Sepsis after renal transplantation: Clinical, immunological, and microbiological risk factors

Management of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Sepsis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Up to 6% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) experience life-threatening complications requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and one of the most common medical complications requiring ICU admission is infection. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) modification on prognosis of KTRs with sepsis.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in 4 university-affiliated hospitals to evaluate the effect of adjusting the IST in KTRs with sepsis. Only patients who either maintained IST after ICU admission or those who underwent immediate (within 24 h of ICU admission) reduction or withdrawal of IST following ICU admission were included in this study. "Any reduction" was defined as a dosage reduction of any IST or discontinuation of at least 1 IST. "Complete withdrawal of IST" was defined as concomitant discontinuation of all ISTs, except steroids.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1596 of the KTRs were admitted to the ICU, and 112 episodes of sepsis or septic shock were identified. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 35.7%. In-hospital mortality was associated with higher sequential organ failure assessment score, simplified acute physiology score 3, non-identical human leukocyte antigen relation, presence of septic shock, and complete withdrawal of IST. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, complete withdrawal of IST remained significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted coefficient, 1.029; 95% confidence interval, 0.024-2.035) and graft failure (adjusted coefficient, 2.001; 95% confidence interval, 0.961-3.058).

CONCLUSIONS

Complete IST withdrawal was common and associated with worse outcomes in critically ill KTRs with sepsis.

The Predictors and Risk Factors of 2-Year Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients: A Multicenter Case-Control Study

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation is a definitive treatment for end-stage renal disease. It is associated with improved life expectancy and quality of life. One of the most common complications following kidney transplantation is graft rejection. To our knowledge, no previous study has identified rejection risk factors in kidney transplant recipients in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the specific risk factors of graft rejection.

METHODS

A multicenter case-control study was conducted at four transplant centers in Saudi Arabia. All adult patients who underwent a renal transplant between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 were screened for eligibility. Included patients were categorized into two groups (cases and control) based on the occurrence of biopsy-proven rejection within 2 years. The primary outcome was to determine the risk factors for rejection within the 2 years of transplant. Exact matching was utilized using a 1:4 ratio based on patients' age, gender, and transplant year.

RESULTS

Out of 1,320 screened renal transplant recipients, 816 patients were included. The overall prevalence of 2-year rejection was 13.9%. In bivariate analysis, deceased donor status, the presence of donor-specific antibody (DSA), intraoperative hypotension, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida, and any infection within 2 years were linked with an increased risk of 2-year rejection. However, in the logistic regression analysis, the presence of DSA was identified as a significant risk for 2-year rejection (adjusted OR: 2.68; 95% CI: 1.10, 6.49, p = 0.03). Furthermore, blood infection, infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa or BK virus within 2 years of transplant, were associated with higher odds of 2-year rejection (adjusted OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.48, 6.48, p = 0.003, adjusted OR: 3.23; 95% CI: 0.87, 11.97, p = 0.08 and adjusted OR: 2.76; 95% CI: 0.89, 8.48, p = 0.07, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings emphasize the need for appropriate prevention and management of infections following kidney transplantation to avoid more serious problems, such as rejection, which could significantly raise the likelihood of allograft failure and probably death. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the impact of serum chloride levels prior to transplant and intraoperative hypotension on the risk of graft rejection and failure.

Early versus late removal of urinary catheter after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease is kidney transplantation. During the operation, a catheter is introduced into the bladder and remains in place postoperatively to allow the bladder to drain. This decreases tension from the cysto-ureteric anastomosis and promotes healing. Unfortunately, urinary catheters can pose an infection risk to patients as they allow bacteria into the bladder, potentially resulting in a urinary tract infection (UTI). The longer the catheter remains in place, the greater the risk of developing a UTI. There is no consensus approach to the time a catheter should remain in place post-transplant. Furthermore, the different timings of catheter removal are thought to be associated with different incidences of UTI and postoperative complications, such as anastomotic breakdown.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to compare patients who had their catheter removed < 5 days post-transplant surgery to those patients who had their catheter removed ≥ 5 days following their kidney transplant. Primary outcome measures between the two groups included: the incidence of symptomatic UTIs, the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria and the incidence of major urological complications requiring intervention and treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 April 2023 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing timing of catheter removal post-transplantation were eligible for inclusion. All donor types were included, and all recipients were included regardless of age, demographics or type of urinary catheter used.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Results from the literature search were screened by two authors to identify if they met our inclusion criteria. We designated removal of a urinary catheter before five days (120 hours) as an 'early removal' and anything later than this as a 'late removal.' The studies were assessed for quality using the risk of bias tool. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria. Statistical analyses were performed using the random effects model, and results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

Two studies (197 patients) were included in our analysis. One study comprised a full-text article, and the other was a conference abstract with very limited information. The risk of bias in the included studies was generally either high or unclear. It is uncertain whether early versus late removal of the urinary catheter made any difference to the incidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria (RR 0.89, 95% Cl 0.17 to 4.57; participants = 197; I2 = 88%; very low certainty evidence). Data on other outcomes, such as the incidence of UTI and the incidence of major urological complications, were lacking. Furthermore, the follow-up of patients across the studies was short, with no patients being followed beyond one month.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

A high-quality, well-designed RCT is required to compare the effectiveness of early catheter removal versus late catheter removal in patients following a kidney transplant. At the present time, there is insufficient evidence to suggest any difference between early and late catheter removal post-transplant, and the studies investigating this were generally of poor quality.

Standardization of neutrophil CD64 and monocyte HLA-DR measurement and its application in immune monitoring in kidney transplantation

Background

Infections cause high mortality in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). The expressions of neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) and monocyte HLA-DR (mHLA-DR) provide direct evidence of immune status and can be used to evaluate the severity of infection. However, the intensities of nCD64 and mHLA-DR detected by flow cytometry (FCM) are commonly measured by mean fluorescence intensities (MFIs), which are relative values, thus limiting their application. We aimed to standardize nCD64 and mHLA-DR expression using molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) and to explore their role in immune monitoring for KTRs with infection.

Methods

The study included 50 KTRs diagnosed with infection, 65 immunologically stable KTRs and 26 healthy controls. The blood samples were collected and measured simultaneously by four FCM protocols at different flow cytometers. The MFIs of nCD64 and mHLA-DR were converted into MESF by Phycoerythrin (PE) Fluorescence Quantitation Kit. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the reliability between the four FCM protocols. MESFs of nCD64 and mHLA-DR, nCD64 index and sepsis index (SI) with the TBNK panel were used to evaluate the immune status. Comparisons among multiple groups were performed with ANOVA one-way analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed to diagnose infection or sepsis. Univariate and multivariate logistic analysis examined associations of the immune status with infection.

Results

MESFs of nCD64 and mHLA-DR measured by four protocols had excellent reliability (ICCs 0.993 and 0.957, respectively). The nCD64, CD64 index and SI in infection group were significantly higher than those of stable KTRs group. Patients with sepsis had lower mHLA-DR but higher SI than non-sepsis patients. ROC analysis indicated that nCD64 had the highest area under the curve (AUC) for infection, and that mHLA-DR had the highest AUC for sepsis. Logistic analysis indicated that nCD64 > 3089 and B cells counts were independent risk factors for infection.

Conclusion

The standardization of nCD64 and mHLA-DR made it available for widespread application. MESFs of nCD64 and mHLA-DR had good diagnostic performance on infection and sepsis, respectively, which could be promising indicators for immune status of KTRs and contributed to individualized treatment.

Aetiology, management, and outcome of lower respiratory tract infection in renal allograft recipients - A report from a tropical country

INTRODUCTION

Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) among renal transplant recipients (RTRs) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to analyse the aetiology, outcome, and risk factors associated with mortality.

METHODS

We analysed baseline transplant characteristics, symptoms, hospital course, laboratory, serological and microbial results, and their association with the outcome of all RTRs between January 2011 and December 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 206 LRTI patients out of 1051 RTRs were analysed. The incidence proportion was nearly 22 episodes per 1000 patients per year. The mean age was 39.3 years, with male predominance. Bacterial was the most common aetiology (53%), and staphylococcus was the most common species. Among the fungal causes (14%), 68% had aspergillus infection. More than one-third RTRs died during the hospital course mainly because of bacterial causes (42.6%). The aspergillus infection was the most common fungus associated with 50% mortality. On multi-variate analysis, sepsis, septic shock, and the need for mechanical ventilation independently predicted mortality.

CONCLUSION

Bacterial aetiology was the most common cause; though the fungal aetiology was seen less, it was associated with higher mortality. Mortality in RTR with LRTI was associated with sepsis, septic shock, and the need for mechanical ventilation.

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

An increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files.

RESULTS

Of the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.

Sepsis affects kidney graft function and one-year mortality of the recipients in contrast with systemic inflammatory response

Background

Infections remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality after kidney transplantation. The aim of our study was to determine the effect of sepsis on kidney graft function and recipient mortality.

Methods

A prospective, observational, single-center study was performed. Selected clinical and biochemical parameters were recorded and compared between an experimental group (with sepsis, n = 34) and a control group (with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, n = 31) comprising kidney allograft recipients.

Results

Sepsis worsened both patient (HR = 14.77, p = 0.007) and graft survival (HR = 15.07, p = 0.007). Overall one-year mortality was associated with age (HR = 1.08, p = 0.048), APACHE II score (HR = 1.13, p = 0.035), and combination immunosuppression therapy (HR = 0.1, p = 0.006), while graft survival was associated with APACHE II (HR = 1.25, p = 0.004) and immunosuppression. In sepsis patients, mortality correlated with the maximal dose of noradrenalin (HR = 100.96, p = 0.008), fungal infection (HR = 5.64, p = 0.024), SAPS II score (HR = 1.06, p = 0.033), and mechanical ventilation (HR = 5.97, p = 0.033), while graft survival was influenced by renal replacement therapy (HR = 21.16, p = 0.005), APACHE II (HR = 1.19, p = 0.035), and duration of mechanical ventilation (HR = 1.01, p = 0.015).

Conclusion

In contrast with systemic inflammatory response syndrome, septic kidney allograft injury is associated with early graft loss and may represent a significant risk of mortality.

Pre-transplant maintenance dialysis duration and outcomes after kidney transplantation: A multicenter population-based cohort study

The association between pre-transplant dialysis duration and post-transplant outcomes may vary by the population and endpoints studied. We conducted a population-based cohort study using linked healthcare databases from Ontario, Canada including kidney transplant recipients (n = 4461) from 2004-2014. Our primary outcome was total graft failure (i.e., death, return to dialysis, or pre-emptive re-transplant). Secondary outcomes included death-censored graft failure, death with graft function, mortality, hospitalization for cardiovascular events, hospitalization for infection, and hospital readmission. We presented results by pre-transplant dialysis duration (pre-emptive transplant, and 0.01-1.43, 1.44-2.64, 2.65-4.25, 4.26-6.45, and 6.46-36.5 years, for quintiles 1-5). After adjusting for clinical characteristics, pre-emptive transplantation was associated with a lower rate of total graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.99), while quintile 4 was associated with a higher rate (aHR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.71), when compared to quintile 1. There was no significant relationship between dialysis duration and death-censored graft failure, cardiovascular events, or hospital readmission. For death with graft function and mortality, quintiles 3-5 had a significantly higher aHR compared to quintile 1, while for infection, quintiles 2-5 had a higher aHR. Longer time on dialysis was associated with an increased rate of several adverse post-transplant outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Characterizing the landscape and impact of infections following kidney transplantation

