comparable incidence of major bleeding events (6.8 vs. 8.0%, p = 0.773). Cox regression analysis showed that LMWH administration was the independent protective factor for septic patients (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81; p = 0.006). Correspondingly, the LMWH treatment group showed a significant improvement in inflammation and coagulopathy. Further subgroup analysis showed that LMWH therapy was associated with favorable outcomes in patients younger than 60 years and diagnosed with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC), ISTH overt DIC, non-septic shock, or non-diabetics and in patients included in the moderate-risk group (APACHE II score 20-35 or SOFA score 8-12).

Conclusion

Our study results showed that LMWH improves 28-day mortality by improving inflammatory response and coagulopathy in patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria. The SIC and ISTH overt DIC scoring systems can better identify septic patients who are likely to benefit more from LMWH administration.

Effect of Antithrombin III Administration on the Prognosis of Severe Trauma Patients with Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the effects of antithrombin III administration on the prognosis of severe trauma patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

METHODS

Medical records of a total of 4023 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) at the single regional trauma center from January 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. After the exclusion of young patients (<15 years old), mild trauma (ISS < 16), non DIC, etc., a total of 140 patients were included in the study. These patients were classified into antithrombin III-administered and non-antithrombin III-administered groups. Clinical data, including laboratory findings, trauma- and ICU-related severity scores, prognosis (including length of hospital stay), and need for organ support, were retrospectively collected. We evaluated the characteristics of the two groups, and compared and analyzed the vital signs, laboratory findings, prognosis, and clinical outcomes of each group. With this, we analyzed the effect of antithrombin III administration in severe trauma patients with DIC.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients, 61 were treated with antithrombin III. No significant difference was observed in the baseline characteristics between the two groups for initial laboratory results, initial vital signs, or trauma-related severity scores. The improvement of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, a prognostic marker, was significantly greater in the administered group (p = 0.009). Additionally, the antithrombin-administered group showed a larger improvement in the SOFA score than the non-administered group (p = 0.002). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups for the frequency or duration of organ support treatments (renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation), mortality, or length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Antithrombin III administration in severe trauma patients with DIC improved SOFA scores and aided in multi-organ dysfunction recovery. Appropriate indications should be studied to maximize the drug's improvement effect in patients with severe trauma in the future.

Sepsis-related coagulopathy treatment based on the disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

The development of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) in patients with sepsis has been repeatedly confirmed as a factor associated with poor prognosis. Anticoagulant therapy has been expected to improve sepsis patient outcomes, whereas no randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the survival benefit of anticoagulant therapies in non-specific overall sepsis. Patient selection based on the component of "high disease severity" in addition to "sepsis with DIC" has recently proved important in identifying appropriate targets for anticoagulant therapy. The aims of this study were to characterize "severe" sepsis DIC patients and to identify the patient population benefiting from anticoagulant therapy.

METHODS

This retrospective sub-analysis of a prospective multicenter study included 1,178 adult patients with severe sepsis from 59 intensive care units in Japan from January 2016 to March 2017. We examined the association of patient outcomes, including organ dysfunction and in-hospital mortality, with the DIC score and prothrombin time-international normalized ratio (PT-INR), one of the components of the DIC score, using multivariable regression models including the cross-product term between these indicators. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with non-linear restricted cubic spline including a three-way interaction term (anticoagulant therapy × the DIC score × PT-INR) was also performed. Anticoagulant therapy was defined as the administration of antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed 1013 patients. The regression model showed that organ dysfunction and in-hospital mortality deteriorated with higher PT-INR values in the range of < 1.5 and that this trend was more pronounced with higher DIC scores. Three-way interaction analysis demonstrated that anticoagulant therapy was associated with better survival outcome in patients with a high DIC score and high PT-INR. Furthermore, we identified a DIC score ≥ 5 and PT-INR ≥ 1.5 as the clinical threshold for identification of optimal targets for anticoagulant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of the DIC score and PT-INR helps in selecting the optimal patient population for anticoagulant therapy in sepsis-induced DIC. The results obtained from this study will provide valuable information regarding the study design of randomized controlled trials examining the effects of anticoagulant therapy for sepsis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN-CTR, UMIN000019742. Registered on November 16, 2015.

Comparisons of coagulation characteristics between elderly and non-elderly patients with sepsis: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

A blunt host defense response in older patients may contribute to different coagulation responses during sepsis. We aimed to investigate the differences in coagulation parameters between elderly and non-elderly patients with sepsis.

METHODS

Adult patients diagnosed with sepsis within 24 hours after admission to the intensive care unit between September 2018 and December 2020 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were categorized into the adult (18-64 years) and elderly (age ≥65 years) groups. Conventional coagulation parameters and inflammatory markers were measured on intensive care unit admission and on Days 3 and 7. Thromboelastography was performed on intensive care unit admission. The differences in the coagulation parameters between the 2 groups were evaluated. The adult and elderly patients were matched to adjust for baseline characteristics. Correlations between inflammatory markers and coagulation-related parameters were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 567 patients, 303 (53.4%) were elderly. Compared with adult patients, elderly patients had lower prothrombin time elevation, lower fibrinogen, D-dimer, and fibrin/Fib degradation product levels, and lower proportion of disseminated intravascular coagulation on intensive care unit admission; and, they had lower dynamic platelet, lower fibrinogen, and D-dimer levels during the first week in the intensive care unit. Thromboelastography parameters were generally within the normal range, although elderly patients had lower R and K values and a higher alpha angle. Comparisons of coagulation parameters between the 2 groups revealed similar results in the matched cohort. The inflammatory markers correlated with prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and antithrombin III.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients had milder coagulation activation, accompanied by a decreased inflammatory response during sepsis, compared to non-elderly patients.

Antithrombin Therapy: Current State and Future Outlook

Antithrombin (AT) is a natural anticoagulant pivotal in inactivating serine protease enzymes in the coagulation cascade, making it a potent inhibitor of blood clot formation. AT also possesses anti-inflammatory properties by influencing anticoagulation and directly interacting with endothelial cells. Hereditary AT deficiency is one of the most severe inherited thrombophilias, with up to 85% lifetime risk of venous thromboembolism. Acquired AT deficiency arises during heparin therapy or states of hypercoagulability like sepsis and premature infancy. Optimization of AT levels in individuals with AT deficiency is an important treatment consideration, particularly during high-risk situations such as surgery, trauma, pregnancy, and postpartum. Here, we integrate the existing evidence surrounding the approved uses of AT therapy, as well as potential additional patient populations where AT therapy has been considered by the medical community, including any available consensus statements and guidelines. We also describe current knowledge regarding cost-effectiveness of AT concentrate in different contexts. Future work should seek to identify specific patient populations for whom targeted AT therapy is likely to provide the strongest clinical benefit.

Sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation: an international estrangement of disease concept

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is an acquired syndrome characterized by widespread intravascular activation of coagulation, which can be caused by infectious and noninfectious insults, such as trauma, postcardiac arrest syndrome, and malignant diseases. At present, diagnosis and treatment of DIC clearly differ between Japan and Western countries; in Japan, DIC has long been considered a therapeutic target, and much evidence on DIC has been published. However, there has recently been no international consensus on whether DIC should be a therapeutic target with anticoagulant therapy. This review describes the coagulofibrinolytic system abnormalities associated with sepsis and discusses related management strategies. It also explores the reasons why DIC is perceived differently in different regions. There is a major discrepancy between diagnostic and treatment options in Japan, which are based on holistic assessments of trials, as well as the results of post hoc subgroup analyses and observational studies, and those in Western countries, which are based mainly on the results of sepsis mega trials, especially randomized controlled trials. The differences might also be due to various patient factors in each region, especially racial characteristics in thrombolytic mechanisms, and differences in interpretation of evidence for candidate drugs. Hence, Japanese researchers need to distribute their high-quality clinical research data not only to Japan but also to the rest of the world.

Sepsis-induced Coagulopathy: The Different Prognosis in Severe Pneumonia and Bacteremia Infection Patients

Sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) is a critical condition in sepsis patients, with varying outcomes depending on the type of infection. This study aims to analyze the prognosis of different infections in SIC cohort. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 525 patients diagnosed with SIC in the intensive care unit from December 2013 to December 2022. These patients were divided into four groups: a non-pneumonia or bacteremia group, a severe pneumonia group, a bacteremia group, and a severe pneumonia concomitant with bacteremia group. The 28-day mortality was 18% (49/271) in the other infections group, 31% (33/106) in the lung infections group, 23% (29/126) in the blood infections group and 36% (8/36) in the lung and blood co-infections group, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that procalcitonin (PCT) correlated strongly with all detected hemostatic markers (p < 0.001). The 28-day mortality rate in Lung infections group was significantly higher (p = 0.019), while Blood infections group had a higher incidence of disseminated intravascular coagulation (p = 0.011). By multivariable model analyses, longer duration of ventilation (p = 0.039) and severe pneumonia (p = 0.040) are risk factors associated with mortality. Different infections, including Lung and Blood infections, indicated different conditions in vivo. Longer duration of ventilation is associated with mortality, while Lung infections indicated higher 28-day mortality rate.

Anticoagulant therapies against sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a frequent but lethal complication in sepsis. Anticoagulant therapies, such as heparin, antithrombin, activated protein C, and recombinant human-soluble thrombomodulin, were expected to regulate the progression of coagulopathy in sepsis. Although a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the survival effects of these therapies over the past few decades, there remains no consistent evidence showing a significant survival benefit of anticoagulant therapies. Currently, anticoagulant therapies are not conducted as a standard treatment against sepsis in many countries and regions. However, most of these RCTs were performed overall in patients with sepsis but not in those with sepsis-induced DIC, who were theoretically the optimal target population of anticoagulants. Actually, multiple lines of evidence from observational studies and meta-analyses of the RCTs have suggested that anticoagulant therapies might reduce mortality only when used in septic DIC. In addition, the severity of illness is another essential factor that maximally affects the efficacy of the therapy. Therefore, to provide evidence on the true effect of anticoagulant therapies, the next RCTs must be designed to enroll only patients with sepsis-induced overt DIC and a high severity of illness. To prepare these future RCTs, a novel scientific infrastructure for accurate detection of patients who can receive maximal benefit from anticoagulant therapies also needs to be established.

Association of antithrombin with development of trauma-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and outcomes

Introduction

Trauma activates the innate immune system to modulate hemostasis and minimize the damage caused by physiological bodily responses, including the activation of coagulation. Sufficiently severe trauma overwhelms physiological responses and elicits the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, which leads to the onset of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), characterized by dysregulated inflammatory coagulofibrinolytic responses. Impaired anticoagulant mechanisms, including antithrombin, constitutes the pathology of DIC, while the dynamics of antithrombin and relevance to outcomes in trauma-induced coagulopathy have not been fully elucidated. This study investigated the associations of antithrombin activity with DIC onset and outcomes in severely injured patients.

Methods

This retrospective sub-analysis of a multicenter, prospective study included patients with an injury severity score ≥16. We characterized trauma patients with low antithrombin activity (antithrombin <80% on hospital arrival, n = 75) in comparison with those who had normal antithrombin activity (antithrombin ≥80%, n = 200). Global markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis, molecular biomarkers for thrombin generation (soluble fibrin [SF]), and markers of anticoagulation (antithrombin) were evaluated to confirm the associations of antithrombin with DIC development and outcomes, including in-hospital mortality and the multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).

Results

Patients with low antithrombin activity had higher prevalence of shock, transfusion requirements, and in-hospital mortality. Higher DIC scores and more severe organ dysfunction were observed in the low AT group compared to that in the normal AT group. Antithrombin activity on arrival at the hospital was an independent predictor of the development of DIC in trauma patients, and levels of SF increased with lower antithrombin values (antithrombin activity > 85%). Antithrombin activity at 3 h showed good predictive performance for in-hospital mortality, and a multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression model with a cross-product term between the antithrombin and DIC showed that the in-hospital mortality in patients with DIC increased with decreased antithrombin activity. A multivariable logistic regression model showed that the odds for the development of MODS in patients with DIC increased with lower antithrombin values.

Conclusion

Decreased antithrombin activity in trauma-induced coagulopathy is associated with poor outcomes through worsening of DIC.

Association between hypomagnesemia and coagulopathy in sepsis: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Hypomagnesemia reportedly has significant associations with poor clinical outcomes such as increased mortality and septic shock in patients with sepsis. Although the mechanism underlying these outcomes mostly remains unclear, some experimental data suggest that magnesium deficiency could potentiate coagulation activation in sepsis. However, in sepsis, the association between serum magnesium levels and coagulopathy, including disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), remains unknown. Thus, we aimed to investigate the relationship between serum magnesium levels and coagulation status and the association between hypomagnesemia and DIC in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted at the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university hospital from June 2011 to December 2017. Patients older than 19 years who met the Sepsis-3 definition were included. We categorized patients into three groups according to their serum magnesium levels: hypomagnesemia (< 1.6 mg/dL), normal serum magnesium level (1.6-2.4 mg/dL), and hypermagnesemia (> 2.4 mg/dL). We investigated the association between serum magnesium levels and overt DIC at the time of ICU admission according to the criteria of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

RESULTS

Among 753 patients included in this study, 181 had DIC, 105 had hypomagnesemia, 552 had normal serum magnesium levels, and 96 had hypermagnesemia. Patients with hypomagnesemia had a more activated coagulation status indicated by lower platelet counts, lower fibrinogen levels, higher prothrombin time-international normalized ratios, higher thrombin-antithrombin complex, and more frequent DIC than those with normal serum magnesium levels and hypermagnesemia (DIC: 41.9% vs. 20.6% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.001). The coagulation status in patients with hypomagnesemia was more augmented toward suppressed fibrinolysis than that in patients with normal serum magnesium levels and hypermagnesemia. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that hypomagnesemia was independently associated with DIC (odds ratio, 1.69; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.84; P = 0.048) after adjusting for several confounding variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with hypomagnesemia had a significantly activated coagulation status and suppressed fibrinolysis. Hypomagnesemia was independently associated with DIC in patients with sepsis. Therefore, the treatment of hypomagnesemia may be a potential therapeutic strategy for the treatment of coagulopathy in sepsis.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients with Severe COVID-19 and the Association between the Dose of Anticoagulants and Outcomes

Introduction

COVID-19 is characterized by a procoagulant state that increases the risk of venous and arterial thrombosis. The dose of anticoagulants in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia without suspected or confirmed thrombosis has been debated.

Aim of the study

We evaluated the prevalence, predictors, and outcomes of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in critically ill COVID-19 patients and assessed the association between the dose of anticoagulants and outcomes.

Materials and methods

This retrospective cohort included patients with COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU between March and July 2020. Patients with clinically suspected and confirmed VTE were compared to those not diagnosed to have VTE.

Results

The study enrolled 310 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: age 60.0±15.1 years, 67.1% required mechanical ventilation and 44.7% vasopressors. Most (97.1%) patients received anticoagulants during ICU stay: prophylactic unfractionated heparin (N=106), standard-dose enoxaparin (N=104) and intermediate-dose enoxaparin (N=57). Limb Doppler ultrasound was performed for 49 (15.8%) patients and chest computed tomographic angiography for 62 (20%). VTE was diagnosed in 41 (13.2%) patients; 20 patients had deep vein thrombosis and 23 had acute pulmonary embolism. Patients with VTE had significantly higher D-dimer on ICU admission. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, intermediate-dose enoxaparin versus standard-dose unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin was associated with lower VTE risk (hazard ratio, 0.06; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.74) and lower risk of the composite outcome of VTE or hospital mortality (hazard ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.78; p=0.006). Major bleeding was not different between the intermediate- and prophylactic-dose heparin groups.

Conclusions

In our study, clinically suspected and confirmed VTE was diagnosed in 13.2% of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Intermediate-dose enoxaparin versus standard-dose unfractionated heparin or enoxaparin was associated with decreased risk of VTE or hospital mortality.

Antithrombin as Therapeutic Intervention against Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: Lessons Learned from COVID-19-Associated Coagulopathy

Recent research has contributed significantly to our understanding of the pathogenesis of acute disseminated intravascular coagulation. COVID-19 can be considered as a new underlying condition of disseminated intravascular coagulation. In this narrative review, current evidence is presented regarding biomarker differences between sepsis-induced and COVID-19-associated coagulopathies, supporting the importance of acquired antithrombin deficiency in the early differential diagnosis of septic coagulopathy and its potential impact on treatment with endogenous anticoagulants. Establishing new scoring systems for septic coagulopathy in combination with endogenous anticoagulant biomarker activities may allow for the identification of those in the heterogeneous population of sepsis patients who are more likely to benefit from targeted specific treatment interventions.

Validation of Two Revised, Simplified Criteria for Assessing Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation in ICU Patients with Sepsis-3: A Retrospective Study

Objective

This study aimed to validate the performance of modified Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (m-JAAM) and simplified Japanese Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (s-JSTH) criteria in diagnosing coagulation disorders in sepsis and examine their prognostic value compared with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria.

Methods

This retrospective study included subjects diagnosed with sepsis (August 2020 to February 2021, n = 296). The m-JAAM, s-JSTH, SIC, and ISTH criteria were evaluated and compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs).

Results

There was no significant difference in AUC for predicting in-hospital 28-day mortality by m-JAAM, s-JSTH, SCI, and ISTH criteria (0.745, 0.763, 0.760, and 0.730, respectively). The proportion of patients fulfilling the m-JAAM and SIC criteria was higher than that of the s-JSTH and ISTH criteria (43.2%, 56.1% vs. 25.0%, 22.6%, P &lt; .05).

