Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care

Optimization of a panel of behavioral tests for use in containment using a golden Syrian hamster model

Golden Syrian hamsters are an often-overlooked model in behavioral testing. While previously utilized for research examining circadian rhythms and mammalian reproduction, they are less common than murine models in both infectious disease and behavioral studies. However, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) quickly pushed hamster modeling to the forefront due to its myriad of advantages over mice in recapitulating human pathology and transmission. At least 10 % of COVID-19 survivors suffer from post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), a collection of some 200 sequelae with neurologic sequelae (neuro-PASC) presenting with potentially debilitating symptomology. This presents a clear need for a small animal model that recapitulates human disease with the ability to assess any potential long term neurological changes. We adapted and optimized a panel of behavioral tests from previously accepted murine models utilizing the golden Syrian hamster model for use within biocontainment facilities. Our panel includes grip strength, Porsolt forced swim, and novel object recognition testing to measure muscle fatigue or weakness, depression, and memory loss or cognitive impairment, respectively. Apart from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), this panel of tests is applicable to other pathogens that cause neurologic sequelae, such as Nipah or eastern equine encephalitis viruses, or any other model systems that require the use of hamsters. In this manuscript, we detail the methods for each of these three behavioral tests, how to interpret and analyze the resulting data, and emphasize additional factors for consideration. We also provide baseline data for both male and female golden Syrian hamsters.

Risk of postacute sequelae of COVID-19 and oral antivirals in adults aged over 60 years: A nationwide retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between oral antiviral administration and postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) risk in Korea.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency and the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We analyzed data from COVID-19 patients aged >60 years from January to December 2022. The primary outcome was the occurrence of 27 PASCs within 30-120 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The hazard ratio was calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir significantly reduced the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure and cardiomyopathies (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.86), cardiac dysrhythmias (aHR, 0.83), and ischemic stroke (aHR, 0.88). Moreover, it also lowered the risk of hospitalization due to respiratory diseases including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aHR, 0.92), and decreased renal disorders including dialysis needs (aHR, 0.57), and acute renal failure (aHR, 0.85). Molnupiravir reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (aHR, 0.84) and other cerebrovascular diseases (aHR, 0.84). Respiratory conditions decreased by approximately 13-14% (aHR, 0.87 and 0.86, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and molnupiravir administration in ambulatory patients were associated with decreased PASC risk; thus, oral antivirals may mitigate the indirect Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection effects.

Mitigating fatigue in long COVID patients with MYPplus: a clinical observation

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the emergence of a secondary public health crisis known as Long COVID. It is estimated that approximately 10% of individuals who contact COVID-19 develop Long COVID, with fatigue and brain fog being among the most commonly reported and debilitating symptoms. However, no standardized or effective treatments are currently available. This observational study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MYPplus, an herbal formulation composed of Astragali Radix, Salviae Radix, and Aquilariae Lignum, in alleviating fatigue and brain fog in patients with Long COVID.

METHODS

Subjects with a score of 60 or higher on the Modified Korean version of the Chalder Fatigue scale (mKCFQ11) or a brain fog rating of 5 or higher on the visual analogue scale (VAS) took two capsules of MYPplus (500 mg per capsule) twice daily for 4 weeks. Changes in symptoms were assessed using the mKCFQ11, Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20), Fatigue VAS, Brain fog VAS, and overall quality of life using the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Additionally, levels of three cytokines (TNF-α, TGF-β, IFN- γ) and cortisol were measured.

RESULTS

Fifty participants successfully completed the 4-week administration with MYPplus. At baseline, fatigue severity was 75.3 ± 10.9 in mKCFQ11, 70.9 ± 11.2 in MFI-20, 7.5 ± 1.2 in Fatigue VAS, 8.4 ± 1.1 in Brain fog VAS, and 45.3 ± 17.8 in SF-12. All parameters significantly improved (p < 0.01), with a decrease of 46% in mKCFQ11, 26% in MFI-20, 49% in Fatigue VAS, and 52% in Brain fog VAS, and an increase of 59% in SF-12, respectively. Unlikely others, the plasma level of TGF-β showed a declining pattern after MYPplus administration (from 765.0 ± 1759.7 to 243.9 ± 708.1 pg/mL, p = 0.07). No safety concerns were observed.

CONCLUSION

This pilot observational study suggests the clinical potential of MYPplus for managing patients with Long COVID, focusing on fatigue-related symptoms and quality of life. Further studies are required to confirm its efficacy and safety using large-scale randomized placebo-controlled trials in the future.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION

This study has been retrospectively registered with the identifier number KCT0008948 on https://cris.nih.go.kr , as of 27/10/23.

Multidisciplinary collaborative guidance on the assessment and treatment of patients with Long COVID: A compendium statement

BACKGROUND

In 2021, the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation established the Multi-Disciplinary Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection Collaborative to provide guidance from established Long COVID clinics for the evaluation and management of Long COVID. The collaborative previously published eight Long COVID consensus guidance statements using a primarily symptom-based approach. However, Long COVID symptoms most often do not occur in isolation.

AIMS

This compendium aims to equip clinicians with an efficient, up-to-date clinical resource for evaluating and managing adults experiencing Long COVID symptoms. The primary intended audience includes physiatrists, primary care physicians, and other clinicians who provide first-line assessment and management of Long COVID symptoms, especially in settings where subspecialty care is not readily available. This compendium provides a holistic framework for assessment and management, symptom-specific considerations, and updates on prevalence, health equity, disability considerations, pathophysiology, and emerging evidence regarding treatments under investigation. Because Long COVID closely resembles other infection-associated chronic conditions (IACCs) such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, the guidance in this compendium may also be helpful for clinicians managing these related conditions.

METHODS

Guidance in this compendium was developed by the collaborative's established modified Delphi approach. The collaborative is a multidisciplinary group whose members include physiatrists, primary care physicians, pulmonologists, cardiologists, psychiatrists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech and language pathologists, patients, and government representatives. Over 40 Long COVID centers are represented in the collaborative.

RESULTS

Long COVID is defined by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine as "an IACC that occurs after SARS-CoV-2 infection and is present for at least 3 months as a continuous, relapsing and remitting, or progressive disease state that affects one or more organ systems." The current global prevalence of Long COVID is estimated to be 6%. Higher prevalence has been identified among female gender, certain racial and ethnic groups, and individuals who live in nonurban areas. However, anyone can develop Long COVID after being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Long COVID can present as a wide variety of symptom clusters. The most common symptoms include exaggerated fatigue and diminished energy windows, postexertional malaise (PEM)/postexertional symptom exacerbation (PESE), cognitive impairment (brain fog), dysautonomia, pain/myalgias, and smell and taste alterations. Holistic assessment should include a traditional history, physical examination, and additional diagnostic testing, as indicated. A positive COVID-19 test during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection is not required to diagnose Long COVID, and currently, there is no single laboratory finding that is definitively diagnostic for confirming or ruling out the diagnosis of Long COVID. A basic laboratory assessment is recommended for all patients with possible Long COVID, and consideration for additional labs and diagnostic procedures is guided by the patient's specific symptoms. Current management strategies focus on symptom-based supportive care. Critical considerations include energy conservation strategies and addressing comorbidities and modifiable risk factors. Additionally, (1) it is essential to validate the patient's experience and provide reassurance that their symptoms are being taken seriously because many patients have had their symptoms dismissed by loved ones and clinicians; (2) physical activity recommendations must be carefully tailored to the patient's current activity tolerance because overly intense activity can trigger PEM/PESE and worsened muscle damage; and (3) treatment recommendations should be delivered with humility because there are many persistent unknowns related to Long COVID. To date, there are limited data to guide medication management specifically in the context of Long COVID. As such, medication use generally follows standard practice regarding indications and dosing, with extra attention to prioritize (1) patient preference via shared decision-making and (2) cautious use of medications that may improve some symptoms (eg, cognitive/attention impairment) but may worsen other symptoms (eg, PEM/PESE). Numerous clinical trials are investigating additional treatments. The return-to-work process for individuals with Long COVID can be challenging because symptoms can fluctuate, vary in nature, affect multiple functional areas (eg, physical and cognitive), and often manifest as an "invisible disability" that may not be readily acknowledged by employers or coworkers. Clinicians can help patients return to work by identifying suitable workplace accommodations and resources, providing necessary documentation, and recommending occupational or vocational therapy when needed. If these efforts are unsuccessful and work significantly worsens Long COVID symptoms or impedes recovery, applying for disability may be warranted. Long COVID is recognized as a potential disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

CONCLUSION

To contribute to the overall health and well-being for all patients, Long COVID care should be delivered in a holistic manner that acknowledges challenges faced by the patient and uncertainties in the field. For more detailed information on assessment and management of specific Long COVID symptoms, readers can reference the collaborative's symptom-specific consensus guidance statements.

A multidimensional network of factors associated with long COVID in the French population

BACKGROUND

Various factors associated with long COVID have been evidenced, but the heterogeneity of definitions and epidemiological investigations has often hidden risk pathways relevant for understanding and preventing this condition.

METHODS

This nationwide random sampling survey conducted in France after the Omicron waves in autumn 2022 assessed eight sets of factors potentially associated with long COVID in a structured epidemiological investigation based on a conceptual model accounting for the relationships between these sets of factors. A representative sample of 1813 adults of whom 55% were infected with SARS-CoV-2 was assessed for infection dates and context, post-COVID symptoms and these factors. Four definitions of long COVID, including the World Health Organisation's, were used.

