Factors influencing attitudes toward xenotransplantation clinical trials: A report of focus group studies

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on the History, Current Status, and Regulation of Xenotransplantation

Recent landmark clinical translation of xenotransplantation depended upon multiple innovations by the xenotransplant community, including the introduction of a variety of source pig genetic modifications, technical innovations, and novel immunosuppressive strategies, as well as the development of ethical and regulatory frameworks to support translation to the clinic. Each organ, tissue, or cell type intended for xenotransplantation will require application-specific preclinical milestones to be met in order to predict "success", as measured by ethical, safe, and efficacious translation to the clinic. Based on successful pre-clinical results and emerging evidence from decedent studies and initial clinical cases, evidence-based infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations are emerging, and will be the foundations for the application-specific position papers that are currently under development. Here, we describe significant landmark events focusing upon safe and efficacious results underpinned by appropriate guidance documents developed over the past three decades that enabled recent translation to the clinic for heart and kidney xenografts. These steps have been undertaken over the past three decades by the xenotransplant community specifically led by the International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) in consultation with the Transplantation Society (TTS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to usher xenotransplantation to the clinic.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year post-transplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on Kidney Xenotransplantation

Porcine kidney xenotransplantation for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has reached the stage of clinical testing following major advances in donor pig genetic modifications and effective immunosuppressive strategies through decades of rigorous translational research. Reports of pig kidney xenograft survival beyond 1 year posttranplant in nonhuman primate (NHP) models justify optimism for its potential as an alternative to allotransplantation. In the United States, experimental transplantations of genetically engineered (GE) porcine kidneys into brain-dead subjects and a small number of ESRD patients have shown no evidence of hyperacute rejection and adequate pig kidney function for up to several months. Here we discuss pre-clinical/clinical results, infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations, and propose evidence-based recommendations. For initial clinical trials in kidney xenotransplantation, we make the following recommendations: (i) transplantation with organs from a triple knockout (TKO) donor pig, preferably with added human transgenes, (ii) an immunosuppressive regimen with induction therapy to deplete T (and possibly B) cells, and maintenance therapy based on a cluster of differentiation (CD)40/CD154 co-stimulation pathway blockade, (iii) the patient should be fully acceptable as a candidate for allotransplantation but should be unlikely ever to receive an allograft. Patients aged 60-69 years (extendable to 40-75 years, if one of the criteria mentioned below is present), of blood group B or O, and with diabetes are most at risk in this regard. Other patients who could be considered are (i) those who have lost two or more previous kidney allografts from recurrent disease in the graft, (ii) those with broad human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-reactivity but no evidence of anti-pig antibodies, including swine leukocyte antigen (SLA), and (iii) those with failing vascular access. Clinical pilot studies in carefully and highly selected patients with no alternative therapy will provide the foundation upon which to base subsequent formal expanded clinical trials.

Attitudes Toward Renal Xenotransplantation in a Muslim Country: Analysis of Specific Subgroups

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but the rising demand for organs necessitates exploring alternative graft sources, including xenotransplantation. This study evaluated attitudes toward xenotransplantation among different social groups in a Muslim country. A structured survey assessing demographics, religiosity levels, attitudes toward xenotransplantation, and the influence of religious authorities was completed by 988 participants: 376 clergy members (38.1%), 206 physicians (20.9%), 162 dialysis patients and their relatives (16.4%), and 244 individuals from other groups (24.7%). Significant sociodemographic differences were observed in gender, marital status, and education (p < 0.001). Physicians and dialysis patients/relatives were likelier to support living donor transplantation (48.5%, 67.3%), whereas clergy members often reported no opinion (44.9%). Favorable attitudes toward xenotransplantation were the highest among physicians (66%) and dialysis patients/relatives (67.3%). When the animal was specified as a pig, 73.1% of the Clergy group exhibited unfavorable attitudes. However, this group significantly changed their opinion after the favorable fatwa issued by the religious authority. Logistic regression identified male gender, lower religiosity, and higher education as predictors of favorable attitudes, with physicians and dialysis patients/relatives demonstrating the strongest associations compared to clergy. To infer, collaboration between religious and scientific authorities is essential to address concerns and emphasize the potential benefits of xenotransplantation.

