Nivolumab and sunitinib combination in advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a multicenter, single-arm, phase Ib/II trial

Potential Mechanisms for Immunotherapy Resistance in Adult Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Soft-tissue sarcomas represent a diverse group of rare malignancies originating from mesenchymal tissue, accounting for less than 1% of adult cancers in the USA. With over 13,000 new cases and around 5350 deaths annually, patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas face limited therapeutic options and an estimated median overall survival of 18 months. While immunotherapy has demonstrated effectiveness in several cancers, its application in soft-tissue sarcomas remains challenging owing to the tumors' largely "cold" immunological environment, characterized by low levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a lack of soft-tissue sarcoma-specific biomarkers. This review examines potential mechanisms underlying immunotherapy resistance in soft-tissue sarcomas, including the complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity, the tumor microenvironment, and the role of immune-related genes. Despite preliminary findings suggesting correlations between immune profiles and histological subtypes, consistent biomarkers for predicting immunotherapeutic responses across soft-tissue sarcoma types are absent. Emerging strategies focus on converting "cold" tumors to "hot" tumors, enhancing their susceptibility to immunologic activation. While research is ongoing, personalized treatment approaches may offer hope for overcoming the inherent heterogeneity and resistance seen in soft-tissue sarcomas, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes for affected patients.

Odontogenic carcinosarcoma: a comprehensive review of clinical and therapeutic insights

Malignant odontogenic tumors are rare, accounting for only 1%-6.1% of all odontogenic tumors. Among them, odontogenic carcinosarcoma (OCS) is an exceptionally rare and aggressive malignant neoplasm originating from dental tissues. First recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1992, OCS is characterized by high-grade biphasic malignant epithelial and mesenchymal components, contributing to its aggressive clinical behavior. OCS often presents with nonspecific symptoms such as pain, swelling, and loosening of teeth, which complicate early diagnosis. Its rarity adds to the diagnostic challenges, frequently leading to delays in identification. Histopathological evaluation remains the cornerstone for accurate diagnosis, distinguishing OCS from other odontogenic tumors through features like epithelial nuclear pleomorphism, mitotic activity, and mesenchymal sarcomatous differentiation. Management typically involves surgical resection with clear margins, while adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy and radiation are considered in select cases. Recent advancements in molecular oncology and surgical techniques, including robotic-assisted procedures and 3D-printed reconstructive aids, offer promising avenues for improving patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach and ongoing research are essential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, refine treatment protocols, and improve the prognosis for patients affected by this rare malignancy. The primary objective of this review is to consolidate current knowledge on OCS, focusing on its diagnostic complexities, treatment strategies, and potential emerging therapies.

Which sarcoma requires PD1/PDL1 inhibitors, and what should be the best scheme? Present status and next steps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced sarcoma has been largely disappointing due to their "cold" tumor microenvironment, characterized by low tumor mutational burden, scarce CD8+ T-cell infiltration, and minimal expression of PD-1/PD-L1. However, recent findings highlight several scenarios in which immune checkpoint blockade exhibits clinical efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

ICIs have shown durable efficacy in specific sarcoma subtypes, such as alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), with objective response rates (ORR) exceeding 35% and 50%, in monotherapy or in combination, respectively. Doxorubicin-based regimens plus ICIs have yielded notorious and higher ORRs in the most common sarcoma subtypes, than historical chemotherapy data. Neoadjuvant radiation therapy combined with ICIs has significantly improved disease-free survival in localized selected soft tissue sarcomas.

SUMMARY

Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints in sarcomas is evolving, with recent findings highlighting its potential. Single-arm trials underscore the efficacy of ICIs in rare sarcomas, exemplified by the FDA approval of atezolizumab for ASPS. Combination strategies are proving more effective than chemotherapy alone, with ongoing comparative studies assessing chemo-immunotherapy in both metastatic and localized sarcomas. Advances in predictive biomarkers could expand the clinical use of ICIs.

Genomic landscape and preclinical models of angiosarcoma

Angiosarcoma is a cancer that develops in blood or lymphatic vessels that presents a significant clinical challenge due to its rarity and aggressive features. Clinical outcomes have not improved in decades, highlighting a need for innovative therapeutic strategies to treat the disease. Genetically, angiosarcomas exhibit high heterogeneity and complexity with many recurrent mutations. However, recent studies have identified some common features within anatomic and molecular subgroups. To identify potential therapeutic vulnerabilities, it is essential to understand and integrate the mutational landscape of angiosarcoma with the models that exist to study the disease. In this review, we will summarize the insights gained from reported genomic alterations in molecular and anatomic subtypes of angiosarcoma, discuss several potential actionable targets, and highlight the preclinical disease models available in the field.

Angiosarcoma: Role of Immunotherapy

OPINION STATEMENT

Recent clinical trials have investigated immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone, in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), or with chemotherapy in angiosarcoma, yielding mixed results across subtypes. Single-agent ICI therapy, such as cemiplimab (ORR 27.8%), has shown responses primarily in UV- and radiation-associated angiosarcomas, likely due to their higher tumor mutation burden (TMB), while dual ICI therapy (SWOG S1609, ORR 25%) suggests potential benefit but remains limited in cutaneous disease. ICI-TKI combinations, such as cabozantinib plus nivolumab (Alliance A091902, second-line, ORR 59%), demonstrated significant efficacy in both cutaneous and non-cutaneous angiosarcomas, suggesting anti-angiogenic therapy may enhance ICI responses in tumors historically resistant to checkpoint blockade. ICI-chemotherapy combinations have been less consistent. The Alliance A091902 first-line trial (paclitaxel ± nivolumab) found no overall PFS benefit, though scalp/face angiosarcoma patients appeared to fare better, raising the question of whether ICI alone might be equally effective in this subset. The South Korean paclitaxel + avelumab trial (ORR 50%) showed promising response rates, but the lack of detailed subgroup analysis limits interpretation. Other chemotherapy-ICI combinations, such as doxorubicin plus pembrolizumab, have shown isolated responses but require further study in larger cohorts. Moving forward, better biomarkers are critical for identifying which patients benefit most from ICIs, and while TKI-ICI combinations appear to hold the most promise, chemotherapy-ICI strategies need further refinement to optimize sequencing and patient selection in angiosarcoma treatment.

Clear Cell Sarcoma of the Knee: A Case Report of Diagnostic Challenges, Rapid Metastatic Spread, and Treatment Dilemmas

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare, aggressive soft tissue sarcoma with a strong predilection for the extremities. It is often misdiagnosed as melanoma. Despite surgical resection, CCS carries a high risk of early metastasis, most commonly to the lungs, bones, and lymph nodes, with limited effective systemic therapies available. We present the case of a 48-year-old man with CCS of the knee, initially presenting as a localized disease but rapidly progressing to widespread metastasis within three months. The patient underwent radical resection with knee arthroplasty and adjuvant radiotherapy, followed by systemic therapy with cabozantinib, ipilimumab, and nivolumab. Despite aggressive treatment, the disease progressed, leading to recurrent pleural effusions, respiratory failure, and, ultimately, the patient's demise within 10 months of diagnosis. This case underscores the highly aggressive nature of CCS and the challenges associated with its management. The rapid metastatic spread despite multimodal therapy highlights the need for improved early detection strategies and more effective systemic treatments, including novel targeted therapies and immunotherapy combinations.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with diverse clinical and molecular characteristics, characterized by limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as promising therapies for STS, yet comprehensive evaluations of their efficacy, especially in combination with other treatments, are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials on ICIs in STS treatment, sourced from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to May 31, 2024. The studies included both monotherapy and combination therapies with ICIs. We assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies. Data synthesis involved random-effects meta-analysis to determine pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for objective response rates (ORR), disease control rates (DCR), and high-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

RESULTS

The analysis included 38 studies with 1349 patients covering 24 STS subtypes. The overall ORR was 16% (95% CI 0.12-0.21), DCR was 64% (95% CI 0.57-0.70), and the rate of Grade 3-5 TRAEs was 19% (95% CI 0.13-0.27). Treatments combining ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) showed the highest efficacy (ORR 28%, 95% CI 0.18-0.40), albeit with increased adverse events. ORRs in first-line treatments were substantially higher (28%) compared to second-line treatments or beyond (11%). Subtypes like alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS), angiosarcoma (AS), and epithelioid sarcoma (ES) exhibited favorable responses exceeding 30%.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that ICIs, particularly when combined with TKIs, provide substantial therapeutic benefits in treating STS, significantly enhancing response rates in specific subtypes such as ASPS and AS. The results underscore the transformative potential of ICIs in STS treatment strategies. However, the variability across subtypes and treatment lines emphasizes the need for further randomized controlled trials to refine and personalize therapeutic approaches, ensuring optimal outcomes for patients with these diverse malignancies.

Efficacy and safety of the combination of anlotinib and envafolimab in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma: findings from a single-center retrospective study

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with envafolimab in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study enrolled 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma, who were treated at the Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery Research Center of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital between April 2022 and November 2023. The treatment regimen consisted of anlotinib combined with envafolimab. Treatment efficacy was evaluated using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

A total of 15 patients with unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma were included; among them, seven were male (46.7%) and eight were female (53.3%), with a median age of 55 years. The pathological subtype distribution was as follows: three (20.0%) patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma, 11 (73.3%) patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, and one (6.7%) patient with myxoid liposarcoma. At 12 weeks post-diagnosis, none of the patients achieved a complete response. The objective response rate was 6.7%, with one patient (6.7%) achieving a partial response. Disease stability was observed in 10 (66.6%) patients, which corresponded to a disease control rate of 73.3%. Disease progression occurred in four (26.7%) patients. The median follow-up time was 16.9 months and the median progression-free survival time was 14.2 months. Seven patients experienced TRAEs, of whom three (42.2%) had grade 3-4 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were liver function abnormalities, hypertension, and fatigue.

Conclusion

Anlotinib combined with envafolimab demonstrates promising efficacy and manageable safety in treating unresectable or metastatic liposarcoma.

Cancer-associated fibroblasts as therapeutic targets for cancer: advances, challenges, and future prospects

Research into cancer treatment has been mainly focused on developing therapies to directly target cancer cells. Over the past decade, extensive studies have revealed critical roles of the tumour microenvironment (TME) in cancer initiation, progression, and drug resistance. Notably, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) have emerged as one of the primary contributors in shaping TME, creating a favourable environment for cancer development. Many preclinical studies have identified promising targets on CAFs, demonstrating remarkable efficacy of some CAF-targeted treatments in preclinical models. Encouraged by these compelling findings, therapeutic strategies have now advanced into clinical evaluation. We aim to provide a comprehensive review of relevant subjects on CAFs, including CAF-related markers and targets, their multifaceted roles, and current landscape of ongoing clinical trials. This knowledge can guide future research on CAFs and advocate for clinical investigations targeting CAFs.

SMARCB1/INI-1-Deficient sinonasal carcinoma demonstrates a poor prognosis but favorable clinical outcomes after PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy: A case series

Despite advances in multimodal cancer therapy, such as combining radical surgery with high-intensity chemoradiotherapy, for SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC), the prognosis of patients remains poor. Immunotherapy is gaining increasing popularity as a novel treatment strategy for patients with SMARCB1/INI-1-deficient tumors. Herein, we report on the management of three patients with SDSC who received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor therapy as a part of multimodal therapy based on surgery and chemoradiotherapy. All three patients survived and demonstrated good clinical remission and disease control. To our knowledge, this is the first case series reporting the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes in neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and late first-line stages of treatment in patients with SDSC. Furthermore, we reviewed the relevant literature and further explored the correlation between SMARCB1/INI-1 deletion and immunotherapy.

IDH1/2 Mutations in Cancer: Unifying Insights and Unlocking Therapeutic Potential for Chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcomas, a rare form of bone sarcomas with multiple subtypes, pose a pressing clinical challenge for patients with advanced or metastatic disease. The lack of US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications underscores the urgent need for further research and development in this area. Patients and their families face challenges as there are no systemic therapeutic options available with substantial effectiveness. A significant number (50-80%) of chondrosarcomas have a mutation in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes. This review focuses on IDH-mediated pathogenesis and recent pharmacological advances with novel IDH inhibitors, explores their potential therapeutic value, and proposes potential future avenues for clinical trials combining IDH inhibitors with other systemic agents for chondrosarcomas.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Nivolumab and sunitinib in patients with advanced bone sarcomas: A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Herein, we present the results of the phase 2 IMMUNOSARC study (NCT03277924), investigating sunitinib and nivolumab in adult patients with advanced bone sarcomas (BS).

METHODS

Progressing patients with a diagnosis of BS were eligible. Treatment was comprised of sunitinib (37.5 mg/day on days 1-14, 25 mg/day afterword) plus nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Primary end point was progression-free survival rate (PFSR) at 6 months based on central radiology review. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 46 patients were screened, 40 patients entered the study, and 38 underwent central radiological review and were evaluable for primary end point. Median age was 47 years (range, 21-74). Histologies include 17 (43%) osteosarcoma, 14 chondrosarcoma (35%, 10 conventional, four dedifferentiated [DDCS]), eight (20%) Ewing sarcoma, and one (2%) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The PFSR at 6 months was 42% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27-58). With a median follow-up of 39.8 months (95% CI, 37.9-41.7), the median PFS and OS were 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-4.8) and 11.9 months (95% CI, 5.6-18.2). ORR by RECIST was 5%, with two of 38 partial responses (one of four DDCS and one of 17 osteosarcoma), 19 of 38 (50%) stable disease, and 17 of 38 (45%) progressions. Grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (six of 40, 15%), anemia (5/40, hypertension (6/40, 15%), 12.5%), ALT/AST elevation (5/40, 12.5%), and pneumonitis (1/40, 2.5%). Seventeen percent of patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity, including a treatment-related grade 5 pneumonitis CONCLUSION: The trial met its primary end point in the BS cohort with >15% of patients progression-free at 6 months. However, the toxicity profile of this regimen was relevant.

