1
|
Berkhout-Byrne NC, Voorend CGN, Meuleman Y, Mooijaart SP, Brunsveld-Reinders AH, Bos WJW, Van Buren M. Nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment as decision-making tool in kidney failure. J Ren Care 2024; 50:112-127. [PMID: 37031361 DOI: 10.1111/jorc.12466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dialysis might not benefit all older patients with kidney failure, particularly those with multimorbid conditions and frailty. Patients' and healthcare professionals' awareness of the presence of geriatric impairments could improve outcomes by tailoring treatment plans and decisions for individual patients. OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals on nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment to fuel decision-making for treatment choices in older patients with kidney failure. DESIGN In an exploratory qualitative study using focus groups, participants discussed perspectives on the use and value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment for the decision-making process to start or forego dialysis. PARTICIPANTS AND MEASUREMENTS Patients (n = 18) with kidney failure, caregivers (n = 4), and professionals (n = 25) were purposively sampled from 10 hospitals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and inductively analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three main themes emerged that supported or impeded decision-making in kidney failure: (1) patient psycho-social situation; (2) patient-related factors on modality choice; (3) organisation of health care. Patients reported feeling vulnerable due to multiple chronic conditions, old age, experienced losses in life and their willingness to trade longevity for quality of life. Professionals recognised the added value of nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment in three major themes: (i) facilitating continual holistic assessment, (ii) filling the knowledge gap, and (iii) uncovering important patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS nephrology-tailored geriatric assessment was perceived as a valuable tool to identify geriatric impairments in older patients with kidney failure. Integration of its outcomes can facilitate a more holistic approach to inform choices and decisions about kidney replacement therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noeleen C Berkhout-Byrne
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn G N Voorend
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette Meuleman
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn Van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine (Nephrology), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pereira M, Tocino MLS, Mas-Fontao S, Manso P, Burgos M, Carneiro D, Ortiz A, Arenas MD, González-Parra E. Dependency and frailty in the older haemodialysis patient. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:416. [PMID: 38730386 PMCID: PMC11088105 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04973-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty among older adults undergoing hemodialysis is increasingly prevalent, significantly impacting cognitive function, mobility, and social engagement. This study focuses on the clinical profiles of very older adults in hemodialysis, particularly examining the interplay of dependency and frailty, and their influence on dialysis regimens. METHODS In this observational, descriptive study, 107 patients aged over 75 from four outpatient centers and one hospital unit were examined over a year. Patient data encompassed sociodemographic factors, dialysis specifics, analytical outcomes, lifestyle elements, and self-reported post-treatment fatigue. Malnutrition-inflammation scale was used to measure the Nutritional status; MIS scale for malnutrition-inflammation, Barthel index for dependency, Charlson comorbidity index; FRIED scale for frailty and the SF12 quality of life measure. RESULTS The study unveiled that a substantial number of older adults on hemodialysis faced malnutrition (55%), dependency (21%), frailty (46%), and diminished quality of life (57%). Patients with dependency were distinctively marked by higher comorbidity, severe malnutrition, enhanced frailty, nursing home residency, dependency on ambulance transportation, and significantly limited mobility, with 77% unable to walk. Notably, 56% of participants experienced considerable post-dialysis fatigue, correlating with higher comorbidity, increased dependency, and poorer quality of life. Despite varying clinical conditions, dialysis patterns were consistent across the patient cohort. CONCLUSIONS The older adult cohort, averaging over four years on hemodialysis, exhibited high rates of comorbidity, frailty, and dependency, necessitating substantial support in transport and living arrangements. A third of these patients lacked residual urine output, yet their dialysis regimen mirrored those with preserved output. The study underscores the imperative for tailored therapeutic strategies to mitigate dependency, preserve residual renal function, and alleviate post-dialysis fatigue, ultimately enhancing the physical quality of life for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Pereira
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
| | - M L Sanchez Tocino
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
- Facultad de Enfermería, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Sebastian Mas-Fontao
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas (CIBERDEM), Madrid, Spain.
- Facultad de Medicina y Biomedicina, Universidad Alfonso X, Villanueva de la Cañada, Spain.
| | - P Manso
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
| | - M Burgos
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
| | - D Carneiro
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
| | - A Ortiz
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, 28040, Spain
- Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - M D Arenas
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain
| | - E González-Parra
- Fundación Renal Íñigo Álvarez de Toledo, Madrid, 28003, Spain.
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
- Servicio de Nefrología, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheetham MS, Ethier I, Krishnasamy R, Cho Y, Palmer SC, Johnson DW, Craig JC, Stroumza P, Frantzen L, Hegbrant J, Strippoli GF. Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for people with kidney failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 4:CD009535. [PMID: 38588450 PMCID: PMC11001293 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009535.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Home haemodialysis (HHD) may be associated with important clinical, social or economic benefits. However, few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated HHD versus in-centre HD (ICHD). The relative benefits and harms of these two HD modalities are uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2014. This update includes non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of HHD versus ICHD in adults with kidney failure. SEARCH METHODS We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 9 October 2022 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We searched MEDLINE (OVID) and EMBASE (OVID) for NRSIs. SELECTION CRITERIA RCTs and NRSIs evaluating HHD (including community houses and self-care) compared to ICHD in adults with kidney failure were eligible. The outcomes of interest were cardiovascular death, all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, all-cause hospitalisation, vascular access interventions, central venous catheter insertion/exchange, vascular access infection, parathyroidectomy, wait-listing for a kidney transplant, receipt of a kidney transplant, quality of life (QoL), symptoms related to dialysis therapy, fatigue, recovery time, cost-effectiveness, blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. The risk of bias was assessed, and relevant outcomes were extracted. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes where there was sufficient data. MAIN RESULTS From the 1305 records identified, a single cross-over RCT and 39 NRSIs proved eligible for inclusion. These studies were of varying design (prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional) and involved a widely variable number of participants (small single-centre studies to international registry analyses). Studies also varied in the treatment prescription and delivery (e.g. treatment duration, frequency, dialysis machine parameters) and participant characteristics (e.g. time on dialysis). Studies often did not describe these parameters in detail. Although the risk of bias, as assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, was generally low for most studies, within the constraints of observational study design, studies were at risk of selection bias and residual confounding. Many study outcomes were reported in ways that did not allow direct comparison or meta-analysis. It is uncertain whether HHD, compared to ICHD, may be associated with a decrease in cardiovascular death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.07; 2 NRSIs, 30,900 participants; very low certainty evidence) or all-cause death (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; 9 NRSIs, 58,984 patients; very low certainty evidence). It is also uncertain whether HHD may be associated with a decrease in hospitalisation rate (MD -0.50 admissions per patient-year, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.02; 2 NRSIs, 834 participants; very low certainty evidence), compared with ICHD. Compared with ICHD, it is uncertain whether HHD may be associated with receipt of kidney transplantation (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.63; 6 NRSIs, 10,910 participants; very low certainty evidence) and a shorter recovery time post-dialysis (MD -2.0 hours, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.28; 2 NRSIs, 348 participants; very low certainty evidence). It remains uncertain if HHD may be associated with decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -11.71 mm Hg, 95% CI -21.11 to -2.46; 4 NRSIs, 491 participants; very low certainty evidence) and decreased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (MD -17.74 g/m2, 95% CI -29.60 to -5.89; 2 NRSIs, 130 participants; low certainty evidence). There was insufficient data to evaluate the relative association of HHD and ICHD with fatigue or vascular access outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures were reported using 18 different measures across 11 studies (QoL: 6 measures; mental health: 3 measures; symptoms: 1 measure; impact and view of health: 6 measures; functional ability: 2 measures). Few studies reported the same measures, which limited the ability to perform meta-analysis or compare outcomes. It is uncertain whether HHD is more cost-effective than ICHD, both in the first (SMD -1.25, 95% CI -2.13 to -0.37; 4 NRSIs, 13,809 participants; very low certainty evidence) and second year of dialysis (SMD -1.47, 95% CI -2.72 to -0.21; 4 NRSIs, 13,809 participants; very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on low to very low certainty evidence, HHD, compared with ICHD, has uncertain associations or may be associated with decreased cardiovascular and all-cause death, hospitalisation rate, slower post-dialysis recovery time, and decreased SBP and LVMI. HHD has uncertain cost-effectiveness compared with ICHD in the first and second years of treatment. The majority of studies included in this review were observational and subject to potential selection bias and confounding, especially as patients treated with HHD tended to be younger with fewer comorbidities. Variation from study to study in the choice of outcomes and the way in which they were reported limited the ability to perform meta-analyses. Future research should align outcome measures and metrics with other research in the field in order to allow comparison between studies, establish outcome effects with greater certainty, and avoid research waste.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa S Cheetham
- Renal Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Isabelle Ethier
- Department of Nephrology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
- Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
| | - Rathika Krishnasamy
- Renal Unit, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Birtinya, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Yeoungjee Cho
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
- Australasian Kidney Trials Network, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Suetonia C Palmer
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - David W Johnson
- Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Craig
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Paul Stroumza
- Medical Office, Diaverum Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Luc Frantzen
- Medical Office, Diaverum Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jorgen Hegbrant
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Giovanni Fm Strippoli
- Cochrane Kidney and Transplant, Centre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Siriwardana AN, Hoffman AT, Morton RL, Smyth B, Brown MA. Estimating a Minimal Important Difference for the EQ-5D-5L Utility Index in Dialysis Patients. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:469-477. [PMID: 38307389 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The EQ-5D-5L is a commonly used health-related quality of life instrument for evaluating interventions in patients receiving dialysis; however, the minimal important difference (MID) that constitutes a meaningful treatment effect for this population has not been established. This study aims to estimate the MID for the EQ-5D-5L utility index in dialysis patients. METHODS 6-monthly EQ-5D-5L measurements were collected from adult dialysis patients between April 2017 and November 2020 at a renal network in Sydney, Australia. EQ-VAS and Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale Renal symptom burden scores were collected simultaneously and used as anchors. MID estimates for the EQ-5D-5L utility index were derived using anchor-based and distribution-based methods. RESULTS A total of 352 patients with ≥1 EQ-5D-5L observation were included, constituting 1127 observations. Mean EQ-5D-5L utility index at baseline was 0.719 (SD ± 0.267), and mean EQ-5D-5L utility decreased over time by -0.017 per year (95% CI -0.029 to -0.006, P = .004). Using cross-sectional anchor-based methods, MID estimates ranged from 0.073 to 0.107. Using longitudinal anchor-based methods, MID for improvement and deterioration ranged from 0.046 to 0.079 and -0.111 to -0.048, respectively. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, MID for improvement and deterioration ranged from 0.037 to 0.122 and -0.074 to -0.063, respectively. MID estimates from distribution-based methods were consistent with anchor-based estimates. CONCLUSIONS Anchor-based and distribution-based approaches provided EQ-5D-5L utility index MID estimates ranging from 0.034 to 0.134. These estimates can inform the target difference or "effect size" for clinical trial design among dialysis populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda N Siriwardana
- Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Anna T Hoffman
- Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brendan Smyth
- Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mark A Brown
- Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stevens PE, Ahmed SB, Carrero JJ, Foster B, Francis A, Hall RK, Herrington WG, Hill G, Inker LA, Kazancıoğlu R, Lamb E, Lin P, Madero M, McIntyre N, Morrow K, Roberts G, Sabanayagam D, Schaeffner E, Shlipak M, Shroff R, Tangri N, Thanachayanont T, Ulasi I, Wong G, Yang CW, Zhang L, Levin A. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int 2024; 105:S117-S314. [PMID: 38490803 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
|
6
|
Jongejan M, de Lange S, Bos WJW, Pieterse AH, Konijn WS, van Buren M, Abrahams AC, van Oevelen M. Choosing conservative care in advanced chronic kidney disease: a scoping review of patients' perspectives. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2024; 39:659-668. [PMID: 37669893 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfad196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conservative care (CC) is a viable treatment option for some patients with kidney failure. Choosing between dialysis and CC can be a complex decision in which involvement of patients is desirable. Gaining insight into the experiences and preferences of patients regarding this decision-making process is an important initial step to improve care. We aimed to identify what is known about the perspective of patients regarding decision-making when considering CC. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were systematically searched on 23 February 2023 for qualitative and quantitative studies on patient-reported experiences on decision-making about CC. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Twenty articles were included. We identified three major themes: creating awareness about disease and treatment choice, decision support and motivation to choose CC. Patients were often not aware of the option to choose CC. Patients felt supported by their loved ones during the decision-making process, although they perceived they made the final decision to choose CC themselves. Some patients felt pressured by their healthcare professional to choose dialysis. Reported reasons to choose CC were maintaining quality of life, treatment burden of dialysis, cost and the desire not to be a burden to others. In general, patients were satisfied with their decision for CC. CONCLUSIONS By focussing on the perspective of patients, we identified a wide range of patient experiences and preferences regarding the decision-making process. These findings can help to improve the complex decision-making process between dialysis and CC and to provide patient-centred care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micha Jongejan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne de Lange
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wanda S Konijn
- Dutch Kidney Patient Association (NVN), Bussum, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mathijs van Oevelen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cortvrindt C, Van Biesen W, Gambino G, Clause AL. Factors influencing renal replacement therapy modality choice from the nephrologist's perspective. J Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s40620-024-01915-w. [PMID: 38512379 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-024-01915-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peritoneal dialysis (PD) offers quality of life and empowerment for persons with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Nevertheless, the prevalence of PD is low in Belgium and Europe in general. Reimbursement, patient mix and late referral have been quoted as underlying reasons. However, to date no one-size-fits-all solution increasing uptake of PD has been successfully implemented. We aimed to understand the nephrologist's perspective, beliefs, and experiences on dialysis modality selection and to clarify underlying process-level and intrinsic motivations steering final decisions. METHODS Using purposeful sampling, Belgian nephrologists (non-/academic, geographical spread, age, gender) were selected. We conducted semi-structured interviews, and audiotapes were transcribed verbatim. Meaningful units were grouped into (sub-)themes, and a conceptual framework was developed using grounded theory according to Charmaz as guidance. RESULTS Twenty-nine nephrologists were interviewed. We identified four themes: Trust and belief (in PD as a technique; own expertise, knowledge and team; in behavior of patient, family practitioner), feeling of control (paternalism; insecurity; prejudice), vision of care and approach (shared decision making; troubleshooting attitude; flexibility and creativity; complacency), and organizational issues (predialysis; access; financial; and assisted PD). CONCLUSIONS Based on these interviews, it is apparent that next to already identified singular issues such as late referral, predialysis education, patient mix and financial incentives, more intrinsic factors also impact uptake of home-based therapies. These factors intertwine and relate both to process-level topics and to attitudes and culture of the nephrologists within the team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Wim Van Biesen
- Renal Division, University Hospital Gent, Gent, Belgium.
- Department of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, University of Gent, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Guiseppe Gambino
- Service de Néphrologie dialyse et transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Anne-Lorraine Clause
- Service de Néphrologie dialyse et transplantation, Hôpital Erasme, ULB, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhang Y, Liu S, Miao Q, Zhang X, Wei H, Feng S, Li X. The Heterogeneity of Symptom Burden and Fear of Progression Among Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Latent Class Analysis. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2024; 17:1205-1219. [PMID: 38524288 PMCID: PMC10959014 DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s454787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) may experience symptoms that increase their fear of progression (FoP), but a dearth of research examines the issue from a patient-centered perspective. Our study aimed to first determine the category of symptom burden, then to explore the differences in characteristics of patients in different subgroups, and finally to analyze the impact of symptom subgroup on FoP. Patients and Methods Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics, Symptom Experience Scale, and Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form were used. Latent class analysis was used to group KTRs according to the occurrence of symptoms. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyze the predictors of different subgroups. The differences in FoP among symptom burden subgroups were analyzed by hierarchical multiple regression. Results Three subgroups were identified, designated all-high (20.5%), moderate (39.9%), and all-low (39.6%) according to their symptom occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression showed that gender, post-transplant time, per capita monthly income, and hyperuricemia were the factors that distinguished and predicted the all-high subgroup (P < 0.05). Hierarchical multiple regression showed that symptom burden had a significant effect on FoP (class1 vs class3: β = 0.327, P < 0.001; class2 vs class3: β = 0.104, P = 0.046), explaining the 8.0% variance of FoP (ΔR2 = 0.080). Conclusion KTRs generally experience moderate or low symptom burden, and symptom burden is an influencing factor in FoP. Identifying the traits of KTRs with high symptom burden can help clinicians develop targeted management strategies and ease FoP of KTRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sainan Liu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qi Miao
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xu Zhang
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - He Wei
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shuang Feng
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiaofei Li
- The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Adenwalla SF, O'Halloran P, Faull C, Murtagh FEM, Graham-Brown MPM. Advance care planning for patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis: narrative review of the current evidence, and future considerations. J Nephrol 2024:10.1007/s40620-023-01841-3. [PMID: 38236475 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01841-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a high symptom-burden and high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, evidence has shown that this patient group does not have timely discussions to plan for deterioration and death, and at the end of life there are unmet palliative care needs. Advance care planning is a process that can help patients share their personal values and preferences for their future care and prepare for declining health. Earlier, more integrated and holistic advance care planning has the potential to improve access to care services, communication, and preparedness for future decision-making and changing circumstances. However, there are many barriers to successful implementation of advance care planning in this population. In this narrative review we discuss the current evidence for advance care planning in patients on dialysis, the data around the barriers to advance care planning implementation, and interventions that have been trialled. The review explores whether the concepts and approaches to advance care planning in this population need to be updated to encompass current and future care. It suggests that a shift from a problem-orientated approach to a goal-orientated approach may lead to better engagement, with more patient-centred and satisfying outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S F Adenwalla
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK.
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
| | - P O'Halloran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Medical Biology Centre, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - C Faull
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - F E M Murtagh
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - M P M Graham-Brown
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, UK
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK
- John Walls Renal Unit, University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Greenwood SA, Young HML, Briggs J, Castle EM, Walklin C, Haggis L, Balkin C, Asgari E, Bhandari S, Burton JO, Billany RE, Bishop NC, Bramham K, Campbell J, Chilcot J, Cooper NJ, Deelchand V, Graham-Brown MPM, Hamilton A, Jesky M, Kalra PA, Koufaki P, McCafferty K, Nixon AC, Noble H, Saynor Z, Taal MW, Tollit J, Wheeler DC, Wilkinson TJ, Worboys H, Macdonald JH. Evaluating the effect of a digital health intervention to enhance physical activity in people with chronic kidney disease (Kidney BEAM): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial in the UK. Lancet Digit Health 2024; 6:e23-e32. [PMID: 37968170 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00204-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remote digital health interventions to enhance physical activity provide a potential solution to improve the sedentary behaviour, physical inactivity, and poor health-related quality of life that are typical of chronic conditions, particularly for people with chronic kidney disease. However, there is a need for high-quality evidence to support implementation in clinical practice. The Kidney BEAM trial evaluated the clinical effect of a 12-week physical activity digital health intervention on health-related quality of life. METHODS In a single-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted at 11 centres in the UK, adult participants (aged ≥18 years) with chronic kidney disease were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to the Kidney BEAM physical activity digital health intervention or a waiting list control group. Randomisation was performed with a web-based system, in randomly permuted blocks of six. Outcome assessors were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was the difference in the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form version 1.3 Mental Component Summary (KDQoL-SF1.3 MCS) between baseline and 12 weeks. The trial was powered to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 3 arbitrary units (AU) in KDQoL-SF1.3 MCS. Outcomes were analysed by an intention-to-treat approach using an analysis of covariance model, with baseline measures and age as covariates. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04872933. FINDINGS Between May 6, 2021, and Oct 30, 2022, 1102 individuals were assessed for eligibility, of whom 340 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to the Kidney BEAM intervention group (n=173) or the waiting list control group (n=167). 268 participants completed the trial (112 in the Kidney BEAM group and 156 in the waiting list control group). All 340 randomly assigned participants were included in the intention-to treat population. At 12 weeks, there was a significant improvement in KDQoL-SF.13 MCS score in the Kidney BEAM group (from mean 44·6 AU [SD 10·8] at baseline to 47·0 AU [10·6] at 12 weeks) compared with the waiting list control group (from 46·1 AU [10·5] to 45·0 AU [10·1]; between-group difference of 3·1 AU [95% CI 1·8-4·4]; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION The Kidney BEAM physical activity platform is an efficacious digital health intervention to improve mental health-related quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease. These findings could facilitate the incorporation of remote digital health interventions into clinical practice and offer a potential intervention worthy of investigation in other chronic conditions. FUNDING Kidney Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharlene A Greenwood
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; Renal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - Hannah M L Young
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK; Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Physiotherapy Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
| | - Juliet Briggs
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Ellen M Castle
- School of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - Christy Walklin
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Lynda Haggis
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Caitlin Balkin
- Department of Renal Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Elham Asgari
- Department of Renal Medicine, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Sunil Bhandari
- Department of Renal Medicine, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - James O Burton
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Roseanne E Billany
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Nicolette C Bishop
- School of Sport Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Kate Bramham
- Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Campbell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK
| | - Joseph Chilcot
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Nicola J Cooper
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Matthew P M Graham-Brown
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Mark Jesky
- Department of Renal Medicine, Nottingham NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip A Kalra
- Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Pelagia Koufaki
- Department of Renal Medicine, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Andrew C Nixon
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Helen Noble
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Zoe Saynor
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Maarten W Taal
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Tollit
- Salford Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - David C Wheeler
- Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas J Wilkinson
- NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK; Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Hannah Worboys
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Jamie H Macdonald
- Institute for Applied Human Physiology, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Desbiens LC, Tennankore KK, Goupil R, Perl J, Trinh E, Chan CT, Nadeau-Fredette AC. Outcomes of Integrated Home Dialysis Care: Results From the Canadian Organ Replacement Register. Am J Kidney Dis 2024; 83:47-57.e1. [PMID: 37657633 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and a timely transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) after PD ends. We compared the outcomes of patients transitioning from PD to HHD with those initiating KRT with HHD. STUDY DESIGN Observational analysis of the Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR). SETTINGS & PARTICIPANTS All patients who initiated PD or HHD within the first 90 days of KRT between 2005 and 2018. EXPOSURE Patients transitioning from PD to HHD (PD+HHD group) versus patients initiating KRT with HHD (HHD group). OUTCOME (1) A composite of all-cause mortality and modality transfer (to in-center hemodialysis or PD for 90 days) and (2) all hospitalizations (considered as recurrent events). ANALYTICAL APPROACH A propensity score analysis for which PD+HHD patients were matched 1:1 to (1) incident HHD patients ("incident-match" analysis) or (2) HHD patients with a KRT vintage at least equivalent to the vintage of PD+HHD patients at the transition time ("vintage-matched" analysis). Cause-specific hazards models (composite outcome) and shared frailty models (hospitalization) were used to compare groups. RESULTS Among 63,327 individuals in the CORR, 163 PD+HHD patients (median of 1.9 years in PD) and 711 HHD patients were identified. In the incident-match analysis, compared to the HHD patients, the PD+HHD group had a similar risk of the composite outcome (HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.58-1.32]) and hospitalizations (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.41]). In the vintage-match analysis, PD+HHD patients had a lower hazard for the composite outcome (HR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.40-0.94]) but a similar hospitalization risk (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.59-1.24]). LIMITATIONS Risk of survivor bias in the PD+HHD cohort and residual confounding. CONCLUSIONS Controlling for KRT vintage, the patients transitioning from PD to HHD had better clinical outcomes than the incident HHD patients. These data support the use of integrated home dialysis for patients initiating home-based KRT. PLAIN-LANGUAGE SUMMARY The integrated home dialysis model proposes the initiation of dialysis with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and subsequent transition to home hemodialysis (HHD) once PD is no longer feasible. It allows patients to benefit from initial lifestyle advantages of PD and to continue home-based treatments after its termination. However, some patients may prefer to initiate dialysis with HHD from the outset. In this study, we compared the long-term clinical outcomes of both approaches using a large Canadian dialysis register. We found that both options led to a similar risk of hospitalization. In contrast, the PD-to-HHD model led to improved survival when controlling for the duration of kidney failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis-Charles Desbiens
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Quebec, Montreal
| | | | - Rémi Goupil
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal; Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emilie Trinh
- McGill University Health Center, Quebec, Montreal
| | - Christopher T Chan
- Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Quebec, Montreal; Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Quebec, Montreal.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Obionu IM, Onyedinma CA, Mielewczyk F, Boyle E. UK maternity care experiences of ethnic minority and migrant women: Systematic review. Public Health Nurs 2023; 40:846-856. [PMID: 37548036 DOI: 10.1111/phn.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increasing population of immigrant and migrant women in the United Kingdom has implications to the provision of healthcare and for healthcare experiences. Eliciting women's experiences and perceptions of maternity care received is an important way of monitoring and evaluating the quality of maternity services. This study was designed to explore the maternity care experiences of ethnic minority and migrant women in the United Kingdom. METHODS A literature search for relevant studies was carried across seven databases. We included nine studies carried out between 2015 and February 2022 that met the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS Findings showed that ethnic minority women and migrant women have had mixed experiences while utilizing maternity services in the United Kingdom. However, most of the experiences were negative and included issues related to communication, discrimination, culture, access to care, physical comfort, and continuity of care. Only one of the studies reported that the respondents had a wholly positive communication experience, one found that a few women felt the staff were respectful and one reported that the midwives gave the women treatment options that would respect their cultural and religious beliefs. CONCLUSION This study has highlighted some important gaps in the maternity care experiences specific to ethnic minority and migrant women in the United Kingdom which provides useful insights to future policy and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ifeoma Maureen Obionu
- College of Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Chioma Amarachi Onyedinma
- Department of Community Medicine University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Ituku/Ozalla, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Frances Mielewczyk
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Elaine Boyle
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Montalescot L, Dorard G, Speyer E, Legrand K, Ayav C, Combe C, Stengel B, Untas A. The experience of relatives and friends of patients with moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease: Insights from the CKD-REIN cohort study. Br J Health Psychol 2023; 28:930-951. [PMID: 37080946 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The transition from chronic kidney disease (CKD) to kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT; i.e., dialysis or transplantation) to sustain life is a stressful event for patients. Families play a role in patients' treatment decision-making, but little is known about how they are involved. This study aimed to explore the experience of CKD among relatives and friends, their views and involvement in KRT choice. DESIGN/METHODS We conducted a qualitative study among 56 relatives or friends of patients with moderate to advanced CKD who were enrolled in the CKD-REIN cohort study. A psychologist conducted semi-structured interviews about their experience with CKD, treatment decision-making and their role in this process. Data were analysed using statistical text analysis. RESULTS The mean age of participants was 56.4 ± 14 years; 75% were women, 61% were patients' partners and 48% had a relative or friend with stage G4 CKD. The analysis yielded four lexical classes: listeners with an opinion, coping with CKD on a daily basis, narrating patients' nephrological monitoring and emotions behind facts. Participants reported a listening role in the decision-making period and information needs. Some reported that CKD had no impact on their own daily lives, but others talked about its current and future physical, psychological and social consequences on them, the patients and their relationships. CONCLUSIONS Most relatives/friends reported having little influence on KRT decision-making but expressed opinions on these treatments. Including relatives/friends in education on KRT and providing them with decision aids, especially when family members are supportive, may allow for more suitable decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Géraldine Dorard
- Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université Paris Cité, F-92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Elodie Speyer
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
| | - Karine Legrand
- Clinical Epidemiology, Inserm CIC-EC, CHU de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Carole Ayav
- Clinical Epidemiology, Inserm CIC-EC, CHU de Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Christian Combe
- Service de Néphrologie Transplantation Dialyse Aphérèses, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, and Unité INSERM U1026, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bénédicte Stengel
- Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, Équipe Epidémiologie Clinique, CESP, 94807, Villejuif, France
| | - Aurélie Untas
- Laboratoire de Psychopathologie et Processus de Santé, Université Paris Cité, F-92100, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Gavaruzzi T, Finderup J, Mooney A. Decision aids to assist patients and professionals in choosing the right treatment for kidney failure. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i20-i38. [PMID: 37711634 PMCID: PMC10497379 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Kidney services vary in the way they involve people with kidney failure (PwKF) in treatment decisions as management needs change. We discuss how decision-science applications support proactively PwKF to make informed decisions between treatment options with kidney professionals. Methods A conceptual review of findings about decision making and use of decision aids in kidney services, synthesized with reference to: the Making Informed Decisions-Individually and Together (MIND-IT) multiple stakeholder decision makers framework; and the Medical Research Council-Complex Intervention Development and Evaluation research framework. Results This schema represents the different types of decision aids that support PwKF and professional reasoning as they manage kidney disease individually and together; adjustments at micro, meso and macro levels supports integration in practice. Conclusion Innovating services to meet clinical guidelines on enhancing shared decision making processes means enabling all stakeholders to use decision aids to meet their goals within kidney pathways at individual, service and organizational levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary L Bekker
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
| | - Anna E Winterbottom
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Teresa Gavaruzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Jeanette Finderup
- ResCenPI – Research Centre for Patient Involvement, Aarhus University, Aarhus and the Central Denmark Region, Denmark
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andrew Mooney
- Leeds Unit of Complex Intervention Development (LUCID), Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- Renal Unit, St James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Welke S, Duncanson E, Bollen C, Britton A, Donnelly F, Faull R, Kellie A, Le Leu R, Manski-Nankervis JA, McDonald S, Richards K, Whittington T, Yeoh J, Jesudason S. The impact on patients of the tertiary-primary healthcare interface in kidney failure: a qualitative study. J Nephrol 2023; 36:2023-2035. [PMID: 37632667 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-023-01742-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians and patients have reported fragmentation in the primary and tertiary healthcare interface. However, perspectives of service navigation and the impacts of fragmentation are not well defined, particularly for patients transitioning to dialysis. This study aimed to define patient perspectives of the functioning of the health service interface and impacts on healthcare experiences and engagement, informing patient-centred and outcomes-focused service models. METHODS A qualitative study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with 25 dialysis patients (16 males) aged 34-78 receiving dialysis across a multi-site tertiary service. Transcripts were analysed thematically. RESULTS Three main themes were identified: (1) The Changing Nature of General Practitioner (GP) Patient Relationships; (2) Ownership and Leadership in Kidney Care; and (3) The Importance of Nephrologist-GP Communications. Patients perceived an unreliable primary-tertiary service interface which lacked coordinated care and created challenges for primary care continuity. These impacted perceptions of healthcare provider expertise and confidence in healthcare systems. Patients subsequently increased the healthcare sought from tertiary kidney clinicians. The fractured interface led some to coordinate communication between health sectors, to support care quality, but this caused additional stress. CONCLUSIONS A fragmented primary-tertiary healthcare interface creates challenges for patient service navigation and can negatively impact patient experiences, leading to primary care disengagement, reduced confidence in health care quality and increased stress. Future studies are imperative for assessing initiatives facilitating health system integration, including communication technologies, healthcare provider training, patient empowerment, and specific outcomes in health, economic and patient experience measures, for patients transitioning to dialysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Welke
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Emily Duncanson
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Chris Bollen
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Anne Britton
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Fiona Donnelly
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Randall Faull
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew Kellie
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Richard Le Leu
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis
- Department of General Practice, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Stephen McDonald
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Katherine Richards
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Tiffany Whittington
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jackie Yeoh
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Shilpanjali Jesudason
- Central Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mcpeake ML, Cook N, Mcilfatrick S, Hasson F. The experience of shared decision-making for patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis and their families-A scoping review. J Clin Nurs 2023; 32:6243-6253. [PMID: 37243448 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
AIM To identify the experiences of shared decision-making (SDM) for adults with end-stage kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis (HD) and their family members. DESIGN A scoping literature review. METHOD A scoping literature review, using Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. DATA SOURCES Medline (OVID), EMBASE, CINAHL, Psych Info, ProQuest, Web of Science, Open grey and grey literature were searched covering years from January 2015 to July 2022. Empirical studies, unpublished thesis and studies in English were included. The scoping review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta analysis-scoping review extension (PRISMA-Scr). RESULTS Thirteen studies were included in the final review. While SDM is welcomed by people undergoing HD, their experience is often limited to treatment decisions, with little opportunity to revisit decisions previously made. The role of the family/caregivers as active participants in SDM requires recognition. CONCLUSION People with end-stage kidney disease undergoing HD do and want to participate in the process of SDM, on a wide range of topics, in addition to treatment. A strategy is needed to ensure that SDM interventions are successful in achieving patient-driven outcomes and enhancing their quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE This review highlights the experiences of people undergoing HD and their family/caregivers. There is a wide variety of clinical decisions requiring consideration for people undergoing HD, including considering the importance who should be involved in the decision-making processes and when decisions should occur. Further study to ensure nurses understand the importance, and influence of including family members in conversations on both SDM processes and outcomes is needed. There is a need for research from both patient and healthcare professional (HCP) perspectives to ensure that people feel supported and have their needs met in the SDM process. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari-Louise Mcpeake
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK
| | - Neal Cook
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Londonderry, UK
| | | | - Felicity Hasson
- School of Nursing and Paramedic Science, Faculty of Life and Health Sciences, Ulster University, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hole B, Scanlon M, Tomson C. Shared decision making: a personal view from two kidney doctors and a patient. Clin Kidney J 2023; 16:i12-i19. [PMID: 37711639 PMCID: PMC10497374 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfad064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) combines the clinician's expertise in the treatment of disease with the patient's expertise in their lived experience and what is important to them. All decisions made in the care of patients with kidney disease can potentially be explored through SDM. Adoption of SDM in routine kidney care faces numerous institutional and practical barriers. Patients with chronic disease who have become accustomed to paternalistic care may need support to engage in SDM-even though most patients actively want more involvement in decisions about their care. Nephrologists often underestimate the risks and overestimate the benefits of investigations and treatments and often default to recommending burdensome treatments rather than discussing prognosis openly. Guideline bodies continue to issue recommendations written for healthcare professionals without providing patient decision aids. To mitigate health inequalities, care needs to be taken to provide SDM to all patients, not just the highly health-literate patients least likely to need additional support in decision making. Kidney doctors spend much of their time in the consulting room, and it is unjustifiable that so little attention is paid to the teaching, audit and maintenance of consultation skills. Writing letters to the patient to summarise the consultation rather than sending them a copy of a letter between health professionals sets the tone for a consultation in which the patient is an active partner. Adoption of SDM will require nephrologists to relinquish long-established paternalistic models of care and restructure care around the values and preferences of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barnaby Hole
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Department of Nephrology, Bristol, UK
- University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Miranda Scanlon
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Department of Nephrology, Bristol, UK
- Kidney Research UK, Lay Advisory Group, Peterborough, UK
| | - Charlie Tomson
- North Bristol NHS Trust, Department of Nephrology, Bristol, UK
- Kidney Research UK, Board of Trustees, Peterborough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jones EL, Shakespeare K, McLaughlin L, Noyes J. Understanding people's decisions when choosing or declining a kidney transplant: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071348. [PMID: 37562929 PMCID: PMC10423837 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To synthesise qualitative research exploring patients' perspectives, experiences and factors influencing their decision-making preferences when choosing or declining kidney transplantation. DESIGN A qualitative evidence synthesis. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases were searched from 2000 to June 2021: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Core Databases for Dissertations and Theses, and Google Scholar. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Qualitative studies exploring and reporting decision-making preferences of people with kidney disease, which reported influencing factors when choosing or declining kidney transplantation, published in English from high-income and middle-income countries. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Titles were screened against the inclusion criteria. Thematic synthesis was done with the use of the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist to assess study quality, and assessment of confidence in the qualitative findings was done using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research. FINDINGS 37 studies from 11 countries reported the perspectives of 1366 patients with kidney disease. Six descriptive themes were developed: decisional preferences influenced patients' readiness to pursue kidney transplantation, gathering sufficient information to support decision-making, navigating the kidney transplant assessment pathway, desire for kidney transplantation, opposed to kidney transplantation and uncertainties while waiting for the kidney transplant. A new enhanced theoretical model was developed to aid understanding of the complexities of decision-making in people with kidney disease, by integrating the Theory of Planned Behaviour and the Adaptive Decision Maker Framework to incorporate the novel findings. CONCLUSION The synthesis provides a better understanding of the extremely complex decision-making processes of people with kidney disease, which are aligned to their kidney transplantation preferences. Further research is needed to better understand the reasons for declining kidney transplantation, and to underpin development of personalised information, interventions and support for patients to make informed decisions when presented with kidney replacement options. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021272588.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Louise Jones
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Kate Shakespeare
- Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Clinical Psychology Dept, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Rhyl, UK
| | - Leah McLaughlin
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Jane Noyes
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ducharlet K, Weil J, Gock H, Philip J. Kidney Clinicians' Perceptions of Challenges and Aspirations to Improve End-Of-Life Care Provision. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:1627-1637. [PMID: 37547531 PMCID: PMC10403660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction End-of-life care is an essential part of integrated kidney care. However, renal clinicians' experiences of care provision and perceptions of end-of-life care needs are limited. This study explored renal clinicians' experiences of providing end-of-life care and developed recommendations to improve experiences. Methods An exploratory qualitative study using semistructured focus groups and 1 interview was undertaken at 5 kidney services in Victoria, Australia. The transcripts were analyzed thematically. Results Between February and December 2017, 54 renal clinicians (21 doctors and 33 nurses) participated in the study. Clinicians reported multiple challenges of end-of-life care experiences resulting in compromised treatment planning and decision making and highlighted priorities to guide better care experiences. Challenges of providing end-of-life care were underpinned by mismatches in illness and treatment expectations, limited engagement in advance care planning, medical complexity, and differences between clinicians and patients in what constituted quality of life. These challenges were associated with compromised end-of-life care planning, which resulted in care experiences that were rushed with a prolonged treatment focus, risking limited preparation for death and moral distress. Clinicians aspired for positive end-of-life care experiences, including patient control and consensus in decision making, and a coordinated and collaborative approach across healthcare providers. Conclusions Renal clinicians highlighted multiple factors and circumstances which resulted in experiences of compromised end-of-life care for patients with kidney disease. To improve care experiences, clinician-directed priorities included more training and support to facilitate systematic and earlier discussions about illness expectations and end-of-life care planning and greater communication and collaboration across healthcare providers is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Ducharlet
- Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Weil
- Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Hilton Gock
- Department of Nephrology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Philip
- Department of Palliative Medicine, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Longley RM, Harnedy LE, Ghanime PM, Arroyo-Ariza D, Deary EC, Daskalakis E, Sadang KG, West J, Huffman JC, Celano CM, Amonoo HL. Peer support interventions in patients with kidney failure: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res 2023; 171:111379. [PMID: 37270909 PMCID: PMC10340538 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peer support has been associated with improved health-related outcomes (e.g., psychological well-being and treatment adherence) among patients with serious, chronic conditions, including kidney disease. Yet, there is little existing research evaluating the effects of peer support programs on health outcomes among patients with kidney failure being treated with kidney replacement therapy. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic review using five databases to assess the effects of peer support programs on health-related outcomes (e.g., physical symptoms, depression) among patients with kidney failure undergoing kidney replacement therapy. RESULTS Peer support in kidney failure was assessed across 12 studies (eight randomized controlled trials, one quasi-experimental controlled trial, and three single-arm trials) with 2893 patients. Three studies highlighted the links between peer support and improved patient engagement with care, while one found peer support did not significantly impact engagement. Three studies showed associations between peer support and improvements in psychological well-being. Four studies underscored the effects of peer support on self-efficacy and one on treatment adherence. CONCLUSIONS Despite preliminary evidence of the positive associations between peer support and health-related outcomes among patients with kidney failure, peer support programs for this patient population remain poorly understood and underutilized. Further rigorous prospective and randomized studies are needed to evaluate how peer support can be optimized and incorporated into clinical care for this vulnerable patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina M Longley
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Lauren E Harnedy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Pia Maria Ghanime
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Daniel Arroyo-Ariza
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Emma C Deary
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Elizabeth Daskalakis
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Katrina G Sadang
- University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States of America
| | - Jason West
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jeff C Huffman
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Christopher M Celano
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Hermioni L Amonoo
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bhatnagar A, Niu J, Ho V, Winkelmayer WC, Erickson KF. Hemodialysis Versus Peritoneal Dialysis Drug Expenditures: A Comparison Within the Private Insurance Market. Kidney Med 2023; 5:100678. [PMID: 37455793 PMCID: PMC10344940 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale and Objective Recent initiatives aim to improve patient satisfaction and autonomy by increasing the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. However, limited knowledge is available about the costs of different dialysis modalities, particularly those incurred by private insurers. In this study, we compared the costs of injectable dialysis drugs (and their oral equivalents) paid by insurers between privately insured patients receiving hemodialysis and PD. Study Design A retrospective cohort study. Setting and Participants From a private insurance claims database, we identified patients who started receiving PD or in-center hemodialysis between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020. Exposure Patients started receiving PD. Outcomes Average annual injectable drug and aggregate expenditures and expenditure subcategories. Analytical Approach Patients who started receiving PD were propensity matched to similar patients who started receiving hemodialysis based on the year of dialysis initiation, patient demographics, health, geography, and comorbidities. Cost ratios (CRs) were estimated from generalized linear models. Results We matched 284 privately insured patients who started receiving PD 1:1 with patients started receiving in-center hemodialysis. The average annual injectable drug expenditures for hemodialysis were 2-fold higher (CR: 1.99; 95% CI, 1.62-2.44) than that for PD. Compared those receiving PD, patients receiving hemodialysis incurred significantly lower nondrug dialysis-related expenditures (0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.94). The average annual expenditures for non-dialysis-dependent outpatient services were significantly higher among patients who underwent in-center hemodialysis (CR: 1.44; 95% CI, 1.10-1.90). Although aggregate and inpatient hospitalization expenditures were higher for in-center hemodialysis, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Limitations Small sample sizes may have restricted our ability to identify differences in some cost categories. Conclusions Compared with privately insured patients who started receiving PD, patients starting in-center hemodialysis incurred higher expenditures for injectable dialysis drugs, whereas differences in other expenditure categories varied. Recent increases in the use of PD may lead to reductions in injectable dialysis drug costs among privately insured patients. Plain Language Summary Recent initiatives aim to improve patient satisfaction and autonomy by increasing the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the United States. However, limited knowledge is available about the costs of different dialysis modalities, particularly those incurred by private insurers. In this study, we compared the costs of injectable dialysis drugs (and their oral equivalents) provided by insurers between privately insured patients receiving hemodialysis and PD. We found that the average annual injectable drug expenditures for hemodialysis were 2.0-fold higher compared with those for PD. These findings suggest that the recent increase in the use of PD may lead to reductions in injectable dialysis drug costs among privately insured patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jingbo Niu
- Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Vivian Ho
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX
| | | | - Kevin F. Erickson
- Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chu WM, Kuo WY, Tung YC. Effects of different palliative care models on decedents with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis: a nationwide population-based retrospective observational study in Taiwan. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e069835. [PMID: 37429693 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis are a particularly important population and carry a heavy disease burden. However, evidence related to palliative care for patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis remains scarce, especially in regard to palliative care consultation services and palliative home care. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different palliative care models on aggressive treatment among patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis during the end of life. DESIGN A population-based retrospective observational study. SETTING This study used a population database maintained by Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare in combination with Taiwan's National Health Research Insurance Database. PARTICIPANTS We enrolled all decedents who were patients with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis from the period 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017 in Taiwan. MAIN EXPOSURE MEASURE Hospice care during the 1-year period before death. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Eight aggressive treatments within 30 days before death, more than one emergency department visit, more than one admission, a longer than 14-day admission, admission to an intensive care unit, death in hospital, endotracheal tube use, ventilator use and need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. RESULTS A total of 10 083 patients were enrolled, including 1786 (17.7%) patients with kidney failure who received palliative care 1 year before death. Compared with patients without palliative care, patients with palliative care had significantly less aggressive treatments within 30 days before death (Estimates: -0.09, CI: -0.10 to -0.08). Patients with inpatient palliative care, palliative home care or a mixed model experienced significantly lower treatment aggressiveness within 30 days before death. CONCLUSIONS Palliative care, particularly use of a mixed care model, inpatient palliative care and palliative home care in patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis, could all significantly reduce the aggressiveness of treatment within 30 days before death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Min Chu
- Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Geriatrics and Gerontology Research Center, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Epidemiology on Aging, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
| | - Wen-Yu Kuo
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chi Tung
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Population Health Research Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sakurada T, Koitabashi K, Murasawa M, Kohatsu K, Kojima S, Shibagaki Y. Effects of one-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic: A retrospective cohort study using propensity score matching. Ther Apher Dial 2023; 27:442-451. [PMID: 36226753 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of present study was to evaluate the effects of one-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality at the outpatient clinic. METHODS Charts of consecutive patients who had started maintenance dialysis from May 2013 to April 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Characteristics at the start of dialysis were compared between patients participated and not participated in the discussion. RESULTS Of the 620 incident dialysis patients, 128 patients had participated in the discussion. After propensity score matching (1:1), 127 patients who participated in the discussion tended to have fewer urgent hospitalizations (13.4% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.068). In addition, more patients who initiated peritoneal dialysis (PD) (30.7% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, participation in the discussion (OR 4.81, 95% CI 2.807-8.24; p < 0.001) was related to PD initiation. CONCLUSION One-hour discussion on the choice of dialysis modality may increase PD initiations and decrease the number of urgent hospitalizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsutomu Sakurada
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Masaru Murasawa
- Division of Nephrology, Gyotoku General Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kaori Kohatsu
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shigeki Kojima
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yugo Shibagaki
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Huang M, Vincent Johnson A, Pourafshar N, Malhotra R, Yang J, Shah M, Balogun R, Chopra T. Pathways to improve nephrologist comfort in managing patients on in-center or home self-care dialysis. Hemodial Int 2023. [PMID: 37157127 DOI: 10.1111/hdi.13093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
In end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), patient engagement and empowerment are associated with improved survival and complications. However, patients lack education and confidence to participate in self-care. The development of in center self-care hemodialysis can enable motivated patients to allocate autonomy, increase satisfaction and engagement, reduce human resource intensiveness, and cultivate a curiosity about home dialysis. In this review, we emphasize the role of education to overcome barriers to home dialysis, strategies of improving home dialysis utilization in the COVID 19 era, the significance of in-center self-care dialysis (e.g., cost containment and empowering patients), and implementation of an in-center self-care dialysis as a bridge to home hemodialysis (HHD).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minghui Huang
- School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Anita Vincent Johnson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Negiin Pourafshar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Rakesh Malhotra
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jason Yang
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Monarch Shah
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rasheed Balogun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Tushar Chopra
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Walklin CG, Young HML, Asghari E, Bhandari S, Billany RE, Bishop N, Bramham K, Briggs J, Burton JO, Campbell J, Castle EM, Chilcot J, Cooper N, Deelchand V, Graham-Brown MPM, Hamilton A, Jesky M, Kalra PA, Koufaki P, McCafferty K, Nixon AC, Noble H, Saynor ZL, Sothinathan C, Taal MW, Tollitt J, Wheeler DC, Wilkinson TJ, Macdonald JH, Greenwood SA. The effect of a novel, digital physical activity and emotional well-being intervention on health-related quality of life in people with chronic kidney disease: trial design and baseline data from a multicentre prospective, wait-list randomised controlled trial (kidney BEAM). BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:122. [PMID: 37131125 PMCID: PMC10152439 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity and emotional self-management has the potential to enhance health-related quality of life (HRQoL), but few people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have access to resources and support. The Kidney BEAM trial aims to evaluate whether an evidence-based physical activity and emotional wellbeing self-management programme (Kidney BEAM) leads to improvements in HRQoL in people with CKD. METHODS This was a prospective, multicentre, randomised waitlist-controlled trial, with health economic analysis and nested qualitative studies. In total, three hundred and four adults with established CKD were recruited from 11 UK kidney units. Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (Kidney BEAM) or a wait list control group (1:1). The primary outcome was the between-group difference in Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL) mental component summary score (MCS) at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the KDQoL physical component summary score, kidney-specific scores, fatigue, life participation, depression and anxiety, physical function, clinical chemistry, healthcare utilisation and harms. All outcomes were measured at baseline and 12 weeks, with long-term HRQoL and adherence also collected at six months follow-up. A nested qualitative study explored experience and impact of using Kidney BEAM. RESULTS 340 participants were randomised to Kidney BEAM (n = 173) and waiting list (n = 167) groups. There were 96 (55%) and 89 (53%) males in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively, and the mean (SD) age was 53 (14) years in both groups. Ethnicity, body mass, CKD stage, and history of diabetes and hypertension were comparable across groups. The mean (SD) of the MCS was similar in both groups, 44.7 (10.8) and 45.9 (10.6) in the intervention and waiting list groups respectively. CONCLUSION Results from this trial will establish whether the Kidney BEAM self management programme is a cost-effective method of enhancing mental and physical wellbeing of people with CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04872933. Registered 5th May 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C G Walklin
- Renal Therapies, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Hannah M L Young
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.
| | - E Asghari
- Department of Nephrology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - S Bhandari
- Department of Nephrology, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
| | - R E Billany
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - N Bishop
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, UK
| | - K Bramham
- Department of Women's Health, King's College London, London, UK
| | - J Briggs
- Renal Therapies, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - J O Burton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - J Campbell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK
| | - E M Castle
- School of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, Brunel University, London, UK
| | - J Chilcot
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Cooper
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - V Deelchand
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - A Hamilton
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Exeter Hospital, Devon, UK
| | - M Jesky
- Department of Nephrology, Nottingham NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - P A Kalra
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Hospital, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - P Koufaki
- Dietetics, Nutrition and Biological Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - K McCafferty
- Department of Nephrology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - A C Nixon
- Department of Renal Medicine, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, Lancashire, UK
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - H Noble
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University, Belfast, UK
| | - Z L Saynor
- School of Sport, Health and Exercise Science, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - C Sothinathan
- Department of Physiotherapy, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - M W Taal
- Centre for Kidney Research and Innovation, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - J Tollitt
- Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - D C Wheeler
- National Institute of Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre , Leicester, UK
| | - T J Wilkinson
- Institute for Applied Human Physiology, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - J H Macdonald
- Faculty of life sciences and medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S A Greenwood
- Renal Therapies, King's College Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ladin K, Tighiouart H, Bronzi O, Koch-Weser S, Wong JB, Levine S, Agarwal A, Ren L, Degnan J, Sewall LN, Kuramitsu B, Fox P, Gordon EJ, Isakova T, Rifkin D, Rossi A, Weiner DE. Effectiveness of an Intervention to Improve Decision Making for Older Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:29-38. [PMID: 36534976 DOI: 10.7326/m22-1543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about managing kidney failure, frequently experiencing decisional conflict, regret, and treatment misaligned with preferences. OBJECTIVE To assess whether a decision aid about kidney replacement therapy improved decisional quality compared with usual care. DESIGN Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03522740). SETTING 8 outpatient nephrology clinics associated with 4 U.S. centers. PARTICIPANTS English-fluent patients, 70 years and older with nondialysis CKD stages 4 to 5 recruited from 2018 to 2020. INTERVENTION DART (Decision-Aid for Renal Therapy) is an interactive, web-based decision aid for older adults with CKD. Both groups received written education about treatments. MEASUREMENTS Change in the decisional conflict scale (DCS) score from baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Secondary outcomes included change in prognostic and treatment knowledge and change in uncertainty. RESULTS Among 400 participants, 363 were randomly assigned: 180 to usual care, 183 to DART. Decisional quality improved with DART with mean DCS declining compared with control (mean difference, -8.5 [95% CI, -12.0 to -5.0]; P < 0.001), with similar findings at 6 months, attenuating thereafter. At 3 months, knowledge improved with DART versus usual care (mean difference, 7.2 [CI, 3.7 to 10.7]; P < 0.001); similar findings at 6 months were modestly attenuated at 18 months (mean difference, 5.9 [CI, 1.4 to 10.3]; P = 0.010). Treatment preferences changed from 58% "unsure" at baseline to 28%, 20%, 23%, and 14% at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months, respectively, with DART, versus 51% to 38%, 35%, 32%, and 18% with usual care. LIMITATION Latinx patients were underrepresented. CONCLUSION DART improved decision quality and clarified treatment preferences among older adults with advanced CKD for 6 months after the DART intervention. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab), Medford, and Departments of Community Health and Occupational Therapy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts (K.L.)
| | - Hocine Tighiouart
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, and Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts (H.T.)
| | - Olivia Bronzi
- William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (O.B., D.E.W.)
| | - Susan Koch-Weser
- Department of Public Health & Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts (S.K.)
| | - John B Wong
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (J.B.W.)
| | - Sarah Levine
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey (S.L., A.A.)
| | - Arushi Agarwal
- Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey (S.L., A.A.)
| | - Lucy Ren
- The University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth/Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth, Texas (L.R.)
| | - Jack Degnan
- Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, UC San Diego, La Jolla, and Nephrology Section, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California (J.D., D.R.)
| | - Lexi N Sewall
- Maine Nephrology Associates, Maine Medical Center, Portland, Maine (L.N.S.)
| | - Brianna Kuramitsu
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, and Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (B.K., E.J.G.)
| | - Patrick Fox
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (P.F.)
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Center for Health Services & Outcomes Research, and Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (B.K., E.J.G.)
| | - Tamara Isakova
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, and Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois (T.I.)
| | - Dena Rifkin
- Division of Nephrology-Hypertension, UC San Diego, La Jolla, and Nephrology Section, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California (J.D., D.R.)
| | - Ana Rossi
- Piedmont Transplant Institute, Atlanta, Georgia (A.R.)
| | - Daniel E Weiner
- William B. Schwartz Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (O.B., D.E.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Siriwardana A, Gray NA, Makris A, Li CK, Yong K, Mehta Y, Ramos J, Di Tanna GL, Gianacas C, Addo IY, Roxburgh S, Naganathan V, Foote C, Gallagher M. Treatment decision-making and care among older adults with kidney failure: protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study with nested substudies and linked qualitative research (the Elderly Advanced CKD Programme). BMJ Open 2022; 12:e066156. [PMID: 36581411 PMCID: PMC9806093 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Shared treatment decision-making and planning of care are fundamental in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) management. There are limited data on several key outcomes for the elderly population including survival, quality of life, symptom burden, changes in physical functioning and experienced burden of healthcare. Patients, caregivers and clinicians consequently face significant uncertainty when making life-impacting treatment decisions. The Elderly Advanced CKD Programme includes quantitative and qualitative studies to better address challenges in treatment decision-making and planning of care among this increasingly prevalent elderly cohort. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The primary component is OUTcomes of Older patients with Kidney failure (OUTLOOK), a multicentre prospective observational cohort study that will enrol 800 patients ≥75 years with kidney failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤15 mL/min/1.73 m2) across a minimum of six sites in Australia. Patients entered are in the decision-making phase or have recently made a decision on preferred treatment (dialysis, conservative kidney management or undecided). Patients will be prospectively followed until death or a maximum of 4 years, with the primary outcome being survival. Secondary outcomes are receipt of short-term acute dialysis, receipt of long-term maintenance dialysis, changes in biochemistry and end-of-life care characteristics. Data will be used to formulate a risk prediction tool applicable for use in the decision-making phase. The nested substudies Treatment modalities for the InfirM ElderLY with end stage kidney disease (TIMELY) and Caregivers of The InfirM ElderLY with end stage kidney disease (Co-TIMELY) will longitudinally assess quality of life, symptom burden and caregiver burden among 150 patients and 100 caregivers, respectively. CONsumer views of Treatment options for Elderly patieNts with kiDney failure (CONTEND) is an additional qualitative study that will enrol a minimum of 20 patients and 20 caregivers to explore experiences of treatment decision-making and care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was obtained through Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee (2019/ETH07718, 2020/ETH02226, 2021/ETH01020, 2019/ETH07783). OUTLOOK is approved to have waiver of individual patient consent. TIMELY, Co-TIMELY and CONTEND participants will provide written informed consent. Final results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Siriwardana
- Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicholas A Gray
- Department of Renal Medicine, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Service, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia
- School of Health and Behavioural Science, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
| | - Angela Makris
- Department of Renal Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chenlei Kelly Li
- Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kenneth Yong
- Department of Renal Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yachna Mehta
- Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jannel Ramos
- Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gian Luca Di Tanna
- Statistics Division, George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Gianacas
- Statistics Division, George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Isaac Yeboah Addo
- Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, University of New South Wales Centre for Social Research in Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Roxburgh
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, The University of Sydney Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Celine Foote
- Department of Renal Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Martin Gallagher
- Renal and Metabolic Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Renal Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Haug K, Buffington A, Zelenski A, Hanlon BM, Stalter L, Kwekkeboom KL, Rathouz P, Bansal AD, Cheung K, Crews D, Frazier R, Koncicki H, Lam D, Moss A, Rao M, Wolfgram DF, Yi J, Brill C, Kendrick R, Campbell TC, Jhagroo R, Schwarze M. Best Case/Worst Case: protocol for a multisite randomised clinical trial of a scenario planning intervention for patients with kidney failure. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e067258. [PMID: 36328383 PMCID: PMC9639110 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Given the burdens of treatment and poor prognosis, older adults with kidney failure would benefit from improved decision making and palliative care to clarify goals, address symptoms, and reduce unwanted procedures. Best Case/Worst Case (BC/WC) is a communication tool that uses scenario planning to support patients' decision making. This article describes the protocol for a multisite, cluster randomised trial to test the effect of training nephrologists to use the BC/WC communication tool on patient receipt of palliative care, and quality of life and communication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We are enrolling attending nephrologists, at 10 study sites in the USA, who see outpatients with advanced chronic kidney disease considering dialysis. We aim to enrol 320 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≤24 mL/min/1.73 m2 who are age 60 and older and have a predicted survival of 18 months or less. Nephrologists will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive training to use the communication tool (intervention) at study initiation or after study completion (wait-list control). Patients in the intervention group will receive care from a nephrologist trained to use the BC/WC communication tool. Patients in the control group will receive usual care. Using chart review and surveys of patients and caregivers, we will test the efficacy of the BC/WC intervention with receipt of palliative care as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include intensity of treatment at the end of life, the effect of the intervention on quality of communication (QOC) between nephrologists and patients (using the QOC scale), the change in quality of life (using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative Care scale) and receipt of dialysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Approvals have been granted by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Wisconsin (ID: 2022-0193), with each study site ceding review to the primary IRB. All nephrologists will be consented and given a copy of the consent form. No patients or caregivers will be recruited or consented until their nephrology provider has chosen to participate in the study. Results will be disseminated via submission for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and at national meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04466865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karlie Haug
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Anne Buffington
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amy Zelenski
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Bret M Hanlon
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Lily Stalter
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Kristine L Kwekkeboom
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Paul Rathouz
- Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Amar D Bansal
- Division of Nephrology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katharine Cheung
- Division of Nephrology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Deidra Crews
- Division of Nephrology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca Frazier
- Division of Nephrology, Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Corp, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Holly Koncicki
- Division of Nephrology, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel Lam
- Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Alvin Moss
- Section of Nephrology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| | - Maya Rao
- Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dawn F Wolfgram
- Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jeniann Yi
- Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | | | | | - Toby C Campbell
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Roy Jhagroo
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Margaret Schwarze
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Kaplan JM, Niu J, Ho V, Winkelmayer WC, Erickson KF. A Comparison of US Medicare Expenditures for Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:2059-2070. [PMID: 35981764 PMCID: PMC9678042 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2022020221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observations that peritoneal dialysis (PD) may be an effective, lower-cost alternative to hemodialysis for the treatment of ESKD have led to policies encouraging PD and subsequent increases in its use in the United States. METHODS In a retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare beneficiaries who started dialysis between 2008 and 2015, we ascertained average annual expenditures (for up to 3 years after initiation of dialysis) for patients ≥67 years receiving in-center hemodialysis or PD. We also determined whether differences in Medicare expenditures across dialysis modalities persisted as more patients were placed on PD. We used propensity scores to match 8305 patients initiating PD with 8305 similar patients initiating hemodialysis. RESULTS Overall average expenditures were US$108,656 (2017) for hemodialysis and US$91,716 for PD (proportionate difference, 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.13). This difference did not change over time (P for time interaction term=0.14). Hemodialysis had higher estimated intravenous (iv) dialysis drug costs (1.69; 95% CI, 1.64 to 1.73), rehabilitation expenditures (1.35; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.45), and other nondialysis expenditures (1.34; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.37). Over time, initial differences in total dialysis expenditures disappeared and differences in iv dialysis drug utilization narrowed as nondialysis expenditures diverged. Estimated iv drug costs declined by US$2900 per patient-year in hemodialysis between 2008 and 2014 versus US$900 per patient-year in PD. CONCLUSIONS From the perspective of the Medicare program, savings associated with PD in patients ≥67 years have remained unchanged, despite rapid growth in the use of this dialysis modality. Total dialysis expenditures for the two modalities converged over time, whereas nondialysis expenditures diverged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jingbo Niu
- Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Vivian Ho
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Kevin F Erickson
- Section of Nephrology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Baker Institute for Public Policy, Rice University, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Rodriguez de Sosa G, Unruh M. Can We Turn the Symptom Curve? Symptom Trajectories and Outcomes among Patients with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1586-1587. [PMID: 36307137 PMCID: PMC9718051 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11240922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark Unruh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
- Medicine Service, New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Frazier R, Levine S, Porteny T, Tighiouart H, Wong JB, Isakova T, Koch-Weser S, Gordon EJ, Weiner DE, Ladin K. Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD. Am J Kidney Dis 2022; 80:599-609. [PMID: 35351579 DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE Older adults with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face difficult decisions about dialysis initiation. Although shared decision making (SDM) can help align patient preferences and values with treatment options, the extent to which older patients with CKD experience SDM remains unknown. STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional analysis of patient surveys examining decisional readiness, treatment options education, care partner support, and SDM. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS Adults aged 70 years or older from Boston, Chicago, San Diego, or Portland (Maine) with nondialysis advanced CKD. PREDICTORS Decisional readiness factors, treatment options education, and care partner support. OUTCOMES Primary: SDM measured by the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) instrument, with higher scores reflecting greater SDM. Exploratory: Factors associated with SDM. ANALYTICAL APPROACH We used multivariable linear regression models to examine the associations between SDM and predictors, controlling for demographic and health factors. RESULTS Among 350 participants, mean age was 78 ± 6 years, 58% were male, 13% identified as Black, and 48% had diabetes. Mean SDM-Q-9 score was 52 ± 28. SDM item agreement ranged from 41% of participants agreeing that "my doctor and I selected a treatment option together" to 73% agreeing that "my doctor told me that there are different options for treating my medical condition." In multivariable analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, and diabetes, being "well informed" and "very well informed" about kidney treatment options, having higher decisional certainty, and attendance at a kidney treatment options class were independently associated with higher SDM-Q-9 scores. LIMITATIONS The cross-sectional study design limits the ability to make temporal associations between SDM and the predictors. CONCLUSIONS Many older patients with CKD do not experience SDM when making dialysis decisions, emphasizing the need for greater access to and delivery of education for individuals with advanced CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Frazier
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; Jesse Brown Veterans Administration Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Sarah Levine
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thalia Porteny
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| | - Hocine Tighiouart
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Tufts University, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - John B Wong
- Division of Clinical Decision Making, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Tamara Isakova
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Center for Translational Metabolism and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Susan Koch-Weser
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elisa J Gordon
- Department of Surgery-Division of Transplantation, Center for Health Services and Outcomes Research, Center for Bioethics and Medical Humanities, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Daniel E Weiner
- William B. Schwartz MD Division of Nephrology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Keren Ladin
- Research on Ethics, Aging, and Community Health (REACH Lab) and Departments of Occupational Therapy and Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Ho YF, Hsu PT, Yang KL. Peritoneal dialysis after shared decision-making: the disparity between reality and patient expectations. BMC Nurs 2022; 21:268. [PMID: 36180845 PMCID: PMC9524315 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-01043-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current health policy in Taiwan favors peritoneal dialysis (PD) at home. Policy objectives may make healthcare providers give more consideration to the introduction of PD treatment. This study aimed to explore the process of information acquisition and consideration during shared decision-making (SDM) for patients undergoing PD and compare their quality of life expectations before and after PD at home. Methods In this qualitative study, 15 patients undergoing PD for < 12 months were purposively recruited from one large PD unit in Taichung, Taiwan. Data were collected between August 2020 and December 2020 using a semi-structured interview. All transcripts were evaluated using thematic analysis. Results Three themes and seven subthemes were identified following data analysis: 1. sources for information on dialysis treatment, including (a) effect of others’ experiences and (b) incomplete information from healthcare providers (HCPs); 2. considerations for choosing PD, including (a) trusting physicians, and (b) maintaining pre-dialysis life; and 3. disparity between pre-and post-PD reality and expectation, including (a) limitation by time and place, (b) discrepancies in expected freedom and convenience, and (c) regret versus need to continue. Conclusion HCPs played an important role in SDM, providing key information that influenced the process. Patients undergoing initial PD at home exhibited a disparity between expectation and reality, which was exacerbated by incomplete information.
Collapse
|
33
|
Campbell-Montalvo R, Jia H, Shukla AM. Supporting Shared Decision-Making and Home Dialysis in End-Stage Kidney Disease. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis 2022; 15:229-237. [PMID: 36105650 PMCID: PMC9467687 DOI: 10.2147/ijnrd.s375347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been widely demonstrated that patient education and empowerment, especially involving shared treatment decisions, improve patient outcomes in chronic medical conditions, including chronic kidney disease requiring kidney replacement therapies. Accordingly, regulatory agencies in the US and worldwide recommend shared decision-making for finalizing one's choice of kidney replacement therapy. It is also recognized that the US needs to substantially increase home dialysis utilization to leverage its positive impacts on patient and healthcare cost-related outcomes. This perspective highlights how the routine clinical use of the recommended practice of shared decision-making can exist in synergy with the system's goal for increased home dialysis use. It introduces a pragmatic provider checklist, The Nephrologist's Shared Decision-Making Checklist, grounded in the relevant theories of shared decision-making, and, unlike some research assessments and extant tools, is easy to understand and implement in clinical practice. This qualitative Checklist can help providers ensure that they have co-constructed an SDM experience with the patient and involved caretakers, helping them benefit from the improved outcomes associated with SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Campbell-Montalvo
- Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
- Department of Medicine, North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Huanguang Jia
- Department of Medicine, North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ashutosh M Shukla
- Department of Medicine, North Florida/South Georgia Veteran Healthcare System, Gainesville, FL, USA
- Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mosconi G, Fantini M, Righini M, Flachi M, Semprini S, Hu L, Chiappo F, Veterani B, Ambri K, Ferrini F, Milanesi C, Giudicissi A, La Manna G, Rigotti A, Buscaroli A, Sambri V, Cappuccilli M. Efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Dialysis Patients: Epidemiological Analysis and Evaluation of the Clinical Progress. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11164723. [PMID: 36012962 PMCID: PMC9410204 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of the fourth COVID-19 pandemic wave on dialysis patients of Romagna territory, assessing the associations of vaccination status with infection risk, clinical severity and mortality. From November 2021 to February 2022, an epidemiological search was conducted on 829 patients under dialysis treatment for at least one month. The data were then analyzed with reference to the general population of the same area. A temporal comparison was also carried out with the previous pandemic waves (from March 2020 to October 2021). The epidemiological evolution over time in the dialysis population and in Romagna citizens replicated the global trend, as the peak of the fourth wave corresponded to the time of maximum diffusion of omicron variant (B.1.1.529). Of 771 prevalent dialysis patients at the beginning of the study, 109 (14.1%) contracted SARS-CoV-2 infection during the 4-month observation period. Vaccine adherence in the dialysis population of the reference area was above 95%. Compared to fully or partially vaccinated subjects, the unvaccinated ones showed a significantly higher proportion of infections (12.5% vs. 27.0% p = 0.0341), a more frequent need for hospitalization (22.2% vs. 50.0%) and a 3.3-fold increased mortality risk. These findings confirm the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in keeping infectious risk under control and ameliorating clinical outcomes in immunocompromised patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Mosconi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
- Correspondence: (G.M.); (F.C.); Tel.: +39-0543-735-312 (G.M.)
| | - Michela Fantini
- Local Healthcare Authority of Romagna (AUSL Romagna), 48121 Ravenna, RA, Italy
| | - Matteo Righini
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, 48121 Ravenna, RA, Italy
| | - Marta Flachi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Infermi Hospital, 47923 Rimini, RN, Italy
| | - Simona Semprini
- Unit of Microbiology, AUSL Romagna Laboratory, 47023 Pievesestina, FC, Italy
| | - Lilio Hu
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Francesca Chiappo
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
- Correspondence: (G.M.); (F.C.); Tel.: +39-0543-735-312 (G.M.)
| | - Barbara Veterani
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Katia Ambri
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Franca Ferrini
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Catia Milanesi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Antonio Giudicissi
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, 47121 Forli, FC, Italy
| | - Gaetano La Manna
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, BO, Italy
| | - Angelo Rigotti
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna Infermi Hospital, 47923 Rimini, RN, Italy
| | - Andrea Buscaroli
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, AUSL Romagna S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, 48121 Ravenna, RA, Italy
| | - Vittorio Sambri
- Unit of Microbiology, AUSL Romagna Laboratory, 47023 Pievesestina, FC, Italy
| | - Maria Cappuccilli
- Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplant Unit, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, BO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vélez-Bermúdez M, Adamowicz JL, Askelson NM, Lutgendorf SK, Fraer M, Christensen AJ. Disparities in dialysis modality decision-making using a social-ecological lens: a qualitative approach. BMC Nephrol 2022; 23:276. [PMID: 35931965 PMCID: PMC9356453 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02905-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) may choose to undergo dialysis in-center or at home, but uptake of home dialysis in the US has been minimal despite its benefits over in-center dialysis. Factors that may have led patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis are poorly understood in the literature, and interventions to improve selection of home dialysis have focused on patient knowledge and shared decision-making processes between patients and providers. The purpose of this study was to explore micro- and macro-level factors surrounding dialysis modality decision-making among patients undergoing in-center and home dialysis, and explore what leads patients to select home dialysis over in-center dialysis. METHODS Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted in a dialysis clinic at a large Midwestern research hospital, from September 2019 to December 2020. Participants were 18 years or older, undergoing dialysis for ESKD, and had the cognitive ability to provide consent. Surveys assessing demographic and clinical information were administered to participants following their interviews. RESULTS Forty patients completed interviews and surveys (20 [50%] in-center dialysis, 17 [43%] female, mean [SD] age, 59 [15.99] years). Qualitative findings suggested that healthcare access and engagement before entering nephrology care, after entering nephrology care, and following dialysis initiation influenced patients' awareness regarding their kidney disease status, progression toward ESKD, and dialysis options. Potential modifiers of these outcomes include race, ethnicity, and language barriers. Most participants adopted a passive-approach during decision-making. Finally, fatigue, concerns regarding one's dialyzing schedule, and problems with fistula/catheter access sites contributed to overall satisfaction with one's dialysis modality. CONCLUSIONS Findings point to broader factors affecting dialysis selection, including healthcare access and racial/ethnic inequities. Providing dialysis information before entering nephrology and after dialysis initiation may improve patient agency in decision-making. Additional resources should be prioritized for patients of underrepresented backgrounds. Dialysis decision-making may be appropriately modeled under the social-ecological framework to inform future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Jenna L Adamowicz
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Natoshia M Askelson
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Susan K Lutgendorf
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mony Fraer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Alan J Christensen
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Department of Psychology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Patient perspectives on chronic kidney disease and decision-making about treatment. Discourse of participants in the French CKD-REIN cohort study. J Nephrol 2022; 35:1387-1397. [PMID: 35696043 PMCID: PMC9217839 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-022-01345-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Little is known about psychological issues in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) facing transition to kidney failure and the involvement of their family in decision-making about kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This study investigated patients’ experience of their illness, their views on KRT choice and their perception of the influence of their relatives. Methods We conducted a qualitative study nested in the CKD-REIN prospective cohort study which included non-dialysis CKD patients from 40 nationally representative nephrology clinics. Among 1555 patients who returned a self-administered questionnaire, we used purposive sampling to select 50 participants who underwent semi-structured phone interviews with a psychologist. Results The patients' mean age was 62.2 ± 12 years, 42% were women, and 68% had CKD stage 4–5. The analysis yielded four lexical classes: “illness rhythm”, “considering dialysis”, “family and transplantation”, and “disease, treatment choice and introspection”. When experiencing few or mild symptoms, patients tended to avoid thinking about CKD, for the prospect of dialysis was the most stressful part of their experience. Surprisingly, the importance of family appeared when they talked about transplantation decision-making, but not about choice of dialysis modality. Conclusions Cognitive avoidance seems common in patients with advanced CKD. Transplantation and dialysis decision-making appear to be two distinct processes, with different levels of family involvement. More research is needed to better understand the frequency and impact of cognitive avoidance on patients’ well-being and decision-making. Graphic abstract ![]()
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40620-022-01345-6.
Collapse
|
37
|
Wong SP, Oestreich T, Chandler B, Curtis JR. Using Human-Centered Design Principles to Create a Decision Aid on Conservative Kidney Management for Advanced Kidney Disease. KIDNEY360 2022; 3:1242-1252. [PMID: 35919540 PMCID: PMC9337892 DOI: 10.34067/kid.0000392022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Background Most patients are unaware of approaches to treating advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) other than dialysis. Methods We developed a dedicated decision aid on conservative kidney management using human-centered design principles in three phases: (1) discovery: engagement of informants to understand their needs and preferences; (2) design: multiple rapid cycles of ideation, prototyping, and testing of a decision aid with a small group of informants; and (3) implementation: testing the decision aid in real-world settings with attention to how the decision aid can be further refined. Informants included a national patient advisory committee on kidney diseases, 50 patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD and 35 of their family members, and 16 clinicians recruited from the greater Seattle area between June 2019 and September 2021. Results Findings from the discovery phase informed an initial prototype of the decision aid, which included five sections: a description of kidney disease and its signs and symptoms, an overview of conservative kidney management and the kinds of supports provided, self-reflection exercises to elicit patients' values and goals, the pros and cons of conservative kidney management, and the option of changing one's mind about conservative kidney management. The prototype underwent several rounds of iteration during its design phase, which resulted in the addition of an introductory section describing the intended audience and more detailed information in other sections. Findings from its implementation phase led to the addition of examples of common questions that patients and family members had about conservative kidney management and a final section on other related educational resources. Conclusions Human-centered design principles supported a systematic and collaborative approach between researchers, patients, family members, and clinicians for developing a decision aid on conservative kidney management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan P.Y. Wong
- VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Division of Nephrology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington,University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - Taryn Oestreich
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bridgett Chandler
- University of Washington, School of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington
| | - J. Randall Curtis
- University of Washington, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Sobels E, Best M, Chadban S, Pais R. End Stage Kidney Disease Patient Experiences of Renal Supportive Care in an Australian Teaching Hospital - A Qualitative Study. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 63:737-746. [PMID: 34954064 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Renal Supportive Care Services (RSCS) were introduced in Australia to provide patient-centred care with a focus on better symptom management and improved quality of life in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients managed with or without dialysis. While RSCS have demonstrated clinical benefits with reduced length of hospital stay and symptom burden, there is a gap in understanding the experience of patients referred to RSCS. OBJECTIVES To identify patient attitudes, beliefs, and perspectives on the RSCS. METHODS Qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 participants from both dialysis and conservative treatment pathways. Transcripts were then thematically analysed and primary themes identified, which were reviewed with a stakeholder group that included doctors, nurses and allied health staff to provide triangulation. RESULTS Patients perceived the RSCS as a provider of multidisciplinary, holistic and patient-centred care that, in addition, helped to ensure prognostic awareness and timely end-of-life care planning. This contributed to an overall sense of patient empowerment with healthcare decisions. This study identified three major themes: (1) Expectations of care; (2) Experience of care; and (3) Understanding patient needs. CONCLUSION The study found that RSCS support patient-centred and family-orientated initiatives in decision making and control over healthcare management. This is empowering for patients. Additional patient values, needs and wants from the RSCS were also identified and these could be addressed to improve the patient experience. Our findings support the ongoing use of RSCS to improve the experience of ESKD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloise Sobels
- Central Clinical School (E.S.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Megan Best
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.B., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute for Ethics and Society (M.B.), University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Steve Chadban
- Department of Renal Medicine (S.C., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Kidney Node, Charles Perkins Centre (S.C.), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Riona Pais
- Department of Palliative Medicine (M.B., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Department of Renal Medicine (S.C., R.P.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Saeed F, Moss AH, Duberstein PR, Fiscella KA. Enabling Patient Choice: The "Deciding Not to Decide" Option for Older Adults Facing Dialysis Decisions. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 33:880-882. [PMID: 35169067 PMCID: PMC9063883 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2021081143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Saeed
- Departments of Medicine and Public Health, Divisions of Nephrology and Palliative Care, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| | - Alvin H Moss
- Sections of Nephrology, Geriatrics, and Palliative Medicine, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey
| | - Kevin A Fiscella
- Department of Family Medicine and Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
"My Pain Is Unbearable…I Cannot Recognize Myself!" Emotions, Cognitions, and Behaviors of People Living With Musculoskeletal Disorders: An Umbrella Review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022; 52:243-A102. [PMID: 35536247 DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize (1) the emotions, cognitions, and behaviors of people who are living with musculoskeletal disorders related to symptoms and (2) the interactions of emotions, cognitions, and behaviors with the person's environment (family, social, and work roles). DESIGN An umbrella review of qualitative research syntheses and meta-summaries (metasynthesis, meta-ethnographies, meta-aggregation, meta-summary). LITERATURE SEARCH We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycARTICLES, PsycEXTRA, PsycINFO, PubMed, and PubPsych from database inception to January 2021. We also searched gray literature via Open Grey and Google Scholar. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA We included qualitative evidence syntheses evaluating adults with musculoskeletal disorders, based on the multidimensional diagnostic criteria for acute and chronic pain. Emotions, cognitions, and behaviors were the phenomenon of interest. DATA SYNTHESIS We developed 3 categories of themes ([1] emotions, [2] cognitions, and [3] behaviors) for each objective. We selected the 3 most common emotions, cognitions, and behaviors that appear as themes in our narrative synthesis. RESULTS We included 20 qualitative evidence syntheses that retrieved 284 original qualitative studies. Despair, distress, and fear were the main emotions reported by people living with musculoskeletal disorders. The alterations of the self and how people described their symptoms, what caused them, and how the symptoms impacted their lives were the most common cognitions. Cognitive strategies (ie, acceptance) and perceptions about social support emerged. People often used passive behaviors (eg, social isolation or hiding symptoms) to cope with the challenges that arose related to musculoskeletal symptoms. However, some people actively faced their symptoms, planning their activities or practicing them despite their symptoms. CONCLUSION Clinicians who support people living with musculoskeletal disorders should consider (1) assessing other emotions than pain-related fear (eg, despair and distress), (2) observing their cognitive responses (ie, acceptance), and (3) evaluating what type of behaviors people use (eg, active or passive). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(5):243-261. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10707.
Collapse
|
41
|
Shah N, Cole A, McCarthy K, Baharani J. A Quality Improvement Process to Increase and Sustain a Peritoneal Dialysis Programme in the United Kingdom. Blood Purif 2022; 51:1022-1030. [PMID: 35477096 DOI: 10.1159/000524160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains underutilised in the West. The proportion of patients in the UK starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) with PD fell from 7.2% in 2011 to 6.0% in 2016. At our centre, 8.4% of dialysis patients received PD in April 2014. Evidence suggests that home dialysis improves patient clinical outcomes; therefore, a target was agreed to achieve 25% of dialysis patients receiving PD by 2018. METHODS A rapid improvement process was introduced, as a quality improvement tool, to increase and sustain the PD programme. With multidisciplinary team support for PD growth, a nephrologist was trained to insert PD catheters. Nurses were trained to provide patients with balanced pre-dialysis information and discuss alternative dialysis modalities with haemodialysis (HD) patients. The "Acceptance, Choice and Empowerment" project raised awareness of home therapy choices, using a peer educator model specifically for ethnic minority patients. Lean methodologies were used to ensure continuous quality improvement. RESULTS PD uptake increased from 37 to 84 patients, giving a PD penetration increase from 8.4% to 19.1% between April 2014 and March 2018. Catheter insertions increased from 94 at the end of QI Period 1 to 185 at the end of QI Period 2, representing a 97% increase, with the medical/surgical split remaining stable. Peritonitis rates remained stable, and PD drop off to HD reduced from 52% to 41% during the same period. CONCLUSIONS By implementing a rapid improvement process and embedding a quality improvement programme, the number of incidents and prevalent PD patients increased and was sustained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nihit Shah
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Cole
- Baxter Healthcare Limited, Compton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Jyoti Baharani
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Verberne WR, Stiggelbout AM, Bos WJW, van Delden JJM. Asking the right questions: towards a person-centered conception of shared decision-making regarding treatment of advanced chronic kidney disease in older patients. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:47. [PMID: 35477488 PMCID: PMC9047263 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00784-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of older patients have to decide on a treatment plan for advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), involving dialysis or conservative care. Shared decision-making (SDM) is recommended as the model for decision-making in such preference-sensitive decisions. The aim of SDM is to come to decisions that are consistent with the patient’s values and preferences and made by the patient and healthcare professional working together. In clinical practice, however, SDM appears to be not yet routine and needs further implementation. A shift from a biomedical to a person-centered conception might help to make the process more shared. Shared should, therefore, be interpreted as two persons bringing two perspectives to the table, that both need to be explored during the decision-making process. Starting from the patient’s perspective will enable to determine the mutual goals of care first and, subsequently, determine the best way for achieving those goals. To perform such SDM, the healthcare professional needs to become a skilled companion, being part of the patient’s relational context, and start asking the right questions about what matters to the patient as person. In this article, we describe the need for a person-centered conception of SDM for the setting of older patients with advanced CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wouter R Verberne
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. .,Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Butcher E, Walker R, Wyeth E, Samaranayaka A, Schollum J, Derrett S. Health-Related Quality of Life and Disability Among Older New Zealanders With Kidney Failure: A Prospective Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2022; 9:20543581221094712. [PMID: 35493402 PMCID: PMC9052826 DOI: 10.1177/20543581221094712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Disability is prevalent in individuals with kidney failure and can contribute
to significantly reduced quality of life and survival. In older individuals
with kidney failure, disability can be caused by a combination of factors,
including issues directly related to their kidney disease and/or treatment,
including weakness, low energy, and low activity. Few studies have
investigated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as a possible predictor
of disability among older individuals experiencing kidney failure. Objective: This study aimed to determine if patient-reported HRQoL, and/or other factors
at baseline, predicts disability in people with kidney failure, aged ≥65
years, after 12 months of follow-up. Design: The DOS65+ study was an accelerated longitudinal cohort design comprising of
both cross-sectional and longitudinal components. Participants were eligible
if they were aged ≥65 years, had chronic kidney disease stage 5G (CKD 5G)
(estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 ml/min/1.73
m2), and had: commenced kidney replacement education, or were
on an active conservative pathway, or were newly incident dialysis patients
commencing dialysis therapy or prevalent on dialysis. Setting: Three New Zealand District Health Board (DHB) nephrology units (Counties
Manukau, Hawke’s Bay, and Southern DHB) were involved in the study. Participants: Participants were eligible if they were aged ≥65 years, had CKD 5G (eGFR
<15 ml/min/1.73 m2), and had: commenced kidney replacement
education, or were on an active conservative pathway, or were newly incident
dialysis patients commencing dialysis therapy or prevalent on dialysis. Measurements: Disability and HRQoL were measured by EQ-5D-3L, a WHO Disability Assessment
Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0. Methods: Baseline and 12-month data from our longitudinal dialysis outcomes in older
New Zealanders’ study were analyzed to determine if HRQoL at baseline
predicted disability outcomes 12 months later. Results: Of the 223 participants at baseline, 157 participants completed a follow-up
interview 12 months later. Individuals with “considerable disability” at
baseline had a significantly (86%) higher risk of experiencing “considerable
disability” at 12 months compared with those with “lesser/no disability” at
baseline. Two thirds of those with ≥3 comorbidities were experiencing
“considerable disability.” In addition, those with problems with EQ-5D-3L
self-care, EQ-5D-3L usual activities, and EQ-5D-3L anxiety/depression
reported higher rates of disability. Limitations: Selection bias is likely to have been an issue in this study as participants
were excluded from the follow-up interview if they had an intercurrent
illness requiring hospitalization within 2 weeks of the survey interview or
if the treating nephrologist judged that the individual’s ability to take
part was significantly impaired. Sample size meant there were a limited
number of explanatory/confounding variables that could be investigated in
the multivariable model. Conclusions: EQ-5D-3L mobility and self-care may be useful in predicting subsequent
disability for individuals with CKD 5G. Although individuals with kidney
failure often experience disability, previous studies have not clearly
identified HRQoL or disability as predictors of later disability for
individuals with kidney failure. Therefore, we would recommend the
assessment of mobility and self-care, in conjunction with existing
disabilities in the clinical review and pre-dialysis education of
individuals with kidney failure as they approach the need for kidney
replacement therapy. Trial registration: the Australian and New Zealand clinical trials registry:
ACTRN12611000024943.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Butcher
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Robert Walker
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Emma Wyeth
- Ngāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Ari Samaranayaka
- Biostatistics Centre, Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - John Schollum
- Department of Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Sarah Derrett
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Shen JI, Perl J. Is There an Ideal Recipe to Increase Home Dialysis Use? Is It Enough? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:484-486. [PMID: 35314482 PMCID: PMC8993473 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.02150222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jenny I Shen
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Lundquist Institute at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Jeffrey Perl
- Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Symptom burden and health-related quality of life in chronic kidney disease: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1003954. [PMID: 35385471 PMCID: PMC8985967 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of patient-reported outcome measurement in chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations has been established. However, there remains a lack of research that has synthesised data around CKD-specific symptom and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) burden globally, to inform focused measurement of the most relevant patient-important information in a way that minimises patient burden. The aim of this review was to synthesise symptom prevalence/severity and HRQOL data across the following CKD clinical groups globally: (1) stage 1-5 and not on renal replacement therapy (RRT), (2) receiving dialysis, or (3) in receipt of a kidney transplant. METHODS AND FINDINGS MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for English-language cross-sectional/longitudinal studies reporting prevalence and/or severity of symptoms and/or HRQOL in CKD, published between January 2000 and September 2021, including adult patients with CKD, and measuring symptom prevalence/severity and/or HRQOL using a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool data, stratified by CKD group: not on RRT, receiving dialysis, or in receipt of a kidney transplant. Methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data, and an exploration of publication bias performed. The search identified 1,529 studies, of which 449, with 199,147 participants from 62 countries, were included in the analysis. Studies used 67 different symptom and HRQOL outcome measures, which provided data on 68 reported symptoms. Random effects meta-analyses highlighted the considerable symptom and HRQOL burden associated with CKD, with fatigue particularly prevalent, both in patients not on RRT (14 studies, 4,139 participants: 70%, 95% CI 60%-79%) and those receiving dialysis (21 studies, 2,943 participants: 70%, 95% CI 64%-76%). A number of symptoms were significantly (p < 0.05 after adjustment for multiple testing) less prevalent and/or less severe within the post-transplantation population, which may suggest attribution to CKD (fatigue, depression, itching, poor mobility, poor sleep, and dry mouth). Quality of life was commonly lower in patients on dialysis (36-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-36] Mental Component Summary [MCS] 45.7 [95% CI 45.5-45.8]; SF-36 Physical Component Summary [PCS] 35.5 [95% CI 35.3-35.6]; 91 studies, 32,105 participants for MCS and PCS) than in other CKD populations (patients not on RRT: SF-36 MCS 66.6 [95% CI 66.5-66.6], p = 0.002; PCS 66.3 [95% CI 66.2-66.4], p = 0.002; 39 studies, 24,600 participants; transplant: MCS 50.0 [95% CI 49.9-50.1], p = 0.002; PCS 48.0 [95% CI 47.9-48.1], p = 0.002; 39 studies, 9,664 participants). Limitations of the analysis are the relatively few studies contributing to symptom severity estimates and inconsistent use of PROMs (different measures and time points) across the included literature, which hindered interpretation. CONCLUSIONS The main findings highlight the considerable symptom and HRQOL burden associated with CKD. The synthesis provides a detailed overview of the symptom/HRQOL profile across clinical groups, which may support healthcare professionals when discussing, measuring, and managing the potential treatment burden associated with CKD. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42020164737.
Collapse
|
46
|
Manns BJ, Garg AX, Sood MM, Ferguson T, Kim SJ, Naimark D, Nesrallah GE, Soroka SD, Beaulieu M, Dixon SN, Alam A, Allu S, Tangri N. Multifaceted Intervention to Increase the Use of Home Dialysis: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:535-545. [PMID: 35314481 PMCID: PMC8993468 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.13191021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Home dialysis therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are less expensive and provide similar outcomes to in-center hemodialysis, but they are underutilized in most health systems. Given this, we designed a multifaceted intervention to increase the use of home dialysis. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the effect of this intervention on home dialysis use in CKD clinics across Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 55 CKD clinic clusters in nine provinces in Canada between October 2014 and November 2015. Participants included all adult patients who initiated dialysis in the year following the intervention. We evaluated the implementation of a four-component intervention, which included phone surveys from a knowledge translation broker, a 1-year center-specific audit/feedback on home dialysis use, delivery of an educational package (including tools aimed at both providers and patients), and an academic detailing visit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients using home dialysis at 180 days after dialysis initiation. RESULTS A total of 55 clinics were randomized (27 in the intervention and 28 in the control), with 5312 patients initiating dialysis in the 1-year follow-up period. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in the use of home dialysis at 180 days in the intervention and control clusters (absolute risk difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 10%). Using a difference-in-difference comparison, the use of home dialysis at 180 days was similar before and after implementation of the intervention (difference of 0% in intervention clinics; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 3%; difference of 0.8% in control clinics; 95% confidence interval, -1% to 3%; P=0.84). CONCLUSIONS A multifaceted intervention did not increase the use of home dialysis in adults initiating dialysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Patient and Provider Education on Use of Home Dialysis, NCT02202018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Braden J Manns
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute and O'Brien Public Health Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Amit X Garg
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Manish M Sood
- The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Ferguson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - S Joseph Kim
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Naimark
- Division of Nephrology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gihad E Nesrallah
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Keenan Research Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven D Soroka
- Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Monica Beaulieu
- Division of Nephrology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Stephanie N Dixon
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahsan Alam
- Division of Nephrology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Selina Allu
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Navdeep Tangri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.,Chronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Haemodialysis (HD) is the commonest form of kidney replacement therapy in the world, accounting for approximately 69% of all kidney replacement therapy and 89% of all dialysis. Over the last six decades since the inception of HD, dialysis technology and patient access to the therapy have advanced considerably, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes vary widely across the world and, overall, the rates of impaired quality of life, morbidity and mortality are high. Cardiovascular disease affects more than two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality. In addition, patients on HD have high symptom loads and are often under considerable financial strain. Despite the many advances in HD technology and delivery systems that have been achieved since the treatment was first developed, poor outcomes among patients receiving HD remain a major public health concern. Understanding the epidemiology of HD outcomes, why they might vary across different populations and how they might be improved is therefore crucial, although this goal is hampered by the considerable heterogeneity in the monitoring and reporting of these outcomes across settings. This Review examines the epidemiology of haemodialysis outcomes — clinical, patient-reported and surrogate outcomes — across world regions and populations, including vulnerable individuals. The authors also discuss the current status of monitoring and reporting of haemodialysis outcomes and potential strategies for improvement. Nearly 4 million people in the world are living on kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and haemodialysis (HD) remains the commonest form of KRT, accounting for approximately 69% of all KRT and 89% of all dialysis. Dialysis technology and patient access to KRT have advanced substantially since the 1960s, particularly in high-income countries. However, HD availability, accessibility, cost and outcomes continue to vary widely across countries, particularly among disadvantaged populations (including Indigenous peoples, women and people at the extremes of age). Cardiovascular disease affects over two-thirds of people receiving HD, is the major cause of morbidity and accounts for almost 50% of mortality; mortality among patients on HD is significantly higher than that of their counterparts in the general population, and treated kidney failure has a higher mortality than many types of cancer. Patients on HD also experience high burdens of symptoms, poor quality of life and financial difficulties. Careful monitoring of the outcomes of patients on HD is essential to develop effective strategies for risk reduction. Outcome measures are highly variable across regions, countries, centres and segments of the population. Establishing kidney registries that collect a variety of clinical and patient-reported outcomes using harmonized definitions is therefore crucial. Evaluation of HD outcomes should include the impact on family and friends, and personal finances, and should examine inequities in disadvantaged populations, who comprise a large proportion of the HD population.
Collapse
|
48
|
Bailey PK, Hole BD, Plumb LA, Caskey FJ. Mixed-methods research in nephrology. Kidney Int 2022; 101:895-905. [DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
49
|
Gutman T, Kelly A, Scholes-Robertson N, Craig JC, Jesudason S, Tong A. Patient and Caregiver Experiences and Attitudes about Their Involvement in Research in Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:215-227. [PMID: 35131928 PMCID: PMC8823931 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.05960521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Although patient and caregiver involvement in research is widely advocated to improve the relevance and uptake of study findings, barriers and uncertainties in achieving this goal remain. This study aimed to describe patient and caregiver experiences and perspectives of their previous involvement in research, to inform strategies to strengthen patient involvement in research. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 23 adult patients with CKD and caregivers who had previously been involved in research, from Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Denmark. Transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS We identified six themes: grappling with CKD diagnosis (overwhelmed by the burden of illness, silenced by stigma and shame, absence of advocacy, and awareness), bearing the responsibility for involvement (autonomy in their own care, forced to be proactive to access opportunities, infrastructural support to connect researchers and patients), battling big agendas (struggling in a system of disincentive, changing research culture, becoming equals), seeing the person behind the patient (harnessing broader knowledge, expertise, skills and interests, understanding patient needs, motivations for involvement), sensitivity to complexities of payment (accounting for individual circumstances, denoting value, enabling diverse involvement), and championing the patient voice (links to important stakeholders, drivers of innovation, responsibility to end users). CONCLUSIONS The burden of CKD, limited opportunities, and power asymmetry between patients/caregivers and researchers were challenges to meaningful involvement in research. Building trust, awareness of opportunities, and recognizing the broad expertise and value of patients/caregivers, including and beyond their illness experience, may better support patient and caregiver involvement in research in CKD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talia Gutman
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Ayano Kelly
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Nicole Scholes-Robertson
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jonathan C. Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Allison Tong
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia,Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Voorend CGN, van Oevelen M, Verberne WR, van den Wittenboer ID, Dekkers OM, Dekker F, Abrahams AC, van Buren M, Mooijaart SP, Bos WJW. OUP accepted manuscript. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:1529-1544. [PMID: 35195249 PMCID: PMC9317173 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Non-dialytic conservative care (CC) has been proposed as a treatment option for patients with kidney failure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims at comparing survival outcomes between dialysis and CC in studies where patients made an explicit treatment choice. Methods Five databases were systematically searched from origin through 25 February 2021 for studies comparing survival outcomes among patients choosing dialysis versus CC. Adjusted and unadjusted survival rates were extracted and meta-analysis performed where applicable. Risk of bias analysis was performed according to the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions. Results A total of 22 cohort studies were included covering 21 344 patients. Most studies were prone to selection bias and confounding. Patients opting for dialysis were generally younger and had fewer comorbid conditions, fewer functional impairments and less frailty than patients who chose CC. The unadjusted median survival from treatment decision or an estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 ranged from 20 and 67 months for dialysis and 6 and 31 months for CC. Meta-analysis of 12 studies that provided adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality showed a pooled adjusted HR of 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.39–0.57) for patients choosing dialysis compared with CC. In subgroups of patients with older age or severe comorbidities, the reduction of mortality risk remained statistically significant, although analyses were unadjusted. Conclusions Patients opting for dialysis have an overall lower mortality risk compared with patients opting for CC. However, a high risk of bias and heterogeneous reporting preclude definitive conclusions and results cannot be translated to an individual level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wouter R Verberne
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Olaf M Dekkers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Friedo Dekker
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alferso C Abrahams
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolijn van Buren
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Willem Jan W Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|