• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4629798)   Today's Articles (305)   Subscriber (49735)
For: Pfingst BE, Burnett PA, Sutton D. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:1283-1292. [PMID: 6687893 DOI: 10.1121/1.389277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Shader MJ, Gordon-Salant S, Goupell MJ. Impact of Aging and the Electrode-to-Neural Interface on Temporal Processing Ability in Cochlear-Implant Users: Gap Detection Thresholds. Trends Hear 2020;24:2331216520956560. [PMID: 32941111 PMCID: PMC7502859 DOI: 10.1177/2331216520956560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]  Open
2
Pfingst BE, Rush NL. Discrimination of Simultaneous Frequency and Level Changes in Electrical Stimuli. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/00034894870960s114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
3
Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms. Ear Hear 2012;32:679-89. [PMID: 21610498 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31821a47df] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
4
Lim HH, Lenarz M, Lenarz T. Auditory midbrain implant: a review. Trends Amplif 2009;13:149-80. [PMID: 19762428 PMCID: PMC4111439 DOI: 10.1177/1084713809348372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
5
Lozano CA, Kaczmarek KA, Santello M. Electrotactile stimulation on the tongue: Intensity perception, discrimination, and cross-modality estimation. Somatosens Mot Res 2009;26:50-63. [PMID: 19697262 PMCID: PMC2839388 DOI: 10.1080/08990220903158797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
6
Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2009;250:46-54. [PMID: 19450432 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2008] [Revised: 01/20/2009] [Accepted: 01/28/2009] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
7
Goupell MJ, Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD. Current-level discrimination and spectral profile analysis in multi-channel electrical stimulation. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2008;124:3142-57. [PMID: 19045799 PMCID: PMC3004436 DOI: 10.1121/1.2981638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
8
Pfingst BE, Burkholder-Juhasz RA, Zwolan TA, Xu L. Psychophysical assessment of stimulation sites in auditory prosthesis electrode arrays. Hear Res 2008;242:172-83. [PMID: 18178350 PMCID: PMC2593127 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2007] [Revised: 11/20/2007] [Accepted: 11/20/2007] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
9
Lim HH, Lenarz T, Anderson DJ, Lenarz M. The auditory midbrain implant: effects of electrode location. Hear Res 2008;242:74-85. [PMID: 18348902 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2007] [Revised: 02/06/2008] [Accepted: 02/11/2008] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
10
Electrical stimulation of the midbrain for hearing restoration: insight into the functional organization of the human central auditory system. J Neurosci 2007;27:13541-51. [PMID: 18057212 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.3123-07.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]  Open
11
Lim HH, Anderson DJ. Spatially distinct functional output regions within the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant. J Neurosci 2007;27:8733-43. [PMID: 17687050 PMCID: PMC6672938 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.5127-06.2007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]  Open
12
Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination in the context of interleaved, multichannel stimulation in cochlear implants: effects of number of stimulated electrodes, pulse rate, and electrode separation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2006;7:308-16. [PMID: 16794913 PMCID: PMC2430008 DOI: 10.1007/s10162-006-0045-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2006] [Accepted: 05/11/2006] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
13
Lim HH, Anderson DJ. Auditory cortical responses to electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus: implications for an auditory midbrain implant. J Neurophysiol 2006;96:975-88. [PMID: 16723413 DOI: 10.1152/jn.01112.2005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
14
Rogers CF, Healy EW, Montgomery AA. Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2006;119:2276-87. [PMID: 16642841 DOI: 10.1121/1.2167150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
15
Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants. Hear Res 2005;202:170-9. [PMID: 15811709 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2004] [Accepted: 11/17/2004] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
16
Xu Y, Collins LM. Predicting Dynamic Range and Intensity Discrimination for Electrical Pulse-Train Stimuli Using a Stochastic Auditory Nerve Model: The Effects of Stimulus Noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2005;52:1040-9. [PMID: 15977734 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2005.846718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
17
Wojtczak M, Donaldson GS, Viemeister NF. Intensity discrimination and increment detection in cochlear-implant users. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2003;114:396-407. [PMID: 12880051 DOI: 10.1121/1.1579007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
18
Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM. Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 2001;155:63-81. [PMID: 11335077 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(01)00248-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
19
Miller AL. Effects of chronic stimulation on auditory nerve survival in ototoxically deafened animals. Hear Res 2001;151:1-14. [PMID: 11124447 DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00226-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
20
Loizou PC, Dorman M, Poroy O, Spahr T. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2000;108:2377-2387. [PMID: 11108378 DOI: 10.1121/1.1317557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
21
Beitel RE, Snyder RL, Schreiner CE, Raggio MW, Leake PA. Electrical cochlear stimulation in the deaf cat: comparisons between psychophysical and central auditory neuronal thresholds. J Neurophysiol 2000;83:2145-62. [PMID: 10758124 DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.4.2145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]  Open
22
Saito H, Miller JM, Pfingst BE, Altschuler RA. Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brainstem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration. Neuroscience 1999;91:139-61. [PMID: 10336066 DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00581-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
23
Richardson LM, Busby PA, Blamey PJ, Clark GM. Studies of prosody perception by cochlear implant patients. AUDIOLOGY : OFFICIAL ORGAN OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF AUDIOLOGY 1998;37:231-45. [PMID: 9723769 DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
24
Barretto RL, Pfingst BE. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: effects of pulse width on frequency discrimination. Hear Res 1992;62:245-9. [PMID: 1429267 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90191-o] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
25
Pfingst BE. Changes over time in thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res 1990;50:225-36. [PMID: 2076974 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90047-s] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
26
Pfingst BE, Rai DT. Effects of level on nonspectral frequency difference limens for electrical and acoustic stimuli. Hear Res 1990;50:43-56. [PMID: 2076982 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90032-k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
27
Pfingst BE. Comparisons of psychophysical and neurophysiological studies of cochlear implants. Hear Res 1988;34:243-51. [PMID: 3139606 DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(88)90005-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA