Immunostaining patterns of myoepithelial cells in breast lesions: a comparison of CD10 and smooth muscle myosin heavy chain

A comprehensive review of the literature on CD10: its function, clinical application, and prospects

CD10, a zinc-dependent metalloprotease found on the cell surface, plays a pivotal role in an array of physiological and pathological processes including cardiovascular regulation, immune function, fetal development, pain response, oncogenesis, and aging. Recognized as a biomarker for hematopoietic and tissue stem cells, CD10 has garnered attention for its prognostic potential in the progression of leukemia and various solid tumors. Recent studies underscore its regulatory significance and therapeutic promise in combating Alzheimer's disease (AD), and it is noted for its protective role in preventing heart failure (HF), obesity, and type-2 diabetes. Furthermore, CD10/substance P interaction has also been shown to contribute to the pain signaling regulation and immunomodulation in diseases such as complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) and osteoarthritis (OA). The emergence of COVID-19 has sparked interest in CD10's involvement in the disease's pathogenesis. Given its association with multiple disease states, CD10 is a prime therapeutic target; inhibitors targeting CD10 are now being advanced as therapeutic agents. This review compiles recent and earlier literature on CD10, elucidating its physicochemical attributes, tissue-specific expression, and molecular functions. Furthermore, it details the association of CD10 with various diseases and the clinical advancements of its inhibitors, providing a comprehensive overview of its growing significance in medical research.

WT1 as a myoepithelial marker: a comparative study of breast, cutaneous, and salivary gland lesions

WT1 immunostain is expressed in various benign and malignant neoplasms, as well as normal myoepithelial cells. WT1 shows differential expression in non-neoplastic, benign, and malignant neoplastic myoepithelial cells of the salivary gland. In this study, WT1 immunostain and other myoepithelial markers were compared to investigate the value of WT1 as a myoepithelial marker, and to delineate the expression profile of WT1 in nonsalivary gland myoepithelial cells. WT1, p63, and calponin immunostains were performed on normal and lesional tissues from the breast (adenosis, sclerosing adenosis, lactating adenoma, nipple adenoma, tubular adenoma, adenomyoepithelioma, and adenoid cystic carcinoma [ACC]), skin (cutaneous mixed tumor, hidradenoma, spiradenoma, and ACC), and salivary gland (pleomorphic adenoma and ACC). The stained slides were digitized and orientated with H&E images and assessed simultaneously using QuPath. A total of 129, 58, and 56 breast, cutaneous, and salivary gland lesions, respectively, were included. There was poor agreement between WT1-p63 and WT1-calponin (κ < 0.1) in all organs, with absence of WT1 expression in normal salivary gland myoepithelium and most ACCs. There were no significant differences in WT1 expression in myoepithelial cells in normal breast tissue and benign breast neoplasms. Compared to pleomorphic adenomas, cutaneous mixed tumors showed lower WT1 expression (P < .001). WT1 is a less sensitive myoepithelial marker than calponin and p63. However, its unique pattern of expression in salivary gland primary for pleomorphic adenomas/cutaneous mixed tumor can favor a diagnosis of benign salivary gland tumors, particularly in small biopsy specimens.

Cytokeratin 5 determines maturation of the mammary myoepithelium

At invasion, transformed mammary epithelial cells expand into the stroma through a disrupted myoepithelial (ME) cell layer and basement membrane (BM). The intact ME cell layer has thus been suggested to act as a barrier against invasion. Here, we investigate the mechanisms behind the disruption of ME cell layer. We show that the expression of basal/ME proteins CK5, CK14, and α-SMA altered along increasing grade of malignancy, and their loss affected the maintenance of organotypic 3D mammary architecture. Furthermore, our data suggests that loss of CK5 prior to invasive stage causes decreased levels of Zinc finger protein SNAI2 (SLUG), a key regulator of the mammary epithelial cell lineage determination. Consequently, a differentiation bias toward luminal epithelial cell type was detected with loss of mature, α-SMA-expressing ME cells and reduced deposition of basement membrane protein laminin-5. Therefore, our data discloses the central role of CK5 in mammary epithelial differentiation and maintenance of normal ME layer.

Thymidylate Synthase, a New Myoepithelial Biomarker for Breast Lesions

Background. The identification of myoepithelial cells (MECs) can facilitate the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. We previously found thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in the nuclei of MECs in breast tissues, which prompted us to investigate the usefulness of TS as a sensitive and specific biomarker in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions, similar to other MEC biomarkers (ie, tumor protein [P63] and cluster of differentiation 10 [CD10]). Methods. Immunohistochemistry for TS, P63, and CD10 was performed on paraffin sections from 189 breast specimens. Results. The results showed the intensity of the immunoreactive TS signal to be comparable with that of P63 in the nuclei of MECs. Furthermore, the nuclei of MECs stained strongly for TS and P63 in normal breast tissues (obtained adjacent to invasive breast lesions), benign breast lesions, and carcinoma in situ, whereas the cytoplasm of MECs stained strongly for CD10. The immunoreactive TS signal in the cytoplasm of MECs was variable in 22 out of 32 (65.6%) cases of invasive breast carcinoma and 4 out of 20 cases (20.0%) of ductal carcinoma in situ. We found no immunoreactive TS signal in the nuclei of luminal and stromal cells in breast lesions, although there was a weak positive signal in the cytoplasm of luminal and stromal cells. Conclusions. TS is a sensitive and specific MEC biomarker in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions.

