Gender-specific differences in clinical outcome of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

Sex differences among subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: a propensity-matched, multicentre, international analysis from the i-SUSI project

AIMS

Women have been historically underrepresented in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials. No data on sex differences regarding subcutaneous ICDs (S-ICD) carriers have been described. Aim of our study was to investigate sex-related differences among unselected S-ICD recipients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicentre, international i-SUSI registry were analysed. Comparisons between sexes were performed using a 1:1 propensity matching adjusted analysis for age, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular function, and substrate. The primary outcome was the rate of appropriate shocks during follow-up. Inappropriate shocks and other device-related complications were deemed secondary outcomes. A total of 1698 patients were extracted from the i-SUSI registry; 399 (23.5%) were females. After propensity matching, two cohorts of 374 patients presenting similar baseline characteristics were analysed. Despite similar periprocedural characteristics and a matched BMI, women resulted at lower risk of conversion failure as per PRAETORIAN score (73.4% vs. 81.3%, P = 0.049). Over a median follow-up time of 26.5 [12.7-42.5] months, appropriate shocks were more common in the male cohort (rate/year 3.4% vs. 1.7%; log-rank P = 0.049), while no significant differences in device-related complications (rate/year: 6.3% vs. 5.8%; log-rank P = 0.595) and inappropriate shocks (rate/year: 4.3% vs. 3.1%; log-rank P = 0.375) were observed. After controlling for confounders, sex remained significantly associated with the primary outcome (aHR 1.648; CI 0.999-2.655, P = 0.048), while not resulting predictor of inappropriate shocks and device-related complications.

CONCLUSION

In a propensity-matched cohort of S-ICD recipients, women are less likely to experience appropriate ICD therapy, while not showing higher risk of device-related complications.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0473876.

Predicting long-term survival after de novo cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary prevention: A population based study

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. While short-term mortality benefit of ICD insertion has been established in landmark randomized controlled trials, little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with ICDs in clinical practice. In this paper, we describe the long-term survival of patients following de novo ICD implantation for primary prevention in clinical practice and determine the factors which help predict survival after ICD implant.

Methods

Retrospective population-based study of all patients receiving a de novo ICD for primary prevention in Ontario, Canada from 2007 to 2011 using the Ontario ICD Database housed within ICES. Simple random selection was used to split the population into a derivation and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 2:1. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine predictors of interest and predict 10-year survival, model performance was assessed using calibration and validation.

Results

In the derivation cohort (n = 3399), mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.0), 664 patients were female (19.5 %) and 2344 patients (69.0 %) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ten year survival was 45.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 44.0 %-47.4 %). The final prediction model included age, sex, disease factors (ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction) and patient factors (symptoms, comorbidities), and biomarkers at the time of ICD assessment. This model had good discrimination and calibration in derivation (0.79, 95 % CI 0.77, 0.81) and validation samples (0.78, 95 % CI 0.76, 0.79).

Conclusions

A combination of demographic and clinical factors determined at baseline can be used to predict 10-year survival in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with good accuracy. Our findings help to identify individuals at risk of long-term mortality and may be useful in targeting future prevention strategies to enhance longevity in this high-risk population.

The association between CPR quality of In-hospital resuscitation and sex: A hypothesis generating, prospective observational study

Introduction

The relationship between sex and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) outcomes remains unclear. Particularly, questions remain regarding the potential contribution of unmeasured confounders. We aimed to examine the differences in the quality of chest compression delivered to men and women.

Methods

Prospective study of observational data recorded during consecutive resuscitations occurring in a single tertiary center (Feb-1-2015 to Dec-31-2018) with real-time follow-up to hospital discharge. The studied variables included time in CPR, no-flow-time and fraction, compression rate and depth and release velocity. The primary study endpoint was the unadjusted association between patient sex and the chest compression quality (depth and rate). The secondary endpoint was the association between the various components of chest compression quality, sex, and survival to hospital discharge/neurologically intact survival.

Results

Overall 260 in-hospital resuscitations (57.7% male patients) were included. Among these 100 (38.5%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and 35 (13.5%) survived to hospital discharge. Female patients were significantly older. Ischemic heart disease and ventricular arrhythmias were more prevalent among males. Compression depth was greater in female vs male patients (54.9 ± 11.3 vs 51.7 ± 10.9 mm; p = 0.024). Other CPR quality-metrics were similar. The rates of ROSC, survival to hospital discharge and neurologically intact survival did not differ between males and females. Univariate analysis revealed no association between sex, quality metrics and outcomes.

