Comparative evaluation of GPR versus APRI and FIB-4 in predicting different levels of liver fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B

Novel integrative models to predict the severity of inflammation and fibrosis in patients with drug-induced liver injury

Background and aims

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is becoming a worldwide emerging problem. However, few studies focus on the diagnostic performance of non-invasive markers in DILI. This study aims to develop novel integrative models to identify DILI-associated liver inflammation and fibrosis, and compare the predictive values with previously developed indexes.

Methods

A total of 72 DILI patients diagnosed as DILI through liver biopsy were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into absent-mild (S0-S1, G0-G1) group and moderate-severe (S2-S4, G2-G4) group based on the histological severity of inflammation and fibrosis. We used the area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) to test the model performances. Backward stepwise regression, best subset and logistic regression models were employed for feature selection and model building. Prediction models were presented with nomogram and evaluated by AUC, Brier score, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

For diagnosing moderate-severe inflammation and fibrosis, we calculated the AUC of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and fibrosis-5 index (FIB-5), which were 0.708 and 0.676, 0.778 and 0.667, 0.822 and 0.742, 0.831 and 0.808, respectively. Then, backward stepwise regression, best subset and logistic regression models were conducted for predicting significant liver inflammation and fibrosis. For the prediction of ≥G2 inflammation grade, the AUC was 0.856, 0.822, 0.755, and for the prediction of ≥S2 fibrosis grade, the AUC was 0.889, 0.889, 0.826. Through Brier score, calibration curves and DCA, it was further demonstrated that backward stepwise regression model was highly effective to predict both moderate-severe inflammation and fibrosis for DILI.

Conclusion

The backward stepwise regression model we proposed in this study is more suitable than the existing non-invasive biomarkers and can be conveniently used in the individualized diagnosis of DILI-related liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Staging liver fibrosis and cirrhosis using non-invasive tests in people with chronic hepatitis B to inform WHO 2024 guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive tests (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [APRI] and transient elastography [FibroScan]) were recommended in the 2015 WHO guidelines to guide treatment decisions in people with chronic hepatitis B. We updated the systematic review and meta-analysis that informed the 2015 guidelines to inform new cutoffs for non-invasive tests for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis for the 2024 WHO guidelines for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

We searched PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, and Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) for studies published in any language between Jan 1, 2014, and Feb 15, 2023. We included all studies that reported cross-sectional data on the staging of fibrosis or cirrhosis with APRI, Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4), and FibroScan compared with liver biopsy as the reference standard in people with chronic hepatitis B. We excluded studies in which the maximum interval between liver biopsy and non-invasive fibrosis test was more than 6 months; that reported on fewer than ten patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis; that were done exclusively in children; and did not report diagnostic accuracy across our prespecified ranges of test cutoffs. The results of this updated search were collated with the meta-analysis that informed the 2015 guidelines. Outcomes of interest were the sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive tests using defined index test cutoffs for detecting significant fibrosis (≥F2), advanced fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) based on the METAVIR staging system. We performed meta-analyses using a bivariate random-effects model.

FINDINGS

Of 19 933 records identified by our search strategy, 195 were eligible for our systematic review and combined with the 69 studies from the previous meta-analysis to total 264. Two studies were at low risk of bias, 31 studies had unclear risk of bias, and 231 studies had a high risk of bias. Of these 264, 211 studies with 61 665 patients were used in the meta-analysis. For the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥F2), sensitivity and specificity were 72·9% (95% CI 70·2-75·5) and 64·7% (95% CI 61·0-68·2) for the APRI low cutoff (>0·3 to 0·7), 30·5% (23·7-38·3) and 92·3% (89·3-94·6) for the APRI high cutoff (>1·3 to 1·7), and 75·1% (72·2-77·7) and 79·3% (76·2-82·2) for FibroScan (>6·0 to 8·0 kPa), respectively. For the diagnosis of cirrhosis (F4), sensitivity and specificity were 59·4% (53·2-65·2) and 73·9% (70·1-77·4) for the APRI low cutoff (>0·8 to 1·2), 30·2% (24·2-36·9) and 88·2% (85·4-90·6) for the APRI high cutoff (>1·8 to 2·2), and 82·6% (77·8-86·5) and 89·0% (86·3-91·2) for FibroScan (>11·0 to 14·0 kPa), respectively. Using a hypothetical population of 1000 unselected patients with chronic hepatitis B with a 25% prevalence of significant fibrosis (≥F2), the APRI low cutoff for significant fibrosis (≥F2) would result in 262 (26·2%) false positives but only 68 (6·8%) false negatives. The FibroScan cutoff would result in 158 (15·8%) false positives and 63 (6·3%) false negatives. In a population with a 5% prevalence of cirrhosis (F4), the APRI low cutoff for cirrhosis (F4) would result in 247 (24·7%) false positives and 21 (2·1%) false negatives and the FibroScan cutoff would result in 105 (10·5%) false positives and nine (0·9%) false negatives.

INTERPRETATION

These findings have informed new thresholds of APRI and FibroScan for diagnosis of significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in the 2024 WHO guidelines on chronic hepatitis B, with an APRI score greater than 0·5 or a FibroScan value greater than 7·0 kPa considered to identify most adults with significant fibrosis (≥F2) and an APRI score greater than 1·0 or a FibroScan value greater than 12·5 kPa to identify most adults with cirrhosis (F4). These patients are a priority for antiviral treatment.

FUNDING

WHO.

Assessing the consistency of FIB-4, APRI, and GPR in evaluating significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in COVID-19 patients with concurrent liver diseases

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the consistency of the FIB-4, APRI, and GPR indices in assessing significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019(COVID-19) who also suffer from various liver diseases, providing references for the clinical selection and application for non-invasive assessment methods.

METHODS

The study evaluated 744 COVID-19 patients with coexisting liver diseases: 508 cases with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), 158 cases with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), and 78 cases with a combination of both ailments. FIB-4, APRI, and GPR were employed to assess significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Concordance among the methods was determined using Kappa analysis, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves helped identify the optimal cutoff values for each index.

RESULTS

For COVID-19 patients with NAFLD, Kappa values for significant liver fibrosis were 0.81, 0.90, 0.80, and 0.79, and for cirrhosis, they were 0.88, 0.97,0.88, and 0.88, respectively (all p < 0.05). Among those with CHB, Kappa values were 0.81, 0.81, 0.83, and 0.75 for fibrosis, and0.87, 0.91, 0.88, and 0.92 for cirrhosis (all p < 0.05). In patients with coexisting liver diseases, the values were 0.87, 0.86, 0.86, and 0.78 for fibrosis, and 0.67, 0.69, 0.54, and 0.81for cirrhosis (all p < 0.05). Linear trend analysis revealed significant relationships between FIB-4 values, APRI values, GPR values, and the severity of COVID-19 (χ2 trend: 15.205,35.114, and 13.973, respectively, all p < 0.001), between FIB-4 values and APRI values and the coronavirus negative conversion time (all p < 0.05) in COVID-19 with NAFLD, and between FIB-4 values and GPR values and the coronavirus negative conversion time in patients with COVID-19 with CHB(all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Using the current cutoff values, the non-invasive assessments demonstrated almost perfect consistency in evaluating significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in COVID-19 patients with liver diseases, though FIB-4 and GPR showed moderate consistency in cirrhosis evaluation in patients with coexisting liver conditions. Moreover, it also indicated that increased liver fibrosis correlates with more severe COVID-19 and prolonged coronavirus negative conversion time.