Conclusion

The m-JAAM criteria might be more suitable for early-stage disseminated intravascular coagulation of sepsis than s-JSTH criteria.

Age-related differences in the survival benefit of the administration of antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination in sepsis

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is one of the major organ dysfunctions associated with sepsis. This retrospective secondary analysis comprised data from a prospective multicenter study to investigate the age-related differences in the survival benefit of anticoagulant therapy in sepsis according to the DIC diagnostic criteria. Adult patients with severe sepsis based on the Sepsis-2 criteria were enrolled and divided into the following groups: (1) anticoagulant group (patients who received anticoagulant therapy) and (2) non-anticoagulant group (patients who did not receive anticoagulant therapy). Patients in the former group were administered antithrombin, recombinant human thrombomodulin, or their combination. The increases in the risk of hospital mortality were suppressed in the high-DIC-score patients aged 60-70 years receiving anticoagulant therapy. No favorable association of anti-coagulant therapy with hospital mortality was observed in patients aged 50 years and 80 years. Furthermore, anticoagulant therapy in the lower-DIC-score range increased the risk of hospital mortality in patients aged 50-60 years. In conclusion, anticoagulant therapy was associated with decreased hospital mortality according to a higher DIC score in septic patients aged 60-70 years. Anticoagulant therapy, however, was not associated with a better outcome in relatively younger and older patients with sepsis.

Thrombin generation capacity is enhanced by low antithrombin activity and depends on the activity of the related coagulation factors

Background

Supplementation with antithrombin (AT) concentrates is now common in the treatment of congenital and acquired AT deficiency. However, there is no established consensus on the target and timing of supplementation. We aimed to elucidate the effects of AT deficiency on the balance between coagulation activation and inhibition using a thrombin generation assay as in vitro global assay.

Methods

Samples were prepared by admixing commercially acquired AT-deficient plasma with < 1% AT activity with pooled normal plasma. The AT activity in each sample was adjusted to 100, 90, 70, 50, 40, 30, 10, 5, and < 1%. A thrombin generation assay was performed in each sample. AT concentrate-spiked samples were also prepared by adjusting the AT activities in four types of the concentrates: one recombinant and three plasma-derived AT concentrates. The final targeted AT activities in the samples were adjusted to 100, 50, 30, and 5% by spiking each concentrate into the AT-deficient plasma. We also prepared samples with five levels of prothrombin time (PT) % in coagulation factors with the AT activity fixed at 30% by dilution by mixing AT-deficient plasma and normal plasma with Owren’s veronal buffer to adjust the coagulation factor activities in several proportions. The theoretical target PT% values were 100, 66, 50, 40, and 30%. A thrombin generation assay was performed on all samples.

Results

The ability to generate thrombin depended on the AT activity, and the amount of thrombin generation was increased as AT was decreased. Additionally, the amount of thrombin generation was changed significantly when AT activity was ≤ 50%, indicating that AT suppressed thrombin generation. In particular, thrombin generation was remarkable when AT activity was < 30%, and it can be assumed that the prognosis is poor due to organ failure from thrombotic tendency.

Conclusions

The results presented in this basic research were found to be consistent with the clinical findings to date. The mechanism by which 30–50% of AT activity is set as the clinical boundary was elucidated by the thrombin generation assay.

Phenotype-oriented anticoagulant therapy for sepsis: still a work in progress

Coagulation disorders ranging from subtle changes in coagulation parameters to fatal disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) are common in septic patients. Coagulation activation is considered to be one of the most important factors contributing to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in sepsis. Anticoagulant therapy is, therefore, necessary to prevent MODS, but eligibility criteria remain controversial. Sepsis is a highly heterogeneous syndrome, which could explain the negative results of clinical studies on the treatment of sepsis. Recently, sepsis has been subdivided into several phenotypes with different therapeutic outcomes. At present, septic patients with dysfunctional coagulation expressed as increased D-dimer and fibrin/fibrinogen degradation products (FDPs) are considered to be candidates for anticoagulant therapy. In this review, we aimed to describe the features of different septic phenotypes. We also discuss factors that contribute to controversies in this area, and challenges in defining which septic phenotypes are good candidates for anticoagulant therapy.