Infections remain a major threat to successful kidney transplantation (KT). To characterize the landscape and impact of post-KT infections in the modern era, we used United States Renal Data System (USRDS) data linked to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to study 141 661 Medicare-primary kidney transplant recipients from January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2014. Infection diagnoses were ascertained by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. The cumulative incidence of a post-KT infection was 36.9% at 3 months, 53.7% at 1 year, and 78.0% at 5 years. The most common infections were urinary tract infection (UTI; 46.8%) and pneumonia (28.2%). Five-year mortality for kidney transplant recipients who developed an infection was 24.9% vs 7.9% for those who did not, and 5-year death-censored graft failure (DCGF) was 20.6% vs 10.1% (P < .001). This translated to a 2.22-fold higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.15 2.222.29 , P < .001) and 1.92-fold higher DCGF risk (aHR: 1.84 1.911.98 , P < .001) for kidney transplant recipients who developed an infection, although the magnitude of this higher risk varied across infection types (for example, 3.11-fold higher mortality risk for sepsis vs 1.62-fold for a UTI). Post-KT infections are common and substantially impact mortality and DCGF, even in the modern era. Kidney transplant recipients at high risk for infections might benefit from enhanced surveillance or follow-up to mitigate these risks.

Unknown cytomegalovirus serostatus in primary immunodeficiency disorders: A new category of transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of recipient (R) and donor (D) influences hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcome. However, it is not a reliable indicator of CMV infection in primary immunodeficiency disorder (PIDD) recipients who are unable to make adequate antigen-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) or who receive intravenous Ig (IVIg) prior to testing.

OBJECTIVE

Since no data exist on PIDD with unknown CMV serostatus, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between pre-HSCT recipient and donor serostatus and incidence of CMV infection in recipients with unknown serostatus.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all pediatric PIDD HSCTs (2007-2018) was performed at University of California San Francisco. Recipients were separated into categories based on pre-transplant serostatus: 1) seropositive (R(+)), 2) seronegative (R(-)), and 3) unknown serostatus (R(x)). Patients with pre-HSCT active CMV viremia were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included, 69% male. The overall incidence of CMV infection was 20%, but varied in R(+), R(-), and R(x) at 80%, 0%, and 14%, (P-value = .0001). Similarly, 5-year survival differed among groups, 60% R(+), 100% R(-), and 90% of R(x) (P-value = .0045). There was no difference in CMV reactivation by donor serostatus (P-value = .29), however, faster time to clearance of CMV was observed for R(x)/D(+) group (median 9.5 days (IQR 2.5-18), P-value = .024).

CONCLUSION

We identify a novel group of recipients, R(x), with an intermediate level of survival and CMV incidence post-HSCT, when compared to seropositive and seronegative recipients. No evidence of CMV transmission from D(+) in R(-) and R(x) was observed. We believe R(x) should be considered as a separate category in future studies to better delineate recipient risk status.

Economic impacts of alternative kidney transplant immunosuppression: A national cohort study

Understanding the economic implications of induction and maintenance immunosuppression (ISx) is important in developing personalized kidney transplant (KTx) care. Using data from a novel integrated data set including financial records from the University Health System Consortium, Medicare, and pharmacy claims (2007-2014), we estimated the differences in the impact of induction and maintenance ISx regimens on transplant hospitalization costs and Medicare payments from KTx to 3 years. Use of thymoglobulin (TMG) significantly increased transplant hospitalization costs ($12 006; P = .02), compared with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. TMG resulted in lower Medicare payments in posttransplant years 1 (-$2058; P = .05) and 2 (-$1784; P = .048). Patients on steroid-sparing ISx incurred relatively lower total Medicare spending (-$10 880; P = .01) compared with patients on triple therapy (tacrolimus, antimetabolite, and steroids). MPA/AZA-sparing, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors-based, and cyclosporine-based maintenance ISx regimens were associated with significantly higher payments. Alternative ISx regimens were associated with different KTx hospitalization costs and longer-term payments. Future studies of clinical efficacy should also consider cost impacts to define the economic effectiveness of alternative ISx regimens.

Revision Joint Arthroplasty and Renal Transplant: A Matched Control Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

There is little literature concerning clinical outcomes following revision joint arthroplasty in solid organ transplant recipients. The aims of this study are to (1) analyze postoperative outcomes and mortality following revision hip and knee arthroplasty in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) compared to non-RTRs and (2) characterize common indications and types of revision procedures among RTRs.

METHODS

A retrospective Medicare database review identified 1020 RTRs who underwent revision joint arthroplasty (359 revision total knee arthroplasty [TKA] and 661 revision total hip arthroplasty [THA]) from 2005 to 2014. RTRs were compared to their respective matched control groups of nontransplant revision arthroplasty patients for hospital length of stay, readmission, major medical complications, infections, septicemia, and mortality following revision.

