Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance testing: a comparison of three sequence-based methods

External Quality Assessment Scheme for HIV-1 Drug-Resistance Genotyping in Thailand

The efficacy of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy can be compromised by the emergence and transmission of HIV-1 drug-resistant strains. HIV-1 drug-resistance (DR) genotypic testing thus plays an important role in the selection of optimal treatment regimens for HIV-infected individuals. Given the complexities of the testing procedures and the variety of approaches used, there is considerable potential for results to vary between laboratories. In Thailand, the national External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme assesses the DR genotype testing performance of laboratories. Here, we evaluated the performance of laboratories in nucleotide sequencing and compared drug-resistance-associated mutations (DRMs) in the HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes during 2010-2015. The EQA samples in the 12 panels showed predominance for the CRF01_AE (85%) and subtype B (15%). Fourteen laboratory datasets were generated: eight using TruGene (TG), two using ViroSeq (VS), and four using in-house (IH) assays. All IH and VS laboratories had penalty scores <7, whereas five of the eight TG laboratories had fluctuating penalty scores. Moreover, seven and six TG laboratories could not amplify the two identical samples, 10B and 10E samples, or the CRF01_AE. Our findings demonstrate the requirement for laboratory participation in the ongoing EQA program and the optimization of kit assays using CRF01_AE samples. Our results also indicate that one advantage of participation is that the laboratories can monitor and investigate the source of laboratory errors.

Diagnosis of Viral Infections

Accurate diagnosis of viral infections enhances the ability of the clinician to make decisions on appropriate treatment of patients, evaluate disease progression and prevent misuse of antibiotics. Knowledge of the pathogen involved also allow implementation of infection control and monitoring of success of antiviral treatments that may affect the prognosis of patients. Epidemiological data collected through accurate diagnostics play an important role in public health through identification and control of outbreaks, implementation of appropriate diagnostic tests, vaccination programs and treatment but also to recognize common and emerging pathogens in a community. It is key that the clinician have an understanding of appropriate specimens to send to the laboratory and the value of specific nucleic acid and serological testing for different viral pathogens. Molecular techniques have revolutionized viral diagnoses over the past decade and enhanced both the sensitivity and specificity of tests and the speed by which a diagnosis can be made and new tests be developed. The continued use of serology for viruses with a short viremia, or for chronic infections should however complement these tests. This chapter aims to provide an overview of the available tests, the principles of testing and appropriate tests to select for different viruses and syndromes. Also provided is a glimpse of new developments in diagnostics that may further enhance the capacity to make a conclusive diagnosis in the near future.

Pitfalls of antiretroviral drug resistance genotyping of HIV-1 Group M and Group N from Cameroon by sequenced-based assays

Background:

HIV-1 genotyping for antiretroviral drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were developed based basically on subtype B HIV-1 Group M, which represents only 10% of HIV strains worldwide. In sub-Saharan Africa, non-B subtypes HIV-1 largely predominate and HIV-1 genetic diversity could affect the performance of drug resistance genotyping assays. We compared prospectively the performance of the ViroSeq^® and Trugene^® genotyping assays to detect DRM in HIV-1-infected adult patients living in Douala, Cameroun.

Materials and Methods:

DRM in protease (P) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes were assessed in parallel using both ViroSeq^® and Trugene^® assays in plasma samples from 45 first-line antiretroviral treatment-experienced patients in Douala, Cameroon.

Results:

Trugene HIV-1 Genotyping Assay^® (Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, NY, USA) and ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System^®(Celera Diagnostics, CA, USA) assessed equivalently antiretroviral DRMs in P and RT genes from non-B HIV-1 Group M in 44 Cameroonian adults in virological failure; Trugene^® was slightly more sensitive than ViroSeq^® (100% vs. 91%). One patient infected by HIV-1 Group N was successfully amplified only by the Trugene HIV-1 Genotyping assay^®, while ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System v2.0^® assay could not.

Conclusion:

Results showed the higher performance of the Trugene^® system to detected and amplify P and RT genes targeting DRM to the principal antiretroviral drugs used in sub-Saharan Africa. Discrepancies between the results of HIV viral load assays and molecular tests should alert clinicians and virologists to the possibility of infection by an atypical variant virus, especially in Central Africa where very broad HIV-1 genetic diversity exists.

Population-based surveillance of HIV drug resistance emerging on treatment and associated factors at sentinel antiretroviral therapy sites in Namibia

OBJECTIVE

The World Health Organization (WHO) prospective surveys of acquired HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) evaluate HIVDR emerging after the first year of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and associated factors.

METHODS

Consecutive ART starters in 2009 were enrolled at 3 sentinel sites in Namibia. Genotyping was performed at start and after 12 months in patients with HIV viral load (VL) >1000 copies per mL. HIVDR outcomes were: HIVDR prevention (VL ≤1000 copies/mL), possible HIVDR (VL >1000 copies/mL without detectable HIVDR or loss to follow-up or ART stop), and HIVDR (VL >1000 copies/mL with detectable HIVDR). Adherence was assessed using medication possession ratio (MPR).

RESULTS

Of 394 starters, at 12 months, 80% were on first-line ART, 1% died, 4% transferred out, 1% stopped ART, <1% switched to second-line, and 15% were lost to follow-up. Among patients on first-line, 77% had VL testing, and 94% achieved VL ≤1000 copies per mL. At baseline, 7% had HIVDR. After 12 months, among patients with VL testing, 5% had HIVDR. A majority of patients failing therapy had high-level resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors but none to protease inhibitors. All sites achieved the WHO target of ≥70% HIVDR prevention. Factors associated with not achieving HIVDR prevention were: baseline resistance to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors [odds ratio (OR) 3.0, P = 0.023], WHO stage 3 or 4 at baseline (OR 2.0, P = 0.012), and MPR <75% (OR 4.9, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier ART initiation and removal of barriers to on-time drug pickups may help to prevent HIVDR. These data inform decisions at national and global levels on the effectiveness of first- and second-line regimens.

