1
|
Resco de Dios V, Schütze SJ, Cunill Camprubí À, Balaguer-Romano R, Boer MM, Fernandes PM. Protected areas as hotspots of wildfire activity in fire-prone Temperate and Mediterranean biomes. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 385:125669. [PMID: 40347863 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2025] [Revised: 04/29/2025] [Accepted: 05/03/2025] [Indexed: 05/14/2025]
Abstract
The European Union has recently passed the Nature Restoration Law which, among others, seeks to increase the cover of forest reserves protected for biodiversity and, globally, the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework similarly seeks to expand protected areas. Here we test whether a trade-off exists between protected areas expansion and fire activity, leading to a higher exposure to fire for the population in protected areas, because they often harbor more biomass and occur in remote areas. We analyzed forest fires affecting 14,892,174 ha, and intersecting 10,999 protected areas, across fire-prone European Temperate and Mediterranean forest biomes, and in similar ecosystems within California, Chile and Australia. Protected areas were being disproportionally affected by fire within most Temperate biomes, and fire severity was 20 % higher within protected areas also in Mediterranean biomes. Population in the periphery of forest areas was up to 16 times more likely to be exposed to large wildfires when their environment was within, or near, protected areas. Differences in manageable factors such as fuel loads and road density were primary drivers of the divergence in burned area across protection status, with abiotic factors playing also significant roles. The importance of fuel loads indicates that current plans for expanding strictly protected areas, where no human intervention is allowed, may be particularly problematic from a fire perspective. Wildfire prevention and mitigation must be central goals in the development of conservation/restoration programs to diminish population exposure and fire severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Víctor Resco de Dios
- Department of Forest and Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25198, Lleida, Spain; Joint Research Unit CTFC-AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, 25198, Lleida, Spain.
| | - Simon J Schütze
- Department of Forest and Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25198, Lleida, Spain; Joint Research Unit CTFC-AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Àngel Cunill Camprubí
- Department of Forest and Agricultural Science and Engineering, University of Lleida, 25198, Lleida, Spain; Joint Research Unit CTFC-AGROTECNIO-CERCA Center, 25198, Lleida, Spain
| | - Rodrigo Balaguer-Romano
- Mathematical and Fluid Physics Department, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040, Madrid, Spain
| | - Matthias M Boer
- Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, 2751, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paulo M Fernandes
- Centre for Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, CITAB, Inov4Agro, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal; ForestWISE Colab, 5000-801, Vila Real, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Velasco-Rodríguez A, Regos A, González IC, Sillero N, Arenas-Castro S. Habitat dynamics of flagship species for conservation prioritization in southern Europe. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2025:e70067. [PMID: 40396461 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.70067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/03/2025] [Indexed: 05/22/2025]
Abstract
Biodiversity loss is accelerating due to human actions, and decision-making for conservation needs to be streamlined. Ex situ biodiversity modeling and monitoring based on satellite time-series data could be an affordable and cost-efficient tool for improving the prioritization of conservation areas. We developed a set of dynamic indicators for conservation prioritization based on a habitat suitability index (HSI) trend analysis of 6 flagship species (two vascular plants, bird, amphibian, reptile, and mammal) over 19 years (2001-2019) in Andalucía (southern Spain). The HSI models were derived from ecological niche models (MaxEnt) and satellite time-series data (MODIS) as predictors. Based on the annual HSI models of all species and using the spatial conservation prioritization tool Marxan, we derived interannual dynamic indicators of habitat quality for conservation prioritization. Overall, models showed a generalized habitat regression. The best predictors of habitat quality were related to vegetation composition and structure (land cover), climate (land surface temperature), and energy balance (evapotranspiration), matching with the ecology of climate (such as Abies pinsapo) or vegetation-dependent (such as Alytes dickhilleni) species. Marxan identified interannual dynamics for the priority areas outside and inside protected areas. Interannual variation in habitat quality led to shifting conservation priorities across Andalucia from 2001 to 2019. Only 10.5% of the region and 20% of protected areas showed high spatial stability. Stable zones appeared both inside and outside protected areas. The south and northeast consistently exhibited high-priority regions. The legacy indicator highlighted areas of historical importance that have since declined in importance. New high-value areas emerged in the south. Static and dynamic approaches to conservation planning differed significantly. Many areas prioritized in 2019 alone ranked lower when long-term trends were considered. Our multiscale method underscores the need to integrate temporal dynamics into effective conservation strategies to achieve long-term conservation objectives in an efficient way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Velasco-Rodríguez
- Área de Ecología, Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Edificio Celestino Mutis C4, 1ª planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Adrián Regos
- Misión Biolóxica de Galicia - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (MBG-CSIC), Sede Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Centre de Ciència i Tecnologia Forestal de Catalunya, Solsona, Spain
| | - Isabel Castillejo González
- Área de Ingeniería Cartográfica, Geodesia y Fotogrametría, Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica y Geomática, Edificio Gregor Mendel C5, 2ª planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| | - Neftalí Sillero
- CICGE - Centro de Investigação em Ciências Geo-Espaciais, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Salvador Arenas-Castro
- Área de Ecología, Departamento de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Edificio Celestino Mutis C4, 1ª planta, Campus Universitario de Rabanales, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He ZZ, Shao WW, Honnay O, Liao H, Chen H, Liu J, Dong SS, Li D, Fan GZ, Zhao Y, Rong J, Liu Y, Lu F, Cui XH, Zhang WJ, Wang YG, Li LF, Yang J, Song ZP. Temporal Dynamics of Genetic Diversity in Protected and Unprotected Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon) Populations: Implications for Conservation. Mol Ecol 2025; 34:e17750. [PMID: 40156220 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2025] [Accepted: 03/17/2025] [Indexed: 04/01/2025]
Abstract
Genetic diversity is vital for population survival, yet there is a paucity of studies focusing on the effectiveness of establishing protected areas for maintaining the population genetic diversity of threatened plant species. To evaluate the effectiveness of in situ conservation measures, we used simple sequence repeats (SSR) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) markers to monitor temporal dynamics in genetic diversity of the threatened wild rice Oryza rufipogon in both protected and unprotected populations in China between 2001 and 2020. Unprotected populations tended to have decreased census population sizes (Nc) compared to protected populations, although they both showed a reduction in effective population size (Ne). While allele diversity and expected heterozygosity remained stable, several populations, especially those without protection, exhibited a significant decrease in observed heterozygosity (Ho) and an increase in inbreeding (FIS). The level of genetic differentiation between populations did not change over time, but the number of private alleles increased and Ne varied in several populations, indicating the effects of genetic drift. Indicators for temporal trends in Ho, FIS, and Ne revealed that both protected and unprotected populations are facing warnings of declining genetic diversity, although some protected populations remain resilient, reflecting the genetic lag behind Nc change. Overall, these findings highlight the effectiveness of in situ conservation efforts in maintaining population size and genetic diversity, yet we also show the necessity of lasting population dynamics monitoring, using different genetic indicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi-Zhou He
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Wen Shao
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- College of Life Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Olivier Honnay
- Division of Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- KU Leuven Plant Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Hui Liao
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Shenzhen & Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shan-Shan Dong
- Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing, China
| | - Ding Li
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guo-Zhen Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yao Zhao
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Jun Rong
- Jiangxi Province Key Laboratory of Watershed Ecosystem Change and Biodiversity, Center for Watershed Ecology, Institute of Life Science and School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yan Liu
- Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing, China
| | - Fan Lu
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xin-Hong Cui
- Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning, Shanghai, China
| | - Wen-Ju Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu-Guo Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin-Feng Li
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ji Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Ping Song
- State Key Laboratory of Wetland Conservation and Restoration, National Observations and Research Station for Wetland Ecosystems of the Yangtze Estuary, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, and Institute of eco-Chongming, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yu H, Hu X. Potential construction area identification of the transboundary national park bridging ecology, society and economics: A case study of Mount Everest region. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 381:125190. [PMID: 40185021 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2025] [Accepted: 03/30/2025] [Indexed: 04/07/2025]
Abstract
In biodiverse border regions, establishing transboundary national parks is essential for conserving ecological integrity, promoting sustainable development, and enhancing cross-border cooperation. This study aims to develop an integrated hierarchical identification model that bridges ecology, society, and economics to support effective site selection. We introduce a novel model that comprehensively evaluates potential construction areas based on three criteria-irreplaceability, connectivity, and cost-effectiveness. The model categorizes the landscape into three priority zones: core ecological areas, connective ecological areas, and peripheral radiation areas. Key indicators such as ecosystem service value, landscape ecological risk, and human activity intensity are employed to assess these zones. Application of the model to the Mount Everest region identified a total potential area of 63,824 km2 for the transboundary national park. Within this area, core ecological areas account for 22.54 %, connective ecological areas for 21.35 %, and peripheral radiation areas for 56.12 %. Significantly, disparities in ecosystem service value, ecological risk, and human activity intensity exist across the China-Nepal border, with indicator variations closely aligned with the corresponding priority zones. The findings underscore the need for China and Nepal to consider regional and national differences when planning future park construction. Tailored zonal management and a dynamic cooperative mechanism are key to sustainable and effective transboundary park development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hu Yu
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China
| | - Xinyue Hu
- Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing, 100101, China; College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Armstrong N, Klure DM, Greenhalgh R, Stapleton TE, Dearing MD. The Eastern Fox Squirrel ( Sciurus niger) exhibits minimal patterns of phylogeography across native and introduced sites. J Mammal 2025; 106:395-405. [PMID: 40144355 PMCID: PMC11933279 DOI: 10.1093/jmammal/gyae133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduced species are one of the leading causes of declining global biodiversity and result in many billions of dollars of losses to the bioeconomy worldwide. Introduced species have become increasingly common due to globalization and climate change, and population genetics is a useful tool for the management of such species. The Eastern Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger) is a highly successful invader that was introduced to many states in western North America throughout the 20th century. We used low-pass whole genome sequencing to evaluate phylogeographic structure across native and introduced ranges of this species and identify the putative number and geographic sources of introductions in California and Utah. We found minimal patterns of phylogeographic structure, consistent with recent range and population expansion since the Last Glacial Maximum. Additionally, we found evidence for multiple mitochondrial haplotypes in California and only 1 haplotype in Utah, which suggests that fox squirrels in California were sourced from multiple introduction events while those in Utah were likely sourced from a single event. Genomic resources generated in this study will be useful for future conservation efforts in this species and will assist with the ongoing management of its introductions across western North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Armstrong
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E. Room 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States
| | - Dylan M Klure
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E. Room 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States
| | - Robert Greenhalgh
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E. Room 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States
| | - Tess E Stapleton
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E. Room 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States
- ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, United States
| | - M Denise Dearing
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 S. 1400 E. Room 201, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cave AE, Dillard JR, Ulloa C, Muñoz-Pérez JP, Skehel A, Deresienski D, Passingham RK, Castaneda J, Lewbart GA, Valle CA. HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF BLUE-FOOTED BOOBIES ( SULA NEBOUXII EXCISA) DETERMINED BY HEMATOLOGY, BIOCHEMISTRY, BLOOD GASES, AND PHYSICAL EXAMINATION IN THE GALÁPAGOS ISLANDS. J Zoo Wildl Med 2025; 56:79-88. [PMID: 40067225 DOI: 10.1638/2023-0127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2025] Open
Abstract
The Galápagos blue-footed booby (Sula nebouxii excisa) is a sulid species endemic to the Galápagos archipelago. Here we present physical examination, breeding status, hematology, and blood chemistry results from 60 Galápagos blue-footed boobies that were captured by hand from their nesting site on North Seymour Island in June 2017 and July 2022. A portable blood analyzer (iSTAT) was used to obtain values in the field for hematocrit, hemoglobin, sodium, potassium, chloride, ionized calcium, total CO2, glucose, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and anion gap for each bird. Blood lactate, total solids, packed cell volume, and blood smears were also assessed. A white blood cell differential was performed in 2017. The breeding status of each bird and the number of chicks in the nests were also recorded. Total CO2, blood urea nitrogen, ionized calcium, potassium, anion gap, hematocrit, and hemoglobin were all higher in 2022 than in 2017. There were also more nests with chicks in 2022 than in 2017. Lactate, ionized calcium, hematocrit, and hemoglobin were all higher in females than in males, and blood urea nitrogen was higher in males than in females. These results provide a reference to the baseline health parameters in a free-living population of Galápagos blue-footed boobies that can be used to monitor the health status of this species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley E Cave
- North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA
- Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jacqueline R Dillard
- North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA
| | - Catalina Ulloa
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales Casilla 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador
| | - Juan Pablo Muñoz-Pérez
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
- University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs QLD 4556, Australia
- Fundación Equilibrio Azul, Puerto López, Machalilla, Ecuador
| | - Alice Skehel
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
| | - Diane Deresienski
- North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales Casilla 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador
| | - Ronald K Passingham
- North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA
| | - Jason Castaneda
- Terrestrial Ecology, Parque Nacional Galápagos Directorate, Puerto Baquerizo Moreno, Galápagos, Ecuador
| | - Gregory A Lewbart
- North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina 27606, USA,
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
| | - Carlos A Valle
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ) and University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill, Alsacio Northia, Galápagos, Ecuador
- Universidad San Francisco de Quito (USFQ), Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales Casilla 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Simkins AT, Sutherland WJ, Dicks LV, Hilton-Taylor C, Grace MK, Butchart SHM, Senior RA, Petrovan SO. Past conservation efforts reveal which actions lead to positive outcomes for species. PLoS Biol 2025; 23:e3003051. [PMID: 40100918 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/20/2025] Open
Abstract
Understanding the consequences of past conservation efforts is essential to inform the means of maintaining and restoring species. Data from the IUCN Red List for 67,217 animal species were reviewed and analyzed to determine (i) which conservation actions have been implemented for different species, (ii) which types of species have improved in status and (iii) which actions are likely to have driven the improvements. At least 51.8% (34,847) of assessed species have actions reported, mostly comprising protected areas (82.7%). Proportionately more actions were reported for tetrapods and warm-water reef-building corals, and fewer for fish, dragonflies and damselflies and crustaceans. Species at greater risk of extinction have a wider range of species-targeted actions reported compared with less threatened species, reflecting differences in documentation and conservation efforts. Six times more species have deteriorated than improved in status, as reflected in their IUCN Red List category. Almost all species that improved have conservation actions in place, and typically were previously at high risk of extinction, have smaller ranges and were less likely to be documented as threatened by hunting and habitat loss or degradation. Improvements in status were driven by a wide range of actions, especially reintroductions; for amphibians and birds, area management was also important. While conservation interventions have reduced the extinction risk of some of the most threatened species, in very few cases has full recovery been achieved. Scaling up the extent and intensity of conservation interventions, particularly landscape-scale actions that benefit broadly distributed species, is urgently needed to assist the recovery of biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley T Simkins
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lynn V Dicks
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Craig Hilton-Taylor
- International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Molly K Grace
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart H M Butchart
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- BirdLife International, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca A Senior
- Conservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom
| | - Silviu O Petrovan
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farwig N, Sprenger PP, Baur B, Böhning-Gaese K, Brandt A, Eisenhauer N, Ellwanger G, Hochkirch A, Karamanlidis AA, Mehring M, Pusch M, Rehling F, Sommerwerk N, Spatz T, Svenning JC, Tischew S, Tockner K, Tscharntke T, Vadrot ABM, Taffner J, Fürst C, Jähnig SC, Mosbrugger V. Identifying Major Factors for Success and Failure of Conservation Programs in Europe. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 75:425-443. [PMID: 39580373 PMCID: PMC11861224 DOI: 10.1007/s00267-024-02086-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/25/2024]
Abstract
In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Farwig
- Department of Conservation Ecology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Philipp P Sprenger
- Central Coordination Office of the BMBF-Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Bruno Baur
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 30, 4056, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Katrin Böhning-Gaese
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Permoserstraße 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Angelika Brandt
- Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nico Eisenhauer
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute of Biology, Leipzig University, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Götz Ellwanger
- Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Konstantinstraße 110, 53179, Bonn, Germany
| | - Axel Hochkirch
- Musée National d'Histoire Naturelle, 25, rue Münster, L-2160, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
- Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, 54296, Trier, Germany
| | - Alexandros A Karamanlidis
- ARCTUROS, Civil Society for the Protection and Management of Wildlife and the Natural Environment, Florina, 53075, Aetos, Greece
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway
| | - Marion Mehring
- Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Institute for Social-Ecological Research, Hamburger Allee 45, 60486, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Martin Pusch
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany
| | - Finn Rehling
- Department of Conservation Ecology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany
- Department of Animal Ecology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape Ecology, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 76, 79104, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nike Sommerwerk
- Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science (MfN), Invalidenstraße 43, 10115, Berlin, Germany
| | - Theresa Spatz
- Department of Conservation Ecology, University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 8, 35032, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jens-Christian Svenning
- Center for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere (ECONOVO), Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark
| | - Sabine Tischew
- Department of Agriculture, Ecotrophology and Landscape Development, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Strenzfelder Allee 28, 06406, Bernburg, Germany
| | - Klement Tockner
- Department of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue-Straße 9, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Teja Tscharntke
- Functional Agrobiodiversity and Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Grisebachstraße 6, 37077, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Alice B M Vadrot
- Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Kolingasse 14-16, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Julian Taffner
- Central Coordination Office of the BMBF-Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
| | - Christine Fürst
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Puschstraße 4, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
- Department Sustainable Landscape Development, Institute for Geosciences and Geography, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 4, 06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Sonja C Jähnig
- Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587, Berlin, Germany
- Geography Department, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Unter den Linden 6, 10099, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Mosbrugger
- Central Coordination Office of the BMBF-Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), Senckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Schwartz MK, Dunn SL, Gendron WAC, Helm JE, Kamau WS, Mark-Shadbolt M, Moehrenschlager A, Redford KH, Russell G, Sandler RL, Schultz CA, Wiedenheft B, Emmel AS, Brodie JF. Principles for introducing new genes and species for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 2025; 40:296-307. [PMID: 39667987 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Revised: 10/29/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024]
Abstract
Introducing new genes and new species into ecosystems where they have not previously existed presents opportunities and complex, multivalue decisions for conservation biologists and the public. Both synthetic biology and conservation introductions offer potential benefits, such as avoiding extinctions and restoring ecological function, but also carry risks of unintended ecological consequences and raise social and moral concerns. Although the conservation community has attempted to establish guidelines for each new tool, there is a need for comprehensive principles that will enable conservation managers to navigate emerging technologies. Here, we combine biological, legal, social, cultural, and ethical considerations into an inclusive set of principles designed to facilitate the efforts of managers facing high-consequence conservation decisions by clarifying the stakes of inaction and action, along with the use of decision frameworks to integrate multiple considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael K Schwartz
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, USA.
| | - Summer L Dunn
- USDA Forest Service, Policy Office, Strategy and Analysis Branch, Washington, DC, USA
| | - William A C Gendron
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer E Helm
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - W Sebastian Kamau
- Media Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Gregory Russell
- Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Ronald L Sandler
- The Ethics Institute and Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Courtney A Schultz
- Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Blake Wiedenheft
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
| | - Amanda S Emmel
- Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Jedediah F Brodie
- Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; Division of Biological Sciences and Wildlife Biology Program, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA; Institute for Biodiversity and Environmental Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodey TW, Cuthbert RN, Diagne C, Marino C, Turbelin A, Angulo E, Fantle-Lepczyk J, Pincheira-Donoso D, Courchamp F, Hudgins EJ. Predicting the global economic costs of biological invasions by tetrapods. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2025; 967:178425. [PMID: 39954469 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2024] [Revised: 12/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025]
Abstract
Globalisation has accelerated rates of biological invasions worldwide, leading to widespread environmental perturbations that often translate into rapidly expanding socio-economic costs. Although such monetary costs can be estimated from the observed effects of invasions, the pathways that lead invasive species to become economically impactful remain poorly understood. Here, we implement the first global-scale test of the hypothesis that adaptive traits that influence demographic resilience predict economic costs, using invasive terrestrial vertebrates as models given their well-catalogued impacts and characteristics. Our results reveal that total global costs of invasive tetrapods are conservatively in the tens of billions of dollars, with the vast majority due to damage costs from invasive mammals. These monetary impacts are predicted by longevity, female maturation age, diet and invasion pathway traits, although the directionality in the association between impacts and these drivers varied across classes. Alarmingly, costs remain unknown for >90 % of recorded established alien tetrapods worldwide, and across the majority of invaded countries. These huge socio-economic costs demonstrate the necessity of mitigating tetrapod invasions and filling knowledge gaps. Effective identification of traits predictive of costs among and within these groups can facilitate the prioritisation of resources to efficiently target the most damaging existing and emerging invasive tetrapod species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas W Bodey
- School of Biological Sciences, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK.
| | - Ross N Cuthbert
- School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, BT9 5DL Belfast, UK
| | - Christophe Diagne
- CBGP, IRD, Université de Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France
| | - Clara Marino
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; FRB-Cesab, 5 rue de l'école de médecine, 34000 Montpellier, France
| | - Anna Turbelin
- Great Lakes Forestry Centre, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 2E5, Canada
| | - Elena Angulo
- Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Avda. Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Seville, Spain
| | - Jean Fantle-Lepczyk
- Auburn University, College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn, AL 36849, USA
| | | | - Franck Courchamp
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, AgroParisTech, Ecologie Systématique Evolution, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France
| | - Emma J Hudgins
- School of Agriculture, Food and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia; Carleton University Department of Biology, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moqanaki E, Milleret C, Dupont P, Mattisson J, Dey S, Brøseth H, Aronsson M, Persson J, Wabakken P, Flagstad Ø, Bischof R. Environmental variability across space and time drives the recolonization pattern of a historically persecuted large carnivore. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2025; 122:e2401679122. [PMID: 39869793 PMCID: PMC11804516 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401679122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/29/2025] Open
Abstract
Wildlife populations are not static. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affect individuals, which lead to spatiotemporal variation in population density and range. Yet, dynamics in density and their drivers are rarely documented, due in part to the inherent difficulty of studying long-term population-level phenomena at ecologically meaningful scales. We studied the spatiotemporal density dynamics in a recolonizing large carnivore population, the wolverine Gulo gulo, across the Scandinavian Peninsula over nine years. We fitted open-population spatial capture-recapture models to noninvasive genetic sampling data collected across Norway and Sweden to estimate annual density surfaces and their drivers. This approach allowed us to model sex-specific changes in wolverine density and the effect of landscape-level environmental determinants over time. Our results revealed that, as wolverines successfully recolonized many parts of their historical range in Scandinavia, the relationship with spatial determinants of density has changed over time. We also found support for sex-specific responses of the Scandinavian wolverine to the environmental determinants of density and differences in the temporal dynamics of their relationships, indicating disproportionate recolonization ability and anthropogenic pressures. We observed significant changes in the relationship of female wolverine density with several determinants during the study period, suggesting still ongoing expansion of female wolverines whereas males might have already reached the range limits. These findings show that the Scandinavian wolverine population is still recovering from centuries of persecution and severe range contraction. Our study sheds light on the dynamics and challenges of recolonizing large carnivores in human-dominated landscapes across time and space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Moqanaki
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås1432, Norway
- Department of Ecosystem and Conservation Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT59812
| | - Cyril Milleret
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås1432, Norway
| | - Pierre Dupont
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås1432, Norway
| | - Jenny Mattisson
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim7485, Norway
| | - Soumen Dey
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås1432, Norway
| | - Henrik Brøseth
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Trondheim7485, Norway
| | - Malin Aronsson
- Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, RiddarhyttanSE-730 91, Sweden
| | - Jens Persson
- Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, RiddarhyttanSE-730 91, Sweden
| | - Petter Wabakken
- Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Evenstad, Koppang2480, Norway
| | | | - Richard Bischof
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås1432, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Buřivalová Z, Rakotonarivo OS. Managing protected areas takes a village. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2025; 122:e2425972122. [PMID: 39869815 PMCID: PMC11804709 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2425972122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2025] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zuzana Buřivalová
- The Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, WI53706
- Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, WI53706
| | - O. Sarobidy Rakotonarivo
- Department of Forestry and Environment, École Supérieure des Sciences Agronomiques, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo101, Madagascar
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shaw RE, Farquharson KA, Bruford MW, Coates DJ, Elliott CP, Mergeay J, Ottewell KM, Segelbacher G, Hoban S, Hvilsom C, Pérez-Espona S, Ruņģis D, Aravanopoulos F, Bertola LD, Cotrim H, Cox K, Cubric-Curik V, Ekblom R, Godoy JA, Konopiński MK, Laikre L, Russo IRM, Veličković N, Vergeer P, Vilà C, Brajkovic V, Field DL, Goodall-Copestake WP, Hailer F, Hopley T, Zachos FE, Alves PC, Biedrzycka A, Binks RM, Buiteveld J, Buzan E, Byrne M, Huntley B, Iacolina L, Keehnen NLP, Klinga P, Kopatz A, Kurland S, Leonard JA, Manfrin C, Marchesini A, Millar MA, Orozco-terWengel P, Ottenburghs J, Posledovich D, Spencer PB, Tourvas N, Unuk Nahberger T, van Hooft P, Verbylaite R, Vernesi C, Grueber CE. Global meta-analysis shows action is needed to halt genetic diversity loss. Nature 2025; 638:704-710. [PMID: 39880948 PMCID: PMC11839457 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08458-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
