Variation in erythromycin and clindamycin susceptibilities of Streptococcus pneumoniae by four test methods

Bacteriological and molecular characterization of temperature- and CO2-dependent Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 24F ST162 isolated from Japanese children

IMPORTANCE

We characterized Streptococcus pneumoniae serotype 24F sequence type (ST) 162 isolated from Japanese children with invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). Owing to its highly invasive nature, serotype 24F is expected to be isolated from clinically significant cases. Serotype 24F ST162 isolates tested in the present study did not grow at 35°C in ambient air. Therefore, antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the broth microdilution method, which is usually conducted in ambient air, cannot be performed, posing a clinical challenge. Clinical practitioners and laboratory personnel should be aware of the epidemiological, bacteriological, and molecular characteristics of serotype 24F ST162. We believe that our findings can help diagnose and treat IPD caused by serotype 24F ST162, a serotype expected to become problematic in the post-13 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine era.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in Belgium

We assessed the in vitro susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with confirmed community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) to β-lactams, macrolides and fluoroquinolones and the association of non-susceptibility and resistance with serotypes/serogroups (STs/SGs), patient's risk factors and vaccination status. Samples (blood or lower respiratory tract) were obtained in 2007-2009 from 249 patients (from seven hospitals in Belgium) with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of CAP [median age 61 years (11.6% aged <5 years); 85% without previous antibiotic therapy; 86% adults with level II Niederman's severity score]. MIC determination (EUCAST breakpoints) showed for: (i) amoxicillin, 6% non-susceptible; cefuroxime (oral), 6.8% resistant; (ii) macrolides: 24.9% erythromycin-resistant [93.5% erm(B)-positive] but 98.4% telithromycin-susceptible; and (iii) levofloxacin and moxifloxacin, all susceptible. Amongst SGs: ST14, all resistant to macrolides and most intermediate to β-lactams; SG19 (>94% ST19A), 73.5% resistant to macrolides and 18-21% intermediate to β-lactams; and SG6, 33% resistant to clarithromycin. Apparent vaccine failures: 3/17 for 7-valent vaccine (children; ST6B, 23F); 16/29 for 23-valent vaccine (adults ST3, 7F, 12F, 14, 19A, 22F, 23F, 33F). Isolates from nursing home residents, hospitalised patients and patients with non-respiratory co-morbidities showed increased MICs for amoxicillin, all β-lactams, and β-lactams and macrolides, respectively. Regarding antibiotic susceptibilities: (i) amoxicillin is still useful for empirical therapy but with a high daily dose; (ii) cefuroxime axetil and macrolides (but not telithromycin) are inappropriate for empirical therapy; and (iii) moxifloxacin and levofloxacin are the next 'best empirical choice' (no resistant isolates) but levofloxacin will require 500 mg twice-daily dosing for effective coverage.

[Evaluation of the BD phoenix automated microbiology system SMIC/ID-2 panel for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae]

BACKGROUND

With the emergence of antimicrobial resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae, a more accurate and automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing method is essential. We evaluated the BD Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Systems, USA) SMIC/ID-2 panel for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of S. pneumoniae.

METHODS

A total of 113 clinical strains of S. pneumoniae (88 penicillin susceptible strains, 8 intermediate strains, and 17 resistant strains by 2008 CLSI criteria) were tested. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for penicillin, cefotaxime, clindamycin, erythromycin, levofloxacin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, tetracycline, and vancomycin were determined by Etest (AB Biodisk, Sweden) and Phoenix System. The results obtained by Phoenix system were compared to those obtained by Etest.

RESULTS

The overall essential agreement of MICs (within one dilution of MICs) defined by the Phoenix and Etest was 92.3%. Neither very major errors nor major errors were produced, and minor errors were 6.5%. Minor errors were frequently observed in susceptibility testings for penicillin (22.1%), cefotaxime (12.4%), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (11.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Phoenix SMIC/ID-2 panel provided a simple and rapid susceptibility testing for S. pneumoniae, and the results were in a good agreement with those of Etest. The Phoenix system appears to be an effective automated system in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Antimicrobial-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: trends and management

Management of pneumococcal infections has been challenged by the development of resistance and, more recently, the unexpected spread of resistant clones of serotypes, such as 19A, following the introduction of a conjugate pneumococcal vaccine for use in children in 2000. High-dose penicillin G and many other agents continue to be efficacious parenterally for pneumonia and bacteremia. However, treatment options for meningitis and for infections treated with oral agents, particularly in children, have been limited by resistance. Empiric treatment guidelines should reflect the emerging threats from increased drug resistance. Compliance with guidelines by physicians and patients is important to prevent further development of resistance as new classes of agents are unlikely to be available in the next decade.

Prevalence and macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae collected in Sofia, Bulgaria from 2001 to 2005

A total of 328 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were analyzed to determine the rate of macrolide and penicillin resistance as well as macrolide resistance phenotypes and genotypes. Erythromycin resistance was found in 81 pneumococcal isolates (24.7%) and 10.7% of isolates were clindamycin resistant. The prevalence of penicillin G-intermediate (minimum inhibitory concentrations, MICs, 0.125 to 1 microg/ml) and penicillin-resistant (MICs, >or=2 microg/ml) S. pneumoniae isolates was 25.6% and 13.7%, respectively. The rate of ceftriaxone-intermediate and ceftriaxone-resistant strains was 2.7% and 1.2%, respectively. Among erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates, strains harboring mef(A) genes (n=42; 51.8%) were found to be predominant over strains with erm(B) genes (n=34; 42.0%). One (1.2%) isolate carried both erm(B) and mef(A), while 4 (4.9%) isolates carried L4 protein mutations. By using the erythromycin, clindamycin and rokitamycin triple-disk test, 42 strains were assigned to the M phenotype of macrolide resistance, 31 isolates were assigned to the partially inducible (iMcLS) phenotype, 4 were assigned to the constitutive (cMLS) phenotype. Four strains with L4 gene showed a rare phenotype with the triple-disk test. Serotyping of S. pneumoniae isolates suggested that serotype (or serogroup) 14, 6 and 19 were predominant (81.5%) among erythromycin-resistant strains. Among mef(A) positive isolates serotype 14 was predominant, among erm(B) positive isolates serogroups 6 and 19 were the most prevalent.

Microbiology and Principles of Antimicrobial Therapy for Head and Neck Infections

The principles of antimicrobial management for head and neck infections include establishing an accurate clinical and microbiologic diagnosis and treating the patient initially with an empiric antimicrobial regimen based on predicted likelihood of success and reduced potential for resistance. Subsequent adjustments may be required based on clinical response and available culture results. This article summarizes the aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of selected acute and chronic infections of the head and neck and the approaches to antimicrobial therapy.

Prevalence and molecular genetics of macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected in Finland in 2002

The prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance among 1,007 clinical pneumococcal isolates collected in Finland were investigated. Of these, 217 (21.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and 11% to clindamycin. Among the erythromycin-resistant isolates, mef(E) was present in 95 isolates (44%), mef(A) was present in 12 isolates (6%), and erm(B) was present in 90 isolates (41%). A double mechanism, mef(E) and erm(B), was detected in five isolates (2%). Ribosomal mutation was detected in 14 (6%) macrolide-resistant isolates in which no other determinant was found. Based on the telithromycin MICs, two groups of isolates were formed: 83.3% of the isolates belonged to a major group for which the telithromycin MIC range was < or =0.008 to 0.063 microg/ml, and 16.7% belonged to a minor group for which the telithromycin MIC range was 0.125 to 8 microg/ml. All except three isolates in the minor population carried a macrolide resistance gene.

Mechanisms by which antibiotics promote dissemination of resistant pneumococci in human populations

Mechanisms by which antimicrobials contribute to dissemination of pneumococcal resistance are incompletely characterized. A serial cross-sectional study of nasopharyngeal pneumococcal carriage in healthy, home-living children <or=6 years of age was conducted in four rural communities-two in Utah (1998-2003) and two in Idaho (2002-2003). Prevalence odds ratios for carriage of resistant pneumococci (OR(res)) and of susceptible pneumococci (OR(sus)) were estimated. Dynamic transmission models were developed to facilitate a mechanistic interpretation of OR(res) and OR(sus) and to compare the population impact of distinct antimicrobial classes. A total of 5,667 cultures were obtained; 25% of the cultures were positive, and 29% of isolates exhibited reduced susceptibility to penicillin. The adjusted OR(res) for recent individual and sibling cephalosporin use was 2.2 (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 3.4) and 1.8 (95% confidence interval: 1.0, 3.3), respectively. Neither individual nor sibling penicillin use was associated with increased OR(res). Rather, recent use of penicillins was associated with decreased carriage of susceptible pneumococci (OR(sus) = 0.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.1, 0.3). In simulations, both types of effects promoted dissemination of resistant pneumococci at the population level. Findings show that oral cephalosporins enhance the risk of acquiring resistant pneumococci. Penicillins accelerate clearance of susceptible strains. The effect of penicillins in increasing resistance is shared equally by treated and untreated members of the population.

Influence of carbon dioxide on the MIC of telithromycin for Streptococcus pneumoniae: an in vitro-in vivo study

Incubation in CO(2) resulted in higher (> or =3 doubling dilution) MICs of telithromycin than those found in ambient air for 31.2% of 346 Streptococcus pneumoniae ermB-positive strains. An increased telithromycin MIC in CO(2) was not correlated with loss of its activity in the murine sepsis/peritonitis model.

Mechanisms of resistance among respiratory tract pathogens

Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory tract pathogens represents a significant health care threat. Identifying the antimicrobial agents that remain effective in the presence of resistance, and knowing why, requires a thorough understanding of the mechanisms of action of the various agents as well as the mechanisms of resistance demonstrated among respiratory tract pathogens. The primary goal of antimicrobial therapy is to eradicate the pathogen, via killing or inhibiting bacteria, from the site of infection; the defenses of the body are required for killing any remaining bacteria. Targeting a cellular process or function specific to bacteria and not to the host limits the toxicity to patients. Currently, there are four general cellular targets to which antimicrobials are targeted: cell wall formation and maintenance, protein synthesis, DNA replication, and folic acid metabolism. Resistance mechanisms among respiratory tract pathogens have been demonstrated for all four targets. In general, the mechanisms of resistance used by these pathogens fall into one of three categories: enzymatic inactivation of the antimicrobial, prevention of intracellular accumulation, and modification of the target site to which agents bind to exert an antimicrobial effect. Resistance to some agents can be overcome by modifying the dosage regimens (e.g., using high-dose therapy) or inhibiting the resistance mechanism (e.g., b-lactamase inhibitors), whereas other mechanisms of resistance can only be overcome by using an agent from a different class. Understanding the mechanisms of action of the various agents and the mechanisms of resistance used by respiratory tract pathogens can help clinicians identify the agents that will increase the likelihood of achieving optimal outcomes.

Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis

Treatment guidelines developed by the Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS) were originally published in 2000. These guidelines were designed to: (1) educate clinicians and patients (or patients’ families) about the differences between viral and bacterial rhinosinusitis; (2) reduce the use of antibiotics for nonbacterial nasal/sinus disease; (3) provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal treatment of ABRS; (4) promote the use of appropriate antibiotic therapy when bacterial infection is likely; and (5) describe the current understanding of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics and how they relate to the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy. The original guidelines are updated here to include the most recent information on management principles, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and therapeutic options.

Burden of disease

An estimated 20 million cases of ABRS occur annually in the United States. According to National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) data, sinusitis is the fifth most common diagnosis for which an antibiotic is prescribed. Sinusitis accounted for 9% and 21% of all pediatric and adult antibiotic prescriptions, respectively, written in 2002. The primary diagnosis of sinusitis results in expenditures of approximately $3.5 billion per year in the United States.

Definition and diagnosis of ABRS

ABRS is most often preceded by a viral upper respiratory tract infection (URI). Allergy, trauma, dental infection, or other factors that lead to inflammation of the nose and paranasal sinuses may also predispose individuals to developing ABRS.

Patients with a “common cold” (viral URI) usually report some combination of the following symptoms: sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, hyposmia/anosmia, facial pressure, postnasal drip, sore throat, cough, ear fullness, fever, and myalgia. A change in the color or the characteristic of the nasal discharge is not a specific sign of a bacterial infection. Bacterial superinfection may occur at any time during the course of a viral URI. The risk that bacterial superinfection has occurred is greater if the illness is still present after 10 days. Because there may be cases that fall out of the “norm” of this typical progression, practicing clinicians need to rely on their clinical judgment when using these guidelines. In general, however, a diagnosis of ABRS may be made in adults or children with symptoms of a viral URI that have not improved after 10 days or worsen after 5 to 7 days. There may be some or all of the following signs and symptoms: nasal drainage, nasal congestion, facial pressure/pain (especially when unilateral and focused in the region of a particular sinus), postnasal drainage, hyposmia/anosmia, fever, cough, fatigue, maxillary dental pain, and ear pressure/fullness.

Physical examination provides limited information in the diagnosis of ABRS.

While sometimes helpful, plain film radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging scans are not necessary for cases of ABRS.

Microbiology of ABRS

The most common bacterial species isolated from the maxillary sinuses of patients with ABRS are Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae , and Moraxella catarrhalis , the latter being more common in children. Other streptococcal species, anaerobic bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus cause a small percentage of cases.

Bacterial resistance in ABRS

The increasing prevalence of penicillin nonsusceptibility and resistance to other drug classes among S pneumoniae has been a problem in the United States, with 15% being penicillin-intermediate and 25% being penicillin-resistant in recent studies. Resistance to macrolides and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) is also common in S pneumoniae . The prevalence of β-lactamase-producing isolates of H influenzae is approximately 30%, while essentially all M catarrhalis isolates produce β-lactamases. Resistance of H influenzae to TMP/SMX is also common.

Antimicrobial treatment guidelines for ABRS

These guidelines apply to both adults and children. When selecting antibiotic therapy for ABRS, the clinician should consider the severity of the disease, the rate of progression of the disease, and recent antibiotic exposure. The guidelines now divide patients with ABRS into two general categories: (1) those with mild symptoms who have not received antibiotics within the past 4 to 6 weeks, and (2) those with mild disease who have received antibiotics within the past 4 to 6 weeks or those with moderate disease regardless of recent antibiotic exposure. The difference in severity of disease does not imply infection with a resistant pathogen. Rather, this terminology indicates the relative degree of acceptance of possible treatment failure and the likelihood of spontaneous resolution of symptoms—patients with more severe symptoms are less likely to resolve their disease spontaneously. The primary goal of antibiotic therapy is to eradicate bacteria from the site of infection, which, in turn, helps (1) return the sinuses back to health; (2) decrease the duration of symptoms to allow patients to resume daily activities more quickly; (3) prevent severe complications such as meningitis and brain abscess; and (4) decrease the development of chronic disease. Severe or life-threatening infections with or without complications are rare, and are not addressed in these guidelines.

Prior antibiotic use is a major risk factor associated with the development of infection with antimicrobial-resistant strains. Because recent antimicrobial exposure increases the risk of carriage of and infection due to resistant organisms, antimicrobial therapy should be based upon the patient’s history of recent antibiotic use. The panel’s guidelines, therefore, stratify patients according to antibiotic exposure in the previous 4 to 6 weeks.

Lack of response to therapy at ≥72 hours is an arbitrary time established to define treatment failures. Clinicians should monitor the response to antibiotic therapy, which may include instructing the patient to call the office or clinic if symptoms persist or worsen over the next few days.

The predicted bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of antibiotics in adults and children has been determined according to mathematical modeling of ABRS developed by Michael Poole, MD, PhD, based on pathogen distribution, resolution rates without treatment, and in vitro microbiologic activity.

Antibiotics can be placed into the following relative rank order of predicted clinical efficacy for adults: 90% to 92% = respiratory fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin), ceftriaxone, high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (4 g/250 mg/day), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (1.75 g/250 mg/day); 83% to 88% = high-dose amoxicillin (4 g/day), amoxicillin (1.5 g/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefixime (based on H influenzae and M catarrhalis coverage), cefuroxime axetil, cefdinir, and TMP/SMX; 77% to 81% = doxycycline, clindamycin (based on gram-positive coverage only), azithromycin, clarithromycin and erythromycin, and telithromycin; 65% to 66% = cefaclor and loracarbef. The predicted spontaneous resolution rate in patients with a clinical diagnosis of ABRS is 62%.

Antibiotics can be placed into the following relative rank order of predicted clinical efficacy in children with ABRS: 91% to 92% = ceftriaxone, high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (45 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day); 82% to 87% = high-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day), amoxicillin (45 mg/kg per day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefixime (based on H influenzae and M catarrhalis coverage only), cefuroxime axetil, cefdinir, and TMP/SMX; and 78% to 80% = clindamycin (based on gram-positive coverage only), cefprozil, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and erythromycin; 67% to 68% = cefaclor and loracarbef. The predicted spontaneous resolution rate in untreated children with a presumed diagnosis of ABRS is 63%.

Recommendations for initial therapy for adult patients with mild disease (who have not received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks) include the following choices: amoxicillin/clavulanate (1.75 to 4 g/250 mg per day), amoxicillin (1.5 to 4 g/day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir. While TMP/SMX, doxycycline, azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, or telithromycin may be considered for patients with β-lactam allergies, bacteriologic failure rates of 20% to 25% are possible. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 4).When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent.

Recommendations for initial therapy for adults with mild disease who have received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks or adults with moderate disease include the following choices: respiratory fluoroquinolone (eg, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin) or high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (4 g/250 mg per day). The widespread use of respiratory fluoroquinolones for patients with milder disease may promote resistance of a wide spectrum of organisms to this class of agents. Ceftriaxone (parenteral, 1 to 2 g/day for 5 days) or combination therapy with adequate gram-positive and negative coverage may also be considered. Examples of appropriate regimens of combination therapy include high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus cefixime, or high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus rifampin. While the clinical effectiveness of ceftriaxone and these combinations for ABRS is unproven; the panel considers these reasonable therapeutic options based on the spectrum of activity of these agents and on data extrapolated from acute otitis media studies. Rifampin should not be used as monotherapy, casually, or for longer than 10 to 14 days, as resistance quickly develops to this agent. Rifampin is also a well-known inducer of several cytochrome p450 isoenzymes and therefore has a high potential for drug interactions. Failure of a patient to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours of therapy should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 4). When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent. Patients who have received effective antibiotic therapy and continue to be symptomatic may need further evaluation. A CT scan, fiberoptic endoscopy or sinus aspiration and culture may be necessary.

Recommendations for initial therapy for children with mild disease and who have not received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks include the following: high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day), amoxicillin (90 mg/kg per day), cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir. TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin is recommended if the patient has a history of immediate Type I hypersensitivity reaction to β-lactams. These antibiotics have limited effectiveness against the major pathogens of ABRS and bacterial failure of 20% to 25% is possible. The clinician should differentiate an immediate hypersensitivity reaction from other less dangerous side effects. Children with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to β-lactams may need: desensitization, sinus cultures, or other ancillary procedures and studies. Children with other types of reactions and side effects may tolerate one specific β-lactam, but not another. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 5).When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent.

The recommended initial therapy for children with mild disease who have received antibiotics in the previous 4 to 6 weeks or children with moderate disease is high-dose amoxicillin/clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg per kg per day). Cefpodoxime proxetil, cefuroxime axetil, or cefdinir may be used if there is a penicillin allergy (eg, penicillin rash); in such instances, cefdinir is preferred because of high patient acceptance. TMP/SMX, azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin is recommended if the patient is β-lactam allergic, but these do not provide optimal coverage. Clindamycin is appropriate if S pneumoniae is identified as a pathogen. Ceftriaxone (parenteral, 50 mg/kg per day for 5 days) or combination therapy with adequate gram-positive and -negative coverage may also be considered. Examples of appropriate regimens of combination therapy include high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus cefixime, or high-dose amoxicillin or clindamycin plus rifampin. The clinical effectiveness of ceftriaxone and these combinations for ABRS is unproven; the panel considers these reasonable therapeutic options based on spectrum of activity and on data extrapolated from acute otitis media studies. Rifampin should not be used as monotherapy, casually, or for longer than 10 to 14 days as resistance quickly develops to this agent. Failure to respond to antimicrobial therapy after 72 hours of therapy should prompt either a switch to alternate antimicrobial therapy or reevaluation of the patient (see Table 5). When a change in antibiotic therapy is made, the clinician should consider the limitations in coverage of the initial agent. Patients who have received effective antibiotic therapy and continue to be symptomatic may need further evaluation. A CT scan, fiberoptic endoscopy or sinus aspiration and culture may be necessary.

Macrolide resistance phenotypes in Streptococcus pneumoniae in Santiago, Chile

The mechanism of resistance was investigated in 39 macrolide-resistant clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae isolated from January 1997 to July 1999 in Santiago, Chile. Our results showed that 22 (56.5%) were macrolide-resistant, clindamycin-susceptible isolates (M phenotype) and 17 (43.5%) were macrolide and clindamycin resistant (MLS(B) phenotype). mefE gene was detected in all M phenotype, while ermB gene was detected in all MLS(B)-phenotype strains. Serotype 14 was the most frequent serotype among M-phenotype strains, and serotypes 19 and 23F were the most frequent serotypes in MLS(B) strains. These results demonstrate that both phenotypes of macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae are found in Santiago, Chile, with the M phenotype predominating.

Antistreptococcal activity of telithromycin compared with seven other drugs in relation to macrolide resistance mechanisms in Russia

The susceptibilities of 468 recent Russian clinical Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates and 600 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates, from 14 centers in Russia, to telithromycin, erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin, levofloxacin, quinupristin-dalfopristin, and penicillin G were tested. Penicillin-nonsusceptible S. pneumoniae strains were rare except in Siberia, where their prevalence rate was 13.5%: most were penicillin intermediate, but for three strains (two from Smolensk and one from Novosibirsk) the MICs of penicillin G were 4 or 8 micro g/ml. Overall, 2.5% of S. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to erythromycin. Efflux was the prevalent resistance mechanism (five strains; 41.7%), followed by ribosomal methylation encoded by constitutive erm(B), which was found in four isolates. Ribosomal mutation was the mechanism of macrolide resistance in three isolates; one erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolate had an A2059G mutation in 23S rRNA, and two isolates had substitution of GTG by TPS at positions 69 to 71 in ribosomal protein L4. All S. pyogenes isolates were susceptible to penicillin, and 11% were erythromycin resistant. Ribosomal methylation was the most common resistance mechanism for S. pyogenes (89.4%). These methylases were encoded by erm(A) [subclass erm(TR)] genes, and their expression was inducible in 96.6% of isolates. The rest of the erythromycin-resistant Russian S. pyogenes isolates (7.6%) had an efflux resistance mechanism. Telithromycin was active against 100% of pneumococci and 99.2% of S. pyogenes, and levofloxacin and quinupristin-dalfopristin were active against all isolates of both species.

Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Canada during 2000

A total of 2,245 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from 63 microbiology laboratories from across Canada during 2000 and characterized at a central laboratory. Of these isolates, 12.4% were not susceptible to penicillin (penicillin MIC, >or=0.12 microg/ml) and 5.8% were resistant (MIC, >or=2 microg/ml). Resistance rates among non-beta-lactam agents were the following: macrolides, 11.1%; clindamycin, 5.7%; chloramphenicol, 2.2%; levofloxacin, 0.9%; gatifloxacin, 0.8%; moxifloxacin, 0.4%; and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 11.3%. The MICs at which 90% of the isolates were inhibited (MIC90s) of the fluoroquinolones were the following: gemifloxacin, 0.03 microg/ml; BMS-284756, 0.06 microg/ml; moxifloxacin, 0.12 microg/ml; gatifloxacin, 0.25 microg/ml; levofloxacin, 1 microg/ml; and ciprofloxacin, 1 microg/ml. Of 578 isolates from the lower respiratory tract, 21 (3.6%) were inhibited at ciprofloxacin MICs of >or=4 microg/ml. None of the 768 isolates from children were inhibited at ciprofloxacin MICs of >or=4 microg/ml, compared to 3 of 731 (0.6%) from those ages 15 to 64 (all of these >60 years old), and 27 of 707 (3.8%) from those over 65. The MIC90s for ABT-773 and telithromycin were 0.015 microg/ml for macrolide-susceptible isolates and 0.12 and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively, for macrolide-resistant isolates. The MIC of linezolid was <or=2 microg/ml for all isolates. Many of the new antimicrobial agents tested in this study appear to have potential for the treatment of multidrug-resistant strains of pneumococci.

Clinical relevance of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for community-acquired pneumonia

Macrolides are often the first choice for empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. However, macrolide resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae has escalated at alarming rates in North America and worldwide. Macrolide resistance among pneumococci is primarily due to genetic mutations affecting the ribosomal target site (ermAM) or active drug efflux (mefE). Prior antibiotic exposure is the major risk factor for amplification and perpetuation of resistance. Clonal spread facilitates dissemination of drug-resistant strains. Data assessing the impact of macrolide resistance on clinical outcomes are spare. Many experts believe that the clinical impact is limited. Ribosomal mutations confer high-grade resistance, whereas efflux mutations can likely be overridden in vivo. Favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, high concentrations at sites of infections, and additional properties of macrolides may enhance their efficacy. In this article, we discuss the prevalence of macrolide resistance among S. pneumoniae, risk factors and mechanisms responsible for resistance, therapeutic strategies, and implications for the future.

Susceptibilities to telithromycin and six other agents and prevalence of macrolide resistance due to L4 ribosomal protein mutation among 992 Pneumococci from 10 central and Eastern European countries

The macrolide and levofloxacin susceptibilities of 992 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae from clinical specimens collected in 1999 and 2000 were determined in 10 centers in Central and Eastern European countries. The prevalences of penicillin G-intermediate (MICs, 0.125 to 1 microg/ml) and penicillin-resistant (MICs, < or =2 microg/ml) Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates were 14.3 and 16.6%, respectively. The MICs at which 50% of isolates are inhibited (MIC(50)s) and the MIC(90)s of telithromycin were 0.016 and 0.06 microg/ml, respectively; those of erythromycin were 0.06 and >64 microg/ml, respectively; those of azithromycin were 0.125 and >64 microg/ml, respectively; those of clarithromycin were 0.03 and >64 microg/ml, respectively; and those of clindamycin were 0.06 and >64 microg/ml, respectively. Erythromycin resistance was found in 180 S. pneumoniae isolates (18.1%); the highest prevalence of erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae was observed in Hungary (35.5%). Among erythromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates, strains harboring erm(B) genes (125 strains [69.4%]) were found to be predominant over strains with mef(E) genes (25 strains [13.4%]), L4 protein mutations (28 strains [15.6%]), and erm(A) genes (2 strains [1.1%]). Similar pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns suggested that some strains containing L4 mutations from the Slovak Republic, Bulgaria, and Latvia were clonally related. Of nine strains highly resistant to levofloxacin (MICs, >8 microg/ml) six were isolated from Zagreb, Croatia. Telithromycin at < or =0.5 microg/ml was active against 99.8% of S. pneumoniae isolates tested and may be useful for the treatment of respiratory tract infections caused by macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates.

Differentiation of resistance phenotypes among erythromycin-resistant Pneumococci

Laboratory differentiation of erythromycin resistance phenotypes is poorly standardized for pneumococci. In this study, 85 clinical isolates of erythromycin-resistant (MIC > or = 1 microg/ml) Streptococcus pneumoniae were tested for the resistance phenotype by the erythromycin-clindamycin double-disk test (previously used to determine the macrolide resistance phenotype in Streptococcus pyogenes strains) and by MIC induction tests, i.e., by determining the MICs of macrolide antibiotics without and with pre-exposure to 0.05 microg of erythromycin per ml. By the double-disk test, 65 strains, all carrying the erm(AM) determinant, were assigned to the constitutive macrolide, lincosamide, and streptogramin B resistance (cMLS) phenotype, and the remaining 20, all carrying the mef(E) gene, were assigned to the recently described M phenotype; an inducible MLS resistance (iMLS) phenotype was not found. The lack of inducible resistance to clindamycin was confirmed by determining clindamycin MICs without and with pre-exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of erythromycin. In macrolide MIC and MIC-induction tests, whereas homogeneous susceptibility patterns were observed among the 20 strains assigned to the M phenotype by the double-disk test, two distinct patterns were recognized among the 65 strains assigned to the cMLS phenotype by the same test; one pattern (n = 10; probably that of the true cMLS isolates) was characterized by resistance to rokitamycin also without induction, and the other pattern (n = 55; designated the iMcLS phenotype) was characterized by full or intermediate susceptibility to rokitamycin without induction turning to resistance after induction, with an MIC increase by more than three dilutions. A triple-disk test, set up by adding a rokitamycin disk to the erythromycin and clindamycin disks of the double-disk test, allowed the easy differentiation not only of pneumococci with the M phenotype from those with MLS resistance but also, among the latter, of those of the true cMLS phenotype from those of the iMcLS phenotype. While distinguishing MLS from M resistance in pneumococci is easily and reliably achieved, the differentiation of constitutive from inducible MLS resistance is far more uncertain and is strongly affected by the antibiotic used to test inducibility.

Prevalence and mechanisms of macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Santiago, Chile

Thirty-two macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes isolates were found among 594 clinical isolates collected from 1990 to 1998 in Santiago, Chile, for an overall prevalence of 7.2%. Among the 32 resistant isolates, 28 (87.5%) presented the M phenotype and 4 (12. 5%) presented the MLS(B) phenotype. Serotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis showed genetic diversity among the resistant isolates.

Antimicrobial resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia. During the past decade, the prevalence of penicillin resistance in S pneumoniae has increased dramatically, with resistance rates approaching 45% in some areas of the United States. Streptococcus pneumoniae has also acquired resistance to other commonly used antimicrobials, including cephalosporins, macrolides, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. While vancomycin and the newer quinolones are currently highly active against most strains of S pneumoniae, reduced susceptibilities to these agents have been identified in some strains. Prior use of antimicrobial agents is the major risk factor for colonization and infection with antibiotic-resistant strains. beta-Lactam antibiotics remain the treatment of choice for infections caused by susceptible S pneumoniae. The optimum therapy for penicillin-resistant strains remains unclear. Appropriate empirical therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia depends in part on the community-specific resistance patterns of S pneumoniae to various antibiotics. In this article, we provide an overview of the development of S pneumoniae resistance to commonly used antibiotics and discuss the implications of the development of resistance on treatment decisions.

Antipneumococcal activity of ABT-773 compared to those of 10 other agents

MICs, time-kills, and postantibiotic effects (PAEs) of ABT-773 (a new ketolide) and 10 other agents were determined against 226 pneumococci. Against 78 ermB- and 44 mefE-containing strains, ABT-773 MICs at which 50% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC(50)s) and MIC(90)s were 0.016 to 0.03 and 0.125 microgram/ml, respectively. Clindamycin was active only against macrolide-resistant strains containing mefE (MIC(50), 0.06 microgram/ml; MIC(90), 0.125 microgram/ml). Activities of pristinamycin (MIC(90), 0.5 microgram/ml) and vancomycin (MIC(90), 0.25 microgram/ml) were unaffected by macrolide or penicillin resistance, while beta-lactam MICs rose with those of penicillin G. Against 19 strains with L4 ribosomal protein mutations and two strains with mutations in domain V of 23S rRNA, ABT-773 MICs were 0.03 to 0.25 microgram/ml, while macrolide and azalide MICs were all >/=16.0 microgram/ml. ABT-773 was bactericidal at twice the MIC after 24 h for 8 of 12 strains (including three strains with erythromycin MICs greater than or equal to 64.0 microgram/ml). Kill kinetics of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and roxithromycin against macrolide-susceptible strains were slower than those of ABT-773. ABT-773 had longer PAEs than macrolides, azithromycin, clindamycin, or beta-lactams, including against ermB-containing strains. ABT-773, therefore, shows promising in vitro activity against macrolide-susceptible as well as -resistant pneumococci.

Use of clindamycin disks To detect macrolide resistance mediated by ermB and mefE in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adults and children

We studied 198 macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates obtained from adults and children to evaluate whether 2-microgram clindamycin disks can distinguish between isolates manifesting ermB- versus mefE-mediated resistance to clarithromycin and to determine the relative frequency with which each resistance mechanism occurred in these populations. The mefE gene was predominant among 109 isolates from children, occurring in 73.4% versus 50.6% of 89 isolates from adults. Three isolates (1.5%) did not amplify either gene. Among 125 mefE(+) isolates, the MIC of clarithromycin at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited, determined by Etest, was 32 microgram/ml versus >256 microgram/ml in 70 ermB(+) isolates. All ermB(+) isolates were highly resistant to clindamycin (MICs >256 microgram/ml), whereas all mefE(+) isolates were susceptible to clindamycin using the 2-microgram disk. Testing S. pneumoniae from the respiratory tract for susceptibility to clindamycin by agar disk diffusion is an easy and inexpensive method to estimate the frequency of resistance mediated by ermB in specific patient populations. Macrolide resistance mediated by ermB is usually of greater magnitude than that due to mefE. Clinical studies are needed to determine the significance of high- versus low-level macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae.

Antipneumococcal activity of telithromycin by agar dilution, microdilution, E test, and disk diffusion methodologies

Agar dilution and microdilution (both in air) and E test and disk diffusion (both in air and CO(2)) were used to test the activity of telithromycin against 110 erythromycin-susceptible and 106 erythromycin-resistant pneumococci. The MICs at which 50 and 90% of strains are inhibited (MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s, respectively) for erythromycin-susceptible strains varied between 0.008 and 0.016 microg/ml and 0.016 and 0.03 microg/ml when the samples were incubated in air. By comparison, telithromycin MIC(50)s and MIC(90)s for erythromycin-resistant strains were in air 0.03 to 0.125 and 0. 125 to 0.5 microg/ml, respectively. When agar dilution was used as the reference method, essential agreement was found for 112 of 216 strains (51.9%) for microdilution, 168 of 216 (77.8%) for E test in air, and 132 of 216 (61.1%) for E test in CO(2). With the exception of four strains tested by E test in CO(2), all organisms were susceptible to a proposed telithromycin susceptibility breakpoint of < or =1 microg/ml. By disk diffusion with 15-microg telithromycin disks, all strains but one had zones of inhibition > or =19 mm in diameter when incubated in CO(2), while all strains had zone diameters of > or = 22 mm when incubated in air. Zone diameters in air were generally 4 to 5 mm larger than in CO(2). By all methods, MICs and zones of all erythromycin-resistant strains occurred in clusters separated from those seen with erythromycin-susceptible strains. The results for macrolide-resistant strains with erm and mef resistance determinants were similar. The results show that (i) telithromycin is very active against erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains irrespective of macrolide resistance mechanism; (ii) susceptibility to telithromycin can be reliably tested by the agar, microdilution, E test, and disk diffusion methods; and (iii) incubation in CO(2) led to smaller zones by disk diffusion and higher MICs by E test, but at a susceptible MIC breakpoint of < or =1 microg/ml and a susceptible zone diameter cutoff of > or =19 mm in CO(2), 215 of 216 strains were found to be susceptible to telithromycin.

Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of oropharyngeal viridans group streptococci isolates from cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis patients

The antimicrobial susceptibility profile of 77 oropharyngeal viridans streptococci isolates from 34 cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and 58 isolates from 43 healthy non-CF patients were studied by the E-test and the standard disk diffusion methods. Overall penicillin and cefotaxime resistances (intermediate plus resistant isolates) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) among CF isolates (72.7% and 45.5%, respectively) than among non-CF isolates (51.7% and 15.5%, respectively). No significant difference was observed in overall (intermediate plus resistant) erythromycin resistance rates, although high-level erythromycin resistance (> or =32 microg/mL) was more frequently found in CF isolates (24.6%) than in non-CF isolates (12.1%). An unexpected high percentage of isolates showed low level erythromycin resistance (MIC range, 0.5-15 microg/mL): 41.5% in cystic fibrosis and 46.5% in non-CF isolates. No significant differences were observed regarding the percentage of colonized patients with at least one penicillin-resistant isolate. On the contrary, colonization with cefotaxime (p < 0.001) or erythromycin (p = 0.014) resistant isolates were significantly more prevalent in CF patients. Similar tetracycline and chloramphenicol resistance rates were observed for both groups. Viridans isolates resistant to a single antibiotic were more prevalent among non-CF patients and multiple resistance was higher among CF patients. Prior antibiotic exposure could result in differences in beta-lactam resistance and colonization rates with resistant isolates between both groups. None of the non-CF patients was previously treated with antimicrobials for a period of three months before sampling. In contrast, 94.1% of CF patients were treated with antimicrobials within the same period; 65.6% with beta-lactam antibiotics. Patients with CF disease, frequently exposed to antimicrobials, may be a reservoir of viridans streptococci isolates with resistance determinants, particularly to beta-lactam antibiotics.

Bacteriologic efficacies of oral azithromycin and oral cefaclor in treatment of acute otitis media in infants and young children

A prospective, open-label, randomized study was conducted in order to determine the bacteriologic efficacies of cefaclor and azithromycin in acute otitis media (AOM). Tympanocentesis was performed on entry into the study and 3 to 4 days after initiation of treatment. Bacteriologic failure after 3 to 4 days of treatment with both drugs occurred in a high proportion of culture-positive patients, especially in those in whom AOM was caused by Haemophilus influenzae (16 of 33 [53%] of those treated with azithromycin and 13 of 34 [52%] of those treated with cefaclor). Although a clear correlation of the persistence of the pathogen with increased MICs of the respective drugs could be demonstrated for Streptococcus pneumoniae, no such correlation was found for H. influenzae. It is proposed that susceptibility breakpoints for H. influenzae should be considerably lower than the current ones for both cefaclor and azithromycin for AOM caused by H. influenzae.

Prevalence of mefE, erm and tet(M) genes in Streptococcus pneumoniae strains from Central Italy

One hundred and seventy-three Streptococcus pneumoniae strains isolated from surveillance studies conducted in daycare centres were studied. The mefE, erm and tet(M) genes were detected in 16.2, 45.1 and 47.4% of isolates respectively. Agreement between PCR results and antibiotic susceptibility patterns was 100%. Macrolide resistance was due to the presence of erm in 73.6% of strains and to the presence of mefE in the remaining 26.4%. All tetracycline resistant strains carried the tet(M) gene. erm was associated with tet(M) in 98.7% of strains, whereas no isolate carrying mefE carried tet(M). A significant association was found between mefE and serogroup 6 (P < 0.0005) and between erm and tet(M) and serogroup 19 (P < 0.00001).

Characteristics and trends in macrolide resistance among Helicobacter pylori strains isolated in Bulgaria over four years

Macrolide resistance trends were examined among Helicobacter pylori strains from 154 patients between 1994 and 1998. Applicabilities of screening agar method (SAM) and modified disk diffusion method (MDDM) were evaluated. Overall primary resistance rates to erythromycin and clarithromycin were 14.8% and 8.7%, respectively. No association was found with age, sex, and diseases. Clarithromycin-resistance rate reached 12.5% in the last 2 years. Secondary resistance to erythromycin occurred more often (in 62.5%) than to clarithromycin (in 42.9%). Therapy with spiramycin or erythromycin in four cases induced no clarithromycin resistance. These data show a considerable prevalence of H. pylori resistance to macrolides, which exhibited a tendency to increase and was often associated with metronidazole resistance. By comparing the MDDM with SAM, an overall agreement was obtained in 81 (94.2%) of 86 results. MDDM and SAM are reliable techniques for testing H. pylori susceptibility to macrolides.

Emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among multiply resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Hong Kong

The MICs of 17 antimicrobial agents for 181 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains were determined by the E-test. Overall, 69.1% were penicillin resistant (MIC > 0.06 microgram/ml). Resistance to ciprofloxacin (MIC > 2 microgram/ml), levofloxacin (MIC > 2 microgram/ml), or trovafloxacin (MIC > 1 microgram/ml) was found in 12.1, 5.5, or 2.2% of the strains, respectively. These high rates of resistance raise concerns for the future.

The role of newer macrolides in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infection. A review of experimental and clinical data

The macrolide class of antibiotics is well established and often recommended for use in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infection (RTI). The newer agents clarithromycin and azithromycin are frequently prescribed as first- or second-line therapy, and have been considered as superior to erythromycin in microbiological activity and clinical efficacy. In-vitro data show that clarithromycin and azithromycin have good activity (MIC < or = 0.5 microg/ml) against certain RTI pathogens. However the activity of both compounds is intrinsically low against Haemophilus influenzae whilst several other important RTI pathogens - notably Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes - exhibit a high prevalence of resistance to them. In many countries, the prevalence of resistance to clarithromycin and azithromycin is still rising with cross resistance with erythromycin. Maximum serum concentrations of clarithromycin and azithromycin are lower than the MIC90s for these agents against H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae. Concentrations in tissues have been reported to be much higher than those in serum. However, the high concentrations observed in tissues are largely a reflection of high concentrations inside cells. Concentrations of clarithromycin and azithromycin in extracellular tissue fluids, where Haemophilus and streptococci are located, are in equilibrium with concentrations in the serum, and remain low. It has been suggested that phagocytes deliver azithromycin to infection sites in a targeted fashion, but the evidence in support of this hypothesis is weak. Recent clinical experience with clarithromycin and azithromycin is consistent with preclinical results, and suggests that these agents have limited efficacy against certain respiratory infections. Clarithromycin and azithromycin are the first choice treatment of atypical infections caused by intracellular pathogens. For community-acquired RTIs, where H. influenzae and S. pneumoniae are present, they may no longer be an appropriate choice for first-line therapy. Indeed, in areas where levels of drug resistant S. pneumoniae are high, their use may be questionable as second-line therapy.

Assessing the quality of the Alexander Project

Controlled, standardized methods and quality control strains should be used in order to ensure that susceptibility data is valid and reproducible. Small differences in the methods used can lead to important variations in the results obtained. Comparisons between related agents and between studies, using statistical analysis, also indicate whether susceptibility data are consistent with known antimicrobial-organism relationships. The Alexander Project has demonstrated a consistently high level of quality, allowing the comparison of susceptibility data from over 27,500 organisms isolated from patients with lower respiratory tract infection.

Antipneumococcal activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin as determined by agar dilution, microdilution, E-test, and disk diffusion methodologies

The activities of levofloxacin and clarithromycin against 199 penicillin- and macrolide-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci were tested by agar and microdilution methods in air and by disk diffusion and E-test methods in air and CO2. For levofloxacin, >/=99. 0% of strains were susceptible at /=17 mm, regardless of incubation in air or CO2. Although zone sizes were smaller and E-test MICs were higher for clarithromycin in CO2 than those in air, category differences were minor, and susceptibility rates for clarithromycin were similar to those obtained by agar and microdilution in air (range, 76.9 to 80.9% by all methods). For clarithromycin, adjustment of breakpoints based upon distribution of results resulted in susceptibility rates which were similar by all methods (75.8 to 76.9% susceptible, 0 to 1.5% intermediate, 22.6 to 23.1% resistant). Minor discrepancies were obtained with levofloxacin for one strain (0.5%) by microdilution and two strains (1.0%) by disk diffusion in CO2. For clarithromycin, minor discrepancies were found in three strains (1.5%) by microdilution, seven strains (3.5%) by agar dilution, four strains (2.0%) by E-test in air, six strains (3.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and five strains (2.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2. Major discrepancies occurred with levofloxacin in one strain (0.5%) by microdilution but were not found with clarithromycin. Very major discrepancies were not seen with levofloxacin, but occurred with clarithromycin in five strains (2.5%) by microdilution, three strains (1.5%) by agar dilution, two strains (1.0%) by E-test in air, eight strains (4.0%) by disk diffusion in air, and one strain (0.5%) by disk diffusion in CO2.

In vitro selection of resistance to four beta-lactams and azithromycin in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Selection of resistance to amoxicillin (with or without clavulanate), cefaclor, cefuroxime, and azithromycin among six penicillin G- and azithromycin-susceptible pneumococcal strains and among four strains with intermediate penicillin sensitivities (azithromycin MICs, 0.125 to 4 microg/ml) was studied by performing 50 sequential subcultures in medium with sub-MICs of these antimicrobial agents. For only one of the six penicillin-susceptible strains did subculturing in medium with amoxicillin (with or without clavulanate) lead to an increased MIC, with the MIC rising from 0.008 to 0.125 microg/ml. Five of the six penicillin-susceptible strains showed increased azithromycin MICs (0.5 to >256.0 microg/ml) after 17 to 45 subcultures. Subculturing in medium with cefaclor did not affect the cefaclor MICs of three strains but and led to increased cefaclor MICs (from 0.5 to 2.0 to 4.0 microg/ml) for three of the six strains, with MICs of other beta-lactams rising 1 to 3 twofold dilutions. Subculturing in cefuroxime led to increased cefuroxime MICs (from 0.03 to 0.06 microg/ml to 0.125 to 0.5 microg/ml) for all six strains without significantly altering the MICs of other beta-lactams, except for one strain, which developed an increased cefaclor MIC. Subculturing in azithromycin did not affect beta-lactam MICs. Subculturing of the four strains with decreased penicillin susceptibility in amoxicillin (with or without clavulanate) or cefuroxime did not select for beta-lactam resistance. Subculturing of one strain in cefaclor led to an increase in MIC from 0.5 to 2.0 microg/ml after 19 passages. In contrast to strains that were initially azithromycin susceptible, which required >10 subcultures for resistance selection, three of four strains with azithromycin MICs of 0.125 to 4.0 microg/ml showed increased MICs after 7 to 13 passages, with the MICs increasing to 16 to 32 microg/ml. All azithromycin-resistant strains were clarithromycin resistant. With the exception of strains that contained mefE at the onset, no strains that developed resistance to azithromycin contained ermB or mefE, genes that have been found in macrolide-resistant pneumococci obtained from clinic patients.

Antipneumococcal activities of a ketolide (HMR 3647), a streptogramin (quinupristin-dalfopristin), a macrolide (erythromycin), and a lincosamide (clindamycin)

Four different compounds belonging to the macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLSb) class of antimicrobial agents were tested against 611 Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. The ketolide (HMR 3647, previously RU66647) and the streptogramin (quinupristin-dalfopristin) were both active against pneumococci with high-level MLSb resistance (clindamycin-resistant strains) as well as those with low-level macrolide resistance (clindamycin-susceptible strains).

Susceptibilities of penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to HMR 3647 (RU 66647), a new ketolide, compared with susceptibilities to 17 other agents

Susceptibility of 230 penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to HMR 3647 (RU 66647), a new ketolide, was tested by agar dilution, and results were compared with those of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, rokitamycin, clindamycin, pristinamycin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, and vancomycin. HMR 3647 was very active against all strains tested, with MICs at which 90% of the strains were inhibited (MIC90s) of 0.03 microg/ml for erythromycin-susceptible strains (MICs, < or =0.25 microg/ml) and 0.25 microg/ml for erythromycin-resistant strains (MICs, > or =1.0 microg/ml). All other macrolides yielded MIC90s of 0.03 to 0.25 and >64.0 microg/ml for erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains, respectively. The MICs of clindamycin for 51 of 100 (51%) erythromycin-resistant strains were < or =0.125 microg/ml. The MICs of pristinamycin for all strains were < or =1.0 microg/ml. The MIC90s of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin were 4.0 and 0.5 microg/ml, respectively, and were unaffected by penicillin or erythromycin susceptibility. Vancomycin and imipenem inhibited all strains at < or =1.0 microg/ml. The MICs of cefuroxime and cefotaxime rose with those of penicillin G. The MICs of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol were variable but were generally higher in penicillin- and erythromycin-resistant strains. HMR 3647 had the best kill kinetics of all macrolides tested against 11 erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains, with uniform bactericidal activity (99.9% killing) after 24 h at two times the MIC and 99% killing of all strains at two times the MIC after 12 h for all strains. Pristinamycin showed more rapid killing at 2 to 6 h, with 99.9% killing of 10 of 11 strains after 24 h at two times the MIC. Other macrolides showed significant activity, relative to the MIC, against erythromycin-susceptible strains only.

Determination of penicillin MICs for Streptococcus pneumoniae by using a two- or three-disk diffusion procedure

The potential for the use of the disk diffusion method to accurately predict penicillin MICs for Streptococcus pneumoniae was investigated with penicillin (6 microg), methicillin (5 microg), and oxacillin (1 microg) disks. A total of 183 S. pneumoniae isolates were tested by three MIC procedures (agar dilution, microdilution, and E-test). Regression analyses of the geometric mean of the three MIC results against (i) the sum of the zone diameters for methicillin, penicillin, and oxacillin disks; (ii) the sum of the zone diameters for methicillin and penicillin disks; and (iii) each of the three individual zone diameters were performed. Calculated MICs were determined from each of these regression analyses and compared to the mean reference MICs. A high level of correlation was obtained with both the two- and the three-disk procedures (r = 0.97), with essential agreement rates (+/-1 doubling dilution) between MICs calculated by the three-disk procedure and the two-disk procedure and the mean reference MICs of 98.4 and 98.9%, respectively. No major or very major errors were obtained with the two- or three-disk procedures. The accuracy of the disks used individually was lower (r = 0.84 to 0.93). However, oxacillin and methicillin disk testing remain excellent for screening strains, with all penicillin-susceptible strains having zones of >21 and >22 mm, respectively. The combination disk procedure, which involves the use of three disks (methicillin, oxacillin, and penicillin) or two disks (methicillin and penicillin) for testing S. pneumoniae, can provide accurate penicillin MICs and qualitative category results that are comparable to results obtained by the E-test, agar, and microdilution MIC methods.

mefE is necessary for the erythromycin-resistant M phenotype in Streptococcus pneumoniae

Recently, it was shown that a significant number of erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes strains contain a determinant that mediates resistance via a putative efflux pump. The gene encoding the erythromycin-resistant determinant was cloned and sequenced from three strains of S. pneumoniae bearing the M phenotype (macrolide resistant but clindamycin and streptogramin B susceptible). The DNA sequences of mefE were nearly identical, with only 2-nucleotide differences between genes from any two strains. When the mefE sequences were compared to the mefA sequence from S. pyogenes, the two genes were found to be closely related (90% identity). Strains of S. pneumoniae were constructed to confirm that mefE is necessary to confer erythromycin resistance and to explore the substrate specificity of the pump; no substrates other than 14- and 15-membered macrolides were identified.

Susceptibility of penicillin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to dirithromycin compared with susceptibilities to erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and clindamycin

Agar dilution with incubation in air and CO2 was used to determine the MICs of erythromycin, dirithromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, and clindamycin for 79 penicillin-susceptible, 72 penicillin-intermediate, and 74 penicillin-resistant pneumococci (158 erythromycin-susceptible and 67 erythromycin-resistant pneumococci). MICs obtained in air were usually 1 to 3 dilutions lower than those obtained in CO2. In air, the respective MICs at which 50% (MIC50s) and 90% (MIC90s) of penicillin-susceptible, -intermediate, and -resistant strains are inhibited were as follows: erythromycin, 0.016 and 0.5, 0.03 and > 64, and 2 and > 64 microg/ml; dirithromycin, 0.03 and 0.5, 0.06 and > 64, and 8 and > 64 microg/ml; azithromycin, 0.03 and 0.5, 0.06 and > 64, and 2 and > 64 microg/ml; clarithromycin, 0.016 and 0.06, 0.03 and > 64, and 2 and > 64 microg/ml; roxithromycin, 0.06 and 2, 0.06 and > 64, and 2 and > 64 microg/ml; and clindamycin, 0.03 and 0.06, 0.06 and > 64, and 0.06 and > 64 microg/ml. The MICs of erythromycin, azithromycin, and dirithromycin were very similar; however, clarithromycin MICs were generally 1 to 2 dilutions lower and roxithromycin MICs were 1 to 2 dilutions higher than those of the other compounds tested. Strains resistant to one macrolide were resistant to all macrolides; however, not all macrolide-resistant strains were resistant to clindamycin, and 32 macrolide-resistant (MICs, > or = 28 microg/ml), clindamycin-susceptible (MICs, < or = 0.25 microg/ml) strains were encountered. Time-kill testing of six strains showed similar killing kinetics for all compounds, with 99.9% killing of all strains observed with the compounds only at or above the MIC after 24 h.

Susceptibilities of 228 penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to RU 64004, a new ketolide, compared with susceptibilities to 16 other agents

The susceptibilities of 228 penicillin- and erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococci to RU 64004, a new ketolide, were tested by agar dilution, and the results were compared with those for penicillin G, erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, rokitamycin, clindamycin, pristinamycin, ciprofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone, imipenem, and vancomycin. RU 64004 was very active against all strains tested, with MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited (MIC90s) of 0.016 microg/ml for erythromycin-susceptible strains (MIC, < or = 0.25 microg/ml) and 0.25 microg/ml for erythromycin-resistant strains (MIC, > or = 0.5 microg/ml). All other macrolides had MIC90s of 0.03 to 0.25 and > or = 128 microg/ml for erythromycin-susceptible and -resistant strains, respectively. Among erythromycin-resistant strains, clindamycin MICs for 28 of 91 (30.7%) were < or = 0.125 microg/ml. Pristinamycin MICs for all strains were < or = 1.0 microg/ml. MIC90s of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin were 4.0 and 0.25 microg/ml, respectively, and were unaffected by susceptibility to penicillin or erythromycin. Vancomycin and imipenem inhibited all strains at < or = 0.5 and < or = 0.25 microg/ml, respectively. MICs of cefuroxime and cefotaxime rose with those of penicillin G. MICs of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, doxycycline, and chloramphenicol were variable but were generally higher for penicillin- and erythromycin-resistant strains. RU 64004 is the first member of the macrolide group which has low MICs for erythromycin-resistant pneumococci.