Quantitative Thresholds Enable Accurate Identification of Clostridium difficile Infection by the Luminex xTAG Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel

QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel and Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel comparative evaluation

The diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis is an ongoing clinical challenge in terms of identification of the etiologic agent, time to results, and appropriate treatment. Rapid detection of gastrointestinal pathogens is needed to improve patient care. This study evaluates the performance of the QIAstat-Dx gastrointestinal panel (Q-GP; Investigational Use Only) compared to the Luminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (L-GPP; US-IVD). Using 245 stool specimens, we evaluated 10 different targets including rotavirus, norovirus, Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Giardia, Cryptosporidium, Escherichia coli O157, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). For the viral targets, the percent positive agreement (PPA) for rotavirus was 100% (n = 19) and that for norovirus was 91% (20/22). For the parasitic targets, the PPA was 100% for Giardia and Cryptosporidium (n = 18 and n = 23, respectively). The PPA was 96% for Salmonella (22/23) and Campylobacter (22/23), and the PPA for Shigella was 100% (n = 23). For the E. coli targets, a PPA of 94% was achieved for STEC (32/34) and 96% for ETEC (24/25). We did not assess PPA for the E. coli O157 target as the Q-GP O157 call is stx dependent. The negative percent agreement across all targets was 99.1%. Our study suggests that QIAstat-Dx GP provides comparable results to Luminex GPP based on the analysis of targets found on both panels.

Clinical evaluation of a non-purified direct molecular assay for the detection of Clostridioides difficile toxin genes in stool specimens

Recently, a new rapid assay for the detection of tcdB gene of Clostridioides difficile was developed using the GENECUBE. The assay can directly detect the tcdB gene from stool samples without a purification in approximately 35 minutes with a few minutes of preparation process. We performed a prospective comparative study of the performance of the assay at eight institutions in Japan. Fresh residual stool samples (Bristol stool scale ≥5) were used and comparisons were performed with the BD MAX Cdiff assay and toxigenic cultures. For the evaluation of 383 stool samples compared with the BD MAX Cdiff assay, the sensitivity, and specificity of the two assays was 99.0% (379/383), 98.1% (52/53), 99.1% (327/330), respectively. In the comparison with toxigenic culture, the total, sensitivity, and specificity were 96.6% (370/383), 85.0% (51/60), and 98.8% (319/323), respectively. The current investigation indicated the GENECUBE Clostridioides difficile assay has equivalent performance with the BD MAX Cdiff assay for the detection of tcdB gene of C. difficile.

A high-throughput and multiplex microsphere immunoassay based on non-structural protein 1 can discriminate three flavivirus infections

The explosive spread of Zika virus (ZIKV) and associated complications in flavivirus-endemic regions underscore the need for sensitive and specific serodiagnostic tests to distinguish ZIKV, dengue virus (DENV) and other flavivirus infections. Compared with traditional envelope protein-based assays, several nonstructural protein 1 (NS1)-based assays showed improved specificity, however, none can detect and discriminate three flaviviruses in a single assay. Moreover, secondary DENV infection and ZIKV infection with previous DENV infection, both common in endemic regions, cannot be discriminated. In this study, we developed a high-throughput and multiplex IgG microsphere immunoassay (MIA) using the NS1 proteins of DENV1-DENV4, ZIKV and West Nile virus (WNV) to test samples from reverse-transcription-polymerase-chain reaction-confirmed cases, including primary DENV1, DENV2, DENV3, WNV and ZIKV infections, secondary DENV infection, and ZIKV infection with previous DENV infection. Combination of four DENV NS1 IgG MIAs revealed a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 97.2% to detect DENV infection. The ZIKV and WNV NS1 IgG MIAs had a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/87.9% and 86.1%/78.4%, respectively. A positive correlation was found between the readouts of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and MIA for different NS1 tested. Based on the ratio of relative median fluorescence intensity of ZIKV NS1 to DENV1 NS1, the IgG MIA can distinguish ZIKV infection with previous DENV infection and secondary DENV infection with a sensitivity of 88.9–90.0% and specificity of 91.7–100.0%. The multiplex and high-throughput assay could be applied to serodiagnosis and serosurveillance of DENV, ZIKV and WNV infections in endemic regions.

Although there was a decrease of Zika virus (ZIKV) infection since late 2017, the specter of congenital Zika syndrome and its re-emergence in flavivirus-endemic regions emphasize the need for sensitive and specific serological tests to distinguish ZIKV, dengue virus (DENV) and other flaviviruses. Compared with traditional tests based on envelope protein, several nonstructural protein 1 (NS1)-based assays had improved specificity, however, none can discriminate three flaviviruses in a single assay. Moreover, secondary DENV infection and ZIKV infection with previous DENV infection, both common in endemic regions, cannot be distinguished. Herein we developed a high-throughput and multiplex IgG microsphere immunoassay using the NS1 proteins of four DENV serotypes, ZIKV and West Nile virus to test samples from laboratory-confirmed cases with different primary and secondary flavivirus infections. Combination of four DENV NS1 assays revealed a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 97.2%. The ZIKV and WNV NS1 assays had a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/87.9% and 86.1%/78.4%, respectively. Based on the signal ratio of ZIKV NS1 to DENV1 NS1, the assay can distinguish ZIKV infection with previous DENV infection and secondary DENV infection with a sensitivity of 88.9–90.0% and specificity of 91.7–100.0%. This has applications to serodiagnosis and serosurveillance in endemic regions.

Enteropathogens in paediatric gastroenteritis: comparison of routine diagnostic and molecular methods

OBJECTIVES

Studies of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) are hampered by the lack of routine diagnostic methods with good sensitivity and specificity. Molecular methods are increasingly used for clinical purposes, but the clinical significance of a positive result remains a challenge. In this study we aimed to compare results of routine diagnostic methods and molecular methods in symptomatic children and asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Patients presenting to the pediatric emergency departments of two university hospitals in Brussels with AGE were recruited prospectively from May 2015 to October 2016; asymptomatic controls were recruited from the same hospitals. Stool analyses were performed for all participants for common pathogenic bacteria (culture), virus (immunochromatography) and parasites (microscopy). Stools were also analysed with the Luminex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel, a multiplex-PCR for common enteropathogens.

RESULTS

Stools from 178 patients and 165 controls were analysed. An enteropathogen was detected in 62.4% (111/178) of cases when combining the two methods (56.2% (100/178) by Luminex, 42.7% (76/178) with routine methods) and 29.1% (48/165) of controls (24.2% (40/165) by Luminex and 10.3% (17/165) by routine methods). Some pathogens were detected more often with Luminex than with routine methods, such as Salmonella (16.3% (29/178) with Luminex and 3.9% (7/178) with routine method, p < 0.05), whereas others identified by culture methods, such as Campylobacter, Shigella, Yersinia, were missed by Luminex.

CONCLUSIONS

Molecular tools seem attractive methods, providing high positivity and a rapid turn-around time for the diagnosis of AGE. However, high rates of positivity in both cases and controls highlight the difficulty in interpreting results. Pathogens missed by Luminex but detected by culture methods raise more questions about the true clinical interest of the technique for our patients.