Comparison of conventional PCR with real-time PCR and branched DNA-based assays for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification and clinical significance for genotypes 1 to 5

Role of HCV Viremia in Corroborated HCV Transmission Events Within Young Adult Injecting Partnerships

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a major cause of morbidity and mortality, is common and rising among young persons who inject drugs (PWID). Reducing the level of viremia may be an intervention, yet the impact of viremia on HCV transmission is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of injecting partnerships (Partner Study) of young adult (age < 30 years) PWID within the UFO Study, which enrolled those at risk for HCV or with seronegative viremic infection and up to 3 HCV RNA-positive regular injecting partners. We examined the level of HCV viremia and stage of infection in the HCV-positive partner in regression analyses of HCV transmission events that were corroborated via HCV phylogenetic linkage analyses.

Results

We enrolled 69 at-risk/acutely infected PWID. There were 25 new HCV infections (incidence rate, 35.9 per 100 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24.3-53.2 per 100 person-years); 12/25 (48%) were phylogenetically linked to at least 1 partner. We found no association between the infected partner's quantitative level of HCV viremia and likely transmission in multivariate analyses (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-1.46); however, seronegative viremic infection in the infected partner was associated with increased transmission (AOR, 28.02; 95% CI, 5.61-139.95).

Conclusions

The HCV viremia level was not associated with increased odds of transmission, yet acute HCV infection (seronegative viremic) was. Explanations include high-risk behavior during acute infection or missed fluctuations in viremia during acute infection. Both point to the need for frequent testing to detect new infection and attempt to prevent onward transmission.

HCV Detection, Discrimination, and Genotyping Technologies

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 71 million people were living with Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection worldwide in 2015. Each year, about 399,000 HCV-infected people succumb to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure. Therefore, screening of HCV infection with simple, rapid, but highly sensitive and specific methods can help to curb the global burden on HCV healthcare. Apart from the determination of viral load/viral clearance, the identification of specific HCV genotype is also critical for successful treatment of hepatitis C. This critical review focuses on the technologies used for the detection, discrimination, and genotyping of HCV in clinical samples. This article also focuses on advantages and disadvantages of the reported methods used for HCV detection, quantification, and genotyping.

Clinical performance of the VERIS HCV assay for hepatitis C virus RNA quantification

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and treatment monitoring rely on detection/quantification of HCV RNA and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are expected to equivalently quantify the different HCV genotypes.

OBJECTIVE

The clinical performance of the VERIS HCV assay for HCV RNA quantification was compared to that of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay.

STUDY DESIGN

Qualitative concordance and quantitative comparison were evaluated on a first panel of 286 clinical samples containing HCV genotypes 1-6. Forty additional genotype 4 samples were tested to explore genotype 4 HCV RNA underquantification.

RESULTS

Qualitative discrepancies were observed for low viral loads (<2 log₁₀ IU/mL) in patients under antiviral therapy and would not have had any impact on patients' management with the current guidelines for the monitoring of patients on direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Quantification results were well correlated (R²=0.89) with an overall minimal quantification bias (mean VERIS - Abbott difference) of -0.09 log₁₀ IU/mL. Quantification agreement for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 samples was excellent, but reached -0.57 log₁₀ IU/mL for 46 genotype 4 samples. A lower quantification bias of -0.24 log₁₀ IU/mL was observed when testing 40 additional genotype 4 samples with a second reagent lot. Underquantification was not associated with 5' untranslated region (UTR) sequence polymorphisms but could be explained by 5' UTR RNA molecular modeling.

CONCLUSION

HCV RNA quantification by the VERIS HCV assay and the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was well correlated for all HCV genotypes, except genotype 4 where 5' UTR RNA folding may impact quantification. Nevertheless, this underestimation of HCV RNA levels had no impact on clinical use.

Prevalence of Diabetes Type 2 in Hepatitis C Infected Patients in Kpk, Pakistan

Hepatitis C (HCV) and diabetes mellitus are the two main health concerns that cause devastating health and financial worries worldwide. It has been observed in the past that both diseases have a high correlation that might be due to the abnormal conditions of the liver. But the mechanism of the prevalence of diabetes in patients with chronic HCV infection still remains unclear. In our study, we have investigated T2DM in the male and female patients at Lady Reading Hospital (LRH), Peshawar. The blood samples of both in- and outpatients were analysed in the PCR laboratories of LRH from December 2014 to April 2015. Great prevalence of diabetes in hepatitis C infected male and female patients was observed during this study. The data were collected from the patients through a preplanned questionnaire that included name of the patient, HCV, being diabetic, age, gender, location, educational background, family history of the disease, other diseases, and any treatments if taken. The results of our study have found 26.42% prevalence of T2DM in HCV infected patients. So we conclude that HCV infection may be one of the reasons that could lead to T2DM.

Differences between quantification of genotype 3 hepatitis C virus RNA by Versions 1.0 and 2.0 of the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test

Background:

Differences between the designs of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load assays can result in genotype-related variability in RNA quantification. We tested paired aliquots of plasma specimens from HCV-infected individuals using two versions (v1.0 and v2.0) of the Roche COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (CAP/CTM HCV) and noted variability between results for a subset of specimens; we then sought to determine whether discrepant results were more prevalent among specific HCV genotypes.

Methods:

Archived and prospectively-collected plasma samples from 114 unique patients were tested using CAP/CTM HCV v1.0 and v2.0. The HCV genotype result for each patient was determined by retrospectively reviewing laboratory records.

Results:

All (46/46) specimens with quantifiable viral loads from patients with genotype 1 or 2 infection had CAP/CTM HCV v1.0 and v2.0 results that were within 0.5 log

Conclusions:

In patients infected with HCV genotype 3, sequential CAP/CTM HCV viral load results should be compared with caution and interpreted in the context of the specific assay version used.

Hepatitis C RNA assay differences in results: Potential implications for shortened therapy and determination of Sustained Virologic Response

Approval of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) includes the truncation of therapy from 12 to 8 weeks in treatment naïve, non-cirrhotic patients with baseline HCV RNA levels <6 million IU/mL (6.8 log10 IU/mL). The aim of this study was to evaluate this clinical cutoff with a different widely used commercially available HCV RNA test. Results from samples tested prospectively with Roche High Pure TaqMan HCV 2.0 test (HPS) were compared to those tested retrospectively with the Abbott RealTime HCV RNA test (ART). Using 6 million IU/mL as the cut-off, pre-treatment results were concordant in 70.4% of cases. When results with the same test measured at screening and baseline, clinical decisions could be impacted in 14.4% and 6.2% of cases for HPS and ART respectively. Using only HCV RNA cutoff of 6 million IU/mL, 29.55% of subjects would receive a different and potentially incorrect treatment duration based solely on HCV RNA test method used. A further 6-14% of subjects would have treatment decision change based on the day the sample was taken.

Applicability of Hepatitis C Virus RNA Viral Load Thresholds for 8-Week Treatments in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection

BACKGROUND

Interferon-free treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection may be shortened to 8 weeks in treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients with baseline HCV RNA levels of <4 or <6 million (M) IU/mL based on post-hoc analyses of phase 3 trial data. The applicability of these viral load thresholds in clinical practice is unknown.

METHODS

Pretreatment and on-treatment serum samples (n = 740) from patients with HCV genotype 1 infection were included for HCV RNA analysis with 2 widely used assays, Cobas AmpliPrep/CobasTaqMan (CAP/CTM) and Abbott RealTime HCV (ART) assays.

RESULTS

HCV RNA levels were significantly higher with CAP/CTM than with ART (overall difference, +0.11 log10 IU/mL; P < .001). In treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, discordance rates around the clinical cutoffs at 4M and 6M IU/mL were 23% and 18%, respectively. The mean differences between assays in discordant samples were 0.38 (4M) and 0.41 (6M) log10 IU/mL, respectively. Overall, 87% and 95% of treatment-naive, noncirrhotic patients, respectively, had baseline HCV RNA levels below 4M and 6M IU/mL with ART. These rates were significantly higher than those measured with CAP/CTM (64% and 78%, respectively; P < .001). Finally, discordance rates around the proposed thresholds in 2 consecutive samples of the same patient were in the range of 1%-2% for ART and 13%-17% for CAP/CTM.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of patients for 8-week regimens on the basis of a single HCV RNA determination may not be reliable because viral load levels around the proposed clinical thresholds show significant interassay and intrapatient variability.

Variation analysis of six HCV viral load assays using low viremic HCV samples in the range of the clinical decision points for HCV protease inhibitors

In the range of clinical decision points for response-guided therapy of HCV, there is still insufficient data concerning the conformity of quantification results obtained by different assays and their correlation with the HPS/CTM v2 assay which was used for initial clinical studies. In a head-to-head comparison, assay accuracy and detection rates of six quantitative assays [artus HCV QS-RGQ, COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HCV v1/v2, High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan (HPS), RealTime HCV, and Versant HCV1.0] were assessed by measuring WHO and PEI standards at dilution steps near clinical decision points. Detection rates and mean differences between assays were evaluated by analyzing twenty clinical samples at 10, 100, and 1,000 IU/mL. Ten replicates from specimens with different HCV genotypes were used to analyze pan-genotypic intra-assay variation. At ≤ 25 IU/mL, RealTime demonstrated the highest detection rates. With 0.1 log difference when testing clinical samples, results obtained from the Versant and RealTime assays matched best with results from HPS. Mean difference analysis across all assay results revealed wide differences between 0.01 and 0.75 log IU/mL. RealTime showed the lowest intra-assay variation across genotypes 1-4 (25, 100, 1,000 IU/mL). There are substantial analytical differences between viral load assays clinicians should be aware of. These variations may have impact on clinical decisions for patients on HCV triple therapy and may argue for assay-specific decision points equivalent to reference values established in studies using HPS. A comparison of quantification is recommended prior to a switch of assays during ongoing therapy.

Diagnosis and Management of Hepatitis C Virus Infection

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects more than 200 million people globally, with increasing incidence, especially in developing countries. HCV infection frequently progresses to chronic liver disease, creating a heavy economic burden on resource-poor countries and lowering patient quality of life. Effective HCV diagnosis, treatment selection, and treatment monitoring are important in stopping disease progression. Serological assays, which detect anti-HCV antibodies in the patient after seroconversion, are used for initial HCV diagnosis. Qualitative and quantitative molecular assays are used to confirm initial diagnosis, determine viral load, and genotype the dominant strain. Viral load and genotype information are used to guide appropriate treatment. Various other biomarker assays are performed to assess liver function and enable disease staging. Most of these diagnostic methods are mature and routinely used in high-resource countries with well-developed laboratory infrastructure. Few technologies, however, are available that address the needs of low-resource areas with high HCV prevalence, such as Africa and Southeast Asia.

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan v2.0 and the Abbott RealTime hepatitis C assays - implications for response-guided therapy in genotype 1 infections

BACKGROUND

With the advent of the protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir a novel therapy approach for HCV genotype 1 infected subjects has become standard of care. Quantification of HCV viral load (VL) represents an important predictor of treatment response.

METHODS

Two different real-time PCR platforms, the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan v2.0 (CAP-CTM v2.0) and the Abbott RealTime (ART) HCV assay are most widely used. We performed a comparative evaluation of both systems focusing on genotype 1 HCV quantification using clinical specimens, the fourth WHO International Standard for HCV and the Paul Ehrlich National Standard, respectively.

RESULTS

The HCV VL assays showed an excellent overall agreement in the clinical specimens studied (R(2)=0.912). Discrepant results were obtained at the low VL end. Four samples tested negative with CAP-CTM v2.0 but were detectable with ART and two samples were undetectable with ART but tested positive with CAP-CTM v2.0. The coefficient of variation in replicate measurements of both reference materials was higher for CAP-CTM v2.0 as compared with ART at the clinical decision point for boceprevir (≥100 IU/ml), but was similar for the two assays at the clinical decision point for telaprevir (≥1,000 IU/ml). The tendency for underestimation of the diluted standards was higher for ART than for CAP-CTM v2.0.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both assays allowed accurate determination of VL levels in clinical samples, careful interpretation of results at the low VL end is essential. Furthermore, discontinuation of therapy based on single HCV RNA measurement should be carefully reconciled, unless the issue of assay variability has been addressed adequately.

Fast, reliable and low cost user-developed protocol for detection, quantification and genotyping of hepatitis C virus

Early detection and genotyping of HCV infection is important for disease management. It is important to develop fast and cost-effective semi-automated techniques allowing an accurate and reproducible detection, quantification and genotyping of HCV. The proposed protocol includes a real-time RT-PCR assay for HCV detection/quantification and a type-specific one-tube RT-PCR assay for genotyping. Both assays detect genotypes 1-4 as intended. The limit of detection was 112IU/ml for the real-time assay and 600±278IU/ml (mean±SD) for the genotyping assay. Concordance between the real-time assay and AMPLICOR HCV v2.0 test was 100%. The real-time assay has wide linear dynamic range of detection and quantification and excellent reproducibility with 2% and 0.75% coefficients of variations, for inter- and intra-assays, respectively. The observed correlation with AMPLICOR HCV Monitor v2.0 kit was linear with the correlation coefficient of 0.988. The diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of the genotyping assay, tested on 102 samples, was 100% and 95%, respectively. The overall procedure of HCV diagnosis is completed within 6h in a closed system with minor contamination risk. In addition to being fast and cost-effective, this approach is reproducible and avoids post-PCR enzymatic and hybridization steps while detecting and genotyping HCV with high clinical sensitivity.

The importance of HCV RNA measurement for tailoring treatment duration

The introduction of telaprevir and boceprevir in the treatment of chronically HCV genotype 1 infected patients has led to substantially improved sustained virologic response rates and shorter treatment duration for a growing group of patients. Management and monitoring of patients receiving protease inhibitor-based triple therapy is of major importance and has become more complicated. Close monitoring of HCV RNA levels for patients on protease inhibitor-based therapy to identify subjects who are eligible for shortening of treatment duration, are virological non-responders or are in danger of experiencing a viral breakthrough is strongly recommended. Several virological tools including qualitative and quantitative HCV RNA assays for detection and quantification of HCV RNA are commercially available. We review these methods and their implications for HCV therapy as well as current sustained virologic response definition, stopping rules and recommendations for protease inhibitor-based treatment durations.

[To consider negative viral loads below the limit of quantification can lead to errors in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatitis C virus infection]

INTRODUCTION

For years many clinical laboratories have routinely classified undetectable and unquantifiable levels of hepatitis C virus RNA (HCV-RNA) determined by RT-PCR as below limit of quantification (BLOQ). This practice might result in erroneous clinical decisions.

AIM

To assess the frequency and clinical relevance of assuming that samples that are BLOQ are negative.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We performed a retrospective analysis of RNA determinations performed between 2009 and 2011 (Cobas/Taqman, lower LOQ: 15 IU/ml). We distinguished between samples classified as «undetectable» and those classified as «<1.50E+01IU/mL» (BLOQ).

RESULTS

We analyzed 2.432 HCV-RNA measurements in 1.371 patients. RNA was BLOQ in 26 samples (1.07%) from 23 patients (1.68%). BLOQ results were highly prevalent among patients receiving Peg-Riba: 23 of 216 samples (10.6%) from 20 of 88 patients receiving treatment (22.7%). The clinical impact of BLOQ RNA samples was as follows: a) 2 patients initially considered to have negative results subsequently showed quantifiable RNA; b) 8 of 9 patients (88.9%) with BLOQ RNA at week 4 of treatment later showed sustained viral response; c) 3 patients with BLOQ RNA at weeks 12 and 48 of treatment relapsed; d) 4 patients with BLOQ RNA at week 24 and/or later had partial or breakthrough treatment responses, and e) in 5 patients the impact were null or could not be ascertained.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that BLOQ HCV-RNA indicates viremia and that equating a BLOQ result with a negative result can lead to treatment errors. BLOQ results are highly prevalent in on-treatment patients. The results of HCV-RNA quantification should be classified clearly, distinguishing between undetectable levels and levels that are BLOQ.

Correlation of viral loads with HCV genotypes: higher levels of virus were revealed among blood donors infected with 6a strains

Background

Both HCV genotypes and viral loads are predictors of therapeutic outcomes among patients treated with α-interferon plus ribavirin; however, such correlation has only been studied for genotypes 1, 2, and 3 but not for genotype 6.

Methodology/Findings

299 voluntary blood donors were recruited who were HCV viremic. Their mean age was 31.8; the male/female ratio was 3.82 (225/59). The viral loads of HCV were measured using the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan test (CAP/CTM) while HCV genotypes were determined by direct sequencing the partial NS5B region. HCV genotypes 1, 2, 3, and 6 were determined in 48.9%, 8.7%, 12.3%, and 30.1% of the donors, respectively, and the levels of mean viral loads in genotype 1 and 6 significantly higher than that of 2 and 3 (P<0.001). As a whole, the viral loads in male donors were higher than in female (P = 0.006). Moreover, the donors' gender and HCV genotypes are independently correlated with the measured viral loads.

Conclusion

HCV genotype 1 and 6 had significantly higher viral loads than genotype 2 and 3.

Direct quantitative analysis of HCV RNA by atomic force microscopy without labeling or amplification

Force-based atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to detect HCV (hepatitis C virus) RNA directly and to quantitatively analyse it without the need for reverse transcription or amplification. Capture and detection DNA probes were designed. The former was spotted onto a substrate with a conventional microarrayer, and the latter was immobilized on an AFM probe. To control the spacing between the immobilized DNAs on the surface, dendron self-assembly was employed. Force-distance curves showed that the mean force of the specific unbinding events was 32 ± 5 pN, and the hydrodynamic distance of the captured RNA was 30-60 nm. Adhesion force maps were generated with criteria including the mean force value, probability of obtaining the specific curves and hydrodynamic distance. The maps for the samples whose concentrations ranged from 0.76 fM to 6.0 fM showed that cluster number has a linear relationship with RNA concentration, while the difference between the observed number and the calculated one increased at low concentrations. Because the detection limit is expected to be enhanced by a factor of 10 000 when a spot of 1 micron diameter is employed, it is believed that HCV RNA of a few copy numbers can be detected by the use of AFM.

The COBAS ® TaqMan ® hepatitis C virus assays: automated systems for accurate and sensitive viral load quantification

In recent years, the real time-based TaqMan(®) technology has allowed the development of highly sensitive hepatitis viral load tests with broad dynamic ranges. The increasing applications of these tests in clinical diagnostics have shown the utility of viral load as a predictive marker of treatment response and proven its key role in invidualized antiviral therapies. Future refinement in viral load assays, including higher sensitivity, genotype inclusivity, standardization and automation, will further foster the concept of personalized healthcare in the clinical management of chronic hepatitis C.

HCV infection among Saudi population: high prevalence of genotype 4 and increased viral clearance rate

HCV is a major etiological agent of liver disease with a high rate of chronic evolution. The virus possesses 6 genotypes with many subtypes. The rate of spontaneous clearance among HCV infected individuals denotes a genetic determinant factor. The current study was designed in order to estimate the rate of HCV infection and ratio of virus clearance among a group of infected patients in Saudi Arabia from 2008 to 2011. It was additionally designed to determine the genotypes of the HCV in persistently infected patients. HCV seroprevalence was conducted on a total of 15,323 individuals. Seropositive individuals were tested by Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay to determine the ratio of persistently infected patients to those who showed spontaneous viral clearance. HCV genotyping on random samples from persistently infected patients were conducted based on the differences in the 5'untranslated region (5'UTR). Anti-HCV antibodies were detected in 7.3% of the totally examined sera. A high percentage of the HCV infected individuals experienced virus clearance (48.4%). HCV genotyping revealed the presence of genotypes 1 and 4, the latter represented 97.6% of the tested strains. Evidences of the widespread of the HCV genotype 4 and a high rate of HCV virus clearance were found in Saudi Arabia.

Genotype 3 diversity and quantification of hepatitis E virus RNA

Genotype 3 hepatitis E viruses (HEVs) are distributed across the world and are now considered to be an emerging public health concern in industrialized countries. At least 10 genotype 3 subtypes have been identified in humans and animals worldwide. It was recently reported that the sensitivities of HEV RNA assays differ greatly. We have assessed the influence of genotype 3 diversity on the performances of two HEV RNA assays: one targeting the ORF3 gene and the other targeting the ORF2 gene. We tested a panel of 5 HEV-positive reference samples of genotypes 3a, 3b, 3c, 3e, and 3f at 10-fold serial dilutions. The HEV RNA concentrations obtained with both reverse transcription (RT)-PCRs were correlated, but the RT-PCR based on ORF2 underestimated the HEV RNA concentrations. The mean [ORF3 - ORF2] difference was 1.41 log copies/ml. We also tested 34 clinical specimens of genotypes 3c (n = 15), 3e (n = 4), and 3f (n = 15), representing the most prevalent subtypes in Europe. The mean [ORF3 - ORF2] differences were 1.41 log copies/ml for genotype 3c, 0.96 log copies/ml for genotype 3e, and 0.70 log copies/ml for genotype 3f. The bias between the 2 RT-PCR assays was significantly greater for genotype 3c than for genotype 3f (P = 0.007). We therefore recommend the use of an RT-PCR protocol based on ORF3 to quantify HEV RNA of genotype 3 strains.

Detection of hepatitis C virus by an improved loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay

An improved, sensitive, specific, and rapid one-step reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay targeting the 5' untranslated region (UTR) was developed to detect hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Based on an accelerating primer (AP), the present assay, named AP-LAMP, has the advantages of rapidity and sensitivity over the routine LAMP method. The possible AP-based amplification pathway during the reaction was revealed by restriction enzyme digestion and eletrophoresis. The detection limit of the AP-LAMP assay was approximately 84 IU/ml, and no cross-detection was observed. The assay was evaluated further with 126 clinical specimens, and the results indicated the suitability and simplicity of the test as a rapid diagnostic tool for detection of HCV RNA.

Multi-center evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for monitoring patients undergoing antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA monitoring during antiviral therapy is essential for early prediction of treatment success and failure to peginterferon alfa/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy.

OBJECTIVES

In this multi-center study we assessed the clinical utility of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for monitoring patients undergoing antiviral therapy for chronic infection with HCV genotypes (GT) 1-3.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed serum from 361 patients with chronic hepatitis C who had been treated with PEG-IFN/RBV. The predictive value of rapid virologic response (RVR), partial (≥2log(10) decline) and complete (HCV-RNA undetectable) early virologic response (pEVR/cEVR) based on RealTime HCV for achieving sustained virologic response was evaluated. In addition, the utility of RealTime HCV to tailor treatment duration according to individual virologic responses was studied in a subset of 136 GT 1 patients and compared to the reference tests, Versant HCV Quantitative 3.0 (bDNA) and Qualitative (TMA) assay.

RESULTS

At week 4 of therapy, patients with RVR had a 100% and 93.5% probability to achieve an SVR in GT 1 and GT 2/3 patients, respectively. At week 12, patients who did not achieve a pEVR had a 97.2% and 100% probability of not achieving an SVR. In addition, assignment of GT 1 patients to abbreviated or extended treatment durations based on low baseline HCV-RNA (<800,000IU/mL) and RVR or pEVR was highly concordant between RealTime HCV and bDNA/TMA assays (97.8% and 91.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The RealTime HCV assay is suitable for monitoring virologic response to PEG-INF/RBV therapy and tailoring treatment duration accordingly.

Development of a second version of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan hepatitis C virus quantitative test with improved genotype inclusivity

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA measurement has been facilitated by the introduction of real-time PCR-based assays with low limits of detection and broad dynamic ranges for quantification. In the present study, the performance of two second-version prototypes of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test (CAP/CTM v2) with decreased sample input volume and improved genotype inclusivity was investigated. A total of 232 serum and plasma samples derived from patients with chronic hepatitis C (genotype 1 [GT1], n = 108; GT2, n = 8; GT3, n = 24; GT4, n = 87; GT5, n = 3; and GT6, n = 2) were processed in parallel with the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Test (CAP/CTM), Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor Test v2.0 (CAM), and two second-version prototype formulations of CAP/CTM, Mastermix 1 (MMx1) and MMx2. In addition, three GT4 transcripts containing rare variant sequences were tested. The mean log(10) HCV RNA differences for the best-performing CAP/CTM v2/MMx2 formulation in comparison to CAM were -0.05, 0.05, -0.12, -0.10, -0.44, and -0.29 for patients with GT1, GT2, GT3, GT4, GT5, and GT6 infections, respectively. GT1, GT2, and GT4 samples including isolates with known variants within the 5' untranslated region (G145A, A165T) that were underquantified with CAP/CTM were correctly quantified with the second-version prototype. In addition, CAP/CTM v2 was able to accurately quantify the three transcripts with rare variant sequences. In conclusion, CAP/CTM v2 accurately quantifies HCV RNA across all HCV genotypes, including specimens with rare polymorphisms previously associated with underquantification.

How to use virological tools for the optimal management of chronic hepatitis C

Approximately 180 million individuals are chronically infected with hepatitis C, which is strongly associated with the development of cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Several virological tools (anti-HCV antibody assays, measurement of HCV-RNA, HCV-genotyping) are useful in management of hepatitis C infected patients. The primary goal of antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C is a sustained virological response (SVR). The HCV genotype should be determined in every patient considered for antiviral therapy because the currently recommended treatment duration and ribavirin doses differ among HCV genotypes. Exact subtyping might gain increased importance for future therapies with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAA) because of differences of antiviral activities and barriers to resistance among HCV subtypes. Monitoring HCV RNA by a highly sensitive assay (LOD ≤ 15 IU/ml) is the basis for management of response guided therapy of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated IFN plus ribavirin. Rules for early discontinuation of antiviral therapy in non-responders and determination of optimal treatment durations in virologic responders have been developed for application of individualized treatment strategies.

Performance of the COBAS® AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan® automated system for hepatitis C virus (HCV) quantification in a multi-center comparison

BACKGROUND

Quantitative HCV RNA testing is considered standard of care for monitoring during treatment of patients infected with HCV. The COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HCV Test fully automates specimen processing and reaction assembly for HCV viral load testing using reverse transcription and real-time PCR amplification.

OBJECTIVES

The performance of the COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HCV Test was evaluated in a multi-center study.

STUDY DESIGN

Typical plasma based specimens were tested for accuracy, analytic range of measurement, reproducibility and genotype specific quantitation.

RESULTS

Linear regression analysis of the quantitative results demonstrated a linear range of detection from 50 to 5 million (1.7-6.7 log(10))IU/mL and a coefficient of determination (R(2)) of 0.9948. The precision of the assay was highly reproducible within and between runs and among laboratories with coefficients of variance (CV) ranging from 6.7% to 40.0% across the seven laboratories. A representative sample for each of the six major HCV genotypes demonstrated reproducible quantitation between the seven laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

The COBAS(®) AmpliPrep/COBAS(®) TaqMan(®) HCV Test is a reliable and sensitive assay for HCV RNA quantitation.

A novel duplex real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of hepatitis C viral RNA with armored RNA as internal control

BACKGROUND

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome is extremely heterogeneous. Several HCV infections can not be detected using currently available commercial assays, probably because of mismatches between the template and primers/probes. By aligning the HCV sequences, we developed a duplex real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay using 2 sets of primers/probes and a specific armored RNA as internal control. The 2 detection probes were labelled with the same fluorophore, namely, 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), at the 5' end; these probes could mutually combine, improving the power of the test.

RESULTS

The limit of detection of the duplex primer/probe assay was 38.99 IU/ml. The sensitivity of the assay improved significantly, while the specificity was not affected. All HCV genotypes in the HCV RNA Genotype Panel for Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques could be detected. In the testing of 109 serum samples, the performance of the duplex real-time RT-PCR assay was identical to that of the COBAS AmpliPrep (CAP)/COBAS TaqMan (CTM) assay and superior to 2 commercial HCV assay kits.

CONCLUSIONS

The duplex real-time RT-PCR assay is an efficient and effective viral assay. It is comparable with the CAP/CTM assay with regard to the power of the test and is appropriate for blood-donor screening and laboratory diagnosis of HCV infection.

Definition of rapid virologic response with a highly sensitive real-time PCR-based HCV RNA assay in peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin response-guided therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Assessing hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA levels is integral to response-guided therapy. Rules for early discontinuation and determination of treatment duration were mainly established with HCV-RNA assays with a detection limit of 50IU/ml (COBAS Amplicor HCV [CA]). The currently used real-time PCR-based COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS-TaqMan HCV (CAP-CTM) test has a detection limit of approximately 10IU/ml. It is unknown whether shortening of treatment duration to 16/24 weeks in patients with rapid virological response at week 4 (RVR) and viral loads between 10 and 50IU/ml is possible.

METHODS

We reanalysed stored serum from two large, multinational, randomized trials in which patients were treated with peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin (n=962). Results of CAP-CTM with truly undetectable HCV RNA and those <15IU/ml, which includes patients with residual viraemia (<15), were compared with the originally obtained results using the CA assay.

RESULTS

RVR rates were comparable for CA (<50) and CAP-CTM (<15) with 32% and 32% for genotype (gt) 1 and 50% and 49% for gt2/3 patients, respectively. A significantly smaller number of samples really had truly undetectable HCV RNA by the CAP-CTM assay (24% for gt1, 37% for gt2/3). However, sustained virological response rates after shortened treatment (16/24weeks) were not significantly different in patients with a RVR <50, a RVR <15 and RVR undetectable (82%, 83%, 83% for 24weeks gt1 and 95%, 95%, 94% for 16weeks gt2/3).

CONCLUSIONS

Shortening the treatment duration to 16/24weeks can be performed on the basis of a RVR with HCV-RNA concentrations <15IU/ml by the CAP-CTM assay.

Clinical performances of two real-time PCR assays and bDNA/TMA to early monitor treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Early viral monitoring is essential for the management of treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C. A variety of commercially available assays are now available to quantify HCV-RNA in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

Compare the clinical results of 3 commercially available assays to evaluate the positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 and early virological response (EVR) at week 12.

STUDY DESIGN

287 patients treated with standard care regimen combination therapy were studied. HCV-RNA values measured at baseline, week 4, week 12 with VERSANT HCV 3.0 Assay (bDNA), and VERSANT HCV-RNA Qualitative Assay (TMA) (bDNA/TMA); COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS/TaqMan (CAP/CTM) and Abbott m2000sp extraction/m2000rt amplification system (ART). RVR was defined as undetectable serum HCV-RNA and EVR as a > OR =2 log decline in baseline viral load (BLV).

RESULTS

Median (range) BVLs were: 5.585(2.585-6.816), 5.189(2.792-7.747) and 4.804(2.380-6.580) log(10)IU/ml, with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p<0.01); RVR was observed in 22%, 30% and 27% of the patients and PPVs were 97%, 91% and 94% with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p=0.317). EVR was observed in 76%, 73% and 67% of the patients and NPVs were 93%, 83% and 79% with bDNA/TMA, CAP/CTM and ART, respectively (p=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment monitoring should include both detection of serum HCV-RNA at week 4 to predict SVR and at week 12 to predict non-SVR. The value of all 3 assays was similar for evaluating RVR or EVR. Because of viral load discrepancies the same assay should be used throughout patient treatment follow-up.

Hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation in venous and capillary small-volume whole-blood samples

Quantitation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in plasma and serum samples is a costly procedure in both time and reagents. Additionally, cell-associated viral RNA may not be detected. This study evaluated the accuracy of HCV RNA quantitation in small-volume whole-blood (WB) samples, which would be appropriate for point-of-care diagnostic devices. HCV RNA was extracted from 222 clinical plasma and WB samples of 82 patients with chronic hepatitis C by a specific locked nucleic acid-mediated capture method and quantified by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. The results were compared to the reference plasma viral load determined with the COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan (CAP/CTM) HCV test. This assay had an analytical sensitivity of 9 IU per 10-microl sample (95% limit of detection [95% LOD]), a linearity range of 500 to 5 x 10(6) IU/ml, and was accurate in testing 10 HCV subtypes (<0.22 log10 unit) in plasma. The assay was matrix equivalent for plasma and WB samples (coefficient of determination [R2] of 0.943) and had a specificity of 100% (n = 20) in WB samples. The HCV RNA concentration in clinical WB samples exceeded the estimated hematocrit-corrected plasma viral loads by 0.22 log10 unit, but absolute quantitation results in plasma and WB samples were identical (95% confidence interval, -0.06 to 0.04 log10 unit). The sensitivity in WB samples was 100% (n = 141) for plasma concentrations above the 95% LOD. Quantitation results in 10-microl WB samples correlated linearly with the CAP/CTM HCV plasma test results (R2 = 0.919; n = 140) and did not differ between capillary and venous samples (R2 = 0.960; n = 40). This study shows that HCV RNA quantitation in 10-microl WB samples is appropriate for monitoring viral loads of >900 IU/ml, although the use of WB does not increase the diagnostic sensitivity.

Evaluation of the Abbott investigational use only RealTime hepatitis C virus (HCV) assay and comparison to the Roche TaqMan HCV analyte-specific reagent assay

The accurate and sensitive measurement of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is essential for the clinical management and treatment of infected patients and as a research tool for studying the biology of HCV infection. We evaluated the linearity, reproducibility, precision, limit of detection, and concordance of viral genotype quantitation of the Abbott investigational use only RealTime HCV (RealTime) assay using the Abbott m2000 platform and compared the results to those of the Roche TaqMan Analyte-Specific Reagent (TaqMan) and Bayer Versant HCV bDNA 3.0 assay. Comparison of 216 samples analyzed by RealTime and TaqMan assays produced the following Deming regression equation: RealTime = 0.940 (TaqMan) + 0.175 log(10) HCV RNA IU/ml. The average difference between the assays was 0.143 log(10) RNA IU/ml and was consistent across RealTime's dynamic range of nearly 7 log(10) HCV RNA IU/ml. There was no significant difference between genotypes among these samples. The limit of detection using eight replicates of the World Health Organization HCV standard was determined to be 7.74 HCV RNA IU/ml by probit analysis. Replicate measurements of commercial genotype panels were significantly higher than TaqMan measurements for most samples and showed that the RealTime assay is able to detect all genotypes with no bias. Additionally, we showed that the amplicon generated by the widely used Roche COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0, can act as a template in the RealTime assay, but potential cross-contamination could be mitigated by treatment with uracil-N-glycosylase. In conclusion, the RealTime assay accurately measured HCV viral loads over a broad dynamic range, with no significant genotype bias.

A proficiency testing study to evaluate laboratory performance for the detection of different genotypes of parvovirus B19

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In Europe, it is a regulatory requirement that parvovirus B19 (B19V) DNA nucleic acid amplification technique-based testing is performed on plasma pools for certain classes of plasma-derived medicinal products. This proficiency testing study set out to examine the ability of public quality control laboratories and plasma fractionation organizations to detect different genotypes of B19V using nucleic acid amplification technique-based assays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laboratories were supplied with cloned DNAs representing the main genotypes of B19V. All samples were adjusted to equivalent copy number and were distributed as part of a routine external quality assessment programme investigating the evaluation of B19V containing plasma samples by these laboratories. The plasmid clones were distributed to 25 laboratories, representing 13 quality control laboratories and 12 manufacturers of plasma derivatives. The criteria for acceptable detection of the different genotypes of B19V DNA was based upon the maximum theoretical efficiency for polymerase chain reaction amplification. Proficient laboratories were deemed to be those reporting results within 1 log(10) dilution for each of the different virus genotypes.

RESULTS

Data were returned by 23 of the participating laboratories. Some laboratories returned data for more than one type of assay and in total 27 data sets were analysed. Nine of the participating laboratories were able to successfully detect all the virus genotypes according to the applied criteria, all except one used in-house assays.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study highlight that there are still discrepancies in the detection of a broad spectrum of B19V genotypes, with implications for batch release testing.

A novel diagnostic target in the hepatitis C virus genome

BACKGROUND

Detection and quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA is integral to diagnostic and therapeutic regimens. All molecular assays target the viral 5'-noncoding region (5'-NCR), and all show genotype-dependent variation of sensitivities and viral load results. Non-western HCV genotypes have been under-represented in evaluation studies. An alternative diagnostic target region within the HCV genome could facilitate a new generation of assays.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

In this study we determined by de novo sequencing that the 3'-X-tail element, characterized significantly later than the rest of the genome, is highly conserved across genotypes. To prove its clinical utility as a molecular diagnostic target, a prototype qualitative and quantitative test was developed and evaluated multicentrically on a large and complete panel of 725 clinical plasma samples, covering HCV genotypes 1-6, from four continents (Germany, UK, Brazil, South Africa, Singapore). To our knowledge, this is the most diversified and comprehensive panel of clinical and genotype specimens used in HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) validation to date. The lower limit of detection (LOD) was 18.4 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, 15.3-24.1 IU/ml), suggesting applicability in donor blood screening. The upper LOD exceeded 10(-9) IU/ml, facilitating viral load monitoring within a wide dynamic range. In 598 genotyped samples, quantified by Bayer VERSANT 3.0 branched DNA (bDNA), X-tail-based viral loads were highly concordant with bDNA for all genotypes. Correlation coefficients between bDNA and X-tail NAT, for genotypes 1-6, were: 0.92, 0.85, 0.95, 0.91, 0.95, and 0.96, respectively; X-tail-based viral loads deviated by more than 0.5 log10 from 5'-NCR-based viral loads in only 12% of samples (maximum deviation, 0.85 log10). The successful introduction of X-tail NAT in a Brazilian laboratory confirmed the practical stability and robustness of the X-tail-based protocol. The assay was implemented at low reaction costs (US$8.70 per sample), short turnover times (2.5 h for up to 96 samples), and without technical difficulties.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates a way to fundamentally improve HCV viral load monitoring and infection screening. Our prototype assay can serve as a template for a new generation of viral load assays. Additionally, to our knowledge this study provides the first open protocol to permit industry-grade HCV detection and quantification in resource-limited settings.

Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C

The current preferred treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is combination therapy consisting of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV) for 24-48 weeks. Although this approach appears to be highly effective for patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, who have a sustained virological response (SVR) of approximately 80%, the treatment algorithm is less effective for patients with HCV genotype 1, as these patients have SVR rates of just 40-50%. In order to improve treatment outcomes, this article explores potential approaches for the optimization of treatment for patients with HCV genotype 1: considering shorter treatment periods for patients with a rapid virological response (RVR), increasing treatment periods for slow responders, and increasing RBV dose are all suggestions. Results from clinical trials suggest that approximately 20% of the HCV genotype 1-infected population are slow responders, and around 15% of all HCV genotype-1 infected patients could benefit from a shorter treatment duration without compromising the SVR rate. Interest has also focused on whether treatment duration could be individualized in some patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection. Here all the findings from recent studies are translated into practical advice, to help practitioners make evidence-based treatment decisions in everyday clinical practice. Although there are areas where currently available data do not provide conclusive evidence to suggest amending treatment approaches, there is clearly potential for individualized treatment in all aspects of hepatitis treatment in the future.

Detection and quantification of serum or plasma HCV RNA: mini review of commercially available assays

The treatment schedule (combination of compounds, doses, and duration) and the virological follow-up for management of antiviral treatment in patients chronically infected by HCV is now well standardized, but to ensure good monitoring of the treated patients, physicians need rapid, reproducible, and sensitive molecular virological tools with a wide range of detection and quantification of HCV RNA in blood samples. Several assays for detection and/or quantification of HCV RNA are currently commercially available. Here, all these assays are detailed, and a brief description of each step of the assay is provided. They are divided into two categories by method: those based on signal amplification and those based on target amplification. These two categories are then divided into qualitative, quantitative, and quantitative detection assays. The real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based assays are the most promising strategy in the HCV virological area.

Clinical performance evaluation of four automated chemiluminescence immunoassays for hepatitis C virus antibody detection

Various automated chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) analyzers for the detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) are now commercially available in clinical laboratories and are replacing conventional enzyme immunoassays. We investigated the performance of four anti-HCV CLIAs (the Architect Anti-HCV assay on the Architect i2000 system, the Vitros Anti-HCV assay on the Vitros ECiQ Immunodiagnostic System, the Access HCV Ab PLUS assay on the UniCel DxI 800 analyzer, and the newly developed Elecsys Anti-HCV assay on the Cobas e 411 analyzer). The total percent coefficient of variation values of imprecision were 3.5 to 5.7% with positive control materials and 7.2 to 10.2% with negative control materials. The agreement between the results of the Elecsys, Architect, Vitros, and Access CLIAs ranged from 94.5 to 98.1%. The clinical sensitivity of all CLIAs was 100%. Each CLIA showed excellent reproducibility and clinical sensitivity. The Elecsys, Architect, Vitros, and Access CLIAs showed clinical specificities of 98.2, 98.8, 96.5, and 98.2%.

Treatment predictors of a sustained virologic response in hepatitis B and C

Treatment predictors are important tools for the management of therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection. In chronic hepatitis B, several pretreatment parameters have been identified for prediction of virologic response to interferon alfa-based antiviral therapies or treatment with polymerase inhibitors. In interferon alfa and pegylated interferon alfa-treated patients, low baseline HBV DNA concentrations, HBV genotype A (B), and high baseline ALT levels are significantly associated with treatment response. In patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogues, low baseline HBV DNA but not viral genotype is positively associated with virologic response. During treatment the best predictor of response is HBV DNA kinetics. Early viral suppression is associated with favourable virologic response and reduced risk for subsequent resistance mutations. For the current standard treatment with pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C, infection with HCV genotypes 2 and 3, baseline viral load below 400,000-800,000 IU/ml, Asian and Caucasian ethnicity, younger age, low GGT levels, absence of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, and absence of steatosis in the liver have been identified as independent pretreatment predictors of a sustained virologic response. After initiation of treatment, initial viral decline with undetectable HCV-RNA at week 4 of therapy (RVR) is the best predictor of sustained virologic response independent of HCV genotype.