The Necessity of Individualized Treatment for Sepsis-Associated Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation by Infected Organ

Objective

Several studies have shown that anticoagulation can improve survival outcomes in patients with sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). A guideline from Japan in 2020 suggested two therapeutic agents for sepsis-associated DIC treatment: antithrombin (AT) replacement therapy and recombinant thrombomodulin (rTM) preparation. In 2021, our preliminary study proposed that different organs of septic infection might lead to distinct treatment outcomes following different therapies against DIC. In this study, we created a subanalysis on the influence of AT replacement therapy and rTM preparations on overall survival (OS) by comparing two causative organs: biliary and respiratory tract infections.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study in a single institution involved patients with sepsis-associated DIC treated by either AT or rTM who were categorized based on sources of infection. The two groups defined for this study were biliary (n = 62) and respiratory tract infection (n = 84). To assess the clinical efficacy of AT and rTM, 30-day OS was examined using a stepwise variable selection for a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The analysis of factors influencing OS by each group showed that rTM preparation remained a significant factor in the biliary tract infection group (HR 0.306, 95% CI 0.133–0.706). In the respiratory tract infection group, the score of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (HR 1.109, 95% CI 1.051–1.170), polymyxin B hemoperfusion (HR 0.390, 95% CI 0.161–0.944), and AT replacement therapy (HR 0.510, 95% CI 0.261–0.997) were established as significant factors.

Conclusion

This study revealed that the OS of patients with biliary tract and respiratory tract infections differed depending on the DIC therapeutic agent. Based on these results, we could suggest that it is necessary to develop individualized treatment strategies for septic infections, taking into consideration the differences in the infected organs.

Simvastatin Prevents Liver Microthrombosis and Sepsis Induced Coagulopathy in a Rat Model of Endotoxemia

Background: Endotoxemia causes endothelial dysfunction and microthrombosis, which are pathogenic mechanisms of coagulopathy and organ failure during sepsis. Simvastatin has potential anti-thrombotic effects on liver endothelial cells. We investigated the hemostatic changes induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and explored the protective effects of simvastatin against liver vascular microthrombosis. Methods and results: We compared male Wistar rats exposed to LPS (5 mg/kg one i.p. dose) or saline in two experimental protocols—placebo (vehicle) and simvastatin (25 mg/kg die, orally, for 3 days before LPS). Morphological studies were performed by light- and electron-microscopy analyses to show intravascular fibrin deposition, vascular endothelial structure and liver damage. Peripheral- and organ-hemostatic profiles were analyzed using whole blood viscoelastometry by ROTEM, liver biopsy and western-blot/immunohistochemistry of thrombomodulin (TM), as well as immunohistochemistry of the von Willebrand factor (VWF). LPS-induced fibrin deposition and liver vascular microthrombosis were combined with a loss of sinusoidal endothelial TM expression and VWF-release. These changes were associated with parenchymal eosinophilia and necrosis. ROTEM analyses displayed hypo-coagulability in the peripheral blood that correlated with the degree of intrahepatic fibrin deposition (p < 0.05). Simvastatin prevented LPS-induced fibrin deposition by preserving TM expression in sinusoidal cells and completely reverted the peripheral hypo-coagulability caused by endotoxemia. These changes were associated with a significant reduction of liver cell necrosis without any effect on eosinophilia. Conclusions: Simvastatin preserves the antithrombotic properties of sinusoidal endothelial cells disrupted by LPS, deserving pharmacological properties to contrast sepsis-associated coagulopathy and hepatic failure elicited by endotoxemia

Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy Predicts Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Postoperative Sepsis

BACKGROUND

The incidence of coagulopathy, which was responsible for poor outcomes, was commonly seen among patients with sepsis. In the current study, we aim to determine whether the presence of sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) predicts the clinical outcomes among critically ill patients with postoperative sepsis.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study by including patients with sepsis admitted to surgical ICU of Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared with respect to the presence of SAC. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to calculate survival rate, and Log-rank test was carried out to compare the differences between two groups. Furthermore, multivariable Cox and logistic and linear regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship between SAC and clinical outcomes, including hospital mortality, development of septic shock, and length of hospital stay (LOS), respectively. Additionally, both sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to further testify the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

A total of 175 patients were included in the current study. Among all included patients, 41.1% (72/175) ICU patients were identified as having SAC. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly higher in the SAC group when compared to that of the No SAC group (37.5% vs. 11.7%; p < 0.001). By performing univariable and multivariable regression analyses, presence of SAC was demonstrated to significantly correlate with an increased in-hospital mortality for patients with sepsis in surgical ICU [Hazard ratio (HR), 3.75; 95% Confidence interval (CI), 1.90-7.40; p < 0.001]. Meanwhile, a complication of SAC was found to be the independent predictor of the development of septic shock [Odds ratio (OR), 4.11; 95% CI, 1.81-9.32; p = 0.001], whereas it was not significantly associated with prolonged hospital LOS (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.83-1.14; p = 0.743).

