Comparative activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate, and sulbactam combined with ampicillin and broad-spectrum penicillins against defined beta-lactamase-producing aerobic gram-negative bacilli

Drug repurposing screens and synergistic drug-combinations for infectious diseases

Infectious diseases account for nearly one fifth of the worldwide death toll every year. The continuous increase of drug-resistant pathogens is a big challenge for treatment of infectious diseases. In addition, outbreaks of infections and new pathogens are potential threats to public health. Lack of effective treatments for drug-resistant bacteria and recent outbreaks of Ebola and Zika viral infections have become a global public health concern. The number of newly approved antibiotics has decreased significantly in the last two decades compared with previous decades. In parallel with this, is an increase in the number of drug-resistant bacteria. For these threats and challenges to be countered, new strategies and technology platforms are critically needed. Drug repurposing has emerged as an alternative approach for rapid identification of effective therapeutics to treat the infectious diseases. For treatment of severe infections, synergistic drug combinations using approved drugs identified from drug repurposing screens is a useful option which may overcome the problem of weak activity of individual drugs. Collaborative efforts including government, academic researchers and private drug industry can facilitate the translational research to produce more effective new therapeutic agents such as narrow spectrum antibiotics against drug-resistant bacteria for these global challenges.

LINKED ARTICLES

This article is part of a themed section on Inventing New Therapies Without Reinventing the Wheel: The Power of Drug Repurposing. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v175.2/issuetoc.

Pulmonary penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam in critically ill patients

Pulmonary infections in critically ill patients are common and are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Piperacillin–tazobactam is a frequently used therapy in critically ill patients with pulmonary infection. Antibiotic concentrations in the lung reflect target‐site antibiotic concentrations in patients with pneumonia. The aim of this study was to assess the plasma and intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics (PK) of piperacillin–tazobactam in critically ill patients administered standard piperacillin–tazobactam regimens. A population PK model was developed to describe plasma and intrapulmonary piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations. The probability of piperacillin exposures reaching pharmacodynamic end points and the impact of pulmonary permeability on piperacillin and tazobactam pulmonary penetration was explored. The median piperacillin and tazobactam pulmonary penetration ratios were 49.3 and 121.2%, respectively. Pulmonary piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations were unpredictable and negatively correlated with pulmonary permeability. Current piperacillin–tazobactam regimens may be insufficient to treat pneumonia caused by piperacillin–tazobactam–susceptible organisms in some critically ill patients.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2014); 96 4, 438–448. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.131

In vitro activity of ampicillin, cefoperazone, their combinations with sulbactam and other antimicrobials: survey of Russian isolates

Methodological differences makes it difficult to compare results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing obtained in Russia and in other regions. During the period from October 1993 to May 1994 susceptibility of 1296 isolates of bacteria was investigated according to NCCLS standards by the broth microdilution method. The order of activity of antibiotics against Gram-negative bacteria based on percent of susceptible strains from common hospitals were: amikacin (98%) > ciprofloxacin (93%) = imipenem (93%) > cefoperazone/sulbactam (92%) > ceftazidime (89%) > ceftriaxone (81%) > cefotaxime (80%) > cefoperazone (77%) > gentamicin (71%) > ampicillin/sulbactam (51%) > cefazoline (45%) > ampicillin (25%). The order of activity against strains from teaching hospitals was similar but the percent of susceptible strains was 10-20% less for the majority of antibiotics. The susceptibility level of Gram-negative isolates from Moscow teaching hospitals is lower than from Northern America and Europe. Ampicillln/sulbactam and cefoperazone/sulbactam, as well as other cephalosporins, demonstrated high activity against methicillin-susceptible staphylococci and penicillin-susceptible pneumococci. B-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations were active against 100% strains of anaerobic bacteria.

Microcalorimetric evaluation of the in vitro compatibility of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid and ampicillin/sulbactam with ciprofloxacin

Solution calorimetric technique has been used to determine the compatibility of binary and ternary systems of ampicillin trihydrate (AMP), sulbactam sodium (SS), amoxicillin trihydrate (AM), potassium clavulanate (PC) and ciprofloxacin hydrochloride (CP). The enthalpy of solution (DeltasolH) were obtained over a wide range of composition in the pH range 2-9. For all the pure drugs the DeltasolH is endothermic in nature. The molar enthalpies of interaction of binary (DeltaHbi.E) and ternary (DeltaHter.E) mixtures of the drugs in aqueous buffers have been determined. The DeltaHbi.E for all binary systems is negative and pH dependent (maximum pH 6-8) indicating the interaction among charged species of the drugs. In case of binary systems with CP the magnitude of DeltaHbi.E indicate strong interactions. The variation and magnitude of DeltaHbi.E for the systems is discussed in terms of hydrogen bonding and van der Waal's interaction in the solution. The interaction parameter for ternary systems (A) is positive indicating repulsive interaction among the drugs. The coefficients hi's calculated from Redlich-Kister equation for binary systems (DeltaHbi.E) and ternary interaction parameter (A) were used to predict the compatibility of the marketed formulations in pH range studied.

Impact of tazobactam pharmacokinetics on the antimicrobial effect of piperacillin–tazobactam combinations

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling was used to study the impact of the pharmacokinetics of tazobactam on the antimicrobial effect of piperacillin-tazobactam combinations. An in vitro experiment using a novel dilution system was performed to compare the effects of two conditions of the combination therapy against Escherichia coli ATCC35218, a beta-lactamase producing bacterium. Both conditions simulated the same initial concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam, but different elimination half-lives for tazobactam. The killing and regrowth kinetics of E. coli clearly indicated that there is a difference in the antimicrobial effects when there is a difference in the pharmacokinetics of tazobactam in the combination therapy. The results show that for equal piperacillin exposure, different tazobactam half-lives will have a significant effect on antimicrobial outcome.

Treatment of nosocomial postoperative pneumonia in cancer patients: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial pneumonia continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality in cancer patients.

METHODS

In an attempt to find an optimal treatment for this infection, nonneutropenic cancer patients with postoperative nosocomial pneumonia were randomized to receive either piperacillin/tazobactam (P/T) 4.5 g i.v. every 6 hours (30 patients) or clindamycin (Cl) 900 mg plus aztreonam (Az) 2 g i.v. every 8 hours (22 patients). Amikacin 500 mg i.v. every 12 hours was given to all patients for the first 48 hours.

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable for the characteristics of pneumonia that included gram-negative etiology and duration of intubation. Response rates were 83% for patients who received P/T and 86% for those who received Cl/Az (P > .99). There were no serious adverse events; however, at our center the cost of the P/T regimen was $73.86 compared with $99.15 for the Cl/Az regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The two regimens had comparable high efficacy, and P/T had a slight cost advantage. Either of these antibiotic regimens combined with an aminoglycoside could lead to favorable outcome in cancer patients at high risk for nosocomial pneumonia.

New advances in the use of antimicrobial agents in surgery: intra-abdominal infections

Advances in both technical methods and antimicrobial therapy have significantly reduced morbidity and mortality for secondary (enterogenous) or community-acquired intra-abdominal infections. Presumptive antimicrobial therapy for most community-acquired intra-abdominal infection can be safely initiated with a single broad-spectrum antimicrobial effective against the expected Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobic flora. Beta-lactams and carbapenems are effective against gram-negative rods and anaerobes, achieve therapeutic levels rapidly, and have low toxicity in the absence of penicillin allergy. Second generation cephalosporins (e.g. cefoxitin and cefotetan) remain useful in surgical prophylaxis and treatment of mild community-acquired pneumonia, but limitations in their spectra and antimicrobial resistance restrict their utility in more serious infections. The fourth generation cephalosporins are also effective, but should be combined with other antimicrobials such as metronidazole for adequate anaerobic coverage. Preliminary data on new fluoroquinolones are scant, but promising results were obtained in one clinical trial. We predict the current trend toward the use of broad-spectrum single agent antimicrobials for therapy of intra-abdominal infection will continue.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amoxicillin-sulbactam, a novel aminopenicillin-beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, against Escherichia coli

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics of amoxicillin-sulbactam (AMX-SUL), a novel drug combination, and its pharmacodynamics against Escherichia coli in 12 volunteers receiving a single oral dose (1, 000 mg). Peak serum bactericidal and urine inhibitory activities in most volunteers were observed against E. coli strains for which AMX-SUL MICs were low (2- to 4-mg/liter) (2 strains) and high (>/=16-mg/liter) (47 strains), respectively.

Screening and isolation of antibiotic resistance inhibitors from herb materials IV-resistance inhibitors from Anetheum graveolens and Acorus gramineus

The hexane fractions from methanolic extracts of Anetheum graveolens L. (Umbelliferae) and Acorus gramineus Soland. (Araceae), revealed potent inhibitory activities against the resistance of multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus SA2 when combined with ampicillin (Am) or chloramphenicol (Cm). As active principles, carvone and the liquid mixture containing carvone from Anetheum graveolens L. and a liquid mixture mainly consisting of benzoic acid phenylmethyl ester (benzyl benzoate) from Acorus gramineus Soland, were identified. They showed resistance inhibition at the level of 20-50 micrograms/ml when combined with 100 or 50 micrograms/ml of Am or Cm, respectively.

Activity of a broad-spectrum cephalosporin (Ro 48-8391) alone and in combination with two novel beta-lactamase inhibitors (Ro 48-5545 and Ro 48-8724)

The susceptibility of a group of beta-lactamase-producing and drug-resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms was tested against a novel cephalosporin (Ro 48-8391) alone and in combination with two bridged carbacephem beta-lactamase inhibitors (Ro 48-5545 or Ro 48-8724) and compared with that of ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, and cefepime (representative "third- and fourth-generation" cephalosporins), imipenem, and a combination of piperacillin and tazobactam. Five hundred and one selected clinical isolates were tested using the reference broth microdilution method (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards). Ro 48-8391 has a spectrum of activity and potency most similar to ceftriaxone but with improved activity against Gram-positive species. The two beta-lactamase inhibitors, Ro 48-5545 and Ro 48-8724, have modest antimicrobial activity. When combined with Ro 48-8391, the beta-lactamase inhibitor Ro 48-8724 was superior to the combination of Ro 48-8391 and Ro 48-5545 in spectrum and enzyme inhibition against extended spectrum beta-lactamase enzyme-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, and against Enterobacteriaceae with "stably derepressed" Bush-Jacoby-Medeiros gr 1 enzymes (ceftazidime-resistant Enterobacter and Citrobacter). Ro 48-5545 and Ro 48-8724 appear to be promising beta-lactamase inhibitors with potential application against chromosomal- and plasmid-mediated enzymes. Ro 48-8391, although superior to some currently available "third-generation" cephems, was not a well-matched active codrug because of limited activity against several commonly isolated species of clinically important bacteria. Further efforts are necessary to find a penicillin or cephem with activity more complementary to that of the tested beta-lactamase inhibitors and the Ro 48-8391 compound could be focused for therapeutic use in serious streptococcal infections.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose piperacillin-tazobactam regimens

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two multiple-dose regimens of piperacillin-tazobactam (3.375 g every 6 h and 4.5 g every 8 h) were evaluated at steady state for 12 healthy adult volunteers. Inhibitory and bactericidal activities for the two regimens were determined with five American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) organisms (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Bacteroides fragilis). The percentage of time that plasma concentrations remained above the MIC (T > MIC) for each organism and dosage regimen was calculated. Areas under the inhibitory (AUIC0-24) and bactericidal activity (AUBC0-24) curves were calculated with the trapezoidal rule by using the reciprocal of the inhibitory and bactericidal titers determined for each dosage regimen. In order to assess the validity of predicted measures of bactericidal (AUC0-24/MBC) and inhibitory (AUC0-24/MIC) activity to determine bacteriological response to beta-lactam antimicrobial agents, AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC values were compared with measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Total body clearance values were equivalent for piperacillin (183.96 +/- 22.66 versus 181.72 +/- 19.54 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) and tazobactam (184.71 +/- 19.89 versus 184.87 +/- 18.35 ml/min/1.73 m2, P > 0.05) following the administration of the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h dosages, respectively. Comparison of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) for piperacillin (967.74 +/- 135.56 microg x h/ml versus 978.88 +/- 140.96 microg x h/ml) and tazobactam (120.14 +/- 15.78 microg x h/ml versus 120.01 +/- 16.22 microg x h/ml) revealed no significant differences (P > 0.05) between the 3.375-g-every-6-h and 4.5-g-every-8-h regimens, respectively. Both regimens provided T > MIC values of > 60% for all organisms tested. Measured values of bactericidal (AUBC) and inhibitory (AUIC) activity were significantly different (P < 0.05) from predicted values (AUC0-24/MBC and AUC0-24/MIC) for all organisms studied with the exception of the bactericidal activity for P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Additionally, ATCC organisms possessing the same MICs and MBCs exhibited great differences in measured AUBC0-24 and AUIC0-24 values. Reasons for this difference may be inherent differences in organism specific susceptibility.

Assessment of biliary excretion of piperacillin-tazobactam in humans

Piperacillin-tazobactam concentrations in serum and bile were measured intraoperatively in 10 patients undergoing cholecystectomy (group 1) and 5 cholecystectomized patients provided with external bile duct drainage (group 2). Each patient received a single intravenous dose of piperacillin at 4 g plus tazobactam at 0.5 g over 30 min. Drug concentrations in both serum and bile were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. In group 1 patients, serum and bile specimens and gallbladder wall fragments were collected at mean times of 70 and 83 min postinfusion, respectively. The mean concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam were, respectively, 69.1 +/- 41.5 (standard deviation) and 9.9 +/- 5.1 microg/ml in serum, 630.4 microg/ml (range, 24.8 to 1,194 microg/ml) and 11.8 microg/ml (range, 3.6 to 22 microg/ml) in choledochal bile, 342.3 microg/ml (range, 1.1 to 1,149 microg/ml) and 7.7 microg/ml, (range, 0.2 to 23.1 microg/ml) in gallbladder bile, and 49.3 microg/g (range, 9.7 to 223 microg/g) and 2.9 microg/g (range, 0.1 to 5.9 microg/g) in the gallbladder wall. In group 2 patients, the amounts of drugs recovered in bile drainage obtained over 12 h were 28.4 +/- 18.0 and 1.0 +/- 0.5 mg for piperacillin and tazobactam, respectively. Peak piperacillin and tazobactam concentrations in bile reached 358 +/- 242 and 10.8 +/- 4.2 microg/ml, respectively. Comparison of drug levels in serum and bile suggests an underlying active secretion process for piperacillin elimination into the bile, unlike that of tazobactam. From a therapeutic viewpoint, given the concentrations of tazobactam recorded in bile fluid and tissue, the addition of this beta-lactamase inhibitor to piperacillin therapy might be of interest in the management of biliary tract infections, mostly in patients at risk of mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections due to beta-lactamase-producing organisms.

Efficacies of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime in rats with experimental intra-abdominal abscesses due to an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae

The in vivo activities of piperacillin-tazobactam and cefepime were compared with those of ticarcillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, and imipenem in a rat model of intra-abdominal abscess with a strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae elaborating an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (TEM-26). With the exception of ceftazidime, all of the antimicrobial agents significantly reduced bacterial counts within abscesses at the end of therapy compared with those in untreated controls. Residual viable cell counts (mean +/- standard deviation in log10 CFU/gram) were as follows: control, 8.76 +/- 0.97; ceftazidime, 8.00 +/- 0.76; piperacillin-tazobactam, 3.87 +/- 1.72; ticarcillin-clavulanate, 3.74 +/- 1.34; cefepime, 3.15 +/- 1.19; cefotaxime, 2.61 +/- 0.77; imipenem, 2.41 +/- 0.93. Imipenem was more effective than either of the inhibitor combinations (P < 0.05). Cefotaxime was unexpectedly effective given its poor in vivo activity against this organism in our earlier studies, which used a different dose and total duration of therapy (L. B. Rice, J. D. C. Yao, K. Klimm, G. M. Eliopoulos, and R. C. Moellering, Jr., Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35:1243-1244, 1991). These observations suggest that the effectiveness of cephalosporins in the treatment of experimental infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing K. pneumoniae may be highly dependent on dosing regimens, even for a specific organism and site of infection.

Activity of beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations on Escherichia coli isolates exhibiting various patterns of resistance to beta-lactam agents

The efficacy of the clinically available beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (CA), ticarcillin/CA, amoxicillin/sulbactam, and piperacillin/tazobactam) was evaluated on 300 amoxicillin-resistant Escherichia coli isolates having the main patterns of beta-lactam resistance. The patterns, which reflect the production of various beta-lactamase enzymes, were analyzed by a principal component analysis of susceptibility to 11 beta-lactam antibiotics or beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Sixty-two percent of strains were not very susceptible to penicillins, cephalothin, or any beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations except for piperacillin/tazobactam; these strains may represent high-level broad-spectrum beta-lactamase (so-called penicillinase) production phenotype or inhibitor-resistant TEM-like enzyme production phenotype. Of the strains, 14.7% were resistant to amoxicillin and ticarcillin compatible with low-level broad-spectrum beta-lactamase production phenotype; 5.7% were cefoxitin resistant and were postulated to present a high-level cephalosporinase production phenotype; and 2.6% were resistant to cephalothin only, attributable to a low-level cephalosporinase production phenotype. Three percent of strains were intermediate or resistant to cefotaxime and may produce an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, and the remaining strains (12 %), resistant to all tested antibiotics except for cefotaxime and piperacillin/tazobactam, were hypothesized to produce both broad-spectrum beta-lactamase plus cephalosporinase. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) for these phenotype patterns indicated that combinations of CA plus amoxicillin or ticarcillin, or sulbactam plus amoxicillin, restored the activity of penicillins against phenotype 1 strains, whereas these combinations remained inactive against the other phenotype strains. Piperacillin plus tazobactam showed the best in vitro effect against the strains of all resistance phenotypes.

Comparative antimicrobial activity of piperacillin-tazobactam tested against more than 5000 recent clinical isolates from five medical centers. A reevaluation after five years

Piperacillin combined with tazobactam at a fixed concentration (4 micrograms/ml) and a ratio (8:1) was tested against 5,029 aerobic isolates and 447 fastidious organisms, including anaerobes. Among the Enterobacteriaceae, > 95% inhibition was shared only by imipenem (99.1% at < or = 4 micrograms/ml), and some newer cephalosporins (95.1% - 99.8% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), and piperacillin-tazobactam (95.8% at < or = 16/4 micrograms/ml). Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent tested against nonenteric Gram-negative bacilli (93.5% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml). Ampicillin-sulbactam was the most active agent against staphylococci (95.0% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), followed by imipenem (91.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (89.3% at < or = 8/4 micrograms/ml), and cefepime (86.2% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml). Against the enterococci, only ampicillin (93.0% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml) with or without sulbactam, piperacillin (91.0% at < or = 16 micrograms/ml) with or without tazobactam, and imipenem (91.0%) had acceptable activity. Piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem were the most active drugs tested against all aerobic isolates, inhibiting 93.5% of isolates each. Piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited all fastidious isolates tested, including Haemophilus influenzae (MIC90, 0.094/4 micrograms/ml), Moraxella catarrhalis (MIC90, 0.064/4 micrograms/ml), Neisseira gonorrhoeae (MIC90, < or = 0.016/4 micrograms/ml), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (all MICs, < or = 4/4 micrograms/ml). Against the anaerobic isolates, the most broad-spectrum antimicrobial agents tested were imipenem (100.0%), piperacillin-tazobactam (99.5% at < or = 32/4 micrograms/ml), metronidazole (98.4% at < or = 8 micrograms/ml), and ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (95.1% at < or = 32/2 micrograms/ml). These results are nearly identical to a previous study involving the same five medical centers in 1989. Piperacillin-tazobactam appears to remain a highly effective beta-lactamase inhibitor combination with a wide empiric spectrum and potency in teaching hospitals.

Comparative in vitro activity of apalcillin alone and combined with Ro 48-1220, a novel penam beta-lactamase inhibitor

OBJECTIVE: The in vitro activity of apalcillin plus Ro 48-1220, a novel penam sulfone beta-lactamase inhibitor, was compared with apalcillin alone, piperacillin/tazobactam, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, imipenem, ceftazidime and cefepime. METHODS: Agar dilution and broth microdilution testing of 854 bacterial strains, subcultured from frozen stocks incubated for 24 h in 5% carbon dioxide, was carried out to determine the minimum bactericidal (MBC) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of each of the study drugs in accordance with the NCCLS M26-T method. RESULTS: Apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 was active against all gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic isolates except Klebsiella oxytoca (MIC90 32 microg/mL). Among the Enterobacteriaceae, synergy for apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 (4 microg/mL fixed concentration) vs apalcillin alone was demonstrated for nearly all species when comparing MIC90 results. Apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 was highly potent against beta-lactamase-producing Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MICs less-than-or-equal 1 microg/mL). However, much of this activity was due to the direct antimicrobial action of Ro 48-1220 alone (MICs less-than-or-equal 4 microg/mL). All Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia and Acinetobacter species were inhibited by apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 (MIC90 0.25 to 4 microg/mL). For the aerobic gram-positive organisms, none of the drugs tested were consistently effective against oxacillin-resistant staphylococci, Corynebacterium jeikeium and Enterococcus species other than E. faecalis. Apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 was as effective as piperacillin/tazobactam against Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum TEM enzymes, but less active against isolates producing SHV-type beta-lactamases. When tested against 204 ceftazidime-, gentamicin- or fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms, 78%, 91% and 66% of strains, respectively, were susceptible to apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 (less-than-or-equal 16 microg/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Apalcillin/Ro 48-1220 is bactericidal with a modest inoculum effect; its wide spectrum of activity favors continued studies of spectrum, pharmacokinetics and in vivo efficacy.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam in infants and children

The pharmacokinetics of piperacillin and tazobactam were assessed after single-dose administration to 47 infants and children. Study subjects ranging in age from 2 months to 12 years were randomized to receive one of two different doses of a piperacillin-tazobactam combination (8:1): a low dose (n = 23) of 50 and 6.25 mg of piperacillin and tazobactam per kg of body weight, respectively, or a high dose (n = 24) of 100 and 12.5 mg, respectively. The pharmacokinetic behavior of tazobactam was very similar to that observed for piperacillin, supporting the use of these two agents in a fixed-dose combination. No differences in the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin or tazobactam were observed between the two doses administered. The elimination parameters half-life and total body clearance decreased and increased, respectively, with increasing age, whereas volume parameters (volume of distribution and steady-state volume of distribution) remained relatively constant for both compounds. The primary metabolite of tazobactam, metabolite M1, was measurable in the plasma of 18 of the 47 study subjects; 17 of these 18 subjects received the high doses. More than 70% of the administered piperacillin and tazobactam doses were excreted unchanged in the urine over a 6-h collection period. These data combined with the known in vitro susceptibilities of a broad range of pediatric bacterial pathogens indicate that a dose of 100 mg of piperacillin and 12.5 of mg tazobactam per kg of body weight administered as a fixed-dose combination every 6 to 8 h would be appropriate to initiate clinical efficacy studies in infants and children for the treatment of systemic infections arising outside of the central nervous system.

Penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam into bronchial secretions after multiple doses to intensive care patients

The penetration of piperacillin-tazobactam in eight mechanically ventilated intensive care patients (age, 56.0 +/- 12.2 years, and weight, 76.5 +/- 15.2 kg [means +/- standard deviations]) with bacterial pneumonia was investigated. They were given intravenous doses of piperacillin (4 g) and tazobactam (0.5 g) as 30-min infusions every 6 h. The kinetic study was performed after the fourth dose on day 2 of treatment. Samples of blood and bronchial secretions (BS) were collected before the fourth dosing and 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 h after the end of infusion. Drug concentrations in both sera and BS were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in serum were 184.80 +/- 63.03 and 40.03 +/- 30.79 for piperacillin and 23.05 +/- 7.53 and 4.86 +/- 4.54 for tazobactam at 0.5 and 6 h, respectively, after the end of infusion. The corresponding concentrations (in micrograms per milliliter) in BS were 29.33 +/- 25.08 and 20.25 +/- 19.11 for piperacillin and 6.86 +/- 4.25 and 4.25 +/- 2.78 for tazobactam. The percentages for the extent of penetration of piperacillin and tazobactam, as defined by the BS/serum area under the curve ratio, were 35.70 and 78.42%, respectively. These data indicate good penetration of both piperacillin and tazobactam into BS. The concentrations of tazobactam in BS are persistent and high enough to exceed the values found to be effective in vitro against the tazobactam-susceptible beta-lactamases produced by the most important pathogens responsible for nosocomial pneumonia.

Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant and -susceptible organisms in an in vitro model of infection

The pharmacodynamics of dosage regimens of piperacillin alone or in combination with tazobactam against piperacillin-resistant or -susceptible bacteria were studied in an in vitro model of infection. Experiments were conducted by using a fixed daily exposure of 12 g of piperacillin, given as 3 g alone or in combination with tazobactam at 0.375 g every 6 h, or the same total dose of the combination given as 4 g of piperacillin plus 0.5 g of tazobactam every 8 h. The addition of tazobactam to piperacillin, irrespective of the dosing interval, did not alter the killing of piperacillin-susceptible organisms (Escherichia coli J53 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853). In contrast, experiments with an isogenic TEM-3-containing transconjugant of E. coli J53 (E. coli J53.2-TEM-3) that was resistant to piperacillin (MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam resulted in bacterial killing similar to that observed with the wild-type strain. Although tazobactam concentrations fell to less than 4 mg/liter (the concentration associated with a reduction in the piperacillin MIC from 128 to 2 mg/liter) 2 to 3 h after a dose, a similar degree of bacterial killing was observed when the same total 24-h dose of piperacillin-tazobactam was fractionated into dosing intervals of every 6 or 8 h. Investigations with Staphylococcus aureus 7176 (piperacillin MIC, 128 micrograms/ml) showed that the addition of tazobactam, again irrespective of dosing interval, also resulted in net bacterial killing which was not seen with piperacillin alone. These data support the use of extended dosing intervals (every 8 h) of piperacillin-tazobactam in the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin-resistant bacteria.

Pharmacokinetic characteristics of piperacillin/tazobactam

Piperacillin/tazobactam is a new combination of a broad-spectrum penicillin and a beta-lactamase inhibitor. In studies in healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of piperacillin combined with tazobactam were similar to those of piperacillin alone. In contrast, tazobactam administered with piperacillin achieved higher plasma concentrations and had a longer half-life than tazobactam administered alone. Intravenous infusion of 4.0 g piperacillin with 0.5 g tazobactam over 5 min resulted in mean maximum plasma concentrations of 380 micrograms piperacillin/ml and 35.3 micrograms tazobactam/ml; half-lives were 1.14 h for piperacillin and 0.92 h for tazobactam. Within 30 min of infusion, piperacillin/tazobactam achieves 16-85% of plasma concentrations in skin, muscle, lung, gallbladder, and intestinal mucosa. Plasma and tissue levels remain above the MIC90s of major pathogens for 2 h post administration. These findings show that piperacillin/tazobactam is truly synergistic combination which can be expected to be effective in treating a wide variety of infections in the clinical setting.

Review of piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of bacteremic infections and summary of clinical efficacy

One method of resistance to beta-lactam antimicrobials involves production of beta-lactamases, enzymes that render the beta-lactam ineffective. Beta-lactamase inhibitors have been combined with beta-lactam antibiotics to combat beta-lactamase producing organisms. One such agent, piperacillin/tazobactam, has been shown to be safe and effective therapy for infections usually treated with a combination of antibiotics such as polymicrobial and nosocomial infection, and has been used for empiric therapy in cases of serious infection. A survey of the literature shows that piperacillin/tazobactam is a safe and efficacious therapy for bacteremia as well as soft tissue, intra-abdominal, and lower respiratory tract infections. When combined with an aminoglycoside, it is also useful in the treatment of severe nosocomial respiratory infections.

Multicenter evaluation of the in vitro activity of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with eleven selected beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin against more than 42,000 aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. In Vitro Susceptibility Surveillance Group

The in vitro activities of piperacillin-tazobactam, 11 other beta-lactam antibiotics, and ciprofloxacin were evaluated in a large multicenter study. A total of 42,208 organisms, collected from 79 listed medical centers and large community hospitals, were tested using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards broth microdilution procedure. Imipenem (94.7% inhibition), ciprofloxacin (93.8%), and ceftazidime (90.8%) were the most active antibiotics against 31,426 Gram-negative bacilli. Piperacillin-tazobactam (88.8%) and ticarcillin-clavulanate (86.4%) were the most active combination antibiotics against these organisms. Ampicillin-sulbactam (97.8%), piperacillin-tazobactam (96.4%), and imipenem (96.9%) were the most active antibiotics against 10,782 Gram-positive cocci. Overall, the most active antibiotics against all organisms tested were imipenem (95.2%), ciprofloxacin (91.0%), and piperacillin-tazobactam (90.8%).

Emergence of clinical isolates of Escherichia coli producing TEM-1 derivatives or an OXA-1 beta-lactamase conferring resistance to beta-lactamase inhibitors

Sixteen Escherichia coli clinical isolates which were resistant to ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanate but susceptible to cephalothin were studied. Eight strains showed the presence of a beta-lactamase which comigrates with reference OXA-1 enzyme. The eight other strains produced different TEM-1 derivatives which had in common a higher Km for penicillins and a higher 50% inhibitory concentration for the beta-lactamase inhibitors. By oligotyping and sequencing of PCR products, it was shown that Ser (AGC) (TEM-30; also called TRI-1) in three strains and Cys (TGC) (TEM-31; also called TRI-2) in one strain were substituted for Arg-241 (CGC), that Leu (CTG) (TEM-33) and Val (GTG) (TEM-34) in one strain each were substituted for Met-67 (ATG), and that in other mutants the two latter substitutions occurred together with the substitution of Asp (GAT) (TEM-35 and TEM-36) for Asn-272 (AAT). Therefore, different sets of amino acid substitutions of TEM-1 can be found in clinical isolates and lead to resistance to beta-lactamase inhibitors.

Comparative activities of clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam against clinically important beta-lactamases

Clavulanic acid, sulbactam, and tazobactam are inhibitors of a variety of plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. However, inhibition data for these three inhibitors with a wide range of different plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have not yet been compared under the same experimental conditions. A number of groups have inferred that clavulanic acid inhibits extended-spectrum TEM and SHV beta-lactamases, but inhibition data have rarely been published. In this study, the 50% inhibitory concentrations of these three beta-lactamase inhibitors for 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases have been determined. Of these 35 beta-lactamases, 20 were extended-spectrum TEM- or SHV-derived beta-lactamases. The other 15 enzymes were conventional-spectrum beta-lactamases such as TEM-1 and SHV-1. Clavulanic acid was a more potent inhibitor than sulbactam for 32 of the 35 plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases tested. In particular, clavulanic acid was 60 and 580 times more potent than sulbactam against TEM-1 and SHV-1, respectively, currently the two most clinically prevalent gram-negative plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases. Statistical analysis of the data of the 50% inhibitory concentrations showed that clavulanic acid was 20 times more active overall than sulbactam against the conventional-spectrum enzymes. In addition, clavulanic acid was 14 times more potent than sulbactam at inhibiting the extended-spectrum enzymes. Tazobactam also showed significantly greater activity than sulbactam against the two groups of beta-lactamases. There were no significant differences between the overall activities of tazobactam and clavulanic acid against the extended-spectrum TEM and SHV enzymes and conventional-spectrum enzymes, although differences in their inhibition profiles were observed.

Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Combining tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, with the ureidopenicillin, piperacillin, successfully restores the activity of piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Tazobactam has inhibitory activity, and therefore protects piperacillin against Richmond and Sykes types II, III, IV and V beta-lactamases, staphylococcal penicillinase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. However, tazobactam has only species-specific activity against class I chromosomally-mediated enzymes. Resistant organisms include some Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Xanthomonas maltophilia and Enterococcus faecium. Consistent with its in vitro activity, preliminary clinical data indicate that the fixed combination of piperacillin/tazobactam (dose ratio 8:1) is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial infections, including intra-abdominal, skin and soft-tissue and lower respiratory tract infections. In limited comparative trials, piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated equivalent or better efficacy than standard comparator regimens in these infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with an aminoglycoside was effective in the empirical treatment of fever in patients with neutropenia and compared favourably with ceftazidime in combination with an aminoglycoside, although second-line therapy with a glycopeptide antibiotic may be indicated in unresponsive episodes. Data from phase III trials indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam has a tolerability profile typical of a penicillin agent. Piperacillin/tazobactam provides a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity in a convenient single formulation suitable for use in the treatment of polymicrobial infections. Possible limitations concern its restricted activity against class I beta-lactamases, enzymes that are becoming increasingly important in the nosocomial environment. Combined therapy with an aminoglycoside may be necessary in more serious infections.

Different ratios of the piperacillin-tazobactam combination for treatment of experimental meningitis due to Klebsiella pneumoniae producing the TEM-3 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacies of piperacillin and tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, given either alone or in different combinations (80:10, 200:10, and 80:25 mg/kg/h), in experimental meningitis due to a strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing the TEM-3 extended-spectrum beta-lactamase. Treatment was administered intravenously as a 7-h constant infusion preceded by a bolus of 20% of the total dose. The mean (+/- standard deviation) rates of penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of infected animals were 6.7 +/- 3.9% for piperacillin given alone and 36.3 +/- 21.9% for tazobactam given alone. Combination treatment significantly magnified the concentration of either drug in CSF. Concentrations of bacteria in CSF increased throughout therapy in animals given either drug alone, even at high dosages. In animals given the combination at dosages of 80:10 and 200/10 mg/kg/h, only a suboptimal reduction of CSF bacterial titers was obtained in vivo, i.e. -0.49 +/- 0.34 and -0.73 +/- 0.49 log CFU/ml/h, respectively. An increase in the tazobactam dosage within the combination (80:25 mg/kg/h) was required in order to obtain a significantly faster elimination of viable organisms from the CSF (-0.97 +/- 0.35 log CFU/ml/h). The study shows that tazobactam is able to provide effective protection against piperacillin hydrolysis by the TEM-3 enzyme within the CSF. Appropriate dosage regimens of various beta-lactam-tazobactam combinations may deserve comparative studies in experimental meningitis caused by organisms producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

Ex vivo pharmacodynamic study of piperacillin alone and in combination with tazobactam, compared with ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid

Ten volunteers received piperacillin (4 g), piperacillin (4 g) plus tazobactam (0.5 g) (Tazocin), and ticarcillin (3 g) plus clavulanic acid (0.2 g) (Timentin) intravenously over 30 min in a cross-over blinded scheme. Blood samples were obtained 0.5 and 3 h after the end of infusion to measure by (high-pressure liquid chromatography) the concentration and bactericidal titers against 70 gram-negative bacilli. Serum time-kill curves were done against 35 strains to measure killing rates and area under the time-kill curve. Using the measure of serum bactericidal activity, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid and piperacillin-tazobactam were equally effective against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, and Bacteroides fragilis. Piperacillin-tazobactam was superior to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against piperacillin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (4 to 16 times) and S. marcescens (2 to 4 times). By using the area under the time-kill curve, piperacillin-tazobactam was equivalent to ticarcillin-clavulanic acid against piperacillin-susceptible strains; piperacillin-tazobactam was significantly more active than piperacillin against piperacillin-resistant strains and was more active than ticarcillin-clavulanic acid when the sample obtained 3 h after the end of infusion to volunteers was considered. Serum piperacillin concentrations (mean +/- standard error of the mean; in mg/liter) were 115 +/- 13 at 0.5 h and 7.4 +/- 1.4 at 3 h after the administration of piperacillin alone and 105.5 +/- 12.6 (0.5 h) and 7.7 +/- 1.6 after the administration of piperacillin-tazobactam. Serum tazobactam concentrations (in milligram per liter) were 13.1 +/- 1.4 at 0.5 h and 1.2 +/- 0.2 at 3 h. The piperacillin-tazobactam ratio was 8 +/- 0.3 at 0.5 h and 6.2 +/- 0.5 at 3 h. Piperacillin-tazobactam appears promising against beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli.

Therapy with cefoperazone plus sulbactam against disseminated infection due to cefoperazone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli in granulocytopenic mice

Using a granulocytopenic murine model, we evaluated the efficacy of cefoperazone plus sulbactam against disseminated infection due to isolates of beta-lactamase-producing, cefoperazone-resistant (MIC, > or = 50 micrograms/ml) Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Both isolates were susceptible in vitro to cefoperazone plus sulbactam (MIC, < or = 6.3 micrograms/ml). Mice rendered granulocytopenic with cyclophosphamide were divided into three groups: group A--infected, untreated mice (controls); group B--infected, cefoperazone-treated mice (700 mg/kg of body weight); and group C--infected, cefoperazone-plus-sulbactam-treated mice (700 mg plus 350 mg). In the E. coli experiment, survival rates in groups A, B, and C were 25, 46, and 73%, respectively. In the experiment with P. aeruginosa, survival rates in groups A, B, and C were 0, 10, and 50%, respectively (P < 0.001). Highly significant differences also were noted for colony counts in the blood, liver, and spleen of group C mice versus group A or B mice in both experiments. Thus, cefoperazone plus sulbactam appears to be a promising combination for the treatment of infections due to certain cefoperazone-resistant gram-negative bacilli, including P. aeruginosa.

In vitro activity of ampicillin, amoxicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid against consecutive clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae

Ampicillin was generally twice as active as amoxicillin against 2440 consecutive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae from five medical centers. When beta-lactamase inhibitors were added to the penicillins, there was a significant increase in susceptibility. The magnitude of the increased susceptibility to ampicillin-sulbactam (A-S) and amoxicillin-clavulanic (A-C) acid varied with the species and types of beta-lactamases elaborated. Although cross-susceptibility and cross-resistance between ampicillin and amoxicillin was nearly complete, major differences were documented between A-S and A-C with 6.7% of our consecutive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. The clinical significance of these findings remains uncertain, but they may help explain some of the discrepancies occasionally observed by clinical microbiologists with the combination drugs.

Comparison of fixed concentration and fixed ratio options for dilution susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli to ampicillin and ampicillin/sulbactam

Ampicillin combined with sulbactam was tested at both fixed ratio (2:1 and 1:1) and fixed sulbactam concentrations (4 micrograms/ml, 8 micrograms/ml and 16 micrograms/ml) against 2440 consecutively isolated gram-negative bacilli. Sulbactam significantly enhanced the spectrum of ampicillin activity. Overall, at 8 micrograms/ml ampicillin inhibited 50% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates, whereas 69% to 84% of the isolates were inhibited by the various sulbactam combinations. The widest spectrum of activity for ampicillin/sulbactam was achieved by testing at a fixed sulbactam concentration of 16 micrograms/ml, followed by the 1:1 ratio and the fixed 8 micrograms/ml (84%, 76% and 74% inhibited, respectively). The amount of sulbactam at the susceptible breakpoint concentrations of ampicillin markedly affected the percentage of susceptible strains. Combinations that include 8 micrograms/ml of sulbactam are suggested for consideration.

Efficacy of ampicillin-sulbactam versus that of cefoxitin for treatment of Escherichia coli infections in a rat intra-abdominal abscess model

We examined the efficacy of ampicillin-sulbactam (2:1) and cefoxitin in the treatment of infections caused by Escherichia coli strains exhibiting increasing levels of beta-lactamase-mediated resistance to ampicillin-sulbactam in the rat intra-abdominal abscess model. Cefoxitin was superior to ampicillin-sulbactam in the treatment of infections caused by all strains. Treatment with ampicillin-sulbactam resulted in a statistically significant decrease in CFU per gram of abscess in comparison with treatment with ampicillin alone for both the moderately resistant and the resistant strains, with an inverse correlation between the MIC and the absolute decrease in CFU per gram of abscess.

Relative efficacy of tazobactam, sulbactam and clavulanic acid in enhancing the potency of ampicillin against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae

Three beta-lactamase inhibitors were combined with ampicillin in a fixed 2:1 ratio. The activity of ampicillin was enhanced by tazobactam and by clavulanic acid, and to a lesser extent by sulbactam when tested against fresh clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae. At a concentration of 8 micrograms/ml, ampicillin alone inhibited 49.6% of 2,434 consecutive isolates of enteric bacilli compared to 81% inhibited by ampicillin combined with tazobactam or clavulanic acid and 69.3% inhibited by the sulbactam/ampicillin combination. A four-fold or greater reduction in ampicillin MICs was observed in comparable numbers of isolates with all three combinations, but the most marked effects were seen with strains that were highly resistant to ampicillin.

Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections

In order to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacies and safety of piperacillin plus tazobactam with those of imipenem plus cilastatin, 134 patients with intra-abdominal infections (73 patients with appendicitis) participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial. A total of 40 men and 29 women (mean age, 53 years; age range, 18 to 92 years) were enrolled in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 40 men and 25 women (mean age, 54 years; age range, 16 to 91 years) were enrolled in the imipenem-cilastatin group. The patients received either piperacillin (4 g) and tazobactam (500 mg) every 8 h or imipenem and cilastatin (500 mg each) every 8 h. Both regimens were given by intravenous infusion. A total of 113 patients were clinically evaluable. Of 55 patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam, 50 were clinically cured, while 40 of 58 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin group were clinically cured. The differences were significant (Wilcoxon test; P = 0.005). There were 4 failures or relapses in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 18 failures or relapses in the imipenem-cilastatin group. The microorganisms isolated were eradicated in similar proportions in the two patient groups. Adverse reactions, mainly gastrointestinal disturbances and nausea, were noted in 13 patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam and in 14 patients who received imipenem-cilastatin. Results of the present study show that piperacillin-tazobactam is effective and safe for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin

A total of 99 patients with head and neck cancer who were to undergo surgery were randomized in a prospective comparative study of sulbactam-ampicillin (1:2 ratio; four doses of 3 g of ampicillin and 1.5 g of sulbactam intravenously [i.v.] every 6 h) versus clindamycin (four doses of 600 mg i.v. every 6 h)-amikacin (two doses of 500 mg i.v. every 12 h) as prophylaxis starting at the induction of anesthesia. The two groups of evaluable patients (43 in the clindamycin-amikacin treatment group and 42 in the sulbactam-ampicillin treatment group) were comparable as far as age (mean, 57 years; range, 21 to 84 years), sex ratio (71 males, 28 females), weight (mean, 66 kg; range, 40 to 69 kg), indication for surgery (first surgery, 48 patients; recurrence, 37 patients), previous anticancer treatment (surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy), type of surgery, and stage of cancer. The overall infection rate (wound, bacteremia, and bronchopneumonia) within 20 days after surgery was 20 patients in each group. Wound infections occurred in 14 (33%) sulbactam-ampicillin-treated patients and 9 (21%) clindamycin-amikacin-treated patients (P = 0.19; not significant). The rates of bacteremia were 2 and 4%, respectively. The rates of bronchopneumonia were 14.3 and 23.2%, respectively (P was not significant). Most infections were polymicrobial, but strict anaerobes were recovered only from patients who received sulbactam-ampicillin. Antimicrobial treatment was required within 20 days after surgery for 42% of the sulbactam-ampicillin-treated patients and 44% of the clindamycin-amikacin-treated patients. By comparison with previous studies, we observed a decreased efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing surgery because of the increased proportion of patients who were at very high risk for infection (extensive excision and plastic reconstruction in patients with recurrent stage III and IV cancers) and because of the longer duration of surgery.

Piperacillin, tazobactam, and gentamicin alone or combined in an endocarditis model of infection by a TEM-3-producing strain of Klebsiella pneumoniae or its susceptible variant

The efficacy of tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, in combination with piperacillin, was studied in vitro and in rabbit experimental endocarditis due to a Klebsiella pneumoniae strain (KpR) producing an extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, TEM-3, or its nonproducing variant (KpS). In vitro, piperacillin was active against KpS (MIC = 4 micrograms/ml, MBC = 8 micrograms/ml with 10(7)-CFU/ml inoculum) but not against KpR (MIC = MBC = 256 micrograms/ml). Tazobactam (1 microgram/ml) restored the activity of piperacillin against KpR (MIC = 2 micrograms/ml, MBC = 4 micrograms/ml). Gentamicin was active against both strains (MIC = 0.25 and 0.5 micrograms/ml for KpS and KpR, respectively). The piperacillin-tazobactam-gentamicin combination was synergistic in vitro. The piperacillin/tazobactam ratio in plasma and in vegetations was always lower than the 4/1 injected dose ratio. In vivo, piperacillin (300 mg/kg of body weight four times a day [QID]) was active against KpS but not against KpR. Tazobactam (75 mg/kg QID) was able to restore the in vivo effect of piperacillin (300 mg/kg QID) against KpR (-3.0 log10 CFU/g of vegetation versus that of controls). Gentamicin (4 mg/kg twice a day [BID]) was active against both strains. Compared with controls, the combination of gentamicin plus piperacillin against KpS (-5.6 log10 CFU/g of vegetation), and the gentamicin-piperacillin-tazobactam combination against KpR (-4.4 log10 CFU/g of vegetation) achieved the greatest decrease in bacterial counts in vegetations and were the only regimens that significantly increased the proportion of sterile vegetations. It is concluded that (i) tazobactam was able to restore the effect of piperacillin against a TEM-3 extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing strain of K. pneumoniae, both in vitro and in a severe experimental infection with high inoculum, when used in a 4/1 piperacillin/tazobactam dose ratio; (ii) gentamicin alone was effective because of the high peak/MBC ratio in plasma; (iii) piperacillin-tazobactam-gentamicin, probably because of the effect of gentamicin in reducing bacterial inoculum in vivo, as stressed by the results obtained by piperacillin-gentamicin against KpS, may be the most effective regimen against KpR.

Comparison of fixed concentration and fixed ratio options for testing susceptibility of gram-negative bacilli to piperacillin and piperacillin/tazobactam

Piperacillin combined with tazobactam was tested at both a fixed ratio (8:1) and fixed tazobactam concentration (4 micrograms/ml) against 2,685 consecutively isolated gram-negative bacilli and 56 highly piperacillin-resistant isolates. Tazobactam significantly enhanced the spectrum of piperacillin activity. Overall, at a concentration of 16 micrograms/ml piperacillin alone inhibited 78.8% of the Enterobacteriaceae isolates compared to inhibition of 92.7% and 95.5% by the 8:1 ratio and fixed (4 micrograms/ml) tazobactam combinations, respectively. In MIC tests the two combination options performed comparably against both routine and highly piperacillin-resistant isolates. Synergistic inhibition was observed for comparable numbers of isolates with the two combination options, the most marked effect being seen in the more highly piperacillin-resistant isolates. Both testing options are supported by the available human pharmacokinetic data; however the 8:1 ratio of piperacillin to tazobactam may be preferable given that the clinical formulation contains the two compounds in an 8:1 ratio and this ratio is maintained in vivo.

Effect of piperacillin/tazobactam therapy on intestinal microflora

The effect of piperacillin/tazobactam treatment upon the intestinal microflora was studied in 20 patients with intraabdominal infections. The patients received piperacillin 4 g combined with tazobactam 500 mg q 8 h by intravenous injection for 4-8 days. Stool specimens were collected before, during and after therapy for cultivation of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms. Six patients had measurable concentrations of piperacillin (1.2-276 mg/kg/faeces) and 4 patients tazobactam concentrations (0.8-22.2 mg/kg/faeces) in the faecal specimens during therapy. The number of enterobacteria and enterococci slightly decreased while there were no changes in the number of staphylococci and bacilli. The anaerobic microflora was also slightly affected. There was a minor decrease in the number of bifidobacteria, eubacteria, lactobacilli, clostridia and veillonella but the numbers of anaerobic Gram-positive cocci and bacteroides were not influenced by the treatment. After therapy, the aerobic and anaerobic microflora returned to normal levels in all patients. None of the patients had Clostridium difficile or cytotoxin in the stools or developed diarrhoea.

Influence of beta-lactamase inhibitors on the potency of their companion drug with organisms possessing class I enzymes

The ability of beta-lactamase inhibitors to induce class I beta-lactamases in certain organisms in vitro suggests a potential for antagonism in vivo. Therefore, a study was designed to assess the ability of sulbactam and clavulanate to induce beta-lactamases in two strains each of Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa both in vitro and in vivo. Induction in vitro was observed only with S. marcescens and P. aeruginosa and generally only when inhibitor concentrations greater than 2 micrograms/ml were examined. A mouse model of lethal infection, designed to detect in vivo antagonism arising from beta-lactamase induction, was used to determine what effect sulbactam and clavulanate would have on the 50% protective doses (PD50s) of cefoperazone and ticarcillin. Antagonism (a significant increase in the PD50) was observed in only 4 of 32 tests. Three of these involved antagonism of cefoperazone by clavulanate, and one involved antagonism of cefoperazone by sulbactam. In 6 of 32 tests, enhancement of efficacy (a significant decrease in PD50) was observed. In four of these, sulbactam enhanced cefoperazone; in one, sulbactam enhanced ticarcillin; and in one, clavulanate enhanced ticarcillin. Four of the six cases of enhancement occurred when the beta-lactamase inhibitor was given at the time of challenge. None of these positive or negative in vivo effects were predicted by in vitro tests. These data suggest that beta-lactamase inhibitors can influence the in vivo potency of their companion drug in both a beneficial and detrimental fashion against organisms with class I beta-lactamases and that these effects cannot be predicted from in vitro assays.

Comparative in vitro activities of amoxicillin-clavulanate, ampicillin-sulbactam and piperacillin-tazobactam against strains of Escherichia coli and proteus mirabilis harbouring known beta-lactamases

Strains of Escherichia coli (N = 124) and Proteus mirabilis (N = 29) harboring known beta-lactamases were analyzed as to their susceptibility to ampicillin, amoxicillin, and piperacillin alone and in combination with sulbactam, clavulanate, and tazobactam. With TEM 1-producing E. coli, a correlation between specific beta-lactamase activity and the MIC of piperacillin and ampicillin-sulbactam was observed. These strains also showed significant differences in susceptibilities to the various combinations, suggesting that, at least in strains resistant to one combination, several beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations should be tested in the laboratory. All combinations tested enhanced the activity of the beta-lactam towards TEM 1-producing E. coli, piperacillin-tazobactam being the most active. The drugs were less active to OXA 1 enzymes; solely with piperacillin-tazobactam 90% of strains were within the therapeutic range of the drug. Sulbactam acted synergistically to chromosomally encoded beta-lactamases, whereas amoxicillin-clavulanate was inactive. Piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam inhibited all strains producing chromosomally encoded beta-lactamases at concentrations within the therapeutic range of the drugs. In contrast, TEM 2 of P. mirabilis was not sensitive to ampicillin-sulbactam, but to the other combinations; here again piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active.

Evaluation of piperacillin-tazobactam in experimental meningitis caused by a beta-lactamase-producing strain of K1-positive Escherichia coli

We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of piperacillin combined with tazobactam, a novel beta-lactamase inhibitor, in experimental meningitis due to a beta-lactamase-producing strain of K1-positive Escherichia coli. Different doses of piperacillin and tazobactam, as single agents and combined (8:1 ratio; dosage range, 40/5 to 200/25 mg/kg per h), and of ceftriaxone were given to experimentally infected rabbits by intravenous bolus injection followed by a 5-h constant infusion. The mean (+/- standard deviation) rates for penetration into the cerebrospinal fluid of infected animals after coadministration of both drugs were 16.6 +/- 8.4% for piperacillin and 32.5 +/- 12.6% for tazobactam. Compared with either agent alone, combination treatment resulted in significantly better bactericidal activity in the cerebrospinal fluid. The bactericidal activity of piperacillin-tazobactam was dose dependent: cerebrospinal fluid bacterial titers were reduced by 0.37 +/- 0.19 log10 CFU/ml per h with the lowest dose versus 0.96 +/- 0.25 log10 CFU/ml per h with the highest dose (P less than 0.001). At the relatively high doses of 160/20 and 200/25 mg of piperacillin-tazobactam per kg per h, the bactericidal activity of the combination was comparable to that of 10 and 25 mg of ceftriaxone per kg per h, respectively.