Liver safety assessment in clinical trials of new agents for chronic hepatitis B

Efficacy and safety of GLS4 with entecavir vs entecavir alone in chronic hepatitis B patients: A multicenter clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

GLS4 is a first-in-class hepatitis B virus (HBV) capsid assembly modulator that inhibits HBV replication by interfering with assembly and disassembly of the virus nucleocapsid, this prospective, open-label, comparative, phase 2b trial evaluated the antiviral activity and safety of GLS4/ritonavir (RTV) combined with entecavir in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients.

METHODS

250 CHB patients were enrolled, including treatment-naïve patients and those interrupted anti-HBV drugs for ≥ 6 months (Part A, n=125), and patients who had taken ETV for ≥1 year and had achieved viral suppression (Part B, n=125). Patients were randomly allocated to receive 120 mg GLS4/100 mg RTV plus 0.5 mg ETV or 0.5 mg ETV monotherapy for 96 weeks.

RESULTS

In the mid-term, in Part A (n=122), greater least-squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline were observed in the GLS4/RTV plus ETV cohort than in ETV monotherapy cohort in HBV DNA (-6.28 vs -5.72 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0005), HBsAg (-0.87 vs -0.65 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0653), HBV pgRNA (-3.83 vs -1.91 log10 copies/ml, p<0.0001); The proportions of both HBV DNA and pgRNA negative patients were 17.3% (13/75, GLS4/RTV plus ETV) and 0% (0/30, ETV monotherapy). In Part B (n=123), greater mean LSM reductions in HBsAg (-0.17 vs -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p=0.0013), HBV pgRNA (-1.61 vs -0.28 log10 copies/ml, p<0.0001) were also observed in the GLS4/RTV+ETV cohort. the proportions of both HBV DNA and pgRNA-negative patients were 71.6% (48/67, GLS4/RTV plus ETV) and 18.9% (7/37, ETV monotherapy), respectively. No patients achieved HBsAg loss at week 48. GLS4/RTV + ETV were well tolerated, the most common adverse events were elevated alanine aminotransferase levels and hypertriglyceridemia, which were reversed by temporary GLS4/RTV discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary analysis at week 48 showed that the antiviral efficacy of GLS4/RTV with ETV was clearly superior to that of ETV monotherapy. GLS4/RTV with ETV was well tolerated; further studies evaluating its safety and efficacy are ongoing. (clinical trial identifier: NCT04147208).

Review article: Recommendations for detection, assessment and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury during clinical trials in oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major concern for oncology drugs in clinical practice and under development. Monitoring cancer patients for hepatotoxicity is challenging as these patients may have abnormal liver tests pre-treatment or on-study for many reasons including liver injury due to past oncology treatments, hepatic metastases, medical co-morbidities such as heart failure, and concomitant medications. At present, there are no regulatory guidelines or position papers that systematically address best practices pertaining to DILI detection, assessment and management in oncology patients.

AIMS

The goals of this review are (1) to examine and interpret the available evidence and (2) to make recommendations for detection, monitoring, adjudication, and management of suspected hepatocellular DILI during oncology clinical trials.

METHODS

This manuscript was developed by the IQ Consortium (International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in pharmaceutical development) DILI Initiative that consists of members from 17 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with academic and regulatory DILI experts. The manuscript is based on extensive literature review, expert interpretation of the literature, and several rounds of consensus discussions.

RESULTS

This review highlights recommendations for patient eligibility for clinical trials with or without primary/metastatic liver involvement, as well as changes in liver tests that should trigger increased monitoring and/or discontinuation of study drug. Guidance regarding causality assessment for suspected DILI events, rechallenge and dose-modification is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This review brings together evidence-based recommendations and expert opinion to provide the first dedicated consensus for best practices in detection, assessment, and management of DILI in oncology clinical trials.

Consensus Guidelines: Best Practices for the Prevention, Detection and Management of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Clinical Trials with Immunosuppressive/Immunomodulatory Therapy

Hepatitis B virus reactivation (HBVr) during and after immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory (IS/IM) therapy is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, including hepatic decompensation and acute liver failure. The risk of HBVr with IS/IM has been heterogeneous and often unpredictable. As a result, patients with active or previous HBV infection are often excluded from clinical drug trials of such agents. Thorough screening for HBV infection, antiviral prophylaxis, and careful monitoring for HBVr have proven to be effective in reducing the rate of HBVr and improving its outcome in the context of IS/IM. Therefore, safe enrollment and management of certain HBV-marker-positive patients in clinical trials is possible. There is a great, unmet need for consistent, evidence-based recommendations for best practices pertaining to enrollment, monitoring, and management of HBVr in clinical trial participants receiving IS/IM. The aim of these consensus guidelines is to provide a step-by-step blueprint to safely enroll, monitor and manage the patient with inactive chronic or resolved HBV in IS/IM clinical trials from the time of screening through to the end of post-treatment follow up.