Accuracy of blood-based biomarkers for staging liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: A systematic review supporting the AASLD Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Blood-based biomarkers have been proposed as an alternative to liver biopsy for noninvasive liver disease assessment in chronic liver disease. Our aims for this systematic review were to evaluate the diagnostic utility of selected blood-based tests either alone, or in combination, for identifying significant fibrosis (F2-4), advanced fibrosis (F3-4), and cirrhosis (F4), as compared to biopsy in chronic liver disease.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We included a comprehensive search of databases including Ovid MEDLINE(R), EMBASE, Cochrane Database, and Scopus through to April 2022. Two independent reviewers selected 286 studies with 103,162 patients. The most frequently identified studies included the simple aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index and fibrosis (FIB)-4 markers (with low-to-moderate risk of bias) in HBV and HCV, HIV-HCV/HBV coinfection, and NAFLD. Positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) likelihood ratios across direct and indirect biomarker tests for HCV and HBV for F2-4, F3-4, or F4 were 1.66-6.25 and 0.23-0.80, 1.89-5.24 and 0.12-0.64, and 1.32-7.15 and 0.15-0.86, respectively; LR+ and LR- for NAFLD F2-4, F3-4, and F4 were 2.65-3.37 and 0.37-0.39, 2.25-6.76 and 0.07-0.87, and 3.90 and 0.15, respectively. Overall, the proportional odds ratio indicated FIB-4 <1.45 was better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index <0.5 for F2-4. FIB-4 >3.25 was also better than aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index >1.5 for F3-4 and F4. There was limited data for combined tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood-based biomarkers are associated with small-to-moderate change in pretest probability for diagnosing F2-4, F3-4, and F4 in viral hepatitis, HIV-HCV coinfection, and NAFLD, with limited comparative or combination studies for other chronic liver diseases.

Non-Invasive Monitoring of the Impact of Low-Level Viremia on Liver Fibrosis in Treated Chronic Hepatitis B Patients

Background

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) presents a global health challenge due to its potential to cause severe liver conditions such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cirrhosis. Prior research has established a correlation between CHB infection with low-level viremia (LLV) and liver disease progression, such as increased HCC incidence. This study aims to investigate whether LLV during treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) contributes to the accelerated progression of liver fibrosis (LF).

Methods

This retrospective cohort study at Jinhua Central Hospital focused on CHB patients undergone NA monotherapy for over 96 weeks. Patients were categorized into maintained virological response (MVR) and LLV groups based on hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels. The study assessed LF using various markers and methods, including chitinase 3-like 1 protein (CHI3L1), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score, and transient elastography.

Results

Analysis was conducted on 92 CHB patients, categorized into LLV (n=42) and MVR (n=50) groups, following the exclusion of 101 patients for various reasons. Significant findings included lower baseline HBV DNA in MVR (<20 IU/mL) compared to LLV (67.8 IU/mL, P<0.001) and different AST/ALT ratios (LLV: 1.1, MVR: 1.36, P=0.011). LF was assessed using CHI3L1, FIB-4, and APRI, with LLV showing a higher baseline CHI3L1 (LLV:83.3 ng/mL vs MVR: 54.5 ng/mL, P=0.016) and scores compared to MVR, indicative of fibrosis. CHI3L1 levels in LLV were higher at baseline and weeks 48, 72, and 96 than MVR, with significance at baseline (P=0.038) and week 48 (P=0.034). Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) showed a time-dependent decline in both groups but no significant intergroup differences.

Conclusion

Non-invasive monitoring of CHB patients who have received treatment indicates that LLV contributes to the progression of LF, necessitating proactive adjustment of antiviral treatment strategies.

The non-invasive serum biomarkers contributes to indicate liver fibrosis staging and evaluate the progress of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic abilities of the non-invasive serum biomarkers to predict liver fibrosis staging and evaluate the progress of hepatitis B.

METHODS

We enrolled 433 patients with chronic HBV infection had complete medical data available for the study, who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy. The extent of fibrosis was assessed using the modified METAVIR score. The predictive values of the non-invasive serum biomarkers were evaluated by the areas under the receiving operator characteristics curves (AUROCs) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

The proportion of males with progressive stages of liver fibrosis was relatively larger, and the average age of patients with cirrhosis stages is older than the non-cirrhotic stages. We found PLT, GGT, ALP, TB, FIB4 and GPR to be significantly associated with liver fibrosis in our cohort. GGT showed a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 76.7% in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), with an AUROC of 0.775 (95%CI 0.711-0.840).The AUROCs of the GPR in distinguishing cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3) was 0.794 (95%CI 0.734-0.853), but it had a lower sensitivity of 59.2%. Additionally, GGT, FIB4, and GPR could differentiate advanced fibrosis (F3-4) from non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) among individuals with chronic hepatitis B, with AUROCs of 0.723 (95%CI 0.668-0.777), 0.729 (95%CI 0.675-0.782), and 0.760 (95%CI: 0.709-0.811) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GGT was a better biomarker to distinguish cirrhosis (F4) from non-cirrhotic stages (F1-3), while GPR was a better biomarker to identify advanced fibrosis (F3-4) and non-advanced fibrosis (F1-2) in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Can quantitative surface antigen levels and systemic immune-inflammation index be predictive as a new indicator for the initiation of treatment in chronic hepatitis b?

OBJECTIVES

The natural history of chronic HBV infection (CHB) is generally divided into four phases: HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection (EPCI) and -hepatitis (EPCH), HBeAg-negative chronic HBV infection (ENCI) and -hepatitis (ENCH). This study aimed to investigate changes in serum quantitative surface antigen (qHBsAg), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammatory response index (SIRI) in a large number of CHB patients.

METHOD

Three hundred seventy-two CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy between January 2015 and February 2020 were evaluated.

RESULTS

The SII-values were strongly significant between EPCI-EPCH ( P = 0.002), however, there was significant difference between ENCI-ENCH ( P = 0.025). Considering the SIRI results, there was a significant difference between both EPCI-EPCH ( P = 0.009) and ENCI-ENCH ( P = 0.118). In HBeAg-positive patients HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, and SII were found to be predictive ( P = 0.029, P = 0.039, P = 0.027, respectively) while in HBeAg-negative patients, age, AST, HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, SII, and SIRI were found to be predictive ( P = 0.047, P = 0.084, P = <0.001, P = 0.001, P = 0.012, P = 0.002, respectively). In EPCH phase, whereby accuracy rate results of HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, and SII were 75.3%, 73.4%, and 60.4%, respectively, while in the ENCH phase the accuracy rates of age, AST, HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, SII, and SIRI values were 57.8%, 65.6%, 68.3%, 63.8%, 57.3% and 53.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, and SII are predictive in EPCH patients. Age, AST, HBV-DNA, qHBsAg, SII and SIRI are all predictive in ENCH patients. In patients with CHB, we recommend using SII to distinguish between EPCI-EPCH and ENCI-ENCH. Based on its sensitivity and features, we believe that qHBsAg and SII are suitable measuring instruments in discrimination both of EPCI-EPCH and ENCI-ENCH.

How to suspect the presence of high-risk esophageal varices and when to start endoscopic surveillance in children with biliary atresia?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Portal hypertension determines the outcome of children with biliary atresia (BA) and is common even after a successful Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE). However, there are no clear-cut guidelines on the age of starting surveillance and the modality (endoscopy vs non-invasive tests [NITs]). In this cohort study, we analyzed our database to find out the utility of NITs in detecting high-risk esophageal varices in BA.

METHODS

From June 2010 to May 2022, consecutive children of BA who underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy were included. Esophageal varices were classified as high-risk (grade II with red-color signs or grade III or IV irrespective of red-color signs. NITs such as splenomegaly (clinical and USG), platelet count, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), and platelet-to-spleen diameter ratio were compared between cases with high-risk and low-risk varices.

