Lambda placMu insertions in genes of the leucine regulon: extension of the regulon to genes not regulated by leucine

The leucine-responsive regulatory proteins/feast-famine regulatory proteins: an ancient and complex class of transcriptional regulators in bacteria and archaea

Since the discovery of the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) almost 50 years ago, hundreds of Lrp homologs have been discovered, occurring in 45% of sequenced bacteria and almost all sequenced archaea. Lrp-like proteins are often referred to as the feast/famine regulatory proteins (FFRPs), reflecting their common regulatory roles. Acting as either global or local transcriptional regulators, FFRPs detect the environmental nutritional status by sensing small effector molecules (usually amino acids) and regulate the expression of genes involved in metabolism, virulence, motility, nutrient transport, stress tolerance, and antibiotic resistance to implement appropriate behaviors for the specific ecological niche of each organism. Despite FFRPs' complexity, a significant role in gene regulation, and prevalence throughout prokaryotes, the last comprehensive review on this family of proteins was published about a decade ago. In this review, we integrate recent notable findings regarding E. coli Lrp and other FFRPs across bacteria and archaea with previous observations to synthesize a more complete view on the mechanistic details and biological roles of this ancient class of transcription factors.

A Thermosensitive, Phase-Variable Epigenetic Switch: pap Revisited

It has been more than a decade since the last comprehensive review of the phase-variable uropathogen-associated pyelonephritis-associated pilus (pap) genetic switch. Since then, important data have come to light, including additional factors that regulate pap expression, better characterization of H-NS regulation, the structure of the Lrp octamer in complex with pap regulatory DNA, the temperature-insensitive phenotype of a mutant lacking the acetyltransferase RimJ, evidence that key components of the regulatory machinery are acetylated, and new insights into the role of DNA binding by key regulators in shaping both the physical structure and regulatory state of the papI and papBA promoters. This review revisits pap, integrating these newer observations with older ones to produce a new model for the concerted behavior of this virulence-regulatory region.

Competitive Repression of the artPIQM Operon for Arginine and Ornithine Transport by Arginine Repressor and Leucine-Responsive Regulatory Protein in Escherichia coli

Two out of the three major uptake systems for arginine in Escherichia coli are encoded by the artJ-artPIQM gene cluster. ArtJ is the high-affinity periplasmic arginine-specific binding protein (ArgBP-I), whereas artI encodes the arginine and ornithine periplasmic binding protein (AO). Both ArtJ and ArtI are supposed to combine with the inner membrane-associated ArtQMP₂ transport complex of the ATP-binding cassette-type (ABC). Transcription of artJ is repressed by arginine repressor (ArgR) and the artPIQM operon is regulated by the transcriptional regulators ArgR and Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). Whereas repression by ArgR requires arginine as corepressor, repression of P_artP by Lrp is partially counteracted by leucine, its major effector molecule. We demonstrate that binding of dimeric Lrp to the artP control region generates four complexes with a distinct migration velocity, and that leucine has an effect on both global binding affinity and cooperativity in the binding. We identify the binding sites for Lrp in the artP control region, reveal interferences in the binding of ArgR and Lrp in vitro and demonstrate that the two transcription factors act as competitive repressors in vivo, each one being a more potent regulator in the absence of the other. This competitive behavior may be explained by the partial steric overlap of their respective binding sites. Furthermore, we demonstrate ArgR binding to an unusual position in the control region of the lrp gene, downstream of the transcription initiation site. From this unusual position for an ArgR-specific operator, ArgR has little direct effect on lrp expression, but interferes with the negative leucine-sensitive autoregulation exerted by Lrp. Direct arginine and ArgR-dependent repression of lrp could be observed with a 25-bp deletion mutant, in which the ArgR binding site was artificially moved to a position immediately downstream of the lrp transcription initiation site. This finding is reminiscent of a previous observation made for the carAB operon encoding carbamoylphosphate synthase, where ArgR bound in overlap with the downstream promoter P2 does not block transcription initiated 67 bp upstream at the P1 promoter, and further supports the hypothesis that ArgR does not act as an efficient roadblock.

The i6A37 tRNA modification is essential for proper decoding of UUX-Leucine codons during rpoS and iraP translation

The translation of rpoS(σ(S)), the general stress/stationary phase sigma factor, is tightly regulated at the post-transcriptional level by several factors via mechanisms that are not clearly defined. One of these factors is MiaA, the enzyme necessary for the first step in theN(6)-isopentyl-2-thiomethyl adenosinemethyl adenosine 37 (ms(2)i(6)A37) tRNA modification. We tested the hypothesis that an elevated UUX-Leucine/total leucine codon ratio can be used to identify transcripts whose translation would be sensitive to loss of the MiaA-dependent modification. We identified iraPas another candidate MiaA-sensitive gene, based on the UUX-Leucine/total leucine codon ratio. AniraP-lacZ fusion was significantly decreased in the abse nce of MiaA, consistent with our predictive model. To determine the role of MiaA in UUX-Leucine decoding in rpoS and iraP, we measured β-galactosidase-specific activity of miaA(-)rpo Sandira P translational fusions upon overexpression of leucine tRNAs. We observed suppression of the MiaA effect on rpoS, and notira P, via overexpression of tRNA(LeuX)but not tRNA(LeuZ) We also tested the hypothesis that the MiaA requirement for rpoS and iraP translation is due to decoding of UUX-Leucine codons within the rpoS and iraP transcripts, respectively. We observed a partial suppression of the MiaA requirement for rpoS and iraP translational fusions containing one or both UUX-Leucine codons removed. Taken together, this suggests that MiaA is necessary for rpoS and iraP translation through proper decoding of UUX-Leucine codons and that rpoS and iraP mRNAs are both modification tunable transcripts (MoTTs) via the presence of the modification.

Regulation of Serine, Glycine, and One-Carbon Biosynthesis

The biosynthesis of serine, glycine, and one-carbon (C1) units constitutes a major metabolic pathway in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. C1 units derived from serine and glycine are used in the synthesis of purines, histidine, thymine, pantothenate, and methionine and in the formylation of the aminoacylated initiator fMet-TRNAfMet used to start translation in E. coli and serovar Typhimurium. The need for serine, glycine, and C1 units in many cellular functions makes it necessary for the genes encoding enzymes for their synthesis to be carefully regulated to meet the changing demands of the cell for these intermediates. This review discusses the regulation of the following genes: serA, serB, and serC; gly gene; gcvTHP operon; lpdA; gcvA and gcvR; and gcvB genes. Threonine utilization (the Tut cycle) constitutes a secondary pathway for serine and glycine biosynthesis. L-Serine inhibits the growth of E. coli cells in GM medium, and isoleucine releases this growth inhibition. The E. coli glycine transport system (Cyc) has been shown to transport glycine, D-alanine, D-serine, and the antibiotic D-cycloserine. Transport systems often play roles in the regulation of gene expression, by transporting effector molecules into the cell, where they are sensed by soluble or membrane-bound regulatory proteins.

