Use of hepatitis B surface and "e" antigen quantification during extensive treatment with tenofovir in patients co-infected with HIV-HBV

Virological Treatment Monitoring for Chronic Hepatitis B

More than 250 million people worldwide are currently infected with hepatitis B, despite the effectiveness of vaccination and other preventive measures. In terms of treatment, new therapeutic approaches are rapidly developing, promising to achieve the elimination of infected cells and the complete cure of infection. The on-treatment monitoring of these innovative antiviral treatments will require the implementation of new virological tools. Therefore, new biomarkers are being evaluated besides the traditional virological and serological assays in order to obtain information on different steps of the viral replication cycle and to monitor response to therapy more accurately. The purpose of this work is to describe both standard and innovative tools for chronic hepatitis B treatment monitoring, and to analyse their potential and feasibility.

Immune Mechanisms Underlying Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Seroclearance in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Viral Coinfection

It is considered that chronic hepatitis B patients have obtained functional cure if they get hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance after treatment. Serum HBsAg is produced by cccDNA that is extremely difficult to clear and dslDNA that is integrated with host chromosome. High HBsAg serum level leads to failure of host immune system, which makes it unable to produce effective antiviral response required for HBsAg seroclerance. Therefore, it is very difficult to achieve functional cure, and fewer than 1% of chronic hepatitis B patients are cured with antiviral treatment annually. Some chronic hepatitis B patients are coinfected with other chronic viral infections, such as HIV, HCV and HDV, which makes more difficult to cure. However, it is found that the probability of obtaining HBsAg seroclearance in patients with coinfection is higher than that in patients with HBV monoinfection, especially in patients with HBV/HIV coinfection who have an up to 36% of HBsAg 5-year-seroclerance rate. The mechanism of this interesting phenomenon is related to the functional reconstruction of immune system after antiretroviral therapy (ART). The quantity increase and function recovery of HBV specific T cells and B cells, and the higher level of cytokines and chemokines such as IP-10, GM-CSF, promote HBsAg seroclearance. This review summarizes recent studies on the immune factors that have influence on HBsAg seroconversion in the chronic hepatitis B patients with viral coinfection, which might provide new insights for the development of therapeutic approaches to partially restore the specific immune response to HBV and other viruses.

Profiles of liver fibrosis evolution during long-term tenofovir treatment in HIV-positive patients coinfected with hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data on liver fibrosis evolution and its involvement in liver-related morbidity are scarce in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection during treatment. We identified profiles of liver fibrosis evolution in coinfected patients undergoing tenofovir (TDF).

METHODS

We included 169 HIV-HBV-coinfected patients on TDF-based antiretroviral therapy. Virological and clinical data were obtained at TDF-initiation and every 6-12 months. From data on non-invasive liver fibrosis assessments collected yearly (FibroTest®), we established clusters of individuals with similar liver fibrosis evolution using group-based trajectory models.

RESULTS

Four profiles of liver fibrosis evolution were established from a median follow-up of 7.6 years (IQR = 3.1-13.1): low fibrosis with no progression (29.6%, profile A), low fibrosis with progression (22.5%, profile B), moderate fibrosis with high fluctuation (39.6%, profile C), and cirrhosis with no regression (8.3%, profile D). When compared to profile A, baseline HBeAg-positive status was associated with profiles B (P = .007) and C (P = .004), older age with profiles C (P < .001) and D (P = .001), exposure to second-generation protease inhibitors with profile C (P = .004), and CD4⁺ <500/mm³ at the last visit with profiles C (P = .02) and D (P = .002). Incident liver-related events occurred in profiles other than A (B, n = 1/38; C, n = 6/67; D, n = 3/14) and all five cases of hepatocellular carcinoma occurred in profiles C (n = 2) and D (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-treated HIV-HBV coinfected individuals do not seem to benefit from comparable levels of liver fibrosis regression as in HBV mono-infection. Liver-related morbidity occurs mainly in those with fluctuating or consistently high fibrosis levels.

Challenges and opportunities for hepatitis B cure in the setting of HIV--hepatitis B virus co-infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine issues specific to HIV--HBV co-infection that are relevant to the search for and achieving hepatitis B cure in this the setting RECENT FINDINGS: In HIV--HBV co-infection, high rates of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss early after initiation of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy (ART) have previously been reported. Between 2012 and 2016, HBsAg loss from 2.8 to 23% was reported in numerous studies, including those already on suppressive HBV-active ART. Data published in 2018-2019 show that these rates have remained fairly stable (3.0-13.9%). However, it appears that higher HBsAg loss on starting HBV-active ART in co-infection falls within a few years to levels similar to that observed in long-term treated HBV mono-infection. Immune reconstitution and CD4+ T-cell recovery are likely to play a role in high HBsAg loss rates seen in early treated co-infection, although the mechanisms driving this are yet to be fully elucidated.

SUMMARY

High rates of HBsAg loss early after HBV-active ART initiation is unique to HIV--HBV co-infection, making it the ideal setting to investigate underlying mechanisms of HBV loss and develop new HBV cure strategies. This phenomenon could be used to enhance HBsAg loss with new therapeutic approaches currently being investigated; however, this is obstructed by excluding co-infection from such studies.

Functional Cure of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Individuals With HIV-Coinfection: A Literature Review

In individuals infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), the loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is the ultimate therapeutic goal, which defines "functional cure." For individuals living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), functional cure occurs roughly 2 per 100 person-years during potent anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy. Although this rate may be higher than expected in treated HBV mono-infected individuals, rates of functional cure widely vary between studies (0.6-10.5 per 100 person-years). Similar to HBV mono-infection, the phase of HBV infection, HBV (sub-)genotypes and hepatitis B "e" Ag-negative variants are associated with functional cure in treated HIV-HBV co-infection. In specifically HIV-HBV co-infected individuals, strong increases in CD4+ T cell counts after treatment initiation have also been linked to functional cure, yet this finding is inconsistent across studies. Several markers directly or indirectly reflecting HBV activity are being developed to predict functional cure, such as quantification of HBsAg, hepatitis B core-related antigen, HBsAg protein composition, anti-hepatitis B core antibodies and interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10. Few have been assessed during treatment in HIV-HBV co-infected individuals and none have been validated to predict functional cure. Novel therapeutics for HBV cure are essential for individuals with HIV-HBV co-infection and need to be separately evaluated in this population.

Clinical significance of quantitative e antigen in a cohort of hepatitis B virus-infected children and adults in North America

BACKGROUND

In chronic hepatitis B (CHB) viral infection, e antigen positivity (HBeAg+) is associated with high levels of viral replication and infectivity. Furthermore, HBeAg-positive CHB is associated with a liver disease spectrum ranging from none to severe.

AIM

To assess whether the level of circulating HBeAg is associated with different clinical presentations of HBeAg-positive CHB.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among HBV mono-infected participants enrolled in Hepatitis B Research Network (HBRN) cohorts to explore clinical and virological associations with quantitative HBeAg (qHBeAg).

RESULTS

Among 763 HBeAg+ participants (56% female; 85% Asian; median age 26 years), multivariable median regression modelling significantly associated qHBeAg with liver injury (inverse qHBeAg association with ALT p<.001 and APRI p<.001), and with both race and age (p=0.01). Among Asians, qHBeAg was inversely related to age; a relationship less clear among Blacks and Whites. Among Asians also, median qHBeAg levels were higher among those infected with HBV genotype C versus B (p<0.001), suggesting causal virologic differences. Across all races, median qHBeAg was higher in women (p=.01). Independent of sex, age, race and HBV genotype, qHBeAg was higher in participants with predominant wild-type versus basal core promoter and/or precore 'stop' viral variants (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Lower qHBeAg was observed among HBRN participants with the greatest degree of liver injury independent of demographics and HBV genotype. These data support longitudinal studies to examine the role of qHBeAg in modulating the host immune response and predicting the outcomes of chronic HBV infection.

Subclinical and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Coinfected With HIV and Chronic Hepatitis B Virus From Clinical Outpatient Centers in France: Protocol for an Ambispective, Longitudinal Cohort Study

Background

Previous large-scale studies have examined the effect of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on overall and cause-specific mortality in individuals with HIV. However, few studies have collected data on the subclinical indicators of HBV that lead to these severe outcomes in the coinfected population.

Objective

In this study, we aim to describe the procedures of a cohort study extension aimed at assessing HBV-DNA replication, serological markers of HBV (hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] and hepatitis B surface antigen), and liver fibrosis and how these subclinical outcomes relate to mortality in predominately tenofovir-treated, coinfected patients with HIV-HBV. We assessed the characteristics at cohort inclusion of those who participated in the cohort extension, as well as those who did not participate due to being lost to follow-up or death.

Methods

Patients with HIV and chronic HBV who completed follow-up in a prospective cohort study conducted in 4 outpatient centers (Paris and Lyon, France; 2002-2011) were invited to participate in a cross-sectional visit from November 2016 to March 2018, during which a comprehensive evaluation of HIV- and HBV-related disease was undertaken. Virological and clinical data since the previous study visit were retrospectively collected.

