Enteral nutrition after bone marrow transplantation

The emerging role of nutritional support in the supportive care of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents a potentially curative strategy for many oncological, hematological, metabolic, and immunological diseases in children. The continuous effort in ameliorating supportive care represents one of the cornerstones in the improvement of outcome in these patients. Nowadays, more than ever nutritional support can be considered a key feature. Oral feeding in the early post-transplant period is severely impaired because of mucositis due to conditioning regimen, characterized by, mainly by vomiting, anorexia, and diarrhea. Gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD), infections and associated treatments, and other medications, such as opioids and calcineurin inhibitors, have also been correlated with decreased oral intake. The consequent reduction in caloric intake combined with the catabolic effect of therapies and transplantation-related complications with consequent extended immobilization, results in a rapid deterioration of nutritional status, which is associated with decreased overall survival and higher complication rates during treatment. Thus, nutritional support during the early post-transplantation period becomes an essential and challenging issue for allo-HSCT recipients. In this context, the role of nutrition in the modulation of the intestinal flora is also emerging as a key player in the pathophysiology of the main complications of HSCT. The pediatric setting is characterized by less evidence, considering the challenge of addressing nutritional needs in this specific population, and many questions are still unanswered. Thus, we perform a narrative review regarding all aspects of nutritional support in pediatric allo-HSCT recipients, addressing the assessment of nutritional status, the relationship between nutritional status and clinical outcomes and the evaluation of the nutritional support, ranging from specific diets to artificial feeding.

Impact of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation on Nutritional Status and Intake in Children

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe the impact of allogeneic/haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation on nutritional status and intake in a group of children aged 2 to 18 years.

METHODS

In an observational study, data were collected prospectively. Patients were prescribed individual nutritional support by hospital routines. Anthropometrics were measured pre-transplant at hospital admission and weekly from the day of transplant (day 0) until day +28. z scores for weight, height, and BMI were calculated using Norwegian growth references to assess nutritional status. Pre-transplant diet was assessed on the day of hospitalization. Nutrient provision from enteral nutrition (EN = oral and tube) and parenteral nutrition (PN) was assessed by daily records from day +1 until day +28, or previous discharge, and compared with recommendations (RI) from the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and ESPGHAN guidelines. Total energy intake was presented as the percentage (%) of basal metabolic rate (BMR) calculated by the Schofield equation. Macro- and micronutrient provisions were presented as medians (interquartile range) and the % of RI.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients, mean age 10.3 years (range 3.5-16.6), were included. Two-thirds (n = 18) had malignant diseases. At admission, mean weight Z-score was -0.3, height z scores -0.7, and BMI Z-score 0.1. Eighteen percent (n = 5) were stunted and 25% (n = 7) had overweight. At admission, 25% (n = 7) had established tube feeding, and 7% (n = 2) also had PN. No significant changes in weight z scores were detected during the studied weeks ( P = 0.454). The median daily energy provision was 115% (110-123) of BMR and proteins 1.5 (1.3-1.8) g/kg. EN was provided during a median of 93% of the studied days and provided 21% of the energy. PN was given on a median of 96% of the studied days and provided 79% of energy. RI for vitamins, magnesium, and zinc was met. Provision of copper, iodine, selenium, calcium, and phosphate was below RI.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined EN and PN providing 115% of BMR and 1.5 g/kg protein ensured stable weight by day +28 and covered RI, except for trace elements and minerals.

Enteral versus Parenteral Nutrition as Nutritional Support after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Nutritional support for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been widely debated. Enteral nutrition (EN) is recommended as first-line nutritional support by the main international guidelines. However, these recommendations are based on weak evidence, and there is wide variability in the types of nutritional support among transplantation centers, with the majority providing parenteral nutrition (PN) instead of EN. Here we provide an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing EN and PN for nutritional support during the neutropenic period after allo-HSCT. The literature search strategy identified 13 papers, of which 10 compared clinical transplantation outcomes, 2 compared gut microbiota (GM) compositions, and 1 compared systemic metabolic profiles. For the meta-analysis, among the 10 clinical studies, 8 studies in which 2 groups were compared were selected: in 1 group, EN was provided as primary nutritional support in the neutropenic phase after allo-HSCT with or without the addition of PN (EN group), whereas in the other group, only PN was provided as nutritional support. The incidence rates of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (relative risk [RR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.86; P = .0007), aGVHD grade III-IV (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.64; P < .0001), and gut aGVHD (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.66; P < .0001) were lower in the EN group than in the PN group. No differences were found between the 2 groups with regard to the incidence of severe oral mucositis (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.09; P = .46) or overall survival at day +100 (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.21; P = .29). Other variables were too heterogeneous to perform quantitative analyses. The results of the meta-analysis showed that EN reduced the incidence of aGVHD, specifically grade III-IV and gut aGVHD. This result should prompt improved efforts to implement EN as first-line nutritional support in patients undergoing allo-HSCT. Considering the emerging evidence regarding the association between GM dysbiosis and aGVHD onset, we speculate that this protective effect could be attributed to the improved gut eubiosis observed in enterally fed patients. Further studies are warranted to better address the relationship between the GM composition, aGVHD, and the nutritional administration route during HSCT.

Enteral nutrition protects children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from blood stream infections

Enteral Nutrition (EN) is recommended as first line nutritional support for patients undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (allo-HSCT), but only few studies exist in the literature which compare EN to Parenteral Nutrition (PN) in the paediatric population.

Forty-two consecutive paediatric patients undergoing allo-HSCT at our referral centre between January 2016 and July 2019 were evaluated. Post-transplant and nutritional outcomes of patients receiving EN for more than 7 days (EN group, n = 14) were compared with those of patients receiving EN for fewer than 7 days or receiving only PN (PN group, n = 28). In the EN group, a reduced incidence of Blood Stream Infections (BSI) was observed (p = 0.02) (n = 2 vs. n = 15; 14.3% vs. 53.6%). The type of nutritional support was also the only variable independently associated with BSI in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.03). Platelet engraftment was shorter in the PN group than in the EN group for a threshold of > 20*10⁹/L (p = 0.04) (23.1 vs 35.7 days), but this correlation was not confirmed with a threshold of > 50*10⁹/L. The Body Mass Index (BMI) and the BMI Z-score were no different in the two groups from admission to discharge.

Our results highlight that EN is a feasible and nutritionally adequate method of nutritional support for children undergoing allo-HSCT in line with the present literature. Future functional studies are needed to better address the hypothesis that greater intestinal eubyosis maintained with EN may explain the observed reduction in BSI.

Better early outcome with enteral rather than parenteral nutrition in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT

There is no consensus on the type of nutritional support to introduce in children undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) after myeloablative conditioning (MAC). This retrospective, multicenter, observational study compared the early administration of enteral nutrition (EN group, n = 97) versus parenteral nutrition (PN group, n = 97) in such patients with matching for important covariates. The primary endpoint was the study of day 100 overall mortality. The early outcome at day 100 was better in EN group regarding mortality rate (1% vs. 13%; p = 0.0127), non relapse mortality (1% vs. 7%; p = 0.066), acute GVHD grades II-IV (37% vs. 54%; p = 0.0127), III-IV (18% vs. 34%; p = 0.0333) and its gut localization (16% vs. 32%; p = 0.0136). Platelet engraftment was better in EN group than in PN group for the threshold of 20 G/L (97% vs. 80% p < 0.0001) and 50 G/L (92% vs. 78%, p < 0.0001). The length of stay was shorter in EN group (28 vs. 52 days, p < 0.0001). There were no differences between the two groups regarding the polynuclear neutrophil engraftment, infection rate or mucositis occurrence. These results suggest that, in children undergoing MAC allo-SCT, PN should be reserved to the only cases when up-front EN is insufficient or impossible to perform.

The burden of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning: a prospective study

This prospective study describes chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children (4-18 years) receiving their first hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Emetic episodes, nausea severity (assessed using a validated, self-report nausea severity assessment tool) and antiemetic administration were documented from the start of conditioning until 24 h after the last conditioning agent was administered (acute) and for a further 7 days (delayed). Relationships between CINV control and parenteral nutrition (PN) use and acute gut GvHD (aGvHD) were explored. Fifty-nine children (4.6-17.4 years) were evaluable. Complete chemotherapy-induced vomiting (CIV; acute: 24%; delayed 22%) and chemotherapy-induced nausea (CIN; acute 7%; delayed 12%) control rates were low. Few children experienced complete CINV control (no vomiting/retching and no nausea) during the acute (5%) or delayed phases (12%). Children experiencing complete acute or delayed CIN control or complete delayed CIV control were more likely to have received: a lower proportion of their total energy requirement as PN at the end of the delayed phase (P<0.036) and PN for a shorter time (P<0.044). Low patient numbers did not permit evaluation of the association between gut aGvHD and CINV control. Effective and safe interventions aimed at improving CINV control in children are required.

