Ureterovesical anastomotic techniques for kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Robotic kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation is the best treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease owing to improved survival and quality of life compared with dialysis. The surgical approach to kidney transplantation has been somewhat stagnant in the past 50 years, with the open approach being the only available option. In this scenario, evidence of reduced surgery-related morbidity after the introduction of robotics into several surgical fields has induced surgeons to consider robot-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) as an alternative approach to these fragile and immunocompromised patients. Since 2014, when the RAKT technique was standardized thanks to the pioneering collaboration between the Vattikuti Urology Institute and the Medanta hospital (Vattikuti Urology Institute-Medanta), several centres worldwide implemented RAKT programmes, providing interesting results regarding the safety and feasibility of this procedure. However, RAKT is still considered an alternative procedure to be offered mainly in the living donor setting, owing to various possible drawbacks such as prolonged rewarming time, demanding learning curve, and difficulties in carrying out this procedure in challenging scenarios (such as patients with obesity, severe atherosclerosis of the iliac vessels, deceased donor setting, or paediatric recipients). Nevertheless, the refinement of robotic platforms through the implementation of novel technologies as well as the encouraging results from multicentre collaborations under the umbrella of the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section are currently expanding the boundaries of RAKT, making this surgical procedure a real alternative to the open approach.

Robotic-Assisted Management of Ureteral Complications in Post-Renal Transplant Patients: A Case Series and Literature Review

Introduction: Urologic complications are thought to be the most common surgical complication of renal transplantation. Ureteral pathology, including stenosis, urine leak, and vesicoureteral reflux, predominates. Although endourologic and interventional radiological management may be utilized, failure rates remain relatively high and surgical reconstruction remains the definitive management. Robotic ureteral reconstruction has been demonstrated to provide patient benefit in nontransplant populations, but the literature on transplant reconstruction is very limited. This study reports an additional series of patients with a focus on surgical technique, as well as reviews the available evidence for robotic reconstruction for post-transplant ureteral complications. Methods: All institutional patients undergoing robotic-assisted reconstruction for post-transplant ureteral complications for the years 2019-2022 were included. Intra- and postoperative variables, patient demographics, and follow-up data were obtained retrospectively from parsing of patient records. Statistics were tabulated descriptively. Results: Eleven patients underwent ureteral reconstruction. Of the 11, 9 (81%) were male with a mean age of 51.9 years (16-70) and BMI of 33.8 (24.3-49.1). The most common (10/11) indication for reconstruction was stricture; the most common (10/11) technique used was Lich-Gregoir reimplantation. Mean operative time was 288 minutes (143-500). There were no intra- or immediate postoperative complications. Median length of stay was 2 days (1-22). There were two incidences of mortality at 2 and 5 months postoperatively unrelated to surgery. There were four readmissions within 30 days, three for urinary tract infection (UTI) and one for a pelvic abscess which required washout. The remainder of the cohort has been followed for a mean of 14.6 months (6-41) without any incidences of graft loss or recurrence of ureteral pathology. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted ureteral reconstruction is a technically challenging but highly feasible technique that may provide the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while still allowing definitive reconstruction. Centers with extensive robotic capabilities should consider the technique.

Combined Urinary Reconstruction During en Bloc Kidney Transplantation From a Pediatric Donor to an Adult Recipient: A Case Report

Urinary reconstruction during en bloc kidney transplantation is challenging, with different techniques described. Here, we report a case of combined urinary reconstruction using modified Lich ureteroneocystostomy and ureteroureterostomy.

Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Repair of Kidney Transplant Ureteral Strictures

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of robotic-assisted transplant ureteral repair (RATUR) for the management of kidney transplant ureteral strictures (TUS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 41 consecutive patients who underwent RATUR for TUS at multiple tertiary referral centers between January 2016 and December 2022. RATUR was performed utilizing a robotic-assisted transperitoneal approach. The primary outcome was stricture recurrence rate and secondary outcomes included postoperative complicate rate, determining factors impacting with allograft functional recovery, and rate of conversion to open surgery. Categorical and continuous variables are displayed as total number (Percentage) or median [Interquartile Range], respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient was utilized to assess categorical variable correlation with creatinine.

RESULTS

The median age was 56years [44,66]. The female-to-male ratio was 1.1:1. Approximately 66% of patients were dialysis-dependent prior to kidney transplantation. TUS was identified at a median time of 4months [2, 15.5] following kidney transplant. Median stricture length was 2 cm [1.22, 2.9 cm]. There were no TUS recurrences with a median follow-up of 36months [24,48]. There were 3 Clavien grade 2 and 1 Clavien grade 3 complications (9.5%). No baseline characteristics or preoperative diagnostics were correlated with a long-term decline in renal allograft function.

CONCLUSION

RATUR has excellent and durable outcomes with low complication rates. These findings encourage the use of a minimally invasive definitive repair as a first-line treatment option for the management of TUS.

Current management of symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric kidney transplantation-A European survey among surgical transplant professionals

BACKGROUND

Vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is common in children and adolescents undergoing kidney transplantation (KTx) and may adversely affect allograft kidney function.

METHODS

To explore the current management of symptomatic native and allograft VUR in pediatric KTx recipients, an online survey was distributed to European surgical transplant professionals.

RESULTS

Surgeons from 40 pediatric KTx centers in 18 countries participated in this survey. Symptomatic native kidney VUR was treated before or during KTx by 68% of the centers (all/selected patients: 33%/67%; before/during KTx: 89%/11%), with a preference for endoscopic treatment (59%). At KTx, 90% favored an anti-reflux ureteral reimplantation procedure (extravesical/transvesical approach: 92%/8%; preferred extravesical technique: Lich-Gregoir [85%]). Management strategies for symptomatic allograft VUR included surgical repair (90%), continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (51%), bladder training (49%), or noninterventional surveillance (21%). Redo ureteral implantation and endoscopic intervention for allograft VUR were equally reported (51%/49%).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey shows uniformity in some surgical aspects of the pediatric KTx procedure. However, with regard to VUR, there is a significant variation in practice patterns that need to be addressed by future well-designed and prospective studies. In this way, more robust data could be translated into consensus guidelines for a more standardized and evidence-based management of this common condition in pediatric KTx.

Pathophysiological Changes in the Hemostatic System and Antithrombotic Management in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Nowadays, the main cause for early graft loss is renal graft thrombosis because kidney transplant outcomes have improved drastically owing to advances in immunological techniques and immunosuppression. However, data regarding the efficacy of antithrombotic therapy in the prevention of renal graft thrombosis are scarce. Adequate antithrombotic management requires a good understanding of the pathophysiological changes in the hemostatic system in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, ESKD and dialysis disrupt the fine balance between pro- and anticoagulation in the body, and further changes in the hemostatic system occur during kidney transplantation. Consequently, kidney transplant recipients paradoxically are at risk for both thrombosis and bleeding. This overview focuses on the pathophysiological changes in hemostasis in ESKD and kidney transplantation and provides a comprehensive summary of the current evidence for antithrombotic management in (adult) kidney transplant recipients.

Transplanting a left or right donor kidney into the left or right iliac fossa: importance of laterality and site of venous anastomosis

Data on the impact of donor-to-recipient laterality on kidney transplantation are lacking. This study evaluated the impact of donor-to-iliac fossa laterality and the site of venous anastomosis on operating time and surgical outcome. This retrospective single-center study analyzed 1262 deceased donor adult kidney transplants into pristine iliac fossa. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to identify variables with an impact on operating time and surgical complications. Operating time was shorter by 11 min in median for transplantations into the right iliac fossa compared to the left iliac fossa (p < 0.001). Operating time in left-to-right donor-to-recipient combination was shorter by 17 min in median if venous anastomoses were performed on the caval vein or common iliac vein as compared to anastomoses to the external iliac vein (p < 0.001). Overall, the shortest operating times (median 112.5 min) were achieved in left-to-right donor-to-recipient combinations with venous anastomosis to the caval or common iliac vein, without an increase in surgical complications. Kidney transplantation into the right iliac fossa with anastomosis to the caval vein or the common iliac vein saves operating time and reduces thrombotic complications. Acceptance of a left donor kidney is likely to further reduce operating time.

Diagnostic and therapeutic management of vesico-ureteral reflux in pediatric kidney transplantation-Results of an online survey on behalf of the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology

BACKGROUND

Vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) is considered to be a risk factor for recurrent febrile urinary tract infections and impaired renal transplant survival.

METHODS

An online survey supported by the European Society for Paediatric Nephrology was designed to evaluate current management strategies of VUR in native and transplanted kidneys of recipients aged <18 years.

RESULTS

Seventy-three pediatric transplant centers from 32 countries contributed to the survey. All centers performed urological evaluation prior to pediatric kidney transplantation (KTx) with subsequent interdisciplinary discussion. Screening for VUR in native kidneys (30% in all, 70% in selected patients) led to surgical intervention in 78% (11% in all, 89% in selected patients) with a decided preference of endoscopic intervention over ureterocystoneostomy. Following KTx, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis was applied in 65% of the patients and screening for allograft VUR performed in 93% of selected patients. The main management strategies of symptomatic allograft VUR were continuous antibiotic prophylaxis (83%) and surgical treatment (74%) (endoscopic intervention 55%, redo ureterocystoneostomy 26%).

CONCLUSIONS

This survey demonstrates the high variability in the management of VUR in pediatric KTx recipients, points to knowledge gaps, and might serve as a starting point for improving the care for patients with VUR in native and transplanted kidneys.

Positive Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Neoureterocystostomy in Rats: An Experimental Study

OBJECTIVES

Some of the most common problems after kidney transplant are urologic complications, including ureterocystoanastomosis leakage and stenosis with the development of severe renal graft complications. Isolated plasma contains active substances that cause the activation of various growth factors for the processes of tissue repair or regeneration, has an anti- inflammatory effect, activates angiogenesis, and reduces the risk of infectious complications. Platelet-rich plasma is actively used to stimulate bone regeneration, heal wounds and ulcers on the skin, enhance reconstruction of the larynx and trachea, and ameliorate urethral damage, among other uses. This study was developed to evaluate the positive effect of platelet-rich plasma on the healing process of an anastomotic wound in a model of ureterocystoanas-tomosis in rats.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We randomized 14 Wistar albino male rats into 2 groups: group 1 included 7 rats that received platelet-rich plasma after ureterocystostomy; group 2 was the control group and included 7 rats that underwent ureterocystostomy without platelet-rich plasma. On postoperative day 7, all animals were euthanized, and the anastomosis area was resected for determination of the tissue hydroxyproline levels and histopathology examination.

RESULTS

Tissue hydroxyproline levels were 767 ± 62.9 μg/g in group 1 and 256 ± 28.0 μg/g in group 2. Tissue hydroxyproline levels were significantly higher in group 1 compared with group 2 (P < .05). There were no significant differences in epithelial damage, acute inflammation, or fibrosis between the tissue samples of both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that the use of platelet-rich plasma during ureterocystostomy produces a positive effect. Our further research will be devoted to the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma in ureterocystostomy in big models.

Does STING failure affect short-term graft functions in renal transplant patients: a single-center study

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of symptomatic VUR treatment in transplant patients, compare open and endoscopic approaches in terms of graft functions, success rates, complications and recurrent UTIs.

METHODS

67 patients who undergone only STING and STING followed redo UNC due to symptomatic VUR after kidney transplantation were included into the investigation. Patients who had lower urinary tract dysfunctions were excluded from the trial. For 67 patients, baseline and before final surgery and 3rd month creatinine and GFR levels were recorded. Twenty-six of those 67 patients had redo UNC due to failed STING. The data of those patients were compared with the remaining 41 patients who had only STING.

RESULTS

In both groups no statistically significant variations in serum creatinine and GFR levels were detected during follow-up (p > 0.05). Serum levels after STING and in the 3rd month of redo UNC were compared. Although variation was observed in serum creatinine levels and in GFR levels, was not statistically significant (p: 0.59 and p: 0.23). The success rate of STING was %61.1 in 67 patients, and was not significantly different when three VUR grade groups (Grade 3 n:17, Grade 4 n:24, Grade 5 n:36) were compared (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that subureteral endoscopic injection is cost effective and safe for the first-line treatment due to its minimally invasive nature, does not cause delay which leads to deterioration of graft functions. Redo-UNC has acceptable morbidity and complication rates, should be considered when STING is failed.

Ultrashort anisoperistaltic end-to-side ureteroureterostomy in renal transplantation

The improvement of surgical techniques in kidney transplantation aims to reduce the incidence of post-transplant complications, contributing to the reduction of hospital stay, related costs, morbidity and mortality, in addition to improving the quality of life of patients. The choice of the best technique is influenced by several factors and the most common technique for urinary tract reconstruction in transplants is performed with implantation of the ureter of the graft in the caudal position, with the anastomosis performed in the bladder. However, the kidney pole can be inverted and the graft ureter anastomosis can be performed directly on the recipient's ureter, facilitating venous and ureteral anastomoses and reducing urological complications.

