1
|
Veenhof RJ, McGrath AH, Champion C, Dworjanyn SA, Marzinelli EM, Coleman MA. The role of microbiota in kelp gametophyte development and resilience to thermal stress. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY 2025. [PMID: 40299544 DOI: 10.1111/jpy.70018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2024] [Revised: 01/30/2025] [Accepted: 03/21/2025] [Indexed: 04/30/2025]
Abstract
Ocean warming is driving profound changes in the ecology of marine habitat formers such as kelps, with negative implications for the biodiversity and ecosystem services they support. Thermal stress can disturb associated microbiota that are essential to the healthy functioning of kelp, but little is known about how this process influences early-life stages. Because kelps have a biphasic life cycle, thermal stress dynamics of adult sporophyte microbiota may not reflect those of the free-living haploid gametophyte. We investigated the role of microbial disruption under thermal stress on gametophytes of the kelp Ecklonia radiata and compared sporophyte and gametophyte microbiota. The microbiota of gametophytes changed significantly when the microbiome was disrupted and under increased temperature (26°C), in which putative generalist bacterial taxa proliferated and bacterial families associated with nitrogen fixation decreased. Concurrently, the survival of gametophytes decreased to <10%, and surviving gametophytes did not become fertile when the microbiome was disrupted. The length of gametophytes decreased under both microbial disruption and thermal stress. Taken together, this suggests that the associated microbiota of Ecklonia gametophytes is important for their survival, fertility, and response to warming. Gametophyte and parental sporophyte microbiota were also distinct from the water column but not each other, suggesting vertical transmission of microbiota from one life stage to the next. This study furthers our understanding of the role of microbiota in gametophyte stress tolerance as well as the acquisition of microbiota, which may prove vital in protecting and increasing the stress resilience of these foundation species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reina J Veenhof
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexander H McGrath
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Curtis Champion
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- Fisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, National Marine Science Centre, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Symon A Dworjanyn
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melinda A Coleman
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
- Fisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, National Marine Science Centre, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fuggle R, Matias MG, Mayer-Pinto M, Marzinelli EM. Multiple stressors affect function rather than taxonomic structure of freshwater microbial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2025; 11:60. [PMID: 40251215 PMCID: PMC12008304 DOI: 10.1038/s41522-025-00700-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2025] [Indexed: 04/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Microbial community responses to environmental stressors are often characterised by assessing changes in taxonomic structure, but such changes, or lack thereof, may not reflect functional changes that are critical to ecosystem processes. We investigated the individual and combined effects of nutrient enrichment ( + 10 mg/L N, + 1 mg/L P) and salinisation ( + 15 g/L NaCl)-key stressors in freshwater systems-on the taxonomic structure and metabolic function of benthic microbial communities using 1000 L open freshwater ponds established >10 years ago in the field. Combined stressors drove strong decreases in maximum and mean total carbon metabolic rates and shifted carbon metabolic profiles compared to either stressor individually and compared to ambient conditions. These metabolic functional changes did not recover through time and occurred without significant alterations in bacterial community taxonomic structure. These results imply that critical functions, including organic carbon release, are likely to be impaired under multiple stressors, even when taxonomic structure remains stable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Fuggle
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | | | - Mariana Mayer-Pinto
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Araujo G, Montoya JM, Thomas T, Webster NS, Lurgi M. A mechanistic framework for complex microbe-host symbioses. Trends Microbiol 2025; 33:96-111. [PMID: 39242229 DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2024.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Virtually all multicellular organisms on Earth live in symbiotic associations with complex microbial communities: the microbiome. This ancient relationship is of fundamental importance for both the host and the microbiome. Recently, the analyses of numerous microbiomes have revealed an incredible diversity and complexity of symbionts, with different mechanisms identified as potential drivers of this diversity. However, the interplay of ecological and evolutionary forces generating these complex associations is still poorly understood. Here we explore and summarise the suite of ecological and evolutionary mechanisms identified as relevant to different aspects of microbiome complexity and diversity. We argue that microbiome assembly is a dynamic product of ecology and evolution at various spatio-temporal scales. We propose a theoretical framework to classify mechanisms and build mechanistic host-microbiome models to link them to empirical patterns. We develop a cohesive foundation for the theoretical understanding of the combined effects of ecology and evolution on the assembly of complex symbioses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gui Araujo
