Comparison of the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate 200 micrograms/day with inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 400 micrograms/day in mild and moderate asthma

Pharmacological Basis of Differences in Dose Response, Dose Equivalence, and Duration of Action of Inhaled Corticosteroids

INTRODUCTION

Asthma treatment guidelines classify inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimens as low, medium, or high dose. However, efficacy and safety are not independently assessed accordingly. Moreover, differences in ICS duration of action are not considered when a dose regimen is selected. We investigated the efficacy and safety implications of these limitations for available ICS molecules.

METHODS

Published pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters were used, alongside physiological and pharmacological principles, to estimate the efficacy and safety of available ICS molecules. Extent and duration of glucocorticoid receptor (GR) occupancy in the lung (efficacy) and cortisol suppression (systemic exposure and safety) were estimated.

RESULTS

Some ICS regimens (e.g., fluticasone furoate, fluticasone propionate, and ciclesonide) rank high for efficacy but low for systemic exposure, contrary to how ICS dose equivalence is currently viewed. Differences in dose-response relationships for efficacy and systemic exposure were unique for each ICS regimen and reflected in their therapeutic indices. Notably, even low doses of most ICSs can generate high GR occupancy (≥ 90%) across the entire dose interval at steady state, which may explain previously reported difficulties in obtaining dose responses within the clinical dose range and observations that most clinical benefit typically occurs at low doses. The estimated post dose duration of lung GR occupancy for ICS molecules was categorized as 4-6 h (short), 14-16 h (medium), 25-40 h (long), or > 80 h (ultra-long), suggesting potentially large differences in anti-inflammatory duration of action.

CONCLUSION

In a real-world clinical setting where there may be poor adherence to prescribed therapy, our findings suggest a significant therapeutic advantage for longer-acting ICS molecules in patients with asthma.

Controller Medication Use and Exacerbations for Children and Adults With Asthma in High-Deductible Health Plans

IMPORTANCE

High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) are increasingly common and associated with decreased medication use in some adult populations. How children are affected is less certain.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between HDHP enrollment and asthma controller medication use and exacerbations.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

For this longitudinal cohort study with a difference-in-differences design, data were obtained from a large, national, commercial (and Medicare Advantage) administrative claims database between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2014. Children aged 4 to 17 years and adults aged 18 to 64 years with persistent asthma who switched from traditional plans to HDHPs or remained in traditional plans (control group) by employer choice during a 24-month period were identified. A coarsened exact matching technique was used to balance the groups on characteristics including employer and enrollee propensity to have HDHPs. In most HDHPs, asthma medications were exempt from the deductible and subject to copayments. Statistical analyses were conducted from August 13, 2019, to January 19, 2021.

EXPOSURE

Employer-mandated HDHP transition.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thirty-day fill rates and adherence (based on proportion of days covered [PDC]) were measured for asthma controller medications (inhaled corticosteroid [ICS], leukotriene inhibitors, and ICS long-acting β-agonists [ICS-LABAs]). Asthma exacerbations were measured by rates of oral corticosteroid bursts and asthma-related emergency department visits among controller medication users.

RESULTS

The HDHP group included 7275 children (mean [SD] age, 10.8 [3.3] years; 4402 boys [60.5%]; and 5172 non-Hispanic White children [71.1%]) and 17 614 adults (mean [SD] age, 41.1 [13.4] years; 10 464 women [59.4%]; and 12 548 non-Hispanic White adults [71.2%]). The matched control group included 45 549 children and 114 141 adults. Compared with controls, children switching to HDHPs experienced significant absolute decreases in annual 30-day fills only for ICS-LABA medications (absolute change, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.01). Adults switching to HDHPs did not have significant reductions in 30-day fills for any controllers. There were no statistically significant differences in PDC, oral steroid bursts, or asthma-related emergency department visits for children or adults. For the 9.9% of HDHP enrollees with health savings account-eligible HDHPs that subjected medications to the deductible, there was a significant absolute decrease in PDC for ICS-LABA compared with controls (-4.8%; 95% CI, -7.7% to -1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This cohort study found that in a population where medications were exempt from the deductible for most enrollees, HDHP enrollment was associated with minimal or no reductions in controller medication use for children and adults and no change in asthma exacerbations. These findings suggest a potential benefit from exempting asthma medications from the deductible in HDHPs.

Efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids relative to fluticasone propionate: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials in asthma

INTRODUCTION

Many trials have been published comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatments in asthma. However, mixed results necessitate the summarization of available evidence to aid in decision-making. Areas covered: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) with other ICS including beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP), budesonide (BUD) and ciclesonide (CIC). PubMed was searched and 54 RCTs that fit pre-determined criteria were included. Endpoints evaluated included lung function, asthma symptom control, exacerbation frequency, reliever use, quality of life and steroid-related side effects. Expert commentary: Across all studies, FP was associated with either more favorable or at least similar efficacy and safety, in comparison with BDP or BUD. This observation may be related to FP's higher relative potency and almost negligible oral bioavailability. FP was comparable to CIC for efficacy. However, CIC appeared to have a smaller impact on cortisol levels than FP, which is likely due to CIC's incomplete conversion to active metabolite (des-CIC) and the lower potency of des-CIC compared with FP. Although there were no significant differences in evaluated outcomes after treatment with different ICS in the majority of studies, some observed differences could be explained by their respective pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties.

Patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials of inhaled asthma medications: systematic review and research needs

PURPOSE

To assess the diversity, application, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in asthma clinical trials.

METHODS

We critically appraised the use of asthma-specific PROs in 87 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of inhaled asthma medications published during 1985-2006.

RESULTS

A total of 79 RCTs reported PROs, of which 78 (99%) assessed symptom scores and seven (9%) assessed asthma quality of life scores. Only eight (10%) used validated instruments and five (6%) provided clinical interpretation of scores. Due to heterogeneity in the reporting of symptom measures, it is not possible to determine how many discrete symptom assessment instruments have been used. Only 26 (33%) of the RCTs that measured symptom scores reported the scores for follow-up. Limited improvement occurred over time: fewer than 30% of the RCTs used validated PRO measures in any individual year.

CONCLUSION

Numerous validated PRO instruments are available but it is unclear why few are used in asthma clinical trials. Problems include poor reporting, and uncritical analysis and interpretation of PRO scores. Research needs include identifying and recommending a set of PROs for use in asthma clinical research and providing guidance for researchers on the application, analysis and interpretation of PRO measures in clinical trials.

Asthma management and prevention: current perspectives

The continuing evolution of asthma treatment and prevention are reflected in updated guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program and Global Initiative for Asthma as well as other recent publications. The 2007 Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines designate severity and control, mediated by considerations of current impairment and future risk, as the primary concepts in assessing and monitoring asthma. Severity should ideally be determined at the time of diagnosis, after which control becomes the central focus of asthma management. In the area of treatment, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) remain first-line therapy for long-term asthma management in children and adults. For patients whose severity of asthma requires more than low-dose ICSs, or whose asthma cannot be well controlled on monotherapy with low-dose ICSs, evidence supports the efficacy of combination therapy consisting of an ICS plus an inhaled long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) or an increase to medium-dose ICSs. For children >5 years of age and adults not controlled on low-dose ICSs, the combination of a low-dose ICS plus an inhaled LABA is equivalent in terms of outcomes to the use of medium-dose ICS. For children <5 years of age not controlled on low-dose ICSs, increasing the dose of ICSs is preferred to the addition of a LABA to low-dose ICS therapy as no studies using combination therapy have been conducted for patients in this age group. With regard to asthma prevention, approaches to primary prevention (to avoid allergen sensitization) and secondary prevention (to avoid disease progression) are still very much in the developmental stage, while tertiary prevention (to avoid asthmatic stimuli) has been more successful particularly in pediatric patients. Written action plans as part of self-management processes appear to improve physician-patient communication and disease status tracking. Other considerations in successful asthma management include patient education and monitoring of adherence to treatment regimens.

Asthma management and prevention: current perspectives

The continuing evolution of asthma treatment and prevention are reflected in updated guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program and Global Initiative for Asthma as well as other recent publications. The 2007 Expert Panel Report 3 guidelines designate severity and control, mediated by considerations of current impairment and future risk, as the primary concepts in assessing and monitoring asthma. Severity should ideally be determined at the time of diagnosis, after which control becomes the central focus of asthma management. In the area of treatment, inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) remain first-line therapy for longterm asthma management in children and adults. For patients whose severity of asthma requires more than low-dose ICSs, or whose asthma cannot be well controlled on monotherapy with low-dose ICSs, evidence supports the efficacy of combination therapy consisting of an ICS plus an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) or an increase to medium-dose ICSs. For children >5 years of age and adults not controlled on low-dose ICSs, the combination of a low-dose ICS plus an inhaled LABA is equivalent in terms of outcomes to the use of medium-dose ICS. For children <5 years of age not controlled on low-dose ICSs, increasing the dose of ICSs is preferred to the addition of a LABA to low-dose ICS therapy as no studies using combination therapy have been conducted for patients in this age group. With regard to asthma prevention, approaches to primary prevention (to avoid allergen sensitization) and secondary prevention (to avoid disease progression) are still very much in the developmental stage, while tertiary prevention (to avoid asthmatic stimuli) has been more successful particularly in pediatric patients. Written action plans as part of self-management processes appear to improve physician-patient communication and disease status tracking. Other considerations in successful asthma management include patient education and monitoring of adherence to treatment regimens.

Inhaled corticosteroids and asthma control in children: assessing impairment and risk

OBJECTIVE

To review the use of inhaled corticosteroids on asthma control in children by using the new therapeutic paradigm outlined in the Expert Panel Report 3: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed by using the Medline and Embase databases (January 1996 to October 2007).

RESULTS

A total of 18 placebo-controlled, clinical trials in >8000 children (aged 0-17 years) with asthma met the criteria for evaluating monotherapy with inhaled corticosteroids: 13 double-blind studies of inhaled corticosteroids versus placebo and 5 controlled studies that compared inhaled corticosteroids to a nonsteroid antiinflammatory agent. The findings can be summarized as follows: (1) Compared with placebo, inhaled corticosteroid treatment was associated with reductions in both the impairment and risk domains. (2) Improvements in impairment and risk observed with inhaled corticosteroids were generally greater than those observed with nonsteroid antiinflammatory comparator medications. (3) Inhaled corticosteroids were well tolerated. (4) Small reductions in growth rates were evident when compared with placebo and/or comparator nonsteroid antiinflammatory medication use in the long-term (>1-year) studies, but when measured, the reductions diminished with time.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with inhaled corticosteroids improves the asthma-control domains of impairment and risk in children. Differences in study protocols make detailed comparisons difficult. Specific needs for additional trials include (1) more studies using appropriate indicators for impairment (eg, rescue-medication use; symptoms scores; asthma/episode-free days) and risk (eg, forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children who can perform spirometry; exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids; urgent care usage) and (2) more studies evaluating adolescents; the majority of the data reported were for children up to the age of 12 years, and data for adolescents are often lost (either grouped with adults [eg, studies in patients > or =12 years old] or not included [eg, studies of school-aged children < or =12 years old]). Attention should be given to standardizing variables that will permit comparison of outcomes between trials.

Effects of nebulized corticosteroids therapy on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in young children with recurrent or persistent wheeze

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are preferred drugs for the long-term treatment of all severities of asthma in children. However, data about the safety of ICS in infants is lacking. So, it is essential to do further clinical studies to examine the safety and efficacy of ICS in this population. In this study, the effects of nebulized budesonide and nebulized fluticasone propionate suspensions on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is examined in infants with recurrent or persistent wheeze. Thirty-one children aged 6-24 months admitted to our hospital between January and December 2005 with symptoms of recurrent or persistent wheeze were included in the study. The patients were randomly allocated to receive 0.25 mg BUD or 0.25 mg fluticasone propionate twice daily for 6 wk and half dose for another 6 wk with a jet nebulizer at home. Blood samples for basal cortisol concentration, adrenocarticotropic hormone, glucose, HbA1c and electrolytes were obtained at the beginning and at the end of the study. Adrenal function assessment was based on changes in cosyntropin-stimulated plasma cortisol levels. The study was completed with 31 patients, 16 of whom received BUD and 15 FP. All patients except one had plasma cortisol concentrations above 500 nmol/l (18 microg/dl) or had an incremental rise in cortisol of >200 nmol/l after stimulation. Although nebulized steroids seem to be safe in infancy, we recommend that adrenal functions should be tested periodically during long-term treatment with nebulized steroids.

Fluticasone versus beclomethasone or budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2007) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2006).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-one studies (14,602 participants) representing 74 randomised comparisons met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was fair. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater end of treatment FEV1 (0.04 litres (95% CI 0 to 0.07 litres), end of treatment and change in morning PEF, but not change in FEV1 or evening PEF. This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. FP led to fewer symptoms and less rescue medication use. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in morning PEF, evening PEF, and FEV1 over BDP or BUD. The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There were no significant differences incidence of hoarseness, pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing sore throat and when given at the same daily dose leads to increased hoarseness. There are concerns about adrenal suppression with Fluticasone given to children at doses greater than 400 mcg/day, but the randomised trials included in this review did not provide sufficient data to address this issue.

Concerns about intranasal corticosteroids for over-the-counter use: position statement of the Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology

The Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology was charged with formulating a position paper regarding the potential release of intranasal corticosteroids for over-the-counter use. We took the position that safety issues regarding this proposal would be our sole concern. We reviewed the literature to evaluate the frequency and severity of potential adverse events related to the administration of intranasal corticosteroids. We limited this review to 5 areas: (1) effects on growth, (2) ocular effects, (3) effects on bone, (4) effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and (5) local adverse effects. After review of the available data, we concluded that intranasal corticosteroids should remain prescription-only drugs. Patients receiving an intranasal corticosteroid should be instructed in its use and that use should be monitored by a physician or an appropriately trained medical provider (eg, nurse practitioner or physician assistant) under the direct supervision of a physician. This conclusion was reached based on the evidence that corticosteroids administered by any route, including the intranasal route, have the potential to cause adverse effects in all the areas noted herein. Our conclusion was strengthened by the fact that these adverse effects can be insidious and therefore not evident for many years; there is the potential for overuse; patients could also have access to other forms of topically administered corticosteroids, thus increasing their total dose; and individuals vary in their susceptibility to corticosteroid-induced adverse effects. We were also influenced to take this position knowing that generally reassuring data regarding the use of respiratory tract-administered corticosteroids are based on mean data and that all such studies have shown outliers in whom adverse effects were evident. Thus, as stated, we recommend that intranasal corticosteroids remain prescription-only drugs.

A comparison of the relative growth velocities with budesonide and fluticasone propionate in children with asthma

There have been no previous large, well-designed direct comparisons of the effects of fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide (BUD) on growth in children. This randomised, double-blind study compared the effects on growth of FP and BUD in children aged 6-9 years with persistent asthma. Following a 6-month run-in period (without inhaled corticosteroids), patients with normal growth velocity were randomised to 12 months' treatment with FP 100 micro g bd (n=114) or BUD 200 micro g bd (n=119). Growth velocity was determined by stadiometric height measurement. Lung function, asthma symptoms and use of relief medication were also assessed. Annualised mean growth velocity during run-in was comparable in the two groups (FP: 5.9 cm/yr; BUD: 6.0 cm/yr). During the treatment period, adjusted mean growth velocity was significantly higher in the FP than the BUD group (5.5 cm/yr vs 4.6 cm/yr; P<0.001). Asthma control improved similarly in both treatment groups. Bone mineral density and overnight urinary cortisol:creatinine ratios were similar in the two groups. Drug-related adverse events were reported among 3% of FP-treated children, compared with 2% for BUD. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that FP for childhood asthma has significantly less impact on childhood growth velocity than a therapeutically equivalent dose of BUD.

Co-administration of salbutamol and fluticasone for emergency treatment of children with moderate acute asthma

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nebulized therapy with salbutamol alone or in combination with fluticasone. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 150 children with moderate acute asthma were randomly assigned to receive by nebulizations either (i) three doses of salbutamol 30 microl/kg per dose, each dose administered every 15 min, (ii) three doses of salbutamol plus two doses of fluticasone 500 microg/dose at 15 and 30 min after first dose of salbutamol, or (iii) three doses of salbutamol/fluticasone 500 microg/dose, each combined dose administered every 15 min. Pulse oxymetry (SaO2), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and Wood et al. (Am J Dis Child, 123, 1972, 123) clinical scale were evaluated at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the first nebulization. Patients in the three groups significantly improved since 15 min after the first nebulization. We did not observe differences in the recovery of SaO2 and PEF among the three groups of treatment (p > 0.10). In group 3, children showed better clinical response at 120 min than the other two groups (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed with any treatment. To summarize, in children with acute moderate asthma, nebulized salbutamol at an accumulated dose of 90 mul/kg plus fluticasone at an accumulated dose of 1500 microg produced better clinical relief after 2 h. However, similar PEF and SaO2 responses were observed with salbutamol alone or in combination with different doses of fluticasone.

Evidence for ototopical glucocorticoid-induced decrease in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis response and liver function

To clarify whether ototopical glucocorticoid treatment is associated with impaired hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) activity and altered hepatic metabolism, one commercially available dexamethasone-containing ointment was tested. At present, very little is known about the effects of ototopical glucocorticoid treatment on HPA and liver function. Ten beagle dogs received two daily therapeutic doses of dexamethasone (0.6 mg/ear) in the outer auditory canal for 21 d in a single-blind, placebo-controlled study. Resting cortisol concentrations were assessed before, during, and after treatment using an RIA system. Adrenal function and HPA feedback sensitivity were measured by a standard dose (250 microg) ACTH stimulation test. Serum biochemical and hematological parameters were measured, whether ototopical glucocorticoids affect hepatic function was studied, and blood cell counts were made. Ototopical dexamethasone treatment induced a marked suppression (to about 100%) of resting plasma cortisol concentrations below the placebo effect (P < 0.0001) within the first 11 d, and these remained reduced during the entire treatment period up to d 19. As well, an ACTH stimulation test found a markedly reduced rise in plasma cortisol concentrations (P = 0.0004). Concomitantly, significant increases in serum activities of alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine transaminase, and aspartate transaminase were detected. Moreover, we found a significant reduction in differential leukocyte counts of eosinophils and lymphocytes, whereas neutrophils increased. Although cortisol levels and hematological parameters returned to baseline 7 d after treatment cessation, liver enzyme activities remained elevated. In conclusion, these findings suggest that after ototopical application, dexamethasone is sufficiently absorbed from the auditory canal to suppress HPA function as well as to alter metabolic and hemopoietic profiles. Thus, in long-term treatment of otitis externa or media, the systemic adverse suppression of HPA has to be considered in relation to stress exposure, whereas changes in serum enzyme activities may not be interpreted as hepathopathy.

Inhaled fluticasone versus inhaled beclomethasone or inhaled budesonide for chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and budesonide (BUD) are commonly prescribed inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of asthma. Fluticasone propionate (FP) is newer agent with greater potency in in-vitro assays.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of Fluticasone to Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group trial register (January 2004) and reference lists of articles. We contacted trialists and pharmaceutical companies for additional studies and searched abstracts of major respiratory society meetings (1997 to 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials in children and adults comparing Fluticasone to either Beclomethasone or Budesonide in the treatment of chronic asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion and methodological quality. One reviewer extracted data. Quantitative analyses were undertaken using RevMan analyses 1.0.1.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty six studies (12, 119 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Methodological quality was variable. Dose ratio 1:2: FP produced a significantly greater FEV1 (0.14 litres, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.22), morning PEF (11.10 L/min, 95%CI 3.12 to 19.09 L/min) and evening PEF (9.31 L/min, 95%CI 5.12 to 13.5 L/min). This applied to all drug doses, age groups, and delivery devices. No difference between FP and BDP/BUD were seen for trial withdrawals. Symptoms and rescue medication use were widely reported but few trials provided sufficient data for analysis. When given at half the dose of BDP/BUD, FP led to a greater likelihood of pharyngitis. There was no difference in the likelihood of oral candidiasis. Plasma cortisol and 24 hour urinary cortisol was measured frequently but data presentation was limited. Dose ratio 1:1: FP produced a statistically significant difference in am PEF (9.58 L/min (95% CI 5.20 to 13.97)), pm PEF (7.41 L/min (95% CI 2.61 to 12.22)), and FEV1 (0.09 L (0.02 to 0.17)). The effects on exacerbations were mixed. There was an increase in the incidence of hoarseness, but no significant difference in pharyngitis, candidiasis, or cough.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluticasone given at half the daily dose of beclomethasone or budesonide leads to small improvements in measures of airway calibre, but it appears to have a higher risk of causing hoarseness when given at the same daily dose. Future studies should attempt to establish the relative efficacy of inhaled steroids delivered with CFC-free propellants.

Decreased cortisol response to insulin induced hypoglycaemia in asthmatics treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate

AIMS

To assess adrenal function in asthmatic children treated with inhaled fluticasone propionate for up to 16 weeks.

METHODS

Children with asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled methacholine were treated with inhaled fluticasone 250-750 microg/day via Volumatic spacer. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed to assess adrenal function.

RESULTS

Eighteen asthmatic patients (10 boys, 8 girls), aged 7-17 years received inhaled fluticasone therapy at a median dose of 477 microg/m2 per day for 5-16 weeks. Adrenal suppression, defined as 60 minute serum cortisol less than 500 nmol/l, was found in 9 of 18 children. Following the ITT, the median basal and 60 minute serum cortisol concentrations of the suppressed group were 135.0 and 350.0 nmol/l, respectively; the corresponding values for the unsuppressed group were 242.2 and 564.7 nmol/l. Repeat ITT in the suppressed group 2-3 months after discontinuation of fluticasone revealed that all patients had a 60 minute serum cortisol greater than 500 nmol/l.

CONCLUSION

After therapy for asthma with inhaled fluticasone at approximately 500 microg daily for up to 16 weeks, half the children had evidence of adrenal suppression.

Asthma management across the life span: applications for the adult and older adult

Asthma is one of the most common and chronic diseases of adults and creates substantial health problems. The disease must be diagnosed appropriately, its severity assessed, and treatment prescribed that matches the level of severity. Patient education in self-management techniques and attention to the problems of adherence are essential for long-term management. Comorbid conditions should be suspected and treated when asthma becomes difficult to control. Asthma in the elderly is a challenging but frequent problem that requires particular attention to controlling the causes of excessive morbidity and mortality. All health care professionals have an important role in controlling this common disease.

