Intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with brain tumors

Medical and neurologic management of brain tumor patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses commonly encountered medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors and highlights recommendations for their management based on updated evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Use of dexamethasone is correlated with worse prognosis in patients with glioblastoma, and in brain metastases, high doses may lead to increased side effects without additional clinical benefit. There are multiple antiseizure medications (ASM) to choose from and possible interactions and toxicity must be considered when choosing an agent. Additionally, there is growing interest in the use of AMPA receptor blockers as ASM in patients with brain tumors. Nonpharmacological strategies for the management of fatigue remain paramount. Cognitive decline is common after whole brain radiation (WBRT) and hippocampal-sparing WBRT results in superior cognitive outcomes. Venous thromboembolism is a common complication and there is growing evidence on the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in this population.

SUMMARY

There is evolving evidence on the management of medical and neurological complications in patients with brain tumors. These complications, require early identification and multidisciplinary collaboration and expertise.

Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Implications

Patients with glioblastoma are among the cancer patients with the highest risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Long-term thromboprophylaxis is not generally prescribed because of the increased susceptibility of glioblastoma patients to intracranial hemorrhage. This review provides an overview of the current clinical standard for glioblastoma patients, as well as the molecular and genetic background which underlies the high incidence of VTE. The two main procoagulant proteins involved in glioblastoma-related VTE, podoplanin and tissue factor, are described, in addition to the genetic aberrations that can be linked to a hypercoagulable state in glioblastoma. Furthermore, possible novel biomarkers and future treatment strategies are discussed, along with the potential of sequencing approaches toward personalized risk prediction for VTE. A glioblastoma-specific VTE risk stratification model may help identifying those patients in which the increased risk of bleeding due to extended anticoagulation is outweighed by the decreased risk of VTE.

Predictors and surgical outcome of hemorrhagic metastatic brain malignancies

PURPOSE

Intracerebral metastases present a substantial risk of tumor-associated intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). This study aimed to investigate the risk of hemorrhagic events in brain metastases (BM) from various primary tumor sites and evaluate the safety and outcomes of surgical tumor removal.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center review of medical records was conducted for patients who underwent BM removal between January 2016 and December 2017. Patients with hemorrhagic BM were compared to those with non-hemorrhagic BM. Data on preoperative predictors, perioperative management, and postoperative outcomes were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 229 patients met the inclusion criteria. Melanoma metastases were significantly associated with preoperative hemorrhage, even after adjusting for confounding factors (p = 0.001). Poor clinical status (p = 0.001), larger tumor volume (p = 0.020), and unfavorable prognosis (p = 0.001) independently predicted spontaneous hemorrhage. Importantly, preoperative use of anticoagulant medications was not linked to increased hemorrhagic risk (p = 0.592). Surgical removal of hemorrhagic BM, following cessation of blood-thinning medication, did not significantly affect intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, or postoperative rebleeding risk (p > 0.096). However, intra-tumoral hemorrhage was associated with reduced overall survival (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the safety of anticoagulation in patients with BM and highlights the safety of neurosurgical treatment in patients with hemorrhagic BM when blood-thinning medication is temporarily paused. The presence of intra-tumoral hemorrhage negatively impacts survival, highlighting its prognostic significance in BM patients. Further research with larger cohorts is warranted to validate these findings and elucidate underlying mechanisms.

The effect of anti-thrombotics on the postoperative bleeding rate in patients undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor

OBJECTIVE

The peak prevalence of many brain tumors is in elderly patients. These patients are often treated with platelet inhibitors (PIs) or anticoagulants (ACs), creating a challenge for neurosurgeons concerning the perioperative management. The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of PI/AC treatment on the postoperative bleeding rates in patients undergoing craniotomy due to a brain tumor.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 415 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy due to a brain tumor. Ninety-nine patients with PI/AC treatment (PI/AC group consisting of 64 PI, 29 AC, and six multiple) and 316 patients without PI/AC (control group) were primarily compared for hemorrhage rate. Secondary outcome measures were clinical outcome and mortality. The association between short preoperative discontinuation (≤5 days), early postoperative resumption time (≤5 days), as well as short total discontinuation time (≤5 days) of PI/AC and postoperative bleeding rates was analyzed.

RESULTS

Postoperative bleeding rates were comparable between the groups (12.2% and 13.5% in the PI/AC and control group, respectively; p=.74). The majority of bleeds were asymptomatic (85.2%). No significant difference in the postoperative mortality rate was observed (1.0% and 1.6% in the PI/AC and the control group, respectively; p=.67). Shorter discontinuation time of PI/AC was not significantly associated with higher postoperative bleeding rates (preoperative: 12.1% vs. 12.3%; p=.94, postoperative: 11.1% vs. 12.5%, respectively; p=.87, total: 16.7% vs. 12%, respectively; p=.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with PI/AC undergoing craniotomy for the resection of brain tumor do not seem to have increased rates of postoperative bleeding or mortality. We did not find a significant correlation between short discontinuation time of PI/AC in the perioperative period and postoperative bleeding.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and bleeding in patients with malignant central nervous system neoplasm: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Central nervous system (CNS) malignant neoplasms may lead to venous thromboembolism (VTE) and bleeding, which result in rehospitalization, morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the incidence of VTE and bleeding in this population.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42023423949) were based on a standardized search of PubMed, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane (n = 1653) in July 2023. After duplicate removal, data screening and collection were conducted by independent reviewers. The combined rates and 95% confidence intervals for the incidence of VTE and bleeding were calculated using the random effects model with double arcsine transformation. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sex, age, income, and type of tumor. Heterogeneity was calculated using Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Egger's test and funnel graphs were used to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

Only 36 studies were included, mainly retrospective cohorts (n = 30, 83.3%) from North America (n = 20). Most studies included were published in high-income countries. The sample size of studies varied between 34 and 21,384 adult patients, mostly based on gliomas (n = 30,045). For overall malignant primary CNS neoplasm, the pooled incidence was 13.68% (95%CI 9.79; 18.79) and 11.60% (95%CI 6.16; 18.41) for VTE and bleeding, respectively. The subgroup with elderly people aged 60 or over had the highest incidence of VTE (32.27% - 95%CI 14.40;53.31). The studies presented few biases, being mostly high quality. Despite some variability among the studies, we observed consistent results by performing sensitivity analysis, which highlight the robustness of our findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed variability in the pooled incidence for both overall events and subgroup analyses. It was highlighted that individuals over 60 years old or diagnosed with GBM had a higher pooled incidence of VTE among those with overall CNS malignancies. It is important to note that the results of this meta-analysis refer mainly to studies carried out in high-income countries. This highlights the need for additional research in Latin America, and low- and middle-income countries.

