The properties of a tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Drosophila melanogaster support an evolutionary link between pre-mRNA editing and tRNA modification

RNA modifications: importance in immune cell biology and related diseases

RNA modifications have become hot topics recently. By influencing RNA processes, including generation, transportation, function, and metabolization, they act as critical regulators of cell biology. The immune cell abnormality in human diseases is also a research focus and progressing rapidly these years. Studies have demonstrated that RNA modifications participate in the multiple biological processes of immune cells, including development, differentiation, activation, migration, and polarization, thereby modulating the immune responses and are involved in some immune related diseases. In this review, we present existing knowledge of the biological functions and underlying mechanisms of RNA modifications, including N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A), 5-methylcytosine (m⁵C), N¹-methyladenosine (m¹A), N⁷-methylguanosine (m⁷G), N⁴-acetylcytosine (ac⁴C), pseudouridine (Ψ), uridylation, and adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, and summarize their critical roles in immune cell biology. Via regulating the biological processes of immune cells, RNA modifications can participate in the pathogenesis of immune related diseases, such as cancers, infection, inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. We further highlight the challenges and future directions based on the existing knowledge. All in all, this review will provide helpful knowledge as well as novel ideas for the researchers in this area.

3' Untranslated Regions Are Modular Entities That Determine Polyadenylation Profiles

The 3' ends of eukaryotic mRNAs are generated by cleavage of nascent transcripts followed by polyadenylation, which occurs at numerous sites within 3' untranslated regions (3' UTRs) but rarely within coding regions. An individual gene can yield many 3'-mRNA isoforms with distinct half-lives. We dissect the relative contributions of protein-coding sequences (open reading frames [ORFs]) and 3' UTRs to polyadenylation profiles in yeast. ORF-deleted derivatives often display strongly decreased mRNA levels, indicating that ORFs contribute to overall mRNA stability. Poly(A) profiles, and hence relative isoform half-lives, of most (9 of 10) ORF-deleted derivatives are very similar to their wild-type counterparts. Similarly, in-frame insertion of a large protein-coding fragment between the ORF and 3' UTR has minimal effect on the poly(A) profile in all 15 cases tested. Last, reciprocal ORF/3'-UTR chimeric genes indicate that the poly(A) profile is determined by the 3' UTR. Thus, 3' UTRs are self-contained modular entities sufficient to determine poly(A) profiles and relative 3'-isoform half-lives. In the one atypical instance, ORF deletion causes an upstream shift of poly(A) sites, likely because juxtaposition of an unusually high AT-rich stretch directs polyadenylation closely downstream. This suggests that long AT-rich stretches, which are not encountered until after coding regions, are important for restricting polyadenylation to 3' UTRs.

Human tRNAs with inosine 34 are essential to efficiently translate eukarya-specific low-complexity proteins

The modification of adenosine to inosine at the wobble position (I34) of tRNA anticodons is an abundant and essential feature of eukaryotic tRNAs. The expansion of inosine-containing tRNAs in eukaryotes followed the transformation of the homodimeric bacterial enzyme TadA, which generates I34 in tRNAArg and tRNALeu, into the heterodimeric eukaryotic enzyme ADAT, which modifies up to eight different tRNAs. The emergence of ADAT and its larger set of substrates, strongly influenced the tRNA composition and codon usage of eukaryotic genomes. However, the selective advantages that drove the expansion of I34-tRNAs remain unknown. Here we investigate the functional relevance of I34-tRNAs in human cells and show that a full complement of these tRNAs is necessary for the translation of low-complexity protein domains enriched in amino acids cognate for I34-tRNAs. The coding sequences for these domains require codons translated by I34-tRNAs, in detriment of synonymous codons that use other tRNAs. I34-tRNA-dependent low-complexity proteins are enriched in functional categories related to cell adhesion, and depletion in I34-tRNAs leads to cellular phenotypes consistent with these roles. We show that the distribution of these low-complexity proteins mirrors the distribution of I34-tRNAs in the phylogenetic tree.