RESULTS

Renal transplantation was significantly associated with increased length of stay (6.12 ± 7.86 vs 4.33 ± 4.29, P < .001), septicemia (odds ratio [OR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.83-3.46; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.51-4.53; P < .001) following revision TKA. Among revision THA patients, RTR status was associated with increased hospital readmission (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.47; P = .023), septicemia (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.41-2.34; P < .001), and 1-year mortality (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.88-3.66; P < .001). The most frequent primary diagnoses associated with revision TKA and THA among RTRs were mechanical complications of prosthetic implant.

CONCLUSION

Prior renal transplantation among revision joint arthroplasty patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality when compared to nontransplant recipients.

Risk factors for complications and graft failure in kidney transplant patients with sepsis

Immunosuppressive therapies decrease the incidence of acute kidney rejection after kidney transplantation, but also increase the risk of infections and sepsis. This study aimed to identify the risk factors associated with complications and/or graft failure in kidney transplant patients with sepsis. A total of 14,658 kidney transplant patients with sepsis, identified in the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database (data from 2005-2014), were included in the study and classified into three groups: patients without complications or graft failure/dialysis (Group 1), patients with complications only (Group 2), and patients with complications and graft failure/dialysis (Group 3). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate factors associated with kidney transplant recipients. Multivariate analysis showed that, compared to Group 1, patients from Group 2 or Group 3 were more likely to be Black and to have cytomegalovirus infection, coagulopathy, and glomerulonephritis (p ≤ 0.041). Also, Group 2 was more likely to have herpes simplex virus infection, and Group 3 was more likely to have hepatitis C infection and peripheral vascular disorders, compared to Group 1 (p ≤ 0.002). In addition, patients in Group 3 were more likely to be Black and to have hepatitis C infection, peripheral vascular disorders, coagulopathy, and hypertension compared to Group 2 (p ≤ 0.039). Age and female gender were associated with lower odds of complications after kidney transplantation regardless of graft rejection/dialysis (p ≤ 0.049). Hyperlipidemia and diabetes decreased the chance of complications and graft failure/dialysis after kidney transplant (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the study highlights that black race, male gender, and specific comorbidities can increase the risk of complications and graft failure in kidney transplant patients with sepsis.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients

Purpose

Prognosis of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients has improved, mainly because of better prevention of rejection by immunosuppressive therapies. However, SOT recipients are highly susceptible to conventional and opportunistic infections, which represent a major cause of morbidity, graft dysfunction and mortality.

Methods

Narrative review.

Results

We cover the current epidemiology and main aspects of infections in SOT recipients including risk factors such as postoperative risks and specific risks for different transplant recipients, key points on anti-infective prophylaxis as well as diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. We provide an up-to-date guide for management of the main syndromes that can be encountered in SOT recipients including acute respiratory failure, sepsis or septic shock, and central nervous system infections as well as bacterial infections with multidrug-resistant strains, invasive fungal diseases, viral infections and less common pathogens that may impact this patient population.

Conclusion

We provide state-of the art review of available knowledge of critically ill SOT patients with infections.

Diabetes and the solid organ transplant recipient

Solid organ transplant candidates undergo very strict screening for cardiovascular risk. Such screening has permitted significant decreases in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality over the ensuing decades of follow up. Long term follow-up has enabled us to identify an increasing incidence of pulmonary and urinary tract infections with or without sepsis as competing factors of morbidity and mortality. Indeed, all-cause mortality may now be dominated by infection-related endpoints. No population of transplant recipients is more naturally susceptible to infection as a diabetic subset, now submitted to immunosuppression. The current review details infection risk for kidney, liver, heart, and lung allograft recipients. A specific feature of this report emphasizes the enhanced risk for bacterial and fungal infection found in diabetic allograft recipients on immunosuppression therapy. The risk of repeated prescription of antibiotics in terms of evolutions of resistant strains of infectious pathogens is emphasized.