RESULTS

A total of 110 children, 75 boys (66 successful KPE and 44 failed/KPE not performed) were enrolled. The median age at KPE was 85 days (IQR 63-98). Thirteen (11.8%) children presented with UGI bleeding. The first endoscopy revealed gastroesophageal varices in 75.4% of cases, and 32% of them had high-risk varices. Multivariate analysis revealed failed KPE, history of UGI bleeding, bigger spleen size (> 3.5 cm), lower platelet count (< 150 000), and higher APRI (> 2) are independent predictors of the presence of high-risk esophageal varices.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopy is the best in predicting the presence of high-risk varices that might bleed; hence, early surveillance endoscopy should be started in children with splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, and high APRI score to prevent variceal bleeding.

Risk factors for more rapid progression of severe liver fibrosis in children with cystic fibrosis-related liver disease: A multi-center study validated by liver biopsy

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Early identification of risk factors for the development of severe fibrosis in children with cystic fibrosis-related liver disease (CFLD) is crucial as promising therapies emerge.

METHODS

This multi-center cohort study of children with a priori defined CFLD from 1999 to 2016, was designed to evaluate the clinical utility of CF-specific characteristics and liver biomarkers assessed years prior to liver biopsy-proven CFLD to predict risk of developing severe fibrosis (F3-4) over time. Fibrosis was staged by Metavir classification.

RESULTS

The overall study cohort of 42 patients (F0-2 (n = 22) and F3-4 (n = 20)) was 57% male (n = 24) with median age of 7.6 years at baseline visit versus 10.3 years at biopsy. Median FEV₁ % predicted was lower in F3-4 participants at baseline versus F0-2 (59% vs. 85%; p = .002), while baseline FIB-4, APRI and GGT were higher in F3-4. Median splits for FIB-4 (≥.13), APRI (≥.36), GPR (≥.09), GGT (≥25.5), and FEV₁ % (<64%) were associated with more rapid progression to F3-4 (p < .01 for all). Using a combination of change/year in FIB-4, APRI, and GPR to predict F3-4, the AUROC was .81 (95% CI, .66, .96; p < .0001). For up to 5.8 years prior, thresholds for GPR were met 6.5-fold more rapidly, and those for APRI and FIB-4 were met 2.5-fold more rapidly, in those who progressed to F3-4 than those that did not.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests mild-moderate pulmonary dysfunction and higher liver biomarker indices at baseline may be associated with faster progression of CFLD.

Serum Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase-to-Platelet Ratio as a Noninvasive Marker of Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B

Background The gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)-to-platelet ratio (GPR) is identified as a new model for the assessment of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of GPR for the prediction of liver fibrosis in patients with CHB. Methods In an observational cohort study, patients with CHB were enrolled. The diagnostic performance of GPR was compared with transient elastography (TE), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) scores for the prediction of liver fibrosis using liver histology as a gold standard. Results Forty-eight patients with CHB with a mean age of 33.42 ± 15.72 years were enrolled. Liver histology showed meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) stage F0, F1, F2, F3, and F4 fibrosis in 11, 12, 11, seven, and seven patients, respectively. The Spearman correlation of METAVIR fibrosis stage with APRI, FIB-4, GPR, and TE were 0.354, 0.402, 0.551, and 0.726, respectively (P value < 0.05). TE had the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) (80%, 83%, 83%, and 79%, respectively), followed by GPR (76%, 65%, 70%, and 71%, respectively) for predicting significant fibrosis (≥F2). However, TE had comparable sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV with GPR (86%, 82%, 42%, and 93%, and 86%, 71%, 42%, and 92%, respectively) for predicting extensive fibrosis (≥F3). Conclusion The performance of GPR is comparable to TE in predicting significant and extensive liver fibrosis. GPR may be an acceptable, low-cost alternative for predicting compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (F3-F4) in CHB patients.

Clinical usefulness of Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer for diagnosing liver cirrhosis and significant fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease: A retrospective single-center study

Accurate diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (LC) and significant fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) is important. The Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) has emerged as a novel serum biomarker for liver fibrosis; however, insufficient clinical data of M2BPGi are available in patients with CLD. Therefore, we performed a retrospective cohort study to investigate the clinical usefulness of serum M2BPGi for assessing LC and significant fibrosis in CLD patients. We retrospectively reviewed the CLD patients with measured serum M2BPGi at Kosin University Gospel Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the independent factors associated with LC. The diagnostic power of serum M2BPGi for LC and significant fibrosis (≥F2) was evaluated and compared to that of other serum biomarkers using receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve (AUC). A total of 454 patients enrolled in this study. M2BPGi (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52-2.07) and fibrosis index based on four factors (aOR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11-1.37) were identified as significant independent factors for LC. The AUC of M2BPGi for LC (0.866) and significant fibrosis (0.816) were comparable to those of fibrosis index based on four factors (0.860, 0.773), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (0.806, 0.752), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (0.759, 0.710). The optimal cut-off values for M2BPGi for LC and significant fibrosis were 1.37 and 0.89, respectively. Serum M2BPGi levels were significantly correlated with liver stiffness measurements (ρ = 0.778). Serum M2BPGi is a reliable noninvasive method for the assessment of LC and significant fibrosis in patients with CLD.

Diagnostic accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient values combined with γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio parameters for predicting hepatitis B-related fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

The accuracy of non-invasive liver fibrosis diagnosis based on the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value combined with the γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) model to predict the stage of hepatitis B-related fibrosis has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of ADC value combined with GPR for liver fibrosis grading.

METHODS

The data of 180 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) diagnosed by liver biopsy were analyzed. The ADC value, GPR, and their combination were assessed in different cirrhosis stages using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate their value in diagnosing liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

We observed that liver fibrosis stages were inversely associated with ADC values (r=-0.691, P<0.001), and positively associated with GPR (r=0.502, P<0.001). The area under the curve for diagnostic efficacy of ADC values, GPR, and their combination for F≥2 liver fibrosis was 0.831, 0.749, and 0.858, respectively, and for F≥3 was 0.872, 0.771, and 0.903, respectively. The diagnostic cutoffs of the combination for each stage were -7.07, -12.21 and -37.75, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined diagnostic tool of ADC and GPR may improve the accuracy of hepatitis B-related liver fibrosis diagnosis, especially for F≥3.

Optimized cutoffs of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, and fibrosis-4 scoring systems for exclusion of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Accurate prediction of the extent of fibrosis is of great clinical importance in patients infected with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). This study aimed to compare the performance of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) in evaluating liver fibrosis stages and to identify optimized cutoffs to exclude cirrhosis. Consecutive patients with CHB with liver biopsies were enrolled and randomly divided into derivation and validation cohorts. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of APRI, FIB-4, and GPR to distinguish fibrosis stages. New cutoffs with a sensitivity of at least 90% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of more than 95% were identified. A total of 880 individuals were enrolled in this study. The derivation data set consisted of 617 patients, with 82 patients with cirrhosis. In the validation cohort (n = 263), 29 patients had cirrhosis. APRI, FIB-4, and GPR had comparable diagnostic performance for diagnosing significant fibrosis. GPR outperformed APRI (p < 0.05) in the prediction of cirrhosis. A newly identified GPR score of 0.35 had a sensitivity and NPV of 93.9% and 98.0%, respectively, and misclassified 5 of 82 (6.1%) patients with cirrhosis in the derivation group. All new cutoffs identified in this study also reached our goal in the validation cohort. The new GPR score could rule out a larger proportion of individuals without cirrhosis, and the subgroup analysis showed more stable performance. However, the lower cutoff dose increases the need for further testing compared to the conventional cutoff. Conclusion: A newly identified cutoff for GPR (<0.35) could rule out more patients without cirrhosis compared to APRI and FIB-4 and have low misclassification rates.

GPR, King's Score and S-Index are superior to other non-invasive fibrosis markers in predicting the liver fibrosis in chronic Hepatitis B patients

Background and study aims

In this study, we investigated the efficacy of nine non-invasive fibrosis markers in the assessment of the degree of fibrosis in patients with chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) in comparison with liver biopsy.

Patients and methods

A total of 1454 untreated CHB patients from two different centers who underwent liver biopsy were included in the study. Laboratory results of patients were reviewed retrospectively and the pathology slides were re-evaluated in accordance with the Ishak score. Degree of fibrosis ≥ 3 was accepted as "significant fibrosis", ≥ 4 as "advanced fibrosis", and ≥ 5 as cirrhosis. The diagnostic performance of the markers Aspartate aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), Aspartate aminotransferase to Alanine aminotransferase Ratio (AAR), AAR to Platelet Ratio Index (AAPRI), Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to Platelet Ratio (GPR), King's Score, Fibro quotient (Fibro-Q), S Index and Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) were evaluated with ROC analysis.

Results

In detecting significant fibrosis, APRI, GPR, King's Score and S Index had AUROC values over 0.70. For advanced fibrosis, all of the models except AAPRI; and for cirrhosis, all of the models had AUROC values over 0.70. In accordance with the chosen staging system, GPR, King's Score and S Index had high diagnostic efficacy whereas APRI, FIB-4, FibroQ and PLR had moderate diagnostic efficacy, AAR and AAPRI had low diagnostic efficacy.

Conclusions

GPR, King's Score and S Index had moderate diagnostic performance in detecting significant fibrosis and advanced fibrosis, and high diagnostic performance in detecting cirrhosis.

Sound touch elastography for assessing cirrhosis preoperatively in infants with biliary atresia: Comparison with serum fibrosis biomarkers

INTRODUCTION

The accurate assessment of the stages of hepatic fibrosis in children with biliary atresia (BA) before performing Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is of utmost importance. Some studies demonstrated that ultrasound elastography can be used to assess the stages of hepatic fibrosis by detecting liver stiffness. Therefore, the aim of this work was to explore the usefulness of sound touch elastography (STE) for preoperatively assessing liver cirrhosis in infants with BA.

METHODS

A total of 189 children from the Hunan Children's Hospital with highly suspected BA were selected for this study, and their preoperative liver STE values and related clinical data were collected. The pathological results of the liver stages were considered as the gold standard. Spearman correlation was used to analyze the correlation between each parameter and the stage of hepatic fibrosis, and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic performance for cirrhosis of each parameter.

RESULTS

Among the selected 189 patients with suspected BA, 159 were included in this study and were composed of 3 at hepatic fibrosis stage F1, 45 at stage F2, 41 at stage F3, and 70 at stage F4, while no patients at stage F0 were present. Spearman correlation analysis showed that the liver STE value had the highest correlation with the stage of hepatic fibrosis, with a correlation coefficient of 0.813 (P < 0.001). The liver STE value had the highest diagnostic performance for hepatic cirrhosis compared to other biomarkers of serum fibrosis; the area under the ROC curve was 0.899 when the best cut-off value was 14.57 kPa. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were 78.6, 84.3, 79.7, 83.3, and 81.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The liver STE value has a high correlation with the stage of hepatic fibrosis in children with BA. STE has a good diagnostic performance in evaluating cirrhosis before KPE in children with BA.

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio as a biomarker of liver disease and hepatic fibrosis severity in paediatric Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis (CF)-associated liver disease (CFLD) causes significant morbidity and mortality in children with CF. Diagnosis of liver disease prior to development of cirrhosis or portal hypertension (PHT) is challenging. While imaging modalities using Elastography show great promise they are still not widely available to all clinicians. This study investigated gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) as a non-invasive biomarker to detect liver disease and stage fibrosis severity in children with CF.

METHODS

237 children were enroled including 76 with CFLD and 161 with CF and no detectable liver disease (CFnoLD). CFLD was diagnosed using standard clinical, biochemical and imaging practice guidelines. Hepatic fibrosis was staged on liver biopsies available from 54 children with CFLD. Serum liver biochemistry was used to calculate GPR (median, [IQR]) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis assessed utility to detect liver disease and stage fibrosis severity.

RESULTS

GPR was significantly increased in CFLD versus CFnoLD (0.33 [0.19-0.96] vs. 0.15 [0.11-0.21], P<0.0001). GPR demonstrated good diagnostic utility for detecting CFLD with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.81 (95% confidence Interval [CI] [0.75-0.87]; P<0.0001), with sensitivity of 74% and specificity of 73%, using a cut-off of 0.20. GPR increased with increasing hepatic fibrosis stage. GPR discriminated both moderate-advanced (F2-F4) fibrosis vs. F0-F1 (AUC=0.82; 95%CI [0.71-0.94]; P<0.0001) and advanced (F3-F4) fibrosis vs. F0-F2 (AUC=0.77; 95%CI [0.64-0.90]; P = 0.004), with a cut-off 0.32 and 0.61, respectively. An elevated GPR of >0.84 was predictive of PHT at diagnosis of CFLD (AUC=0.81; 95%CI [0.67-0.95]; P = 0.0003).

CONCLUSIONS

GPR demonstrates good diagnostic utility for assessing the presence of liver disease, PHT and hepatic fibrosis severity in children with CF. These findings will aid in better identification of patients at risk for CF-related liver involvement and the potential for more targeted and timely follow-up and treatment.

A Comparative Analysis of the APRI, FIB4, and FibroScan Score in Evaluating the Severity of Chronic Liver Disease in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in India

Background and aims

Non-invasive assessment methods to assess liver fibrosis are important tools where FibroScan or liver biopsy is not accessible. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and performance of the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) to evaluate liver fibrosis against FibroScan for the stages of liver fibrosis in patients of chronic liver disease due to chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care center in Uttar Pradesh, India, and the patients were enrolled between 2017 and 2020. During the study period, 520 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection were selected. Laboratory blood testing and FibroScan were performed in all patients with CHB. APRI and FIB-4 were calculated using a standard formula involving laboratory parameters.

Result

The performance of FIB-4 scores are nearly similar to APRI, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.753, (95% CI) (0.711-0.795) (p<0.0001) for ≥F2 fibrosis (significant fibrosis) and even better 0.851 (0.815-0.887) (p<0.0001) for the F4 fibrosis (cirrhosis) group. Both the tests are proven good to diagnose fibrosis but FIB-4 has more area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) than APRI in each set, thus FIB-4 is considered better than APRI.

Conclusions

APRI and FIB-4 scores showed good performance in detecting patients without liver fibrosis as compared with FibroScan. Based on this study, FibroScan can be avoided in patients examined for the diagnosis of mild fibrosis and cirrhosis in the source constrained area.

Comparison of two-dimensional shear wave elastography, magnetic resonance elastography, and three serum markers for diagnosing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE), magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4), and King's score have been proposed for diagnosing fibrosis.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched until October 1st, 2020. The summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratios, and the summary sensitivities and specificities were used to assess the performance of these noninvasive methods for staging fibrosis.

RESULTS

Our final data contained 72 studies. The prevalence of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis was 58.3%, 36.2%, and 20.5%, respectively, in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). For 2D-SWE and MRE, the summary AUROCs were 0.89 and 0.97, 0.95 and 0.97, and 0.94 and 0.97 for significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. The summary AUROCs using APRI and FIB-4 for detecting significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.76 and 0.75, 0.74 and 0.77, and 0.77 and 0.82, respectively. The summary AUROCs of King's score for detecting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 0.77 and 0.83, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRE and 2D-SWE may show the best diagnostic accuracy for predicting fibrosis in CHB. Among the three serum markers, King's score may be more useful for diagnosing fibrosis.

