1
|
Galekop MMJ, Uyl-de Groot C, Redekop WK. Economic Evaluation of a Personalized Nutrition Plan Based on Omic Sciences Versus a General Nutrition Plan in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: A Modeling Study Based on Trial Data in Denmark. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:313-331. [PMID: 38113009 PMCID: PMC10883904 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-023-00461-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since there is no diet that is perfect for everyone, personalized nutrition approaches are gaining popularity to achieve goals such as the prevention of obesity-related diseases. However, appropriate choices about funding and encouraging personalized nutrition approaches should be based on sufficient evidence of their effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. In this study, we assessed whether a newly developed personalized plan (PP) could be cost-effective relative to a non-personalized plan in Denmark. METHODS Results of a 10-week randomized controlled trial were combined with a validated obesity economic model to estimate lifetime cost-effectiveness. In the trial, the intervention group (PP) received personalized home-delivered meals based on metabolic biomarkers and personalized behavioral change messages. In the control group these meals and messages were not personalized. Effects were measured in body mass index (BMI) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Costs [euros (€), 2020] were considered from a societal perspective. Lifetime cost-effectiveness was assessed using a multi-state Markov model. Univariate, probabilistic sensitivity, and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS In the trial, no significant differences were found in the effectiveness of PP compared with control, but wide confidence intervals (CIs) were seen [e.g., BMI (-0.07, 95% CI -0.51, 0.38)]. Lifetime estimates showed that PP increased costs (€520,102 versus €518,366, difference: €1736) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (15.117 versus 15.106, difference: 0.011); the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) was therefore high (€158,798 to gain one QALY). However, a 20% decrease in intervention costs would reduce the ICUR (€23,668 per QALY gained) below an unofficial gross domestic product (GDP)-based willingness-to-pay threshold (€47,817 per QALY gained). CONCLUSION On the basis of the willingness-to-pay threshold and the non-significant differences in short-term effectiveness, PP may not be cost-effective. However, scaling up the intervention would reduce the intervention costs. Future studies should be larger and/or longer to reduce uncertainty about short-term effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT04590989).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carin Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - William Ken Redekop
- Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Noordman J, Meurs M, Poortvliet R, Rusman T, Orrego-Villagran C, Ballester M, Ninov L, de Guzmán EN, Alonso-Coello P, Groene O, Suñol R, Heijmans M, Wagner C. Contextual factors for the successful implementation of self-management interventions for chronic diseases: A qualitative review of reviews. Chronic Illn 2024; 20:3-22. [PMID: 36744382 DOI: 10.1177/17423953231153337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify and describe the most relevant contextual factors (CFs) from the literature that influence the successful implementation of self-management interventions (SMIs) for patients living with type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, COPD and/or heart failure. METHODS We conducted a qualitative review of reviews. Four databases were searched, 929 reviews were identified, 460 screened and 61 reviews met the inclusion criteria. CFs in this paper are categorized according to the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework. RESULTS A great variety of CFs was identified on several levels, across all four chronic diseases. Most CFs were on the level of the patient, the professional and the interaction level, while less CFs were obtained on the level of the intervention, organization, setting and national level. No differences in main themes of CFs across all four diseases were found. DISCUSSION For the successful implementation of SMIs, it is crucial to take CFs on several levels into account simultaneously. Person-centered care, by tailoring SMIs to patients' needs and circumstances, may increase the successful uptake, application and implementation of SMIs in real-life practice. The next step will be to identify the most important CFs according to various stakeholders through a group consensus process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Meurs
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tamara Rusman
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carola Orrego-Villagran
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Suñol
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cordula Wagner
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beltran J, Valli C, Medina-Aedo M, Canelo-Aybar C, Niño de Guzmán E, Song Y, Orrego C, Ballester M, Suñol R, Noordman J, Heijmans M, Seitidis G, Tsokani S, Kontouli KM, Christogiannis C, Mavridis D, Graaf GD, Groene O, Grammatikopoulou MG, Camalleres-Guillem F, Perestelo-Perez L, McGloin H, Winkley K, Mueller BS, Saz-Parkinson Z, Corcoy R, Alonso-Coello P. COMPAR-EU Recommendations on Self-Management Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:483. [PMID: 38391858 PMCID: PMC10887949 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12040483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) offer a promising approach to actively engage patients in the management of their chronic diseases. Within the scope of the COMPAR-EU project, our goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the utilisation and implementation of SMIs in the care of adult individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A multidisciplinary panel of experts, utilising a core outcome set (COS), identified critical outcomes and established effect thresholds for each outcome. The panel formulated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach, a transparent and rigorous framework for developing and presenting the best available evidence for the formulation of recommendations. All recommendations are based on systematic reviews (SR) of the effects and of values and preferences, a contextual analysis, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. The COMPAR-EU panel is in favour of using SMIs rather than usual care (UC) alone (conditional, very low certainty of the evidence). Furthermore, the panel specifically is in favour of using ten selected SMIs, rather than UC alone (conditional, low certainty of the evidence), mostly encompassing education, self-monitoring, and behavioural techniques. The panel acknowledges that, for most SMIs, moderate resource requirements exist, and cost-effectiveness analyses do not distinctly favour either the SMI or UC. Additionally, it recognises that SMIs are likely to enhance equity, deeming them acceptable and feasible for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Beltran
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valli
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Melixa Medina-Aedo
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yang Song
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Avedis DonabedianResearch Institute (FAD), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 008037 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Sofia Tsokani
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Katerina-Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos Christogiannis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Gimon de Graaf
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maria G Grammatikopoulou
- Immunonutrition and Clinical Nutrition Unit, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Biopolis Campus, 43100 Larissa, Greece
| | | | - Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
- Evaluation Unit (SESCS), Canary Islands Health Service (SCS), Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 38109 Tenerife, Spain
| | - Helen McGloin
- School of Nursing, Health Science and Disability Studies, ATU St Angelas, F91 C643 Sligo, Ireland
| | - Kirsty Winkley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8WA, UK
| | - Beate Sigrid Mueller
- Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Rosa Corcoy
- CIBER Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanotechnology, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28220 Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Antoni Maria Claret, 167, 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Santero M, Song Y, Beltran J, Medina-Aedo M, Canelo-Aybar C, Valli C, Rocha C, León-García M, Salas-Gama K, Kaloteraki C, Niño de Guzmán E, Ballester M, González-González AI, Poortvliet R, van der Gaag M, Spoiala C, Gurung P, Willemen F, Cools I, Bleeker J, Kancheva A, Ertl J, Laure T, Kancheva I, Pacheco-Barrios K, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Tsokani S, Veroniki AA, Seitidis G, Christogiannis C, Kontouli KM, Groene O, Sunol R, Orrego C, Heijmans M, Alonso-Coello P. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Self-Management Interventions for Adults Living with Heart Failure to Improve Patient-Important Outcomes: An Evidence Map of Randomized Controlled Trials. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:302. [PMID: 38338187 PMCID: PMC10855227 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12030302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) may enhance heart failure (HF) outcomes and address challenges associated with disease management. This study aims to review randomized evidence and identify knowledge gaps in SMIs for adult HF patients. Within the COMPAR-EU project, from 2010 to 2018, we conducted searches in the databases MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO. We performed a descriptive analysis using predefined categories and developed an evidence map of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We found 282 RCTs examining SMIs for HF patients, comparing two to four interventions, primarily targeting individual patients (97%) globally (34 countries, only 31% from an European country). These interventions involved support techniques such as information sharing (95%) and self-monitoring (62%), often through a mix of in-person and remote sessions (43%). Commonly assessed outcomes included quality of life, hospital admissions, mortality, exercise capacity, and self-efficacy. Few studies have focused on lower socio-economic or minority groups. Nurses (68%) and physicians (30%) were the primary providers, and most studies were at low risk of bias in generating a random sequence for participant allocation; however, the reporting was noticeably unclear of methods used to conceal the allocation process. Our analysis has revealed prevalent support techniques and delivery methods while highlighting methodological challenges. These findings provide valuable insights for researchers, clinicians, and policymakers striving to optimize SMIs for individuals living with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilina Santero
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Yang Song
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Jessica Beltran
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Melixa Medina-Aedo
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Claudia Valli
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
| | - Claudio Rocha
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Montserrat León-García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Quality, Process and Innovation Direction, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Universitari, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chrysoula Kaloteraki
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Marieke van der Gaag
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Pema Gurung
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Fabienne Willemen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Iza Cools
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Julia Bleeker
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Angelina Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Julia Ertl
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Tajda Laure
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Ivana Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sofia Tsokani
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada;
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Christos Christogiannis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Katerina Maria Kontouli
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, 20095 Hamburg, Germany
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain (R.S.)
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 08007 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.P.); (A.K.); (I.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain; (M.S.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (M.L.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Song Y, Beltran Puerta J, Medina-Aedo M, Canelo-Aybar C, Valli C, Ballester M, Rocha C, Garcia ML, Salas-Gama K, Kaloteraki C, Santero M, Niño de Guzmán E, Spoiala C, Gurung P, Willemen F, Cools I, Bleeker J, Poortvliet R, Laure T, van der Gaag M, Pacheco-Barrios K, Zafra-Tanaka J, Mavridis D, Angeliki Veroniki A, Zevgiti S, Seitidis G, Alonso-Coello P, Groene O, González-González AI, Sunol R, Orrego C, Heijmans M. Self-Management Interventions for Adults Living with Type II Diabetes to Improve Patient-Important Outcomes: An Evidence Map. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:3156. [PMID: 38132046 PMCID: PMC10742682 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11243156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) may be promising in the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (T2DM). However, accurate comparisons of their relative effectiveness are challenging, partly due to a lack of clarity and detail regarding the intervention content being evaluated. This study summarizes intervention components and characteristics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to T2DM using a taxonomy for SMIs as a framework and identifies components that are insufficiently incorporated into the design of the intervention or insufficiently reported. Following evidence mapping methodology, we searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane, and PsycINFO from 2010 to 2018 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SMIs for T2DM. We used the terms 'self-management', 'adult' and 'T2DM' for content. For data extraction, we used an online platform based on the taxonomy for SMIs. Two independent reviewers assessed eligible references; one reviewer extracted data, and a second checked accuracy. We identified 665 RCTs for SMIs (34% US, 21% Europe) including 164,437 (median 123, range 10-14,559) adults with T2DM. SMIs highly differed in design and content, and characteristics such as mode of delivery, intensity, location and providers involved were poorly described. The majority of interventions aimed to improve clinical outcomes like HbA1c (83%), weight (53%), lipid profile (45%) or blood pressure (42%); 27% (also) targeted quality of life. Improved knowledge, health literacy, patient activation or satisfaction with care were hardly used as outcomes (<16%). SMIs most often used education (98%), self-monitoring (56%), goal-setting (48%) and skills training (42%) to improve outcomes. Management of emotions (17%) and shared decision-making (5%) were almost never mentioned. Although diabetes is highly prevalent in some minority groups, in only 13% of the SMIs, these groups were included. Our findings highlight the large heterogeneity that exists in the design of SMIs for T2DM and the way studies are reported, making accurate comparisons of their relative effectiveness challenging. In addition, SMIs pay limited attention to outcomes other than clinical, despite the importance attached to these outcomes by patients. More standardized and streamlined research is needed to better understand the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of SMIs of T2DM and benefit patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Song
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Jessica Beltran Puerta
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Melixa Medina-Aedo
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Claudia Valli
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autὸnoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autὸnoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudio Rocha
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Montserrat León Garcia
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Chrysoula Kaloteraki
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Marilina Santero
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Pema Gurung
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Fabienne Willemen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Iza Cools
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Julia Bleeker
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Tajda Laure
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Marieke van der Gaag
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
| | - Jessica Zafra-Tanaka
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (D.M.); (S.Z.); (G.S.)
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada;
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Stella Zevgiti
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (D.M.); (S.Z.); (G.S.)
| | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece; (D.M.); (S.Z.); (G.S.)
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Institut de Recerca Sant Pau (IR SANT PAU), Sant Quintí 77-79, 08041 Barcelona, Spain; (Y.S.); (J.B.P.); (M.M.-A.); (C.C.-A.); (C.V.); (C.R.); (M.L.G.); (K.S.-G.); (M.S.); (E.N.d.G.); (P.A.-C.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, 20095 Hamburg, Germany;
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - Ana Isabel González-González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autὸnoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autὸnoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain; (M.B.); (K.P.-B.); (J.Z.-T.); (A.I.G.-G.); (R.S.); (C.O.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autὸnoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands; (C.S.); (P.G.); (F.W.); (I.C.); (J.B.); (R.P.); (T.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krah NS, Zietzsch P, Salrach C, Toro CA, Ballester M, Orrego C, Groene O. Identifying Factors to Facilitate the Implementation of Decision-Making Tools to Promote Self-Management of Chronic Diseases into Routine Healthcare Practice: A Qualitative Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2397. [PMID: 37685431 PMCID: PMC10487156 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11172397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This study, as part of the COMPAR-EU project, utilized a mixed-methods approach involving 37 individual, semi-structured interviews and one focus group with 7 participants to investigate the factors influencing the implementation and use of self-management interventions (SMIs) decision tools in clinical practice. The interviews and focus group discussions were guided by a tailored interview and focus group guideline developed based on the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases (TICD) framework. The data were analyzed using a directed qualitative content analysis, with a deductive coding system based on the TICD framework and an inductive coding process. A rapid analysis technique was employed to summarize and synthesize the findings. The study identified five main dimensions and facilitators for implementation: decision tool factors, individual health professional factors, interaction factors, organizational factors, and social, political, and legal factors. The findings highlight the importance of structured implementation through SMI decision support tools, emphasizing the need to understand their benefits, secure organizational resources, and gain political support for sustainable implementation. Overall, this study employed a systematic approach, combining qualitative methods and comprehensive analysis, to gain insights into the factors influencing the implementation of SMIs' decision-support tools in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Zietzsch
- OptiMedis, Research and Innovation, 20095 Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, 08037 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute, 08037 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, Research and Innovation, 20095 Hamburg, Germany
- Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Niño-de-Guzman Quispe E, Bracchiglione J, Ballester M, Groene O, Heijmans M, Martínez García L, Noordman J, Orrego C, Rocha C, Suñol R, Alonso-Coello P. Patients' and informal caregivers' perspectives on self-management interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus outcomes: a mixed-methods overview of 14 years of reviews. Arch Public Health 2023; 81:140. [PMID: 37537669 PMCID: PMC10401891 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01153-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management interventions (SMIs) are core components of high-quality care in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to identify and summarise the scientific evidence exploring the perspectives of patients with T2DM and their informal caregivers on outcomes of SMIs, and the key themes to enhance T2DM patient-centred care. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods overview of reviews. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO, up to June 2021 for systematic reviews (SRs) exploring the perspectives of adults with T2DM and their informal caregivers, regarding self-management. Two reviewers conducted independently study selection, data extraction and quality assessment. We estimated the degree of overlap across SRs. We performed a qualitative analysis using a thematic synthesis approach. RESULTS We identified 54 SRs, corresponding to 939 studies, with a slight overlap. Most SRs (47/54, 87%) were considered high quality. We developed summaries for 22 outcomes and identified six overarching themes: (1) diabetic identity; (2) accessing healthcare; (3) experience of care; (4) engagement with self-management; (5) outcomes awareness; and (6) challenges adhering to self-management. We found important variability in how patients with T2DM and their informal caregivers value critical outcomes influenced by the disease progression and several contextual factors. CONCLUSIONS Our findings represent what matters most to patients with T2DM and their informal caregivers regarding outcomes of SMIs. Our results can facilitate the development and evaluation of SMIs, and guide decision-making in diabetes care, including the formulation of decisions and recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ena Niño-de-Guzman Quispe
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.
- Cancer Screening Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Javier Bracchiglione
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
- Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Viña del Mar, Chile
| | - Marta Ballester
- Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, Hamburg, Germany
- University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Laura Martínez García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carola Orrego
- Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudio Rocha
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Noordman J, Heijmans M, Poortvliet R, Groene O, Ballester M, Ninov L, de Guzmán EN, Alonso-Coello P, Orrego C, Suñol R, Wagner C. Identifying most important contextual factors for the implementation of self-management interventions: A Delphi study. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 114:107843. [PMID: 37352753 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To reach consensus amongst stakeholders about the most important contextual factors (CFs) that may influence the successful implementation of (components of) self-management interventions (SMIs) for type 2 diabetes, obesity, COPD and heart failure. METHODS Building on our literature review that identified 31 CFs on different levels we conducted a Delphi with 44 stakeholders to identify which of these CFs, or additional ones, contribute most to successful implementation of SMIs. The Delphi consisted of three rounds in which the CFs were scored, prioritized and discussed. RESULTS The most important CFs overlapped to a great extent across components of SMIs and diseases. Overall, stakeholders identified 'HCP's ability to adapt the advice, communication or intervention to patients' situation and level of knowledge' as most important CF. CONCLUSION CFs need to be taken into account when implementing promising SMIs. According to stakeholders, the most important CFs are patient-, HCP- or interaction related. 'Tailoring' was selected as the most crucial aspect for HCPs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Stakeholders can make informed decisions on the adoption of the most suitable SMIs in a given context. These CFs are available through a self-management platform. Suggestions to implement self-management behaviour and to close the research-to-practice gap are made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janneke Noordman
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, Burchardstr 17, 20095 Hamburg, Germany; Faculty of Management, Economics and Society, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455 Witten, Germany
| | - Marta Ballester
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona 08037, Spain; Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Spain
| | - Lyudmil Ninov
- European Patients' Forum (EPF), Brussels 1040, Belgium
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona 08037, Spain; Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Spain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona 08037, Spain; Health Services Research Network on Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Spain
| | - Cordula Wagner
- Netherlands institute for health services research (Nivel), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sunol R, González-González AI, Valli C, Ballester M, Seils L, Heijmans M, Poortvliet R, van der Gaag M, Rocha C, León-García M, Salas-Gama K, de Guzman EN, Kaloteraki C, Santero M, Spoiala C, Gurung P, Moaddine S, Wilemen F, Cools I, Bleeker J, Kancheva A, Ertl J, Laure T, Kancheva I, Veroniki AA, Zevgiti S, Beltrán J, Canelo-Aybar C, Zafra-Tanaka JH, Seitidis G, Mavridis D, Groene O, Alonso-Coello P, Orrego C. Self-management interventions for adults living with obesity to improve patient-relevant outcomes: An evidence map. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 110:107647. [PMID: 36739705 PMCID: PMC10109091 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To conduct an evidence map on self-management interventions and patient-relevant outcomes for adults living with overweight/obesity. METHODS Following Arksey and O'Malley methodology, we searched in five electronical databases including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SMIs for overweight/obesity. We used the terms "self-management", "adult" and "obesity" for content. Two independent reviewers assessed eligible references; one reviewer extracted data, a second checked accuracy. RESULTS We identified 497 RCTs (58% US, 20% Europe) including 99,741 (median 112, range 11-5145) adults living with overweight/obesity. Most research evaluated clinical outcomes (617, 55%) and behaviors adherence (255, 23%). Empowerment skills, quality of life and satisfaction were less targeted (8%, 7%, 0.2%, respectively). The most frequent techniques included sharing information (858, 99%), goal setting (619, 72%) and self-monitoring training (614, 71%), provided face-to-face (386, 45%) or in combination with remote techniques (256, 30%). Emotional management, social support and shared-decision were less frequent (18%, 26%, 4%). Socio-economic status, minorities or health literacy were seldom reported. CONCLUSION There is a need of widening the scope of research by focusing on outcomes important to patients, assessing emotional/social/share-decision support, exploring remote techniques and including vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08103, Spain.
| | - Ana Isabel González-González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08103, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain; Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main D-60590, Germany.
| | - Claudia Valli
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08103, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.
| | - Laura Seils
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08103, Spain.
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Marieke van der Gaag
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Claudio Rocha
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Montserrat León-García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada.
| | - Ena Niño de Guzman
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Chrysoula Kaloteraki
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Marilina Santero
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Pema Gurung
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Saida Moaddine
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Fabienne Wilemen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Iza Cools
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Julia Bleeker
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Angelina Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Julia Ertl
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Tajda Laure
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Ivana Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118, Utrecht 3513, the Netherlands.
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5B 1T8, Canada; Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada.
| | - Stella Zevgiti
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
| | - Jessica Beltrán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain.
| | | | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina 45110, Greece.
| | - Oliver Groene
- OptiMedis, Burchardstrasse 17, Hamburg 20095, Germany.
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Carrer de Sant Quintí 77, Barcelona 08025, Spain; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Provença, 293, pral., Barcelona 08037, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Plaça Cívica, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08103, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Soldato D, Arecco L, Agostinetto E, Franzoi MA, Mariamidze E, Begijanashvili S, Brunetti N, Spinaci S, Solinas C, Vaz-Luis I, Di Meglio A, Lambertini M. The Future of Breast Cancer Research in the Survivorship Field. Oncol Ther 2023:10.1007/s40487-023-00225-8. [PMID: 37005952 DOI: 10.1007/s40487-023-00225-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Prevalence of survivors of breast cancer has been steadily increasing in the last 20 years. Currently, more than 90% of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer are expected to be alive at 5 years from diagnosis thanks to early detection and breakthrough innovations in multimodal treatment strategies. Alongside this advancement in clinical outcomes, survivors of breast cancer might experience several specific challenges and present with unique needs. Survivorship trajectories after diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can be significantly impacted by long-lasting and severe treatment-related side effects, including physical problems, psychological distress, fertility issues in young women, and impaired social and work reintegration, which add up to patients' individual risk of cancer recurrence and second primary malignancies. Alongside cancer-specific sequelae, survivors still present with general health needs, including management of chronic preexisting or ensuing conditions. Survivorship care should implement high-quality, evidence-based strategies to promptly screen, identify, and address survivors' needs in a comprehensive way and minimize the impact of severe treatment sequelae, preexisting comorbidities, unhealthy lifestyles, and risk of recurrence on quality of life. This narrative review focuses on core areas of survivorship care and discuss the state of the art and future research perspectives in key domains including selected long-term side effects, surveillance for recurrences and second cancers, well-being promotion, and specific survivors' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - L Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - E Agostinetto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M A Franzoi
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - E Mariamidze
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - S Begijanashvili
- Department of Clinical Oncology, American Hospital Tbilisi, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - N Brunetti
- Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - S Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - C Solinas
- Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Italy
| | - I Vaz-Luis
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Di Meglio
- Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Breast Cancer Unit, Medical Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - M Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taouktsi N, Papageorgiou ST, Tousinas G, Papanikolopoulou S, Grammatikopoulou MG, Giannakoulas G, Goulis DG. Fragility of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) examining nutrition interventions among patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Hormones (Athens) 2022; 21:665-681. [PMID: 36129664 PMCID: PMC9712353 DOI: 10.1007/s42000-022-00396-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is controversy regarding the optimal statistical method to interpret how robust is a statistically significant result. The fragility index (FI) and the reverse fragility index (RFI) are quantitative measures that can facilitate the appraisal of a clinical trial's robustness. This study was performed to evaluate the FI and RFI of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining nutritional interventions in patients with diabetes mellitus, focusing on cardiovascular outcomes. METHODS A systematic search was conducted and relevant RCTs were identified in three databases. RCTs examining nutritional interventions (supplements or dietary patterns) in patients with DM with dichotomous primary endpoints involving cardiovascular outcomes were eligible. Data were extracted to compose 2 × 2 event tables and the FI and RFI were calculated for each comparison, using Fisher's exact test. Risk of bias (RoB) of the included RCTs was assessed with the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. RESULTS A total of 14,315 records were screened and 10 RCTs were included in the analyses. The median FI of the paired comparisons was 3 (IQR: 2-4) and the median RFI was 8 (IQR: 4.5-17). RoB and heterogeneity were low. CONCLUSIONS RCTs examining nutritional interventions and cardiovascular outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus appear to be statistically fragile. Τhe FI and the RFI can be reported and interpreted as an additional perspective of a trial's robustness. HIGHLIGHTS • In the evidence-healthcare era, assessing how robust statistically significant results are remains a matter of controversy. • Recently, the fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were proposed to assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 2 × 2 comparisons. • When applying the FI and RFI, RCTs examining nutritional interventions and cardiovascular outcomes among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) appear to be statistically fragile. • Τhe FI and the RFI can be reported and interpreted as an additional perspective of a trial's robustness. • RCTs implementing nutrition interventions among patients with DM can improve their methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niki Taouktsi
- Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Stefanos T Papageorgiou
- Medical School, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Tousinas
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, GR-56429, Greece
| | | | - Maria G Grammatikopoulou
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, GR-56429, Greece
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical School, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece
| | - George Giannakoulas
- Department of Cardiology, AHEPA University Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Dimitrios G Goulis
- Unit of Reproductive Endocrinology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Thessaloniki, GR-56429, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Xiao Z, Han X. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Telehealth Chronic Disease Management System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (Preprint). J Med Internet Res 2022; 25:e44256. [PMID: 37103993 PMCID: PMC10176143 DOI: 10.2196/44256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term daily health monitoring and management play a more significant role in telehealth management systems nowadays, which require evaluation indicators to present patients' general health conditions and become applicable to multiple chronic diseases. OBJECTIVE This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of subjective indicators of telehealth chronic disease management system (TCDMS). METHODS We selected Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Cochrane library, IEEE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wanfang, a Chinese medical database, and searched papers published from January 1, 2015, to July 1, 2022, regarding randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of the telehealth system on patients with chronic diseases. The narrative review summarized the questionnaire indicators presented in the selected studies. In the meta-analysis, Mean Difference (MD) and Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) with a 95% CI were pooled depending on whether the measurements were the same. Subgroup analysis was conducted if the heterogeneity was significant, and the number of studies was sufficient. RESULTS Twenty RCTs with 4153 patients were included in the qualitative review. Seventeen different questionnaire-based outcomes were found, within which quality of life, psychological well-being (including depression, anxiety, and fatigue), self-management, self-efficacy, and medical adherence were most frequently used. Ten RCTs with 2095 patients remained in meta-analysis. Compared to usual care, telehealth system can significantly improve the quality of life (SMD 0.44; 95% CI 0.16-0.73; P=.002), whereas no significant effects were found on depression (SMD -0.25; 95% CI -0.72 to 0.23; P=.30), anxiety (SMD -0.10; 95% CI -0.27 to 0.07; P=.71), fatigue (SMD -0.36; 95% CI -1.06 to 0.34; P<.001), and self-care (SMD 0.77; 95% CI -0.28-1.81; P<.001). In the subdomains of quality of life, telehealth statistically significantly improved physical functioning (SMD 0.15; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.29; P=.03), mental functioning (SMD 0.37; 95% CI 0.13-0.60; P=.002), and social functioning (SMD 0.64; 95% CI 0.00-1.29; P=.05), while there was no difference on cognitive functioning (MD 8.31; 95% CI -7.33 to 23.95; P=.30) and role functioning (MD 5.30; 95% CI -7.80 to 18.39; P=.43). CONCLUSIONS TCDMS positively affected patients' physical, mental, and social quality of life across multiple chronic diseases. However, no significant difference was found in depression, anxiety, fatigue, and self-care. Subjective questionnaires had the potential ability to evaluate the effectiveness of long-term telehealth monitoring and management. However, further well-designed experiments are warranted to validate TCDMS's effects on subjective outcomes, especially when tested among different chronically ill groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyan Xiao
- Research Center Intelligent Equipment and Technology, Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
- Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Xiuping Han
- Research Center Intelligent Equipment and Technology, Yangtze Delta Region Institute of Tsinghua University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heijmans M, Poortvliet R, Van der Gaag M, González-González AI, Beltran Puerta J, Canelo-Aybar C, Valli C, Ballester M, Rocha C, Garcia ML, Salas-Gama K, Kaloteraki C, Santero M, Niño de Guzmán E, Spoiala C, Gurung P, Moaddine S, Willemen F, Cools I, Bleeker J, Kancheva A, Ertl J, Laure T, Kancheva I, Pacheco-Barrios K, Zafra-Tanaka J, Mavridis D, Angeliki Veroniki A, Zevgiti S, Seitidis G, Alonso-Coello P, Groene O, Sunol R, Orrego C. Using a Taxonomy to Systematically Identify and Describe Self-Management Interventions Components in Randomized Trials for COPD. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191912685. [PMID: 36231985 PMCID: PMC9566761 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve outcomes in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, accurate comparisons of their relative effectiveness are challenging, partly due to a lack of clarity and detail regarding the intervention content being evaluated. This study systematically describes intervention components and characteristics in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) related to COPD self-management using the COMPAR-EU taxonomy as a framework, identifying components that are insufficiently incorporated into the design of the intervention or insufficiently reported. Overall, 235 RCTs published between 2010 and 2018, from a systematic review were coded using the taxonomy, which includes 132 components across four domains: intervention characteristics, expected patient (or caregiver) self-management behaviours, patient relevant outcomes, and target population characteristics. Risk of bias was also assessed. Interventions mainly focused on physical activity (67.4%), and condition-specific behaviours like breathing exercise (63.5%), self-monitoring (50.8%), and medication use (33.9%). Support techniques like education and skills-training, self-monitoring, and goal setting (over 35% of the RCTs) were mostly used for this. Emotional-based techniques, problem-solving, and shared decision-making were less frequently reported (less than 15% of the studies). Numerous SMIs components were insufficiently incorporated into the design of COPD SMIs or insufficiently reported. Characteristics like mode of delivery, intensity, location, and providers involved were often not described. Only 8% of the interventions were tailored to the target population's characteristics. Outcomes that are considered important by patients were hardly taken into account. There is still a lot to improve in both the design and description of SMIs for COPD. Using a framework such as the COMPAR-EU SMI taxonomy may contribute to better reporting and to better informing of replication efforts. In addition, prospective use of the taxonomy for developing and reporting intervention content would further aid in building a cumulative science of effective SMIs in COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - Rune Poortvliet
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke Van der Gaag
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ana I. González-González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Jessica Beltran Puerta
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valli
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Claudio Rocha
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Montserrat León Garcia
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Chrysoula Kaloteraki
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marilina Santero
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pema Gurung
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saida Moaddine
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Fabienne Willemen
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Iza Cools
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Bleeker
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Angelina Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Ertl
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tajda Laure
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ivana Kancheva
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), 3513 Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Pacheco-Barrios
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jessica Zafra-Tanaka
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Areti Angeliki Veroniki
- Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Stella Zevgiti
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Georgios Seitidis
- Department of Primary Education, School of Education, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), 08037 Barcelona, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), 08025 Barcelona, Spain
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van der Gaag M, Heijmans M, Ballester M, Orrego C, Niño de Guzmán E, Ninov L, Rademakers J. Preferences Regarding Self-Management Intervention Outcomes of Dutch Chronically Ill Patients With Limited Health Literacy. Front Public Health 2022; 10:842462. [PMID: 35646791 PMCID: PMC9130718 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.842462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: For many chronically ill patients self-management of their disease is difficult. This may be especially true for people with limited health literacy as they are faced with additional challenges in the day-to-day management of their disease. Research has shown that self-management support is most effective when tailored to the needs and preferences of patients. Therefore, this study explores the preferences regarding self-management outcomes of chronically ill patients with limited health literacy. Methods A total of 35 patients with limited health literacy were invited to a concept-mapping procedure consisting of two card sorting tasks. Patients ranked 60 outcomes, which are often found in literature in relation to self-management, to the level that was important for themselves. Means were calculated for each outcome and domain, and differences within the group were analyzed. Results For patients with limited health literacy, satisfaction with care is the most important outcome domain. This domain includes overall satisfaction, the communication with health care providers, the provision of information and trust. At an outcome level, outcomes related to symptom management and improving competences to self-management scored very high. No differences between patient groups for age and sex were found. Conclusion Chronically ill patients with limited health literacy prefer a wide variety of outcomes for their self-management. Next to health related outcomes, patients mostly prefer to work on their competences for self-management. For health care professionals, acting on these patient preferences and building a solid relationship will enhance successful self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Marta Ballester
- Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas, Madrid, Spain.,Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas, Madrid, Spain.,Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Sant Pau Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain.,Ibero-American Cochrane Center (CCIb), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Jany Rademakers
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
van der Gaag M, Heijmans M, Spoiala C, Rademakers J. The importance of health literacy for self-management: A scoping review of reviews. Chronic Illn 2022; 18:234-254. [PMID: 34402309 DOI: 10.1177/17423953211035472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Self-management of chronic diseases is rather complex, especially for patients with limited health literacy. In this review, we aim to disentangle the specific difficulties patients with limited health literacy face in relation to self-management and their associated needs with respect to self-management support. METHODS We performed a literature search in five databases. We used a broad definition of health literacy and self-management was categorized into four types of activities: medical management, changing lifestyle, communicating and navigating through the health care system and coping. Included reviews described the relationship between health literacy and different domains of self-management and were published after 2010. RESULTS A total of 28 reviews were included. Some clear difficulties of patients with limited health literacy emerged, predominantly in the area of medical management (especially adherence), communication and knowledge. Other associations between health literacy and self-management were inconclusive. Barriers from the patients' perspective described mainly medical management and the communication and navigation of the health care system. DISCUSSION Patients with limited health literacy experience difficulties with specific domains of self-management. For a better understanding of the relationship between health literacy and self-management, a broader conceptualization of health literacy is warranted, including both cognitive and behavioural aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monique Heijmans
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands
| | - Cristina Spoiala
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands
| | - Jany Rademakers
- 8123Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, the Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, 168092Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perestelo-Perez L, Rivero-Santana A, Alvarez-Perez Y, Duarte-Díaz A, Ramos-García V, Torres-Castaño A, Abt-Sacks A, Toledo-Chavarri A, Alonso-Coello P, Orrego C, Serrano-Aguilar P. Shared decision-making in Spain in 2022: An updated revision of the current situation. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ, FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAT IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN 2022; 171:122-128. [PMID: 35624010 DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In Spain, there is not a national strategy to promote shared decision making (SDM) in clinical practice, and it is still not a requisite for improving the quality of health services, in either the legal norms or professionals' educational curricula. However, several national strategies in specific health areas increasingly include the principles of person centred care (PCC) and SDM into their objectives, promoting patients' empowerment and activation. Furthermore, several institutions continue to develop Patient Decision Aids (PtDAs) and other resources to facilitate patients' involvement in their own care; training programs for professionals; links between PtDAs and clinical practice guidelines; as well as interventional studies assessing the impact of PCC and SDM interventions in clinical practice. Initiatives to involve patients in health research design and health technology assessment are also being developed. We describe an update of the current state of research, policy and implementation of SDM after five years of substantial advances in Spain. Many challenges remain regarding national and regional policies on PCC and SDM, implementation of SDM in real practice and educational curricula, development of quality indicators and evaluation procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez
- Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain.
| | - Amado Rivero-Santana
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Yolanda Alvarez-Perez
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Andrea Duarte-Díaz
- Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Alezandra Torres-Castaño
- Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Analía Abt-Sacks
- Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Ana Toledo-Chavarri
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain; Canary Islands Health Research Institute Foundation (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau-CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Carola Orrego
- Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Fundació Avedis Donavedian, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
- Evaluation Unit of the Canary Islands Health Service (SESCS), Tenerife, Spain; Research Network on Health Services in Chronic Diseases (REDISSEC), Tenerife, Spain; Network for Research on Chronicity, Primary Care, and Health Promotion (RICAPPS), Tenerife, Spain; Network of Agencies for Assessing National Health System Technologies and Performance (RedETS), Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Basu S, Majumdar B, Mukherjee K, Munjal S, Palaksha C. The role of artificial intelligence in HRM: A systematic review and future research direction. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
18
|
Valli C, Suñol R, Orrego C, Niño de Guzmán E, Strammiello V, Adrion N, Immonen K, Ninov L, van der Gaag M, Ballester M, Alonso‐Coello P. The development of a core outcomes set for self-management interventions for patients living with obesity. Clin Obes 2022; 12:e12489. [PMID: 34617681 PMCID: PMC9285702 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Self-management interventions (SMIs) can improve the life of patients living with obesity. However, there is variability in the outcomes used to assess the effectiveness of SMIs and these are often not relevant for patients. In the context of COMPAR-EU, our aim was to develop a core outcome set (COS) for the evaluation of SMIs for patients with obesity. We followed a four steps multimethod approach: (1) the development of the initial catalogue of outcomes; (2) a scoping review of reviews on patients' values and preferences on outcomes of self-management (SM); (3) a Delphi survey including patients and patient representatives to rate the importance of outcomes; and (4) a 2-day consensus workshop with patients, patient representatives, healthcare professionals and researchers. The initial catalogue included 82 outcomes. Ten patients and patient's representatives participated in the Delphi survey. We identified 16 themes through the thematic synthesis of the scoping review that informed 37.80% of the outcomes on initial catalogue. Five patients, five healthcare professionals, and four researchers participated in the consensus workshop. After the consensus process, 15 outcomes were selected to be part of the final COS, and five supplementary outcomes were also provided. We developed a COS for the evaluation of SMIs in obesity with a significant involvement of patients and other key stakeholders. This COS will help improving data synthesis and increasing the value of SM research data in healthcare decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Valli
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona—Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public HealthBiomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)BarcelonaSpain
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive MedicineUniversidad Autónoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD)Spain
- Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD)Spain
- Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC)BarcelonaSpain
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona—Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public HealthBiomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)BarcelonaSpain
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive MedicineUniversidad Autónoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Cancer Prevention and Control ProgrammeCatalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelonaSpain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marta Ballester
- Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD)Spain
- Cancer Prevention and Control ProgrammeCatalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, Hospitalet de LlobregatBarcelonaSpain
| | - Pablo Alonso‐Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona—Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public HealthBiomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)BarcelonaSpain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), MadridSpain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Niño de Guzmán Quispe E, Martínez García L, Orrego Villagrán C, Heijmans M, Sunol R, Fraile-Navarro D, Pérez-Bracchiglione J, Ninov L, Salas-Gama K, Viteri García A, Alonso-Coello P. The Perspectives of Patients with Chronic Diseases and Their Caregivers on Self-Management Interventions: A Scoping Review of Reviews. THE PATIENT 2021; 14:719-740. [PMID: 33871808 PMCID: PMC8563562 DOI: 10.1007/s40271-021-00514-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management (SM) interventions are supportive interventions systematically provided by healthcare professionals, peers, or laypersons to increase the skills and confidence of patients in their ability to manage chronic diseases. We had two objectives: (1) to summarise the preferences and experiences of patients and their caregivers (informal caregivers and healthcare professionals) with SM in four chronic diseases and (2) to identify and describe the relevant outcomes for SM interventions from these perspectives. METHODS We conducted a mixed-methods scoping review of reviews. We searched three databases until December 2020 for quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods reviews exploring patients' and caregivers' preferences or experiences with SM in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart failure (HF). Quantitative data were narratively synthesised, and qualitative data followed a three-step descriptive thematic synthesis. Identified themes were categorised into outcomes or modifiable factors of SM interventions. RESULTS We included 148 reviews covering T2DM (n = 53 [35.8%]), obesity (n = 20 [13.5%]), COPD (n = 32 [21.6%]), HF (n = 38 [25.7%]), and those with more than one disease (n = 5 [3.4%]). We identified 12 main themes. Eight described the process of SM (disease progression, SM behaviours, social support, interaction with healthcare professionals, access to healthcare, costs for patients, culturally defined roles and perceptions, and health knowledge), and four described their experiences with SM interventions (the perceived benefit of the intervention, individualised care, sense of community with peers, and usability of equipment). Most themes and subthemes were categorised as outcomes of SM interventions. CONCLUSION The process of SM shaped the perspectives of patients and their caregivers on SM interventions. Their perspectives were influenced by the perceived benefit of the intervention, the sense of community with peers, the intervention's usability, and the level of individualised care. Our findings can inform the selection of patient-important outcomes, decision-making processes, including the formulation of recommendations, and the design and implementation of SM interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ena Niño de Guzmán Quispe
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (IbCC)-Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167. Pabellón 18, Planta 0, 08025, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Laura Martínez García
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (IbCC)-Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167. Pabellón 18, Planta 0, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Carola Orrego Villagrán
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (Nivel), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - David Fraile-Navarro
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
- Madrid Primary Health Care Service, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Karla Salas-Gama
- Health Services Research Group, Institut de Recerca Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrés Viteri García
- Centro de Investigación de Salud Pública y Epidemiología Clínica (CISPEC), Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
- Centro Asociado Cochrane de Ecuador, Universidad UTE, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre (IbCC)-Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), C/ Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167. Pabellón 18, Planta 0, 08025, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Modeling Multicomponent Interventions in Network Meta-Analysis. Methods Mol Biol 2021. [PMID: 34550595 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
There is a rapid increase in trials assessing healthcare interventions consisting of a combination of drugs (polytherapies) or multiple components. In the latter type of interventions (also known as complex interventions), the aspect of complexity is of paramount importance. For example, nonpharmacological interventions, such as psychological interventions or self-management interventions, usually share common components that relate to the nature of intervention, who delivers it, or where and how. In a network of trials, there is often the need to identify the most effective (or safest) component and/or combination of components. Four key meta-analytical approaches have been presented in the literature to handle complex interventions. These include (a) the single-effect model, (b) the full interaction model, (c) the additive main effects model, and (d) the two-way interaction model. In this chapter, we present and discuss the advantages and limitations of these approaches. We illustrate these methods using a network that assesses the relative effects of self-management interventions on waist size in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Orrego C, Ballester M, Heymans M, Camus E, Groene O, Niño de Guzman E, Pardo-Hernandez H, Sunol R. Talking the same language on patient empowerment: Development and content validation of a taxonomy of self-management interventions for chronic conditions. Health Expect 2021; 24:1626-1638. [PMID: 34252259 PMCID: PMC8483213 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The literature on self-management interventions (SMIs) is growing exponentially, but it is characterized by heterogeneous reporting that limits comparability across studies and interventions. Building an SMI taxonomy is the first step towards creating a common language for stakeholders to drive research in this area and promote patient self-management and empowerment. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate the content of a comprehensive taxonomy of SMIs for long-term conditions that will help identify key characteristics and facilitate design, reporting and comparisons of SMIs. METHODS We employed a mixed-methods approach incorporating a literature review, an iterative consultation process and mapping of key domains, concepts and elements to develop an initial SMI taxonomy that was subsequently reviewed in a two-round online Delphi survey with a purposive sample of international experts. RESULTS The final SMI taxonomy has 132 components classified into four domains: intervention characteristics, expected patient/caregiver self-management behaviours, outcomes for measuring SMIs and target population characteristics. The two-round Delphi exercise involving 27 international experts demonstrated overall high agreement with the proposed items, with a mean score (on a scale of 1-9) per component of 8.0 (range 6.1-8.8) in round 1 and 8.1 (range 7.0-8.9) in round 2. CONCLUSIONS The SMI taxonomy contributes to building a common framework for the patient self-management field and can help implement and improve patient empowerment and facilitate comparative effectiveness research of SMIs. Patient or public contribution. Patients' representatives contributed as experts in the Delphi process and as partners of the consortium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC)
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC)
| | | | - Estela Camus
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oliver Groene
- OPTIMEDIS.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Ena Niño de Guzman
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hector Pardo-Hernandez
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre - Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Sunol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain.,Red de investigación en servicios de salud en enfermedades crónicas (REDISSEC)
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Guerreiro MP, Strawbridge J, Cavaco AM, Félix IB, Marques MM, Cadogan C. Development of a European competency framework for health and other professionals to support behaviour change in persons self-managing chronic disease. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2021; 21:287. [PMID: 34016108 PMCID: PMC8136137 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02720-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare and other professionals are expected to support behaviour change in people living with chronic disease. However, effective behaviour change interventions are largely absent in routine encounters. The Train4Health project, a European strategic partnership for higher education, sought to address this problem. The primary aim of this study, which is part of an early work package, was to develop an interprofessional competency framework for health and other professions to support behaviour change for the self-management of chronic disease at a European level. A secondary aim was to derive a set of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) from an established taxonomy to link with framework competencies. METHODS The study comprised two interlinked parts. Part 1 involved a two-round e-Delphi study with an interprofessional panel of 48 experts across 12 European countries to develop the behaviour change competency framework. Preparatory work included drafting a list of competency statements based on seven existing frameworks. Part 2 involved an expert panel of six behavioural psychologists deriving a set of BCTs to link with framework competencies. Their feedback was based on preparatory work, which focused on seven high priority chronic diseases for self-management, identified through European projects on self-management and identifying five relevant target behaviours from key clinical guidelines. A literature search yielded 29 effective BCTs for the target behaviours in the selected chronic diseases. RESULTS Twenty-seven competency statements, were presented in Round 1 to the Delphi panel. Consensus was achieved for all statements. Based on comments, two statements were removed, one was added, and 14 were modified. All 15 statements subjected to Round 2 were consensus-approved, yielding a total of 12 foundational competencies for behaviour change in self-management of chronic disease and 14 behaviour change competencies. Four behaviour change competencies related to BCTs. Behavioural psychologists' feedback led to a core set of 21 BCTs deemed applicable to the five target behaviours across the seven chronic diseases. CONCLUSIONS A behaviour change competency framework comprising 26 statements for European health and other professionals to support self-management of chronic disease was developed, linked with a core set of 21 BCTs from an established taxonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Pereira Guerreiro
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Centro de Investigação Interdisciplinar Egas Moniz (CiiEM), Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Monte de Caparica, Portugal.
| | - Judith Strawbridge
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Isa Brito Félix
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marta Moreira Marques
- ADAPT SFI Research Centre & Trinity Centre for Practice and Healthcare Innovation, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC), NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cathal Cadogan
- Trinity College Dublin, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Camus-García E, González-González AI, Heijmans M, Niño de Guzmán E, Valli C, Beltran J, Pardo-Hernández H, Ninov L, Strammiello V, Immonen K, Mavridis D, Ballester M, Suñol R, Orrego C. Self-management interventions for adults living with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): The development of a Core Outcome Set for COMPAR-EU project. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247522. [PMID: 33647039 PMCID: PMC7920347 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large body of evidence suggests that self-management interventions (SMIs) may improve outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, accurate comparisons of the relative effectiveness of SMIs are challenging, partly due to heterogeneity of outcomes across trials and uncertainty about the importance of these outcomes for patients. We aimed to develop a core set of patient-relevant outcomes (COS) for SMIs trials to enhance comparability of interventions and ensure person-centred care. METHODS We undertook an innovative approach consisting of four interlinked stages: i) Development of an initial catalogue of outcomes from previous EU-funded projects and/or published studies, ii) Scoping review of reviews on patients and caregivers' perspectives to identify outcomes of interest, iii) Two-round Delphi online survey with patients and patient representatives to rate the importance of outcomes, and iv) Face-to-face consensus workshop with patients, patient representatives, health professionals and researchers to develop the COS. RESULTS From an initial list of 79 potential outcomes, 16 were included in the COS plus one supplementary outcome relevant to all participants. These were related to patient and caregiver knowledge/competence, self-efficacy, patient activation, self-monitoring, adherence, smoking cessation, COPD symptoms, physical activity, sleep quality, caregiver quality of life, activities of daily living, coping with the disease, participation and decision-making, emergency room visits/admissions and cost effectiveness. CONCLUSION The development of the COPD COS for the evaluation of SMIs will increase consistency in the measurement and reporting of outcomes across trials. It will also contribute to more personalized health care and more informed health decisions in clinical practice as patients' preferences regarding COPD outcomes are more systematically included.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estela Camus-García
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Isabel González-González
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Institute of General Practice, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Monique Heijmans
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ena Niño de Guzmán
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claudia Valli
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine, Universidad Atónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jessica Beltran
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Hector Pardo-Hernández
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre Barcelona, Biomedical Research Institute San Pau (IIB Sant Pau) - CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Dimitris Mavridis
- Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Marta Ballester
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Rosa Suñol
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Carola Orrego
- Avedis Donabedian Research Institute (FAD), Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| |
Collapse
|