Novel Therapeutics in Soft Tissue Sarcoma

There has been noteworthy progress in molecular characterisation and therapeutics in soft tissue sarcomas. Novel agents have gained regulatory approval by the FDA. Examples are the tyrosine kinase inhibitors avapritinib and ripretinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST), the immune check point inhibitor atezolizumab in alveolar soft part tissue sarcoma, the γ-secretase inhibitor nirogacestat in desmoid tumours, the NTRK inhibitors larotrectinib and entrectinib in tumours with NTRK fusions, the mTOR inhibitor nab-sirolimus in PEComa, and the EZH-2 inhibitor tazemetostat in epithelioid sarcoma. The FDA has also recently granted accelerated approval for autologous T-cell therapy with afami-cel in patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. There are other promising treatments that are still investigational, such as MDM2 and CDK4/6 inhibitors in well-/dedifferentiated liposarcoma, immune checkpoint inhibitors in the head and neck angiosarcoma and a subset of patients with undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and PARP inhibitors in leiomyosarcoma. The challenges in drug development in soft tissue sarcoma are due to the rarity and the molecular heterogeneity of the disease and the fact that many subtypes are associated with complex karyotypes or non-targetable molecular alterations. We believe that progress maybe possible with a better understanding of the complex biology, the development of novel compounds for difficult targets such as proteolysis targeting chimeras (Protacs), the utilisation of modern clinical trial designs, and enhanced collaboration of academia with industry to develop treatments with a strong biologic rationale.

Histology-Specific Clinical Trial of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab in Patients with Sarcoma

PURPOSE

Survival of patients with metastatic sarcoma remains poor, and there is a pressing need for new therapies. Most sarcoma subtypes are not responsive to immune checkpoint inhibition alone. Lenvatinib, a multireceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor vasculature, has an immunomodulatory activity that contributes to its antitumor effects. Therefore, we hypothesized that a combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab would lead to improved clinical outcomes in patients with sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm study of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab in the following cohorts: (A) leiomyosarcoma, (B) undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), (C) vascular sarcomas (angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma), (D) synovial sarcoma or malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), and (E) bone sarcomas (osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma). The primary endpoint was the best overall response (BOR) rate documented by RECIST v1.1 by 27 weeks in each cohort, with a threshold of ≥2 responses among 10 patients. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, duration of response, and safety.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients were evaluable for the primary endpoint, which was met in the UPS and MPNST/synovial cohorts (BOR rates by 27 weeks of 25% and 30%, respectively). There were seven partial responses overall with additional responses noted in angiosarcoma and osteosarcoma. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade and grade 3 or higher occurred in 50/51 (98%) and 29/51 (57%) of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed durable responses in MPNST, synovial sarcoma, and osteosarcoma. Patients with UPS and angiosarcoma also responded. Further exploration of this approach is warranted to confirm activity and determine optimal dosing schedules.

Anlotinib plus TQB2450, a PD-L1 Antibody, in Patients with Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma: A Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

PURPOSE

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is an ultrarare soft-tissue sarcoma with a high rate of metastasis and no established treatment. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor) and TQB2450 (a PD-L1 inhibitor) in patients with ASPS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-arm, phase II study evaluated the efficacy of TQB2450, an anti-PD-L1 agent, combined with anlotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in adults with advanced ASPS. TQB2450 was given intravenously (1,200 mg) on day 1, and anlotinib (12 mg/day) was taken orally from day 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall response rate, with secondary endpoints including duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Lymphocyte infiltration and tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) were also analyzed as potential prognostic biomarkers.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 29 patients, of whom 28 were evaluable (one withdrew because of acute pancreatitis). An objective response was achieved in 82.1% of patients, including 4 complete and 19 partial responses. The median time to response was 2.8 months, and the duration of response was not reached, with an estimated median progression-free survival of 35.2 months. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.8% of patients, with no study-related deaths. Responders had a higher proportion of TLS area, TLS density, and CD20-positive immune cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of anlotinib and TQB2450 is effective and tolerable in patients with ASPS. TLS may serve as a prognostic biomarker, meriting further investigation.

Real world outcomes in alveolar soft part sarcomas: experience with an ultra-rare sarcoma from a tertiary care centre in North India

Background

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare, indolent soft tissue sarcoma, with a high predilection for systemic dissemination. This study aims to elucidate the patterns of clinical presentation of ASPS and their treatment outcomes, with emphasis on the use of newer therapeutic agents and their efficacy in advanced ASPS.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort that included patients with ASPS treated at our institute between 2016 and 2023. Clinicopathological data were obtained from case records and analysed to assess outcomes.

Results

The study included 34 patients (19 males, 15 females) with a median age of 28 (3-72) years. 7 patients presented with localised disease, and 27 with metastatic disease. The most common site of primary was the extremities (73%), and the most common sites of metastasis included the lungs (82%) and bones (21%). Brain metastasis was seen in 7 patients at baseline (25.9%). 90% of patients with metastatic disease received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in the first-line setting with a median progression-free survival of 12 months. The median overall survival in this subset was 36 months. 7 patients with the advanced disease received immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) (3-atezolizumab, 4-nivolumab); 2 patients on atezolizumab and 1 on nivolumab continue to be progression free at 20,15 and 52 months, respectively. Patients with brain metastasis were seen to have markedly poor outcomes.

Conclusion

The use of anti-angiogenic agents and ICIs has significantly improved survival in patients with advanced ASPS. Brain metastasis confers poor survival in these patients despite the use of newer agents. This study represents the largest cohort of patients with advanced ASPS from this region.

Predictive and Dynamic Signature for Antiangiogenics in Combination with a PD1 Inhibitor in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Correlative Studies Linked to the IMMUNOSARC Trial

PURPOSE

The IMMUNOSARC trial combined an antiangiogenic agent (sunitinib) with a PD1 inhibitor (nivolumab) in advanced sarcomas. Here, we present the first correlative studies of the soft-tissue sarcoma cohort enrolled in this trial.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded and peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and week 13. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples were used for transcriptomics and multiplex immunofluorescence, whereas peripheral blood samples were used for multiplexed immunoassays. Flow cytometry and Luminex assays were performed to validate translational findings in tumor-isolated cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells derived from patients.

RESULTS

The density of intratumoral CD8+ T cells, measured by multiplexed immunophenotyping, was significantly increased after treatment. This augment was accompanied by the dynamic significant increase in the gene expressions of CD86, CHI3L1, CXCL10, CXCL9, LAG3, and VCAM1 and the decrease in the expression levels of NR4A1. In peripheral blood, 12 proteins were significantly modulated by treatment at week 13. A score integrating the dynamic expression of the 7 genes and the 12 soluble factors separated 2 groups with distinct progression-free survival (PFS): 4.1 months [95% confidence interval, 3.5-not reached (NR)] versus 17 months (95% confidence interval, 12.0-NR), P = 0.014. This molecular score was predictive of PFS when applied to the normalized data determined in the baseline samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with sunitinib and nivolumab inflamed the sarcoma microenvironment, increasing CD8+ T-cell density and the expression of several genes/proteins with relevance in the response to PD1 inhibitors. A molecular signature identified two groups of patients with distinct PFS for the combination of antiangiogenics plus PD1 inhibitor therapy.