Predictive Performances of Blood Parameter Ratios for Liver Inflammation and Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

OBJECTIVE

Blood parameter ratios, including neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), have been reported that they are correlated to the progression of liver disease. This study is aimed at evaluating the predictive value of PLR, NLR, and MLR for liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

We recruited 457 patients with CHB who underwent a liver biopsy and routine laboratory tests. Liver histology was assessed according to the Scheuer scoring system. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis was assessed by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

PLR and NLR presented significantly reverse correlation to liver inflammation and fibrosis. However, these correlations were not observed for MLR and liver histology. The AUROCs of PLR for assessing G2-3 and G3 were 0.676 and 0.705 with cutoffs 74.27 and 68.75, respectively. The AUROCs of NLR in predicting inflammatory scores G2-3 and G3 were 0.616 and 0.569 with cutoffs 1.36 and 1.85, respectively. The AUROCs of PLR for evaluating fibrosis stages S3-4 and S4 were 0.723 and 0.757 with cutoffs 79.67 and 74.27, respectively. The AUROCs of NLR for evaluating fibrosis stages S3-4 and S4 were 0.590 with cutoff 1.14.

CONCLUSION

Although PLR has similar predictive power of progressive liver fibrosis compared with APRI, FIB-4, and GPR in CHB patients, it has the advantage of less cost and easy application with the potential to be widely used in clinical practice.

Association of α-fetoprotein levels with liver stiffness measurement in outpatients with chronic hepatitis B

The association between α-fetoprotein (AFP) levels with the assessment of liver stiffness (LS) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients were explored. A total of 283 outpatients with CHB were enrolled. Patient age, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), AFP, platelet (PLT), total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin (ALB), globulin, and albumin/globulin (A/G) levels were associated with LS values in the univariate model (P<0.05). Significant associations between AFP and PLT levels with LS values were observed when both variables were included in the multivariate analysis models. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated that the combination of AFP and PLT levels could enhance the predictive performance of liver fibrosis (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.819, P<0.001) and that PLT levels (PLT < 100 × 10⁹/l) combined with high AFP levels (AFP > 8 ng/ml) significantly increased the prediction of liver fibrosis (OR = 11.216). More importantly, LS values associated with higher AFP levels (AFP > 8 ng/ml), independently of higher ALT or AST values, were significantly higher than those of low AFP level groups. In conclusion, in Chinese outpatients with CHB, AFP outperformed ALT and/or AST levels in terms of their association with LS. AFP and PLT levels were independently associated with LS, and their combined assessment could enhance the diagnostic and predictive performance of liver fibrosis among CHB patients.

Development and Validation of Nomograms Based on Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase to Platelet Ratio for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Reveal Novel Prognostic Value and the Ratio Is Negatively Correlated With P38MAPK Expression

Background

Early prediction of recurrence and death risks is significant to the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. We aimed to develop and validate prognosis nomogram models based on the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT)-to-platelet (PLT) ratio (GPR) for HCC and to explore the relationship between the GPR and inflammation-related signaling pathways.

Methods

All data were obtained from 2000 to 2012 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. In the training cohort, factors included in the nomograms were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. In the training and validation cohorts, the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves were used to assess predictive accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess discriminative ability. Clinical utility was evaluated using decision curve analysis. Moreover, improvement of the predictive accuracy of the nomograms was evaluated by calculating the decision curve analysis, the integrated discrimination improvement, and the net reclassification improvement. Finally, the relationship between the GPR and inflammation-related signaling pathways was evaluated using the independent-samples t-test.

Results

A larger tumor size and higher GPR were common independent risk factors for both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in HCC (P < 0.05). Good agreement between our nomogram models' predictions and actual observations was detected by the C-index and calibration curves. Our nomogram models showed significantly better performance in predicting the HCC prognosis compared to other models (P < 0.05). Online webserver and scoring system tables were built based on the proposed nomogram for convenient clinical use. Notably, including the GPR greatly improved the predictive ability of our nomogram models (P < 0.05). In the validation cohort, p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (P38MAPK) expression was significantly negatively correlated with the GPR (P < 0.01) and GGT (P = 0.039), but was not correlated with PLT levels (P = 0.063). And we found that P38MAPK can regulate the expression of GGT by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting experiments.

Conclusions

The dynamic nomogram based on the GPR provides accurate and effective prognostic predictions for HCC, and P38MAPK-GGT may be a suitable therapeutic target to improve the prognosis of HCC patients.

Evaluation of liver fibrosis by non-invasive diagnostic indexes in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for determining the degree of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, but it has certain limitations in clinical application because of its invasive nature. Hence, non-invasive assessment is essential.

AIM

To compare the diagnostic value of ten noninvasive models indexes for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 1030 patients with chronic hepatitis B admitted during June 2003 and August 2019 were enrolled in the study. All the patients received liver biopsy and blood and ultrasound examinations. The AST-to-ALT ratio, AST-to-platelet ratio index, age platelet index, cirrhosis discriminant score, fibrosis index based on four factors, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase-to-platelet ratio, S-index, spleen-to-platelet ratio index, age-spleen-to-platelet ratio index (ASPRI), and FV (our model) were calculated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the clinical value of noninvasive models in diagnosis of liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

All the models were correlated with the stage of liver fibrosis (r = 0.215, 0.382, 0.629, 0.449, 0.612, 0.618, 0.654, 0.658, 0.707, and 0.775, respectively; P < 0.05). The best AUROCs of FV and ASPRI for diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis (F2-3) were 0.834 and 0.796, with sensitivities of 78.8% and 70.2%, specificities of 74.0% and 76.1%, and accuracies of 76.3% and 73.3%, respectively. The best AUROCs for diagnosis of early liver cirrhosis (F4) were 0.928 and 0.912, with sensitivities of 85.4% and 89.4%, specificities of 85.0% and 77.3%, accuracies of 85.1% and 79.7%, negative predictive values of 96.2% and 96.5%, and negative likelihood ratios of 0.172 and 0.137, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FV and ASPRI have better accuracies than other noninvasive diagnostic indexes in diagnosing significant liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, especially in the diagnosis of early liver cirrhosis.

Nonfasted Liver Stiffness Correlates with Liver Disease Parameters and Portal Hypertension in Pediatric Cholestatic Liver Disease

Elastographic measurement of liver stiffness is of growing importance in the assessment of liver disease. Pediatric experiences with this technique are primarily single center and limited in scope. The Childhood Liver Disease Research Network provided a unique opportunity to assess elastography in a well-characterized multi-institutional cohort. Children with biliary atresia (BA), alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (A1ATD), or Alagille syndrome (ALGS) followed in a prospective longitudinal network study were eligible for enrollment in a prospective investigation of transient elastography (FibroScan). Studies were performed in participants who were nonfasted and nonsedated. Liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) were correlated with standard clinical and biochemical parameters of liver disease along with a research definition of clinically evident portal hypertension (CEPH) graded as absent, possible, or definite. Between November 2016 and August 2019, 550 participants with a mean age of 8.8 years were enrolled, 458 of whom had valid LSMs (BA, n = 254; A1ATD, n = 104; ALGS, n = 100). Invalid scans were more common in participants <2 years old. There was a positive correlation between LSM and total bilirubin, international normalized ratio (INR), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), GGT to platelet ratio (GPR), pediatric end-stage liver disease score, AST to platelet ratio index, and spleen size, and a negative correlation with albumin and platelet count in BA, with similar correlations for A1ATD (except AST, ALT, and albumin) and ALGS (except for INR, GGT, GPR, and ALT). Possible or definite CEPH was more common in BA compared to ALGS and A1ATD. LSM was greater in definite versus absent CEPH in all three diseases. Disease-specific clinical and biochemical characteristics of the different CEPH grades were observed. Conclusion: It is feasible to obtain LSMs in children, especially over the age of 2 years. LSM correlates with liver parameters and portal hypertension, although disease-specific patterns exist.