Discussion

Women received deeper chest compressions during in-hospital CPR. Our findings require corroboration in larger cohorts but nonetheless underscore the need to maintain high-quality CPR in all patients using real-time feedback devices. Future studies should also include data on ventilation rates and volumes which may contribute to survival outcomes.

Comparison of Frequency of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Men-Versus-Women in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention

Current guidelines do not account for possible sex differences in the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA). We sought to identify specific factors associated with increased risk for VTA in women implanted with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Our study cohort consisted of 4,506 patients with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator who were enrolled in the 4 landmark MADIT studies - MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT and MADIT-RIT (1,075 women [24%]). Fine and Gray regression models were used to identify female-specific risk factors for the primary end point of VTA, defined as ICD-recorded, treated, or monitored, sustained ventricular tachycardia ≥170 beats per minute or ventricular fibrillation. At 3.5 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of VTA was significantly lower in women than men (17% vs 26%, respectively; p <0.001 for the entire follow-up). Use of amiodarone at enrollment, Black race, and history of previous myocardial infarction without previous revascularization was found to be independent risk factors of VTA in women. Of these factors, only Black race was associated with a statistically significant risk increase in men. At 3.5 years, the cumulative incidence of VTA in women with one or more of these risk factors was 27% compared with 14% in women with none of the risk factors (hazard ratio [confidence interval] = 2.08 [1.49 to 2.91]). In conclusion, our study, comprising 4 landmark ICD clinical trials, shows that sex and race have the potential to be used for improved risk stratification of patients who are candidates for primary prevention ICD.

Sex Differences in the Risk of First and Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias Among Patients Receiving an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention

Importance

Current guidelines for primary implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy do not account for sex differences in arrhythmic risk in ICD candidates.

Objective

To evaluate the association between sex and risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) and mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study compared differences in the risk of VTA and mortality between 4506 men and women enrolled in the 4 Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trials (MADIT) between July 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011. Data from prospective randomized controlled multicenter studies were analyzed retrospectively. Men and women with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator who were enrolled in all MADIT studies were included. Data were analyzed between January 10 and June 10, 2021.

Exposures

ICD implant.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was sustained VTA, defined as ICD-recorded, treated or monitored VTA at least 170/min or ventricular fibrillation. Secondary VTA end points included VTA at least 200/min, appropriate ICD shocks, and appropriate antitachycardia pacing. All end points were included in a first and recurrent event analysis.

Results

Of the 4506 study participants, 3431 were men (76%). Mean (SD) age of the cohort was 64 (12) years. For women vs men, the mean (SD) age (64 [12] years vs 64 [11] years) and left ventricular ejection fraction (24% vs 25%) were similar, but women exhibited a higher frequency of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (454 of 1075 women [42%] vs 2535 of 3431 men [74%]). Women had significantly lower 3-year cumulative probability of sustained VTA (16% vs 26%), fast VTA (9% vs 17%), and appropriate ICD shocks (7% vs 15%) compared with men (P < .001 for all). Multivariable analysis showed that female sex was independently associated with at least 40% lower risk of all first and recurrent VTA end points (P < .001 for all), including the primary end point (first event, HR = 60 [95% CI, 50-73], P < .001; recurrent event, HR = 49 [95% CI, 43-55], P < .001), after accounting for the competing risk of all-cause mortality and nonarrhythmic mortality. The lower VTA risk associated with female sex was consistent in risk subsets but was significantly more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (female vs male in the ischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.56-0.95], P = .02; nonischemic group: hazard ratio, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.38-0.66], P < .001; P = .03 for interaction between female sex and cardiomyopathy).

Conclusions and Relevance

Findings suggest that women display a significantly lower risk of first and recurrent life-threatening VTA events than men, and that it is more pronounced in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy, suggesting a need for sex-specific risk assessment for primary prevention ICD therapy.

Improving the care for female subcutaneous ICD patients: A qualitative study of gender-specific issues

BACKGROUND

The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) consists of a large generator and is implanted near the left breast. This might lead to discomfort and problems with self-perception and sexuality, especially in the female population. We aimed to assess the issues that female S-ICD patients experience and to provide practical guidance for cardiologists and implanters on minimizing these issues.

METHODS

For this retrospective single-center study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with four female S-ICD patients and processed their experiences into a questionnaire. This consisted of three open questions and 17 statements that participants could answer through a five-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was subsequently sent to all female adult patients who received an S-ICD between February 2009 and November 2018 in our tertiary centre in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

RESULTS

The response rate of the questionnaire was 73%, with 52 female respondents (mean age 47.4 ± 12.5 years, mean time since implant 4.6 ± 3.1 years). Postoperative pain exceeded the expectation of 54% of the respondents. Furthermore, 14 out of 49 respondents (29%) expressed an unpleasant feeling during intimate contact with their sexual partner since the implant. Many women (44%) reported daily discomfort caused by their bra and preferred a more cranial and posterior position of the S-ICD generator. Finally, a smaller design of the generator is desired by a great majority (63%) of female S-ICD patients CONCLUSION: Female S-ICD patients experience a variety of issues with a substantial impact on their daily life. Most issues that we identified would benefit from adequate counseling and implanter awareness.

Sex difference in inappropriate therapy and survival among 1471 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients

Introduction

To assess a potential relationship between sex and outcome in recipients of an implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD).

Methods and Results

All 1471 ICD recipients between 2000 and 2015 were sex‐related analyzed with the following outcome parameters: overall survival (OS), the occurrence of inappropriate and appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and shock therapy. We followed 1206 (82%) male and 265 (18%) female ICD recipients during 4.1 ± 3.6 and 4.3 ± 3.8 years, respectively, (P = .369). Kaplan‐Meier analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in OS between female and male patients (P = .132). After adjustment for relevant confounding factors in a multivariate model, sex remained a nonsignificant predictor of overall mortality (hazard ratio [male] = 1.11; P = .493). Negative binomial regression analysis revealed that women received less appropriate ATP therapy (rate ratio [RR] = 0.37; P = .043), whereas rates of appropriate shock therapy (RR = 1.95; P = .369) did not differ between women and men. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of inappropriate ATP (RR = 1.22; P = .715) and inappropriate shock therapy (RR = 0.64; P = .121).

Conclusion

Female and male patients equally benefit from ICD therapy in terms of OS. Women are less likely to receive appropriate ATP therapy, whereas appropriate shock and inappropriate ATP and shock therapy are independent of sex.

Sex differences in outcomes of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy: combined registry data from eleven European countries

Aims

Therapy with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is established for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in high risk patients. We aimed to determine the effectiveness of primary prevention ICD therapy by analysing registry data from 14 centres in 11 European countries compiled between 2002 and 2014, with emphasis on outcomes in women who have been underrepresented in all trials.

Methods and results

Retrospective data of 14 local registries of primary prevention ICD implantations between 2002 and 2014 were compiled in a central database. Predefined primary outcome measures were overall mortality and first appropriate and first inappropriate shocks. A multivariable model enforcing a common hazard ratio for sex category across the centres, but allowing for centre-specific baseline hazards and centre specific effects of other covariates, was adjusted for age, the presence of ischaemic cardiomyopathy or a CRT-D, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤25%. Of the 5033 patients, 957 (19%) were women. During a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 16-55 months) 129 women (13%) and 807 men (20%) died (HR 0.65; 95% CI: [0.53, 0.79], P-value < 0.0001). An appropriate ICD shock occurred in 66 women (8%) and 514 men (14%; HR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.47-0.79; P = 0.0002).

Conclusion

Our retrospective analysis of 14 local registries in 11 European countries demonstrates that fewer women than men undergo ICD implantation for primary prevention. After multivariate adjustment, women have a significantly lower mortality and receive fewer appropriate ICD shocks.

Gender Differences in Appropriate Shocks and Mortality among Patients with Primary Prophylactic Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Some but not all prior studies have shown that women receiving a primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) have a lower risk of death and appropriate shocks than men.

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of gender on the risk of appropriate shock, all-cause mortality and inappropriate shock in contemporary studies of patients receiving a primary prophylactic ICD.

Data Source

PubMed, LIVIVO, Cochrane CENTRAL between 2010 and 2016.

Study Selection

Studies providing at least 1 gender-specific risk estimate for the outcomes of interest.

Data Extraction

Abstracts were screened independently for potentially eligible studies for inclusion. Thereby each abstract was reviewed by at least two authors.

Data Synthesis

Out of 680 abstracts retained by our search strategy, 20 studies including 46’657 patients had gender-specific information on at least one of the relevant endpoints. Mean age across the individual studies varied between 58 and 69 years. The proportion of women enrolled ranged from 10% to 30%. Across 6 available studies, women had a significantly lower risk of first appropriate shock compared with men (pooled multivariable adjusted hazard ratio 0.62 (95% CI [0.44; 0.88]). Across 14 studies reporting multivariable adjusted gender-specific hazard ratio estimates for all-cause mortality, women had a lower risk of death than men (pooled hazard ratio 0.75 (95% CI [0.66; 0.86]). There was no statistically significant difference for the incidence of first inappropriate shocks (3 studies, pooled hazard ratio 0.99 (95% CI [0.56; 1.73]).

Limitations

Individual patient data were not available for most studies.

Conclusion

In this large contemporary meta-analysis, women had a significantly lower risk of appropriate shocks and death than men, but a similar risk of inappropriate shocks. These data may help to select patients who benefit from primary prophylactic ICD implantation.

Analysis of ECG Measures of Cardiac Repolarization in Relation to Arrhythmic Events in an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Population

BACKGROUND

ECG-derived measures of cardiac repolarization may have utility in risk prediction of future ventricular arrhythmia, and a range of different measures have been proposed. We compared time-based, vectorcardiographic, and singular value decomposition (SVD) derived measures of repolarization to determine which was most predictive of appropriate therapy in an ICD population.

METHODS

We examined the independent prognostic value of a range of repolarization measures derived from 60 second 12-lead ECG recordings in 150 patients receiving new ICD implants in relation to the occurrence of appropriate therapy during follow-up.

RESULTS

Over an average follow-up of 2.15 ± 0.87 years, male gender, presence of premature ventricular complex (PVC), relative T wave residuum (TWR-rel, measures regional repolarization heterogeneity), and TCRT (the total cosine R-to-T, describes the global angle between repolarization and depolarization wavefronts) were the only independent predictors of appropriate therapy. With every 0.01% increase in TWR-rel, there was 2% increased risk of appropriate therapy (HR = 1.02, 95% CI 1.006-1.034, P < 0.001). With every 1° decrease in TCRT, there was an increase in arrhythmic risk of 0.9% (HR 1.009, 95% CI 1.003-1.015, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of advanced analytic ECG techniques to derive measures of repolarization abnormality might shave utility in risk stratification in an ICD population.

Impact of sex and ethnicity on arrhythmic risk

Substantial differences in the risk of common arrhythmia syndromes exist between men and women, as well as in varying ethnic/racial groups. For example, despite an overall lower risk of sudden death and atrial fibrillation in women compared with men, women have longer QT intervals and a higher risk of torsades de pointes due to antiarrhythmic drugs and worse outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation. An ethnicity-related paradox in atrial fibrillation epidemiology is apparent; despite a higher prevalence of medical comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and prolonged PR interval, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians have a lower risk of atrial fibrillation than whites. In this promising era of genomic medicine, an improved understanding of epidemiology and phenotype holds the potential for revealing novel therapeutic targets and preventing disease.

Primary Prevention Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Therapy in Women-Data From a Multicenter French Registry

Background

There are limited data describing sex specificities regarding implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in the real‐world European setting.

Methods and Results

Using a large multicenter cohort of consecutive patients referred for ICD implantation for primary prevention (2002–2012), in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, we examined the sex differences in subjects' characteristics and outcomes. Of 5539 patients, only 837 (15.1%) were women and 53.8% received cardiac resynchronization therapy. Compared to men, women presented a significantly higher proportion of nonischemic cardiomyopathy (60.2% versus 36.2%, P<0.001), wider QRS complex width (QRS >120 ms: 74.6% versus 68.5%, P=0.003), higher New York Heart Association functional class (≥III in 54.2%♀ versus 47.8%♂, P=0.014), and lower prevalence of atrial fibrillation (18.7% versus 24.9%, P<0.001). During a 16 786 patient‐years follow‐up, overall, fewer appropriate therapies were observed in women (hazard ratio=0.59, 95% CI 0.45–0.76; P<0.001). By contrast, no sex‐specific interaction was observed for inappropriate shocks (odds ratio ♀=0.84, 95% CI 0.50–1.39, P=0.492), early complications (odds ratio=1.00, 95% CI 0.75–1.32, P=0.992), and all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio=0.87 95% CI 0.66–1.15, P=0.324). Analysis of sex‐by‐ cardiac resynchronization therapy interaction shows than female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients experienced fewer appropriate therapies than men (hazard ratio=0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.77; P<0.001) and lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.68, 95% CI 0.47–0.97; P=0.034).

Conclusions

In our real‐life registry, women account for the minority of ICD recipients and presented with a different clinical profile. Whereas female cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients had a lower incidence of appropriate ICD therapies and all‐cause death than their male counterparts, the observed rates of inappropriate shocks and early complications in all ICD recipients were comparable.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01992458.

Gender Disparities in Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Defibrillator Recipients

BACKGROUND

Most patients cope well with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), but psychological distress and ICD-related concerns have been reported in about 20% of ICD recipients. Many previous studies have not distinguished between genders.

METHODS

In this nationwide study we compared quality of life, anxiety, and depression symptoms between the genders in ICD recipients, and determined predictors of each of these variables in men and women. All adult Swedish ICD recipients were invited by mail to participate and 2,771 patients (66 ± 12 years) completed standardized measures of quality of life, symptoms of anxiety, and depression. Time since implantation ranged from 1 year to 23 years with a mean of 4.7 ± 3.9.

RESULTS

Women reported worse quality of life (mean index 0.790 vs 0.825) and higher prevalence of anxiety (20.5% vs 14.7%) than did men (P < 0.001 for both comparisons), while there were no differences in symptoms of depression (8.8% vs 8.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Most ICD recipients report a good quality of life, without emotional distress, but among the minority with distress, women fare worse than men.

Sex difference in appropriate shocks but not mortality during long-term follow-up in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

AIMS

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have been shown to improve survival, although a considerable number of patients never receive therapy. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are routinely implanted regardless of sex. There is continuing controversy whether major outcomes differ between men and women.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective single-centre study, 1151 consecutive patients (19% women) undergoing ICD implantation between 1998 and 2010 were followed for mortality and first appropriate ICD shock over 4.9 ± 2.7 years. Sex-related differences were investigated using multivariable Cox models adjusting for potential confounders. During follow-up, 318 patients died, a rate of 5.9% per year among men and 4.6% among women (uncorrected P = 0.08); 266 patients received a first appropriate ICD shock (6.3% per year among men vs. 3.6% among women, P = 0.002). After multivariate correction, independent predictors of all-cause mortality were age (hazard ratio, HR = 1.04 per year of age, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.03-1.06], P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (HR = 0.98 per %, 95% CI [0.97-1.00], P = 0.025), renal function (HR = 0.99 per mL/min/1.73 m(2), 95% CI [0.99-1.00], P = 0.009), use of diuretics (HR = 1.81, 95% CI [1.29-2.54], P = 0.0023), peripheral arterial disease (HR = 2.21, 95% CI [1.62-3.00], P < 0.001), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR = 1.48, 95% CI [1.13-1.94], P = 0.029), but not sex. Female sex (HR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.33-0.81], P = 0.013), older age (HR = 0.98, 95% CI [0.97-0.99], P < 0.001), and primary prophylactic ICD indication (HR = 0.69, 95% CI [0.52-0.93], P = 0.043) were independent predictors for less appropriate shocks.

CONCLUSION

Women receive 50% less appropriate shocks than men having similar mortality in this large single-centre population. These data may pertain to individually improved selection of defibrillator candidates using risk factors, e.g. sex as demonstrated in this study.

Gender and outcomes after primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Findings from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR)

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have demonstrated the benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) for the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in selected high-risk individuals. Because of small numbers of women enrolled in these trials, outcomes for women after hospital discharge have not been well described. We compared procedure-related complications and outcomes after hospital discharge between men and women undergoing single- or dual-chamber ICD implantation for primary prevention.

METHODS

In patients 65 years or older with Medicare fee-for-service coverage, we identified 38,912 initial implants (25% women) who received single- or dual-chamber ICDs for primary prevention between January 2006 and December 2009 in the NCDR and evaluated gender differences in outcomes.

RESULTS

Women had greater comorbidity and more advanced heart failure (HF) at the time of ICD implantation than did men. Device-related complications, death at 6 months, all-cause readmissions, and HF readmissions at 6 months were significantly more common in women (7.2% vs 4.8%, 6.5% vs 5.6%, 37.2% vs 31.7%, and 14.0% vs 10.0% respectively; P < .001 for all). Women continued to have higher odds of procedural complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.26-1.53, P < .001), 6-month all-cause readmission (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28, P < .001), and 6-month HF readmission (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.23-1.42, P < .001), with a trend toward higher 6-month mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.98-1.20, P = .123), compared with men, after adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and device type (single vs dual chamber).

CONCLUSIONS

Among older patients receiving ICDs for primary prevention in clinical practice, women experience worse outcomes than do men. Reasons for gender differences in outcomes are poorly understood and require further investigation.

Age and sex differences in long-term outcomes following implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement in contemporary clinical practice: findings from the Cardiovascular Research Network

Background

Patient sex and age may influence rates of death after receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention. Differences in outcomes other than mortality and whether these differences vary by heart failure symptoms, etiology, and left ventricular ejection fraction are not well characterized.

Methods and Results

We studied 2954 patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 undergoing first-time implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention within the Cardiovascular Research Network; 769 patients (26%) were women, and 2827 (62%) were aged >65 years. In a median follow-up of 2.4 years, outcome rates per 1000 patient-years were 109 for death, 438 for hospitalization, and 111 for heart failure hospitalizations. Procedure-related complications occurred in 8.36%. In multivariable models, women had significantly lower risks of death (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.80) and heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98) and higher risks for complications (hazard ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.90) than men; patients aged >65 years had higher risks of death (hazard ratio 1.55, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.86) and heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.49) than younger patients. Age and sex differences were generally consistent in strata according to symptoms, etiology, and severity of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, except the higher risk of complications in women, which differed by New York Heart Association classification (P=0.03 for sex–New York Heart Association interaction), and the risk of heart failure hospitalization in older patients, which differed by etiology of heart failure (P=0.05 for age–etiology interaction).

Conclusions

The burden of adverse outcomes after receipt of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention is substantial and varies according to patient age and sex. These differences in outcome generally do not vary according to baseline heart failure characteristics.

The clinical course of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: Extended experience on clinical outcome, device replacements, and device-related complications

BACKGROUND

Large randomized trials demonstrated the beneficial effect of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) treatments in selected patients. Data on long-term follow-up of patients outside the setting of clinical trials are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of ICD and CRT-D recipients.

METHODS

All patients who underwent ICD (n = 1729 [57%]) or CRT-D (n = 1326 [43%]) implantation at the Leiden University Medical Center since 1996 were evaluated. Follow-up visits were performed every 3-6 months, and events were registered. Cumulative incidence curves of device therapy and device-related complications were adjusted for the competing risk of all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 5.1 years (25th-75th percentile 3.1-7.8 years), 842 patients (28%) died. The cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45%-54%) in ICD recipients after 12 years of follow-up and 55% (95% CI 52%-58%) in CRT-D recipients after 8 years of follow-up. A total of 1081 patients (35%) received appropriate defibrillator therapy. The cumulative incidence of appropriate therapy in ICD patients was 58% (95% CI 54%-62%) after 12 years of follow-up and 39% (95% CI 35%-43%) in CRT-D patients after 8 years of follow-up. Twelve-year cumulative incidences of adverse events were 20% (95% CI 18%-22%) for inappropriate shock, 6% (95% CI 5%-8%) for device-related infection, and 17% (95% CI 14%-21%) for lead failure.

CONCLUSION

After long-term follow-up of ICD (12 years) and CRT-D (8 years) recipients, 49% of ICD recipients and 55% of CRT-D recipients had died. Appropriate ICD therapy was received by the majority (58%) of ICD recipients and by almost 40% of CRT-D recipients.