Mitigating loss of genetic diversity is a major global biodiversity challenge1-4. To meet recent international commitments to maintain genetic diversity within species5,6, we need to understand relationships between threats, conservation management and genetic diversity change. Here we conduct a global analysis of genetic diversity change via meta-analysis of all available temporal measures of genetic diversity from more than three decades of research. We show that within-population genetic diversity is being lost over timescales likely to have been impacted by human activities, and that some conservation actions may mitigate this loss. Our dataset includes 628 species (animals, plants, fungi and chromists) across all terrestrial and most marine realms on Earth. Threats impacted two-thirds of the populations that we analysed, and less than half of the populations analysed received conservation management. Genetic diversity loss occurs globally and is a realistic prediction for many species, especially birds and mammals, in the face of threats such as land use change, disease, abiotic natural phenomena and harvesting or harassment. Conservation strategies designed to improve environmental conditions, increase population growth rates and introduce new individuals (for example, restoring connectivity or performing translocations) may maintain or even increase genetic diversity. Our findings underscore the urgent need for active, genetically informed conservation interventions to halt genetic diversity loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn E Shaw
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
- Centre for Conservation Ecology and Genomics, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Katherine A Farquharson
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Innovations in Peptide and Protein Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael W Bruford
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- School of Biosciences, Museum Avenue, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
| | - David J Coates
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Carole P Elliott
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Joachim Mergeay
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium
- Ecology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kym M Ottewell
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Gernot Segelbacher
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Wildlife Ecology and Management, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Sean Hoban
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- The Center for Tree Science, The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, IL, USA
| | - Christina Hvilsom
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Copenhagen Zoo, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Sílvia Pérez-Espona
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, UK
| | - Dainis Ruņģis
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Genetic Resource Centre, Latvian State Forest Research Institute "Silava", Salaspils, Latvia
| | - Filippos Aravanopoulos
- Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Laura D Bertola
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Helena Cotrim
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- cE3c-Center for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Change and CHANGE-Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Karen Cox
- Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Geraardsbergen, Belgium
| | - Vlatka Cubric-Curik
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Department of Animal Science, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Robert Ekblom
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Wildlife Analysis Unit, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - José A Godoy
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | - Maciej K Konopiński
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Linda Laikre
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Isa-Rita M Russo
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- School of Biosciences, Museum Avenue, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
| | - Nevena Veličković
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Philippine Vergeer
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Plant Ecology and Nature Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Carles Vilà
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Estación Biológica de Doñana (EBD-CSIC), Seville, Spain
| | - Vladimir Brajkovic
- Department of Animal Science, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - David L Field
- Applied BioSciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia
| | | | - Frank Hailer
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- School of Biosciences, Museum Avenue, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Institute of Zoology Joint Laboratory for Biocomplexity Research (CIBR), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Tara Hopley
- Royal Botanic Gardens Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Frank E Zachos
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Natural History Museum Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Genetics, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Paulo C Alves
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- CIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, InBIO/ BIOPOLIS Program in Genomics, Biodiversity and Land Planning, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- EBM, Biological Station of Mértola, Mértola, Portugal
| | - Aleksandra Biedrzycka
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Institute of Nature Conservation, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
| | - Rachel M Binks
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Joukje Buiteveld
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Centre for Genetic Resources, The Netherlands, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Buzan
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
- Faculty of Environmental Protection, Velenje, Slovenia
| | - Margaret Byrne
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Barton Huntley
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Laura Iacolina
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Faculty of Mathematics, Natural Sciences and Information Technologies, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
- Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Naomi L P Keehnen
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Klinga
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Department of Phytology, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia
- Department of Forest Ecology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Alexander Kopatz
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sara Kurland
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Earth Sciences, Natural Resources and Sustainable Development, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Chiara Manfrin
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alexis Marchesini
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Research Institute on Terrestrial Ecosystems (IRET), The National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Porano, Italy
- National Biodiversity Future Center, Palermo, Italy
| | - Melissa A Millar
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Kensington, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Pablo Orozco-terWengel
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- School of Biosciences, Museum Avenue, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jente Ottenburghs
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Forest Ecology and Forest Management, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Diana Posledovich
- Department of Zoology, Division of Population Genetics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter B Spencer
- School of Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nikolaos Tourvas
- Laboratory of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Pim van Hooft
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rita Verbylaite
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Department of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, Institute of Forestry, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Kėdainiai, Lithuania
| | - Cristiano Vernesi
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG)
- European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), COST Action CA 18134 'Genomic Biodiversity Knowledge for Resilient Ecosystems (G-BiKE)'
- Forest Ecology Unit, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all'Adige, Italy
| | - Catherine E Grueber
- International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Conservation Genetics Specialist Group (CGSG), .
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Melnychuk MC, Lees S, Veiga P, Rasal J, Baker N, Koerner L, Hively D, Kurota H, de Moor CL, Pons M, Mace PM, Parma AM, Mannini A, Little LR, Bensbai J, Muñoz Albero A, Polidoro B, Jardim E, Hilborn R, Longo C. Comparing voluntary and government-mandated management measures for meeting sustainable fishing targets. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2025; 374:124090. [PMID: 39827606 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
Management of natural resources and environmental systems has often involved top-down approaches in which government agencies set and enforce regulations on extractive activities. More recently, market-driven approaches were introduced to incentivise producers to voluntarily engage in practices that align with management objectives and support regulations. For the first time, we compare government and voluntary approaches within fisheries management systems and quantify their relative influences on the sustainability status of fish populations. Voluntary measures include eco-certification against the Marine Stewardship Council's (MSC) Fisheries Standard and Fishery Improvement Projects (FIP). Government-mandated measures are implemented for individual populations, or else at national and international levels. Using a hierarchical time series analysis, we treated each of these measures as independent interventions potentially affecting trends in fishing pressure and biomass of nearly 300 populations. Supporting earlier findings, we confirmed a strong effect of government rebuilding plans in sharply reducing fishing pressure and allowing population biomass to recover. Other government-mandated measures further contributed to reducing fishing pressure. While simultaneously accounting for government measures, we found that biomass increases were associated with stronger incentives generated by voluntary measures. This influence was attributed to the opening of conditions of certification or suspension of certification for MSC fisheries, while no clear influence was attributed to FIPs. MSC certification was rarely observed in the absence of strong government-mandated measures, however, suggesting that sustainability-related incentives associated with voluntary measures can promote more desirable environmental outcomes for target stocks if used in parallel with more conventional approaches to management of natural resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Melnychuk
- Marine Stewardship Council, London, UK; School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Pedro Veiga
- Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | | | - Nicole Baker
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Daniel Hively
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Kurota
- Fisheries Resources Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Carryn L de Moor
- Marine Resource Assessment and Management (MARAM) Group, Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| | - Maite Pons
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Ana M Parma
- Center for the Study of Marine Systems, CONICET, Puerto Madryn, Argentina
| | - Alessandro Mannini
- CNR IRBIM - Istituto per le Risorse Biologiche e le Biotecnologie Marine del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Jilali Bensbai
- Institut National de Recherche Halieutique, Casablanca, Morocco
| | - Arturo Muñoz Albero
- Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
| | - Beth Polidoro
- Marine Stewardship Council, London, UK; School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | - Ray Hilborn
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Etterson JR, Fliehr P, Pizza R, Gross BL. Domestication During Restoration: Unintentional Selection During Eight Generations of Wild Seed Propagation Reduces Herkogamy, Dichogamy and Heterozygosity in Clarkia pulchella. Mol Ecol 2025:e17655. [PMID: 39810715 DOI: 10.1111/mec.17655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2024] [Revised: 12/09/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Seed production on native seed farms has increased to meet the rising demand for plant material for restoration. Although these propagation efforts are necessary for restoration, cultivating wild populations may also result in unintentional selection and elicit evolutionary changes that mimic crop domestication, essentially turning these efforts into artificial domestication experiments. Here, we investigated whether phenotypic and genomic changes associated with domestication occurred in the wildflower Clarkia pulchella Pursh (Onagraceae) by comparing the wild source populations to the farmed population after eight generations of cultivation. At the phenotypic level, the farmed population shifted towards a floral morphology associated with self-pollination, with a significant decrease in both dichogamy and herkogamy. At the genomic level, > 6500 SNPs revealed that mean expected heterozygosity of the farmed population was significantly lower than the wild populations, despite the fact that the farmed population originated from a pool of multiple wild populations. Both the shift towards a selfing phenotype and the loss of diversity are expected consequences of domestication, although the phenotypic shifts in particular occurred much more rapidly than has been observed for other domestication traits. We discuss these results in the context of plant domestication and the implications for retaining the genetic integrity of wild populations during the process of seed production for restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie R Etterson
- Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Paige Fliehr
- Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Riley Pizza
- Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
- Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Briana L Gross
- Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Desbureaux S, Kabore I, Vaglietti G, Baghai M, Lindsey P, Robson A, Delacote P, Leblois A. Collaborative management partnerships strongly decreased deforestation in the most at-risk protected areas in Africa since 2000. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2025; 122:e2411348121. [PMID: 39793059 PMCID: PMC11725833 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2411348121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Accepted: 11/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/12/2025] Open
Abstract
Collaborative management partnerships (CMPs) between state wildlife authorities and nonprofit conservation organizations to manage protected areas (PAs) have been used increasingly across Sub-Saharan Africa since the 2000s. They aim to attract funding, build capacity, and increase the environmental effectiveness of PAs. Our study documents the rise of CMPs, examines their current extent, and measures their effectiveness in protecting habitats. We combine statistical matching and Before-After-Control-Intervention regressions to quantify the impact of CMPs, using tree cover loss as a proxy. We identify 127 CMPs located in 16 countries. CMPs are more often located in remote PAs, with habitats that are least threatened by human activity. Our results indicate that, on average, each year in a CMP results in an annual decrease in tree cover loss of about 55% compared to PAs without CMPs. Where initial anthropogenic pressure was low, we measure no effect. Where it was high, we see a 66% decrease in tree cover loss. This highly heterogeneous effect illustrates the importance of moving beyond average effect size when assessing conservation interventions, as well as the need for policy makers to invest public funds to protect the areas the most at risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Desbureaux
- Center for Environmental Economics - Montpellier (Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro), Montpellier34000, France
| | - Ibrahim Kabore
- Equipe D’Economie - le Havre Normandie, Université Le Havre Normandie), Le Havre76063, France
- Climate Economics Chair, Paris75002, France
| | - Giulia Vaglietti
- Climate Economics Chair, Paris75002, France
- Technologies for the Energy Transition, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, Milan20123Italy
- Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée (Université de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE), Nancy54000, France
| | | | - Peter Lindsey
- Lion Recovery Fund, Wildlife Conservation Network, Harare0002, Zimbabwe
| | - Ashley Robson
- Institute for Communities and Wildlife in Africa, Department of Biological Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town7701, South Africa
| | - Philippe Delacote
- Climate Economics Chair, Paris75002, France
- Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée (Université de Lorraine, AgroParisTech, INRAE), Nancy54000, France
| | - Antoine Leblois
- Center for Environmental Economics - Montpellier (Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro), Montpellier34000, France
- Climate Economics Chair, Paris75002, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gomes SIF, Gundersen P, Bezemer TM, Barsotti D, D'Imperio L, Georgopoulos K, Justesen MJ, Rheault K, Rosas YM, Schmidt IK, Tedersoo L, Vesterdal L, Yu M, Anslan S, Aslani F, Byriel DB, Christiansen J, Hansen SH, Kasal N, Kosawang C, Larsen H, Larsen KS, Lees J, van Dijke ACP, Kepfer-Rojas S. Soil Microbiome Inoculation for Resilient and Multifunctional New Forests in Post-Agricultural Landscapes. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2025; 31:e70031. [PMID: 39829414 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.70031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2024] [Revised: 12/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025]
Abstract
Afforestation is increasingly recognized as a critical strategy to restore ecosystems and enhance biodiversity on post-agricultural landscapes. However, agricultural legacies, such as altered soil structure, nutrient imbalances, and depleted microbial diversity, can slow down forest establishment or cause ecosystems to deviate from expected successional trajectories. In this opinion paper, we explore the potential of soil inoculations as a tool to overcome these challenges by introducing beneficial microbial communities that can accelerate ecosystem recovery and forest development. Restoring soil biodiversity is a crucial aspect of this process that drives broader ecosystem functionality and resilience. We highlight the need to carefully consider the type and timing of inoculations and to ensure compatibility between the inoculum and recipient site characteristics to optimize the establishment of introduced species. While tree productivity is often a central focus of afforestation efforts, the restoration of soil biodiversity, which will also contribute to increased ecosystem-level functions, should also be a priority for long-term forest resilience. Agricultural legacies add complexities to the restoration process, creating unique challenges that need to be addressed in restoration planning. Thus, successful inoculation strategies require a thorough understanding of both donor and recipient site characteristics, also in relation to potential mismatches related to soil physiochemical properties to avoid unintended consequences such as the non-establishment of introduced species. Additionally, we call for the re-evaluation of afforestation targets and the development of standardized monitoring protocols that track the success of inoculation efforts, particularly regarding soil health, microbial community establishment, and biodiversity recovery. By integrating inoculation practices within a broader restoration framework, we can enhance the resilience, biodiversity, and ecosystem functionality of newly afforested landscapes. Ultimately, this approach may play a critical role in ensuring the success of large-scale afforestation projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia I F Gomes
- Above-Belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Per Gundersen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - T Martijn Bezemer
- Above-Belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Davide Barsotti
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Ludovica D'Imperio
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | | | - Mathias Just Justesen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Karelle Rheault
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Yamina M Rosas
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Inger Kappel Schmidt
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Leho Tedersoo
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lars Vesterdal
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Ming Yu
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Sten Anslan
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
- Department of Biological and Environmental Science, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | - Farzad Aslani
- Above-Belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - David Bille Byriel
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Jesper Christiansen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Sascha H Hansen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Naksha Kasal
- Above-Belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chatchai Kosawang
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Heidi Larsen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Klaus S Larsen
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - Jane Lees
- Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Annemiek C P van Dijke
- Above-Belowground Interactions, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas
- Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Woinarski JC, Braby MF, Gibb H, Harvey MS, Legge SM, Marsh JR, Moir ML, New TR, Rix MG, Murphy BP. This is the way the world ends; not with a bang but a whimper: Estimating the number and ongoing rate of extinctions of Australian non-marine invertebrates. CAMBRIDGE PRISMS. EXTINCTION 2024; 2:e23. [PMID: 40078797 PMCID: PMC11895748 DOI: 10.1017/ext.2024.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 10/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
Biodiversity is in rapid decline, but the extent of loss is not well resolved for poorly known groups. We estimate the number of extinctions for Australian non-marine invertebrates since the European colonisation of the continent. Our analyses use a range of approaches, incorporate stated uncertainties and recognise explicit caveats. We use plausible bounds for the number of species, two approaches for estimating extinction rate, and Monte Carlo simulations to select combinations of projected distributions from these variables. We conclude that 9,111 (plausible bounds of 1,465 to 56,828) Australian species have become extinct over this 236-year period. These estimates dwarf the number of formally recognised extinctions of Australian invertebrates (10 species) and of the single invertebrate species listed as extinct under Australian legislation. We predict that 39-148 species will become extinct in 2024. This is inconsistent with a recent pledge by the Australian government to prevent all extinctions. This high rate of loss is largely a consequence of pervasive taxonomic biases in community concern and conservation investment. Those characteristics also make it challenging to reduce that rate of loss, as there is uncertainty about which invertebrate species are at the most risk. We outline conservation responses to reduce the likelihood of further extinctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John C.Z. Woinarski
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia
| | - Michael F. Braby
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia
- Australian National Insect Collection, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Heloise Gibb
- Centre for Future Landscapes, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Sarah M. Legge
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia
- Fenner School of Society and the Environment, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Jessica R. Marsh
- Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA, Australia
- School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Engineering and Technology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Melinda L. Moir
- Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, South Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Tim R. New
- Department of Environment and Genetics, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Brett P. Murphy
- Research Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, NT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Forsblom L, Virtanen EA, Arponen H, Boman R, Haapamäki J, Hoikkala J, Kallio N, Karvinen VJ, Kaskela A, Keskinen E, Kuismanen L, Kurvinen L, Laine AO, Lanki M, Lampinen E, Lappalainen J, Lehtonen P, Nieminen A, O'Brien K, Riihimäki A, Rinne H, Salovius-Lauren S, Takolander A, Weckström K, Viitasalo M. Finnish inventory data of underwater marine biodiversity. Sci Data 2024; 11:1297. [PMID: 39604367 PMCID: PMC11603137 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-024-04092-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Since 2004, marine biodiversity inventory data have been systematically collected with diving, video, and benthic sampling methods in Finland. To date, this collection of data consists of more than 194 000 spatially explicit observations, covering more than 280 aquatic genera, representing mainly macroalgae, vascular plants, water mosses, and invertebrates. We describe the data collection and storage methods, data extraction from national databases, and provide potential users a curated, open-access version of the inventory data. Additionally, examples of data applications and discussion on potential limitations are provided. This extensive dataset can be used in ecological and biogeographical studies to provide general descriptions of biodiversity patterns and species distributions, as well as in more applied studies to support marine management, conservation, and sustainable use of marine areas. The sampling strategy and high spatial and taxonomic resolution allow for statistical modelling, which further increases the usability of the data in research, for instance in identifying key biodiversity areas, estimating biodiversity loss, and assessing efficiency of conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elina A Virtanen
- Finnish Environment Institute (Syke), Helsinki, Finland.
- Finnish Natural History Museum (LUOMUS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Heidi Arponen
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Rasmus Boman
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Niko Kallio
- Finnish Environment Institute (Syke), Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Anu Kaskela
- Geological Survey of Finland (GTK), Espoo, Finland
| | - Essi Keskinen
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Lasse Kurvinen
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ari O Laine
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Maiju Lanki
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Eveliina Lampinen
- North Ostrobothnia Centre for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Pekka Lehtonen
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aija Nieminen
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kevin O'Brien
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu Riihimäki
- Metsähallitus Parks & Wildlife Finland, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henna Rinne
- Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki, Finland
- Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aide TM. The Biodiversity Credit Market needs rigorous baseline, monitoring, and validation practices. NPJ BIODIVERSITY 2024; 3:30. [PMID: 39433686 PMCID: PMC11494116 DOI: 10.1038/s44185-024-00062-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- T Mitchell Aide
- Smithsonian National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Conservation and Sustainability, Washington, DC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dawson NM, Coolsaet B, Bhardwaj A, Brown D, Lliso B, Loos J, Mannocci L, Martin A, Oliva M, Pascual U, Sherpa P, Worsdell T. Reviewing the science on 50 years of conservation: Knowledge production biases and lessons for practice. AMBIO 2024; 53:1395-1413. [PMID: 39023682 PMCID: PMC11383897 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-024-02049-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
Drawing on 662 studies from 102 countries, we present a systematic review of published empirical studies about site-level biodiversity conservation initiated between 1970 and 2019. Within this sample, we find that knowledge production about the Global South is largely produced by researchers in the Global North, implying a neocolonial power dynamic. We also find evidence of bias in reported ecological outcomes linked to lack of independence in scientific studies, serving to uphold narratives about who should lead conservation. We explore relationships in the sample studies between conservation initiative types, the extent of Indigenous Peoples' and local communities' influence in governance, and reported social and ecological outcomes. Findings reveal positive ecological and social outcomes are strongly associated with higher levels of influence of Indigenous Peoples and local communities and their institutions, implying equity in conservation practice should be advanced not only for moral reasons, but because it can enhance conservation effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil M Dawson
- Global Environmental Justice Research Group, School of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
- Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB), French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB), 34000, Montpellier, France.
| | - Brendan Coolsaet
- Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS), 1000, Brussels, Belgium
- Institute for the Analysis of Change in Contemporary and Historical Societies, UCLouvain, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | | | - David Brown
- Global Environmental Justice Research Group, School of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
- Centre for Landscape Regeneration, University of Cambridge Conservation Research Institute, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Bosco Lliso
- World Benchmarking Alliance, 1012 TM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Basque Centre for Climate Change, 48940, Leioa, Spain
| | - Jacqueline Loos
- Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Vienna, 1030, Vienna, Austria
- Institute of Ecology and Social-Ecological Systems Institute, Leuphana University, 21335, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - Laura Mannocci
- Centre for the Synthesis and Analysis of Biodiversity (CESAB), French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB), 34000, Montpellier, France
- MARBEC (Univ Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD), 34070, Montpellier, France
| | - Adrian Martin
- Global Environmental Justice Research Group, School of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
| | - Malena Oliva
- Laboratorio Nacional de Ciencias de la Sostenibilidad, LANCIS, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Unai Pascual
- Basque Centre for Climate Change, 48940, Leioa, Spain
- Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Plaza Euskadi 5, 48009, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Pasang Sherpa
- Central Department of Sociology, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu, 44618, Nepal
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pienkowski T, Jagadish A, Battista W, Blaise GC, Christie AP, Clark M, Emenyu AP, Joglekar A, Nielsen KS, Powell T, White T, Mills M. Five lessons for avoiding failure when scaling in conservation. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:1804-1814. [PMID: 39242871 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02507-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Many attempts to scale conservation actions have failed to deliver their intended benefits, caused unintended harm or later been abandoned, hampering efforts to bend the curve on biodiversity loss. Here we encourage those calling for scaling to pause and reflect on past scaling efforts, which offer valuable lessons: the total impact of an action depends on both its effectiveness and scalability; effectiveness can change depending on scale for multiple reasons; feedback processes can change socio-ecological conditions influencing future adoption; and the drive to scale can incentivize bad practices that undermine long-term outcomes. Cutting across these themes is the recognition that monitoring scaling can enhance evidence-informed adaptive management, reporting and research. We draw on evidence and concepts from disparate fields, explore new linkages between often isolated concepts and suggest strategies for practitioners, policymakers and researchers. Reflecting on these five lessons may help in the scaling of effective conservation actions in responsible ways to meet the triple goals of reversing biodiversity loss, combating climate change and supporting human wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Pienkowski
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Arundhati Jagadish
- The Betty and Gordon Moore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA.
- Nature Conservation Foundation, Mysore, India.
| | | | - Gloria Christelle Blaise
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Alec Philip Christie
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Downing College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Matt Clark
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Abha Joglekar
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kristian Steensen Nielsen
- Department of Management, Society and Communication, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Tom Powell
- Global Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Thomas White
- Department of Biology and Leverhulme Centre for Nature Recovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, UK
| | - Morena Mills
- Centre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Graham OJ, Harvell D, Christiaen B, Gaeckle J, Aoki LR, Ratliff B, Vinton A, Rappazzo BH, Whitman T. Taking the Pulse of Resilience in Conserving Seagrass Meadows. Integr Comp Biol 2024; 64:816-826. [PMID: 39066484 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icae120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Foundational habitats such as seagrasses and coral reefs are at severe risk globally from climate warming. Infectious disease associated with warming events is both a cause of decline and an indicator of stress in both habitats. Since new approaches are needed to detect refugia and design climate-smart networks of marine protected areas, we test the hypothesis that the health of eelgrass (Zostera marina) in temperate ecosystems can serve as a proxy indicative of higher resilience and help pinpoint refugia. Eelgrass meadows worldwide are at risk from environmental stressors, including climate warming and disease. Disease outbreaks of Labyrinthula zosterae are associated with recent, widespread declines in eelgrass meadows throughout the San Juan Islands, Washington, USA. Machine language learning, drone surveys, and molecular diagnostics reveal climate impacts on seagrass wasting disease prevalence (proportion of infected individuals) and severity (proportion of infected leaf area) from San Diego, California, to Alaska. Given that warmer temperatures favor many pathogens such as L. zosterae, we hypothesize that absent or low disease severity in meadows could indicate eelgrass resilience to climate and pathogenic stressors. Regional surveys showed the San Juan Islands as a hotspot for both high disease prevalence and severity, and surveys throughout the Northeast Pacific indicated higher prevalence and severity in intertidal, rather than subtidal, meadows. Further, among sites with eelgrass declines, losses were more pronounced at sites with shallower eelgrass meadows. We suggest that deeper meadows with the lowest disease severity will be refuges from future warming and pathogenic stressors in the Northeast Pacific. Disease monitoring may be a useful conservation approach for marine foundation species, as low or absent disease severity can pinpoint resilient refugia that should be prioritized for future conservation efforts. Even in declining or at-risk habitats, disease surveys can help identify meadows that may contain especially resilient individuals for future restoration efforts. Our approach of using disease as a pulse point for eelgrass resilience to multiple stressors could be applied to other habitats such as coral reefs to inform conservation and management decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia J Graham
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Drew Harvell
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Bart Christiaen
- Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA 47027, USA
| | - Jeff Gaeckle
- Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA 47027, USA
| | - Lillian R Aoki
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1245, USA
| | - Baylen Ratliff
- College of the Environment, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Audrey Vinton
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Brendan H Rappazzo
- Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Tina Whitman
- Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
- Friends of the San Juans, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Arponen A. Conservation interventions are effective but far from sufficient. Nat Ecol Evol 2024; 8:1567-1568. [PMID: 38992292 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-024-02486-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Arponen
- Research Group Politics of Nature and the Environment (PONTE), Administrative Studies, Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geldmann J. Protected areas: Biodiversity or people - or both? Curr Biol 2024; 34:R633-R635. [PMID: 38981430 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2024]
Abstract
With 195 countries agreeing to protect 30% of the globe in an effort to curb the ongoing biodiversity crisis, there is an increasing focus on how this might harm or potentially benefit people living in and around protected areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Geldmann
- Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|