Kidney transplant recipient perspectives on telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic

Establishment of emerging practices and research priorities for telerehabilitation in solid organ transplantation: meeting report and narrative literature review

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is a life-saving procedure for those with end-stage organ dysfunction. The main goals of SOT are to improve quality of life and daily function, which are supported by pre- and post-transplant rehabilitation. In-person rehabilitation programs have traditionally been the standard-of-care for delivering rehabilitation for SOT patients. Many programs have adopted a virtual delivery model [telerehabilitation (TR)], an approach that has become increasingly used given restrictions to in-person delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Presently, TR programs are being used both clinically and in research with variable practices. A 2-day virtual meeting held in February 2023 brought together over 30 Canadian adult and pediatric researchers, clinicians, and patient and family partners across SOT. The meeting objectives were: (1) To facilitate knowledge exchange and dialogue in TR between patient partners, healthcare professionals, researchers, and key stakeholders, and (2) Identify gaps in clinical practice and research in TR. The discussion focused on delivery methods of TR, digital tools, facilitators and barriers of TR, and the effects of TR on physical and mental health in both adult and pediatric populations. This meeting report incorporates a narrative literature review of SOT and rehabilitation articles in the last 20 years. Future directions in TR are highlighted leading to the development of key research priorities targeted towards improved delivery of TR in SOT patients.

Clinical Relevance of an Online Self-Management Intervention in Haemodialysis: A Secondary Data Analysis of the 'Connected We St@nd' Programme

BACKGROUND

The 'Connected We St@nd' programme is an Internet-mediated self-management intervention that combines health education with psychosocial support, with evidenced feasibility and acceptability in haemodialysis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical relevance of the programme and to better understand which intervention outcomes/health-related self-report measures are most sensitive to reflect changes between pre- and post-intervention assessments.

DESIGN

This study followed a pre-post quasi-experimental design.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six individuals (16 people on haemodialysis and 10 family caregivers) completed the intervention.

MEASUREMENTS

Participants filled out a web-based assessment protocol before and after the intervention. To determine the clinical relevance of within-group pre-post changes, effect sizes, minimal clinically important differences, and reliable change indexes were calculated.

RESULTS

Clinically meaningful results were found on outcome measures with reasonable sensitivity to detect pre-post changes in the positive affect dimension of subjective well-being, purpose in life, overall quality of life, and psychological health. The latter was the variable that obtained the greatest number of respondents with reliable post-intervention improvements.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in the programme led to clinically important and reliable improvements in several intervention outcomes, hinting that this evidence-informed intervention has the potential to be a valuable resource for promoting successful psychosocial adjustment among this population. Suggestions were made to fine-tune the evaluation and implementation of a large-scale trial to, in due course, encourage the integration of this technology-assisted interdisciplinary initiative into existing kidney care services.

Health professional experiences of kidney transplantation in regional, rural, and remote Australia

BACKGROUND

Despite the demonstrated improved patient survival and financial benefits for health services with kidney transplantation compared to dialysis, populations outside of urban areas face inequities in access and a more difficult journey to kidney transplantation than their metropolitan counterparts. This study aimed to explore the experiences of Australian kidney transplant health professionals regarding kidney transplantation processes for patients residing in regional, rural, and remote areas, with a focus on improving access to and experiences of transplantation for this patient cohort.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with Australian kidney transplant health professionals. Transcripts were analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Interview participants (n = 26) consisted primarily of nephrologists from transplanting centres (15%), nephrologists from regional, rural, or remote non-transplanting centres (19%), clinical pharmacists (19%), and nursing staff (19%). Six main themes were identified regarding barriers to transplantation, including ineffective communication and education, overwhelming geographical burden, fighting for equal opportunities, paucity of social support, crushing financial peril, and deprived of adequate local care. Participants also made recommendations for new or modified service delivery models to address identified barriers, including coordination of work-up testing, outreach visits for transplant assessment, increased social and financial support, and increased and earlier provision of transplant education.

CONCLUSIONS

Health professionals described patient-specific and system level barriers to kidney transplantation for regional, rural, and remote populations in Australia that could be addressed or improved by the modification of current processes or implementation of new service delivery models for provision of transplant care.

Factors Influencing Telehealth Satisfaction Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients now have widespread access to telehealth, but the factors influencing their satisfaction still need to be understood. This cross-sectional study explored potential contributors to telehealth satisfaction among SOT recipients, including liver, kidney, and simultaneous liver-kidney recipients. A total of 136 adult SOT recipients completed an online survey. The survey assessed telehealth satisfaction, previous telehealth experiences, including confidence levels and the need for assistance from others, electronic health literacy (eHealth literacy), perceived physical and mental health status, and cognitive function, along with demographic and clinical characteristics. The multivariate regression backward selection method was used to identify potential factors contributing to telehealth satisfaction. Participants had a mean age of 60.1 years (standard deviation [SD] = 10.5) and were, on average, 92 months post-transplant (SD = 99.9). The mean telehealth satisfaction score was 5.3 out of 7 (SD = 1.2), indicating positive satisfaction with telehealth. However, lower telehealth satisfaction was associated with poor confidence in communicating with providers via telehealth, lower eHealth literacy, better perceived cognitive function, and a prolonged time since SOT (adjusted R2 = 0.49). SOT recipients who perceive vulnerability in online technology, report better perceived cognitive function, and are farther out from their SOT may exhibit lower satisfaction with telehealth. When considering telehealth for transplant care, clinicians should prioritize addressing the specific concerns and challenges of SOT recipients who may perceive telehealth unfavorably.

Hybrid Telemedicine and In-Person Care for Kidney Transplant Follow-Up: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant recipients are immunocompromised and require lifelong follow-up. Recipients face geographic, socioeconomic, and logistical challenges when seeking follow-up that can be alleviated using telemedicine. We aimed to understand patient experiences and preferences regarding telemedicine video visits and highlight insights to advance adopting hybrid telemedicine/in-person transplant care.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative in-depth, semi-structured interviews with kidney transplant recipients between November 18, 2022, and January 11, 2023. Participants had follow-up at ≥12 months post-transplant via telemedicine at a tertiary transplant center. Study enrollment continued until data saturation was reached (n = 20 participants) when no new information emerged from additional interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants median age was 58 years (IQR, 52-72), and 50% were female, 45% were White, 30% were Black, 15% were Asian, 10% were Hispanic/Other persons, and 30% were out-of-state residents. We identified the following seven themes: (1) reducing travel time, (2) minimizing financial burden (decreasing travel-related expenses and lost wages), (3) engaging patients within their comfort space, (4) establishing rapport with patients, (5) limitations of the virtual physical exam, (6) enhancing access to transplant providers (maximizing adherence to follow-up), and (7) lowering risk of communicable diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating telemedicine with in-person visits enhances post-transplant follow-up care. A hybrid model should leverage the strengths of both modalities, ensuring patient access to care and being patient-centered and flexible. Efforts are needed to advance technological tools in physical examination and human connection, and assess patient outcomes. Policymakers and healthcare systems need to incentivize the adoption and expansion of telemedicine in transplant care.

Ten tips to carry out video consultations in nephrology

Video consultations have seen increasing use in nephrology since the COVID-19 pandemic with an aim to address constraints in F2F outpatient capacity and also patients' concerns around risks of infection when attending healthcare facilities. Nephrologists have learned through experience to use video consultations for providing routine follow up and also for ad hoc triage of unwell patients. Advantages of video consultations include convenience, cost savings through avoiding clinic overheads, and reducing the carbon footprint of care. The last is increasingly relevant as nephrologists consider climate change and its implications. Video consultations are not a panacea to overcome challenges in nephrology and risks also exist for example when it comes to redesigning pathways and maintaining access to F2F assessments when required. It is equally important to consider practical aspects such as reimbursement, prescribing, and documentation. Some clinicians may wish to carry out video consultations from home to save time spent commuting but this, too, requires careful thought. Another consideration is the digital divide and support should be provided for patients who are less IT literate or who have no access to the digital world. Patients with special needs such as those with visual or hearing impairment and those with language issues also require consideration. We view video consultations as a developing and growing part of the portfolio of renal care. We see their main role in providing routine follow up to stable and IT literate outpatients, particularly where there is provider continuity and where care is provided across a large geographical area.

