1
|
Hibbert PD, Molloy CJ, Cameron ID, Gray LC, Reed RL, Wiles LK, Westbrook J, Arnolda G, Bilton R, Ash R, Georgiou A, Kitson A, Hughes CF, Gordon SJ, Mitchell RJ, Rapport F, Estabrooks C, Alexander GL, Vincent C, Edwards A, Carson-Stevens A, Wagner C, McCormack B, Braithwaite J. The quality of care delivered to residents in long-term care in Australia: an indicator-based review of resident records (CareTrack Aged study). BMC Med 2024; 22:22. [PMID: 38254113 PMCID: PMC10804560 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03224-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study estimated the prevalence of evidence-based care received by a population-based sample of Australian residents in long-term care (LTC) aged ≥ 65 years in 2021, measured by adherence to clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations. METHODS Sixteen conditions/processes of care amendable to estimating evidence-based care at a population level were identified from prevalence data and CPGs. Candidate recommendations (n = 5609) were extracted from 139 CPGs which were converted to indicators. National experts in each condition rated the indicators via the RAND-UCLA Delphi process. For the 16 conditions, 236 evidence-based care indicators were ratified. A multi-stage sampling of LTC facilities and residents was undertaken. Trained aged-care nurses then undertook manual structured record reviews of care delivered between 1 March and 31 May 2021 (our record review period) to assess adherence with the indicators. RESULTS Care received by 294 residents with 27,585 care encounters in 25 LTC facilities was evaluated. Residents received care for one to thirteen separate clinical conditions/processes of care (median = 10, mean = 9.7). Adherence to evidence-based care indicators was estimated at 53.2% (95% CI: 48.6, 57.7) ranging from a high of 81.3% (95% CI: 75.6, 86.3) for Bladder and Bowel to a low of 12.2% (95% CI: 1.6, 36.8) for Depression. Six conditions (skin integrity, end-of-life care, infection, sleep, medication, and depression) had less than 50% adherence with indicators. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study of adherence to evidence-based care for people in LTC using multiple conditions and a standardised method. Vulnerable older people are not receiving evidence-based care for many physical problems, nor care to support their mental health nor for end-of-life care. The six conditions in which adherence with indicators was less than 50% could be the focus of improvement efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Hibbert
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia.
| | - Charlotte J Molloy
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Ian D Cameron
- John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Northern Sydney Local Health District, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Kolling Institute, Reserve Rd, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Leonard C Gray
- Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Princess Alexandra Hospital Campus, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia
| | - Richard L Reed
- Discipline of General Practice, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Louise K Wiles
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- IIMPACT in Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Johanna Westbrook
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Gaston Arnolda
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Rebecca Bilton
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Ruby Ash
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Andrew Georgiou
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Alison Kitson
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Clifford F Hughes
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Susan J Gordon
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Sturt Rd, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Frances Rapport
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| | - Carole Estabrooks
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | | | - Charles Vincent
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Radcliffe Observatory, University of Oxford, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, England, UK
| | - Adrian Edwards
- PRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, 8Th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Andrew Carson-Stevens
- PRIME Centre Wales & Division of Population Medicine, Cardiff University, 8Th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, Wales, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Cordula Wagner
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Otterstraat 118, Utrecht, 3513 CR, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam University Medical Center/VU University, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brendan McCormack
- The Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, City Road, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Jeffrey Braithwaite
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, 75 Talavera Rd, North Ryde, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mayland CR, Keetharuth AD, Mukuria C, Haugen DF. Validation of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODE TM) within an international study exploring bereaved relatives' perceptions about quality of care in the last days of life. J Pain Symptom Manage 2022; 64:e23-e33. [PMID: 35257928 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.02.340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Assessing quality of care provided during the dying phase using validated tools aids quality assurance and recognizes unmet need. OBJECTIVE To assess construct validity and internal consistency of 'Care Of the Dying Evaluation' (CODETM) within an international context. METHODS Post-bereavement survey (August 2017 to September 2018) using CODETM. Respondents were next-of-kin to adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with cancer who had an 'expected' death within 22 study site hospitals in 7 countries: Argentina, Brazil, Germany, Norway, Poland, United Kingdom, Uruguay. Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (EFA and CFA) were conducted, and internal reliability was assessed using Cronbach alpha (α). Known group validity was assessed by ability to discriminate quality of care based in place (Palliative Care Units (PCUs)) and country (Poland, where most deaths were in PCUs) of care. Differences were quantified using effect sizes (ES). RESULTS A 914 CODETM questionnaires completed (54% response rate). 527 (58%) male deceased patients; 610 (67%) next-of-kin female who were most commonly the 'spouse/partner' (411, 45%). EFA identified 4 factors: 'Overall care,' 'Communication and support,' 'Trust, respect and dignity,' and 'Symptom management' with good reliability scores (α = 0.628 - 0.862). CFA confirmed the 4-factor model; these were highly correlated and a bifactor model showed acceptable fit. The ES for quality of care in PCU's was 0.727; ES for Poland was 0.657, supporting the sensitivity of CODETM to detect differences. CONCLUSION Within an international context, good evidence supports the validity and reliability of CODETM for assessing the quality of care provided in the last days of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catriona R Mayland
- Yorkshire Cancer Research Senior Clinical Research Fellow and Honorary Consultant in Palliative Medicine (C.R.M.), University of Sheffield, Honorary Clinical Fellow, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| | - Anju D Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research (A.D.K., C.M.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clara Mukuria
- School of Health and Related Research (A.D.K., C.M.), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dagny Faksvåg Haugen
- Regional Centre of Excellence for Palliative Care, Western Norway (D.F.H.), Haukeland University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine K1, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|