Cytodiagnosis in the management of extrahepatic biliary stricture

Biliary Tree Diagnostics: Advances in Endoscopic Imaging and Tissue Sampling

The diagnostic approach to the biliary tree disorders can be challenging, especially for biliary strictures. Albeit the great diagnostic impact of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) which allows one to obtain fluoroscopic imaging and tissue sampling through brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy, a considerable proportion of cases remain indeterminate, leading to the risk of under/over treated patients. In the last two decades, several endoscopic techniques have been introduced in clinical practice, shrinking cases of uncertainties and improving diagnostic accuracy. The aim of this review is to discuss recent advances and emerging technologies applied to the management of biliary tree disorders through peroral endoscopy procedures.

Optimal tissue sampling during ERCP and emerging molecular techniques for the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures

Patients with cholangiocarcinoma have poor survival since the majority of patients are diagnosed at a stage precluding surgical resection, due to locally irresectable tumors and/or metastases. Optimization of diagnostic strategies, with a principal role for tissue diagnosis, is essential to detect cancers at an earlier stage amenable to curative treatment. Current barriers for a tissue diagnosis include both insufficient tissue sampling and a difficult cyto- or histopathological assessment. During endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, optimal brush sampling includes obtaining more than one brush within an individual patient to increase its diagnostic value. Currently, no significant increase of the diagnostic accuracy for the new cytology brush devices aiming to enhance the cellularity of brushings versus standard biliary brush devices has been demonstrated. Peroral cholangioscopy with bile duct biopsies appears to be a valuable tool in the diagnostic work-up of indeterminate biliary strictures, and may overcome current technical difficulties of fluoroscopic-guided biopsies. Over the past years, molecular techniques to detect chromosomal instability, mutations and methylation profiling of tumors have revolutionized, and implementation of these techniques on biliary tissue during diagnostic work-up of biliary strictures may be awaited in the near future. Fluorescence in situ hybridization has already been implemented in routine diagnostic evaluation of biliary strictures in several centers. Next-generation sequencing is promising for standard diagnostic care in biliary strictures, and recent studies have shown adequate detection of prevalent genomic alterations in KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4, PIK3CA, and GNAS on biliary brush material. Detection of DNA methylation of tumor suppressor genes and microRNAs may evolve over the coming years to a valuable diagnostic tool for cholangiocarcinoma. This review summarizes optimal strategies for biliary tissue sampling during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and focuses on the evolving molecular techniques on biliary tissue to improve the differentiation of benign and malignant biliary strictures.

Diagnostic Process Using Endoscopy for Biliary Strictures: A Narrative Review

The diagnostic process for biliary strictures remains challenging in some cases. A broad differential diagnosis exists for indeterminate biliary strictures, including benign or malignant lesions. The diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures requires a combination of physical examination, laboratory testing, imaging modalities, and endoscopic procedures. Despite the progress of less invasive imaging modalities such as transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy plays an essential role in the accurate diagnosis, including the histological diagnosis. Imaging findings and brush cytology and/or forceps biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are widely used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. However, ERCP cannot provide an intraluminal view of the biliary lesion, and its outcomes are not satisfactory. Recently, peroral cholangioscopy, confocal laser endomicroscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration have been reported as useful for indeterminate biliary strictures. Appropriate endoscopic modalities need to be selected according to the patient's condition, the lesion, and the expertise of the endoscopist. The aim of this review article is to discuss the diagnostic process for indeterminate biliary strictures using endoscopy.

Tiny but mighty: use of next generation sequencing on discarded cytocentrifuged bile duct brushing specimens to increase sensitivity of cytological diagnosis

Bile duct brushing (BDB) is used to evaluate pancreatobiliary lesions as it widely samples lesions with a low complication rate. Cytological evaluation of BDB is a specific but insensitive test. There is limited literature on the use of post-cytocentrifuged (PCC) samples, which are usually discarded, for next-generation sequencing (NGS) as an adjunct to cytological diagnosis of BDB. In this study we investigate whether molecular analysis by NGS of PCC specimens improves the sensitivity of diagnosis. PCC samples from 100 consecutive BDB specimens spanning 93 unique patients were retained. DNA was extracted and mutational analysis was performed agnostic of morphologic or clinical findings. Each BDB specimen was characterized as negative, atypical or positive based on morphological analysis by trained cytopathologists. Performance characteristics for mutational profiling and morphological analysis were calculated on the basis of clinicopathologic follow-up. There was sufficient clinicopathologic follow-up to classify 94 of 100 cases as either malignant (n = 43) or benign (n = 51). Based on morphologic analysis of cytology, these 94 cases were classified as either benign (n = 55), atypical (n = 18), or as at least suspicious or positive for malignancy (n = 21). Morphologic analysis of cytology showed a sensitivity of 49% and a specificity of 100% if atypical cases were considered negative. NGS revealed oncogenic alterations in 40/43 (93%) of malignant cases based on clinicopathologic follow-up. The most common alterations were in KRAS and TP53, observed in 77% and 49% of malignant cases respectively. No alterations were observed in the 51 benign cases classified based on clinicopathologic follow-up. Supplementing cytomorphologic analysis with molecular profiling of PCC by targeted NGS analysis increased the sensitivity to 93% and maintained specificity at 100%. This study provides evidence for the utility of NGS molecular profiling of PCC specimens to increase the sensitivity of BDB cytology samples, although studies with larger cohorts are needed to verify these findings.

Endoscopic Perspective in Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnostic Process

Cholangiocarcinoma is a malignancy arising from the epithelial lining of the intrahepatic or extrahepatic biliary tract. Timely diagnosis is challenging due to its silent clinical course. As reliable laboratory markers are lacking, diagnostic imaging plays a pivotal role. While cross-sectional imaging studies are usually conclusive for intrahepatic lesions, endoscopy plays an essential role in cases of extrahepatic tumors. Rational utilization of different diagnostic methods based on available evidence is needed. This article focuses on the diagnostic role of advanced biliary endoscopy, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, cholangioscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and intraductal sonography.

Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Bile Cytology Using a Newly Designed Biliary Scraper for Biliary Strictures

BACKGROUND

A new device with metallic wires for scrape cytology was developed.

AIMS

To compare the diagnostic performance of scrape cytology and conventional cytology during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary strictures.

METHODS

A total of 420 cases with biliary stricture underwent transpapillary bile cytology. Among them, there are 79 cases with scrape cytology using the new device (scrape group) and 341 cases with conventional cytology (control group). Seventy-two and 174 cases underwent biliary biopsy at the same time as bile cytology in the scrape and control group, respectively.

RESULTS

The sensitivity for malignancy of bile cytology in the scrape and control group was 41.2% [pancreatic cancer (PC): 23.1%, biliary cancer (BC): 52.5%] and 27.1% (PC: 16.3%, BC: 38.0%), respectively (P = 0.023). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between the two groups. In the both groups, the sensitivity was significantly higher for BC than PC. In the scrape group, there was no difference in the sensitivity between cytology and biopsy [39.7% (PC: 17.4%, BC: 55.3%)], but in the control group, a significantly lower sensitivity was observed with cytology than biopsy (36.4% (PC: 19.7%, BC: 50.0%)) (P = 0.046). When analyzed PC and BC, respectively, there was no significant difference between cytology and biopsy. The sensitivity of combined cytology and biopsy was 55.6% (PC: 30.4%, BC: 71.1%) in the scrape group and 47.0% (PC: 24.6%, BC: 64.3%) in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Scrape bile cytology for biliary strictures may be superior to conventional cytology.

Diagnosis of Malignant Biliary Strictures: Conventional or Negative Pressure Brush Cytology?

Background/Objective: The aim of this study was to perform a comparative evaluation of the yields of conventional brush cytology and brush cytology with negative pressure in the diagnosis of malignant biliary strictures. Methods: A total of 132 consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic were identified. Of these, 88.0 had brush cytology after ERCP and 44 were Brush cytology with negative pressure. Retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) including brush cytology and brush cytology with negative pressure in patients with biliary strictures between 2012-2015. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed with a standard videoduodenoscope Olympus TFJ 160-R (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) and brush cytology with a Cook medical Double Lumen Biliary BrushTM (Cytology). Means and standard frequencies were used to calculate variables. Results: Positive results for malignancy were obtained in 22 of 88 patients (25%) by brush cytology and 31 of 44 patients (70.4 %) by brush cytology with negative pressure. Conclusions: Sensitivity of cytology sampling could be maximized by negative pressure during ERCP.

The diagnostic value of brush cytology alone and in combination with tumor markers in pancreaticobiliary strictures

Aim. Differentiation of malignant and benign strictures constitutes a problem despite the increasing experience of the endoscopists, radiologists, and pathologists. The aim of our study is to determine the factors that affect the efficacy of the ERCP guided brush cytology in PBS and to evaluate its diagnostic success when used alone and together with tumor markers. Method. The data from brush cytologies of 301 PBS patients were collected retrospectively and analyzed. The final diagnosis was approved based on the histological examination of the tissue taken surgically or by other methods. In the absence of a histological diagnosis, the final diagnosis was based on radiological studies or the results of a 12-month clinical follow up. Results. A total of 28 patients were excluded from the study. From the remaining 273 patients 299 samples were analyzed. The sensitivity and the specificity of brush cytology in diagnosing malignancy are 62.4% and 97.7, respectively. The sensitivity of brush cytology increased to 94.1% when combined with CA-19.9 and CA-125. Conclusion. Brush cytology is a useful method in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary strictures. Advanced age, stricture dilatation before sampling, the presence of a mass identified by radiological studies, high levels of CA-19.9, ALT, and total bilirubin increase the sensitivity of brush cytology.

Triple modality testing by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

Brush cytology has a low sensitivity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. This study aimed to compare the standard approach (brush cytology) with a triple modality approach utilizing brush cytology, forceps biopsy and fluorescence in situ hybridization in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

In a retrospective study at a single academic center, 50 patients underwent triple modality testing. Additionally, 61 patients underwent brush cytology alone. Intervention was endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with brush cytology, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and forceps biopsy. The main outcome measures included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 patients underwent triple tissue sampling, and 61 patients underwent brush cytology alone. Twenty-two patients were eventually diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma. Brush cytology had a sensitivity of 42%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 88%. Triple tissue sampling had an overall sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 87%. Within the triple test group, brush cytology had a sensitivity of 27%, forceps biopsy had a sensitivity of 50%, and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis had a sensitivity of 59%.

CONCLUSIONS

A triple modality approach results in a marked increase in sensitivity for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma compared with single modality testing such as brush cytology and should be considered in the evaluation of indeterminate or suspicious biliary strictures.

Plasma miR-21 is a novel diagnostic biomarker for biliary tract cancer

Biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a generally poor prognosis. Furthermore, it is difficult to distinguish BTC from benign biliary disease (BBD) with commonly used modalities. Therefore, a novel biomarker to facilitate cancer detection is highly desirable. Recent studies have reported the use of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers for cancers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether circulating miRNA-21 (miR-21) could be used as a biomarker for BTC. Plasma samples were obtained from 94 BTC patients, 50 healthy volunteers (HVs), and 23 BBD patients. miR-21 levels in the samples were measured by qRT-PCR. Plasma miR-21 levels in patients with BTC were significantly higher than in HVs or in patients with BBD (P < 0.0001 for both). Receiver-operator curve (ROC) curve analysis in differentiating BTC patients from HVs indicated that area under the curve (AUC), optimal sensitivity and specificity was 0.93, 85.1% and 100%, respectively, and those in differentiating BTC patients from BBD patients was 0.83, 72.3%, 91.3%, respectively. Validation of these results indicated that the negative predictive value, positive predictive value, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in differentiating BTC patients from HVs was 76.6%, 98.6%, 84.0%, 98.0%, and 88.9%, respectively, and those in differentiating BTC patients from BBD patients was 42.2%, 93.0%, 71.2%, 82.6%, and 72.6%, respectively. These sets of values were improved by combining miR-21 and CA19-9 measurements. Plasma miR-21 is a novel diagnostic biomarker for BTC, and may be useful in distinguishing between BTC and BBD patients.

Management of primary sclerosing cholangitis: conventions and controversies

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory cholangiopathy that results in fibrotic strictures and dilations of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts. PSC is uncommon, occurs predominantly in males and has a strong association with inflammatory bowel disease. While the pathogenesis of PSC has not been fully elucidated, emerging evidence supports roles for the innate and adaptive immune systems, and genome-wide analyses have identified several genetic associations. Using the best available evidence, the present review summarizes the current understanding of the diagnosis, pathogenesis and management of PSC. Despite its rarity, there is an urgent need for collaborative research efforts to advance therapeutic options for PSC beyond liver transplantation.

Fluorescence in situ hybridisation in the cytological diagnosis of pancreatobiliary tumours

AIMS

To assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and conventional cytology in identifying bile duct stricture malignancies.

METHODS

Brushing samples were collected from 64 patients by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and assessed cytologically and by means of a multi-probe FISH set. The cytological diagnoses were: positive, negative and suspicious, whereas criteria for FISH positivity were: more than five polysomic cells or more than 10 trisomic cells for chromosomes 3 or 7.

RESULTS

Forty-eight of the 64 patients showed histological or clinical signs of malignancy. The sensitivity of cytology was high (77%) if suspicious cases were considered positive, but was significantly lower than that of FISH if suspicious cases were considered negative (58% versus 90%; p < 0.05). The specificity of cytology was 81% (positive and suspicious) or 100% (negative and suspicious), and the specificity of FISH was 94% (p = 1). FISH yielded one false negative result (isolated chromosome 7 trisomy). FISH allowed a definite diagnosis of 9/12 cytologically inconclusive cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest using FISH in the case of bile duct strictures cytologically negative or inconclusive; a FISH diagnosis of malignancy should only be made in the presence of polysomic pattern.

Endoscopic diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: Advances and current limitations

The accurate diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma is difficult, even now. When ultrasonography (US) shows dilatation of the bile duct, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography followed by endoscopic US (EUS) is the next step. When US or EUS shows localized bile duct wall thickening, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography should be conducted with intraductal US (IDUS) and forceps biopsy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization increases the sensitivity of brush cytology with similar specificity. In patients with papillary type bile duct carcinoma, three biopsies are sufficient. In patients with nodular or infiltrating-type bile duct carcinoma, multiple biopsies are warranted, and IDUS can compensate for the limitations of biopsies. In preoperative staging, the combination of dynamic multi-detector low computed tomography (MDCT) and IDUS is useful for evaluating vascular invasion and cancer depth infiltration. However, assessment of lymph nodes metastases is difficult. In resectable cases, assessment of longitudinal cancer spread is important. The combination of IDUS and MDCT is useful for revealing submucosal cancer extension, which is common in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. To estimate the mucosal extension, which is common in extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, the combination of IDUS and cholangioscopy is required. The utility of current peroral cholangioscopy is limited by the maneuverability of the “baby scope”. A new baby scope (10 Fr), called “SpyGlass” has potential, if the image quality can be improved. Since extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma is common in the Far East, many researchers in Japan and Korea contributed these studies, especially, in the evaluation of longitudinal cancer extension.

Cholangiopancreatoscopy for targeted biopsies of the bile and pancreatic ducts

Establishing a tissue diagnosis in patients with suspected pancreaticobiliary malignancies remains challenging. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-based sampling methods have been reviewed in a previous issue of this journal but, unfortunately, the diagnostic yield continues to be inadequate in a significant minority of patients. The availability and image quality of cholangioscopy and pancreatoscopy have advanced in the last few years and our ability to make a diagnosis on imaging alone is improving. However, a definitive diagnosis requires tissue; cholangiopancreatoscopy allows targeted biopsies of the epithelium of the biliary and pancreatic ducts. This article reviews the evidence that cholangioscopy- and pancreatoscopy-guided biopsies improves diagnostic yield over ERCP-based tissue sampling techniques.

Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: An expanding scope of possibility

Intraductal endoscopy describes the use of an endoscope to directly visualize the biliary and pancreatic ducts. For many years, technological challenges have made performing these procedures difficult. The “mother-baby” system and other various miniscopes have been developed, but routine use has been hampered due to complex setup, scope fragility and the time consuming, technically demanding nature of the procedure. Recently, the SpyGlass peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system has shown early success at providing diagnostic information and therapeutic options. The clinical utility of intraductal endoscopy is broad. It allows better differentiation between benign and malignant processes by allowing direct visualization and targeted sampling of tissue. Therapeutic interventions, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser lithotripsy, photodynamic therapy, and argon plasma coagulation (APC), may also be performed as part of intraductal endoscopy. Intraductal endoscopy significantly increases the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP), and as technology progresses, it is likely that its utilization will only increase. In this review of intraductal endoscopy, we describe in detail the various endoscopic platforms and their diagnostic and clinical applications.

Diagnosis of biliary tract lesions by histological sectioning of brush bristles as alternative to cytological smearing

AIM

To increase the diagnostic potential of endoscopic biliary tract brushing, we devised an approach alternative to cytological smearing, leading to the preoperative histological examination of the collected material.

METHODS

One hundred twelve consecutive biliary brush specimens were included. All patients presented a stricture of the biliary tract, leading to a diagnostic procedure by brushing. Immediately following brushing, the endoscopist immersed the brush into methanol and sent it to the pathology laboratory. The brush was introduced into a cassette for paraffin embedding and sections parallel to the long axis of brush were cut until the metal wire was almost reached, then the block was rotated and new sections were obtained from the opposite side. Samples of the mucosa, inflammatory cell aggregates, small fragments of carcinomas, or isolated cells were observed, and displayed an optimal fixation, allowing a definite diagnosis that proved mandatory for therapy in the vast majority of cases (99.1%).

RESULTS

The results obtained in 112 consecutive cases using such technique compared with final histological diagnosis proved: 91% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% positive predictive value (PPV), and 87% negative predictive value (NPV) (P < 0.001). In nonoperated patients, the clinical diagnosis after at least 6 months of follow-up showed: 95.5% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 100% PPV, and 88.2% NPV (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Such novel approach to the preoperative diagnosis of biliary tract lesions proved to be highly sensitive and specific, limiting the inadequate preoperative diagnoses to less than 1%.

Pancreatic and bile duct brushing cytology in 1000 cases: review of findings and comparison of preparation methods

BACKGROUND

Duct brushing cytology is an important tool in evaluation of the extrahepatic biliary tract and large pancreatic ducts. The emergence of neoadjuvant therapies underscores the importance of accurate preoperative diagnosis by noninvasive means. Liquid-based preparation methods, such as ThinPrep, have become popular for nongynecologic cytology specimens.

METHODS

Findings from bile and pancreatic duct brushings were reviewed over the 10-year period of 1994-2003. Cytologic material, imaging reports, and clinical data were reviewed and pathologic and clinical follow-up data were obtained. The slides were prepared by direct smear only (18.8%), direct smear plus cytospin (14.4%), or direct smear plus ThinPrep (66.8%).

RESULTS

A total of 1118 specimens were identified (1008 bile duct, 110 pancreatic duct) from 864 patients. The cytologic findings were: 53.5% negative, 16.5% malignant, 18.2% suspicious for malignancy, 11% atypical/inconclusive, 0.8% inadequate. Follow-up in the form of either histology or at least 6 months clinical observation was available for 82.2% of cases (n = 971). Overall operating characteristics were: 52.6% sensitivity, 99.4% specificity, 98.9% positive predictive value, 67.1% negative predictive value, and 75.7% accuracy. Diagnostic agreement between cytology and follow-up was the main variable analyzed. Agreement was significantly affected by characteristics of the sampled lesion, with ductal narrowing having the lowest rate of malignancy. In addition, the ThinPrep method showed superior sensitivity and accuracy compared with other preparation methods (P = .02). Nonsignificant associations were noted for patient age and gender, site of lesion, and the presence of either stones or prior stent.

CONCLUSION

In a large dataset from a single institution, brushing cytology showed modest sensitivity and high specificity. Diagnostic agreement was considerably better for benign cases. The combination of direct smear and the ThinPrep method showed superior sensitivity and accuracy.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA biopsy of bile duct and gallbladder: analysis of 53 cases

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP)-guided brushing has been the standard of practice for surveillance and detection of carcinoma in the biliary tree. Few studies have evaluated the role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing clinically suspected cholangiocarcinoma. The role of this method in diagnosing clinically suspected gallbladder malignancies has not been extensively evaluated in the USA. This study investigates the role of EUS-FNA in the diagnosis of clinically suspected biliary tree and gallbladder malignancies in a large patient series.

METHODS

EUS-FNAs were obtained from 46 bile duct and seven gallbladder lesions. On-site rapid interpretation was provided using air-dried Diff Quik stained smears. In addition, alcohol fixed Papanicoloau stained smears and Thin Prep preparations (Cytye Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA) were evaluated before providing a final cytological diagnosis. Tissue biopsies and/or clinical follow-up were used as the standards to determine operating characteristics for EUS-FNA.

RESULTS

The mean ages for bile duct and gallbladder lesions were 66 years (range: 37-84 years), and 69 years (range 49-86 years), respectively. All cases diagnosed as suspicious/malignant on preliminary evaluation were confirmed on final cytological interpretation (27/27). The operating characteristics show that EUS-FNA is highly specific (100%) with sensitivity rates of 87% and 80% from clinically suspected malignancies of biliary tract and gallbladder, respectively. Sampling error in three cases and associated acute inflammation in two cases resulted in false-negative diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA of biliary tree and gallbladder carcinoma is highly specific and should be considered for evaluation of clinically suspicious lesions. Marked inflammation may result in false-negative diagnoses.

Palliative management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Around 80% of the patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma are candidates for palliative management due to extensive co-morbidity for major surgery, metastases or advanced loco-regional disease. The primary aim of treatment is to provide biliary drainage with long-term relief from pruritus, cholangitis, pain and jaundice. Endoscopically placed self-expanding metallic biliary stent has low procedure-related complications and is probably the modality of choice for patients with unresectable tumour on preoperative assessment. Percutaneous biliary drainage has comparable results and is an alternative when endoscopic expertise is not available or has failed or there are multiple isolated segments with cholangitis. Surgical cholangiojejunostomy provides lasting biliary drainage but has limitations of associated morbidity and mortality. In the absence of high-quality studies, comparing these modalities the choice of biliary drainage procedure should be guided by the available local expertise. Other modalities of treatment like radiotherapy, chemotherapy and photodynamic therapy currently remain investigational.

Phenotypic diversity of intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy: case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CC) represents approximately 10% of primary liver malignancies and can mimic metastatic adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed the cytopathology files at the University of Texas Medical Branch to identify patients who were diagnosed with intrahepatic or extrahepatic CC by aspiration cytology between 1995 and 2004. Brush cytology specimens of extrahepatic CC were excluded. All diagnoses were confirmed as CC by clinical, imaging, and histopathologic findings and by chart review.

RESULTS

Cytopathology files from 13 patients with CC diagnosed by FNA were retrieved. The male:female ratio was 5:8, and the patients ranged in age from 29 years to 74 years (mean age, 59 years). In 12 of 13 patients, aspirates were obtained by ultrasound guidance; and, in 1 patient, computed tomography guidance was used. Three patients had aspirates only, 10 patients also had core biopsies, and 1 patient had cell block preparations. The phenotypic distribution of CC according to the World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification was 9 adenocarcinoma (intrahepatic), not otherwise specified (NOS) (69%); 2 gastric foveolar type (extrahepatic) CCs (15%); 1 intestinal type (extrahepatic) CC (8%); and 1 sarcomatous/spindle cell type (intrahepatic) CC (8%). One adenocarcinoma, NOS was well differentiated CC with bland tubular architecture, and one was pleomorphic. Ancillary histochemical and immunochemical stains were performed on 5 of 13 specimens, which included 4 core biopsies and 1 aspirate with Mucicarmine positivity (3 specimens), carcinoembryonic antigen positivity (3 specimens), and a cytokeratin 7 (CK7)-positive/CK20-negative pattern (2 specimens). The 1 sarcomatous/spindle cell type CC was chromogranin-negative and low molecular weight keratin (cell adhesion molecule 5.2)-positive, which excluded metastatic carcinoid.

CONCLUSIONS

Classification of intrahepatic and extrahepatic CC in aspiration cytology specimens was achieved in a reliable manner concordant with the WHO histologic classification. Special types of CC with bland nuclear features posed a diagnostic challenge on cytologic evaluation, particularly the well differentiated CC with tubular architecture and the gastric foveolar type CC with mucin-producing tumor cells. The addition of core biopsy and/or ancillary studies, such as histochemical and immunochemical stains, were helpful in reaching the correct diagnosis.

A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the relative sensitivities and specificities of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and routine cytology for the detection of malignancy in biliary tract strictures.

METHODS

Bile duct brushing and aspirate specimens were collected from 131 patients being evaluated for possible malignant bile duct strictures. Both specimen types were assessed by FISH but only brushing specimens were assessed by cytology. The FISH assay used a mixture of fluorescently-labeled probes to the centromeres of chromosomes 3, 7, and 17 and chromosomal band 9p21 (Vysis UroVysion) to identify cells having chromosomal abnormalities. A case was considered positive for malignancy if five or more cells exhibited polysomy.

RESULTS

Sixty-six of the 131 patients had surgical pathologic and/or clinical evidence of malignancy. Thirty-nine patients had cholangiocarcinoma, 19 had pancreatic carcinoma, and 8 had other types of malignancy. The sensitivity of cytology and FISH for the detection of malignancy in bile duct brushing specimens in these patients was 15% and 34% (p < 0.01), respectively. The sensitivity of FISH for the bile aspirate specimens was 23%, and the combined sensitivity of FISH for aspirate and brushing specimens was 35%. The specificity of FISH and cytology brushings were 91% and 98% (p= 0.06), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH is significantly more sensitive than and nearly as specific as conventional cytology for the detection of malignant biliary strictures in biliary brushing specimens. FISH may improve the clinical management of patients who are being evaluated for malignancy in bile duct strictures.

ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study

BACKGROUND

The accuracy of ERCP-based brush cytology or forceps biopsy for tissue diagnosis is relatively low (usually not exceeding 70%). By contrast, reported accuracy rates for EUS-guided FNA of pancreatobiliary masses are over 80%. This prospective study compared these two modalities for the first time in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures and pancreatic tumors.

METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients (29 men, 21 women; mean age 62.1 years) with obstructive jaundice in whom a tissue diagnosis was required were included. During ERCP, intraductal specimens were obtained with a forceps and with two different types of brush (conventional and spiral suction) in random order. During EUS, only visible mass lesions or localized bile duct wall thickening were aspirated (22-gauge needle), with at least two passes yielding material sufficient for assessment. A cytopathologist was not present in the procedure room to evaluate specimen adequacy. The reference methods were surgery, other biopsy results, follow-up until death, or the conclusion of the study (mean follow-up 20 months).

RESULTS

The final diagnoses were malignancy, 28 (16 pancreatic, 12 biliary), and benign biliary stricture, 22. Sensitivity and specificity for ERCP-guided biopsy were 36% and 100%, respectively; for ERCP-guided cytology (when using conventional and spiral suction brushes), 46% and 100%, respectively; and for EUS-guided FNA, 43% and 100%, respectively. If the punctured lesions are considered (n=28) alone, the sensitivity of EUS-guided FNA was 75%. In general, sensitivity was better for ERCP-based techniques in the subgroup biliary tumor (ERCP 75% vs. EUS 25%), whereas EUS-guided biopsy was superior for pancreatic mass (EUS 60% vs. ERCP 38%).

CONCLUSIONS

For biliary strictures, combined ERCP- and EUS-guided tissue acquisition seems to be the best approach to tissue diagnosis. From a clinical standpoint, it appears reasonable, when a tissue diagnosis is required, to start with ERCP if biliary malignancy is suspected and with EUS when a pancreatic tumor is thought to be the cause of a biliary stricture.

Biliary brushing cytology

Biliary tract brush specimens are fast becoming the method of choice in the evaluation of patients who present with biliary tract strictures. Although the specificity is high, sensitivity rates for the detection of malignancy are generally low on cytological sampling. New liquid-based preparations and ancillary tests have emerged with the intent of addressing this issue. This review focuses on the current schemata used in the diagnosis of biliary tract lesions and the current available modalities which aid in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Improving diagnostic yield of biliary brushings cytology for pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma

Biliary brushings are currently the best accepted method to obtain a cytological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. The technique has good specificity but poor sensitivity. Two dedicated pathologists reviewed 137 consecutive biliary brushings from 127 patients between February 1997 and February 2000. The ultimate diagnosis was determined by review of radiology, operative diagnosis and patient outcome. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the original results and the review results were calculated and compared. Additional diagnostic categories 'suspicious' and 'atypical possibly benign' were included on review. After review, the sensitivity improved from 49.4% to 89.0% and the specificity remained 100%. The use of the additional diagnostic category 'suspicious' increased the sensitivity to 90.4%, at the expense of a fall of the specificity to 66.7%. We conclude that review by two dedicated pathologists and additional diagnostic categories can improve the diagnostic accuracy of biliary brushings.

Utility of serum CA19-9 in diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma: In comparison with CEA

AIM: The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult, making management approaches problematic. A reliable serum marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful diagnostic test. The aims of our study were to evaluate the usefulness of a serum CA19-9 determination in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS: We prospectively measured serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n = 35), benign biliary diseases (n = 92), and healthy individuals (n = 15). Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS: The sensitivity of a CA19-9 value > 37 KU·L^-1 and a CEA value > 22 μg·L^-1 in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma were 77.14% and 68.57%, respectively. When compared with the benign biliary diseases group, the true negative rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 84.78% and 81.52%, respectively. The false positive rates of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 15.22% and 18.48%, whereas the accuracy of serum CA19-9 and CEA were 82.68% and 77.95%, respectively. Serum CA19-9 and CEA concentrations were significantly elevated (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05) in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (290.31 ± 5.34 KU·L^-1 and 36.46 ± 18.03 μg·L^-1) compared with patients with benign biliary diseases (13.38 ± 2.59 KU·L^-1 and 13.84 ± 3.85 μg·L^-1) and healthy individuals (12.78 ± 3.69 KU·L^-1 and 11.48 ± 3.37 μg·L^-1). In 15 patients undergoing curative resection of cholangiocarcinoma, the mean serum CA19-9 concentration was decreased from a preoperative level of 286.41 ± 4.36 KU·L^-1 to a postoperative level of 62.01 ± 17.43 KU·L^-1 (P < 0.001), and the mean serum CEA concentration from 39.41 ± 24.35 μg·L^-1 to 28.69 ± 11.03 μg·L^-1(P < 0.05). In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, however, no correlation was found between serum CEA and CA19-9 concentrations (r = 0.036).

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the serum CA19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Serum CA19-9 is an effective tumor marker in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma, deciding whether the tumor has been radically resected and monitoring effect of treatment.

Clinical manifestation of opisthorchiasis and treatment

This paper presents an overview of recent progress in the clinical study of opisthorchiasis and treatment. Details of clinical manifestations of opisthorchiasis, hepatobiliary diseases and liver functions, community-based ultrasound study, treatment efficacy, and future study are discussed.

Differential diagnosis of intrahepatic bile duct dilatation without demonstrable mass on ultrasonography or CT: benign versus malignancy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to define the differential diagnostic markers of benign and malignant bile duct strictures without demonstrable mass on ultrasonography (US) or computed tomography (CT) using aspects of clinical, laboratory and imaging findings.

METHODS

Between February 1995 and February 2001, 24 patients who underwent surgical resection for dilations of the bile duct (peripheral and hilar) without visible mass lesion on US or CT were included in our study. Hospital records, laboratory results, findings of imaging studies and pathological findings were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

For laboratory results, levels of alkaline phosphatase (benign 163.9 +/- 145.1 vs malignant 407.25 +/- 481.7; p < 0.05) and CA 19-9 (benign 25.0 +/- 41.1 vs malignant 614.6 +/- 818.5; p < 0.05) levels were significantly elevated in the malignant group compared with that of the benign group. Findings such as thickening of the bile duct wall >/= 5 mm (P < 0.05) on radiological examination, significant regional lymph node enlargement (> 1 cm, p = 0.01) on CT scan and abrupt cut-off (P < 0.01), and separation of bile ducts (P < 0.05) on cholangiogram were differential diagnostic markers between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative laboratory data such as alkaline phosphatase and CA 19-9, and imaging findings such as significant wall thickening and regional lymph node enlargement on CT, abrupt cut-off and separation of bile duct on cholangiogram are useful differential diagnostic markers for benign and malignant bile duct strictures without demonstrable mass on US or CT.

Innovative methods of biliary tract diagnosis: intraductal ultrasound and tissue acquisition

Tissue can be acquired from the bile and pancreatic duct with either brush cytology or biopsy forceps, often without the need for sphincterotomy. Although the diagnosis of malignancy with these sampling techniques is often specific, the sensitivity is limited, and a wide range of diagnostic accuracies has been reported. A combination of biopsy and brush cytology along with some newer techniques in the development stage may increase the sensitivity. Intraductal ultrasound is a newer technique offers the endoscopist the ability to image the bile and pancreatic duct wall, adjacent organs, and vascular structures with a high degree of detail. This visualization can be accomplished during the course of an ERCP or percutaneously under fluoroscopic guidance. Indications for the procedure include detection of choledocholithiasis, differentiation of benign and malignant ductal strictures, pancreaticobiliary tumor staging, and detection of various pancreatic tumors. Continued research into the design of the probes, which could improve durability and extend the depth of penetration, may promote more widespread use of this novel technology.

Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction

BACKGROUND

The sensitivity for cancer detection of brush cytology at ERCP is relatively low. Manipulation of the stricture and repeated tissue sampling may increase the yield. This study compared the cancer detection rate of brush cytology before and after biliary stricture dilation.

METHODS

In patients with a biliary stricture at ERCP of suspected malignant origin, the stricture was sampled with a cytology brush and then dilated with either a graduated dilating catheter or a dilating balloon (4-8 mm). Brushing was then repeated in all patients. Specimens were interpreted as normal, atypical (benign), highly atypical (suspicious for cancer), and malignant. Final diagnoses were based on cytology plus surgery, EUS, percutaneous biopsy, autopsy, or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients with suspected malignant obstructive jaundice underwent 143 ERCPs (116 ultimately found to have malignant obstruction, and 27 benign disease). Dilation was performed with a catheter in 68 cases, balloon in 73, and both in 2. Brush cytology had a sensitivity of 34.5% (40/116) before dilation and 31% (36/116) after dilation (p = NS). However, sensitivity with predilation and postdilation brushing specimens combined was 44% (51/116), which was higher than that for either the predilation or postdilation brush cytology (p = 0.001). Cancer detection rates were 34.7% (17/49) after dilation with the catheter and 27.7% (18/65) after balloon dilation (p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Stricture dilation does not improve the sensitivity of brush cytology for the detection of cancer, which remains relatively low. However, repeat brushing increases the diagnostic yield and should be performed when sampling biliary strictures with a cytology brush at ERCP.

Cytologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma in biliary and pancreatic duct brushings

Biliary and pancreatic duct brush specimens are relatively uncommon specimens seen by pathologists. Not only can the findings of malignancy be subtle, the implications of a malignant diagnosis can be significant. This review focuses on cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma sampled by endoscopic brush cytology, with an emphasis on diagnostic criteria for adenocarcinoma. In addition, assessment of specimen adequacy, utilization of liquid-based preparations, molecular diagnosis, and timing of liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis are also briefly discussed.

FDG PET in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Resectional surgery offers a curative intent and a survival benefit for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, but is associated with high morbidity. Since morphological imaging cannot solve differential diagnosis preoperatively, in order to exclude patients inappropriate to this aggressive surgery, we evaluated the impact of functional imaging using fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) in the detection of cholangiocarcinoma and its usefulness in the differentiation from benign Klatskin tumour-mimicking lesions. Fifteen consecutive patients aged 47-78 years underwent standardized whole-body FDG PET with attenuation correction before potentially curative surgery using a conventional full-ring PET scanner with an axial field-of-view of 16.2 cm. FDG PET was evaluated visually and semiquantitatively using tumour-to-background ratios (T/B) ratios. All lesions were evaluated histopathologically. FDG PET presumed to be indicative for carcinoma was positive in 12 of 15 patients, true positive in 10 (T/B ratio, 3.2+/-1.9) and false positive in two of them (T/B ratios, 2.1 and 2.8) with Klatskin tumour-mimicking lesions. While all true positive PET results were seen in the tubular type of cholangiocarcinoma with a high amount of tumour cells and only low production of mucus, a false negative FDG PET in three patients was observed in mucinous adenocarcinoma. Additionally, FDG PET detected locoregional lymph nodes in two patients and distant metastases in a further three patients. Due to false positive results FDG PET does not allow the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, and FDG PET should be avoided in patients with mucinous cholangiocarcinoma. However, FDG PET may have significant influence on the treatment strategy in as much as 20% of the patients, since it may detect distant metastases.

DNA image analysis combined with routine cytology improves diagnostic sensitivity of common bile duct brushing

BACKGROUND

Cytologic evaluation of common bile duct brushings has a low sensitivity for diagnosing malignancy because of scant cellularity, poor cellular preservation, or sampling errors occur. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether cytology combined with image analysis improves the diagnostic accuracy of bile duct brushing in comparison with cytology alone.

METHODS

Forty-nine specimens of bile duct brushings obtained from 45 patients during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were evaluated using cytology and image analysis. Specimens were classified as negative, atypical, suspicious, or malignant by using cytologic evaluation. DNA histograms were classified as diploid (D), broad diploid (BD), aneuploid (A), or tetraploid (T). Degree of hyperploidy (DH), representing cells with a DNA content > 5C was evaluated using a cutoff value of > or = 1%. Final diagnosis of cancer was based on tissue specimens that were obtained by fine-needle aspiration or surgical biopsy and clinical fol- low-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients ultimately proved to have a malignancy. Cytology revealed 19 negative cases, 15 atypical cases, 9 suspicious cases, and 6 malignant cases. Together, suspicious and malignant cytology cases yielded a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 100% for a cytologic diagnosis of cancer. The DNA histogram pattern was D in 24 cases, BD in 9 cases, and A in 16 cases. BD and A patterns were significantly associated with malignancy (P < 0.001). A DH > or = 1% was noted in 22 cases. DH alone had a sensitivity of 62% and a specificity of 91% and was significantly associated with malignancy (P < 0.004). Atypical cytology alone had a false-negative rate of 29%, but in combination with a DH > or = 1%, the false-negative rate decreased to 7%. Additionally, when the authors combined atypical, suspicious, and malignant cytology with a DH > or = 1%, the diagnostic sensitivity increased to 88%, but the specificity decreased to 73%.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined cytology and image analysis of bile duct brushing increased diagnostic sensitivity compared with cytology alone. The findings suggest that image analysis may help select patients having atypical cytology who should undergo a more rigorous evaluation for malignancy. A larger prospective study of the usefulness of combined cytology and image analysis of bile duct brushing is warranted.

Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases

AIMS

To assess the accuracy of brush cytology in patients investigated for pancreatico-biliary strictures.

METHODS

All pancreatico-biliary brush cytology specimens submitted from two major teaching hospitals over a 6.5 year period were reviewed. Four hundred and forty eight satisfactory specimens from 406 patients with adequate clinical and/or pathological follow up data were examined in the study period.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty six patients (60.6%) were shown to have neoplastic strictures. One hundred and forty seven tumours were identified cytologically, including 87 of 146 pancreatic carcinomas, 29 of 47 cholangiocarcinomas, one of one bile duct adenoma, four of seven carcinomas of the gallbladder, eight of 13 ampullary carcinomas, two of three ampullary adenomas, 10 of 16 malignancies of undetermined origin, none of two islet cell tumours, one of three hepatocellular carcinomas, and five of eight metastatic tumours. The three adenomas identified on brush cytology could not be distinguished from adenocarcinoma morphologically. One hundred and sixty patients (39.4%) had benign strictures, most often as a result of chronic pancreatitis and bile duct stones. There were three false positive cytological diagnoses mainly as a result of the misinterpretation of cases with relatively scant and/or degenerative atypical epithelial cells. Forty one cases were reported as atypical or suspicious of malignancy on brush cytology, of which 29 were ultimately shown to have carcinoma. The overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 59.8% and 98.1%, respectively. The sensitivity increased from 44.3% in the initial third of cases to 70.7% in the final third of cases examined in the series.

CONCLUSIONS

Brush cytology, in conjunction with other clinical and radiological investigations, is a useful technique in the assessment of patients with suspected pancreatico-biliary neoplasia.

Cholangiocarcinoma

Despite overall advances in the ability to diagnose and treat patients with cholangiocarcinoma, the prognosis for patients with this malignancy remains poor. Further improvements in the survival of patients with cholangiocarcinoma will come with the early diagnosis of these lesions. New molecular techniques should improve the ability to screen high-risk patients, such as those with primary sclerosing cholangitis, hepatolithiasis, choledochal cysts, and ulcerative colitis. Improvements in imaging will continue, and spiral CT scanning, duplex ultrasonography, MR imaging and, perhaps, PET scans will improve the ability to stage patients with cholangiocarcinoma noninvasively. Complete surgical resection remains the only curative treatment for malignancies of the biliary tract. Aggressive surgical approaches are likely to continue, and the challenge remains in being able to perform these procedures safely in jaundiced and sometimes septic patients. For patients with unresectable lesions, the optimal form of palliation, whether surgical or nonsurgical, remains to be defined. Finally, multicenter, prospective, randomized trials of chemoradiation need to be performed to delineate an effective adjuvant therapy more precisely, and to improve the overall prognosis of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case series

BACKGROUND

Improved methods of tissue diagnosis for obstruction at the hilum of the liver (porta hepatis) have contributed substantially to the preoperative diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Endoscopic brushing during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), with sensitivity of 20% to 100%, is the preferred technique for obtaining accurate pathologic results. Extensive hepatic resection with curative intent as well as modern approaches to palliative treatment are based on definitive diagnosis. This is a study involving endosonography-guided, fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for cytodiagnosis of potentially operable hilar cholangiocarcinoma when brush cytology was negative or unavailable.

METHODS

Ten consecutive patients (7 men, 3 women; age 47 to 78 years, median 59 years) with bile duct strictures at the hepatic hilum, diagnosed by CT and/or ERCP, underwent EUS-FNA using linear echoendoscopes and 22-gauge needles.

RESULTS

Adequate material was obtained in nine patients. Cytology revealed cholangiocarcinoma in seven and hepatocellular carcinoma in one. One benign inflammatory lesion identified on cytology proved to be a false-negative finding by frozen section. Metastatic locoregional hilar lymph nodes were detected in two patients, and in one patient the celiac and para-aortic lymph nodes were aspirated to obtain tissue proof of distant metastasis. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

When standard methods of tissue diagnosis are inconclusive, EUS-guided FNA may have a potential role in the diagnosis of primary cholangiocarcinoma of the hepatic hilum. As a new, minimally invasive approach, it proved to be technically feasible without significant risks.

Detection of Ki-ras gene point mutations in bile specimens for the differential diagnosis of malignant and benign biliary strictures

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The present study was undertaken to determine if detection of Ki-ras gene point mutations in bile specimens could differentiate between benign and malignant biliary strictures.

PATIENTS

Bile specimens were obtained from 117 patients exhibiting a stricture of the main bile duct, the nature of which was assessed by cholangiography, histology, and follow up.

METHODS

DNA from frozen bile specimens was extracted, amplified, and tested for codon 12 point mutations of Ki-ras gene using sequence specific oligonucleotide hybridisation and mutant allele specific amplification.

RESULTS

DNA amplification was successful in 110/117 bile specimens (94%). Detection of Ki-ras gene mutations in bile specimens was positive in 24.4% (22/90) of patients with malignant strictures, in 31.4% (22/70) when only primary malignant tumours were considered, and in 4% (1/25) of patients with benign strictures. Of the 49 patients with histological specimens obtained before surgery, the sensitivity of histology, Ki-ras mutation analysis, and combined methods was 59.2%, 28.6%, and 73.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that Ki-ras mutations may be detected in about one third of bile specimens from patients with primary tumours invading the main bile duct. Detection of such mutations appears to be specific and may help to differentiate between benign and malignant biliary strictures.

The utility of CA 19-9 in the diagnoses of cholangiocarcinoma in patients without primary sclerosing cholangitis

OBJECTIVES

The diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma is often difficult, making management approaches problematic. A reliable serum tumor marker for cholangiocarcinoma would be a useful additional diagnostic test. Previous studies have demonstrated that elevated serum concentrations of CA 19-9, a tumor-associated antigen, have good sensitivity and specificity for cholangiocarcinoma in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, the value of this tumor marker for cholangiocarcinoma unassociated with primary sclerosing cholangitis is unclear. Thus, the aims of this study were to determine the usefulness of a serum CA 19-9 determination in the diagnosis of de novo cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

We prospectively measured serum CA 19-9 concentrations in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (n = 36), nonmalignant liver disease (n = 41), and benign bile duct strictures (n = 26). Serum CA 19-9 concentrations were measured by an immunoradiometric assay (CIS Bio International) without knowledge of the clinical diagnosis.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of a CA 19-9 value >100 U/ml in diagnosing cholangiocarcinoma was 53%. When compared with the nonmalignant liver disease and the benign bile duct stricture groups, the true negative rates were 76% and 92%, respectively. Patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma had significantly greater mean CA 19-9 concentrations compared to patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that the serum CA 19-9 determination is a useful addition to the available tests for the differential diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma.

Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushing in the evaluation of biliary strictures

Pathologic evidence of malignancy in biliary strictures is useful in the preoperative setting because it helps define therapeutic planning and prognosis. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of endoscopic bile duct brushings in the evaluation of bile duct strictures. We retrospectively evaluated 34 endoscopic biliary brushings derived from 31 patients with bile duct strictures. Relevant clinical and follow-up data were collected. Histologic specimens were reviewed in patients undergoing subsequent biopsies. Patients included 18 men and 13 women with an age range of 25 to 79 years (mean, 52 years). All patients had histologic and/or clinical follow-up. Cytologic diagnosis included cholangiocarcinoma (14.7%), suspicious for cholangiocarcinoma (5.9%), atypical hyperplasia (17.6%), and negative for malignancy (61.7%). All positive diagnoses were confirmed by histologic testing (false-positive rate, 0%). The cases that were suspicious for cholangiocarcinoma and the 5 atypical hyperplasia cases were also subsequently diagnosed as cholangiocarcinoma by biopsy. One atypical case was diagnosed as pancreatic carcinoma. All 21 negative cases were confirmed by biopsies (15) and clinical follow-up (6) (false-negative rate, 20%). Endoscopic bile duct brushing is diagnostically accurate and hence clinically useful in the management of patients with bile duct strictures. Atypical hyperplasias may contribute to diagnostic pitfalls leading to false-positive and false-negative diagnoses.

Accuracy and complication rate of brush cytology from bile duct versus pancreatic duct

BACKGROUND

The accuracy and complication rates of brush cytology obtained from pancreaticobiliary strictures have not been fully defined. In this study we compared the accuracy and complications of brush cytology obtained from bile versus pancreatic ducts.

METHODS

We identified 148 consecutive patients for whom brush cytology was done during an ERCP from a database with prospectively collected data. We compared cytology results with the final diagnosis as determined by surgical pathologic examination or long-term clinical follow-up. We followed all patients and recorded ERCP-related complications.

RESULTS

Forty-two pancreatic brush cytology samples and 101 biliary brush cytology samples were obtained. The accuracy rate of biliary cytology was 65 of 101 (64.3%) and the accuracy rate of pancreatic cytology was 30 of 42 (71.4%). Overall sensitivity was 50% for biliary cytology and 58.3% for pancreatic cytology. Of 67 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, sensitivity for biliary cytology was 50% versus 66% for pancreatic cytology. Concurrent pancreatic and biliary cytology during the same procedure increased the sensitivity in only 1 of 10 (10%) patients. Pancreatitis occurred in 11 (11%) patients (9 mild cases, 2 moderate cases) after biliary cytology and in 9 (21%) patients (6 mild cases, 3 moderate cases) after pancreatic cytology (p = 0.22). In 10 patients who had pancreatic brush cytology, a pancreatic stent was placed. None of these patients developed pancreatitis versus 9 of 32 (28%) patients in whom a stent was not placed (p = 0.08). Pancreatic cytology samples obtained from the head of the pancreas were correct in 13 of 18 (72%) cases, from the genu in 7 of 7 (100%) cases, from the body in 5 of 9 (55%) cases, and from the tail in 4 of 7 (57%) cases.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of biliary brush cytology is similar to the accuracy of pancreatic brush cytology. The yield of the latter for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is similar to that of the former. Complication rates for pancreatic cytology are not significantly higher than the rates for biliary cytology. The placement of a pancreatic stent after pancreatic brushing appears to reduce the risk of postprocedure pancreatitis.

Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy

BACKGROUND

We determined the accuracy of intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS) in distinguishing between bile duct cancer and benign bile duct disease.

METHODS

Patients (n=42) who required bile duct biopsy using percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS) to evaluate bile duct strictures or filling defects were studied. A thin-caliber ultrasonic probe (2.0 mm diameter and 20 MHz frequency) was inserted into the bile duct, and its images were prospectively reviewed before PTCS.

RESULTS

Disruption of the bile duct wall structure, seen on IDUS, was associated with malignancy in 25 of 26 patients. When IDUS demonstrated a lesion with normal bile duct structure, six of nine patients were found to have no malignancy. IDUS demonstrated no intraductal lesion in seven patients, and bile duct biopsy also did not indicate cancer in any of these patients. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of IDUS for diagnosing bile duct cancer were 76%, 89%, and 50%, respectively. When used in tandem with IDUS, the sensitivity of bile cytology (64%) and PTCS (93%) improved to 96% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of IDUS for diagnosing bile duct cancer was less than that of PTCS (95%). However, the sensitivity for bile cytology, or bile duct biopsy improved when performed in combination with IDUS.

Advances in the early detection, diagnosis, and staging of pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. It has long been regarded as one of the most difficult cancers to accurately diagnose and stage preoperatively. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of the state-of-the-art for early detection, diagnosis, and staging of pancreatic cancer. These methods include spiral CT scans, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, laparoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, CA 19-9 serology, fine needle aspiration cytology, ERCP brush cytology, and screening for p53 and ras oncogenes. These advanced techniques should help us to detect pancreatic cancers in high-risk populations at a curative stage and to decrease pancreaticoduodenectomies for benign disease which could otherwise be treated with less morbid procedures. In addition, these tests will help reliably diagnose pancreatic cancer preoperatively.