WITHDRAWN: Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH METHODS

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Nutrition Issues in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: State of the Art

There have been many changes in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that affect the patient's nutrition support. In the early 1970s, allogeneic transplants were the most common types of HSCTs; today, autologous transplants are the most common. Bone marrow, peripheral blood, and umbilical cord blood all now serve as sources of stem cells. Conditioning therapies include myeloablative, reduced-intensity myeloablative, and nonmyeloablative regimens. New medications are being developed and used to minimize the toxicities of the conditioning therapy and to minimize infectious complications. Supportive therapies for renal and liver complications have changed. In the past, HSCT patients received parenteral nutrition (PN) throughout their hospitalization and sometimes as home therapy. Because of medical complications and cost issues associated with PN, many centers are now working to use less PN and increase use of enteral nutrition. The immunosuppressed diet has changed from a sterile diet prepared under laminar-flow hoods to a more liberal diet that avoids high-risk foods and emphasizes safety in food handling practices. This article will review these changes in HSCT and the impact of these changes on the nutrition support of the patient.

Weight Gain and Height Velocity in Young Children 1 Year Following Bone Marrow Transplant: A Single Institution Study

The nutritional and growth effects on children following a bone marrow transplant (BMT) have not been well documented. The purpose of this study was to describe the growth patterns of young children during the first year following BMT. A retrospective chart review was used to examine the nutritional status of 25 young children, 1 to 6 years of age, who received an allogeneic BMT. Nutritional data were reviewed prior to BMT and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months following BMT. The mean weight gain was 2.5 kg with a median weight gain of 2.3 kg (range, -1.2 to 9.4 kg). The mean height gain was 7 cm with a median height gain of 7.4 cm (range, 1.2 to 16.8 cm). Growth related to gender, age, and incidence of infection was similar to the overall average; however, children with graft-versus-host disease revealed poor weight and height gain. Nurses must learn to recognize patients at nutritional risk and intervene when necessary. More research is needed to address specific nutritional needs of the pediatric BMT patient.

Enteral Nutrition and Bone Marrow Transplantation

This retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of enteral nutrition for pediatric patients undergoing the challenging treatment of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. During the period from January 1999 to May 2000, 15 patients were transplant recipients. On admission to the hospital, 87% of patients were above the 50th percentile for weight for age. Nasogastric tubes were inserted while platelet counts remained greater than 50 × 10 9 mL/L. A specialized elemental formula for pediatric patients was commenced. These feeds were administered continuously and were titrated until caloric requirement or tolerance level had been achieved. During hospitalization for bone marrow transplantation, enteral nutrition was the major form of nutritional support for all patients. Enteral feeds continued even during maximal gut toxicity and were supported with antiemetics and analgesia. There were insignificant weight fluctuations during hospitalization, with 80% of children above the 50th percentile weight for age being discharged. Enteral nutrition via a nasogastric tube was effective in the provision of nutrition during bone marrow transplantation and continues to have an important role in this unit.

Could enteral nutrition improve the outcome of patients with haematological malignancies undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation? A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (the NEPHA study)

BACKGROUND

Myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a major procedure usually accompanied by multifactorial malnutrition, prompting the recommendation of systematic artificial nutritional support. Parenteral nutrition (PN) is usually administered during allo-HSCT, essentially for practical reasons. Recently published data suggest that enteral nutrition (EN), given as systematic artificial nutrition support, could decrease grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and infectious events, which are associated with early toxicity after allo-HSCT and then have an impact on early transplant-related mortality (D100 mortality).

METHODS/DESIGN

We report on the NEPHA trial: an open-label, prospective, randomised, multi-centre study on two parallel groups, which has been designed to evaluate the effect of EN compared to PN on early toxicity after an allo-HSCT procedure. Two hundred forty patients treated with allo-HSCT for a haematological malignancy will be randomly assigned to two groups to receive either EN or PN. The primary endpoint will assess the effect of EN on D100 mortality. Secondary endpoints will compare EN and PN with regards to the main haematological, infectious and nutritional outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The impacts of nutritional support should exceed the limits of nutritional status improvement: EN may directly reduce immunological and infectious events, as well as decrease early transplant-related morbidity and mortality. EN and PN need to be prospectively compared in order to assess their impacts and to provide treatment guidelines. (Clinical trials gov number: NCT01955772; registration: July 19th, 2013).

Rotavirus in organ transplantation: drug-virus-host interactions

Although rotavirus is usually recognized as the most common etiology of diarrhea in young children, it can in fact cause severe diseases in organ transplantation recipients irrespective of pediatric or adult patients. This comprehensive literature analysis revealed 200 cases of rotavirus infection with 8 related deaths in the setting of organ transplantation been recorded. Based on published cohort studies, an average incidence of 3% (187 infections out of 6176 organ recipients) was estimated. Rotavirus infection often causes severe gastroenteritis complications and occasionally contributes to acute cellular rejection in these patients. Immunosuppressive agents, universally used after organ transplantation to prevent organ rejection, conceivably play an important role in such a severe pathogenesis. Interestingly, rotavirus can in turn affect the absorption and metabolism of particular immunosuppressive medications via several distinct mechanisms. Even though rotaviral enteritis is self-limiting in general, infected transplantation patients are usually treated with intensive care, rehydration and replacement of nutrition, as well as applying preventive strategies. This article aims to properly assess the clinical impact of rotavirus infection in the setting of organ transplantation and to disseminate the interactions among the virus, host and immunosuppressive medications.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Nourishing a child undergoing bone marrow transplant (BMT) is essential, but the optimal method to achieve this is not established. The objectives of the study were to investigate the incidence and risk factors for complications of gastrostomy tubes in patients with BMT.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of pediatric patients who received a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) either for BMT or for other indications during a 3-year period. Occurrences of complications, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at time of PEG placement, and ANC at time of complication were reviewed for both BMT and the comparison group.

RESULTS

Of the 11 subjects in the BMT group, 4 (36%) had a major complication of infection related to PEG and 3 of those required PEG removal. Two of the 4 subjects who developed a major complication were moderately neutropenic at the time of PEG placement and all subjects were neutropenic at the time of complication. Of the 30 subjects in the comparison group, only 1 (2.8%) had a major complication with cellulitis. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups before PEG placement for age, weight, albumin, or white blood cell count. The incidence of complication in BMT compared with the comparison group was significant (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support that ANC should be considered before placement of PEG, significant neutropenia may be a contraindication for PEG placement in BMT patients, and other modalities for nutrition support might need to be considered.

Perceptions of Nutrition Support in Pediatric Oncology Patients and Parents

An estimated 60% of pediatric oncology patients experience malnutrition during cancer therapy. Initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) are interventions aimed at maintaining and promoting growth. Limited literature addressing perceptions of nutrition support methods exists. To develop effective guidelines on nutrition education, it is important to understand perceptions regarding nutrition support. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe perceptions of pediatric oncology patients and parents regarding the use of EN and PN and identify influencing variables. A convenience sample of pediatric oncology patients and parents were surveyed at a large Midwestern children’s hospital. The majority of those surveyed chose PN over EN if they or their child were unable to eat or maintain their nutritional status. Perceptions may be influenced by comfort, ease of nutrition or medication administration, experience, health care team’s recommendation, choice, and image. This study provides health care professionals an initial opportunity to understand perceptions of EN and PN, which may provide a foundation for a multi-institutional study and enhance patient and family education.

Enteral nutrition is feasible in pediatric stem cell transplantation patients

We aimed to demonstrate whether enteral nutrition (EN) is feasible in daily practice of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).Nutritional records of 100 patients were evaluated. Patients with poor oral intake were fed by EN with tube. A total of 79 patients required nutritional support. Of them, 71 were fed by EN only. Five were fed by EN plus parenteral nutrition (PN),three were fed by PN only. Median duration of EN was 21 days. In the EN only group, 68% gained or maintained their weight. EN should be considered as a feasible option for nutrition support in children undergoing HSCT.

Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders after bone marrow transplant

Reduced oral intake is a known complication of bone marrow transplant (BMT) and may result in short-term tube feedings. Although most children return to typical eating habits, a subgroup of children requires intervention. The focus of the current investigation was to retrospectively identify the incidence and characteristics of feeding and swallowing disorders in pediatric patients during the first 100 days after BMT and to determine what factors contribute to feeding/swallowing disorders past the BMT acute phase (100+ d). The charts of 292 sequential patients undergoing BMT were reviewed. Seventy-two children (25%) were referred for feeding and/or swallowing intervention with a mean age of 78.6 months (SD=±63.4). Sixteen patients underwent instrumental evaluation with swallowing dysfunction identified in 50% (n=8) of the patients. Oral-motor dysfunction was reported in 33% (n=24) and feeding disorders occurred in 61% (n=44) of the patients referred for treatment. This single-institution review describes the impact of this interruption in the first 100 days after transplant on feeding and swallowing and determined what factors place a child at an increased risk for requiring tube feeding for 100+ days after transplant. The type of BMT, the use of a tube during the first 100 days, and the age were all significant predictors of requiring a tube when considered together for the individual patient. Children who do not require a tube in the first 100 days are significantly less likely to require one in future, approximately 85% less likely to require one whereas children receiving an autologous transplant are approximately 70% less likely to require a tube than children receiving an allogenic transplant. Providers should consider an intervention for younger children undergoing BMT to help maintain or facilitate the development of their feeding and swallowing skills. This may lead to improved feeding outcome in the pediatric BMT population.

Enteral nutrition during bone marrow transplantation in patients with pediatric cancer: a prospective cohort study

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Cancer patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation (BMT) often require nutritional therapy due to treatment toxicities. The aim here was to evaluate the use of tube feeding and its applicability, indications, contraindications and complications in these patients.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Prospective observational study conducted at a public university in São Paulo between January 2002 and August 2007.

METHODS

The patients were followed up daily in the BMT unit by a research dietitian. Tube feeding was indicated when oral supplementation proved to be insufficient, when the patient had severe malnutrition or there was an impediment to use of oral feeding. It was contraindicated in the presence of gastrointestinal toxicity of grade 3 and 4 or other conditions that implied a risk or hindered its use or placement. Complications of tube feeding were divided into minor and major, according to whether they had life-threatening implications.

RESULTS

Forty-two (47.2%) patients had indications for tube feeding: the main reasons were transplantation inadequate food and supplement intake, insufficient intake with malnutrition or weight loss, severe malnutrition or need for oral fasting. Thirty-one (73.8%) received tube feeding: 11 autologous and 20 allogenic patients (P = 0.04). The main contraindications were severe gastrointestinal toxicities and sinusitis. Minor complications from tube feeding were more prevalent in patients with allogenic BMT, but no major complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Enteral nutrition is a feasible procedure in patients undergoing BMT and should be encouraged. The main difficulty in BMT patients, in relation to tube feeding, is gastrointestinal toxicities.

Resultados da implantação de um algoritmo para terapia nutricional enteral em crianças e adolescentes com câncer

Objetivo Descrever o algoritmo e os resultados globais após sua implantação. Métodos Ensaio clínico randomizado realizado com pacientes com câncer e desnutrição. O acompanhamento foi guiado por algoritmo, e desnutridos leves eram randomizados para suplementação oral industrializada ou artesanal, reavaliados após três, oito e doze semanas. Dependendo da resposta no grupo suplementação oral indus-trializada, indicava-se suplemento industrializado por sonda, mantinha-se suplementação oral industrializada ou ela era suspensa. O grupo suplementação oral artesanal com resposta positiva permaneceu com a mesma orientação; se negativa iniciou com suplementação oral industrializada. Nos desnutridos graves, resposta negativa indicou suplemento industrializado por sonda, positiva manteve suplementação oral industrializada ou ela era suspensa no caso de eutrofia. A avaliação das respostas foi realizada por meio do escore-Z de peso para estatura, índice de massa corpórea, prega cutânea triciptal e circunferências. Resultados Cento e dezessete de 141 pacientes completaram três semanas iniciais; 58 desnutridos grave e 59 leve. Evolução nutricional positiva ocorreu em 41% dos graves, em 97% dos leves com suplementação oral industrializada e em 77% dos desnutridos leves com suplementação oral artesanal. Dos 117, 42 tiveram indicação de suplemento industrializado por sonda; 23 usaram e 19 recusaram, mantendo suplementação oral industrializada. Pacientes que usaram suplemento industrializado por sonda apresentaram consumo de suplemento superior aos demais; o consumo de suplemento industrializado por sonda também foi superior quando comparado ao período anterior com suplementação oral industrializada nos mesmos pacientes. O uso de suplemento industrializado por sonda demonstrou melhorar o estado nutricional, com associação positiva entre sua duração e evolução nutricional. Conclusão Suplementação oral industrializada reduziu o deficit nutricional, principalmente em desnutridos leves. Os resultados sugerem que a suplemento industrializado por sonda favoreceu a recuperação nutricional, principalmente com o uso mais prolongado.

Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Nutrition support for bone marrow transplant patients

BACKGROUND

This is an update of the original Cochrane review published in Issue 2, 2002. Bone marrow transplantation involves administration of toxic chemotherapy and infusion of marrow cells. After treatment, patients can develop poor appetite, mucositis and gastrointestinal failure, leading to malnutrition. To prevent this, parenteral nutrition (PN) support is often first choice but is associated with increased risk of infection. Enteral nutrition (EN) is an alternative, as is addition of substrates.

OBJECTIVES

To determine efficacy of EN or PN support for patients receiving bone marrow transplant.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Search of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL in November 2000 and subsequently June 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs that compared one form of nutrition support with another, or control, for bone marrow transplant patients.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Twenty nine studies were identified. Data were collected on participants' characteristics; adverse effects; neutropaenia; % change in body weight; graft versus host disease; and survival.

MAIN RESULTS

In two studies (82 participants) glutamine mouthwash reduced number of days patients were neutropenic (6.82 days, 95%CI (1.67 to 11.98) P = 0.009) compared with placebo. Three studies reported (103 participants) that patients receiving PN with glutamine had reduced hospital stay, 6.62 d (95%CI 3.47 to 9.77, P = 0.00004) compared with patients receiving standard PN. However, in the update a further study was added (147 participants) which altered the pooled results: duration in hospital may be increased for those who receive PN with additional glutamine - 0.22 days (95%CI (1.29 to 1.72). Two other studies reported that (73 participants) patients receiving PN plus glutamine had reduced incidence of positive blood cultures (OR 0.23, 95%CI 0.08 to 0.65, P = 0.006) compared to those receiving standard PN. However, a study from the update (113 participants in total) showed the odds of having a positive blood culture have increased but are still less likely if the patient receives PN with glutamine compared to standard PN (OR 0.46, 95%CI 0.20 to 1.04). When patients were given PN versus IV hydration, (25 participants) patients receiving PN had a higher incidence of line infections (OR 21.23, 95%CI 4.15 to 108.73, P = 0.0002) compared to those receiving standard IV fluids. The update identified one study which recognised that (55 participants) those who received IV were likely to spend less time in hospital, 3.30 days (95%CI -0.38 to 6.98, P = 0.08), although this result was not significant. As reported in the original review there remains no evaluable data to properly compare PN with EN.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this update an additional study that compared PN and Glutamine versus standard PN showed that the certain benefits of parenteral nutrition with added glutamine compared to standard PN for reducing hospital stay are no longer definite. When PN with glutamine is compared with standard PN, patients may not leave hospital earlier, but do have reduced incidence of positive blood cultures, than those receiving standard PN. Where possible use of intravenous fluids and oral diet should be considered as a preference to parenteral nutrition, however, in the event of a patient suffering severe gastrointestinal failure even with a trial of enteral feeding, PN with the addition of glutamine could be considered.

Enteral Feeding and Early Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Myeloablative Conditioning

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of enteral nutrition on early outcome of patients after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). From January 2001 to January 2003, 22 patients agreed to receive enteral nutrition via a nasogastric feeding tube; the remaining 23 patients received parenteral nutrition (n=22) or standard oral feeding (n=1). Early complications and factors influencing 100-day overall survival (OS) were investigated. Patients who received enteral nutrition developed less often acute-grade III/IV graft-versus-host disease (18%) than those who did not (35%) (P=0.011). In addition, this group showed lower mortality from infection during the first 100 days after transplantation. In multivariate analyses, only the absence of enteral nutrition was found to adversely influence 100-day OS with a hazard ratio of 8.3. Enteral nutrition is a safe and effective method for feeding allo-SCT patients. A randomized trial is warranted to confirm its advantage on early patient outcome.

Diretrizes para terapia nutricional em crianças com câncer em situação crítica

Este trabalho é constituído de uma revisão de conceitos fundamentais e atualizados relacionados à terapia nutricional de crianças com câncer criticamente doentes. O objetivo principal desta revisão é discutir alterações nutricionais e metabólicas decorrentes dessa condição, bem como as indicações, recomendações, contra-indicações e complicações da terapia nutricional (nutrição enteral e parenteral) em pacientes com câncer. Este artigo aborda, de forma objetiva, a aplicação prática de alguns conceitos baseados em evidências científicas, e propõe algumas diretrizes para auxiliar na decisão da terapia nutricional no âmbito da vivência clínica. Conclui-se que há necessidade de maior incentivo ao desenvolvimento da ciência da terapia de suporte, como o tratamento das infecções, a terapia intensiva e a terapia metabólico-nutricional, para que se ampliem as possibilidades de cura de crianças e adolescentes com câncer.

A multiagent strategy to decrease regimen-related toxicity in children undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Regimen-related toxicity (RRT) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In this pilot study, we examined the feasibility and potential efficacy of administering a fixed combination of agents as a novel approach to reducing RRT in children undergoing HSCT. Thirty-seven patients were treated with ursodeoxycholic acid, folinic acid, vitamin E, and parenteral nutrition titrated to measured energy expenditure in the peritransplantation period. Outcomes were compared with those in historical controls (n = 131). Compliance with oral ursodeoxycholic acid and vitamin E of at least 90% was achieved in a mean of 86% (95% confidence interval, 75%-97%) of patients. In the study group, we observed (1) reduced prevalence and severity of mucositis (P = .008 and.004, respectively); (2) less severe hepatic toxicity (P = .007); and (3) shorter time to engraftment (P = .02) compared with the control group. These benefits appeared most pronounced among high-risk patients. The administration of this regimen, including oral medications, is feasible during the peritransplantation period, and it is well tolerated. The decreased RRT observed in comparison to historical controls suggests that combination approaches deserve exploration as a means of reducing the morbidity of HSCT.

Nutritional and metabolic support in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a sophisticated procedure consisting of the administration of high-dose chemoradiotherapy followed by intravenous infusion of hemopoietic stem cells to reestablish marrow function when bone marrow is damaged or defective. BMT is used in the treatment of solid tumors, hematologic diseases, and autoimmune disorders. Artificial nutrition, total parenteral nutrition in particular, is provided to patients undergoing BMT to minimize the nutritional consequences of both the conditioning regimens (eg, mucositis of the gastrointestinal tract) and complications resulting from the procedure (eg, graft versus host disease and venoocclusive disease of the liver). Although artificial nutrition is now recognized as the standard of care for BMT patients, defined guidelines for the use of artificial nutrition in this clinical setting are lacking. During the past 2 decades, artificial nutrition in BMT patients has moved from simple supportive care to adjunctive therapy because of the possible benefits, not strictly nutritional, of specialized nutritional intervention. Although data exist documenting the beneficial role of special nutrients, such as lipids and glutamine, in the management of BMT recipients, the results obtained to date are controversial. The reasons for this controversy may reside in the heterogeneity of the patients studied and of the study designs. This review focuses on the need to correctly identify the different patterns of BMT to achieve reproducible and reliable data, which may in turn be used to devise precise guidelines for the use of specialized artificial nutrition in BMT patients.

Using research to change practice: enteral feedings for pediatric oncology patients

This report details a study whose purpose was to show the safety of and describe the clinical and financial outcomes of nasogastric (NG) and nasojejeunal (NJ) tube feedings for nutritional support during and after intensive treatment for cancer. During a 17-month period, NG or NJ tubes were inserted in 25 patients who experienced, or were anticipated to experience, suboptimal nutrition during or after their chemotherapy (n = 14), radiation therapy (n = 2), or chemotherapy plus radiation (n = 5), after bone marrow transplant (n = 2), and as a result of neurological impairment (n = 2). Patient ages ranged from 1 month to 14 years. NG/NJ tubes were used for a total of 1415 patient days (median 40 days). Of those, 756 days occurred in the hospital (median, 18 days) and 659 were outpatient days (median = 12 days). Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) was used during 104 patient days (range, 1 to 35 days), and combination NG/NJ feedings were given with TPN for a total of 101 days. A comparable number of days of TPN therapy for the NG-fed patients would have cost $177,390 (average $135/day), compared with $65,700 (average, $50/day) for enteral feedings, for a savings of $111,690. Ten patients experienced grade 2 to 3 diarrhea and/or vomiting during the study. No untoward outcomes were identified. Enteral feedings were found to be a safe and cost-effective method for providing nutrition to these children with cancer.

Nutrient support in hematopoietic cell transplantation

High-dose cytoreduction and hematopoietic stem cell infusion form the basis for treatment of hematologic cancers, defects or failure of hematopoiesis, and some solid tumors. As an antitumor therapy, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is superior to autologous HCT by induction of a graft-vs-tumor effect. However, recipients of allografts suffer higher transplant-related mortality owing to graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Nutrition support research must recognize that HCT is a heterogeneous modality whose short and long-term outcomes are affected by transplant type, preparative regimens, diagnosis, disease stage, age, and nutritional status. The field of HCT will diversify further as lower dose cytoreduction and mixed chimerism grafts allow expansion of the technique to older patients and to other diseases.

Intensive enteral nutrition support in paediatric bone marrow transplantation

This study retrospectively analyses the experience with an intensive enteral feeding protocol in children undergoing BMT at the National Paediatric BMT Centre, Our Lady's Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin. Fifty-three patients were transplanted between January 1996 and December 1998; 42 patients received allogeneic transplants, (19 unrelated) and 11 were autologous. Indications included ALL (21), ANLL (3), CML (3), JCML (1), MPS (5), WAS (2), AA/FA (6), NHL/HD (3) and solid tumours (9). Nasogastric (NG) tubes were inserted electively either during conditioning or within the first week when voluntary oral intake had decreased. Nineteen patients were commenced on a whole protein-based formula, 28 on a semi-elemental preparation and two were commenced on an elemental feed. All were maintained on an elemental formula during the period of maximal gut toxicity. Tubes which were vomited were promptly replaced and morphine infusions were routinely employed until mucositis had resolved. Of 49 evaluable patients, 42 (86%) were maintained exclusively on enteral nutrition and seven required parenteral nutrition. Seven patients weighed <85% ideal body weight (IBW) at discharge (range 75-84), only one of whom was <85% IBW at 3 months. Twenty-two patients continued on NG feeds following discharge (median 41 days). No patient had veno-occlusive disease. The programme was overwhelmingly endorsed by patients and/or parents but required intensive multidisciplinary counselling to ensure success.

Ductus venosus flow velocity in newborn lambs during increased pulmonary artery pressure

The aim of the present study was to assess with ultrasound the ductus venosus flow velocity in newborn lambs with increasing pulmonary artery pressures and to evaluate whether this is a useful method to detect elevated pulmonary artery pressure. The ductus venosus flow velocity was studied with pulsed-wave Doppler echocardiography in nine newborn lambs < or = 30 h old. The lambs were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated, and instrumented to measure mean airway pressure and pulmonary artery and arterial blood pressures. A vascular occluder was placed around the main pulmonary artery. With mean pressures ranging from 20 to 50 mm Hg in the pulmonary artery, the ductus venosus flow velocity was examined. In seven lambs, the mean portal pressure and central venous pressure were also measured. With a stepwise increase in the pulmonary artery pressure, the minimum ductus venosus flow velocity during atrial systole decreased to a reversed flow, and the duration of this reversed flow component increased. The systolic forward peak flow velocity signal also gradually decreased. No changes were detected in the mean central venous or in the portal pressure with increasing pulmonary artery pressure or changes in ductus venosus flow. The flow velocity in the ductus venosus, which is higher than in other precordial veins, shows a reduction and even reversal of the nadir and an increase of the duration of reversed flow during atrial systole as a response to increased pulmonary artery pressure. Thus, Doppler ultrasound of the ductus venosus flow velocity may be a useful noninvasive diagnostic supplement to detect pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.

Nutritional support of the cancer patient: issues and dilemmas

Malnutrition in cancer patients results from multifactorial events and is associated with an alteration of quality of life and a reduced survival. A simple nutritional assessment program and early counselling by a dietitian are essential to guide nutritional support and to alert the physician to the need for enteral (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN). A daily intake of 20-35 kcal/kg, with a balanced contribution of glucose and lipids, and of 0.2-0.35 g nitrogen/kg is recommended both for EN and PN, with an adequate provision of electrolytes, trace elements and vitamins. EN, always preferable for patients with an intact digestive tract, and PN are both safe and effective methods of administering nutrients. The general results in clinical practice suggest no tumor growth during nutritional support. The indiscriminate use of conventional EN and PN is not indicated in well-nourished cancer patients or in patients with mild malnutrition. EN or PN is not clinically efficacious for patients treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, unless there are prolonged periods of GI toxicity, as in the case of bone marrow transplant patients. Severely malnourished cancer patients undergoing major visceral surgery may benefit from perioperative nutritional support, preferably via enteral access. Nutritional support in palliative care should be based on the potential risks and benefits of EN and PN, and on the patient's and family's wishes. Research is currently directed toward the impact of nutritional pharmacology on the clinical outcome of cancer patients. Glutamine-supplemented PN is probably beneficial in bone marrow transplant patients. Immune diets are likely to reduce the rate of infectious complications and the length of hospital stay after GI surgery. Further studies are needed to determine the efficacy of such novel approaches in specific populations of cancer patients, and should also address the question of the overall cost-benefit ratio of nutritional pharmacology, and the effect of nutritional support on length and quality of life.

Mucosal barrier injury: biology, pathology, clinical counterparts and consequences of intensive treatment for haematological malignancy: an overview

Mucositis is an inevitable side-effect of the conditioning regimens used for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The condition is better referred to as mucosal barrier injury (MBI) since it is primarily the result of toxicity and is a complex and dynamic pathobiological process manifested not only in the mouth but also throughout the entire digestive tract. A model has been proposed for oral MBI and consists of four phases, namely inflammatory, epithelial, ulcerative and healing phases. A variety of factors are involved in causing and modulating MBI including the nature of the conditioning regimen, the elaboration of pro-inflammatory and other cytokines, translocation of the resident microflora and their products, for example, endotoxins across the mucosal barrier, exposure to antimicrobial agents and whether or not the haematopoietic stem cell graft is from a donor. Neutropenic typhlitis is the most severe gastrointestinal manifestation of MBI, but it also influences the occurrence of other major transplant-related complications including acute GVHD, veno-occlusive disease and systemic infections. The pathobiology, clinical counterparts and the means of measuring MBI are discussed together with potential approaches for prevention, amelioration and, perhaps, even cure. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 25, 1269-1278.