Cancer-associated thrombosis: How many patients seen in clinical practice would be eligible for a direct oral anticoagulant randomized controlled trial?

Based on the results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) assessing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the treatment of patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT), DOACs have been proposed as alternative to low molecular weight heparin by several international guidelines. However, the proportion of CAT patients who would have not been eligible for such trials is currently unknown. Our primary aim was to assess the proportion of patients seen in clinical practice for acute CAT who would not have been eligible for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Secondary aim was to describe patients outcomes according to eligibility. In a multicenter, observational study, all patients consecutively admitted from January 2017 to December 2019 for an acute CAT event were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified according to the presence or absence of non-inclusion criteria for CARAVAGGIO or HOKUSAI-VTE RCT. Event free survival during a 6-month follow-up were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Among the 302 patients (women: 53 %, mean age: 67.9 ± 13.2) analyzed, 138 (46 %) for HOKUSAI-VTE cancer and 161 (53 %) for CARAVAGGIO met one or more non-inclusion criteria. Main criteria were upper limb and unsual site thrombosis (n = 63, 18.5 %), anemia/thrombopenia (n = 43, 14.2 %), brain tumors (n = 33, 10.9 %), ECOG PS >2 (n = 28, 9.3 %), severe renal failure (n = 16, 5.3 %). At 6 months, the event-free survival rate was not statistically different between the two groups. Almost half of CAT patients would have not been able to participate to a modern DOAC RCT. Evaluation of DOACs safety and efficacy in this subset of patients deserves further research.

Structured benefit-risk assessment for enoxaparin, in the context of its label extension, for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and prevention of its recurrence in patients with active cancer

PURPOSE

Guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis. However, until recently, only dalteparin and tinzaparin were approved in the European Economic Area (EEA) for these patients. This study compares the benefit-risk profile of enoxaparin with dalteparin and tinzaparin for the extended treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrence in adult patients with active cancer.

METHODS

A semi-quantitative structured benefit-risk assessment was conducted for the label-extension application of enoxaparin based on the benefit-risk action team descriptive framework: define decision context; determine key benefit and risk outcomes; identify data sources; extract data; interpret results.

RESULTS

The key benefits were defined as reduced all-cause mortality and venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence (including symptomatic DVT, fatal PE or non-fatal PE); the key risks were major and non-major bleeding of clinical significance, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Enoxaparin demonstrated comparable effects for the reduction of VTE recurrence and all-cause mortality versus other EEA-approved LMWHs (dalteparin, tinzaparin). There was no evidence of a significant difference between enoxaparin and the comparator groups with regard to incidence of major and non-major bleeding. The data on HIT were too limited to assess the difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment demonstrated a favourable benefit-risk profile for enoxaparin similar to that of other EEA-approved LMWHs for the treatment of DVT and PE and the prevention of recurrence in patients with active cancer and thus supported the label-extension approval.

Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients

Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours"]

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

The Role of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Review by Middle East and North African Experts

Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with active cancer who require anticoagulation treatment. Choice of anticoagulant is based on careful balancing of the risks and benefits of available classes of treatment: vitamin K antagonists, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Results from randomized controlled trials have shown the consistent efficacy of DOACs versus LMWH in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, increased major gastrointestinal bleeding was observed for edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not apixaban, compared with LMWH dalteparin. Most guidelines recommend DOACs for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE in patients without gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer, and with considerations for renal impairment and drug-drug interactions. These updates represent a major paradigm shift for clinicians in the Middle East and North Africa. The decision to prescribe a DOAC for a patient with cancer is not always straightforward, particularly in challenging subgroups of patients with an increased risk of bleeding. In patients with gastrointestinal malignancies who are at high risk of major gastrointestinal bleeds, apixaban may be the preferred DOAC; however, caution should be exercised if patients have upper or unresected lower gastrointestinal tumors. In patients with gastrointestinal malignancies and upper or unresected lower gastrointestinal tumors, LMWH may be preferred. Vitamin K antagonists should be used only when DOACs and LMWH are unavailable or unsuitable. In this review, we discuss the overall evidence for DOACs in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE and provide treatment suggestions for challenging subgroups of patients with cancer associated VTE.

Between a rock and a hard place: resumption of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared and lethal complication of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. Resumption of OAC after ICH has long posed a challenge for clinicians, complicated by the expanding range of anticoagulant agents available in modern clinical practice, including direct OACs and, more recently, factor XI and XII inhibitors. A review of the current literature found support for resuming OAC in the majority of patients after ICH based on pooled retrospective data showing that resumption is associated with a lower risk of mortality and thromboembolism without a significantly increased risk of recurrent hemorrhage. The optimal time to resume OAC is less clear; however, the available evidence suggests that the composite risk of both recurrent hemorrhage and thromboembolism is likely minimized, somewhere between 4 and 6 weeks, after ICH in most patients. Specific considerations to guide the optimal resumption time in the individual patient include ICH location, mechanism, and anticoagulant class. Patients with mechanical heart valves and intracerebral malignancy represent high-risk groups who require more nuanced decision making. Here, we appraise the literature with the aim of providing a practical guide for clinicians while also discussing priorities for future investigation.

Anticoagulant prescribing patterns in patients with primary central nervous system malignancies and secondary metastases

To evaluate the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients with central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and secondary metastases. All adult patients with CNS malignancies and secondary metastases who were treated with a DOAC or LMWH for any indication from 2018 to 2022 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after anticoagulation initiation. Secondary outcomes included non-ICH bleeding events and thromboembolic events. Tolerability was assessed by any changes in anticoagulant therapy during study period. 153 patients were included; 48 patients received enoxaparin and 105 received DOACs, of which apixaban was used most commonly. The population was predominantly White (74%) and male (59%) with a median age of 65. Data was censored for immortal time bias for outcomes evaluated beyond 3 months. ICH occurred in 7.7% of the population, more frequently in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 4, 4% vs. enoxaparin 7, 16%, p = 0.037). Non-ICH bleeds were predominantly minor and more common in the DOAC group (DOACs 13, 13% vs. enoxaparin 1, 2%, p = 0.037). Thromboembolic events were not different between groups (DOACs 9. 9% vs, enoxaparin 2, 4%, p = 0.503). Anticoagulant switches occurred more in the enoxaparin group (DOACs 12, 12.4% vs. enoxaparin, 37.8%, p < 0.001), primarily due to patient or provider preference. Our data supports DOACs to be preferred over LMWH for the treatment of VTE or for stroke prevention with AF to prevent ICH in patients with brain tumors or metastases.

Comparison of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in primary and metastatic brain cancers: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The safety and efficacy of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for therapeutic anticoagulation in the setting of primary or metastatic brain cancer is not known.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a meta-analysis and systematic review of studies that compare the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with brain cancer treated with DOACs vs low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH).

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Summary statistics were obtained by calculating the risk ratio (RR), and heterogeneity across studies was estimated using the I2 statistic. A total of 10 retrospective studies (n = 1638) met criteria for inclusion. The primary endpoint was the pooled RR for ICH in patients with brain tumors receiving anticoagulation with DOACs compared with those receiving LMWH. Secondary analyses included the risk of fatal ICH in each subgroup.

RESULTS

The pooled RR for ICH in patients receiving DOACs vs those receiving LMWH was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.36-1.17; P = .15; I2 = 50%). In studies evaluating primary brain cancer, there was a reduction in risk of ICH with DOACs (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.69; P = .003; I2 = 0%). In patients with metastatic brain cancer, there was no difference in the risk of ICH with the type of anticoagulation (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.71-1.56; P = .80; I2 = 0%). The overall risk of fatal ICH was not different between anticoagulants.

CONCLUSION

The risk of ICH in patients with brain cancer receiving therapeutic anticoagulation varies by anticoagulation agent and diagnosis of primary or metastatic disease.

Clinical and molecular determinants of bleeding-related adverse outcomes in high-grade glioma

PURPOSE

Cancer is an independent risk factor for the development of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) including glioblastoma (GBM) are at a particularly high risk of VTE with an incidence up to 20-30% per year. Patients are often placed on anticoagulation if they are found to have VTE. However, patients with primary brain tumors such as HGG are at increased risk for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) even without the administration of anticoagulation. The combination of risk factors for ICH with anticoagulation and HGG complicates decision-making. Currently it is not known which of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are safest for patients with HGG in terms of adverse bleeding-related outcomes such as ICH. Furthermore, a deeper understanding of the clinical and molecular determinants of bleeding-related adverse outcomes in HGG is not fully characterized.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we identified and gathered data on 75 consecutive patients with pathology-confirmed HGG with hospital encounters at two academic medical center hospitals in Austin between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2022. We compared clinical and treatment-related factors among cohorts who had received various forms of anticoagulation or no anticoagulation.

RESULTS

Patients who were on rivaroxaban (3/7 (43%)) had a statistically significant association with more bleeding-related adverse events compared to those on apixaban (0/12 (0%)) or enoxaparin (0/5 (0%), p = 0.022) even though the groups were similar in characteristics including total time on the respective anticoagulation. Patients on anticoagulation vs those never on anticoagulation did not differ in terms of their studied demographic and clinical characteristics. Intriguingly, logistic regression analysis revealed that patients Astrocytoma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant, grade 4 had a significant association with more adverse bleeding-related events even when controlling for other relevant factors (Odds Ratio compared to reference GBM: 49.4, 95% CI: 2.8, 2084.7; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this study we found that the use of rivaroxaban was associated with more bleeding-related events compared to apixaban and enoxaparin in patients with high-grade glioma. In this study we also found that the diagnosis of astrocytoma, IDH mutant, grade 4 was associated with more bleeding events. However, this is based on a small study and there is a need for larger studies to further evaluate these results.

Management of Neurologic Complications in Patients with Brain and Spine Tumors

Patients with brain and spine tumors represent a distinct population with unique needs. We provide a practical review of neurologic care in this group with an emphasis on familiarizing the general neurologist to the nuances of neuro-oncologic supportive care. We review the management of cerebral edema, steroid dosing, and pertinent side effects. We discuss seizure management, including choice of anticonvulsants, putative antitumor effects, and important seizure mimics like drop attacks. We review the presentation and symptomatology of stroke-like migraine attack after radiation therapy (SMART syndrome). We describe the signs and symptoms that should prompt concern for metastatic spinal cord compression, as well as both acute and definitive treatment options. Finally, we discuss the underappreciated incidence of venous thromboembolic events, particularly in patients with gliomas, and review the data on management.

Evaluating of Existing VTE Risk Scales in Glioma Patients

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequently occurring complication among glioma patients. Several risk assessment models (RAMs), including the Caprini RAM, the IMPROVE Risk Score, the IMPROVED VTE Risk Score, and the Padua Prediction Score, have not been validated within the glioma patient population. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive accuracy of established VTE risk scales in patients with glioma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted on 265 glioma patients who underwent surgery at the Almazov Medical and Research Centre between 2021 and 2022. VTE detection followed the current clinical guidelines. Threshold values for the Caprini, IMPROVE VTE, IMPROVEDD, and Padua scales were determined using ROC analysis methods, with cumulative weighting for sensitivity and specificity in predicting VTE development. The areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were calculated, and comparisons were made using the DeLong test.

RESULTS

The area under the curve for the Caprini risk assessment model was 80.41, while the IMPROVEDD VTE risk score was 75.38, the Padua prediction score was 76.9, and the IMPROVE risk score was 72.58. No significant differences were observed in the AUC values for any of the scales. The positive predictive values of all four scales were low, with values of 50 (28-72) for Caprini, 48 (28-69) for IMPROVEDD VTE, 50 (30-70) for Padua, and 64 (35-87) for IMPROVE RAM. No significant differences were found in terms of PPV, NPV, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio among the analyzed scales.