Recommendations for living donor kidney transplantation

This Guide for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation (LDKT) has been prepared with the sponsorship of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN), the Spanish Transplant Society (SET), and the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). It updates evidence to offer the best chronic renal failure treatment when a potential living donor is available. The core aim of this Guide is to supply clinicians who evaluate living donors and transplant recipients with the best decision-making tools, to optimise their outcomes. Moreover, the role of living donors in the current KT context should recover the level of importance it had until recently. To this end the new forms of incompatible HLA and/or ABO donation, as well as the paired donation which is possible in several hospitals with experience in LDKT, offer additional ways to treat renal patients with an incompatible donor. Good results in terms of patient and graft survival have expanded the range of circumstances under which living renal donors are accepted. Older donors are now accepted, as are others with factors that affect the decision, such as a borderline clinical history or alterations, which when evaluated may lead to an additional number of transplantations. This Guide does not forget that LDKT may lead to risk for the donor. Pre-donation evaluation has to centre on the problems which may arise over the short or long-term, and these have to be described to the potential donor so that they are able take them into account. Experience over recent years has led to progress in risk analysis, to protect donors' health. This aspect always has to be taken into account by LDKT programmes when evaluating potential donors. Finally, this Guide has been designed to aid decision-making, with recommendations and suggestions when uncertainties arise in pre-donation studies. Its overarching aim is to ensure that informed consent is based on high quality studies and information supplied to donors and recipients, offering the strongest possible guarantees.

Ureterovesical Anastomosis Complications in Kidney Transplantation: Definition, Risk Factor Analysis, and Prediction by Quantitative Fluorescence Angiography with Indocyanine Green

Ureteral stenosis and urinary leakage are relevant problems after kidney transplantation. A standardized definition of ureterovesical anastomosis complications after kidney transplantation has not yet been established. This study was designed to demonstrate the predictive power of quantitative indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence angiography. This bicentric historic cohort study, conducted between November 2015 and December 2019, included 196 kidney transplantations. The associations between quantitative perfusion parameters of near-infrared fluorescence angiography with ICG and the occurrence of different grades of ureterovesical anastomosis complications in the context of donor, recipient, periprocedural, and postoperative characteristics were evaluated. Post-transplant ureterovesical anastomosis complications occurred in 18%. Complications were defined and graded into three categories. They were associated with the time on dialysis (p = 0.0025), the type of donation (p = 0.0404), and the number of postoperative dialysis sessions (p = 0.0173). Median ICG ingress at the proximal ureteral third was 14.00 (5.00–33.00) AU in patients with and 23.50 (4.00–117.00) AU in patients without complications (p = 0.0001, cutoff: 16 AU, sensitivity 70%, specificity 70%, AUC = 0.725, p = 0.0011). The proposed definition and grading of post-transplant ureterovesical anastomosis complications is intended to enable valid comparisons between studies. ICG Fluorescence angiography allows intraoperative quantitative assessment of ureteral microperfusion during kidney transplantation and is able to predict the incidence of ureterovesical anastomosis complications. Registration number: NCT-02775838.

Influence of double J stent in the complications of ureterovesical anastomosis during kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Complications arising from ureterovesical anastomosis in kidney transplantation have an important influence on the success of the procedure. The most serious and frequent complications are fistula and stenosis of the ureterovesical junction. The placement of double J stents in anastomosis is currently recommended to reduce these complications.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to evaluate whether the placement of a DJ stent affects complications of anastomosis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 697 patients treated with cadaveric donor renal transplant in our center from 1999 to 2018 was performed. Results were compared according to double J stent placement and the surgical technique employed for anastomosis.

RESULTS

Transplantation was performed without DJ placement in 51.7% of the patients, compared to 48.3% who were treated with DJ stent placement. The most commonly used technique was Lich-Gregoir. Ureterovesical fistula occurred in 5% of cases, and ureterovesical stenosis in 4.2%. DJ stent behaved as a protective factor for ureterovesical fistula but did not significantly influence the development of stenosis. The Taguchi technique greatly increased the risk of developing both ureterovesical fistula and stenosis. The incidence of stenosis and fistula was significantly higher when the Taguchi technique was combined with no DJ stent placement.

CONCLUSION

DJ stent placement acts as a protective factor for ureterovesical stenosis complications. The results of our study seem to agree with current literature.

Pearls and Pitfalls in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation After 5 Decades

Worldwide, over 1,300 pediatric kidney transplantations are performed every year. Since the first transplantation in 1959, healthcare has evolved dramatically. Pre-emptive transplantations with grafts from living donors have become more common. Despite a subsequent improvement in graft survival, there are still challenges to face. This study attempts to summarize how our understanding of pediatric kidney transplantation has developed and improved since its beginnings, whilst also highlighting those areas where future research should concentrate in order to help resolve as yet unanswered questions. Existing literature was compared to our own data of 411 single-center pediatric kidney transplantations between 1968 and 2020, in order to find discrepancies and allow identification of future challenges. Important issues for future care are innovations in immunosuppressive medication, improving medication adherence, careful donor selection with regard to characteristics of both donor and recipient, improvement of surgical techniques and increased attention for lower urinary tract dysfunction and voiding behavior in all patients.

A STENTLESS MODIFIED LICH-GREGOIR TECHNIQUE FOR SAFE EARLY BLADDER CATHETER REMOVAL IN LIVING AND DECEASED KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS

OBJECTIVES

To describe a stentless modified Lich-Gregoir technique (mLG) for ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation (RT), with early bladder catheter (BC) removal (under 48 hours), and compare the postoperative results with those of the traditional technique (LG) with routine bladder catheter removal (4 to 5 days). The modification consists of maintaining a thin layer of detrusor fibers covering the bladder mucosa during dissection, which is incorporated into the anastomosis to reinforce the ureteroneocystostomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study compared the postoperative outcomes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent mLG with early removal of BC between October 2018 to November 2019 with those of a historical cohort of 165 consecutive patients transplanted using stentless LG and routine removal of BC, who underwent surgery between July 2017 and September 2018. All transplants were performed by the same surgeon. Follow-up was 6 months.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were comparable, although patients in the mLG group had a higher mean preoperative urine volume (911±753.8mL vs. 629±638.6mL, p=0.016). Patients in the mLG group successfully underwent early BC removal (2.2±0.9 vs. 4.8±4.8 days, p<0.001), with no differences in the incidence of surgical or clinical complications, including urine leaks (1 vs. 3%, p=0.284). In addition, mLG patients presented a shorter mean length of hospital stay (6.5±5.0 vs. 7.1±6.2 days, p=0.023).

