Mucosal erosions in longterm non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users: predisposition to ulceration and relation to Helicobacter pylori

The clinical and endoscopic aspects of peptic ulcers secondary to the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs of various origins

Introduction

currently, the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs constitute a veritable object of auto medication throughout the world. The goal of this study was to evaluate the endoscopic and clinical aspects of gastro-duodenal ulcer secondary to taking of non-steroid anti-inflammatory of various sources.

Methods

this was a cross-sectional study which was conducted between July 2016 and December 2017. All adult patients admitted to hospital for clinical symptoms suggestive of gastroduodenal involvement after taking anti-inflammatory drugs and having undergone upper digestive endoscopy were included in this study. Data analysis was done with Epi-info version 7 Software.

Results

a total of 114 patients were included, the mean age was 47.18±26 years with a male predominance (64.9%). Among the patients, only 1.75% had taken a non-steroid anti-inflammatory (NSAIDs) from pharmacy. The NSAIDs used were of different types: diclofenac, aceclofenac, aspirin and non-selective NSAIDs. For each drug used, more than half were derived from the streets. Clinically we noted: the dyspepsia (38.58%), hemorrhages (11.40%), the ulcerous syndrome (77.19%), haematemesis (19.29%), haematemesis associated with melena (37.71%), and the rectorrhagia in 6.14 of cases. The specific endoscopic lesions were bulbar ulcer (45.61%), gastric ulcers (20.17%), antral ulcerations (5.26%) and acute gastritis (9.64%), esophagitis (7.89%), esophageal varices (6.14%), and uncomplicated hiatal hernia in 7.01% of cases.

Conclusion

the serious gastroduodenal lesions observed in this study and due to use of NSAIDs are mainly attributable to unauthorized molecules due to safety concerns. It would be necessary to conduct sensitization days at the community level and in each health facility.

Famotidine for the prevention of peptic ulcers and oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin (FAMOUS): a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

There are few therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal mucosal damage caused by low-dose aspirin. We therefore investigated the efficacy of famotidine, a well-tolerated histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist, in the prevention of peptic ulcers and erosive oesophagitis in patients receiving low-dose aspirin for vascular protection.

METHODS

Adult patients (aged >/=18 years) from the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and diabetes clinics at Crosshouse Hospital, Kilmarnock, UK, were eligible for enrolment in this phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial if they were taking aspirin 75-325 mg per day with or without other cardioprotective drugs. Patients without ulcers or erosive oesophagitis on endoscopy at baseline were randomly assigned by computer-generated randomisation sequence to receive famotidine 20 mg twice daily (n=204) or placebo twice daily (n=200). Patients had a final endoscopic examination at 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the development of new ulcers in the stomach or duodenum or erosive oesophagitis at 12 weeks after randomisation. Analysis was by intention to treat, including all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug (famotidine or placebo). This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Clinical Trial, number ISRCTN96975557.

FINDINGS

All randomised patients received at least one dose and were included in the ITT population. 82 patients (famotidine, n=33; placebo, n=49) did not have the final endoscopic examination and were assumed to have had normal findings; the main reason for participant withdrawal was refusal to continue. At 12 weeks, comparing patients assigned to famotidine with patients assigned to placebo, gastric ulcers had developed in seven (3.4%) of 204 patients compared with 30 (15.0%) of 200 patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.47; p=0.0002); duodenal ulcers had developed in one (0.5%) patient compared with 17 (8.5%; OR 0.05, 0.01-0.40; p=0.0045); and erosive oesophagitis in nine (4.4%) compared with 38 (19.0%; OR 0.20, 0.09-0.42; p<0.0001), respectively. There were fewer adverse events in the famotidine group than in the placebo group (nine vs 15); four patients in the placebo group were admitted to hospital with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage. The other most common adverse event was angina (famotidine, n=2; placebo, n=4).

INTERPRETATION

Famotidine is effective in the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcers, and erosive oesophagitis in patients taking low-dose aspirin. These findings widen the therapeutic options for the prevention of gastrointestinal damage in patients needing vascular protection.

FUNDING

Merck Laboratories and Astellas Pharma.

Role of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in anti-ulcer effect mechanism of estrogen and luteinising hormone on rats

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate anti-ulcer effect of estrogen and luteinising hormone (LH) on indomethacin-induced ulcer model in female rats.

STUDY DESIGN

Ovariectomy in healthy adult famale rats. Acute administration of estradiol to ovariectomised rats. Acute administration of LH to intact rats. Combined administration of tamoxifen with estradiol or LH to intact rats. Combined administration of yohimbin with estradiol or LH to intact rats. Combined administration of piperoxan with estradiol or LH to intact rats. Indomethacin administration to all rats.

RESULTS

Results have shown that LH exerted anti-ulcer activity at all doses we used but estradiol at 5 and 10 mg/kg. In rats administered yohimbine and piperoxan estradiol and LH could not prevent indomethacin-induced ulcers. In rats administered tamoxifen, estradiol and LH could prevent indomethacin-induced ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

LH is a very potent endogen anti-ulcer factor, and the anti-ulcerative activities of estrogen and LH are mediated via alpha-2 adrenergic receptors, but not es receptors. The resistance of gastric mucosa to aggressive factors may decrease as a result of LH inhibition when estrogen is secreted chronically in the human body.

The use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the occurrence of gastric lesions among patients undergoing upper endoscopy in a university hospital in Brazil

BACKGROUND

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely used in Brazil in spite of the known risks associated with their use, but investigation of their side effects conducted in this country has been far from sufficient. This study investigates the use of NSAIDs among patients undergoing upper endoscopy in the Hospital das Clínicas of the Federal University of Minas Gerais and the association of this use with the endoscopic diagnosis of gastric erosions, gastric erosions with hematin pigmentation, and gastric ulcer.

METHODS

The cross-sectional methodological approach was used; 533 patients aged 17 or older were interviewed, between June and December, 2000. Data were submitted to bivariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

More than two thirds of the interviewed population reported the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a period of 1 month before the upper endoscopy. The most used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were acetylsalicylic acid and diclofenac. An association was clearly shown between the use of these drugs and the occurrence of the studied lesions, with the latter attaining significance. There was also a significant association between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use for a period greater than 15 days and the occurrence of the gastric lesions, with a higher odds ratio than for the other comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have a significant association with the occurrence of the gastric lesions and point to the need of further study of this issue in Brazil.

NSAID-induced peptic ulcers and Helicobacter pylori infection: implications for patient management

The conflicting data about the influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the ulcer risk in patients receiving NSAIDs can be accounted for by the heterogeneity of study designs and the diversified host response to H. pylori. Factors that will affect the outcome include the choice of H. pylori diagnostic tests, previous ulcer complications, concurrent use of acid suppressants, NSAID-naive versus long-term users, low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) versus non-aspirin NSAIDs and whether the result was derived from a pre-specified endpoint or post hoc subgroup analysis. Current evidence suggests that H. pylori eradication reduces the ulcer risk for patients who are about to start receiving NSAIDs but not for those who are already on long-term NSAID therapy. Since treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) worsens H. pylori-associated corpus gastritis, H. pylori should be tested for, and eradicated if present, before starting long-term prophylaxis with PPIs. Patients with H. pylori infection and a history of ulcer complications who require NSAIDs should receive concomitant PPIs or misoprostol after curing the infection. Among patients receiving low-dose aspirin, who have H. pylori infection and previous ulcer complications, long-term treatment with a PPI further reduces the risk of complicated ulcers if H. pylori eradication fails or if patients use concomitant non-aspirin NSAIDs. Current data on the gastric safety of COX-2 selective NSAIDs in H. pylori-infected patients are conflicting. Limited data suggest that the gastroduodenal sparing effect of rofecoxib is negated by H. pylori infection in patients who have had prior upper gastrointestinal events. In light of potential cardiovascular risk with COX-2 selective NSAIDs, it is important to weigh the potential adverse effects against the benefits for an individual patient.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on anti-thrombotic dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are two major causes of gastric injury but the effect of H. pylori eradication on the development of aspirin-induced gastric mucosal injury is unclear. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroduodenal mucosal injury induced by antithrombotic doses of aspirin.

METHODS

Patients who had been planned to start on medium-dose aspirin (300 mg) for any kind of indication were included in the study. All subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for determination of H. pylori status and Lanza score. The H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive either aspirin + eradication (omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 500 mg q.i.d. for 2 weeks) or aspirin + placebo eradication. Endoscopic reassessment was done 4 months after the onset of aspirin or when symptoms developed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (placebo group n = 16, H. pylori-eradicated group n = 16) completed the study and Lanza scores of both groups were similar before treatment. Lanza scores significantly increased in the placebo group (0.69 +/- 0.87 vs 2.25 +/- 1.3, P < 0.0001) and did not change in the H. pylori-eradicated group after aspirin treatment (0.43 +/- 0.72 vs 0.75 +/- 0.93, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Helicobacter pylori eradication may prevent medium-dose aspirin-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury.

Should we eradicate Helicobacter pylori in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users?

The interaction between Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in ulcerogenesis has been visited by many studies. Apparently these studies yielded conflicting results. This is a result of a wide diversity of methodology, selection of patient groups and definitions of outcome used by different investigators. This review attempts to analyse separately studies dealing with new or chronic NSAID users, primary or secondary prophylaxis, complicated or uncomplicated ulcers in NSAID or aspirin users. Evidence suggests that eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection may reduce the risk of ulcer and ulcer complications in patients requiring NSAIDs and aspirin. Whether or not one should test-and-treat H. pylori before prescribing NSAIDs is a complicated issue. Factors such as the ulcer risk of patients, previous history of NSAID usage and the use of aspirin or NSAIDs would guide the strategy.

Prevention of experimentally-induced gastric ulcers in rats by an ethanolic extract of "Parsley" Petroselinum crispum

An ethanolic extract of Parsley, Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Nym.ex A.W. Hill (Umbelliferae), was tested for its ability to inhibit gastric secretion and to protect gastric mucosa against the injuries caused by pyloric ligation, hypothermic restraint stress, indomethacin and cytodestructive agents (80% ethanol, 0.2 M NaOH and 25% NaCl) in rats. The extract in doses of 1 and 2 g/kg body weight had a significant antiulcerogenic activity on the models used. Besides, ethanol-induced depleted gastric wall mucus and non-protein sulfhydryl contents were replenished by pretreatment with Parsley extract. Acute toxicity tests showed a large margin of safety for the extract. The phytochemical screening of Parsley leaves revealed the presence of tannins, flavonoids, sterols and/or triterpenes.

Physiopathologie des lésions gastro-duodénales induites par les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

The pathogenesis of the gastroduodenal lesions induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and aspirin is primarily caused by a reduction in mucosal blood flow, which is the consequence of inhibition of cyclooxygenase-producing vasodilator prostaglandins. The subsequent phase is adherence of leukocytes to the endothelium, which may depend on cyclooxygenase-2. Endothelial lesions accentuate the fall of mucosal blood flow and promote the inflammatory process in the gastric mucosa. The inflammatory process is amplified by expression of TNFalpha in polymorphonuclears induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. A few days after starting treatment, epithelial proliferation and increased mucosal blood flow, partly dependent on cyclooxygenase-2 and nitric oxide expression, compensates for the damaging process. Selective inhibitors of inducible cyclooxygenase-2 have reduced gastrointestinal toxicity, which could partially be explained by the protection effect of cyclooxygenase-2 on the gastrointestinal mucosa during inflammation or epithelial repair. Selective inhibitors may worsen inflammatory bowel disease. Non-steroidal inflammatory drugs and aspirin, but perhaps not selective inhibitors, increase the mucosal lesions associated with Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis. Co-administration of selective inhibitors and aspirin leads to gastrointestinal toxicity equivalent to that of non-specific anti-inflammatory drugs.

Impact de l’infection à Helicobacter pylori sur le risque de complications gastro-duodénales des traitements anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

The interaction of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the development of gastro-duodenal ulcers and their complications is complex and controversial. From a clinical point of view, the question is whether or not H. pylori infection should be tested and eradicated in patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin. Contradictory results have been reported in epidemiological studies. Recent data suggest that H. pylori-NSAID interaction may be different depending on the type of treatment, non aspirin NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin, the gastric or duodenal localization of ulcer and the strains of H. pylori. Controlled randomized studies suggest that eradication of H. pylori may be beneficial in NSAID-naïve patients but not in those already on long term NSAID therapy. Recommendations are proposed for different subgroups of patients. In NSAID users presenting with gastro-duodenal ulcer or complications, H. pylori screening and eradication are indicated. In patients treated or about to be treated by NSAIDs, the "test and treat" H. pylori strategy is recommended if there is a history of gastroduodenal ulcer or complications. Whether this strategy should be generalized preventively in patients without ulcer history is still controversial and deserves further studies.

N/A

N/A

The gastrointestinal safety of the COX-2 selective inhibitor etoricoxib assessed by both endoscopy and analysis of upper gastrointestinal events

OBJECTIVES

Etoricoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase inhibitor that in clinical studies has improved the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis and reduced the potential for GI injury. The incidence of endoscopically detected ulcers and of clinically important upper GI events (perforations, ulcers, and bleeding episodes) was compared in patients taking etoricoxib or nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

Upper GI endoscopy was performed at intervals over 12 wk in 680 patients taking etoricoxib 120 mg once daily, ibuprofen 800 mg three times daily, or placebo in a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study. Survival analysis was used to analyze time-to-event data for the incidence of gastric or duodenal ulcers (> or =3 mm and > or =5 mm), and the log rank test was used to compare the cumulative incidence between treatment groups. A combined analysis of upper GI events in all 10 Phase II/III clinical trials of etoricoxib (60, 90, or 120 mg) versus nonselective NSAIDs (naproxen, ibuprofen, or diclofenac) for osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic low back pain was conducted. Investigators reported potential events for adjudication by an external, blinded committee, using prespecified criteria to confirm events. All events that occurred during active treatment periods (maximum 792 days) or within 14 days of stopping treatment were included in the analysis. Time to first event was evaluated using survival analysis; the Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine the cumulative incidence, and relative risk was estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

In the endoscopy study, the cumulative incidence of ulcers >/=3 mm at 12 wk in the ibuprofen group (17%) was significantly higher than in the etoricoxib group (8.1%, p < 0.001); similar results were seen for ulcers >/=5 mm. In the placebo group, the rate of ulcers >/=3 mm was 1.86%. Of 3142 patients treated with once-daily etoricoxib and 1828 patients treated with a nonselective NSAID (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac), 82 patients with investigator-reported upper GI events (71 confirmed) were eligible for the combined analysis. For etoricoxib versus NSAIDs, the rate per 100 patient-yr for confirmed events was 1.16 versus 3.05 (relative risk = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.27-0.72, p < 0.001), whereas that for investigator-reported events was 1.35 versus 3.42 (relative risk = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.30-0.74, p = 0.001). Results were driven primarily by studies with naproxen as the comparator.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of endoscopically detected ulcers was significantly lower with etoricoxib 120 mg than with ibuprofen 2400 mg. Treatment with etoricoxib reduced the incidence of investigator-reported and confirmed adverse upper GI events by approximately 50% compared with treatment with nonselective NSAIDs.

Incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after 12 weeks of rofecoxib, naproxen, or placebo: a multicentre, randomised, double blind study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies in patients with osteoarthritis have suggested that the selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor rofecoxib results in less gastrointestinal damage than non-selective non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). This study compared the incidence of endoscopically detected gastroduodenal ulcers in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with rofecoxib or a non-selective NSAID.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, double blind, 12 week study, patients with rheumatoid arthritis were allocated to rofecoxib 50 mg once daily (n=219), naproxen 500 mg twice daily (n=220), or placebo (n=221). Endoscopy was performed at baseline and at six and 12 weeks. Lifetable analysis and log rank tests were used to analyse the incidence of gastroduodenal ulcers > or =3 mm. Gastric or duodenal ulcers > or =5 mm and erosions were also evaluated as secondary end points. Tolerability was assessed by adverse events.

RESULTS

The cumulative incidence of ulcers > or =3 mm at 12 weeks was significantly higher in patients on naproxen (25.5%) than in patients receiving rofecoxib (6.8%; difference 18.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.7%, 25.7%); p<0.001) or placebo (2.9%; difference 22.6% (95% CI 16.1%, 29.1%); p<0.001). The difference between rofecoxib (6.8%) and placebo (2.9%) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.066). Results were similar for ulcers > or =5 mm and for mean changes from baseline in the number of gastroduodenal erosions. The overall incidence of clinical adverse events was similar among treatment groups (61% of patients on placebo, 62% in patients on rofecoxib, and 66% in patients on naproxen).

CONCLUSIONS

Rofecoxib 50 mg daily (twice the dose recommended for this patient population) resulted in a lower incidence of endoscopically detected gastroduodenal ulcers and erosions than treatment with naproxen 500 mg twice daily.

Complementary studies of the gastrointestinal safety of the cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor etoricoxib

BACKGROUND

Cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are intended to preserve cyclo-oxygenase-1-mediated gastroprotection and platelet function, whilst inhibiting cyclo-oxygenase-2-mediated inflammation.

AIM

To assess the gastrointestinal safety of the cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor etoricoxib vs. non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

METHODS

Two randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled studies were performed: (i) daily faecal red blood cell loss was measured in 62 subjects receiving etoricoxib (120 mg once daily), ibuprofen (800 mg t.d.s.) or placebo for 28 days; (ii) the incidence of endoscopically detectable gastric/duodenal ulcers was determined in 742 osteoarthritis or rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving etoricoxib (120 mg once daily), naproxen (500 mg b.d.) or placebo over 12 weeks.

RESULTS

In the first study, the between-treatment ratio of faecal blood loss for etoricoxib vs. placebo (1.06) was not significantly different from unity; however, the ratios for ibuprofen vs. placebo (3.26) and etoricoxib (3.08) were significantly greater than unity (P < 0.001). In the second study, the incidence of ulcers of > or = 3 mm with naproxen (25.3%) was significantly higher than that with etoricoxib (7.4%) or placebo (1.4%; P < 0.001); the results were similar for ulcers of > or = 5 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced toxicity of etoricoxib (less faecal blood loss and fewer endoscopically detectable lesions) suggests that use of this drug will may be associated with a reduced incidence of gastrointestinal perforations, ulcers and bleeds.

Impact of Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on gastric ulcerogenesis in experimental animals and in humans

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are the most common pathogens in the gastroduodenal mucosa in animals and humans, but their relationship in ulcerogenesis has been little studied. According to some authors, H. pylori infection in humans does not act synergistically with NSAID on ulcer healing, therefore, there is no need to eradicate the germ. This notion is supported by the finding that the eradication of H. pylori does not affect NSAID-induced gastropathy treated with omeprazole and that H. pylori infection induces a strong cyclooxygenase-2 expression resulting in excessive biosynthesis of gastroprotective prostaglandins, which should in turn counteract NSAID-induced gastropathy and heal the existing ulcer. Other investigators claim that H. pylori infection acts synergistically with NSAID on ulcer development, therefore, H. pylori should be eradicated, particularly at the start of long-term NSAID therapy. Maastricht 2-2000 consensus also recommends eradication prior to NSAID treatment, but this eradication does not appear to accelerate ulcer healing or to prevent the recurrent ulcers in NSAID users. Our studies in almost 6,000 dyspeptic patients undergoing upper endoscopy and [(13)C]-urea breath test (UBT) revealed that about 70% of these patients are H. pylori (+) and about 30.6% of these develop gastroduodenal ulcers. Of these ulcers, over 70% were H. pylori (+) positive, 12% NSAID (+), 8% were both H. pylori (+) and NSAID (+), while 22% ulcers were H. pylori (-) and NSAID (-) or "idiopathic" ulcers. Basically, our results support Hawkey's concept and this also agrees with our findings in the rat model showing that: (1) there is no synergistic interaction between H. pylori infection and NSAID on gastric ulcer development, (2) H. pylori and NSAID are independent risk factors for peptic ulceration, and (3) NSAID therapy in H. pylori positive patients attenuates the ulcer development possibly due to direct inhibitory action of these drugs on H. pylori.

The role of Herpes simplex and Helicobacter pylori infection in the etiology of persistent or recurrent gastric erosions: a follow-up study

The etiology of chronic gastric erosions is unknown. We have evaluated the significance of Helicobacter pylori and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections, the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), alcohol, and smoking in a prospective long term follow-up study. A prospective series of 117 patients with gastric erosions and 117 controls were studied in 1974-1981, and invited for reendoscopy in 1996. At both visits, H. pylori infection was diagnosed by histology, serum HSV antibodies were measured, and the use of NSAIDs, alcohol, and smoking was evaluated by interview. Biopsies from erosions from the latter visit were studied for HSV by immunohistochemistry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the follow-up visit, 16 of 42 patients had still gastric erosions while six of 47 controls had developed erosions. No HSV antigen or DNA could be detected in biopsy specimens. However, only high antibody titers (> or = 32) against HSV at the first visit predicted persistence of erosions (P = 0.000), while H. pylori infection, use of NSAIDs, alcohol, or smoking were not associated with chronic erosions. High HSV titers at the follow-up visit were also significantly associated with concurrent erosions in the patient group. In conclusion, the results suggest that a significant proportion of chronic gastric erosions are related to HSV infection.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori infection in peptic ulcer haemorrhage

In this overview, medical advice for routine clinical practice regarding peptic ulcer haemorrhage (PUH) is given, based on the extensive literature about Helicobacter pylori and the controversial results about the interaction of H. pylori infection and nonsteriodal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use. PUH remains an important emergency situation with an incidence between 32 and 51/100 000 persons per year. There is a high association between H. pylori infection and peptic ulcer disease. The association between H. pylori infection and PUH is less clear, but a strong argument for the aetiological role is the fact that eradication of H. pylori decreases recurrence of bleeding. NSAID use is another important risk factor for PUH. H. pylori infection and NSAID use seem to act independently, although some studies show a synergistic interaction while other studies report that H. pylori is protective against the development of PUH in NSAID users. All patients with PUH should be tested for H. pylori infection, regardless of the use of NSAIDs. Because invasive tests are less sensitive in PUH patients, negative tests in patients with no other risk factors should be confirmed by serology or urea breath test (UBT). Eradication therapy with a proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy should be given to all H. pylori-positive patients. Only for nonaspirin-NSAID users does the effect of eradication therapy on the healing of gastric ulcers remain controversial, but currently we also advise eradication of H. pylori in this subgroup. After eradication therapy, acid-suppressant therapy is advised to heal the ulcer. The success of eradication should always be confirmed because of the risk of recurrence of peptic ulcer disease and bleeding in H. pylori-infected patients.

