Liver decompensation in HIV/Hepatitis B coinfection in the combination antiretroviral therapy era does not seem increased compared to hepatitis B mono-infection

Epidemiological characteristic and prognosis changes in chronic hepatitis B in people living with HIV

INTRODUCTION

Due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment and vaccination during the last decades in Spain, epidemiological and prognosis of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may have changed.

METHODS

Retrospective review of CHB-HIV coinfected patients in a single reference center in Madrid until year 2019. We compared incidence, epidemiological and clinical characteristics according diagnosis period (before 2000, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, 2015-2019). A retrospective longitudinal study was done to assess mortality, related risk factors and hepatic decompensation.

RESULTS

Out of 5452 PLHIV, 160 had CHB (prevalence 2.92%; 95%CI 2.5-3.4), 85.6% were men, median age 32.1 (27-37.2). Incidence rate did not change over the years (2.4/100 patients-year). PLHIV with CHB diagnosed before year 2000 (n = 87) compared with those diagnosed between 2015 and 2019 (n = 11) were more often native-Spanish (90.8% vs. 18.2%), had infected using intravenous drugs (55.2% vs. 0), were coinfected with hepatitis C (40% vs. 9.1%) or hepatitis delta virus (30.4% vs. 0) and had more severe liver disease (cirrhosis 24.1% vs. 0). After a median follow-up of 20.4 years, 23 patients died (7.1/1000 patients-year) and 19 had liver decompensation (4.9/1000 patients-year). All deaths and liver decompensation occurred in patients diagnosed before year 2010. Mortality was associated with higher liver fibrosis in Fibroscan® (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.09).

CONCLUSION

The epidemiology of CHB in PLHIV in our cohort is changing with less native Spanish, more sexually transmitted cases and less coinfection with other hepatotropic virus. Patients diagnosed before 2010 have worst prognosis related to higher grades of liver fibrosis.

Mortality and associated factors among people living with HIV admitted at a tertiary-care hospital in Uganda: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Hospital admission outcomes for people living with HIV (PLHIV) in resource-limited settings are understudied. We describe in-hospital mortality and associated clinical-demographic factors among PLHIV admitted at a tertiary-level public hospital in Uganda.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of routinely collected data for PLHIV admitted at Kiruddu National Referral Hospital between March 2020 and March 2023. We estimated the proportion of PLHIV who had died during hospitalization and performed logistic regression modelling to identify predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 5,827 hospitalized PLHIV, the median age was 39 years (interquartile range [IQR] 31-49) and 3,293 (56.51%) were female. The median CD4 + cell count was 109 cells/µL (IQR 25-343). At admission, 3,710 (63.67%) were active on antiretroviral therapy (ART); 1,144 (19.63%) had interrupted ART > 3 months and 973 (16.70%) were ART naïve. In-hospital mortality was 26% (1,524) with a median time-to-death of 3 days (IQR 1-7). Factors associated with mortality (with adjusted odds ratios) included ART interruption, 1.33, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.13-1.57, p 0.001; CD4 + counts ≤ 200 cells/µL 1.59, 95%CI 1.33-1.91, p < 0.001; undocumented CD4 + cell count status 2.08, 95%CI 1.73-2.50, p < 0.001; impaired function status 7.35, 95%CI 6.42-8.41, p < 0.001; COVID-19 1.70, 95%CI 1.22-2.37, p 0.002; liver disease 1.77, 95%CI 1.36-2.30, p < 0.001; co-infections 1.53, 95%CI 1.32-1.78, p < 0.001; home address > 20 km from hospital 1.23, 95%CI 1.04-1.46, p 0.014; hospital readmission 0.7, 95%CI 0.56-0.88, p 0.002; chronic lung disease 0.62, 95%CI 0.41-0.92, p 0.019; and neurologic disease 0.46, 95%CI 0.32-0.68, p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION

One in four admitted PLHIV die during hospitalization. Identification of risk factors (such as ART interruption, function impairment, low/undocumented CD4 + cell count), early diagnosis and treatment of co-infections and liver disease could improve outcomes.

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and mortality in chronic viral hepatitis in an Asian population with and without HIV infection

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether people with HIV infection have a higher incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) than the general population.