Exploratory analysis of immunomodulatory factors identifies L1CAM as a prognostic marker in alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Background

Alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare tumor driven by the ASPSCR1-TFE3 fusion protein, with a propensity for metastasis. Prognostic factors remain poorly understood, and traditional chemotherapies are largely ineffective. Recent interest lies in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), yet predictive biomarkers for treatment response are lacking. Previous studies have shown promising results with ICIs in ASPS, indicating a need for further investigation into biomarkers associated with immune response.

Objectives

To identify prognostic biomarkers in ASPS and to explore the role of immune-related markers, particularly L1CAM, in predicting patient outcomes.

Design

A retrospective cohort study of 19 ASPS patients registered in the GEIS database. The study involved the collection of clinical and histopathological data, followed by an analysis of immune markers and gene expression profiles to identify potential prognostic indicators.

Methods

Clinical and histopathological data were retrospectively collected from the GEIS-26 study cohort of 19 ASPS patients. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate immune markers programmed death-1 ligand (PD-L1), programmed death-1, FAS, FASL, CD8, CD3, and CD4. An HTG ImmunOncology panel was conducted on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples to explore gene expression. Effects of differentially expressed genes on survival were explored by Kaplan-Meier.

Results

PD-L1 positivity was widely observed (63%) in tumors, and CD8+ lymphocytic infiltration was common. High CD8 density correlated with greater overall survival (OS) while not statistically significant. No associations were found for other immune markers. L1CAM was identified as differentially expressed in patients with low CD8 infiltration and correlated negatively with OS.

Conclusion

High L1CAM expression correlated with poorer OS, highlighting its potential as a prognostic marker and therapeutic target in ASPS. Immunomodulatory interventions may hold promise, as evidenced by PD-L1 expression and CD8+ infiltration. Further research, including larger cohorts and international collaborations, is needed to validate these findings and explore therapeutic strategies targeting L1CAM in ASPS.

Results of an Integrated Phase I/II Prospective Clinical Trial (NEXIS) for Neoadjuvant Anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab) and Anti-CTLA-4 (Tremelimumab) With Radiation for High-Risk Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities

Background The current management of large, high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the trunk and extremities includes radiation and surgical resection. The initial use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy are controversial and although most patients present with localized disease, many eventually develop incurable metastases. The results and analysis of the safety and antitumor activity of combined checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy with neoadjuvant radiation for high-risk primary STS are presented here. Methods This was an integrated phase I/II prospective single-arm trial (Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness Trial (NEXIS) trial). Eligible patients were age ≥18 years with histologically confirmed intermediate or high-grade STS of the trunk or extremity ≥5 cm diameter and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The treatment algorithm included neoadjuvant anti-PD-L1 (Durvalumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (Tremelimumab) for three cycles of four weeks/cycle along with external beam radiation for five weeks, followed by wide surgical resection, and adjuvant Durvalumab monotherapy for four cycles. High-grade toxicity was continually assessed for the first 12 patients in phase I and the primary endpoint for phase II was an excellent histological response (grade 0 or 1 score on a semi-quantitative assessment for tumor regression). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03116529. Findings Between October 2017 and November 2021, 23 patients were enrolled. Five patients had progression of distant disease during neoadjuvant treatment and withdrew from the study before surgery. A total of 18 patients who completed at least the neoadjuvant immunotherapy, radiation and surgery were included for analysis. The most common tumor was undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n=9, 50%). The occurrence of any adverse event (AE) was recorded in 16 (88.9%) patients, and 3 (16.7%) patients had a serious AE. Eight out of 18 patients (44.4%) had disease-free survival at a median of 39.7 months. Four out of 18 patients (22.2%) were alive-with-disease at a median of 37.1 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis, and six out of 18 (33.3%) died of disease at a median of 20.8 months from diagnosis of distant metastasis. Local recurrence occurred in two patients (11.1%) and was concomitant with distant disease in each case. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1, a partial response was noted in five (27.8%) cases, stable disease in 10 (55.6%) cases, and progressive disease in three (16.7%) cases. Histological semiquantitative analysis revealed a "good" response in eight (44.4%) patients, a "moderate" response in four (22.2%) patients, and a "poor" response in six (33.3%) patients. The mean patient-reported outcome measures regarding fatigue, physical function, or physical interference demonstrated no significant differences between various timepoints before, during, or after treatment. Conclusion Neoadjuvant combined immunotherapy and radiation for high-risk STS was relatively well-tolerated. The histological, radiologic, and clinical outcome data in this novel trial were relatively similar to historical literature for non-immunotherapy treatment regimens.

Advances on immunotherapy for osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone cancer in children and young adults. Limited progress has been made in improving the survival outcomes in patients with osteosarcoma over the past four decades. Especially in metastatic or recurrent osteosarcoma, the survival rate is extremely unsatisfactory. The treatment of osteosarcoma urgently needs breakthroughs. In recent years, immunotherapy has achieved good therapeutic effects in various solid tumors. Due to the low immunogenicity and immunosuppressive microenvironment of osteosarcoma, immunotherapy has not yet been approved in osteosarcoma patients. However, immune-based therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and bispecfic antibodies are in active clinical development. In addition, other immunotherapy strategies including modified-NK cells/macrophages, DC vaccines, and cytokines are still in the early stages of research, but they will be hot topics for future study. In this review, we showed the functions of cell components including tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing cells in the tumor microenvironment of osteosarcoma, and summarized the preclinical and clinical research results of various immunotherapy strategies in osteosarcoma, hoping to provide new ideas for future research in this field.

Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Never Smokers: An Insight into SMARCB1 Loss

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constituting 85% of cases. Among NSCLCs, squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) is strongly associated with smoking. However, lung cancer in never smokers (LCINS) represents approximately 25% of lung cancer cases globally and shows increasing incidence, particularly in East Asia. LCINS-SqCC is less well-characterized, especially regarding its genomic alterations and their impact on clinical outcomes. We conducted a retrospective analysis over a 20-year period (July 2003-July 2023) at two major tertiary centers in the UK. The cohort included 59 patients with LCINS-SqCC who underwent radical surgical resection. Data collected included demographic information, comorbidities, histopathological details, and outcome metrics such as disease-free and overall survival. Molecular sequencing of tumor specimens was performed to identify genomic aberrations. The cohort had a median age of 71 years (IQR 62-77) and a median BMI of 25.4 (IQR 22.8-27.8), with a slight male predominance (53%). The majority of patients (93%) had a preoperative MRC of 1-2. Recurrent disease was observed in 23 patients (39%), and 32 patients (54%) had died at a median follow-up of 3 years. Median disease-free survival was 545 days (IQR 132-1496), and overall survival was 888 days (IQR 443-2071). Preoperative creatinine levels were higher in patients who experienced recurrence (p = 0.037). Molecular analysis identified biallelic SMARCB1 loss in two younger patients, associated with rapid disease progression despite R0 resection. These patients' tumors were PDL1-negative, TTF-1-negative, and positive for cytokeratin, CD56, and p40. SMARCB1-deficient SqCC in never smokers represents a highly aggressive variant with poor disease-free survival, highlighting the importance of integrating advanced molecular diagnostics in clinical practice. This study underscores the necessity for personalized treatment strategies, including targeted therapies such as EZH2 inhibitors and immune checkpoint blockade, to address the unique molecular pathways in SMARCB1-deficient cancers. Further clinical trials are essential to optimize therapeutic approaches for this challenging subgroup of lung cancer.

