Effects of drugs on 2',3'-dideoxy-2',3'-didehydrothymidine phosphorylation in vitro

Pharmacokinetics of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors for the treatment and prevention of HIV infection

INTRODUCTION

Despite dramatic increases in new drugs and regimens, a combination of two nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) remains the backbone of many regimens to treat HIV.

AREA COVERED

This article summarizes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of approved NRTIs that are currently in the international treatment and prevention guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

Compared to other NRTIs, tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) is more advantageous in terms of potency and safety. It is therefore a preferred choice in combination with emtricitabine (FTC) in most HIV treatment guidelines. The efficacy of the two-drug combination of NRTI/Integrase strand-transfer inhibitor, i.e. lamivudine/dolutegravir has been approved as an option for initial therapy. This regimen however has some limitations in patients with HBV coinfection. The two NRTI combinations tenofovir disproxil fumarate (TDF)/FTC and TAF/FTC have also been approved for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Interestingly, a promising long-acting nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, islatravir, formulated for implant was well tolerated and remained effective for up to a year, suggesting its potential as a single agent for PrEP. In the next decade, it remains to be seen whether NRTI-based regimens will remain the backbone of preferred ART regimens, or if the treatment will eventually move toward NRTI-sparing regimens to avoid long-term NRTI-toxicity.

Significant Drug Interactions in the HIV Patient

Current treatment guidelines advocate the use of triple combination antiretroviral therapy for the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection with one protease inhibitor (PI) or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). Additionally, patients often receive medications for prophylaxis and treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbid illnesses. Polypharmacy with potent medications places the patient with HIV at significant risk of drug interactions. The purpose of this review is to assist clinicians regarding awareness and management of clinically significant drug interactions frequently encountered in the HIV population.

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions are discussed in depth with several tables of significant interactions encountered in the patient with HIV. Certain combinations of NRTIs have antagonistic antiretroviral action (e.g., zidovudine plus stavudine), and thus should be avoided. All of the currently available PIs and delavirdine are cytochrome (CYP) 450 inhibitors and can cause significant inhibition of concomitant drug metabolism. Nevirapine is a CYP 450 inducer and can cause induction of drug metabolism, whereas efavirenz may cause inhibition or induction. Drug-herbal interactions are reviewed, including the decreased concentrations of indinavir following the administration of St. John’s wort. Additionally, the pharmacist’s role as an integral member of the HIV patient care team is discussed.

Effect of abacavir on sustained virologic response to HCV treatment in HIV/HCV co-infected patients, Cohere in Eurocoord

BACKGROUND

Contradicting results on the effect of abacavir (ABC) on hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment responses in HIV/HCV co-infected patients have been reported. We evaluated the influence of ABC on the response to pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV)-containing HCV treatment in HIV/HCV co-infected patients in a large European cohort collaboration, including data from different European countries.

METHODS

HIV/HCV co-infected patients were included if they were aged ≥16 years, received pegIFN alfa-2a or 2b and RBV combination treatment and were enrolled in the COHERE cohort collaboration. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the impact of abacavir on achieving a sustained virologic response (SVR) to HCV treatment.

RESULTS

In total 1309 HIV/HCV co-infected patients who had received HCV therapy were included, of whom 490 (37 %) had achieved an SVR. No statistically significant difference was seen for patients using ABC-containing regimens compared to patients using an emtricitabine + tenofovir (FTC + TDF)-containing backbone, which was the most frequently used backbone. In the multivariate analyses, patients using a protease inhibitor (PI)-boosted regimen were less likely to achieve an SVR compared to patients using a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-based regimen (OR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.41-0.91). The backbone combinations zidovudine&lamivudine (AZT + 3TC) and stavudine&lamivudine (d4t + 3TC) were associated with lower SRV rates (0.45 (0.24-0.82) and 0.46 (0.22-0.96), respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this large European cohort study validate that SVR rates are generally not affected by ABC. Use of d4T or AZT as part of the HIV treatment regimen was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving an SVR.

Intracellular effects of the Hepatitis C virus nucleoside polymerase inhibitor RO5855 (Mericitabine Parent) and Ribavirin in combination

Mericitabine (RG7128) is the prodrug of a highly selective cytidine nucleoside analog inhibitor (RO5855) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. This study evaluated the effects of combining RO5855 and ribavirin on HCV replication in the HCV subgenomic replicon by using two drug-drug interaction models. The effects of RO5855 and ribavirin on the intracellular metabolism of each compound, on interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression, and on the viability of hepatocyte-derived cells were also investigated. RO5855 and ribavirin had additive inhibitory activities against HCV subgenomic replicon replication in drug-drug interaction analyses. RO5855 did not affect the uptake or phosphorylation of ribavirin in primary human hepatocytes, human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, or genotype 1b (G1b) replicon cells. Similarly, ribavirin did not affect the concentrations of intracellular species derived from RO5855 in primary human hepatocytes or the formation of the triphosphorylated metabolites of RO5855. Ribavirin at concentrations of >40 μM significantly reduced the viability of primary hepatocytes but not of Huh7, the G1b replicon, or interferon-cured Huh7 cells. RO5855 alone or with ribavirin did not significantly alter the viability of Huh7 or G1b replicon cells, and it did not significantly affect the viability of primary hepatocytes when it was administered alone. The viability of primary hepatocytes was reduced when they were incubated with RO5855 and ribavirin, similar to the effects of ribavirin alone. RO5855 alone or with ribavirin had no effect on ISG mRNA levels in any of the cells tested. In conclusion, RO5855 did not show any unfavorable interactions with ribavirin in human hepatocytes or an HCV subgenomic replicon system.

Hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a spherical enveloped RNA virus of the Flaviviridae family, classified within the Hepacivirus genus. Since its discovery in 1989, HCV has been recognized as a major cause of chronic hepatitis and hepatic fibrosis that progresses in some patients to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In the United States, approximately 4 million people have been infected with HCV, and 10,000 HCVrelated deaths occur each year. Due to shared routes of transmission, HCV and HIV co-infection are common, affecting approximately one third of all HIV-infected persons in the United States. In addition, HIV co-infection is associated with higher HCV RNA viral load and a more rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease, leading to an increased risk of cirrhosis. HCV infection may also impact the course and management of HIV disease, particularly by increasing the risk of antiretroviral drug-induced hepatotoxicity. Thus, chronic HCV infection acts as an opportunistic disease in HIV-infected persons because the incidence of infection is increased and the natural history of HCV infection is accelerated in co-infected persons. Strategies to prevent primary HCV infection and to modify the progression of HCV-related liver disease are urgently needed among HIV/HCV co-infected individuals.