Effects of individual self-management education on clinical, biological, and adherence outcomes in asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines urge teaching patients the knowledge and skills required for self-management, based on the assumption that education will lead to improved skills and better asthma control.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized controlled trial of 65 adults with mild-to-moderate asthma, we examined whether an educational self-management intervention would improve adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy, decrease markers of airway inflammation, and improve clinical control. Peak flow, symptoms, and adherence were monitored for 7 weeks. After a 1-week run-in, subjects were assigned randomly to either the educational intervention or control group. The 30-minute intervention was delivered and reinforced at biweekly intervals.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, the intervention group had improvements in adherence to inhaled corticosteroid therapy (by 30% vs. -5%, P = 0.01), self-reported control of asthma (by 14% vs. 5%, P = 0.04), and perhaps quality of life (by 37% vs. 21%, P = 0.06). The direction of change for all other clinical outcomes was more favorable in the intervention group, but not significantly so. Markers of inflammation in sputum decreased more in the intervention group, with sputum eosinophils declining significantly (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In asthmatic patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids, education and training in self-management improves adherence with inhaled therapy, perceived control of asthma, and sputum eosinophilia.

Trends in the use of inhaled corticosteroids for childhood asthma in New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

To compare the dispensed volumes and prescribed doses for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for children in New Zealand.

DESIGN

Longitudinal analysis of prescribing trends using the Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners Research Unit database and the Pharm Warehouse database of the New Zealand Health Information System.

SETTING

New Zealand from 1993 to 2001.

SUBJECTS

Children aged 0-5 years and 6-17 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The ratio of potency-adjusted mean daily dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) to beclomethasone (BDP) and dispensed volumes of FP, BDP and budesonide.

RESULTS

The ratio of potency-adjusted mean daily dose of FP to BDP prescribed to children aged 0-17 years ranged from 1.22 to 1.91. With the introduction of FP, the total amount of ICS dispensed to children aged 0-5 years in New Zealand nearly doubled, when adjusted for potency.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of FP into New Zealand corresponds with an increase in the total amount of ICS dispensed and an increase in the adjusted daily dose prescribed.

The influence of inhaler selection on efficacy of asthma therapies

Many different devices are available to aid inhalational drug delivery. Although each device is claimed to have advantages over its rivals, the evidence to support greater efficacy of a particular device is scanty. Most comparative studies are underpowered or flawed in their design. They may use inappropriate end-points, or involve healthy subjects, whose response may be very different from the patient with acute severe asthma. The dosage of drug used in a trial may be at the shallow part of the dose-response curve, masking differences in devices. Only in a few cases have clinical trials detected a significant difference between devices, and trials have rarely taken patient preference into account. The most efficacious device in practice is likely to be the one that the patient will use regularly and in accordance with a health care workers' recommendations.

Oral candidiasis associated with inhaled corticosteroid use: comparison of fluticasone and beclomethasone

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroids such as fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate play a central role in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Fluticasone exhibits excellent clinical effectiveness; however, oral adverse effects can occur.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the frequency of oral candidiasis in asthmatic patients treated with fluticasone and beclomethasone, to evaluate the effect of gargling with amphotericin B, and to measure the inhalation flow rate on candidiasis.

METHODS

The study consisted of 143 asthmatic patients who were treated with inhaled steroids, 11 asthmatic patients not treated with inhaled steroids, and 86 healthy volunteers. Quantitative fungal culture was performed by aseptically obtaining a retropharyngeal wall swab from these patients. Patients with positive results were treated with gargling using a 1:50 dilution amphotericin B solution. In asthmatic patients treated with fluticasone, the inhalation flow rate was measured using an inspiratory flow meter.

RESULTS

The amount of Candida spp. was significantly greater in asthmatic patients taking inhaled steroids compared with those who were not. It was also significantly greater in patients with oral symptoms than asymptomatic patients and significantly greater in asthmatic patients treated with fluticasone than in those treated with beclomethasone. Although the presence of Candida did not correlate with the inhaled dose of beclomethasone, it did increase with the dose of fluticasone. Gargling with amphotericin B was effective in most asthmatic patients with candidiasis. Candidiasis was not due to inappropriate flow rates during inhalation of steroids.

CONCLUSIONS

Fungal culture of a retropharyngeal wall swab may be useful for predicting the risk of developing oral candidiasis in asthmatic patients treated with inhaled steroids. The amount of isolated Candida was significantly greater in asthmatic patients treated with fluticasone than in those treated with beclomethasone. Attention to dosage is required as the amount of Candida increased with dose of fluticasone. Gargling with a 1:50 dilution of amphotericin B is effective in treating oral candidiasis of asthmatic patients treated with inhaled steroids.

Fluticasone and beclometasone: what are their effects on children's growth?

Fear of growth retardation may account for the underuse of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma, despite compelling evidence of their effectiveness. This fear may be reduced with newer agents with lower oral bioavailability if their theoretical advantage of fewer systemic adverse effects than the standard treatment of inhaled beclometasone is realized in practice. This review aims to determine if one of the newer agents, inhaled fluticasone, has less effect on the growth of pre-pubertal asthmatic children than inhaled beclometasone. The outcome measure was growth velocity. Two double blind, randomized controlled trials were identified. In one of the studies the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.7 cm/year greater than in the beclometasone group. In the second, smaller study the mean growth velocity in the fluticasone group was 0.8 cm/year greater. There is therefore some evidence that fluticasone has less (if any) adverse effect on growth.

Repeatability of airway resistance measurements made using the interrupter technique

BACKGROUND

To be able to interpret any measurement, its repeatability should be known. This study reports the repeatability of airway resistance measurements using the interrupter technique (Rint) in children with and without respiratory symptoms.

METHODS

Children aged 2-10 years who were healthy, had persistent isolated cough, or who had previous wheeze were studied. On the same occasion, three Rint measurements were made 15 minutes apart, before and after placebo and salbutamol given in random order. Results from those given placebo first were analysed for within-occasion repeatability. Between-occasion repeatability measurements were made 2-20 weeks apart (median 3 weeks).

RESULTS

For 85 pairs of measurements before and after placebo the limits of agreement were 20% expected resistance and were unaffected by age or health status. The change in resistance following bronchodilator in one of 18 healthy children, 12 of 28 with cough, and 22 of 39 with wheeze exceeded this threshold. For between-occasion measurements the limits of agreement were 32% in 72 healthy subjects, 49% in 57 with cough, and 53% in 95 with previous wheeze.

CONCLUSION

The measurement of airways resistance by the interrupter technique is clinically meaningful when change following an intervention such as the administration of bronchodilator is greater than its within-occasion repeatability. Between-occasion repeatability is too poor to judge change confidently.

Patterns of inhaled asthma medication use: a 3-year longitudinal analysis of prescription claims data from British Columbia, Canada

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To assess trends in asthma management and to identify factors associated with increasing short-acting (SA) beta-agonist utilization in British Columbia using administrative prescription data.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

All patients between 13 and 50 years of age who had received at least one prescription for a SA beta-agonist covered by BC Pharmacare between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1998.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analysis of all patients, and longitudinal analyses only of patients who had received at least one SA beta-agonist prescription in each of the 3 years. Trends in asthma medication use over time were evaluated using repeated-measures Mantel-Haenszel tests. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with increasing SA beta-agonist use.

RESULTS

A total of 78,758 patients were included in the cohort. No decrease in the annual prevalence of receiving more than four canisters per year of a SA beta-agonist was identified between 1996 and 1998. A total of 12,844 patients filled at least one SA beta-agonist prescription each year. Time-trend analysis showed an overall increasing probability of not receiving an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) agent in this population (p = 0.002). In patients exhibiting low SA beta-agonist use, > 18 years of age (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.5), male gender (adjusted OR, 1.7), and in receipt of social assistance (adjusted OR, 2.3) were associated with receiving increasing amounts of SA beta-agonist agents over the 3 years. In patients with a high degree of use of SA beta-agonists, only the receipt of social assistance (adjusted OR, 1.3) was significantly associated with increasing use.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the development and dissemination of asthma management guidelines, there was no trend toward decreasing SA beta-agonist use. An unexpected trend toward decreasing ICS utilization was identified. Receiving social assistance was a risk factor for increasing SA beta-agonist use, independent of baseline utilization.

Inhaled steroids and the risk of adrenal suppression in children

Corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment of all asthma severity levels in adults and children. With their widespread use comes a responsibility to monitor, understand, and balance their efficacy and safety. Systemic adverse effects such as adrenal suppression have been clearly associated with the use of oral corticosteroids and to a lesser degree with the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). In clinical trials, adrenal suppression is more evident when ICS are used in long-term therapy and at higher doses. However, monitoring adrenal suppression during short-term therapy and at lower doses is still of value in order to ascertain the lower limit of an inhaled corticosteroid's safety profile. Significant adrenal suppression at conventional ICS doses appears to be rare in clinical practice. When evaluating the effect of ICS on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal-axis (HPA-axis), one must consider sources of variability both within and among trials including test sensitivity, systemic bioavailability, degree of airway obstruction, and delivery devices. All of these factors have the potential to effect the level of adrenal suppression detected and must be considered when interpreting HPA-axis test results in research or practice. This review will discuss adrenal suppression found with common ICS.

Switching from conventional to extrafine aerosol beclomethasone dipropionate therapy in children: a 6-month, open- label, randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In adults with asthma, hydrofluoralkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control at half the daily dose of conventional chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-BDP.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and tolerability of switching from CFC-BDP to HFA-BDP at half the daily dose in children with stable asthma.

METHODS

This 6-month, open-label, randomized, multicenter study enrolled 520 children aged 5 to 11 years with well-controlled asthma receiving inhaled CFC-BDP or budesonide 200 to 800 microg/d x. (Four hundred fifty-two patients were using doses within the recommended range of 200-400 microg and were analyzed separately.) During a 4-week run-in period, patients used CFC-BDP plus a spacer (CFC-BDP+S) at approximately the same dose as they were using before study entry. Patients were then randomized in a 1:3 ratio to continue on CFC-BDP+S or switch to HFA-BDP Autohaler at half the daily dose.

RESULTS

The change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow was significantly greater in patients receiving 100-200 microg of HFA-BDP compared with those receiving 200-400 microg of CFC-BDP+S at weeks 7 to 8 (8.5 and 0.4 L/min, respectively; P =.014), with continuing improvement in both groups over 6 months (12.2 and 12.4 L/min, respectively, at month 6). There were no significant differences between treatments in mean change from baseline in FEV(1), percentage of days or nights without asthma symptoms, and daily beta-agonist use over the 6-month treatment period. The proportion of patients who had one or more asthma exacerbations, the incidence of adverse events, and the percentage change from baseline in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were similar in the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that asthma control can be well maintained in children when switching from CFC-BDP+S to an HFA-BDP Autohaler at doses as low as 100 to 200 microg/d.

'Real world' pragmatic clinical trials: what are they and what do they tell us?

Although the explanatory clinical therapeutic trial remains the foundation for assessing drug efficacy and is required for licensing purposes, the overall effectiveness of a treatment can be best judged by carefully designed and well conducted pragmatic 'real world' randomized trials. Pragmatic trials seek to inform prescribers and health care planners on the most effective and cost beneficial treatments. Pragmatic trials deserve more attention and should be included in evidence based guidelines for the pharmacological management of common diseases such as asthma and atopy.

Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate administered via metered-dose inhaler plus babyhaler spacer in the treatment of asthma in preschool-aged children

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in children aged 12 to 47 months with asthma symptoms.

DESIGN

A retrospective economic analysis conducted from the perspective of the Danish health-care system, based on clinical data from a 12-week study.

SETTING

Thirty-three outpatient centers in nine countries.

PATIENTS

Two hundred thirty-seven children aged 12 to 47 months with documented history of recurrent wheeze or asthma symptoms.

INTERVENTIONS

Two dosages of FP, 100 microg/d and 200 microg/d, and placebo administered in two divided doses via a metered-dose inhaler and a Babyhaler (Glaxo Wellcome; Middlesex, UK) spacer device.

MEASUREMENTS

Effectiveness in terms of asthma exacerbations, control of cough and wheeze symptoms, symptom-free days, overall direct costs of asthma management in Danish kroner at 1999 prices, and mean and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.

RESULTS

FP, 200 microg/d, was significantly more effective than placebo treatment in terms of the proportion of exacerbation-free patients (73.7% vs 59.8%; p = 0.025) and patients experiencing a > or = 25% improvement in cough symptoms (57.9% vs 39.0%; p = 0.018). The costs per exacerbation-free patient, per patient with a > or = 25% improvement in cough and wheeze symptoms from baseline, and per symptom-free day were lower in the FP groups than in the placebo group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for these end points indicated that the additional benefits of FP, 200 microg/d, were achieved at a lower overall cost compared with placebo treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of the Danish health-care system, FP, 100 microg bid, administered via the Babyhaler inhalation device was cost-effective relative to standard therapy with bronchodilators alone.

A comparison of the efficacy and safety of a half dose of fluticasone propionate with beclamethasone dipropionate and budesonide in childhood asthma

This study was carried out in an attempt to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) at the half dose of budesonide (BUD) and beclamethasone dipropionate (BD) in childhood asthma. Ninety-six children with moderate to severe asthma (9.6 +/- 2.17 years) whose asthma was already controlled on BUD (n = 52) or BD (n = 44) were recruited into the study. In the first part of the study (the first 12 weeks) each group was followed with three weekly lung function measurements, daily diary records, and peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements on the initial medication. At the end of 6 weeks, drugs were switched to a half dose of FP, and the subjects were followed for another 6 weeks. Blood samples were obtained for osteocalcin and plasma cortisol levels after each treatment period. In the second part of the study, 50 patients continued to take FP at the half dose of BUD or BD for another 30 weeks. Clinic visits, including lung function and PEF measurements, were conducted every 10 weeks. After 6 weeks of FP treatment, there was a small but statistically significant decrease in FEV1 and FEF(25-75) in both groups (BUD and BD) without any significant obstruction. These mild changes in lung function measurements continued during long-term follow-up. However, there was no statistically significant further decrease in any lung function parameters while receiving FP (visits 3-8) (coefficient = -0.00751 L/day, p = 0.39 for FEF(25-75) and coefficient = -0.00910 L/sec/day, p = 0.055 for FEV1). There were no significant changes in the morning and evening PEF measurements and diurnal PEF variations after 6 weeks of treatment with FP compared with BUD and BD treatments. There were no significant changes in basal cortisol and osteocalcin levels before or after 6 weeks of FP treatment (p > 0.05). The present study concluded that, although FP at the half dose of BUD or BD seems to maintain reasonable control of the disease symptoms, a mild but significant and persistent decrease in lung function parameters may indicate that FP may not be twice as potent as BUD or BD in childhood asthma by evaluation of lung functions. This conclusion must be further verified with long-term studies.

Efficacy of nebulized fluticasone propionate compared with oral prednisolone in children with an acute exacerbation of asthma

The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of nebulized fluticasone propionate (FP Nebules) compared with oral soluble prednisolone in children with an acute exacerbation of asthma. The study used an international, multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group design. Three hundred and twenty-one patients, aged 4-16 years old, who presented with an acute exacerbation of asthma, were randomly allocated to either nebulized FP (1 mg b.d.) or oral prednisolone (2 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 4 days then 1 mg kg(-1) day(-1) for 3 days) for 7 days. Patients in the FP group showed a significantly greater increase in diary card morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) over 7 days compared with patients in the prednisolone group (difference = 9.51 min(-1), CI = 2.1, 16.8, P = 0.034). Similar increases for both treatments were shown for evening PEF. Clinic PEF improved with both treatments, but was significantly greater in patients taking FP after 7 days (difference = 11.41 min(-1), CI = 2.8, 20.0, P = 0.029). Both treatments reduced symptom scores to a similar extent. The two treatments were well tolerated, and there was no difference in the incidence of adverse events. The present study demonstrated that nebulized FP is at least as effective as oral prednisolone in the treatment of children presenting with an acute exacerbation of asthma.

Cost-efficacy comparison of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in the treatment of asthma

BACKGROUND

The results of a recent meta-analysis comparing 2 inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate (FP) and budesonide, demonstrated that FP had an improved efficacy-to-safety ratio compared with budesonide. However, limited data are available on the relative economic benefits of these 2 regimens.

OBJECTIVE

This pharmacoeconomic analysis used individual patient data from studies in the meta-analysis to compare the relative cost-efficacy of 2 asthma regimens from the perspective of a US third-party payer.

METHODS

This analysis included all 7 studies in the meta-analysis that compared budesonide with FP dosed at approximately half the dose of budesonide and that included measurement of daily morning peak expiratory flow (PEF).

RESULTS

The total daily per-person cost of asthma management was higher for patients treated with budesonide than with FP ($3.00 vs $2.25, respectively). Treatment with FP had greater cost-efficacy than treatment with budesonide, based on a range of outcome measures that included improvement in morning PEF, symptom-free days, and episode-free days. The daily cost per effectively treated patient (an increase in PEF of > or = 10%) was $5.62 with FP and $10.05 with budesonide. The cost per symptom-free day was $4.36 with FP, compared with $6.67 with budesonide. The cost per episode-free day was $5.60 with FP and $9.42 with budesonide. The pharmacoeconomic difference continued to favor FP as the criteria for success were made more stringent and the cost of budesonide was lowered.

CONCLUSION

Based on data from the 7 randomized, controlled trials, treatment of asthma with FP was more effective and less expensive, using US health care assumptions and costs, than treatment with budesonide.

Inhaled fluticasone propionate. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma

Contemporary asthma management guidelines list inhaled corticosteroids as the preferred controller medication for patients with persistent asthma. Despite the availability of explicit guidelines, there is evidence that these agents are underused and that guidelines are not always adhered to. Fluticasone propionate is one of several inhaled corticosteroids used for the treatment of asthma. Like other agents of its class, its efficacy is backed by extensive clinical data. More recently, the quality of life of recipients of fluticasone propionate and its relative cost effectiveness have been investigated. A series of comparative analyses show that inhaled fluticasone propionate is more cost effective than oral zafirlukast and triamcinolone acetonide and slightly more cost effective than flunisolide in adult patients with asthma. Analyses used cost per symptom-free day and/or cost per successfully treated patient as outcome measures and were generally conducted from the perspective of the third-party payer. When administered at a microgram dose of half or less than budesonide (as is therapeutically appropriate), the cost effectiveness of fluticasone propionate was similar to or better than that of budesonide. In children, fluticasone propionate was more cost effective per treatment success compared with inhaled sodium cromoglycate. Quality-of-life assessments in patients with mild to moderate disease show that inhaled fluticasone propionate achieved improvements which were deemed to be clinically meaningful in patients with mild to moderate asthma; these changes were significantly greater than those achieved with oral zafirlukast, inhaled triamcinolone acetonide or placebo. Greater improvements were evident with inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with severe disease.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the considerable body of clinical evidence supporting the use of inhaled fluticasone propionate in patients with asthma, accumulating short term cost-effectiveness data also suggest that this agent can be administered for a similar or lower cost per outcome than other inhaled corticosteroids or oral zafirlukast. Importantly, the clinical benefits offered by fluticasone propionate in patients with persistent asthma are accompanied by clinically significant improvements in quality of life.

Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/100 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in children with asthma

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety in children of salmeterol (50 microg twice daily) plus fluticasone propionate (100 microg twice daily) when delivered together via a single Diskus inhaler (Seretide; combination therapy) or concurrently using two separate Diskus inhalers (concurrent therapy). In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 257 children with reversible airways obstruction who remained symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg daily) alone were randomized to combination or concurrent therapy for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), symptom scores, and rescue salbutamol use. In addition, lung function tests were performed at each clinic visit. Safety assessments included monitoring of adverse events and morning serum cortisol concentrations. The primary efficacy parameter (mean morning PEF) increased during treatment in both groups; adjusted mean changes were 33 and 28 L/min for the combination and concurrent therapies, respectively. The 90% confidence interval for the difference in mean morning PEF between treatment groups was within the +15 L/min criterion for clinical equivalence. Similarly, there were improvements in pulmonary function, symptom score, and rescue salbutamol use during treatment in both groups, with no significant differences between the combination and concurrent therapy groups for any of these secondary efficacy parameters. Both treatment regimens were well-tolerated and had comparable adverse event profiles. Mean morning serum cortisol levels increased similarly in both groups during the study. In conclusion, salmeterol and fluticasone propionate therapy given as a new combination product is as safe and effective in children with asthma as the same drugs given concurrently via separate inhalers.

Cost-effectiveness of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product 50/250 microg twice daily and budesonide 800 microg twice daily in the treatment of adults and adolescents with asthma. International Study Group

Despite a good understanding of the disease and its treatments, asthma continues to place a large economic burden on healthcare systems. As such, it is important to consider the economic impact of alternative therapeutic options for the treatment of this condition to ensure that scarce resources are used in the most efficient manner possible. Thus, the aim of asthma management from an economic perspective is to reduce the burden of this disease through maximizing health gain with available resources. A prospective economic analysis was conducted as part of a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, comparative trial of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SFC) 50/250 microg twice daily vs. budesonide (800 microg twice daily) in adults and adolescents with asthma who were symptomatic despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroids at doses of 800-1200 microg day(-1). Treatment effectiveness was measured in terms of successfully-treated weeks, defined as a > or =5% improvement in morning peak expiratory flow, episode-free days (a day without the need for rescue medication, no nocturnal awakening or adverse events) and symptom-free days. Cost-effectiveness analyses were performed using direct healthcare and drug costs, from the perspective of the Swedish healthcare system (1998 prices), with appropriate sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of the findings. Overall, SFC produced significantly higher (P<0.001) proportions of successfully-treated weeks, episode-free days and symptom-free days. Direct asthma management costs were similar between the two groups [SEK19.6 ($US2.4) for SFC vs. SEK18.5 (SUS2.2) for budesonide]. The cost per successfully-treated week was lower for SFC than for budesonide [SEK204 ($US24.8) vs. SEK300 ($US36.4) per week], as were the costs per episode-free day [SEK51.1 ($US6.2) vs. SEK75.1 ($US9.1) per day] and symptom-free day [SEK42.2 ($US5.1) vs. SEK53.0 ($US6.4) per day]. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios showed that the additional costs to achieve additional benefits with SFC were minimal. Costs per additional successfully-treated week, symptom-free day and episode-free day with SFC were SEK31.6 ($US3.9), SEK9.2 ($US1.1) and SEK7.7 ($US0.9), respectively, relative to budesonide. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were stable over a wide range of assumptions. The results suggest that SFC is a more cost-effective treatment than budesonide in the management of moderate to severe asthma.

The effect of inhaled steroids on the linear growth of children with asthma: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether inhaled steroid therapy causes delayed linear growth in children with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

Medline (1966-1998), Embase (1980-1998), and Cinahl (1982-1998) databases and bibliographies of included studies were searched for randomized, controlled trials of inhaled steroid therapy in children with asthma that evaluated linear growth.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they met the following criteria: subjects 0 to 18 years of age with the clinical diagnosis of asthma; subjects randomized to inhaled beclomethasone, budesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone, or triamcinolone versus a nonsteroidal inhaled control for a minimum of 3 months; single- or double-blind; and outcome convertible to linear growth velocity. English- and non-English-language trials were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted using a priori guidelines. Methodologic quality was assessed independently by both authors. Outcome was extracted as linear growth velocity.

RESULTS

Included trials were subgrouped by inhaled steroid. The beclomethasone subgroup, with 4 studies and 450 subjects, showed a decrease in linear growth velocity of 1.51 cm/year (95% confidence interval: 1.15,1.87). The fluticasone subgroup, with 1 study and 183 subjects, showed a decrease in linear growth velocity of.43 cm/year (95% confidence interval:.01,.85). Sensitivity analysis in the beclomethasone subgroup, which evaluated study quality, mode of medication delivery, control medication, and statistical model, showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that moderate doses of beclomethasone and fluticasone in children with mild to moderate asthma cause a decrease in linear growth velocity of 1.51 cm/year and.43 cm/year, respectively. The effects of inhaled steroids when given for >54 weeks, or on final adult height, remain unknown.

The role of inhaled corticosteroids in children with asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids offer a wide range of anti-inflammatory activity and have consistently proved to be the most effective medication for the control of childhood asthma. The high efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids has led to their use in milder disease and younger children in the hope that permanent changes in lung function and airway remodelling may be prevented. However, evidence has emerged over the past six years that the first of the inhaled corticosteroids to become available, beclomethasone dipropionate, may cause growth deceleration at a dose of 400 microg per day. This is especially apparent in children with mild symptoms. The newest of the inhaled corticosteroids to be developed, fluticasone propionate, is equipotent to older compounds at half the dose and in low doses is superior in efficacy to sodium cromoglycate. Two recent studies have shown that fluticasone propionate 100-200 microg per day does not cause growth suppression in children with mild asthma. The long term outcome for children who wheeze in early life is difficult to predict. For this reason the use of inhaled corticosteroids in very young children is best reserved for those with severe symptoms or a strong family history of asthma, and evidence, from measurement of inflammatory markers, of airway inflammation.

Effects of 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate 100 mcg b.d. by comparison with zafirlukast 20 mg b.d. on bronchial hyper-responsiveness in patients with mild to moderate asthma

This study was designed to compare the effects of low-dose inhaled fluticasone propionate (100 mcg twice daily) with those of the leukotriene antagonist, zafirlukast (20 mg twice daily), on bronchial hyper-responsiveness. The study recruited 30 patients (nine men, 21 women; mean age 45 years) with forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) > 50% and airway reversibility to salbutamol > or =15%. This was a single centre, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over study, composed of two successive 2-week treatment periods, each preceded by a 2-4 week single-blind placebo period. Following 2 weeks of treatment with fluticasone propionate and zafirlukast, the mean provocational concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) histamine was 1.61 mg ml(-1) (SD 2.34) and 0.99 mg ml(-1) (SD 1.74) respectively. Taking baseline differences into account, the difference between treatments was equivalent to 0.77 doubling doses of histamine (95% CI, 0.05-1.50; P=0.037). Morning peak flow values were significantly higher (17 l min(-1); P=0.049) after treatment with fluticasone propionate during the second week of treatment. Both treatments were well tolerated. The results of this short-term study show that compared with zafirlukast, a low dose of fluticasone propionate offers greater clinical benefit and is more cost effective.

Beclomethasone for asthma in children: effects on linear growth

BACKGROUND

Inhaled steroids play a central role in the management of childhood asthma. There is concern about their side effects, especially on growth. However asthma may also cause growth retardation. Growth rates are not stable, so randomised controlled parallel group studies are needed to assess the impact of inhaled steroids on growth. This review is confine to one inhaled steroid, beclomethasone, that is known to have significant levels of systemic absorption.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether inhaled beclomethasone cause significant delay in the linear growth of children with asthma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Group asthma register was searched. Bibliographies from included studies, and known reviews were searched for additional citations. Personal contact with colleagues and researchers working in the field of asthma were made to identify potentially relevant trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effects of beclamethasone to non-steroidal medication (placebo or non-steroidal therapy) on the linear growth of children with asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data related to the clinical outcome "change in growth" were extracted by two reviewers working independently

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-nine citations were identified by the search strategy and bibliography review. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. All used beclomethasone 200 mcg twice daily delivered by dry powder Diskhaler to treat children with mild-moderate asthma. Study duration was 7-12 months. In all three studies, a significant decrease in linear growth occurred in children treated with beclomethasone compared to those receiving placebo or non-steroidal asthma therapy. The average decrease, calculated through meta-analysis, was -1.54 cm per year (95% CI -1.15, -1.94).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

In children with mild-moderate asthma, beclomethasone 200 mcg twice daily caused a decrease in linear growth of -1.54 cm per year. These studies lasted a maximum of 54 weeks, so it remains unclear whether the decrease in growth is sustained or whether it reverses with 'catch up' after therapy is discontinued. We are unable to comment on growth effects of other inhaled steroids that have potentially less systemic effects. If inhaled steroids are required to control a child's asthma, we recommend using the minimum dose that effectively controls the child's asthma and closely following growth.

Comparison of the efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate, 880 microg/day, with flunisolide, 1500 microg/day, in moderate-to-severe persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids have become the mainstay of asthma therapy. Few studies however, have compared inhaled steroids in children. We compared the efficacy of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP), 880 microg/day (2 puffs of 220 microg/puff, BID) with inhaled flunisolide (FLU), 1500 microg/day (3 puffs of 250 microg/puff, BID).

METHODS

Thirty children with moderate to severe asthma, mean age 12.7 years (range 10 to 17 years), mean duration of asthma 8.4 years, initially received flunisolide 1500 microg/day for 1 year, and then were switched to fluticasone propionate 880 microg/day and followed for an additional year. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were monitored and analyzed before and after the switch for the duration of study. Mean percent predicted for age values for FVC, FEV1, FEF25-75%, and FEFR were compared at 1 month, 2 to 6-month intervals, and 7 to 12-month intervals and during the same season of the year. Pulmonary function tests within 3 weeks of an exacerbation were not included in the study. The number of asthma exacerbations, emergency room visits, hospital admissions, and number of school days lost were also compared.

RESULTS

There was significant improvement in mean asthma exacerbations/patient/year (1.7 +/- 1.66 SD) versus (4 +/- 2.6) (P < .0002); mean emergency room visits/patient/year (0.23 +/- 0.62) versus (1.2 +/- 1.74) (P = .004); mean hospital admissions for asthma/patient/year (0.2 +/- 0.61) versus (1.13 +/- 1.45) (P < .0002); and number of school days lost/patient/year (1.4 +/- 2.38) versus (7.93 +/- 6.7) (P < .0002) while patients were receiving fluticasone propionate as compared with flunisolide. Also, the mean percent values predicted for age in all time-periods (at 1 month, 2 to 6 months, and 7 to 12 months) revealed significant improvement in FEV1 and FEF25-75% (P < .05 for both parameters). As PFT can be affected by seasonal changes, PFT parameters were compared during the same season of the year and significant improvement in FVC and FEV1 was observed in all seasons while patients were receiving fluticasone propionate (FP) compared with flunisolide (FLU) (P < .05 for all parameters). Significant improvement in PEFR and FEF25-75% was observed only in spring and summer season.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate 880 microg/day improved lung function and quality of life in adolescents with moderate-to-severe asthma when compared with flunisolide 1500 microg/day.

The effect of high-dose fluticasone propionate and budesonide on lung function and asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma

The purpose of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of equal doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) and inhaled budesonide (BUD) using their respective dry powder inhalers in a population of severe asthmatics requiring high doses of inhaled corticosteroid. This double-blind double-dummy parallel-group study compared the effects of 24 weeks of treatment with FP (2000 micrograms daily via a Diskhaler inhaler; Glaxo Wellcome, Evreux, France) and BUD (2000 micrograms daily via a Turbuhaler inhaler; Astra Pharmaceuticals, Rijswijka, Netherlands) on lung function and asthma exacerbations in 395 patients with asthma. FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD with respect to the percentage of symptom-free days (P = 0.02), the incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage (P = 0.02) and the distribution of change in peak expiratory flow (PEF) expressed as a percentage of the predicted PEF (P = 0.04). During the treatment period FP was statistically significantly superior to BUD for change in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at 8, 16 and 24 weeks, change in the median daytime symptom score during weeks 5-16, for incidence of symptom-free days and incidence of days free from rescue bronchodilator usage during weeks 17-24. There was no significant difference between FP and BUD with respect to the number of patients experiencing one or more asthma exacerbation (33.8 and 28.4% of patients, respectively). There was, however, evidence that the exacerbations were clinically less severe in patients treated with FP, in that the time to resolution was quicker (11.0 vs. 14.7 days; P = 0.035), mean duration of all exacerbations (for an individual patient) tended to be shorter (18.5 vs. 23.6 days; P = 0.12), the time off work was reduced (4.2 vs. 7.6 days; P = 0.012) and the lowest PEF recorded during the exacerbation was higher (301 vs. 263 l min-1; P = 0.07). There were no clinically relevant differences in the safety (serum cortisol levels, markers of bone turnover, adverse events) of FP and BUD at these microgram equivalent doses. The patients recruited into this study, in retrospect, probably had no need for such high doses of inhaled corticosteroid but, irrespective of this, FP at microgram equivalent doses showed evidence of superior efficacy to BUD with respect to lung function and severity of asthma exacerbations without producing any greater adverse systemic effect.

Measures of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in patients with asthma treated with inhaled glucocorticoids: clinical and research implications

In asthmatic patients treated with inhaled glucocorticoids there may be a risk of suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) function. The aim of the present study was to review peer-refereed data on HPA function in asthmatic patients taking inhaled glucocorticoids, and to discuss the value of HPA function measures in clinical practice and research. There is no evidence that inhaled glucocorticoids in recommended doses cause clinically significant HPA insufficiency. If sensitive measures of basal adrenal activity are used, however, dose-related suppressive effects with specific drugs and application systems can be detected. In adults, fluticasone propionate appears to be more potent than budesonide or triamcinolone acetonide in suppressing measures of basal adrenal activity. Measures of basal adrenal activity are useful in clinical trials that assess and compare systemic activity of specific drugs, application devices, and administration regimens, but have no place in the management of asthma.

Adrenal suppression secondary to inhaled fluticasone propionate

BACKGROUND

Inhaled glucocorticoids are the medical treatment of choice in many of patients with asthma. Fluticasone propionate is an inhaled glucocorticoid with little systemic bioavailability via the oral route and infrequent association with systemic adverse effects at the recommended dosage.

OBJECTIVE

To report a case of adrenal suppression and exogenous glucocorticoid excess from inhaled fluticasone propionate.

METHODS

A 9-year-old girl with a previous history of episodic asthma was placed on 550 microg of fluticasone propionate daily for severe labile asthma diagnosed by history and methacholine challenge. The patient returned 6 months later with complaints of increased appetite, nausea, and feeling "hot and flushed." On physical exam she had stigmata of Cushing's syndrome. The patient subsequently developed orthostatic hypotension and moderate dehydration following a viral illness. After a long taper of fluticasone propionate the patient' s adrenal function returned to normal and she had no acute or chronic exacerbations of her asthma.

RESULTS

Her 8 AM cortisol was undetectable with an ACTH of 21 pg/mL. The serum prolactin, TSH, free thyroxine, insulin-like growth factor I, and renin activity were all normal. An MRI study of her head was also normal. Repeat methacholine challenges while receiving a much smaller dose fluticasone propionate showed a significant decrease in airway reactivity.

CONCLUSION

Adrenal suppression can occur from inhaled fluticasone propionate at a dosage less than has been previously reported.

The cost-effectiveness of inhaled fluticasone propionate and budesonide in the treatment of asthma in adults and children

Inhaled corticosteroids form the mainstay of the treatment and management of asthma and the results of a meta-analysis comparing two of the most frequently prescribed inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide, administered in a clinically equivalent 1:2 dose ratio to 1980 patients with asthma, demonstrated that fluticasone propionate had an improved efficacy:safety ratio. However, limited data are available on the relative economic benefits of fluticasone propionate and budesonide. The database for clinically relevant parameters, for which the efficacy:safety meta-analysis had demonstrated statistical significance between the two corticosteroids, was used for this pharmacoeconomic analysis. Treatment with fluticasone propionate was more cost-effective than budesonide with respect to improvement in morning peak expiratory flow rate, successfully treated weeks, symptom-free days, symptom-free 24 h and episode-free days. The costs of treatment for fluticasone propionate and budesonide were 7.78 Pounds per week and 12.33 Pounds per week, respectively. The main contributing factor to the higher costs of budesonide was the higher cost of health care contacts, which were 4.53 Pounds per week for budesonide and 0.57 Pounds per week for fluticasone propionate. The pharmacoeconomic difference increased in favour of fluticasone propionate as the criteria for success were made more stringent. These results demonstrate that, for asthma patients requiring modification of therapy treatment with fluticasone propionate is more effective and also cheaper, in terms of overall health-care costs, than treatment with budesonide.

A comparison of multiple doses of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate in subjects with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended for the treatment of persistent asthma. Comparative clinical studies evaluating 2 or more doses of these agents are few.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (88 micrograms twice daily and 220 micrograms twice daily) with 2 doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (168 micrograms twice daily and 336 micrograms twice daily) in subjects with persistent asthma.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-nine subjects participated in this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial. Eligible subjects were using daily inhaled corticosteroids and had an FEV1 of 45% to 80% of predicted value. Clinic visits, including spirometry, were conducted every 1 to 2 weeks. Subjects recorded symptoms, use of albuterol, and peak expiratory flows on daily diary cards.

RESULTS

Fluticasone propionate treatment resulted in significantly (P </=.034) greater improvements in objective pulmonary function parameters than did beclomethasone dipropionate treatment and significantly greater reductions in daily albuterol use (P </=.010) and asthma symptoms (P </=.027). Both low-dose (88 micrograms twice daily) and medium-dose (220 micrograms twice daily) fluticasone propionate significantly increased FEV1 compared with higher doses of beclomethasone dipropionate (P =. 006). Low-dose and medium-dose fluticasone propionate improved FEV1 by 0.31 L (14%) and 0.36 L (15%), respectively, compared with improvements of 0.18 L (8%) and 0.21 L (9%) with low-dose and medium-dose beclomethasone dipropionate. The adverse event profiles were similar for both medications.

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate provides greater asthma control at roughly half the dose of beclomethasone dipropionate, with a comparable adverse event profile.