Comparison of single-dose treatment with norfloxacin and standard 5-day treatment with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for acute shigellosis in adults

Target Product Profile and Development Path for Shigellosis Treatment with Antibacterials

Enteric infection with Shigella spp. can lead to symptoms ranging from acute watery diarrhea to sudden, severe dysentery. Approximately 212 000 diarrheal deaths annually are attributed to Shigella with a disproportionate impact in low-resource countries. The impact in under-resourced countries was illustrated by a reanalysis of the Global Enteric Multicenter Study which found that Shigella was the leading pathogen associated with moderate-to severe diarrhea in children under 5 years old. While recent studies have highlighted the burden of the disease, there has been a concurrent reduction in therapeutic options for the treatment of shigellosis as drug resistant strains increase in prevalence. In addition, increasing reports of drug resistant shigellosis cases in the men who have sex with men community confirm that the impact is not limited to low-resource countries. Despite the urgent need for new treatments, a target product profile (TPP) has not been established, and there is no clear development path for antibacterial treatments. To address this troubling concern, this manuscript describes a TPP for antishigellosis small molecule therapeutics and a development path that integrates currently available preclinical and clinical models of Shigella infection.

Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea: a graded expert panel report

BACKGROUND

: Travelers' diarrhea causes significant morbidity including some sequelae, lost travel time and opportunity cost to both travelers and countries receiving travelers. Effective prevention and treatment are needed to reduce these negative impacts.

METHODS

: This critical appraisal of the literature and expert consensus guideline development effort asked several key questions related to antibiotic and non-antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment, utility of available diagnostics, impact of multi-drug resistant (MDR) colonization associated with travel and travelers' diarrhea, and how our understanding of the gastrointestinal microbiome should influence current practice and future research. Studies related to these key clinical areas were assessed for relevance and quality. Based on this critical appraisal, guidelines were developed and voted on using current standards for clinical guideline development methodology.

RESULTS

: New definitions for severity of travelers' diarrhea were developed. A total of 20 graded recommendations on the topics of prophylaxis, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up were developed. In addition, three non-graded consensus-based statements were adopted.

CONCLUSIONS

: Prevention and treatment of travelers' diarrhea requires action at the provider, traveler and research community levels. Strong evidence supports the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy in most cases of moderate to severe travelers' diarrhea, while either increasing intake of fluids only or loperamide or bismuth subsalicylate may suffice for most cases of mild diarrhea. Further studies are needed to address knowledge gaps regarding optimal therapies, the individual, community and global health risks of MDR acquisition, manipulation of the microbiome in prevention and treatment and the utility of laboratory testing in returning travelers with persistent diarrhea.

Proposal for shorter antibiotic therapies

OBJECTIVES

Reducing antibiotic consumption has now become a major public health priority. Reducing treatment duration is one of the means to achieve this objective. Guidelines on the therapeutic management of the most frequent infections recommend ranges of treatment duration in the ratio of one to two. The Recommendation Group of the French Infectious Diseases Society (SPILF) was asked to collect literature data to then recommend the shortest treatment durations possible for various infections.

METHODS

Analysis of the literature focused on guidelines published in French and English, supported by a systematic search on PubMed. Articles dating from one year before the guidelines publication to August 31, 2015 were searched on the website.

RESULTS

The shortest treatment durations based on the relevant clinical data were suggested for upper and lower respiratory tract infections, central venous catheter-related and uncomplicated primary bacteremia, infective endocarditis, bacterial meningitis, intra-abdominal, urinary tract, upper reproductive tract, bone and joint, skin and soft tissue infections, and febrile neutropenia. Details of analyzed articles were shown in tables.

CONCLUSION

This work stresses the need for new well-conducted studies evaluating treatment durations for some common infections. Following the above-mentioned work focusing on existing literature data, the Recommendation Group of the SPILF suggests specific study proposals.

An outbreak of shigellosis in a Children Welfare Institute caused by a multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain of Shigella flexneri 2a

From September 1 to October 27, 2015, an outbreak of bacillary dysentery occurred in the Shenzhen Children Welfare Institute (SCWI). The shigellosis was uncommon in Shenzhen and no related outbreak was reported during the last 5 years. An epidemiological investigation was conducted and the children and nursing workers in SCWI were surveyed for gastrointestinal symptoms; 28 of children reported having a diarrheal illness. Rectal swabs or fecal specimens from 14 case patients and 24 nursing workers or cook, as well as 17 swabs from implicated items were collected and examined for Shigella, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Salmonella. Susceptibility testing and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed on the Shigella isolates. The multiple-antibiotic-resistant Shigella flexneri 2a was isolated from 10 ill children aged less than 5 years. The source of the outbreak was most likely a new welfare child transferred from an institute in another county and the secondary transmission of the illness was facilitated by the limited activity space and the cohabiting of ill and well residents. The outbreak was controlled after quarantine of ill residents, introduction of new antibiotics and the improvements of hygienic condition. This was the first time that shigellosis outbreak was reported at such settings in Shenzhen and the results of this investigation underscored the need for adequate precautions to prevent secondary transmission of multiple-antibiotic-resistant strain in the welfare setting.

Diarrhoea during military deployment: current concepts and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Diarrhoea among military travellers deployed globally in conflict and peacekeeping activities remains one of the most important health threats. Here we review recent advances in our understanding of the epidemiology, laboratory identification, treatment and chronic health consequences of this multi-cause infection, and consider the implications for public health management and future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

The incidence of diarrhoea among deployed military personnel from industrialized countries to lesser developed countries is approximately 30% per month overall, with clinical incidence between 5 and 7% per 100 person-months. The risk appears to be higher early during deployment and is associated with poor hygienic conditions and contaminated food sources. Gaps remain in our understanding of the cause, given the lack of laboratory capability in austere conditions of deployment; however, recent advances in molecular methods of characterization hold promise in improving our detection capabilities. While there have been improvements in understanding of best treatments, more work needs to be done in transforming this knowledge into action and optimizing single-dose antibiotic treatment regimens. Finally, the under-recognized burden of chronic consequences of these infections is gaining awareness and reinforces the need to find effective preventive strategies.

SUMMARY

Our understanding of the epidemiology of diarrhoea is improving but further research is needed to fully account for acute operational-focused health impacts as well as the chronic enduring disease impacts. Improved field diagnostics would be of great value to support these efforts.

Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery

BACKGROUND

Shigella dysentery is a relatively common illness and occasionally causes death, worldwide. Mild symptoms are self-limiting but in more severe cases, antibiotics are recommended for cure and preventing relapse. The antibiotics recommended are diverse, have regional differences in sensitivity, and have side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Shigella dysentery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In June 2009 we identified all relevant trials from the following databases: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT). We also checked conference proceedings for relevant abstracts, and contacted researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of antibiotics for Shigella dysentery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors, working in pairs, independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data, and used the random-effects model for significant heterogeneity. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity, when present, in subgroup analyses of participant age and percentage of participants with confirmed Shigella infection.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (1748 participants), spanning four decades and with differing sensitivity to Shigella isolates, met the inclusion criteria. Seven were judged to be at risk of bias due to inadequate allocation concealment or blinding, and 12 due to incomplete reporting of outcome data. Limited data from one three-armed trial of people with moderately severe illness suggest that antibiotics reduce the episodes of diarrhoea at follow-up (furazolidone versus no drug RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 73 participants; cotrimoxazole versus no drug RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59, 76 participants).There was insufficient evidence to consider any class of antibiotic superior in efficacy in treating Shigella dysentery, but heterogeneity for some comparisons limits confidence in the results. All the antibiotics studied were safe. There was inadequate evidence regarding the role of antibiotics in preventing relapses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics reduce the duration of Shigella dysentery.Regularly updated local or regional antibiotic sensitivity patterns to different species and strains of Shigella are required to guide empiric therapy. More trials adhering to standard guidelines are required to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the treatment of severe forms of Shigella dysentery and in groups who are at high risk of complications.

Lomefloxacin versus trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole in the treatment of adults with acute bacterial diarrhea

This study compared the efficacy and safety of lomefloxacin with that of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in the treatment of adult patients with acute diarrhea of bacterial etiology. Two centers enrolled a total of 133 patients; 99 (74%) presented with severe symptoms. The patients were randomized to receive either lomefloxacin 400 mg once daily (n=68) or TMP/SMX 160/800 mg twice daily (n=65) for five days. Bacteriologic success was achieved in 89.5% of evaluation lomefloxacin-treated patients and in 97.5% of patients treated with TMP/SMX. Clinical success was achieved in 100% and 97.5% of patients in the two treatment groups, respectively. The predominant organisms isolated in both groups at baseline, i.e. Shigella flexneri, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and Salmonella Group D, were eradicated in all patients. Campylobacter jejuni was isolated at baseline in four patients in the lomefloxacin group but in none randomized to receive TMP/SMX; this organism persisted in three patients. Adverse events were experienced by 14 (23%) of the lomefloxacin-treated patients and by 18 (30%) of the TMP/SMX-treated patients. All adverse events reported were mild or moderate in severity and their distribution was similar in both groups. The results of this study show that lomefloxacin 400 mg once daily is as effective as TMP/SMX 160/800 mg twice daily and suggest that lomefloxacin is a promising new quinolone for the treatment of bacterial diarrhea.

Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery

BACKGROUND

Shigella dysentery is a relatively common illness and occasionally causes death, worldwide. Mild symptoms are self-limiting but in more severe cases, antibiotics are recommended for cure and preventing relapse. The antibiotics recommended are diverse, have regional differences in sensitivity, and have side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Shigella dysentery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In June 2009 we identified all relevant trials from the following databases: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT). We also checked conference proceedings for relevant abstracts, and contacted researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of antibiotics for Shigella dysentery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors, working in pairs, independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data, and used the random-effects model for significant heterogeneity. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity, when present, in subgroup analyses of participant age and percentage of participants with confirmed Shigella infection.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (1748 participants), spanning four decades and with differing sensitivity to Shigella isolates, met the inclusion criteria. Seven were judged to be at risk of bias due to inadequate allocation concealment or blinding, and 12 due to incomplete reporting of outcome data. Limited data from one three-armed trial of people with moderately severe illness suggest that antibiotics reduce the episodes of diarrhoea at follow-up (furazolidone versus no drug RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 73 participants; cotrimoxazole versus no drug RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59, 76 participants).There was insufficient evidence to consider any class of antibiotic superior in efficacy in treating Shigella dysentery, but heterogeneity for some comparisons limits confidence in the results. All the antibiotics studied were safe. There was inadequate evidence regarding the role of antibiotics in preventing relapses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics reduce the duration of Shigella dysentery.Regularly updated local or regional antibiotic sensitivity patterns to different species and strains of Shigella are required to guide empiric therapy. More trials adhering to standard guidelines are required to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the treatment of severe forms of Shigella dysentery and in groups who are at high risk of complications.

Antibiotic therapy for Shigella dysentery

BACKGROUND

Shigella dysentery is a relatively common illness and occasionally causes death, worldwide. Mild symptoms are self-limiting but in more severe cases, antibiotics are recommended for cure and preventing relapse. The antibiotics recommended are diverse, have regional differences in sensitivity, and have side effects.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotics for treating Shigella dysentery.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In June 2009 we identified all relevant trials from the following databases: Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2008, issue 4), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT). We also checked conference proceedings for relevant abstracts, and contacted researchers, organizations, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials of antibiotics for Shigella dysentery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors, working in pairs, independently assessed trial eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data. We calculated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous data, and used the random-effects model for significant heterogeneity. We explored possible sources of heterogeneity, when present, in subgroup analyses of participant age and percentage of participants with confirmed Shigella infection.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixteen trials (1748 participants), spanning four decades and with differing sensitivity to Shigella isolates, met the inclusion criteria. Seven were judged to be at risk of bias due to inadequate allocation concealment or blinding, and 12 due to incomplete reporting of outcome data. Limited data from one three-armed trial of people with moderately severe illness suggest that antibiotics reduce the episodes of diarrhoea at follow-up (furazolidone versus no drug RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.48, 73 participants; cotrimoxazole versus no drug RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.59, 76 participants).There was insufficient evidence to consider any class of antibiotic superior in efficacy in treating Shigella dysentery, but heterogeneity for some comparisons limits confidence in the results. All the antibiotics studied were safe. There was inadequate evidence regarding the role of antibiotics in preventing relapses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics reduce the duration of Shigella dysentery.Regularly updated local or regional antibiotic sensitivity patterns to different species and strains of Shigella are required to guide empiric therapy. More trials adhering to standard guidelines are required to evaluate the role of antibiotics in the treatment of severe forms of Shigella dysentery and in groups who are at high risk of complications.

Increasing antimicrobial resistance--an emerging problem in the treatment of shigellosis

Shigellosis is a major cause of diarrhoea-related morbidity and mortality, especially in developing countries. Effective antibiotic treatment reduces the average duration of illness by reducing faecal excretion of the bacterium and preventing further transmission and potentially lethal complications. Treatment of shigellosis is currently limited by the high prevalence of multidrug-resistant strains of Shigella. Although fluoroquinolones are currently effective in treating adults, resistance to fluoroquinolones among Shigella spp. is emerging, and their use in children is subject to limitations. Azithromycin and third-generation cephalosporins are also effective in the treatment of shigellosis, but monitoring of Shigella isolates to detect the emergence of resistance is essential.

Prevention and self-treatment of traveler's diarrhea

Of the millions who travel from the industrialized world to developing countries every year, between 20% and 50% will develop at least one episode of diarrhea, making it the most common medical ailment afflicting travelers. Although usually a mild illness, traveler's diarrhea can result in significant morbidity and hardship overseas. Precautions can be taken to minimize the risk of developing traveler's diarrhea, either through avoidance of potentially contaminated food or drink or through various prophylactic measures, including both nonpharmacological and antimicrobial strategies. If diarrhea does develop despite the precautions taken, effective treatment-usually a combination of an antibiotic and an antimotility agent-can be brought by the traveler and initiated as soon as symptoms develop. In the future, vaccines-several of which are in the advanced stages of clinical testing-may be added to the list of prophylactic measures.

Prevention and self-treatment of travelers' diarrhea

Of the 50 million people who travel from the industrialized world to developing countries every year, between 20% and 50% will develop at least one episode of diarrhea, making it the most common ailment of travel. Although usually a mild illness, travelers' diarrhea can result in significant morbidity and hardship while overseas. Precautions can be taken to minimize the risk of developing diarrhea. If diarrhea does develop despite precautions, effective treatment, usually a combination of an antibiotic and an antimotility agent, can be taken along and started by the traveler at the onset of symptoms.

Treatment of bacillary dysentery in Vietnamese children: two doses of ofloxacin versus 5-days nalidixic acid

Nalidixic acid (NA: 55 mg/kg daily for 5 days) is the recommended treatment for uncomplicated bacillary dysentery in areas where multidrug-resistant Shigella are prevalent. An open randomized comparison of this NA regimen with 2 doses of ofloxacin (total 15 mg/kg) was conducted in 1995/96 in 135 Vietnamese children with fever and bloody diarrhoea. Sixty-six children with a bacterial pathogen isolated were eligible for analysis. Of the 63 Shigella isolates, 39 (62%) were resistant to multiple antibiotics. Resolution times for fever and diarrhoea were similar in the 2 groups, but excretion time of stool pathogen was significantly longer in the NA recipients [median (range) days 1 (1-9) vs 1 (1-2), P = 0.001]. There were 9 (25%) treatment failures in the NA regimen and 3 (10%) in the ofloxacin group; P = 0.1. Two patients had NA-resistant Shigella flexneri. One of these isolates was selected during NA treatment. From a clinical and public health standpoint a 2-dose regimen of ofloxacin is preferable to nalidixic acid in the treatment of bacillary dysentery.

Clinical use of fluoroquinolones in children

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of fluoroquinolones in children.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (January 1966-March 1998) was conducted for relevant literature.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Data from compassionate use and published studies were reviewed for the assessment of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of fluoroquinolones in children.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fluoroquinolones have a broad spectrum coverage of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa and intracellular organisms. Fluoroquinolones are well absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, have excellent tissue penetration, low protein binding, and long elimination half-lives. These antibiotics are effective in treating various infections and are well tolerated in adults. However, the use of fluoroquinolones in children has been restricted due to potential cartilage damage that occurred in research with immature animals. Fluoroquinolones have been used in children on a compassionate basis. Ciprofloxacin is the most frequently used fluoroquinolone in children, most often in the treatment of pulmonary infection in cystic fibrosis as well as salmonellosis and shigellosis. Other uses include chronic suppurative otitis media, meningitis, septicemia, and urinary tract infection. Safety data of fluoroquinolones in children appear to be similar to those in adults. Fluoroquinolones are associated with tendinitis and reversible arthralgia in adults and children. However, direct association between fluoroquinolones and arthropathy remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluoroquinolones have been found to be effective in treating certain infections in children. Additional research is needed to define the optimal dosage regimens in pediatric patients. Although fluoroquinolones appear to be well tolerated, further investigations are needed to determine the risk of arthropathy in children. However, their use in children should not be withheld when the benefits outweigh the risks.

Infectious Diarrhea

Infectious diarrhea constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality for all age groups. The focus of this article is to identify high risk host and pathogenic risk determinants of enteric infections, discuss pathophysiologic mechanisms for diarrhea, review conventional and upcoming therapeutic managements of bacterial, protozoal or viral-type diarrhea, and describe the integral role of the pharmacist in the overall care of patients having this illness.

Use of ciprofloxacin in developing countries

BACKGROUND

The demographic and subsequent economic pressures in developing nations have contributed to the increasing levels of antibiotic resistance among both commensal flora and pathogenic bacteria. As empirical options are diminishing daily, the role of ciprofloxacin in pediatric infections is becoming increasingly significant.

OBJECTIVE

The levels of resistance among various enteric pathogens are described, and the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in treating infections such as shigellosis, cholera and Escherichia coli gastroenteritis are discussed. The findings of a large study of invasive salmonellosis in children in rural Africa are briefly presented, including the role of ciprofloxacin in multiresistant invasive disease. In addition the role of ciprofloxacin as a chemoprophylactic agent in the control of meningococcal disease is discussed.

RESULTS

The efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in children were found to be similar to those observed in adults for gastrointestinal infectious diseases. Overall the data presented confirm that ciprofloxacin is a safe and efficacious agent for use in children in the developing world.

CONCLUSION

Ciprofloxacin has been shown to be safe and efficacious in children in developing countries. Subsequently a priority for both the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory authorities in developing nations is to prevent fluoroquinolone misuse and development of antibiotic resistance.

Quinolones

Fluoroquinolones represent a major advance in antimicrobial chemotherapy. Currently, there are five fluoroquinolones approved by the FDA, and many more quinolones are expected to become available in years to come. Although their clinical utility is constantly expanding, they have been best studied in complicated urinary tract infections, chronic osteomyelitis caused by gram-negative bacilli, bacterial gastrointestinal infections such as traveler's diarrhea and typhoid fever, and uncomplicated gonococcal infections and in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in patients with neutropenia. These agents have the convenience of oral administration, favorable pharmacokinetic properties, and low toxicity profiles but should be used advisedly because indiscriminate use may result in the early emergence of resistance.

Role of quinolones in the treatment of diarrhoeal diseases

Diarrhoeal diseases are still an important health problem in both developing and developed countries, and resistance to commonly used antibiotics among enteric pathogens is a major issue. Quinolones have become important agents in the treatment of diarrhoeal diseases because of their excellent in vitro activity against pathogens and their pharmacological features. In many clinical studies, they appeared to be effective in the treatment of shigellosis and the prevention and treatment of diarrhoea in travellers. Several studies have demonstrated that single-dose therapy with these agents is sufficient in many cases. Their role in the treatment of acute salmonellosis is still controversial, because of their lack of efficacy in eliminating salmonella from the faeces.

The new quinolones in the treatment of diarrhoea and typhoid fever

Diarrhoea and typhoid fever are two important diseases in the developing world, particularly the Asian countries. The management of these conditions is becoming increasingly difficult in the face of emerging pathogen resistance. The new fluoroquinolones demonstrate good in vitro activity against the causative pathogens involved, including those that are multidrug resistant. These agents have been shown to be very effective in the treatment of diarrhoea and typhoid in clinical trials, achieving results equal to, or better than, standard drugs. Importantly, fluoroquinolones also considerably shorten the duration of illness, thereby offering rapid relief to the patient.

Antimicrobial resistance of Shigella isolates causing traveler's diarrhea

Shigella isolates were identified as a cause of traveler's diarrhea in 67 (10%) of 675 patients and were tested for resistance to seven antimicrobial agents in a comparative study with those causing nontraveler's diarrhea in Spain. Ampicillin and chloramphenicol resistance was more frequent in Shigella flexneri (60 and 46%, respectively) than in Shigella sonnei (32 and 18%, respectively) and in travel-related isolates (P < 0.05 and 0.04, respectively). Of S. sonnei isolates from patients with traveler's diarrhea, 73 and 54% showed tetracycline and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole resistance, respectively, compared with only 8% of isolates from patients without a history of travel to developing countries (P < 0.007 and P < 0.0002). Low-level resistance to cephalosporins was found, whereas quinolone-resistant strains were not detected among travel-related Shigella isolates. Thus, quinolones may be an effective alternative therapy for travel-related shigellosis.

Acute bacterial diarrhoea in the emergency room: therapeutic implications of stool culture results

Empiric treatment with ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin has been recommended recently for patients with acute diarrhoeal disease. In a retrospective 6-month study period the results of stool cultures from 209 patients with acute diarrhoea admitted to the emergency room were analysed. Seventy-eight cultures (37%) were positive for one or more bacteria. Shigella was the most commonly isolated pathogen (68%). Shigella sonnei comprised 72% and Shigella flexneri 19% of all the bacterial isolates. While no antimicrobial resistance to ciprofloxacin was found for both Shigella species, only 36 and 26% of the Shigella isolates were sensitive to ampicillin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ), respectively. These findings point out to the emergence of drug resistance to commonly used antimicrobial drugs. Shigella's high sensitivity to the newer quinolones should make this the treatment of choice for the very sick patient, although physicians should be cautioned to the fact that indiscriminate use of this drug could result in the emergence of resistance similar to that noted with ampicillin and TMP-SMZ.

The role of new antibiotics for the treatment of infections in the emergency department

Treatment of infectious diseases comprises a large part of emergency medicine practice. The management of infectious diseases in the emergency department is often different than in other settings because of the types of infectious presentations and the frequent necessity of empiric treatment decisions. This paper examines the new antimicrobials and their role for the treatment of infections in the ED.

Antibiotic misuse in diarrhea. A household survey in a Mexican community

A survey of 1659 households in a periurban community in Mexico City was carried out to assess the frequency of and risk factors for inappropriate antimicrobial therapy in acute diarrhea. The housewife was interviewed to obtain information of the occurrence of diarrhea or use of an antibiotic in the previous 2 weeks by any member of the family. An antibiotic was used in 37% or 287 diarrheal episodes although only in 5% of all episodes was this therapy indicated, based on the presence of gross blood in stools. Patients seen by a physician were 6 times more likely to be treated with an antibiotic compared to those who did not consult a physician (p < 0.001). Self-medication was associated with a higher risk of using an inadequate drug or dose (in 72% of treated episodes) and of following treatment for less than 5 days (in 66% of treated episodes). Other risk factors significantly and independently associated with antibiotic misuse were: an increased number of stools (odds ratio [OR] = 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.04, 1.41), bloody diarrhea (OR = 19.04; 95% CI = 2.52, 160.90) and family crowding (OR = 2.07; 95% CI = 1.17, 3.63). These findings support future community-oriented educational interventions aimed at improving physician prescribing practices and patient compliance behavior in order to achieve a more rational use of antibiotics.

Acute infectious diarrhea

Diarrhea continues to be a major cause of mortality and morbidity in third world countries as well as a major symptomatic complaint in the primary care setting in the United States. The etiologic pathogen depends on an exposure history to include recent travel to foreign countries, consuming fecally contaminated water or food, prior use of antibiotics, or homosexual behavior. A careful history from patients directed at attempting to identify particular risk factors may help in making a diagnosis. Not all patients require a diagnostic workup. A large number of patients may only require oral rehydration, careful observation over time with or without use of antimotility agents. In toxic appearing patients or patients with fever, however, bloody stools, abdominal pain or tenesmus, a selective diagnostic workup is indicated. Antimicrobial treatments are not always required, some pathogens clearly call for treatment while some have less clear indications and other pathogens are not responsive to antimicrobial agents at all. Finally, one needs to remember that the differential diagnosis of acute diarrhea includes many noninfectious origins.

Quinolones in the treatment of acute bacterial diarrhoeal diseases

Acute bacterial diarrhoea is still an important disease, especially in developing countries. Resistance to antibiotics among enteric pathogens is relatively common in many parts of the world. The quinolones are active in vitro against these organisms, and achieve high stool concentrations. Because of these features, quinolones have been used in the treatment of acute diarrhoeal diseases caused by various bacteria. They appear to be effective in the therapy of shigellosis and travellers' diarrhoea, as well as in the prevention of diarrhoeal disease in travellers. However, their role in the treatment of salmonella gastroenteritis has not been established yet.

Pharmacoeconomics of the therapy of diarrhoeal disease

We review the pathophysiology of intestinal water and electrolyte transport leading to diarrhoea, the currently available pharmacological strategies for its treatment, and the economic implications of such treatments. Diarrhoea occurs most frequently and is associated with highest mortality in children under 5. Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is the cornerstone of its management. The safety and efficacy of ORT in the prevention of death from dehydration, both in field and also in hospital settings, are now well established. Because it is also inexpensive, ORT is widely applicable worldwide. More recently, rice-based ORT has emerged, based on well known traditional remedies for diarrhoea in southeast Asia and the Far East. Rice-based ORT has the advantage of being more culturally acceptable, readily available even in rural homes in developing countries, and is more effective in reducing stool output and the duration of diarrhoea, compared with conventional glucose-electrolyte solutions such as World Health Organization ORT. For infants, the well known antidiarrhoeal properties of human milk needs emphasis for a variety of reasons including economic ones. Data concerning the economic benefits to a nations' health budget as a result of nationwide implementation of oral rehydration solution (ORS) use are limited. Available data from individual centres in developing countries, if projected to national level, would incur considerable economic advantage. Except for a few notable infections such as shigellosis, cholera, amoebiasis and giardiasis, the widespread use of antibiotics in acute diarrhoea, still a common practice in many developing countries, has no proven value and may be detrimental. The economic implications of antibiotic abuse in the treatment of diarrhoea in developing countries is enormous. Despite the availability of a wide spectrum of pharmacological agents for diarrhoea reviewed in this article, only a few such agents are of proven clinical efficacy: corticosteroids, aminosalicylates and immunosuppressants in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and opioid derivatives such as loperamide which may be useful in protracted diarrhoea in children and in disorders where rapid gastrointestinal transit is the main cause of diarrhoea. Opioids are not recommended for acute infective diarrhoea in childhood. Octreotide, a somatostatin analogue, is reported to be useful in the treatment of secretory diarrhoea due to noninfective causes and in the treatment of intractable diarrhoea associated with AIDS. Its high cost and need for parenteral administration prevent its wider application.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Pharmacoeconomics of antibacterial treatment

Antibacterial drugs account for between 3 and 25% of all prescriptions, between 6 and 21% of the total market value of drugs in a single country, and up to 50% of the drug budget in hospitals. Bacterial infection is widely perceived as disease caused by harmful outside agents which can be isolated and tested to select the best drug for treatment. In fact, the need for any treatment and the pros and cons of different drugs are just as debatable as in any other therapeutic area. Moreover, the bacteria which make up the normal flora of the body fulfil important roles, so that the ecological implications of treatment for the individual and for society should be considered in assessing the costs and consequences of antibacterial treatment. In this review we outline the most important issues relating to the treatment of bacterial infection in the community and in the hospital, contrasting information from developed and developing countries where appropriate. We review the existing literature on economic evaluation, but in general most of the literature deals with containing the costs of antibacterial drugs in hospitals, and there are many gaps in the literature on cost-effectiveness of treatment. Consequently there are still extreme variations in medical practice which present a challenge for future evaluation. As the outcomes of antibacterial treatment are apparent in a few weeks or months, this is an ideal field for testing pharmacoeconomic methodology. The desire to overcome medical practice variation through consensus statements should be avoided. Instead we recommend wider application of decision analysis to acknowledge that choices exist for the diagnosis and treatment of bacterial infection and to gather information about the implications of these choices. Much of the existing literature would be improved by a more explicit definition of costs. Direct costs to the health services should be distinguished from non medical costs. Moreover, the analysis should consider whether savings from one budget result in costs to another health service budget, or to the patient (transfer costs). These deficiencies in cost analysis will be relatively easy to correct. Of more concern is the fact that the efficacy of much antibacterial treatment is either totally debatable, or variable, depending on factors such as the type of patient treated or the quality of delivery of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

The fluoroquinolones

The fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics promises to become as diverse and as important as beta-lactam agents. The fluoroquinolones inhibit bacterial DNA gyrase and are bactericidal. All fluoroquinolones have potent activity against most gram-negative bacteria; ciprofloxacin is the most active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Activity against gram-positive organisms is variable; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus has acquired resistance to the fluoroquinolones at an alarming rate. Currently available quinolones do not have, but new quinolone agents likely will have, substantial activity against anaerobic bacteria. Some quinolones are also active against Mycobacterium, Chlamydia, and Mycoplasma organisms. All fluoroquinolones have excellent absorption after oral administration; however, this process can be impaired by the presence of aluminum- or magnesium-containing antacids and by zinc, iron, or calcium supplements. Ciprofloxacin is also available for intravenous use. Although most fluoroquinolones do not achieve adequate cerebrospinal fluid levels, penetration into other tissues is excellent. Dosage adjustments for renal and hepatic dysfunction vary among the quinolones. Although side effects are rare, concomitant use of caffeine or theophylline with some quinolones may cause toxicity to the central nervous system. Because they may affect the development of cartilage, all fluoroquinolones are contraindicated in children, adolescents, and pregnant or breast-feeding women.

Infectious Gastroenteritis

Infectious gastroenteritis currently constitutes the greatest source of morbidity and mortality among various age groups. Issues of focus for this article include establishing epidemiological determinants of risk for enteric infection, describing host factors that favor survival of the infecting enteric pathogen, defining pathophysiological mechanisms of diarrhea, and reviewing the therapeutic management of bacterial, protozoal, and viral infectious diarrhea.

Use of quinolones in the treatment of gastrointestinal infections

Bacterial enteropathogens are responsible for between 40% and 80% of diarrheal illness depending upon the age of the persons affected and geographic areas where illness occurs. Antibacterial agents will shorten the illness associated with enteric infection caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Shigella spp. and Campylobacter jejuni. These drugs also are effective in the therapy of certain clinical conditions (presumably because they are due to the same agents) which are characterized by moderate to severe diarrhea with one or more of the following: high fever, dysentery (passage of bloody mucoid stools), or high leukocyte counts in stools. Antimicrobial agents are also effective in the therapy of travelers' diarrhea. The quinolone drugs have several advantages in the management of bacterial diarrhea where strains causing illness from nearly all regions of the world will show general susceptibility: high concentrations are achieved in the intestinal lumen following oral administration and resistance development is unusual. A quinolone probably represents the optimal agent for therapy of bacterial diarrhea in adults in areas where trimethoprim-resistant enteric pathogens are common.

Therapy for acute infectious diarrhea in children

This article reviews current recommendations of therapy with antidiarrheal compounds and antimicrobial agents for acute infectious diarrhea in children. In most infants and children with acute infectious diarrhea, treatment with antidiarrheal compounds is not indicated. Many of these compounds interfere with identification of enteropathogens in stool specimens, and the antimotility class has an overdose potential. Antimicrobial therapy is given to reduce symptoms and to prevent the spread of infection by decreasing fecal shedding of organisms. Although effective therapy is not available for patients with enteric viruses, Cryptosporidium, and Microsporidium, therapy is useful for children with amebiasis, antimicrobial-associated colitis, cholera, giardiasis, various forms of Escherichia coli diarrhea and Salmonella disease, isosporiasis, shigellosis, and strongyloidiasis. For several other conditions, antimicrobial therapy is of questionable benefit (infection with Campylobacter jejuni or Yersinia enterocolitica, intestinal salmonellosis and enterohemorrhagic E. coli infection). Compounds such as the fluoroquinolones, which are effective in the treatment of acute infectious diarrhea in adults, are not approved for use in children because of potential side effects. Many bacterial, viral, and parasitic organisms cause acute infectious diarrhea; appropriate antimicrobial therapy requires the accurate, rapid identification of the offending enteropathogen. In children with an underlying illness such as acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, manifestations may be prolonged, severe, and recurrent despite appropriate therapy.

Emporiatrics: diarrhea in travelers

The degree of discomfort and inconvenience caused by travelers' diarrhea highlights the need to prepare the international traveler thoroughly. In addition to observing food and water precautions, most travelers should carry antibiotics and antimotility agents to be started if diarrhea occurs. Used judiciously, these precautions may prevent an unplanned tour of bathrooms and outhouses in foreign countries.