Results

Of the 308 individuals enrolled in the cohort, 147 (47.7%) participated in the cross-sectional study. At this visit, most participants were HBeAg negative (111/134, 82.8% with available data), had undetectable HBV DNA (124/132, 93.9% with available data), and were undergoing antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir alafenamide (114/147, 77.6%). There were no significant differences in characteristics at cohort inclusion between those who did and did not complete the cross-sectional visit, except for a lower proportion with an AIDS-defining illness (30/147, 20.5% vs 49/161, 30.4%, respectively; P=.04). Of the 161 nonparticipating individuals, 42 (26.1%) died, 41 (25.4%) were lost to follow-up and known to be alive, and 78 (48.4%) were lost to follow-up with unknown vital status. Most differences in characteristics at cohort inclusion were observed between deceased individuals and those participating in the cross-sectional visit or those lost to follow-up. With this extension, the median follow-up time of the overall cohort is presently 9.2 years (IQR 3.4-14.6).

Conclusions

Extended follow-up of the French HIV-HBV cohort will provide important long-term data on the subclinical trajectory of HBV disease in the coinfected population. The biases due to the relatively high rate of those lost to follow-up need to be assessed in future studies of this cohort.

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/24731

Kinetics of Hepatitis B Core-Related Antigen and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Antibody and Their Association With Serological Response in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Hepatitis B Coinfection

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to describe the kinetics of quantified hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) and quantified anti-hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) during tenofovir (TDF) treatment and assess their ability to predict hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus.

METHODS

Serum qHBcrAg, qAnti-HBc, and hepatitis B virus DNA were obtained at TDF initiation and every 6-12 months. The on-treatment kinetics of qHBcrAg (ΔqHBcrAg) and qAnti-HBc (ΔqAnti-HBc) were estimated using mixed-effect linear regression. Hazard ratios (HRs) assessing the association between markers and HBeAg seroclearance were calculated using proportional hazards regression, and the sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of marker levels in predicting HBeAg seroclearance were assessed using time-dependent receiving operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

During a median of 4.6 years, the cumulative incidences of hepatitis B surface antigen and HBeAg seroclearance were 3.2% (n = 5 of 158) and 27.4% (n = 26 of 95), respectively. ΔqHBcrAg was biphasic in HBeAg-positive patients (-0.051 and -0.011 log10 U/mL/mo during ≤18 and >18 months, respectively) and monophasic in HBeAg-negative patients. ΔqAnti-HBc was monophasic regardless of HBeAg status. In HBeAg-positive patients, baseline qHBcrAg and qAnti-HBc levels were associated with HBeAg seroclearance (adjusted HR, 0.48/log10 U/mL [95% confidence interval, .33-.70] and unadjusted HR, 1.49/log10 Paul Ehrlich Institute units/mL [1.08-2.07], respectively). Cutoffs with the highest accuracy in predicting HBeAg seroclearance at 36 months were qHBcrAg <6.5 log10 U/mL at month 24 (Se, 1; Sp, 0.58) and baseline qAnti-HBc ≥4.1 log10 Paul Ehrlich Institute units/mL (Se, 0.42; Sp, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In coinfected patients undergoing TDF, qHBcrAg/qAnti-HBc could be of use in monitoring HBeAg seroclearance.

Long-Term TDF-Inclusive ART and Progressive Rates of HBsAg Loss in HIV-HBV Coinfection-Lessons for Functional HBV Cure?

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is effective in suppressing HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication in HIV-HBV coinfection although HBV DNA can persist in some individuals on TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy (ART). We initiated a prospective longitudinal study to determine durability of HBV virological control and clinical outcomes after prolonged TDF-based ART in HIV-HBV coinfection.

METHODS

Ninety-two HIV-HBV coinfected participants on, or about to commence, TDF-containing ART from Australia (n = 41) and Thailand (n = 52) were enrolled. Participants were followed 6-monthly for 2 years, then annually to 5 years. Laboratory and clinical assessments and a serum sample were collected at each study visit. These analyses compare follow-up at 2 and 5 years.