CONCLUSION

This stentless modified Lich-Gregoir technique enables safe early bladder catheter removal and is associated with reduced hospital length of stay.

Urological Complications Associated With Pyeloureterostomy Without Ipsilateral Nephrectomy in Renal Transplant Recipients

Background: The implications of ligating the native ureter without ipsilateral nephrectomy after primary kidney transplant pyeloureterostomy (PU) have been described previously.

Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study including 4,215 kidney transplants performed between February 2010 and December 2014, analyzed urological complications following primary (P-PU) and secondary (S-PU) pyeloureterostomy used to treat urological leaks (UL-PU) and ureteral stenosis (US-PU) without concomitant ipsilateral nephrectomy, in a large cohort of patients.

Results: There were 495 (11.7%) pyeloureterostomy with native ureter ligation without nephrectomy, 409 P-PU (82.6%) and 86 S-PU (17.4%), of which 76 were UL-PU and 10 were US-PU. The median follow-up was 33.8 months. The incidence of native ipsilateral kidney complications requiring nephrectomy was 2.02% (n = 10). Urinary leak was diagnosed in 3.6% of patients after P-UP and 9.2% after UL-PU. Ureteral stenosis was diagnosed in 1.7% of patients after P-UP, 3.9% after UL-PU and 10% after US-PU.

Conclusion: This cohort analysis suggests that native ureter ligation during pyeloureterostomy without native nephrectomy is associated with low incidence of clinically indicated ipsilateral native nephrectomy. Caution and awareness should be emphasized in patients with history of ADPKD and neurogenic augmented bladders.

Long-term results of endoscopic treatment in vesicoureteral reflux after kidney transplantation

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term clinical outcomes and identify factors predicting success of endoscopic treatment for symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after kidney transplantation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients who had a symptomatic VUR after renal transplantation at our centre between January 2000 and December 2020 was performed. VUR was documented by retrograde cystography and was determined by at least one episode of acute graft pyelonephritis (AGPN). Endoscopic injections of polydimethylsiloxane (MacroPlastique^™) or dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux^™) were performed by expert urologists via rigid cystoscopy with a bevelled needle system. The results of endoscopic treatment were evaluated by cystography at three months. The primary endpoint was clinical efficacy as defined by the absence of AGPN during follow-up. Radiological success was defined by the absence of VUR at the three months follow-up cystography.

RESULTS

Out of 2135 kidney transplantations, a total of 117 (5.5%) patients had symptomatic VUR: 100 (85.5%) underwent Deflux^™ and 17 (14.5%) MacroPlastique^™. Preoperative high-grade VUR was recorded in 71% of patients. One postoperative complication was observed, Clavien > II. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (IQR 6.5-14.4), clinical success was achieved in 73 patients (62.4%). Radiological success was obtained in 42 patients (36%). Multivariable analysis failed to identify predictors of endoscopic treatment success, which was independent of the preoperative grade of VUR and the type of bulking agent used.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic treatment of VUR is a simple and well-tolerated procedure with long-term clinical efficacy.

Allograft Vesicoureteral Reflux after Kidney Transplantation

Allograft vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) is a leading urological complication of kidney transplantation. Despite the relatively high incidence, there is a lack of consensus regarding VUR risk factors, impact on renal function, and management. Dialysis vintage and atrophic bladder have been recognized as the most relevant recipient-related determinants of post-transplant VUR, whilst possible relationships with sex, age, and ureteral implantation technique remain debated. Clinical manifestations vary from an asymptomatic condition to persistent or recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs). Voiding cystourethrography is widely accepted as the gold standard diagnostic modality, and the reflux is generally graded following the International Reflux Study Committee Scale. Long-term transplant outcomes of recipients with asymptomatic grade I-III VUR are yet to be clarified. On the contrary, available data suggest that symptomatic grade IV-V VUR may lead to progressive allograft dysfunction and premature transplant loss. Therapeutic options include watchful waiting, prolonged antibiotic suppression, sub-mucosal endoscopic injection of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer at the site of the ureteral anastomosis, and surgery. Indication for specific treatments depends on recipient’s characteristics (age, frailty, compliance with antibiotics), renal function (serum creatinine concentration < 2.5 vs. ≥ 2.5 mg/dL), severity of UTIs, and VUR grading (grade I-III vs. IV-V). Current evidence supporting surgical referral over more conservative strategies is weak. Therefore, a tailored approach should be preferred. Properly designed studies, with adequate sample size and follow-up, are warranted to clarify those unresolved issues.

Anastomose uretero-ureteral término-lateral anisoperistáltica ultracurta no transplante renal

RESUMO O aprimoramento das técnicas cirúrgicas no transplante renal tem o objetivo de reduzir a incidência de complicações pós-transplante, contribuindo com a redução do tempo de internamento hospitalar, os custos relacionados, a morbidade e a mortalidade, além de melhorar a qualidade de vida dos pacientes. A escolha da melhor técnica é influenciada por diversos fatores e a técnica mais comum de reconstrução do trato urinário nos transplantes é a realizada com implante do ureter do enxerto na posição caudal, com a anastomose feita na bexiga. No entanto, pode-se inverter o polo do rim, posicionando o polo inferior cranialmente e realizar a anastomose do ureter do enxerto diretamente no ureter do receptor, facilitando a anastomose ureteral e diminuindo as complicações urológicas.

Urinary Tract Infections in the First 6 Months after Renal Transplantation

Purpose

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in the first 6 months after renal transplantation, and there are only limited data about UTIs after transplantation in Saudi Arabia in general.

Methods

A retrospective study from January 2017 to May 2020 with 6-month follow-up.