Coping With COVID-19: Perspectives of Caregivers of Children and Young People With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Caregivers of children and young people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) face challenging circumstances on a daily basis; however, the difficulties they experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as potentially positive experiences, are not yet fully understood. The aim of this study was to explore the pandemic-related experiences of these caregivers.

METHODS

Twelve caregivers were recruited from a hospital-based pediatric renal program; eight families were posttransplant. Caregivers participated in virtual semistructured interviews conducted between March 2021 and November 2022. They provided responses to open-ended questions concerning how the pandemic affected their child with CKD, their family, and themselves. Interviews were transcribed and coded using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four main themes were identified: (1) Family Life, which included disruptions in routine, reduced social supports, and changes in the quality of family relationships; (2) Mental Health and Coping, which included increased anxiety and positive coping strategies; (3) Work and School Life, which included changes to work and school; and (4) Health and Health Care Systems, which included virtual health care and public health restrictions.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite facing profound challenges, caregivers identified both positive and negative aspects of their pandemic experiences. Their coping strategies highlighted individual and family resilience characteristics. Implications for health care providers, including future pandemic planning, support for the transition from in-person to virtual care, and strategies to better address barriers to resources for families of children with chronic kidney disease were discussed.

Telemedicine in Advanced Kidney Disease and Kidney Transplant: A Qualitative Meta-Analysis of Studies of Patient Perspectives

Rationale & Objective

While the use of telemedicine has increased dramatically across disciplines, patient perspectives on telemedicine related to chronic kidney disease are not well understood. We systematically reviewed qualitative studies on patients with chronic kidney disease as well as those with kidney transplant to better understand these patients' perspectives related to telemedicine.

Study Design

Qualitative meta-analysis.

Setting & Participants

Pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients that used telemedicine.

Selection Criteria for Studies

English language studies published in the year 2000 and beyond that investigated patient perspectives in a qualitative manner. Works that were not qualitative or did not focus on provider-patient interactive modes of telemedicine were excluded.

Data Extraction

375 articles were pulled from PubMed, Embase, and Academic Science Premier. After filtering, 8 final articles were selected. These articles were critically appraised for quality and were used in the final analysis.

Analytical Approach

We used a grounded theory approach to develop a codebook to systematically review each of the selected articles through a qualitative meta-analysis of the included literature.

Results

Telemedicine was seen by patients to have notable strengths as well as weaknesses. These characteristics can be organized into 4 primary themes (autonomy, logistics, privacy/confidentiality, and trust). Within each primary theme, we identified subthemes. Universally, all articles included the subtheme "fewer trips to the health care facility" as a beneficial factor of telemedicine within the primary theme "logistics." A majority (6 of 8) of the articles included positive patient perspectives on the primary theme "autonomy" in terms of telemedicine promoting the subtheme of "engagement." Patients' views on telemedicine were mixed regarding the primary themes of "privacy/confidentiality" and "trust" related to telemedicine.

Limitations

Lack of provider perspectives, non-English studies, and studies published before the year 2000. Articles published after the start of data extraction were also not included.

Conclusions

Telemedicine should continue to be offered to patients with chronic kidney disease and kidney transplant patients to facilitate access. Additional research should focus on ways to decrease negative factors experienced by some patients such as difficulty using the technology.

Expanding the access to kidney transplantation: Strategies for kidney transplant programs

Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.