Expanded roles of leucine-responsive regulatory protein in transcription regulation of the Escherichia coli genome: Genomic SELEX screening of the regulation targets

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a transcriptional regulator for the genes involved in transport, biosynthesis and catabolism of amino acids in Escherichia coli. In order to identify the whole set of genes under the direct control of Lrp, we performed Genomic SELEX screening and identified a total of 314 Lrp-binding sites on the E. coli genome. As a result, the regulation target of Lrp was predicted to expand from the hitherto identified genes for amino acid metabolism to a set of novel target genes for utilization of amino acids for protein synthesis, including tRNAs, aminoacyl-tRNA synthases and rRNAs. Northern blot analysis indicated alteration of mRNA levels for at least some novel targets, including the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes. Phenotype MicroArray of the lrp mutant indicated significant alteration in utilization of amino acids and peptides, whilst metabolome analysis showed variations in the concentration of amino acids in the lrp mutant. From these two datasets we realized a reverse correlation between amino acid levels and cell growth rate: fast-growing cells contain low-level amino acids, whilst a high level of amino acids exists in slow-growing cells. Taken together, we propose that Lrp is a global regulator of transcription of a large number of the genes involved in not only amino acid transport and metabolism, but also amino acid utilization.

Evolution of context dependent regulation by expansion of feast/famine regulatory proteins

Background

Expansion of transcription factors is believed to have played a crucial role in evolution of all organisms by enabling them to deal with dynamic environments and colonize new environments. We investigated how the expansion of the Feast/Famine Regulatory Protein (FFRP) or Lrp-like proteins into an eight-member family in Halobacterium salinarum NRC-1 has aided in niche-adaptation of this archaeon to a complex and dynamically changing hypersaline environment.

Results

We mapped genome-wide binding locations for all eight FFRPs, investigated their preference for binding different effector molecules, and identified the contexts in which they act by analyzing transcriptional responses across 35 growth conditions that mimic different environmental and nutritional conditions this organism is likely to encounter in the wild. Integrative analysis of these data constructed an FFRP regulatory network with conditionally active states that reveal how interrelated variations in DNA-binding domains, effector-molecule preferences, and binding sites in target gene promoters have tuned the functions of each FFRP to the environments in which they act. We demonstrate how conditional regulation of similar genes by two FFRPs, AsnC (an activator) and VNG1237C (a repressor), have striking environment-specific fitness consequences for oxidative stress management and growth, respectively.

Conclusions

This study provides a systems perspective into the evolutionary process by which gene duplication within a transcription factor family contributes to environment-specific adaptation of an organism.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0122-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A mixed double negative feedback loop between the sRNA MicF and the global regulator Lrp

Roughly 10% of all genes in Escherichia coli are controlled by the global transcription factor Lrp, which responds to nutrient availability. Bioinformatically, we identified lrp as one of several putative targets for the sRNA MicF, which is transcriptionally downregulated by Lrp. Deleting micF results in higher Lrp levels, while overexpression of MicF inhibits Lrp synthesis. This effect is by antisense; mutations in the predicted interaction region relieve MicF-dependent repression of Lrp synthesis, and regulation is restored by compensatory mutations. In vitro, MicF sterically interferes with initiation complex formation and inhibits lrp mRNA translation. In vivo, MicF indirectly activates genes in the Lrp regulon by repressing Lrp, and causes severely impaired growth in minimal medium, a phenotype characteristic of lrp deletion strains. The double negative feedback between MicF and Lrp may promote a switch for adequate Lrp-dependent adaptation to nutrient availability. Lrp adds to the growing list of transcription factors that are targeted by sRNAs, thus indicating that perhaps the majority of all bacterial genes may be directly or indirectly controlled by sRNAs.

An overview of prokaryotic transcription factors : a summary of function and occurrence in bacterial genomes

Transcriptional initiation is arguably the most important control point for gene expression. It is regulated by a combination of factors, including DNA sequence and its three-dimensional topology, proteins and small molecules. In this chapter, we focus on the trans-acting factors of bacterial regulation. Initiation begins with the recruitment of the RNA polymerase holoenzyme to a specific locus upstream of the gene known as its promoter. The sigma factor, which is a component of the holoenzyme, provides the most fundamental mechanisms for orchestrating broad changes in gene expression state. It is responsible for promoter recognition as well as recruiting the holoenzyme to the promoter. Distinct sigma factors compete with for binding to a common pool of RNA polymerases, thus achieving condition-dependent differential expression. Another important class of bacterial regulators is transcription factors, which activate or repress transcription of target genes typically in response to an environmental or cellular trigger. These factors may be global or local depending on the number of genes and range of cellular functions that they target. The activities of both global and local transcription factors may be regulated either at a post-transcriptional level via signal-sensing protein domains or at the level of their own expression. In addition to modulating polymerase recruitment to promoters, several global factors are considered as "nucleoid-associated proteins" that impose structural constraints on the chromosome by altering the conformation of the bound DNA, thus influencing other processes involving DNA such as replication and recombination. This chapter concludes with a discussion of how regulatory interactions between transcription factors and their target genes can be represented as a network.

Discretely calibrated regulatory loops controlled by ppGpp partition gene induction across the 'feast to famine' gradient in Escherichia coli

Bacteria comprehensively reorganize their global gene expression when faced with starvation. The alarmone ppGpp facilitates this massive response by co-ordinating the downregulation of genes of the translation apparatus, and the induction of biosynthetic genes and the general stress response. Such a large reorientation requires the activities of multiple regulators, yet the regulatory network downstream of ppGpp remains poorly defined. Transcription profiling during isoleucine depletion, which leads to gradual starvation (over > 100 min), allowed us to identify genes that required ppGpp, Lrp and RpoS for their induction and to deduce the regulon response times. Although the Lrp and RpoS regulons required ppGpp for their activation, they were not induced simultaneously. The data suggest that metabolic genes, i.e. those of the Lrp regulon, require only a low level of ppGpp for their induction. In contrast, the RpoS regulon was induced only when high levels of ppGpp accumulated. We tested several predictions of a model that explains how bacteria allocate transcriptional resources between metabolism and stress response by discretely tuning two regulatory circuits to different levels of ppGpp. The emergent regulatory structure insures that stress survival circuits are only triggered if homeostatic metabolic networks fail to compensate for environmental deficiencies.

