Nonpermissive infection of L cells by an avian reovirus: restricted transcription of the viral genome

Avian Reovirus: From Molecular Biology to Pathogenesis and Control

Avian reoviruses (ARVs) represent a significant economic burden on the poultry industry due to their widespread prevalence and potential pathogenicity. These viruses, capable of infecting a diverse range of avian species, can lead to a variety of clinical manifestations, most notably tenosynovitis/arthritis. While many ARV strains are asymptomatic, pathogenic variants can cause severe inflammation and tissue damage in organs such as the tendons, heart, and liver. In broilers and turkeys, ARVs can induce severe arthritis/tenosynovitis, characterized by swollen hock joints and lesions in the gastrocnemius tendons. Additionally, ARVs have been implicated in other diseases, although their precise role in these conditions remains to be fully elucidated. In recent years, ARV cases have surged in the United States, emphasizing the need for effective control measures. Routine vaccination with commercial or autogenous vaccines is currently the primary strategy for mitigating ARV's impact. Future research efforts should focus on enhancing our understanding of ARV-induced pathogenesis, identifying host factors that influence disease severity, and developing novel vaccines based on ongoing surveillance of circulating ARV strains. This review aims to explore the molecular aspects of ARV, including virus structure, replication, molecular epidemiology, the roles of its encoded proteins in host pathogenesis, and the immune response to ARV infection. Furthermore, we discuss the diagnostic approaches of avian reovirus and the potential biosecurity measures and vaccination trials in combating ARV and developing effective antiviral strategies.

Avian reovirus: Structure and biology

Avian reoviruses are important pathogens that cause considerable losses to the poultry industry, but they have been poorly characterized at the molecular level in the past, mostly because they have been considered to be very similar to the well-studied mammalian reoviruses. Studies performed over the last 20 years have revealed that avian reoviruses have unique properties and activities, different to those displayed by their mammalian counterparts, and of considerable interest to molecular virologists. Notably, the avian reovirus S1 gene is unique, in that it is a functional tricistronic gene that possesses three out-of-phase and partially overlapping open reading frames; the identification of the mechanisms that govern the initiation of translation of the three S1 cistrons, and the study of the properties and activities displayed by their encoded proteins, are particularly interesting areas of research. For instance, avian reoviruses are one of the few nonenveloped viruses that cause cell-cell fusion, and their fusogenic phenotype has been associated with a nonstructural 10 kDa transmembrane protein, which is expressed by the second cistron of the S1 gene; the small size of this atypical fusion protein offers an interesting model for studying the mechanisms of cell-cell fusion and for identifying fusogenic domains. Finally, avian reoviruses are highly resistant to interferon, and therefore they may be useful for investigating the mechanisms and strategies that viruses utilize to counteract the antiviral actions of interferons.

Persistent infection promotes cross-species transmissibility of mouse hepatitis virus

Persistent infection with mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) strain A59 in murine DBT (delayed brain tumor) cells resulted in the emergence of host range variants, designated V51A and V51B, at 210 days postinfection. These host range mutants replicated efficiently in normally nonpermissive Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), in human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2), and to a lesser extent in human breast carcinoma (MCF7) cell lines. Little if any replication was noted in baby hamster kidney (BHK), green African monkey kidney (COS-7), feline kidney (CRFK), and swine testicular (ST) cell lines. By fluorescent antibody (FA) staining, persistent viruses V10B and V30B, isolated at days 38 and 119 days postinfection, also demonstrated very low levels of replication in human HepG2 cells. These data suggest that persistence may rapidly select for host range expansion of animal viruses. Pretreatment of HepG2 cells with a polyclonal antibody directed against human carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) or with some monoclonal antibodies (Col-1, Col-4, Col-12, and Col-14) that bind human CEA significantly inhibited V51B infection. Under identical conditions, little or no blockade was evident with other monoclonal antibodies (kat4c or Col-6) which also bind the human CEA glycoproteins. In addition, an antibody (EDDA) directed against irrelevant antigens did not block V51B replication. Pretreatment with the Col-4 and Col-14 antibodies did not block Sindbis virus replication in HepG2 cells or MHV infection in DBT cells, suggesting that one or more CEA glycoproteins likely functioned as receptors for V51B entry into human cell lines. To test this hypothesis, the human biliary glycoprotein (Bgp) and CEA genes were cloned and expressed in normally nonpermissive BHK cell lines by using noncytopathic Sindbis virus replicons (pSinRep19). By growth curves and FA staining, human CEA and to a much lesser extent human Bgp functioned as receptors for V51B entry. Furthermore, V51B replication was blocked with polyclonal antiserum directed against human CEA and Bgp. Under identical conditions, the parental MHV strain A59 failed to replicate in BHK cells expressing human Bgp or CEA. These data suggest that MHV persistence may promote virus cross-species transmissibility by selecting for virus variants that recognize phylogenetic homologues of the normal receptor.

Avian reovirus S1133 can replicate in mouse L cells: effect of pH and cell attachment status on viral infection

Previous reports have suggested that avian reovirus S1133 fails to replicate in mouse L cells. In this article, we report that replication does occur under certain culture conditions. The avian reovirus was found to grow in mouse L cells at pH 6.4 and 7.2 but not at pH 8.2. Culture medium with a basic pH directly inhibited viral transcription and genome replication. As a result, viral protein synthesis was also affected. At permissive pH levels, avian reovirus grew better in monolayers than in suspension cultures of L cells because of the influence of cell attachment status on viral macromolecular synthesis. Our results not only show that avian reovirus can replicate in mouse L cells but also help to explain why it did not in previous studies.

The stimulatory effect of actinomycin D on avian reovirus replication in L cells suggests that translational competition dictates the fate of the infection

Indirect immunostaining of avian reovirus S1133-infected L-cell monolayers showed that most of the cells can support viral replication. However, the number of cells in which the virus was actually replicating depended on the multiplicity of virus infection. The presence of actinomycin D during infection increased viral protein synthesis, viral growth, and the number of actively infected cells at late infection times. The antibiotic elicited these effects by triggering viral replication in cells that already contained unproductive cytoplasmic virus but that would not get productively infected in the absence of the drug. From these results, we propose a model for the interaction between L cells and avian reovirus S1133 in which viral versus host mRNA competition for the translational machinery determines the fate of the virus infection.

Avian reovirus mRNAs are nonfunctional in infected mouse cells: translational basis for virus host-range restriction

Avian reovirus S1133 penetrates and uncoats in suspension cultures of mouse L cells. The multiple species of viral transcripts are produced in the cytoplasm of the infected cell, but they fail to associate with polysomes, consistent with the absence of viral protein synthesis. The selective block in avian virus mRNA translation is not overcome by coinfection with mammalian reovirus type 3, which replicates in mouse L cells, or by hypertonic shock or exposure to a low concentration of cycloheximide. Although the avian viral transcripts are inactive in vivo, RNA extracted from infected, nonpermissive L cells directs the synthesis of a normal spectrum of viral proteins in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. These results indicate that avian viral transcription is not restricted in mouse cells and that viral replication is prevented at the level of initiation of protein synthesis.

In vitro characterization of an avian reovirus vaccine strain

In vitro studies were performed to characterize the vaccine strain, designated P100, derived from the arthrogenic reovirus isolate, S1133, by cold adaptation. P100 appeared to be temperature sensitive, shown by a marked drop in titer and efficiency of plaquing after incubation at 41 degrees. Studies indicated that genomic double-stranded RNA and protein synthesis were severely restricted at the elevated temperature. Differences in the growth behavior of P100 and S1133 at 37 degrees were also noted. The vaccine strain seemed to be more cell associated than S1133. Three outer coat proteins of P100 grown at 37 degrees displayed mobilities different from those of S1133 by PAGE. It is possible that alterations in these proteins may have some relationship to the growth characteristics observed for the P100 strain.

Structure and function of the reovirus genome

Images

Small reovirus particle composed solely of sigma NS with specificity for binding different nucleic acids

We reported previously that polycytidylate [poly(C)]-dependent RNA polymerase activity was a property of small spherical or triangular reovirus-specific particles which sedimented at 13 to 19S and were composed solely of the reovirus protein, sigma NS. Depending on the fraction of cellular extracts from which they were obtained, these particles exhibited marked differences in stability. Most 13 to 19S particles from a particular fraction repeatedly disaggregated into smaller 4 to 5S subunits with no enzymatic activity. Disruption of many particles could be prevented and polymerase activity retained after these particles had bound different single-stranded (ss) RNAs. Our previous results indicated that there was heterogeneity among the 13 to 19S particles in that possession of poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase activity was a property of only some. Support for this heterogeneity was derived from the demonstration in this report that there were at least three types of binding sites present within particles in any purified preparation: (i) those binding only poly(C); (ii) those binding only reovirus ss RNAs; and (iii) those binding one or the other, but not both at the same time. It is suggested that only those particles able to bind either poly(C) or reovirus ss RNAs had poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase activity, as reovirus ss RNAs markedly inhibited the polymerase activity. All three size classes of reovirus ss RNAs were equally effective in binding, but once bound, they were not copied. It is possible that heterogeneity in binding capacity of different particles comprised of only one protein, sigma NS, could result from the ability of subunits containing this protein to assemble into slightly different 13 to 19S particles with specificity of binding or polymerase activity conferred by the configuration of the assembled particles. The high capacity of sigma NS to bind many different nucleic acids with some specificity suggests that these particles may act during infection as condensing agents to bring together 10 reovirus ss RNA templates in preparation for double-stranded RNA synthesis.

Small reovirus-specific particle with polycytidylate-dependent RNA polymerase activity

We previously reported that virus-specific particles with polycytidylate [poly(C)]-dependent RNA polymerase activity accumulated at 30 degrees C in reovirus-infected cells. These particles sedimented heterogeneously from 300 to 550S and traversed through a 40% glycerol cushion to the pellet in 3 h at 190,000 x g. In the present report, we found that smaller particles with poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase activity remained in the glycerol cushion. These smaller, enzymatically active particles, when purified, sedimented at 15 to 1S. They were spherical or triangular with a diameter of 11 to 12 nm. They were comprised mostly, and likely solely, of one reovirus protein, sigma NS. No particles with poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase activity were found in mock-infected cells. Chromatography on the cation exchanger, CM-Sephadex, ascertained that sigma NS was the poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase and showed its existence in two forms. In one form, it was enzymatically active and eluted from the column at 0.5 M KCl. In the enzymatically inactive state, it did not bind to the column. Our results suggest that the enzymatically active form of sigma NS carries a greater net positive charge than the inactive form. They also suggest that both forms of sigma NS are associated with a particle which has poly(C)-dependent RNA polymerase activity.