CONCLUSIONS

The Caprini Risk Assessment Model, the IMPROVE Risk Score, the IMPROVED VTE Risk Score, and the Padua Prediction Score exhibit acceptable specificity and sensitivity for glioma patients. However, their low positive predictive ability, coupled with the complexity of interpretation, limits their utility in neurosurgical practice.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct Factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral Factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct Factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

Antithrombotic strategy in cancer patients comorbid with acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation

It has been shown that patients with cancer have a longer expected life duration, benefiting from advanced medical therapy. Meanwhile, the risk of suffering from cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been increasing with ageing. A growing number of studies have elucidated the association between cancer and CVD. Cancer, atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease share some common factors and interact with each other, such as obesity, aging, diabetes, and inflammation, but the potential specific mechanism is still unclear. In addition, cancer-specific and therapy-related factors may increase the risk of embolism and bleeding in patients with cancer than in general population. However, current available embolic and bleeding risk scores applied in patients with CVD may not be applicable for risk assessment in cancer patients, which would be difficult for clinicians to select an appropriate antithrombotic regimen and ensure the balance between bleeding and embolism. Moreover, different types of cancer have distinct risks, which may increase the complexity of antithrombotic therapy. In this review, we review the literature related to cancer, AF, and acute coronary syndrome, focusing on the epidemiological status, physiological mechanism, embolism and bleeding risks, and strategies of antithrombotic therapy.

Management of Complications in Neuro-oncology Patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to familiarize the reader with the spectrum of neurologic and medical complications relevant to the care of patients with neurologic cancer while highlighting best practices to prevent morbidity and mortality. Topics include tumor-related epilepsy, vasogenic edema, complications of corticosteroid use, disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, venous thromboembolism, and opportunistic infection.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

In 2021, a joint guideline from the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology reaffirmed recommendations first established in 2000 that patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors should not be prescribed an antiseizure medication prophylactically. For those with tumor-related epilepsy, monotherapy with a non-enzyme-inducing anticonvulsant is the preferred initial treatment, and levetiracetam remains the preferred first choice. Surveys of physician practice continue to demonstrate excessive use of glucocorticoids in the management of patients with both primary and metastatic central nervous system malignancy. This is particularly concerning among patients who require checkpoint inhibitors as the efficacy of these agents is blunted by concomitant glucocorticoid use, resulting in a reduction in overall survival. Finally, direct oral anticoagulants have been shown to be safe in patients with brain tumors and are now favored as first-line treatment among those who require treatment for venous thromboembolism.

ESSENTIAL POINTS

Medical care for patients impacted by primary and secondary central nervous system malignancy is complex and requires a committed team-based approach that routinely calls upon the expertise of physicians across multiple fields. Neurologists have an important role to play and should be familiar with the spectrum of complications impacting these patients as well as the latest recommendations for management.

Management of Thromboembolic Disease in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Patients with primary brain tumors are at a substantially elevated risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) compared to other disease states or other forms of malignancy. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), often complicate the care of patients with primary brain tumors, and treatment may pose specific unique risks and considerations for management. This paper critically reviews the relevant literature and the most common treatment options in addition to a discussion regarding the relative risk considerations for neurooncology patients facing thromboembolic disease.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To present the randomized controlled trial (RCT) evidence and highlight the areas of uncertainty regarding direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT).

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last years, four RCTs have shown that rivaroxaban, edoxaban, and apixaban are at least as effective as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for the treatment of both incidental and symptomatic CAT. On the other hand, these drugs increase the risk of major gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with cancer at this site. Another two RCTs have demonstrated that apixaban and rivaroxaban also prevent CAT in subjects at intermediate-to-high risk commencing chemotherapy, albeit at the price of higher likelihood of bleeding. By contrast, data are limited about the use DOAC in individuals with intracranial tumors or concomitant thrombocytopenia. It is also possible that some anticancer agents heighten the effects of DOAC via pharmacokinetic interactions, up to making their effectiveness-safety profile unfavorable. Leveraging the results of the aforementioned RCTS, current guidelines recommend DOAC as the anticoagulants of choice for CAT treatment and, in selected cases, prevention. However, the benefit of DOAC is less defined in specific patient subgroups, in which the choice of DOAC over LMWH should be carefully pondered.

Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A focus on special populations

Current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of both low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and direct factor Xa inhibitors (apixapan, edoxaban and rivaroxaban) as first-line options for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer. However, most of these guidelines refer to the general cancer patient population and provide limited guidance for specific subgroups of patients at particularly high risk of bleeding, such as those with gastrointestinal cancers, primary or metastatic brain tumors, thrombocytopenia, or renal impairment. In these complex populations, the management of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) poses unique challenges and requires a nuanced approach based on the primum non nocere principle. This comprehensive review critically examines the relevant literature and discusses the therapeutic options currently available for the management of CAT in these special situations.

Epidemiology, biology, and management of venous thromboembolism in gliomas: An interdisciplinary review

Patients with diffuse glioma are at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) over the course of the disease, with up to 30% incidence in patients with glioblastoma (GBM) and a lower but nonnegligible risk in lower-grade gliomas. Recent and ongoing efforts to identify clinical and laboratory biomarkers of patients at increased risk offer promise, but to date, there is no proven role for prophylaxis outside of the perioperative period. Emerging data suggest a higher risk of VTE in patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioma and the potential mechanistic role of IDH mutation in the suppression of production of the procoagulants tissue factor and podoplanin. According to published guidelines, therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or alternatively, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients without increased risk of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding is recommended for VTE treatment. Due to the elevated risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in GBM, anticoagulation treatment remains challenging and at times fraught. There are conflicting data on the risk of ICH with LMWH in patients with glioma; small retrospective studies suggest DOACs may convey lower ICH risk than LMWH. Investigational anticoagulants that prevent thrombosis without impairing hemostasis, such as factor XI inhibitors, may carry a better therapeutic index and are expected to enter clinical trials for cancer-associated thrombosis.

Unmet clinical needs in the prevention and treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Based on accumulating evidence, the prophylaxis and treatment of cancer-associated VTE have been changed over the years. Recently, the introduction in clinical practice of the direct oral anticoagulants has radically changed the management of cancer-associated VTE for their easier use and non-inferior efficacy-safety profile compared to low-molecular-weight heparins. However, the heterogeneity of the cancer population in terms of site, type and stage of the malignancy, the presence of comorbidities, and the variability in cancer treatment and prognosis represent major challenges in the management of VTE in patients with cancer. In the present review, we will discuss clinical questions that represent unsolved issues in the setting of cancer-associated VTE and provide an overview on recent evidence on this topic: primary prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients treated with chemotherapy and in cancer surgical patients, need of long-term anticoagulation in cancer patients, treatment of VTE in cancer patients at increased bleeding risk and in special categories such as incidental VTE, splanchnic vein thrombosis or catheter-related thrombosis.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulation versus low molecular weight heparin in the treatment of brain tumor-associated venous thromboembolism: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are effective in treating cancer-related thrombosis and are superior to low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in terms of efficacy. The effects of DOACs or LMWH on intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) remain uncertain in individuals with brain tumors. We conducted a meta-analysis to compare the frequency of ICH in individuals with brain tumors treated with DOACs or LMWH.

METHODS

Two independent investigators reviewed all studies that compared the frequency of ICH in patients with brain tumors who received DOACs or LMWH. The primary outcome was the incidence of ICH. We used the Mantel-Haenszel method to estimate the combined effect and calculated 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

This study encompassed six articles. The results indicated that cohorts treated with DOAC experienced much fewer instances of ICH compared to the LMWH cohorts (relative risk [RR] 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.65; P = 0.0003; I2 = 0%). The same effect was observed for the prevalence of major ICH (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.12-0.97; P = 0.04; I2 = 0%), but there was no difference for fatal ICH. Subgroup analysis indicated that DOACs had a substantially reduced incidence of ICH in primary brain tumors (RR 0.18; 95% CI 0.06-0.50; P = 0.001; I2 = 0%), but had no impact on ICH with secondary brain tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that DOACs are associated with a lower risk of ICH than LMWH therapy in treating venous thromboembolism associated with brain tumors, especially in patients with primary brain tumors.

The risk of intracranial hemorrhage in glioma patients receiving anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism: a bayesian network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We aimed to perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis to assess the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with glioma receiving anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolism.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant publications until September 2022. All studies evaluating the risk of ICH in patients with glioma receiving anticoagulant treatment were included. Bayesian network meta-analysis and pairwise meta-analysis were performed to compare the ICH risk between the anticoagulant treatments. The Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to evaluate the quality of studies.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies with 1301 patients were included. Pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences excepted with LMWH vs. DOACs (OR: 7.28, 95% CI: 2.11-25.17) and LMWH vs. Placebo (OR: 3.66, 95% CI: 2.15-6.24). For network meta-analysis, significant difference was found between patients treated with LMWH vs. Placebo (OR: 4.16, 95% CI: 2.00-10.14) and LMWH vs. DOACs (OR: 10.13, 95% CI: 2.70-70.19).

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that LMWH has the highest risk of ICH in glioma patients, while no evidence indicates that DOACs increase the risk of ICH. The use of DOACs may perhaps be a better choice. Further larger studies focusing on the benefit-to-risk ratio are warranted.

Intra-and peritumoral hemorrhage in the meningioma of a nonagenarian due to administration of direct oral anticoagulants after mechanical thrombectomy

Background

Spontaneous intratumoral hemorrhage of meningiomas is rare, and their incidence due to anticoagulants is unclear. The incidence of both meningioma and cardioembolic stroke increases with age. We report the very elderly case of intra- and peritumoral hemorrhage in frontal meningioma induced by direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) following mechanical thrombectomy, in whom, surgical resection was required 10 years after the tumor was first indicated.

Case Description

A 94-year-old woman with independence in daily living who suffered sudden consciousness disturbance, total aphasia, and right hemiparesis was admitted to our hospital. Magnetic resonance imaging showed an acute cerebral infarction and left middle cerebral artery occlusion. There was also a left frontal meningioma with peritumoral edema, which was discovered 10 years prior, and the size and edema had remarkably increased. The patient underwent urgent mechanical thrombectomy, and recanalization was achieved. Administration of DOAC was initiated for the atrial fibrillation. Computed tomography (CT) revealed an asymptomatic intratumoral hemorrhage at postoperative day 26. The patient's symptoms gradually improved; however, she suffered sudden disturbance of consciousness and right hemiparesis on postoperative day 48. CT revealed intra- and peritumoral hemorrhages with compression of the surrounding brain. Therefore, we decided to perform tumor resection instead of conservative treatment. The patient underwent surgical resection, and the postoperative course was uneventful. It was diagnosed with transitional meningioma with no malignant features. The patient was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation.

Conclusion

Peritumoral edema representing a pial blood supply might be a significant factor associated with intracranial hemorrhage due to DOAC administration in patients with meningioma. The evaluation of hemorrhagic risk due to DOACs is important not only for meningioma but also for other brain tumor cases.

Antiplatelet medications and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with primary brain tumors

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a frequent and severe consequence of primary brain tumors. The safety of antiplatelet medications in this patient population is undefined.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to determine whether antiplatelet medications are associated with an increased risk of ICH in patients with primary brain tumors.

PATIENTS/METHODS

We performed a matched, retrospective cohort study of patients with the diagnosis of primary brain tumor treated at our institution between 2010 and 2021. Radiographic images of all potential ICH events underwent blinded review. The primary end point of the study was the cumulative incidence of ICH at 1 year after tumor diagnosis.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

A total of 387 patients with primary brain tumors were included in the study population (130 exposed to antiplatelet agents, 257 not exposed). The most common malignancy was glioblastoma (n = 256, 66.1%). Among the intervention cohort, 119 patients received aspirin monotherapy. The cumulative incidence of any ICH at 1 year was 11.0% (95% CI, 5.3-16.6) in those receiving antiplatelet medications and 13.0% (95% CI, 8.5-17.6) in those not receiving antiplatelet medications (Gray test, p = 0.6). The cumulative incidence of major ICH was similar between the cohorts (3.3% in antiplatelet cohort vs 2.9% in control cohort, p = 1.0). This study did not identify an increased incidence of ICH in patients with primary brain tumors exposed to antiplatelet medications.

[Prophylaxis and management of cancer-associated thrombosis: Practical issues about anticoagulant use]

Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication resulting from various vascular mechanisms related to cancer, antitumoral therapy and patient status, and is associated with a poor prognosis. Anticoagulants recommended for CAT treatment or prevention mainly include low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Regarding thromboprophylaxis, a situation for which LMWH is a preferred option due to a lower risk of hemorrhage especially in patients with unresected gastro-intestinal and genito-urinary malignancies, the identification of patients at risk is a major issue. For patients with established CAT, the main issue is the choice of the most appropriate anticoagulant therapy. Because of the convenience of oral formulation, DOACs are an attractive option, and their efficacy has been shown in randomized trials. However, such studies are limited by selection biases, which make the analyzed population not representative of the real-life setting, as for instance cancers associated with a high risk of hemorrhage, or antitumoral therapies (e.g., tyrosine kinase inhibitors) known to interact with DOACs and then modifying their bioavailability. Caution associated with DOAC use is highlighted by most updated guidelines that recommend a case-by-case-based approach. The aim of the present paper is to help the oncologists make the most appropriate decision regarding the choice of anticoagulant therapy in a context of thromboprophylaxis or established CAT management in a patient with a solid tumor. The main issues are addressed through key practical questions, the answers of which are based on the current guidelines and additional published data or expert opinions.