International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) Position Paper on the History, Current Status, and Regulation of Xenotransplantation

Recent landmark clinical translation of xenotransplantation depended upon multiple innovations by the xenotransplant community, including the introduction of a variety of source pig genetic modifications, technical innovations, and novel immunosuppressive strategies, as well as the development of ethical and regulatory frameworks to support translation to the clinic. Each organ, tissue, or cell type intended for xenotransplantation will require application-specific preclinical milestones to be met in order to predict "success", as measured by ethical, safe, and efficacious translation to the clinic. Based on successful pre-clinical results and emerging evidence from decedent studies and initial clinical cases, evidence-based infectious disease, ethical, and regulatory considerations are emerging, and will be the foundations for the application-specific position papers that are currently under development. Here, we describe significant landmark events focusing upon safe and efficacious results underpinned by appropriate guidance documents developed over the past three decades that enabled recent translation to the clinic for heart and kidney xenografts. These steps have been undertaken over the past three decades by the xenotransplant community specifically led by the International Xenotransplantation Association (IXA) in consultation with the Transplantation Society (TTS) and the World Health Organization (WHO) to usher xenotransplantation to the clinic.

Engineering organs, hopes and hybridity: considerations on the social potentialities of xenotransplantation

The development of replacing human organs with those from genetically modified pigs holds immense potential for alleviating the shortage of organs necessary for patients in need of transplants. This medical advancement is also accompanied by significant social changes, including the emergence of a bioeconomy, new modes of biotechnology governance, altered human-animal relations and increased public engagement. Some aspects, such as the impact on the transplant allocation system, effects on clinical practice and healthcare provision, global trajectories and most importantly the consequences for patients and their families remain unpredictable. Given that xenotransplantation occurs within a societal context and its success or failure will not be confined to technical feasibility alone, it is essential to engage a social sciences perspective to highlight the social implications and emphasise the importance of social research in accompanying future developments.

Religion and Attitudes Toward Xenotransplantation: Results of a Nationwide Survey in the United States

Religious viewpoints have been shown to influence the ways in which many persons approach medical decision-making and have been noted as a potential barrier to xenotransplantation acceptance. This study sought to explore how attitudes toward xenotransplantation differ among various religious beliefs. A national Likert-scale survey was conducted in 2023 with a representative sample in the United States. Religious belief was self-reported. Regression analysis was used to identify associations with religious belief and hesitations about xenotransplantation. Five thousand and eight individuals across the United States responded to the survey. The two biggest concerns about xenotransplantation across religious groups were the current lack of evidence about success and the risk of xenozoonosis. Although they still expressed concerns about certain issues, Catholic and Muslim respondents were most comfortable with xenotransplantation for all. On average, the risk of xenozoonosis was a concern among 25% across all religious beliefs (p <0.0001). Orthodox Christians expressed the highest rate of negative feelings toward the recent xenotransplantation experiments on brain dead and living individuals. Those who reported no religion were most likely to have negative feelings about killing pigs for human organ transplant (OR 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08-1.46). As xenotransplantation progresses from pre-clinical studies to clinical trials, and potentially to clinical therapy, hesitations among religious groups exist. Specific studies should be designed to investigate how religious viewpoints can affect xenotransplantation acceptance.

Transplant Patients' Perceptions About Participating in First-in-Human Pig Kidney Xenotransplant Clinical Trials: A Mixed Methods Study

First-in-human pig xenotransplant clinical trials may soon begin, which raises ethical concerns about patients' decision-making to participate in such trials. We assessed kidney transplant candidates' attitudes and hypothetical decision-making about participating in xenotransplant trials through semi-structured telephone interviews and an online survey. We analyzed qualitative data by thematic analysis and quantitative data by descriptive statistics. Twenty-eight patients participated in interviews; 142 patients participated in the survey. Most interview and survey respondents were male (68%, 56%), White (54%, 61%), or Black (36%, 22%). Although interview participants appreciated xenotransplantation research's potential to advance science, they expressed concerns about infection transmission and graft function. Few survey respondents were willing to participate in a pig kidney trial to test the safety of pig kidneys (12.6%) or pig kidney function (16.9%). Interview participants would be more likely to participate in a first-in-human pig kidney trial if receiving a human kidney was unlikely and their health status declined. Willingness would also depend on how long the pig kidney would function. Most interview participants were receptive to long-term monitoring, but not to family monitoring. Transplant programs planning xenotransplant trials should anticipate these types of concerns for optimizing human subject protections and conducting a robust informed consent process.

