Intestinal absorption of the bile acid analogue 75Se-homocholic acid-taurine is increased in primary biliary cirrhosis, and reverts to normal during ursodeoxycholic acid administration

Baicalin restore intestinal damage after early-life antibiotic therapy: the role of the MAPK signaling pathway

Antibiotic related intestinal injury in early life affects subsequent health and susceptibility. Here, we employed weaned piglets as a model to investigate the protective effects of baicalin against early-life antibiotic exposure-induced microbial dysbiosis. Piglets exposed to lincomycin showed a marked reduction in body weight (p < 0.05) and deterioration of jejunum intestinal morphology, alongside an increase in antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as Staphylococcus, Dolosicoccus, Escherichia-Shigella, and Raoultella. In contrast, baicalin treatment resulted in body weights, intestinal morphology, and microbial profiles that closely resembled those of the control group (p > 0.05), with a significant increase in norank_f_Muribaculaceae and Prevotellaceae_NK3B31_group colonization compared with lincomycin group (p < 0.05). Further analysis through fecal microbial transplantation into mice revealed that lincomycin exposure led to significant alterations in intestinal morphology and microbial composition, notably increasing harmful microbes and decreasing beneficial ones such as norank_Muribaculaceae and Akkermansia (p < 0.05). This shift was associated with an increase in harmful metabolites and disruption of the calcium signaling pathway gene expression. Conversely, baicalin supplementation not only counteracted these effects but also enhanced beneficial metabolites and regulated genes within the MAPK signaling pathway (MAP3K11, MAP4K2, MAPK7, MAPK13) and calcium channel proteins (ORA13, CACNA1S, CACNA1F and CACNG8), suggesting a mechanism through which baicalin mitigates antibiotic-induced intestinal and microbial disturbances. These findings highlight baicalin's potential as a plant extract-based intervention for preventing antibiotic-related intestinal injury and offer new targets for therapeutic strategies.

The Role of Bile Acids in the Human Body and in the Development of Diseases

Bile acids are specific and quantitatively important organic components of bile, which are synthesized by hepatocytes from cholesterol and are involved in the osmotic process that ensures the outflow of bile. Bile acids include many varieties of amphipathic acid steroids. These are molecules that play a major role in the digestion of fats and the intestinal absorption of hydrophobic compounds and are also involved in the regulation of many functions of the liver, cholangiocytes, and extrahepatic tissues, acting essentially as hormones. The biological effects are realized through variable membrane or nuclear receptors. Hepatic synthesis, intestinal modifications, intestinal peristalsis and permeability, and receptor activity can affect the quantitative and qualitative bile acids composition significantly leading to extrahepatic pathologies. The complexity of bile acids receptors and the effects of cross-activations makes interpretation of the results of the studies rather difficult. In spite, this is a very perspective direction for pharmacology.

UDCA, NorUDCA, and TUDCA in Liver Diseases: A Review of Their Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications

Bile acids (BAs) are key molecules in generating bile flow, which is an essential function of the liver. In the last decades, there have been great advances in the understanding of BA physiology, and new insights have emerged regarding the role of BAs in determining cell damage and death in several liver diseases. This new knowledge has helped to better delineate the pathophysiology of cholestasis and the adaptive responses of hepatocytes to cholestatic liver injury as well as of the mechanisms of injury of biliary epithelia. In this context, therapeutic approaches for liver diseases using hydrophilic BA (i.e., ursodeoxycholic acid, tauroursodeoxycholic, and, more recently, norursodeoxycholic acid), have been revamped. In the present review, we summarize current experimental and clinical data regarding these BAs and its role in the treatment of certain liver diseases.

Understanding and Treating Pruritus in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

Pruritus is a common symptom with primary biliary cholangitis. Research has focused on refining understanding of the neurohumoral pathways involved in transduction of pruritus from peripheral cutaneous receptors to the central nervous system, and identifying modulating drugs. Current treatments have variable efficacy and safety. Because of the deleterious effects on quality of life or debilitation, many patients necessitate individualized therapeutic approaches; clinicians may need to consider invasive treatment options. This article highlights various therapeutic interventions, from general measures to invasive strategies, and novel agents under investigation, providing clinicians with the management tricks of the trade.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Evaluations Following Single Oral Doses of GSK2330672 in Healthy Japanese Volunteers

GSK2330672 is an inhibitor of the ileal bile acid transporter, designed to have minimal systemic exposure, and is under development as a potential therapeutic for pruritus associated with primary biliary cholangitis and other cholestatic liver diseases. A phase 1, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-period crossover study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of GSK2330672 in healthy Japanese participants. Sixteen healthy male participants received single oral doses of GSK2330672 (10-180 mg) or placebo in each period. No serious adverse events and no adverse events leading to study discontinuation or withdrawal were reported. Drug-related adverse events reported included gastrointestinal symptoms (mostly diarrhea) and positive fecal occult blood tests, and were all mild and resolved without any interventions. GSK2330672 was undetectable in the majority of participants' plasma. Pharmacodynamic observations included a tendency for total serum bile acids to reduce and for serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, a key intermediate of bile acid synthesis, to increase with increasing doses of GSK2330672. In the context of recently published indications of potential efficacy for cholestatic pruritus in non-Japanese populations, these data support further evaluations of GSK2330672 in Japanese patients.

