1
|
Pontes L, de Azevedo JS, Secco IL, Pereira HP, Vieira SCM, Afonso RQ. Negative pressure therapy in pediatric patient with surgical site infection: experience report. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2024; 58:e20240077. [PMID: 39589153 PMCID: PMC11584165 DOI: 10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2024-0077en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 11/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the use of negative pressure wound therapy and hydrofiber dressing with silver in a pediatric patient with a hard-to-heal surgical wound infection. METHOD This is a descriptive professional experience report on the use of conventional dressings and negative pressure wound therapy in a pediatric patient with a surgical wound infection. It was developed in 2023 at a Public Health Service that is a reference in the care of pediatric patients in the state of Paraná. RESULTS The surgical wound dehiscence started 12 days after peritoneostomy. Initially, the wound was treated with hydrofiber dressing with silver for 22 days and subsequently, negative pressure wound therapy was used for 15 days, regenerating the wound. CONCLUSION Negative pressure wound therapy in pediatrics proved to be safe, effective and efficient for the treatment of complex wounds and corroborated the skin regeneration process, as did hydrofiber dressing with silver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leticia Pontes
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Prática do Cuidado em Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | - Juliana Szreider de Azevedo
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Prática do Cuidado em Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
- Hospital Infantil Doutor Waldemar Monastier, Campo Largo, PR, Brazil
| | - Izabela Linha Secco
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Prática do Cuidado em Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
- Hospital Infantil Doutor Waldemar Monastier, Campo Largo, PR, Brazil
| | - Higor Pacheco Pereira
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Prática do Cuidado em Saúde, Curitiba, PR, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rombaldi MC, Barreto CG, Rombaldi RL, Costa EC, Holanda F, Cavazzola LT, Fraga JC. Barriers to diffusion and implementation of pediatric minimally invasive surgery in Brazil. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:906. [PMID: 39180085 PMCID: PMC11342547 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05897-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The main barriers to the broad implementation of pediatric minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are technological, technical, and epistemological barriers, as well as the rarity of certain pathologies. These issues are presumed to be more significant in low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to identify and analyze the factors limiting the diffusion and implementation of pediatric MIS in Brazil. METHODS A nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted via an online questionnaire in Brazil from January 2022 to July 2022. The sample was taken by convenience from the population of pediatric surgeons in Brazil. A total of 187 surgeons were included. The collected data were divided into three sections to evaluate technological, technical, and epistemological limitations to pediatric MIS implementation. RESULTS Although 85% of the participants had previous training, a lack of adequate training was identified as a significant limiting factor, particularly among those who had taken only short courses (42.3% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.033). Only 14% of the participants reported performing MIS for major pediatric procedures. With respect to intracorporeal suturing, 38.1% of the surgeons with extensive training considered it a limiting factor compared with 60.7% (p = 0.029) of those without prior training. Among those without previous training, 61% cited a lack of financial support or encouragement from their department as the reason. Additionally, 65% of the surgeons considered the lack of basic instruments a limiting factor. Although 95% of the participants agreed that simulation training is indispensable, pediatric surgery fellowship programs in Brazil do not include a standardized curriculum or mandatory training in MIS, and only 47% reported providing training space for their current fellows. CONCLUSION A combination of technological, technical, and epistemological barriers hinders the implementation of pediatric MIS. Despite its limitations, this study serves as a foundational guide for future analysis and overcoming the identified barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcelo Costamilan Rombaldi
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
- Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
| | | | | | - Eduardo Correa Costa
- Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Felipe Holanda
- Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Leandro Totti Cavazzola
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- General Surgery Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Jose Carlos Fraga
- Postgraduate Program in Medicine: Surgical Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Pediatric Surgery Department, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirengo TO, Dossajee H, Onyango EM, Rachakonda RH, Schneider B, Sela DP, Hosseinzadeh Z, Nadeem Z, Obonyo NG. Catalysing global surgery: a meta-research study on factors affecting surgical research collaborations with Africa. Syst Rev 2024; 13:89. [PMID: 38500200 PMCID: PMC10946148 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02474-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the urgent need for rapid collaboration, research, and interventions. International research collaborations foster more significant responses to rapid global changes by enabling international, multicentre research, decreasing biases, and increasing study validity while reducing overall research time and costs. However, there has been low uptake of collaborative research by African institutions and individuals. AIM To systematically review facilitating factors and challenges to collaborative surgical research studies conducted in Africa. METHODOLOGY A meta-research review using PubMed®/MEDLINE and Embase on surgical collaboration in Africa from 1st of January 2011 to 31st of September 2021 in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Surgical studies by collaborative groups involving African authors and sites were included (55 papers). Data on the study period, geographical regions, and research scope, facilitating factors, and challenges were extracted from the studies retrieved from the search. RESULTS Most of the collaborations in Africa occurred with European institutions (76%). Of the 54 African countries, 63% (34/54) participated in surgical collaborations. The highest collaboration frequency occurred in South Africa (11%) and Nigeria (8%). However, most publications originated from Eastern Africa (43%). Leveraging synergies between high- and low- to middle-income countries (LMICs), well-defined structures, and secure data platforms facilitated collaboration. However, the underrepresentation of collaborators from LMICs was a significant challenge. CONCLUSION Available literature provides critical insights into the facilitating factors and challenges of research collaboration with Africa. However, there is a need for a detailed prospective study to explore the themes highlighted further. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022352115 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas O Kirengo
- Imara Hospital, Embu, Kenya.
- Kenya Medical Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
| | - Hussein Dossajee
- MP Shah Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
- Kenya Medical Association, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Evans M Onyango
- Ministry of Health, Kajiado County, Kenya
- Kenya Medical Association, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Reema H Rachakonda
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Bailey Schneider
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Declan P Sela
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Zahra Hosseinzadeh
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Zohaib Nadeem
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Nchafatso G Obonyo
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Critical Care Research Group, Brisbane, Australia
- KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
- Kenya Medical Association, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pata F, Tutino R, Picciariello A, Cantarella F. Editorial: Colorectal surgery and proctology: past, present, and future. Front Surg 2024; 11:1373867. [PMID: 38371881 PMCID: PMC10870640 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1373867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pata
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, Rende, Italy
- Department of Surgery, AO Annunziata, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Roberta Tutino
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Cantarella
- CPEP (Centre for Proctology and Perineology), Ospedali Privati Forlì, Forlì, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Edwards M, Graziadio S, Shore J, Schmitz ND, Galvain T, Danker WA, Kocaman M, Pournaras DJ, Bowley DM, Hardy KJ. Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models. BMC Surg 2023; 23:300. [PMID: 37789307 PMCID: PMC10548560 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02187-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent ~ 20% of all hospital-acquired infections in surgical patients and are associated with prolonged hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mortality. We conducted a systematic review with economic and environmental models to assess whether triclosan-coated sutures (Plus Sutures) provide benefits over non-coated sutures in the reduction of SSI risk. METHODS Searches were conducted in fifteen databases. A total of 1,991 records were retrieved. Following deduplication and screening by two independent reviewers, 31 randomized controlled trials in adults and children were included in the review. Similarity of the studies was assessed by narrative review and confirmed by quantitative assessment. A fixed effects meta-analysis of SSI incidence model including all groups of patients estimated a risk ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.79) indicating those in the Plus Sutures group had a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an SSI compared with those in the control group (p < 0.001). Safety outcomes were analysed qualitatively. RESULTS The economic model estimated the use of Plus Sutures to result in average cost savings of £13.63 per patient. Plus Sutures remained cost-saving in all subgroup analyses with cost-savings ranging between £11 (clean wounds) and £140 (non-clean wounds). The environmental impact of SSI is substantial, and the model suggests that the introduction of Plus Sutures could result in potential environmental benefits. CONCLUSIONS The evidence suggests that Plus Sutures are associated with a reduced incidence of SSI across all surgery types alongside cost savings when compared with standard sutures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Edwards
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, York, YO10 5NQ, UK.
| | - S Graziadio
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - J Shore
- York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Enterprise House, Innovation Way, York, YO10 5NQ, UK
| | - N D Schmitz
- Johnson & Johnson MEDICAL GmbH, Robert-Koch-Strasse 1, 22851, Norderstedt, Germany
| | - T Galvain
- Global Health Economics, Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - W A Danker
- Ethicon Inc., 1000 US-202, Raritan, NJ, 08869, USA
| | - M Kocaman
- Johnson & Johnson Medical Limited, Berkshire, UK
| | - D J Pournaras
- Department of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - D M Bowley
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK
| | - K J Hardy
- Derbyshire Pathology, University Hospitals Derby and Burton NHS Trust, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
He K, Iwaniuk M, Goretsky MJ, Cina RA, Saito JM, Hall B, Grant C, Cohen ME, Newland J, Hall M, Ko CY, Rangel SJ. Incidence and Relative Burden of Surgical Site Infections in Children Undergoing Nonemergent Surgery: Implications for Performance Benchmarking and Prioritization of Prevention Efforts. Ann Surg 2023; 278:280-287. [PMID: 35943207 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish surgical site infection (SSI) performance benchmarks in pediatric surgery and to develop a prioritization framework for SSI prevention based on procedure-level SSI burden. BACKGROUND Contemporary epidemiology of SSI rates and event burden in elective pediatric surgery remain poorly characterized. METHODS Multicenter analysis using sampled SSI data from 90 hospitals participating in NSQIP-Pediatric and procedural volume data from the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Procedure-level incisional and organ space SSI (OSI) rates for 17 elective procedure groups were calculated from NSQIP-Pediatric data and estimates of procedure-level SSI burden were extrapolated using procedural volume data. The relative contribution of each procedure to the cumulative sum of SSI events from all procedures was used as a prioritization framework. RESULTS A total of 11,689 nonemergent procedures were included. The highest incisional SSI rates were associated with gastrostomy closure (4.1%), small bowel procedures (4.0%), and gastrostomy (3.7%), while the highest OSI rates were associated with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair (8.1%), colorectal procedures (1.8%), and small bowel procedures (1.5%). 66.1% of the cumulative incisional SSI burden from all procedures were attributable to 3 procedure groups (gastrostomy: 27.5%, small bowel: 22.9%, colorectal: 15.7%), and 72.8% of all OSI events were similarly attributable to 3 procedure groups (small bowel: 28.5%, colorectal: 26.0%, esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula repair: 18.4%). CONCLUSIONS A small number of procedures account for a disproportionate burden of SSIs in pediatric surgery. The results of this analysis can be used as a prioritization framework for refocusing SSI prevention efforts where they are needed most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine He
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Michael J Goretsky
- Department of Surgery, Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters, Norfolk, VA
| | - Robert A Cina
- Department of Surgery, The Medical University of South Carolina, Charlestown, SC
| | - Jacqueline M Saito
- Department of Surgery, Washington University St. Louis School of Medicine and BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, MO
| | - Bruce Hall
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL
- Department of Surgery, Washington University St. Louis School of Medicine and BJC Healthcare, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | - Jason Newland
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | - Shawn J Rangel
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brima N, Morhason-Bello IO, Charles V, Davies J, Leather AJ. Improving quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of hospital-based quality improvement interventions. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062616. [PMID: 36220318 PMCID: PMC9557325 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To systematically review existing literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa that aim to improve surgical and anaesthesia care, capturing clinical, process and implementation outcomes in order to evaluate the impact of the intervention and implementation learning. DESIGN We conducted a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. SETTING Literature on hospital-based quality improvement studies in sub-Saharan Africa reviewed until 31 December 2021. PARTICIPANTS MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science databases and grey literature were searched. INTERVENTION We extracted data on intervention characteristics and how the intervention was delivered and evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Importantly, we assessed whether clinical, process and implementation outcomes were collected and separately categorised the outcomes under the Institute of Medicine quality domains. Risk of bias was not assessed. RESULTS Of 1573 articles identified, 49 were included from 17/48 sub-Saharan African countries, 16 of which were low-income or lower middle-income countries. Almost two-thirds of the studies took place in East Africa (31/49, 63.2%). The most common intervention focus was reduction of surgical site infection (12/49, 24.5%) and use of a surgical safety checklist (14/49, 28.6%). Use of implementation and quality improvement science methods were rare. Over half the studies measured clinical outcomes (29/49, 59.2%), with the most commonly reported ones being perioperative mortality (13/29, 44.8%) and surgical site infection rate (14/29, 48.3%). Process and implementation outcomes were reported in over two thirds of the studies (34/49, 69.4% and 35, 71.4%, respectively). The most studied quality domain was safety (44/49, 89.8%), with efficiency (4/49, 8.2%) and equitability (2/49, 4.1%) the least studied domains. CONCLUSIONS There are few hospital-based studies that focus on improving the quality of surgical and anaesthesia care in sub-Saharan Africa. Use of implementation and quality improvement methodologies remain low, and some quality domains are neglected. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019125570.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nataliya Brima
- King's Centre for Global Health and Health Partnerships, School of Life Course and Population Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Imran O Morhason-Bello
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine/University College Hospital, University of Ibadan, University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria
| | | | - Justine Davies
- University of Birmingham Institute of Applied Health Research, Birmingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bielicki I, Subotic U, Bielicki JA. Systematic literature review on surgical site preparation in paediatric surgery. BMC Pediatr 2022; 22:455. [PMID: 35902844 PMCID: PMC9336073 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03502-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) in children represent a common and serious postoperative complication. Surgical skin preparation is an essential preventive measure in every surgical procedure. The most commonly used antiseptic agents for surgical skin preparation are chlorhexidine gluconate and iodophors in alcohol-based solutions. In adult patients the use of chlorhexidine-containing antiseptic solutions for preoperative skin preparation has been advocated to reduce SSI rates. Our objective was to conduct a systematic literature review on use of antiseptic agents for surgical skin preparation in children less than 16 years of age. Methods A systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and CENTRAL was performed using both MeSH and free text terms and using the relevant Cochrane filter to identify full text randomized trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies. Interventions of interest were the choice of main agent in antiseptic solutions (chlorhexidine/povidone-iodine/alcohol) compared with each other or with other antiseptic agents. Primary outcome was the reported rate of surgical site infections. Results In total 8 studies were included in the review; 2 RCTs and 6 observational studies. Observational studies generally did not primarily investigate the association of different antiseptics with subsequent SSI. The identified randomised controlled trials included only 61 children in total, and were of low quality. Consequently, we did not conduct a formal meta-analysis. Since the publication of a comprehensive systematic review of perioperative measures for the prevention of SSI in 2016, no randomized controlled trials comparing antiseptic agents for surgical skin preparation in paediatric surgery have been conducted. Conclusion Robust evidence on the optimal skin antisepsis to reduce SSIs in children is lacking. Direct extrapolation of effects from trials involving adults is not appropriate as physiologic characteristics and risk factors for SSIs differ between adults and children. It is therefore essential to conduct high quality RCT investigating interventions to identify optimal measures to reduce SSI rates in children. Trial registration Prospero registration (CRD42020166193). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12887-022-03502-z.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Bielicki
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Basel, Spitalstr. 33, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Ulrike Subotic
- Department of Paediatric Surgery, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julia Anna Bielicki
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Paediatric Pharmacology Group, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland University of Basel Children's Hospital, Basel, Switzerland National Centre for Infection Prevention, SwissNoso, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bianchini S, Rigotti E, Monaco S, Nicoletti L, Auriti C, Castagnola E, Conti G, Galli L, Giuffrè M, La Grutta S, Lancella L, Lo Vecchio A, Maglietta G, Petrosillo N, Pietrasanta C, Principi N, Tesoro S, Venturini E, Piacentini G, Lima M, Staiano A, Esposito S. Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Abdominal Surgery for Neonates and Paediatrics: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:279. [PMID: 35203881 PMCID: PMC8868062 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs), i.e., surgery-related infections that occur within 30 days after surgery without an implant and within one year if an implant is placed, complicate surgical procedures in up to 10% of cases, but an underestimation of the data is possible since about 50% of SSIs occur after the hospital discharge. Gastrointestinal surgical procedures are among the surgical procedures with the highest risk of SSIs, especially when colon surgery is considered. Data that were collected from children seem to indicate that the risk of SSIs can be higher than in adults. This consensus document describes the use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in neonates and children that are undergoing abdominal surgery and has the purpose of providing guidance to healthcare professionals who take care of children to avoid unnecessary and dangerous use of antibiotics in these patients. The following surgical procedures were analyzed: (1) gastrointestinal endoscopy; (2) abdominal surgery with a laparoscopic or laparotomy approach; (3) small bowel surgery; (4) appendectomy; (5) abdominal wall defect correction interventions; (6) ileo-colic perforation; (7) colorectal procedures; (8) biliary tract procedures; and (9) surgery on the liver or pancreas. Thanks to the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies that take care of neonates and children, this document presents an invaluable reference tool for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the paediatric and neonatal populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Bianchini
- Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.B.); (S.M.); (L.N.)
| | - Erika Rigotti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy; (E.R.); (G.P.)
| | - Sara Monaco
- Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.B.); (S.M.); (L.N.)
| | - Laura Nicoletti
- Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.B.); (S.M.); (L.N.)
| | - Cinzia Auriti
- Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Elio Castagnola
- Infectious Diseases Unit, IRCCS Giannina Gaslini, 16147 Genoa, Italy;
| | - Giorgio Conti
- Pediatric ICU and Trauma Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Luisa Galli
- Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (L.G.); (E.V.)
| | - Mario Giuffrè
- Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties “G. D’Alessandro”, University of Palermo, 90141 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Stefania La Grutta
- Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, National Research Council, 90146 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Laura Lancella
- Paediatric and Infectious Disease Unit, Academic Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, Italy;
| | - Andrea Lo Vecchio
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.L.V.); (A.S.)
| | - Giuseppe Maglietta
- Research and Innovation Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy;
| | | | - Carlo Pietrasanta
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Department of Mother, Child and Infant, NICU, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | | | - Simonetta Tesoro
- Division of Anesthesia, Analgesia and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, 06129 Perugia, Italy;
| | - Elisabetta Venturini
- Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Meyer Children’s Hospital, 50139 Florence, Italy; (L.G.); (E.V.)
| | - Giorgio Piacentini
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, 37124 Verona, Italy; (E.R.); (G.P.)
| | - Mario Lima
- Paediatric Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy;
| | - Annamaria Staiano
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.L.V.); (A.S.)
| | - Susanna Esposito
- Pediatric Clinic, University Hospital, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, Italy; (S.B.); (S.M.); (L.N.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vallribera F, Kraft M, Pera M, Vidal L, Espín-Basany E. Outcomes of Intra- versus Extra-Corporeal Ileocolic Anastomosis after Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy for Cancer: An Observational Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:307. [PMID: 33467636 PMCID: PMC7830629 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10020307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Intracorporeal anastomoses (IA) are increasingly being used in colorectal surgery. Some data suggest that these might confer benefits compared with extracorporeal anastomoses (EA). The aim of this study is to compare the short-term complications associated with IA versus EA for minimally invasive right colectomy. This is a single-centre, retrospective study on a prospective database. Patients who underwent minimally invasive right colectomy for cancer between January 2017 and December 2019 were assessed for inclusion. The primary outcome was global 30-day morbidity. Overall, 189 patients were included, of whom 102 had IA. Global morbidity and medical complications were higher in patients with EA (23.5% vs. 40.2%, p = 0.014; 5.9% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.039, respectively). None of the patients with IA had non-infectious surgical wound complications, compared to 4.6% in the EA group (p = 0.029). No differences were found in anastomotic leakage (9.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.55). At multivariable analysis, EA was an independent risk factor for both surgical (OR = 3.71 95% CI: 1.06-12.91, p = 0.04) and overall complications (OR = 3.58 95% CI: 1.06-12.12, p = 0.04). IA lowers the risk for global, medical, and surgical complications with minimum risk for wound complications, without increasing the risk of AL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Eloy Espín-Basany
- Colorectal Surgery, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; (F.V.); (M.K.); (M.P.); (L.V.)
| |
Collapse
|