Agonist-selective NOP receptor phosphorylation correlates in vitro and in vivo and reveals differential post-activation signaling by chemically diverse agonists

Septo-hypothalamic regulation of binge-like alcohol consumption by the nociceptin system

High-intensity alcohol drinking during binge episodes contributes to the socioeconomic burden created by alcohol use disorders (AUDs), and nociceptin receptor (NOP) antagonists have emerged as a promising intervention. To better understand the contribution of the NOP system to binge drinking, we found that nociceptin-containing neurons of the lateral septum (LSPnoc) displayed increased excitability during withdrawal from binge-like alcohol drinking. LSPnoc activation promoted active avoidance and potentiated binge-like drinking behavior, whereas silencing of this population reduced alcohol drinking. LSPnoc form robust monosynaptic inputs locally within the LS and genetic deletion of NOP or microinjection of a NOP antagonist into the LS decreased alcohol intake. LSPnoc also project to the lateral hypothalamus and supramammillary nucleus of the hypothalamus, and genetic deletion of NOP from each site reduced alcohol drinking. Together, these findings implicate the septo-hypothalamic nociceptin system in excessive alcohol consumption and support NOP antagonist development for the treatment of AUD.

Non-canonical signaling initiated by hormone-responsive G protein-coupled receptors from subcellular compartments

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of membrane receptors in the mammalian genomes, regulate almost all known physiological processes by transducing numerous extracellular stimuli including almost two-thirds of endogenous hormones and neurotransmitters. The traditional view held that GPCR signaling occurs exclusively at the cell surface, where the receptors bind with the ligands and undergo conformational changes to recruit and activate heterotrimeric G proteins. However, with the application of advanced biochemical and biophysical techniques, this conventional model is challenged by the elucidation of spatiotemporal GPCR activation with the evidence that receptors can signal from subcellular compartments to exhibit various molecular and cellular responses with physiological and pathophysiological relevance. Thus, this 'location bias' of GPCR signaling has become another layer of complexity of GPCR signal transduction. In this review, we generally introduce the development of the concept of compartmentalized GPCR signaling and comprehensively summarize the receptors reported to be localized on the membranes of different intracellular organelles. We review the physiological functions of these compartmentalized GPCRs with emphasis on some well-characterized prototypical hormone/neurotransmitter-binding receptors, including β2-adrenergic receptor, opioid receptors, parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor, cannabinoid receptor type 1, and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, as examples. In addition, the therapeutic implications of compartmentalized GPCR signaling by introducing lipophilic or hydrophilic ligands for intracellular targeting, lipid conjugation anchor drugs, and strategy to modulate receptor internalization/resensitization, are highlighted and open new avenues in GPCR pharmacology and therapeutics.

Acute single non-sedative doses of NOP receptor agonists affect acquisition of object location memory but repeated high doses do not induce long-lasting deficits

The Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) system has been shown to modulate various aspects of long-term memory. It is therefore important to study the effects on memory impairment by nociceptin receptor (NOP) agonists under preclinical development. In the present study, we investigated the effect of systemic injection of two small molecule selective NOP agonists, AT-202 and AT-524, in the object location memory task in male and female mice. Since high doses of NOP agonists have been shown to induce sedation, we first determined the sedative doses for the two compounds and found them to be higher in female than in male mice. We then observed that sub-sedative doses of NOP agonists administered before learning, induced memory impairment during a test session performed 24 h later. Again, female mice were less sensitive to the amnesic effects than males. On the contrary, in male mice, NOP agonists did not produce amnesia when they were injected after learning, suggesting that they do not affect the consolidation of object location memory. Finally, repeated administration of high doses of NOP agonists over 7 days did not impair long-term spatial memory. Together, our data show for the first time that NOP receptor agonists impair the acquisition of object location memory with sex-dependent potency but do not affect memory consolidation, and that repeated stimulation of the receptor does not compromise long-term episodic-like spatial memory.

Heterodimerization of apelin and opioid receptor-like 1 receptors mediates apelin-13-induced G protein biased signaling

The apelin receptor (APJ) and the opioid-related nociceptin receptor 1 (ORL1) are family A G protein-coupled receptors that participate in a variety of physiological processes. The distribution and function of APJ and ORL1 in the nervous system and peripheral tissues are similar; however, the detailed mechanism of how these two receptors modulate signaling and physiological effects remains unclear. Here, we examined whether APJ and ORL1 form dimers, and investigated signal transduction pathways. The endogenous co-expression of APJ and ORL1 in SH-SY5Y cells was confirmed by western blotting and RT-PCR. Bioluminescence and fluorescence resonance energy transfer assays, as well as a proximity ligation assay and co-immunoprecipitation experiments, demonstrated that APJ and ORL1 heterodimerize in HEK293 cells. We found that the APJ-ORL1 heterodimer is selectively activated by apelin-13, which causes the dimer to couple to Gαi proteins and reduce the recruitment of GRKs and β-arrestins to the dimer. We showed that the APJ-ORL1 dimer exhibits biased signaling, in which G protein-dependent signaling pathways override β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. Our results demonstrate that the structural interface of the APJ-ORL1 dimer switches from transmembrane domain TM1/TM2 in the inactive state to TM5 in the active state. We used mutational analysis and BRET assays to identify key residues in TM5 (APJ L218^5.55, APJ I224^5.61, and ORL1 L229^5.52) responsible for the receptor-receptor interaction. These results provide important information on the APJ-ORL1 heterodimer and may assist the design of new drugs targeting biased signaling pathways for treatment of pain and cardiovascular and metabolic diseases.

In situ visualization of opioid and cannabinoid drug effects using phosphosite-specific GPCR antibodies

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important signal transducers that are phosphorylated upon activation at intracellular serine and threonine residues. Although antibodies that specifically recognize the phosphorylation state of GPCRs have been available for many years, efficient immunolocalization of phosphorylated receptors in their tissues of origin has not been possible. Here, we show that phosphorylation of receptors is highly unstable during routine immunohistochemical procedures, requiring the use of appropriate phosphatase inhibitors particular during tissue perfusion, post-fixation, and cryoprotection but not during immunostaining of tissue sections. We provide proof of concept using phosphorylation state-specific μ-opioid receptor (MOP) and cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) antibodies. Indeed, three of four well-characterized phosphosite-specific MOP antibodies, including pS375-MOP, pT376-MOP, and pT379-MOP, showed robust neuronal immunostaining in brain and spinal cord sections of opioid-treated mice only after inclusion of phosphatase inhibitors. We then extended this approach to the CB1 receptor and demonstrated that one of three newly-generated phosphosite-specific CB1 antibodies, namely pS425-CB1, showed striking staining of fibers and varicosities in brain slices from cannabinoid-treated mice. Although subsequent experiments showed that phospho-CB1 immunostaining was less sensitive to phosphatases, we conclude that the use of phosphatase inhibitors should always be considered in the development of immunohistochemical procedures for new phosphosite-specific GPCR antibodies. In summary, we anticipate that this improved protocol will facilitate the widespread use of phosphorylation state-specific antibodies to monitor the activation of endogenous GPCRs under physiological and pharmacological conditions. Our approach may also prove useful to confirm target engagement of GPCR drug candidates in native tissues.

Biased Agonism: Lessons from Studies of Opioid Receptor Agonists

In ligand bias different agonist drugs are thought to produce distinct signaling outputs when activating the same receptor. If these signaling outputs mediate therapeutic versus adverse drug effects, then agonists that selectively activate the therapeutic signaling pathway would be extremely beneficial. It has long been thought that μ-opioid receptor agonists that selectively activate G protein- over β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways would produce effective analgesia without the adverse effects such as respiratory depression. However, more recent data indicate that most of the therapeutic and adverse effects of agonist-induced activation of the μ-opioid receptor are actually mediated by the G protein-dependent signaling pathway, and that a number of drugs described as G protein biased in fact may not be biased, but instead may be low-intrinsic-efficacy agonists. In this review we discuss the current state of the field of bias at the μ-opioid receptor and other opioid receptor subtypes.

A bead-based GPCR phosphorylation immunoassay for high-throughput ligand profiling and GRK inhibitor screening

Analysis of agonist-driven phosphorylation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can provide valuable insights into the receptor activation state and ligand pharmacology. However, to date, assessment of GPCR phosphorylation using high-throughput applications has been challenging. We have developed and validated a bead-based immunoassay for the quantitative assessment of agonist-induced GPCR phosphorylation that can be performed entirely in multiwell cell culture plates. The assay involves immunoprecipitation of affinity-tagged receptors using magnetic beads followed by protein detection using phosphorylation state-specific and phosphorylation state-independent anti-GPCR antibodies. As proof of concept, five prototypical GPCRs (MOP, C5a1, D1, SST2, CB2) were treated with different agonizts and antagonists, and concentration-response curves were generated. We then extended our approach to establish selective cellular GPCR kinase (GRK) inhibitor assays, which led to the rapid identification of a selective GRK5/6 inhibitor (LDC8988) and a highly potent pan-GRK inhibitor (LDC9728). In conclusion, this versatile GPCR phosphorylation assay can be used extensively for ligand profiling and inhibitor screening.

A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) phosphorylation assay for cell culture plates can be used for ligand profiling and inhibitor screening, as evidenced by the identification of two GRK inhibitor compounds.

How Arrestins and GRKs Regulate the Function of Long Chain Fatty Acid Receptors

FFA1 and FFA4, two G protein-coupled receptors that are activated by long chain fatty acids, play crucial roles in mediating many biological functions in the body. As a result, these fatty acid receptors have gained considerable attention due to their potential to be targeted for the treatment of type-2 diabetes. However, the relative contribution of canonical G protein-mediated signalling versus the effects of agonist-induced phosphorylation and interactions with β-arrestins have yet to be fully defined. Recently, several reports have highlighted the ability of β-arrestins and GRKs to interact with and modulate different functions of both FFA1 and FFA4, suggesting that it is indeed important to consider these interactions when studying the roles of FFA1 and FFA4 in both normal physiology and in different disease settings. Here, we discuss what is currently known and show the importance of understanding fully how β-arrestins and GRKs regulate the function of long chain fatty acid receptors.

The M1 muscarinic receptor is present in situ as a ligand-regulated mixture of monomers and oligomeric complexes

Although it is appreciated that members of the large family of rhodopsin-like cell surface receptors can form dimeric or larger protein complexes when expressed at high levels in cultured cells, their organizational state within native cells and tissues of the body is largely unknown. We assessed this in neurons of the central nervous system by replacing the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in mice with a form of this receptor with an added fluorescent protein. Receptor function was unaltered by this change, and the biophysical approach we used demonstrated that the receptor exists as a mixture of monomers and dimers or oligomers. Drug treatments that target this receptor promote its monomerization, which may have significance for receptor function.

The quaternary organization of rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors in native tissues is unknown. To address this we generated mice in which the M₁ muscarinic acetylcholine receptor was replaced with a C-terminally monomeric enhanced green fluorescent protein (mEGFP)–linked variant. Fluorescence imaging of brain slices demonstrated appropriate regional distribution, and using both anti-M₁ and anti–green fluorescent protein antisera the expressed transgene was detected in both cortex and hippocampus only as the full-length polypeptide. M₁-mEGFP was expressed at levels equal to the M₁ receptor in wild-type mice and was expressed throughout cell bodies and projections in cultured neurons from these animals. Signaling and behavioral studies demonstrated M₁-mEGFP was fully active. Application of fluorescence intensity fluctuation spectrometry to regions of interest within M₁-mEGFP–expressing neurons quantified local levels of expression and showed the receptor was present as a mixture of monomers, dimers, and higher-order oligomeric complexes. Treatment with both an agonist and an antagonist ligand promoted monomerization of the M₁-mEGFP receptor. The quaternary organization of a class A G protein-coupled receptor in situ was directly quantified in neurons in this study, which answers the much-debated question of the extent and potential ligand-induced regulation of basal quaternary organization of such a receptor in native tissue when present at endogenous expression levels.

Attenuated G protein signaling and minimal receptor phosphorylation as a biochemical signature of low side-effect opioid analgesics

Multi-receptor targeting has been proposed as a promising strategy for the development of opioid analgesics with fewer side effects. Cebranopadol and AT-121 are prototypical bifunctional ligands targeting the nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptor (NOP) and µ-opioid receptor (MOP) that elicit potent analgesia in humans and nonhuman primates, respectively. Cebranopadol was reported to produce typical MOP-related side effects such as respiratory depression and reward, whereas AT-121 appeared to be devoid of these liabilities. However, the molecular basis underlying different side effect profiles in opioid analgesics remains unknown. Here, we examine agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation and G protein signaling profiles of a series of chemically diverse mixed MOP/NOP agonists, including cebranopadol and AT-121. We found that these compounds produce strikingly different MOP phosphorylation profiles. Cebranopadol, AT-034 and AT-324 stimulated extensive MOP phosphorylation, whereas AT-201 induced selective phosphorylation at S375 only. AT-121, on the other hand, did not promote any detectable MOP phosphorylation. Conversely, none of these compounds was able to elicit strong NOP phosphorylation and low NOP receptor phosphorylation correlated with partial agonism in a GIRK-channel assay. Our results suggest a close correlation between MOP receptor phosphorylation and side effect profile. Thus, bifunctional MOP/NOP opioid ligands combining low efficacy G protein signaling at both NOP and MOP with no detectable receptor phosphorylation appear to be devoid of side-effects such as respiratory depression, abuse liability or tolerance development, as with AT-121.

Therapeutic potential of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide (NOP) receptor modulators for treatment of traumatic brain injury, traumatic stress, and their co-morbidities

The nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptide (NOP) receptor is a member of the opioid receptor superfamily with N/OFQ as its endogenous agonist. Wide expression of the NOP receptor and N/OFQ, both centrally and peripherally, and their ability to modulate several biological functions has led to development of NOP receptor modulators by pharmaceutical companies as therapeutics, based upon their efficacy in preclinical models of pain, anxiety, depression, Parkinson's disease, and substance abuse. Both posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI) are debilitating conditions that significantly affect the quality of life of millions of people around the world. PTSD is often a consequence of TBI, and, especially for those deployed to, working and/or living in a war zone or are first responders, they are comorbid. PTSD and TBI share common symptoms, and negatively influence outcomes as comorbidities of the other. Unfortunately, a lack of effective therapies or therapeutic agents limits the long term quality of life for either TBI or PTSD patients. Ours, and other groups, demonstrated that PTSD and TBI preclinical models elicit changes in the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system, and that administration of NOP receptor ligands alleviated some of the neurobiological and behavioral changes induced by brain injury and/or traumatic stress exposure. Here we review the past and most recent progress on understanding the role of the N/OFQ-NOP receptor system in PTSD and TBI neurological and behavioral sequelae. There is still more to understand about this neuropeptide system in both PTSD and TBI, but current findings warrant further examination of the potential utility of NOP modulators as therapeutics for these disorders and their co-morbidities. We advocate the development of standards for common data elements (CDE) reporting for preclinical PTSD studies, similar to current preclinical TBI CDEs. That would provide for more standardized data collection and reporting to improve reproducibility, interpretation and data sharing across studies.

Knock-In Mouse Models to Investigate the Functions of Opioid Receptors in vivo

Due to their low expression levels, complex multi-pass transmembrane structure, and the current lack of highly specific antibodies, the assessment of endogenous G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) remains challenging. While most of the research regarding their functions was performed in heterologous systems overexpressing the receptor, recent advances in genetic engineering methods have allowed the generation of several unique mouse models. These animals proved to be useful to investigate numerous aspects underlying the physiological functions of GPCRs, including their endogenous expression, distribution, interactome, and trafficking processes. Given their significant pharmacological importance and central roles in the nervous system, opioid peptide receptors (OPr) are often referred to as prototypical receptors for the study of GPCR regulatory mechanisms. Although only a few GPCR knock-in mouse lines have thus far been generated, OPr are strikingly well represented with over 20 different knock-in models, more than half of which were developed within the last 5 years. In this review, we describe the arsenal of OPr (mu-, delta-, and kappa-opioid), as well as the opioid-related nociceptin/orphanin FQ (NOP) receptor knock-in mouse models that have been generated over the past years. We further highlight the invaluable contribution of such models to our understanding of the in vivo mechanisms underlying the regulation of OPr, which could be conceivably transposed to any other GPCR, as well as the limitations, future perspectives, and possibilities enabled by such tools.

GPCR kinase knockout cells reveal the impact of individual GRKs on arrestin binding and GPCR regulation

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate G proteins and undergo a complex regulation by interaction with GPCR kinases (GRKs) and the formation of receptor-arrestin complexes. However, the impact of individual GRKs on arrestin binding is not clear. We report the creation of eleven combinatorial HEK293 knockout cell clones lacking GRK2/3/5/6, including single, double, triple and the quadruple GRK knockout. Analysis of β-arrestin1/2 interactions for twelve GPCRs in our GRK knockout cells enables the differentiation of two main receptor subsets: GRK2/3-regulated and GRK2/3/5/6-regulated receptors. Furthermore, we identify GPCRs that interact with β-arrestins via the overexpression of specific GRKs even in the absence of agonists. Finally, using GRK knockout cells, PKC inhibitors and β-arrestin mutants, we present evidence for differential receptor-β-arrestin1/2 complex configurations mediated by selective engagement of kinases. We anticipate our GRK knockout platform to facilitate the elucidation of previously unappreciated details of GRK-specific GPCR regulation and β-arrestin complex formation.

Spotlight on Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptor in the Treatment of Pain

In our society today, pain has become a main source of strain on most individuals. It is crucial to develop novel treatments against pain while focusing on decreasing their adverse effects. Throughout the extent of development for new pain therapies, the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor (NOP receptor) has appeared to be an encouraging focal point. Concentrating on NOP receptor to treat chronic pain with limited range of unwanted effects serves as a suitable alternative to prototypical opioid morphine that could potentially lead to life-threatening effects caused by respiratory depression in overdose, as well as generate abuse and addiction. In addition to these harmful effects, the uprising opioid epidemic is responsible for becoming one of the most disastrous public health issues in the US. In this article, the contributing molecular and cellular structure in controlling the cellular trafficking of NOP receptor and studies that support the role of NOP receptor and its ligands in pain management are reviewed.

Pharmacological Characterization of Veldoreotide as a Somatostatin Receptor 4 Agonist

Veldoreotide, a somatostatin analogue, binds to the somatostatin receptors (SSTR) 2, 4, and 5. The current aim was to assess its pharmacological activity as an SSTR4 agonist. G-protein signaling was assessed using a fluorescence-based membrane potential assay in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells stably co-expressing G-protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium 2 channels and the individual SSTR2, SSTR4, and SSTR5, and in human BON-1 cells stably expressing these SSTRs. Veldoreotide effects on chromogranin A (CgA) secretion and cell proliferation were examined in BON-1 cells. In HEK293 transfected cells, veldoreotide showed a high efficacy for activating the SSTR4; octreotide and pasireotide had little activity (E_max, 99.5% vs. 27.4% and 52.0%, respectively). Veldoreotide also activated SSTR2 and SSTR5 (E_max, 98.4% and 96.9%, respectively). In BON-1 cells, veldoreotide activated SSTR2, SSTR4, and SSTR5 with high potency and efficacy. CgA secretion was decreased to a greater degree in the BON-1 cells expressing SSTR4 versus the cells expressing SSTR2 and SSTR5 (65.3% vs. 80.3% and 77.6%, respectively). In the BON-1 cells expressing SSTR4, veldoreotide inhibited cell proliferation more than somatostatin SS-14 (71.2% vs. 79.7%) and to a similar extent as the SSTR4 agonist J-2156 in the presence of SSTR2 and SSTR5 antagonists. Veldoreotide is a full agonist of SSTR2, SSTR4, and SSTR5.

Differential barcoding of opioid receptors trafficking

Over the past several years, studies have highlighted the δ-opioid receptor (DOPr) as a promising therapeutic target for chronic pain management. While exhibiting milder undesired effects than most currently prescribed opioids, its specific agonists elicit effective analgesic responses in numerous animal models of chronic pain, including inflammatory, neuropathic, diabetic, and cancer-related pain. However, as compared with the extensively studied μ-opioid receptor, the molecular mechanisms governing its trafficking remain elusive. Recent advances have denoted several significant particularities in the regulation of DOPr intracellular routing, setting it apart from the other members of the opioid receptor family. Although they share high homology, each opioid receptor subtype displays specific amino acid patterns potentially involved in the regulation of its trafficking. These precise motifs or "barcodes" are selectively recognized by regulatory proteins and therefore dictate several aspects of the itinerary of a receptor, including its anterograde transport, internalization, recycling, and degradation. With a specific focus on the regulation of DOPr trafficking, this review will discuss previously reported, as well as potential novel trafficking barcodes within the opioid and nociceptin/orphanin FQ opioid peptide receptors, and their impact in determining distinct interactomes and physiological responses.

Buprenorphine Increases HIV-1 Infection In Vitro but Does Not Reactivate HIV-1 from Latency

BACKGROUND

medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with buprenorphine is now widely prescribed to treat addiction to heroin and other illicit opioids. There is some evidence that illicit opioids enhance HIV-1 replication and accelerate AIDS pathogenesis, but the effect of buprenorphine is unknown.

METHODS

we obtained peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from healthy volunteers and cultured them in the presence of morphine, buprenorphine, or methadone. We infected the cells with a replication-competent CCR5-tropic HIV-1 reporter virus encoding a secreted nanoluciferase gene, and measured infection by luciferase activity in the supernatants over time. We also surveyed opioid receptor expression in PBMC, genital epithelial cells and other leukocytes by qPCR and western blotting. Reactivation from latency was assessed in J-Lat 11.1 and U1 cell lines.

RESULTS

we did not detect expression of classical opioid receptors in leukocytes, but did find nociception/orphanin FQ receptor (NOP) expression in blood and vaginal lymphocytes as well as genital epithelial cells. In PBMCs, we found that at physiological doses, morphine, and methadone had a variable or no effect on HIV infection, but buprenorphine treatment significantly increased HIV-1 infectivity (median: 8.797-fold increase with 20 nM buprenorphine, eight experiments, range: 3.570-691.9, p = 0.0078). Using latently infected cell lines, we did not detect reactivation of latent HIV following treatment with any of the opioid drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

our results suggest that buprenorphine, in contrast to morphine or methadone, increases the in vitro susceptibility of leukocytes to HIV-1 infection but has no effect on in vitro HIV reactivation. These findings contribute to our understanding how opioids, including those used for MAT, affect HIV infection and reactivation, and can help to inform the choice of MAT for people living with HIV or who are at risk of HIV infection.

Differential In Vitro Pharmacological Profiles of Structurally Diverse Nociceptin Receptor Agonists in Activating G Protein and Beta-Arrestin Signaling at the Human Nociceptin Opioid Receptor

Agonists at the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP) are under investigation as therapeutics for nonaddicting analgesia, opioid use disorder, Parkinson's disease, and other indications. NOP full and partial agonists have both been of interest, particularly since NOP partial agonists show a reduced propensity for behavioral disruption than NOP full agonists. Here, we investigated the in vitro pharmacological properties of chemically diverse NOP receptor agonists in assays measuring functional activation of the NOP receptor such as guanosine 5'-O-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTPγS) binding, cAMP inhibition, G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channel activation, phosphorylation, β-arrestin recruitment and receptor internalization. When normalized to the efficacy of the natural agonist nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), we found that different functional assays that measure intrinsic activity produce inconsistent levels of agonist efficacy, particularly for ligands that were partial agonists. Agonist efficacy obtained in the GTPγS assay tended to be lower than that in the cAMP and GIRK assays. These structurally diverse NOP agonists also showed differential receptor phosphorylation profiles at the phosphosites we examined and induced varying levels of receptor internalization. Interestingly, although the rank order for β-arrestin recruitment by these NOP agonists was consistent with their ability to induce receptor internalization, their phosphorylation signatures at the time point we investigated were not indicative of the levels of β-arrestin recruitment or internalization induced by these agonists. It is possible that other phosphorylation sites, yet to be identified, drive the recruitment of NOP receptor ensembles and subsequent receptor trafficking by some nonpeptide NOP agonists. These findings potentially help understand NOP agonist pharmacology in the context of ligand-activated receptor trafficking. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Chemically diverse agonist ligands at the nociceptin opioid receptor G protein-coupled receptor showed differential efficacy for activating downstream events after receptor binding, in a suite of functional assays measuring guanosine 5'-O-[gamma-thio]triphosphate binding, cAMP inhibition, G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying protein channel activation, β-arrestin recruitment, receptor internalization and receptor phosphorylation. These analyses provide a context for understanding nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP) agonist pharmacology driven by ligand-induced differential NOP receptor signaling.

Comprehensive overview of biased pharmacology at the opioid receptors: biased ligands and bias factors

One of the main challenges in contemporary medicinal chemistry is the development of safer analgesics, used in the treatment of pain. Currently, moderate to severe pain is still treated with the "gold standard" opioids whose long-term often leads to severe side effects. With the discovery of biased agonism, the importance of this area of pharmacology has grown exponentially over the past decade. Of these side effects, tolerance, opioid misuse, physical dependence and substance use disorder (SUD) stand out, since these have led to many deaths over the past decades in both USA and Europe. New therapeutic molecules that induce a biased response at the opioid receptors (MOR, DOR, KOR and NOP receptor) are able to circumvent these side effects and, consequently, serve as more advantageous therapies with great promise. The concept of biased signaling extends far beyond the already sizeable field of GPCR pharmacology and covering everything would be vastly outside the scope of this review which consequently covers the biased ligands acting at the opioid family of receptors. The limitation of quantifying bias, however, makes this a controversial subject, where it is dependent on the reference ligand, the equation or the assay used for the quantification. Hence, the major issue in the field of biased ligands remains the translation of the in vitro profiles of biased signaling, with corresponding bias factors to in vivo profiles showing the presence or the lack of specific side effects. This review comprises a comprehensive overview of biased ligands in addition to their bias factors at individual members of the opioid family of receptors, as well as bifunctional ligands.

Compartment-specific opioid receptor signaling is selectively modulated by different dynorphin peptides

Many signal transduction systems have an apparent redundancy built into them, where multiple physiological agonists activate the same receptors. Whether this is true redundancy, or whether this provides an as-yet unrecognized specificity in downstream signaling, is not well understood. We address this question using the kappa opioid receptor (KOR), a physiologically relevant G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that is activated by multiple members of the Dynorphin family of opioid peptides. We show that two related peptides, Dynorphin A and Dynorphin B, bind and activate KOR to similar extents in mammalian neuroendocrine cells and rat striatal neurons, but localize KOR to distinct intracellular compartments and drive different post-endocytic fates of the receptor. Strikingly, localization of KOR to the degradative pathway by Dynorphin A induces sustained KOR signaling from these compartments. Our results suggest that seemingly redundant endogenous peptides can fine-tune signaling by regulating the spatiotemporal profile of KOR signaling.

New phosphosite-specific antibodies to unravel the role of GRK phosphorylation in dopamine D2 receptor regulation and signaling

The dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) is the target of drugs used to treat the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and schizophrenia. The D₂R is regulated through its interaction with and phosphorylation by G protein receptor kinases (GRKs) and interaction with arrestins. More recently, D₂R arrestin-mediated signaling has been shown to have distinct physiological functions to those of G protein signalling. Relatively little is known regarding the patterns of D₂R phosphorylation that might control these processes. We aimed to generate antibodies specific for intracellular D₂R phosphorylation sites to facilitate the investigation of these mechanisms. We synthesised double phosphorylated peptides corresponding to regions within intracellular loop 3 of the hD₂R and used them to raise phosphosite-specific antibodies to capture a broad screen of GRK-mediated phosphorylation. We identify an antibody specific to a GRK2/3 phosphorylation site in intracellular loop 3 of the D₂R. We compared measurements of D₂R phosphorylation with other measurements of D₂R signalling to profile selected D₂R agonists including previously described biased agonists. These studies demonstrate the utility of novel phosphosite-specific antibodies to investigate D₂R regulation and signalling.

Functional Selectivity Does Not Predict Antinociceptive/Locomotor Impairing Potencies of NOP Receptor Agonists

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ controls several functions, including pain transmission, via stimulation of the N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor. Here we tested the hypothesis that NOP biased agonism may be instrumental for identifying innovative analgesics. In vitro experiments were performed with the dynamic mass redistribution label free assay and the NOP non-peptide agonists Ro 65-6570, AT-403 and MCOPPB. In vivo studies were performed in wild type and β-arrestin 2 knockout mice using the formalin, rotarod and locomotor activity tests. In vitro all compounds mimicked the effects of N/OFQ behaving as potent NOP full agonists. In vivo Ro 65-6570 demonstrated a slightly higher therapeutic index (antinociceptive vs. motor impairment effects) in knockout mice. However, all NOP agonists displayed very similar therapeutic index in normal mice despite significant differences in G protein biased agonism. In conclusion the different ability of inducing G protein vs. β-arrestin 2 recruitment of a NOP agonist cannot be applied to predict its antinociceptive vs. motor impairment properties.

GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors

Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.

How GPCR Phosphorylation Patterns Orchestrate Arrestin-Mediated Signaling

Binding of arrestin to phosphorylated G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls many aspects of cell signaling. The number and arrangement of phosphates may vary substantially for a given GPCR, and different phosphorylation patterns trigger different arrestin-mediated effects. Here, we determine how GPCR phosphorylation influences arrestin behavior by using atomic-level simulations and site-directed spectroscopy to reveal the effects of phosphorylation patterns on arrestin binding and conformation. We find that patterns favoring binding differ from those favoring activation-associated conformational change. Both binding and conformation depend more on arrangement of phosphates than on their total number, with phosphorylation at different positions sometimes exerting opposite effects. Phosphorylation patterns selectively favor a wide variety of arrestin conformations, differently affecting arrestin sites implicated in scaffolding distinct signaling proteins. We also reveal molecular mechanisms of these phenomena. Our work reveals the structural basis for the long-standing "barcode" hypothesis and has important implications for design of functionally selective GPCR-targeted drugs.

GRKs as Key Modulators of Opioid Receptor Function

Understanding the link between agonist-induced phosphorylation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and the associated physiological effects is critical for the development of novel analgesic drugs and is particularly important for understanding the mechanisms responsible for opioid-induced tolerance and addiction. The family of G protein receptor kinases (GRKs) play a pivotal role in such processes, mediating phosphorylation of residues at the C-tail of opioid receptors. Numerous strategies, such as phosphosite specific antibodies and mass spectrometry have allowed the detection of phosphorylated residues and the use of mutant knock-in mice have shed light on the role of GRK regulation in opioid receptor physiology. Here we review our current understanding on the role of GRKs in the actions of opioid receptors, with a particular focus on the MOR, the target of most commonly used opioid analgesics such as morphine or fentanyl.

Biased Agonism at Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ Receptors: A Structure Activity Study on N/OFQ(1-13)-NH2

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) controls different biological functions via selective stimulation of the N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor. The pleiotropic actions of N/OFQ may limit the development of NOP ligands as innovative drugs in different therapeutic areas. The pharmacological concept of functional selectivity (aka biased agonism) might be useful for amplifying beneficial actions and/or counteracting side effects. Thus, molecules with large bias factors toward G protein or β arrestin are required for investigating the translational value of NOP biased modulation. Herein, the biased behavior of a heterogeneous library of NOP-targeting peptide derivatives was evaluated in vitro with the aim to provide possible insights into the structural determinants that govern the selective activation of G protein versus β-arrestin. Our results demonstrate that lipidation of N/OFQ(1-13)-NH2 is a useful strategy for obtaining G protein biased agonists for the NOP receptor.

Biased Opioid Ligands

Achieving effective pain management is one of the major challenges associated with modern day medicine. Opioids, such as morphine, have been the reference treatment for moderate to severe acute pain not excluding chronic pain modalities. Opioids act through the opioid receptors, the family of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate pain relief through both the central and peripheral nervous systems. Four types of opioid receptors have been described, including the μ-opioid receptor (MOR), κ-opioid receptor (KOR), δ-opioid receptor (DOR), and the nociceptin opioid peptide receptor (NOP receptor). Despite the proven success of opioids in treating pain, there are still some inherent limitations. All clinically approved MOR analgesics are associated with adverse effects, which include tolerance, dependence, addiction, constipation, and respiratory depression. On the other hand, KOR selective analgesics have found limited clinical utility because they cause sedation, anxiety, dysphoria, and hallucinations. DOR agonists have also been investigated but they have a tendency to cause convulsions. Ligands targeting NOP receptor have been reported in the preclinical literature to be useful as spinal analgesics and as entities against substance abuse disorders while mixed MOR/NOP receptor agonists are useful as analgesics. Ultimately, the goal of opioid-related drug development has always been to design and synthesize derivatives that are equally or more potent than morphine but most importantly are devoid of the dangerous residual side effects and abuse potential. One proposed strategy is to take advantage of biased agonism, in which distinct downstream pathways can be activated by different molecules working through the exact same receptor. It has been proposed that ligands not recruiting β-arrestin 2 or showing a preference for activating a specific G-protein mediated signal transduction pathway will function as safer analgesic across all opioid subtypes. This review will focus on the design and the pharmacological outcomes of biased ligands at the opioid receptors, aiming at achieving functional selectivity.

Post-translational Modifications of Opioid Receptors

Post-translational modifications (PTMs) are key events in signal transduction since they affect protein function by regulating their abundance and/or activity. PTMs involve the covalent attachment of functional groups to specific amino acids. Since they tend to be generally reversible, PTMs serve as regulators of signal transduction pathways. G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are major signaling proteins that undergo multiple types of PTMs. In this Review, we focus on the opioid receptors, members of GPCR family A, and highlight recent advances in the field that have underscored the importance of PTMs in the functional regulation of these receptors. Since opioid receptor activity plays a central role in the development of tolerance and addiction to morphine and other drugs of abuse, understanding the molecular mechanisms regulating receptor activity is of fundamental importance.

Agonist-induced phosphorylation bar code and differential post-activation signaling of the delta opioid receptor revealed by phosphosite-specific antibodies

The δ-opioid receptor (DOP) is an attractive pharmacological target due to its potent analgesic, anxiolytic and anti-depressant activity in chronic pain models. However, some but not all selective DOP agonists also produce severe adverse effects such as seizures. Thus, the development of novel agonists requires a profound understanding of their effects on DOP phosphorylation, post-activation signaling and dephosphorylation. Here we show that agonist-induced DOP phosphorylation at threonine 361 (T361) and serine 363 (S363) proceeds with a temporal hierarchy, with S363 as primary site of phosphorylation. This phosphorylation is mediated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases 2 and 3 (GRK2/3) followed by DOP endocytosis and desensitization. DOP dephosphorylation occurs within minutes and is predominantly mediated by protein phosphatases (PP) 1α and 1β. A comparison of structurally diverse DOP agonists and clinically used opioids demonstrated high correlation between G protein-dependent signaling efficacies and receptor internalization. In vivo, DOP agonists induce receptor phosphorylation in a dose-dependent and agonist-selective manner that could be blocked by naltrexone in DOP-eGFP mice. Together, our studies provide novel tools and insights for ligand-activated DOP signaling in vitro and in vivo and suggest that DOP agonist efficacies may determine receptor post-activation signaling.

Acute Elevations in Cortisol Increase the In Vivo Binding of [11C]NOP-1A to Nociceptin Receptors: A Novel Imaging Paradigm to Study the Interaction Between Stress- and Antistress-Regulating Neuropeptides

BACKGROUND

An imbalance between neuropeptides that promote stress and resilience, such as corticotropin-releasing factor and nociceptin, has been postulated to underlie relapse in addiction. The objective of this study was to develop a paradigm to image the in vivo interaction between stress-promoting neuropeptides and nociceptin (NOP) receptors in humans.

METHODS

[11C]NOP-1A positron emission tomography was used to measure the binding to NOP receptors at baseline (BASE) and following an intravenous hydrocortisone challenge (CORT) in 19 healthy control subjects. Hydrocortisone was used as a challenge because in microdialysis studies it has been shown to increase corticotropin-releasing factor release in extrahypothalamic brain regions such as the amygdala. [11C]NOP-1A total distribution volume (VT) in 11 regions of interest were measured using a 2-tissue compartment kinetic analysis. The primary outcome measure was hydrocortisone-induced ΔVT calculated as (VT CORT - VT BASE)/VT BASE.

RESULTS

Hydrocortisone led to an acute increase in plasma cortisol levels. Regional [11C]NOP-1A VT was on average 11% to 16% higher in the post-hydrocortisone condition compared with the baseline condition (linear mixed model, condition, p = .005; region, p < .001; condition × region, p < .001). Independent Student's t tests in all regions of interest were statistically significant and survived multiple comparison correction. Hydrocortisone-induced ΔVT was significantly negatively correlated with baseline VT in several regions of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrocortisone administration increases NOP receptor availability. Increased NOP in response to elevated cortisol might suggest a compensatory mechanism in the brain to counteract corticotropin-releasing factor and/or stress. The [11C]NOP-1A and hydrocortisone imaging paradigm should allow for the examination of interactions between stress-promoting neuropeptides and NOP in addictive disorders.