Multicenter prospective study to validate a new transient elastography device for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

To validate the operational and diagnostic performances of a new device for transient elastography (TE), FibroTouch, for liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

In this prospective multicenter study, adult patients with CHB and valid liver pathological results were recruited to validate the operational and diagnostic performance of a TE device by FibroTouch for staging liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

In total, 517 patients with histologically proven CHB were enrolled. All had achieved at least 10 successful liver stiffness measurements (LSM), resulting in a success rate of 99.1% and reliable evaluations of 95.2%. Altogether 412 patients were included to analyze the diagnostic performance of FibroTouch. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the LSM was 0.846 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.808-0.880) for fibrosis stage ≥ F1, 0.850 (95% CI 0.811-0.883) for ≥ F2, 0.908 (95% CI 0.876-0.934) for ≥ F3 and 0.874 (95% CI 0.836-0.903) for F4. The diagnostic accuracy of LSM was superior to that of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR), aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), or fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) index in staging fibrosis F2-F4 (P = 0.007 to < 0.0001). Optimal LSM cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis stage ≥ F1, ≥ F2, ≥ F3, and F4 were 5.5 kPa, 7.85 kPa, 10.0 kPa, and 12.7 kPa, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FibroTouch has a high success rate and good reliability in staging liver fibrosis in patients with CHB.

A Liver Biopsy Validation Pilot Study of Shear Wave Elastography, APRI, FIB-4, and Novel Serum Biomarkers for Liver Fibrosis Staging in Children With Chronic Viral Hepatitis

As liver biopsy in children poses inherent risks, noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis are needed. This was a cross-sectional, liver biopsy validation pilot study of 16 participants evaluating the ability of shear wave elastography, aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factors, and novel serum biomarkers to stage liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis B or C. There was very high intrasegmental shear wave speed variation in our participants and little correlation with fibrosis. APRI and monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1) were higher in fibrosis stage F2-3 versus F0-1 (P = .02, P = .06, respectively). Soluble Fas (sFas) was lower in F2-3 versus F0-1 (P = .046). A logistic regression analysis calculated by (APRI × MCP-1)/sFas demonstrated an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (P < .001), suggesting that this combination can differentiate fibrosis stage F0-1 from F2-3 in children with chronic viral hepatitis.

Review of Serum Biomarkers and Models Derived from Them in HBV-Related Liver Diseases

A series of predictive scoring systems is available for stratifying the severity of conditions and assessing the prognosis in patients with HBV-related liver diseases. We show nine of the most popular serum biomarkers and their models (i.e., serum cystatin C, homocysteine, C-reactive protein, C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index, fibrosis index based on four factors, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio, albumin-bilirubin score, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to albumin ratio) that have gained great interest from clinicians. Compared with traditional scoring systems, these serum biomarkers and their models are easily acquired, simple, and relatively inexpensive. In the present review, we summarize the latest studies focused on these serum biomarkers and their models as diagnostic and prognostic indexes in HBV-related liver diseases.

Performance of Non-invasive Blood Parameters for Ruling Out Significant Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B

Background and Aims: Evaluation of significant liver fibrosis is important for treatment decision and treatment response evaluation in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Since liver biopsy is invasive and transient elastography (TE) has limited availability, various non-invasive blood parameters need evaluation for their capabilities for detection of significant fibrosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, records of patients who had undergone liver biopsy for treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B were evaluated to obtain various non-invasive blood parameters (aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index [referred to as APRI], Fibrosis-4 score [referred to as FIB-4], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio [referred to as GPR], and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-albumin ratio [referred to as GAR]), in addition to TE, to assess significant liver fibrosis and compare these to fibrosis stage in liver biopsy. Results: A total of 113 patients were included in the study (median age 33 [interquartile range: 11-82 years], 74% males). Most (75%) patients were HBeAg-negative. The liver biopsy revealed significant fibrosis (Ishak ≥3) in 13% of the patients and nil or mild fibrosis (Ishak <3) in 87% of the patients. TE findings were available for 85 patients, APRI and FIB-4 for 95 patients, GPR for 79 patients, and GAR for 78 patients. The median values of all the parameters were significantly higher in patients with significant fibrosis, as compared to patients with non-significant fibrosis, and all the blood parameters as well as TE were able to identify patients with significant fibrosis significantly well (p<0.05). All non-invasive parameters had low positive predictive value but negative predictive value above 92%. Compared to TE, all the non-invasive blood parameters had similar area under the curve for detecting significant fibrosis, with excellent negative predictive value (≥93%). Conclusions: Non-invasive blood parameters (APRI, FIB-4, GPR, and GAR) with negative predictive values above 93% are excellent parameters for ruling-out significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. These can be used at bedside in place of TE.

Comparison and evaluation of non-invasive models in predicting liver inflammation and fibrosis of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels

Few studies have paid attention to the performances of non-invasive models in diagnosing stages of liver fibrosis and inflammation, which are critical for early and accurate assessment of prognostication and decisions on antiviral treatment in chronic hepatitis B infection patients with high hepatitis B virus DNA and normal or mildly elevated alanine transaminase levels (≤2 times upper limit of normal (ULN)). This study aimed to investigate the value of routine serum markers in evaluation of liver inflammation and fibrosis in these patients.A total of 370 consecutive chronic hepatitis B virus-infected patients who underwent liver biopsy were retrospectively analyzed. The Scheuer scoring system was adopted as the pathological standard for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis. The receiver-operating characteristic curves (ROC) and the area under the ROC curves (AUROCs) were used to analyze the performances of the models, including aspartate transaminase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4), red cell volume distribution width-to-platelet ratio (RPR), globulin-platelet model (GP), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio index (GPR).To predict significant inflammation (G ≥2), the AUROC of APRI was higher than that of FIB-4 (0.705 vs 0.629, P = .001), RPR (0.705 vs 0.593, P < .001) and GP (0.705 vs 0.620, P = .002), equivalent to that of GPR (0.705 vs 0.690, P = .606). As for severe inflammation (≥G3) and significant fibrosis (≥S2), there was no statistic difference among them. To predict severe fibrosis (≥ S3), the AUROC of FIB-4 was higher than that of RPR (0.805 vs 0.750, P = .006) and GP (0.805 vs 0.755, P = .046), comparable to that of APRI (0.805 vs 0.785, P = .550) and GPR (0.805 vs 0.818, P = .694). As for significant liver histological changes (G ≥ 2 or/and S ≥ 2), the performance of APRI was higher than that of RPR (0.717 vs 0.652, P = .006), GP (0.717 vs 0.659, p = .011), equivalent to that of FIB-4 (0.717 vs 0.692, P = .254) and GPR (0.717 vs 0.680, P = .166).We found that APRI, GPR, and FIB-4 were more effective than RPR and GP for diagnosing liver inflammation and fibrosis.