Impact of COVID-19 on patient experience of kidney care: a rapid review

INTRODUCTION

In March 2020, a pandemic state was declared due to SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19). Patients with kidney disease, especially those on replacement therapies, proved more susceptible to severe infection. This rapid literature review aims to help understand how the pandemic impacted patient experience of kidney care.

METHODS

It was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Rapid Review interim guidance. Search terms, 'coronavirus', 'kidney care', and 'patient-reported experience' and terms with similar semantic meaning, identified 1,117 articles in Medline, Scopus, and Worldwide Science. Seventeen were included in the narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

The findings were summarised into three themes: remote consultation and telemedicine (n = 9); psychosocial impact (n = 2); and patient satisfaction and patient-reported experience (n = 6). Patients were mostly satisfied with remote consultations, describing them as convenient and allowing avoidance of hospital visits. Anxieties included missing potentially important clinical findings due to lack of physical examination, poor digital literacy, and technical difficulties. Psychosocial impact differed between treatment modalities-transplant recipients expressing feelings of instability and dread of having to return to dialysis, and generally, were less satisfied, citing reduced ability to work and difficulty accessing medications. Those on home dialysis treatments tended to feel safer. Findings focused on aspects of patient experience of kidney care during the pandemic rather than a holistic view.

CONCLUSIONS

There was little direct evaluation of modality differences and limited consideration of health inequalities in care experiences. A fuller understanding of these issues would guide policy agendas to support patient experience during future public health crises.

Telemedicine for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Current State, Advantages, and Barriers

Telemedicine is defined as the use of electronic information and communication technologies to provide and support healthcare at a distance. In kidney transplantation, telemedicine is limited but is expected to grow markedly in the coming y. Current experience shows that it is possible to provide transplant care at a distance, with benefits for patients like reduced travel time and costs, better adherence to medication and appointment visits, more self-sufficiency, and more reliable blood pressure values. However, multiple barriers in different areas need to be overcome for successful implementation, such as recipients' preferences, willingness, skills, and digital literacy. Moreover, in many countries, limited digital infrastructure, legislation, local policy, costs, and reimbursement issues could be barriers to the implementation of telemedicine. Finally, telemedicine changes the way transplant professionals provide care, and this transition needs time, training, willingness, and acceptance. This review discusses the current state and benefits of telemedicine in kidney transplantation, with the aforementioned barriers, and provides an overview of future directions on telemedicine in kidney transplantation.

Challenges in the management of the kidney allograft: from decline to failure: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

In March 2022, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) held a virtual Controversies Conference to address the important but rarely examined phase during which the kidney transplant is failing or has failed. In addition to discussing the definition of a failing allograft, 4 broad areas were considered in the context of a declining functioning graft: prognosis and kidney failure trajectory; immunosuppression strategies; management of medical and psychological complications, and patient factors; and choice of kidney replacement therapy or supportive care following graft loss. Identifying and paying special attention to individuals with failing allografts was felt to be important in order to prepare patients psychologically, manage immunosuppression, address complications, prepare for dialysis and/or retransplantation, and transition to supportive care. Accurate prognostication tools, although not yet widely available, were embraced as necessary to define allograft survival trajectories and the likelihood of allograft failure. The decision of whether to withdraw or continue immunosuppression after allograft failure was deemed to be based most appropriately on risk-benefit analysis and likelihood of retransplantation within a few months. Psychological preparation and support was identified as a critical factor in patient adjustment to graft failure, as was early communication. Several models of care were noted that enabled a medically supportive transition back to dialysis or retransplantation. Emphasis was placed on the importance of dialysis-access readiness before initiation of dialysis, in order to avoid use of central venous catheters. The centrality of the patient to all management decisions and discussions was deemed to be paramount. Patient "activation," which can be defined as engaged agency, was seen as the most effective way to achieve success. Unresolved controversies, gaps in knowledge, and areas for research were also stressed in the conference deliberations.