Results

279 renal transplant recipients were included. Mean age was 43.4 ± 16.0 years, and114 (40.9%) were women. Urinary stents were inserted routinely during transplantation and were removed 35.3 ± 28 days postoperatively. Ninety-seven patients (35%) developed urinary tract infections (UTIs) in the first six months after renal transplantation. Of those who developed the first episode of UTI, the recurrence rates were 57%, 27%, and 14% for having one, two, or three recurrences, respectively. Late urinary stent removals, defined as more than 21 days postoperatively, tended to have more UTIs (OR: 1.43, P: 0.259, CI: 0.76–2.66). Age >40, female gender, history of neurogenic bladder, and transplantation abroad were statistically significant factors associated with UTIs and recurrence. Diabetes, level of immunosuppression, deceased donor renal transplantation, pretransplant residual urine volume, or history of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) was not associated with a higher incidence of UTIs. UTIs were asymptomatic in 60% but complicated with bacteremia in 6% of the cases. Multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs) were the causative organisms in 42% of cases, and in-hospital treatment was required in about 50% of cases. Norfloxacin + Bactrim DD (160/800 mg) every other day was not associated with the lower risk of developing UTIs compared to the standard prophylaxis daily Bactrim SS (80/400 mg).

Conclusion

UTIs and recurrence are common in the first 6 months after renal transplantation. Age >40, female gender, neurogenic bladder, and transplantation abroad are associated with the increased risk of UTIs and recurrence. MDROs are common causative organisms, and hospitalization is frequently required. Dual prophylactic antibiotics did not seem to be advantageous over the standard daily Bactrim.

Transplant Ureteral Stenosis after Renal Transplantation: Risk Factor Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The results of kidney transplants have improved dramatically in recent years, leading to reduced morbidity and mortality. Despite continuous improvements, urological complications occur at a rate of 2.6%-15%. Ureteral stenosis of graft ureters is the most common complication, with a probability of 0.5%-6.3%. This study aimed to determine the incidence of ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation and identify risk factors that distinguish transplant patients with and without ureteral stenosis.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone kidney transplantation at the Department of Urology of the Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg between 2001 and 2015. Forty-seven patients developed ureteral stenosis during the operation. Most of the ureteral stenosis cases occurred in the first 4 months after transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate the cumulative risk, and the Mann-Whitney U test was used nonparametrically. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed that residual diuresis (p = 0.008), cold ischemia time (CIT) (p = 0.040), the body mass index (p = 0.027), and donor serum creatinine value (p = 0.039) showed a significantly different distribution between recipients with or without ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation. In multivariate Cox's regression modeling, residual diuresis and the donor serum creatinine level were identified as the only independent predictors of patients' stenosis-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Urological complications not diagnosed and treated in time endanger the success of kidney transplantation. After evaluating the kidney transplantation data of the patients at the Transplant Center Erlangen-Nuremberg from 2001 to 2015, residual diuresis, CIT, the body mass index, and donor serum creatinine value were found to influence the development of ureteral stenosis.

Taguchi versus Lich-Grégoir Extravesical Ureteroneocystostomy in Kidney Transplantation: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Ureteric implantation of the transplanted ureter into native urinary bladder tissue in kidney transplantation recipients is essential for post-operative kidney function. We aimed to determine the effects of Taguchi versus Lich-Grégoir extravesical ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science), trial registries, and conference proceedings until March 2021. We included prospective studies comparing Taguchi and Lich-Grégoir ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. Two review authors independently screened the identified records, extracted data, evaluated the risk of bias using ROBINS-I, and assessed the certainty of evidence according to GRADE.

RESULTS

We identified 3 prospective studies with serious or critical risk of bias, leading to low-certainty evidence. We downgraded the risk of bias due to study limitations. Assessment and/or reporting of baseline imbalances, co-interventions, and confounding factors was insufficient in all included studies. The effect of Taguchi ureteroneocystostomy remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Currently available evidence is not useful to determine the effect of Taguchi versus Lich-Grégoir ureteroneocystostomy in kidney transplantation. There is a need for methodologically better designed and executed studies, such as randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up reporting baseline imbalances, co-interventions, and confounding factors.

Development of strangulation ileus associated with the ureter of the transplanted kidney 18 years after kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION

After kidney transplantation, patients should be treated with caution and monitored for surgical complications. Among the possible surgical complications, strangulation ileus after kidney transplantation is rare.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 59-year-old woman who had undergone kidney transplantation at 41 years of age presented to our hospital with lower abdominal pain. She was diagnosed with strangulation ileus and underwent emergency surgery. In the lower right abdomen, the small intestine was compressed by cord-like tissue running from the intraperitoneal space to the retroperitoneal space. We confirmed that the cord-like tissue was the ureter of the transplanted kidney. The necrotic small intestine was resected, and ureter-ureteral anastomosis of the ureter of the transplanted kidney was performed.

CONCLUSION

All surgical procedures, including ureteroneocystostomy, require careful attention. The occurrence of some postoperative surgical complications can be prevented by carefully performing the kidney transplantation procedure.

Robot-assisted Transplant Ureteral Repair to Treat Transplant Ureteral Strictures in Patients after Robot-assisted Kidney Transplant: A Case Series

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of robotic-assisted transplant ureteral repair (RATUR) for treating transplant ureteral stricture (TUS) in 3 patients who had undergone robot assisted kidney transplant (RAKT).

METHOD

We reviewed the medical records of 3 patients who experienced TUS after RAKT and who underwent RATUR between 2017 and 2020. The patients' RAKT, post-transplant clinical course, endourological interventions, reoperation, and recovery were assessed.

RESULTS

All patients diagnosed with TUS presented with deterioration of kidney function after RAKT. Method of diagnosis included ultrasound, antegrade ureterogram, and CT scan. All 3 patients had a short (<1 cm) area of TUS and underwent RATUR. For 2 patients, distal strictures were bypassed with modified Lich-Gregoir ureteroneocystostomy reimplantation. One patient was treated with pyelo-ureterostomy to the contralateral native ureter. No intraoperative complications, conversions to open surgery, or significant operative blood loss requiring blood transfusion for any patient were observed. Also, no patients had urine leaks in the immediate or late postoperative period. After RATUR, 2 patients developed Clavien grade II complications with rectus hematoma or urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSION

RATUR is a technically feasible operation for kidney transplant patients with TUS after RAKT. This procedure may provide the same benefits of open operation without promoting certain comorbidities that may occur from open surgical procedures.

