A bacterial enhancer functions to tether a transcriptional activator near a promoter

Deregulated enhancer-promoter communication in cancer through altered nuclear architecture

Enhancers are critical regulators of gene expression. Structural variations in cancer genomes can lead to enhancer hijacking, where oncogenes are activated by mistargeted enhancer activity. Novel enhancer-promoter interactions may also arise through chromosomal rearrangements that create extrachromosomal DNA elements. Additionally, fusion proteins and other mutation-induced alterations in protein properties can lead to the aberrant assembly of proteins into large complexes on the size scale of 0.1-1 μm termed onco-condensates. Transcription factors and co-activators accumulate with cis-regulatory elements in these structures, driving oncogenic programs. Here, we review current evidence of how altered genome architecture and macromolecular assembly result in deregulated enhancer-promoter communication. We discuss emerging strategies to exploit these mechanisms for clinical applications.

Long-range enhancer-controlled genes are hypersensitive to regulatory factor perturbations

Cell-type-specific gene activation is regulated by enhancers, sometimes located at large genomic distances from target gene promoters. Whether distal enhancers require specific factors to orchestrate gene regulation remains unclear. Here, we used enhancer distance-controlled reporter screens to find candidate factors. We depleted them and employed activity-by-contact predictions to genome-wide classify genes based on enhancer distance. Predicted distal enhancers typically control tissue-restricted genes and often are strong enhancers. We find cohesin, but also mediator, most specifically required for long-range activation, with cohesin repressing short-range gene activation and prioritizing distal over proximal HBB genes competing for shared enhancers. Long-range controlled genes are also most sensitive to perturbations of other regulatory proteins and to BET inhibitor JQ1, this being more a consequence of their distinct enhancer features than distance. Our work predicts that lengthening of intervening sequences can help limit the expression of target genes to specialized cells with optimal trans-factor environments.

Remote Regulation by VirB, the Transcriptional Anti-Silencer of Shigella Virulence Genes, Provides Mechanistic Information

Classical models of bacterial transcription show regulators binding close to promoter elements to exert their effect. However, the scope for long-range regulation exists, especially by nucleoid structuring proteins, like H-NS. Here, long-range regulation by VirB, a transcriptional regulator that alleviates H-NS-mediated silencing of key virulence genes in Shigella species, is explored in vivo to test the limits of long-range regulation and provide further mechanistic insight. VirB-dependent regulation of the well-characterized icsP promoter persists if its cognate site is repositioned 1 kb, 3.3 kb, and even 4.7 kb further upstream than its native position in a plasmid reporter. VirB-dependent regulation diminishes with binding site distance. While increasing cellular VirB pools elevated promoter activity in all constructs with wild-type VirB binding sites, it did not generate a disproportionate increase in promoter activity from remote sites relative to the native site. Since VirB occludes a constitutively active promoter (PT5) when docked adjacent to its -35 element, we next moved the VirB binding site far outside the promoter region. We discovered that VirB still interfered with promoter activity. These findings and those generated from molecular roadblocks engineered around a distally located VirB-binding site are reconciled with the various models of transcriptional regulation by VirB.

Evolution of Regulated Transcription

The genomes of all organisms abound with various cis-regulatory elements, which control gene activity. Transcriptional enhancers are a key group of such elements in eukaryotes and are DNA regions that form physical contacts with gene promoters and precisely orchestrate gene expression programs. Here, we follow gradual evolution of this regulatory system and discuss its features in different organisms. In eubacteria, an enhancer-like element is often a single regulatory element, is usually proximal to the core promoter, and is occupied by one or a few activators. Activation of gene expression in archaea is accompanied by the recruitment of an activator to several enhancer-like sites in the upstream promoter region. In eukaryotes, activation of expression is accompanied by the recruitment of activators to multiple enhancers, which may be distant from the core promoter, and the activators act through coactivators. The role of the general DNA architecture in transcription control increases in evolution. As a whole, it can be seen that enhancers of multicellular eukaryotes evolved from the corresponding prototypic enhancer-like regulatory elements with the gradually increasing genome size of organisms.

Positive and Negative Control of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions by Other DNA Loops Generates Specificity and Tunability

Enhancers are ubiquitous and critical gene-regulatory elements. However, quantitative understanding of the role of DNA looping in the regulation of enhancer action and specificity is limited. We used the Escherichia coli NtrC enhancer-σ54 promoter system as an in vivo model, finding that NtrC activation is highly sensitive to the enhancer-promoter (E-P) distance in the 300-6,000 bp range. DNA loops formed by Lac repressor were able to strongly regulate enhancer action either positively or negatively, recapitulating promoter targeting and insulation. A single LacI loop combining targeting and insulation produced a strong shift in specificity for enhancer choice between two σ54 promoters. A combined kinetic-thermodynamic model was used to quantify the effect of DNA-looping interactions on promoter activity and revealed that sensitivity to E-P distance and to control by other loops is itself dependent on enhancer and promoter parameters that may be subject to regulation.

Programmable DNA looping using engineered bivalent dCas9 complexes

DNA looping is a ubiquitous and critical feature of gene regulation. Although DNA looping can be efficiently detected, tools to readily manipulate DNA looping are limited. Here we develop CRISPR-based DNA looping reagents for creation of programmable DNA loops. Cleavage-defective Cas9 proteins of different specificity are linked by heterodimerization or translational fusion to create bivalent complexes able to link two separate DNA regions. After model-directed optimization, the reagents are validated using a quantitative DNA looping assay in E. coli. Looping efficiency is ~15% for a 4.7 kb loop, but is significantly improved by loop multiplexing with additional guides. Bivalent dCas9 complexes are also used to activate endogenous norVW genes by rewiring chromosomal DNA to bring distal enhancer elements to the gene promoters. Such reagents should allow manipulation of DNA looping in a variety of cell types, aiding understanding of endogenous loops and enabling creation of new regulatory connections.

DNA loops are a ubiquitious feature of gene regulation across the kingdoms of life. Here the authors design a Cas9-based dimerization system for inducing DNA loops in E. coli, allowing activation and rewiring of gene expression.

Functional Characterization of Key Residues in Regulatory Proteins HrpG and HrpV of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000

The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 uses a type III secretion system (T3SS) to transfer effector proteins into the host. The expression of T3SS proteins is controlled by the HrpL σ factor. Transcription of hrpL is σ⁵⁴-dependent and bacterial enhancer-binding proteins HrpR and HrpS coactivate the hrpL promoter. The HrpV protein imposes negative control upon HrpR and HrpS through direct interaction with HrpS. HrpG interacts with HrpV and relieves such negative control. The sequence alignments across Hrp group I-type plant pathogens revealed conserved HrpV and HrpG amino acids. To establish structure-function relationships in HrpV and HrpG, either truncated or alanine substitution mutants were constructed. Key functional residues in HrpV and HrpG are found within their C-terminal regions. In HrpG, L101 and L105 are indispensable for the ability of HrpG to directly interact with HrpV and suppress HrpV-dependent negative regulation of HrpR and HrpS. In HrpV, L108 and G110 are major determinants for interactions with HrpS and HrpG. We propose that mutually exclusive binding of HrpS and HrpG to the same binding site of HrpV governs a transition from negative control to activation of the HrpRS complex leading to HrpL expression and pathogenicity of P. syringae.

Modulating Salmonella Typhimurium's Response to a Changing Environment through Bacterial Enhancer-Binding Proteins and the RpoN Regulon

Transcription sigma factors direct the selective binding of RNA polymerase holoenzyme (Eσ) to specific promoters. Two families of sigma factors determine promoter specificity, the σ(70) (RpoD) family and the σ(54) (RpoN) family. In transcription controlled by σ(54), the Eσ(54)-promoter closed complex requires ATP hydrolysis by an associated bacterial enhancer-binding protein (bEBP) for the transition to open complex and transcription initiation. Given the wide host range of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, it is an excellent model system for investigating the roles of RpoN and its bEBPs in modulating the lifestyle of bacteria. The genome of S. Typhimurium encodes 13 known or predicted bEBPs, each responding to a unique intracellular or extracellular signal. While the regulons of most alternative sigma factors respond to a specific environmental or developmental signal, the RpoN regulon is very diverse, controlling genes for response to nitrogen limitation, nitric oxide stress, availability of alternative carbon sources, phage shock/envelope stress, toxic levels of zinc, nucleic acid damage, and other stressors. This review explores how bEBPs respond to environmental changes encountered by S. Typhimurium during transmission/infection and influence adaptation through control of transcription of different components of the S. Typhimurium RpoN regulon.

Transcription Factor Binding Site Mapping Using ChIP-Seq

Transcription factors (TFs) play a central role in regulating gene expression in all bacteria. Yet until recently, studies of TF binding were limited to a small number of factors at a few genomic locations. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-Seq) provides the ability to map binding sites globally for TFs, and the scalability of the technology enables the ability to map binding sites for every DNA binding protein in a prokaryotic organism. We have developed a protocol for ChIP-Seq tailored for use with mycobacteria and an analysis pipeline for processing the resulting data. The protocol and pipeline have been used to map over 100 TFs from Mycobacterium tuberculosis, as well as numerous TFs from related mycobacteria and other bacteria. The resulting data provide evidence that the long-accepted spatial relationship between TF binding site, promoter motif, and the corresponding regulated gene may be too simple a paradigm, failing to adequately capture the variety of TF binding sites found in prokaryotes. In this article we describe the protocol and analysis pipeline, the validation of these methods, and the results of applying these methods to M. tuberculosis.

Interplay among Pseudomonas syringae HrpR, HrpS and HrpV proteins for regulation of the type III secretion system

Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, a plant pathogenic gram-negative bacterium, employs the type III secretion system (T3SS) to cause disease in tomato and Arabidopsis and to induce the hypersensitive response in nonhost plants. The expression of T3SS is regulated by the HrpL extracytoplasmic sigma factor. Expression of HrpL is controlled by transcriptional activators HrpR and HrpS and negative regulator HrpV. In this study, we analysed the organization of HrpRS and HrpV regulatory proteins and interplay between them. We identified one key residue I26 in HrpS required for repression by HrpV. Substitution of I26 in HrpS abolishes its interaction with HrpV and impairs interactions between HrpS and HrpR and the self-association of HrpS. We show that HrpS self-associates and can associate simultaneously with HrpR and HrpV. We now propose that HrpS has a central role in the assembly of the regulatory HrpRSV complex. Deletion analysis of HrpR and HrpS proteins showed that C-terminal parts of HrpR and HrpS confer determinants indispensable for their self-assembly.

Determination of the self-association residues within a homomeric and a heteromeric AAA+ enhancer binding protein

The σ(54)-dependent transcription in bacteria requires specific activator proteins, bacterial enhancer binding protein (bEBP), members of the AAA+ (ATPases Associated with various cellular Activities) protein family. The bEBPs usually form oligomers in order to hydrolyze ATP and make open promoter complexes. The bEBP formed by HrpR and HrpS activates transcription from the σ(54)-dependent hrpL promoter responsible for triggering the Type Three Secretion System in Pseudomonas syringae pathovars. Unlike other bEBPs that usually act as homohexamers, HrpR and HrpS operate as a highly co-dependent heterohexameric complex. To understand the organization of the HrpRS complex and the HrpR and HrpS strict co-dependence, we have analyzed the interface between subunits using the random and directed mutagenesis and available crystal structures of several closely related bEBPs. We identified key residues required for the self-association of HrpR (D32, E202 and K235) with HrpS (D32, E200 and K233), showed that the HrpR D32 and HrpS K233 residues form interacting pairs directly involved in an HrpR-HrpS association and that the change in side-chain length at position 233 in HrpS affects self-association and interaction with the HrpR and demonstrated that the HrpS D32, E200 and K233 are not involved in negative regulation imposed by HrpV. We established that the equivalent residues K30, E200 and E234 in a homo-oligomeric bEBP, PspF, are required for the subunit communication and formation of an oligomeric lock that cooperates with the ATP γ-phosphate sensing PspF residue R227, providing insights into their roles in the heteromeric HrpRS co-complex.

Nucleotide-induced asymmetry within ATPase activator ring drives σ54-RNAP interaction and ATP hydrolysis

It is largely unknown how the typical homomeric ring geometry of ATPases associated with various cellular activities enables them to perform mechanical work. Small-angle solution X-ray scattering, crystallography, and electron microscopy (EM) reconstructions revealed that partial ATP occupancy caused the heptameric closed ring of the bacterial enhancer-binding protein (bEBP) NtrC1 to rearrange into a hexameric split ring of striking asymmetry. The highly conserved and functionally crucial GAFTGA loops responsible for interacting with σ54-RNA polymerase formed a spiral staircase. We propose that splitting of the ensemble directs ATP hydrolysis within the oligomer, and the ring's asymmetry guides interaction between ATPase and the complex of σ54 and promoter DNA. Similarity between the structure of the transcriptional activator NtrC1 and those of distantly related helicases Rho and E1 reveals a general mechanism in homomeric ATPases whereby complex allostery within the ring geometry forms asymmetric functional states that allow these biological motors to exert directional forces on their target macromolecules.

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of the ATPase domain of the σ(54)-dependent transcription activator NtrC1 from Aquifex aeolicus bound to the ATP analog ADP-BeFx

One way that bacteria regulate the transcription of specific genes to adapt to environmental challenges is to use different σ factors that direct the RNA polymerase holoenzyme to distinct promoters. Unlike σ(70) RNA polymerase (RNAP), σ(54) RNAP is unable to initiate transcription without an activator: enhancer-binding protein (EBP). All EBPs contain one ATPase domain that belongs to the family of ATPases associated with various cellular activities (AAA+ ATPases). AAA+ ATPases use the energy of ATP hydrolysis to remodel different target macromolecules to perform distinct functions. These mechanochemical enzymes are known to form ring-shaped oligomers whose conformations strongly depend upon nucleotide status. Here, the crystallization of the AAA+ ATPase domain of an EBP from Aquifex aeolicus, NtrC1, in the presence of the non-hydrolyzable ATP analog ADP-BeFx is reported. X-ray diffraction data were collected from two crystals from two different protein fractions of the NtrC1 ATPase domain. Previously, this domain was co-crystallized with ADP and ATP, but the latter crystals were grown from the Walker B substitution variant E239A. Therefore, the new data sets are the first for a wild-type EBP ATPase domain co-crystallized with an ATP analog and they reveal a new crystal form. The resulting structure(s) will shed light on the mechanism of EBP-type transcription activators.