Public attitudes to xenotransplantation: A national survey in the United States

Xenotransplantation (XTx) presents a potential clinical alternative to the shortage of human organs for transplantation. Before clinical trials occur in the United States, public assessments are crucial to understand potential barriers to acceptance. The purpose of this study was to explore barriers and identify characteristics associated with attitudes toward XTx. A survey assessing demographic characteristics and attitudes toward XTx was distributed to a nationally representative sample of adults aged ≥18 years in the United States. Regression analysis was employed to identify characteristics associated with attitudes toward XTx. Between May 25 and June 14, 2023, 5008 respondents completed the survey. Importantly, half of the respondents expressed low or no knowledge of either transplantation or XTx. Approximately 40% expressed discomfort with receiving a pig organ for themselves or a loved one. Despite a lack of xenotransplant outcome data, 36% were open to experimental XTx if they needed a transplant. However, 57% rated lack of current evidence of success or fear of complications as top concerns. Regression models consistently associated being younger, female, not needing an organ, or being a member of a racial minority group with lower acceptance. This survey is the largest to date exploring public attitudes toward XTx. Despite overall acceptance, concerns persist. Increasing public acceptance is key as the field advances.

Challenges in Paediatric Xenotransplantation: Ethical Components Requiring Distinct Attention in Children and Obligations to Patients and Society

The transplantation of non-human organs into humans, or xenotransplantation (XTx), has recently garnered new attention and is being developed to help address the problem of organ scarcity in transplantation. Ethical issues surrounding XTx have been studied since initial interest arose decades ago and have experienced renewed discussion in the literature. However, the distinct and relevant differences when applied to children has largely been overlooked with few groups attending to the concerns that XTx in children raises. In this paper, we explore ethical challenges to be expected in paediatric XTx, in particular exploring organ sizing concerns, infectious risks, psychological burdens, and issues of moral hazard. We review these domains with the aim of highlighting the implications of pursuing paediatric XTx and the cross-disciplinary approach needed to solve these issues. Children require a unique analysis from a bioethical perspective to best prepare for the issues XTx presents.

Pediatric Cardiac Xenotransplantation: Recommendations for the Ethical Design of Clinical Trials

For children with complex congenital heart problems, cardiac allotransplantation is sometimes the best therapeutic option. However, availability of hearts for pediatric patients is limited, resulting in a long and growing waitlist, and a high mortality rate while waiting. Cardiac xenotransplantation has been proposed as one therapeutic alternative for neonates and infants, either in lieu of allotransplantation or as a bridge until an allograft becomes available. Scientific and clinical developments in xenotransplantation appear likely to permit cardiac xenotransplantation clinical trials in adults in the coming years. The ethical issues around xenotransplantation of the heart and other organs and tissues have recently been examined, but to date, only limited literature is available on the ethical issues that are attendant with pediatric heart xenotransplantation. Here, we summarize the ethical issues, focusing on (1) whether cardiac xenotransplantation should proceed in adults or children first, (2) pediatric recipient selection for initial xenotransplantation trials, (3) special problems regarding informed consent in this context, and (4) related psychosocial and public perception considerations. We conclude with specific recommendations regarding ethically informed design of pediatric heart xenotransplantation trials.

The promise of xenotransplantation: a challenge

According to many scholars, kidney xenotransplantation promises to mitigate the organ supply shortage. This claim has a certain obviousness to it: by flooding the market with a new source of kidneys, xenotransplantation promises to be a panacea. Our goal is to challenge this claim. We argue that xenotransplantation may increase rather than decrease demand for kidneys, may reduce kidney allotransplants, and may be inaccessible or otherwise unused. By offering the challenge, we hope to show deeper reflection is needed on how xenotransplantation will affect the dearth of available organs.

The importance of public engagement in clinical xenotransplantation

Over the past several decades, significant scientific progress in xenotransplantation has brought the field to the threshold of clinical trials. In the past 3 years in the United States, experimental pig kidney and heart xenotransplantation have been performed on human subjects recently declared dead by neurological criteria (decedents). In addition, two pig heart transplants have been carried out in living patients under the United States Food and Drug Administration's expanded access guidelines. However, though there has been a flurry of activity there remain unanswered questions regarding how the public views xenotransplantation, what concerns may exist, and how to address these concerns in a meaningful way. This paper aims to underscore the importance of public engagement in xenotransplantation, emphasizing the ongoing need for studies to assess public opinions. The current evidence on public engagement studies is reviewed and gaps in our understanding are identified. We propose practical steps to advance this field. Additional studies to determine the extent of racial/ethnic differences in attitudes to xenotransplantation should be conducted. Empirical and descriptive analysis of certain religious viewpoints-especially minority faiths-would be valuable. As public engagement is an important aspect of public acceptance of novel research that is accompanied by risk, we suggest that xenotransplantation biotechnology companies might consider leading the way in funding this research.