Manual acupuncture relieves bile acid-induced itch in mice: the role of microglia and TNF-α

Pruritus, or itch, is a frequent complaint amongst patients with cholestatic hepatobiliary disease and is difficult to manage, with many patients refractory to currently available antipruritic treatments. In this study, we examined whether manual acupuncture (MA) at particular acupoints represses deoxycholic acid (DCA)-induced scratching behavior and microglial activation and compared these effects with those induced by another pruritogen, 5'-guanidinonaltrindole (GNTI, a kappa opioid receptor antagonist). MA at Hegu (LI4) and Quchi (LI11) acupoints significantly attenuated DCA- and GNTI-induced scratching, whereas no such effects were observed at the bilateral Zusanli acupoints (ST36). Interestingly, GNTI-induced scratching was reduced similarly by both MA and electroacupuncture (EA) at the LI4 and LI11 acupoints. MA at non-acupoints did not affect scratching behavior. Intraperitoneal injection of minocycline (a microglial inhibitor) reduced GNTI- and DCA-induced scratching behavior. In Western blot analysis, subcutaneous DCA injection to the back of the neck increased spinal cord expression of ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (Iba1) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) as compared with saline injection, while MA at LI4 and LI11 reduced these DCA-induced changes. Immunofluorescence confocal microcopy revealed that DCA-induced Iba1-positive cells with thicker processes emanated from the enlarged cell bodies, while this effect was attenuated by pretreatment with MA. It is concluded that microglia and TNF-α play important roles in the itching sensation and MA reduces DCA-induced scratching behavior by alleviating spinal microglial activation. MA may be an effective treatment for cholestatic pruritus.

Management of Pruritus in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: A Narrative Review

Primary biliary cholangitis is an autoimmune condition characterized by destruction of intrahepatic bile ducts. It causes debilitating symptoms that dramatically affect the patient's quality of life. Pruritus affects 60% to 70% of individuals with primary biliary cholangitis and leads to sleep disturbances, fatigue, depression, and suicidal ideation. A complete search was performed with studies from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane database, Countway Library, and CINAHL with specific search terms. This narrative review was prepared after a comprehensive literature review. Treating patients with cholestatic pruritus is challenging and may have a profound impact on quality of life. The standard of therapy for primary biliary cholangitis, ursodeoxycholic acid, does not have a beneficial effect in cholestatic pruritus. Patients often do not respond to conventional therapies such as cholestyramine, rifampicin, opioid antagonists, and sertraline. These therapies lack long-term efficacy and have side effects. Patients who have not responded to these initial treatments can be considered for experimental therapies or clinical trials. This review outlines the current and emerging treatment modalities for patients with primary biliary cholangitis who have pruritus.

Effect of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor GSK2330672 on pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover, phase 2a study

BACKGROUND

Up to 70% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis develop pruritus (itch) during the course of their disease. Treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis is challenging and novel therapies are needed. Ursodeoxycholic acid, the standard first-line treatment for primary biliary cholangitis, is largely ineffective for pruritus. We investigated the efficacy and safety of GSK2330672, a selective inhibitor of human ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT), in patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus.

METHODS

We conducted this phase 2a, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in two UK medical centres. Following 2 weeks of open placebo run-in, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio with a block size of 4 to receive GSK2330672 or placebo twice daily during two consecutive 14-day treatment periods in a crossover sequence. The treatment periods were followed by a 14-day single-blinded placebo follow-up period. The primary endpoints were safety of GSK2330672, assessed using clinical and laboratory parameters, and tolerability as rated by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. The secondary endpoints were changes in pruritus scores measured using the 0 to 10 numerical rating scale (NRS), primary biliary cholangitis-40 (PBC-40) itch domain score and 5-D itch scale, changes in serum total bile acids and 7 alpha hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), and changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of ursodeoxycholic acid and its conjugates. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01899703.

FINDINGS

Between March 10, 2014, and Oct 7, 2015, we enrolled 22 patients. 11 patients were assigned to receive intervention followed by placebo (sequence 1), and 11 patients were assigned to receive placebo followed by intervention (sequence 2). One patient assigned to sequence 2 withdrew consent prior to receiving randomised therapy. One patient did not attend the placebo follow-up period, but was included in the final analysis. GSK2330672 treatment for 14 days was safe with no serious adverse events reported. Diarrhoea was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with GSK2330672 (seven with GSK2330672 vs one with placebo) and headache was the most frequent adverse event during treatment with placebo (seven with placebo vs six with GSK2330672). After GSK2330672 treatment, the percentage changes from baseline itch scores were -57% (95% CI -73 to -42, p<0·0001) in the NRS, -31% (-42 to -20, p<0·0001) in the PBC-40 itch domain and -35% (-45 to -25, p<0·0001) in the 5-D itch scale. GSK2330672 produced significantly greater reduction from baseline than the double-blind placebo in the NRS (-23%, 95% CI -45 to -1; p=0·037), PBC-40 itch domain, (-14%, -26 to -1; p=0·034), and 5-D itch scale (-20%, -34 to -7; p=0·0045). After GSK2330672 treatment, serum total bile acid concentrations declined by 50% (95% CI -37 to -61, p<0·0001) from 30 to 15 μM, with a significant 3·1-times increase (95% CI 2·4 to 4·0, p<0·0001) in serum C4 concentrations from 7·9 to 24·7ng/mL.

INTERPRETATION

In patients with primary biliary cholangitis with pruritus, 14 days of ileal bile acid transporter inhibition by GSK2330672 was generally well tolerated without serious adverse events, and demonstrated efficacy in reducing pruritus severity. GSK2330672 has the potential to be a significant and novel advance for the treatment of pruritus in primary biliary cholangitis. Diarrhoea, the most common adverse event associated with GSK2330672 treatment, might limit the long-term use of this drug.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline and National Institute for Health Research.

BAT117213: Ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) inhibition as a treatment for pruritus in primary biliary cirrhosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pruritus (itch) is a symptom commonly experienced by patients with cholestatic liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis (PBC, previously referred to as primary biliary cirrhosis). Bile acids (BAs) have been proposed as potential pruritogens in PBC. The ileal bile acid transporter (IBAT) protein expressed in the distal ileum plays a key role in the enterohepatic circulation of BAs. Pharmacological inhibition of IBAT with GSK2330672 may reduce BA levels in the systemic circulation and improve pruritus.

METHODS

This clinical study (BAT117213 study) is sponsored by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) with associated exploratory studies supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). It is a phase 2a, multi-centre, randomised, double bind, placebo controlled, cross-over trial for PBC patients with pruritus. The primary objective is to investigate the safety and tolerability of repeat doses of GSK2330672, and explore whether GSK2330672 administration for 14 days improves pruritus compared with placebo. The key outcomes include improvement in pruritus scores evaluated on a numerical rating scale and other PBC symptoms in an electronic diary completed twice daily by the patients. The secondary outcomes include the evaluation of the effect of GSK2330672 on total serum bile acid (BA) concentrations, serum markers of BA synthesis and steady-state pharmacokinetics of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

DISCUSSION

BAT117213 study is the first randomised controlled crossover trial of ileal bile acid transporter inhibitor, a novel class of drug to treat pruritus in PBC. The main strengths of the trial are utility of a novel, study specific, electronic symptom diary as patient reported outcome to measure the treatment response objectively and the crossover design that allows estimating the treatment effect in a smaller number of patients. The outcome of this trial will inform the trial design of future development phase of the IBAT inhibitor drug. The trial will also provide opportunity to conduct metabonomic and gut microbiome studies as explorative and mechanistic research in patients with cholestatic pruritus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT number: 2012-005531-84, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01899703 , registered on 3(rd) July 2013.

Novel bile acid therapeutics for the treatment of chronic liver diseases

Recent developments in understanding the role of bile acids (BAs) as signalling molecules in human metabolism and inflammation have opened new avenues in the field of hepatology research. BAs are no longer considered as simple molecules helping in fat digestion but as agents with real therapeutic value in treating complex autoimmune and metabolic liver diseases. BAs and their receptors such as farnesoid X receptor, transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor 5 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor have been identified as novel targets for drug development. Some of these novel pharmaceuticals are already in clinical evaluation with the most advanced drugs having reached phase III trials. Chronic liver diseases such as primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, for which there is no or limited pharmacotherapy, are most likely to gain from these developments. In this review we discuss recent and the most relevant basic and clinical research findings related to BAs and their implications for novel therapy for chronic liver diseases.

Serum level of taurine would be associated with the amelioration of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhotic patients

AIM

A variety of treatment modalities including L-carnitine have been tried for cirrhotic patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE), which improved MHE for some patients, but were not effective for the other patients. We aimed to identify pre-therapeutic independent factors to predict the amelioration of MHE after L-carnitine treatment.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study on a total of 64 consecutive outpatients of cirrhotic patients who underwent blood biochemical examinations and neuropsychiatric (NP) test at Kobe University Hospital. MHE patients diagnosed by the NP test were p.o. administrated L-carnitine for 3 months. The patients with and without MHE amelioration were compared, and the independent factors were statistically examined. Predictive scoring systems of the amelioration of MHE were established using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The amelioration of MHE was found in 45.8% of MHE patients. Serum taurine before the treatment was the best predictive factor of the amelioration of MHE (P = 0.046). The predictive model using serum taurine discriminated well between patients with and without the amelioration of MHE (area under the receiver-operator curve, 0.748; 95% confidence interval, 0.531-0.901). The predictive scores of the amelioration of MHE enable the patient-specific probability to be easily looked up.

CONCLUSION

Serum taurine before L-carnitine treatment was shown to be an independent factor associated with the amelioration of MHE 3 months after the treatment. The easy pre-therapeutic prediction of MHE amelioration after L-carnitine treatment would help in improving awareness of the selection of MHE patients with good response to L-carnitine, thus being beneficial from a financial perspective.

Prednisolone increases enterohepatic cycling of bile acids by induction of Asbt and promotes reverse cholesterol transport

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Glucocorticoids, produced by the adrenal gland under control of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, exert their metabolic actions largely via activation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Synthetic glucocorticoids are widely used as anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs but their application is hampered by adverse metabolic effects. Recently, it has been shown that GR may regulate several genes involved in murine bile acid (BA) and cholesterol metabolism, yet the physiological relevance hereof is controversial. The aim of this study is to provide a mechanistic basis for effects of prednisolone on BA and cholesterol homeostasis in mice.

METHODS

Male BALB/c mice were treated with prednisolone (12.5mg/kg/day) for 7days by subcutaneous implantation of slow-release pellets, followed by extensive metabolic profiling.

RESULTS

Sustained prednisolone treatment induced the expression of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (Asbt) in the ileum, which stimulated BA absorption. This resulted in elevated plasma BA levels and enhanced biliary BA secretion. Concomitantly, both biliary cholesterol and phospholipid secretion rates were increased. Enhanced BA reabsorption suppressed hepatic BA synthesis, as evident from hepatic gene expression, reduced plasma C4 levels and reduced fecal BA loss. Plasma HDL cholesterol levels were elevated in prednisolone-treated mice, which likely contributed to the stimulated flux of cholesterol from intraperitoneally injected macrophage foam cells into feces.

CONCLUSIONS

Sustained prednisolone treatment increases enterohepatic recycling of BA, leading to elevated plasma levels and reduced synthesis in the absence of cholestasis. Under these conditions, prednisolone promotes macrophage-derived reverse cholesterol transport.

Conformational dynamics of human FXR-LBD ligand interactions studied by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry: insights into the antagonism of the hypolipidemic agent Z-guggulsterone

Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of transcription factors that plays a key role in the regulation of bile acids, lipid and glucose metabolisms. The regulative function of FXR is governed by conformational changes of the ligand binding domain (LBD) upon ligand binding. Although FXR is a highly researched potential therapeutic target, only a limited number of FXR-agonist complexes have been successfully crystallized and subsequently yielded high resolution structures. There is currently no structural information of any FXR-antagonist complexes publically available. We therefore explored the use of amide hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) coupled with mass spectrometry for characterizing conformational changes in the FXR-LBD upon ligand binding. Ligand-specific deuterium incorporation profiles were obtained for three FXR ligand chemotypes: GW4064, a synthetic non-steroidal high affinity agonist; the bile acid chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), the endogenous low affinity agonist of FXR; and Z-guggulsterone (GG), an in vitro antagonist of the steroid chemotype. A comparison of the HDX profiles of their ligand-bound FXR-LBD complexes revealed a unique mode of interaction for GG. The conformational features of the FXR-LBD-antagonist interaction are discussed.

Ursodeoxycholic acid and bile-acid mimetics as therapeutic agents for cholestatic liver diseases: an overview of their mechanisms of action

Chronic cholestasis and liver inflammation are the two main pathophysiological components of the two major classes of disease - primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) - leading to bile duct destruction and ultimately to cirrhosis and liver failure. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), initially introduced as a therapeutic approach to counteract the cholestatic components to PBC and PSC, was subsequently shown to exhibit unexpected anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatoty properties. The use of farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and TGR5 agonists in various animal models have confirmed early observations indicating that bile acids are not only toxicants and inflammagens, but also repressors of innate and adaptive immunity. Obeticholic acid is a bile-acid mimetic, with no toxic or inflammagen behavior, that strongly activates FXR to combat the toxic effects of high concentrations of bile acid. Because UDCA is not an FXR agonist, its combination with obeticholic acid could be a promising tool for the treatment of PBC and PSC. In this overview, the biological properties of UDCA, NorUDCA and FXR agonists are highlighted, as well as their overlapping mechanisms of action in inflammatory biliary disorders.

Unusual binding of ursodeoxycholic acid to ileal bile acid binding protein: role in activation of FXRα

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA, ursodiol) is used to prevent damage to the liver in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. The drug also prevents the progression of colorectal cancer and the recurrence of high-grade colonic dysplasia. However, the molecular mechanism by which UDCA elicits its beneficial effects is not entirely understood. The aim of this study was to determine whether ileal bile acid binding protein (IBABP) has a role in mediating the effects of UDCA. We find that UDCA binds to a single site on IBABP and increases the affinity for major human bile acids at a second binding site. As UDCA occupies one of the bile acid binding sites on IBABP, it reduces the cooperative binding that is often observed for the major human bile acids. Furthermore, IBABP is necessary for the full activation of farnesoid X receptor α (FXRα) by bile acids, including UDCA. These observations suggest that IBABP may have a role in mediating some of the intestinal effects of UDCA.

Bile acid transporters

In liver and intestine, transporters play a critical role in maintaining the enterohepatic circulation and bile acid homeostasis. Over the past two decades, there has been significant progress toward identifying the individual membrane transporters and unraveling their complex regulation. In the liver, bile acids are efficiently transported across the sinusoidal membrane by the Na(+) taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide with assistance by members of the organic anion transporting polypeptide family. The bile acids are then secreted in an ATP-dependent fashion across the canalicular membrane by the bile salt export pump. Following their movement with bile into the lumen of the small intestine, bile acids are almost quantitatively reclaimed in the ileum by the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. The bile acids are shuttled across the enterocyte to the basolateral membrane and effluxed into the portal circulation by the recently indentified heteromeric organic solute transporter, OSTalpha-OSTbeta. In addition to the hepatocyte and enterocyte, subgroups of these bile acid transporters are expressed by the biliary, renal, and colonic epithelium where they contribute to maintaining bile acid homeostasis and play important cytoprotective roles. This article will review our current understanding of the physiological role and regulation of these important carriers.

Bile acid transporters

In liver and intestine, transporters play a critical role in maintaining the enterohepatic circulation and bile acid homeostasis. Over the past two decades, there has been significant progress toward identifying the individual membrane transporters and unraveling their complex regulation. In the liver, bile acids are efficiently transported across the sinusoidal membrane by the Na(+) taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide with assistance by members of the organic anion transporting polypeptide family. The bile acids are then secreted in an ATP-dependent fashion across the canalicular membrane by the bile salt export pump. Following their movement with bile into the lumen of the small intestine, bile acids are almost quantitatively reclaimed in the ileum by the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. The bile acids are shuttled across the enterocyte to the basolateral membrane and effluxed into the portal circulation by the recently indentified heteromeric organic solute transporter, OSTalpha-OSTbeta. In addition to the hepatocyte and enterocyte, subgroups of these bile acid transporters are expressed by the biliary, renal, and colonic epithelium where they contribute to maintaining bile acid homeostasis and play important cytoprotective roles. This article will review our current understanding of the physiological role and regulation of these important carriers.

Bile acids: trying to understand their chemistry and biology with the hope of helping patients

An informal review of the author's five decades of research on the chemistry and biology of bile acids in health and disease is presented. The review begins with a discussion of bile acid structure and its remarkable diversity in vertebrates. Methods for tagging bile acids with tritium for metabolic or transport studies are summarized. Bile acids solubilize polar lipids in mixed micelles; progress in elucidating the structure of the mixed micelle is discussed. Extensive studies on bile acid metabolism in humans have permitted the development of physiological pharmacokinetic models that can be used to simulate bile acid metabolism. Consequences of defective bile acid biosynthesis and transport have been clarified, and therapy has been developed. Methods for measuring bile acids have been improved. The rise and fall of medical and contact dissolution of cholesterol gallstones is chronicled. Finally, principles of therapy with bile acid agonists and antagonists are given. Advances in understanding bile acid biology and chemistry have helped to improve the lives of patients with hepatobiliary or digestive disease.

Role of bile acids and bile acid receptors in metabolic regulation

The incidence of the metabolic syndrome has taken epidemic proportions in the past decades, contributing to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. The metabolic syndrome can be defined as a cluster of cardiovascular disease risk factors including visceral obesity, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, increased blood pressure, and hypercoagulability. The farnesoid X receptor (FXR) belongs to the superfamily of ligand-activated nuclear receptor transcription factors. FXR is activated by bile acids, and FXR-deficient (FXR(-/-)) mice display elevated serum levels of triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, demonstrating a critical role of FXR in lipid metabolism. In an opposite manner, activation of FXR by bile acids (BAs) or nonsteroidal synthetic FXR agonists lowers plasma triglycerides by a mechanism that may involve the repression of hepatic SREBP-1c expression and/or the modulation of glucose-induced lipogenic genes. A cross-talk between BA and glucose metabolism was recently identified, implicating both FXR-dependent and FXR-independent pathways. The first indication for a potential role of FXR in diabetes came from the observation that hepatic FXR expression is reduced in animal models of diabetes. While FXR(-/-) mice display both impaired glucose tolerance and decreased insulin sensitivity, activation of FXR improves hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia in vivo in diabetic mice. Finally, a recent report also indicates that BA may regulate energy expenditure in a FXR-independent manner in mice, via activation of the G protein-coupled receptor TGR5. Taken together, these findings suggest that modulation of FXR activity and BA metabolism may open new attractive pharmacological approaches for the treatment of the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.

Intestinal bile acid physiology and pathophysiology

Bile acids (BAs) have a long established role in fat digestion in the intestine by acting as tensioactives, due to their amphipathic characteristics. BAs are reabsorbed very efficiently by the intestinal epithelium and recycled back to the liver via transport mechanisms that have been largely elucidated. The transport and synthesis of BAs are tightly regulated in part by specific plasma membrane receptors and nuclear receptors. In addition to their primary effect, BAs have been claimed to play a role in gastrointestinal cancer, intestinal inflammation and intestinal ionic transport. BAs are not equivalent in any of these biological activities, and structural requirements have been generally identified. In particular, some BAs may be useful for cancer chemoprevention and perhaps in inflammatory bowel disease, although further research is necessary in this field. This review covers the most recent developments in these aspects of BA intestinal biology.

Drug insight: Mechanisms and sites of action of ursodeoxycholic acid in cholestasis

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) exerts anticholestatic effects in various cholestatic disorders. Several potential mechanisms and sites of action of UDCA have been unraveled in clinical and experimental studies, which could explain its beneficial effects. The relative contribution of these mechanisms to the anticholestatic action of UDCA depends on the type and stage of the cholestatic injury. In early-stage primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, protection of injured cholangiocytes against the toxic effects of bile acids might prevail. Stimulation of impaired hepatocellular secretion by mainly post-transcriptional mechanisms, including stimulation of synthesis, targeting and apical membrane insertion of key transporters, seems to be relevant in more advanced cholestasis. In intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, stimulation of impaired hepatocellular secretion could be crucial for rapid relief of pruritus and improvement of serum liver tests, as it is in some forms of drug-induced cholestasis. In cystic fibrosis, stimulation of cholangiocellular calcium-dependent secretion of chloride and bicarbonate ions could have a major impact. Inhibition of bile-acid-induced hepatocyte apoptosis can have a role in all states of cholestasis that are characterized by hepatocellular bile-acid retention. Different mechanisms of action could, therefore, contribute to the beneficial effect of UDCA under various cholestatic conditions.

Role of nuclear receptors in the adaptive response to bile acids and cholestasis: pathogenetic and therapeutic considerations

Cholestasis results in intrahepatic accumulation of cytotoxic bile acids which cause liver injury ultimately leading to biliary fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cholestatic liver damage is counteracted by a variety of intrinsic hepatoprotective mechanisms. Such defense mechanisms include repression of hepatic bile acid uptake and de novo bile acid synthesis. Furthermore, phase I and II bile acid detoxification is induced rendering bile acids more hydrophilic. In addition to "orthograde" export via canalicular export systems, these compounds are also excreted via basolateral "alternative" export systems into the systemic circulation followed by renal elimination. Passive glomerular filtration of hydrophilic bile acids, active renal tubular secretion, and repression of tubular bile acid reabsorption facilitate renal bile acid elimination during cholestasis. The underlying molecular mechanisms are mediated mainly at a transcriptional level via a complex network involving nuclear receptors and other transcription factors. So far, the farnesoid X receptor FXR, pregnane X receptor PXR, and vitamin D receptor VDR have been identified as nuclear receptors for bile acids. However, the intrinsic adaptive response to bile acids cannot fully prevent liver injury in cholestasis. Therefore, additional therapeutic strategies such as targeted activation of nuclear receptors are needed to enhance the hepatic defense against toxic bile acids.

c-Fos is a critical mediator of inflammatory-mediated repression of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Ileal bile acid malabsorption is present in Crohn's ileitis. The molecular mechanisms of regulation of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) by inflammatory cytokines in vitro and in vivo are investigated.

METHODS

Transient transfection studies of the human, mouse, and rat ASBT promoters and Northern analyses were performed in cells treated with the inflammatory cytokines and/or various activator protein-1 constructs. Rat ASBT promoter transgenic, wild-type, and c-fos-null mice were treated with indomethacin to assess the response to acute inflammation of the ileal mucosa.

RESULTS

In Caco-2 cells, ASBT messenger RNA expression was reduced 65% after interleukin-1beta treatment, while c-fos and c-jun were up-regulated 2-fold. Human ASBT promoter activity was enhanced by c-jun and repressed by a dominant negative c-jun, c-fos, or a dominant negative c-fos. Meanwhile, c-fos antisense treatment activated the human ASBT promoter 5-fold and not only abrogated interleukin-1beta-mediated repression but led to a paradoxical increase in ASBT promoter activity. Indomethacin-induced acute ileitis led to repression of ASBT in wild-type mice and in the transgenic rat ASBT promoter reporter, while paradoxical activation of ASBT was seen in c-fos-null mice. Indomethacin-induced ileal injury was greater in the c-fos-null mice compared with the wild-type littermates.

CONCLUSIONS

Human, rat, and mouse ASBT is inhibited by inflammatory cytokines via direct interactions of c-fos with the ASBT promoter.

Adaptive regulation of the ileal apical sodium dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) in patients with obstructive cholestasis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The apical sodium dependent bile acid transporter ASBT (SLC10A2) contributes substantially to the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids by their reabsorption from the intestine. In the rat, its adaptive regulation was observed in the kidneys, cholangiocytes, and terminal ileum after bile duct ligation. Whether adaptive regulation of the human intestinal ASBT exists during obstructive cholestasis is not known.

METHODS

Human ASBT mRNA expression along the intestinal tract was analysed by real time polymerase chain reaction in biopsies of 14 control subjects undergoing both gastroscopy and colonoscopy. Their duodenal ASBT mRNA expression was compared with 20 patients with obstructive cholestasis. Additionally, in four patients with obstructive cholestasis, duodenal ASBT mRNA expression was measured after reconstitution of bile flow.

RESULTS

Normalised ASBT expression in control subjects was highest (mean arbitrary units (SEM)) in the terminal ileum (1010 (330)). Low ASBT expression was found in colonic segments (8.3 (5), 4.9 (0.9), 4.8 (1.7), and 1.1 (0.2) in the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, respectively). Duodenal ASBT expression in control subjects (171.8 (20.3)) was found to be approximately fourfold higher compared with patients with obstructive cholestasis (37.9 (6.5); p<0.0001). Individual ASBT mRNA expression was inversely correlated with bile acid and bilirubin plasma concentrations. In four cholestatic patients, average ASBT mRNA increased from 76 (18) before to 113 (18) after relief of cholestasis (NS). Immunohistochemical assessment indicated that ASBT protein was expressed on the apical surface of duodenal epithelial cells.

CONCLUSION

Obstructive cholestasis in humans leads to downregulation of ASBT mRNA expression in the distal part of the human duodenum.

Regulation of ileal bile acid-binding protein expression in Caco-2 cells by ursodeoxycholic acid: Role of the farnesoid X receptor

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is beneficial in cholestatic diseases but its molecular mechanisms of action remain to be clearly elucidated. Other bile acids, such as chenodeoxycholic (CDCA), are agonists for the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and regulate the expression of genes relevant for bile acid and cholesterol homeostasis. In ileal cells CDCA, through the FXR, up-regulates the expression of the ileal bile acid-binding protein (IBABP), implicated in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids. We report that UDCA (100 and 200 microM) induced a moderate increase of IBABP mRNA (approximately 10% of the effect elicited by 50 microM CDCA) in enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells and approximately halved the potent effect of CDCA (50 microM). On the contrary, UDCA reduced by 80-90% CDCA-induced IBABP transcription in hepatocarcinoma derived HepG2 cells. We confirmed that these effects on IBABP transcription required the FXR by employing a cell-based transactivation assay. Finally, in a receptor binding assay, we found that UDCA binds to FXR expressed in CHO-K1 cells (K(d)=37.7 microM). Thus, UDCA may regulate IBABP in Caco-2 cells, which express it constitutively, by acting as a partial agonist through a FXR mediated mechanism. The observation that in HepG2 cells, which do not express constitutively IBABP, UDCA was able to almost completely prevent CDCA-induced activation of IBABP promoter, suggests that tissue-specific factors, other than FXR, may be required for bile acid regulation of FXR target genes.

Molecular regulation of hepatobiliary transport systems: clinical implications for understanding and treating cholestasis

Hepatobiliary transport systems are responsible for hepatic uptake and excretion of bile salts and other biliary constituents (eg, bilirubin) into bile. Hereditary transport defects can result in progressive familial and benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis. Exposure to acquired cholestatic injury (eg, drugs, hormones, proinflammatory cytokines, biliary obstruction or destruction) also results in altered expression and function of hepatic uptake and excretory systems, changes that may maintain and contribute to cholestasis and jaundice. Recruitment of alternative efflux pumps and induction of phase I and II detoxifying enzymes may limit hepatic accumulation of potentially toxic biliary constituents in cholestasis by providing alternative metabolic and escape routes. These molecular changes are mediated by bile salts, proinflammatory cytokines, drugs, and hormones at a transcriptional and posttranscriptional level. Alterations of hepatobiliary transporters and enzymes are not only relevant for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of cholestatic liver diseases, but may also represent important targets for pharmacotherapy. Drugs (eg, ursodeoxycholic acid, rifampicin) used to treat cholestatic liver diseases and pruritus may counteract cholestasis via stimulation of defective transporter expression and function. In addition, therapeutic strategies may be aimed at supporting and stimulating alternative detoxification pathways and elimination routes for bile salts in cholestasis.

Options for treatment of primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is a chronic progressive cholestatic disease where there is progressive, granulomatous destruction of the middle-sized bile ducts. The disease affects mainly middle-aged women. The association with other autoimmune diseases and the widespread disturbance of the humoral and cellular immune systems has led to the inclusion of PBC as an autoimmune disease. However, there are several lines of evidence that suggest that both host and environmental factors are implicated in triggering the disease. Without a clear aetiology, it is difficult to find a logical approach to treatment. Well constructed clinical trials are difficult to run because of the variable and long natural history of the disease; and suitable endpoints are difficult to define and validated surrogate endpoints have not been defined. The only drug licensed for use is the bile acid, ursodeoxycholic acid. This drug is associated with significant biochemical improvement and improvement in the immunological disturbances (including a reduction in the titre of the diagnostic autoantibody, antimitochondrial antibody), but the effect on survival and histological progression is still controversial. There is little effect on symptoms. Nonetheless, its safety and lack of toxicity have meant that it has become the drug of choice and most studies now assess the effect of additional treatments. Many other agents have been studied. There is some evidence, from prospective, controlled studies, for a beneficial effect of azathioprine and ciclosporin (cyclosporine); evidence for a beneficial effect of corticosteroids and of mycophenolate is limited and there is little firm evidence for a beneficial effect of methotrexate, penicillamine, thalidomide or colchicine. Other treatments being evaluated include fibric acid derivatives (fibrates), NSAIDs and leukotriene antagonists. Liver transplantation remains the only option for end-stage disease but recurrence of disease may be found in the graft. Experimental therapies include antiretroviral therapy. Symptomatic treatment is required for pruritus and the mainstays are the bile acid binding agents such as colestyramine. For those who are intolerant of the drug or where it is ineffective, rifampicin and naltrexone may be effective. There is no effective treatment for the associated lethargy.

Bile acid-induced negative feedback regulation of the human ileal bile acid transporter

Ileal expression of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) in the rat is unaffected by bile salts, yet in the mouse it is under negative-feedback regulation. The bile acid responsiveness of human ASBT is unknown. The human ASBT promoter linked to a luciferase reporter was studied in Caco-2 cells treated with chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and transfected with expression plasmids for farnesoid X-receptor (FXR), short heterodimer partner (SHP), and retinoic acid receptor/retinoid X receptor (RAR/RXR). CDCA treatment of Caco-2 cells led to a 75% reduction in steady-state ASBT messenger RNA levels and a 78% reduction in human ASBT promoter activity. A dominant negative FXR abrogated the response to CDCA. Site-directed mutagenesis of an RAR/RXR cis element in the human ASBT promoter reduced its activity by 50% and eliminated the bile acid response. Retinoic acid activated the human ASBT promoter fourfold. SHP repressed the activity of the ASBT promoter and reduced activation by retinoic acid. Antisense mediated knock-down of SHP in Caco-2 cells partially offset the bile acid mediated repression of ASBT promoter activity. In conclusion, the human ASBT is positively regulated by retinoic acid. Bile acids induce a negative feedback regulation of human ASBT via an FXR-mediated, SHP-dependent effect upon RAR/RXR activation of ASBT.

Cholestatic syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review highlights recent developments in the molecular pathogenesis of cholestasis as well new aspects of pathogenesis and management of clinical cholestatic disorders.

RECENT FINDINGS

Highlights include the role of nuclear receptors including FXR ligands as potential therapeutic agents, new genetic defects for pediatric cholestasis and sclerosing cholangitis, and novel infections and environmental agents as etiologies for primary biliary cirrhosis. Important clinical studies have been published in the area of pediatric cholestatic syndromes, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, primary biliary cirrhosis, primary and secondary sclerosing cholangitis, cholestasis of sepsis, viral cholestatic syndromes, and drug-induced cholestasis.

SUMMARY

These advances continue to improve understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of cholestatic liver disease.