First-in-human randomized study of RNAi therapeutic RG6346 for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

BACKGROUND & AIMS

RG6346 is an N-acetyl-D-galactosamine (GalNAc)-conjugated, double-stranded RNA interference agent targeting the HBV genome S-region. We investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of RG6346 in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic HBV infection (CHB).

METHODS

This first-in-human, adaptive, randomized, double-blinded, phase I study recruited three groups of participants: Group A, 30 healthy volunteers received single-dose RG6346 at 0.1, 1.5, 3.0, 6.0, or 12.0 mg/kg, or placebo; Group B, nucleos(t)ide analogue-naïve participants with CHB received single-dose RG6346 at 3.0 mg/kg (n = 6) or placebo (n = 3); Group C, participants with nucleos(t)ide-suppressed CHB received four doses (every 28 days) of RG6346 at 1.5, 3.0, or 6.0 mg/kg (n = 4 in each cohort) or placebo (n = 6).

RESULTS

RG6346 treatment for up to 4 months was safe and well tolerated. The most common adverse event was a mild injection site reaction. Several nucleos(t)ide-naïve participants exhibited self-resolving transaminase elevations with preserved liver function. By the end of RG6346 treatment in Group C (Day 112), the mean reduction from baseline in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was 1.39, 1.80, and 1.64 log10 IU/ml in the 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 mg/kg cohorts, respectively. Of the 12 participants in Group C, 11 (91.7%) achieved a ≥1 log10 IU/ml reduction in HBsAg (3 of 11 [27.3%] had the response sustained at conditional follow-up Day 448). No dose-response relationship was apparent between RG6346 and serum HBsAg levels. The RG6346-induced HBsAg response was independent of hepatitis B e antigen status. Moderate-to-marked sustained reductions of hepatitis B core-related antigen, HBV RNA, HBV DNA (in nucleos[t]ide analogue-naïve participants), and hepatitis B e antigen levels were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These favorable safety and pharmacodynamic data support the clinical development of RG6346 as the backbone of a finite antiviral treatment regimen, with the goal of sustained HBsAg loss (functional cure) in patients with CHB.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03772249.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Currently available therapies for chronic HBV infection are associated with low rates of functional cure and new, more efficacious treatments are needed. This first-in-human study of RG6346, an RNA interference therapy, showed a favorable safety profile as well as marked and durable reductions in hepatitis B surface antigen levels. These results support the continued development of RG6346 as the backbone of a finite treatment regimen targeting high functional cure rates and are important for HBV researchers and physicians.

Design and analysis considerations for early phase clinical trials in hepatitis B (HBV) cure research: the ACTG A5394 study in persons with both HIV and HBV

With growing interest and efforts to achieve a hepatitis B (HBV) cure, HBV therapeutics have increasingly entered the clinical testing phase. In designing an early phase clinical trial aimed at HBV cure, the heterogeneity in participants and the choice of a biomarker endpoint that signals a cure requires careful consideration. We describe the key elements to consider during the development of HBV clinical trials aimed at a functional cure, and how we have addressed them in the design of a phase II AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study, A5394 (NCT05551273). The trial we present is for persons with both HIV and HBV, a unique population that has much to gain from an HBV cure. Our decisions on the design elements are specific to the study agent and the targeted population, but our deliberations may be informative in the emerging field of early phase HBV trials aimed at cure.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of the capsid inhibitor AB-506 from Phase 1 studies in healthy subjects and those with hepatitis B

AB-506 is a potent, pan-genotypic small molecule capsid inhibitor that inhibits hepatitis B virus (HBV) pregenomic RNA encapsidation. We assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiviral activity of AB-506 in two randomized, double-blinded Phase 1 studies in healthy subjects (HS) and subjects with chronic HBV infection (CHB). Single ascending and multiple doses of AB-506 or placebo (30-1000 mg or 400 mg daily for 10 days) were assessed in HS. AB-506 or placebo was assessed at either 160 mg or 400 mg daily for 28 days in subjects with CHB. A second follow-up study examined AB-506 or placebo at 400 mg daily for 28 days in 14 Caucasian and 14 East-Asian HS. Twenty-eight days of AB-506 at 160 mg and 400 mg produced mean HBV-DNA declines from baseline of 2.1 log₁₀ IU/ml and 2.8 log₁₀ IU/ml, respectively. Four subjects with CHB (all Asian) had Grade 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevations (2 at each dose) as HBV DNA was declining; three events led to treatment discontinuation. In the second follow-up study, 2 Asian HS had serious transaminitis events leading to treatment and study termination. No subjects had bilirubin elevations or signs of hepatic decompensation. Conclusion: AB-506 demonstrated mean HBV-DNA declines of >2 log₁₀ ; however, transient but severe ALT flares were observed in 4 Asian subjects with CHB. In the follow-up study in HS, 2 additional Asian HS had Grade 4 flares, suggesting that AB-506 hepatotoxicity contributed to the ALT elevations. The AB-506 development program was terminated because of these findings.

Farnesoid X receptor agonist for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: A safety study

The nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) regulates bile acid homeostasis and is a drug target for metabolic liver diseases. FXR also plays an important role in hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA transcription. In vitro and in mice, FXR agonist treatment leads to inhibition of viral replication and a decline in viral proteins, pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and HBV DNA levels. We aimed to translate this to a clinical use by primarily evaluating the safety and secondary the anti-viral effect of Vonafexor, a FXR agonist, in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. In total, 73 CHB patients were enrolled in a two-part Phase Ib double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were randomized to receive oral Vonafexor (100, 200 and 400 mg once daily, or 200 mg twice daily), placebo, or entecavir (Part A, n = 48) or to receive Vonafexor (300 mg once daily or 150 mg twice daily), or placebo, combined with pegylated-interferon-α2a (Part B, n = 25) for 29 days. Patients were followed up for 35 days. Enrolled CHB patients were mostly HBeAg-negative. Vonafexor was overall well tolerated and safe. The most frequent adverse events were moderate gastrointestinal events. Pruritus was more frequent with twice-daily compared with once-daily regimens (56%-67% vs. 16%, respectively, p < 0.05). Vonafexor monotherapy of 400 mg once daily decreased HBsAg concentrations (-0.1 log₁₀  IU/mL, p < 0.05), and Vonafexor/pegylated-IFN-α2a combination therapy decreased HBcrAg and pgRNA. In conclusion, Vonafexor was safe with a decline in HBV markers observed in CHB patients suggesting a potential anti-viral effect the therapeutic potential of which has to be evaluated in larger trials.

Consensus Guidelines: Best Practices for Detection, Assessment and Management of Suspected Acute Drug-Induced Liver Injury During Clinical Trials in Adults with Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Adults with Cirrhosis Secondary to Hepatitis B, C and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

With the widespread development of new drugs to treat chronic liver diseases (CLDs), including viral hepatitis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), more patients are entering trials with abnormal baseline liver tests and with advanced liver injury, including cirrhosis. The current regulatory guidelines addressing the monitoring, diagnosis, and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) during clinical trials primarily address individuals entering with normal baseline liver tests. Using the same laboratory criteria cited as signals of potential DILI in studies involving patients with no underlying liver disease and normal baseline liver tests may result in premature and unnecessary cessation of a study drug in a clinical trial population whose abnormal and fluctuating liver tests are actually due to their underlying CLD. This position paper focuses on defining best practices for the detection, monitoring, diagnosis, and management of suspected acute DILI during clinical trials in patients with CLD, including hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), both with and without cirrhosis and NASH with cirrhosis. This is one of several position papers developed by the IQ DILI Initiative, comprising members from 16 pharmaceutical companies in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. It is based on an extensive literature review and discussions between industry members and experts from outside industry to achieve consensus regarding the recommendations. Key conclusions and recommendations include (1) the importance of establishing laboratory criteria that signal potential DILI events and that fit the disease indication being studied in the clinical trial based on knowledge of the natural history of test fluctuations in that disease; (2) establishing a pretreatment value that is based on more than one screening determination, and revising that baseline during the trial if a new nadir is achieved during treatment; (3) basing rules for increased monitoring and for stopping drug for potential DILI on multiples of baseline liver test values and/or a threshold value rather than multiples of the upper limit of normal (ULN) for that test; (4) making use of more sensitive tests of liver function, including direct bilirubin (DB) or combined parameters such as aspartate transaminase:alanine transaminase (AST:ALT) ratio or model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) to signal potential DILI, especially in studies of patients with cirrhosis; and (5) being aware of potential confounders related to complications of the disease being studied that may masquerade as DILI events.

Contribution of NK cells to HBsAg seroconversion in inactive HBsAg carriers following pegylated IFN therapy

Our recent study showed a high rate of HBsAg seroconversion in inactive HBsAg carriers (IHCs) treated with pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN). To understand the immune-mediated component of the HBsAg seroconversion better, this study investigated the role of NK cells. A total of 44 IHCs were given 48 wk of PEG-IFN. Fifteen cases achieved HBsAg seroconversion (R group), whereas 29 failed (NR group). The proportion and activity (CD107α and IFN-γ production) of NK cells were measured before and during treatment. We found that the proportion of NK cells in the R group was higher than in the NR group at baseline and during PEG-IFN treatment, even when patients were matched for age, sex and treatment period. IFN- γ secretion and CD107α expression from NK cells in cases who achieved HBsAg seroconversion were significantly higher than patients matched for age, sex, HBsAg and treatment period in the NR group at baseline and during PEG-IFN treatment. We also found that in HBsAg seroconversion cases, NK cells activity increased after PEG-IFN treatment, especially before HBsAg seroconversion. These effects were not found in non-responders. In conclusion, we demonstrated that the increase of NK cells accompanied by enhanced activity during PEG-IFN treatment favoured HBsAg seroconversion for IHC, and that NK cells may play a role in HBV seroconversion.