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - José M Montoya
- Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station, CNRS, 2 route du CNRS, 09200 Moulis, France
| | - Torsten Thomas
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052, Australia
| | - Nicole S Webster
- Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia; Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4072, Australia; Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, 4810, Australia
| | - Miguel Lurgi
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saha M, Dittami SM, Chan CX, Raina JB, Stock W, Ghaderiardakani F, Valathuparambil Baby John AM, Corr S, Schleyer G, Todd J, Cardini U, Bengtsson MM, Prado S, Skillings D, Sonnenschein EC, Engelen AH, Wang G, Wichard T, Brodie J, Leblanc C, Egan S. Progress and future directions for seaweed holobiont research. THE NEW PHYTOLOGIST 2024; 244:364-376. [PMID: 39137959 DOI: 10.1111/nph.20018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
In the marine environment, seaweeds (i.e. marine macroalgae) provide a wide range of ecological services and economic benefits. Like land plants, seaweeds do not provide these services in isolation, rather they rely on their associated microbial communities, which together with the host form the seaweed holobiont. However, there is a poor understanding of the mechanisms shaping these complex seaweed-microbe interactions, and of the evolutionary processes underlying these interactions. Here, we identify the current research challenges and opportunities in the field of seaweed holobiont biology. We argue that identifying the key microbial partners, knowing how they are recruited, and understanding their specific function and their relevance across all seaweed life history stages are among the knowledge gaps that are particularly important to address, especially in the context of the environmental challenges threatening seaweeds. We further discuss future approaches to study seaweed holobionts, and how we can apply the holobiont concept to natural or engineered seaweed ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahasweta Saha
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Marine Ecology and Biodiversity, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Simon M Dittami
- CNRS, Integrative Biology of Marine Models Laboratory (LBI2M, UMR 8227), Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Sorbonne Université, Roscoff, 29680, France
| | - Cheong Xin Chan
- Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia
| | - Jean-Baptiste Raina
- Climate Change Cluster, Faculty of Science, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Willem Stock
- Phycology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281 Sterre S8, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Fatemeh Ghaderiardakani
- Institute for Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Lessingstr. 8, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | | | - Shauna Corr
- Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Marine Ecology and Biodiversity, Prospect Place, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, UK
| | - Guy Schleyer
- Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (HKI), Beutenbergstr. 11a, Jena, 07745, Germany
| | - Jonathan Todd
- School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
- Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System, and College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Ulisse Cardini
- Department of Integrative Marine Ecology (EMI), Genoa Marine Centre, Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn - National Institute of Marine Biology, Ecology and Biotechnology, Genoa, 16126, Italy
| | - Mia M Bengtsson
- Institute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, Greifswald, 17489, Germany
| | - Soizic Prado
- National Museum of Natural History, Unit Molecules of Communication and Adaptation of Microorganisms (UMR 7245), Paris, France
| | - Derek Skillings
- Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27402, USA
| | - Eva C Sonnenschein
- Department of Biosciences, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | | | - Gaoge Wang
- College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China
- Institute of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China
- MoE Key Laboratory of Evolution & Marine Biodiversity, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China
| | - Thomas Wichard
- Institute for Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Lessingstr. 8, Jena, 07743, Germany
| | - Juliet Brodie
- Natural History Museum, Research, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
| | - Catherine Leblanc
- CNRS, Integrative Biology of Marine Models Laboratory (LBI2M, UMR 8227), Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Sorbonne Université, Roscoff, 29680, France
| | - Suhelen Egan
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation (CMSI), School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences (BEES), UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Halliday FW, Barnes EM, Ojima MN, Stiver I. On the hunt for facilitation in symbiont communities. Trends Ecol Evol 2024; 39:793-796. [PMID: 39112138 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 07/08/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
Host-associated organisms (i.e., symbionts) commonly interact within their shared hosts to form complex ecological communities. Here we suggest that within-host facilitation, where the presence of one symbiont group promotes establishment, growth, or reproduction of another, is prevalent, can arise from six fundamental mechanisms, and has broad implications for ecosystem dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fletcher W Halliday
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
| | - Elle M Barnes
- Thomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
| | - Miriam N Ojima
- Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Isabelle Stiver
- Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marzinelli EM, Thomas T, Vadillo Gonzalez S, Egan S, Steinberg PD. Seaweeds as holobionts: Current state, challenges, and potential applications. JOURNAL OF PHYCOLOGY 2024; 60:785-796. [PMID: 39047050 DOI: 10.1111/jpy.13485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Seaweeds play a strong ecological and economical role along the world's coastlines, where they support industries (e.g., aquaculture, bioproducts) and essential ecosystem services (e.g., biodiversity, fisheries, carbon capture). Evidence from wild and cultured seaweeds suggests that microorganisms play crucial roles in their health and functioning, prompting the need for considering seaweeds and their microbiome as a coherent entity or "holobiont." Here we show that the number of studies investigating seaweed hosts and their microbiome have increased in the last two decades. This likely reflects the increase in the appreciation of the importance of microbiomes for eukaryotic hosts, improved molecular approaches used to characterize their interactions, and increasing interest in commercial use of seaweeds. However, although increasing, most studies of seaweed holobionts have focused on (i) a few seaweed species of ecological or commercial significance, (ii) interactions involving only bacteria, and (iii) descriptive rather than experimental approaches. The relatively few experimental studies have mostly focused on manipulating abiotic factors to examine responses of seaweeds and their microbiome. Of the few studies that directly manipulated microorganisms to investigate their effects on seaweeds, most were done in laboratory or aquaria. We emphasize the need to move beyond the descriptions of patterns to experimental approaches for understanding causation and mechanisms. We argue that such experimental approaches are necessary for a better understanding of seaweed holobionts, for management actions for wild and cultivated seaweeds, and to better integrate studies of seaweed holobionts with the broader fields of seaweed ecology and biology, which are strongly experimental.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Torsten Thomas
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sebastian Vadillo Gonzalez
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Suhelen Egan
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter D Steinberg
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McGrath AH, Lema K, Egan S, Wood G, Gonzalez SV, Kjelleberg S, Steinberg PD, Marzinelli EM. Disentangling direct vs indirect effects of microbiome manipulations in a habitat-forming marine holobiont. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2024; 10:33. [PMID: 38553475 PMCID: PMC10980776 DOI: 10.1038/s41522-024-00503-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Host-associated microbiota are critical for eukaryotic host functioning, to the extent that hosts and their associated microbial communities are often considered "holobionts". Most studies of holobionts have focused on descriptive approaches or have used model systems, usually in the laboratory, to understand host-microbiome interactions. To advance our understanding of host-microbiota interactions and their wider ecological impacts, we need experimental frameworks that can explore causation in non-model hosts, which often have highly diverse microbiota, and in their natural ecological setting (i.e. in the field). We used a dominant habitat-forming seaweed, Hormosira banksii, to explore these issues and to experimentally test host-microbiota interactions in a non-model holobiont. The experimental protocols were aimed at trying to disentangle microbially mediated effects on hosts from direct effects on hosts associated with the methods employed to manipulate host-microbiota. This was done by disrupting the microbiome, either through removal/disruption using a combination of antimicrobial treatments, or additions of specific taxa via inoculations, or a combination of thew two. The experiments were done in mesocosms and in the field. Three different antibiotic treatments were used to disrupt seaweed-associated microbiota to test whether disturbances of microbiota, particularly bacteria, would negatively affect host performance. Responses of bacteria to these disturbances were complex and differed substantially among treatments, with some antibacterial treatments having little discernible effect. However, the temporal sequence of responses antibiotic treatments, changes in bacterial diversity and subsequent decreases in host performance, strongly suggested an effect of the microbiota on host performance in some treatments, as opposed to direct effects of the antibiotics. To further test these effects, we used 16S-rRNA-gene sequencing to identify bacterial taxa that were either correlated, or uncorrelated, with poor host performance following antibiotic treatment. These were then isolated and used in inoculation experiments, independently or in combination with the previously used antibiotic treatments. Negative effects on host performance were strongest where specific microbial antimicrobials treatments were combined with inoculations of strains that were correlated with poor host performance. For these treatments, negative host effects persisted the entire experimental period (12 days), even though treatments were only applied at the beginning of the experiment. Host performance recovered in all other treatments. These experiments provide a framework for exploring causation and disentangling microbially mediated vs. direct effects on hosts for ecologically important, non-model holobionts in the field. This should allow for better predictions of how these systems will respond to, and potentially mitigate, environmental disturbances in their natural context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Harry McGrath
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia.