RESULTS

Female sex, household size (≥2), low financial security, negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on occupation and work conditions, number of comorbidities (≥2), presence of respiratory disease, mental and sensory disorders, number of SARS-CoV-2 infections (≥2) and initial symptoms (≥6), perceived high severity of COVID-19 are positively and consistently associated with long COVID. Age ≥ 75 years, retirement, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (≥2 doses) and good perceived information regarding long Covid are negatively associated with the condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The broad spectrum of factors confirmed here strongly suggests that long COVID should be regarded not only as a direct complication of SARS-CoV-2 infection but also as driven by a broader network of contextual, medical, psychological and social factors. These factors should be better considered in strategies aimed at limiting the long COVID burden in the general population.

Long COVID in pediatric age: an observational, prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study in Italy

Introduction

This observational prospective longitudinal multicenter study examines the occurrence and characteristics of long COVID (LC) in the Italian pediatric population.

Methods

Conducted across 12 Pediatric Units in Italy from January to March 2022, the study involved 1129 children diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data were collected via self-administered questionnaires at 1-3 months, 3-6 months, and 6-12 months post-infection, with LC defined as symptoms persisting for at least 2 months and occurring 3 months post-diagnosis.

Results

Results revealed that 68.6% of children reported at least one post-COVID symptom, with 16.2% experiencing LC. The most frequent symptoms included respiratory issues (43.4%), neurological and cognitive dysfunction (27.7%), gastrointestinal symptoms (22.1%), fatigue (21.6%), and sleep disturbances (18.8%). Age and gender differences were significant, with older children and females more prone to cardiovascular and neurological & cognitive dysfunction.

Discussion

The study highlights that LC in children presents similarly to adults, though less frequently. The occurrence of LC was lower compared to adult populations, likely due to the generally milder course of COVID-19 in children. The findings underscore the need for targeted follow-up and support for affected children, especially considering the long-term persistence of symptoms. Further research is necessary to explore the impact of COVID-19 vaccines on pediatric LC and the effects of different SARS-CoV-2 variants. These insights are crucial for developing strategies to manage and mitigate long-term impacts in children recovering from COVID-19.

Serum sST2: key biomarkers in COVID-19 patients with implications for coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

As the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic persists, post-COVID-19 syndrome (PS), characterized by symptoms like chest pain, fatigue, and palpitations, is becoming a significant medical and social issue. COVID-19 patients with existing coronary artery disease (CAD) may face higher risks of complications. It is crucial to assess if PS patients also have CAD, though data is limited.

METHODS

We studied 75 COVID-19 patients and 68 non-COVID-19 patients admitted to our hospital between 2022/12/20 to 2023/01/20. Demographic, laboratory, and clinical data were collected upon admission. The Gensini score (GS) was used to assess coronary atherosclerosis severity. Patients were categorized by GS and clinical traits to identify potential independent risks linked to CAD and COVID-19 severity.

RESULTS

COVID-19 patients with existing CAD had higher levels of serum soluble growth stimulation expression of gene 2 protein (sST2), myeloperoxidase, ALT, AST, PT, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and hypersensitive troponin-I (hs-cTnI), along with longer hospital stays, more ICU admissions, and increased heart failure and ACS morbidity compared to those without CAD. Univariate and multivariate analysis identified sST2 as an independent risk factor for COVID-19 patients with coexisting CAD (odds ratio 1.122). sST2 levels were positively correlated with coronary angiography GS (r = 0.474, p < 0.001) in COVID-19 patients and were significantly higher in cases with GS ≥ 32, regardless of COVID-19 status (p < 0.001) and specifically in COVID-19 patients (p = 0.006). ROC analysis showed sST2 predicted ICU admission, hospital stay duration, and morbidity of HF and ACS similarly to GS.

CONCLUSIONS

Admission serum sST2 levels should be considered in COVID-19 patients with CAD-like symptoms for treatment planning and could serve as a prognostic biomarker for COVID-19 with co-existing CAD in clinical practice.

Long COVID Characteristics and Experience: A Descriptive Study From the Yale LISTEN Research Cohort

BACKGROUND

The experience of people with long COVID needs further amplification, especially with a comprehensive focus on symptomatology, treatments, and the impact on daily life and finances. Our intent is to describe the experience of people with long COVID symptomatology and characterize the psychological, social, and financial challenges they experience.

METHODS

We collected data from individuals aged 18 and older reporting long COVID as participants in the Yale Listen to Immune, Symptom and Treatment Experiences Now study. The sample population included 441 participants surveyed between May 2022 and July 2023. We evaluated their demographic characteristics, socioeconomic and psychological status, index infection period, health status, quality of life, symptoms, treatments, prepandemic comorbidities, and new-onset conditions.

RESULTS

Overall, the median age of the participants with long COVID was 46 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 38-57 years); 74% were women, 86% were non-Hispanic White, and 93% were from the United States. Participants reported a low health status measured by the Euro-QoL visual analog scale, with a median score of 49 (IQR: 32-61). Participants documented a diverse range of symptoms, with all 96 possible symptom choices being reported. Additionally, participants had tried many treatments (median number of treatments: 19, IQR: 12-28). They were also experiencing psychological distress, social isolation, and financial stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite having tried numerous treatments, participants with long COVID continued to experience an array of health and financial challenges-findings that underscore the failure of the healthcare system to address the medical needs of people with long COVID. These insights highlight the need for crucial medical, mental health, financial, and community support services, as well as further scientific investigation to address the complex impact of long COVID.

Is asynchronous telerehabilitation equal to synchronous telerehabilitation in COVID-19 survivors with classes 4-6?

IntroductionThe first aim of this study was to compare synchronous and asynchronous telerehabilitation programs in COVID-19 survivors with classes 4-6 and determine the more appropriate telerehabilitation approach.MethodsThirty-six COVID-19 survivors with class 4-6 severity were randomly divided into two groups. Telerehabilitation programs were an 8-week exercise program that comprised pulmonary, aerobic, and strengthening exercises. Patients were assessed at the baseline, post-treatment, and follow-up for the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), short physical performance battery (SPPB), health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS)ResultsThe overall mean age of the study population was 54.06 (SD 10.50), and 15 (46.8%) were male. There were no significant differences between the two groups in any of the demographics and clinical characteristics at the baseline (p > 0.05), except for physical function (p < 0.05). There was a significant improvement in exercise capacity (p < 0.001) and lower extremity function (p < 0.01) within both groups in the short term and long term. There was a significant improvement in some subparameters of quality of life in both groups. As the synchronous group's short-term and long-term psychological status improved significantly, the asynchronous group's short-term psychological status improved significantly (p < 0.05). Telerehabilitation programs had similar effects, and only synchronous telerehabilitation outperformed asynchronous telerehabilitation in terms of physical function, role-emotional, and long-term anxiety.DiscussionAsynchronous telerehabilitation was as effective as synchronous telerehabilitation in developing clinical and functional parameters when properly planned and implemented.

The intersection of microbiome and autoimmunity in long COVID-19: Current insights and future directions

Long COVID-19 affects a significant percentage of patients and is characterized by a wide range of symptoms, including weariness and mental fog as well as emotional symptoms like worry and sadness. COVID-19 is closely linked to the autoimmune disorders that are becoming more prevalent worldwide and are linked to immune system hyperactivation, neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) development, and molecular mimicry pathways. Long-term COVID-related autoimmune responses include a watchful immune system referring to the ability of immune system to constantly monitor the body for signs of infection, disease, or abnormal cells; altered innate and adaptive immune cells, autoantigens secreted by living or dead neutrophils, and high concentrations of autoantibodies directed against different proteins. The microbiome, which consists of billions of bacteria living in the human body, is essential for controlling immune responses and supporting overall health. The microbiome can affect the course of long COVID-associated autoimmunity, including the degree of illness, the rate of recovery, and the onset of autoimmune reactions. Although the precise role of the microbiome in long COVID autoimmunity is still being investigated, new studies indicate that probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary changes-interventions that target the microbiome-may be able to reduce autoimmune reactions and enhance long-term outcomes for COVID-19 survivors. More research is required to precisely understand how the microbiome affects COVID-19-related autoimmunity and to create tailored treatment plans.

A Review on Long COVID Screening: Challenges and Perspectives Focusing on Exhaled Breath Gas Sensing

Long COVID (LC) is a great global health concern, affecting individuals recovering from SARS-CoV-2 infection. The persistent and varied symptoms across multiple organs complicate diagnosis and management, and an incomplete understanding of the condition hinders advancements in therapeutics. Current diagnostic methods face challenges related to standardization and completeness. To overcome this, new technologies such as sensor-based electronic noses are being explored for LC assessment, offering a noninvasive screening approach via volatile organic compounds (VOC) sensing in exhaled breath. Although specific LC-associated VOCs have not been fully characterized, insights from COVID-19 research suggest their potential as biomarkers. Additionally, AI-driven chemometrics are promising in identifying and predicting outcomes; despite challenges, AI-driven technologies hold the potential to enhance LC evaluation, providing rapid and accurate diagnostics for improved patient care and outcomes. This review underscores the importance of emerging and sensing technologies and comprehensive diagnostic strategies to address screening and treatment challenges in the face of LC.

Post-COVID-19 Syndrome as Described by Patients: A Qualitative Study

Background/Objectives: Growing interest in post-viral conditions following COVID-19 infection has led researchers and clinicians to develop several definitions of post-COVID-19 syndrome. This study aimed to understand the meaning given to post-COVID-19 syndrome by individuals who survived the first wave of the pandemic two years after its onset. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was performed according to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research guidelines. An inductive and content analysis were adopted on narratives collected via the interview of patients who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the first pandemic wave in the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region (Italy). Results: This study included 230 patients, of whom 158 experienced post-COVID-19 syndrome, and 46 (29.1%) reported suffering from this condition 24 months after the infection. On average, patients experienced three symptoms, with most of them experiencing at least one. Seventy-five patients reported being familiar with the definition of the post-COVID-19 syndrome, mainly through media and the internet (28.9% and 28.2%, respectively). The post-COVID-19 syndrome was described as characterized by two themes: (a) the experience of interrelated physical and psychological symptoms and (b) the experience of fighting like warriors for a long time. Conclusions: The post-COVID-19 syndrome is highly prevalent but poorly understood. Patients rely on low-quality information rather than that offered by clinicians. The post-COVID-19 syndrome appears to be a complex syndrome encompassing physical and mental symptoms, as well as those disabling the person with an unclear trajectory. There is a need to focus on the long-term consequences of COVID-19, incorporating insights from individuals' lived experiences.

Impact of treatment of COVID-19 with sotrovimab on post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): an analysis of National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) data

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of early sotrovimab treatment versus no treatment on the risk of developing post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC; long COVID) in patients (age ≥ 12 years) with COVID-19 at high risk for progression to severe disease.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study using the US National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) data. Phase 1 identified and assessed multiple definitions of PASC; Phase 2 evaluated the effectiveness of sotrovimab for reducing the risk of PASC, utilizing definitions from Phase 1. Average treatment effect in the treated (ATT)-weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare time to event for PASC between high-risk patients who received sotrovimab treatment between May 26, 2021 and April 5, 2022, and high-risk patients with COVID-19 diagnosed between May 26, 2021 and March 26, 2022 who did not receive any treatment for COVID-19 during the acute phase or any pre-exposure prophylaxis against SARS-CoV-2.

RESULTS

A total of 9,504 sotrovimab-treated and 619,668 untreated patients were included in the main analysis. Most baseline characteristics were balanced between the two cohorts after ATT weighting. The doubly robust ATT-weighted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) was 0.92 (0.89-0.96) (p < 0.001), indicating that sotrovimab use was associated with a significantly lower risk of PASC. Results remained consistent in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

In patients at high risk for severe COVID-19, the benefits of early sotrovimab treatment may extend beyond the acute phase of COVID-19 and contribute to the prevention of PASC symptoms.

COVID-19 related complications

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted global healthcare systems, revealed vulnerabilities and prompted a re-evaluation of medical practices. Acute complications from the virus, including cardiovascular and neurological issues, have underscored the necessity for timely medical interventions. Advances in diagnostic methods and personalized therapies have been pivotal in mitigating severe outcomes. Additionally, Long COVID has emerged as a complex challenge, affecting various body systems and leading to respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, psychological, and musculoskeletal problems. This broad spectrum of complications highlights the importance of multidisciplinary management approaches that prioritize therapy, rehabilitation, and patient-centered care. Vulnerable populations such as paediatric patients, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals face unique risks and complications, necessitating continuous monitoring and tailored management strategies to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19.

A Pragmatic Study of Cardiovascular Disease During Long-Term COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Many patients diagnosed with COVID-19 have persistent cardiovascular symptoms, but whether this represents a true cardiac process is unclear. This study assessed whether symptoms associated with long COVID among patients referred for cardiovascular evaluation are associated with objective abnormalities on cardiac testing to explain their clinical presentation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 40,462 unique patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at our tertiary referral was conducted and identified 363 patients with persistent cardiovascular symptoms a minimum of 4 weeks after polymerase chain reaction confirmed COVID-19 infection. Patients had no cardiovascular symptoms prior to COVID-19 infection. Each patient was referred for cardiovascular evaluation at a tertiary referral center. The incidence and etiology of abnormalities on cardiovascular testing among patients with long COVID symptoms are reported here. The cohort was subsequently divided into 3 categories based on the dominant circulating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 variant at the time of initial infection for further analysis.

RESULTS

Among 40,462 unique patients diagnosed with COVID-19 at our tertiary referral center from April 2020 to March 2022, 363 (0.9%) patients with long COVID were evaluated by Cardiology for possible cardiac sequelae from COVID and formed the main study cohort. Of these, 229 (63%) were vaccinated and 47 (12.9%) had severe initial infection, receiving inpatient treatment for COVID prior to developing long COVID symptoms. Symptoms were associated with a cardiac cause in 85 (23.4%), of which 52 (14.3%) were attributed to COVID; 39 (10.7%) with new cardiac disease from COVID, and 13 (3.6%) to worsening of pre-existing cardiac disease after COVID infection. The median troponin change in 45 patients with troponin measurements within 4 weeks of acute infection was +4 ng/dL (9 to 13 ng/dL). Among the total cohort with long COVID, 83.7% were diagnosed during the pre-Delta phase, 13.2% during the Delta phase, and 3.1% during the Omicron phase of the pandemic. There were 6 cases of myocarditis, 11 rhythm disorders, 8 cases of pericarditis, 5 suspected cases of endothelial dysfunction, and 33 cases of autonomic dysfunction.

CONCLUSION

This pragmatic retrospective cohort study suggests that patients with long COVID referred for cardiovascular evaluation infrequently have new, objective cardiovascular disease to explain their clinical presentation. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach is warranted for symptom management along with conservative use of diagnostic testing.

Osteonecrosis as a manifestation of Long-COVID Syndrome: a systematic review

Purpose SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus responsible for COVID-19 pandemic. Some authors described the set of persistent symptoms COVID-related as "Long-COVID Syndrome." Several cases of post-COVID-19 osteonecrosis (ON) are described. Our primary aim was to study the hypothetical correlation between SARS-CoV-2 infection and ON; our secondary aim was to understand if ON can be considered part of Long-COVID. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviewers and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Because COVID-19 is a recently described disease, we included all levels of evidence studies. We excluded studies lacking specification regarding the use of corticosteroids (CCS) and studies not related to COVID-19. The variables extracted were age, sex, risk factors, affected joints, signs and symptoms, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and X-ray features, histology, treatment of COVID-19, dose and duration of treatment with CCS, treatment of ON, follow-up, and treatment outcome. Results A total of 13 studies were included, involving 95 patients and 159 joints. Time between the diagnosis of COVID-19 and the onset of symptoms related to ON was 16 weeks on average. Time between the onset of symptoms and the MRI was 6 weeks. An average of 926.4 mg of prednisolone equivalent per patient were administered. On average, CCS were administered for 20.6 days. Conclusions Patients with a history of COVID-19 infection developed osteonecrosis prematurely and with a lower dose of CCS than usually reported in the literature. Symptoms of osteonecrosis occur within the interval of the period described as Long-COVID. Surgeons should not underestimate the persistence of arthralgia when a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and use of CCS is reported.

A double-blind randomized trial of hyperbaric oxygen for persistent symptoms after brain injury

In this double-blind randomized trial, adults with persistent symptoms following non-stroke brain injury received 40 hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) sessions or 40 sham sessions over 12 weeks. Three months later, all were offered 40 unblinded HBO2 sessions. Participants completed the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory (NSI) at baseline, 13 weeks (after 40 chamber sessions), 6 months, 9 months (after the second chamber series), and 12 months, with prime outcome at 13 weeks, and additional questionnaires, neuropsychological tests, and functional measures. We enrolled 49 participants and analyzed 47 due to drop-out/exclusion (26 males, 40 with traumatic brain injury). Baseline NSI was 35.9 ± 15.8 in the HBO2 group (n = 26) and 30.7 ± 16.9 in the sham group (n = 21) (p = 0.28). Mean 13-week change scores were 10.6 ± 10.6 (HBO2 group) and 3.6 ± 5.9 (sham group) (mean difference 7.0, 95% CI 1.7-12.3, p = 0.01). The HBO2 group improved on measures of olfaction, anxiety, sleep difficulties, and vestibular complaints. Both groups reported improvements in depression, headaches, PTSD symptoms, physical quality of life, and degree to which difficulties interfere with daily life. With an additional 40 HBO2 sessions, the original HBO2 group reported additional improvements on NSI at 12 months. Only 15 original sham participants completed the second chamber series, limiting conclusions from that data.

Cerebral Blood Flow in Orthostatic Intolerance

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is vital for delivering oxygen and nutrients to the brain. Many forms of orthostatic intolerance (OI) involve impaired regulation of CBF in the upright posture, which results in disabling symptoms that decrease quality of life. Because CBF is not easy to measure, rises in heart rate or drops in blood pressure are used as proxies for abnormal CBF. These result in diagnoses such as postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and orthostatic hypotension. However, in many other OI syndromes such as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and long COVID, heart rate and blood pressure are frequently normal despite significant drops in CBF. This often leads to the incorrect conclusion that there is nothing hemodynamically abnormal in these patients and thus no explanation or treatment is needed. There is a need to measure CBF, as orthostatic hypoperfusion is the shared pathophysiology for all forms of OI. In this review, we examine the literature studying CBF dysfunction in various syndromes with OI and evaluate methods of measuring CBF including transcranial Doppler ultrasound, extracranial cerebral blood flow ultrasound, near infrared spectroscopy, and wearable devices.

Longer-Term Mental Health Consequences of COVID-19 Infection: Moderation by Race and Socioeconomic Status

OBJECTIVE

While evidence suggests that the mental health symptoms of COVID-19 can persist for several months following infection, little is known about the longer-term mental health effects and whether certain sociodemographic groups may be particularly impacted. This cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the longer-term mental health consequences of COVID-19 infection and examine whether such consequences are more pronounced in Black people and people with lower socioeconomic status.

METHODS

277 Black and White adults (age ≥ 30 years) with a history of COVID-19 (tested positive ≥ 6 months prior to participation) or no history of COVID-19 infection completed a 45-minute online questionnaire battery.

RESULTS

People with a history of COVID-19 had greater depressive (d = 0.24), anxiety (d = 0.34), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (d = 0.32), and insomnia (d = 0.31) symptoms than those without a history of COVID-19. These differences remained for anxiety, PTSD, and insomnia symptoms after adjusting for age, sex, race, education, income, employment status, body mass index, and smoking status. No differences were detected for perceived stress and general psychopathology. People with a history of COVID-19 had more than double the odds of clinically significant symptoms of anxiety (OR = 2.22) and PTSD (OR = 2.40). Education, but not race, income, or employment status, moderated relationships of interest such that COVID-19 status was more strongly and positively associated with all the mental health outcomes for those with fewer years of education.

CONCLUSION

The mental health consequences of COVID-19 may be significant, widespread, and persistent for at least 6 months post-infection and may increase as years of education decreases.

Multicentre, multitime, multidimension, prospective follow-up cohort study on patients during the first wave of COVID-19 in China: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

During the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak in China, the surge of COVID-19 cases was rapid and drastic. Emerging evidence suggests that beyond the acute phase, patients with COVID-19 may experience a wide range of postacute or long COVID sequelae. However, the mechanism and burden of COVID-19, especially long COVID, have not yet been comprehensively clarified. To fill this knowledge gap, this large prospective follow-up study aims to investigate the short-term and long-term effects of COVID-19, explore the underlying biological mechanism and identify predictive neuroimaging and haematological biomarkers associated with these effects.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This multicentre study will recruit patients infected during the first wave of COVID-19 in China and healthy controls (HCs) with no history of COVID-19 infection from nine participating hospitals. Confirmed patients with mild or moderate COVID-19 will complete the following programmes during the acute infection phase and at 3, 12 and 24 months after infection: (a) blood test at the local laboratory, (b) multimodal brain and spine MRI scan and (c) the neuropsychological scales and questionnaires. Similarly, the uninfected HCs will complete the same programmes as the infected group mentioned above at the time of inclusion. At the first time point, 501 participants (418 patients and 83 HCs) from nine recruiting hospitals have been observed. Ultimately, all of these results will be analysed to explore the short-term and long-term effects of COVID-19.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was granted by Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (XJTU1AF2023LSK-013). Findings will be presented at national and international conferences, as well as published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05745805.

Thirteen serum biochemical indexes and five whole blood coagulation indices in a point-of-care testing analyzer: ideal protocol for evaluating pulmonary and critical care medicine

The accurate and timely detection of biochemical coagulation indicators is pivotal in pulmonary and critical care medicine. Despite their reliability, traditional laboratories often lag in terms of rapid diagnosis. Point-of-care testing (POCT) has emerged as a promising alternative, which is awaiting rigorous validation. We assessed 226 samples from patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University using a Beckman Coulter AU5821 and a PUSHKANG POCT Biochemistry Analyzer MS100. Furthermore, 350 samples were evaluated with a Stago coagulation analyzer STAR MAX and a PUSHKANG POCT Coagulation Analyzer MC100. Metrics included thirteen biochemical indexes, such as albumin, and five coagulation indices, such as prothrombin time. Comparisons were drawn against the PUSHKANG POCT analyzer. Bland-Altman plots (MS100: 0.8206‒0.9995; MC100: 0.8318‒0.9911) evinced significant consistency between methodologies. Spearman correlation pinpointed a potent linear association between conventional devices and the PUSHKANG POCT analyzer, further underscored by a robust correlation coefficient (MS100: 0.713‒0.949; MC100: 0.593‒0.950). The PUSHKANG POCT was validated as a dependable tool for serum and whole blood biochemical and coagulation diagnostics. This emphasizes its prospective clinical efficacy, offering clinicians a swift diagnostic tool and heralding a new era of enhanced patient care outcomes.

The emotions of Chinese netizens toward the opening-up policies for COVID-19: panic, trust, and acceptance

With the development of social media platforms such as Weibo, they have provided a broad platform for the expression of public sentiments during the pandemic. This study aims to explore the emotional attitudes of Chinese netizens toward the COVID-19 opening-up policies and their related thematic characteristics. Using Python, 145,851 texts were collected from the Weibo platform. Sentiment analysis and topic modeling techniques were employed to reveal the distribution of public emotions and key themes. The study found that the proportions of emotions were as follows: Good (46%), Happy (11%), Anger (17%), Disgust (6%), Sadness (10%), Surprise (2%), and Fear (8%). Through topic analysis, the following main themes were identified: medical resource shortages, healthcare workers, national policies, and COVID-19 sequelae. Based on the results of sentiment and topic analysis, public emotions toward the COVID-19 opening-up policies were categorized into three dimensions: panic, trust, and acceptance. Panic was primarily associated with medical resource shortages, concerns about COVID-19 sequelae, and doubts about policy transparency and fairness. Trust was reflected in public gratitude toward healthcare workers and support for national policies. Acceptance represented the public's optimism about returning to normal life. The findings demonstrate that changes in public emotions not only reflect the social impact of policy implementation but also highlight the critical roles of medical resource allocation, information transparency, and psychological health support in adjusting pandemic policies. This study provides empirical evidence and theoretical support for the government to develop more precise pandemic control strategies.

Prevalence of and factors associated with long COVID among diverse healthcare workers in the UK: a cross-sectional analysis of a nationwide study (UK-REACH)

OBJECTIVES

To assess the prevalence of UK healthcare workers (HCWs) who reported symptoms of COVID-19 lasting for longer than 5 weeks and examine associated factors with experiencing long COVID in an ethnically diverse cohort.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study using data from the UK Research study into Ethnicity And COVID-19 Outcomes in HCWs cohort study.

SETTING

Data were collected electronically between December 2020 and March 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals aged 16 years or older, residing in the UK, and working as HCWs or ancillary workers in a healthcare setting and/or registered with one of the seven major UK healthcare professional regulators.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome was long COVID (symptoms>5 weeks). The primary exposure of interest was self-reported ethnicity. We employed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify associations. We adjusted for demographic information, health status and existing long-term conditions in our multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In our analysis of 11 513 HCWs, we found that 2331 (20.25%) reported COVID-19, of whom 525 (22.52%) experienced long COVID. There were no significant differences in risk of long COVID by ethnic group. In terms of other demographic characteristics, the majority of those experiencing long COVID were female (80.0%) and were slightly older than those who did not experience long COVID (median age 46 (IQR 36-54)). In multivariable analyses of those who reported having had COVID-19, HCWs in nursing/midwifery roles (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.76, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.46; p=0.001) and allied health professions (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.93; p=0.023) had higher odds of experiencing long COVID compared with those in medical roles. Other factors significantly associated with long COVID included self-reported psychological conditions (eg, depression and anxiety) and respiratory conditions (eg, asthma).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large ethnically diverse cohort study, more than one in five UK HCWs reported experiencing long COVID after acute COVID-19 during the first year of the pandemic. We found that specific demographic (older age and female gender) and occupational factors (nursing/midwifery and allied health professions) were associated with higher odds of long COVID. Notably, there were no significant differences in the risk of long COVID by ethnic group. Further research and collaborative efforts are urgently needed to address these factors effectively, develop targeted interventions and understand the temporal and longitudinal dynamics of the condition.

Dermatological complications due to post‑COVID‑19 syndrome: A systematic review

Almost 20% of patients affected by COVID-19 develop dermatological symptoms after recovery. This condition is termed as post-COVID-19 syndrome and is characterized by a state of hyperinflammation, as well as deregulations in the humoral response of CD8+ T-cells. Since there is no specific treatment for these injuries, the treatment of choice depends on the symptoms; thus, it is essential to provide a description of the type and nature of the injuries presented. In the present study, a systemic review was performed using the PICO strategy in the repositories of PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus using the key words 'POST-COVID and skin symptoms'. A total of 44 studies were included in the present systematic review. In these studies, the majority of subjects exhibited non-specific symptoms, commonly referred to as 'skin rash', affecting up to 27.4% of the population. According to the studies, a maximum prevalence of 50% of alopecia was observed among the affected subjects. Additionally, several studies reported the prevalence of other lesions, including pruritus (25%), subcutaneous nodules (12%), dermatitis (9.4%), edema (9%) and pigmentation changes (6%). Dermatological lesions associated with autoimmunity were also identified, with these findings being more pronounced among females and in patients with a history of severe COVID-19. Finally, several studies investigated the presence of autoantibodies, revealing a maximum prevalence of 41% for autoantibodies targeting the epidermis. Specifically, the prevalence was 12.9% for the Wuhan variant, 5.7% for the Alpha variant and 5% for the Delta variant. Although mostly benign, post-COVID-19 syndrome produces marked dermatological alterations for hair health, mainly among females. This, together with the development of lesions with an autoimmune component, constitutes an emerging therapeutic need.

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with long COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated efficacy in managing long COVID-19, underscoring the need to refine and tailor PR strategies for optimal patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the impact of PR on patients with long COVID-19 and to compare the efficacy of different types and durations of PR interventions.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES AND METHODS

We systematically searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the effectiveness of PR in long COVID-19 patients published before April 2024. The primary outcomes were physical capacity assessed by the 6-minute walking test (6MWT), lung function measured by forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were thirty-second sit-to-stand test (30STST), handgrip strength tests, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), dyspnea, depression, anxiety, perceived effort, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies with 3363 patients were included. Compared to controls, PR improved physical capacity (6MWT, 30STST, handgrip), lung function (FEV1, FVC, MIP, MEP), HRQoL, fatigue, dyspnea, and anxiety but did not reach statistical significance for depression. Subgroup analyses of PR duration indicated that programs of ⩽4 weeks improved 6MWT; those between 4 and 8 weeks significantly improved 6MWT, lung function (FEV1, FVC), HRQoL, and reduced fatigue; and programs over 8 weeks improved HRQoL and reduced fatigue. Exercise type analysis revealed that breathing exercises improved 6MWT, lung function (FEV1, FVC), and HRQoL; multicomponent exercises enhanced 6MWT performance and reduced fatigue; the combination of both types improved 6MWT, FEV1 (L), FVC (%pred), HRQoL, and reduced fatigue.

CONCLUSION

PR improves physical capacity, lung function, and quality of life and alleviates dyspnea, fatigue, and anxiety in long COVID-19 patients. A 4- to 8-week PR program and a combination of both breath exercises and multicomponent training is most effective for managing long-term COVID-19 syndromes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD42024455008.

[How did men report their long COVID experience? Health-Disease socio-anthropological meaning]

The study aims to explain the discourse of the collective subject of adult and elderly men about the experience of long COVID. Qualitative research, derived from a national multicenter clinical-virtual observatory involving 92 adult men, between 2022 and 2023 in Brazil. IRaMuTeQ software was used (data processing), the Collective Subject Discourse technique (analysis) and socio-anthropological references of the disease experience (interpretation). The results showed that the long COVID experience was marked by the prolongation of respiratory symptoms characteristic of COVID-19; systemic symptomatology in the physical-psychic body; and severe clinical complications. The experience of the long COVID-19 disease was shaped by gender relations and masculinities, constructed notions of health-disease, imaginaries about the capacity of the disease in the context of vaccination, the systemic character of syndromic events understood as sequelae left by the disease, resonating the sense of incapacity and stigmatization.

Long Coronavirus Disease and the Brain: Molecular Neuroimaging Insights into Neurologic and Psychiatric Sequelae

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a variety of health challenges, with "long COVID" emerging as a widespread and debilitating post-acute syndrome among a considerable number of infected patients. This PET review synthesizes current evidence of the neurologic and psychiatric sequelae of COVID. This review also explores the pathophysiological mechanisms of these results, including astrocyte dysfunction and glutamate dysregulation, as well as the multimodal comparison to MR imaging findings. The findings underscore the potential for long-term brain injury. Additionally, the authors discuss the role of advanced imaging multimodal techniques in diagnosing, monitoring, and guiding treatment strategies for long COVID.

Proteomic and metabolomic profiling of plasma uncovers immune responses in patients with Long COVID-19

Long COVID is an often-debilitating condition with severe, multisystem symptoms that can persist for weeks or months and increase the risk of various diseases. Currently, there is a lack of diagnostic tools for Long COVID in clinical practice. Therefore, this study utilizes plasma proteomics and metabolomics technologies to understand the molecular profile and pathophysiological mechanisms of Long COVID, providing clinical evidence for the development of potential biomarkers. This study included three age- and gender-matched cohorts: healthy controls (n = 18), COVID-19 recovered patients (n = 17), and Long COVID patients (n = 15). The proteomics results revealed significant differences in proteins between Long COVID-19 patients and COVID-19 recovered patients, with dysregulation mainly focused on pathways such as coagulation, platelets, complement cascade reactions, GPCR cell signal transduction, and substance transport, which can participate in regulating immune responses, inflammation, and tissue vascular repair. Metabolomics results showed that Long COVID patients and COVID-19 recovered patients have similar metabolic disorders, mainly involving dysregulation in lipid metabolites and fatty acid metabolism, such as glycerophospholipids, sphingolipid metabolism, and arachidonic acid metabolism processes. In summary, our study results indicate significant protein dysregulation and metabolic abnormalities in the plasma of Long COVID patients, leading to coagulation dysfunction, impaired energy metabolism, and chronic immune dysregulation, which are more pronounced than in COVID-19 recovered patients.

Advancing Interpretable Regression Analysis for Binary Data: A Novel Distributed Algorithm Approach

Sparse data bias, where there is a lack of sufficient cases, is a common problem in data analysis, particularly when studying rare binary outcomes. Although a two-step meta-analysis approach may be used to lessen the bias by combining the summary statistics to increase the number of cases from multiple studies, this method does not completely eliminate bias in effect estimation. In this paper, we propose a one-shot distributed algorithm for estimating relative risk using a modified Poisson regression for binary data, named ODAP-B. We evaluate the performance of our method through both simulation studies and real-world case analyses of postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children using data from 184 501 children across eight national academic medical centers. Compared with the meta-analysis method, our method provides closer estimates of the relative risk for all outcomes considered including syndromic and systemic outcomes. Our method is communication-efficient and privacy-preserving, requiring only aggregated data to obtain relatively unbiased effect estimates compared with two-step meta-analysis methods. Overall, ODAP-B is an effective distributed learning algorithm for Poisson regression to study rare binary outcomes. The method provides inference on adjusted relative risk with a robust variance estimator.

The Role of Age and Comorbidity Interactions in COVID-19 Mortality: Insights from Cardiac and Pulmonary Conditions

Background: Understanding the interactions between age and comorbidities is crucial for assessing COVID-19 mortality, particularly in patients with cardiac and pulmonary conditions. This study investigates the relationship between comorbidities and mortality outcomes in a cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, emphasizing the interplay of age, cardiac, and pulmonary conditions. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 3005 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between 2020 and 2022. Key variables included age, comorbidities (diabetes, cardiac, pulmonary, and neoplasms), and clinical outcomes. Chi-square tests and logistic regression models were used to assess the association between comorbidities and mortality. Stratified analyses by age, diabetes, and pulmonary conditions were conducted to explore interaction effects. Additionally, interaction terms were included in multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the combined impact of age, comorbidities, and mortality. Results: Cardiac conditions such as hypertension, ischemic cardiopathy, and myocardial infarction showed significant protective effects against mortality in younger patients and in those without pulmonary conditions (p < 0.001). However, these protective effects were diminished in older patients and those with pulmonary comorbidities. Age was found to be a significant modifier of the relationship between cardiac conditions and mortality, with a stronger protective effect observed in patients under the median age (p < 0.001). Pulmonary comorbidities significantly increased the risk of mortality, particularly when co-occurring with cardiac conditions (p < 0.001). Diabetes did not significantly modify the relationship between cardiac conditions and mortality. Conclusions: The findings highlight the complex interactions between age, cardiac conditions, and pulmonary conditions in predicting COVID-19 mortality. Younger patients with cardiac comorbidities show a protective effect against mortality, while pulmonary conditions increase mortality risk, especially in older patients. These insights suggest that individualized risk assessments incorporating age and comorbidities are essential for managing COVID-19 outcomes.

Assessment of cognitive and psychiatric disturbances in people with post-COVID-19 condition: a cross-sectional observational study

OBJECTIVE

Cognitive and psychiatric symptoms have been increasingly reported after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, developing soon after infection and possibly persisting for several months. We aimed to study this syndrome and start implementing strategies for its assessment.

METHODS

Consecutive patients, referred by the infectious disease specialist because of cognitive complaints after COVID-19, were neurologically evaluated. Neurological evaluation included a cognitive screening test (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA). Moreover, patients were invited to fill out a general symptom questionnaire and a self-administered multidimensional assessment of psychiatric symptoms, followed by a full psychiatric assessment if scores were above validated cutoffs.

RESULTS

Of 144 referred patients, 101 (mean age 55.2±13.1, 63.4% females) completed the cognitive screening and the self-administered psychiatric questionnaire. Acute infection severity was low for most patients and the most common persisting symptoms were fatigue (92%), sleep problems (69.5%), and headache (52.4%). MoCA outlined cognitive deficits in ≥1 cognitive domain in 34% of patients, mainly in memory and attention. About 60% of patients presented depressive, anxiety, or stress-related symptoms. Psychiatric scale scores significantly correlated with overall symptom burden and MoCA score. No significant correlation was found between MoCA scores and overall symptom burden.

CONCLUSION

We hypothesize that persistent cognitive complaints after COVID-19 might reflect a concomitant or reactive psychopathological condition, possibly coupled with an infection-related impact on cognitive functions. The application of a combined neurological and psychiatric assessment seems crucial to appraise the nature of post-COVID-19 condition.

Comprehensive Risk Assessment of Infection Induced by SARS-CoV-2

The pandemic COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which devastated the global economy and healthcare system. The infection caused an unforeseen rise in COVID-19 patients and increased the mortality rate globally. This study gives an overall idea about host-pathogen interaction, immune responses to COVID-19, recovery status of infection, targeted organs and complications associated, and comparison of post-infection immunity in convalescent subjects and non-infected individuals. The emergence of the variants and episodes of COVID-19 infections made the situation worsen. The timely introduction of vaccines and precautionary measures helped control the infection's severity. Later, the population that recovered from COVID-19 grew significantly. However, understanding the impact of healthcare issues resulting after infection is paramount for improving an individual's health status. It is now recognised that COVID-19 infection affects multiple organs and exhibits a broad range of clinical manifestations. So, post COVID-19 infection creates a high risk in individuals with already prevailing health complications. The identification of post-COVID-19-related health issues and their appropriate management is of greater importance to improving patient's quality of life. The persistence, sequelae and other medical complications that normally last from weeks to months after the recovery of the initial infection are involved with COVID-19. A multi-disciplinary approach is necessary for the development of preventive measures, techniques for rehabilitation and strategies for clinical management when it comes to long-term care.

Is there a rationale for hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the patients with Post COVID syndrome? : A critical review

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has resulted in 762 million infections worldwide from 2020 to date, of which approximately ten percent are suffering from the effects after infection in 2019 (COVID-19) [1, 40]. In Germany, it is now assumed that at least one million people suffer from post-COVID condition with long-term consequences. These have been previously reported in diseases like Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS). Symptoms show a changing variability and recent surveys in the COVID context indicate that 10-30 % of outpatients, 50 to 70% of hospitalised patients suffer from sequelae. Recent data suggest that only 13% of all ill people were completely free of symptoms after recovery [3, 9]. Current hypotheses consider chronic inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, latent viral persistence, autoimmunity, changes of the human microbiome or multilocular sequelae in various organ system after infection. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is applied since 1957 for heart surgery, scuba dive accidents, CO intoxication, air embolisms and infections with anaerobic pathogens. Under hyperbaric pressure, oxygen is physically dissolved in the blood in higher concentrations and reaches levels four times higher than under normobaric oxygen application. Moreover, the alternation of hyperoxia and normoxia induces a variety of processes at the cellular level, which improves oxygen supply in areas of locoregional hypoxia. Numerous target gene effects on new vessel formation, anti-inflammatory and anti-oedematous effects have been demonstrated [74]. The provision of intermittently high, local oxygen concentrations increases repair and regeneration processes and normalises the predominance of hyperinflammation. At present time only one prospective, randomized and placebo-controlled study exists with positive effects on global cognitive function, attention and executive function, psychiatric symptoms and pain interference. In conclusion, up to this date HBO is the only scientifically proven treatment in a prospective randomized controlled trial to be effective for cognitive improvement, regeneration of brain network and improvement of cardiac function. HBOT may have not only theoretical but also potential impact on targets of current pathophysiology of Post COVID condition, which warrants further scientific studies in patients.

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation with a focus on physiotherapy in patients with Post Covid19 condition: an observational pilot study

There is a lack of interventions that treat the Post-Covid-19 Condition (PCC) itself. Accordingly, treatment guidelines recommend physiotherapy interventions to alleviate symptoms and enhance functioning. In cases where unimodal treatments prove ineffective, non-organ-specific multidisciplinary bio-psycho-social rehabilitation (MBR) programs are a suitable option. In a pilot observational study with assessments at the entry and end of treatment we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a 3-week day clinic MBR program and explore its effects on physical functioning in PCC patients with fatigue and reduced physical capacity. Patient selection was based on an interdisciplinary assessment involving a physician, a psychologist and a physiotherapist. Feasibility was determined based on full participation (≥ 8 of 9 days) and maintenance of stable endurance in the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). From 37 patients included in the study, 33 completed the MBR (mean age: 43 ± 12 years, 73% female). Four patients discontinued the MBR, with two of them having reported deterioration of PCC symptoms. The 6MWT showed a numerical improvement from 501 ± 97 m to 512 ± 87 m, although it did not reach statistical significance. These results support the feasibility of outpatient MBR with a focus on active physiotherapy interventions in PCC patients with fatigue. This study aligns with previous research supporting the effectiveness of physiotherapy and rehabilitation in PCC patients. However, further research is needed to address possible different treatment responses and varying treatment approaches in subgroups of PCC patients.

Doxophylline, a Non-Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitor, Protects Against Chronic Fatigue-Induced Neurobehavioral, Biochemical, and Mitochondrial Alterations

Chronic fatigue stress (CFS) is a multisystem disorder which exhibits multiple signs of neurological complications like brain fog, cognitive deficits and oxidative stress with no specific treatment. Doxophylline, a non-selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDEI), has anti-inflammatory properties with enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration and tissue specificity. We have evaluated the neuroprotective potential of doxophylline in a murine model of forced swim test (FST) induced CFS and in H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) induced oxidative stress in PC12 cells. An FST model to induce a state of CFS in mice was induced by forcing them to swim daily for 6 min for 15 days. The drug was administered daily 30 min prior to FST. The immobility period was compared for day 1 and day 15. Animals were sacrificed on day 16 for biochemical, mitochondrial, and histopathological estimations in the brain. Cytotoxicity assay, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nuclear morphology determination were carried out in PC12 cells. A significant increase in immobility has been observed on the 15th day in CFS-induced mice compared to doxophylline treated group. Neurobehavioral studies revealed hypo locomotion, anxiety, motor incoordination, and memory deficit. Biochemical analysis showed a significant change in oxidative stress markers (superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH), catalase, lipid peroxidation (LPO) and nitrite levels) and acetylcholinesterase enzyme activity (AChE) in brain homogenates. Doxophylline pre-treatment protects against these impairments. In PC12 cell lines, doxophylline exhibits alleviation against H2O2-induced oxidative stress, intracellular ROS generation, and changes in nuclear morphology. Doxophylline could be promising and possess therapeutic potential in CFS treatment. Further research is needed to test if doxophylline can be repurposed for neurological disorders.

Mitigating the risks of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) with intranasal chlorpheniramine: perspectives from the ACCROS studies

BACKGROUND

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the end of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) global public health emergency on May 5, 2023, but its long-term consequences have still been haunting the global population. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and long-term COVID-19 are serious concerns and present with various symptoms. Intranasal chlorpheniramine (iCPM) has been shown to decrease the viral burden of SARS-COV-2. iCPM uses decreased COVID-19 disease progression and severity in Accelerating COVID-19 Clinical Recovery in an Outpatient Setting (ACROSS)-I & III randomized control trials (RCT).

METHODS

This prospective survey study included 259 participants in ACROSS I and III RCTs. We compared the effect of iCPM versus placebo on the reduction of PASC symptoms. A PASC questionnaire containing 17 questions regarding the most common PASC symptoms was used in this study. T-test and Pearson chi-square statistics were performed according to continuous and categorical data using STATA 17.0 Basic Edition software.

FINDINGS

The iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with fatigue or tiredness vs. placebo (0 Vs 17, 21, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with difficulty concentrating or mental confusion (0 vs. 22, 27, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had also a lower number of patients with difficulty in the ability to perform daily activities or work vs. placebo (1 Vs 38, 48, p < 0.001). A smaller number of patients in the iCPM cohort sought medical attention for PACS symptoms compared to placebo (0 vs. 48, 68, p < 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The use of intranasal chlorpheniramine shows promise in preventing COVID-19 progression to the often-debilitating post-COVID-19 syndrome PASC. The association between iCPM use and a lower prevalence of PASC symptoms is strong. Further studies are needed to establish the role of ICPM in preventing PASC.

Changing characteristics of post-COVID-19 syndrome: Cross-sectional findings from 458 consultations using the Stanford Hall remote rehabilitation assessment tool

BACKGROUND

In the UK, there have been multiple waves of COVID-19, with a five-tier alert system created to describe the transmission rate and appropriate restrictions. While acute mortality decreased, there continued to be a significant morbidity, with individuals suffering from persistent, life-restricting symptoms for months to years afterwards. A remote rehabilitation tool was created at the Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) Stanford Hall to assess post-COVID-19 symptoms and their impact on the UK military.This study aims to understand changes in post-COVID-19 syndrome between wave 1 and wave 2, identify interactions between alert level and symptoms and investigate any predictive nature of acute symptoms for postacute symptomology in a young, physically active population.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of 458 consecutive remote rehabilitation assessments performed at DMRC Stanford Hall between 2 April 2020 and 29 July 2021. Consultations were coded, anonymised, and statistical analysis was performed to determine associations between acute and postacute symptoms, and between symptoms, alert levels and waves.

RESULTS

435 assessments were eligible; 174 in wave 1 and 261 in wave 2. Post-COVID-19 syndrome prevalence reduced from 43% to 2% between the waves. Acutely, widespread pain was more prevalent in wave 2 (p<0.001). Postacutely, there was increased anxiety (p=0.10) in wave 1 and increased sleep disturbance (p<0.001), memory/concentration issues (p<0.001) and shortness of breath/cough (p=0.017) in wave 2. Increasing alert level was associated with increased postacute symptom prevalence (p=0.046), with sleep disturbance increasing at higher alert level (p=0.016). Acute symptoms, including fatigue, sleep disturbance and myalgia, were associated with multiple postacute symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reports the overall prevalence and symptom burden in the UK military in the first two waves of COVID-19. By reporting differences in COVID-19 in different waves and alert level, this study highlights the importance of careful assessment and contextual understanding of acute and postacute illnesses for individual management plans.

Neuropsychiatric Burden of SARS-CoV-2: A Review of Its Physiopathology, Underlying Mechanisms, and Management Strategies

The COVID-19 outbreak, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, was linked to significant neurological and psychiatric manifestations. This review examines the physiopathological mechanisms underlying these neuropsychiatric outcomes and discusses current management strategies. Primarily a respiratory disease, COVID-19 frequently leads to neurological issues, including cephalalgia and migraines, loss of sensory perception, cerebrovascular accidents, and neurological impairment such as encephalopathy. Lasting neuropsychological effects have also been recorded in individuals following SARS-CoV-2 infection. These include anxiety, depression, and cognitive dysfunction, suggesting a lasting impact on mental health. The neuroinvasive potential of the virus, inflammatory responses, and the role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in neuroinflammation are critical factors in neuropsychiatric COVID-19 manifestations. In addition, the review highlights the importance of monitoring biomarkers to assess Central Nervous System (CNS) involvement. Management strategies for these neuropsychiatric conditions include supportive therapy, antiepileptic drugs, antithrombotic therapy, and psychotropic drugs, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach. Understanding the long-term neuropsychiatric implications of COVID-19 is essential for developing effective treatment protocols and improving patient outcomes.

Salivary Metabolomics in Patients with Long COVID-19 Infection

Background: Long COVID-19 has been characterized by the presence of symptoms lasting longer than 4 weeks after the acute infection. The pathophysiology of clinical manifestations still lacks knowledge. Objective: The objective of this paper was to evaluate metabolite abundance in the saliva of long COVID patients 60 days after hospital discharge. Methods: A convenience sample was composed of 30 post-discharge patients with long COVID and seven non-COVID-19 controls. All COVID-19 patients were evaluated by demographic characteristics, spirometry, 6 min walk test (6mWT), Saint George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and body composition. Metabolomics was performed on saliva. Results: The long COVID-19 patients were 60.4 ± 14.3 years-old, and 66% male. Their lean body mass was 30.7 ± 7.3 kg and fat mass, 34.4 ± 13.7 kg. Spirometry evaluation showed forced vital capacity (FVC) of 3.84 ± 0.97 L with 96.0 ± 14.0% of the predicted value, and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) of 3.11 ± 0.83 L with 98.0 ± 16.0 of the predicted value. The long COVID-19 patients had reduced maximal inspiratory (90.1 ± 31.6 cmH2O) and maximal expiratory (97.3 ± 31.0 cmH2O) pressures. SGRQ showed domain symptoms of 32.3 ± 15.2, domain activities of 41.9 ± 25.6, and domain impact 13.7 ± 11.4, with a mean of 24.3 ± 14.9%. Physical capacity measured by distance covered in the 6mWT was 418.2 ± 130 m with a 73.3% (22.3-98.1) predictive value. The control group consisted of 44.1 ± 10.7-year-old men with a body mass index of 26.5 ± 1.66 Kg/m2. Metabolomics revealed 19 differentially expressed metabolites; expression was lower in 16 metabolites, and 2 metabolites were absent in the COVID-19 patients compared to controls. Calenduloside G methyl ester (p = 0.03), Gly Pro Lys (p = 0.0001), and creatine (p = 0.0001) expressions were lower in patients than controls. Conclusions: Long COVID-19 patients present less abundance of calenduloside G methyl ester, Gly Pro Lys, and creatine in saliva than healthy controls. Lower creatine abundance may be related to reduced physical capacity and fatigue.

Single-cell sequencing reveals cellular landscape alterations in the airway mucosa of patients with pulmonary long COVID

AIM

To elucidate the important cellular and molecular drivers of pulmonary long COVID, we generated a single-cell transcriptomic map of the airway mucosa using bronchial brushings from patients with long COVID who reported persistent pulmonary symptoms.

METHOD

Adults with and without long COVID were recruited from the general community in Greater Vancouver, Canada. The cohort was divided into those with pulmonary long COVID, which was defined as persons with new or worsening respiratory symptoms following ≥12 weeks from their initial acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (n=9); and control subjects defined as SARS-CoV-2 infected persons whose acute respiratory symptoms had fully resolved or individuals who had no history of acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) (n=9). These participants underwent bronchoscopy from which a single cell suspension was created from bronchial brush samples and then sequenced.

RESULTS

A total of 56 906 cells were recovered for the downstream analysis, with 34 840 cells belonging to the pulmonary long COVID group, which strikingly showed a unique cluster of neutrophils in the pulmonary long COVID group (p<0.05). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis revealed that the neutrophil degranulation pathway was enriched across epithelial cell clusters. Differential gene expression analysis between the pulmonary long COVID and control groups demonstrated upregulation of inflammatory chemokines and epithelial barrier dysfunction across epithelial cell clusters, as well as over-expression of mucin genes across secretory cell clusters.

CONCLUSION

A single-cell transcriptomic landscape of the small airways suggest that neutrophils may play a significant role in mediating the chronic small airway inflammation driving pulmonary symptoms of long COVID.

Impact of COVID-19 on Exercise-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation: What Lessons Have We Learned?

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a major global impact on health care, including the delivery, modality, and importance of outcomes in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). This review discusses the impact of the pandemic on PR and the changes that were required to maintain its delivery. This article reviews the current evidence on PR during the COVID-19 pandemic period, focusing on delivery models, modalities, outcomes, perspectives, and barriers. A search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and SciELO databases and the Cochrane Library on this topic was conducted between December 1, 2019 and August 1, 2023. Studies were reviewed and relevant topics were included in this narrative. Rehabilitation of patients with severe acute COVID-19 and symptoms of long COVID has been challenging. The number of rehabilitation programs worldwide is still low, and community-based programs are still rare. Integrated programs with a multidisciplinary approach and exercise therapy with individualized prescription based on symptoms have been an interesting strategy. Telerehabilitation and outpatient rehabilitation are both effective in the treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the uptake of PR remains considerably low, and technological barriers for patients and lack of technological resources in low-income countries affect the delivery of these services in much of the world.

Caring for Long Covid patients in primary healthcare: a cross-sectional study on general practitioners' knowledge, perception and experience in Belgium and Malta

BACKGROUND

At least 10% of Covid-19 recovered individuals experience persistent symptoms (Long Covid). Primary healthcare and general practitioners (GPs) are at the forefront in their care. In this study, GPs' knowledge, perceptions and experiences with Long Covid, and the definition used in two countries, are investigated to provide insight into GPs' care for Long Covid patients at a cross-country level.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study targeted towards GPs was conducted in Belgium and Malta during spring and early summer 2022. An online survey consisting of 15 questions on Long Covid was disseminated. Additionally, country-specific practice and demographic characteristics were collected. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 150 GPs (Belgium = 105; Malta = 45) responded. Female GPs represented 58.0%, median age was 49 years (IQR: 37-61). Concerning GPs' knowledge and perception on Long Covid, in both countries, most GPs reported insufficient scientific knowledge and information on Long Covid diagnosis and treatment. Access to educational material was limited and an awareness-rising campaign on Long Covid was deemed necessary. Moreover, two out of three GPs stated that Long Covid patients were not well followed up by primary healthcare in mid-2022. For diagnosing Long Covid, 54.7% required a positive Covid-19 test, more often among Belgian GPs than Maltese (64.3% vs. 45.2%, p = 0.036). To assess Long Covid, GPs mainly applied diagnostic criteria by themselves (47.3%) in combination with persistent symptoms (4 weeks to 5 months). Most GPs had experience with Long Covid patients in their practice, regardless of practice type and GPs' country, sex or age (p = 0.353; p = 0.241; p = 0.194; p = 0.058). Although most GPs (94.7%) stated that Long Covid patients should follow multidisciplinary approach, 48.3% reported providing care for these patients themselves or with GP colleagues and only 29.8% by multidisciplinary cooperation.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs frequently provide (multidisciplinary) care to Long Covid patients and GPs' care showed similarities at cross-country level. Although GPs perceive lack of scientific knowledge and educational material on Long Covid, similar diagnostic criteria among GPs were noted. Uniform evidence-based guidelines, scientific support and training for GP across Europe must be a priority to enhance their treatment approach to Long Covid.

Long COVID at 3 and 6 months after covid-19 infection in Thailand

"Long COVID", which describes a diverse set of symptoms or conditions that persist or develop after four weeks from the onset of initial SARS-CoV-2 infection has been introduced. However, the true prevalence varies worldwide. This study aimed to determine the point prevalence and clinical characteristics of long COVID at three and six months after acute COVID-19 infection in Thailand. Methods All adult patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 by positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 at Thammasat University Hospital between October and December 2021 were recruited and followed for long COVID symptoms by telephone interviews at 3 and 6 months after an acute infection. Among 1,400 eligible COVID-19 cases, interviews were complete for 1,129 and 932 individuals at 3 and 6 months, respectively. Of those, 431 and 314 reported at least one symptom consistent with long COVID. The point prevalence was 38.2% (95% confidence interval: 35.3-41.1%) and 33.7% (95% confidence interval: 30.7-36.7%) respectively. Female gender, disease severity, and symptomatic acute infection were identified as independent risk factors. Conclusion Based on the reported symptoms, long COVID is commonly observed either at 3 or 6 months in our study.

Persistent ENT Manifestations in Individuals who Recovered from COVID-19: A Systematic Review

Introduction  Long coronavirus disease (COVID) refers to the persistence of symptoms long after the recovery from the acute phase of the illness, and it is due to the interplay of various inflammatory mechanisms. This has led to emergence of new deficits, including otorhinolaryngological symptoms, in patients wo have recovered from COVID. The plethora of otorhinolaryngological symptoms associated with long COVID are tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), vertigo, nasal congestion, sinonasal discomfort, hyposmia/anosmia, dysgeusia, sore throat, dry cough, dyspnea, dysphagia, and hoarseness of voice. Objective  To evaluate the possible ENT symptoms in patients wo have recovered from COVID and to combine those findings with our experience. Data Synthesis  We conducted a search on the PubMed, ENT Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases, and a total of 44 studies were selected for the present review. Conclusion  Otorhinolaryngological complications such as tinnitus, SNHL, vertigo, nasal congestion, sinonasal discomfort, hyposmia/anosmia, dysgeusia, sore throat, dry cough, dyspnea, dysphagia, and hoarseness of voice have been widely reported among in long-COVID patients.

Body Mass Index and Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Young Adults

Importance

Obesity is associated with increased severity of COVID-19. Whether obesity is associated with an increased risk of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) among pediatric populations, independent of its association with acute infection severity, is unclear.

Objective

To quantify the association of body mass index (BMI) status before SARS-CoV-2 infection with pediatric PASC risk, controlling for acute infection severity.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study occurred at 26 US children's hospitals from March 2020 to May 2023 with a minimum follow-up of 179 days. Eligible participants included children and young adults aged 5 to 20 years with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data analysis was conducted from October 2023 to January 2024.

Exposures

BMI status assessed within 18 months before infection; the measure closest to the index date was selected. The BMI categories included healthy weight (≥5th to <85th percentile for those aged 5-19 years or ≥18.5 to <25 for those aged >19 years), overweight (≥85th to <95th percentile for those aged 5-19 years or ≥25 to <30 for for those aged >19 years), obesity (≥95th percentile to <120% of the 95th percentile for for those aged 5-19 years or ≥30 to <40 for those aged >19 years), and severe obesity (≥120% of the 95th percentile for those aged 5-19 years or ≥40 for those aged >19 years).

Main Outcomes And Measures

To identify PASC, a diagnostic code specific for post-COVID-19 conditions was used and a second approach used clusters of symptoms and conditions that constitute the PASC phenotype. Relative risk (RR) for the association of BMI with PASC was quantified by Poisson regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic, acute COVID severity, and other clinical factors.

Results

A total of 172 136 participants (mean [SD] age at BMI assessment 12.6 [4.4] years; mean [SD] age at cohort entry, 13.1 [4.4] years; 90 187 female [52.4%]) were included. Compared with participants with healthy weight, those with obesity had a 25.4% increased risk of PASC (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.48) and those with severe obesity had a 42.1% increased risk of PASC (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.25-1.61) when identified using the diagnostic code. Compared with those with healthy weight, there was an increased risk for any occurrences of PASC symptoms and conditions among those with obesity (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.15) and severe obesity (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.14-1.21), and the association held when assessing total incident occurrences among those with overweight (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.00-1.11), obesity (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.19), and severe obesity (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14-1.22).

Conclusions And Relevance

In this cohort study, elevated BMI was associated with a significantly increased PASC risk in a dose-dependent manner, highlighting the need for targeted care to prevent chronic conditions in at-risk children and young adults.

Wearable Devices for Long COVID: Prospects, Challenges and Options

Post COVID-19 infections resulting in long COVID symptoms remain persistent yet neglected in healthcare priorities. Although long COVID symptoms are expected to decline after some time, many people continue to endure its debilitating effects affecting their daily lives. The diversity of characteristics amongst long COVID patients adds to the complexity of communicating personal health predicaments to healthcare providers. Recent research towards building an evidence base for long COVID with the aim of delivering responsive healthcare interventions for long COVID patients has utilised datasets generated from wearable devices. This paper examines the prospects presented by wearable devices for long COVID patients and physicians. It highlights distinct ethical and legal challenges arising from their use in practice. Several recommendations aiming to support their usage amongst long COVID patients are outlined for future research using wearable devices for long COVID treatment.

Care needs of patients with the post-COVID syndrome in Dutch general practice: an interview study among patients and general practitioners

BACKGROUND

The post-COVID syndrome (PCS) has a large impact on an individual's daily life. The wide variety of symptoms in PCS patients and the fact that it is still relatively new makes it difficult for general practitioners (GPs) to recognize, diagnose and treat patients with PCS, leading to difficulties in assessing and fulfilling healthcare needs. It is largely unknown what the experiences of Dutch patients and GPs are with PCS and, therefore, we gained insight into the different aspects of living with PCS and the associated healthcare needs.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were performed with 13 self-reported PCS patients (varying in sex, age, education, and health literacy) and 6 GPs (varying in gender, age, and type of practice) between January-July 2022. Patients and GPs were most likely unrelated (not in the same practices). The data have been analysed using the Thematic Analysis method.

RESULTS

Experiences appeared to vary between two types of PCS patients that emerged during the interviews: (1) individuals with good pre-existing health status (PEHS) who are severely affected by PCS and have difficulty recovering and (2) individuals with poorer PEHS whose health became even poorer after COVID-19 infection. The interviews with PCS patients and GPs revealed two main themes, in which the types of patients differed: (1) aspects of living with PCS; individuals with good PEHS mainly experience symptoms when overstimulated, while individuals with poorer PEHS generally feel exhausted continuously. (2) Healthcare experiences; GPs emphasized that individuals with good PEHS seem to benefit from support in distributing their energy by careful planning of daily activities, whereas individuals with poorer PEHS require support in activation. Patients and GPs emphasised the importance of taking patients seriously and acknowledging their symptoms. Finally, the patients interviewed indicated that some GPs doubted the existence of PCS, resulting in insufficient recognition.

CONCLUSION

Awareness of the differences in needs and experiences of the two types of PCS patients could contribute to more appropriate care. Acknowledgement of PCS by GPs as a real syndrome is important for patients and plays an important role in coping with or recovering from PCS. A multidisciplinary person-centred approach is important and can be coordinated by a GP.

Utilization frequency and patient-reported effectiveness of symptomatic therapies in post-COVID syndrome

BACKGROUND

To date there is no causal treatment for post-COVID syndrome, leaving symptomatic treatments as the primary recourse. However, the practical implementation and effectiveness of these interventions remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the utilization frequency of symptomatic therapies and patient-reported effectiveness across various treatment modalities at a German post-COVID center.

METHODS

As the baseline investigation we conducted a single-cohort retrospective study to analyze the frequency of symptomatic therapies among post-COVID patients who attended the post-COVID center of the University Hospital of Erlangen, between December 2022 to July 2023. Additionally, we administered a follow-up at least 3 months after the initial presentation, using a questionnaire to assess patient-reported improvements in post-COVID symptoms associated with the symptomatic therapies received.

RESULTS

Our study included 200 patients (mean age: 44.6 ± 12.6 years; 69.0% women; mean duration since acute infection: 15.3 ± 8.3 months). Pharmacotherapy was the predominant symptomatic treatment (79.5%), with psychotropic drugs (32.5%) and analgesics (31.5%) being the most frequently prescribed. Over half of the patients (55.5%) utilized vitamins and nutritional supplements. Hospital admission rates to acute care occurred in 35.5% of cases; 33.0% underwent inpatient rehabilitation and 31.0% pursued outpatient psychotherapy. Cardiologists (76.5%), pulmonologists (67.5%), and neurologists (65.5%) were the most consulted specialists. Therapies involving medical devices were infrequently employed (12.0%). In a follow-up questionnaire (response rate: 82.5%, 6.3 ± 2.2 months post-baseline), beta-blockers were the most effective pharmacological intervention with 31.5% of patients reporting strong to very strong symptom improvement, followed by antibiotics (29.6%). Furthermore, 33.0% of the patients perceived plasmapheresis to strongly alleviate symptoms. Only a small proportion of the sample attributed a strong or very strong symptom improvement to outpatient psychotherapy (11.0%).

CONCLUSION

This study provides initial insights into symptomatic therapy utilization and patient-reported symptom improvement in post-COVID syndrome. Further research into symptoms clusters and interdisciplinary collaboration are warranted to comprehensively address the multifaceted physical and psychological symptomatology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00033621) on March 20, 2024.

Characterization model of the post COVID-19 condition based on immunological, biochemical, and cytokine markers

Post-coronavirus disease condition (PCC) continues to affect many people globally, yet there remains a lack of diagnostic biomarkers to distinguish PCC from those recovered from acute COVID-19. This study compared biomarkers between two age- and gender-matched groups: PCC individuals and those recovered within three months of acute COVID-19 in 2020 (n = 85 each). Biomarkers were assessed 12-24 months after initial diagnosis, examining biochemical profiles, blood cell counts, coagulation status, antibody serology, lymphocyte populations, and cytokine levels. PCC individuals exhibited significant alterations in 49 of 167 markers, including K+ levels, αGAD antibodies, antithrombin III, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and interleukin-10 (IL-10). A panel of αGAD, IL-10, potassium levels, and CD16brightCD56- cell presence distinguished PCC individuals from recovered patients with >88% accuracy and <92% precision.