Prise en charge du transplanté rénal en réanimation

La transplantation rénale est la thérapeutique de choix de l’insuffisance rénale chronique au stade ultime, son usage est de plus en plus large. Les progrès réalisés dans les traitements immunosuppresseurs ont permis une amélioration de la durée de vie du greffon, mais au prix d’une augmentation des complications cardiovasculaires et infectieuses. Environ 5 % des transplantés rénaux présentent des complications sévères qui nécessitent une prise en charge intensive. Elles sont principalement de cause infectieuse et dominées par la défaillance respiratoire aiguë. L’insuffisance rénale aiguë est commune, elle affecte la fonction du greffon à court et long termes. La prise en charge en réanimation de ces complications doit prendre en compte le terrain particulier du transplanté rénal et les effets délétères de l’immunosuppression, condition nécessaire à une amélioration de la mortalité qui reste à plus de 30 %.

Factors and outcomes in association with sepsis differ between simultaneous pancreas/kidney and single kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

As immunosuppressive therapy has improved in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients (SPKTRs), infection has become the major limitation of disease-free survival.

METHODS

We studied all SPKTRs and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2003 and 2015. Thirty-six of 134 SPKTRs (26.9%) were diagnosed with sepsis among which 13/36 SPKTRs (36.1%) developed severe sepsis/septic shock. A control group of 98 SPKTRs without sepsis and 61/538 KTRs (11.3%) with sepsis were used for comparison.

RESULTS

Among SPKTRs, female sex, low BMI, CMV seronegativity, CMV disease, and acute cellular rejection increased the risk for sepsis (P < .05). Patient and allograft survival was comparable among SPKTRs with and without sepsis (P > .05), but showed inferior kidney allograft function (P < .05). While urosepsis was less common among SPKTRs (45%), pneumonia (33%) and peritonitis (15%) as site of infections were more frequent (P < .05). Here, gram-positive and fungal sepsis were more common among SPKTRs compared to KTRs (P < .05). SPKTRs showed a higher incidence and an earlier onset of sepsis compared to KTRs (P < .001). SPKTRs with severe sepsis/septic shock were more likely to show pneumonia as site of infection with gram-positive/polymicrobial bacteremia (P < .05). Mortality from severe sepsis was 29% among SPKTRs compared to 58% among KTRs (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Differences in incidence, site, causative pathogens, and onset of sepsis between SPKTRs and KTRs may be attributed to more intense immunosuppression, major surgery, and complications of diabetes among SPKTRs. Lower sepsis-related mortality may reflect younger age and more timely diagnosis, but also supports recent findings of less sepsis-related mortality among recipients of solid organ transplantation.

Simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients are predisposed to tissue-invasive cytomegalovirus disease and concomitant infectious complications

BACKGROUND

Infections have increased in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients (SPKTRs) with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection being the most important viral infection with adverse impact on patient and allograft outcomes.

METHODS

We studied all primary SPKTRs and deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) between 2008 and 2015 for the development of CMV infection. A total of 21/62 SPKTRs (33.9%) and 90/335 KTRs (26.9%) were diagnosed with CMV infection. A control group of 41 SPKTRs without CMV infection was used for comparison.

RESULTS

SPKTRs showed an increased incidence of CMV infection compared with KTRs. SPKTRs were more likely to develop CMV disease, CMV pneumonia, recurrent CMV infection, higher initial and peak CMV loads, and more need for intravenous antiviral therapy compared with KTRs (P<.05). High-risk CMV serostatus (D+R-) and 2 HLA-B/-DR mismatches increased the risk of CMV infection in SPKTRs (P<.05). No differences were observed for patient and allograft outcomes (P>.05). SPKTRs with CMV infection were more likely to show concomitant Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viremia compared with SPKTRs without CMV infection (P<.05). SPKTRs with CMV infection showed higher incidences of concomitant BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy, EBV viremia, and sepsis compared with KTRs with CMV infection (P<.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a higher incidence and more severe course of CMV infection in SPKTRs compared with KTRs. The increased incidence of concomitant infectious complications among SPKTRs with CMV infection suggests an overall impaired immunity, and calls for more intense screening.