Effect of norfloxacin on theophylline metabolism

Novel Amino Acid Derivatives of Quinolines as Potential Antibacterial and Fluorophore Agents

A new series of amino acid derivatives of quinolines was synthesized through the hydrolysis of amino acid methyl esters of quinoline carboxamides with alkali hydroxide. The compounds were purified on silica gel by column chromatography and further characterized by TLC, NMR and ESI-TOF mass spectrometry. All compounds were screened for in vitro antimicrobial activity against different bacterial strains using the microdilution method. Most of the synthesized amino acid-quinolines show more potent or equipotent inhibitory action against the tested bacteria than their correspond esters. In addition, many of them exhibit fluorescent properties and could possibly be utilized as fluorophores. Molecular docking and simulation studies of the compounds at putative bacterial target enzymes suggest that the antimicrobial potency of these synthesized analogues could be due to enzyme inhibition via their favorable binding at the fluoroquinolone binding site at the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and/or the ParC subunit of topoisomerase-IV.

Meta-Analysis of Quinolone—Theophylline Interactions

Several fluoroquinolones currently under investigation or on the market potentially interact with theophylline. In this study, meta-analysis methodology was used to evaluate the significance of findings from quinolone-theophylline interaction studies. Two major databases were searched: Index Medicus (from 1986 to March 1990) and Current Content/Clinical Medicine (from 1985 to March 1990). A total of 32 studies were retrieved; 20 of these met the inclusion criteria. With a large effect size (ES) value of 2.26, enoxacin is the strongest inhibitor of theophylline metabolism of this family. The fail-safe N value was 135, indicating that 135 studies enrolling an average of 8 patients and showing no interaction (i.e., ES = 0) would be required to lower the ES to the threshold value of 0.1, which we considered a priori to render the results nonsignificant. Other fluoroquinolones showed a degree of interaction that can be considered significant: Ciprofloxacin (ES = 0.50, fail-safe N = 26), norfloxacin (ES = 0.31, fail-safe N = 10). Ofloxacin (ES = 0.13, fail-safe N = 4), lomefloxacin (ES = 0.12, fail-safe N = 2), and fleroxacin (ES = 0.06, fail-safe N = 2) provided the weakest evidence of interaction based on effect size and power. Among the fluoroquinolones studied, ofloxacin, lomefloxacin, and fleroxacin, when available, should be the fluoroquinolones of choice when the patient also is receiving theophylline.

Absence of effect of rufloxacin on theophylline pharmacokinetics in steady state

Several quinolone antibacterial agents are known to inhibit the metabolism of theophylline, with the potential to cause adverse events due to raised theophylline concentrations during coadministration. A randomized crossover study was therefore conducted with 12 healthy male volunteers (ages, 23 to 34 years; body weight, 64 to 101 kg) to evaluate a possible interaction between rufloxacin and theophylline. Both drugs were administered at steady state. Following the administration of an oral loading dose of 400 mg on day 1, rufloxacin was given orally at 200 mg once daily on days 2 to 7 during one period only. During both periods, 146 mg of theophylline was administered orally twice daily for 3 days (which were days 4 to 6 of the rufloxacin coadministration period) and intravenously once the next morning to test for an interaction. Theophylline and rufloxacin concentrations were measured by reversed-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography, the pharmacokinetics of theophylline at steady state following administration of the last dose were calculated by compartment-model-independent methods. To compare the treatments, analysis of variance-based point estimates and 90% confidence intervals (given in parentheses) were calculated for the mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic parameters from the test (rufloxacin coadministration) over those from the reference (theophylline without rufloxacin) period. These were as follows: maximum concentration at steady state, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.07); area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h, 0.98 (0.94 to 1.02); half-life, 0.99 (0.95 to 1.03); total clearance at steady state, 1. 02 (0.99 to 1.06); and volume of distribution in the elimination phase, 1.01 (0.97 to 1.05). In conclusion, rufloxacin did not affect theophylline pharmacokinetics at steady state. Therefore, therapeutic coadministration of rufloxacin and theophylline is not expected to cause an increased incidence of theophylline-related adverse events.

Absence of a pharmacokinetic interaction between intravenous theophylline and orally administered levofloxacin

A randomized, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study in 16 healthy men was performed to determine the effect of orally administered levofloxacin at steady-state conditions, given at 500 mg every 12 hours, on the pharmacokinetics of theophylline given as a single 4.5-mg/kg intravenous infusion. Participants were assigned randomly to receive theophylline with levofloxacin in one study period and theophylline with placebo in the other period. Fourteen individuals completed the study. Mean (+/-SD) values for theophylline pharmacokinetic parameters for the levofloxacin and placebo treatments, respectively, were peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 11.4 (1.8) micrograms/mL and 10.7 (1.3) micrograms/mL; areas under the concentration time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCzero-infinity) of 124 (32) micrograms.hr/mL and 126 (30) micrograms.hr/mL; volumes of distribution at steady state (Vdss) 31.7 (3.5) L and 32.0 (3.9) L; clearances (Cl) of 48.6 (11.6) mL/min and 47.4 (10.3) mL/min; and half-lives (t1/2) of 8.1 (1.9) hours and 8.2 (1.8) hours. There were no statistically significant differences between treatments for any of these parameters. There was no pharmacokinetic interaction between levofloxacin administered orally at steady-state conditions and intravenously administered theophylline.

Inhibitory potency of quinolone antibacterial agents against cytochrome P450IA2 activity in vivo and in vitro

Inhibition of cytochrome P450IA2 activity is an important adverse effect of quinolone antibacterial agents. It results in a prolonged half-life for some drugs that are coadministered with quinolones, such as theophylline. The objective of the study described here was to define the parameters for quantifying the inhibitory potencies of quinolones against cytochrome P450IA2 in vivo and in vitro and to investigate the relationship between the results of both approaches. Cytochrome P450IA2 activity in vitro was measured by using the 3-demethylation rate of caffeine (500 microM) in human liver microsomes. The inhibitory potency of a quinolone in vitro was determined by calculating the decrease in the activity of cytochrome P450IA2 caused by addition of the quinolone (500 microM) into the incubation medium. The mean values (percent reduction of activity without quinolone) were as follows: enoxacin, 74.9%; ciprofloxacin, 70.4%; nalidixic acid, 66.6%; pipemidic acid, 59.3%; norfloxacin, 55.7%; lomefloxacin, 23.4%; pefloxacin, 22.0%; amifloxacin, 21.4%; difloxacin, 21.3%; ofloxacin, 11.8%; temafloxacin, 10.0%; fleroxacin, no effect. The inhibitory potency of a quinolone in vivo was defined by a dose- and bioavailability-normalized parameter calculated from changes of the elimination half-life of theophylline and/or caffeine reported in previously published studies. Taking the pharmacokinetics of the quinolones into account, it was possible to differentiate between substances with and without clinically relevant inhibitory effects by using results of in vitro investigations. The in vitro test described here may help to qualitatively predict the relevant drug interactions between quinolones and methylxanthines that occur during therapy.

The U.S. clinical experience with lomefloxacin, a new once-daily fluoroquinolone

Lomefloxacin is a new fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent that has undergone extensive worldwide clinical evaluation. This report summarizes the safety and efficacy of lomefloxacin in the treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections, complicated urinary tract infections, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and for prophylaxis during urinary tract surgery. The clinical data presented are an overview of all clinical studies conducted in the United States to date. The results have been derived from multiple studies in which patients received lomefloxacin or a comparative agent in either blinded or open-label studies. During the course of the clinical program in the United States, lomefloxacin has been compared with oral norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and cefaclor, as well as parenteral cefotaxime. In all instances, the once-daily oral administration of lomefloxacin was either equally effective or statistically significantly superior in clinical and/or bacteriologic efficacy to these comparative agents. In addition, the comparators were administered either two or three times per day, except in the surgical prophylaxis studies, in which single doses of each antibiotic were administered preoperatively. These results attest to the value of the convenience and simplicity of the oral dosing regimen for lomefloxacin. During the course of the clinical program, lomefloxacin was well tolerated, with most adverse events of mild to moderate severity. In general, the incidence of adverse events for patients and subjects receiving lomefloxacin was comparable to that observed in patients treated with comparator drugs. The most common adverse events were related to the gastrointestinal tract (nausea and diarrhea), the skin and appendages (photosensitivity), and the central nervous system (dizziness and headache). A sub-analysis of adverse events in the respiratory studies demonstrated that concomitant administration of lomefloxacin and theophylline does not increase the incidence of adverse events when compared to lomefloxacin alone. An additional sub-analysis also showed that the incidence of adverse events in elderly patients was similar to that in younger patients. The results of the U.S. clinical program indicate that lomefloxacin administered orally once daily is effective and well tolerated in a variety of infections of bacterial origin.

The effects of quinolones on xanthine pharmacokinetics

Caffeine, theobromine, and theophylline are among the most widely consumed compounds in beverages and in pharmaceutical preparations. These methylxanthine alkaloids are metabolized by similar pathways involving demethylation and hydroxylation that are predominantly cytochrome P-450 mediated. In vivo and in vitro evidence suggests that the cytochrome P-450 isozymes involved in the demethylation pathways are distinct from the cytochrome P-450 isozymes involved in the hydroxylation pathways. Although distinctions can be made between demethylation and hydroxylation pathways, the evidence suggests that these different cytochrome P-450 isozymes are under common regulatory control. Any drug inhibiting the family of cytochrome P-450 isozymes involved in the metabolism of the methylxanthines would, therefore, be expected to have a similar effect on theophylline, theobromine, and caffeine. A number of quinolones, including enoxacin, pipemidic acid, ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin, and pefloxacin, have been shown to reduce the clearance of theophylline, while lomefloxacin has no effect on theophylline or caffeine clearance. It has been hypothesized that only fluoroquinolones that form a 4-oxo-metabolite inhibit theophylline clearance. Lomefloxacin, which does not form a 4-oxo-metabolite, would therefore not be expected to inhibit the clearance of theophylline or caffeine. In contrast, ciprofloxacin, which does form a 4-oxo-metabolite, has been shown to reduce theophylline and caffeine clearances by about one third. Another hypothesis for the differences among quinolones suggests that quinolones that have a greater impact on theophylline clearances are more stereochemically similar to theophylline. Substitutions at position 8 on the quinolone nucleus (as in lomefloxacin) would result in stearic hindrance and decrease the structural similarity to theophylline.

Overview of fluoroquinolone safety

The safety of the fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agents is reviewed, discussing documented and potential clinical and laboratory adverse effects and drug-drug interactions. In prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing fluoroquinolones to nonquinolone drugs or placebo, the fluoroquinolones were not significantly different (22 studies) or were superior (5 studies) to comparison agents but were only rarely more toxic (2 studies). Adverse effects included mild gastrointestinal toxicities and less common but more problematic central nervous system toxicities. Clinically important interactions occurred with coadministration of antacids and all fluoroquinolones and with theophylline and enoxacin and to a lesser extent ciprofloxacin and pefloxacin but not other fluoroquinolones. Potential adverse effects such as cartilage damage, DNA damage, teratogenicity, and crystalluria, while of concern, have not as yet been shown to be of clinical importance. Therapy of bacterial infections in children and adolescents is relatively contraindicated, but growing clinical experience with treatment of these patients has not so far revealed serious bone or cartilage toxicity. The fluoroquinolones thus far have exhibited a favorable safety profile, but our clinical experience is still limited, and monitoring for as yet unappreciated toxicities is warranted.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin

Compared with nalidixic acid, ciprofloxacin is representative of a newer, more potent class of quinolones, termed the fluoroquinolones. It is available in both oral and parenteral dosage forms. The primary target of quinolone activity appears to be the bacterial DNA gyrase enzyme, which is a member of the class of type II topoisomerases. Bacterial do not acquire resistance to fluoroquinolones through mechanisms that are plasmid or R-factor mediated and, additionally, the quinolones do not appear to be vulnerable to degradation by bacterial inactivating mechanisms. Rather, bacterial resistance to ciprofloxacin occurs either through chromosomal mutation in the target enzyme DNA gyrase or through mutations that alter drug permeability into the bacterial cell. Ciprofloxacin and the fluoroquinolones in general are no more likely to select resistant mutant than are aminoglycosides or beta-lactam antibiotics. Ciprofloxacin displays in vitro activity against most Gram-negative and many Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria, many of which are resistant to a wide range of antibiotics. This finding is of considerable potential clinical significance. High pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) and microbiological agar diffusion assays have been routinely used to quantify ciprofloxacin concentrations in biological fluids. Both methods are reproducible and accurate for serum but HPLC is recommended for other specimens because of the presence of microbiologically active metabolites. Absorption after oral administration is rapid and can be satisfactorily described as a zero-order process; peak serum ciprofloxacin concentrations (Cmax) are reached in approximately 1 to 2 hours. Concomitant administration of food does not cause clinically significant impairment of absorption and may be helpful in minimising gastric distress caused by the drug. A linear relationship between serum ciprofloxacin concentrations and the dose administered either orally or intravenously has been reported. The absolute bioavailability of ciprofloxacin is approximately 70%. The volume of distribution is large with a steady-state range after oral or intravenous dosing of 1.74 to 5.0 L/kg reflecting penetration of the drug into most tissues. Nonrenal clearance accounts for approximately 33% of the elimination of ciprofloxacin; to date, 4 metabolites have been identified. A first-pass effect has been reported but is thought to be clinically unimportant. Faecal recovery of ciprofloxacin accounts for approximately 15% of an intravenous dose. Nonrenal elimination includes metabolic degradation, biliary excretion and transluminal secretion across the enteric mucosa. Glomerular filtration and tubular secretion account for approximately 66% of the total serum clearance. The terminal disposition half-life (t1/2) is about 3 to 4 hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Effect of ciprofloxacin on antipyrine pharmacokinetics and metabolism in rats

The effect of ciprofloxacin pretreatment on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of antipyrine in male rats was studied. The animals received oral antipyrine (20 mg/kg of body weight) with and without ciprofloxacin pretreatment (40 mg/kg orally once a day for 8 days). The total plasma clearance of antipyrine was decreased from 0.130 +/- 0.007 to 0.090 +/- 0.005 liter/h (mean +/- standard error of the mean) (P less than 0.01) by ciprofloxacin, while the half-life at beta (elimination) phase and the area under the concentration-time curve for antipyrine were increased from 1.90 +/- 0.22 to 2.83 +/- 0.29 h (P less than 0.05) and from 43.25 +/- 3.35 to 52.41 +/- 2.31 mg.h/liter (P less than 0.05), respectively. The urinary excretions of norantipyrine, 4-hydroxyantipyrine, and 3-hydroxymethylantipyrine decreased by 73, 43, and 54%, respectively (P less than 0.001), in the 96 h after ciprofloxacin treatment. In addition, the rate constants for formation of each of these metabolites were significantly decreased, by an average of approximately 75%. These results suggest that ciprofloxacin is capable of inhibiting oxidative metabolism. This finding could be of clinical significance for drugs that are highly dependent of metabolic pathways, such as those inhibited in this study.

Safety of fleroxacin coadministered with theophylline to young and elderly volunteers

The influence of multiple doses of fleroxacin on the plasma clearance and the urinary excretion of theophylline was studied in 19 young and 18 elderly male volunteers. A theophylline dosage individualized to obtain a mean theophylline concentration in plasma of 10 +/- 3 micrograms/ml was administered for 1 week to each subject. At week 2, oral fleroxacin (400 mg once daily) was added. Theophylline concentrations in plasma were measured with TDx (Abbott Diagnostics, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), and urinary excretion of theophylline and its three major metabolites was measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Total theophylline clearance remained essentially unchanged throughout the study period (3.5 and 2.9 liters/h in the young and the elderly, respectively) both after a single fleroxacin dose and after multiple doses. Although significant changes occurred in the urinary excretion of unchanged theophylline and its metabolites after a single fleroxacin dose, no changes were observed after multiple doses. Side effects consisted mainly of gastrointestinal and sleep disturbances, more related to theophylline; photosensitivity was observed in six subjects and was attributed to fleroxacin. We conclude that fleroxacin may be administered concomitantly with theophylline in either young or elderly patients. Close monitoring of theophylline concentrations in serum should be performed, particularly in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, for whom data are currently lacking.

Prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin with cefaclor in the treatment of patients with purulent bronchitis

We compared safety and efficacy of ciprofloxacin and cefaclor in the treatment of patients with purulent bronchitis. Fifty-five patients were randomized prospectively to receive ciprofloxacin with a dose of 500 mg orally twice daily or cefaclor 250 mg over 8 hr for 5 days or longer. Patient groups did not differ with respect to age, duration of illness, severity of infection, or number of other concomitant disease states. A significantly larger number of patients in the ciprofloxacin group had poor health status (39.3% vs 7.4% for the ciprofloxacin and cefaclor groups, respectively, p = 0.02). The response to therapy did not differ between groups. Infection was completely resolved in 71.4% vs 66.7% and markedly improved in 7.1% and 11.1% for the ciprofloxacin and cefaclor groups, respectively. The response to therapy and adverse reaction rate did not differ between groups. Seven patients treated with ciprofloxacin and five patients treated with cefaclor developed adverse reactions. We conclude that ciprofloxacin is a useful agent for the treatment of purulent bronchitis.