Review article: the effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal tract injury

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the two major causes of peptic ulcers. This article reviews the interaction of H. pylori and NSAIDs on the development of gastric mucosal histological changes, endoscopically confirmed ulcers, and ulcer complications, and assesses whether underlying H. pylori infection potentiates (or mitigates) the development of NSAID-induced ulcer disease. The weight of evidence does not suggest that H. pylori infection potentiates the risk of ulcer formation or ulcer complications in NSAID users. If such an effect occurs, it is likely to be relatively small. Some data even suggest that H. pylori may be protective against NSAID-induced gastric ulcers. Limited data raise the possibility that H. pylori infection, however, may potentiate the effect of low-dose aspirin with respect to ulcer bleeding. Both NSAIDs and H. pylori are independent risk factors for ulcer disease. Therefore, in an individual patient with an ulcer, one cannot be certain which factor is responsible for the ulcer, and both risks should be removed if possible.

Effects of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and non-selective NSAIDs on Helicobacter pylori-induced gastritis in Mongolian gerbils

BACKGROUND

It is still a point of controversy whether Helicobacter pylori-infected patients are more likely to develop mucosal damage while taking NSAIDs. Selective cyclooxygenase (COX-2) inhibitors may be associated with less severe gastric mucosal damage than conventional NSAIDs, but this association is undefined in H. pylori-induced gastritis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of selective COX-2 and nonselective NSAIDs on H. pylori-induced gastritis.

METHODS

After intragastric administration of indomethacin, NS-398 or vehicle alone, once daily for 5 days in H. pylori-infected and uninfected Mongolian gerbils, we evaluated gastric mucosal damage, inflammatory cell infiltration and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) concentration. We investigated whether H. pylori infection induced the COX-2 expression.

RESULTS

In H. pylori-uninfected groups, the indomethacin-treated group showed the highest mucosal damage score and the lowest PGE2 concentration. There was no difference in mucosal damage scores and PGE2 concentration between NS-398 and vehicle-alone treated group. In H. pylori-infected groups, there was no difference in mucosal damage scores, irrespective of the type of drugs administered. The indomethacin-treated group showed the lowest PGE2 concentration, similar to that of the NS-398 and vehicle-alone treated groups, both without H. pylori infection. Gastric neutrophil and monocyte infiltration scores were higher in H. pylori-infected groups than in uninfected groups. However, there was no difference in these scores according to the type of drugs administered, within H. pylori-infected or uninfected groups. COX-2 protein expression was observed in H. pylori-infected Mongolian gerbils but not in uninfected ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our animal study showed that H. pylori infection induced COX-2 expression and increased prostaglandin concentration. Administration of NSAIDs decreased the prostaglandin concentration, but did not increase mucosal damage in H. pylori-induced gastritis. Selective COX-2 inhibitors, instead of conventional NSAIDs, had no beneficial effect on preventing mucosal damage in H. pylori-induced gastritis.

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relation between H pylori infection and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the pathogenesis of peptic-ulcer disease is controversial. We undertook a meta-analysis to address this issue.

METHODS

By computer and manually we sought observational studies on the prevalence of peptic-ulcer disease in adult NSAID takers or the prevalence of H pylori infection and NSAID use in patients with peptic-ulcer bleeding. Summary odds ratios were calculated from the raw data. Tests for homogeneity were done.

FINDINGS

Of 463 citations identified, 25 studies met inclusion criteria. In 16 studies of 1625 NSAID takers, uncomplicated peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in patients positive than in those negative for H pylori (341/817 [41.7%] vs 209/808 [25.9%]; odds ratio 2.12 [95% CI 1.68-2.67]). In five controlled studies, peptic-ulcer disease was significantly more common in NSAID takers (138/385 [35.8%]) than in controls (23/276 [8.3%]), irrespective of H pylori infection. Compared with H pylori negative individuals not taking NSAIDs, the risk of ulcer in H pylori infected NSAID takers was 61.1 (9.98-373). H pylori infection increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease in NSAID takers 3.53-fold in addition to the risk associated with NSAID use (odds ratio 19.4). Similarly, in the presence of risk of peptic-ulcer disease associated with H pylori infection (18.1), use of NSAIDs increased the risk of peptic-ulcer disease 3.55-fold. H pylori infection and NSAID use increased the risk of ulcer bleeding 1.79-fold and 4.85-fold, respectively. However, the risk of ulcer bleeding increased to 6.13 when both factors were present.

INTERPRETATION

Both H pylori infection and NSAID use independently and significantly increase the risk of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding. There is synergism for the development of peptic ulcer and ulcer bleeding between H pylori infection and NSAID use. Peptic-ulcer disease is rare in H pylori negative non-NSAID takers.

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and risk of peptic ulcers in patients starting long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Whether Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of ulcers in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is controversial. We hypothesised that eradication of H pylori infection would reduce the risk of ulcers for patients starting long-term NSAID treatment.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled if they were NSAID naïve, had a positive urea breath test, had dyspepsia or an ulcer history, and required long-term NSAID treatment. They were randomly assigned omeprazole triple therapy (eradication group) or omeprazole with placebo antibiotics (placebo group) for 1 week. All patients were given diclofenac slow release 100 mg daily for 6 months from randomisation. Endoscopy was done at 6 months or if severe dyspepsia or gastrointestinal bleeding occurred. The primary endpoint was the probability of ulcers within 6 months. Analyses were by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Of 210 arthritis patients screened, 128 (61%) were positive for H pylori. 102 patients were enrolled, and 100 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. H pylori was eradicated in 90% of the eradication group and 6% of the placebo group. Five of 51 eradication-group patients and 15 of 49 placebo-group patients had ulcers. The 6-month probability of ulcers was 12.1% (95% CI 3.1-21.1) in the eradication group and 34.4% (21.1-47.7) in the placebo group (p=0.0085). The corresponding 6-month probabilities of complicated ulcers were 4.2% (1.3-9.7) and 27.1% (14.7-39.5; p=0.0026).

INTERPRETATION

Screening and treatment for H pylori infection significantly reduces the risk of ulcers for patients starting long-term NSAID treatment.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. Indications and regimens: an update

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection is still surrounded by controversy and uncertainties. Indications and correct application of current regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection are still considered a matter of debate. Regarding indications, only peptic ulcer and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma are considered clear indications for treatment. In other conditions, such as atrophic gastritis, post gastric cancer resection, first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, dyspeptic patients, patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, the value of Helicobacter pylori eradication is still controversial. The regimens for first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection have been recommended by the Maastricht 2 Consensus Report. Although all the treatments are considered to be effective, physicians still do not agree on what first-line regimen should be used. Furthermore, a consensus on the duration of the antibiotic treatment is still lacking, although Maastricht guidelines for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a one-week therapy. Also regimens, as a third-line treatment, and methods to improve compliance and clinical outcome are still a matter of debate. All these points will be considered in the present review

Helicobacter pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

The complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs implies that it is over simplistic to conclude that their relationship is independent, synergistic, or antagonistic without considering the influence of other factors. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a history of ulcer complication, concurrent use of acid-suppressant therapy, and the difference between NSAIDs and low-dose aspirin all affect the outcome. Several recommendations can be made with regard to the indications of H. pylori eradication for patients requiring NSAIDs. First, patients taking NSAIDs who have ulcers or previous ulcer disease should be tested for the bacterium, and it should be eradicated if present because it is impossible to determine whether the ulcers are caused by H. pylori or NSAIDs or both. Antiulcer drugs should be prescribed to prevent ulcer recurrence for patients who continue to require NSAIDs. Although the efficacy of omeprazole is enhanced by H. pylori infection, it is not justified to leave a pathogen in the stomach in exchange for a modest therapeutic gain. Second, for patients who take low-dose aspirin, eradication of H. pylori substantially reduces the risk of ulcer bleeding. It is advisable that patients taking low-dose aspirin who are at risk of ulcer bleeding should be tested for H. pylori and treated for it if the infection is found. Third, for patients who are about to start NSAIDs, screen-and-treat H. pylori has the potential of reducing the ulcer risk at an affordable incremental cost. It might be argued that any interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs would become irrelevant in the era of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. Even among patients who are receiving a COX-2-selective NSAID, however, a large-scale study showed that the ulcer risk is significantly higher in H. pylori-positive patients than in uninfected patients. This finding suggests that the relative importance of H. pylori in ulcer development might increase with a reduced toxicity of COX-2-selective NSAIDs. With an increasing use of low-dose aspirin for cardiovascular prophylaxis, the problem of aspirin-related ulcer disease is expected to rise. Given the significant role of H. pylori in the latter condition, screen-and-treat H. pylori might be a useful strategy for the prevention of ulcer complications in high-risk patients receiving low-dose aspirin in the future.

Prophylaxis and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced upper gastrointestinal side-effects

The use of specific agents to heal mucosal lesions or to prevent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity, has focused upon two approaches: replacement of prostaglandin deficiency and inhibition of acid secretion. Acid suppression with traditional ulcer healing doses of H2-blockers is effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers upon discontinuation of the offending drug. In the event the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug must be continued, the use of H2-blockers is associated with a decrease in the healing rate. In long-term prevention studies, H2-blockers significantly reduce duodenal ulcer rates, but are ineffective in reducing gastric ulceration. More potent acid inhibition with a double-dose of H2-blockers (famotidine 80 mg daily, ranitidine 600 mg daily) may reduce the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcers. Marked acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (omeprazole 20-40 mg, lansoprazole 30 mg daily) also appears to be very effective in healing gastric and duodenal ulcers in patients continuing the offending drug as well. An analysis of pooled data from comparative studies on omeprazole vs ranitidine, misoprostol and sucralfate shows a therapeutic advantage in favour of the proton pump inhibitor, ranging from 10 to 40%. In long-term prevention studies, omeprazole (20 mg daily) and pantoprazole (40 mg daily) have also been shown to reduce the risk of gastric and duodenal ulcers and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related dyspepsia. Current data from recent comparative studies of omeprazole (20 mg daily) vs ranitidine (150 mg daily) and misoprostol (200 microg daily) showed that, after 6 months' follow-up, the proton pump inhibitor was significantly superior to control drugs in reducing the risk both of gastric and duodenal ulcer. Misoprostol (at doses ranging from 400 microg to 800 microg/day) is an effective form of therapy for preventing non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal lesions. However high-dose misoprostol only, seems adequate for the prevention of ulcer complications, mainly in high-risk non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users. Thus, available data are undoubtedly in favour of the proton pump inhibitors as well tolerated and effective drugs in the prophylaxis and treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.

Epidemiology of NSAID-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the agents most frequently used against musculoskeletal and rheumatic disorders throughout the world. The gastroduodenal adverse effects include dyspepsia without endoscopically proven damage, asymptomatic endoscopic lesions of submucosal haemorrhage, erosions and ulcers, and-most important-ulcer complications. Established risk factors for NSAID-associated ulcer complications include patient-specific factors such as advanced age, female gender, a history of peptic ulcer, and drug-specific factors such as the use of non-selective NSAIDs (type, dose, duration, multiple use) and concomitant anticoagulant drugs or corticosteroids. Probable risk factors comprise Helicobacter pylori infection and heavy consumption of alcohol, whereas use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, smoking and a number of other factors have also been proposed to contribute. Knowledge of absolute risk estimates is important for clinical decision making. The aim of this chapter is to summarize the epidemiological data related to the broad spectrum of iatrogenic gastroduodenal mucosal injury.

Cyclooxygenase 2-implications on maintenance of gastric mucosal integrity and ulcer healing: controversial issues and perspectives

Cyclooxygenase (COX), the key enzyme for synthesis of prostaglandins, exists in two isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2). COX-1 is constitutively expressed in the gastrointestinal tract in large quantities and has been suggested to maintain mucosal integrity through continuous generation of prostaglandins. COX-2 is induced predominantly during inflammation. On this premise selective COX-2 inhibitors not affecting COX-1 in the gastrointestinal tract mucosa have been developed as gastrointestinal sparing anti-inflammatory drugs. They appear to be well tolerated by experimental animals and humans following acute and chronic (three or more months) administration. However, there is increasing evidence that COX-2 has a greater physiological role than merely mediating pain and inflammation. Thus gastric and intestinal lesions do not develop when COX-1 is inhibited but only when the activity of both COX-1 and COX-2 is suppressed. Selective COX-2 inhibitors delay the healing of experimental gastric ulcers to the same extent as non-COX-2 specific non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Moreover, when given chronically to experimental animals, they can activate experimental colitis and cause intestinal perforation. The direct involvement of COX-2 in ulcer healing has been supported by observations that expression of COX-2 mRNA and protein is upregulated at the ulcer margin in a temporal and spatial relation to enhanced epithelial cell proliferation and increased expression of growth factors. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that upregulation of COX-2 mRNA and protein occurs during exposure of the gastric mucosa to noxious agents or to ischaemia-reperfusion. These observations support the concept that COX-2 represents (in addition to COX-1) a further line of defence for the gastrointestinal mucosa necessary for maintenance of mucosal integrity and ulcer healing.

Review article: Helicobacter pylori and NSAID gastropathy

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori are known to share a number of pathogenic mechanisms, but there is no evidence to show a significant synergic action between the two risk factors. Studies assessing this subject have differed in almost every aspect of their methodology, including the definition of a NSAID user as well as the types, doses, duration and their indications for NSAID use. They also differed in their end-points, the definition of dyspepsia and the regimes used for eradication of H. pylori. However, some conclusions may be drawn from the results of clinical trials. In H. pylori-positive patients without mucosal lesions, NSAIDs may aggravate dyspeptic symptoms but, with the exception of elderly patients, they do not present a definite major risk of gastric and duodenal lesions and, above all, of ulcer-correlated complications. So what recommendations can be made with regard to H. pylori eradication in patients requiring treatment with NSAIDs? The microorganism and the anti-inflammatory drugs are undoubtedly independent causes of gastric and duodenal damage. Patients taking NSAIDs who are found to have gastric or duodenal ulcers should therefore be tested for the bacterium and specifically treated, since H. pylori and NSAID-induced ulcers may be macroscopically indistinguishable. Whether asymptomatic patients taking NSAIDs should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection is still a matter of debate.

Role of Helicobacter pylori infection in gastroduodenal injury and gastric prostaglandin synthesis during long term/low dose aspirin therapy: a prospective placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

Whether gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori increases the risk of gastric mucosal injury during long term/low dose aspirin therapy is unknown. We examined whether H. pylori infection enhances upper GI mucosal damage, assessed endoscopically, in volunteers given low dose aspirin. We studied 61 healthy men and women, 29 with and 32 without active H. pylori infection.

METHODS

We treated volunteers for 45 days with a placebo or aspirin (either 81 mg every day or 325 mg every 3 days). Gastroduodenal mucosal damage was then assessed by endoscopy, as was gastric histology and ex vivo gastric mucosal prostaglandin E2 and F2alpha synthesis rates.

RESULTS

Erosive disease from low dose aspirin (erosions and/or ulcers) occurred in 50% of H. pylori-infected volunteers and in 16% of their noninfected counterparts (p = 0.02). Aspirin caused a significantly higher average mucosal injury score in the gastric antrum in H. pylori-infected participants than in noninfected subjects (p = 0.03), and two H. pylori-infected subjects developed antral gastric ulcers. Subjects with H. pylori gastritis treated with the placebo had nearly 50% higher gastric mucosal prostaglandin (E2 plus F2alpha) synthesis rates than their noninfected counterparts (108 +/- 6 ng/g/min versus 75 +/- 6 ng/g/min, p < 0.001). Aspirin reduced mucosal prostaglandin synthesis to similar levels in infected and noninfected participants.

CONCLUSIONS

Long term/low dose aspirin therapy led to more gastric mucosal damage when H. pylori gastritis was present than when it was absent, despite similar degrees of gastric mucosal prostaglandin depletion.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy and Helicobacter pylori: the search for an improbable consensus

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori are known to share a number of pathogenic mechanisms, but there is no evidence to show a significant synergistic action between these two risk factors. Studies to assess possible interactions in the pathogenesis of dyspepsia and upper gastrointestinal mucosal lesions have differed in their endpoints, the definition of dyspepsia, and the regimens used for eradication of H. pylori. However, some conclusions may be drawn from the results of clinical trials. As far as dyspepsia is concerned, an association between NSAID dyspepsia and infection with H. pylori, seems likely, but it is difficult to make sense of the discrepant data that are currently available. On the contrary, neither short- nor long-term NSAID administration presents a definite major risk of gastric and duodenal injury or, above all, of ulcer-related complications (bleeding or perforation) in H. pylori-positive patients. Based on these considerations, what recommendations can be made with regard to H. pylori eradication in patients requiring treatment with NSAIDs? H. pylori and anti-inflammatory drugs are probably independent causes of gastric and duodenal damage. Patients taking NSAIDs who are found to have gastric or duodenal ulcers should, therefore, be tested for the bacterium and specifically treated, because H. pylori and NSAID-induced ulcers may be macroscopically indistinguishable. Whether asymptomatic patients taking NSAIDs should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection is still a matter of debate.

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs controversy

The relationship between NSAIDs and H. pylori as risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer is complex and controversial. In the case of duodenal ulcers in NSAID users, there now is enough information to suggest that eradication of H. pylori usually is worthwhile. In the stomach, however, there is some evidence that ulcers heal faster and are no more likely to reappear if the infection is left alone, provided that patients continue to take an NSAID. Why this situation should be so is unclear. Possibilities include greater efficacy of antisecretory agents, a smaller inhibition of prostaglandin production, and a blunted apoptotic response in patients who are infected with H. pylori and take NSAIDs.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug toxicity in the upper gastrointestinal tract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) toxicity in the upper gastrointestinal tract is the most common serious drug-induced toxicity reported to drug regulatory authorities. In the last two decades, the rediscovery of H. pylori, development of potent ulcer-healing drugs and specific Cox-II inhibitors have opened new horizons in the management of NSAID toxicity. A Working Party composed of gastroenterologists and rheumatologists in the Asia-Pacific region met in Cairns, Australia, in 1999 to review the literature and develop appropriate guidelines. Recommendations were made based on the latest existing evidence. The importance of clinical events as study endpoints was emphasized. While differences exist between NSAIDs and aspirin, most studies have shown that advanced age, history of peptic ulcer disease, serious concomitant illnesses and coprescription of NSAID/aspirin with anticoagulants and steroids are high risk factors. These patients should be considered for prophylactic anti-ulcer therapy. Helicobacter pylori infection may aggravate the toxicity of NSAIDs and, in selected cases, should be treated before NSAID/aspirin is prescribed. Proton pump inhibitors and misoprostol are the most promising agents in preventing gastric and duodenal ulcers. When NSAID/aspirin needs to be continued in patients who develop an NSAID-related ulcer, proton pump inhibitors offer the best healing effect. With the discovery of cyclo-oxygenase isoforms (Cox-I and Cox-II), preferential and specific Cox-II inhibitors have been developed. While early clinical data have suggested promising antiinflammatory effects and improved safety profile in the gastrointestinal tract, several key issues on long-term safety remain unresolved. The use of potent anti-ulcer therapy, treatment of H. pylori infection and the development of Cox-II inhibitor will change the scenario of NSAID/aspirin-related gastrointestinal toxicity in the next millennium.

Diagnosis and treatment of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated upper gastrointestinal toxicity

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed in the United States to treat pain and reduce inflammation from chronic inflammatory disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Approximately 40% of older Americans take NSAIDs. Chronic NSAID use carries a risk of peptic ulcer and other gastrointestinal disturbances. This article reviews the diagnosis of medication-induced ulcers based on clinical presentation, laboratory tests, and endoscopic findings to assist the clinician in early diagnosis and appropriate therapy. Risk factors for NSAID-induced ulcers include old age, poor medical status, prior ulcer, alcoholism, smoking, high NSAID dosage, prolonged NSAID use, and concomitant use of other drugs that are gastric irritants, such as alendronate, a bone resorption inhibitor prescribed for osteoporosis. Appropriate treatment options for patients with medication-induced ulcers include dosage reduction, medication substitution, medication withdrawal, antiulcer therapy, and discontinuation of other gastrotoxic drugs.

How does Helicobacter pylori infection interact with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?

There have been conflicting clinical data on whether Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) contributes to the pathogenesis of ulcers induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The discrepant findings reflect the complex interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs, which has generated divergent results under different clinical conditions. This chapter reviews the pathogenetic mechanisms in ulcer formation that are common to H. pylori and NSAIDs, and explains how a better understanding of these factors might resolve some of the controversies. Existing evidence indicates that the interaction between H. pylori and NSAIDs is not an 'all-or-none' relationship. Factors such as previous exposure to NSAIDs, a past history of ulcer complication, gastric acid output, neutrophil infiltration, concurrent acid suppressive therapy and the type of NSAID used (aspirin versus non-aspirin NSAIDs) would influence the role of H. pylori as a risk factor in NSAID users. Recommendations on H. pylori eradication for different subgroups of NSAID users are proposed.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori and bleeding gastric ulcer

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID usage are considered to be independent risk factors for gastric ulcer (GU). Whether they interact to influence the risk of bleeding in GU is unclear.

AIM

To determine the prevalence of H. pylori infection and NSAID ingestion in a group of patients with GU and determine their roles in bleeding and non-bleeding GU.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 1993 to June 1996, a total of 217 GU patients (150 male, 67 female, median age 61 years, range 26-94) were eligible for the study. Eighty-five per cent were H. pylori-positive and 15% were H. pylori-negative. NSAID usage within 4 weeks prior to endoscopy was present in 30%, more in the H. pylori-negative than H. pylori-positive patients (59% vs. 25% P = 0.0002). Aspirin was most commonly used (43%). One hundred patients bled from GU (69 male, 31 female, mean age 67 years, range 26-94) and 117 did not (81 male, 36 female, mean age 57 years, range 28-86). Univariate logistic regression showed that advanced age (>/= 65 years) and NSAID usage carried an increased risk of bleeding GU (odds ratio 3.4 and 6.8, respectively) while H. pylori infection alone was not associated with additional risk (OR = 0.8). However, when three variables were considered jointly in a multiple logistic regression, the OR associated with H. pylori infection increased to 2.4, suggesting that in the presence of NSAIDs and advanced age, H. pylori also increases the risk of bleeding GU, indicating an interaction between the variables.

CONCLUSION

NSAID usage and advanced age are risk factors for bleeding GU, whereas H. pylori infection by itself is not. In the presence of NSAIDs and advanced age, an increased risk of bleeding GU with H. pylori is observed, indicating the possibility of an interaction between these factors.

Current status of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use in the United States: risk factors and frequency of complications

Gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is a major limiting factor in the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Because of the widespread use of these medications, the morbidity and costs associated with GI complications of NSAID use are significant. On the other hand, the costs of providing prophylactic cotherapy to all patients to prevent NSAID-induced ulcers and bleeding are prohibitive. The presence of specific risk factors (advanced age, prior peptic ulcer disease and bleeding, high NSAID doses and concomitant therapy with corticosteroids or anticoagulants) identifies patients who are most likely to have a GI complication. The recognition of these risks in specific patients may influence therapeutic decisions that could decrease the morbidity and costs of NSAID therapy.

Gastroprotective effect from Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. bark on experimental gastric lesions in rats and mice

In order to establish the pharmacological basis for the ethnomedicinal use of stem bark extracts of Calophyllum brasiliense Camb. in gastrointestinal affections, this study examined the effects of a dichloromethane fraction (DCMF), obtained from the hexane extract of bark, on ethanol, indomethacin and hypothermic restraint stress-induced gastric lesions in mice and rats, respectively. Oral administration of DCMF at doses ranging from 12.5-250 mg/kg significantly inhibited the development of gastric lesions in all the three test models. It caused significant decreases of the pyloric-ligation and bethanechol-stimulated gastric secretion, and also the free and total acidities. Besides, DCMF offered protection against ethanol-induced depletion of stomach wall mucus and reduction in nonprotein sulfhydryl concentration. The results indicate that DCMF from C. brasiliense possesses antisecretory, antiulcer and cytoprotective properties.

Helicobacter pylori infection is a protective factor for bleeding gastric ulcers but not for bleeding duodenal ulcers in NSAID users

BACKGROUND

The effect of Helicobacter pylori infection on NSAID-induced gastroduodenal damage is unclear.

AIM

To determine the role of H. pylori and NSAID use in complicated peptic ulcers.

METHODS

A total of 185 consecutive patients with bleeding peptic ulcers and 185 hospitalized matched controls were studied prospectively. Additionally, 75 consecutive uncomplicated peptic ulcers and 75 community controls were also studied. Active H. pylori infection was determined by urea breath test and/or both urease test and histology. Serum CagA and VacA status were determined at random in 135 infected patients and 82 controls. NSAID use was determined by structured data collection.

RESULTS

H. pylori (odds ratio [OR]=5. 98; 2.9-12.3) and NSAID use (OR=5.74; 3.4-9.7) were independent risk factors for duodenal ulcer bleeding, whereas NSAID use was the main risk factor for bleeding gastric ulcers (OR=12.4; 5.5-27.9). Interaction of both factors was associated with reduced risk for bleeding gastric ulcers (OR=0.19; 0.04-0.88) but not for bleeding duodenal ulcers, which showed a similar risk to any one factor alone. This was observed for all types of NSAID use, including low-dose aspirin, and infection by CagA positive strains. H. pylori was the only factor involved in common uncomplicated duodenal ulcers.

CONCLUSION

Interaction of both H. pylori infection and NSAID use decreases the risk of bleeding due to gastric ulcers, but not that due to duodenal ulcers.

Does eradication of Helicobacter pylori impair healing of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug associated bleeding peptic ulcers? A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widely accepted view that Helicobacter pylori is the most important cause of peptic ulcer disease, recent studies have suggested that the microbe protects against nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated gastroduodenal lesions and promotes ulcer healing. We investigated the effects of H. pylori eradication on the healing of NSAID-associated bleeding peptic ulcers.

METHODS

Chronic NSAID users presenting with peptic ulcer haemorrhage underwent endoscopy to secure haemostasis and to document H. pylori infection by rapid urease test and culture. They were prospectively randomized to receive either omeprazole (20 mg once daily) for 8 weeks or a 1-week course of triple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, all given four times daily) plus omeprazole (20 mg once daily) for 8 weeks. Endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks. Final H. pylori status was determined by a 13C-urea breath test that was performed at least 4 weeks after discontinuation of omeprazole.

RESULTS

195 H. pylori-infected NSAID users, complicated by bleeding ulcers, were randomized to receive omeprazole alone (102) or triple therapy plus omeprazole (93). 174 patients returned for second endoscopy at 8 weeks (91 in the omeprazole group, 83 in the triple therapy group). Urea breath test was negative in 14% in the omeprazole group vs. 92% in the triple therapy group (P < 0.001). Complete ulcer healing was achieved in 88 (97%) patients in the omeprazole group and 77 (93%) in the triple therapy group (P=0. 31). On intention-to-treat analysis, ulcers were healed in 86% of the omeprazole group and 83% of the triple therapy group (P=0.50). There was no significant difference in the healing rates of gastric or duodenal ulcers between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Eradication of H. pylori did not impair the healing of NSAID-associated bleeding peptic ulcers.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs could reverse Helicobacter pylori-induced apoptosis and proliferation in gastric epithelial cells

It remains controversial whether the harmful effects of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are additive. We studied the effects of Hp (virulent and nonvirulent strains) and NSAIDs, alone or in combination, on apoptosis and proliferation of gastric epithelial cells in nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD) patients. Forty-four (25 Hp-positive and 19 Hp-negative) consecutive Chinese NUD patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had taken continuously NSAIDs for more than three months were recruited for this study. Another 41 (20 Hp-positive and 21 Hp-negative) NUD patients not on any NSAIDs were included as controls. All patients underwent a gastroscopy examination and gastric biopsies. Hp infection was confirmed by CLOtest, anti-Hp ELISA, and [13C]urea breath test. The CagA status was determined by the anti-CagA antibody assay. The degree of gastritis, apoptosis, and proliferation indices were determined with H&E staining, terminal uridine deoxynucleotidyl nick end-labeling (TUNEL), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) immunostaining methods, respectively. A significantly higher apoptosis was observed in subjects who had Hp infection or had been consuming NSAIDs when compared with the controls. Unlike NSAID-treated subjects, patients with Hp infection were shown to have significantly enhanced cell proliferation. However, the increased apoptosis and proliferation in Hp-positive subjects were reversed by also taking NSAIDs. No correlation was found between apoptosis and proliferation in all the study groups. There was no association found between CagA expression or degree of gastritis with cell proliferation or apoptosis. It was demonstrated at the cellular level that NSAIDs could abrogate apoptosis or proliferation effects induced by Hp. Furthermore, the latter effects appeared not to be influenced by the virulent nature of the Hp strains.

Does Helicobacter pylori status affect nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated gastroduodenal pathology?

There are two lines of thought regarding the interrelationship between the damaging effects of Helicobacter pylori and those of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on the gastroduodenal mucosa. First, both pathogenic factors exert a damaging effect on the mucosa, and therefore an additive, or even synergistic, effect occurs, leading to aggravation of mucosal damage. Second, mutual antagonism exists, leading to one of the pathogenic factors actually deriving some protection from the damaging potential of the other. Microscopically, H. pylori- and NSAID-associated gastritis are recognized as two separate entities. Furthermore, pathologically, the mechanisms of mucosal damage of the two factors have important differences; for example, H. pylori increases the synthesis of prostaglandins, whereas NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. The role of H. pylori infection in patients with NSAID-associated peptic ulcers has been addressed recently in two large, randomized, multicenter trials. From these studies, it appears that antisecretory drugs are more effective in H. pylori-positive peptic ulcer patients taking NSAIDs than in H. pylori-negative patients taking these drugs. The studies, however, do not provide any evidence that H. pylori infection reduces the pathogenic effects of NSAIDs. Other studies, however, have shown protection against NSAID-associated gastroduodenal damage in H. pylori-negative patients. Thus, there are no firm conclusions on the role of H. pylori infection in patients with NSAID-associated peptic ulcers. Based on the available data, however, practical considerations and guidelines are listed.

Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: does infection affect the outcome of NSAID therapy?

1. H. pylori gastritis appears to increase the likelihood of developing dyspeptic symptoms on NSAID therapy. 2. There is preliminary evidence that the histologic severity of H. pylori gastritis may be adversely affected by NSAID therapy, with a consequent increase in the risk of developing a peptic ulcer, possibly with complications. Whether this results from an effect on the inflammatory process or results from a quantitative increase in H. pylori colonization is unknown. In these respects, ASA may differ from other NSAIDs. 3. Ulcers are more likely to develop during the course of NSAID therapy in those infected with H. pylori; eradication of the infection reduces ulcer recurrence in the face of continued NSAID therapy, and it seems likely that this must reduce but not abolish the risk of GI bleeding in those using NSAIDs. Eradication also reduces the damage (and possibly risks) of low-dose aspirin therapy. 4. While H. pylori and NSAID use are independent risk factors for GI bleeding, whether or not they are interactive remains unresolved. 5. The effect of H. pylori infection on the risk of perforation during NSAID therapy, or conversely, the contribution of NSAID therapy to the risk of perforation in H. pylori-infected subjects, is also unclear at the present time. 6. Only large outcome studies of accurately diagnosed patients (with regard to H. pylori gastritis), and with much more specific detail as to the type of NSAID, dose and duration of therapy, employing only well-defined end-points, such as significant hemorrhage, perforation or death, and avoiding all surrogate markers short of these end points can hope to unravel this tangled web.

Relationship between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, Helicobacter pylori, and gastroduodenal mucosal injury

With the realization that Helicobacter pylori is the main etiologic factor for peptic ulcer disease, recent studies have explored a potential relationship between H. pylori and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Using serology and/or histology to detect H. pylori, case-control studies have shown no meaningful differences in H. pylori prevalence in both arthritis and nonarthritis NSAID users and controls. Placebo-controlled short-term trials of NSAIDs have also shown no change in the frequency of detection of H. pylori by gastric mucosal biopsy specimens after 7-30 days of NSAID ingestion. A number of studies have shown that the histological gastritis identified in NSAID users is caused by H. pylori infection, whereas the reactive (chemical) gastritis can be caused by NSAID use. Although the overall relationship between H. pylori gastritis and dyspepsia remains controversial, there is no evidence from well-controlled studies using either serology or histology that this gastritis predisposes to NSAID-related dyspepsia. The effect of H. pylori on NSAID-related gastroduodenal mucosal injury may be best established by evaluating the ulcer recurrence rate after H. pylori eradication and rechallenge with NSAIDs. To date, only one such study has examined this question, and in this small study, the ulcer recurrence rate at 6 months was not reduced by H. pylori eradication.

Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and smoking

Attributable risk models describe the role of three risk factors for peptic ulcer and related serious upper gastrointestinal (GI) events. The factors-nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Helicobacter pylori, and cigarette smoking-have been identified as major risk factors for peptic ulcer in numerous clinical and epidemiologic studies. Overall risk ratios for each risk factor were based on meta-analyses of English-language studies of risk for peptic ulcer-related GI events. Exposure estimates for factors used data from North American populations. Summary risk and exposure values were computed for the general population, males and females separately, and the elderly. Hypothetical models of multiple factor attributable risks were developed using population attributable risk percent calculated from these summary values. General population attributable risk percent were as follows: 24%, NSAIDs; 48%, H. pylori; and 23%, cigarette smoking. Based on these numbers, the "no interaction" attributable risk model estimates that 95% of total peptic ulcer related risk is attributable to these factors in the general population. The "interaction" model attributes 89% of cases to these risk factors: 24%, NSAIDs alone; 31%, H. pylori alone; 34%, H. pylori/smoking combined. Between 89% and 95% of peptic ulcer-related serious upper GI events may be attributed to NSAID use, H. pylori infection, and cigarette smoking.

Role of Helicobacter pylori in ulcer healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcers in longterm NSAID users. Response to omeprazole dual therapy

BACKGROUND

The relation between Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated peptic ulcers remains unclear; in particular, it is not known whether H pylori plays a part in the healing and recurrence of these ulcers.

AIMS

To evaluate prospectively in a consecutive series of arthritis patients receiving longterm NSAID treatment the prevalence of peptic ulcer as well as the effect of H pylori eradication on the healing and recurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer found.

PATIENTS

Some 278 consecutive patients underwent gastroscopy with multiple biopsies of the gastric antrum and corpus for histological examination and rapid urease test. One hundred peptic ulcers (59 gastric ulcers, 39 duodenal ulcers, and two gastric ulcers concomitant with a duodenal ulcer) were found. Seventy per cent of these ulcers were H pylori positive.

METHODS

According to their H pylori status, ulcer patients were randomised to one of the following treatments: H pylori negative ulcers received omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for four to eight weeks, whereas H pylori positive lesions were treated with omeprazole 20 mg twice daily plus amoxycillin 1 g twice daily (the second of these for the first two weeks) or omeprazole alone for four to eight weeks while continuing NSAID therapy. Patients with healed ulcers were endoscopically followed up for six months after stopping antiulcer therapy while continuing NSAIDs.

RESULTS

Endoscopic healing rates for gastric and duodenal ulcers in the three different groups were similar both at four and eight weeks. H pylori eradication did not influence healing, which occurred in 14 of 20 (70%) of patients in whom H pylori was eradicated, compared with 14 of 17 (82%) of patients with persistent infection. Cumulative recurrence rates at six months did not statistically differ among the three different groups (27% in H pylori negative, 46% in H pylori positive, and 31% in those where H pylori was eradicated during the healing phase), although a numerical trend in favour of a higher recurrence rate in infected patients was evident.

CONCLUSIONS

H pylori eradication does not confer any significant advantage on the healing of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with longterm NSAID use. It remains to be established with certainty whether eradication may be helpful in the reduction of recurrence in a specific subset of NSAID associated ulcer.