Practical Considerations for the Management of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Guide for the General Oncology Practitioner

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism is a devastating complication of cancer and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The cornerstone of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism treatment is anticoagulation, and in recent years, there have been notable randomized clinical trials that have revealed insights into the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and low-molecular-weight heparin in the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Deciding on the ideal anticoagulation treatment plan for a patient with a cancer-associated thrombosis is a complex task that requires an understanding of clinical trial data, society guidelines, and, most importantly, consideration of many cancer-related, treatment-related, and patient-related factors. This article summarizes important factors to consider when deciding on anticoagulation therapy for a patient with cancer-associated thrombosis.

ICH in primary or metastatic brain cancer patients with or without anticoagulant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anticoagulant treatment in patients with primary and metastatic brain cancer is a concern due to risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of ICH in patients with primary or metastatic brain cancer treated with or without anticoagulants. Articles on ICH in patients with primary or metastatic brain cancer treated with or without anticoagulants published up to September 2021 were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. The primary outcome of this analysis was ICH. Thirty studies were included. Rate of ICH was 13.0% in 1009 patients with metastatic brain cancer and 6.4% in 2353 patients with primary brain cancer (relative risk [RR], 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.69-3.94; I2 = 92.8%). In patients with primary brain cancer, ICH occurred in 12.5% and 4.4% of patients treated with or without anticoagulants, respectively (11 studies, 659 treated and 1346 not treated patients; RR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.48-4.67; I2 = 49.6%). In patients with metastatic brain cancer, ICH occurred in 14.7% and 15.4% (5 studies, 265 treated and 301 not treated patients; RR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.43-1.93; I2 = 0%). ICH occurred in 8.3% of 172 treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and in 11.7% of 278 treated with low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (5 studies; RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25-0.79; I2 = 0%). Patients with metastatic brain cancer have a particularly high risk of ICH. Patients with primary brain cancer have an increased risk of ICH during anticoagulation. DOACs are associated with a lower risk of ICH than LMWH.

2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19

The International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer is an independent academic working group of experts aimed at establishing global consensus for the treatment and prophylaxis of cancer-associated thrombosis. The 2013, 2016, and 2019 International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer clinical practice guidelines have been made available through a free, web-based mobile phone application. The 2022 clinical practice guidelines, which are based on a literature review up to Jan 1, 2022, include guidance for patients with cancer and with COVID-19. Key recommendations (grade 1A or 1B) include: (1) low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) for the initial (first 10 days) treatment and maintenance treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis; (2) direct oral anticoagulants for the initial treatment and maintenance treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in patients who are not at high risk of gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding, in the absence of strong drug-drug interactions or of gastrointestinal absorption impairment; (3) LMWHs or direct oral anticoagulants for a minimum of 6 months to treat cancer-associated thrombosis; (4) extended prophylaxis (4 weeks) with LMWHs to prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism after major abdominopelvic surgery in patients not at high risk of bleeding; and (5) primary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with LMWHs or direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban or apixaban) in ambulatory patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who are treated with anticancer therapy and have a low risk of bleeding.

Unanswered questions in cancer-associated thrombosis

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Treatment of cancer-associated VTE comes with a heightened risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding that differs by choice of anticoagulant as well as by patient- and disease-specific risk factors. Available data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies in cancer-associated VTE suggest that direct oral anticoagulants are effective, continuing anticoagulation beyond six months is indicated in those with active cancer and that patients who develop 'breakthrough' thrombotic events can be effectively treated. We review the evidence that addresses these key clinical questions and offer pragmatic approaches in individualizing care. While significant investigative efforts over the past decade have made impactful advances, future research is needed to better define the factors that contribute to anticoagulant-related bleeding and VTE recurrence, in order to aid clinical decision-making that improves the care of patients with cancer-associated VTE.

Risk of intracranial hemorrhage with direct oral anticoagulants vs low molecular weight heparin in glioblastoma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is associated with a high incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but there are little data to guide anticoagulation in patients with GBM, in whom the risks of VTE must be balanced against the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with GBM diagnosed with VTE from 2014 to 2021 who were treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC). The incidence of ICH was compared between the LMWH and DOAC groups. The primary outcome was clinically relevant ICH within the first 30 days of anticoagulation, defined as any ICH that was fatal, symptomatic, required surgical intervention, and/or led to cessation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes included clinically relevant ICH within 6 months, fatal ICH within 30 days and 6 months, and any bleeding within 30 days and 6 months.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients were identified in the cohort for 30-day outcome analyses (DOAC, n = 33; LMWH, n = 88). For 6-month outcome analyses, the cohort included only patients who were maintained on their initial anticoagulant (DOAC, n = 32; LMWH, n = 75). The incidence of clinically relevant ICH at 30 days was 0% in the DOAC group and 9% in the LMWH group (P = .11). The cumulative incidence of clinically relevant ICH at 6 months was 0% in the DOAC group and 24% in the LMWH group (P = .001), with 4 fatal ICHs in the LMWH group.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs are associated with a lower incidence of clinically relevant ICH in patients with GBM-associated VTE compared to LMWH.

Low dose apixaban as secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients - 30 months follow-up

BACKGROUND

There are no data on the effect of low-dose anticoagulation as secondary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients. We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apixaban for 30 months, after initial 6 months of full-dose treatment.

METHODS

We included 298 patients with cancer and any type of VTE in a single arm interventional clinical trial. All patients were treated with full-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) for 6 months. Total 196 patients with active cancer after 6 months treatment continued with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily for another 30 months. The main endpoints were recurrent VTE, major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding.