Platelet count is closely associated with the severity of liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A cross-sectional study

Although the platelet count may provide clues regarding the severity of liver disease, there are currently no available data supporting the utility of the platelet count to evaluate the degree of liver injury in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. The present study aimed to determine the association between the platelet count and the severity of liver injury in patients with chronic HBV infection. A total of 941 patients were included and were stratified into a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A group and a CTP class B/C group using the CTP scoring system. A total of 53 patients underwent liver biopsy. The pathological stage F4 was defined as cirrhosis based on the METAVIR scoring system. Compared with that in patients with CTP class A, the platelet count in patients with CTP class B/C was lower (P<0.001). Similarly, for patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, the platelet count was significantly different between the CTP class B/C and A groups (P<0.001). The platelet count was inversely correlated with the CTP score (r=-0.420, P<0.001) and independently associated with CTP grade B/C [odds ratio (OR), 0.994; 95% CI, 0.990-0.999; P=0.009]. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the platelet count to distinguish CTP grade B/C from A was 0.712 and 0.791, respectively, in all patients with HBV infection and the subset with normal ALT levels. In addition, compared to patients with chronic hepatitis B, patients with cirrhosis had a lower platelet count and higher aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4) (P<0.001). The platelet count was inversely correlated with FIB-4 (r=-0.855, P<0.001) and APRI (r=-0.741, P<0.001). The AUC for the platelet count to distinguish cirrhosis from chronic hepatitis B was 0.927 (sensitivity, 78.76%; specificity, 92.22%). Among patients who underwent liver biopsy, the platelet count in those with F4 was lower compared with that in patients with ≤F3 (P=0.013). The platelet count was inversely correlated with the pathological stage (r=-0.295, P=0.032) and was independently associated with F4 (OR, 0.978; 95% CI, 0.960-0.997; P=0.026). The AUC of the platelet count to distinguish F4 from patients with ≤F3 was 0.761. In conclusion, the platelet count may be used as a non-invasive marker to assess the severity of liver injury and of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic HBV infection.

Diagnostic value of fibrinogen to prealbumin ratio and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio in the progression of AFP-negative hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

This study aimed to comprehensively assess the diagnostic value of fibrinogen to prealbumin ratio (FPR) and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) as single markers or in combination in patients with alpha-fetoprotein-negative (AFP-negative) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 199 healthy controls and 515 AFP-negative patients were enrolled in this study, including 180 HCC inpatients, 151 liver cirrhosis (LC) patients, and 184 chronic hepatitis (CH) cases. Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis H test were used to analyze differences between groups in laboratory parameters and clinicopathological features. The diagnostic value of FPR and GPR, alone or in combination, in AFP-negative HCC (AFP-NHCC) patients was determined via a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Results

The levels of FPR and GPR were gradually increased in the development of AFP-NHCC and positively correlated with the tumor size and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. Moreover, GPR was associated with Edmondson-Steiner grades. After univariate logistic regression analysis, FPR and GPR remained independent predictors of adverse outcomes. The combination of FPR and GPR had a good ability to detect AFP-NHCC from the control group (area under curve [AUC] = 0.977), AFP-negative CH (AUC = 0.745), and AFP-negative LC (AUC = 0.666). FPR combined with GPR possessed a larger area (0.943, 0.971) and sensitivity (87.50%, 89.81%) than FPR or GPR alone for differentiating AFP-NHCC with tumor size < 3 cm or at the BCLC-A stage.

Conclusions

The pretreatment levels of FPR and GPR played vital roles in the development of AFP-NHCC, especially in patients with early or small AFP-NHCC.

Quantitative Anti-HBc in Liver Pathological States in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Changes of hepatitis B core antigen antibody (anti-HBc) in liver pathological involvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have not been investigated in detail. This study aimed to explore evolving patterns of anti-HBc following liver pathological states and to investigate validities of anti-HBc for predicting liver pathological states.

Methods

254 HBeAg-positive and 237 HBeAg-negative patients with chronic HBV infection were enrolled. Liver pathological diagnoses referred to Scheuer standard, and anti-HBc was measured using chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay.

Results

Anti-HBc was significantly positively correlated with pathological grades and stages in both HBeAg-positive (r_s = 0.312, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.268, P < 0.0001) and HBeAg-negative (r_s = 0.270, P < 0.0001, and r_s = 0.147, P=0.0237) patients. The medians of anti-HBc in pathological grades of G1, G2, and G3 and stages of S1, S2, S3, and S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were all significantly lower than those in HBeAg-negative patients (all P < 0.005). The areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves (95% confidence interval) of anti-HBc for predicting pathological grades ≥G2 and ≥G3, and stages ≥S2 and =S4 in HBeAg-positive patients were 0.683 (0.622–0.740) and 0.662 (0.601–0.720), and 0.627 (0.564–0.687) and 0.683 (0.622–0.740), respectively, and in HBeAg-negative patients were 0.681 (0.618–0.740) and 0.702 (0.639–0.760), and 0.569 (0.503–0.633) and 0.630 (0.565–0.691), respectively.

Conclusion

Following hepatic aggravation of necroinflammation and progression of fibrosis, anti-HBc increases gradually in HBeAg-positive patients and continues to increase gradually in HBeAg-negative patients, which is a useful but unsatisfactory marker for monitoring pathological states.

Performance of common imaging techniques vs serum biomarkers in assessing fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive biomarkers have been developed to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) related fibrosis owing to the significant limitations of liver biopsy. Both serum biomarkers and imaging techniques have shown promising results and may improve the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, most of the previous studies focused on the diagnostic effects of various imaging techniques on fibrosis in all chronic liver diseases.

AIM

To compare the performance of common imaging methods and serum biomarkers for prediction of significant fibrosis caused only by HBV infection.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on the records available in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases until December 2018. We systematically assessed the effectiveness of two serum biomarkers and three imagine techniques in predicting significant fibrosis solely caused by HBV infection. The serum biomarkers included aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis index based on the 4 factors (FIB-4). The three imaging techniques included acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI), FibroScan, and magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Three parameters, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC), the summary diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary sensitivity and specificity, were used to examine the accuracy of all tests for liver fibrosis.

RESULTS

Out of 2831 articles evaluated for eligibility, 204 satisfied the predetermined inclusion criteria for this current meta-analysis. Eventually, our final data contained 81 studies. The AUSROCs of serum biomarkers of APRI and FIB-4 were both 0.75. For imaging techniques (ARFI, FibroScan, and MRE), the areas were 0.89, 0.83, and 0.97, respectively. The heterogeneities of ARFI and FibroScan were statistically significant (I² > 50%). The publication bias was not observed in any of the serum biomarkers or imaging methods.

CONCLUSION

These five methods have attained an acceptable level of diagnostic accuracy. Imaging techniques, MRE in particular, demonstrate significant advantages in accurately predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, while serum biomarkers are admissible methods.

Dynamic Changes of the Aspartate Aminotransferase-to-Platelet Ratio and Transient Elastography in Predicting a Histologic Response in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B After Entecavir Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the dynamic changes of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio and transient elastography (FibroScan; Echosens, Paris, France) in predicting a histologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after entecavir treatment.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients with CHB were enrolled. Patient information was collected. All patients received liver biopsy and FibroScan before and after 96 weeks of entecavir treatment.