RESULTS

12.0% (95% confidence interval 6.8 to 20.2) of total study entry cohort (n = 92) or 15.3% (95% confidence interval: 8.8 to 25.3) of those with data to year 5 (n = 72) lost hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). The only statistically significant association with HBsAg loss was lower study entry quantitative HBsAg. CD4 T-cell count increased by a median 245 cells/mm3 between the preTDF sample and 5 years of follow-up. By year 5, 98.5% of the cohort had undetectable HBV DNA (<15 IU/mL) and 91.4% had undetectable HIV RNA (<20 copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg loss was high and ongoing over 5 years of follow-up in HIV-HBV coinfected individuals on TDF-containing ART and undetectable HBV was almost universal. Although the pattern of HBsAg loss temporarily parallels immune reconstitution, we could not identify predictive immune markers. The high rate of HBsAg loss in HIV-HBV coinfection may offer valuable insights into the search for a functional HBV cure.

Correlation of serum hepatitis B core-related antigen with hepatitis B virus total intrahepatic DNA and covalently closed circular-DNA viral load in HIV-hepatitis B coinfection

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether quantified hepatitis B core-related antigen (qHBcrAg) is a surrogate marker of intrahepatic replication in HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study of 31 HIV-HBV-infected patients (total liver biopsies, n = 38) from a well defined cohort.

METHODS

Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated between qHBcrAg and intrahepatic markers of HBV replication [total intrahepatic-DNA, covalently closed circular (ccc) DNA, cccDNA : total intrahepatic-DNA ratio].

RESULTS

At biopsy, 22 (71.0%) patients were hepatitis B 'e' antigen (HBeAg)-positive, 22 (71.0%) had detectable plasma HBV-DNA, and 17 (54.8%) were treated with tenofovir. Median levels (interquartile range) of intrahepatic markers were as follows: HBV cccDNA (n = 34), 0.26 copies/cell (0.4-2.89); total intrahepatic-DNA (n = 38), 2.38 copies/cell (0.58-207.9), and cccDNA : total intrahepatic-DNA ratio (n = 34), 0.05 (interquartile range = 0.01-0.12). There was a significantly strong correlation between qHBcrAg and cccDNA in all patients (Rho = 0.65, P < 0.001), while a moderate correlation was observed between qHBcrAg and total intrahepatic-DNA (Rho = 0.57, P < 0.001) or cccDNA : total intrahepatic-DNA ratio (Rho = -0.45, P = 0.01). Similar findings were observed for HBeAg-positive patients and those with detectable HBV-DNA, with the exception of qHBcrAg and cccDNA or cccDNA : total intrahepatic-DNA ratio. In contrast, no significant correlation between qHBcrAg and any intrahepatic marker was observed in HBeAg-negative patients or those with undetectable HBV-DNA. No significant difference was observed in median qHBcrAg levels across liver fibrosis stages (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

qHBcrAg is a potential surrogate marker of cccDNA in HIV-HBV coinfected patients, yet might be less useful with undetectable serum HBV-DNA or HBeAg-negative status. Whether qHBcrAg provides further clinical utility compared with other serological markers remains debatable.

Risk of Liver Fibrosis in Hepatitis B Virus and HIV Coinfected Youths Receiving Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Regimen

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV coinfection is associated with risk of progression to chronic liver disease. We assessed liver stiffness in HBV-HIV coinfected youths.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study in HBV-HIV coinfected youths aged 18 to 25 years who received a tenofovir (TDF)-containing antiretroviral therapy regimen for >96 weeks. Measurements included HBV DNA level, HBV serology profiles, and transient elastography (TE). The cutoff for TE results included ≥5.9 kPa for F2-moderate fibrosis, ≥7.4 kPa for F3-severe fibrosis, and ≥9.6 kPa for F4-cirrhosis.

RESULTS

From March to December 2016, 15 HBV-HIV coinfected youths with a median duration on TDF-containing regimens of 3.3 years were enrolled. Five (33%) youths had significant liver fibrosis, 3 with F2-moderate, 1 with F3-advanced fibrosis, and 1 with F4-cirrhosis. Other 5 without liver fibrosis had hepatitis B surface e antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B surface e antigen (HBeAg) loss. Higher mean alanine transaminase (ALT) was observed among the group with F2-F4 when compared to those with F0.

CONCLUSION

Liver fibrosis was evidenced in HBV-HIV coinfected youths in Thailand. Transient elastography might be considered for those who do not achieve HBsAg loss or have persistent ALT elevation while on treatment.

Long-term observation on hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance in therapy experienced HIV/HBV co-infected Chinese

The aim of this retrospective study was to observe hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and explore predictors of HBsAg loss in HIV/HBV-co-infected patients receiving long-term lamivudine or both tenofovir and lamivudine containing therapies. Quantification of HBsAg, hepatitis B e antigen and HBV DNA before and after initiation of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy in a total of 268 HIV/HBV-co-infected patients started treatment between 2005 and 2017 were performed. Over a median of 65.63 months of follow-up, 10 (3.7%) were observed HBsAg loss and the quantification of HBsAg in 7 (2.6%) patients were less than 50 IU/mL. With the prolongation of antiretroviral therapy duration time, the rates of HBsAg seroclearance tended to increase gradually, rising from 1.8% (3/163) during 2-4 years treatment to 29.4% (10/34) after antiretroviral therapy for up to 10 years. Lower baseline qHBsAg and HBV DNA levels and strong 12-month declines in qHBsAg were significantly associated with HBsAg seroclearance. The event of HBsAg seroclearance is uncommon among Chinese individuals with HIV/HBV co-infection who have been treated with anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy, and lifelong therapy for HBV is needed for HIV/HBV co-infected patients. Baseline qHBsAg and HBV DNA levels and qHBsAg decline rate were predictors for HBsAg seroclearance.

Long-term virological and serologic responses of chronic hepatitis B virus infection to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing regimens in patients with HIV and hepatitis B coinfection

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the durability of HBV viral suppression with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) combined with lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients are scarce in hyperendemic areas of chronic HBV infection.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2016, HIV/HBV-coinfected Taiwanese with available baseline HBV DNA load were retrospectively reviewed. Determinations of plasma HBV DNA load, HBV serologic markers (HBsAg, anti-HBs, HBeAg, and anti-HBe), and liver function were performed after initiation of cART. Factors associated with time to undetectable HBV DNA load were explored.

RESULTS

A total of 366 patients were included according to cART history: Group 1, 3TC as the only anti-HBV therapy (n = 73); Group 2, TDF-containing cART as initial therapy (n = 127); and Group 3, switch of 3TC-based to TDF-containing cART (n = 166). At year 5, HBV suppression was achieved in 77.8%, 95.7%, and 95.7% of Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, TDF ( ± 3TC or FTC) but not 3TC alone as initial anti-HBV therapy was significantly associated with HBV suppression (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.635; 95% CI 1.720-4.037), while HBeAg positivity at baseline was associated with failure to achieve HBV suppression (aHR 0.293; 95% CI 0.178-0.482). Loss of HBsAg occurred in 15 patients (4.1%), with 7 (1.9%) seroconversion to anti-HBs positivity, while HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 11 (16.9%) of 65 HBeAg-positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-containing cART achieved durable HBV viral suppression in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients and HBeAg positivity at baseline was associated with failure to achieve HBV suppression despite long-term TDF-containing cART.

Effect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface-gene variability on markers of replication during treated human immunodeficiency virus-HBV infection in Western Africa

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Replication markers exhibit substantial variation during chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, part of which can be explained by mutations on the surface (S) gene. We aimed to identify S-gene mutations possibly influencing the quantification of HBV replication markers (MUPIQH) in HBV genotype E infection, common to Western Africa.

METHODS

Seventy-three antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HBV co-infected patients from Côte d'Ivoire, initiating anti-HBV-containing ART, had available HBV S-gene sequences. S-gene MUPIQHs were screened at ART initiation based on lower HBV-DNA or HBsAg quantification (qHBsAg) compared to wildtype. Their association with HBV virological response and qHBsAg slope during treatment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Genotype E was predominant (95.9%). At ART initiation, median HBV-DNA was 7.27 log₁₀ copies/mL (IQR = 5.26-8.33) and qHBsAg 4.08 log₁₀ IU/mL (IQR = 3.49-4.61). Twelve S-gene MUPIQHs were identified among 21 patients (28.8%): sS140L (n = 4), sD144A (n = 1), sS167L (n = 2), sS174N (n = 6), sP178Q (n = 2), sG185L (n = 2), sW191L (n = 2), sP203Q/R (n = 2), sS204N/I/R/K/T/G (n = 7), sN207T (n = 2), sF212C (n = 1) and sV224A/Y (n = 7). MUPIQHs at positions s185+s191+s224 and s178+s204 were within highly covarying networks of S-gene mutations. Older age (P = 0.02), elevated transaminases (P = 0.03) and anti-hepatitis B "e" antibody-positive serology (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with prevalent MUPIQHs at ART initiation. During treatment, baseline MUPIQHs were not associated with time-to-undetectable HBV-DNA (P = 0.7) and qHBsAg levels decreased at similar rates between those with vs without MUPIQHs (P = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Several novel S-gene mutations were associated with reductions in replication markers among West African co-infected patients. These mutations, however, do not affect response during antiviral treatment. Their diagnostic and clinical consequences need clarification.