Immunological Drug-Drug Interactions Affect the Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapies

With the rapid expansion in the development and clinical utility of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for oncology, the continual evaluation of the safety profile of such agents is imperative. The safety profile of ICIs as monotherapy is dominated by immune-related adverse events, which can be considered as an extension of the mechanism of action of these immunomodulatory drugs. Further to this, an emerging theme is that ICI treatment can significantly impact upon the tolerability of coadministered medications. Numerous reports in literature indicate that ICIs may alter the immunological perception of coadministered drugs, resulting in undesirable reactions to a variety of concomitant medications. These reactions can be severe in manifestation, including hepatotoxicity and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS)/toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), but may also have detrimental impact on malignancy control. To minimize the impact of such drug-drug interactions on patients, it is imperative to identify medications that may cause these reactions, understand the underlying mechanisms, consider the timing and dosing of comedication, and explore alternative medications with comparable efficacies. Improving our understanding of how concomitant medications affect the safety and efficacy of ICIs can allow for potential culprit drugs to be identified/removed/desensitized. This approach will allow the continuation of ICI therapy that may have been discontinued otherwise, thereby improving malignant control and patient and drug development outcomes.

ASPSCR1::TFE3 Drives Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma by Inducing Targetable Transcriptional Programs

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare mesenchymal malignancy driven by the ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion. A better understanding of the mechanisms by which this oncogenic transcriptional regulator drives cancer growth is needed to help identify potential therapeutic targets. In this study, we characterized the transcriptional and chromatin landscapes of ASPS tumors and preclinical models, identifying the essential role of ASPSCR1::TFE3 in tumor cell viability by regulating core transcriptional programs involved in cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and mitochondrial biology. ASPSCR1::TFE3 directly interacted with key epigenetic regulators at enhancers and promoters to support ASPS-associated transcription. Among the effector programs driven by ASPSCR1::TFE3, cell proliferation was driven by high levels of cyclin D1 expression. Disruption of cyclin D1/CDK4 signaling led to a loss of ASPS proliferative capacity, and combined inhibition of CDK4/6 and angiogenesis halted tumor growth in xenografts. These results define the ASPS oncogenic program, reveal mechanisms by which ASPSCR1::TFE3 controls tumor biology, and identify a strategy for therapeutically targeting tumor cell-intrinsic vulnerabilities. Significance: The ASPSCR1::TFE3 fusion propels the growth of alveolar soft part sarcoma  by activating transcriptional programs that regulate proliferation, angiogenesis, mitochondrial biogenesis, and differentiation and can be therapeutically targeted to improve treatment.

Real-world outcomes of metastatic clear cell sarcoma sequential chemotherapy

Clear cell sarcoma is an ultra-rare chemoresistant subtype of soft tissue sarcoma. This retrospective analysis aimed to clarify the efficacy of palliative chemotherapy in CCS by assessing response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) at a referral center. A retrospective analysis of palliative treatment was conducted on patients with CCS treated at the sarcoma unit from 1997 to 2023. Treatment responses were assessed using RECIST criteria, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate PFS and OS. The analysis covered 23 CCS chemotherapy-treated patients with 11 (47.8%) men. The median age at the palliative treatment start was 32 years (range 18-59). The median follow-up was 8.2 months. Four patients were referred to our centre for M1 disease, and 6 received perioperative chemotherapy and progressed during follow-up. In the first line, 14 patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy (60.9%), five were treated with ifosfamide (HD-IFO), and four received other regimens. One patient (4.3%) achieved partial response (PR), and 12 patients (52.2%) achieved stable disease (SD) as the best response. Median PFS in 1 line was 2.79 months (95% CI: 2.04-8.38), and 1.76 months (95% CI: 0.72-6.97) in the second line. The median OS from first-line palliative chemotherapy was 8.2 months (95% CI: 6.2-14), and the second-line palliative chemotherapy mOS was 4.6 months (95% CI: 3.9-NA). Perioperatively anthracycline-pretreated worsened patients' median PFS in the M1 setting. Poor responses to conventional chemotherapy were observed in CCS, indicating a need for further clinical trials in this indication.

Combination treatment with PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors for sarcomas: state of the art, next questions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Only a small fraction of sarcomas exhibit recognized parameters of immune sensitivity, such as tumor mutational burden, PDL-1 expression, or microsatellite instability. Combined strategies aimed to modulate tumor microenvironment to increase the efficacy of PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors in sarcoma. Most explored prospective studies were based on combinations of PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors with antiangiogenics, other immune checkpoints, or chemotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Results on 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, and ORR in trials using PD1/PDL-1 inhibitors plus antiangiogenics ranged respectively as 46.9-55%, 4.7-7.8 months and 21-36.7%. In combination with other immune checkpoint inhibitors, the results of median PFS and ORR ranged from 2.8-4.1 months and 10-16%, respectively. In combination with chemotherapy, the best results were obtained with doxorubicin-based regimens compared to other agents. Duplet-based chemotherapy plus anti-PD1/PDL-1 obtained the highest ORR (56.2%) compared with doxorubicin (19-36.7%). Currently, the most robust predictive biomarker for anti-PD1/PDL-1 efficacy is the presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) with mature dendritic cells.

SUMMARY

Even when direct comparisons between PD1/PDL-1 inhibitor-based combinations and single agents have not been performed yet in sarcoma, some combinations appear promising. Studies controlling heterogeneity by biomarker or histotype selection contribute to an increase in efficacy or knowledge crucial for future comparative trials.

Emerging Treatments Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment for Advanced Chondrosarcoma

Chondrosarcoma (ChS), a malignant cartilage-producing tumor, is the second most frequently diagnosed osseous sarcoma after osteosarcoma. It represents a very heterogeneous group of malignant chemo- and radiation-resistant neoplasms, accounting for approximately 20% of all bone sarcomas. The majority of ChS patients have a good prognosis after a complete surgical resection, as these tumors grow slowly and rarely metastasize. Conversely, patients with inoperable disease, due to the tumor location, size, or metastases, represent a great clinical challenge. Despite several genetic and epigenetic alterations that have been described in distinct ChS subtypes, very few therapeutic options are currently available for ChS patients. Therefore, new prognostic factors for tumor progression as well as new treatment options have to be explored, especially for patients with unresectable or metastatic disease. Recent studies have shown that a correlation between immune infiltrate composition, tumor aggressiveness, and survival does exist in ChS patients. In addition, the intra-tumor microvessel density has been proven to be associated with aggressive clinical behavior and a high metastatic potential in ChS. This review will provide an insight into the ChS microenvironment, since immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents are emerging as interesting therapeutic options for ChS patients.