Moral approval of xenotransplantation in Egypt: associations with religion, attitudes towards animals and demographic factors

Xenotransplantation has great potential as an alternative to alleviate the shortage of organs for donation. However, given that the animal most suited for xenotransplantation is the pig, there are concerns that people in Muslim countries may be more hesitant to morally approve of these procedures. In this study, the moral approval of xenotransplantation was assessed in a group of 895 participants in Egypt. The results showed that religiosity itself does not predict moral approval of xenotransplantation, but religious identity does, as Muslims are less likely to approve of xenotransplantation than Christians. However, the strongest predictor of moral approval of xenotransplantation was gender, with women displaying less approval. A partial mediating factor in this association was concern for animal welfare. Based on these results, some implications for public policy are discussed.

Pressing ethical issues relating to clinical pig organ transplantation studies

Clinical pig heart transplant experiments have been undertaken, and further clinical experiments and/or clinical trials of gene-edited pig organ xenotransplantation are anticipated. The ethical issues relating to xenotransplantation have been discussed for decades but with little resolution. Consideration of certain ethical issues is more urgent than others, and the need to attain consensus is important. These issues include: (i) patient selection criteria for expanded access and/or clinical trials; (ii) appropriate protection of the patient from xenozoonoses, that is, infections caused by pig microorganisms transferred with the organ graft, (iii) minimization of the risk of a xenozoonosis to bystanders, and (iv) the need for additional public perception studies. We discuss why it is important and urgent to achieve consensus on these ethical issues prior to carrying out further expanded access experiments or initiating formal clinical trials. The ways forward on each issue are proposed.

Kidney xenotransplantation: Future clinical reality or science fiction?

There is a global shortage of organs for transplantation and despite many governments making significant changes to their organ donation systems, there are not enough kidneys available to meet the demand. This has led scientists and clinicians to explore alternative means of meeting this organ shortfall. One of the alternatives to human organ transplantation is xenotransplantation, which is the transplantation of organs, tissues, or cells between different species. The resurgence of interest in xenotransplantation and recent scientific breakthroughs suggest that genetically engineered pigs may soon present a realistic alternative as sources of kidneys for clinical transplantation. It is therefore important for healthcare professionals to understand what is involved in xenotransplantation and its future implications for their clinical practices. First, we explore the insufficiency of different organ donation systems to meet the kidney shortage. Second, we provide a background and a summary of the progress made so far in xenotransplantation research. Third, we discuss some of the scientific, technological, ethical, and public health issues associated with xenotransplantation. Finally, we summarize the literature on the attitudes of healthcare professionals toward xenotransplantation.

Future of Lung Transplantation: Xenotransplantation and Bioengineering Lungs

Xenotransplantation promises to alleviate the issue of donor organ shortages and to decrease waiting times for transplantation. Recent advances in genetic engineering have allowed for the creation of pigs with up to 16 genetic modifications. Several combinations of genetic modifications have been associated with extended graft survival and life-supporting function in experimental heart and kidney xenotransplants. Lung xenotransplantation carries specific challenges related to the large surface area of the lung vascular bed, its innate immune system's intrinsic hyperreactivity to perceived 'danger', and its anatomic vulnerability to airway flooding after even localized loss of alveolocapillary barrier function. This article discusses the current status of lung xenotransplantation, and challenges related to immunology, physiology, anatomy, and infection. Tissue engineering as a feasible alternative to develop a viable lung replacement solution is discussed.

Xenotransplantation: A historical-ethical account of viewpoints

Formal clinical trials of pig-to-human organ transplant-known asxenotransplantation-may begin this decade, with the first trials likely to consist of either adult renal transplants or pediatric cardiac transplant patients. Xenotransplantation as a systematic scientific study only reaches back to the latter half of the 20th century, with episodic xenotransplantation events occurring prior to that. As the science of xenotransplantation has progressed in the 20th and 21st centuries, the public's knowledge of the potential therapy has also increased. With this, there have been shifting ethical stances toward xenotransplantation in key areas, such as religious and public viewpoints towards xenotransplantation, animal rights, and public health concerns. This review provides a historical-ethical account of xenotransplantation and details if or how viewpoints have shifted over time.