Trajectories of serum hepatitis B surface antigen kinetics in patients with chronic hepatitis B receiving long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The kinetics of serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels during long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients remains unclear. We investigated the patterns of serum HBsAg kinetics and their association with therapeutic outcomes in genotype B- or C-infected CHB patients receiving long-term NA therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 329 treatment-naive CHB patients receiving NA therapy for >5 years to analyse the kinetic patterns by using group-based trajectory models (GBTMs).

RESULTS

Most patients (82.4%) received entecavir therapy. The median treatment duration was 83.6 (68.5-89.7) months. The GBTMs revealed three groups for both the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative patients. The median annual decline in serum HBsAg levels during the first 5 years was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Groups 2 and 3 in HBeAg-positive (0.78 vs 0.10 vs 0.10 log₁₀ IU/mL) and HBeAg-negative (0.71 vs 0.08 vs 0.09 log₁₀ IU/mL) patients. HBsAg levels at the baseline and 12 months combined with an HBsAg decline from the baseline to 12 months of treatment predicted trajectory pattern 1 in HBeAg-positive (sensitivity, 77.8%; specificity, 99.1%; positive predictive value [PPV], 87.5%; and negative predictive value [NPV], 98.2%) and HBeAg-negative (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 99.5%; PPV, 88.9%; and NPV, 100%) patients. The trajectory patterns were significantly associated with HBeAg loss in the HBeAg-positive patients and the achievement of HBsAg <100 IU/mL or HBsAg loss in HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The trajectory of serum HBsAg levels predicts HBsAg loss in CHB patients receiving long-term NA therapy.

Impact of Antiretroviral Therapy on Liver Fibrosis Among Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Adults With and Without HBV Coinfection in Zambia

Background

We investigated changes in hepatic fibrosis, based on transient elastography (TE), among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with and without hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Zambia.

Methods

Patients' liver stiffness measurements (LSM; kiloPascals [kPa]) at ART initiation were categorized as no or minimal fibrosis (equivalent to Metavir F0-F1), significant fibrosis (F2-F3), and cirrhosis (F4). TE was repeated following 1 year of ART. Stratified by HBV coinfection status (hepatitis B surface antigen positive at baseline), we described LSM change and the proportion with an increase/decrease in fibrosis category. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed correlates of significant fibrosis/cirrhosis at 1 year on ART.

Results

Among 463 patients analyzed (61 with HBV coinfection), median age was 35 years, 53.7% were women, and median baseline CD4+ count was 240 cells/mm3. Nearly all (97.6%) patients received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-containing ART, in line with nationally recommended first-line treatment. The median LSM change was -0.70 kPa (95% confidence interval, -3.0 to +1.7) and was similar with and without HBV coinfection. Significant fibrosis/cirrhosis decreased in frequency from 14.0% to 6.7% (P < .001). Increased age, male sex, and HBV coinfection predicted significant fibrosis/cirrhosis at 1 year (all P < .05).

Conclusion

The percentage of HIV-infected Zambian adults with elevated liver stiffness suggestive of significant fibrosis/cirrhosis decreased following ART initiation-regardless of HBV status. This suggests that HIV infection plays a role in liver inflammation. HBV-coinfected patients were more likely to have significant fibrosis/cirrhosis at 1 year on ART.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02060162.

HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfection: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and treatment

: HIV infection has a significant impact on the natural history of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, with increased levels of HBV DNA, accelerated progression of liver disease and increased liver-associated mortality compared with HBV monoinfection. Widespread uptake and early initiation of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy has substantially improved the natural history of HIV-HBV coinfection but the prevalence of liver disease remains elevated in this population. In this paper, we review recent studies examining the natural history and pathogenesis of liver disease and seroconversion in HIV-HBV coinfection in the era of HBV-active antiretroviral therapy and the effects of HIV directly on liver disease. We also review novel therapeutics for the management of HBV with a particular emphasis on clinical strategies being developed for an HBV cure and an HIV cure and their impact on HIV-HBV coinfected individuals.

Tenofovir dipivoxil for treatment of chronic hepatitis B patients with gastric ulcer: Efficacy and impact on host immune response

AIM

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tenofovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with gastric ulcer and its effect on host immune response.