The small RNA Aar in Acinetobacter baylyi: a putative regulator of amino acid metabolism

Small non-coding RNAs (sRNAs) are key players in prokaryotic metabolic circuits, allowing the cell to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Regulatory interference by sRNAs in cellular metabolism is often facilitated by the Sm-like protein Hfq. A search for novel sRNAs in A. baylyi intergenic regions was performed by a biocomputational screening. One candidate, Aar, encoded between trpS and sucD showed Hfq dependency in Northern blot analysis. Aar was expressed strongly during stationary growth phase in minimal medium; in contrast, in complex medium, strongest expression was in the exponential growth phase. Whereas over-expression of Aar in trans did not affect bacterial growth, seven mRNA targets predicted by two in silico approaches were upregulated in stationary growth phase. All seven mRNAs are involved in A. baylyi amino acid metabolism. A putative binding site for Lrp, the global regulator of branched-chain amino acids in E. coli, was observed within the aar gene. Both facts imply an Aar participation in amino acid metabolism.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) acts as a virulence repressor in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global gene regulator that influences expression of a large number of genes including virulence-related genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella. No systematic studies examining the regulation of virulence genes by Lrp have been reported in Salmonella. We report here that constitutive expression of Lrp [lrp(Con)] dramatically attenuates Salmonella virulence while an lrp deletion (Deltalrp) mutation enhances virulence. The lrp(Con) mutant caused pleiotropic effects that include defects in invasion, cytotoxicity, and colonization, whereas the Deltalrp mutant was more proficient at these activities than the wild-type strain. We present evidence that Lrp represses transcription of key virulence regulator genes--hilA, invF, and ssrA--in Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI-1) and 2 (SPI-2), by binding directly to their promoter regions, P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). In addition, Western blot analysis showed that the expression of the SPI-1 effector SipA was reduced in the lrp(Con) mutant and enhanced in the Deltalrp mutant. Computational analysis revealed putative Lrp-binding consensus DNA motifs located in P(hilA), P(invF), and P(ssrA). These results suggest that Lrp binds to the consensus motifs and modulates expression of the linked genes. The presence of leucine enhanced Lrp binding to P(invF) in vitro and the addition of leucine to growth medium decreased the level of invF transcription. However, leucine had no effect on expression of hilA and ssrA or on cellular levels of Lrp. In addition, Lrp appears to be an antivirulence gene, since the deletion mutant showed enhanced cell invasion, cytotoxicity, and hypervirulence in BALB/c mice.

Genome-scale reconstruction of the Lrp regulatory network in Escherichia coli

Broad-acting transcription factors (TFs) in bacteria form regulons. Here, we present a 4-step method to fully reconstruct the leucine-responsive protein (Lrp) regulon in Escherichia coli K-12 MG 1655 that regulates nitrogen metabolism. Step 1 is composed of obtaining high-resolution ChIP-chip data for Lrp, the RNA polymerase and expression profiles under multiple environmental conditions. We identified 138 unique and reproducible Lrp-binding regions and classified their binding state under different conditions. In the second step, the analysis of these data revealed 6 distinct regulatory modes for individual ORFs. In the third step, we used the functional assignment of the regulated ORFs to reconstruct 4 types of regulatory network motifs around the metabolites that are affected by the corresponding gene products. In the fourth step, we determined how leucine, as a signaling molecule, shifts the regulatory motifs for particular metabolites. The physiological structure that emerges shows the regulatory motifs for different amino acid fall into the traditional classification of amino acid families, thus elucidating the structure and physiological functions of the Lrp-regulon. The same procedure can be applied to other broad-acting TFs, opening the way to full bottom-up reconstruction of the transcriptional regulatory network in bacterial cells.

Autoregulated expression of the gene coding for the leucine-responsive protein, Lrp, a global regulator in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

In this study, the lrp gene encoding the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium was found to be negatively autoregulated. Its transcription start site was determined by primer extension analysis, showing that the lrp promoter is located at a different site to that inferred previously from the S. Typhimurium genome sequence. Chromosomal DNA fragments that include the promoter region were bound by purified Lrp protein in vitro, producing up to four distinct protein-DNA complexes. DNase I footprinting identified regions that were protected by the protein in vitro as well as bases that became hypersensitive to DNase I treatment following Lrp binding. A clear pattern of periodic hypersensitivity was detected between positions -130 and +15 that was consistent with wrapping of the DNA around Lrp in a nucleoprotein complex that includes the putative promoter region. Lrp-DNA interaction in this region was fully consistent with the observed repression of lrp transcription by this protein. Leucine was found to modulate Lrp-mediated autorepression by remodelling the Lrp-DNA nucleoprotein complex.

Identification of the Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae leucine-responsive regulatory protein and its involvement in the regulation of in vivo-induced genes

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae is a gram-negative bacterial pathogen that causes a severe hemorrhagic pneumonia in swine. We have previously shown that the limitation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) is a cue that induces the expression of a subset of A. pleuropneumoniae genes identified as specifically induced during infection of the natural host animal by using an in vivo expression technology screen. Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global regulator and has been shown in Escherichia coli to regulate many genes, including genes involved in BCAA biosynthesis. We hypothesized that A. pleuropneumoniae contains a regulator similar to Lrp and that this protein is involved in the regulation of a subset of genes important during infection and recently shown to have increased expression in the absence of BCAAs. We report the identification of an A. pleuropneumoniae serotype 1 gene encoding a protein with similarity to amino acid sequence and functional domains of other reported Lrp proteins. We further show that purified A. pleuropneumoniae His6-Lrp binds in vitro to the A. pleuropneumoniae promoter regions for ilvI, antisense cps1AB, lrp, and nqr. A genetically defined A. pleuropneumoniae lrp mutant was constructed using an allelic replacement and sucrose counterselection method. Analysis of expression from the ilvI and antisense cps1AB promoters in wild-type, lrp mutant, and complemented lrp mutant strains indicated that Lrp is required for induction of expression of ilvI under BCAA limitation.

The Escherichia coli proteome: past, present, and future prospects

Proteomics has emerged as an indispensable methodology for large-scale protein analysis in functional genomics. The Escherichia coli proteome has been extensively studied and is well defined in terms of biochemical, biological, and biotechnological data. Even before the entire E. coli proteome was fully elucidated, the largest available data set had been integrated to decipher regulatory circuits and metabolic pathways, providing valuable insights into global cellular physiology and the development of metabolic and cellular engineering strategies. With the recent advent of advanced proteomic technologies, the E. coli proteome has been used for the validation of new technologies and methodologies such as sample prefractionation, protein enrichment, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, protein detection, mass spectrometry (MS), combinatorial assays with n-dimensional chromatographies and MS, and image analysis software. These important technologies will not only provide a great amount of additional information on the E. coli proteome but also synergistically contribute to other proteomic studies. Here, we review the past development and current status of E. coli proteome research in terms of its biological, biotechnological, and methodological significance and suggest future prospects.

Feast/famine regulatory proteins (FFRPs): Escherichia coli Lrp, AsnC and related archaeal transcription factors

Feast/famine regulatory proteins comprise a diverse family of transcription factors, which have been referred to in various individual identifications, including Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein and asparagine synthase C gene product. A full length feast/famine regulatory protein consists of the N-terminal DNA-binding domain and the C-domain, which is involved in dimerization and further assembly, thereby producing, for example, a disc or a chromatin-like cylinder. Various ligands of the size of amino acids bind at the interface between feast/famine regulatory protein dimers, thereby altering their assembly forms. Also, the combination of feast/famine regulatory protein subunits forming the same assembly is altered. In this way, a small number of feast/famine regulatory proteins are able to regulate a large number of genes in response to various environmental changes. Because feast/famine regulatory proteins are shared by archaea and eubacteria, the genome-wide regulation by feast/famine regulatory proteins is traceable back to their common ancestor, being the prototype of highly differentiated transcription regulatory mechanisms found in organisms nowadays.

CodY-regulated aminotransferases AraT and BcaT play a major role in the growth of Lactococcus lactis in milk by regulating the intracellular pool of amino acids

Aminotransferases, which catalyze the last step of biosynthesis of most amino acids and the first step of their catabolism, may be involved in the growth of Lactococcus lactis in milk. Previously, we isolated two aminotransferases from L. lactis, AraT and BcaT, which are responsible for the transamination of aromatic amino acids, branched-chain amino acids, and methionine. In this study, we demonstrated that double inactivation of AraT and BcaT strongly reduced the growth of L. lactis in milk. Supplementation of milk with amino acids and keto acids that are substrates of both aminotransferases did not improve the growth of the double mutant. On the contrary, supplementation of milk with isoleucine or a dipeptide containing isoleucine almost totally inhibited the growth of the double mutant, while it did not affect or only slightly affected the growth of the wild-type strain. These results suggest that AraT and BcaT play a major role in the growth of L. lactis in milk by degrading the intracellular excess isoleucine, which is responsible for the growth inhibition. The growth inhibition by isoleucine is likely to be due to CodY repression of the proteolytic system, which is necessary for maximal growth of L. lactis in milk, since the growth of the CodY mutant was not affected by addition of isoleucine to milk. Moreover, we demonstrated that AraT and BcaT are part of the CodY regulon and therefore are regulated by nutritional factors, such as the carbohydrate and nitrogen sources.

The Lrp family of transcriptional regulators

Genome analysis has revealed that members of the Lrp family of transcriptional regulators are widely distributed among prokaryotes, both bacteria and archaea. The archetype Leucine-responsive Regulatory Protein from Escherichia coli is a global regulator involved in modulating a variety of metabolic functions, including the catabolism and anabolism of amino acids as well as pili synthesis. Most Lrp homologues, however, appear to act as specific regulators of amino acid metabolism-related genes. Like most prokaryotic transcriptional regulators, Lrp-like regulators consist of a DNA-binding domain and a ligand-binding domain. The crystal structure of the Pyrococcus furiosus LrpA revealed an N-terminal domain with a common helix-turn-helix fold, and a C-terminal domain with a typical alphabeta-sandwich fold. The latter regulatory domain constitutes a novel ligand-binding site and has been designated RAM. Database analysis reveals that the RAM domain is present in many prokaryotic genomes, potentially encoding (1) Lrp-homologues, when fused to a DNA-binding domain (2) enzymes, when fused as a potential regulatory domain to a catalytic domain, and (3) stand-alone RAM modules with unknown function. The architecture of Lrp regulators with two distinct domains that harbour the regulatory (effector-binding) site and the active (DNA-binding) site, and their separation by a flexible hinge region, suggests a general allosteric switch of Lrp-like regulators.

A requirement for anaerobically induced redox functions during aerobic growth of Escherichia coli with serine, glycine and leucine as carbon source

Escherichia coli strains with mutations in 3 genes coding for redox functions--torA, nuoM and glpC--are able to grow with pyruvate as carbon source, but are not able to use a combination of serine, glycine and leucine as carbon source, unlike the parent strain which uses either. All three mutants are able to produce and activate L-serine deaminase (L-SD) when grown in glucose minimal medium, and thus should be able to convert serine to pyruvate and grow on it. We suggest that activation of L-SD involves specific chemical reactions, perhaps building an Fe-S cluster. Mutant cells can carry out the necessary reaction to activate L-SD when grown in glucose minimal medium but apparently cannot do so when grown in SGL medium.

Global gene expression profiling in Escherichia coli K12. The effects of leucine-responsive regulatory protein

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) is a global regulatory protein that affects the expression of multiple genes and operons in bacteria. Although the physiological purpose of Lrp-mediated gene regulation remains unclear, it has been suggested that it functions to coordinate cellular metabolism with the nutritional state of the environment. The results of gene expression profiles between otherwise isogenic lrp(+) and lrp(-) strains of Escherichia coli support this suggestion. The newly discovered Lrp-regulated genes reported here are involved either in small molecule or macromolecule synthesis or degradation, or in small molecule transport and environmental stress responses. Although many of these regulatory effects are direct, others are indirect consequences of Lrp-mediated changes in the expression levels of other global regulatory proteins. Because computational methods to analyze and interpret high dimensional DNA microarray data are still an early stage, much of the emphasis of this work is directed toward the development of methods to identify differentially expressed genes with a high level of confidence. In particular, we describe a Bayesian statistical framework for a posterior estimate of the standard deviation of gene measurements based on a limited number of replications. We also describe an algorithm to compute a posterior estimate of differential expression for each gene based on the experiment-wide global false positive and false negative level for a DNA microarray data set. This allows the experimenter to compute posterior probabilities of differential expression for each individual differential gene expression measurement.

The Sulfolobus solfataricus Lrp-like protein LysM regulates lysine biosynthesis in response to lysine availability

Although the archaeal transcription apparatus resembles the eukaryal RNA polymerase II system, many bacterial-like regulators can be found in archaea. Particularly, all archaeal genomes sequenced to date contain genes encoding homologues of Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein). Whereas Lrp-like proteins in bacteria are involved in regulation of amino acid metabolism, their physiological role in archaea is unknown. Although several archaeal Lrp-like proteins have been characterized recently, no target genes apart from their own coding genes have been discovered yet, and no ligands for these regulators have been identified so far. In this study, we show that the Lrp-like protein LysM from Sulfolobus solfataricus is involved in the regulation of lysine and possibly also arginine biosynthesis, encoded by the lys gene cluster. Exogenous lysine is the regulatory signal for lys gene expression and specifically serves as a ligand for LysM by altering its DNA binding affinity. LysM binds directly upstream of the TFB-responsive element of the intrinsically weak lysW promoter, and DNA binding is favored in the absence of lysine, when lysWXJK transcription is maximal. The combined in vivo and in vitro data are most compatible with a model in which the bacterial-like LysM activates the eukarya-like transcriptional machinery. As with transcriptional activation by Escherichia coli Lrp, activation by LysM is apparently dependent on a co-activator, which remains to be identified.

Glycine binds the transcriptional accessory protein GcvR to disrupt a GcvA/GcvR interaction and allow GcvA-mediated activation of the Escherichia coli gcvTHP operon

The Escherichia coli gcvTHP operon is under control of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator GcvA. GcvA activates the operon in the presence of glycine and represses the operon in its absence. Repression by GcvA is dependent on a second regulatory protein, GcvR. Generally, LysR-type transcriptional regulators bind to specific small co-effector molecules which results in either their altered affinity for specific binding sites on the DNA or altered ability to bend the DNA, resulting in either activation or repression of their respective operons. This study shows that glycine, the co-activator for the gcv operon, does not alter either GcvA's ability to bind DNA nor its ability to bend DNA. Rather, glycine binds to GcvR, disrupting a GcvA/GcvR interaction required for repression and allowing GcvA activation of the gcvTHP operon. Amino acid changes in GcvR that reduce glycine binding result in a loss of glycine-mediated activation in vivo.

Structure of the Lrp-regulated serA promoter of Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the Escherichia coli serA gene is activated in vivo by the product of the lrp gene, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), an effect partially reversed by L-leucine. We show here that serA is transcribed from two promoters, P1 45 bp upstream of the translation start site, and P2 92 bp further upstream. Lrp binds to a long AT-rich sequence from -158 to -82 from the start of the coding region, i.e. upstream of P1 and overlapping P2. It activates transcription from P1 and represses expression from P2. A second regulator, cAMP/CRP, activates P2, an effect that is largely inhibited by Lrp, such that catabolite repressor protein (Crp) and Lrp are rival activators of serA transcription.

GcvR interacts with GcvA to inhibit activation of the Escherichia coli glycine cleavage operon

The Escherichia coli glycine cleavage enzyme system, encoded by the gcvTHP operon, catalyses the oxidative cleavage of glycine to CO(2), NH(3) and a one-carbon methylene group. Transcription of the gcv operon is positively regulated by GcvA and negatively regulated by GcvA and GcvR. Using a LexA-based system for analysing protein heterodimerization, it is shown that GcvR interacts directly with GcvA in vivo to repress gcvTHP expression. Several mutations in either gcvA or gcvR that result in a loss of gcv repression also result in a loss of GcvA/GcvR heterodimerization. Finally, it is shown that the C-terminal half of GcvA is involved in its interaction with GcvR, whilst the entire GcvR protein appears to be necessary for heterodimerization.

GcvA binding site 1 in the gcvTHP promoter of Escherichia coli is required for GcvA-mediated repression but not for GcvA-mediated activation

GcvA binds to three sites in the gcvTHP control region, from base -34 to -69 (site 1), from base -214 to -241 (site 2) and from base -242 to -271 (site 3). Previous results suggested that sites 3 and 2 are required for both GcvA-dependent activation and repression of a gcvT::lacZ fusion. However, the results were less clear as to the role of site 1. To determine the role of site 1 in regulation, single and multiple base changes were made in site 1 and tested for their ability to alter GcvA-mediated activation and GcvA/GcvR-mediated repression. Several of the mutants were also tested for effects on GcvA binding to site 1 and the ability of GcvA to bend DNA at site 1. The results are consistent with site 1 playing primarily a role in negative regulation of the gcvTHP operon.

Effects of global regulatory proteins and environmental conditions on fimbrial gene expression of F165(1) and F165(2) produced by Escherichia coli causing septicaemia in pigs

Escherichia coli O115:F165 strains are associated with septicaemia in young pigs and possess at least two types of fimbriae. F165(1) fimbriae belong to the P fimbrial family and F165(2) fimbriae belong to the S fimbrial family. Regulatory regions of foo (F165(1)) and fot (F165(2)) fimbrial gene clusters from wild-type strain 4787 were sequenced and characterised. Expression of F165(1) and F165(2) fimbrial genes was analysed by using lacZ and/or luxAB as reporter genes under the control of the native fimbrial promoters. Differential expression of fimbrial genes was observed. Global regulatory mechanisms such as catabolite repression, leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), methylation and DNA supercoiling were demonstrated to influence foo and fot expression. foo and fot expression was optimal at 37 degrees C and under aerobic conditions. Expression of foo was higher on minimal medium, whereas fot expression was higher on complex Luria-Bertani medium. This could reflect an in vivo differential expression.

The gcvB gene encodes a small untranslated RNA involved in expression of the dipeptide and oligopeptide transport systems in Escherichia coli

The Escherichia coli gcvB gene encodes a small RNA transcript that is not translated in vivo. Transcription from the gcvB promoter is activated by the GcvA protein and repressed by the GcvR protein, the transcriptional regulators of the gcvTHP operon encoding the enzymes of the glycine cleavage system. A strain carrying a chromosomal deletion of gcvB exhibits normal regulation of gcvTHP expression and glycine cleavage enzyme activity. However, this mutant has high constitutive synthesis of OppA and DppA, the periplasmic-binding protein components of the two major peptide transport systems normally repressed in cells growing in rich medium. The altered regulation of oppA and dppA was also demonstrated using oppA-phoA and dppA-lacZ gene fusions. Although the mechanism(s) involving gcvB in the repression of these two genes is not known, oppA regulation appears to be at the translational level, whereas dppA regulation occurs at the mRNA level.

Characterization of LrpC DNA-binding properties and regulation of Bacillus subtilis lrpC gene expression

The lrpC gene was identified during the Bacillus subtilis genome sequencing project. Previous experiments suggested that LrpC has a role in sporulation and in the regulation of amino acid metabolism and that it shares features with Escherichia coli Lrp, a transcription regulator (C. Beloin, S. Ayora, R. Exley, L. Hirschbein, N. Ogasawara, Y. Kasahara, J. C. Alonso, and F. Le Hégarat, Mol. Gen. Genet. 256:63-71, 1997). To characterize the interactions of LrpC with DNA, the protein was overproduced and purified. We show that LrpC binds to multiple sites in the upstream region of its own gene with a stronger affinity for a region encompassing P1, one of the putative promoters identified (P1 and P2). By analyzing lrpC-lacZ transcriptional fusions, we demonstrated that P1 is the major in vivo promoter and that, unlike many members of the lrp/asnC family, lrpC is not negatively autoregulated but rather slightly positively autoregulated. Production of LrpC in vivo is low in both rich and minimal media (50 to 300 LrpC molecules per cell). In rich medium, the cellular LrpC content is six- to sevenfold lower during the exponentional phase than during the stationary growth phase. Possible determinants and the biological significance of the regulation of lrpC expression are discussed.

Growth phase-dependent expression and degradation of histones in the thermophilic archaeon Thermococcus zilligii

HTz is a member of the archaeal histone family. The archaeal histones have primary sequences and structural similarity to the eukaryal histone fold domain, and are thought to resemble the archetypal ancestor of the eukaryal nucleosome core histones. The effects of growth phase on the total soluble proteins from Thermococcus zilligii, isolated after various stages of growth from mid-logarithmic to late stationary phase, were examined by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. On entry into stationary phase, at least 11 proteins were detected that changed considerably in level. One of these proteins was identified by Western hybridization as HTz. The level of HTz decreased dramatically as cells entered stationary phase, and it could not be detected by late stationary phase. Unexpectedly, the Western hybridization detected a second protein, with an estimated molecular mass of approximately 14 kDa, which paralleled the decrease in level of HTz. Native purified HTz was shown to retain complete activity after prolonged incubation at the growth temperature of the organism, suggesting that the decrease in HTz was a specific cell-regulated process. Analysis of native purified HTz by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry revealed the molecular masses of HTz1 and HTz2 to be 7204 +/- 3 Da and 7016 +/- 3 Da respectively. The only non-covalent species that was detected corresponded to the molecular mass of an HTz1-HTz2 heterodimer. Northern analyses of T. zilligii total RNA with an htz1 gene probe indicated a rapid decrease in expression of htz1 with progression of the growth phase, and complete repression of htz1 transcript synthesis by late logarithmic phase. Three proteins that changed in level with growth phase were identified by N-terminal sequence analysis. The first was homologous to a hypothetical protein conserved in all Archaea sequenced to date, the second to the Sac10b family of archaeal DNA-binding proteins and the third to the C-terminal region of the leucine-responsive regulatory family of DNA-binding proteins (LRPs).

Escherichia coli Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) does not directly regulate expression of the leu operon promoter

Studies by R. Lin et al. (J. Bacteriol. 174:1948-1955, 1992) suggested that the Escherichia coli leu operon might be a member of the Lrp regulon. Their results were obtained with a leucine auxotroph; in leucine prototrophs grown in a medium lacking leucine, there was little difference in leu operon expression between lrp(+) and lrp strains. Furthermore, when leuP-lacZ transcriptional fusions that lacked the leu attenuator were used, expression from the leu promoter varied less than twofold between lrp(+) and lrp strains, irrespective of whether or not excess leucine was added to the medium. The simplest explanation of the observations of Lin et al. is that the known elevated leucine transport capacity of lrp strains (S. A. Haney et al., J. Bacteriol. 174:108-115, 1992) leads to very high intracellular levels of leucine for strains grown with leucine, resulting in the superattenuation of leu operon expression.

The cyclic AMP receptor protein is dependent on GcvA for regulation of the gcv operon

The Escherichia coli gcv operon is transcriptionally regulated by the GcvA, GcvR, Lrp, and PurR proteins. In this study, the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein (CRP) is shown to be involved in positive regulation of the gcv operon. A crp deletion reduced expression of a gcvT-lacZ fusion almost fourfold in glucose minimal (GM) medium. The phenotype was complemented by both the wild-type crp gene and four crp alleles that encode proteins with amino acid substitutions in known activating regions of CRP. A cyaA deletion also resulted in a fourfold decrease in gcvT-lacZ expression, and wild-type expression was restored by the addition of cAMP to the growth medium. A cyaA crp double deletion resulted in levels of gcvT-lacZ expression identical to those observed with either single mutation, showing that CRP and cAMP regulate through the same mechanism. Growth in GM medium plus cAMP or glycerol minimal medium did not result in a significant increase in gcvT-lacZ expression. Thus, the level of cAMP present in GM medium appears to be sufficient for regulation by CRP. DNase I footprint analysis showed that CRP binds and protects two sites centered at bp -313 (site 1) and bp -140 (site 2) relative to the transcription initiation site, but a mutational analysis demonstrated that only site 1 is required for CRP-mediated regulation of gcvT-lacZ expression. Expression of the gcvT-lacZ fusion in a crp gcvA double mutant suggested that CRP's role is dependent on the GcvA protein.

Two roles for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein in expression of the alanine catabolic operon (dadAB) in Klebsiella aerogenes

The lrp gene, which codes for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp), was cloned from Klebsiella aerogenes W70. The DNA sequence was determined, and the clone was used to create a disruption of the lrp gene. The lack of functional Lrp led to an increased expression of the alanine catabolic operon (dad) in the absence of the inducer L-alanine but also to a decreased expression of the operon in the presence of L-alanine. Thus, Lrp is both a repressor and activator of dad expression. Lrp is also necessary for glutamate synthase formation but not for the formation of two other enzymes controlled by the nitrogen regulatory (Ntr) system, glutamate dehydrogenase and histidase.

Roles for GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 and the Lrp-binding region in gcvT::lacZ expression in Escherichia coli

GcvA and Lrp are both necessary for activation of the gcv operon. The upstream GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 were separated from the Lrp-binding region and the rest of the gcv control region. Moving these sites by 1 or 2 helical turns of DNA further from the gcv promoter reduces, but does not eliminate, either GcvA-mediated activation or repression of a gcvT::lacZ gene fusion. However, moving these sites by 1.5 or 2.5 helical turns of DNA results in a GcvA-mediated super-repression of the operon. This repression is dependent on Lrp and is partially dependent on GcvR. Lrp bound to the gcv control region induces a bend in the DNA. Based on these results, a model for gcv regulation is presented in which Lrp plays a primarily structural role, by bending the DNA and GcvA functions as the activator protein.

Lack of S-adenosylmethionine results in a cell division defect in Escherichia coli

The enzyme S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthetase, the Escherichia coli metK gene product, produces SAM, the cell's major methyl donor. We show here that SAM synthetase activity is induced by leucine and repressed by Lrp, the leucine-responsive regulatory protein. When SAM synthetase activity falls below a certain critical threshold, the cells produce long filaments with regularly distributed nucleoids. Expression of a plasmid-carried metK gene prevents filamentation and restores normal growth to the metK mutant. This indicates that lack of SAM results in a division defect.

Spacing and orientation requirements of GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 and the Lrp-binding region for gcvT::lacZ expression in Escherichia coli

Both GcvA and Lrp are required for normal regulation of the gcv operon. Moving the GcvA-binding sites 3 and 2 and the Lrp-binding region either closer to, or further away from, the gcv promoter by approximately one helical turn of DNA resulted in a less than twofold decrease in glycine-mediated activation or inosine-mediated repression of a gcvT::IacZ fusion. Moving these sites approximately two helical turns of DNA away from the gcv promoter resulted in a further loss of both activation and repression; moving these sites approximately three helical turns of DNA from the gcv promoter resulted in an essentially complete loss of both glycine-mediated activation and inosine-mediated repression. However, when these sites were moved by approximately 1.5 and 2.5 helical turns of DNA away from the gcv promoter, there was a complete loss of both glycine-mediated activation and inosine-mediated repression of the gcvT::IacZ fusion. The flexibility in the absolute distance of the GcvA- and Lrp-binding sites relative to the gcv promoter, but strict orientation dependence of these sites is consistent with a possible protein-protein interaction of either GcvA, Lrp, or both of these proteins with RNA polymerase. Because of the location of these target sites relative to the gcv promoter, it is also likely that DNA looping is required for this mechanism of regulation.

Promoter characterization and constitutive expression of the Escherichia coli gcvR gene

The Escherichia coli glycine cleavage repressor protein (GcvR) negatively regulates expression of the glycine cleavage operon (gcv). In this study, the gcvR translational start site was determined by N-terminal amino acid sequence analysis of a GcvR-LacZ fusion protein. Primer extension analysis of the gcvR promoter region identified a primary transcription start site 27 bp upstream of the UUG translation start site and a minor transcription start site approximately 100 bp upstream of the translation start codon. The -10 and -35 promoter regions upstream of the primary transcription start site were defined by mutational analysis. Expression of a gcvR-lacZ fusion was unaltered in the presence of glycine or inosine, molecules known to induce or repress expression of gcv, respectively. In addition, it was shown that gcvR-lacZ expression is neither regulated by the glycine cleavage activator protein (GcvA) nor autogenously regulated by GcvR. From DNA sequence analysis, it was predicted that the translation start codon of the downstream bcp gene overlaps the gcvR stop codon, suggesting that these genes may form an operon. However, a down mutation in the -10 promoter region of gcvR had no effect on the expression of a downstream bcp-lacZ fusion, and primer extension analysis of the bcp promoter region demonstrated that bcp has its own promoter within the gcvR coding sequence. These results show that gcvR and bcp do not form an operon. Furthermore, the deletion of bcp from the chromosome had no effect on gcv-lacZ expression.

Comparison of the sensitivities of two Escherichia coli genes to in vivo variation of Lrp concentration

Transcription of the Escherichia coli genes serA and gltBDF depends on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein, Lrp, and is very much decreased in an lrp mutant. By the use of an Lrp-deficient host and the lrp gene cloned under a plasmid-borne arabinose pBAD promoter, we varied the amount of Lrp present in the cell and showed that both genes were transcribed in proportion to the amount of Lrp synthesized. The affinity of serA for Lrp was four to five times greater than the affinity of gltD. Overproduction of Lrp was lethal to the cell.

Use of an inducible regulatory protein to identify members of a regulon: application to the regulon controlled by the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) in Escherichia coli

Procedures were developed to facilitate the identification of genes that belong to a given regulon and characterization of their responses to the regulator. The regulon controlled by the Escherichia coli leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) was studied by isolating random transcriptional fusions to lacZ, using lambda placMu53 and a strain in which lrp is under isopropylthio-beta-D-galactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible control. Fusions exhibiting IPTG-responsive beta-galactosidase activity were cloned by integrating the suicide vector pIVET1 via homologous recombination at lacZ, followed by self-ligating digested chromosomal DNA. We verified the patterns of lacZ expression after using the plasmid clones to generate merodiploid strains with interrupted and uninterrupted copies of the same sequence. If the merodiploid expression pattern was unchanged from that shown by the original fusion strain, then the cloned fusion was responsible for the regulatory pattern of interest; a difference in the expression pattern could indicate that the original strain carried multiple fusions or that there were autogenous effects of having interrupted the fused gene. Using these procedures, we generated a fusion library of approximately 5 x 10(6) strains; approximately 3,000 of these strains were screened, yielding 84 Lrp-responsive fusions, and 10 of the 84 were phenotypically stable and were characterized. The responses of different fusions in a given operon to in vivo Lrp titrations revealed variations in expression with the position of insertion. Among the newly identified members of the regulon is an open reading frame (orf3) between rpiA and serA. Also, expression of a fusion just downstream of dinF was found to be Lrp dependent only in stationary phase.

A nucleoprotein activation complex between the leucine-responsive regulatory protein and DNA upstream of the gltBDF operon in Escherichia coli

The global regulator Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein), in some cases modulated by its co-regulator leucine, has been shown to regulate more than 40 genes and operons in Escherichia coli. Leucine modulates Lrp regulation of leucine-responsive operons. The level of sensitivity of these operons to leucine varies greatly, but the basis for this variation is only partially understood. One operon controlled by Lrp that is relatively insensitive to leucine is gltBDF, which includes genes specifying the large (GltB) and small (GltD) subunits of glutamate synthase. Earlier gel mobility shift assays have demonstrated that Lrp binds to a fragment of DNA containing the gltBDF promoter region. To further define the nature of this Lrp-gltBDF interaction, DNase I footprinting experiments were performed. The results indicate that Lrp binds cooperatively to three sites quite far upstream, spanning the region from -140 to -260 base-pairs relative to the start of transcription. Phased hypersensitivity is observed throughout the entire binding region, suggesting that Lrp bends the DNA. To determine the relative importance of these three sites for the transcriptional activation of gltBDF, a series of site-directed mutations was generated. The effects of these mutations on Lrp binding were determined both by DNase I footprinting and by quantitative mobility shift assays, while their effects on transcription in vivo were examined by measuring beta-galactosidase activity levels of chromosomal gltB::lacZ operon fusions. Our results indicate that all three sites are required for maximal gene expression, as is the proper phasing of the sites with one another and with the start of transcription. Our results suggest that Lrp binds a central palindromic site, interacting predominantly with the major groove of its DNA target, and that additional dimers bind to flanking sites to form a nucleoprotein activation complex.

Metabolic regulation of lrp gene expression in Escherichia coli K-12

Expression of the lrp gene is regulated in part by the nutrients available to the cell, and is decreased in rich medium, in glucose minimal media enriched with amino acids, and in minimal medium with alternative carbon sources, such as acetate and succinate. When Lrp production is increased in a given medium, expression of its target genes is also increased. However, when the medium is changed from glucose to acetate, the response of the target genes is governed by many factors.

The Escherichia coli stpA gene is transiently expressed during growth in rich medium and is induced in minimal medium and by stress conditions

The transcriptional regulation of the stpA gene, encoding the Escherichia coli H-NS-like protein StpA, has been studied as a function of a variety of environmental conditions, and its response to trans-acting factors has been characterized. Chromosomally located stpA is expressed primarily from a promoter immediately upstream of the gene which is severely repressed by the homologous nucleoid-associated protein H-NS. However, we show here that even in a strain containing functional H-NS, stpA is transiently induced during growth of a batch culture in rich medium. It can also be induced strongly by osmotic shock and, to a lesser extent, by an increase in growth temperature. Moreover, when cells are grown in minimal medium, we observe a more sustained induction of stpA which is dependent on the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp). This enhanced level of stpA transcription is virtually abolished in an H-NS-independent manner when the culture undergoes carbon starvation. A sensitivity of the stpA promoter to DNA topology may contribute to some of these responses. Results reported here show that cloned fragments of the stpA promoter region can confer H-NS and Lrp responsiveness upon a lacZ reporter gene and suggest that several hundred base pairs of DNA upstream of the transcriptional start may be required for regulation by these two proteins.

Effects of nutrition and growth rate on Lrp levels in Escherichia coli

Lrp (leucine-responsive regulatory protein) activates some Escherichia coli operons that function in anabolism and represses others involved in catabolism (for a review, see J. M. Calvo and R. G. Matthews, Microbiol. Rev. 58:466-490, 1994). This overall pattern suggests that Lrp may help cells adapt to changes in the nutritional environment. Here, we tested the idea that the nutritional richness of the medium determines the amount of Lrp in cells. Lrp was measured directly by Western blotting (immunoblotting) in cells grown in a chemically defined rich medium or in a minimal medium. In addition, transcription from the lrp promoter was assessed with a lacZ reporter gene. The results with these two different measurements were nearly the same, indicating that under the conditions employed, beta-galactosidase measurements can accurately reflect Lrp levels. For cells in a minimal medium, Lrp levels were consistently lowest during the logarithmic phase of growth, but overall, there was not much variation in levels as a function of growth phase (1.3-fold difference between highest and lowest values). However, for cells in a rich medium, Lrp levels dropped 3- to 4-fold during the lag phase, remained constant during the log phase, and then rose to starting levels upon entry into the stationary phase. When cells in the log phase were compared, Lrp levels were 3- to 4-fold higher in cells growing in a minimal medium than those in a rich medium. The levels of lrp expression were the same or slightly higher in strains containing mutations in rpoS, cya, or crp compared with wild-type strains, suggesting that neither RpoS nor the cyclic AMP (cAMP) receptor protein-cAMP complex is required for expression. On the other hand, lrp expression was severely restricted in cells that could not make ppGpp because of mutations in relA and spoT. The reduced expression of lrp during logarithmic growth in a rich medium may be due to low ppGpp levels under these conditions. The repressive effects of rich medium and the stimulatory effects of ppGpp were also observed with a construct having only a minimal lrp promoter (-57 to +21). The results of other experiments suggest that Lrp levels vary inversely with the growth rate of cells instead of being determined by some component of the medium.

Use of an in vivo titration method to study a global regulator: effect of varying Lrp levels on expression of gltBDF in Escherichia coli

Most studies of global regulatory proteins are performed in vitro or involve phenotypic comparisons between wild-type and mutant strains. We report the use of strains in which the gene for the leucine-responsive regulatory protein (lrp) is transcribed from isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible promoters for the purpose of continuously varying the in vivo concentration of Lrp. To obtain a broad range of Lrp concentrations, strains were employed that contained the lrp fusion either in the chromosome (I. C. Blomfield, P. J. Calie, K. J. Eberhardt, M. S. McClain, and B. I. Eisenstein, J. Bacteriol. 175:27-36, 1993) or on a multicopy plasmid. Western blot (immunoblot) analysis with polyclonal antiserum to Lrp confirmed that Lrp levels could be varied more than 70-fold by growing the strains in glucose minimal 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) medium containing different amounts of IPTG. Expression of an Lrp-regulated gltB::lacZ operon fusion was measured over this range of Lrp concentrations. beta-Galactosidase activity rose with increasing Lrp levels up to the level of Lrp found in wild-type strains, at which point expression is maximal. The presence of leucine in the medium increased the level of Lrp necessary to achieve half-maximal expression of the gltB::lacZ fusion, as predicted by earlier in vitro studies (B. R. Ernsting, J. W. Denninger, R. M. Blumenthal, and R. G. Matthews, J. Bacteriol. 175:7160-7169, 1993). Interestingly, levels of Lrp greater than those in wild-type cells interfered with activation of gltB::lacZ expression. The growth rate of cultures correlated with the intracellular Lrp concentration: levels of Lrp either lower or higher than wild-type levels resulted in significantly slower growth rates. Thus, the level of Lrp in the cell appears to be optimal for rapid growth in minimal medium, and the gltBDF control region is designed to give maximal expression at this Lrp level.

Leucine-responsive regulatory protein-DNA interactions in the leader region of the ilvGMEDA operon of Escherichia coli

The leucine-responsive regulatory protein (Lrp) regulates the expression of many operons in Escherichia coli including several involved in the metabolism of the branched-chain amino acids, L-isoleucine, L-valine, and L-leucine. The ilvGMEDA operon contains the genes for four of the five enzymes of the common pathway for the biosynthesis of these amino acids. A high affinity, consensus-like Lrp-DNA binding site has been identified at an unusual position in the leader region of this operon 226 base pairs downstream of the transcriptional initiation site between the attenuator and the ilvG gene. Binding to this site facilitates the cooperative binding of a second Lrp protomer to an adjacent, upstream, secondary site. At higher Lrp concentrations, binding to a third site is observed. Chemical, enzymatic, and alkylation protection and interference footprinting experiments demonstrate that the Lrp homodimer contacts the DNA helix at symmetrical half-sites present in adjacent major grooves and that the primary and secondary binding sites are separated by one helical turn and aligned along the same face of the DNA helix. In vivo, Lrp represses transcription through the leader-attenuator region of the ilvGMEDA operon. Lrp-dependent production of attenuated RNA transcripts is also observed in vitro. No transcriptional effects are observed, in vivo or in vitro, in the absence of an intact Lrp primary binding site. A possible physiological role for Lrp in the regulation of ilvGMEDA operon expression is discussed.

A new Escherichia coli cell division gene, ftsK

A mutation in a newly discovered Escherichia coli cell division gene, ftsK, causes a temperature-sensitive late-stage block in division but does not affect chromosome replication or segregation. This defect is specifically suppressed by deletion of dacA, coding for the peptidoglycan DD-carboxypeptidase, PBP 5. FtsK is a large polypeptide (147 kDa) consisting of an N-terminal domain with several predicted membrane-spanning regions, a proline-glutamine-rich domain, and a C-terminal domain with a nucleotide-binding consensus sequence. FtsK has extensive sequence identity with a family of proteins from a wide variety of prokaryotes and plasmids. The plasmid proteins are required for intercellular DNA transfer, and one of the bacterial proteins (the SpoIIIE protein of Bacillus subtilis) has also been implicated in intracellular chromosomal DNA transfer.