Computational prediction of MHC anchor locations guides neoantigen identification and prioritization

Methodological approach to identify immunogenic epitopes candidates for vaccines against emerging pathogens tailored to defined HLA populations

Vaccines stimulate cells of the adaptive immune system, generating a protective and lasting memory, and are the main public health strategy to protect the world population from emerging pathogens such as the SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for millions of deaths in the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Several in-silico algorithms have facilitated the selection of antigens as vaccine candidates; however, their predictive capacity remains limited and it is necessary to continue training them, using information obtained in immunological assays. In this work, the SARS-CoV-2 proteome was sampled using a series of concatenated algorithms that allowed us to define a series of candidate viral peptides for a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in individuals from Colombian, whose haplotypes for HLA-I and II were incorporated as part of the algorithm. The immunogenicity of the peptides predicted with three tools or with the combination of them was evaluated and found that short peptides predicted and selected as highly immunogenic peptides were capable of expanding memory CD8 T lymphocytes with an activation phenotype. Altogether, our results outline a pipeline that combines a bioinformatic and immunological approach useful to select immunogenic epitopes from emerging pathogens as vaccine candidates tailored to the population's HLA-Haplotypes.

Comprehensive assessment of computational methods for cancer immunoediting

Cancer immunoediting reflects the role of the immune system in eliminating tumor cells and shaping tumor immunogenicity, which leaves marks in the genome. In this study, we systematically evaluate four methods for quantifying immunoediting. In colorectal cancer samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we found that these methods identified 78.41%, 46.17%, 36.61%, and 4.92% of immunoedited samples, respectively, covering 92.90% of all colorectal cancer samples. Comparison of 10 patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) with their original tumors showed that different methods identified reduced immune selection in PDXs ranging from 44.44% to 60.0%. The proportion of such PDX-tumor pairs increases to 77.78% when considering the union of results from multiple methods, indicating the complementarity of these methods. We find that observed-to-expected ratios highly rely on neoantigen selection criteria and reference datasets. In contrast, HLA-binding mutation ratio, immune dN/dS, and enrichment score of cancer cell fraction were less affected by these factors. Our findings suggest integration of multiple methods may benefit future immunoediting analyses.

Dual mRNA nanoparticles strategy for enhanced pancreatic cancer treatment and β-elemene combination therapy

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is notoriously immune-resistant, limiting the clinical efficacy of single-agent immune modulators and thereby necessitating the exploration of multimodal immunotherapy combinations. Traditional approaches combining conventional immune checkpoint inhibitors with neoantigen vaccines have shown some promise in treating PDAC but are often compromised by intratumoral T lymphocyte exhaustion and systemic toxicity. Hence, novel approaches are needed to address these challenges. Herein, we demonstrate that mRNA polymeric nanoparticles encoding anti-PD-1 antibodies in situ at the tumor site enhance the therapeutic efficacy of neoantigen-based mRNA vaccine for PDAC. This mRNA-based, in situ anti-PD-1 antibody production strategy also protects tumor-infiltrating T cells from PD-1 inhibition, potentially reducing the toxicities induced by systemic checkpoint inhibition. Our study may provide an innovative dual mRNA nanoparticle strategy for effective tumor neoantigen immunotherapy, as well as an mRNA cancer combination therapy strategy with other clinically approved drugs (e.g., β-elemene).

OnmiMHC: a machine learning solution for UCEC tumor vaccine development through enhanced peptide-MHC binding prediction

The key roles of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) Class I and II molecules in the immune system are well established. This study aims to develop a novel machine learning framework for predicting antigen peptide presentation by MHC Class I and II molecules. By integrating large-scale mass spectrometry data and other relevant data types, we present a prediction model OnmiMHC based on deep learning. We rigorously assessed its performance using an independent test set, OnmiMHC achieves a PR-AUC score of 0.854 and a TOP20%-PPV of 0.934 in the MHC-I task, which outperforms existing methods. Likewise, in the domain of MHC-II prediction, our model OnmiMHC exhibits a PR-AUC score of 0.606 and a TOP20%-PPV of 0.690, outperforming other baseline methods. These results demonstrate the superiority of our model OnmiMHC in accurately predicting peptide-MHC binding affinities across both MHC-I and MHC-II molecules. With its superior accuracy and predictive capability, our model not only excels in general predictive tasks but also achieves significant results in the prediction of neoantigens for specific cancer types. Particularly for Uterine Corpus Endometrial Carcinoma (UCEC), our model has successfully predicted neoantigens with a high binding probability to common human alleles. This discovery is of great significance for the development of personalized tumor vaccines targeting UCEC.

Comprehensive epitope mutational scan database enables accurate T cell receptor cross-reactivity prediction

Predicting T cell receptor (TCR) activation is challenging due to the lack of both unbiased benchmarking datasets and computational methods that are sensitive to small mutations to a peptide. To address these challenges, we curated a comprehensive database, called BATCAVE, encompassing complete single amino acid mutational assays of more than 22,000 TCR-peptide pairs, centered around 25 immunogenic human and mouse epitopes, across both major histocompatibility complex classes, against 151 TCRs. We then present an interpretable Bayesian model, called BATMAN, that can predict the set of peptides that activates a TCR. We also developed an active learning version of BATMAN, which can efficiently learn the binding profile of a novel TCR by selecting an informative yet small number of peptides to assay. When validated on our database, BATMAN outperforms existing methods and reveals important biochemical predictors of TCR-peptide interactions. Finally, we demonstrate the broad applicability of BATMAN, including for predicting off-target effects for TCR-based therapies and polyclonal T cell responses.

Relevance of mutation-derived neoantigens and non-classical antigens for anticancer therapies

Efficacy of cancer immunotherapies relies on correct recognition of tumor antigens by lymphocytes, eliciting thus functional responses capable of eliminating tumor cells. Therefore, important efforts have been carried out in antigen identification, with the aim of understanding mechanisms of response to immunotherapy and to design safer and more efficient strategies. In addition to classical tumor-associated antigens identified during the last decades, implementation of next-generation sequencing methodologies is enabling the identification of neoantigens (neoAgs) arising from mutations, leading to the development of new neoAg-directed therapies. Moreover, there are numerous non-classical tumor antigens originated from other sources and identified by new methodologies. Here, we review the relevance of neoAgs in different immunotherapies and the results obtained by applying neoAg-based strategies. In addition, the different types of non-classical tumor antigens and the best approaches for their identification are described. This will help to increase the spectrum of targetable molecules useful in cancer immunotherapies.

Driver mutation landscape of acute myeloid leukemia provides insights for neoantigen-based immunotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has lagged in benefiting from immunotherapies, primarily due to the scarcity of actionable AML-specific antigens. Driver mutations represent promising immunogenic targets, but a comprehensive characterization of the AML neoantigen landscape and their impact on patient outcomes and the AML immune microenvironment remain unclear. Herein, we conducted matched DNA and RNA sequencing on 304 AML patients and extensively integrated data from additional ∼2500 AML cases, identifying 49 driver genes, notably characterized by a significant proportion of insertions and deletions (indels). Neoantigen analysis showed that indels triggered a higher abundance of neoantigens both in quantity and quality compared to single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and gene fusions. By integrating peptide features pertinent to neoantigen presentation and T cell recognition, we developed two robust models of epitope immunogenicity that significantly enriched immunogenic neoepitopes. We validated 30 neoantigens through in vitro direct binding assays of predicted peptides to MHC proteins and confirmed the immunogenicity of 20 neoantigens using interferon-γ ELISpot and tetramer assays. Moreover, we demonstrated that patients with higher neoantigen loads, derived from driver mutations, exhibited poor clinical outcomes and an IFN-driven adaptive immune response, which was associated with immune suppression and tumor evasion. Through deconvolution of large-scale bulk transcriptomes, integration of single-cell RNA sequencing and multiparametric flow cytometry, we confirmed a strong association between neoantigen load and CD8+ T cell exhaustion. This study provides a comprehensive landscape of AML neoantigens derived from driver mutations, offering putative immunogenic targets and emphasizing the need for strategies to revitalize the immunosuppressive milieu.

Genetically Engineered T Cells and Recombinant Antibodies to Target Intracellular Neoantigens: Current Status and Future Directions

Recombinant antibodies and, more recently, T cell receptor (TCR)-engineered T cell therapies represent two immunological strategies that have come to the forefront of clinical interest for targeting intracellular neoantigens in benign and malignant diseases. T cell-based therapies targeting neoantigens use T cells expressing a recombinant complete TCR (TCR-T cell), a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) with the variable domains of a neoepitope-reactive TCR as a binding domain (TCR-CAR-T cell) or a TCR-like antibody as a binding domain (TCR-like CAR-T cell). Furthermore, the synthetic T cell receptor and antigen receptor (STAR) and heterodimeric TCR-like CAR (T-CAR) are designed as a double-chain TCRαβ-based receptor with variable regions of immunoglobulin heavy and light chains (VH and VL) fused to TCR-Cα and TCR-Cβ, respectively, resulting in TCR signaling. In contrast to the use of recombinant T cells, anti-neopeptide MHC (pMHC) antibodies and intrabodies neutralizing intracellular neoantigens can be more easily applied to cancer patients. However, different limitations should be considered, such as the loss of neoantigens, the modification of antigen peptide presentation, tumor heterogenicity, and the immunosuppressive activity of the tumor environment. The simultaneous application of immune checkpoint blocking antibodies and of CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing tools to engineer different recombinant T cells with enhanced therapeutic functions could make T cell therapies more efficient and could pave the way for its routine clinical application.

pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection

BACKGROUND

Neoantigen-targeting therapies including personalized vaccines have shown promise in the treatment of cancers, particularly when used in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy. At least 100 clinical trials involving these therapies have been initiated globally. Accurate identification and prioritization of neoantigens is crucial for designing these trials, predicting treatment response, and understanding mechanisms of resistance. With the advent of massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing technologies, it is now possible to computationally predict neoantigens based on patient-specific variant information. However, numerous factors must be considered when prioritizing neoantigens for use in personalized therapies. Complexities such as alternative transcript annotations, various binding, presentation and immunogenicity prediction algorithms, and variable peptide lengths/registers all potentially impact the neoantigen selection process. There has been a rapid development of computational tools that attempt to account for these complexities. While these tools generate numerous algorithmic predictions for neoantigen characterization, results from these pipelines are difficult to navigate and require extensive knowledge of the underlying tools for accurate interpretation. This often leads to over-simplification of pipeline outputs to make them tractable, for example, limiting prediction to a single RNA isoform or only summarizing the top ranked of many possible peptide candidates. In addition to variant detection, gene expression, and predicted peptide binding affinities, recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of mutation location, allele-specific anchor locations, and variation of T-cell response to long versus short peptides. Due to the intricate nature and number of salient neoantigen features, presenting all relevant information to facilitate candidate selection for downstream applications is a difficult challenge that current tools fail to address.

RESULTS

We have created pVACview, the first interactive tool designed to aid in the prioritization and selection of neoantigen candidates for personalized neoantigen therapies including cancer vaccines. pVACview has a user-friendly and intuitive interface where users can upload, explore, select, and export their neoantigen candidates. The tool allows users to visualize candidates at multiple levels of detail including variant, transcript, peptide, and algorithm prediction information.

CONCLUSIONS

pVACview will allow researchers to analyze and prioritize neoantigen candidates with greater efficiency and accuracy in basic and translational settings. The application is available as part of the pVACtools software at pvactools.org and as an online server at pvacview.org.

Personalized cancer vaccine design using AI-powered technologies

Immunotherapy has ushered in a new era of cancer treatment, yet cancer remains a leading cause of global mortality. Among various therapeutic strategies, cancer vaccines have shown promise by activating the immune system to specifically target cancer cells. While current cancer vaccines are primarily prophylactic, advancements in targeting tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and neoantigens have paved the way for therapeutic vaccines. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into cancer vaccine development is revolutionizing the field by enhancing various aspect of design and delivery. This review explores how AI facilitates precise epitope design, optimizes mRNA and DNA vaccine instructions, and enables personalized vaccine strategies by predicting patient responses. By utilizing AI technologies, researchers can navigate complex biological datasets and uncover novel therapeutic targets, thereby improving the precision and efficacy of cancer vaccines. Despite the promise of AI-powered cancer vaccines, significant challenges remain, such as tumor heterogeneity and genetic variability, which can limit the effectiveness of neoantigen prediction. Moreover, ethical and regulatory concerns surrounding data privacy and algorithmic bias must be addressed to ensure responsible AI deployment. The future of cancer vaccine development lies in the seamless integration of AI to create personalized immunotherapies that offer targeted and effective cancer treatments. This review underscores the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and innovation in overcoming these challenges and advancing cancer vaccine development.

Molecular targets and strategies in the development of nucleic acid cancer vaccines: from shared to personalized antigens

Recent breakthroughs in cancer immunotherapies have emphasized the importance of harnessing the immune system for treating cancer. Vaccines, which have traditionally been used to promote protective immunity against pathogens, are now being explored as a method to target cancer neoantigens. Over the past few years, extensive preclinical research and more than a hundred clinical trials have been dedicated to investigating various approaches to neoantigen discovery and vaccine formulations, encouraging development of personalized medicine. Nucleic acids (DNA and mRNA) have become particularly promising platform for the development of these cancer immunotherapies. This shift towards nucleic acid-based personalized vaccines has been facilitated by advancements in molecular techniques for identifying neoantigens, antigen prediction methodologies, and the development of new vaccine platforms. Generating these personalized vaccines involves a comprehensive pipeline that includes sequencing of patient tumor samples, data analysis for antigen prediction, and tailored vaccine manufacturing. In this review, we will discuss the various shared and personalized antigens used for cancer vaccine development and introduce strategies for identifying neoantigens through the characterization of gene mutation, transcription, translation and post translational modifications associated with oncogenesis. In addition, we will focus on the most up-to-date nucleic acid vaccine platforms, discuss the limitations of cancer vaccines as well as provide potential solutions, and raise key clinical and technical considerations in vaccine development.

pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection

Background

Neoantigen targeting therapies including personalized vaccines have shown promise in the treatment of cancers, particularly when used in combination with checkpoint blockade therapy. At least 100 clinical trials involving these therapies are underway globally. Accurate identification and prioritization of neoantigens is highly relevant to designing these trials, predicting treatment response, and understanding mechanisms of resistance. With the advent of massively parallel DNA and RNA sequencing technologies, it is now possible to computationally predict neoantigens based on patient-specific variant information. However, numerous factors must be considered when prioritizing neoantigens for use in personalized therapies. Complexities such as alternative transcript annotations, various binding, presentation and immunogenicity prediction algorithms, and variable peptide lengths/registers all potentially impact the neoantigen selection process. There has been a rapid development of computational tools that attempt to account for these complexities. While these tools generate numerous algorithmic predictions for neoantigen characterization, results from these pipelines are difficult to navigate and require extensive knowledge of the underlying tools for accurate interpretation. This often leads to over-simplification of pipeline outputs to make them tractable, for example limiting prediction to a single RNA isoform or only summarizing the top ranked of many possible peptide candidates. In addition to variant detection, gene expression and predicted peptide binding affinities, recent studies have also demonstrated the importance of mutation location, allele-specific anchor locations, and variation of T-cell response to long versus short peptides. Due to the intricate nature and number of salient neoantigen features, presenting all relevant information to facilitate candidate selection for downstream applications is a difficult challenge that current tools fail to address.

Results

We have created pVACview, the first interactive tool designed to aid in the prioritization and selection of neoantigen candidates for personalized neoantigen therapies including cancer vaccines. pVACview has a user-friendly and intuitive interface where users can upload, explore, select and export their neoantigen candidates. The tool allows users to visualize candidates across three different levels, including variant, transcript and peptide information.

Conclusions

pVACview will allow researchers to analyze and prioritize neoantigen candidates with greater efficiency and accuracy in basic and translational settings The application is available as part of the pVACtools pipeline at pvactools.org and as an online server at pvacview.org.

Targeting Neoantigens in Cancer: Possibilities and Opportunities in Breast Cancer

As one of the most prevalent forms of cancer worldwide, breast cancer has garnered significant attention within the clinical research setting. While traditional treatment employs a multidisciplinary approach including a variety of therapies such as chemotherapy, hormone therapy, and even surgery, researchers have since directed their attention to the budding role of neoantigens. Neoantigens are defined as tumor-specific antigens that result from a multitude of genetic alterations, the most prevalent of which is the single nucleotide variant. As a result of their foreign nature, neoantigens elicit immune responses upon presentation by Major Histocompatibility Complexes I and II followed by recognition by T cell receptors. Previously, researchers have been able to utilize these immunogenic properties and manufacture neoantigen-specific T-cells and neoantigen vaccines. Within the context of breast cancer, biomarkers such as tumor protein 53 (TP53), Survivin, Partner and Localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2), and protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor T (PTPRT) display exceeding potential to serve as neoantigens. However, despite their seemingly limitless potential, neoantigens must overcome various obstacles if they are to be fairly distributed to patients. For instance, a prolonged period between the identification of a neoantigen and the dispersal of treatment poses a serious risk within the context of breast cancer. Regardless of these current obstacles, it appears highly promising that future research into neoantigens will make an everlasting impact on the health outcomes within the realm of breast cancer. The purpose of this literature review is to comprehensively discuss the etiology of various forms of breast cancer and current treatment modalities followed by the significance of neoantigens in cancer therapeutics and their application to breast cancer. Further, we have discussed the limitations, future directions, and the role of transcriptomics in neoantigen identification and personalized medicine. The concepts discussed in the original and review articles were included in this review article.

Are we getting closer to a successful neoantigen cancer vaccine?

Although significant advances in immunotherapy have revolutionized the treatment of many cancer types over the past decade, the field of vaccine therapy, an important component of cancer immunotherapy, despite decades-long intense efforts, is still transmitting signals of promises and awaiting strong data on efficacy to proceed with regulatory approval. The field of cancer vaccines faces standard challenges, such as tumor-induced immunosuppression, immune response in inhibitory tumor microenvironment (TME), intratumor heterogeneity (ITH), permanently evolving cancer mutational landscape leading to neoantigens, and less known obstacles: neoantigen gain/loss upon immunotherapy, the timing and speed of appearance of neoantigens and responding T cell clonotypes and possible involvement of immune interference/heterologous immunity, in the complex interplay between evolving tumor epitopes and the immune system. In this review, we discuss some key issues related to challenges hampering the development of cancer vaccines, along with the current approaches focusing on neoantigens. We summarize currently well-known ideas/rationales, thus revealing the need for alternative vaccine approaches. Such a discussion should stimulate vaccine researchers to apply out-of-box, unconventional thinking in search of new avenues to deal with critical, often yet unaddressed challenges on the road to a new generation of therapeutics and vaccines.

Cancer neoepitopes viewed through negative selection and peripheral tolerance: a new path to cancer vaccines

A proportion of somatic mutations in tumors create neoepitopes that can prime T cell responses that target the MHC I-neoepitope complexes on tumor cells, mediating tumor control or rejection. Despite the compelling centrality of neoepitopes to cancer immunity, we know remarkably little about what constitutes a neoepitope that can mediate tumor control in vivo and what distinguishes such a neoepitope from the vast majority of similar candidate neoepitopes that are inefficacious in vivo. Studies in mice as well as clinical trials have begun to reveal the unexpected paradoxes in this area. Because cancer neoepitopes straddle that ambiguous ground between self and non-self, some rules that are fundamental to immunology of frankly non-self antigens, such as viral or model antigens, do not appear to apply to neoepitopes. Because neoepitopes are so similar to self-epitopes, with only small changes that render them non-self, immune response to them is regulated at least partially the way immune response to self is regulated. Therefore, neoepitopes are viewed and understood here through the clarifying lens of negative thymic selection. Here, the emergent questions in the biology and clinical applications of neoepitopes are discussed critically and a mechanistic and testable framework that explains the complexity and translational potential of these wonderful antigens is proposed.

Computational immunogenomic approaches to predict response to cancer immunotherapies

Cancer immunogenomics is an emerging field that bridges genomics and immunology. The establishment of large-scale genomic collaborative efforts along with the development of new single-cell transcriptomic techniques and multi-omics approaches have enabled characterization of the mutational and transcriptional profiles of many cancer types and helped to identify clinically actionable alterations as well as predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Researchers have developed computational approaches and machine learning algorithms to accurately obtain clinically useful information from genomic and transcriptomic sequencing data from bulk tissue or single cells and explore tumours and their microenvironment. The rapid growth in sequencing and computational approaches has resulted in the unmet need to understand their true potential and limitations in enabling improvements in the management of patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapies. In this Review, we describe the computational approaches currently available to analyse bulk tissue and single-cell sequencing data from cancer, stromal and immune cells, as well as how best to select the most appropriate tool to address various clinical questions and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.

Utilizing immunogenomic approaches to prioritize targetable neoantigens for personalized cancer immunotherapy

Advancements in sequencing technologies and bioinformatics algorithms have expanded our ability to identify tumor-specific somatic mutation-derived antigens (neoantigens). While recent studies have shown neoantigens to be compelling targets for cancer immunotherapy due to their foreign nature and high immunogenicity, the need for increasingly accurate and cost-effective approaches to rapidly identify neoantigens remains a challenging task, but essential for successful cancer immunotherapy. Currently, gene expression analysis and algorithms for variant calling can be used to generate lists of mutational profiles across patients, but more care is needed to curate these lists and prioritize the candidate neoantigens most capable of inducing an immune response. A growing amount of evidence suggests that only a handful of somatic mutations predicted by mutational profiling approaches act as immunogenic neoantigens. Hence, unbiased screening of all candidate neoantigens predicted by Whole Genome Sequencing/Whole Exome Sequencing may be necessary to more comprehensively access the full spectrum of immunogenic neoepitopes. Once putative cancer neoantigens are identified, one of the largest bottlenecks in translating these neoantigens into actionable targets for cell-based therapies is identifying the cognate T cell receptors (TCRs) capable of recognizing these neoantigens. While many TCR-directed screening and validation assays have utilized bulk samples in the past, there has been a recent surge in the number of single-cell assays that provide a more granular understanding of the factors governing TCR-pMHC interactions. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of existing strategies to identify candidate neoantigens using genomics-based approaches and methods for assessing neoantigen immunogenicity. Additionally, applications, prospects, and limitations of some of the current single-cell technologies will be discussed. Finally, we will briefly summarize some of the recent models that have been used to predict TCR antigen specificity and analyze the TCR receptor repertoire.

Structural basis for T cell recognition of cancer neoantigens and implications for predicting neoepitope immunogenicity

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) with tumor-specific T cells has been shown to mediate durable cancer regression. Tumor-specific T cells are also the basis of other therapies, notably cancer vaccines. The main target of tumor-specific T cells are neoantigens resulting from mutations in self-antigens over the course of malignant transformation. The detection of neoantigens presents a major challenge to T cells because of their high structural similarity to self-antigens, and the need to avoid autoimmunity. How different a neoantigen must be from its wild-type parent for it to induce a T cell response is poorly understood. Here we review recent structural and biophysical studies of T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of shared cancer neoantigens derived from oncogenes, including p53R175H, KRASG12D, KRASG12V, HHATp8F, and PIK3CAH1047L. These studies have revealed that, in some cases, the oncogenic mutation improves antigen presentation by strengthening peptide-MHC binding. In other cases, the mutation is detected by direct interactions with TCR, or by energetically driven or other indirect strategies not requiring direct TCR contacts with the mutation. We also review antibodies designed to recognize peptide-MHC on cell surfaces (TCR-mimic antibodies) as an alternative to TCRs for targeting cancer neoantigens. Finally, we review recent computational advances in this area, including efforts to predict neoepitope immunogenicity and how these efforts may be advanced by structural information on peptide-MHC binding and peptide-MHC recognition by TCRs.

Computational Methods in Immunology and Vaccinology: Design and Development of Antibodies and Immunogens

The design of new biomolecules able to harness immune mechanisms for the treatment of diseases is a prime challenge for computational and simulative approaches. For instance, in recent years, antibodies have emerged as an important class of therapeutics against a spectrum of pathologies. In cancer, immune-inspired approaches are witnessing a surge thanks to a better understanding of tumor-associated antigens and the mechanisms of their engagement or evasion from the human immune system. Here, we provide a summary of the main state-of-the-art computational approaches that are used to design antibodies and antigens, and in parallel, we review key methodologies for epitope identification for both B- and T-cell mediated responses. A special focus is devoted to the description of structure- and physics-based models, privileged over purely sequence-based approaches. We discuss the implications of novel methods in engineering biomolecules with tailored immunological properties for possible therapeutic uses. Finally, we highlight the extraordinary challenges and opportunities presented by the possible integration of structure- and physics-based methods with emerging Artificial Intelligence technologies for the prediction and design of novel antigens, epitopes, and antibodies.