AIMS

To compare the incidence of HCC between people infected with HBV and/or HCV with and without HIV METHODS: We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study, involving people with HBV and/or HCV infection from 2001 to 2018. The primary endpoint was incidence of HCC; secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. We performed Cox proportional hazard regression models to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of HIV for the primary and secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

We identified 1374 people infected with HIV and 39,908 people without HIV with HBV and/or HCV infection. Among those with HIV, 654 (47.6%) had HBV, 649 (47.2%) HCV and 71 (5.2%) HBV-HCV-co-infection; they were younger, and had a higher prevalence of HCV and a lower prevalence of cirrhosis. The incidence rate estimates of HCC were, respectively, 1.5 (95% CI: 0.8-2.5) and 7.6 (95% CI 7.3-8.0) per 1000 person-years for those with and without HIV infection. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models, among people with HBV, HIV was associated with lower risk of HCC (adjusted HR: 0.376, 95% CI: 0.201-0.704, p = 0.01) and death (adjusted HR: 0.692, 95% CI: 0.552-0.867, p = 0.007). Risks of HCC were similar for HCV and HBV-HCV co-infection for people with and without HIV.

CONCLUSIONS

Among individuals with HBV infection, the Incidence of HCC was lower in those with HIV. For HCV infection, incidence of HCC was similar between those with and without HIV.

Outcomes of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation in end-stage liver disease patients co-infected with hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus

BACKGROUND

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients coinfected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) are eligible for liver transplantation (LT) in Africa and Southeast Asia, particularly China. However, the outcome of HIV-HBV coinfected patients referred for ABO-incompatible LT (ABOi-LT) is unknown.

AIM

To clarify the outcome of ABOi-LT for HIV-HBV coinfected patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD).

METHODS

We report on two Chinese HIV-HBV coinfected patients with ESLD who underwent A to O brain-dead donor LT and reviewed the literature on HIV-HBV coinfected patients treated with ABO-compatible LT. The pretransplantation HIV viral load was undetectable, with no active opportunistic infections. Induction therapy consisted of two sessions of plasmapheresis and a single dose of rituximab in two split doses, followed by an intraoperative regimen of intravenous immunoglobulin, methylprednisolone, and basiliximab. Post-transplant maintenance immunosuppressive agents consisted of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone.

RESULTS

At the intermediate-term follow-up, patients showed undetectable HIV viral load, CD4(+) T cell counts greater than 150 cells/μL, no HBV recurrence, and stable liver function. A liver allograft biopsy showed no evidence of acute cellular rejection. Both patients survived at 36-42 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of ABOi-LT in HIV-HBV recipients with good intermediate-term outcomes, suggesting that ABOi-LT may be feasible and safe for HIV-HBV coinfected patients with ESLD.

Profiles of liver fibrosis evolution during long-term tenofovir treatment in HIV-positive patients coinfected with hepatitis B

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Data on liver fibrosis evolution and its involvement in liver-related morbidity are scarce in individuals with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection during treatment. We identified profiles of liver fibrosis evolution in coinfected patients undergoing tenofovir (TDF).

METHODS

We included 169 HIV-HBV-coinfected patients on TDF-based antiretroviral therapy. Virological and clinical data were obtained at TDF-initiation and every 6-12 months. From data on non-invasive liver fibrosis assessments collected yearly (FibroTest®), we established clusters of individuals with similar liver fibrosis evolution using group-based trajectory models.

RESULTS

Four profiles of liver fibrosis evolution were established from a median follow-up of 7.6 years (IQR = 3.1-13.1): low fibrosis with no progression (29.6%, profile A), low fibrosis with progression (22.5%, profile B), moderate fibrosis with high fluctuation (39.6%, profile C), and cirrhosis with no regression (8.3%, profile D). When compared to profile A, baseline HBeAg-positive status was associated with profiles B (P = .007) and C (P = .004), older age with profiles C (P < .001) and D (P = .001), exposure to second-generation protease inhibitors with profile C (P = .004), and CD4⁺ <500/mm³ at the last visit with profiles C (P = .02) and D (P = .002). Incident liver-related events occurred in profiles other than A (B, n = 1/38; C, n = 6/67; D, n = 3/14) and all five cases of hepatocellular carcinoma occurred in profiles C (n = 2) and D (n = 3).

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-treated HIV-HBV coinfected individuals do not seem to benefit from comparable levels of liver fibrosis regression as in HBV mono-infection. Liver-related morbidity occurs mainly in those with fluctuating or consistently high fibrosis levels.

Higher risk of mortality in HIV-HBV co-infected patients from sub-Saharan Africa is observed at lower CD4+ cell counts

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive individuals increases the risk of overall mortality, especially when HBV DNA levels are high. The role of CD4+ cell counts in this association is poorly defined. We aimed to determine whether HIV–HBV co-infection influences changes in CD4+ cell count before and during antiretroviral therapy and whether it affects mortality risk at levels of CD4+.

Methods

2052 HIV-positive participants from Côte d’Ivoire in a randomized-control trial assessing early or deferred ART were included. HBV-status was determined by hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). Changes in CD4+ cell levels were estimated using a mixed-effect linear model. The incidence rates of all-cause mortality were estimated at CD4+ counts ≤350, 351–500, >500/mm3 and were compared between HBV-status groups as incidence rate ratios (IRR).

