Acceptance of xenotransplantation by patients waiting for organ donation: A qualitative study

A Nationwide Assessment of Turkish Society's Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess public perceptions, awareness, and attitudes toward xenotransplantation (XTx) and organ donation in Turkey by examining the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and religious factors to identify barriers and facilitators to organ donation and XTx acceptance METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted with 10 650 participants, selected through stratified sampling to ensure national representation. Data collection was performed via Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI), with structured questionnaires designed to evaluate participants' perspectives on organ donation, XTx, and religious influences, and comparisons were made based on age groups, geographical region, sectarian affiliation, education level, belief categories, and economic status.

RESULTS

Organ donation rates were low across all demographic groups, with notable differences by geographical region, education level, income, age, and religious beliefs. The highest organ donation rate was in Central Anatolia (0.9%), while Southeastern Anatolia had the lowest (0.0%) (p = 0.014). Higher education (p = 0.001) and income levels (p = 0.01) correlated with greater organ donation support. Younger individuals (18-24 years) were less religiously observant, while older participants (65+) displayed the highest religious adherence (p = 0.022). Acceptance of XTx from halal animals was highest in the Aegean region (43.0%) (p = 0.001) and among participants with lower religious adherence (27.4%) (p = 0.004). Approval for XTx from non-halal animals was significantly lower, particularly among highly religious individuals (23.9%). Awareness of XTx-related studies was lowest among participants aged 65+ (9.4%) (p < 0.001) and highest among Maliki participants (27.3%).

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the influence of demographic, socioeconomic, and religious factors on public attitudes toward organ donation and XTx in Turkey. These findings offer critical insights for policymakers and healthcare professionals to design culturally adaptive strategies that improve organ donation rates and foster XTx acceptance.

Attitudes Toward Renal Xenotransplantation in a Muslim Country: Analysis of Specific Subgroups

Renal transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease, but the rising demand for organs necessitates exploring alternative graft sources, including xenotransplantation. This study evaluated attitudes toward xenotransplantation among different social groups in a Muslim country. A structured survey assessing demographics, religiosity levels, attitudes toward xenotransplantation, and the influence of religious authorities was completed by 988 participants: 376 clergy members (38.1%), 206 physicians (20.9%), 162 dialysis patients and their relatives (16.4%), and 244 individuals from other groups (24.7%). Significant sociodemographic differences were observed in gender, marital status, and education (p < 0.001). Physicians and dialysis patients/relatives were likelier to support living donor transplantation (48.5%, 67.3%), whereas clergy members often reported no opinion (44.9%). Favorable attitudes toward xenotransplantation were the highest among physicians (66%) and dialysis patients/relatives (67.3%). When the animal was specified as a pig, 73.1% of the Clergy group exhibited unfavorable attitudes. However, this group significantly changed their opinion after the favorable fatwa issued by the religious authority. Logistic regression identified male gender, lower religiosity, and higher education as predictors of favorable attitudes, with physicians and dialysis patients/relatives demonstrating the strongest associations compared to clergy. To infer, collaboration between religious and scientific authorities is essential to address concerns and emphasize the potential benefits of xenotransplantation.

Engineering organs, hopes and hybridity: considerations on the social potentialities of xenotransplantation

The development of replacing human organs with those from genetically modified pigs holds immense potential for alleviating the shortage of organs necessary for patients in need of transplants. This medical advancement is also accompanied by significant social changes, including the emergence of a bioeconomy, new modes of biotechnology governance, altered human-animal relations and increased public engagement. Some aspects, such as the impact on the transplant allocation system, effects on clinical practice and healthcare provision, global trajectories and most importantly the consequences for patients and their families remain unpredictable. Given that xenotransplantation occurs within a societal context and its success or failure will not be confined to technical feasibility alone, it is essential to engage a social sciences perspective to highlight the social implications and emphasise the importance of social research in accompanying future developments.

Exploring attitudes toward xenotransplantation: A scoping review of healthcare workers, healthcare students, and kidney patients

BACKGROUND

Recent advances mean that formal clinical trials of solid organ xenotransplantation are increasingly likely to begin and patients requiring a kidney transplant could be the first participants. Healthcare workers and healthcare students constitute the current and future workforce that will influence public opinion of xenotransplantation. The attitudes of these populations are important to consider before recruitment for formal clinical trials begins.

METHODS

This scoping review was reported according to the PRISMA extensions for scoping reviews checklist and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect databases were searched to identify articles that studied the attitudes of healthcare workers, healthcare students, or kidney patients toward xenotransplantation.

RESULTS

The search generated 816 articles, of which 27 met the eligibility criteria. The studies were conducted in 14 different countries on five different continents. Participants from the 27 studies totaled 29,836-this was constituted of 6,223 (21%) healthcare workers, 21,067 (71%) healthcare students, and 2,546 (8%) kidney patients. All three groups had an overall positive attitude toward xenotransplantation. However, in studies where participants were asked to consider xenotransplantation when the risks and results were not equal to allotransplantation-the overall attitude switched from positive to negative. The results also found that Spanish-speaking populations expressed more favorable views toward xenotransplantation compared to English-speaking populations.

CONCLUSION

The results of this review suggest that while attitudes of the three groups toward xenotransplantation are-on the face of it-positive, this positivity deteriorates when the risks and outcomes are framed in more clinically realistic terms. Only formal clinical trials can determine how the risks and outcomes of xenotransplantation compare to allotransplantation.

Moral approval of xenotransplantation in Egypt: associations with religion, attitudes towards animals and demographic factors

Xenotransplantation has great potential as an alternative to alleviate the shortage of organs for donation. However, given that the animal most suited for xenotransplantation is the pig, there are concerns that people in Muslim countries may be more hesitant to morally approve of these procedures. In this study, the moral approval of xenotransplantation was assessed in a group of 895 participants in Egypt. The results showed that religiosity itself does not predict moral approval of xenotransplantation, but religious identity does, as Muslims are less likely to approve of xenotransplantation than Christians. However, the strongest predictor of moral approval of xenotransplantation was gender, with women displaying less approval. A partial mediating factor in this association was concern for animal welfare. Based on these results, some implications for public policy are discussed.

Evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and awareness of liver transplant patients toward xenotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Xenotransplantation (XTx) is an alternative treatment for organ scarcity. Investigating the acceptance of XTx among patients from diverse cultural and religious backgrounds is essential. This study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and awareness of XTx among patients undergoing liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted between November 2022 and August 2023. The study population comprised LT patients aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the hepatology clinic of a university hospital in Turkey. Of the 360 patients (n = 360) interviewed, 351 were deemed eligible for inclusion. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, median, standard deviation, minimum-maximum, number, percentage, and Pearson's chi-square test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 78.3% were religious and adhered to religious requirements, and 87.2% considered their religious beliefs when making important decisions. In all, 41.3% of the participants believed that organ or tissue transplantation from animals to humans is ethical, while 70.1% of the participants believed that organ and tissue transplantation from non-halal animals to humans was impossible. Specifically, 56.7% would not allow organ or tissue transplantation from a non-halal animal to themselves or a relative. Knowledge and attitude towards XTx were not affected by transplantation type (p > .05), but were affected by sex and educational level (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that LT patients generally oppose XTx. To enhance knowledge and awareness, religious leaders and healthcare professionals should organize comprehensive and effective seminars on this topic.

Xenotransplantation literature update March 2023-November 2023

We present an updated report highlighting significant developments in the field of xenotransplantation since March 2023. The past six months have witnessed significant strides in the field and the emergence of novel research that is expected to facilitate the journey towards clinical trials. We are reviewing here the most pertinent findings from March 2023 to November 2023.