RESULTS

Baseline liver biopsy results showed that there were 7 patients without liver fibrosis (fibrosis stage F0; 4.7%), 51 patients with mild liver fibrosis (F1; 34.5%), and 90 patients with advanced liver fibrosis (>F1; 60.9%). The liver stiffness value and AST-to-platelet ratio increased significantly as the METAVIR score of the patients increased from F0 to F4 (P < .001). After antiviral therapy for 96 weeks, the average liver stiffness value measured by FibroScan and the AST-to-platelet ratio showed a significant decrease. When we use a decreased liver stiffness value to predict a histologic response, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.79; P < .001), and the sensitivity and specificity were 74.3% and 68.8%, respectively. The decrease of the AST-to-platelet ratio also could predict the histologic response of patients with CHB; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.86; P < .001) with sensitivity of 76.2% and specificity of 70.2%. A multivariate analysis indicated that a high hepatitis B virus DNA viral load (odds ratio, 1.44; P = .04) and high METAVIR score (odds ratio, 1.38; P = .02) were independent risk factors for the histologic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the AST-to-platelet ratio and FibroScan value can effectively predict a histologic response in patients with CHB during entecavir treatment. Therefore, they can be used to monitor these patients during antiviral treatment to avoid multiple liver biopsies.

Diagnostic accuracy of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio for predicting hepatitis B-related fibrosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Emerging published data on the accuracy of γ-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) for diagnosing hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related fibrosis are inconsistent. The aim of this study was to systematically review the performance of GPR for diagnosing HBV-related significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE was conducted before July 2018. Study selection was performed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant parameters of eligible studies were abstracted. The methodological quality was assessed according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratios were used to examine the GPR accuracy for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies including 5882 patients with HBV infection underwent liver biopsy were incorporated. The prevalence of significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 58% (range: 22-72%), 36% (range: 10-55%), and 19% (range: 2-33%), respectively. Areas under summary receiver operating characteristic curves of GPR for predicting significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 0.733, 0.777, and 0.796, respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed according to geographical region and histological scoring system with similar results.

CONCLUSION

GPR has moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting HBV-related significant fibrosis, severe fibrosis, and cirrhosis, and further studies with large sample size, rigorous design, multicenter study population are urgently needed.

Diagnostic thresholds and performance of noninvasive fibrosis scores are limited by age in patients with chronic hepatitis B

AIM

We aimed at investigating the effects of age on the predictive performances of noninvasive fibrosis scores for significant fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

A total of 496 CHB patients who underwent liver biopsy were stratified into four age groups: ≤30, 31 to 40, 41 to 50, and ≥51 years. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis score-4 (Fib-4) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) in different age groups.

RESULTS

The extent of fibrosis significantly increased with age, and the percentage of significant fibrosis (≥F2) was 21.3%, 29.0%, 38.5%, and 46.1%, respectively. All three scores displayed a moderate accuracy to diagnose significant fibrosis in overall patients. However, for patients with age ≤30 years, APRI, Fib-4, and GPR performed poorly with the AUROC of 0.567, 0.627 and 0.596, respectively. Furthermore, using the established cut-off values-1.45 for Fib-4, the sensitivity for significant fibrosis increased with age, from 14.8%, 38.1%, 74.5% to 97.87% in above age groups, respectively. To improve the diagnostic accuracy for significant fibrosis, the proposed low and high cut-off points for Fib-4 were 0.41 and 1.15 in ≤30 years, 0.8 and 1.59 in 31 to 40 years, 1.17 and 1.94 in 41 to 50 years, 1.76 and 3.10 in ≥ 51 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Age may influence the diagnostic thresholds and performance of APRI, Fib-4, and GPR for significant fibrosis in patients with CHB. In particular, these scores performed poorly for identifying significant fibrosis in younger patients (≤30 years).

Comparison of non-invasive models for predicting liver damage in chronic hepatitis B patients

INTRODUCTION

Inexpensive blood tests have been well established as alternatives to liver biopsies to evaluate liver fibrosis in CHB patients. Here, we aim to compare their diagnostic accuracy in assessing liver fibrosis and necroinflammation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to evaluate the predictive value of non-invasive models in chronic hepatitis B patients with liver fibrosis by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The clinical data of 160 patients were collected from medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 160 consecutive treatment-naïve CHB patients, 29 (16%) had significant fibrosis and 34 (21%) had severe necroinflammation. The AUROC of the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) (0.761, 95% CI 0.671-0.850) for predicting significant fibrosis was significantly higher than that of the aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (0.680, 95% CI 0.585-0.774, p=0.034), but comparable with the fibrosis index based on four factors (Fib-4) (0.746, 95% CI 0.656-0.836, p=0.703), while for predicting severe necroinflammation, the performance of the GPR (AUROC=0.869, 95% CI 0.800-0.937) was better than the APRI (AUROC=0.816, 95% CI 0.740-0.892, p=0.085) and Fib-4 (0.792, 95% CI 0.711-0.873, p=0.023).

DISCUSSION

GPR is a satisfactory model to stage liver fibrosis and to grade necroinflammation activity, representing a convenient non-invasive alternative to liver biopsy in China.

A Noninvasive Score to Predict Liver Fibrosis in HBeAg-Positive Hepatitis B Patients with Normal or Minimally Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase Levels

Noninvasive fibrosis tests are highly needed but have not been well studied in chronic hepatitis B patients with normal or minimally elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. This study is aimed at developing a noninvasive score system to predict liver fibrosis in these patients. HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with ALT levels of <80 IU/l and liver histology (n = 290) were assigned to training (n = 203) or validation (n = 87) groups. Training group patients were divided into nonsignificant (F0-1) and significant fibrosis (F2-4) according to METAVIR stages. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors for liver fibrosis and develop a score system. The capacity of the score to identify the severity of fibrosis was displayed by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and area under ROC (AUROC) values. Multivariate logistic regression showed that HBeAg (ratios of the sample to the cutoff values (S/CO)) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM; kilopascals (kPa)) were independent factors of liver fibrosis. A score system composed of HBeAg and LSM by assigning a point of 1, 2, or 3 to different HBeAg and LSM levels, respectively, was developed. The scores 2-3, 4, and 5-6 of the sum of HBeAg and LSM points indicated nonsignificant, indeterminate, and significant fibrosis, respectively. The score system had an AUROC of 0.880 and showed similar performance in validation group patients. The accuracy for identifying significant and nonsignificant fibrosis was 77.14% in validation group patients and 71.26% in the entire group of patients. It is suggested that this noninvasive score system can accurately predict hepatic fibrosis and may reduce the need for liver biopsy in HBeAg-positive patients with normal or minimally elevated ALT levels.

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase to cholinesterase and platelet ratio in predicting significant liver fibrosis and cirrhosis of chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of a new mathematical model γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to cholinesterase and platelet ratio (GCPR) versus γ-glutamyl transpeptidase to platelet ratio (GPR) in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis of chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

A complete cohort of 2343 patients was divided into early and late cohort depending on the time of liver biopsy. With reference to the Scheuer standard, liver pathologic stage 2 or higher and stage 4 or higher were defined as significant fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of investigated models.

RESULTS

In the early cohort, the areas under ROC curves (AUROCs) of GCPR in predicting significant fibrosis of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients (0.782 and 0.775) were both significantly greater than those of GPR (0.748 and 0.747) (Z = 8.198 and Z = 6.023, both p <0.0001); the AUROCs of GCPR in predicting cirrhosis of HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients (0.842 and 0.861) were both significantly greater than those of GPR (0.802 and 0.823) (Z = 6.686 and Z = 6.116, both p <0.0001). In early, late and complete cohorts, using a single cutoff of GCPR > 0.080, the specificities of GCPR in predicting significant fibrosis of HBeAg-positive patients were 83.3%, 88.2% and 85.0% and of HBeAg-negative patients were 87.6%, 87.4% and 87.6%, respectively; and the sensitivities of GCPR in predicting cirrhosis of HBeAg-positive patients were 81.9%, 88.7% and 84.2% and of HBeAg-negative patients were 83.1%, 82.1% and 82.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

GCPR has higher performance than GPR in predicting significant fibrosis and cirrhosis of chronic hepatitis B.