CONCLUSION

The presence of SAC was significantly associated with increased risk of in-hospital death and septic shock among postoperative patients with sepsis admitted to ICU. Moreover, there was no statistical difference of hospital LOS between the SAC and no SAC groups.

Which Septic Shock Patients With Non-Overt DIC Progress to DIC After Admission? Point-of-Care Thromboelastography Testing

BACKGROUND

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a life-threatening complication of septic shock; however, risk factors for its development after admission are unknown. Thromboelastography (TEG) can reflect coagulation disturbances in early non-overt DIC that are not detected by standard coagulation tests. This study investigated the risk factors including TEG findings as early predictors for DIC development after admission in septic shock patients with non-overt DIC.

METHODS

This retrospective observation study included 295 consecutive septic shock patients with non-overt DIC at admission between January 2016 and December 2019. DIC was defined as an International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) score ≥ 5. The primary outcome was non-overt DIC at admission that met the ISTH DIC criteria within 3 days after admission.

RESULTS

Of the 295 patients with non-overt DIC, 89 (30.2%) developed DIC after admission. The DIC group showed a higher ISTH score and 28-day mortality rate than the non-DIC group (2 vs. 3, P < 0.001; 13.6% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.008, respectively). The DIC rate increased with the ISTH score (7.7%, 13.3%, 15.8%, 36.5%, and 61.4% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively). Among TEG values, the maximum amplitude (MA) was higher in the non-DIC group (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, an MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development (odds ratio, 2.311; 95% confidence interval, 1.298-4.115).

CONCLUSIONS

DIC more often developed among those with admission ISTH scores ≥ 3 and was associated with higher mortality rates. An MA < 64 mm was independently associated with DIC development in septic shock patients.

Favorable Outcomes of Anticoagulation With Unfractioned Heparin in Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Analysis of MIMIC-III Database

Backgrounds: Anticoagulation in sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether unfractioned heparin (UFH) could improve clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC).

Methods: Septic patients with SIC were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. Cox-proportional hazards model, logistic regression model and linear regression were used to assess the associations between UFH administration and 28-day mortality, hospital mortality, occurrence of bleeding complications and length of stay, respectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to match the imbalance between patients in the UFH group and the control group. Patients were further stratified according to SIC score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II).

Results: A total of 1,820 septic patients with SIC were included in the data analysis. After PSM, 652 pairs of patients were matched between the patients in the UFH group and the control group. UFH was significantly associated with reduced 28-day mortality (HR, 0.323, 95% CI, 0.258–0.406; p < 0.001) and hospital mortality (HR, 0.380, 95% CI, 0.307–0.472; p < 0.001) without increasing the risks of intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 1.480, 95% CI, 0.955–2.294; p = 0.080) or gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 1.094, 95% CI, 0.503–2.382; p = 0.820). For subgroup analysis, it didn't change the favorable results of UFH on mortality and UFH didn't increase the risk of hemorrhage in patients with severe disease.

Conclusions: The analysis of MIMIC-III database indicated that anticoagulant therapy with UFH may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with SIC.

Low molecular weight heparin is useful in adult COVID-19 inpatients. Experience during the first Spanish wave: observational study

BACKGROUND

The intensity of the thromboprophylaxis needed as a potential factor for preventing inpatient mortality due to coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between anticoagulation intensity and COVID-19 survival.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Retrospective observational study in a tertiary-level hospital in Spain.

METHODS

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) status was ascertained based on prescription at admission. To control for immortal time bias, anticoagulant use was analyzed as a time-dependent variable.

RESULTS

690 patients were included (median age, 72 years). LMWH was administered to 615 patients, starting from hospital admission (89.1%). 410 (66.7%) received prophylactic-dose LMWH; 120 (19.5%), therapeutic-dose LMWH; and another 85 (13.8%) who presented respiratory failure, high D-dimer levels (> 3 mg/l) and non-worsening of inflammation markers received prophylaxis of intermediate-dose LMWH. The overall inpatient-mortality rate was 38.5%. The anticoagulant nonuser group presented higher mortality risk than each of the following groups: any LMWH users (HR 2.1; 95% CI: 1.40-3.15); the prophylactic-dose heparin group (HR 2.39; 95% CI, 1.57-3.64); and the users of heparin dose according to biomarkers (HR 6.52; 95% CI, 2.95-14.41). 3.4% of the patients experienced major hemorrhage. 2.8% of the patients developed an episode of thromboembolism.