Smooth muscle: a stiff sculptor of epithelial shapes

Smooth muscle is increasingly recognized as a key mechanical sculptor of epithelia during embryonic development. Smooth muscle is a mesenchymal tissue that surrounds the epithelia of organs including the gut, blood vessels, lungs, bladder, ureter, uterus, oviduct and epididymis. Smooth muscle is stiffer than its adjacent epithelium and often serves its morphogenetic function by physically constraining the growth of a proliferating epithelial layer. This constraint leads to mechanical instabilities and epithelial morphogenesis through buckling. Smooth muscle stiffness alone, without smooth muscle cell shortening, seems to be sufficient to drive epithelial morphogenesis. Fully understanding the development of organs that use smooth muscle stiffness as a driver of morphogenesis requires investigating how smooth muscle develops, a key aspect of which is distinguishing smooth muscle-like tissues from one another in vivo and in culture. This necessitates a comprehensive appreciation of the genetic, anatomical and functional markers that are used to distinguish the different subtypes of smooth muscle (for example, vascular versus visceral) from similar cell types (including myofibroblasts and myoepithelial cells). Here, we review how smooth muscle acts as a mechanical driver of morphogenesis and discuss ways of identifying smooth muscle, which is critical for understanding these morphogenetic events.This article is part of the Theo Murphy meeting issue 'Mechanics of Development'.

Spatially correlated phenotyping reveals K5-positive luminal progenitor cells and p63-K5/14-positive stem cell-like cells in human breast epithelium

Understanding the mechanisms regulating human mammary epithelium requires knowledge of the cellular constituents of this tissue. Different and partially contradictory definitions and concepts describing the cellular hierarchy of mammary epithelium have been proposed, including our studies of keratins K5 and/or K14 as markers of progenitor cells. Furthermore, we and others have suggested that the p53 homolog p63 is a marker of human breast epithelial stem cells. In this investigation, we expand our previous studies by testing whether immunohistochemical staining with monospecific anti-keratin antibodies in combination with an antibody against the stem cell marker p63 might help refine the different morphologic phenotypes in normal breast epithelium. We used in situ multilabel staining for p63, different keratins, the myoepithelial marker smooth muscle actin (SMA), the estrogen receptor (ER), and Ki67 to dissect and quantify the cellular components of 16 normal pre- and postmenopausal human breast epithelial tissue samples at the single-cell level. Importantly, we confirm the existence of K5+ only cells and suggest that they, in contrast to the current view, are key luminal precursor cells from which K8/18+ progeny cells evolve. These cells are further modified by the expression of ER and Ki67. We have also identified a population of p63+K5+ cells that are only found in nipple ducts. Based on our findings, we propose a new concept of the cellular hierarchy of human breast epithelium, including K5 luminal lineage progenitors throughout the ductal-lobular axis and p63+K5+ progenitors confined to the nipple ducts.

Discriminating the earliest stages of mammary carcinoma using myoepithelial and proliferative markers

Mammographic screening has led to increased detection of breast cancer at a pre-invasive state, hence modelling the earliest stages of breast cancer invasion is important in defining candidate biomarkers to predict risk of relapse. Discrimination of pre-invasive from invasive lesions is critically important for such studies. Myoepithelial cells are the barrier between epithelial cells and the surrounding stroma in the breast ductal system. A number of myoepithelial immunohistochemistry markers have been identified and validated in human tissue for use by pathologists as diagnostic tools to distinguish in situ carcinoma from invasive breast cancer. However, robust myoepithelial markers for mouse mammary tissue have been largely under-utilised. Here, we investigated the utility of the myoepithelial markers smooth muscle actin (SMA), smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), cytokeratin-14 (CK14) and p63 to discriminate mammary intraepithelial neoplasia (MIN) from invasive disease in the C57BL/6J MMTV-PyMT transgenic model of mammary carcinoma. We identified that SMMHC and CK14 are retained in early in situ neoplasia and are appropriate markers for distinguishing MIN from invasive disease in this model. Additionally, the proliferation marker Ki67 is a superior marker for differentiating between normal and hyperplastic ducts, prior to the development of MIN. Based on this, we developed a scoring matrix for discriminating normal, hyperplasia, MIN and invasive lesions in this spontaneous mammary tumorigenesis model. This study demonstrates heterogeneous expression of myoepithelial proteins throughout tumour development, and highlights the need to characterise the most appropriate markers in other models of early breast cancer to allow accurate classification of disease state.

C-kit positive intraosseous myoepithelioma arising in rib: a case report

We describe a rare intraosseous myoepithelioma, arising in a rib. The patient was a 14-year-old female. The tumor, composed of epitheliod cells and plump spindle cells, was immunopositive for AE1/AE3, S-100 protein, HHF-35, desmin, smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD10, and c-kit, indicating a diagnosis of myoepithelioma. The tumor had invaded surrounding soft tissues, indicating a locally aggressive tumor. Positive staining for CD10 supported the diagnosis of myoepithelioma. To our knowledge, c-kit immunoreactivity has not been reported in intraosseous myoepithelioma. This form of myoepithelioma, arising in a rib and showing c-kit positivity, is very rare.

Use of Smooth Muscle Myosin Heavy Chain as an Effective Marker of Follicular Dendritic Cells

Smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC) is a major structural component of the contractile apparatus in smooth muscle cells. Even though it is considered a relatively specific marker for terminal smooth muscle cell differentiation, expression in other cell types such as follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) has rarely been reported. To determine whether SMMHC represents an effective FDC marker in lymphoid tissues, we compared the immunohistochemical results for SMMHC with those of the traditional FDC markers podoplanin (D2-40) and CD21. Paraffin sections of 44 lymphoid tissues were analyzed, including 31 cases of follicular hyperplasia, 6 cases of follicular lymphoma, 2 cases of peripheral T-cell lymphoma, 3 cases of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma arising in follicular lymphoma, 1 case of nodular sclerosis classical Hodgkin lymphoma, and 1 case of small lymphocytic lymphoma. There was no statistically significant difference between the number of SMMHC-positive and D2-40-positive or CD21 lymph nodes (P>0.05). The extent and intensity of SMMHC-positive FDCs were similar to those of D2-40-positive FDCs (P=0.127 and 0.733, respectively), but significantly lower compared with those of CD21 cells (P=0.009 and 0.00002, respectively). However, in contrast to CD21 which was also positive in some germinal center B cells, SMMHC expression was restricted to FDCs. Our results indicate that SMMHC is an excellent marker for FDCs and can be particularly helpful in demonstrating the underlying architecture in lymphoid processes.