Attitudes of patients with renal disease on xenotransplantation: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Recent years have seen major advancements in xenotransplantation: the first pig-to-human heart transplant, the development of a brain-dead recipient model for kidney xenotransplantation, and the registration of the first xenokidney clinical trial. The attitudes of patients with kidney disease or transplants on xenotransplantation and an assessment of their reservations and considerations regarding the technology are crucial to successful clinical translation and eventual widespread implementation.

METHODS

This systematic review was registered through PROSPERO (CRD42022344581) prior to initiation of the study and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included studies that evaluated attitudes towards and willingness to undergo xenotransplantation in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), including those who had already undergone transplantation. MEDLINE (via Ovid), Embase (via Elsevier), and Web of Science (via Clarivate) were searched from database inception to July 15, 2022 by an experienced medical librarian for studies on xenotransplantation and attitudes. Abstracts and full text were screened using Covidence software and data items regarding study methodology, patient demographics, and attitudes regarding xenotransplantation were extracted using Microsoft Excel. Risk of bias assessments were performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programmed and National Institute of Health study quality assessment tools.

RESULTS

Of 1992 studies identified, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies were conducted across eight countries, four in the United States, for a total of 3114 patients on the kidney waitlist or with a kidney transplant. All patients were over 17 years old and 58% were male. Acceptance of a xenotransplant was assessed using surveys in 12 studies. Sixty-three percent (n = 1354) of kidney patients reported that they would accept a xenotransplant with function comparable to that of an allotransplant. Acceptance of xenografts with inferior function to allografts (15%) or as bridge organs (35%) to allotransplantation was lower. Specific concerns expressed by patients included graft function, infection, social stigma, and animal rights. Subgroup analyses showed higher acceptance in already transplanted compared to waitlist patients and white compared to Black Americans.

CONCLUSION

An understanding of patient attitudes and reservations is key to the successful execution of the first xenotransplantation clinical trials. This study compiles important factors to consider, such as patient concerns, attitudes regarding practical clinical scenarios for the use of xenotransplantation, and the impact of demographic factors on acceptance of this emerging technology.

Practical ethical concerns in allocation of pig kidneys to humans

The fundamental ethical question of whether pig organs should be transplanted into humans has been settled, as recent surgeries demonstrating proof of concept demonstrate. Other issues need to be considered and reconciled before xenotransplantation of pig kidneys becomes a solution to the organ shortage for people waiting for a kidney transplant or as a viable alternative to the deceased donor or living donor human kidneys. Human trials will be needed beyond brain-dead individuals to show that xenotransplantation is safe from immunologic and infectious standpoints. Transplant centers will need to show that xenotransplantation provides a long-term benefit to recipients and is financially viable. If trials are successful and receive regulatory approval, pig xenotransplants may become another option for people waiting for a kidney. Before patients are discharged with a functioning xenograft, practical issues with ethical implications remain.

The Use of Porcine-Derived Materials for Medical Purposes: What do Muslim and Jewish Individuals Know and Opine About It?

Porcine-derived medical products represent an effective solution for a wide range of human suffering, yet this may contradict Muslim and Jewish religious prohibitions against consuming pig. The present study evaluated the level to which Muslim and Jewish participants are knowledgeable about the conditions permitting porcine-based treatments and explored their attitudes toward the permissibility of these treatments. A questionnaire that presented fifteen medical uses of porcine-derived products was completed by 809 Muslims and 714 Jews. Neither Muslim nor Jewish participants are knowledgeable about the religious rulings of their religions which permit the use of pig for life saving. Participants of both groups objected to the view that porcine-derived materials should be permitted. The findings imply that the attitude toward porcine-derived materials for medical use is contingent upon the knowledge or lack thereof that individuals have regarding the permissibility of such use. We offer useful recommendations to improve the informed consent process before conducting porcine-based treatments.