RESULTS

During the 30 months of treatment with low-dose apixaban 14 (7.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0%-11.7%) patients experienced recurrent VTE, six (3.1%; 95% CI 1.1%-6.5%) experienced major bleeding and 16 (8.1%, 95% CI: 4.7%-12.8%) experienced clinically relevant non-major bleeding. The incidence rate per person month of recurrent VTE was 0.8% (95% CI 0.41-1.6) at 2-6 months with full-dose apixaban, and 1.0% (95% CI 0.5-1.9) at 7-12 months with low-dose apixaban. The incidence rate of major bleeding was 1.1% (95% CI 0.6-2.0) at 2-6 months, and 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-1.0) at 7-12 months. Between 12 and 36 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleedings remained low.

CONCLUSION

Dose reduction of apixaban to 2.5 mg twice daily seems safe after 6 months of full-dose treatment. After 12 months the incidence rate of recurrent VTE and major bleeding remained low.

Venous Thrombotic Events and Anticoagulation in Brain Tumor Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Brain tumor patients have a 20-30% risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), with management complicated by risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Here we review the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and recommended management of VTE in brain tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

New risk factors and molecular mechanisms of VTE in brain tumor patients have emerged, including the protective effect of IDH mutation in gliomas and the potential role of podoplanin-mediated platelet aggregation in thrombogenesis in these tumors. Recent studies show that the risk of ICH is not significantly higher in brain tumor patients receiving anticoagulation. Based on systemic cancer trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be a suitable alternative to traditional heparin treatment, but the applicability of these findings to brain tumors is unclear. Anticoagulation is indicated in the treatment of VTE for brain tumor patients, and appears to be reasonably safe; based on retrospective evidence, DOACs may be a reasonable agent.

Anti-platelet medications and risk of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with metastatic brain tumors

Antiplatelet medication was not associated with an increased risk of ICH in patients with metastatic brain tumors.

Combined antiplatelet agents and anticoagulation was not associated with an increased risk of ICH compared with single-agent use.

Although intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is frequent in the setting of brain metastases, there are limited data on the influence of antiplatelet agents on the development of brain tumor–associated ICH. To evaluate whether the administration of antiplatelet agents increases the risk of ICH, we performed a matched cohort analysis of patients with metastatic brain tumors with blinded radiology review. The study population included 392 patients with metastatic brain tumors (134 received antiplatelet agents and 258 acted as controls). Non–small cell lung cancer was the most common malignancy in the cohort (74.0%), followed by small cell lung cancer (9.9%), melanoma (4.6%), and renal cell cancer (4.3%). Among those who received an antiplatelet agent, 86.6% received aspirin alone and 23.1% received therapeutic anticoagulation during the study period. The cumulative incidence of any ICH at 1 year was 19.3% (95% CI, 14.1-24.4) in patients not receiving antiplatelet agents compared with 22.5% (95% CI, 15.2-29.8; P = .22, Gray test) in those receiving antiplatelet agents. The cumulative incidence of major ICH was 5.4% (95% CI, 2.6-8.3) among controls compared with 5.5% (95% CI, 1.5-9.5; P = .80) in those exposed to antiplatelet agents. The combination of anticoagulation plus antiplatelet agents did not increase the risk of major ICH. The use of antiplatelet agents was not associated with an increase in the incidence, size, or severity of ICH in the setting of brain metastases.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Cancer Patients Visiting the Emergency Department

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is a dreaded complication of both cancer and its treatment. To evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of cancer patients with ICH, we identified all patients with ICH who visited The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center emergency department between 1 September 2006 and 16 February 2016. Clinical and radiologic data were collected and compared. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between clinical variables and various outcomes. During the period studied, 704 confirmed acute ICH cases were identified. In-hospital, 7-day, and 30-day mortality rates were 15.1, 11.4, and 25.6%, respectively. Hypertension was most predictive of intensive care unit admission (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.09–2.12, p = 0.013). Low platelet count was associated with both in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.94–0.99, p = 0.008) and 30-day mortality (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96–1.00, p = 0.016). Radiologic findings, especially herniation and hydrocephalus, were strong predictors of short-term mortality. Among known risk factors of ICH, those most helpful in predicting cancer patient outcomes were hypertension, low platelet count, and the presence of hydrocephalus or herniation. Understanding how the clinical presentation, risk factors, and imaging findings correlate with patient morbidity and mortality is helpful in guiding the diagnostic evaluation and aggressiveness of care for ICH in cancer patients.

Intracranial Hemorrhage in Patients with Anticoagulant Therapy Undergoing Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: A Bi-Institutional Analysis

Background: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a well-established treatment modality for brain metastases (BM). Given the manifold implications of metastatic cancer on the body, affected patients have an increased risk of comorbidities, such as atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE), which includes pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep-vein thrombosis (DVT). These may require therapeutic anticoagulant therapy (ACT). Limited data are available on the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after SRS for patients with BM who are receiving ACT. This bi-institutional analysis aimed to describe the bleeding risk for this patient subgroup. Methods: Patients with ACT at the time of single-fraction SRS for BM from two institutions were eligible for analysis. The cumulative incidence of ICH with death as a competing event was assessed during follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography. Results: Forty-one patients with 97 BM were included in the analyses. The median follow-up was 8.2 months (range: 1.7–77.5 months). The median and mean BM volumes were 0.47 and 1.19 cubic centimeters, respectively. The most common reasons for ACT were PE (41%), AF (34%), and DVT (7%). The ACT was mostly performed utilizing phenprocoumon (37%), novel oral anticoagulants (32%), or low-molecular-weight heparin (20%). Nine BM from a group of five patients with ICH after SRS were identified: none of them caused neurological or any other deficits. The 6-, 12-, and 18-month cumulative bleeding incidences per metastasis were 2.1%, 12.4%, and 12.4%, respectively. The metastases with previous bleeding events and those originating from malignant melanomas were found to more frequently demonstrate ICH after SRS (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). No surgical or medical intervention was necessary for ICH management, and no observed death was associated with an ICH. Conclusion: Patients receiving an ACT and single-fraction SRS for small- to medium-sized BM did not seem to have a clinically relevant risk of ICH. Previous bleeding and metastases originating from a malignant melanoma may favor bleeding events after SRS. Further studies are needed to validate our reported findings.