A Comparative Study of Immunohistochemical Myoepithelial Cell Markers in Cutaneous Benign Cystic Apocrine Lesions

The use of immunohistochemical markers for myoepithelial cells (MEC) is a useful tool in the distinction of benign from malignant epithelial neoplasms. Although their use in breast tumors is well recognized, little is known concerning its application in comparable cutaneous lesions. Using benign cutaneous cystic apocrine lesions as a study model, the aim of this study was to compare 5 immunohistochemical markers [calponin, p63, smooth muscle actin (SMA), cytokeratin 14, and CD10] in their effectiveness to highlight MEC. Cases of apocrine hidrocystoma and cystadenoma (n = 44) were reviewed with a particular emphasis on proliferative features and apocrine change. The MEC staining pattern and the intensity and distribution scores in proliferative (n = 29) and nonproliferative (n = 15) lesions were assessed, and the differences between the 2 groups were statistically analyzed using Fisher exact test. Calponin and SMA stained MEC in the most consistent manner. Being a nuclear stain, p63 was easy to interpret but typically showed discontinuous staining. Cytokeratin 14 not only effectively highlighted MEC but also stained some luminal epithelial cells in an unpredictable manner. Because of prominent background dermal fibroblast staining, CD10 was often difficult to interpret. Only SMA and p63 showed a statistically significant difference in MEC staining intensity scores between the proliferative and nonproliferative groups. Our results show that immunohistological staining for MEC in benign cystic apocrine lesions of the skin is variable. The authors recommend that a panel of markers that includes calponin and p63 be used and highlight the need for awareness of specific caveats associated with individual markers.

Novel Use for DOG1 in Discriminating Breast Invasive Carcinoma from Noninvasive Breast Lesions

Aims. DOG1 has proven to be a useful marker of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Recently, DOG1 expression has also been reported in some non-GIST malignant tumors, but the details related to DOG1 expression in breast tissue remain unclear. The aim of this study was to detect the expression of DOG1 in the human breast and to evaluate the feasibility of using DOG1 to discriminate between invasive breast carcinoma and noninvasive breast lesions. Methods and Results. A total of 210 cases, including both invasive and noninvasive breast lesions, were collected to assess DOG1 expression immunohistochemically. DOG1 expression was consistently positive in breast myoepithelial cells (MECs), which was similar to the results obtained for three other MEC markers: calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMMHC), and P63 (P > 0.05 in all). Importantly, DOG1 was useful in discriminating invasive breast carcinoma from noninvasive breast lesions (P < 0.05). Conclusions. DOG1 is a useful marker of breast MECs, and adding DOG1 to the MEC identification panel will provide more sophisticated information when diagnosing uncertain cases in the breast.

CD10 Immunohistochemical Expression in Apocrine Lesions of the Breast

OBJECTIVE

In the breast, CD10 is expressed by myoepithelial cells (MECs), and apocrine metaplasia has also been mentioned as being positive with this marker. Apocrine lesions have been explored for the expression of CD10.

METHODS

The apocrine lesions studied included 11 cysts, 6 cases of apocrine adenosis, 2 of apocrine metaplasia or hyperplasia in papilloma, 13 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS) and invasive carcinomas (14 ductal and 4 lobular).

RESULTS

Benign apocrine lesions showed complete or partial luminal CD10 staining, although most cases included parts without staining, and 2 lesions were completely negative. The MECs were often but not always positive. Nine of the 13 cases of apocrine DCIS displayed no luminal staining, but 4 demonstrated very focal luminal positivity. The MECs around the DCIS showed a spectrum of staining from nil to strong and complete. Only 4 invasive carcinomas demonstrated luminal/membranous staining. Cytoplasmic CD10 positivity was seen focally in 4 invasive cancers and in 3 DCIS.

CONCLUSION

CD10 positivity is luminal/membranous in most benign apocrine lesions, the staining being nonuniversal and sometimes focal. Analogous staining in apocrine malignancies seems rarer in DCIS and even rarer in invasive apocrine carcinomas, but atypical cytoplasmic positivity may also occur. CD10 is not an ideal myoepithelial marker in apocrine lesions.

Immunostaining of ∆Np63 (using the p40 antibody) is equal to that of p63 and CK5/6 in high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

As a result of breast cancer screening programs, high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is diagnosed more often. Frequently, a DCIS diagnosis can only be made using immunohistochemical stains to visualize the myoepithelial layer in order to assess microinvasion. Standard markers for myoepithelial cells are CK5/6 and p63. An isoform of the latter, ∆Np63, is recognized by a recently developed antibody, p40. Here, we compare the standard myoepithelial markers CK5/6 and p63 with p40. We immunostained full sections of tissue samples of 35 high-grade DCIS and compared the staining pattern of CK5/6, p63 and p40 in tumour tissue and in normal glands. Staining patterns of myoepithelial cells for p63 and p40 were similar in terms of the percentage of stained nuclei. In all cases, p63 was strongly expressed, while this was the case for p40 in 31 (89%) and moderately in 4 (11%) cases. All but one case (97%) showed a similar percentage of stained myoepithelial cells in comparing CK5/6 and p40 staining. CK5/6 expression was heterogeneous and strong/moderate/weak in 60, 34 and 6 % respectively. Compared to surrounding normal glands, staining of myoepithelial cells for all three markers in the neoplastic lesion was attenuated. In high-grade DCIS, p40 staining is highly specific for myoepithelial cells. Its staining pattern and intensity are equal to p63, which opens up its use for daily practice. Staining with p40 is less heterogeneous than that for CK5/6.

Application of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: a review and update

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in routine breast pathology, used for both diagnostic and prognostic parameters. The diagnostic immunomarkers are the scope of this review. Most breast lesions can be diagnosed on routine hematoxylin-eosin sections; however, in several scenarios, such as morphologically equivocal cases or metastatic tumors of unknown primary, the appropriate application of immunohistochemistry adds true value in reaching an accurate diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the most commonly studied immunomarkers in the field of breast pathology by review of the literature, using the database of indexed articles in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) from 1976 to 2013.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review, and author's research data and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate use of immunohistochemistry by applying a panel of immunomarkers and using a standardized technical and interpretational method will complement the morphologic assessment and aid in the accurate classification of difficult breast lesions and the identification of metastasis from a breast primary.

Diagnostic role of immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry plays a vital role in the evaluation of breast pathology specimens.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the role of myoepithelial cell markers in the evaluation of various breast lesions. Other markers, such as E-cadherin and those used to differentiate mammary carcinoma from metastatic tumors to the breast, and markers used in the differential diagnosis of Paget disease, are also discussed.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from review of the pertinent peer-reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Myoepithelial cell markers vary in their sensitivity and specificity, and one should be aware of the potential pitfalls in interpretation. Using panels of 2 or more myoepithelial cell markers is always recommended, either singly or in cocktail forms. Although negative E-cadherin staining supports the diagnosis of lobular origin, positive staining does not rule it out. Immunohistochemistry can be helpful in differentiating Paget disease from its mimics. Although metastatic tumors to the breast are rare, a triple-negative immunophenotype and absence of an in situ component should be a "red flag" for such possibility, especially in patients with clinical history of an extramammary malignancy.

Profiling of normal and malignant breast tissue show CD44high/CD24low phenotype as a predominant stem/progenitor marker when used in combination with Ep-CAM/CD49f markers

Background

Accumulating evidence supports cancer to initiate and develop from a small population of stem-like cells termed as cancer stem cells (CSC). The exact phenotype of CSC and their counterparts in normal mammary gland is not well characterized. In this study our aim was to evaluate the phenotype and function of stem/progenitor cells in normal mammary epithelial cell populations and their malignant counterparts.

Methods

Freshly isolated cells from both normal and malignant human breasts were sorted using 13 widely used stem/progenitor cell markers individually or in combination by multi-parametric (up to 9 colors) cell sorting. The sorted populations were functionally evaluated by their ability to form colonies and mammospheres, in vitro.

Results

We have compared, for the first time, the stem/progenitor markers of normal and malignant breasts side-by-side. Amongst all markers tested, we found CD44^high/CD24^low cell surface marker combination to be the most efficient at selecting normal epithelial progenitors. Further fractionation of CD44^high/CD24^low positive cells showed that this phenotype selects for luminal progenitors within Ep-CAM^high/CD49f + cells, and enriches for basal progenitors within Ep-CAM^-/low/CD49f + cells. On the other hand, primary breast cancer samples, which were mainly luminal Ep-CAM^high, had CD44^high/CD24^low cells among both CD49f^neg and CD49f + cancer cell fractions. However, functionally, CSC were predominantly CD49f + proposing the use of CD44^high/CD24^low in combination with Ep-CAM/CD49f cell surface markers to further enrich for CSC.

Conclusion

Our study clearly demonstrates that both normal and malignant breast cells with the CD44^high/CD24^low phenotype have the highest stem/progenitor cell ability when used in combination with Ep-CAM/CD49f reference markers. We believe that this extensive characterization study will help in understanding breast cancer carcinogenesis, heterogeneity and drug resistance.

Prognostic impact of CD10 expression in clinical outcome of invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Early diagnosis and treatment for breast cancers has greatly improved in recent years, however, subset of this disease with early recurrence have remained to be unpredictable. Several studies has addressed that strong CD10 expression in tumor stroma is associated with poor survival rate of breast cancers, but no correlation between CD10 expression and disease-free survival has been elucidated yet. For these reasons, this study with modified immunohistochemical (IHC) staining evaluated the expression of CD10 in invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs) and analyzed correlations between CD10 expression on tumor cells, stromal cells and myeloid-like cells with clinicopathological parameters and recurrence status.

METHOD

IHC staining method was performed on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections of 73 cases of primary IBCs, with record of pathological characteristics of subjects followed up from 1998 to 2007.

RESULTS

Stromal CD10 expression was observed in 39/73 cases (53.4 %) with strong expression in 41.0 %. Three cases stained positive for myeloid-like cells and five for carcinomatous cells, of which 6 cases had recurrence and/or regional LN status. Stromal CD10 expression was significantly higher in the unfavorable group (69.6 %; 16/23 cases) compared with the favorable group (32.1 %; 9/28 cases) (p = 0.048). The levels of CD10 expression showed significant difference among clinical outcomes (recurrence or non-recurrence), independent of regional LN status (p = 0.034), histology type (p = 0.044), ER status (p = 0.042), PgR status (p = 0.039), Her2 status (p = 0.038) and Ki67 index (p = 0.036) (partial Pearson correlations). Cox proportional-hazards regression showed that risk factors for disease-free survival were stromal CD10 expression [CD10±, CD10+ versus CD10++; p = 0.003; HR 2.824 (1.427-5.591)]; regional LN status [N0, N1, N2, versus N3; p = 0.004; HR 2.107 (1.262-3.517)] and PgR status [negative versus positive, p = 0.006, HR 0.172 (0.049-0.596)].

CONCLUSION

CD10 expression on stroma with or without other positive tumor cells and/or myeloid-like cells may function as a powerful prognostic factor for IBC disease-free survival rates, predicting of potential recurrence. It can be determined by a simple modified IHC staining method, which is independent of other prognostic morphologic markers and biomarkers in IBC.

Use of CD10 as a marker of canine mammary myoepithelial cells

CD10 is an important cell marker in the diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia and of breast myoepithelial (ME) cells in humans. The objective of this study was to assess the value of CD10 as a marker of canine ME cells using immunohistochemistry on routinely processed normal, dysplastic and neoplastic mammary tissue. Five different CD10 positive cell types were identified on the basis of cell morphology, pattern of immunoreactivity, and on the co-expression of additional cell lineage-specific markers. Type 1 cells were typical fusiform cells with a ME cell phenotype (calponin- and cytokeratin [CK] 14-positive, CK8/18-negative). Type 2 cells were typical or atypical polyhedral cells with a luminal epithelial (LE) cell phenotype (calponin- and CK14-negative, CK8/18-positive). Type 3 cells had a type 1 phenotype with variable morphology, and type 4 were atypical neoplastic cells with a mixed ME/LE phenotype. Type 5 cells were typical fusiform cells with a stromal phenotype. Type 1 cells were considered normal ME cells and were found in all sample types; type 2 cells were considered normal or neoplastic LE cells and were also found in all sample types; types 3 and 4 cells were restricted to tumour samples and to malignant tumours, respectively, and type 5 cells were found in all sample types, although predominantly in neoplastic tissue. The findings indicate that the CD10 antigen is a sensitive (although not specific) marker of canine ME cells in normal, dysplastic and neoplastic mammary tissue. Differences in the distribution and staining intensity of CD10-positive cells suggest a number of potential roles for this protein in the pathogenesis of canine mammary neoplasia.

Triennial Lactation Symposium: Bovine mammary epithelial cell lineages and parenchymal development

Mammary development proceeds from an aggregation of cells in the ventral ectoderm to the establishment of an elaborate tree of alveoli, ducts, and cisternae. However, despite abundant data on endocrine regulation of ruminant mammary growth, we know comparatively little about cell lineages, expression of differentiation markers, and plasticity in mammary cell phenotype. Histologic analyses have revealed cell populations with distinct histochemical profiles, but functional assessment of cell populations during development has been limited to analysis of proliferation and frequency estimations of morphotypes. The lack of transplantation models, limited availability of validated antibodies with reactivity to bovine antigens, and similar technical challenges have generally hindered the pace of discovery, but the application of new technologies such as laser microdissection, transcriptional profiling, and multispectral image analysis are yielding important clues into bovine mammary cell ontogeny and developmental regulation. Our analyses have shown that prepubertal ovariectomy affects epithelial architecture, increases the proportion of cells expressing the estrogen receptor, and increases myoepithelial cell development, all concomitant with a dramatic reduction in the mass of parenchymal tissue. Our observations point to a dual role for ovarian secretions in the control of not only the rate of epithelial development, but also the nature of the parenchymal development. The balance of stimulus and inhibition pathways cooperatively regulates mammary growth. The increased reliance on objective staining analyses and quantitative approaches will ensure broader repeatability, application, and extension of the findings regarding the impact of the ovary and other regulatory entities and factors. Advances in understanding the ontogeny of mammary epithelial cells, coupled with established and increasing knowledge of endocrine factors affecting mammary development, may yield intervention strategies to improve dairy profitability.

Best practices in diagnostic immunohistochemistry: myoepithelial markers in breast pathology

CONTEXT

Numerous immunohistochemical stains have been shown to exhibit exclusive or preferential positivity in breast myoepithelial cells relative to their luminal/epithelial counterparts. These myoepithelial markers provide invaluable assistance in accurately classifying breast proliferations, especially in core biopsies. Although numerous myoepithelial markers are available, they differ in their sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation, which may be attributed, to a large extent, to the variable immunoreactivity of these markers in stromal cells including myofibroblasts, vessels, luminal/epithelial cells, and tumor cells.

OBJECTIVE

To review commonly used myoepithelial markers in breast pathology and a selection of diagnostic scenarios where they may be useful.

DATA SOURCES

The information outlined in this review article is based on our experiences with routine cases and a review of English-language articles published between 1987 and 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

To demonstrate the presence or absence of myoepithelial cells, a panel-based approach of 2 or more markers is recommended. Markers that most effectively combine sensitivity, specificity, and ease of interpretation include smooth muscle myosin heavy chains, calponin, p75, p63, P-cadherin, basal cytokeratins, maspin, and CD10. These markers, however, display varying cross-reactivity patterns and variably reduced expression in the myoepithelial cells bordering in situ carcinomas. The choice of a myoepithelial marker should be dependent on a combination of factors, including published evidence on its diagnostic utility, its availability, performance characteristics that have been achieved in a given laboratory, and the specific diagnostic scenario. When its use is deemed necessary, immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial cells in breast pathology is most effective when conceptualized as supplemental, rather than central to routine morphologic interpretation.

Clinical examination and validation of primary diagnosis in anatomic pathology using whole slide digital images

CONTEXT

Novel anatomic pathology technologies allow pathologists to digitally view and diagnose cases. Although digital pathology advocates champion its strengths and move to integrate it into practice and workflow, the capabilities and limitations of digital slides have not been fully investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate intrapathologist diagnostic discrepancy between glass and digital slides and to determine pathologists' diagnostic certainty when diagnosing with the 2 formats.

DESIGN

Intrapathologist diagnostic consistency between glass and digital slides was measured. Three pathologists diagnosed 101 cases digitally and with corresponding glass slides. Discrepancies between formats were evaluated, and diagnostic precision and certainty were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 606 diagnoses were evaluated in pairs (202 per pathologist). Seven cases did not transfer to the database and were eliminated from further study. We report no discrepancies between media in 75%, 87%, and 83% of the cases diagnosed by the 3 pathologists, respectively; significant discrepancies were identified in 3%, 3%, and 7% of cases by each pathologist. In total, we identified significant clinical and therapeutic discrepancies in 13 of 296 cases (4.4%). The certainty values provided by each pathologist were similar between formats.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not detect significant differences between diagnoses based on digital and glass slides. We believe that this study further supports the integration of digital slides into pathology workflow, particularly considering the low rate of discrepancy documented here.

D2-40: an additional marker for myoepithelial cells of breast and the precaution in interpreting tumor lymphovascular invasion

D2-40 is a recently available mouse monoclonal antibody specific for human podoplanin and has been used in identifying lymphovascular invasion (LVI) of tumors. Although its expression has been evaluated in other tissues, its use as a marker for myoepithelial cells (MEC) of breast has not been studied. To explore its expression in the MEC of breast, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 48 patients with breast diseases were selected to include usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH, 41 cases), atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH, 4 cases) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS, 17 cases). Normal breast parenchyma and invasive carcinoma coexisting in the tissue sections were also included in the study. Immunohistochemistry for D2-40, calponin and p63 was performed and the staining patterns were reviewed and compared. D2-40 immunohistochemical staining is positive in the cytoplasm of MEC in UDH, ADH, and the majority of DCIS. The staining pattern of D2-40 is comparable with that of calponin, however D2-40 staining of MEC is weaker than that of calponin and with less background. In addition, myoepithelial cells and myofibroblasts at the edge of retraction spaces of DCIS are also stained by D2-40 that could be misinterpreted as tumor LVI. In conclusion, D2-40 immunohistochemistry reliably identifies the MEC of breast in a variety of lesions in a pattern similar to that of calponin and p63, and can be used as an additional MEC marker. Caution should be exercised when interpreting the staining of cells surrounding DCIS and carcinoma with retraction artifact.

Low CD10 mRNA expression identifies high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Purpose

Optimal management of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is controversial, and many patients are still overtreated. The local death of myoepithelial cells (MECs) is believed to be a pre-requisite to tumor invasion. We thus hypothesized that loss of CD10 expression, a MEC surface peptidase, would signify basement membrane disruption and confer increased risk of relapse in DCIS. The aim of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the prognostic value of CD10 in DCIS.

Experimental Design

CD10 expression was evaluated by quantitative RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry using paraffin-embedded samples of normal breast tissue (n = 11); of morphologically normal ducts associated with DCIS (n = 10); and of DCIS without an invasive component (n = 154).

Results

CD10 immunostaining was only observed in MECs in normal tissue and in DCIS. Normal tissue showed high mRNA expression levels of CD10, whereas DCIS showed a variable range. After a median follow-up of 6 years, DCIS with CD10 expression below the levels observed in normal tissue (71%) demonstrated a higher risk of local relapse (HR = 1.88; [95CI:1.30–2.70], p = 0.001) in univariate analysis. No relapse was observed in patients expressing high CD10 mRNA levels (29%) similar to the ones observed in normal tissue. In multivariate analysis including known prognostic factors, low CD10 mRNA expression remained significant (HR = 2.25; [95%CI:1.24–4.09], p = 0.008), as did the recently revised Van Nuys Prognostic Index (VNPI) score (HR = 2.03; [95%CI:1.23–3.35], p = 0.006).

Conclusion

The decrease of CD10 expression in MECs is associated with a higher risk of relapse in DCIS; this knowledge has the potential to improve DCIS management.

Role of myoepithelial cells in breast tumor progression

Myoepithelial cells form a semi-continuous protective sheet separating the human breast epithelium and the surrounding stroma. They suppress stromal invasion of tumor cells by the secretion of various anti-angiogenic and anti-invasive factors. The disruption of this cell layer results in the release of the growth factors, angiogenic factors, and reactive oxygen species causing an alteration in the microenvironment. This helps in the proliferation of surrounding cells and increases the invasiveness of tumor cells. Two theories are proposed for the mechanism of tumor epithelial cells progression from in situ to invasive stage. According to the first theory, tumor cell invasion is triggered by the overproduction of proteolytic enzymes by myoepithelial cells and surrounding tumor cells. The second theory states that tumor invasion is a multistep process, the interactions between damaged myoepithelial cells and the immunoreactive cells trigger the release of basement membrane degrading enzymes causing tumor progression. Further studies in understanding of molecular mechanism of myoepithelial cell functions in tumor suppression may lead to the identification of novel therapeutic targets for breast cancer.

Myoepithelial cells: any role in aspiration cytology smears of breast tumors?

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

To study the role of myoepithelial (ME) cells in distinguishing benign, proliferative breast diseases (PBD) and frank malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, histology proven 71 cases of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of palpable breast lesions were selected. There were 30 invasive carcinomas (24 infiltrating duct carcinoma and 6 infiltrating lobular carcinoma), 25 cases of benign lesion (21 fibroadenomas and 4 fibrocystic lesions) and 11 proliferative breast diseases (other than carcinoma in situ) and five cases of carcinoma in situ. The number of ME cells were estimated in respect to 1000 ductal cells. In every case at least 20 high power fields (x 40) were studied. Quantitative estimation of ME cell was correlated with the final diagnosis. Corresponding histopathology cases were also evaluated for diagnostic confirmation along with the pattern of distribution of ME cells. The ME cells were also quantitated on histopathology sections on smooth muscle actin (SMA) immunostained sections.

RESULTS

The mean number of ME cells per 1000 ductal cells on cytology smears was 5.1 +/- 5.5, 30.8 +/- 25, 28.3 +/- 20.2, and 38.4 +/- 38.8 in malignant, carcinoma in situ, PBD and benign breast lesions respectively. The non parametric Mann Whitney test showed significant difference in number of the ME cells between benign and malignant groups (p < .000), PBD and malignant groups (p < .000) and carcinoma in situ and malignant group (p < .001). However, it was insignificant between benign and PBD group, and PBD and carcinoma in situ (p > .01). In SMA stained histopathology sections, ME cell in benign, PBD, carcinoma in situ and malignant cases were 741.12 +/- 248, 238 +/- 172, 121.6 +/- 115 and 15.6 +/- 25.1 respectively. Statistical analysis showed significantly different number of ME cell between benign versus PBD group, carcinoma in situ and malignant group. It was also significant between PBD versus malignant, and carcinoma in situ versus malignant (p < .001, Mann Whitney test). However number of ME cell was not significant between PBD versus carcinoma in situ.

CONCLUSION

The number of ME cell in breast lesions may be helpful in distinguishing PBD versus invasive malignant tumors on FNAC smears. However it is not helpful to distinguish benign lesions versus PBD.

Use of p63 and CD10 in the differential diagnosis of papillary neoplasms of the breast

Papillary neoplasms of the breast represent a complex spectrum ranging from benign to malignant lesions. The myoepithelial cell (MEC) layer is generally continuous in papillomas and increasingly discontinuous to absent in atypical and malignant counterparts. Identification of MECs can be difficult on morphological grounds and currently relies on immunomarkers. We investigated the potential role of p63 and CD10 in 20 papillary lesions and compared them with 1A4 and calponin. In 18 cases, adjacent normal breast tissue was available for study. All four markers were diffusely positive in all samples of normal tissue and benign papillomas indicating similar sensitivity in the identification of MECs. Intense positivity was found in 100% of the cases with 1A4 and CD10, but in only 76% with calponin and in 60.5% with p63 (differences statistically significant, p < 0.05), suggesting that the former two render more reproducible results. The most specific markers were p63 and CD10 which showed cross-reactivity in 0% and in up to 33% of the cases respectively. 1A4 and calponin showed diffuse cross-reactivity in all cases. When assessing benign versus atypical papillomas, the best parameters were diffuse positivity using CD10 or p63, and continuous MEC layer, mainly using CD10. When comparing benign papillomas to carcinomas all parameters were equally useful with 1A4 and CD10. Regardless of the marker, intense positivity was the only parameter that could distinguish atypical papillomas from papillary carcinomas. p63 staining, which renders a nuclear and mostly discontinuous reactivity, was not as useful as the other markers when the parameter continuous MEC layer was evaluated. Although CD10 seems to combine the highest specificity and reproducibility with a good sensitivity, reproducibility of 1A4 is higher. Thus, a minimum panel to assess papillary lesions should include both markers. Although p63 is the most specific, its nuclear and discontinuous pattern may lead to erroneous diagnosis, especially in the differentiation between benign papillomas and atypical/malignant lesions.

Immunohistochemical staining of papillary breast lesions

The separation of ductal papilloma from intraductal papillary carcinoma of the breast on hematoxylin and eosin stained sections often presents diagnostic difficulty. Immunohistochemical staining is often employed in diagnosis, historically with smooth muscle actin (SMA). In this study, the staining characteristics of a panel of myoepithelial markers (calponin, p63, P-cadherin), were compared with SMA, and the epithelial expression of CD44s was assessed in 99 papillary lesions. SMA, calponin, and p63 demonstrated myoepithelial cells in 61%, 63%, and 65% of papillary lesions, respectively. However, specificity was quite variable. Calponin-stained stromal myofibroblasts (35% of cases), vessel pericytes (92%), and endothelial cells (69%), though each to a lesser degree than SMA. Calponin also showed cross reactivity with epithelium in 18% of cases. p63 was almost completely restricted to myoepithelial cell nuclei, and did not stain vascular smooth muscle or myofibroblasts. However, p63 stained the epithelial component in one papillary carcinoma, a basal layer of cells in 1 biphasic invasive carcinoma, and the cytoplasm in 1 case. P-cadherin stained both epithelial and myoepithelial cells. The epithelial expression of CD44s and did not distinguish papillomas from papillary carcinomas. Thus, P-cadherin and CD44s are not useful in the characterization of papillary lesions. Given increased specificity as compared with SMA, the combination of p63 and calponin is recommended for analysis of breast papillary lesions.

CD109, a new marker for myoepithelial cells of mammary, salivary, and lacrimal glands and prostate basal cells

The CD109 gene encodes a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface protein. Herein it is shown that CD109 is highly expressed in myoepithelial cells of mammary, salivary, and lacrimal glands; and in prostate basal cells. The anti-CD109 antibody generated by the authors was available for formalin-fixed paraffin section, and it strongly stained myoepithelial cells and basal cells but not ductal, acinar, and secretory cells in these glands. CD109 expression was negative in examined breast ductal carcinomas and prostate adenocarcinomas. These findings indicate that CD109 is a useful marker for the diagnosis of invasive breast and prostate carcinomas.

Use of immunohistochemistry in diagnosis of breast epithelial lesions

In recent years, the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast pathology has increased tremendously. It is not because the new genre of breast pathologists are less well trained than their "experienced" counterparts; it is mainly because of the demands of more accurate and precise diagnoses, identification of new entities and availability of novel antibodies. The main purpose of this review is to discuss the use of best available antibodies in diagnoses of breast epithelial lesions. The following items are discussed: assessment of invasion, IHC in papillary lesions, identification of breast tumor subtypes, IHC in proliferative breast lesions, assessment of lymphatic space invasion, diagnosis of metaplastic breast carcinoma, IHC in Paget disease, use of cytokeratins in sentinel lymph node assessment, and diagnosis of breast carcinoma at metastatic sites. Because the main focus of this review is on diagnosis, receptor studies on breast carcinoma are briefly discussed and only a few general comments are made.

Stromal CD10 expression in invasive breast carcinoma correlates with poor prognosis, estrogen receptor negativity, and high grade

CD10 is a zinc-dependent peptidase (metalloproteinase), which degrades a variety of bioactive peptides. Earlier studies suggested that CD10 expression in tumor stroma is associated with biological aggressiveness of the tumor. To date, only one study has addressed the clinical significance of stromal CD10 expression in invasive carcinoma of the breast. The aim of this confirmatory study is to evaluate stromal CD10 expression in breast carcinoma and to examine associations between CD10, clinicopathological variables, and patient outcome. Tissue microarrays, containing 438 cases of invasive breast carcinoma and 15 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ with 15 years median follow-up time, were assembled. CD10 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry and scored as negative, weak and strong. Nonparametric correlational tests, univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. Stromal CD10 was preferentially expressed in invasive compared to noninvasive breast cancers (P=0.003). There were correlations between stromal CD10 expression and higher tumor grade (P=0.01) and estrogen receptor (ER) negative status (P=0.002). There was no correlation between CD10 and lymph node status, tumor size, histological subtype, progesterone receptors, and Her2 status. Stromal CD 10 expression was associated with decreased long-term disease-specific and overall survival in the entire cohort (P<0.01), and in lymph node negative (P<0.05), but not lymph node positive subset of patients. It approached prognostic significance in multivariate analysis (P=0.06) when lymph node status, tumor size, ER and Her2 were considered in the same model; and was associated with a relative risk of death of 2.8, compared to relative risk of 2.4 for lymph node positive status. Thus, stromal CD10 expression in invasive carcinoma of the breast is associated with ER negativity, higher tumor grade and decreased survival and constitutes a potential prognostic marker and a target for development of novel therapies.

Differential expression of smooth muscle myosin, smooth muscle actin, h-caldesmon, and calponin in the diagnosis of myofibroblastic and smooth muscle lesions of skin and soft tissue

The diagnosis of low-grade and pseudosarcomatous spindle cell lesions of skin and soft tissue can sometimes be problematic; in particular, distinction between fibroblastic, myofibroblastic, and smooth muscle proliferations can occasionally pose difficulties on routine histologic examination. We have applied a panel of immunohistochemical markers to a series of spindle cell lesions of skin and soft tissue to assess the utility of the differential expression of smooth muscle and myofibroblastic-associated markers. Twenty-eight cases of nodular fasciitis, 42 cases of fibromatosis, and 3 cases of myofibroblastic sarcoma were stained with antibodies against smooth muscle actin (SMA), smooth muscle myosin (SMMS), calponin, and high-molecular weight caldesmon (h-caldesmon). For comparison, 12 cases of cutaneous leiomyoma and 8 cases of leiomyosarcomas involving superficial soft tissues and fascia were studied with the same panel of antibodies. Thirty-eight of 42 cases of fibromatosis were positive for SMA, 42/42 cases were positive for calponin, 39/42 cases were negative for SMMS, and all cases were negative for h-caldesmon. All cases of nodular fasciitis were positive for SMA and calponin, and all were negative for h-caldesmon and SMMS. All cases of myofibroblastic sarcoma were positive for SMA and 2/3 cases for calponin, and were negative for SMMS and h-caldesmon. All cases of cutaneous leiomyoma and leiomyosarcoma were positive for all 4 markers tested. Our results demonstrate a remarkably consistent pattern of reactivity of muscle and myofibroblastic-associated markers in lesions predominantly composed of myofibroblastic spindle cells, characterized by positive staining for SMA and calponin and absence of reactivity for SMMS and h-caldesmon. Application of this panel of stains may be of aid in the differential diagnosis of low-grade myofibroblastic lesions such as nodular fasciitis and fibromatosis from smooth muscle tumors of skin and soft tissue. This panel may additionally be of assistance in the diagnosis of myofibroblastic sarcoma.

Immunohistochemical expression of p63 in pleomorphic adenomas and carcinomas ex-pleomorphic adenomas of salivary glands

Alteration of the p63 protein expression has been associated with several human cancers including salivary gland tumors. We sought to assess the p63 expression in pleomorphic adenomas (PA) and carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenomas (Ca ex-PA), since this protein has been related to myoepithelial phenotype and the biological behavior of cancer. Ten samples of PA and ten of Ca ex-PA were submitted to immunohistochemistry using a monoclonal anti-p63 antibody, clone 4A4. p63 was regularly expressed in myoepithelial cells' nuclei of the normal glandular parenchyma and in PA, but it was completely absent in five out of the ten samples of Ca ex-PA. (P < 0.05 by Fisher's exact test). Apparently, only those cases depicting some myoepithelial differentiation were positive. Our data suggest that loss of myoepithelial differentiation is important in the evolution of Ca ex-PA, and corroborate the hypothesis that p63 antigen may be a useful marker of myoepithelial cells in salivary glands neoplasms.