Immunotherapy in Sarcoma: Current Data and Promising Strategies

Traditionally sarcomas have been considered immunologically quiet tumours, with low tumour mutational burden (TMB) and an immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment (TME), consisting of decreased T-cell infiltration and elevated levels of H1F1α, macrophages and neutrophils.1,2 However, research has shown that a subset of sarcomas are immunologically 'hot' with either high TMB, PDL-1 expression, CD8+ T cells or presence of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) demonstrating sensitivity to immunotherapy.3,4 Here, we review the current evidence for immunotherapy use in bone sarcomas (BS) and soft tissue sarcomas (STS), with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and adoptive cellular therapies including engineered T-cell therapies, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and cancer vaccines and biomarkers of response.

Studies on Autophagy and Apoptosis of Fibrosarcoma HT-1080 Cells Mediated by Chalcone with Indole Moiety

This study demonstrated the anticancer efficacy of chalcones with indole moiety (MIPP, MOMIPP) in fibrosarcoma cells for the first time. The results showed that MIPP and MOMIPP reduced the viability of HT-1080 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. MOMIPP was more active than MIPP in HT-1080 cells, showing lower IC50 values (3.67 vs. 29.90 μM). Both compounds at a concentration of 1 μM induced apoptosis in HT-1080 cells, causing death strictly related to caspase activation, as cell viability was restored when the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD was added. Reactive oxygen species production was approximately 3-fold higher than in control cells, and cotreatment with the inhibitor of mitochondrial ATPase oligomycin diminished this effect. Such effects were also reflected in mitochondrial dysfunction, including decreased membrane potential. Interestingly, the compounds that were studied caused massive vacuolization in HT-1080 cells. Immunocytochemical staining and TEM analysis showed that HT-1080 cells exhibited increased expression of the LC3-II protein and the presence of autophagosomes with a double membrane, respectively. Both compounds induced apoptosis, highlighting a promising link between autophagy and apoptosis. This connection could be a new target for therapeutic strategies to overcome chemoresistance, which is a significant cause of treatment failure and tumour recurrence in fibrosarcoma following traditional chemotherapy.

How to develop new systemic treatments in ultra-rare cancers with high unmet needs? The case of alveolar soft-part sarcoma

Developing new drugs or generating evidence for existing drugs in new indications for ultra-rare cancers is complex and carries a high-risk of failure. This gets even harder in ultra-rare tumours, which have an annual incidence of 1 per 1,000,000 population or less. Here, we illustrate the problem of adequate evidence generation in ultra-rare tumours, using Alveolar Soft-Part Sarcomas (ASPS) - an ultra-rare sarcoma newly diagnosed in approximately 60 persons a year in the European Union - as an exemplar case showing challenges in development despite being potentially relevant for classes of agents. We discuss some possible approaches for addressing such challenges, especially focussing on constructive collaboration between academic groups, patients and advocates, drug manufacturers, and regulators to optimise drug development in ultra-rare cancers. This article, written by various European stakeholders, proposes a way forward to ultimately get better options for patients with ultra-rare cancers.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma: a two-center study

Background

Sarcoma is a highly heterogeneous malignancy with a poor prognosis. Although chemotherapy and targeted therapy have improved the prognosis to some extent, the efficacy remains unsatisfactory in some patients. The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in sarcoma need further evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a two-center study of sarcoma patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital and Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. The treatment regimens included PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy based on PD-1 inhibitors. The observed primary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS). Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

A total of 43 patients were included from the two centers. The median follow-up time for all patients was 13 months (range, 1-48 months). In the group of 37 patients with advanced or unresectable sarcoma, the mPFS was 6 months (95%CI: 5-12 months), and the mOS was 16 months (95%CI: 10-28 months). The ORR was 10.8% (4/37), and the DCR was 18.9% (7/37). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.11) and mOS (p=0.88) between patients with PD-L1 negative/positive expression. There were also no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.13) or mOS (p=0.72) between PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy. Additionally, there were no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.52) or mOS (p=0.49) between osteogenic sarcoma and soft tissue sarcoma. Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences in mPFS (p=0.66) or mOS (p=0.96) between PD-1 inhibitors combined with targeted therapy and PD-1 inhibitors combined with AI chemotherapy. Among the 6 patients receiving adjuvant therapy after surgery, the mPFS was 15 months (95%CI: 6-NA months), and the mOS was not reached. In terms of safety, most adverse events were mild (grade 1-2) and manageable. The most severe grade 4 adverse events were bone marrow suppression, which occurred in 4 patients but resolved after treatment. There was also one case of a grade 4 adverse event related to hypertension.

Conclusion

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment modality for sarcoma with manageable safety. Further inclusion of more patients or prospective clinical trials is needed to validate these findings.

Efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcomas after prior chemotherapy: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma is a heterogeneous malignancy arising from interstitial tissue. Anthracycline-based therapy is the first-line treatment recommended by guidelines for patients with locally advanced or metastatic unresectable sarcoma. Recently, targeted therapies, in particular tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), have made significant progress in the treatment of sarcoma, and their efficacy has been investigated in randomized controlled trials. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy of TKIs in patients with advanced or metastatic sarcoma who have previously received chemotherapy.

METHODS

We completed a meta-analysis after conducting literature searches in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. The single-drug, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled clinical trials of TKIs in patients with advanced or progressive sarcoma who have previously received chemotherapy are available for inclusion in the study. The observation results were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The subgroup analysis was performed according to histological subtypes of sarcoma.

RESULTS

This study included 6 studies, including 1033 patients. The ORR (OR: 7.99, 95% CI: 3.62-19.61, P < .00001), DCR (OR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.27-5.08, P = .009), PFS (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34-0.62, P < .00001), and OS (HR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.67-0.96, P = .02) of patients treated with TKIs were better than those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced sarcoma, TKIs have been shown to have advantages in terms of ORR, DCR and PFS and OS. Multi-targeted TKIs may be considered as one of the second-line treatment options for sarcoma patients who have received prior chemotherapy.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Remarkable response to pazopanib plus vivolumab in a patient with pericardial synovial sarcoma carrying a novel genotype BRCA2 c.968dupT: A case report

Pericardial synovial sarcomas (PSS) have a low incidence rate and are highly invasive with a dismal prognosis. Standard treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy but with limited response. Here, we report the case of a 15-year-old nonsmoking youngster diagnosed with PSS who developed disease relapsed from surgery after 1 month. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) using baseline tissue was performed, and BRCA2 c.968dupT was detected. Then pazopanib (a multitargeted inhibitor) plus nivolumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor) was administered, with a partial response and progression-free survival of 14 months. BRCA2 c.968dupT has not previously been reported in PSS and its response to targeted combination immunotherapy are not well characterized. Here, we report the efficacy of pazopanib combined with nivolumab in a PSS patient harboring BRCA2 c.968dupT and also provide the clinical evidence of the utility of NGS in exploring actionable mutations for solid tumor. Combination therapy based on immunotherapy may be a potential treatment choice for PSS harboring BRCA2 mutation.

Durvalumab plus pazopanib combination in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a phase II trial

We aimed to determine the activity of the anti-VEGF receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, pazopanib, combined with the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor, durvalumab, in metastatic and/or recurrent soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In this single-arm phase 2 trial (NCT03798106), treatment consisted of pazopanib 800 mg orally once a day and durvalumab 1500 mg once every 3 weeks. Primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, disease control rate, immune-related response criteria, and safety. The ORR was 30.4% and the trial met the pre-specified endpoint. The median PFS was 7.7 months (95% confidence interval: 5.7-10.4). The common treatment-related adverse events of grades 3-4 included neutropenia (9 [19.1%]), elevated aspartate aminotransferase (7 [14.9%]), alanine aminotransferase (5 [10.6%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [8.5%]). In a prespecified transcriptomic analysis, the B lineage signature was a significant key determinant of overall response (P = 0.014). In situ analysis also showed that tumours with high CD20+ B cell infiltration and vessel density had a longer PFS (P = 6.5 × 10-4) than those with low B cell infiltration and vessel density, as well as better response (50% vs 12%, P = 0.019). CD20+ B cell infiltration was identified as the only independent predictor of PFS via multivariate analysis. Durvalumab combined with pazopanib demonstrated promising efficacy in an unselected STS cohort, with a manageable toxicity profile.

Role of Immunotherapy in Sarcomas

Sarcomas are a group of malignancies of mesenchymal origin with a plethora of subtypes. Given the sheer heterogeneity of various subtypes and the rarity of the disease, the management of sarcomas has been challenging, with poor patient outcomes. Surgery, radiation therapy and chemotherapy have remained the backbone of treatment in patients with sarcoma. The introduction of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of various solid and hematological malignancies. In this review, we discuss the basics of immunotherapy and the immune microenvironment in sarcomas; various modalities of immunotherapy, like immune checkpoint blockade, oncolytic viruses, cancer-targeted antibodies, vaccine therapy; and adoptive cell therapies like CAR T-cell therapy, T-cell therapy, and TCR therapy.

Emerging innovations and advancements in the treatment of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas

In this special edition update on soft tissue sarcomas (STS), we cover classifications, emerging technologies, prognostic tools, radiation schemas, and treatment disparities in extremity and truncal STS. We discuss the importance of enhancing local control and reducing complications, including the role of innovative imaging, surgical guidance, and hypofractionated radiation. We review advancements in systemic and immunotherapeutic treatments and introduce disparities seen in this vulnerable population that must be considered to improve overall patient care.

Immune Cells in the Tumor Microenvironment of Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a rare heterogeneous group of malignant neoplasms characterized by their aggressive course and poor response to treatment. This determines the relevance of research aimed at studying the pathogenesis of STSs. By now, it is known that STSs is characterized by complex relationships between the tumor cells and immune cells of the microenvironment. Dynamic interactions between tumor cells and components of the microenvironment enhance adaptation to changing environmental conditions, which provides the high aggressive potential of STSs and resistance to antitumor therapy. Today, active research is being conducted to find effective antitumor drugs and to evaluate the possibility of using therapy with immune cells of STS. The difficulty in assessing the efficacy of new antitumor options is primarily due to the high heterogeneity of this group of malignant neoplasms. Studying the role of immune cells in the microenvironment in the progression STSs and resistance to antitumor therapies will provide the discovery of new biomarkers of the disease and the prediction of response to immunotherapy. In addition, it will help to initially divide patients into subgroups of good and poor response to immunotherapy, thus avoiding wasting precious time in selecting the appropriate antitumor agent.

Comprehensive analysis reveals potential therapeutic targets and an integrated risk stratification model for solitary fibrous tumors

Solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs) are rare mesenchymal tumors with unpredictable evolution and with a recurrence or metastasis rate of 10-40%. Current medical treatments for relapsed SFTs remain ineffective. Here, we identify potential therapeutic targets and risk factors, including IDH1 p.R132S, high PD-L1 expression, and predominant macrophage infiltration, suggesting the potential benefits of combinational immune therapy and targeted therapy for SFTs. An integrated risk model incorporating mitotic count, density of Ki-67+ cells and CD163+ cells, MTOR mutation is developed, applying a discovery cohort of 101 primary non-CNS patients with negative tumor margins (NTM) and validated in three independent cohorts of 210 SFTs with the same criteria, and in 36 primary CNS SFTs with NTM. Compared with the existing models, our model shows significantly improved efficacy in identifying high-risk primary non-CNS and CNS SFTs with NTM for tumor progression.Our findings hold promise for advancing therapeutic strategies and refining risk prediction in SFTs.

Factors associated with survival in patients with clear cell sarcoma

Aims

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) of soft-tissue is a rare melanocytic subtype of mesenchymal malignancy. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and therapeutic factors associated with increased survival, stratified by clinical stage, in order to determine the optimal treatment.

Methods

The study was a retrospective analysis involving 117 patients with histologically confirmed CCS, between July 2016 and November 2017, who were enrolled in the Bone and Soft Tissue Tumour Registry in Japan.

Results

The five- and ten-year survival rates were 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 29 to 52) and 37% (95% CI 25 to 49), respectively. On multivariable analysis, the size of the tumour of > 10 cm (p = 0.006), lymph node metastasis at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), distant metastases at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.001), and no surgery for the primary tumour (p = 0.019) were independently associated with a poor survival. For N0M0 CCS (n = 68), the development of distant metastases was an independent prognostic factor for survival (early (< 12 months), hazard ratio (HR) 116.78 (95% CI 11.69 to 1,166.50); p < 0.001; late (> 12 months), HR 14.79 (95% CI 1.66 to 131.63); p = 0.016); neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.895) and/or radiotherapy (p = 0.216) were not significantly associated with survival. The five-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 19% (95% CI 8 to 35) and the size of the tumour was significantly associated with an increased rate of local recurrence (p = 0.012). For N1M0 CCS (n = 18), the risk of mortality was significantly lower in patients who underwent surgery for both the primary tumour and lymph node metastases (HR 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.56); p = 0.020). For M1 CCS (n = 31), excision of the primary tumour was independently associated with better survival (HR 0.26 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.76); p = 0.013). There was no significant difference in survival between the different types of systemic treatment (p = 0.523).

Conclusion

Complete excision of the primary tumour and lymph nodes is associated with a better survival in patients with CCS. Systemic treatment appears to provide limited benefits, demonstrating a pressing need for novel systemic agents.