Telehealth Experience Among Liver and Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Mixed Methods Study

Telehealth has become widely available to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic. While evidence suggests that telehealth serves as an acceptable alternative for most SOT recipients, their satisfaction and its context remain unclear. This study used a mixed methods approach to investigate the perspectives of SOT recipients (i.e., liver, kidney, and simultaneous liver-kidney) on the benefits and disadvantages of telehealth. A total of 252 adult SOT recipients completed an online survey that quantitatively assessed telehealth experience and satisfaction. Fifteen of them further shared their perspectives by participating in either a focus group or individual interview. Approximately 70% of online survey participants had previously used telehealth for their transplant care. The quantitative data documented that, while recipients were mostly satisfied with telehealth, especially with its effectiveness and convenience, they were less satisfied with the reliability of navigating the telehealth system. The qualitative data further showed that telehealth could be less effective for SOT recipients who perceived themselves as clinically and/or socially vulnerable, needed urgent care, and were concerned about privacy. These findings suggest that the plan for using telehealth to provide transplant care should prioritize personalization, considering unique needs and preferences of each SOT recipient.

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With CKD: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 disproportionately affects people with comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). We describe the impact of COVID-19 on people with CKD and their caregivers.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of qualitative studies.

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS

Primary studies that reported the experiences and perspectives of adults with CKD and/or caregivers were eligible.

SEARCH STRATEGY & SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL searched from database inception to October 2022.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors independently screened the search results. Full texts of potentially relevant studies were assessed for eligibility. Any discrepancies were resolved by discussion with another author.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

A thematic synthesis was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies involving 1,962 participants were included. Four themes were identified: exacerbating vulnerability and distress (looming threat of COVID-19 infection, intensifying isolation, aggravating pressure on families); uncertainty in accessing health care (overwhelmed by disruption of care, confused by lack of reliable information, challenged by adapting to telehealth, skeptical about vaccine efficacy and safety); coping with self-management (waning fitness due to decreasing physical activity, diminishing ability to manage diet, difficulty managing fluid restrictions, minimized burden with telehealth, motivating confidence and autonomy); and strengthening sense of safety and support (protection from lockdown restrictions, increasing trust in care, strengthened family connection).

LIMITATIONS

Non-English studies were excluded, and inability to delineate themes based on stage of kidney and treatment modality.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncertainty in accessing health care during the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated vulnerability, emotional distress, and burden, and led to reduced capacity to self-manage among patients with CKD and their caregivers. Optimizing telehealth and access to educational and psychosocial support may improve self-management and the quality and effectiveness of care during a pandemic, mitigating potentially catastrophic consequences for people with CKD.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) faced barriers and challenges to accessing care and were at an increased risk of worsened health outcomes. To understand the perspectives about the impact of COVID-19 among patients with CKD and their caregivers, we conducted a systematic review of 34 studies involving 1,962 participants. Our findings demonstrated that uncertainty in accessing care during the COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated the vulnerability, distress, and burden of patients and impaired their abilities for self-management. Optimizing the use of telehealth and providing education and psychosocial services may mitigate the potential consequences for people with CKD during a pandemic.

Financial toxicity experienced by rural Australian families with chronic kidney disease

AIM

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its treatment places a financial burden on healthcare systems and households worldwide, yet little is known of its financial impact, on those who reside in rural settings. We aimed to quantify the financial impacts and out-of-pocket expenditure experienced by adult rural patients with CKD in Australia.

METHODS

A web based structured survey was completed between November 2020 and January 2021. English speaking participants over 18 years of age, diagnosed with CKD stages 3-5, those receiving dialysis or with a kidney transplant, who lived in a rural location in Australia.

RESULTS

In total 77 (69% completion rate) participated. The mean out of pocket expenses were 5056 AUD annually (excluding private health insurance costs), 78% of households experienced financial hardship with 54% classified as experiencing financial catastrophe (out-of-pocket expenditure greater than 10% of household income). Mean distances to access health services for all rural and remote classifications was greater than 50 kilometres for specialist nephrology services and greater than 300 kilometres for transplanting centres. Relocation for a period greater than 3 months to access care was experienced by 24% of participants.