Results

At baseline, 190 (9%) were HBsAg-positive [135 (71%) with HBV DNA <2000 IU/mL, 55 (29%) ≥2000 IU/mL]. Follow-up was a median 58 months (IQR = 40–69). Between co-infection groups, there were no differences in CD4+ decline before ART initiation and no differences in CD4+ increase after ART initiation. After adjusting for sex, age, baseline HIV RNA level, and early/deferred ART arm, mortality rates were not significantly different between HBsAg-positive versus HBsAg-negative participants across strata of CD4+ levels. However, HBsAg-positive individuals with HBV-DNA ≥2000 IU/mL versus HBsAg-negative individuals had increased mortality rates at ≤350/mm3 (adjusted-IRR = 3.82, 95% CI = 1.11–9.70) and 351–500/mm3 (adjusted-IRR = 4.37, 95% CI = 0.98–13.02), but not >500/mm3 (adjusted-IRR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.01–4.91).

Conclusion

Despite no effect of HBV-infection on CD4+ levels, HIV-HBV co-infected individuals with high HBV replication are at higher risk of mortality when CD4+ is <500/mm3.

Chronic Hepatitis B and HIV Coinfection: A Continuing Challenge in the Era of Antiretroviral Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The burden of chronic hepatitis B (HBV) remains disproportionately high among people living with HIV (PLWH) despite the advent of HBV vaccination and HBV-active antiretroviral therapy (ART). This review summarizes new insights and evolving issues in HIV-HBV coinfection.

RECENT FINDINGS

HBV-HIV coinfection is still a leading cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality more than a decade after the approval of tenofovir. While tenofovir-based ART has been shown to improve rates of HBV virologic suppression and halt fibrosis progression, the long-term benefits on the prevention of end-stage liver disease or HCC in HIV-HBV coinfection have yet to be convincingly demonstrated in PLWH. Missed opportunities for HBV vaccination persist despite evidence of ongoing risk for HBV infection in this population.

SUMMARY

Even as we work towards HBV elimination and functional cure, ongoing efforts should focus on optimizing risk stratification as well as uptake of HBV-active antiviral therapy and HBV immunization in this priority population.

Investigational drugs with dual activity against HBV and HIV (Review)

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) are global public health problems that pose a significant health burden. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfection is common, as these viruses have similar transmission routes, such as blood transmission, sexual transmission and mother-to-child transmission. Coinfection frequently leads to accelerated disease progression. For individuals coinfected with HIV/HBV, combination antiretroviral therapy containing dual anti-HBV drugs is recommended. Certain studies have also indicated the benefits of antiretroviral drugs with anti-HBV activity in patients with coinfection. A total of four Food and Drug Administration-approved HIV drugs also have anti-HBV activity; namely, emtricitabine, lamivudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and tenofovir alafenamide, which are all nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. However, various issues, including drug resistance and side effects, limit their application. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more drugs with dual activity against HBV and HIV. The present review outlines the mechanisms, safety and efficacy of certain drugs that have been investigated for this purpose.

Decreased All-Cause and Liver-Related Mortality Risk in HIV/Hepatitis B Virus Coinfection Coinciding With the Introduction of Tenofovir-Containing Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

Background

The development of efficacious combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has led to a dramatic decrease in mortality in HIV-positive patients. Specific data on the impact in HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)–coinfected patients are lacking. In this study, all-cause and cause-specific mortality risks stratified per era of diagnosis are investigated.

Methods

Data were analyzed from HIV/HBV-coinfected patients enrolled in the ATHENA cohort between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2017. Risk for (cause-specific) mortality was calculated using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, comparing patients diagnosed before 2003 with those diagnosed ≥2003. Risk factors for all-cause and liver-related mortality were also assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.

Results

A total of 1301 HIV/HBV-coinfected patients were included (14 882 person-years of follow-up). One-hundred ninety-eight patients (15%) died during follow-up. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for all-cause mortality in patients diagnosed in or after 2003 was 0.50 (95% CI, 0.35–0.72) relative to patients diagnosed before 2003. Similar risk reduction was observed for liver-related (aHR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11–0.75) and AIDS-related mortality (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.87). Use of a tenofovir-containing regimen was independently associated with a reduced risk of all-cause and liver-related mortality. Prior exposure to didanosine/stavudine was strongly associated with liver-related mortality. Ten percent of the population used only lamivudine as treatment for HBV.

Conclusions

All-cause, liver-related, and AIDS-related mortality risk in HIV/HBV-coinfected patients has markedly decreased over the years, coinciding with the introduction of tenofovir. Tenofovir-containing regimens, in absence of major contraindications, should be strongly encouraged in this population.

Hepatitis B virus seroprevalence among HIV-infected patients receiving combination antiretroviral therapy three decades after universal neonatal hepatitis B immunization program in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the seroprevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) among patients receiving HIV care in Taiwan.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of HIV-infected adult patients who initiated cART at 11 designated hospitals in Taiwan between 2012 and 2016. The clinical information collected included serological profiles on HBV, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and syphilis, plasma HIV RNA load, nadir CD4 cell count, and antiretrovirals with activity against both HBV and HIV (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [TDF], lamivudine [LAM], and emtricitabine [FTC]).

RESULTS

We analyzed 1800 HIV-infected patients; 1742 (96.8%) were male and 794 (44.1%) were born after July, 1986, when nationwide universal neonatal HBV vaccination was implemented. HBsAg positive results were 11.6% (209/1800), which decreased significantly from 18.1% (182/1006) in those born before July 1986 to 3.4% (27/794) in those born after. In multivariable analysis, HBsAg positivity was significantly associated with age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.08), CD4≧200 cells/μL (aOR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53-0.99), and HCV seropositivity (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.06-2.50). Of 209 HBV/HIV-coinfected patients, 31.1% started cART containing only LAM with anti-HBV activity, while 68.9% started cART containing TDF plus LAM or coformulated TDF/FTC.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall prevalence of HBV/HIV coinfection remained high among HIV-infected patients in Taiwan. Despite recommendations of the HIV treatment guidelines for the management of HBV infection, a substantial proportion of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients received cART containing only LAM for HBV infection.

Impact of antiretroviral therapy containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the survival of patients with HBV and HIV coinfection

BACKGROUND

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is active against both HBV and HIV. Whether the introduction of TDF-containing combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has improved the outcome of HIV/HBV-coinfected patients remains unclear in areas of higher HBV endemicity.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of newly diagnosed antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients between 2007 and 2015. Four groups of patients were defined, according to the HBV status and availability of TDF for HIV treatment in Taiwan in 2011. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

During the 9-year study period, 1,723 HIV-infected patients were included, with a median age of 31 years and baseline CD4 count of 273 cells per μL. The HBV seroprevalence had declined from 18.1% (125/692) in the pre-TDF era to 10.1% (104/1031) in the post-TDF era. The respective mortality rate for HIV/HBV-coinfected and HIV-monoinfected patients in the pre-TDF era was 23.2 (95% CI, 12.5-43.1) and 9.6 (95% CI, 6.1-15.0) deaths per 1000 person-years of follow-up [PYFU], and the respective mortality rate in the post-TDF era was 15.7 (95% CI, 7.0-34.8) and 8.0 (95% CI, 5.5-11.6) deaths per 1000 PYFU. The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality in multivariate Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients compared to HIV-monoinfected patients was 2.79 (95% CI, 1.25-6.22) in pre-TDF era and 1.11 (95% CI, 0.45-2.72) in post-TDF era.

CONCLUSIONS

In this country of high HBV endemicity, the adverse impact of chronic HBV infection on the survival observed in the pre-TDF era has significantly diminished among HIV/HBV-coinfected patients compared to HIV-monoinfected patients in the era of TDF-containing cART.

Impact of initiation of combination antiretroviral therapy according to the WHO recommendations on the survival of HIV-positive patients in Taiwan

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Early initiation of antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces the risks for serious infections and mortality. We aimed to assess the outcomes of initiating ART among HIV-positive Taiwanese according to the CD4 cut-off values by the WHO recommendations.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients with newly diagnosed HIV infection between 2004 and 2015 and 3 groups of patients were defined according to the timing of ART initiation based on CD4 count recommended by WHO: Group 1 between 2004 and 2009; Group 2 between 2010 and 2012; and Group 3 between 2013 and 2015. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. All patients were followed until 2 years after the last patient was included in each group.

RESULTS

Of 2022 patients included, the mortality rate was 18.28, 14.01, and 9.10 deaths per 1000 person-years of follow-up (PYFU) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, factors associated with mortality were age (per 1-year increase, adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.08), presence of AIDS-defining disease at HIV diagnosis (AHR, 4.81; 95% CI, 2.99-7.74), solid-organ malignancy (AHR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.86-5.18), and initiation of ART (AHR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.05-0.16). By competing risk regression model for non-AIDS-related death, the AHR for Group 3 versus Group 1 was 0.27 (95% CI, 0.09-0.80).

CONCLUSIONS

While continued efforts are needed to improve early diagnosis and linkage to care, initiation of cART improved survival among HIV-positive patients in Taiwan according to the increasing CD4 cut-off values that were recommended by the WHO.