Capacity building and predictors of success for HIV-1 drug resistance testing in the Asia-Pacific region and Africa

BACKGROUND

The TREAT Asia Quality Assessment Scheme (TAQAS) was developed as a quality assessment programme through expert education and training, for laboratories in the Asia-Pacific and Africa that perform HIV drug-resistance (HIVDR) genotyping. We evaluated the programme performance and factors associated with high-quality HIVDR genotyping.

METHODS

Laboratories used their standard protocols to test panels of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive plasma samples or electropherograms. Protocols were documented and performance was evaluated according to a newly developed scoring system, agreement with panel-specific consensus sequence, and detection of drug-resistance mutations (DRMs) and mixtures of wild-type and resistant virus (mixtures). High-quality performance was defined as detection of ≥95% DRMs.

RESULTS

Over 4.5 years, 23 participating laboratories in 13 countries tested 45 samples (30 HIV-1 subtype B; 15 non-B subtypes) in nine panels. Median detection of DRMs was 88-98% in plasma panels and 90-97% in electropherogram panels. Laboratories were supported to amend and improve their test outcomes as appropriate. Three laboratories that detected <80% DRMs in early panels demonstrated subsequent improvement. Sample complexity factors - number of DRMs (p<0.001) and number of DRMs as mixtures (p<0.001); and laboratory performance factors - detection of mixtures (p<0.001) and agreement with consensus sequence (p<0.001), were associated with high performance; sample format (plasma or electropherogram), subtype and genotyping protocol were not.

CONCLUSION

High-quality HIVDR genotyping was achieved in the TAQAS collaborative laboratory network. Sample complexity and detection of mixtures were associated with performance quality. Laboratories conducting HIVDR genotyping are encouraged to participate in quality assessment programmes.

Improvement of the oligonucleotide ligation assay for detection of the M184V drug-resistant mutation in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype CRF01_AE

Methods based on genetic sequencing to monitor drug-resistance mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) require expensive instruments and are only capable of detecting mutant strains comprising >20% of virus populations. The National Institutes of Health's AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program (NIH ARRRP) makes available a probe-based method, an oligonucleotide ligation assay (OLA-ARRRP), which is less expensive and more sensitive than sequencing to detect such mutations for HIV-1 subtype B. In this study, an OLA was designed to detect the Methionine to Valine mutation at codon 184 (M184V) of the reverse transcriptase (RT) gene in the circulating recombinant form AE strain of HIV-1 (HIV-1 CRF01_AE) common in Thailand, and was evaluated in Thai patients experiencing treatment failure. The subtype-specific OLA-CRF01_AE proved superior to OLA-ARRRP in detecting M184V, although this mutation existed in the genome of the multiple-drug-resistant virus at lower minimal detection levels of 3% prevalence of mutated virus, compared to 50% for OLA-ARRRP. On evaluation using clinical specimens, OLA-CRF01_AE showed excellent agreement with nucleotide sequencing (95.1% overall concordance, kappa>0.79), and the sensitivity was 100% for wild-type and 93.9% for mutant detection at codon 184. The OLA-CRF01_AE also detected M184V mutations in 2.4% (1/42) of specimens that were not detected by sequencing. The indeterminate detection by OLA-CRF01_AE was decreased, from 16.7% to 4.8%, in the samples containing mutant genotype when the strategy using unmodified- as a substitute of the modified-mutant detector probe was applied. Because of their low cost, sensitivity, and ease of use, the OLA-CRF01_AE is an attractive alternative to standard sequencing in resource-limited countries affected by this subtype of HIV-1.

Restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP) analysis based on MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for detecting antiretroviral resistance in HIV-1 infected patients

Viral genotype assessment is important for effective clinical management of HIV-1 infected patients, especially when access and/or adherence to antiretroviral treatment is reduced. In this study, we describe development of a matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based viral genotyping assay, termed restriction fragment mass polymorphism (RFMP). This assay is suitable for sensitive, specific and high-throughput detection of multiple drug-resistant HIV-1 variants. One hundred serum samples from 60 HIV-1-infected patients previously exposed to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) and protease inhibitors (PIs) were analysed for the presence of drug-resistant viruses using the RFMP and direct sequencing assays. Probit analysis predicted a detection limit of 223.02 copies/mL for the RFMP assay and 1268.11 copies/mL for the direct sequencing assays using HIV-1 RNA Positive Quality Control Series. The concordance rates between the RFMP and direct sequencing assays for the examined codons were 97% (K65R), 97% (T69Ins/D), 97% (L74VI), 97% (K103N), 96% (V106AM), 97% (Q151M), 97% (Y181C), 97% (M184VI) and 94% (T215YF) in the reverse transcriptase coding region, and 100% (D30N), 100% (M46I), 100% (G48V), 100% (I50V), 100% (I54LS), 99% (V82A), 99% (I84V) and 100% (L90M) in the protease coding region. Defined mixtures were consistently and accurately identified by RFMP at 5% relative concentration of mutant to wild-type virus while at 20% or greater by direct sequencing. The RFMP assay based on mass spectrometry proved to be sensitive, accurate and reliable for monitoring the emergence and early detection of HIV-1 genotypic variants that lead to drug resistance.