Biodegradable Stent with mTOR Inhibitor-Eluting Reduces Progression of Ureteral Stricture

In this study, we investigated the effect of mTOR inhibitor (mTORi) drug-eluting biodegradable stent (DE stent), a putative restenosis-inhibiting device for coronary artery, on thermal-injury-related ureteral stricture in rabbits. In vitro evaluation confirmed the dose-dependent effect of mTORi, i.e., rapamycin, on fibrotic markers in ureteral component cell lines. Upper ureteral fibrosis was induced by ureteral thermal injury in open surgery, which was followed by insertion of biodegradable stents, with or without rapamycin drug-eluting. Immunohistochemistry and Western blotting were performed 4 weeks after the operation to determine gross anatomy changes, collagen deposition, expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition markers, including Smad, α-SMA, and SNAI 1. Ureteral thermal injury resulted in severe ipsilateral hydronephrosis. The levels of type III collagen, Smad, α-SMA, and SNAI 1 were increased 28 days after ureteral thermal injury. Treatment with mTORi-eluting biodegradable stents significantly attenuated thermal injury-induced urinary tract obstruction and reduced the level of fibrosis proteins, i.e., type III collagen. TGF-β and EMT signaling pathway markers, Smad and SNAI 1, were significantly modified in DE stent-treated thermal-injury-related ureteral stricture rabbits. These results suggested that intra-ureteral administration of rapamycin by DE stent provides modification of fibrosis signaling pathway, and inhibiting mTOR may result in fibrotic process change.

Complex Ureteral Reconstruction in Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Despite advances in surgical techniques and organ preservation, transplant ureteric strictures remain a common complication in kidney transplantation. A variety of endourological and surgical techniques have been utilized; however, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal modality in dealing with these complex cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We present challenging ureteral reconstruction cases after failed attempts at ureteral dilatation, failed conventional open repairs, and/or with bladder dysfunction.

RESULTS

All renal allografts were salvaged by successful use of bladder Boari flap and intestinal segment interpositions/diversions.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative repair remains the most durable and successful approach, and minimally invasive options should be reserved for nonsurgical candidates, with consideration of a single attempt in patients with early, distal, short (<2 cm), nonischemic strictures.

Minimal-invasive management of urological complications after kidney transplantation

Kidney transplantation represents the gold standard treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease. Improvements in surgical technique and pharmacologic treatment have continuously prolonged allograft survival in recent years. However, urological complications are frequently observed, leading to both postoperative morbidity and putative deterioration of allograft function. While open redo surgery in these patients is often accompanied by elevated surgical risk, endoscopic management of urological complications is an alternative, minimal-invasive option. In the present article, we reviewed the literature on relevant urological postoperative complications after kidney transplantation and describe preventive approaches during the pre-transplantation assessment and their management using minimal-invasive approaches.

Results of a previously unreported extravesical ureteroneocystostomy technique without ureteral stenting in 500 consecutive kidney transplant recipients

Urologic complications can still occur following kidney transplantation, sometimes requiring multiple radiological and/or surgical procedures to fully correct the problem. Previously proposed extravesical ureteral reimplantation techniques still carry non-negligible risks of the patient developing urologic complications. About 10 years ago, a new set of modifications to the Lich-Gregoir technique was developed at our center, with the goal of further minimizing the occurrence of urologic complications, and without the need for initial ureteral stent placement. It was believed that an improvement in the surgical technique to minimize the risk of developing urologic complications was possible without the need for stent placement at the time of transplant. In this report, we describe the advantages of this technique (i.e., mobilized bladder, longer spatulation of the ureter, inclusion of bladder mucosa with detrusor muscle layer in the ureteral anastomosis, and use of a right angle clamp in the ureteral orifice to ensure that it does not become stenosed). We also retrospectively report our experience in using this technique among 500 consecutive (prospectively followed) kidney transplant recipients transplanted at our center since 2014. During the first 12mo post-transplant, only 1.4%(7/500) of patients developed a urologic complication; additionally, only 1.0%(5/500) required surgical repair of their original ureteroneocystostomy. Five patients(1.0%) developed a urinary leak, with 3/5 having distal ureteral necrosis, and 1/5 subsequently developing a ureteral stricture. Two other patients developed ureteral stenosis, one due to stricture and one due to ureteral stones. These overall results are excellent when compared with other reports in the literature, especially those in which routine stenting was performed. In summary, we believe that the advantages in using this modified extravesical ureteroneocystostomy technique clearly help in lowering the early post-transplant risk of developing urologic complications. Importantly, these results were achieved without the need for ureteral stent placement at the time of transplant.

Identifying Early Extraperitoneal High-Volume Urine Leak Post Kidney Transplantation

Transplant clinicians need to be watchful of several potential surgical complications in the early post-transplant period, including haemorrhage, extraperitoneal urine leak, and lymphocele. While haemorrhage and extraperitoneal urine leak usually present in the early post kidney transplant period, lymphoceles usually present 2–6 weeks after transplantation. While the colour and volume of the drained fluid can give some indication of the problem, is not enough evidence for a confident urine leak diagnosis. Further investigations, such as serum biochemical parameter analysis of the drained fluid and ultrasonography, help to identify the true cause. This paper discusses how to identify high-volume extraperitoneal urine leaks in the early post kidney transplant period and considers the differential diagnoses. Different ureteroneocystostomy procedures, including the Lich–Grégoir, Politano–Leadbetter, and U-stitch techniques, are discussed and compared regarding complication rates (especially urine leak and haematuria). The authors also address the management of low- and high-volume extraperitoneal urine leak, the follow-up needed, and the impact of urine leak on graft and patient survival, length of hospital stay, and rate of hospital readmission.

Recipient and renal allograft survival following living related-donor transplantation: a single center experience

Background

Despite improvements in surgical techniques of renal transplantation, still surgical complications remain a big challenge that might affect the post-transplant recipient and graft outcome. The aim of the current study was to retrospectively assess the surgical complications following living related kidney transplants in our center from 1990 to 2012 and determine their impact on long term recipient and graft survival.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of all live related-donor kidney transplants performed at our tertiary referral center between June 1990 and December 2012. Data regarding recipient demographics, details of surgical techniques, any reported complications and cumulative recipient and graft survival was analyzed.

Results

One hundred and four patients were included in the study whom we had access to their complete hospital records and they didn’t miss follow up. There were 41 surgical complications reported in 37 recipients, prevalence of 35.5%. Vascular and urologic complications were reported in 17(16.3%) and 11 (10.5%) recipients respectively. Lymphocele was post-operatively diagnosed in nine (8.7%) recipients. Recipient survival at 1 year and 5-year were 100% and 97% respectively. Graft survival at 1 year and at 5 years were 96% and 85.5% respectively. Surgical complications mentioned, other than renal artery thrombosis, had no statistically significant impact on the graft and recipient survival.

Conclusion

Although surgical complications post-transplantation are not rare, the resulting morbidity can be minimized by prompt management of complications. In general, the existence of surgical complications did not impact recipient or graft survival.

Surgical learning curve in kidney transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To assess the impact of the learning curve of kidney transplantation on operative and postoperative complications.

METHODS

A literature search was systematically conducted to evaluate the significance of the learning curve on complications in kidney transplantation. Meta-analyses of the effect of the learning curve on warm ischemic time, total operating time (TOT), vascular and urological complications, postoperative bleeding, lymphocele and infection.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and 2762 patients were included in the present meta-analyses. Surgeons at the beginning of the learning curve were found to have longer TOT (mean difference 41.77 (95% CI: 4.48-79.06; P = .03) and more urological complications (risk ratio 3.93; 95% CI: 1.87-8.25; P < .01). No differences were seen in warm ischemic time, postoperative bleeding, lymphocele, and vascular complications.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons at the beginning of their learning curve have a longer TOT and more urological complications, without an effect on postoperative bleeding, lymphocele, infection and vascular complications. For interpretation of the outcomes, the quality and sample size of the evidence should be taken into consideration.

Robotic Surgery for the Reconstruction of Transplant Ureteral Strictures

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility and success of a robotic approach to reconstruction of ureterovesical anastomotic strictures in kidney transplants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2017 and December 2019, a total of 5 patients with transplant ureteral stricture were identified and treated with robot assisted laparoscopic repair. All patients were confirmed to have ureteral stricture with a preoperative antegrade nephrostogram through their nephrostomy tube and cystogram. The patients demographics, ureteral characteristics, type of procedure, and outcomes are reported.

RESULTS

All patients were diagnosed after evaluation for renal deterioration. The average age of the patients was 49 years old. The average stricture length was 2.5 cm, and the location was variable, though more commonly in the distal ureter. Three patients required a pyelo-vesicostomy, while 2 required a ureteroneocystostomy. The mean length of stay was 2.2 days. Average follow-up was 97 days, with all 5 patients having successful outcomes, no strictures or delayed leaks were identified. There were no wound infections or readmissions within 30 days.

CONCLUSION

Though a complex repair, the robot-assisted approach to transplant ureter reconstruction using either an end to side neoureterocystotomy or direct pyelo-vesicotomy is technically feasible and successful. Given the many advantages inherent in comparison to an open approach, the robotic repair offers significant advantages to both the patient and the surgeon who is experienced with robotic surgery and reconstructive principles.

Is peritoneal dialysis prior to kidney transplantation a risk factor for ureteral stenosis after adult to adult live kidney transplantation

Objectives

Major urinary complications such as urinary leaks, stenosis or urinary tract infections after kidney transplantation can lead to graft or patient loss. The effect of peritoneal dialysis on post-kidney transplantation complications have been discussed but its effect on ureteral stenosis is unknown. In this study, it was aimed to analyze factors effecting major ureteral complications after living donor kidney transplantation and impact of peritoneal dialysis and double J-stents (JJ stents).

Material and Methods

This study included 116 adult to adult living donor kidney transplant patients. Factors effecting major urologic complications after living donor kidney transplantation were analyzed. The donors were primary relatives of the recipients.

Results

Major urologic complications after living donor kidney transplantation was 8/116 (6.9%). Urinary leak was present in 2 (1.7%) patients. Ureteral stenosis was encountered in 6 (5.2%) patients. Double J stents were used in 84 (72.4%) of the cases. The effect of JJ ureteral stent was not statistically significant for urinary leak, ureteral stenosis (p= 0.074, p= 0.470, respectively). A total of 29 (25%) patients had peritoneal dialysis before kidney transplantation. Preoperative peritoneal dialyses and bacteriuria after kidney transplantation were independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis in multivariate analysis (p= 0.013, and p= 0.010 respectively).

Conclusion

In the guidance of the results of the present study, peritoneal dialysis prior to kidney transplantation and bacteriuria are independent risk factors for ureteral stenosis after living donor kidney transplantation. JJ stents have no effect on urologic complications after living donor kidney transplantation.

Laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for correction of primary and secondary megaureters: Preliminary report of a new simplified technique

PURPOSE

To describe a simplified surgical technique for the treatment of primary and secondary obstructed megaureters in children by laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation (LEUR) and evaluate the short-term outcomes.

METHODS

Prospective study of children with primary and secondary megaureters treated at our institution between 2016 and 2018 by LEUR. A transperitoneal approach was used in all cases. The distal ureter was transected at the level of the stenosis. Detrusor muscle fibers were divided to expose bladder mucosa. The distal ureter was introduced into the bladder to create a valve-like mechanism. The ureter was fixed to the bladder mucosa by four stitches. We analyzed indications for surgery, complications and outcomes. Definition of success was relieved of obstruction and absence of VUR.

RESULTS

Six patients with a mean age of 28.83 months (SD: 21.4) underwent LEUR. Indications for surgery were: infection [2], obstruction [2], decrease in renal differential function [1] and increase in hydronephrosis [1]. There were no intraoperative complications. Resolution of hydronephrosis, obstruction and VUR was achieved in all cases. Mean follow-up was 13 months (SD: 6.67).

CONCLUSION

LEUR for the correction of primary and secondary megaureters by this new technique is safe. The most important advantage is that this technique is simpler and more easily reproducible than conventional LEUR. However, long-term follow-up is required.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective, observational.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Ureter in the Kidney Transplant Setting: Ureteroneocystostomy Surgical Options, Double-J Stent Considerations and Management of Related Complications

Purpose of Review

In the setting of kidney transplantation, the ureter is a common source for complications. As a result, prevention of ureteral complications and their management is of crucial importance. In this context, the purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature on the ureter in the kidney transplant setting with a special focus on new findings. We conducted a PubMed and Medline search over the last 10 years to identify all new publications related to ureteroneoimplantations, stents and management of complications in the kidney transplant setting.

Recent Findings

Performance of the “Lich-Gregoir” technique for ureteroneocystostomy seems to be favourable in regard to postoperative complications when compared with other methods described in the literature. Moreover, major urologic complications can be further reduced by ureteral stenting.

Summary

A new approach for management of ureteral strictures in renal transplants is presented. We discussed the usage of a ureteral stent covered with a biostable polymer aiming to prevent tissue ingrowth into the lumen as a new option for management of ureteral stricture in the kidney transplant setting.

Pelvic Surgery in the Transplant Recipient: Important Considerations for the Non-transplant Surgeon

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Classically, kidney transplantation (KT) consists of heterotopic implantation of the renal graft in the iliac fossa with vascular anastomosis on the iliac vessel and reimplantation of the graft ureter in the bladder of the recipient. However, a wide range of variations exist in both vascular anastomosis and urinary diversion that the non-transplant surgeon should know.

RECENT FINDINGS

For any pelvic surgery in a KT patient, the non-transplant surgeon should preoperatively evaluate the anatomy of the graft, its vascularization and its urinary tract. The transplant ureter should be identified and secured by preoperative JJ stenting whenever needed. For any surgery, maintenance and control of both immunosuppressive treatment and renal function is crucial. The advice or even the assistance of a transplant surgeon should be required because any damage to vascularization or urinary drainage of the renal graft could have dramatic and definitive consequences on graft function.

An Update on Early Urological Complications in Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study

<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> This study aimed to provide an update on the occurrence of early urological complications in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplantation (KTX). <strong>MATERIAL AND METHODS</strong> Data on all kidney transplant recipients in the Netherlands between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrieved from the prospectively collected Dutch National Organ Transplant Registry Database (NOTR). We assessed the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs) within 3 months after KTX, defined as urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction. Outcomes of living donor and deceased donor kidney transplants were compared. We performed regression analysis to identify predictive factors of urological complications and studied the influence of early urological complications on graft and patient survival. We performed an additional sub-study to explore the influence of preservation of the peri-ureteric connective tissue in living-donor KTX on the occurrence of urological complications. <strong>RESULTS</strong> Among 3329 kidney transplant recipients, urological complications occurred in 208 patients (6.2%) within 3 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in complication rates between recipients from living donors and deceased donors. Multiple regression analysis showed that older donor age and previous cardiac events of the recipient were predictors for the development of urological complications. Graft and patient survival were not affected by early MUCs. The additional sub-study showed that preservation of peri-ureteric tissue within living-donor KTX was not independently associated with urological complications. <strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong> Many living- and deceased-donor KTX recipients have early urological complications. MUCs did not affect long-term graft or patient survival.

Native ureteroureterostomy in renal allograft recipient surgery: A single-center 5-year experience

Introduction

In renal transplant, surgeons use a myriad of ureteral anastomotic techniques. Although ureteroneocystostomy (UNC) using Lich-Gregoir extravesical anastomosis is used most commonly, ureteroureterostomy with native ureter has its own importance in certain situations.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent renal transplantation at our center from March 2011 to February 2016. Records of patients who underwent ureteroureterostomy with the native ureter were reviewed for the indications and complications of the procedure.

Results

Of 1050 renal transplants during the study period, 32 patients underwent native ureteroureterostomy. Among these 32 patients, 20 patients were planned preoperatively for native ureteroureterostomy (elective), and intraoperative decision was made in 12 patients (emergency). On follow-up, only one patient had ureteral obstruction due to kink just distal to ureteroureterostomy and was managed by double-J stenting. Other patients had an expected postoperative course.

Conclusion

In our experience, ureteroureterostomy with native ureter is technically and functionally good option for ureteric reimplantation in kidney transplant patients. It can be used selectively for elective and emergency situations where UNC is not possible. Hence, the kidney transplant surgeon should be well versed with both techniques.

Surgical Complications in Kidney Transplantation: An Overview of a Portuguese Reference Center

INTRODUCTION

Kidney transplantation (KT) is a surgery performed worldwide and has some complications. The objective of this study is to evaluate our surgical complications, comparing the outcomes with those KTs without surgical complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study of all surgical complications among 3102 kidney transplants performed between June 1980 and April 2018.

RESULTS

Of 3102 kidney transplantations, 490 (15.8%) had the following complications: surgical complications (n = 527); urinary (n = 184; 5.9%); vascular (n = 140; 4.5%); wound-related (n = 78; 2.5%); lymphocele (n = 56; 1.8%); and others (n = 69; 2.2%). The most common complications were ureteral obstruction (n = 85; 2.7%) and urinary fistula (n = 72; 2.3%). The immunosuppression regimen did not influence the surgical complications rate. Surgical complications mainly occurred in male (71.4% vs 66.7%) and heavier (67.6 ± 13.9 vs 65.9 ± 13.5 kg) recipients (P < .05). The hospitalization time was also different (26.3 ± 30.6 vs 15.0 ± 38.8 days, P < .05). Serum creatinine values were different until the second year. After that, the renal function was approximately the same. Nearly 26.1% of complicated kidney transplants had delayed graft function (vs 14.8%, P < .001). Only 23.9% of complicated kidney transplants needed transplant nephrectomy (vs 6.2%, P < .001). The survival of kidneys with surgical complications was lower (64.2 ± 4.5 vs 94.09 ± 2.6 months, P < .001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Kidney transplant surgical complications occur over time, especially urinary and vascular complications, remaining a problem that leads to prolonged hospitalization and decreased graft survival.

Renal transplantation with duplicated ureters: A case report

We reported a case in which a renal allograft with duplicated ureters from a 25-year old donor were successfully transplanted into a 38-year old recipient with combination of spatulation and side-to-side anastomosis of the duplicated ureters with Lich-Gregoir technique for ureteroneocystostomy of the transplantation. There was no complication after the transplant. The recipient's post-operative course remains uneventful at more than 4 months with serum creatinine 1.35 mg/dL.

Urologic Complications After Transplantation of Kidneys With Duplicated Ureter: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Duplication of ureters is a common anatomic abnormality and occurs in 0.7% to 1% of the general population. In this article we focus on the safety of using of kidneys with complete ureteral duplication, provided no hydronephrosis or ureterocele was present in the donor.

METHODS

From 1998 to March 2018 there were 1965 kidneys transplanted at our institution, including 27 kidneys with duplicated ureter, which corresponds to incidence of 1.4%. Patients' medical records, surgery protocols, and Poltransplant registries were searched for urinary complications.

RESULTS

In the double ureter group, urologic complications occurred in 4 patients (15.4%). Similarly, severe urinary complications developed in 4 patients from the control group (17.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Transplantation of kidneys with duplicated ureters appears to be a safe and feasible procedure.

Urologic complications in renal transplants

Urologic complications of renal transplant occur commonly and can have significant impact on graft function, survival, and patient morbidity. This review examines the prevalence of urologic complications, risk factors, diagnosis and options for management of the most common urologic complications.