1
|
Liu W, Wang D, Wang L, Hu S, Jiang Y, Wang Y, Cai X, Chen J. Receptor dimers and biased ligands: Novel strategies for targeting G protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacol Ther 2025; 269:108829. [PMID: 40023322 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2025.108829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2024] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/23/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest superfamily of membrane receptors. They regulate physiological and pathological processes such as metabolic homeostasis, cell proliferation and differentiation, and the immune response, and are one of the most important classes of drug targets, being targeted by 30-40 % of marketed drugs. A growing number of studies continue to reveal the complexity of GPCRs, especially their ability to interact with each other to form higher-order structures such as homodimers and heterodimers, which have different functions than monomers, and are involved in disease development and progression. The existence of GPCR homodimers and heterodimers is opening up new directions in drug discovery and development to harness their therapeutic potential. Particularly striking is the ability of GPCR dimers to trigger unique biased signalling pathways, which exquisitely balance the relationship between therapeutic effects and side effects. By suppressing adverse reactions and enhancing beneficial drug effects, GPCR dimers provide an unprecedented opportunity to minimise side effects, maximise therapeutic efficacy and enhance safety. This review aims to highlight the latest research advances in GPCR dimerization and GPCR-biased signalling, focusing on the development of dimer-targeting and biased ligands as innovative drugs that will likely provide new strategies for treating GPCR-related diseases as well as a better understanding of drug design for compounds that target GPCRs. GPCRs will play an increasingly important role in precision medicine and personalised therapy, leading us towards a safer, more efficient and smarter pharmaceutical future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenkai Liu
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261042, PR China
| | - Dexiu Wang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261042, PR China
| | - Luoqi Wang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261042, PR China
| | - Shujuan Hu
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261042, PR China
| | - Yunlu Jiang
- Neurobiology Institute, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272067, PR China
| | - Yixiang Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong 261042, PR China
| | - Xin Cai
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong, 261042, PR China.
| | - Jing Chen
- Neurobiology Institute, Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272067, PR China; Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ripoll L, von Zastrow M, Blythe EE. Intersection of GPCR trafficking and cAMP signaling at endomembranes. J Cell Biol 2025; 224:e202409027. [PMID: 40131202 PMCID: PMC11934914 DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202409027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2024] [Revised: 02/11/2025] [Accepted: 03/13/2025] [Indexed: 03/26/2025] Open
Abstract
GPCRs comprise the largest family of signaling receptors and control essentially every physiological process. Many biochemical reactions underlying GPCR signaling are now elucidated to atomic resolution in cell-free preparations, but how elemental signaling reactions are organized in intact cells remains less clear. Significant progress has been made toward bridging this knowledge gap by leveraging new tools and methodologies enabling the experimental detection, localization, and manipulation of defined signaling reactions in living cells. Here, we chronicle advances at this rapidly moving frontier of molecular and cell biology, focusing on GPCR-initiated signaling through the classical cAMP pathway as an example. We begin with a brief review of established concepts. We then discuss the still-evolving understanding that ligand-induced GPCR signaling occurs from endomembranes as well as the plasmalemma, and that this enables cells to flexibly sculpt downstream signaling responses in both space and time. Finally, we note some key limitations of the present understanding and propose some promising directions for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Léa Ripoll
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mark von Zastrow
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Quantitative Biology Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily E. Blythe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sun D, Li X, Yuan Q, Wang Y, Shi P, Zhang H, Wang T, Sun W, Ling S, Liu Y, Lai J, Xie W, Yin W, Liu L, Xu HE, Tian C. Molecular mechanism of the arrestin-biased agonism of neurotensin receptor 1 by an intracellular allosteric modulator. Cell Res 2025; 35:284-295. [PMID: 40118988 PMCID: PMC11958688 DOI: 10.1038/s41422-025-01095-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 03/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Biased allosteric modulators (BAMs) of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been at the forefront of drug discovery owing to their potential to selectively stimulate therapeutically relevant signaling and avoid on-target side effects. Although structures of GPCRs in complex with G protein or GRK in a BAM-bound state have recently been resolved, revealing that BAM can induce biased signaling by directly modulating interactions between GPCRs and these two transducers, no BAM-bound GPCR-arrestin complex structure has yet been determined, limiting our understanding of the full pharmacological profile of BAMs. Herein, we developed a chemical protein synthesis strategy to generate neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1) with defined hexa-phosphorylation at its C-terminus and resolved high-resolution cryo-EM structures (2.65-2.88 Å) of NTSR1 in complex with both β-arrestin1 and the BAM SBI-553. These structures revealed a unique "loop engagement" configuration of β-arrestin1 coupling to NTSR1 in the presence of SBI-553, markedly different from the typical "core engagement" configuration observed in the absence of BAMs. This configuration is characterized by the engagement of the intracellular loop 3 of NTSR1 with a cavity in the central crest of β-arrestin1, representing a previously unobserved, arrestin-selective conformation of GPCR. Our findings fill the critical knowledge gap regarding the regulation of GPCR-arrestin interactions and biased signaling by BAMs, which would advance the development of safer and more efficacious GPCR-targeted therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Demeng Sun
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiang Li
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Qingning Yuan
- State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Advanced Electron Microscope Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
| | - Yuanxia Wang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Pan Shi
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Huanhuan Zhang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Wenjing Sun
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Shenglong Ling
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, University of Science and Technology of China, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yuanchun Liu
- Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinglin Lai
- Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wenqin Xie
- Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Wanchao Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Advanced Electron Microscope Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
- Zhongshan Institute for Drug Discovery, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Lei Liu
- Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Center for Synthetic and Systems Biology, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
| | - H Eric Xu
- State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Advanced Electron Microscope Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
| | - Changlin Tian
- Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Joint Center for Biological Analytical Chemistry, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, China.
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, University of Science and Technology of China, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
- School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering & Zhangjiang Institute for Advanced Study, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Saha S, Sano FK, Sharma S, Ganguly M, Dalal A, Mishra S, Tiwari D, Akasaka H, Kobayashi TA, Roy N, Zaidi N, Itoh Y, Leurs R, Banerjee R, Shihoya W, Nureki O, Shukla AK. Structural visualization of small molecule recognition by CXCR3 uncovers dual-agonism in the CXCR3-CXCR7 system. Nat Commun 2025; 16:3047. [PMID: 40155369 PMCID: PMC11953467 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58264-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 03/16/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Chemokine receptors are critically involved in multiple physiological and pathophysiological processes related to immune response mechanisms. Most chemokine receptors are prototypical GPCRs although some also exhibit naturally-encoded signaling-bias toward β-arrestins (βarrs). C-X-C type chemokine receptors, namely CXCR3 and CXCR7, constitute a pair wherein the former is a prototypical GPCR while the latter exhibits selective coupling to βarrs despite sharing a common natural agonist: CXCL11. Moreover, CXCR3 and CXCR7 also recognize small molecule agonists suggesting a modular orthosteric ligand binding pocket. Here, we determine cryo-EM structures of CXCR3 in an Apo-state and in complex with small molecule agonists biased toward G-proteins or βarrs. These structural snapshots uncover an allosteric network bridging the ligand-binding pocket to intracellular side, driving the transducer-coupling bias at this receptor. Furthermore, structural topology of the orthosteric binding pocket also allows us to discover and validate that selected small molecule agonists of CXCR3 display robust agonism at CXCR7. Collectively, our study offers molecular insights into signaling-bias and dual agonism in the CXCR3-CXCR7 system with therapeutic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirsha Saha
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Fumiya K Sano
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Saloni Sharma
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Manisankar Ganguly
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Annu Dalal
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Sudha Mishra
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Divyanshu Tiwari
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Hiroaki Akasaka
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaaki A Kobayashi
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nabarun Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Nashrah Zaidi
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Yuzuru Itoh
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Rob Leurs
- Amsterdam Institute for Molecules, Medicines, and Systems (AIMMS), Division of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ramanuj Banerjee
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
| | - Wataru Shihoya
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Osamu Nureki
- Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Arun K Shukla
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marx DC, Gonzalez-Hernandez AJ, Huynh K, Strauss A, Rico C, Siepe D, Gallo P, Lee J, Sharghi S, Arefin A, Broichhagen J, Eliezer D, Kalocsay M, Khelashvili G, Levitz J. Structural Diversity of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor/Beta-Arrestin Coupling. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.02.03.636340. [PMID: 39975168 PMCID: PMC11838584 DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.03.636340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
Despite the widespread physiological roles of beta-arrestin (β-arr) coupling in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) regulation, the molecular basis of GPCR/β-arr interaction has been studied primarily in monomeric family A GPCRs. Here we take an integrative biophysical and structural approach to uncover extreme molecular diversity in β-arr coupling to the neuromodulatory metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs), prototypical, dimeric family C GPCRs. Using a new single molecule pulldown assay, we find that mGluRs couple to β-arrs with a 2:1 or 2:2 stoichiometry via a combination of "tail" and "core" interactions. Single molecule FRET and electron microscopy show that β-arr1 stabilizes active conformations of mGluR8 and a combination of cryo-EM structures and molecular dynamics simulations define the positioning of mGluR8-bound β-arr1, together suggesting a steric mechanism of mGluR desensitization involving interactions with both subunits and the lipid bilayer. Finally, combinatorial mutagenesis enables the identification of a landscape of homo- and hetero-dimeric mGluR/β-arr complexes, including mGluR/β-arr1/β-arr2 megacomplexes, providing a framework for family C GPCR/β-arr coupling and expanding the known range of GPCR/transducer coupling modes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Petrovic I, Grzesiek S, Isaikina P. Advances in the molecular understanding of GPCR-arrestin complexes. Biochem Soc Trans 2024; 52:2333-2342. [PMID: 39508463 DOI: 10.1042/bst20240170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/17/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
Arrestins are essential proteins for the regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They mediate GPCR desensitization after the activated receptor has been phosphorylated by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs). In addition, GPCR-arrestin interactions may trigger signaling pathways that are distinct and independent from G proteins. The non-visual GPCRs encompass hundreds of receptors with varying phosphorylation patterns and amino acid sequences, which are regulated by only two human non-visual arrestin isoforms. This review describes recent findings on GPCR-arrestin complexes, obtained by structural techniques, biophysical, biochemical, and cellular assays. The solved structures of complete GPCR-arrestin complexes are of limited resolution ranging from 3.2 to 4.7 Å and reveal a high variability in the relative receptor-arrestin orientation. In contrast, biophysical and functional data indicate that arrestin recruitment, activation and GPCR-arrestin complex stability depend on the receptor phosphosite sequence patterns and density. At present, there is still a manifest lack of high-resolution structural and dynamical information on the interactions of native GPCRs with both GRKs and arrestins, which could provide a detailed molecular understanding of the genesis of receptor phosphorylation patterns and the specificity GPCR-arrestin interactions. Such insights seem crucial for progress in the rational design of advanced, arrestin-specific therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivana Petrovic
- Biozentrum, University of Basel, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Polina Isaikina
- Center for Life Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institut, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tiwari D, Roy N, Shukla AK. Bound by the love for cholesterol: A transporter meets a GPCR. Cell 2024; 187:6518-6520. [PMID: 39547211 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2024] [Revised: 10/16/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
In a recently published article in Nature, Bayly-Jones et al. report the cryo-EM structures of a lysosomal cholesterol sensor, LYCHOS, also known as GPR155, which reveals a unique fusion of a plant auxin-transporter-like domain with a seven-transmembrane GPCR-like domain and elucidates mechanistic insights into cellular regulation of mTORC1 activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Divyanshu Tiwari
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Nabarun Roy
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
| | - Arun K Shukla
- Department of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Steiner WP, Iverson N, Venkatakrishnan V, Wu J, Stepniewski TM, Michaelson Z, Bröckel JW, Zhu JF, Bruystens J, Lee A, Nelson I, Bertinetti D, Arveseth CD, Tan G, Spaltenstein P, Xu J, Hüttenhain R, Kay M, Herberg FW, Selent J, Anand GS, Dunbrack RL, Taylor SS, Myers BR. A Structural Mechanism for Noncanonical GPCR Signal Transduction in the Hedgehog Pathway. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.10.31.621410. [PMID: 39554190 PMCID: PMC11565934 DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.31.621410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is fundamental to embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Hh signals are transduced via an unusual mechanism: upon agonist-induced phosphorylation, the noncanonical G protein-coupled receptor SMOOTHENED (SMO) binds the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA-C) and physically blocks its enzymatic activity. By combining computational structural approaches with biochemical and functional studies, we show that SMO mimics strategies prevalent in canonical GPCR and PKA signaling complexes, despite little sequence or secondary structural homology. An intrinsically disordered region of SMO binds the PKA-C active site, resembling the PKA regulatory subunit (PKA-R) / PKA-C holoenzyme, while the SMO transmembrane domain binds a conserved PKA-C interaction hub, similar to other GPCR-effector complexes. In contrast with prevailing GPCR signal transduction models, phosphorylation of SMO promotes intramolecular electrostatic interactions that stabilize key structural elements within the SMO cytoplasmic domain, thereby remodeling it into a PKA-inhibiting conformation. Our work provides a structural mechanism for a central step in the Hh cascade and defines a paradigm for disordered GPCR domains to transmit signals intracellularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P. Steiner
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nathan Iverson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Jian Wu
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tomasz Maciej Stepniewski
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) – Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona, Spain
- InterAx Biotech AG, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Zachary Michaelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jan W. Bröckel
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Ju-Fen Zhu
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jessica Bruystens
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Annabel Lee
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Isaac Nelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniela Bertinetti
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Corvin D. Arveseth
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gerald Tan
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul Spaltenstein
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jiewei Xu
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ruth Hüttenhain
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Kay
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Friedrich W. Herberg
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Jana Selent
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) – Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ganesh S. Anand
- Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Roland L. Dunbrack
- Institute for Cancer Research. Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia PA, USA
| | - Susan S. Taylor
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin R. Myers
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kaoullas MG, Thal DM, Christopoulos A, Valant C. Ligand bias at the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor family: Opportunities and challenges. Neuropharmacology 2024; 258:110092. [PMID: 39067666 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2024.110092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that are activated by the endogenous neurotransmitter, acetylcholine (ACh). Disruption of mAChR signalling has been associated with a variety of neurological disorders and non-neurological diseases. Consequently, the development of agonists and antagonists of the mAChRs has been a major avenue in drug discovery. Unfortunately, mAChR ligands are often associated with on-target side effects for two reasons. The first reason is due to the high sequence conservation at the orthosteric ACh binding site among all five receptor subtypes (M1-M5), making on-target subtype selectivity a major challenge. The second reason is due to on-target side effects of mAChR drugs that are associated with the pleiotropic nature of mAChR signalling at the level of a single mAChR subtype. Indeed, there is growing evidence that within the myriad of signalling events produced by mAChR ligands, some will have therapeutic benefits, whilst others may promote cholinergic side effects. This paradigm of drug action, known as ligand bias or biased agonism, is an attractive feature for next-generation mAChR drugs, as it holds the promise of developing drugs devoid of on-target adverse effects. Although relatively simple to detect and even quantify in vitro, ligand bias, as observed in recombinant systems, does not always translate to in vivo systems, which remains a major hurdle in GPCR drug discovery, including the mAChR family. Here we report recent studies that have attempted to detect and quantify ligand bias at the mAChR family, and briefly discuss the challenges associated with biased agonist drug development. This article is part of the Special Issue on "Ligand Bias".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela G Kaoullas
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 399 Royal Parade, 3052, VIC, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David M Thal
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 399 Royal Parade, 3052, VIC, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Arthur Christopoulos
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 399 Royal Parade, 3052, VIC, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Celine Valant
- Drug Discovery Biology, Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, 399 Royal Parade, 3052, VIC, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saha S, Khanppnavar B, Maharana J, Kim H, Carino CMC, Daly C, Houston S, Sharma S, Zaidi N, Dalal A, Mishra S, Ganguly M, Tiwari D, Kumari P, Jhingan GD, Yadav PN, Plouffe B, Inoue A, Chung KY, Banerjee R, Korkhov VM, Shukla AK. Molecular mechanism of distinct chemokine engagement and functional divergence of the human Duffy antigen receptor. Cell 2024; 187:4751-4769.e25. [PMID: 39089252 PMCID: PMC11349380 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/03/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024]
Abstract
The Duffy antigen receptor is a seven-transmembrane (7TM) protein expressed primarily at the surface of red blood cells and displays strikingly promiscuous binding to multiple inflammatory and homeostatic chemokines. It serves as the basis of the Duffy blood group system in humans and also acts as the primary attachment site for malarial parasite Plasmodium vivax and pore-forming toxins secreted by Staphylococcus aureus. Here, we comprehensively profile transducer coupling of this receptor, discover potential non-canonical signaling pathways, and determine the cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure in complex with the chemokine CCL7. The structure reveals a distinct binding mode of chemokines, as reflected by relatively superficial binding and a partially formed orthosteric binding pocket. We also observe a dramatic shortening of TM5 and 6 on the intracellular side, which precludes the formation of the docking site for canonical signal transducers, thereby providing a possible explanation for the distinct pharmacological and functional phenotype of this receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shirsha Saha
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Basavraj Khanppnavar
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jagannath Maharana
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Heeryung Kim
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Carlo Marion C Carino
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3, Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Carole Daly
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Shane Houston
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Saloni Sharma
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Nashrah Zaidi
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Annu Dalal
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Sudha Mishra
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Manisankar Ganguly
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Divyanshu Tiwari
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India
| | - Poonam Kumari
- Division of Neuroscience and Ageing Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
| | | | - Prem N Yadav
- Division of Neuroscience and Ageing Biology, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, India
| | - Bianca Plouffe
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3, Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578, Japan
| | - Ka Young Chung
- School of Pharmacy, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea
| | - Ramanuj Banerjee
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India.
| | - Volodymyr M Korkhov
- Laboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland; Institute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Arun K Shukla
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur 208016, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu S, Anderson PJ, Rajagopal S, Lefkowitz RJ, Rockman HA. G Protein-Coupled Receptors: A Century of Research and Discovery. Circ Res 2024; 135:174-197. [PMID: 38900852 PMCID: PMC11192237 DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.124.323067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
GPCRs (G protein-coupled receptors), also known as 7 transmembrane domain receptors, are the largest receptor family in the human genome, with ≈800 members. GPCRs regulate nearly every aspect of human physiology and disease, thus serving as important drug targets in cardiovascular disease. Sharing a conserved structure comprised of 7 transmembrane α-helices, GPCRs couple to heterotrimeric G-proteins, GPCR kinases, and β-arrestins, promoting downstream signaling through second messengers and other intracellular signaling pathways. GPCR drug development has led to important cardiovascular therapies, such as antagonists of β-adrenergic and angiotensin II receptors for heart failure and hypertension, and agonists of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor for reducing adverse cardiovascular events and other emerging indications. There continues to be a major interest in GPCR drug development in cardiovascular and cardiometabolic disease, driven by advances in GPCR mechanistic studies and structure-based drug design. This review recounts the rich history of GPCR research, including the current state of clinically used GPCR drugs, and highlights newly discovered aspects of GPCR biology and promising directions for future investigation. As additional mechanisms for regulating GPCR signaling are uncovered, new strategies for targeting these ubiquitous receptors hold tremendous promise for the field of cardiovascular medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Liu
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical
Center
| | - Preston J. Anderson
- Cell and Molecular Biology (CMB), Duke University, Durham,
NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Medical Scientist Training Program, Duke University,
Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Sudarshan Rajagopal
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical
Center
- Cell and Molecular Biology (CMB), Duke University, Durham,
NC, 27710, USA
- Deparment of Biochemistry Duke University, Durham, NC,
27710, USA
| | - Robert J. Lefkowitz
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical
Center
- Deparment of Biochemistry Duke University, Durham, NC,
27710, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Duke University Medical
Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | - Howard A. Rockman
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical
Center
- Cell and Molecular Biology (CMB), Duke University, Durham,
NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Flores-Espinoza E, Thomsen ARB. Beneath the surface: endosomal GPCR signaling. Trends Biochem Sci 2024; 49:520-531. [PMID: 38643023 PMCID: PMC11162320 DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2024] [Revised: 03/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) located at the cell surface bind extracellular ligands and convey intracellular signals via activation of heterotrimeric G proteins. Traditionally, G protein signaling was viewed to occur exclusively at this subcellular region followed by rapid desensitization facilitated by β-arrestin (βarr)-mediated G protein uncoupling and receptor internalization. However, emerging evidence over the past 15 years suggests that these βarr-mediated events do not necessarily terminate receptor signaling and that some GPCRs continue to activate G proteins after having been internalized into endosomes. Here, we review the recently elucidated mechanistic basis underlying endosomal GPCR signaling and discuss physiological implications and pharmacological targeting of this newly appreciated signaling mode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Flores-Espinoza
- Department of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA; NYU Pain Research Center, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA
| | - Alex R B Thomsen
- Department of Molecular Pathobiology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA; NYU Pain Research Center, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tóth AD, Soltész-Katona E, Kis K, Guti V, Gilzer S, Prokop S, Boros R, Misák Á, Balla A, Várnai P, Turiák L, Ács A, Drahos L, Inoue A, Hunyady L, Turu G. ArreSTick motif controls β-arrestin-binding stability and extends phosphorylation-dependent β-arrestin interactions to non-receptor proteins. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114241. [PMID: 38758647 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
The binding and function of β-arrestins are regulated by specific phosphorylation motifs present in G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, the exact arrangement of phosphorylated amino acids responsible for establishing a stable interaction remains unclear. We employ a 1D sequence convolution model trained on GPCRs with established β-arrestin-binding properties. With this approach, amino acid motifs characteristic of GPCRs that form stable interactions with β-arrestins can be identified, a pattern that we name "arreSTick." Intriguingly, the arreSTick pattern is also present in numerous non-receptor proteins. Using proximity biotinylation assay and mass spectrometry analysis, we demonstrate that the arreSTick motif controls the interaction between many non-receptor proteins and β-arrestin2. The HIV-1 Tat-specific factor 1 (HTSF1 or HTATSF1), a nuclear transcription factor, contains the arreSTick pattern, and its subcellular localization is influenced by β-arrestin2. Our findings unveil a broader role for β-arrestins in phosphorylation-dependent interactions, extending beyond GPCRs to encompass non-receptor proteins as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- András Dávid Tóth
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Internal Medicine and Haematology, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi street 46, 1088 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Eszter Soltész-Katona
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Katalin Kis
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Viktor Guti
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sharon Gilzer
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Susanne Prokop
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Roxána Boros
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ádám Misák
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Balla
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary; HUN-REN SE Hungarian Research Network Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Várnai
- Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary; HUN-REN SE Hungarian Research Network Laboratory of Molecular Physiology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Lilla Turiák
- Institute of Organic Chemistry, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Ács
- Institute of Organic Chemistry, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Drahos
- Institute of Organic Chemistry, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
| | - László Hunyady
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Gábor Turu
- Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Centre of Excellence of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, HUN-REN Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Magyar Tudósok krt. 2., 1117 Budapest, Hungary; Department of Physiology, Semmelweis University, Tűzoltó street 37-47, 1094 Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|