METHODS

From January 2015 to October 2015, 60 CHB patients with gastric ulcer were randomly divided into a control group (n = 30) and an observation group (n = 30). The control group was treated with adefovir dipivoxil, and the observation group was treated with tenofovir dipivoxil. The immune levels before and after treatment were measured by flow cytometry. The clinical efficacy and the effect on the host immune response were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the rate of viral breakthrough between the two groups (P > 0.05). The ALT normalization rate, HBV DNA negative convsersion rate and HBeAg seroconversion rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The percentages of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ cells and CD4⁺/CD8⁺ ratio in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 10.00% in the observation group and 13.33% in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tenofovir dipivoxil has good efficacy in CHB patients with gastric ulcer and can be used to regulate immunity.

Virological Response to Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in HIV-Positive Patients with Lamivudine-Resistant Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection in an Area Hyperendemic for Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Background

Sequential addition of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is often needed for patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) who develop HBV resistance to lamivudine after combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) containing only lamivudine for HBV. We aimed to assess the virological response of HBV to add-on TDF in patients coinfected with lamivudine-resistant HBV.

Methods

Between November 2010 and December 2014, 33 HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV and 56 with lamivudine-susceptible HBV were prospectively included. TDF plus lamivudine was used to substitute zidovudine or abacavir plus lamivudine contained in cART in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection, while patients with lamivudine-susceptible HBV infection received TDF plus lamivudine as backbone of cART. Serial determinations of plasma HBV DNA load, HBV serologic markers, and liver and renal functions were performed after initiation of TDF-containing cART.

Results

Of 89 patients included, 38.6% tested positive for HBV envelope antigen (HBeAg) at baseline. The plasma HBV DNA level at enrollment of lamivudine-resistant and lamivudine-susceptible group were 6.1 ± 2.2 log₁₀ and 6.0 ± 2.2 log₁₀ copies/mL, respectively (p = 0.895). The cumulative percentage of HBV viral suppression in lamivudine-resistant and lamivudine-susceptible group was 81.8% and 91.1% at 48 weeks, respectively (p = 0.317), which increased to 86.7% and 96.2% at 96 weeks, respectively (p = 0.185). At 48 weeks, 11 patients testing HBeAg-positive at baseline failed to achieve viral suppression. In multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with failure to achieve viral suppression at 48 weeks was higher HBV DNA load at baseline (odds ratio, per 1-log₁₀ copies/mL increase, 1.861; 95% CI, 1.204–2.878). At 48 weeks, HBeAg seroconversion was observed in 5 patients (1 in the lamivudine-resistant group and 4 in the lamivudine-susceptible group; p = 0.166). During the study period, HBsAg levels decreased over time, regardless of lamivudine resistance. Loss of HBsAg was observed in 3 (3.4%) patients in the lamivudine-susceptible group.

Conclusions

Add-on TDF-containing cART in patients coinfected with lamivudine-resistant HBV achieved a similar rate of HBV viral suppression compared to TDF-containing cART as initial regimen in patients coinfected with lamivudine-susceptible HBV. A higher baseline HBV DNA load and HBeAg positivity were associated with failure to achieve HBV viral suppression.

Intensification with pegylated interferon during treatment with tenofovir in HIV-hepatitis B virus co-infected patients

In hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg) positive patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) mono-infection, intensification of nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment with pegylated interferon (PegIFN) could help induce higher HBeAg seroclearance rates. Our aim was to determine the long-term effect of adding PegIFN to tenofovir (TDF)-containing antiretroviral therapy on seroclearance in HBeAg-positive patients co-infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HBV. In this prospective matched cohort study, 46 patients with 1-year PegIFN intensification during TDF-containing antiretroviral therapy (TDF+PegIFN) were matched 1:1 to controls undergoing TDF without PegIFN (TDF) using a time-dependent propensity score based on age, CD4+ count and liver cirrhosis status. Kinetics of HBeAg quantification (qHBeAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen quantification (qHBsAg) were estimated using mixed-effect linear regression and time to HBeAg seroclearance or HBsAg seroclearance was modelled using proportional hazards regression. At baseline, previous TDF exposure was a median 39.8 months (IQR=21.4-59.4) and median qHBeAg and qHBsAg levels were 6.9 PEIU/mL and 3.72 log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively (P>.5 between groups). Median follow-up was 33.4 months (IQR=19.0-36.3). During intensification, faster average declines of qHBeAg (-0.066 vs -0.027 PEIU/mL/month, P=.001) and qHBsAg (-0.049 vs -0.026 log₁₀ IU/mL/month, P=.09) were observed in patients undergoing TDF+PegIFN vs TDF, respectively. After intensification, qHBeAg and qHBsAg decline was no different between groups (P=.7 and P=.9, respectively). Overall, no differences were observed in HBeAg seroclearance (TDF+PegIFN=13.2 vs TDF=12.6/100 person·years, P=.5) or HBsAg seroclearance rates (TDF+PegIFN=1.8 vs TDF=1.3/100 person·years, P=.7). In conclusion, PegIFN intensification in HBeAg-positive co-infected patients did not lead to increased rates of HBeAg or HBsAg clearance, despite faster declines of antigen levels while on PegIFN.