Therapeutic Anticoagulation Impacts MR Morphologic Recurrence Patterns in Glioblastoma-A Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients are at particularly high risk for thrombotic complications. In the event of a postoperative pulmonary embolism, therapeutic anticoagulation (tAC) is indispensable. The impact of therapeutic anticoagulation on recurrence pattern in GBM is currently unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a matched-pair cohort analysis of 57 GBM patients with or without tAC that were matched for age, sex, gross total resection and MGMT methylation status in a ratio of 1:2. Patients' characteristics and clinical course were evaluated using medical charts. MRI characteristics were evaluated by two independent authors blinded to the AC status.

RESULTS

The morphologic MRI appearance in first GBM recurrence showed a significantly higher presence of multifocal, midline crossing and sharp demarcated GBM recurrence patterns in patients with therapeutic tAC compared to the matched control group. Although statistically non-significant, the therapeutic tAC cohort showed increased survival.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic anticoagulation induced significant morphologic changes in GBM recurrences. The underlying pathophysiology is discussed in this article but remains to be further elucidated.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: A Latin American Perspective

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. On the basis of results from randomized controlled trials, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now recommended for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. The decision to use a DOAC requires consideration of bleeding risk, particularly in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies, the cost-benefit and convenience of oral therapy, and patient preference. While efficacy with apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus dalteparin has been consistent in the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, heterogeneity is evident with respect to major GI bleeding, with an increased risk with edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not apixaban. Although cost and accessibility vary in different countries of Latin America, DOACs should be considered for the long-term treatment of cancer-associated VTE in all patients who are likely to benefit. Apixaban may be the preferred DOAC in patients with GI malignancies and LMWH may be preferred for patients with upper or unresected lower GI tumors. Vitamin K antagonists should only be used for anticoagulation when DOACs and low molecular weight heparin are inaccessible or unsuitable.

Treatment Algorithm in Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Updated Canadian Expert Consensus

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) are at high risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding complications. Risks vary significantly between individuals based on cancer status, treatment, and other characteristics. To facilitate the evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy in this patient population, a committee of 11 Canadian clinical experts updated a consensus-based algorithm for the acute and extended treatment of symptomatic and incidental CAT that was developed in 2018. Following a systematic review of the literature, updates to the algorithm were discussed during an online teleconference, and the algorithm was subsequently refined based on feedback from committee members. Clinicians using this treatment algorithm should consider bleeding risk, type of cancer, and drug-drug interactions, as well as patient and clinician preferences, in tailoring anticoagulation for patients with CAT. Anticoagulant therapy should be adapted as the patient's cancer status and management change over time.

Direct oral anticoagulants or low-molecular-weight heparins for venous thromboembolism in patients with brain tumors

INTRODUCTION

Patients with central nervous system malignancies have limited representation in studies evaluating DOACs for VTE treatment. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of DOACs in comparison with LMWH for cancer-associated VTE in patients with primary brain tumors or secondary brain metastases.

MATERIALS & METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective cohort study, adult patients with a diagnosis of primary brain tumor or secondary brain metastases who received either a DOAC or LMWH for treatment of cancer-associated VTE were evaluated. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage within a 6-month period following the initiation of anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative incidence of any bleeding event, and recurrent VTE events.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2012 and October 9, 2019, one-hundred eleven patients met inclusion criteria. The 6-month cumulative incidence of intracranial hemorrhage was 4.3% (95% CI, 0.74-13.2%) in the DOAC group, compared to 5.9% (95% CI, 1.5-14.9%) in the LMWH group (p = 0.61). The 6-month cumulative incidence of bleeding events was 14.3% (95% CI, 6.2-25.8%) in the DOAC group, compared to 27.8% (95% CI, 15.5-41.6%) in the LMWH group (p = 0.10). The 6-month cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE events was 5.6% in the DOAC group (95% CI, 1.5-14.2%), compared to 6.6% in the LMWH group (95% CI, 1.7-16.5%) (p = 0.96). No differences were found with respect to other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in bleeding or recurrent VTE events between DOACs and LMWH. These findings suggest DOACs may be safe and effective for VTE treatment in this patient population.

Anticoagulation in Acute Neurological Disease

While anticoagulation and its reversal have been of clinical relevance for decades, recent academic and technological advances have expanded the repertoire of its application in neurological disease. The advent of direct oral anticoagulants provides effective, mechanistically elegant, and relatively safer therapeutic options than warfarin for eligible patients at risk for neurological sequelae of prothrombotic states, particularly given the recent availability of corresponding reversal agents. In this review, we examine the provenance, indications, safety, and reversal tools for anticoagulant medications in the context of neurological disease, with specific attention to acute ischemic stroke, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and intracerebral hemorrhage. We will use specific clinical scenarios to illustrate the complex factors that must be considered in the use of anticoagulation, including intracranial pathology such as intracerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or malignancy; metabolic complications such as chronic kidney disease; pregnancy; and advanced age.

Medical and Neurological Management of Brain Tumor Complications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The diagnosis of brain tumors often leads to complications that are either related to the tumor itself or the tumor-directed and supportive therapies, increasing the burden on the patients' quality of life and even survival. This article reviews the medical and neurological conditions that commonly complicate the disease course of brain tumors patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various mechanisms have been newly identified to be involved in the pathophysiology of seizures and brain edema and can help advance the treatment of such complications. There have also been new developments in the management of thromboembolic disease and cognitive impairment. Medical and neurological complications are being identified more often in brain tumor patients with the improved survival provided by therapeutic advances. Early and proper identification and management of such complications are crucial for a better survival and quality of life.

Management of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Unmet Needs and Future Perspectives

Patients with cancer are at a high risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in this patient population. Increased risk of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications are two major challenges associated with therapeutic anticoagulation in these patients. Long-term therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) has been the standard of care for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE given its favorable risk–benefit ratio in comparison with vitamin K antagonists. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which offer the convenience of oral administration and have a rapid onset of action, have recently emerged as a new treatment option for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CT). Randomized clinical trial data with head-to-head comparisons between DOACs and LMWHs showed that overall, DOACs have a similar efficacy profile but a higher risk of bleeding was observed in some of these studies. This review aims to identify unmet needs in the treatment of CT. We discuss important considerations for clinicians tailoring anticoagulation (1) drug–drug interactions, (2) risk of bleeding (e.g., gastrointestinal bleeding), (3) thrombocytopenia, hematological malignancies, (4) metastatic or primary brain tumors, and (5) renal impairment. Additional research is warranted in several clinical scenarios to help clinicians on the best therapeutic approach.