| | - Kimberley Lema
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Suhelen Egan
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Georgina Wood
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
- UWA Oceans Institute & School of Biological Sciences, Indian Ocean Marine Research Centre, The University of Western Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sebastian Vadillo Gonzalez
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
| | - Staffan Kjelleberg
- Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, SBS-01N-27, Singapore, 637551, Singapore
| | - Peter D Steinberg
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, SBS-01N-27, Singapore, 637551, Singapore
| | - Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- The University of Sydney, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Institute of Marine Science, Mosman, NSW, Australia
- Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 60 Nanyang Drive, SBS-01N-27, Singapore, 637551, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rieseberg L, Warschefsky E, Burton J, Huang K, Sibbett B. Editorial 2024. Mol Ecol 2024; 33:e17239. [PMID: 38146175 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Loren Rieseberg
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Emily Warschefsky
- William L. Brown Center, Missouri Botanical Garden, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jade Burton
- John Wiley & Sons, Atrium Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
| | - Kaichi Huang
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Benjamin Sibbett
- John Wiley & Sons, Atrium Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Khan T, Song W, Nappi J, Marzinelli EM, Egan S, Thomas T. Functional guilds and drivers of diversity in seaweed-associated bacteria. FEMS MICROBES 2023; 5:xtad023. [PMID: 38213395 PMCID: PMC10781435 DOI: 10.1093/femsmc/xtad023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Comparisons of functional and taxonomic profiles from bacterial communities in different habitats have suggested the existence of functional guilds composed of taxonomically or phylogenetically distinct members. Such guild membership is, however, rarely defined and the factors that drive functional diversity in bacteria remain poorly understood. We used seaweed-associated bacteria as a model to shed light on these important aspects of community ecology. Using a large dataset of over 1300 metagenome-assembled genomes from 13 seaweed species we found substantial overlap in the functionality of bacteria coming from distinct taxa, thus supporting the existence of functional guilds. This functional equivalence between different taxa was particularly pronounced when only functions involved in carbohydrate degradation were considered. We further found that bacterial taxonomy is the dominant driver of functional differences between bacteria and that seaweed species or seaweed type (i.e. brown, red and green) had relatively stronger impacts on genome functionality for carbohydrate-degradation functions when compared to all other cellular functions. This study provides new insight into the factors underpinning the functional diversity of bacteria and contributes to our understanding how community function is generated from individual members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahsin Khan
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Weizhi Song
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Jadranka Nappi
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Ezequiel M Marzinelli
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Suhelen Egan
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Torsten Thomas
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation & School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Delva S, De Baets B, Baetens JM, De Clerck O, Stock W. No bacterial-mediated alleviation of thermal stress in a brown seaweed suggests the absence of ecological bacterial rescue effects. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 876:162532. [PMID: 36870499 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
While microbiome alterations are increasingly proposed as a rapid mechanism to buffer organisms under changing environmental conditions, studies of these processes in the marine realm are lagging far behind their terrestrial counterparts. Here, we used a controlled laboratory experiment to examine whether the thermal tolerance of the brown seaweed Dictyota dichotoma, a common species in European coastal ecosystems, could be enhanced by the repeated addition of bacteria from its natural environment. Juvenile algae from three genotypes were subjected for two weeks to a temperature gradient, spanning almost the entire thermal range that can be tolerated by the species (11-30 °C). At the start of the experiment and again in the middle of the experiment, the algae were inoculated with bacteria from their natural environment or left untouched as a control. Relative growth rate was measured over the two-week period, and we assessed bacterial community composition prior to and at the end of the experiment. Since the growth of D. dichotoma over the full thermal gradient was not affected by supplementing bacteria, our results indicate no scope for bacterial-mediated stress alleviation. The minimal changes in the bacterial communities linked to bacterial addition, particularly at temperatures above the thermal optimum (22-23 °C), suggest the existence of a barrier to bacterial recruitment. These findings indicate that ecological bacterial rescue is unlikely to play a role in mitigating the effects of ocean warming on this brown seaweed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soria Delva
- Phycology Research Group, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; Research Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Bernard De Baets
- Research Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Jan M Baetens
- Research Unit Knowledge-Based Systems (KERMIT), Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Olivier De Clerck
- Phycology Research Group, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Willem Stock
- Phycology Research Group, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li J, Weinberger F, de Nys R, Thomas T, Egan S. A pathway to improve seaweed aquaculture through microbiota manipulation. Trends Biotechnol 2023; 41:545-556. [PMID: 36089422 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Eukaryotic hosts are associated with microbial communities that are critical to their function. Microbiota manipulation using beneficial microorganisms, for example, in the form of animal probiotics or plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs), can enhance host performance and health. Recently, seaweed beneficial microorganisms (SBMs) have been identified that promote the growth and development and/or improve disease resistance of seaweeds. This knowledge coincides with global initiatives seeking to expand and intensify seaweed aquaculture. Here, we provide a pathway with the potential to improve commercial cultivation of seaweeds through microbiota manipulation, highlighting that seaweed restoration practices can also benefit from further understanding SBMs and their modes of action. The challenges and opportunities of different approaches to identify and apply SBMs to seaweed aquaculture are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiasui Li
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Florian Weinberger
- Marine Ecology Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Rocky de Nys
- Sea Forest Limited, 488 Freestone Point Road, Triabunna, Tasmania 7190, Australia and College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville 4810, Australia
| | - Torsten Thomas
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia
| | - Suhelen Egan
- Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|