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study showed that LMWH administered at the time of admission was associated with lower mortality among unselected adult COVID-19 inpatients. The magnitude of the benefit may have been greatest for the intermediate-dose subgroup. Randomized controlled trials to assess the benefit of heparin within different therapeutic regimes for COVID-19 patients are required.

Dielectric Blood Coagulometry for the Early Detection of Sepsis-Induced Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Prospective Observational Study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of dielectric blood coagulometry for early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis.

DESIGN

Single-center, prospective observational study.

SETTING

Patients with sepsis or septic shock at the Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital of Medicine between September 2019 and September 2020.

PATIENTS

The patients were divided into three groups according to the timing of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnosis based on the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score by the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine: 1) no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 2) late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group: not diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1 but diagnosed within 48 hours after admission, and 3) disseminated intravascular coagulation group: diagnosed with disseminated intravascular coagulation on day 1. The study evaluated 80 patients (no disseminated intravascular coagulation, 31 [38.8%]; late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation, 34 (42.5%); disseminated intravascular coagulation, 15 [18.8%]).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We compared the clinical severity scores and mortality of the groups and assessed the correlation between the dielectric blood coagulometry-derived coagulation marker, thrombin levels, and Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score using Spearman rank correlation. The mortality rate was 0% (0/31) in the no disseminated intravascular coagulation group, 35.3% (12/34) in the late-diagnosed disseminated intravascular coagulation group, and 33.3% (5/15) in the disseminated intravascular coagulation group. Although the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation score on day 1 did not reflect disseminated intravascular coagulation in approximately 70% of patients who developed disseminated intravascular coagulation by day 2, dielectric clot strength measured by dielectric blood coagulometry on day 1 strongly correlated with disseminated intravascular coagulation development by day 2 (Spearman ρ = 0.824; p < 0.05) and with thrombin level on day 1 (Spearman ρ = 0.844; p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dielectric blood coagulometry can be used to detect early-phase disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis and is strongly correlated with thrombin levels. Larger studies are needed to verify our results for developing clinical applications.

An Interpretable Early Dynamic Sequential Predictor for Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy Progression in the Real-World Using Machine Learning

Sepsis-associated coagulation dysfunction greatly increases the mortality of sepsis. Irregular clinical time-series data remains a major challenge for AI medical applications. To early detect and manage sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) and sepsis-associated disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), we developed an interpretable real-time sequential warning model toward real-world irregular data. Eight machine learning models including novel algorithms were devised to detect SIC and sepsis-associated DIC 8n (1 ≤ n ≤ 6) hours prior to its onset. Models were developed on Xi'an Jiaotong University Medical College (XJTUMC) and verified on Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC). A total of 12,154 SIC and 7,878 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) overt-DIC labels were annotated according to the SIC and ISTH overt-DIC scoring systems in train set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were used as model evaluation metrics. The eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model can predict SIC and sepsis-associated DIC events up to 48 h earlier with an AUROC of 0.929 and 0.910, respectively, and even reached 0.973 and 0.955 at 8 h earlier, achieving the highest performance to date. The novel ODE-RNN model achieved continuous prediction at arbitrary time points, and with an AUROC of 0.962 and 0.936 for SIC and DIC predicted 8 h earlier, respectively. In conclusion, our model can predict the sepsis-associated SIC and DIC onset up to 48 h in advance, which helps maximize the time window for early management by physicians.

Management of Vascular Thrombosis in Patients with Thrombocytopenia

Platelets play critical roles in hemostasis and thrombosis. While low platelet counts increase the risk of bleeding, antithrombotic drugs, including anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, are used to treat thromboembolic events. Thus, the management of thrombosis in patients with low platelet counts is challenging with hardly any evidence available to guide treatment. Recognition of the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia is essential for assessing the bleeding risk and tailoring therapeutic options. A typical clinical scenario is the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients experiencing transient thrombocytopenia during myelosuppressive chemotherapy. In such patients, the severity of thrombocytopenia, thrombus burden, clinical symptoms, and the timing of VTE relative to thrombocytopenia must be considered. In clinical practice, distinct hematological disorders characterized by low platelet counts and a thrombogenic state require specific diagnostics and treatment. These include the antiphospholipid syndrome, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and (spontaneous) HIT syndromes, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria.