Ganciclovir sensitivity of cytomegalovirus at diagnosis and during treatment of cytomegalovirus pneumonia in marrow transplant recipients

Global estimate of phenotypic and genotypic ganciclovir resistance in cytomegalovirus infections among HIV and organ transplant patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV), an opportunistic pathogen belonging to Herpesviridae family, is considered as one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality among wide variety of patients, particularly in transplant recipients and HIV positive patients. As this virus can be resistant to treatment, frequency of CMV in patients who receive organ transplantation and people suffering from AIDS was studied between 1980 and 2019. Medline (via PubMed), Embase, Web of Science, and the Iranian Database were reviewed, and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (V2.0, Biostat) software analyzed all data. Finally, we used Cochran's Q-statistic to encounter heterogeneity between different studies. Meta-analyses indicated, GCV resistance was 14.1% (95% CI 11.2-17.7); however, in patients suffering from AIDS and organ transplantation were 19.5% (95% CI 14.7-25.4) and 11.4% (95% CI 8.1-15.8), respectively. There were increasing rates in the prevalence of GCV resistance in CMV among transplant recipients, and HIV positive patients. Therefore, evaluation of these refractory infections is beneficial.

How I treat resistant cytomegalovirus infection in hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a significant complication in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Four antiviral drugs are used for preventing or treating CMV: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. With prolonged and repeated use of these drugs, CMV can become resistant to standard therapy, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality, especially in HCT recipients. Antiviral drug resistance should be suspected when CMV viremia (DNAemia or antigenemia) fails to improve or continue to increase after 2 weeks of appropriately dosed and delivered antiviral therapy. CMV resistance is diagnosed by detecting specific genetic mutations. UL97 mutations confer resistance to ganciclovir and valganciclovir, and a UL54 mutation confers multidrug resistance. Risk factors for resistance include prolonged or previous anti-CMV drug exposure or inadequate dosing, absorption, or bioavailability. Host risk factors include type of HCT and degree of immunosuppression. Depending on the genotyping results, multiple strategies can be adopted to treat resistant CMV infections, albeit no randomized clinical trials exist so far, after reducing immunosuppression (if possible): ganciclovir dose escalation, ganciclovir and foscarnet combination, and adjunct therapy such as CMV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infusions. Novel therapies such as maribavir, brincidofovir, and letermovir should be further studied for treatment of resistant CMV.

Anticytomegaloviral activity of esterified milk proteins and L-polylysines

MRC-5 fibroblasts infected with human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reference strain AD 169 were treated with different concentrations of methylated alpha-lactalbumin (Met-ALA) or methylated beta-lactoglobulin (Met-BLG), as well as with their peptic hydrolysates, and with the highly basic polypeptides such as are L-polylysines (4-15 kDa). The antiviral activity was calculated by comparing the number of infected cells in the presence and absence of the tested substances. Both Met-ALA and Met-BLG, as well as their peptic hydrolysates, decreased the infectious activity of cytomegalovirus in fibroblast cells. As expected, L-polylysines showed the highest antiviral activity. However, the tested basic proteins and polypeptides despite their lower antiviral activities might be potentially quite useful in fight of arising drug resistance activities and the persistence capacities of this virus.

Reconstitution of HLA-A*2402-restricted cytomegalovirus-specific T-cells following stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific immune reconstitution early after stem cell transplantation (SCT) was evaluated prospectively by detecting CD8+ T-cells, which recognize the peptide QYDPVAALF in the context of HLA-A*2402. Fifteen allogeneic SCT recipients were included in the study. All recipients and donors were seropositive for CMV and had the HLA-A*2402 allele. CMV-specific T-cells were detected as early as 1 month after transplantation, and their numbers increased to peak levels 2 to 5 months after transplantation. The numbers of CMV-specific T-cells in patients who developed grade II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and received corticosteroids for acute GVHD were low in the early period after allogeneic SCT. There was a trend toward earlier reconstitution of CMV-specific CD8+ T-cells in allogeneic peripheral blood SCT (PBSCT) patients than in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation patients. The contribution of T-cells in the graft to the recovery of CMV-specific immune responses was also suggested by the finding that the reconstitution of CMV-specific CD8+ T-cells was delayed in CD34-selected autologous PBSCT compared with unpurged autologous PBSCT. The reconstitution of CMV-specific CD8+ T-cells was delayed in patients with CMV disease or recurrent CMV reactivation. These observations suggest that the detection of CMV-specific T-cells with an HLA-peptide tetramer is useful to assess immune reconstitution against CMV and to identify patients at risk for CMV disease or recurrent CMV reactivation after SCT.

Recent advances in the prevention of CMV infection and disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important pathogen in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients in the current era of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy, despite the almost complete elimination of CMV disease during the first 3 months after transplantation. Pretransplant CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for poor post-transplant outcome, especially in highly immunodeficient patients (e.g. recipients of ex vivo or in vivo T-cell depletion). Prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations, and indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV (e.g. invasive bacterial and fungal infections) appear to contribute to the poor outcome. The risk of developing antiviral resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (e.g. after transplantation from a haploidentical donor) the incidence may be as high as 8%. Transfusion-transmitted CMV infection can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1-2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy is effective in preventing transfusion-related CMV disease. The development of new drugs and immunologic strategies (adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T-cells and donor/recipient vaccination strategies) are important goals for the elimination of the negative impact of CMV in the HCT setting.

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants

The main risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) are recipient CMV seropositivity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently, two antiviral strategies, prophylactic or preemptive antiviral treatment, are used for prevention of CMV disease. Preemptive treatment is most favorable when short-term (14-day) treatment is applied. Several methods are available for monitoring of CMV reactivation. PCR-based CMV DNA detection assays are the most sensitive methods; however, the clinical benefit of this high sensitivity is unclear. Even more, there is lack of clarity whether PCR tests can better be performed with plasma, whole blood, or peripheral blood leukocyte samples. Recovery of a CMV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response is necessary for preventing CMV reactivation and disease. Reconstitution of absolute CMV-specific CTL counts to values above 10 x 10(6) to 20 x 10(6) CTLs/liter is associated with protection from CMV disease. In the near future, preemptive therapy might be withheld in patients with CMV reactivation who are shown to have adequate CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell levels. Antiviral therapy with (val)acyclovir has been studied only as prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV infection. High-dose oral valacyclovir is more effective than acyclovir when used in addition to preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Three antiviral drugs have been tested for preemptive therapy of CMV reactivation and/or treatment of CMV disease. Although intravenous ganciclovir is considered the drug of choice, foscarnet has similar efficacy and less toxicity, especially hematologic toxicity. Cidofovir has not been tested extensively, but so far the results are disappointing. Oral valganciclovir for preemptive treatment of SCT recipients is currently being studied. In addition to antiviral therapy, adoptive immunotherapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells as prophylactic or preemptive therapy is a very elegant strategy; however, generation of these cells is expensive and time-consuming, and therefore the therapy is not available at every transplantation center. Magnetic selection of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells from peripheral blood by using HLA class I-peptide tetramers may be very promising, making this strategy more accessible.

Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current status, known challenges, and future strategies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant progress has been made in the prevention of CMV disease over the past decade, but prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations. The pretransplantation CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for posttransplantation outcome despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; CMV-seropositive recipients of T cell-depleted grafts in particular continue to have a survival disadvantage compared with seronegative recipients with seronegative donors. The risk of developing antiviral drug resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (eg, after transplantation from a haploidentical donor), the incidence may be as high as 8%. Primary CMV infection via blood transfusion can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1% to 2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy are effective in preventing the sequelae of transfusion-related CMV infection. Indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV are increasingly recognized in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Strategies currently being investigated include long-term suppression of CMV with valganciclovir for the prevention of late CMV infection and disease, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells, and donor and recipient vaccination strategies.

Randomized comparison of oral valacyclovir and intravenous ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation

In this multicenter, randomized study, cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive patients who received an allogeneic bone marrow transplant were provided high-dose intravenous acyclovir (500 mg/m(2) q8h) from the day of transplantation until engraftment. The patients were then randomly assigned to receive either oral valacyclovir, 2 g q.i.d. (n=83), or intravenous ganciclovir, 5 mg/kg q12h for 1 week, then 6 mg/kg once daily for 5 days per week (n=85), until day 100 after transplantation. CMV infection occurred in 12% of the patients who received valacyclovir and in 19% of the patients who received ganciclovir (hazard ratio [HR], 1.042; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.391-2.778; P=.934). CMV disease developed in only 2 patients who received valacyclovir and in 1 patient who received ganciclovir (HR, 1.943; 95% CI, 0.176-21.44; P=.588). Oral valacyclovir can be an effective alternative to intravenous ganciclovir for prophylaxis of CMV disease after bone marrow transplantation.

Rapid, large-scale generation of highly pure cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T cells for adoptive immunotherapy

Adoptive transfer of donor-derived cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific cytotoxic T cell (CTL) clones can restore immunity in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients, providing protection against CMV disease. Current methods for selecting and expanding CMV-specific T cell clones are technically difficult, making adoptive T cell therapy impractical for routine clinical use. In this study, we describe a method for ex vivo generation and expansion of high-purity CMV-specific CTL using peptide-pulsed dendritic cells as antigen-presenting cells. Generation of CMV-specific CTL in numbers sufficient for clinical use in the time span of 4 weeks was accomplished in 6 of 8 CMV-seropositive donors. Examination of pp65 specificity by HLA/peptide tetramer staining demonstrated that a purity of greater than 95% peptide-specific cells could be obtained after two weekly stimulations and retained after further expansion for 3-4 weeks. Median expansion of total cell number was greater than 500-fold and expansion of peptide-specific CTL by tetramer staining was greater than 1.7 x 10(5)-fold. Four weeks after initiating CTL culture, we were able to generate greater than 10(9) total cells that specifically lysed target cells loaded with CMV peptide and cells infected with CMV. This simple and rapid method for generating high-purity CMV-specific CTL for adoptive immunotherapy is currently being examined for routine clinical use for allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Adoptive transfer of Ag-specific T cells to prevent CMV disease after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus is a major cause of infectious morbidity and mortality after allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Farmacotherapy to prevent or treat CMV reaction and infection is only partially effective, and has considerable toxicity. Adoptive transfer of ex vivo generated CMV specific T cells is a new approach to the management of CMV post-allo-SCT.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the published literature describing 1) the recovery of CMV immunity post-allo-SCT and 2) new strategies for the production of CMV specific T cells for adoptive immunotherapy.

RESULTS

CMV specific T cells can be generated using a variety of systems comprising different antigen presenting cells and antigens.

DISCUSSION

The ability to raise CMV specific T cells on a clinical scale will have a major impact on the management of CMV post-allo-SCT, but will have to be compared to current pharmacological approaches. Further, the raising of CMV specific T cells may serve as a model, to generate other antigen specific T cells including other anti-viral and anti-tumor T cells.

High-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We evaluated high-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients who were at risk for CMV infection (either recipient or donor seropositive) and received either intensive chemoradiotherapy and a T cell-depleted stem cell transplant followed by delayed add-back of donor T cells (TCDT: n = 98), or a non-myeloablative preparative regimen followed by an unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell transplant (NMT: n = 76) from an HLA-identical sibling donor were studied. All received high-dose acyclovir (HDACV) from day - 7 for 3 months post-transplant in conjunction with weekly CMV pp65 antigenemia monitoring and pre-emptive treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (not CMV-specific) and ganciclovir. The actuarial probabilities of developing pp65 antigenemia were 83 +/- 4% after TCDT and 41 +/- 6% after NMT (P < 0.00001) with reactivation occurring earlier in the TCDT group (the median 36 days vs 55 days). We observed no reactivation of CMV in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (n = 23). A total of 11 patients (5 in TCDT, 6 in NMT) developed CMV disease within 400 days after transplantation, and one death was clearly attributable to CMV interstitial pneumonitis (IP). This strategy was associated with effective control of CMV antigenemia in the majority of patients and near-complete eradication of fatal CMV IP.

Resistance of herpesviruses to antiviral drugs: clinical impacts and molecular mechanisms

Nucleoside analogues such as acyclovir and ganciclovir have been the mainstay of therapy for alphaherpesviruses (herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus (VZV)) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections, respectively. Drug-resistant herpesviruses are found relatively frequently in the clinic, almost exclusively among severely immunocompromised patients receiving prolonged antiviral therapy. For instance, close to 10% of patients with AIDS receiving intravenous ganciclovir for 3 months excrete a drug-resistant CMV isolate in their blood or urine and this percentage increases with cumulative drug exposure. Many studies have reported that at least some of the drug-resistant herpesviruses retain their pathogenicity and can be associated with progressive or relapsing disease. Viral mutations conferring resistance to nucleoside analogues have been found in either the drug activating/phosphorylating genes (HSV or VZV thymidine kinase, CMV UL97 kinase) and/or in conserved regions of the viral DNA polymerase. Currently available second line agents for the treatment of herpesvirus infections--the pyrophosphate analogue foscarnet and the acyclic nucleoside phosphonate derivative cidofovir--also inhibit the viral DNA polymerase but are not dependent on prior viral-specific activation. Hence, viral DNA polymerase mutations may lead to a variety of drug resistance patterns which are not totally predictable at the moment due to insufficient information on specific drug binding sites on the polymerase. Although some CMV and HSV DNA polymerase mutants have been found to replicate less efficiently in cell cultures, further research is needed to correlate viral fitness and clinical outcome.

Lack of emergence of cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations conferring ganciclovir (GCV) resistance following preemptive GCV therapy in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients

Fifty allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided preemptive therapy trial. Among these, 10 of 34 patients who received ganciclovir exhibited sustained and/or recurrent antigenemia despite treatment. Thirteen leukocyte preparations from these 10 subjects were screened for the presence of the most frequent cytomegalovirus UL97 mutations conferring ganciclovir resistance. None of these mutations were detected after mean and median ganciclovir exposures of 31.6 and 28.0 days, respectively.

Isolation and expansion of cytomegalovirus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes to clinical scale from a single blood draw using dendritic cells and HLA-tetramers

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in immunocompromised recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a cause of morbidity and mortality from viral pneumonitis. Antiviral drugs given to reactivating patients have reduced the mortality from CMV but have toxic side effects and do not always prevent late CMV disease. Cellular immunotherapy to prevent CMV disease is less toxic and could provide prolonged protection. However, a practical approach to generating sufficient quantities of CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) is required. This study describes a system for generating sufficient CMV-specific CTLs for adoptive immunotherapy of HLA-A*0201 bone marrow transplant recipients from 200 mL donor blood. Donor monocytes are used to generate dendritic cells (DCs) in medium with autologous plasma, interleukin 4, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and CD40 ligand. The DCs are pulsed with the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted CMV peptide pp65(495-503), and incubated with donor T cells. These cultures are restimulated twice with peptide-pulsed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) or CD40-ligated B cells and purified with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled pp65(495-503)/HLA-A*0201 tetramers by flow sorting, or with anti-PE paramagnetic beads. The pure tetramer-positive population is then rapidly expanded to obtain sufficient cells for clinical immunotherapy. The expanded CTLs are more than 80% pure, of memory phenotype, with a Tc1 cytokine profile. They efficiently kill CMV-infected fibroblasts and express the integrin VLA-4, suggesting that the CTLs could cross endothelial barriers. This technique is reproducible and could be used for generating CMV-specific CTLs to prevent CMV disease after allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation. (Blood. 2001;98:505-512)

Emergence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among recipients of solid-organ transplants

BACKGROUND

Concerns have been raised about emergence of ganciclovir resistance as a result of the advent of both routine oral ganciclovir prophylaxis and highly potent immunosuppression. We retrospectively assessed the occurrence of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease among transplant recipients who had received oral ganciclovir prophylaxis and highly potent immunosuppression.

METHODS

We studied 240 recipients of liver, kidney, or pancreas transplants. Antiviral susceptibility testing of blood cytomegaloviral isolates was done when patients failed to respond to intravenous ganciclovir treatment for symptomatic cytomegalovirus infection. Portions of the UL97 gene associated with ganciclovir resistance were sequenced in cytomegalovirus isolates with phenotypic resistance to ganciclovir.

FINDINGS

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease developed in five (7%) of 67 seronegative recipients of cytomegalovirus-seropositive organs (D+/R-) compared with none of 173 seropositive recipients (p=0.002). Among the 25 (10.4%) patients who developed cytomegalovirus disease within 1 year after transplantation, five had ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease. Among D+/R-transplant recipients, ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease was more common among the group receiving the most potent immunosuppression--ie, recipients of kidney and pancreas or pancreas alone (four of 19) compared with all other transplant recipients (one of 48, p=0.02). Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus disease was diagnosed at a median of 10 months after transplantation (range 7-12) after lengthened exposure to ganciclovir, was associated with previously described mutations of the UL97 gene, and led to serious clinical complications.

INTERPRETATION

Ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus is an important cause of late morbidity among D+/R- transplant recipients who have had lengthened exposure to ganciclovir and have received highly potent immunosuppression. Strategies to reduce this complication, especially among D+/R- patients, are warranted.

The impact of ganciclovir-resistant cytomegalovirus infection after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) resistance to ganciclovir has become increasingly common in acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients but has only rarely been reported in recipients of solid organ transplants.

METHODS

A retrospective study of ganciclovir susceptibility testing of CMV isolates recovered from lung transplant recipients was performed. Patients with CMV isolates having partial (1<IC50<3 microg/ml) or full resistance (IC50> or =3 microg/ml) to ganciclovir determined by plaque reduction assay were included in a case-control study to identify risk factors for ganciclovir resistance.

RESULTS

Between 2/91 and 5/98, 18 patients (5.2% of patients transplanted) were found to have CMV infections with some degree of ganciclovir resistance (4 partially, 14 fully resistant). More positive viral blood cultures (3.2+/-2.5 vs. 1.6+/-1.4 CMV positive cultures, P=0.02) and more episodes of CMV pneumonitis (0.24+/-0.23 vs. 0.10+/-0.17 episodes/bronchoscopy, P=0.02) occurring before the detection of resistance were seen among resistant patients than controls. Ganciclovir-resistant patients received more antithymocyte globulin during induction (70+/-44 vs. 45+/-39 mg/kg, P=0.03) and received ganciclovir for a greater number of days (79+/-52 vs. 64+/-53 days, P=0.005) before the detection of resistance than controls. Ganciclovir-resistant patients had a shorter survival and an earlier onset of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome compared with patients in the transplant database at Washington University.

CONCLUSIONS

Ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection is a serious complication of solid organ transplantation associated with more episodes of viremia, more frequent disease, earlier onset of bronchiolitis obliterans and shorter survival. The use of antithymocyte globulin and prolonged exposure to ganciclovir are risk factors for the development of ganciclovir resistance.

Current antiviral strategies for controlling cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: prevention and therapy

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a cause of significant morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Ganciclovir prophylaxis, or preemptive treatment based on detection of antigenemia or CMV DNA by PCR, effectively prevents CMV disease during the first 100 days after transplant in allograft recipients. In recipients of T-cell depleted transplant or if severe acute graft-versus-host disease is present, ganciclovir prophylaxis or preemptive treatment should be started with an induction course of ganciclovir (5 mg/kg BID) and given at least 5 days per week and continued until day 100 after transplant. Although prevention of CMV disease before day 100 is highly effective, there is a continued risk of late-onset CMV disease after day 100. In CMV-seropositive recipients, the incidence of late CMV disease may be as high as 17%. Strategies to prevent late CMV infection and disease are needed. In seronegative recipients, seronegative or leukocyte-reduced blood products are effective in preventing acquisition of CMV through blood products. Controversy exists about the optimal strategy of preventing CMV disease in seropositive autologous HSCT recipients. The outcome of CMV pneumonia remains poor despite treatment with ganciclovir in combination with CMV hyperimmune globulin or intravenous immunoglobulin. Owing to continued clinical significance of CMV in the HSCT setting, new and more effective anti-CMV drugs with improved pharmacokinetic properties are urgently needed.

Antiviral drug resistance in human cytomegalovirus

Drug-resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) should be considered when viral shedding persists after several weeks of therapy. The problem is most likely to arise in the setting of a severely immunosuppressed host with continuing or relapsing disease. Not all treatment failure can be attributed to drug resistance. The testing of CMV isolates for drug resistance in cell culture is time-consuming and labor-intensive, but recent advances in understanding of the genetics of resistance have resulted in rapid genotypic assays for specific mutations in the viral UL97 phosphotransferase or UL54 DNA polymerase genes that can predict resistance and cross-resistance to specific drugs. This information may help in the selection of alternative therapy.

Resistance of human cytomegalovirus to antiviral drugs

Resistance of cytomegalovirus (CMV) to antiviral agents is a well-recognized phenomenon that has been observed in the laboratory and in the clinical setting. Infections caused by antiviral-resistant CMV have been found exclusively among immunocompromised individuals, including patients with AIDS, bone marrow and solid-organ transplant recipients, and patients with hematologic malignancies, and in individuals with primary immunodeficiencies. The majority of these infections have been described to occur in patients with AIDS receiving prolonged antiviral therapy for CMV end-organ disease. Antiviral agents currently licensed for the treatment of CMV infections include ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. Resistance of CMV to ganciclovir is related to mutations in the UL97 region of the viral genome and/or mutations in the viral DNA polymerase. Resistance to foscarnet and cidofovir is associated with mutations in the viral DNA polymerase. Antiviral susceptibility of CMV strains containing DNA polymerase mutations is dependent on the region of the DNA polymerase where the mutations are located. Some DNA polymerase mutant viruses are cross-resistant to ganciclovir, foscarnet, and cidofovir. The recognition that specific UL97 and UL54 mutations are associated with resistance to antiviral agents has led to the development of molecular methods for detection of mutant viruses. This article reviews the mechanisms of resistance of CMV to antiviral agents, the laboratory methods for detection of resistant CMV, and the clinical aspects of infections caused by antiviral-resistant CMV.

A simplified assay for screening of drug resistance of cell-associated cytomegalovirus strains

BACKGROUND

Conventional phenotypic drug resistance determination of cell-free clinical human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) isolates is usually very laborious and may take 8-12 weeks, since serially passages of slowly growing viral isolates in tissue cultures are required to obtain a sufficient viral titer for an appropriate inoculum. Rapid screening of a large number of samples would therefore only be possible if simplified, less work-intensive methods are employed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to develop an assay which speeds up the whole procedure of phenotypic drug resistance determination. Steps of the classical plaque reduction assay should be simplified or omitted, but on the other hand, the assay should be reliable and reproducible.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-six clinical HCMV isolates from 20 immunocompromised patients (ten pre-treatment and 16 post-treatment with ganciclovir) were tested for drug susceptibility with the simplified plaque reduction assay. Most isolates were tested at least twice in independent assays. Virus titration could be avoided by using four different doses of cell-associated virus from the secondary culture for coculture susceptibility testing. Drug susceptibility values were determined by plaque titration and Probit analysis.

RESULTS

All clinical HCMV isolates tested showed a mean ganciclovir ID50 value of 1.98 microM, (range 0.2-12.2; median 0.95) and a mean foscarnet ID50 value of 92.4 microM (range 35.7-181; median 81). All except one isolate were classified ganciclovir sensitive when compared to ID50 values of two ganciclovir resistant control stains (53.7 +/- 6.4 and 12.7 +/- 0.9 microM) and the sensitive laboratory strain Towne (2.1 +/- 0.8 microM). Repeated tests of individual isolates were reproducible, although the infectivity of the inoculum has not been determined prior of the assay. The mean time which elapsed between receipt of the clinical specimen and read-out of the assay was circa 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenotypic resistance testing of HCMV isolates following to this protocol drastically reduces expenditure of time and work. The assay allows reliably the discrimination of HCMV isolates as drug resistant or sensitive according to the recent classification criteria of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG). The simple handling and uncomplicated calibration of this assay facilitates the screening of large specimen numbers and renders drug susceptibility determination of HCMV more accessible to diagnostic routine use.

Long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis for successful prevention of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors

BACKGROUND

We conducted a trial of long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors.

METHODS

Patients received intravenous ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg once a day from day 1 to day 30 after transplant, and then at a dose of 6 mg/kg once a day, Monday through Friday, until day 100. Forty-seven consecutive patients were evaluated. Due to the primary physician's decision or administrative error, 10 patients received less than 7 weeks of ganciclovir (mean duration, 3 weeks).

RESULTS

Four of the 10 (40%) patients who received less than 7 weeks of ganciclovir developed CMV disease (hepatitis). In contrast, none of the 37 patients given 100 days of prophylactic ganciclovir developed CMV disease while receiving ganciclovir. Two patients (5.4%) subsequently developed CMV disease (hepatitis) 21 and 88 days, respectively, after completing their ganciclovir prophylaxis. Reversible neutropenia in three patients (8.1%) was the only side effect associated with long-term ganciclovir. Complications from central intravenous catheters did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

These results reaffirm the efficacy and safety of long-term ganciclovir prophylaxis for prevention of primary CMV disease in a large number of high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors.

What clinicians need to know about antiviral drugs and viral resistance

The development of safe and effective antiviral therapies for the management of a variety of viral infections has expanded tremendously in recent years. Treatment is now possible for serious and potentially life-threatening infections with herpesviruses, respiratory viruses such as influenza A and respiratory syncytial virus, and the human immunodeficiency virus. The increased availability and use of antiviral drugs, however, has led to the emergence of drug-resistant viruses, especially in immunocompromised hosts. With this review, the major antiviral agents are presented with a description of the mechanisms of action, the evolution of drug resistance, and the need for in vitro antiviral susceptibility testing.

Cytomegalovirus-Specific T-Cell Immunity in Recipients of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplants

The cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) and CD4+ T-helper cell (Th) functions were characterized in 15 CMV seropositive recipients of autologous peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplants. These immune functions were evaluated in peripheral blood specimens obtained before and at 1, 2, and 3 months after transplant. For study of CTL activity, blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with CMV-infected autologous fibroblasts for 2 weeks and then tested for cytotoxicity against CMV-infected or mock-infected autologous and HLA-mismatched fibroblasts. The Th response to CMV antigen was assessed by standard lymphoproliferative assay. CMV-specific CD8+ CTL and CD4+ Th responses were detectable in 12 (80%) and 14 (93%) patients, respectively, in the first 3 months after transplantation. A Th response to CMV was always present by the time of first CTL detection. During the posttransplant period, CMV infection occurred in 6 (40%) patients, and detection of CMV-specific CD8+ CTL activity was associated with protection from subsequent CMV infection (P = .002). Among CMV seropositive autograft recipients, CMV-specific CD8+ CTL and CD4+ Th responses are restored in a large proportion of patients in the first 3 months after transplantation, and the presence of a specific CD8+ CTL activity affords protection from CMV infection.

Cytomegalovirus-Specific T-Cell Immunity in Recipients of Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell or Bone Marrow Transplants

The cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8+ cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) and CD4+ T-helper cell (Th) functions were characterized in 15 CMV seropositive recipients of autologous peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplants. These immune functions were evaluated in peripheral blood specimens obtained before and at 1, 2, and 3 months after transplant. For study of CTL activity, blood mononuclear cells were cocultured with CMV-infected autologous fibroblasts for 2 weeks and then tested for cytotoxicity against CMV-infected or mock-infected autologous and HLA-mismatched fibroblasts. The Th response to CMV antigen was assessed by standard lymphoproliferative assay. CMV-specific CD8+ CTL and CD4+ Th responses were detectable in 12 (80%) and 14 (93%) patients, respectively, in the first 3 months after transplantation. A Th response to CMV was always present by the time of first CTL detection. During the posttransplant period, CMV infection occurred in 6 (40%) patients, and detection of CMV-specific CD8+ CTL activity was associated with protection from subsequent CMV infection (P = .002). Among CMV seropositive autograft recipients, CMV-specific CD8+ CTL and CD4+ Th responses are restored in a large proportion of patients in the first 3 months after transplantation, and the presence of a specific CD8+ CTL activity affords protection from CMV infection.

Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis and treatment following bone marrow transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) in the bone marrow transplant (BMT) population and update the current methods of prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease, with emphasis on CMV interstitial pneumonia (CMV-IP).

DATA SOURCES

The current medical literature, including abstracts presented at recent national and international meetings, is reviewed. References were identified by searching the MEDLINE database from January 1988 through June 1994. The reference lists of the published studies and reviews obtained from the initial literature search were reviewed as well.

STUDY SELECTION

Data regarding the epidemiology of CMV, the risk factor associated with CMV infection and disease, as well as data on the prevention and the treatment of CMV infection and disease in the BMT population are cited. Specific attention was focused on randomized, placebo-controlled studies pertaining to the prevention of CMV infection and disease in CMV-immunoglobulin G positive recipients undergoing allogeneic BMT. Information from nonrandomized, placebo-controlled studies was included in the absence of stronger data.

DATA EXTRACTION

Information contributing to CMV in the BMT population was reviewed. Data supporting and disputing specific preventive and treatment modalities are presented.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The incidence of CMV seropositivity in the general population is high and while BMT becomes a widely accepted treatment modality, CMV reactivation and subsequent disease, especially CMV-IP, becomes a significant prognostic factor of morbidity and mortality. Even though antiviral agents such as ganciclovir and foscarnet can inhibit the viral replication in vivo, they have not been able to treat CMV-IP effectively. It has been suggested that CMV-IP is an immunopathologic process that can cause irreversible damage, hence, the low efficacy of antiviral therapy and the associated high mortality. Immunomodulating agents such as intravenous immune globulin and cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin can increase the efficacy of antivirals in the treatment of CMV-IP. This further supports the postulated immunopathologic process of this disease. The lack of understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease compromised the efforts of treatment and led to the development of preventive interventions with antiviral and immunomodulatory regimens that resulted in a significantly lower incidence of infection and disease. As a result of current data, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group has published guidelines for the prevention and treatment of CMV infection and disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of CMV disease in the BMT recipients has improved as a result of a wide variety of modifications in the management of BMT recipients. These include an increased understanding of the risk factors associated with CMV infection, routine screening for CMV replication and excretion, and more effective prophylactic regimens. Still, more than half of the patients who develop pneumonia will die, indicating that more studies are needed to increase the understanding of the pathophysiology and refine the preventive and therapeutic regimens against CMV.

Herpesvirus resistance to antiviral drugs: a review of the mechanisms, clinical importance and therapeutic options

During the past decade, potent agents against herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, varicella zoster virus (VZV), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) have become available. The increasing clinical use of acyclovir, ganciclovir, and foscarnet has been associated with the emergence of drug-resistant herpesvirus strains. Resistance to acyclovir or ganciclovir most frequently results from deficient intracellular phosphorylation of these agents which is required for drug activation. Resistance to foscarnet is due to viral DNA polymerase mutants that permit viral replication despite the presence of the drug. In immunocompetent patients, herpesvirus resistance is rare and generally does not correlate with clinical outcome. In contrast, in immunocompromised hosts, resistance of HSV, VZV, and CMV is increasingly detected, and may be associated with disease refractory to antiviral therapy. Foscarnet treatment has been used with some clinical benefit in patients with acyclovir-resistant HSV or VZV, or ganciclovir-resistant CMV. For therapy of resistant mucocutaneous HSV disease, topical trifluorothymidine, and topical or intravenous cidofovir (HPMPC) have yielded encouraging results that warrant further investigation. Improved methods for detection of herpesvirus resistance, and validation of alternative therapy for patients with documented resistance are required to reduce the clinical impact of drug-resistant herpesviruses.