Absence of Clinically Relevant Pharmacokinetic Interaction Between Ribavirin and Tenofovir in Healthy Subjects

This was a 36-day, open-label, fixed-sequence, multiple-dose drug interaction study in 23 healthy subjects to evaluate the effects of multiple doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of ribavirin. Subjects received a 600-mg once-daily oral dose of ribavirin on days 1 and 22 and 300-mg once-daily oral doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on days 17 through 24. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 through 4 and 22 through 25. Pharmacokinetics of ribavirin was not altered by its coadministration with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate as the point estimates (day 22 [test treatment]/day 1 [reference treatment]), and the 90% confidence interval for maximum observed concentration (0.95; 88.7-101) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to time of last measurable concentration (1.12; 106-117) were within the equivalence bounds of 80% to 125%. Tenofovir pharmacokinetics after ribavirin coadministration was similar to that observed in previous studies. These results indicate that coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and ribavirin does not result in substantial changes to their individual pharmacokinetic profiles.

A quantitative basis for antiretroviral therapy for HIV-1 infection

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)^1–3 has dramatically decreased mortality from HIV-1 infection⁴ and is a major achievement of modern medicine. However, there is no fundamental theory of HAART. Elegant models describe the dynamics of viral replication^3,5–9, but a metric for the antiviral activity of drug combinations relative to a target value needed for control of replication is lacking. Treatment guidelines^10,11 are based on empirical results of clinical trials in which other factors like regimen tolerability also affect outcome. Why only certain drug combinations control viral replication remains unclear.

Here we quantify the intrinsic antiviral activity of antiretroviral drug combinations. We show that most single antiretrovirals exhibit previously unappreciated complex non-linear pharmacodynamics that determine their inhibitory potential at clinical concentrations. We demonstrate that neither of the major theories for drug combinations accurately predicts the combined effects of multiple antiretrovirals. However, combined effects can be understood with a novel approach that considers the degree of independence of drug effects.

This analysis allows a direct comparison of the inhibitory potential of different drug combinations under clinical concentrations, reconciles the results of clinical trials, defines a target level of inhibition associated with treatment success, and provides a rational basis for treatment simplification and optimization.

In Vitro antiretroviral properties of S/GSK1349572, a next-generation HIV integrase inhibitor

S/GSK1349572 is a next-generation HIV integrase (IN) inhibitor designed to deliver potent antiviral activity with a low-milligram once-daily dose requiring no pharmacokinetic (PK) booster. In addition, S/GSK1349572 demonstrates activity against clinically relevant IN mutant viruses and has potential for a high genetic barrier to resistance. S/GSK1349572 is a two-metal-binding HIV integrase strand transfer inhibitor whose mechanism of action was established through in vitro integrase enzyme assays, resistance passage experiments, activity against viral strains resistant to other classes of anti-HIV agents, and mechanistic cellular assays. In a variety of cellular antiviral assays, S/GSK1349572 inhibited HIV replication with low-nanomolar or subnanomolar potency and with a selectivity index of 9,400. The protein-adjusted half-maximal effective concentration (PA-EC(50)) extrapolated to 100% human serum was 38 nM. When virus was passaged in the presence of S/GSK1349572, highly resistant mutants were not selected, but mutations that effected a low fold change (FC) in the EC(50) (up to 4.1 fold) were identified in the vicinity of the integrase active site. S/GSK1349572 demonstrated activity against site-directed molecular clones containing the raltegravir-resistant signature mutations Y143R, Q148K, N155H, and G140S/Q148H (FCs, 1.4, 1.1, 1.2, and 2.6, respectively), while these mutants led to a high FC in the EC(50) of raltegravir (11- to >130-fold). Either additive or synergistic effects were observed when S/GSK1349572 was tested in combination with representative approved antiretroviral agents; no antagonistic effects were seen. These findings demonstrate that S/GSK1349572 would be classified as a next-generation drug in the integrase inhibitor class, with a resistance profile markedly different from that of first-generation integrase inhibitors.

Evaluation of the in vitro anti-HBV activity of clevudine in combination with other nucleoside/nucleotide inhibitors

BACKGROUND

To reduce the incidence of drug resistance and to maintain viral suppression, patients chronically infected with HBV might require combination therapy using two or more drugs with different resistance profiles. We investigated the activity of clevudine (CLV) in combination with other nucleoside/nucleotide analogues to determine if these combinations were compatible in vitro.

METHODS

Using the HepAD38 cell line, which expresses wild-type HBV, and a real-time PCR assay, we tested the anti-HBV activity of CLV in combination with entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir and telbivudine (TBV). We evaluated the uptake and phosphorylation of CLV in the presence of TBV, using HepAD38 cells and primary hepatocytes to determine the effect of TBV on the phosphorylation of CLV and vice versa. Phosphorylation of TBV and CLV to their corresponding monophosphate by deoxycytidine kinase, thymidine kinase-1 and thymidine kinase-2, and the phosphorylation of TBV monophosphate and CLV monophosphate by thymidylate kinase was evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

When CLV was combined with entecavir, lamivudine, adefovir or tenofovir, a synergistic antiviral effect was observed; however, the combination of CLV and TBV gave an antagonistic antiviral response. The results of in vitro metabolism and enzyme studies suggest that the antagonism observed with the CLV/TBV combination involves competition for uptake and phosphorylation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our studies demonstrate that combination treatments can provide enhanced antiviral activity and, when used in conjunction with appropriate metabolic investigations, provide a rational basis for the design and development of combination regimens for treating chronic HBV infection.

Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alpha-2a therapy for chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients with haemophilia

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alpha-2a monotherapy in a cohort of Chinese haemophilic patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) and undergoing highly active antiretroviral drugs therapy. Twenty-two (n = 22) patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts over 200 cells microL(-1) were treated with 180 microg of PEG-IFN alpha-2a subcutaneously once in a week for 48 weeks. HCV load (HCV RNA), HIV load (HIV RNA) and CD4 lymphocyte counts were measured at baseline and 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 weeks after initiation of anti-HCV therapy. Efficacy and safety were analysed according to baseline CD4 status (> or =350 cells microL(-1)). Significant HCV-RNA decreases (>1 log(10) copies mL(-1)) were observed through week 72 after PEG-INF alpha-2a monotherapy across both CD4 strata. CD4 status was not associated with treatment outcomes as evaluated using rapid viral response rate (P = 0.655), early viral response rate (P = 0.387), end-of-treatment viral response rate (P = 1.000) or sustained viral response rate (SVR, P = 0.674). A sustained virological response was achieved in nine patients (41%), five with genotype 2a (83%) and four with genotype 1b (25%, P = 0.023). SVR was HCV genotype dependent. Eleven patients required a dose reduction in PEG-IFN alpha-2a. PEG-IFN alpha-2a monotherapy could be considered as a safe and effective option for the treatment of HCV infection in HIV patients with haemophilia, particularly in resource-limited settings. While higher CD4 lymphocyte counts resulted in greater HCV-RNA reduction, HCV genotype was a predictor for sustained virological response.

[Role of tenofovir in HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection]

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is common in HIV-infected individuals, especially if the route of infection is intravenous (e.g. intravenous drug use or blood transfusion). Prognosis is poorer in patients with HCV and HIV coinfection than in those with HCV monoinfection, mainly due to the immunodepression caused by HIV infection and probably also to a direct effect of HIV on the liver. Moreover, although antiretroviral therapy can cause liver damage, there is little doubt about the net benefits obtained with triple therapy in coinfected individuals, since suppression of HIV replication and immune recovery help to halt liver damage. However, not all antiretroviral agents are equal and those with the lowest hepatotoxicity and best metabolic profile should be used in coinfected patients, since hepatic steatosis accelerates progression of hepatic fibrosis and insulin resistance hampers the success of treatment with interferon and ribavirin. Tenofovir is currently one of the safest nucleos(t)ide analogues, due to its low hepatotoxicity and its lack of negative interference on treatment of HCV infection.

In vitro analysis of synergism and antagonism of different nucleoside/nucleotide analogue combinations on the inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication

In this study we have developed an in vitro system to evaluate the combined effect of two NRTIs on HIV replication and to assess their antagonism or synergy. Synergy or antagonism effect was determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to approach a more physiological model than T-cell lines. PBMCs were infected with a full-length HIV-1 clone carrying the luciferase gene as a reporter. The following combinations were investigated: zidovudine+stavudine (ZDV + d4T), lamivudine + abacavir (3TC + ABC), lamivudine + didanosine (3TC + ddI), lamivudine + stavudine (3TC + d4T), tenofovir + stavudine (TDF + d4T), tenofovir + didanosine (TDF + ddI), tenofovir + abacavir (TDF + ABC), tenofovir + lamivudine (TDF + 3TC), tenofovir + zidovudine (TDF + ZDV), stavudine + didanosine (d4T + ddI), zidovudine + lamivudine (ZDV + 3TC), abacavir + didanosine (ABC + ddI), zidovudine + didanosine (ZDV + ddI), and abacavir + stavudine (ABC + d4T). The effect of combining two drugs was evaluated with a quantitative method based on the median-effect principle of Chou and Talalay. A synergistic effect was observed with combinations containing TDF and ZDV or d4T, d4T and ddI and ZDV plus 3TC. In contrast, combinations including TDF + ddI, 3TC + ddI, ABC + ddI, and ZDV + ddI showed an antagonistic effect on the inhibition of viral replication at all levels of inhibition tested. Lower antagonistic effect was also found in drug combinations that included 3TC + ABC, 3TC + TDF, 3TC + d4T, and TDF + ABC. In conclusion, the method developed allows to measure in vitro the effect of different combinations of two NRTIs on HIV replication. The results suggest that combined therapy including TDF with thymidine analogues may be considered for future therapeutic options in contrast to clearly antagonistic combinations such us TDF plus ddI or 3TC plus ddI, that would explain virological failure in clinical studies when these combinations were used.

Pilot pharmacokinetic study of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF): investigation of systemic and intracellular interactions between TDF and abacavir, lamivudine, or lopinavir-ritonavir

Previous work has demonstrated the existence of systemic interaction between tenofovir (TFV) disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and didanosine as well as between TDF and lopinavir-ritonavir (LPV/r). Here we investigated TDF interactions with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) lamivudine (3TC) and abacavir (ABC), comparing both the concentrations of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in plasma and the intracellular concentrations of their triphosphate metabolites (NRTI-TP) for human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving these NRTIs with TDF and after 4 weeks of TDF interruption. We also looked at interactions between TDF-ABC and LPV/r, comparing patients receiving or not receiving LPV/r. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at 1, 2, and 4 h after dosing. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure NRTIs and NRTI-TPs. Statistical analyses were performed on pharmacokinetic parameters: the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 h (AUC(0-4)), the maximum concentration of the drug (C(max)), and the residual concentration of the drug at the end of the dosing interval (C(trough)) for plasma and the AUC(0-4) and C(trough) for intracellular data. Among the groups of patient discontinuing TDF, the very long intracellular half-life of elimination (150 h) of TFV-DP (the diphosphorylated metabolite of TFV, corresponding to a triphosphorylated species) was confirmed. Comparison between groups as well as the longitudinal study showed no significant systemic or intracellular interaction between TDF and ABC or 3TC. Significant differences were observed between patients receiving LVP/r and those receiving nevirapine. For ABC, plasma exposure was decreased (40%) under LVP/r, while, in contrast, plasma exposure to TFV was increased by 50% and the intracellular TFV-DP AUC(0-4) was increased by 59%. A trend for a gender effect was observed for TFV-DP at the intracellular level, with higher and C(trough) values for women.

Abacavir does not Influence the Rate of Virological Response in HIV–HCV-Coinfected Patients Treated with Pegylated Interferon and Weight-Adjusted Ribavirin

Background

The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) is the standard of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HIV-coinfected individuals. In 2007, abacavir (ABC)-based antiretroviral therapy was, for the first time, reported to be associated with early virological failure during HCV treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of ABC on the response rate to HCV therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of HIV–HCV- coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and weight-adjusted RBV in four hospitals in Spain was performed. An analysis of baseline descriptive variables was conducted. Logistic regression models were used to test possible associations between non-response and pretreatment characteristics, including antiretroviral drugs.

Results

A total of 244 HIV–HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and RBV were included. Overall, 85% of patients were on highly active antiretroviral therapy; of these patients, 24% received ABC-based regimens. The most frequent genotypes were 1 and 3. RBV dosing was ≥13.2 mg/kg/day in 97% of the patients. In the global intent-to-treat analyses, 46.3% of patients reached a sustained virological response (SVR; 46.2% in ABC group versus 46.7% in non-ABC group, P=1). The only two factors in the multivariate analysis that were statistically associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve SVR were HCV genotypes 1 or 4 and older age. The use of ABC was not associated with failure to achieve SVR at any of the other time points evaluated.

Conclusions

Our data suggest that the use of ABC-based regimens in the context of HCV therapy does not negatively affect the outcome of this treatment.

Abacavir does not influence the rate of virological response in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon and weight-adjusted ribavirin

BACKGROUND

The combination of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) is the standard of care for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in HIV-coinfected individuals. In 2007, abacavir (ABC)-based antiretroviral therapy was, for the first time, reported to be associated with early virological failure during HCV treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of ABC on the response rate to HCV therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and weight-adjusted RBV in four hospitals in Spain was performed. An analysis of baseline descriptive variables was conducted. Logistic regression models were used to test possible associations between non-response and pretreatment characteristics, including antiretroviral drugs.

RESULTS

A total of 244 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN and RBV were included. Overall, 85% of patients were on highly active antiretroviral therapy; of these patients, 24% received ABC-based regimens. The most frequent genotypes were 1 and 3. RBV dosing was 213.2 mg/kg/day in 97% of the patients. In the global intent-to-treat analyses, 46.3% of patients reached a sustained virological response (SVR; 46.2% in ABC group versus 46.7% in non-ABC group, P=1). The only two factors in the multivariate analysis that were statistically associated with an increased risk of failure to achieve SVR were HCV genotypes 1 or 4 and older age. The use of ABC was not associated with failure to achieve SVR at any of the other time points evaluated.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the use of ABC-based regimens in the context of HCV therapy does not negatively affect the outcome of this treatment.

The naphthyridinone GSK364735 is a novel, potent human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase inhibitor and antiretroviral

The naphthyridinone GSK364735 potently inhibited recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase in a strand transfer assay (mean 50% inhibitory concentration +/- standard deviation, 8 +/- 2 nM). As expected based on the structure of the drug, it bound competitively with another two-metal binding inhibitor (Kd [binding constant], 6 +/- 4 nM). In a number of different cellular assays, GSK364735 inhibited HIV replication with potency at nanomolar concentrations (e.g., in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and MT-4 cells, 50% effective concentrations were 1.2 +/- 0.4 and 5 +/- 1 nM, respectively), with selectivity indexes of antiviral activity versus in-assay cytotoxicity of at least 2,200. When human serum was added, the antiviral potency decreased (e.g., a 35-fold decrease in the presence of 100% human serum was calculated by extrapolation from the results of the MT-4 cell assay). In cellular assays, GSK364735 blocked viral DNA integration, with a concomitant increase in two-long-terminal-repeat circles. As expected, this integrase inhibitor was equally active against wild-type viruses and mutant viruses resistant to approved drugs targeting either reverse transcriptase or protease. In contrast, some but not all viruses resistant to other integrase inhibitors were resistant to GSK364735. When virus was passaged in the presence of the inhibitor, we identified resistance mutations within the integrase active site that were the same as or similar to mutations arising in response to other two-metal binding inhibitors. Finally, either additive or synergistic effects were observed when GSK364735 was tested in combination with approved antiretrovirals (i.e., no antagonistic effects were seen). Thus, based on all the data, GSK364735 exerted potent antiviral activity through the inhibition of viral DNA integration by interacting at the two-metal binding site within the catalytic center of HIV integrase.

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the effects of ribavirin on zidovudine triphosphate formation: ACTG 5092s Study Team

OBJECTIVES

Ribavirin (RBV) is used for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in subjects with HIV-1 infection who may require antiretroviral treatment (ART) with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors including zidovudine (ZDV). We sought to investigate the potential antagonism between RBV and ZDV by evaluating the impact of RBV on the formation of intracellular ZDV triphosphate (TP) in HIV-infected patients receiving ZDV who were treated for HCV infection.

METHODS

Serial plasma and intracellular ZDV TP pharmacokinetics (PK) were determined in 14 subjects at entry (within 2 weeks prior to RBV administration) and at 8 weeks following initiation of RBV. Intracellular ZDV TP in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was quantified by a validated cartridge/liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method. PK exposure was estimated from the steady-state area under the concentration vs time curve (AUC(0-12 h)) in plasma and PBMC.

RESULTS

Ribavirin did not have a statistically significant impact on ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h), plasma ZDV AUC(0-12 h) or the ratio of ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h) to plasma ZDV AUC(0-12 h), although there was a trend towards an increase post-RBV ratio compared with pre-RBV. There was extensive variability in the ZDV TP AUC(0-12 h).

CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin did not inhibit formation of ZDV TP in PBMC in 14 patients receiving ZDV as part of ART and RBV-based HCV therapy for 8 weeks. These results are consistent with those of a previously published limited study in seven subjects. These PK findings should be weighed carefully against emerging clinical reports of significant anaemia associated with combination ZDV and high-dose RBV therapy.

Mitochondrial Toxicity of Tenofovir, Emtricitabine and Abacavir Alone and in Combination with Additional Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Background

Some nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) combinations cause additive or synergistic interactions in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

We evaluated the mitochondrial toxicity of tenofovir (TFV), emtricitabine (FTC) and abacavir as carbovir (CBV) alone, with each other, and in combination with additional NRTIs. HepG2 human hepatoma cells were incubated with TFV, FTC, CBV, didanosine (ddI), stavudine (d4T), lamivudine (3TC) and zidovudine (AZT) at concentrations equivalent to 1 and 10x clinical steady-state peak plasma levels (Cmax). NRTIs were also used in double and triple combinations. Cell growth, lactate production, intracellular lipids, mtDNA and the mtDNA-encoded respiratory chain subunit II of cytochrome c oxidase (COXII) were monitored for 25 days.

Results

TFV and 3TC had no or minimal toxicity. FTC moderately reduced hepatocyte proliferation independent of effects on mtDNA. ddI and d4T induced a time- and dose-dependent loss of mtDNA and COXII, decreased cell growth and increased levels of lactate and intracellular lipids. CBV and AZT strongly impaired hepatocyte proliferation and increased lactate and lipid production, but did not induce mtDNA depletion. The dual combination of TFV plus 3TC had only minimal toxicity; TFV plus FTC slightly reduced cell proliferation without affecting mitochondrial parameters. All other combinations exhibited more pronounced adverse effects on mitochondrial endpoints. Toxic effects on mitochondrial parameters were observed in all combinations with ddI, d4T, AZT or CBV. TFV and 3TC both attenuated ddI-related cytotoxicity, but worsened the effects of CBV and AZT.

Conclusions

The data demonstrate unpredicted interactions between NRTIs with respect to toxicological endpoints and provide an argument against the liberal use of NRTI cocktails without first obtaining data from clinical trials.

Nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in children

By the end of 2006, approximately 2.3 million children worldwide were living with HIV infection, representing about 15% of all HIV-infected individuals but only 5-7% of the total population of treated patients worldwide. Despite a general increase in the use of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in resource-limited settings, appropriate care and ART remain inaccessible for most of the world's HIV-infected children. ART of children is challenging because of a general lack of paediatric formulations (including tablets in paediatric strengths), limited options of drugs available for children (some have been approved only for use in adults), different viral and immunological responses, dependency on caregivers for administration of the therapy, and specific issues of toxicity in long-term therapy related to maturation and development. As in adults, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) are a key component of any ART schedule in children, being the recommended 'backbone' treatment in US, European and WHO guidelines, and, indeed, NRTIs have been extensively studied in children. NRTIs are the class of antiretroviral drugs that have more drugs licensed for paediatric use and more paediatric formulations.Generally, the dual NRTI backbone treatment of combination with a non-NRTI (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) should comprise a cytidine analogue (lamivudine, emtricitabine) and a thymidine analogue (stavudine, zidovudine), guanosine analogue (i.e. abacavir), or nucleotide RTI (NtRTI; i.e. tenofovir). European and US guidelines recommend the use of triple NRTI therapy (abacavir/lamivudine/zidovudine) in children with anticipated poor adherence to other treatment regimens because of tablet burden. In conclusion, while use of ART in children needs to be dramatically increased, selecting and administering the best drug combination for children is still limited by a lack of paediatric formulations and knowledge of drug metabolism, safety and efficacy in children. NRTIs are already a key component of paediatric ART, but fixed-dose combinations and specific research in children are needed to optimise their use. In this article we review the available information to facilitate selection of the best NRTI for backbone treatment in combination ART for HIV-infected children.

Intracellular Nucleoside Triphosphate Concentrations in HIV-Infected Patients on Dual Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Therapy

Background

Intracellular nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor triphosphate (NRTI-TP) concentrations are crucial in suppressing HIV replication. Little is known about how commonly used dual-NRTI regimens affect the intracellular levels of NRTI-TPs, the active form of these drugs. This study investigates the effect of dual-NRTI therapy in intracellular NRTI-TP levels.

Methods

NRTI and NRTI-TP concentrations were evaluated in HIV-infected patients receiving either lamivudine (3TC) and stavudine (d4T) or lamivudine with zidovudine (ZDV); NRTI and NRTI-TP concentrations were determined using a validated HPLC/MS/MS method. Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels were determined at baseline and monthly to examine the relationship between NRTI-TP concentrations and plasma HIV-1 RNA.

Results

Forty-one subjects completed the study. 3TC-TP significantly increased between day 1 and week 28 from 1.48 to 5.00 pmol/106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC; P<0.0001). NRTI-TP concentrations for d4T and ZDV did not significantly increase, with values at week 28 of 0.011 and 0.02 pmol/106 PBMC, respectively. Mean NRTI-TP/plasma ratios were 3%, 0.007% and 0.05% for 3TC, d4T and ZDV, respectively. Linear relationships were observed between ZDV- and 3TC-TP and changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA.

Conclusion

Of the three drugs studied, only 3TC-TP levels increased significantly between day 1 and week 28. ZDV-TP and 3TC-TP levels were unaffected by dual-NRTI therapy relative to monotherapy, regardless of the combination (3TC-ZDV or 3TC-d4T). Intracellular levels of d4T-TP were similar to previous reports for dual-NRTI therapy; however, in the case of d4T, these values appear lower than those achieved with d4T monotherapy.

Therapeutic issues in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The importance of treating hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated morbidities in a growing population of patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has increased since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy. As a result, investigative attention is turning to HCV-related liver disease and treatment-associated issues in coinfection. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients have higher HCV RNA loads and show more rapid progression of fibrosis than do monoinfected patients. Combination therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (RBV) is the standard of care for HCV in coinfected patients. Therapy slows fibrosis progression, but toxicity prevents identification of the most effective RBV dose. Coinfected patients have about a threefold greater risk of antiretroviral therapy-associated hepatotoxicity than patients with HIV only. Other challenges include anaemia, mitochondrial toxicity, drug-drug interactions and leucopenia. Thus, chronic hepatitis C should be treated in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, but steps must be taken to prevent and treat potential toxicities. The first European Consensus Conference on the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B and C in HIV Co-infected Patients was held March 2005 in Paris to address these issues. This article reviews the peer-reviewed literature and expert opinion published from 1990 to 2005, and compares results with presentations and recommendations from the Consensus Conference to best present current issues in coinfection.

In vitro interactions between apricitabine and other deoxycytidine analogues

Apricitabine is a novel deoxycytidine analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor that is under development for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Apricitabine is phosphorylated to its active triphosphate by deoxycytidine kinase, which is also responsible for the intracellular phosphorylation of lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC); hence, in vitro studies were performed to investigate possible interactions between apricitabine and these agents. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were incubated for 24 h with various concentrations of (3)H-labeled or unlabeled apricitabine, 3TC, or FTC. Intracellular concentrations of parent compounds and their phosphorylated derivatives were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. In other experiments, viral reverse transcriptase activity was measured in PBMC infected with HIV-1 bearing M184V in the presence of various concentrations of apricitabine and 3TC. [(3)H]apricitabine and [(3)H]3TC were metabolized intracellularly to form mono-, di-, and triphosphates. 3TC and FTC (1 to 10 microM) produced concentration-dependent decreases in apricitabine phosphorylation; in contrast, apricitabine at concentrations of up to 30 muM had no effect on the phosphorylation of 3TC or FTC. The combination of apricitabine and 3TC reduced the antiviral activity of apricitabine against HIV-1: apricitabine concentrations producing 50% inhibition of viral reverse transcriptase were increased two- to fivefold in the presence of 3TC. These findings suggest that nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with similar modes of action may show biochemical interactions that affect their antiviral efficacy. It is therefore essential that potential interactions between combinations of new and existing agents be thoroughly investigated before such combinations are introduced into clinical practice.

Effect of Lamivudine on the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of apricitabine, a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers

Apricitabine is a novel deoxycytidine analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor. In vitro apricitabine competes with other deoxycytidine analogues for intracellular phosphorylation mediated by deoxycytidine kinase. The topic of this study, the effect of concomitant administration of apricitabine and lamivudine on the plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of the two compounds, was investigated in healthy volunteers. Participants (n = 21; age, 18 to 30 years) received apricitabine at 600 mg twice daily, lamivudine at 300 mg once daily, and the two treatments in combination for 4 days each in random order. Plasma, urine, and intracellular pharmacokinetics were assessed on day 4 of each treatment period. Apricitabine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with peak concentrations being attained after a mean of 1.76 h. Coadministration with lamivudine had no significant effect on the plasma and urine pharmacokinetics of apricitabine. However, the formation of apricitabine triphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was markedly reduced after the coadministration of apricitabine and lamivudine than after the administration of apricitabine alone: the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h for apricitabine triphosphate during combination treatment was ca. 15% of that seen after the administration of apricitabine alone. In contrast, apricitabine had no effect on the plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine or on the formation of lamivudine triphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. These results are consistent with in vitro findings that lamivudine inhibits the intracellular phosphorylation of apricitabine. In conjunction with similar in vitro observations for emtricitabine and apricitabine, these results suggest that apricitabine should not be coadministered with other deoxycytidine analogues for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Antiviral hepatitis and antiretroviral drug interactions

More and more HIV-infected patients are treated for viral hepatitis, increasing interactions. HEPATITIS C: The concomitant use of didanosine and ribavirin increases the risk of mitochondrial toxicity, responsible for pancreatitis and/or lactic acidosis. Lactic acidosis is characterized by a high mortality rate. Thus, didanosine, but also stavudine, should not be co-administered with ribavirin. Cases of hepatic decompensation have been reported in cirrhotics concomitantly receiving ribavirin and didanosine. Thus, this co-admininistration should be contraindicated in patients with advanced liver fibrosis. Anemia is a frequent side effect of ribavirin. In patients with zidovudine-related anemia, this drug should be discontinued before prescribing ribavirin. Erythropoietin may help to improve the haemoglobin level. HEPATITIS B: Adefovir significantly decreases the plasma levels of saquinavir. Pancreatitis may occur with the co-administration of didanosine and tenofovir. Thus this co-administration should be avoided. Atazanavir concentrations are decreased when tenofovir is co-administered. Thus, atazanavir should be boosted with ritonavir, when combined with tenofovir. Atazanavir increases the concentrations of tenofovir, with the potential risk of increasing the adverse events of tenofovir, including renal disorders. Tenofovir area under the curve is increased if lopinavir-ritonavir are co-administered. The main interactions, with a fatal risk, are observed with didanosine, when co-administered with ribavirin (hepatitis C) or with tenofovir (hepatitis B). Anemia is frequent, but usually moderate, when zidovudine is co-administered with ribavirin. Other interactions are usually easy to manage.

Treatment of viral hepatitis in HIV-coinfected patients-adverse events and their management

For the treatment of HBV/HIV-co-infection, study data on interferon-based therapy are very limited and insufficient to draw any specific conclusions. In contrast, data on HBV-polymerase inhibitors (lamivudine, adefovir, tenofovir) are available from controlled trials. Lamivudine is well tolerated and safe, however, development of HBV-resistance is frequent. Adefovir has a nephrotoxic potential and may at least theoretically induce antiretroviral resistance in HBV/HIV-patients treated with adefovir. Tenofovir has gastrointestinal side effects, is associated with hypophospatemia, which has not induced serious osteopenia so far and may have a nephrotoxic potential. For HCV/HIV-co-infection pegylated interferon alpha plus ribavirin is standard of care. Flu-like symptoms, fatigue and depressive mood changes are frequent. In patients with a history of neurotic or minor depression initiation of treatment with antidepressants before the start of interferon-based therapy should be considered. Weight loss may be pronounced in individual cases. A marked decrease in absolute, but not relative CD4 +/- cells is the rule, but no relevant increase in opportunistic infection was observed, and anaemia (<10 g/dl) is reported in up to 30% of patients. Neutropenia (< 1,000 cells/microl) is observed in up to 50% of the patients. Adverse events specific to the HCV/HIV-patient population as compared to HCV-mono-infected patients are the occurrence of hyperlactataemia/lactic acidosis and hepatic decompensation.

Treatment algorithm for the management of hepatitis C in HIV-coinfected persons

In the era of highly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART), HCV-related liver disease has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, expert panels have recommend that coinfected patients undergo medical evaluation for HCV-related liver disease, consideration for HCV treatment and, if indicated, orthotopic liver transplantation. While the treatment of such patients is complicated by medical, and psychiatric comorbidities, HIV disease, and concurrent antiretroviral therapy, randomized controlled trials support the safety, tolerability and efficacy of HCV treatment with peginterferon alfa (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in HIV-infected persons. Although, the available data has led to consensus among experts regarding the need to medically manage HCV disease in HIV-infected persons, uncertainty remains regarding the best treatment algorithm for coinfected patients.

Lack of evidence for in vivo transformation of zidovudine triphosphate to stavudine triphosphate in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

The in vivo and in vitro determination of significant intracellular stavudine (d4T) triphosphate (d4TTP) concentrations in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects and NS-1 cells treated with zidovudine (ZDV) has recently been reported. This study was conducted to corroborate these findings with in vivo samples from HIV-infected subjects taking ZDV and in vitro CEM(SS) cells incubated with different ZDV concentrations. Previously, we have reported on our validated high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry methodology for the simultaneous determination of d4TTP, lamivudine triphosphate, and ZDV triphosphate (ZDVTP) concentrations. Using this methodology, we monitored the d4TTP concentration in more than 100 samples from HIV-infected subjects treated with d4T. In addition, we simultaneously monitored the concentrations of d4TTP and ZDVTP in more than 500 samples from HIV-infected individuals who were taking ZDV. Finally, we performed in vitro studies by incubating CEM(SS) cells with 10 microM, 50 microM, and 100 microM ZDV and monitored the formation of d4TTP at 24 and 48 h. We could measure d4TTP concentrations from HIV-infected individuals with a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 2.7 fmol/10(6) cells (total injection, 54 fmol). In the in vivo studies, we measured the d4TTP concentrations among patients receiving d4T treatment, but the samples from patients taking ZDV did not provide d4TTP concentrations above the LOQ. Furthermore, in vitro samples did not produce any signal for d4TTP, despite the detection of substantial ZDVTP concentrations in CEM(SS) cells. Thus, contrary to the previous report, we found no evidence for the in vivo or in vitro transformation of ZDVTP to d4TTP in HIV-infected subjects or CEM(SS) cells.

Effect of ribavirin on intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus coinfection: results of a randomized clinical study

The intracellular triphosphorylation and plasma pharmacokinetics of lamivudine (3TC), stavudine (d4T), and zidovudine (ZDV) were assessed in a pharmacokinetic substudy, in 56 human immunodeficiency virus-hepatitis C virus (HIV-HCV) coinfected patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) 180 microg/week plus either placebo or ribavirin (RBV) 800 mg/day in the AIDS PEGASYS Ribavirin International Coinfection Trial. There were no significant differences between patients treated with RBV and placebo in plasma pharmacokinetics parameters for the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) at steady state (weeks 8 to 12): ratios of least squares mean of area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12 h)) were 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.51) for 3TC, 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 3.60) for d4T and 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.50 to 1.45) for ZDV, and ratios of least squares mean plasma C(max) were 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.78), 1.06 (95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.65), and 0.84 (95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.53), respectively. Concentrations of NRTI triphosphate (TP) metabolites in relation to those of the triphosphates of endogenous deoxythymidine-triphosphate (dTTP) and deoxcytidine-triphosphate (dCTP) were similar in the RBV and placebo groups. Differences (RBV to placebo) in least squares mean ratios of AUC(0-12 h) at steady state were 0.274 (95% confidence interval, -0.37 to 0.91) for 3TC-TP:dCTP, 0.009 (95% confidence interval, -0.06 to 0.08) for d4T-TP:dTTP, and -0.081 (95% confidence interval, -0.40 to 0.24) for ZDV-TP:dTTP. RBV did not adversely affect HIV-1 replication. In summary, RBV 800 mg/day administered in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) does not significantly affect the intracellular phosphorylation or plasma pharmacokinetics of 3TC, d4T, and ZDV in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

Drug interactions between psychoactive substances and antiretroviral therapy in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency and hepatitis viruses

The liver disease characteristic of alcohol dependence encompasses three main related entities: steatosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality. Alcohol intake among injecting drug users is a major contributor to transmission of viral infections, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C viruses (HCV). HIV and HCV coinfected patients develop liver diseases earlier and more severely than the monoinfected individuals, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Interactions exist between the therapeutic drugs used to minimize and control the drug and alcohol dependence. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions occur between the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and alcohol, different HAART components and methadone, or each one of the therapies with the other, thus contributing to a higher toxicity level. With the evolution of effective antiretroviral therapy, survival of persons with HIV, and the syndrome it causes, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) has increased dramatically. Drug-drug interactions may appear between alcohol and anti-HBV or anti-HCV, therapy in the presence or absence of anti-HIV therapy. Several other medical-, social-, and drug-related factors of this population have to be considered when providing HAART. Because many coinfected patients also have problems with substance use, dealing with their drug dependence is an important first step in an attempt to improve adherence to and tolerance of antiviral therapy. It is necessary to minimize the risk of liver disease acceleration and/or reinfection with hepatitis viruses. Knowledge of potential drug interactions between methadone, antiretroviral therapy, psychoactive drugs, and antipsychotics and the role of coinfection with HBV or HCV and the drugs used in eradicating viral hepatitis permits suitable antiretroviral combinations.

Hepatitis C virus infection in HIV-infected patients

Because of shared routes of transmission, hepatitis C and HIV coinfection is common in the United States, affecting 15% to 30% of HIV-infected individuals. In the era of highly effective antiretroviral therapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease has emerged as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease guidelines for the management of HCV recommend that patients with HIV/HCV undergo medical evaluation for HCV-related liver disease and consideration for HCV treatment and, if indicated, orthotopic liver transplantation. However, the treatment of patients with HIV/HCV is complicated by the relatively high prevalence of medical and psychiatric comorbidities and the challenges of anti-HCV therapy in the setting of HIV disease and antiretroviral therapy. Nonetheless, recently completed randomized controlled trials provide evidence of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of HCV treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha plus ribavirin in HIV-infected individuals. This review focuses on the epidemiology, natural history, and management of HCV in the HIV-infected patient.

HCV/HIV-coinfection--is there a state of the art after APRICOT and RIBAVIC?

Today hepatitis C is one of the unsolved medical problems and results in a significant number of deaths in the HIV population, particularly in southern Europe and the USA, where the prevalence of HCV/HIV-coinfection in the HIV population ranges from 30-50%. Recent trials using pegylated interferon alfa in combination with low dose ribavirin have achieved overall sustained response rates of up to 42%. However, high discontinuation rates, adverse events associated with mitochondrial toxicities or treatment of patients with advanced cirrhosis may decrease response to treatment and result in serious adverse events. Optimizing antiretroviral therapy before the start of interferon-based therapy and active management of adverse events will reduce complications and improve treatment success. The use of higher ribavirin doses and longer treatment periods should be systematically studied to improve hepatitis C therapy in coinfected patients in the near future.

Measurement of intracellular didanosine and tenofovir phosphorylated metabolites and possible interaction of the two drugs in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Recent work has demonstrated the existence of a systemic interaction between didanosine (ddI) and tenofovir disoproxyl fumarate (TDF) that leads to a significant increase in plasma ddI levels when coadministered with TDF (40 to 50% increase). These two drugs are, respectively, nucleoside and nucleotide analogues of adenosine and efficiently inhibit the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcriptase when transformed to their triphosphate moieties in the intracellular (IC) medium (ddA-TP and TFV-DP, respectively). Since ddI and TDF partly share the same IC metabolic pathway leading to the active triphosphates, we investigated a putative IC interaction. We used high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry techniques to determine ddA-TP and TFV-DP IC levels in HIV-infected patients cotreated with both drugs, in comparison with patients treated with just one of the two drugs. These measurements revealed no significant differences in IC levels of the corresponding triphosphates when ddI (250 mg, once a day [QD]) was coadministered with TDF (300 mg, QD) compared to ddI 400 mg (QD) administered without TDF, thus supporting the dose adaptation proposed for this combination. However, we observed that both ddA-TP and TFV-DP have very long IC half-lives, resulting in unusual IC pharmacokinetic profiles with no significant changes in triphosphate concentrations between two dosings. In the case of TFV-DP, this t(1/2) of elimination was roughly estimated to be 180 h (7.5 days). This characteristic is certainly interesting in terms of efficacy but could have some drawbacks in terms of virus resistance for patients discontinuing these drugs.

Coinfection with HIV and Hepatitis C Virus in Injection Drug Users and Minority Populations

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is common. In the United States, it has been estimated that 25% of persons infected with HIV are also infected with HCV. The prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV is highest among those infected via percutaneous routes. In fact, in urban areas in the United States, 50%-90% of persons infected with HIV via injection drug use are coinfected with HCV. In addition, limited data from drug treatment centers in these urban areas suggest that the prevalence of coinfection with HIV and HCV may be highest among African Americans and Hispanics. Little information is available with regard to the epidemiology of coinfection with HIV and HCV among injection drug users (IDUs) or minority populations. Likewise, although there is a growing body of data on the potential complexities of treating HCV among IDUs and the poor response to current anti-HCV treatment among African Americans, few data address the therapy of coinfection with HIV and HCV among IDUs and minority populations.

Therapy Insight: management of hepatitis C in patients coinfected with HIV

Infection with HCV is common in HIV-infected patients and is an increasingly important public health problem. The medical management of hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients is complicated by immune suppression, potential drug interactions and toxicities, and the relative paucity of health-care providers with expertise in the management of both diseases. Nonetheless, there are now data to support the safety, tolerability and efficacy of hepatitis C treatment with peginterferon plus ribavirin in HIV-infected patients, and the impetus to treat these patients is, therefore, strong. Although the standard of care for the treatment of hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients has been more clearly defined, the delivery of care for hepatitis C remains inconsistent in many settings. The development and implementation of single-center multidisciplinary programs that combine the expertise of HIV specialists, hepatologists, gastroenterologists, psychiatrists, and addiction specialists, are needed to improve hepatitis C treatment outcomes in HIV-infected patients. This review considers the management of HCV infection in HIV-infected patients.

Review: mixing new cocktails: drug interactions in antiretroviral regimens

Current highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for the treatment of HIV infection requires the concomitant administration of three or four different agents, often with a high potential for drug-drug interactions. Additionally, some HIV-positive patients still require concomitant treatment with drugs for opportunistic infections, some require medication to treat unrelated medical conditions and/or the metabolic complications of antiretroviral therapy, others may self-medicate with herbal formulations and/or over-the-counter drugs, and still others many take drugs for recreational reasons or to manage addiction. Therefore, the virtually limitless number of drug combinations that may be taken by patients undergoing treatment of HIV infection makes drug-drug interactions almost inevitable. Managing these interactions is one of the major challenges associated with the multidrug regimens used for HIV therapy. This paper provides an overview of the most common interactions between antiretrovirals in the same and different classes-nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), protease inhibitors (PI), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI)-by focusing on principles rather than specific interactions. The paper also addresses interactions between these antiretrovirals and other commonly used medications that may be prescribed concomitantly.

Drug interactions in the management of HIV infection

The availability of antiretroviral therapy has significantly reduced the morbidity and mortality of HIV infection. In addition, improved treatment of opportunistic infections and comorbidities common to patients with HIV is further prolonging the lives of patients. Improvement in the treatment of HIV has led to a significant increase in the number of medications which caregivers are able to utilise to manage HIV/AIDS. Antiretroviral medications, as well as many of the drugs used in the management of opportunistic infections and primary care (e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungals, cholesterol-lowering medications), are particularly prone to drug interactions. The interpretation of clinically significant interactions is complicated by the rate at which new information on drug metabolism and transport is becoming available. Management of drug interactions in HIV is further confounded by conflicting study results and differences between documented and theoretical inter-actions. The mechanisms and significance of interactions involving antiretrovirals, drugs used for opportunistic infections, and other medications commonly used in HIV patients will be reviewed.

Management of Hepatitis C in HIV-infected Patients

As the survival of HIV-infected patients has been lengthening over the past 10 years as a consequence of effective antiretroviral therapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV) coinfection has emerged as a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population. HCV/HIV coinfection is associated with accelerated progression of liver disease, untoward effects on the immunologic and virologic response to antiretroviral medications, and possibly with a more aggressive course of HIV disease. The results of major trials of combination therapy for HCV in coinfected patients have clearly established the combination of pegylated interferon-alpha with ribavirin as the treatment of choice in this population. However, the effectiveness and tolerability of this regimen remains suboptimal, particularly in patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. This paper reviews the impact of HCV coinfection in HIV-infected patients, outlines current concepts on management and antiviral treatment, and discusses some of the newer agents, currently in the therapeutic pipeline, that are directed against novel molecular targets.

Tolérance et interactions médicamenteuses des traitements anti-VIH et anti-VHC

Treating Hepatitis C among HIV patients under antiretroviral drug therapy requires a high degree of vigilance and continuous monitoring because of frequent problems with intolerance and/or drug interactions. Recent studies, including three therapeutic trials, on Ribavic, APRICOT, and ACTG A5671, have given some insights on following these patients up. The adverse effects are relatively similar in HCV-HIV-co-infected patients and patients infected by HCV only. Their frequency is, on the other hand, higher among HCV-HIV-Co-infected patients. The adverse-effects are consistent, in a non-exhaustive way, with pseudo influenza-like symptoms, fever, myalgia, cephalgia, with psychiatric disorders (irritability, depression, etc.); endocrine disorders (thyroid dysfunction, diabetes...); and with hematological anomalies especially anemia and leucopenia. But the percentage of lymphocyte T CD4 is not modified, therefore there is no risk of opportunistic infection. Pharmacokinetic interactions between antiretroviral drugs and treatment for HCV infection including ribavirin plus interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or pegylated IFN are described. They are almost exclusively due to the combination of ribavirin and of nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors. One of the principal consequences is the emergence of mitochondrial toxicity defined by the occurrence of hyperlactatemia, or acute pancreatitis). Thus, some combinations should be avoided such as ddI+ribavirin and ddI+d4T+ribavirin. The d4T+ribavirin combination must also be used with caution.

In Vitro Combination Studies of Tenofovir and Other Nucleoside Analogues with Ribavirin against HIV-1

In patients coinfected and treated for both HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV), administration of ribavirin (RBV) may result in altered intracellular drug levels of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors through inhibition of inosine 5′-monophosphate dehydrogenase. Drug interactions between tenofovir and RBV were studied in vitro in order to provide insights into the safety of co-administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DF) and RBV in HCV/HIV-1-coinfected patients. In accordance with previous in vitro studies, strongly increased anti-HIV activity was observed when RBV was combined with didanosine (ddI). In contrast, low-level anti-HIV antagonism was observed when RBV was combined with either tenofovir or abacavir. Significantly stronger anti-HIV antagonism was observed when RBV was combined with either zidovudine, stavudine, emtricitabine or lamivudine. Thus, although tenofovir and ddI are both adenosine analogues, their in vitro interactions with RBV are markedly different. These results suggest a low potential for increased toxicity upon co-administration of teno-fovir DF with RBV in patients.

Modifications of haematological series in patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus during treatment with interferon and ribavirin: differences between pegylated and standard interferon

Therapy with interferon and ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection induces a decrease in several haematological population counts. It is unclear whether haematological toxicity is more severe in patients co-infected with HCV and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study analysed the evolution of haematological population counts during and after interferon and ribavirin therapy for chronic HCV infection. Eleven patients co-infected with HIV and HCV and treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin, and ten treated with standard interferon plus ribavirin, were analysed. With reference to baseline values, neutrophil counts decreased by an average of 45% (range 18-67%), total lymphocytes by 50% (16-63%), CD4 lymphocytes by 54% (16-61%), haemoglobin by 9% (5-16%) and platelets by 31% (16-45%). The nadir of the decrease was reached in the first weeks of therapy and was maintained while patients were receiving treatment. The reduction in all series was higher with pegylated interferon. Patients recovered their baseline counts after finishing the treatment. No cases of haemorrhage or outstanding infection were detected during follow-up.

Risk factors for hepatic decompensation in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection and liver cirrhosis during interferon-based therapy

OBJECTIVE

Hepatic decompensation was reported from two recent trials (APRICOT and RIBAVIC) assessing interferon (IFN)-based treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. This paper identifies risk factors associated with hepatic decompensation in APRICOT.

METHODS

APRICOT is a randomized, partially-blinded, controlled trial comparing treatment with peg-IFN alpha-2a 180 microg once weekly plus ribavirin/placebo 400 mg twice daily with IFN alpha-2a 3 million units three times weekly plus ribavirin 400 mg twice daily for 48 weeks in a total of 859 patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed comparing the baseline characteristics of those cirrhotic patients who experienced decompensation with those of the other cirrhotic patients enrolled.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients, all cirrhotic, experienced hepatic decompensation during the study. The incidence in the cirrhotic subgroup of the study was 10.4% (14/134). Six of the 14 patients died as a result of hepatic decompensation. The risk factors associated with hepatic decompensation were increased bilirubin, decreased haemoglobin, increased alkaline phosphatase or decreased platelets, and treatment with didanosine. Markers of viral replication, histological activity, cellular immune status or HCV-therapy, treatment with ribavirin and pegylated versus non-pegylated IFN were not associated with hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from APRICOT indicate that the overall risk of hepatic decompensation in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients without cirrhosis receiving IFN-based treatment is low. In contrast, patients with markers of advanced cirrhosis, despite the absence of a history of hepatic decompensation, should be monitored closely during IFN-based therapy, because they are at risk of hepatic decompensation. Treatment with antiretrovirals such as didanosine may increase the risk further.