Screening for and verification of novel mutations associated with drug resistance in the HIV type 1 subtype B(') in China

OBJECTIVE

Mutations associated with HIV drug resistance have been extensively characterized at the HIV-1 polymerase domain, but more studies have verified that mutations outside of the polymerase domain also results in resistance to antiviral drugs. In this study, mutations were identified in 354 patients experiencing antiretroviral therapy (ART) failure and in 97 naïve-therapy patients. Mutations whose impact on antiviral drugs was unknown were verified by phenotypic testing.

METHODS

Pol sequences of HIV subtype B(') obtained from patients experiencing ART failure and from naïve-therapy patients were analyzed for mutations distinct between two groups. Mutations that occurred at a significantly higher frequency in the ART failure than the naïve-therapy group were submitted to the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database (SHDB) to analyze the correlation between HIV mutations and drug resistance. For mutations whose impact on the antiviral drug response is unknown, the site-directed mutagenesis approach was applied to construct plasmids containing the screened mutations. 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) to AZT, EFV and NVP was measured to determine the response of the genetically constructed viruses to antiviral drugs.

RESULTS

7 mutations at 6 positions of the RT region, D123E, V292I, K366R, T369A, T369V, A371V and I375V, occurred more frequently in the ART failure group than the naïve-therapy group. Phenotypic characterization of these HIV mutants revealed that constructed viruses with mutations A371V and T369V exhibited dual resistance to AZT and EFV respectively, whereas the other 5 mutations showed weak resistance. Although the impact of the other six mutations on response to NVP was minimal, mutation T369V could enhance resistance to NVP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that mutations at the RT C-terminal in subtype B' could result in resistance to RT inhibitors if the mutations occurred alone, but that some mutations could promote susceptibility to antiviral drugs.

Global trends in antiretroviral resistance in treatment-naive individuals with HIV after rollout of antiretroviral treatment in resource-limited settings: a global collaborative study and meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

The emergence and spread of high levels of HIV-1 drug resistance in resource-limited settings where combination antiretroviral treatment has been scaled up could compromise the effectiveness of national HIV treatment programmes. We aimed to estimate changes in the prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance in treatment-naive individuals with HIV since initiation of rollout in resource-limited settings.

METHODS

We did a systematic search for studies and conference abstracts published between January, 2001, and July, 2011, and included additional data from the WHO HIV drug resistance surveillance programme. We assessed the prevalence of drug-resistance mutations in untreated individuals with respect to time since rollout in a series of random-effects meta-regression models.

FINDINGS

Study-level data were available for 26,102 patients from sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, and Latin America. We recorded no difference between chronic and recent infection on the prevalence of one or more drug-resistance mutations for any region. East Africa had the highest estimated rate of increase at 29% per year (95% CI 15 to 45; p=0·0001) since rollout, with an estimated prevalence of HIV-1 drug resistance at 8 years after rollout of 7·4% (4·3 to 12·7). We recorded an annual increase of 14% (0% to 29%; p=0·054) in southern Africa and a non-significant increase of 3% (-0·9 to 16; p=0·618) in west and central Africa. There was no change in resistance over time in Latin America, and because of much country-level heterogeneity the meta-regression analysis was not appropriate for Asia. With respect to class of antiretroviral, there were substantial increases in resistance to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) in east Africa (36% per year [21 to 52]; p<0·0001) and southern Africa (23% per year [7 to 42]; p=0·0049). No increase was noted for the other drug classes in any region.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest a significant increase in prevalence of drug resistance over time since antiretroviral rollout in regions of sub-Saharan Africa; this rise is driven by NNRTI resistance in studies from east and southern Africa. The findings are of concern and draw attention to the need for enhanced surveillance and drug-resistance prevention efforts by national HIV treatment programmes. Nevertheless, estimated levels, although increasing, are not unexpected in view of the large expansion of antiretroviral treatment coverage seen in low-income and middle-income countries--no changes in antiretroviral treatment guidelines are warranted at the moment.

FUNDING

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the European Community's Seventh Framework Programme.

Past, present and future molecular diagnosis and characterization of human immunodeficiency virus infections

Substantive and significant advances have been made in the last two decades in the characterization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections using molecular techniques. These advances include the use of real-time measurements, isothermal amplification, the inclusion of internal quality assurance protocols, device miniaturization and the automation of specimen processing. The result has been a significant increase in the availability of results to a high level of accuracy and quality. Molecular assays are currently widely used for diagnostics, antiretroviral monitoring and drug resistance characterization in developed countries. Simple and cost-effective point-of-care versions are also being vigorously developed with the eventual goal of providing timely healthcare services to patients residing in remote areas and those in resource-constrained countries. In this review, we discuss the evolution of these molecular technologies, not only in the context of the virus, but also in the context of tests focused on human genomics and transcriptomics.

Description of two commercially available assays for genotyping of HIV-1

HIV-1 resistance testing is one important part in the diagnostics of antiretroviral treatment and is commonly done by genotyping. Currently, two systems are commercially available and, despite being far from easy to use, these have achieved a high degree of sophistication. Modifications of standard kit protocols might be necessary based on the clinical situation. Although resistance reports based on decision rules are a part of both systems, considerable knowledge and skills are nevertheless required by the user to establish useful clinical data out of detected resistance patterns. Both systems described here have their advantages and disadvantages; a decision for one or the other system needs to be based on individual requirements. The future might lie in so-called 'next-generation sequencing' systems based on pyrosequencing, which enable a high throughput and the detection of minor variants of less than 1%.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance testing: Evaluation of a new ultra-deep sequencing-based protocol and comparison with the TRUGENE HIV-1 Genotyping Kit

Genotypic HIV-1 drug resistance testing with standard Sanger sequencing is limited to the detection of mutations with >20% prevalence. A new protocol for variant detection of protease and reverse transcriptase genes of HIV-1 genotype B samples with ultra-deep sequencing on the GS-FLX sequencer (Roche 454 Life Sciences, Branford, CT) was evaluated. The new technology was compared with the standard Sanger sequencing method. For accuracy testing, genotype B samples obtained from proficiency panels were examined with ultra-deep sequencing. Reproducibility was determined by repeat GS-FLX sequencing of 21 clinical samples. Clinical performance was evaluated with 44 samples and the results were compared to the TRUGENE HIV-1 Genotyping Kit (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY). Sequences generated with both protocols were analyzed using the Stanford University HIV drug resistance database. When accuracy was tested, 316 of 317 mutation codons included in the analysis of proficiency panels could be identified correctly with ultra-deep sequencing. Reproducibility testing resulted in a correlation value of R(2)=0.969. Analysis of 44 routine clinical samples with the Stanford University HIV drug resistance database revealed a total number of 269 and 171 mutations by the ultra-deep and standard Sanger sequencing, respectively. Drug resistance interpretations showed differences for 11 samples. With ultra-deep sequencing, total time to result was four times longer in comparison to standard Sanger sequencing. Manual work was increased significantly using the new protocol. The ultra-deep sequencing protocol showed good accuracy and reproducibility. However, automation and shorter time to obtain results are essential for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory.

Genotypic prediction of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism by use of plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the routine clinical laboratory

We developed a sequencing assay for genotypic HIV-1 tropism determination. The assay allows examination of HIV RNA from plasma and HIV DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), including PBMC samples from patients with undetectable viral loads. Assessment of 100 pairs of plasma and PBMC samples showed a high concordance of 90%. With the limitations of population-based sequencing, the assay was found to be robust and suitable for the routine clinical laboratory.

Use of phylogenetics in the molecular epidemiology and evolutionary studies of viral infections

Since DNA sequencing techniques first became available almost 30 years ago, the amount of nucleic acid sequence data has increased enormously. Phylogenetics, which is widely applied to compare and analyze such data, is particularly useful for the analysis of genes from rapidly evolving viruses. It has been used extensively to describe the molecular epidemiology and transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), the origins and subsequent evolution of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-associated coronavirus (SCoV), and, more recently, the evolving epidemiology of avian influenza as well as seasonal and pandemic human influenza viruses. Recent advances in phylogenetic methods can infer more in-depth information about the patterns of virus emergence, adding to the conventional approaches in viral epidemiology. Examples of this information include estimations (with confidence limits) of the actual time of the origin of a new viral strain or its emergence in a new species, viral recombination and reassortment events, the rate of population size change in a viral epidemic, and how the virus spreads and evolves within a specific population and geographical region. Such sequence-derived information obtained from the phylogenetic tree can assist in the design and implementation of public health and therapeutic interventions. However, application of many of these advanced phylogenetic methods are currently limited to specialized phylogeneticists and statisticians, mainly because of their mathematical basis and their dependence on the use of a large number of computer programs. This review attempts to bridge this gap by presenting conceptual, technical, and practical aspects of applying phylogenetic methods in studies of influenza, HIV, and SCoV. It aims to provide, with minimal mathematics and statistics, a practical overview of how phylogenetic methods can be incorporated into virological studies by clinical and laboratory specialists.

TREAT Asia Quality Assessment Scheme (TAQAS) to standardize the outcome of HIV genotypic resistance testing in a group of Asian laboratories

The TREAT Asia (Therapeutics, Research, Education, and AIDS Training in Asia) Network is building capacity for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type-1 (HIV-1) drug resistance testing in the region. The objective of the TREAT Asia Quality Assessment Scheme - designated TAQAS - is to standardize HIV-1 genotypic resistance testing (HIV genotyping) among laboratories to permit rigorous comparison of results from different clinics and testing centres. TAQAS has evaluated three panels of HIV-1-positive plasma from clinical material or low-passage, culture supernatant for up to 10 Asian laboratories. Laboratory participants used their standard protocols to perform HIV genotyping. Assessment was in comparison to a target genotype derived from all participants and the reference laboratory's result. Agreement between most participants at the edited nucleotide sequence level was high (>98%). Most participants performed to the reference laboratory standard in detection of drug resistance mutations (DRMs). However, there was variation in the detection of nucleotide mixtures (0-83%) and a significant correlation with the detection of DRMs (p<0.01). Interpretation of antiretroviral resistance showed approximately 70% agreement among participants when different interpretation systems were used but >90% agreement with a common interpretation system, within the Stanford University Drug Resistance Database. Using the principles of external quality assessment and a reference laboratory, TAQAS has demonstrated high quality HIV genotyping results from Asian laboratories.

Genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase inhibitors by use of the TruGene sequencing system

A sequencing assay for detection of mutations conferring resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir was developed using the automated TruGene sequencing system. The assay returned clear sequencing results for samples with >or=500 RNA copies/ml for mutation detection and HIV-1 subtyping across a spectrum of HIV-1 subtypes.

A new strategy based on recombinant viruses as a tool for assessing drug susceptibility of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

The emergence of drug-resistant variants during antiretroviral therapy is a serious obstacle to sustained suppression of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). For that reason, resistance assays are essential to guide clinicians in the selection of optimal treatment regimens. Genotypic assays are less expensive and results are available faster than phenotypic assays. However, in heavily experienced patients with multiple treatment failures interpretation of complex mutation patterns remains difficult, and in these cases phenotypic assays are recommended. This report describes a novel recombinant virus assay where protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) sequences derived from the plasma isolated from patients are introduced into the back-bone of an HIV molecular clone that expresses Renilla luciferase protein in the place of nef gene. All drug resistance profiles analyzed correlate with previously reported data and showed high reproducibility. This assay, in addition to a fast (completed in 10 days), precise, reproducible and automated method, presents several advantages as compared to other phenotypic assays. The system described below allows the generation of recombinant viruses with multiples cycles of replication carrying a reporter gene in their genomes. These features increase the sensitivity of the test, an important aspect to be considered in the evaluation of less fit viral isolates. In conclusion, the assay permits the quantitation of the level of resistance of clinical HIV-1 isolates to PR and RT inhibitors.

Antiviral Activity, Pharmacokinetics, and Dose Response of the HIV-1 Integrase Inhibitor GS-9137 (JTK-303) in Treatment-Naive and Treatment-Experienced Patients

BACKGROUND

GS-9137 is a potent low-nanomolar strand transfer inhibitor of HIV-1 integrase.

METHODS

The antiviral activity, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of GS-9137 were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy study in 40 HIV-1- infected patients not receiving antiretroviral therapy with an HIV-1 RNA between 10,000 and 300,000 copies/mL and a CD4 count of 200 cells/microL or greater. GS-9137 or matching placebo was administered with food for 10 days at 5 dosage regimens (200, 400, or 800 mg BID, 800 mg QD, or 50 mg+100 mg ritonavir QD; 6 active, 2 placebo per dose level). The primary end point was the maximum reduction from baseline in log10 HIV-1 RNA.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled, with a mean baseline viral load of 4.75 log10 copies/mL and a CD4 count of 442 cells/microL. Each GS-9137 dosing regimen exhibited significant, exposure-dependent (mean reductions, -0.98 to -1.99 log10 copies/mL) antiviral activity compared with placebo (P<0.01). Twice-daily administrations of GS-9137 at doses of 400 or 800 mg or once-daily dosing of 50 mg with ritonavir demonstrated mean reductions from baseline in HIV-1 RNA of 1.91 log10 copies/mL or greater, with all patients exhibiting 1 log10 or greater and 50% having 2 log10 or greater reductions. No patient developed evidence of integrase resistance. GS-9137 showed an adverse event profile similar to placebo, and there were no study drug discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS

GS-9137 demonstrated substantial short-term antiviral activity and was well tolerated as monotherapy, thus warranting further study.

Pathogen Detection in the Genomic Era

In the 21st century, one of the greatest challenges to public health and clinical microbiologists is the rapid detection and identification of emerging and reemerging pathogens. Complex factors such as genetic variation in the host and pathogen, environmental changes, population pressures, and global travel can all influence the emergence of infectious diseases. The SARS epidemic of 2003 highlighted the potential of an emerging pathogen to spread globally in a very short time frame (Peruski and Peruski, 2003). The diagnostics of such infectious diseases has been greatly affected in the past 20 years. No longer is cultivation and microscopy the only means of detecting infectious agents. With the introduction of molecular diagnostics, the ability to detect minute amounts of microbial nucleic acids in clinical specimens has revolutionized clinical microbiology. In particular, the utility of PCR allows the detection and quantitation of specific agents in a matter of hours. PCR sequencing of specific segments of nucleic acid allows for the determination of specific drug resistance that now aids in guiding viral therapies.

Study of antiretroviral mutants in HIV patients with treatment failures and the effect of risk factors in the virological failures

INTRODUCTION: Information about HIV phenotypes of resistant to available ART and the influence of different risk factors on virological failures (VF) in Costa Rican HIV positive patients prior or during HAART is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty nine samples, 72 VF and 17 basal (before treatment) were analyzed by examining resistant mutants in reverse transcriptase (RT) and protease (PT) regions using Trugene or LIPA genotyping kits. Sixty eight control patients were selected and relevant information was collected in a questionnaire. RESULTS: Poor adherence, presence of resistant mutations and number of treatment's changes were the only significant factors found (p = 0.006, 0.04 and 0.01 respectively). From 66 sequenced samples, 78%, 50% and 50% showed resistance to NRTI (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors), NNRT (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors) and PI (protease inhibitors), respectively. The most frequent mutations were M41L, M184V, and T215FY in RT and L62PI, L10FIRV and M36I in PT. DISCUSSION: The most important factor related to treatment response in this study was adherence to treatment. Mutations in RT were related to the treatment failure while the ones found in PT were secondary mutations which have been previously described to influence the selection of primary resistance mutations in these regions. The study reveals the urgency to detect resistant mutations in VF to be considered by physicians for selection of treatment schedule, to analyze basal HIV patients for monitoring of the spread of resistant mutations and the importance to reinforce the adherence in the patients for overall treatment outcome.

Genotyping of B and non-B subtypes of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

Current HIV-1 genotyping assays were developed using subtype B viruses prevalent in Western countries. It is not clear whether these assays are appropriate for use among African patients, who are likely to be infected with non-B subtypes. We evaluated the Bayer TRUGENE HIV-1 genotyping (TG) assay using prospectively collected samples from HIV-1-infected individuals who acquired infection in either sub-Saharan Africa or the West (Europe, North America, and Australia). Plasma samples from 208 individuals with an HIV-1 viral load of >1,000 copies/ml were tested using version 1 primers supplied with the TG assay. If these failed, an alternative primer set version 1.5 was used. Of the 208 individuals, the likely origin of infection was Africa (n = 104), Western (n = 87) and "Others" (i.e., all other geographic locations or origin not certain; n = 17). Among the three groups, the version 1 primers were successful in 85 (82%), 77 (89%), and 13 (76%) individuals, respectively (P = 0.1). Of the remaining 32 samples, 30 were successfully amplified by using the version 1.5 primers. HIV-1 subtypes deduced from the reverse transcriptase sequences correlated with the likely origin of infection: Africa (28A, 3B, 33C, 13D, 6G, 4J, 2K, 5CRF01_AE, and 10CRF02_AG), Western (86B and 1K), and Others (1A and 16B). The success of the version 1 primers correlated with viral load (P < 0.014) and not with HIV-1 subtypes. A protocol based on version 1 primers, followed by 1.5 primers, was successful in sequencing 99% of the samples in this cohort.

Behavioral impact, acceptability, and HIV incidence among homosexual men with access to postexposure chemoprophylaxis for HIV

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the behavioral impact, acceptability, and incidence of HIV infection in persons with easy access to post-sexual exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent HIV.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from a well-characterized, high-risk HIV seronegative homosexual male cohort in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, given a 4-day supply of zidovudine and lamivudine, and instructed to begin PEP immediately after an eligible exposure. For eligible exposures, an additional 24-day supply was provided. Reported behavior, PEP utilization, adverse events, and incident HIV infection were the main study outcomes. The observed and expected incidences of HIV infection were compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred subjects were enrolled and followed for a median of 24.2 months. The median age was 28 years. PEP was initiated 109 times by 68 participants (34.0%). In comparison to reported behavior at baseline, reported high-risk sexual activities on average declined over time for both PEP and non-PEP users. There were no serious drug-related adverse events. There were 11 HIV seroconversions, 10 among non-PEP users and 1 that was a PEP failure. The overall seroincidence was 2.9 per 100 person-years (95% CI = 1.4, 5.1). The expected number of new HIV infections and corresponding expected seroincidence based on the risk profile were 11.8 and 3.1, respectively (P > 0.97). The most commonly reported reasons for not initiating PEP among seroconverters were sex with a steady partner and not considering the exposure to be of sufficiently high risk to warrant PEP.

CONCLUSION

PEP was safe and did not appear to be associated with increases in reported high-risk behavior in our cohort. Ready access to PEP did not appear to substantially affect HIV transmission, suggesting a limited public health impact of this intervention.

RNA extraction prior to HIV-1 resistance detection using Line Probe Assay (LiPA): comparison of three methods

BACKGROUND

Genotyping testing has been accepted as a guidance in the therapeutic management of Human Immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1). However, optimization of the available routine techniques for such purpose has not been fulfilled.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of three RNA extraction methods in order to be applied in the genotypic HIV-1 resistance testing by LiPA.

STUDY DESIGN

Comparative prospective study of three HIV-1 RNA extraction methods. Forty-eight plasma samples were tested for the determination of viral load (VL) by means of Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (Roche Diagnostics. Branchburg, NJ, USA), preserving the obtained RNA extracts. RNA was also extracted using two other techniques: "SV Total RNA Isolation System" (Promega Corporation. Madison, WI, USA) and "QIAamp Viral RNA" (QIAGEN Inc., Valencia, CA, USA). The three RNA extracts were processed in parallel for the detection of HIV resistance by LiPA, and bands were recorded comparatively.

RESULTS

Results obtained by Roche extraction method were superior, followed by those of Qiagen and Promega, in the several studied parameters. First, proportion of amplified samples (75.0% by Promega versus 95.8 by Qiagen and 97.9% by Roche for LiPA RT and 97.7% by Promega versus 100.0% by Roche and Qiagen for LiPA P); second, percentage of combined mutations patterns, and third, differences in band intensity. Thus, for LiPA RT 51.4% and 54.3% of the samples showed greater intensity after Roche and Qiagen extractions, respectively. These percentages dropped to 12.8 and 19.1 for LiPA P.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome obtained by LiPA after RNA extraction by Roche methodology was remarkably superior to those of Promega and Qiagen. LiPA technique needs further optimization, especially the sample amplification phase of LiPA RT.

Model for assessment of proficiency of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sequencing-based genotypic antiretroviral assays

Use of sequencing-based genotyping as a diagnostic assay for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antiretroviral resistance is increasing. Periodic evaluation of the proficiency of laboratories performing this assay should be established. It is important to identify components of the assay that influence the generation of reliable sequencing data and that should and can be monitored. A model was developed to determine what parameters were reasonable and feasible for assessing the performance of genotyping assays. Ten laboratories using the genotyping platform, HIV-1 Genotyping System (HGS) v. 1 and software versions 1.1 or 2.0, participated in two rounds of testing. For each round, each group was sent a panel consisting of three clinical samples to sequence in real time. Six months later, seven laboratories using the TRUGENE HIV-1 Genotyping Kit participated in a separate round, working with both panels at the same time. Analysis of the data showed that one main indicator of genotyping proficiency was achievement of > or =98% sequence homology of a sample tested to a group consensus sequence for that sample. A second was concordant identification of codons at sites identified with resistance mutations in the sample, although scoring of these criteria is still undetermined from this study. These criteria are applicable to all sequence-based genotyping platforms and have been used as a baseline for assessing the performance of genotyping for the determination of antiretroviral resistance in our ongoing proficiency program.

Performance of drug-resistance genotypic assays among HIV-1 infected patients with predominantly CRF02_AG strains of HIV-1 in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the performance of three genotypic assays to detect resistant mutations among HIV-1 infected patients with known antiretroviral drug resistance profile in Abidjan, Cote d'Ivoire, most of whom had the circulating recombinant form (CRF02_A/G) of HIV-1.

METHODS

The 56 patients analyzed in this study were enrolled in a pilot program to make available antiretroviral therapy (ART) to HIV-infected patients in Abidjan through the UNAIDS Drug Access Initiative (DAI). These patients had failed ART, as demonstrated by rebound in RNA viral load. Their plasma samples had been previously analyzed for ART genotypic drug-resistance by VircoGEN (Mechelen, Belgium) and were known to have primary and secondary resistance mutations, and also had phenotypic drug-resistance by a recombinant virus assay technology (Mechelen, Belgium). The two assays we evaluated were: VircoGEN, TruGene HIV-1, and ViroSEQ HIV-1 assays.

RESULTS

For the reverse transcriptase gene, all 27 samples that had the T215Y/F mutation were detected by VircoGEN , ViroSEQ, and TrueGene. All 19 (100%) samples that had the K70R/E mutation detected by VircoGEN were detected by ViroSEQ, and 18 (94.7%) by TrueGene. All ten samples with the M184V mutation, three with the K65R, two with the G190A mutation, one with the K103N mutation, and one with the V75T mutation were detected similarly by all three assays. For the protease gene, all three assays detected the I84V (n = 1), M46I (n = 1), and L90M (n = 1) mutations.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that any of these assays should be considered for monitoring the occurrence of drug resistance among HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy in West Africa.

Detection of HIV-1 antiretroviral resistance from patients with persistently low but detectable viraemia

We modified the Abbott diagnostics HIV-1 Viroseq version 2 assay trade mark in order to detect the presence of HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in patients with viraemia below 1000 copies/ml of plasma. One hundred and forty-four patients with a detectable HIV-1 plasma viral load below 1000 copies/ml were selected and HIV-1 genetic analysis carried out using a modification of the Abbott Diagnostics Viroseq 2.0 assay trade mark. The procedure differs from the standard protocol in that a nested PCR amplification step was introduced. The oligonucleotide primers for the first round of PCR were those supplied in the RT-PCR module of the kit. The nested PCR primers were primers A and H taken from the sequencing module. One hundred and twenty-eight out of 144 (89%) plasma samples with an HIV-1 viral load of less than 1000 copies/ml (ranging from 54 to 992 copies) were successfully sequenced. HIV-1 genotypes were obtained from 68 out of 81 (84%) samples with a viral load of greater than 50 but less than 300 copies/ml and 60/63 (95%) of samples with a viral load of greater than 300 but less than 1000 copies/ml. Serial dilution of a sample with a high viral load did not affect the detection of resistance mutations. Multiple sequencing of samples with low viral load did not result in detection of additional mutations, although, in one sample the K103N mutation was detected in 3/6 replicates while wild-type was detected in 2/6 and a mixture of wild-type/mutant in 1/6. Samples from patients infected with both clade B and non-B clades of HIV-1 could be genotyped at low copy number. Modification of the Abbott Viroseq assay allows reproducible sequencing of the HIV-1 genome from patients with low, but detectable, plasma virus burden.

Modifications and substitutions of the RNA extraction module in the ViroSeq™ HIV-1 genotyping system version 2: Effects on sensitivity and complexity of the assay

Genotypic testing for HIV-1 resistance to anti-retroviral drugs has become accepted widely as a routine method to guide anti-retroviral therapy. However, implementation into routine high-throughput laboratory diagnosis is difficult due to the complexity of the assay. A commercially available assay is the ViroSeq HIV-1 Genotyping System (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany). We modified and substituted the RNA extraction module to optimize the proportion of samples amplified successfully as follows: 1 ml plasma was concentrated by ultracentrifugation and extracted according to the manufacturer's instructions (Kit), by substituting the lysis buffer (Roche, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany), and by using the QIAamp Viral RNA Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) with elution volumes of 60 (Q60) or 50 micro l (Q50). Overall Q50 showed a higher success rate (97%) than the other extraction modules used (range 88-91%). In samples with a viral load range of 1,000-4,999 copies/ml, Q50 was superior (95 vs. 65% to 83%), while in samples with a viral load range of 5,000-9,999 copies/ml or those with 10,000 or more copies/ml, the success rate of the extraction procedures showed no significant differences. In 18 samples, which were negative using the Kit or Roche extraction, Q60 resulted in 7/18 positive results; in addition the Q50 was successful in amplifying 7/10 of the Q60 negative samples. When investigating samples with a measurable viral load of less than 1,000 copies/ml or lower, Q50 had the highest success rate with 80% compared to the other procedures (33-63%). A statistically significant new cut-off could be defined for Q50 at a value of 250 copies/ml. The results showed clearly that the ViroSeq System is suitable for analyzing the HIV-1 genotype over a wide range of viral loads but could be improved significantly when substituting the RNA extraction module with Q50 without using a nested PCR protocol. This is of great importance as it avoids further time- and cost-intensive steps.

Evaluation of the editing process in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genotyping

Sequencing-based human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotyping assays require subjective interpretation (editing) of sequence data from multiple primers to form consensus sequences and identify antiretroviral drug resistance mutations. We assessed interlaboratory variations in editing and their impact on the recognition of resistance mutations. Six samples were analyzed in a central laboratory by using a research-use-only HIV-1 genotyping system previously produced by Applied Biosystems. The electronic files of individual primer sequences from the samples were sent to 10 laboratories to compare sequence editing strategies. Each sequence data set included sequences from seven primers spanning protease codons 1 to 99 and reverse transcriptase codons 1 to 320. Each laboratory generated a consensus sequence for each sample and completed a questionnaire about editing strategy. The amount of editing performed, the concordance of consensus sequences among the laboratories, and the identification of resistance mutations were evaluated. Sequence agreement was high among the laboratories despite wide variations in editing strategies. All laboratories identified 66 (88%) of 75 resistance mutations in the samples. Nonconcordant identifications were made for 9 (12%) of the 75 mutations, all of which required editing for identification. These results indicate a need for standardized editing guidelines in genotyping assays. Proficiency in editing should be assessed in training and included in quality control programs for HIV-1 genotyping.

Sources and magnitude of intralaboratory variability in a sequence-based genotypic assay for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

We assessed the intralaboratory reproducibility of a system for sequencing human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) by using replicate subanalyses of 46 plasma samples collected from HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-experienced patients in order to determine the relative contributions of the different procedural steps to final sequence variability. Complete sequence concordance between duplicates of each sample was 99.4%. Complete and partial mismatches occurred scattered throughout the PR-RT genome segment at >300 positions. Approximately 75% of the discordances involved mixtures, some of which appeared at key resistance sites. Most differences were the result of the first-round RT-PCR procedure. Inter-rater concordance for sequence analysis and assembly was >99.9%. There was no observed correlation between the number or frequency of mismatches and plasma viral loads. A separate longitudinal analysis of a single routine control sample sequenced 103 times over 9 months consistently gave highly reproducible sequences (median percentage of nucleotide discordances, 0.04%; range, 0 to 0.2%). Finally, sequence data from 168 sequential samples collected from 22 patients with long-term, predominantly wild type HIV showed that intrapatient nucleotide concordance with individual index sequences ranged from 96.5 to 100%. Together, these results confirm that sequence-based genotyping can be a precise and reliable tool for monitoring HIV drug resistance, and they suggest that efforts to reduce variability should focus on the first RT-PCR step. Consequently, the data suggest that the composition of external quality assessment panels should be based on clinical HIV isolates rather than DNA clones.

Performance characteristics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) genotyping systems in sequence-based analysis of subtypes other than HIV-1 subtype B

Given the diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) subtypes and the emergence of subtypes other than HIV-1 subtype B in the United States, genotypic assays must be capable of delivering sequence data on diverse HIV-1 subtypes. We evaluated the performance of Visible Genetics TRUGENE HIV-1 genotyping kit and Applied Biosystems ViroSeq HIV-1 genotyping system on a panel of 34 well-characterized HIV-1 viral stocks (subtypes A through H). Both assays perform well on diverse HIV-1 subtypes despite being designed for HIV-1 subtype B. The TRUGENE assay produced sequence data for 31 isolates but not for one C and two G isolates. The TRUGENE assay using prototype 1.5 RT-PCR primers and the ViroSeq assay were both successful for all variants tested, although five isolates lacked double-strand sequence coverage in the ViroSeq assay. The availability of standardized HIV-1 genotyping kits that perform reliably with all HIV subtypes will facilitate broad implementation of HIV-1 resistance testing.

Quality assessment program for genotypic antiretroviral testing improves detection of drug resistance mutations

Genotypic antiretroviral testing is now widely used for the management of patients who are undergoing antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus infection. The assays are complex, and there is considerable potential for variation between laboratories. Informative and ongoing quality assessment programs (QAPs) which address all aspects of testing are required. The panel distribution of clinical material is a critical component of QAPs. We report on the results and data from a recent panel. Four cryopreserved plasma samples from treated donors were distributed to nine laboratories. Three laboratories performed testing by commercial assays, and six laboratories used in-house assays, with one laboratory reporting results from two in-house assays. There was complete concordance between results for 95.9% of the nucleotide sequence and 94.5% of the amino acid sequence. Despite this overall high level of concordance, the degree of concordance at drug resistance mutation (DRM) sites when DRMs were present was considerably less (38% of DRM sites). Consequently, only 3 of the 10 methods reported 100% of DRMs as present. This elevated discrepancy rate is almost certainly a result of variability in the identification of mixtures of nucleotides (mixtures) at any site within the sequence. In addition, laboratories differed in the number of codons in the reverse transcriptase gene that were sequenced and their ability to amplify all samples. This panel distribution demonstrated a requirement for laboratory participation in ongoing QAPs and the optimization of assays with standards that contain mixtures.

Molecular detection and genotyping of pathogens: more accurate and rapid answers

Rapid molecular methods have enhanced the capabilities of laboratories to identify and characterize microbial pathogens in greater detail. Nucleic acid amplification strategies and advances in amplicon detection have been key aspects in the progress of molecular microbiology. Sophisticated new amplification-detection combinations are resulting in many applications in laboratory testing for infectious diseases. These applications include qualitative detection, sub-species-level DNA fingerprinting, molecular resistance testing and genotyping, and quantitative (viral load) testing. When applied selectively in the laboratory, these applications can enhance diagnostic approaches and clinical management and will probably evolve into standard laboratory and point-of-care testing protocols.

HIV-1 genotypic and phenotypic resistance

Antiretroviral failure caused by the development of drug resistance in HIV-1 is an increasingly common clinical problem. Two types of resistance assays are available to clinicians. Genotypic assays determine the presence of mutations associated with drug resistance. The interpretation of mutations is often complicated, however, and may require expert opinion. Phenotypic assays provide a direct measure of the drug susceptibility of the virus. The magnitude of increase, however, in viral drug inhibitory concentration that is predictive of clinical drug failure remains unknown for several antiretroviral drugs. The mutational patterns underlying resistance to each antiretroviral drug are often diverse, and cross-resistance patterns within each of the currently available classes are complex. Currently, resistance testing is recommended for patients who have virologic failure on an antiretroviral regimen. Furthermore, testing should also be considered in treatment-native patients when the prevalence of transmitted drug-resistant virus is expected to be high.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.