Identification and expression of adenosine deaminases acting on tRNA (ADAT) during early tail regeneration of the earthworm

BACKGROUND

RNA editing is a widespread phenomenon in all metazoans. One of the common RNA editing event is the chemical conversion of adenosine to inosine (A-to-I) catalyzed by adenosine deaminases acting on tRNA (ADAT). During D. melanogaster development, the ADAT1 transcript was found to localize mainly to the central nervous system including brain and ventral nerve cord during brain development. Although an earthworm adenosine deaminases acting on mRNA (ADAR) has been identified and its possible implication in earthworm regeneration has been investigated, there is little accumulated information on ADAT and tRNA editing in the annelid including terrestrial earthworms.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics and the expression pattern of earthworm ADAT during tail regeneration to understand its physiological significance.

METHODS

Nucleotide sequence of Ean-ADAT was retrieved from the genome assembly of Eisenia andrei via Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST). The genome assembly of Eisenia andrei was downloaded from National Genomics Data Center ( http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gwh/ ). The alignment and phylogenetic relationship of the core deaminase domains of ADATs and ADARs were analyzed. Its temporal expression during early tail regeneration was measured using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

The open reading frame of Ean-ADAT consists of 1719 nucleotides encoding 573 amino acids. Domain analysis indicates that Ean-ADAT has a deaminase domain composed of 498 amino acids and a predicted nuclear localization signal at the N-terminal. Its subcellular localization was predicted to be nuclear. The core deaminase region of Ean-ADAT encompasses the three active-site motifs, including zinc-chelating residues and a glutamate residue for catalytic activity. In addition, Ean-ADAT shares highly conserved RNA recognition region flanking the third cysteine of the deaminase motif with other ADAT1s even from the yeast. Multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis indicate that Ean-ADAT shows greater similarity to vertebrate ADARs than to yeast Tad1p. Ean-ADAT mRNA expression began to remarkably decrease before 12 h post-amputation, showing a tendency to gradual decrease until 7 dpa and then it slightly rebounded at 10 dpa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that Ean-ADAT belongs to a class of ADAT1s and support the hypothesis of a common evolutionary origin for ADARs and ADATs. The temporal expression of Ean-ADAT could suggest that its activity is unrelated to the molecular mechanisms of dedifferentiation.

Evidence of multifaceted functions of codon usage in translation within the model beetle Tribolium castaneum

Synonymous codon use is non-random. Codons most used in highly transcribed genes, often called optimal codons, typically have high gene counts of matching tRNA genes (tRNA abundance) and promote accurate and/or efficient translation. Non-optimal codons, those least used in highly expressed genes, may also affect translation. In multicellular organisms, codon optimality may vary among tissues. At present, however, tissue specificity of codon use remains poorly understood. Here, we studied codon usage of genes highly transcribed in germ line (testis and ovary) and somatic tissues (gonadectomized males and females) of the beetle Tribolium castaneum. The results demonstrate that: (i) the majority of optimal codons were organism-wide, the same in all tissues, and had numerous matching tRNA gene copies (Opt-codon_↑tRNAs), consistent with translational selection; (ii) some optimal codons varied among tissues, suggesting tissue-specific tRNA populations; (iii) wobble tRNA were required for translation of certain optimal codons (Opt-codon_wobble), possibly allowing precise translation and/or protein folding; and (iv) remarkably, some non-optimal codons had abundant tRNA genes (Nonopt-codon_↑tRNAs), and genes using those codons were tightly linked to ribosomal and stress-response functions. Thus, Nonopt-codon_↑tRNAs codons may regulate translation of specific genes. Together, the evidence suggests that codon use and tRNA genes regulate multiple translational processes in T. castaneum.

RNA modifications in structure prediction - Status quo and future challenges

Chemical modifications of RNA nucleotides change their identity and characteristics and thus alter genetic and structural information encoded in the genomic DNA. tRNA and rRNA are probably the most heavily modified genes, and often depend on derivatization or isomerization of their nucleobases in order to correctly fold into their functional structures. Recent RNomics studies, however, report transcriptome wide RNA modification and suggest a more general regulation of structuredness of RNAs by this so called epitranscriptome. Modification seems to require specific substrate structures, which in turn are stabilized or destabilized and thus promote or inhibit refolding events of regulatory RNA structures. In this review, we revisit RNA modifications and the related structures from a computational point of view. We discuss known substrate structures, their properties such as sub-motifs as well as consequences of modifications on base pairing patterns and possible refolding events. Given that efficient RNA structure prediction methods for canonical base pairs have been established several decades ago, we review to what extend these methods allow the inclusion of modified nucleotides to model and study epitranscriptomic effects on RNA structures.

Integrated tRNA, transcript, and protein profiles in response to steroid hormone signaling

The accurate and efficient transfer of genetic information into amino acid sequences is carried out through codon-anticodon interactions between mRNA and tRNA, respectively. In this way, tRNAs function at the interface between gene expression and protein synthesis. Whether tRNA levels are dynamically regulated and to what degree tRNA abundance influences the cellular proteome remains largely unexplored. Here we profile tRNA, transcript and protein levels in Drosophila Kc167 cells, a plasmatocyte cell line that, upon treatment with 20-hydroxyecdysone, differentiates into macrophages. We find that high abundance tRNAs associate with codons that are overrepresented in the Kc167 cell proteome, whereas tRNAs that are in low supply associate with codons that are underrepresented. Ecdysone-induced differentiation of Kc167 cells leads to changes in mRNA codon usage in a manner consistent with the developmental progression of the cell. At both early and late time points, ecdysone treatment concomitantly increases the abundance of tRNAThr(CGU), which decodes a differentiation-associated codon that becomes enriched in the macrophage proteome. These results together suggest that tRNA levels may provide a meaningful regulatory mechanism for defining the cellular proteomic landscape.

A-to-I editing on tRNAs: biochemical, biological and evolutionary implications

Inosine on transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are post-transcriptionally formed by a deamination mechanism of adenosines at positions 34, 37 and 57 of certain tRNAs. Despite its ubiquitous nature, the biological role of inosine in tRNAs remains poorly understood. Recent developments in the study of nucleotide modifications are beginning to indicate that the dynamics of such modifications are used in the control of specific genetic programs. Likewise, the essentiality of inosine-modified tRNAs in genome evolution and animal biology is becoming apparent. Here we review our current understanding on the role of inosine in tRNAs, the enzymes that catalyze the modification and the evolutionary link between such enzymes and other deaminases.

Posttranscriptional recoding by RNA editing

The posttranscriptional recoding of nuclear RNA transcripts has emerged as an important regulatory mechanism during eukaryotic gene expression. In particular the deamination of adenosine to inosine (interpreted by the translational machinery as a guanosine) is a frequent event that can recode the meaning of amino acid codons in translated exons, lead to structural changes in the RNA fold, or may affect splice consensus or regulatory sequence sites in noncoding exons or introns and modulate the biogenesis of small RNAs. The molecular mechanism of how the RNA editing machinery and its substrates recognize and interact with each other is not understood well enough to allow for the ab initio delineation of bona fide RNA editing sites. However, progress in the identification of various physiological modification sites and their characterization has given important insights regarding molecular features and events critical for productive RNA editing reactions. In addition, structural studies using components of the RNA editing machinery and together with editing competent substrate molecules have provided information on the chemical mechanism of adenosine deamination within the context of RNA molecules. Here, I give an overview of the process of adenosine deamination RNA editing and describe its relationship to other RNA processing events and its currently established roles in gene regulation.

Disconnected Interacting Protein 1 binds with high affinity to pre-tRNA and ADAT

Disconnected Interacting Protein 1 (DIP1), a member of the double-stranded RNA-binding protein family based on amino acid sequence, was shown previously to form complexes with multiple transcription factors in Drosophila melanogaster. To explore this protein further, we have undertaken sedimentation equilibrium experiments that demonstrate that DIP1-c (longest isoform of DIP1) is a dimer in solution, a characteristic common to other members of the dsRNA-binding protein family. The closest sequence identity for DIP1 is found within the dsRBD sequences of RNA editase enzymes. Consistent with this role, we demonstrate binding of DIP1-c to a potential physiological RNA target: pre-tRNA. In addition, DIP1-c was shown to interact with ADAT, a tRNA deaminase that presumably modifies pre-tRNAs. From these data, we hypothesize that DIP1 may serve an integrator role by binding its dsRNA ligand and recruiting protein partners for the appropriate metabolism of the bound RNA.

Dissecting the splicing mechanism of the Drosophila editing enzyme; dADAR

In Drosophila melanogaster, the expression of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA is regulated by transcription and alternative splicing so that at least four different isoforms are generated that have a tissue-specific splicing pattern. Even though dAdar has been extensively studied, the complete adult expression pattern has yet to be elucidated. In the present study, we investigate mature transcripts of dAdar arising from different promoters. Two predominant isoforms of dAdar are expressed in gonads and dAdar is transcribed from both the embryonic and the adult promoters. Furthermore, full-length transcripts containing the alternatively spliced exon-1 are expressed in a tissue-specific manner. The splicing factor B52/SRp55 binds within the alternative spliced exon 3a and plays a role in this alternative splicing event.

Noncoding RNAs and RNA Editing in Brain Development, Functional Diversification, and Neurological Disease

The progressive maturation and functional plasticity of the nervous system in health and disease involve a dynamic interplay between the transcriptome and the environment. There is a growing awareness that the previously unexplored molecular and functional interface mediating these complex gene-environmental interactions, particularly in brain, may encompass a sophisticated RNA regulatory network involving the twin processes of RNA editing and multifaceted actions of numerous subclasses of non-protein-coding RNAs. The mature nervous system encompasses a wide range of cell types and interconnections. Long-term changes in the strength of synaptic connections are thought to underlie memory retrieval, formation, stabilization, and effector functions. The evolving nervous system involves numerous developmental transitions, such as neurulation, neural tube patterning, neural stem cell expansion and maintenance, lineage elaboration, differentiation, axonal path finding, and synaptogenesis. Although the molecular bases for these processes are largely unknown, RNA-based epigenetic mechanisms appear to be essential for orchestrating these precise and versatile biological phenomena and in defining the etiology of a spectrum of neurological diseases. The concerted modulation of RNA editing and the selective expression of non-protein-coding RNAs during seminal as well as continuous state transitions may comprise the plastic molecular code needed to couple the intrinsic malleability of neural network connections to evolving environmental influences to establish diverse forms of short- and long-term memory, context-specific behavioral responses, and sophisticated cognitive capacities.

AMINOHYDROLASES ACTING ON ADENINE, ADENOSINE AND THEIR DERIVATIVES

BACKGROUND

Adenine and adenosine-acting aminohydrolases are important groups of enzymes responsible for the metabolic salvage of purine compounds. Several subclasses of these enzymes have been described and given current knowledge of the full genome sequences of many organisms, it is possible to identify genes encoding these enzymes and group them according to their primary structure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This article is a short overview of the enzymes classified as adenine and adenosine deaminase. It summarises knowledge of their occurrence, genetic basis and their catalytic and structural properties.

CONCLUSIONS

These enzymes are constitutive components of purine metabolism and their impairment may cause serious medical disorders. In humans, adenosine deaminase deficiency is linked to severe combined immunodeficiency and as such the enzyme has been approved for the first gene therapy trial. The role of these enzymes in plants is unclear, since the activity was has not been detected in extracts and putative genes have not been yet cloned and analyzed. A literature search and amino acid identity comparison show that Ascomycetes contain only adenine deaminase, but not adenosine deaminase, despite the fact that corresponding genes are annotated in databases as the adenosine cleaving enzymes because they share the same conserved domain.

Dynamic association of RNA-editing enzymes with the nucleolus

ADAR1 and ADAR2 are editing enzymes that deaminate adenosine to inosine in long double stranded RNA duplexes and specific pre-mRNA transcripts. Here, we show that full-length and N-terminally truncated forms of ADAR1 are simultaneously expressed in HeLa and COS7 cells owing to the usage of alternative starting methionines. Because the N-terminus of ADAR1 contains a nuclear export signal, the full-length protein localizes predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas the N-terminally truncated forms are exclusively nuclear and accumulate in the nucleolus. ADAR2, which lacks a region homologous to the N-terminal domain of ADAR1, localizes exclusively to the nucleus and similarly accumulates in the nucleolus. Within the nucleolus, ADAR1 and ADAR2 co-localize in a novel compartment. Photobleaching experiments demonstrate that, in live cells, ADAR1 and ADAR2 are in constant flux in and out of the nucleolus. When cells express the editing-competent glutamate receptor GluR-B RNA, endogenous ADAR1 and ADAR2 de-localize from the nucleolus and accumulate at sites where the substrate transcripts accumulate. This suggests that ADAR1 and ADAR2 are constantly moving through the nucleolus and might be recruited onto specific editing substrates present elsewhere in the cell.

Widespread inosine-containing mRNA in lymphocytes regulated by ADAR1 in response to inflammation

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification of pre-mRNA catalysed by an RNA-specific adenosine deaminase (ADAR). A-to-I RNA editing has been previously reported in the pre-mRNAs of brain glutamate and serotonin receptors and in lung tissue during inflammation. Here we report that systemic inflammation markedly induces inosine-containing mRNA to approximately 5% of adenosine in total mRNA. Induction was the result of up-regulation of A-to-I RNA editing as both dsRNA editing activity and ADAR1 expression were increased in the spleen, thymus and peripheral lymphocytes from endotoxin-treated mice. Up-regulation of ADAR1 was confirmed in vitro in T lymphocytes and macrophages stimulated with a variety of inflammatory mediators including tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interferon-gamma. A late induction of RNA editing was detected in concanavalin A-activated splenocytes stimulated with interleukin-2 in vitro. Taken together, these data suggest that a large number of inosine-containing mRNAs are produced during acute inflammation via up-regulation of ADAR1-mediated RNA editing. These events may affect the inflammatory and immune response through modulation of protein production.

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases generates RNA and protein diversity

RNA editing is defined as a post-transcriptional change of a gene-encoded sequence at the RNA level, excluding alterations due to processes such as pre-mRNA splicing and 3'-end formation. RNA editing is found in many organisms and can occur either by the insertion or deletion of nucleotides or by the substitution of bases by modification. The nucleoside inosine (I) was first detected in cytoplasmic tRNA and was later found in messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) and in viral transcripts. It is formed by hydrolytic deamination of a genomically encoded adenosine (A) at C6 of the base and this reaction is catalysed by a family of related enzymes. ADARs (for adenosine deaminases acting on RNA) catalyse A to I conversion either promiscuously or site-specifically in pre-mRNAs, viral RNAs and synthetic double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs), whereas ADATs (for adenosine deaminases acting on tRNA) are involved in inosine formation in tRNAs. ADAT1 generates I at position 37 (3' of the anticodon) in eukaryotic tRNA(Ala). ADAT2 and ADAT3 function as a heterodimer which catalyses inosine formation at the wobble position (position 34) in eukaryotic tRNAs. Here, we review the state of knowledge on ADARs and ADATs and their RNA substrates, with an emphasis on the developments over the past few years that have increased the understanding of the mechanism of action of these enzymes and of the functional consequences of the widespread modification they catalyse.

tadA, an essential tRNA-specific adenosine deaminase from Escherichia coli

We report the characterization of tadA, the first prokaryotic RNA editing enzyme to be identified. Escherichia coli tadA displays sequence similarity to the yeast tRNA deaminase subunit Tad2p. Recombinant tadA protein forms homodimers and is sufficient for site-specific inosine formation at the wobble position (position 34) of tRNA(Arg2), the only tRNA having this modification in prokaryotes. With the exception of yeast tRNA(Arg), no other eukaryotic tRNA substrates were found to be modified by tadA. How ever, an artificial yeast tRNA(Asp), which carries the anticodon loop of yeast tRNA(Arg), is bound and modified by tadA. Moreover, a tRNA(Arg2) minisubstrate containing the anticodon stem and loop is sufficient for specific deamination by tadA. We show that nucleotides at positions 33-36 are sufficient for inosine formation in mutant Arg2 minisubstrates. The anticodon is thus a major determinant for tadA substrate specificity. Finally, we show that tadA is an essential gene in E.coli, underscoring the critical function of inosine at the wobble position in prokaryotes.

Comparative genomics and evolution of proteins involved in RNA metabolism

RNA metabolism, broadly defined as the compendium of all processes that involve RNA, including transcription, processing and modification of transcripts, translation, RNA degradation and its regulation, is the central and most evolutionarily conserved part of cell physiology. A comprehensive, genome-wide census of all enzymatic and non-enzymatic protein domains involved in RNA metabolism was conducted by using sequence profile analysis and structural comparisons. Proteins related to RNA metabolism comprise from 3 to 11% of the complete protein repertoire in bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes, with the greatest fraction seen in parasitic bacteria with small genomes. Approximately one-half of protein domains involved in RNA metabolism are present in most, if not all, species from all three primary kingdoms and are traceable to the last universal common ancestor (LUCA). The principal features of LUCA's RNA metabolism system were reconstructed by parsimony-based evolutionary analysis of all relevant groups of orthologous proteins. This reconstruction shows that LUCA possessed not only the basal translation system, but also the principal forms of RNA modification, such as methylation, pseudouridylation and thiouridylation, as well as simple mechanisms for polyadenylation and RNA degradation. Some of these ancient domains form paralogous groups whose evolution can be traced back in time beyond LUCA, towards low-specificity proteins, which probably functioned as cofactors for ribozymes within the RNA world framework. The main lineage-specific innovations of RNA metabolism systems were identified. The most notable phase of innovation in RNA metabolism coincides with the advent of eukaryotes and was brought about by the merge of the archaeal and bacterial systems via mitochondrial endosymbiosis, but also involved emergence of several new, eukaryote-specific RNA-binding domains. Subsequent, vast expansions of these domains mark the origin of alternative splicing in animals and probably in plants. In addition to the reconstruction of the evolutionary history of RNA metabolism, this analysis produced numerous functional predictions, e.g. of previously undetected enzymes of RNA modification.

RNA editing by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA

ADARs are RNA editing enzymes that target double-stranded regions of nuclear-encoded RNA and viral RNA. These enzymes are particularly abundant in the nervous system, where they diversify the information encoded in the genome, for example, by altering codons in mRNAs. The functions of ADARs in known substrates suggest that the enzymes serve to fine-tune and optimize many biological pathways, in ways that we are only starting to imagine. ADARs are also interesting in regard to the remarkable double-stranded structures of their substrates and how enzyme specificity is achieved with little regard to sequence. This review summarizes ongoing investigations of the enzyme family and their substrates, focusing on biological function as well as biochemical mechanism.

RNA editing by base deamination: more enzymes, more targets, new mysteries

The posttranscriptional modification of messenger RNA precursors (pre-mRNAs) by base deamination can profoundly alter the physiological function of the encoded proteins. The recent identification of tRNA-specific adenosine deaminases (ADATs) has led to the suggestion that these enzymes, as well as the cytidine and adenosine deaminases acting on pre-mRNAs (CDARs and ADARs), belong to a superfamily of RNA-dependent deaminases. This superfamily might have evolved from an ancient cytidine deaminase. This article reviews the reactions catalysed by these enzymes and discusses their evolutionary relationships.

Functions and mechanisms of RNA editing

RNA editing can be broadly defined as any site-specific alteration in an RNA sequence that could have been copied from the template, excluding changes due to processes such as RNA splicing and polyadenylation. Changes in gene expression attributed to editing have been described in organisms from unicellular protozoa to man, and can affect the mRNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs present in all cellular compartments. These sequence revisions, which include both the insertion and deletion of nucleotides, and the conversion of one base to another, involve a wide range of largely unrelated mechanisms. Recent advances in the development of in vitro editing and transgenic systems for these varied modifications have provided a better understanding of similarities and differences between the biochemical strategies, regulatory sequences, and cellular factors responsible for such RNA processing events.

RNA editing: cytidine to uridine conversion in apolipoprotein B mRNA

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that changes the informational capacity within the RNA. These processes include alterations made by nucleotide deletion, insertion and base conversion. A to I and C to U conversion occurs in mammals and these editing events are catalysed by RNA binding deaminases. C to U editing of apoB mRNA was the first mammalian editing event to be identified. The minimal protein complex necessary for apoB mRNA editing has been determined and consists of APOBEC-1 and ACF. Overexpression of APOBEC-1 in transgenic animals caused liver dysplasia and APOBEC-1 has been identified in neurofibromatosis type 1 tumours, suggesting that RNA editing may be another mechanism for tumourigenesis. Several APOBEC-1-like proteins have been identified, including a family of APOBEC-1-related proteins with unknown function on chromosome 22. This review summarises the different types of RNA editing and discusses the current status of C to U apoB mRNA editing. This knowledge is very important in understanding the structure and function of these related proteins and their role in biology.

Changing genetic information through RNA editing

RNA editing, the post-transcriptional alteration of a gene-encoded sequence, is a widespread phenomenon in eukaryotes. As a consequence of RNA editing, functionally distinct proteins can be produced from a single gene. The molecular mechanisms involved include single or multiple base insertions or deletions as well as base substitutions. In mammals, one type of substitutional RNA editing, characterized by site-specific base-modification, was shown to modulate important physiological processes. The underlying reaction mechanism of substitutional RNA editing involves hydrolytic deamination of cytosine or adenosine bases to uracil or inosine, respectively. Protein factors have been characterized that are able to induce RNA editing in vitro. A supergene family of RNA-dependent deaminases has emerged with the recent addition of adenosine deaminases specific for tRNA. Here we review the developments that have substantially increased our understanding of base-modification RNA editing over the past few years, with an emphasis on mechanistic differences, evolutionary aspects and the first insights into the regulation of editing activity.

A-to-I pre-mRNA editing in Drosophila is primarily involved in adult nervous system function and integrity

Specific A-to-I RNA editing, like that seen in mammals, has been reported for several Drosophila ion channel genes. Drosophila possesses a candidate editing enzyme, dADAR. Here, we describe dADAR deletion mutants that lack ADAR activity in extracts. Correspondingly, all known Drosophila site-specific RNA editing (25 sites in three ion channel transcripts) is abolished. Adults lacking dADAR are morphologically wild-type but exhibit extreme behavioral deficits including temperature-sensitive paralysis, locomotor uncoordination, and tremors which increase in severity with age. Neurodegeneration accompanies the increase in phenotypic severity. Surprisingly, dADAR mutants are not short-lived. Thus, A-to-I editing of pre-mRNAs in Drosophila acts predominantly through nervous system targets to affect adult nervous system function, integrity, and behavior.

Identification and molecular characterization of two novel Trypanosoma cruzi genes encoding polypeptides sharing sequence motifs found in proteins involved in RNA editing reactions

We have previously identified a Trypanosoma cruzi cDNA encoding a protein named Tc52 sharing structural and functional properties with the thioredoxin and glutaredoxin protein family involved in thiol-disulphide redox reactions. Furthermore, we reported that Tc52 also plays a role in T. cruzi-associated immunosuppression observed during Chagas' disease. Moreover, Tc52 gene targeting deletion strategy allowed us to demonstrate that monoallelic disruption of Tc52 resulted in the alteration of the metacyclogenesis process and the production of less virulent parasites. Sequence analysis of a 7358 bp genomic fragment containing the Tc52 encoding gene revealed two additional open reading frames (ORF-A and C). The ORFs are likely to have protein coding function by a number of criteria, including reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses. The deduced amino-acid (aa) sequence of the ORF-A localized upstream of the Tc52 gene revealed that it contains within its N-terminus (aa 1 to 170) four RGG boxes known to act as RNA binding motifs in some proteins that interact with RNA, interspersed with a high density of glycine with regular spacing of tryptophan (WX(9-10)) in which X is often a glycine. Moreover, the C-terminal part of the ORF-C (aa 253-289) contains a motif that is strikingly similar (7-35% identity, 14-46% similarity over 28aa) to a short sequence (RNP1) comprising the consensus sequence RNA binding domain (CS-RBD) found in a number of proteins that interact with RNA. The aa sequence from the ORF-C localized downstream of the Tc52 gene showed significant homology to human adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (hADAT1) that specifically deaminates adenosine 37 to inosine in eukaryotic tRNA(Ala) and to its homologue yeast protein (Tad1p) (22-25% identity and an additional 38-40% similarity over 177aa). Moreover, highly similar motifs of the deaminase domain are present in the T. cruzi ORF-C. Furthermore, the 5' flanking regions of the genes contained repeat TATA and CAAT nucleotide sequences which resemble the motifs found upstream of the transcription initiation sites in eukaryotic promoters. Therefore, the characterization of novel T. cruzi genes encoding proteins which show similarity to components of RNA processing reactions provides new tools to investigate the gene expression regulation in these parasitic organisms. Moreover, our recent findings on the Tc52 encoding gene underline the interest of genetic manipulation of T. cruzi, not only making it possible to use more closely an in vitro approach to find out how genes function, but also to obtain 'attenuated' strains that could be used in the development of vaccinal strategies.

dADAR, a Drosophila double-stranded RNA-specific adenosine deaminase is highly developmentally regulated and is itself a target for RNA editing

We have identified a homolog of the ADAR (adenosine deaminases that act on RNA) class of RNA editases from Drosophila, dADAR. The dADAR locus has been localized to the 2B6-7 region of the X chromosome and the complete genomic sequence organization is reported here. dADAR is most homologous to the mammalian RNA editing enzyme ADAR2, the enzyme that specifically edits the Q/R site in the pre-mRNA encoding the glutamate receptor subunit GluR-B. Partially purified dADAR expressed in Pichia pastoris has robust nonspecific A-to-I deaminase activity on synthetic dsRNA substrates. Transcripts of the dADAR locus originate from two regulated promoters. In addition, alternative splicing generates at least four major dADAR isoforms that differ at their amino-termini as well as altering the spacing between their dsRNA binding motifs. dADAR is expressed in the developing nervous system, making it a candidate for the editase that acts on para voltage-gated Na+ channel transcripts in the central nervous system. Surprisingly, dADAR itself undergoes developmentally regulated RNA editing that changes a conserved residue in the catalytic domain. Taken together, these findings show that both transcription and processing of dADAR transcripts are under strict developmental control and suggest that the process of RNA editing in Drosophila is dynamically regulated.