Hepatitis B surface antigen quantification as a predictor of seroclearance during treatment in HIV-hepatitis B virus coinfected patients from Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND AND AIM

In Sub-Saharan Africa, seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B "e" antigen (HBeAg), including their quantifiable markers, have rarely been evaluated during long-term antiviral treatment among patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study from two randomized-control trials in Côte d'Ivoire, 161 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-HBV coinfected patients starting lamivudine (n = 76) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (n = 85) containing antiretroviral therapy were included. HBV DNA was quantified using an in-house assay (detection limit = 12 copies/mL) and HBsAg quantification (qHBsAg) using the Elecsys assay.

RESULTS

Overall, 33 (20.5%) patients were HBeAg positive, 121 (75.2%) had detectable HBV DNA, and 92/93 (98.9%) harbored HBV genotype E. Median treatment duration was 35.5 months (interquartile range: 24.3-36.4). Among HBeAg-positive patients, cumulative proportion with HBeAg seroclearance was 46.3% (n = 14). Overall, cumulative proportion of HBsAg seroclearance was 6.6% (n = 10). Lower baseline qHBsAg levels and strong 12-month declines in qHBsAg were significantly associated with HBsAg seroclearance for both HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive patients. When taken at certain levels, these determinants provided moderate sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) in predicting HBsAg seroclearance at month 36 (≤ 1000 IU/mL at baseline, Se = 0.80, Sp = 0.80; ≥ 1.0 log10  IU/mL drop at month 12, Se = 0.57, Sp = 1.00). Instead, qHBsAg levels ≤ 100 or ≤ 10 IU/mL at month 12 were optimal (both Se = 0.90 and Sp = 1.00). Detectable HBV-DNA provided fairly high Se and Sp when evaluated at baseline (Se = 1.00, Sp = 0.80), but not at month 12 (Se = 0.80, Sp = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

HBsAg seroclearance rates are not common in patients from Sub-Saharan Africa treated with anti-HBV containing antiretroviral therapy. qHBsAg levels at 12 months of treatment may accurately predict HBsAg seroclearance.

Rates and determinants of hepatitis B 'e' antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance during long-term follow-up of patients coinfected with HIV and hepatitis B virus

OBJECTIVE

This study determines rates and risk factors associated with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B 'e' antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance, two important prognostic indicators during infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), in a large contemporary cohort of patients coinfected with HIV-HBV.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study of predominately antiretroviral therapy (ART) experienced, coinfected patients.

METHODS

Participants enrolled in the French HIV-HBV Cohort had complete HBV serological battery conducted at inclusion and every yearly visit. Piecewise-exponential survival models were used to determine risk factors associated with seroclearance.

RESULTS

A total of 290 patients, of whom 151 (52.1%) were HBeAg positive, had been followed for a median 7.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] = 3.1-8.0). Tenofovir (TDF) containing ART became increasingly more frequent, as rates of undetectable HBV-DNA increased accordingly (at baseline = 39.3%, end of follow-up = 91.0%). In HBeAg-positive patients, 60 of 151 had HBeAg seroclearance (cumulative 46.4% at end of follow-up) after a median 3.0 years (IQR = 2.0-4.9). Overall, 17 of 290 patients had HBsAg seroclearance (cumulative 7.4% at end of follow-up) after a median 4.6 years (IQR = 2.1-7.2). Lower levels of time-averaged cumulative HBV-DNA were significantly associated with both HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance (P < 0.001 and P = 0.01, respectively). In post hoc analysis among patients initiating TDF, incidence rates of HBeAg seroclearance peaked at year 4 of TDF treatment (13.1/100 person-years), whereas a steep drop in HBsAg seroclearance incidence rates occurred after year 3 (at year 3 = 1.2/100 person-years versus thereafter = 0.6/100 person-years).

CONCLUSION

HBsAg seroclearance and, to a lesser extent, HBeAg seroclearance remain difficult endpoints for patients coinfected with HIV-HBV to achieve. HBV-DNA suppression, associated with effective treatment, is strongly linked to seroclearance, but this mostly occurs within the first years of ART-containing highly potent anti-HBV activity.