Structure, function, and tethering of DNA-binding domains in σ⁵⁴ transcriptional activators

We compare the structure, activity, and linkage of DNA-binding domains (DBDs) from σ(54) transcriptional activators and discuss how the properties of the DBDs and the linker to the neighboring domain are affected by the overall properties and requirements of the full proteins. These transcriptional activators bind upstream of specific promoters that utilize σ(54)-polymerase. Upon receiving a signal the activators assemble into hexamers, which then, through adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis, drive a conformational change in polymerase that enables transcription initiation. We present structures of the DBDs of activators nitrogen regulatory protein C 1 (NtrC1) and Nif-like homolog 2 (Nlh2) from the thermophile Aquifex aeolicus. The structures of these domains and their relationship to other parts of the activators are discussed. These structures are compared with previously determined structures of the DBDs of NtrC4, NtrC, ZraR, and factor for inversion stimulation. The N-terminal linkers that connect the DBDs to the central domains in NtrC1 and Nlh2 were studied and found to be unstructured. Additionally, a crystal structure of full-length NtrC1 was solved, but density of the DBDs was extremely weak, further indicating that the linker between ATPase and DBDs functions as a flexible tether. Flexible linking of ATPase and DBDs is likely necessary to allow assembly of the active hexameric ATPase ring. The comparison of this set of activators also shows clearly that strong dimerization of the DBD only occurs when other domains do not dimerize strongly.

Nitrogen assimilation in Escherichia coli: putting molecular data into a systems perspective

We present a comprehensive overview of the hierarchical network of intracellular processes revolving around central nitrogen metabolism in Escherichia coli. The hierarchy intertwines transport, metabolism, signaling leading to posttranslational modification, and transcription. The protein components of the network include an ammonium transporter (AmtB), a glutamine transporter (GlnHPQ), two ammonium assimilation pathways (glutamine synthetase [GS]-glutamate synthase [glutamine 2-oxoglutarate amidotransferase {GOGAT}] and glutamate dehydrogenase [GDH]), the two bifunctional enzymes adenylyl transferase/adenylyl-removing enzyme (ATase) and uridylyl transferase/uridylyl-removing enzyme (UTase), the two trimeric signal transduction proteins (GlnB and GlnK), the two-component regulatory system composed of the histidine protein kinase nitrogen regulator II (NRII) and the response nitrogen regulator I (NRI), three global transcriptional regulators called nitrogen assimilation control (Nac) protein, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), and cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (Crp), the glutaminases, and the nitrogen-phosphotransferase system. First, the structural and molecular knowledge on these proteins is reviewed. Thereafter, the activities of the components as they engage together in transport, metabolism, signal transduction, and transcription and their regulation are discussed. Next, old and new molecular data and physiological data are put into a common perspective on integral cellular functioning, especially with the aim of resolving counterintuitive or paradoxical processes featured in nitrogen assimilation. Finally, we articulate what still remains to be discovered and what general lessons can be learned from the vast amounts of data that are available now.

The Drosophila gypsy insulator supports transvection in the presence of the vestigial enhancer

Though operationally defined as cis-regulatory elements, enhancers can also communicate with promoters on a separate homolog in trans, a mechanism that has been suggested to account for the ability of certain alleles of the same gene to complement one another in a process otherwise known as transvection. This homolog-pairing dependent process is facilitated in Drosophila by chromatin-associated pairing proteins, many of which remain unknown and their mechanism of action uncharacterized. Here we have tested the role of the gypsy chromatin insulator in facilitating pairing and communication between enhancers and promoters in trans using a transgenic eGFP reporter system engineered to allow for targeted deletions in the vestigial Boundary Enhancer (vgBE) and the hsp70 minimal promoter, along with one or two flanking gypsy elements. We found a modest 2.5-3x increase in eGFP reporter levels from homozygotes carrying an intact copy of the reporter on each homolog compared to unpaired hemizygotes, although this behavior was independent of gypsy. However, detectable levels of GFP protein along the DV wing boundary in trans-heterozygotes lacking a single enhancer and promoter was only observed in the presence of two flanking gypsy elements. Our results demonstrate that gypsy can stimulate enhancer-promoter communication in trans throughout the genome in a context-dependent manner, likely through modulation of local chromatin dynamics once pairing has been established by other elements and highlights chromatin structure as the master regulator of this phenomenon.

DNA looping in prokaryotes: experimental and theoretical approaches

Transcriptional regulation is at the heart of biological functions such as adaptation to a changing environment or to new carbon sources. One of the mechanisms which has been found to modulate transcription, either positively (activation) or negatively (repression), involves the formation of DNA loops. A DNA loop occurs when a protein or a complex of proteins simultaneously binds to two different sites on DNA with looping out of the intervening DNA. This simple mechanism is central to the regulation of several operons in the genome of the bacterium Escherichia coli, like the lac operon, one of the paradigms of genetic regulation. The aim of this review is to gather and discuss concepts and ideas from experimental biology and theoretical physics concerning DNA looping in genetic regulation. We first describe experimental techniques designed to show the formation of a DNA loop. We then present the benefits that can or could be derived from a mechanism involving DNA looping. Some of these are already experimentally proven, but others are theoretical predictions and merit experimental investigation. Then, we try to identify other genetic systems that could be regulated by a DNA looping mechanism in the genome of Escherichia coli. We found many operons that, according to our set of criteria, have a good chance to be regulated with a DNA loop. Finally, we discuss the proposition recently made by both biologists and physicists that this mechanism could also act at the genomic scale and play a crucial role in the spatial organization of genomes.

ChIP-Seq and the complexity of bacterial transcriptional regulation

Transcription factors (TFs) play a central role in regulating gene expression in all bacteria. Yet, until recently, studies of TF binding were limited to a small number of factors at a few genomic locations. Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing enables mapping of binding sites for TFs in a global and high-throughput fashion. The NIAID funded TB systems biology project http://www.broadinstitute.org/annotation/tbsysbio/home.html aims to map the binding sites for every transcription factor in the genome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB), the causative agent of human TB. ChIP-Seq data already released through TBDB.org have provided new insight into the mechanisms of TB pathogenesis. But in addition, data from MTB are beginning to challenge many simplifying assumptions associated with gene regulation in all bacteria. In this chapter, we review the global aspects of TF binding in MTB and discuss the implications of these data for our understanding of bacterial gene regulation. We begin by reviewing the canonical model of bacterial transcriptional regulation using the lac operon as the standard paradigm. We then review the use of ChIP-Seq to map the binding sites of DNA-binding proteins and the application of this method to mapping TF binding sites in MTB. Finally, we discuss two aspects of the binding discovered by ChIP-Seq that were unexpected given the canonical model: the substantial binding outside the proximal promoter region and the large number of weak binding sites.

Oligomerization of the response regulator ComE from Streptococcus mutans is affected by phosphorylation

We have previously characterized the interactions of the response regulator ComE from Streptococcus mutans and DNA binding sites through DNase I footprinting and electrophoretic mobility shift assay analysis. Since response regulator functions are often affected by their phosphorylation state, we investigated how phosphorylation affects the biochemical function of ComE. Unlike many response regulators, we found that the phosphorylation state of ComE does not likely play a role in DNA binding affinity but rather seems to induce the formation of an oligomeric form of the protein. The role of this oligomerization state for ComE function is discussed.

THE INTERNAL SEQUENCE OF IS1STIMULATES RNA SYNTHESIS FROM THE IS1OWN AND EXOGENOUS PROMOTERS

The bacterial IS1 contains the genes insA and B′-insB encoding transposition related-proteins. The expression of these genes is driven by a promoter within the left end of IS1. Using IS1-lacZ constructs in which lacZs were fused in-frame at various sites of IS1 genes, it was found that the presence of the internal region of insA results in about a 100-fold increase in lacZ expression. The lacZ expression of the fusion constructs in which the IS1 own promoter was displaced by an exogenous promoter, was also stimulated by the presence of the IS1 internal region. Similarly, when lacZ was transcriptionally fused to the internal region of IS1, the lacZ expression from an exogenous promoter was stimulated. This result shows that the IS1 internal region acts as a cis-element to stimulate RNA synthesis from the upstream promoter. This was confirmed by Northern blot analyses. Furthermore, the gene which encodes the factor working with the IS1 internal sequence to stimulate transcription, was cloned. The gene was artA in the transfer region of the Escherichia coli F factor. Interestingly, the cis-element for transcription stimulation is found downstream, whereas many such elements are located upstream, of the promoter.

Activity map of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase bridge helix

Transcription, the synthesis of RNA from a DNA template, is performed by multisubunit RNA polymerases (RNAPs) in all cellular organisms. The bridge helix (BH) is a distinct feature of all multisubunit RNAPs and makes direct interactions with several active site-associated mobile features implicated in the nucleotide addition cycle and RNA and DNA binding. Because the BH has been captured in both kinked and straight conformations in different crystals structures of RNAP, recently supported by molecular dynamics studies, it has been proposed that cycling between these conformations is an integral part of the nucleotide addition cycle. To further evaluate the role of the BH, we conducted systematic alanine scanning mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli RNAP BH to determine its contributions to activities required for transcription. Combining our data with an atomic model of E. coli RNAP, we suggest that alterations in the interactions between the BH and (i) the trigger loop, (ii) fork loop 2, and (iii) switch 2 can help explain the observed changes in RNAP functionality associated with some of the BH variants. Additionally, we show that extensive defects in E. coli RNAP functionality depend upon a single previously not studied lysine residue (Lys-781) that is strictly conserved in all bacteria. It appears that direct interactions made by the BH with other conserved features of RNAP are lost in some of the E. coli alanine substitution variants, which we infer results in conformational changes in RNAP that modify RNAP functionality.

Gene repression by minimal lac loops in vivo

The inflexibility of double-stranded DNA with respect to bending and twisting is well established in vitro. Understanding apparent DNA physical properties in vivo is a greater challenge. Here, we exploit repression looping with components of the Escherichia coli lac operon to monitor DNA flexibility in living cells. We create a minimal system for testing the shortest possible DNA repression loops that contain an E. coli promoter, and compare the results to prior experiments. Our data reveal that loop-independent repression occurs for certain tight operator/promoter spacings. When only loop-dependent repression is considered, fits to a thermodynamic model show that DNA twisting limits looping in vivo, although the apparent DNA twist flexibility is 2- to 4-fold higher than in vitro. In contrast, length-dependent resistance to DNA bending is not observed in these experiments, even for the shortest loops constraining <0.4 persistence lengths of DNA. As observed previously for other looping configurations, loss of the nucleoid protein heat unstable (HU) markedly disables DNA looping in vivo. Length-independent DNA bending energy may reflect the activities of architectural proteins and the structure of the DNA topological domain. We suggest that the shortest loops are formed in apical loops rather than along the DNA plectonemic superhelix.

A prehydrolysis state of an AAA+ ATPase supports transcription activation of an enhancer-dependent RNA polymerase

ATP hydrolysis-dependent molecular machines and motors often drive regulated conformational transformations in cell signaling and gene regulation complexes. Conformational reorganization of a gene regulation complex containing the major variant form of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP), Esigma(54), requires engagement with its cognate ATP-hydrolyzing activator protein. Importantly, this activated RNAP is essential for a number of adaptive responses, including those required for bacterial pathogenesis. Here we characterize the initial encounter between the enhancer-dependent Esigma(54) and its cognate activator AAA+ ATPase protein, before ADP+P(i) formation, using a small primed RNA (spRNA) synthesis assay. The results show that in a prehydrolysis state, sufficient activator-dependent rearrangements in Esigma(54) have occurred to allow engagement of the RNAP active site with single-stranded promoter DNA to support spRNA synthesis, but not to melt the promoter DNA. This catalytically competent transcription intermediate has similarity with the open promoter complex, in that the RNAP dynamics required for DNA scrunching should be occurring. Significantly, this work highlights that prehydrolysis states of ATPases are functionally important in the molecular transformations they drive.

Baculovirus immediately early 1, a mediator for homologous regions enhancer function in trans

BACKGROUND

Enhancers are DNA sequences that serve as binding sites for regulatory proteins, and stimulate transcriptional activity independent of their positions and orientations with respect to the transcriptional initiation site. Previous studies considered that baculovirus homologous regions (hrs) function as enhancers in cis. In our study, a plasmid containing homologous region 3 (hr3) enhancer from Bombyx mori nucleopolyhedrovirus (BmNPV) failed to enhance transcription of promoter in other plasmid in co-transfection assays, but strong stimulation occurred when cells were infected by BmNPV.

RESULTS

The cotransfection results of each BmNPV genomic library plasmid, hr3 plasmid and reporter plasmid showed that there were eight library plasmids stimulated the luciferase gene expression remarkably. Sequencing these plasmids revealed that each of them contained the ie-1 gene. Transfected plasmids, containing ie-1, hr3 and various origin promoter drove reporter gene showed the function was even retained. Cotransfection of hr3 functional dissected fragment and ie-1 revealed that the 30-bp imperfect palindrome destroyed fragment can't enhance reporter gene expression even though transfected with ie-1.

CONCLUSION

IE-1 was the only early factor of BmNPV that could act as a mediator for hr enhancer function in trans and the trans-function was achieved with a broad-spectrum of promoters. The 30-bp imperfect palindrome was the elementary molecular structure by which IE-1 participated in the enhancer function in trans.

Activation and repression of a sigmaN-dependent promoter naturally lacking upstream activation sequences

The Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP protein AtzR is a LysR-type transcriptional regulator required for activation of the atzDEF operon in response to nitrogen limitation and cyanuric acid. Transcription of atzR is directed by the sigma(N)-dependent promoter PatzR, activated by NtrC and repressed by AtzR. Here we use in vivo and in vitro approaches to address the mechanisms of PatzR activation and repression. Activation by NtrC did not require any promoter sequences other than the sigma(N) recognition motif both in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that NtrC activates PatzR in an upstream activation sequences-independent fashion. Regarding AtzR-dependent autorepression, our in vitro transcription experiments show that the concentration of AtzR required for repression of the PatzR promoter in vitro correlates with AtzR affinity for its binding site. In addition, AtzR prevents transcription from PatzR when added to a preformed E-sigma(N)-PatzR closed complex, but isomerization to an open complex prevents repression. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprint assays indicate that DNA-bound AtzR and E-sigma(N) are mutually exclusive. Taken together, these results strongly support the notion that AtzR represses transcription from PatzR by competing with E-sigma(N) for their overlapping binding sites. There are no previous reports of a similar mechanism for repression of sigma(N)-dependent transcription.

Construction and functional analyses of a comprehensive sigma54 site-directed mutant library using alanine-cysteine mutagenesis

The sigma(54) factor associates with core RNA polymerase (RNAP) to form a holoenzyme that is unable to initiate transcription unless acted on by an activator protein. sigma(54) is closely involved in many steps of activator-dependent transcription, such as core RNAP binding, promoter recognition, activator interaction and open complex formation. To systematically define sigma(54) residues that contribute to each of these functions and to generate a resource for site specific protein labeling, a complete mutant library of sigma(54) was constructed by alanine-cysteine scanning mutagenesis. Amino acid residues from 3 to 476 of Cys(-)sigma(54) were systematically mutated to alanine and cysteine in groups of two adjacent residues at a time. The influences of each substitution pair upon the functions of sigma(54) were analyzed in vivo and in vitro and the functions of many residues were revealed for the first time. Increased sigma(54) isomerization activity seldom corresponded with an increased transcription activity of the holoenzyme, suggesting the steps after sigma(54) isomerization, likely to be changes in core RNAP structure, are also strictly regulated or rate limiting to open complex formation. A linkage between core RNAP-binding activity and activator responsiveness indicates that the sigma(54)-core RNAP interface changes upon activation.

Identification of the binding site of the σ 54 hetero-oligomeric FleQ/FleT activator in the flagellar promoters of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Expression of the flagellar genes in Rhodobacter sphaeroides is dependent on one of the four sigma-54 factors present in this bacterium and on the enhancer binding proteins (EBPs) FleQ and FleT. These proteins, in contrast to other well-characterized EBPs, carry out activation as a hetero-oligomeric complex. To further characterize the molecular properties of this complex we mapped the binding sites or upstream activation sequences (UASs) of six different flagellar promoters. In most cases the UASs were identified at approximately 100 bp upstream from the promoter. However, the activity of the divergent promoters flhAp-flgAp, which are separated by only 53 bp, is mainly dependent on a UAS located approximately 200 bp downstream from each promoter. Interestingly, a significant amount of activation mediated by the upstream or contralateral UAS was also detected, suggesting that the architecture of this region is important for the correct regulation of these promoters. Sequence analysis of the regions carrying the potential FleQ/FleT binding sites revealed a conserved motif. In vivo footprinting experiments with the motAp promoter allowed us to identify a protected region that overlaps with this motif. These results allow us to propose a consensus sequence that represents the binding site of the FleQ/FleT activating complex.

Organization of an activator-bound RNA polymerase holoenzyme

Transcription initiation involves the conversion from closed promoter complexes, comprising RNA polymerase (RNAP) and double-stranded promoter DNA, to open complexes, in which the enzyme is able to access the DNA template in a single-stranded form. The complex between bacterial RNAP and its major variant sigma factor σ⁵⁴ remains as a closed complex until ATP hydrolysis-dependent remodeling by activator proteins occurs. This remodeling facilitates DNA melting and allows the transition to the open complex. Here we present cryoelectron microscopy reconstructions of bacterial RNAP in complex with σ⁵⁴ alone, and of RNAP-σ⁵⁴ with an AAA+ activator. Together with photo-crosslinking data that establish the location of promoter DNA within the complexes, we explain why the RNAP-σ⁵⁴ closed complex is unable to access the DNA template and propose how the structural changes induced by activator binding can initiate conformational changes that ultimately result in formation of the open complex.

Trapping of a transcription complex using a new nucleotide analogue: AMP aluminium fluoride

Mechanochemical proteins rely on ATP hydrolysis to establish the different functional states required for their biological output. Studying the transient functional intermediate states these proteins adopt as they progress through the ATP hydrolysis cycle is key to understanding the molecular basis of their mechanism. Many of these intermediates have been successfully 'trapped' and functionally characterised using ATP analogues. Here, we present a new nucleotide analogue, AMP-AlF(x), which traps PspF, a bacterial enhancer binding protein, in a stable complex with the sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme. The crystal structure of AMP-AlF(x)*PspF(1-275) provides new information on protein-nucleotide interactions and suggests that the beta and gamma phosphates are more important than the alpha phosphate in terms of sensing nucleotide bound states. In addition, functional data obtained with AMP-AlF(x) establish distinct roles for the conserved catalytic AAA(+) (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) residues, suggesting that AMP-AlF(x) is a powerful new tool to study AAA(+) protein family members and, more generally, Walker motif ATPases.

Look, no hands! Unconventional transcriptional activators in bacteria

Transcriptional activation in bacteria usually involves an activator protein that binds to sites near the target promoter. Some activators of sigma(54)-RNA polymerase holoenzyme, however, can stimulate transcription even when their DNA-binding domains are removed. Recent studies have revealed examples of sigma(54)-dependent activators that naturally lack DNA-binding domains and seem to activate transcription from solution rather than from specific DNA sites. In addition, some activators that function with other forms of RNA polymerase holoenzyme, including Bacillus subtilis Spx and the bacteriophage N4 single-stranded DNA-binding protein, also stimulate transcription without binding to DNA. Because binding to regulatory sites enables activators to stimulate transcription from specific promoters, alternative strategies for achieving specificity are required for activators that do not bind to DNA.

Biochemical analysis of enhancer-promoter communication in chromatin

Regulation of many biological processes often occurs by DNA sequences positioned over a large distance from the site of action. Such sequences, capable of activating transcription over a distance, are termed enhancers. Several experimental approaches for analysis of the mechanisms of communication over a distance between DNA regions positioned on the same molecule and, in particular, for analysis of enhancer-promoter communication were developed recently. Most of these methods are technically complicated and not applicable for studies of various important aspects of distant interactions in chromatin. As an alternative, we propose a more efficient and versatile method for the study of enhancer-promoter communication in chromatin using a prokaryotic model enhancer-promoter system that recapitulates most of the key aspects of eukaryotic transcriptional enhancer action (including action over a large distance) both in vivo and in vitro. Below we describe the application of this highly efficient experimental system to analyze the structural and dynamic properties of chromatin that allow communication between DNA regulatory regions over a distance.

Structural basis of DNA recognition by the alternative sigma-factor, sigma54

The sigma subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase (RNAP) regulates gene expression by directing RNAP to specific promoters. Unlike sigma(70)-type proteins, the alternative sigma factor, sigma(54), requires interaction with an ATPase to open DNA. We present the solution structure of the C-terminal domain of sigma(54) bound to the -24 promoter element, in which the conserved RpoN box motif inserts into the major groove of the DNA. This structure elucidates the basis for sequence specific recognition of the -24 element, orients sigma(54) on the promoter, and suggests how the C-terminal domain of sigma(54) interacts with RNAP.

Mutations of the act promoter in Myxococcus xanthus

Mutations within the -12 and -24 elements provide evidence that the act promoter is recognized by sigma-54 RNA polymerase. Deletion of the -20 base pair, which lies between the two conserved elements of sigma-54 promoters, decreased expression by 90%. In addition, mutation of a potential enhancer sequence, around -120, led to an 80% reduction in act gene expression. actB, the second gene in the act operon, encodes a sigma-54 activator protein that is proposed to be an enhancer-binding protein for the act operon. All act genes, actA to actE, are expressed together and constitute an operon, because an in-frame deletion of actB decreased expression of actA and actE to the same extent. After an initially slow phase of act operon expression, which depends on FruA, there is a rapid phase. The rapid phase is shown to be due to the activation of the operon expression by ActB, which completes a positive feedback loop. That loop appears to be nested within a larger positive loop in which ActB is activated by the C signal via ActA, and the act operon activates transcription of the csgA gene. We propose that, as cells engage in more C signaling, positive feedback raises the number of C-signal molecules per cell and drives the process of fruiting body development forward.

Chromatin structure can strongly facilitate enhancer action over a distance

Numerous DNA transactions in eukaryotic nuclei are regulated by elements (enhancers) that can directly interact with their targets over large regions of DNA organized into chromatin. The mechanisms allowing communication over a distance in chromatin are unknown. We have established an experimental system allowing quantitative analysis of the impact of chromatin structure on distant transcriptional regulation. Assembly of relaxed or linear DNA templates into subsaturated chromatin results in a strong increase of the efficiency of distant enhancer-promoter E-P communication and activation of transcription. The effect is directly proportional to the efficiency of chromatin assembly and cannot be explained only by DNA compaction. Transcription activation on chromatin templates is enhancer- and activator-dependent, and must be accompanied by direct E-P interaction and formation of a chromatin loop. Previously we have shown that DNA supercoiling can strongly facilitate E-P communication on histone-free DNA. The effects of chromatin assembly and DNA supercoiling on the communication are quantitatively similar, but the efficiency of enhancer action in subsaturated chromatin does not depend on the level of unconstrained DNA supercoiling. Thus chromatin structure per se can support highly efficient communication over a distance and functionally mimic the supercoiled state characteristic for prokaryotic DNA.

The flagellar hierarchy of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is controlled by the concerted action of two enhancer-binding proteins

The expression of the bacterial flagellar genes follows a hierarchical pattern. In Rhodobacter sphaeroides the flagellar genes encoding the hook and basal body proteins are expressed from sigma54-dependent promoters. This type of promoters is always regulated by transcriptional activators that belong to the family of the enhancer-binding proteins (EBPs). We searched for possible EBPs in the genome of R. sphaeroides and mutagenized two open reading frames (ORFs) (fleQ and fleT), which are in the vicinity of flagellar genes. The resulting mutants were non-motile and could only be complemented by the wild-type copy of the mutagenized gene. Transcriptional fusions showed that all the flagellar sigma54-dependent promoters with exception of fleTp, required both transcriptional activators for their expression. Interestingly, transcription of the fleT operon is only dependent on FleQ, and FleT has a negative effect. Both activators were capable of hydrolysing ATP, and were capable of promoting transcription from the flagellar promoters at some extent. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays suggest that only FleQ interacts with DNA whereas FleT improves binding of FleQ to DNA. A four-tiered flagellar transcriptional hierarchy and a regulatory mechanism based on the intracellular concentration of both activators and differential enhancer affinities are proposed.

Structures and organisation of AAA+ enhancer binding proteins in transcriptional activation

Initiation of transcription is a major point of transcriptional regulation and invariably involves the transition from a closed to an open RNA polymerase (RNAP) promoter complex. In the case of the sigma(54)-RNAP, this multi step process requires energy, provided by ATP hydrolysis occurring within the AAA+ domain of enhancer binding proteins (EBPs). Typically, EBPs have an N-terminal regulatory domain, a central AAA+ domain that directly contacts sigma(54) and a C-terminal DNA binding domain. The following AAA+ EBP crystal structures have recently become available: heptameric AAA+ domains of NtrC1 and dimeric NtrC1 with its regulatory domain, hexameric AAA+ domains of ZraR with DNA binding domains, apo and nucleotide bound forms of the AAA+ domain of PspF as well as a cryo-EM structure of the AAA+ domain of PspF complexed with sigma(54). These AAA+ domains reveal the structural conservation between EBPs and other AAA+ domains. EBP specific structural features involved in substrate remodelling are located proximal to the pore of the hexameric ring. Parallels with the substrate binding elements near the central pore of other AAA+ members are drawn. We propose a structural model of EBPs in complex with a sigma(54)-RNAP-promoter complex.

Controlled hierarchical assembly of switchable DNA–multiprotein complexes

Directed, biologically-driven self-assembly has the potential to yield hybrid multicomponent architectures with applications ranging from sensors and diagnostics to catalysts and responsive materials. To enable these applications, it is critical to gain control over the precise orientation and geometry of biomolecules interacting with one-another and with surfaces. Such control has thus far been difficult to achieve in even the simplest biomolecular designs. We report a novel methodology for the design and synthesis of functional, oriented, and reversibly switchable hierarchical assemblies at the nanoscale using DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions. The biomolecular assembly relies on the highly selective recognition between transcription factors (TFs) and their cognate DNA motifs that serve as transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) along with the calmodulin (CaM)-calmodulin binding peptide (CBP) interaction that is regulated by Ca2+. Through these two types of controllable interactions, we achieved the sequential and hierarchical self-assembly of multiprotein complexes complete with embedded fluorescence and catalytic capabilities, which may serve as a paradigm for multifunctional assemblies.

The C-terminal RpoN domain of sigma54 forms an unpredicted helix-turn-helix motif similar to domains of sigma70

The "sigma" subunit of prokaryotic RNA polymerase allows gene-specific transcription initiation. Two sigma families have been identified, sigma70 and sigma54, which use distinct mechanisms to initiate transcription and share no detectable sequence homology. Although the sigma70-type factors have been well characterized structurally by x-ray crystallography, no high resolution structural information is available for the sigma54-type factors. Here we present the NMR-derived structure of the C-terminal domain of sigma54 from Aquifex aeolicus. This domain (Thr-323 to Gly-389), which contains the highly conserved RpoN box sequence, consists of a poorly structured N-terminal tail followed by a three-helix bundle, which is surprisingly similar to domains of the sigma70-type proteins. Residues of the RpoN box, which have previously been shown to be critical for DNA binding, form the second helix of an unpredicted helix-turn-helix motif. The homology of this structure with other DNA-binding proteins, combined with previous biochemical data, suggests how the C-terminal domain of sigma54 binds to DNA.

Characterization of enhancer binding by the Vibrio cholerae flagellar regulatory protein FlrC

The human pathogen Vibrio cholerae is a highly motile organism by virtue of a polar flagellum, and motility has been inferred to be an important aspect of virulence. It has previously been demonstrated that the sigma(54)-dependent activator FlrC is necessary for both flagellar synthesis and for enhanced intestinal colonization. In order to characterize FlrC binding, we analyzed two FlrC-dependent promoters, the highly transcribed flaA promoter and the weakly transcribed flgK promoter, utilizing transcriptional lacZ fusions, mobility shift assays, and DNase I footprinting. Promoter fusion studies showed that the smallest fragment with wild-type transcriptional activity for flaAp was from positions -54 to +137 with respect to the start site, and from -63 to +144 for flgKp. Gel mobility shift assays indicated that FlrC binds to a fragment containing the region from positions +24 to +95 in the flaAp, and DNase I footprinting identified a protected region between positions +24 and +85. Mobility shift and DNase I footprinting indicated weak binding of FlrC to a region downstream of the flgKp transcription start site. These results demonstrate a relatively novel sigma(54)-dependent promoter architecture, with the activator FlrC binding downstream of the sigma(54)-dependent transcription start sites. When the FlrC binding site(s) in the flaA promoter was moved a large distance (285 bp) upstream of the transcription start site of either flaAp or flgKp, high levels of FlrC-dependent transcription resulted, indicating that this binding region functions as an enhancer element. In contrast, the relatively weak FlrC binding site(s) in the flgK promoter failed to function as an enhancer element at either promoter, suggesting that FlrC binding strength contributes to enhancer activity. Our results suggest that the differences in FlrC binding to various flagellar promoters results in the differences in transcription levels that mirror the relative requirement for the flagellar components within the flagellum.

Dicarboxylate transport by rhizobia

Soil bacteria collectively known as rhizobia are able to convert atmospheric dinitrogen to ammonia while participating in a symbiotic association with legume plants. This capability has made the bacteria an attractive research subject at many levels of investigation, especially since physiological and metabolic specialization are central to this ecological niche. Dicarboxylate transport plays an important role in the operation of an effective, nitrogen-fixing symbiosis and considerable evidence suggests that dicarboxylates are a major energy and carbon source for the nitrogen-fixing rhizobia. The dicarboxylate transport (Dct) system responsible for importing these compounds generally consists of a dicarboxylate carrier protein, DctA, and a two component kinase regulatory system, DctB/DctD. DctA and DctB/D differ in the substrates that they recognize and a model for substrate recognition by DctA and DctB is discussed. In some rhizobia, DctA expression can be induced during symbiosis in the absence of DctB/DctD by an alternative, uncharacterized, mechanism. The DctA protein belongs to a subgroup of the glutamate transporter family now thought to have an unusual structure that combines aspects of permeases and ion channels. While the structure of C(4)-dicarboxylate transporters has not been analyzed in detail, mutagenesis of S. meliloti DctA has produced results consistent with the alignment of the rhizobial protein with the more characterized bacterial and eukaryotic glutamate transporters in this family.

Nonhomologous end-joining ligation transfers DNA regulatory elements between cointroduced plasmids

Cointroduction of plasmids into mammalian cells is commonly used to investigate transcription factor regulation of reporter genes or to normalize transfection efficiency. We report here that cotransfected DNA molecules commonly transfer enhancer elements from one plasmid to another. Using separate Renilla or Firefly luciferase reporters, we found that an estrogen response element (ERE) originally linked to one of the reporters stimulated expression of the non-ERE-containing reporter. Similar enhancer transfer was seen with the cytomegalovirus enhancer. This enhancer transfer effect was not seen when cells were transfected separately with the reporters and the extracts were then combined before luciferase assays. The degree of enhancer transfer increased with transfected plasmid concentration and was greater when linearized rather than circular plasmid DNA was used. We hypothesized that double-strand breaks and heteroligation of cointroduced DNA molecules mediated the transfer of regulatory elements from one molecule to another. PCR of transfected plasmid DNA confirmed nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) ligation of DNA fragments originally present in separate plasmids. The NHEJ reaction was enhanced by UV light treatment to introduce double-strand breaks, and it was greater after liposome-mediated transfection than after calcium-phosphate-mediated transfection. NHEJ also occurred after adenoviral transfer of DNA into cells. We conclude that NHEJ mediates the transfer of regulatory DNA elements among cointroduced DNA molecules. These findings indicate the need for caution when interpreting results of transfection experiments containing more than one plasmid and suggest a mechanism whereby viruses or other exogenous DNA might recombine to activate unrelated genes.

Geometric and dynamic requirements for DNA looping, wrapping and unwrapping in the activation of E.coli glnAp2 transcription by NtrC

Transcriptional activation by the E.coli NtrC protein can occur via DNA looping between a DNA-bound activator and the target sigma(54) RNA polymerase. NtrC forms an octamer on DNA that is capable of binding two DNA molecules. Its ATPase activity is required for open complex formation. Geometric requirements for activation were assessed using a library of DNA bending sequences created by random ligation of A-tract oligonucleotides, as well as several designed sequences. Thirty random or designed sequences with a variety of DNA lengths and bending geometries were cloned in plasmids, and the library was used to replace the spacer between the NtrC binding sites and the core glnAp2 promoter. The activity of each promoter construct under nitrogen limitation was determined in vivo, in a lambda phage lacZ reporter system integrated as a single-copy lysogen to avoid titrating NtrC or polymerase. A wide variety of bending geometries was found to support a similar level of transcriptional activation ( approximately 3-4-fold). Computer modeling of the DNA trajectories suggests that the most inactive promoters have short spacer DNA and the NtrC sites on the opposite side of the helix as the wild-type sites; otherwise, the loop can form effectively. Flexibility and multivalency of the NtrC-Esigma(54) interaction apparently provides substantial independence from DNA stiffness constraints, and in general activation requires less efficient looping than repression. However, none of the random templates were as active as wild-type promoter. Subsidiary activator binding sites in the wild-type were found to be required for full activity, but, surprisingly, these sites could not be functionally replaced by strong binding sites. This suggests that one or more protomers in the NtrC octamer must form and then release contacts with DNA in order to complete the ATPase cycle and act as an AAA(+) activator of the Esigma(54). This dynamic DNA wrapping around the NtrC octamer is proposed to be necessary for efficient activation, and the wrapping may also reduce adventitious activation of other promoters.

Transient XylR binding to the UAS of the Pseudomonas putida sigma54 promoter Pu revealed with high intensity UV footprinting in vivo

The binding of the transcriptional regulator XylR to its cognate upstream activating sequences (UAS) of the sigma54-dependent promoter Pu of Pseudomonas putida has been examined in vivo in single copy gene dose and stoichiometry. To this end, we have employed a novel in vivo genomic footprinting procedure that uses short exposures of bacterial cells to diffuse high intensity UV light that causes formation of TT or TC dimers. In contrast to simpler models for activation of sigma54-dependent promoters, our results clearly indicate that the XylR protein is not permanently bound in vivo to its target sites in Pu. On the contrary, the UAS appear to be mostly unoccupied at all growth stages. This is in contrast to the integration host factor (IHF), which binds Pu strongly in vivo at stationary phase, as also revealed by UV footprinting. Only overexpression of XylR altered the photoreactivity of the corresponding DNA region to report stable binding of the regulator to the UAS. However, the presence of aromatic XylR inducers reversed the forced occupation caused by increased levels of the activator. These results are compatible with the notion that XylR interacts very transiently with the UAS and detaches from the promoter during transcriptional activation of Pu.

Evidence for a second interaction between the regulatory amino-terminal and central output domains of the response regulator NtrC (nitrogen regulator I) in Escherichia coli

Nitrogen limitation in Escherichia coli activates about 100 genes. Their expression requires the response regulator NtrC (also called nitrogen regulator I or NR(I)). Phosphorylation of the amino-terminal domain (NTD) of NtrC activates the neighboring central domain and leads to transcriptional activation from promoters that require sigma(54)-containing RNA polymerase. The NTD has five beta strands alternating with five alpha helices. Phosphorylation of aspartate 54 has been shown to reposition alpha helix 3 to beta strand 5 (the "3445 face") within the NTD. To further study the interactions between the amino-terminal and central domains, we isolated strains with alterations in the NTD that were able to grow on a poor nitrogen source in the absence of phosphorylation by the cognate sensor kinase. We identified strains with alterations located in the 3445 face and alpha helix 5. Both types of alterations stimulated central domain activities. The alpha helix 5 alterations differed from those in the 3445 face. They did not cause a large scale conformational change in the NTD, which is not necessary for transcriptional activation in these mutants. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that substitutions in both alpha helix 5 and the 3445 face diminish the interaction between the NTD and the central domain. Our results suggest that alpha helix 5 of the NTD, in addition to the 3445 face, interacts with the central domain. We present a model of interdomain signal transduction that proposes different functions for alpha helix 5 and the 3445 face.

Governor of the glnAp2 promoter of Escherichia coli

Low-affinity sites for the activator NRI-P (NtrC-P) that map between the enhancer and the glnAp2 promoter were responsible for limiting promoter activity at high concentrations of NRI approximately P in intact cells and in an in vitro transcription system consisting of purified bacterial components. That is, the low-affinity sites constitute a 'governor', limiting the maximum promoter activity. As the governor sites are themselves far from the promoter, they apparently act either by preventing the formation of the activation DNA loop that brings the enhancer-bound activator and the promoter-bound polymerase into proximity or by preventing a productive interaction between the enhancer-bound activator and polymerase. The combination of potent enhancer and governor sites at the glnAp2 promoter provides for efficient activation of the promoter when the activator concentration is low, while limiting the maximum level of promoter activity when the activator concentration is high.

New roles for conserved regions within a sigma 54-dependent enhancer-binding protein

23 amino acid substitutions were made in the C7 and C3 regions of pspFDeltaHTH, a protein required to convert sigma(54) closed promoter complexes to open complexes. These mutants were assayed for transcriptional competence, for the ability to hydrolyze ATP, for their multimerization state, and for their ability to interact with sigma(54) and its holoenzyme. C7 region mutants caused the protein to assume a compact form. This property could be mimicked by the addition of ATP, implying that compaction via C7 and ATP is part of the activation process. A number of C3 mutants were important for energy coupling, as indicated previously for several members of this activator family (, ). However, a patch within C3 influenced oligomerization. The C3 region was especially important in interacting with sigma(54) during the transition state but not important in inducing sigma(54) holoenzyme to engage the nontemplate strand of the promoter. It is proposed that both regions contain deterrent functions that prevent premature activation. Overall, the results imply unexpected roles for the C7 and C3 regions of this protein family during promoter activation.

Binding affinity of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase*sigma54 holoenzyme for the glnAp2, nifH and nifL promoters

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase associated with the sigma54 factor (RNAP*sigma54) is a holoenzyme form that transcribes a special class of promoters not recognized by the standard RNA polymerase*sigma70 com plex. Promoters for RNAP*sigma54 vary in their overall 'strength' and show differences in their response to the presence of DNA curvature between enhancer and promoter. In order to examine whether these effects are related to the promoter affinity, we have determined the equilibrium dissociation constant K(d) for the binding of RNAP*sigma54 to the three promoters glnAp2, nifH and nifL. Binding studies were conducted by monitoring the changes in fluorescence anisotropy upon titrating RNAP*sigma54 to carboxyrhodamine-labeled DNA duplexes. For the glnAp2 and nifH promoters similar values of K(d) = 0.94 +/- 0.55 nM and K(d) = 0.85 +/- 0.30 nM were determined at physiological ionic strength, while the nifL promoter displayed a significantly weaker affinity with K(d) = 8.5 +/- 1.9 nM. The logarithmic dependence of K(d) on the ionic strength I was -Deltalog(K(d))/Deltalog(I) = 6.1 +/- 0.5 for the glnAp2, 5.2 +/- 1.2 for the nifH and 2.1 +/- 0.1 for the nifL promoter. This suggests that the polymerase can form fewer ion pairs with the nifL promoter, which would account for its weaker binding affinity.

In vivo UV laser footprinting of the Pseudomonas putidasigma 54Pu promoter reveals that integration host factor couples transcriptional activity to growth phase

The occupation of the final sigma(54)-dependent Pu promoter of Pseudomonas putida by the integration host factor (IHF) under different growth conditions has been monitored in its native state and stoichiometry (i.e. monocopy) with UV laser footprinting technology. We present evidence that an abrupt change in intracellular IHF concentrations occurs when P. putida cells enter stationary phase. This change results in enhanced binding of the factor to the promoter and in the ensuing bending of the target DNA. Since Pu activity depends rigorously on DNA bending, promoter occupation is in turn translated into a much higher transcriptional output when cells leave exponential growth. Inspection of the residual activity of Pu in an IHF(-) strain reveals that IHF predominantly locks the capacity of the promoter to specific growth stages and also that additional physiological signals are entered in the system through final sigma(54)-RNA polymerase. The results substantiate the notion that final sigma(54) promoters process metabolic co-regulation signals through factor-induced changes in the architecture of the cognate DNA region. Further, they validate UV laser technology as a suitable tool to visualize nondisruptive alterations of DNA shape in vivo.