CONCLUSION

Rural households experience considerable financial hardship due to out-of-pocket costs in accessing treatment for CKD and other health-related care, raising concerns about equity in Australia, a high-income country with universal healthcare.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to healthcare, physical and mental health among patients with chronic kidney disease in Victoria, Australia

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the difficulties healthcare systems face to care for patients with chronic diseases. In the state of Victoria, Australia, the government implemented a state-wide lockdown and restricted the delivery of healthcare to limit the spread of the virus. This study investigated the impact of the pandemic on healthcare access, mental and physical health for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

Patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD were recruited from the nephrology unit of a metropolitan hospital in Victoria. Participants completed a quantitative and qualitative questionnaire that assessed the impact of the pandemic on their access to healthcare and mental and physical health. The quantitative data were analysed by a series of one-way between-groups analysis of variance (ANOVAs) comparing impact between different time periods since the beginning of the pandemic.

RESULTS

Participants (n = 75) completed the questionnaire from 30 March 2020 to 29 September 2021. Participants reported significant disruptions to accessing healthcare in the initial 6 months of the pandemic. There were no significant differences in the quantitative assessments of physical and mental health of participants across the 18 months of this study. The participants' qualitative comments about disrupted normal activities, feeling vulnerable to COVID-19, transitioning to telehealth, feeling isolated and vaccination protection provided further insight into the cumulative negative mental health impact of the extended lockdown.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the importance of optimising telehealth to improve communication between CKD patients and their treating teams and continuing to monitor the impacts of pandemic restrictions on patients' mental and physical health.

Australian Rural Caregivers' Experiences in Supporting Patients With Kidney Failure to Access Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation: A Qualitative Study

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Caregivers of patients with chronic kidney disease from rural communities play a crucial role in access to dialysis and transplantation, but they face many challenges including geographical distance, financial hardship, and limited support. This study aimed to inform strategies to overcome these challenges by describing the experiences of caregivers of patients with kidney failure from rural Australian communities in accessing kidney replacement therapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

18 adult caregivers of Australian rural patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Semistructured interviews were conducted. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The 18 participants were aged 20 to 78 years; 13 (72%) were female, and 13 (72%) were the spouse/partner of the patient. We identified 5 themes: devastating social isolation (difficult periods of separation, exclusion from peers, forced relocation); financial dependency and sacrifice (burgeoning out-of-pocket costs, disruption to work life, foregoing autonomy); ongoing psychological trauma (concern for neglect and stress on children, long-term emotional distress); overwhelmed by multifaceted roles and expectations (patient advocacy, uncertainty in navigating multiple health systems); and persistent burden of responsibility (loss of self-identity, ongoing travel requirements, scarcity of psychosocial support, unpreparedness for treatment regime).

LIMITATIONS

The study was conducted in a high-income, English-speaking country with universal health insurance, which may limit the transferability of the findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Australian rural caregivers of people with kidney failure treated by maintenance dialysis or transplantation experience an exhausting physical, financial, and psychological burden. Strategies to address these profound challenges are needed.

PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This interview-based study elicited the challenges faced by people and family members who care for patients from rural towns who are receiving dialysis or kidney transplantation. The barriers and difficulties reported included traveling long distances, needing to move to larger towns and leaving their homes, feeling concerned for the long-term effects on their children, physical exhaustion, and financial issues. Additional efforts are needed to identify the means by which caregivers and their families in rural towns can obtain support to care for those with kidney failure.

Patient perspectives and experiences of remote consultations in people receiving kidney care: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in a rapid and sometimes chaotic change in how clinical care was delivered for people living with kidney disease, with increased reliance on digital technologies and the introduction of remote services.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a scoping review of studies about patients' experiences and perspectives in receipt of remote consultations for kidney care.

DESIGN

Using Arksey and O'Malley's framework, three databases were searched on EBSCO (CINAHL, MEDLINE and Psych INFO). The search included studies published in English from August 2010 to August 2021.

RESULTS

Eight studies met the scoping review criteria (two cross-sectional, two mixed-method and four qualitative). Five themes were identified: overall satisfaction with remote services, benefits to patients (convenience, involvement in care and patient safety), barriers to remote consultations (technical difficulties, digital literacy and loss of interpersonal communication), patient concerns (need for physical examination, privacy and confidentiality) and prerequisites for successful remote care (existing patient-practitioner relationship, stable illness phase and access to technology).

CONCLUSION

Remote consultations confer multiple advantages to patients; therefore, remote consultations should be offered as an option to patients living with kidney disease beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are several barriers to remote consultation that need to be addressed and understood before implementing remote care long-term. Future research should examine the impact of remote consultations on people living with kidney disease from under-served groups to identify barriers and ensure their suitability and accessibility to the wider population for a more patient-centred approach to kidney care.

The Global Impact of COVID-19 on Solid Organ Transplantation: Two Years Into a Pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a major global impact on solid organ transplantation (SOT). An estimated 16% global reduction in transplant activity occurred over the course of 2020, most markedly impacting kidney transplant and living donor programs, resulting in substantial knock-on effects for waitlisted patients. The increased severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection risk and excess deaths in transplant candidates has resulted in substantial effort to prioritize the safe restart and continuation of transplant programs over the second year of the pandemic, with transplant rates returning towards prepandemic levels. Over the past 2 y, COVID-19 mortality in SOT recipients has fallen from 20%-25% to 8%-10%, attributed to the increased and early availability of SARS-CoV-2 testing, adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions, development of novel treatments, and vaccination. Despite these positive steps, transplant programs and SOT recipients continue to face challenges. Vaccine efficacy in SOT recipients is substantially lower than the general population and SOT recipients remain at an increased risk of adverse outcomes if they develop COVID-19. SOT recipients and transplant teams need to remain vigilant and ongoing adherence to nonpharmaceutical interventions appears essential. In this review, we summarize the global impact of COVID-19 on transplant activity, donor evaluation, and patient outcomes over the past 2 y, discuss the current strategies aimed at preventing and treating SARS-CoV-2 infection in SOT recipients, and based on lessons learnt from this pandemic, propose steps the transplant community could consider as preparation for future pandemics.

Telehealth cancer care consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of the experiences of Australians affected by cancer

BACKGROUND

In response to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth was rapidly rolled out in health services across Australia including those delivering cancer care. This study aimed to understand people with cancer and carers' experiences with telehealth for cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic and associated restrictions.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews conducted with people with cancer and carers via telephone or online video link between December 2020 and May 2021. Participants were recruited through cancer networks and social media. Interviews were transcribed and thematic analysis undertaken.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients and 5 carers were interviewed. Telephone-based appointments were most common. Responses to telehealth were influenced by existing relationships with doctors, treatment/cancer stage and type of appointment. Four themes were derived: (i) benefits, (ii) quality of care concerns, (iii) involving carers, and (iv) optimising use of telehealth. Benefits included efficiency and reduced travel. Quality of care concerns identified subthemes: transactional feel to appointments; difficulties for rapport; suitability for appointment type and adequacy for monitoring. Both patients and carers noted a lack of opportunity for carers to participate in telephone-based appointments. Aligning appointment mode (i.e. telehealth or in person) with appointment purpose and ensuring telehealth was the patient's choice were seen as essential for its ongoing use.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

While telehealth has benefits, its potential to reduce the quality of interactions with clinicians made it less attractive for cancer patients. Patient-centred guidelines that ensure patient choice, quality communication, and alignment with appointment purpose may help to increase telehealth's utility for people affected by cancer.