The 2021 IXA Keith Reemtsma Lecture: Moving xenotransplantation to the clinic

Keith Reemtsma was a pioneer in xenotransplantation, the Honorary Founding President of the International Xenotransplantation Association (in 1998), and a wonderful personality. It is a privilege to be invited to give this lecture in his memory. If he were alive today, he would be delighted to see the progress that has been made in pig organ transplantation into nonhuman primate recipients. This progress has largely resulted from two major advances: (i) the increasing availability of pigs with multiple genetic manipulations aimed at protecting the cells of the organ from the primate immune response and (ii) the introduction of novel immunosuppressive agents that block the CD40/CD154 costimulation pathway. There is strong evidence from numerous in vitro studies that the transplantation of a triple-knockout pig organ, particularly if expressing several human protective proteins, into a patient is likely to be significantly more successful than if that same organ is transplanted into a nonhuman primate recipient. With this fact in mind, and in view of the advances currently being made, the time has surely come when we need to consider moving from the laboratory to the clinic. However, there are still questions we need to definitively resolve: (i) What exact genetic modifications do we need in the organ-source pig? (ii) What exact immunosuppressive regimen will we choose? (iii) How will we monitor the immune response and diagnose and treat rejection? and (iv) How do we plan to prevent or treat potential infectious complications? Furthermore, when these matters have been resolved, which patients will be offered a pig organ in the first trial? We have suggested that patients who are very unlikely to survive until a suitable deceased human donor kidney becomes available are those who should be considered for the initial trials. Assessing public attitudes to xenotransplantation is also important before embarking on a clinical trial. I suggest that progress is much more likely to be made from a small clinical trial than if we persist in carrying out experiments in an animal model that no longer mimics the clinical situation.

Scientific and psychosocial ethical considerations for initial clinical trials of kidney xenotransplantation

The initial clinical trials of pig solid organ xenotransplantation (XTx) are drawing closer and could begin in the coming years. The first clinical trials may aim to transplant genetically-modified pig kidneys into adult humans. The impetus for beginning these first-in-human trials is the severe lack of deceased donor kidneys for transplantation and the number of patients with end-stage renal disease currently on transplant waitlists, which in the USA approaches 100 000. The majority of patients on the kidney transplant waitlist receive continuous renal replacement therapy. In the United States, for patients on the kidney waitlist, the median wait-time to receive a deceased human donor organ is approximately 4.5 years for patients aged 45-74, with a 5-year mortality (or removal from the waitlist because of deteriorating health) of approximately 40%. XTx has the potential to reduce the kidney waitlist morbidity and mortality while improving quality of life. By focusing on scientific and psychosocial criteria, we present ethical considerations of certain inclusion and exclusion criteria for these first-in-human clinical trials that we suggest have not yet been fully explored.

Genetically engineered pig kidney transplantation in a brain-dead human subject

In September 2021, a kidney (with donor-specific thymic tissue) from an α1, 3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GTKO) pig was transplanted into the groin (with anastomoses to the femoral vessels) of a brain-dead subject by a surgical team at New York University Langone Health (NYU). It was reported to function immediately, passing urine and excreting creatinine. The experiment was terminated after 54 h and, during this period, the kidney did not show macroscopic features of rejection. Does this experiment provide information not available to us previously and does it move the field forward to clinical trials? The information provided was very limited, but the following points are worthy of note. (i) Numerous in vivo studies in nonhuman primates have predicted that the pig kidney would function immediately. (ii) Numerous in vitro studies have predicted that a GTKO pig kidney would not be rejected within the first few days after transplantation into a human subject. (iii) GTKO kidneys are not optimal for clinical transplantation, and the transplantation of a triple-knockout (TKO) pig kidney would have been more relevant. (iv) There was no purpose in transplanting a "thymokidney" without pre-transplant conditioning therapy and follow-up for several months. (v) Because the native kidneys were retained, it is difficult to determine whether the function of the graft was sufficient to support life. (vi) The experiment was announced to the media rather than published in a peer-reviewed medical journal (although hopefully this will follow), suggesting that it was primarily carried out to gain attention to the great potential of xenotransplantation (and/or possibly to NYU). In this respect the experiment was successful. Because of the very limited period of time for which a brain-dead subject can be maintained in a metabolically and hemodynamically stable state, the value of experiments in such subjects will remain very limited. It is hoped that any future similar experiments will be planned to be more relevant to the clinical situation. Nevertheless, the report has stimulated public attention towards xenotransplantation which, unless there is an adverse response to what some might consider to be a bizarre experiment, should be of significant benefit to future progress.