Antiangiogenics in Malignant Granular Cell Tumors: Review of the Literature

Granular cell tumors (GCT) represent 0.5% of all soft tissue sarcomas (STS), and when metastatic, they exhibit aggressive behavior and determine limited survival. Metastatic GCTs are relatively chemo-resistant; however, there is growing evidence of the benefit of using pazopanib and other targeted therapies in this histology. This is a review of the role of pazopanib and other targeted therapies in the treatment of GCTs, along with some insights on pathology and molecular biology described in GCTs. From 256 articles found in our search, 10 case-report articles met the inclusion criteria. Pazopanib was the most employed systemic therapy. The median reported time on therapy with pazopanib was seven months. Eight out of ten patients (80%) experienced disease control with pazopanib, while four out of ten (40%) patients achieved an objective RECIST response. Molecular studies suggested that antitumoral effects of pazopanib in GCT might be due to a loss-of-function of ATP6AP1/2 genes which consequently enhance signaling through several molecular pathways, such as SFKs, STAT5a/b, and PDGFR-β. Other reported targeted therapies for malignant GCTs included pazopanib in combination with crizotinib, which showed disease control for four months in one patient, and a PI3K inhibitor which achieved disease control for nine months in another patient. Dasatinib and megestrol were ineffective in two other different patients. Pazopanib has been demonstrated to be active in advanced GCTs and may be considered as a preferable treatment option.

Immune-related Adverse Events after Immune Checkpoint Blockade-based Therapy Are Associated with Improved Survival in Advanced Sarcomas

The association between immune-related AEs (irAE) and outcome in patients with sarcoma is not known. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with advanced sarcoma treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB)-based therapy. Association of irAEs with survival was assessed using a Cox regression model that incorporated irAE occurrence as a time-dependent covariate. Tumor samples with available RNA sequencing data were stratified by presence of an irAE to identify patterns of differential gene expression. A total of 131 patients were included. Forty-two (32%) had at least one irAE of any grade and 16 (12%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 irAE. The most common irAEs were hypothyroidism (8.3%), arthralgias (5.3%), pneumonitis (4.6%), allergic reaction (3.8%), and elevated transaminases (3.8%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from the time of study entry were 11.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.7-15.0) and 74.6 weeks (CI, 44.9-89.7), respectively. On Cox analysis adjusting for clinical covariates that were significant in the univariate setting, the HR for an irAE (HR, 0.662; CI, 0.421-1.041) approached, but did not reach statistical significance for PFS (P = 0.074). Patients had a significantly lower HR for OS (HR, 0.443; CI, 0.246-0.798; P = 0.007) compared with those without or before an irAE. Gene expression profiling on baseline tumor samples found that patients who had an irAE had higher numbers of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells, CD8+ T cells, and regulatory T cells as well as upregulation of immune and inflammatory pathways.

SIGNIFICANCE

irAE after ICB therapy was associated with an improved OS; it also approached statistical significance for improved PFS. Patients who had an irAE were more likely to have an inflamed tumor microenvironment at baseline.

The current management of clear cell sarcoma

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a rare melanocytic soft tissue sarcoma with a high propensity for lymphatic metastasis and poor prognosis. It is characterized by the translocation of t (12;22), resulting in the rearrangement of the EWSR1 gene and overexpression of MET. Despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue sarcomas, the management of CCSs remains challenging owing to their rarity, unique biological behaviour and limited understanding of their molecular pathogenesis. The standard treatment for localized CCSs is surgical excision with negative margins. However, there is an ongoing debate regarding the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy and lymphadenectomy in the management of this disease. CCSs are usually resistant to conventional chemotherapy. Targeted therapies, such as sunitinib and MET inhibitors, may provide promising results. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, is currently under investigation as a potential treatment option for CCSs. Further research is needed to better understand the biology of CCSs and develop effective therapeutic strategies. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of current knowledge and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of CCSs.

Role of immunotherapy in chondrosarcoma: A case report and review of the literature

Chondrosarcomas (CSs) consist of a heterogenous group of primary bone cancers arising from malignant cells which produce cartilaginous matrix. As the second most common primary bone cancer, CS are often resistant to systemic chemotherapy due to poor vascularization, slow proliferation, and expression of multidrug-resistant pumps. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the field of oncology and are now designated as frontline therapy for many solid tumor cancers. Several studies have demonstrated increased expression of programed cell death 1 (PD-1) and PD-L1 in CS tissue in vitro, which has led to the development of multiple clinical trials for immunotherapy in patients with aggressive CS. In this review, we highlight the ongoing investigation into the role for immunotherapy in CS. We also report the case of a 44-year-old female with a history of stage IV primary CS of the right shoulder who underwent radical resection with recurrence and demonstrated a spectacular sustained response to pembrolizumab at our center. Our review highlights the need for further studies investigating the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of aggressive bone sarcomas that are resistant to standard surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment.

Atezolizumab for Advanced Alveolar Soft Part Sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare soft-tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis and no established therapy. Recently, encouraging responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported.

METHODS

We conducted an investigator-initiated, multicenter, single-group, phase 2 study of the anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) agent atezolizumab in adult and pediatric patients with advanced ASPS. Atezolizumab was administered intravenously at a dose of 1200 mg (in patients ≥18 years of age) or 15 mg per kilogram of body weight with a 1200-mg cap (in patients <18 years of age) once every 21 days. Study end points included objective response, duration of response, and progression-free survival according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), version 1.1, as well as pharmacodynamic biomarkers of multistep drug action.

RESULTS

A total of 52 patients were evaluated. An objective response was observed in 19 of 52 patients (37%), with 1 complete response and 18 partial responses. The median time to response was 3.6 months (range, 2.1 to 19.1), the median duration of response was 24.7 months (range, 4.1 to 55.8), and the median progression-free survival was 20.8 months. Seven patients took a treatment break after 2 years of treatment, and their responses were maintained through the data-cutoff date. No treatment-related grade 4 or 5 adverse events were recorded. Responses were noted despite variable baseline expression of programmed death 1 and PD-L1.

CONCLUSIONS

Atezolizumab was effective at inducing sustained responses in approximately one third of patients with advanced ASPS. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03141684.).

Combination of Genomic Landsscape and 3D Culture Functional Assays Bridges Sarcoma Phenotype to Target and Immunotherapy

Genomic-based precision medicine has not only improved tumour therapy but has also shown its weaknesses. Genomic profiling and mutation analysis have identified alterations that play a major role in sarcoma pathogenesis and evolution. However, they have not been sufficient in predicting tumour vulnerability and advancing treatment. The relative rarity of sarcomas and the genetic heterogeneity between subtypes also stand in the way of gaining statistically significant results from clinical trials. Personalized three-dimensional tumour models that reflect the specific histologic subtype are emerging as functional assays to test anticancer drugs, complementing genomic screening. Here, we provide an overview of current target therapy for sarcomas and discuss functional assays based on 3D models that, by recapitulating the molecular pathways and tumour microenvironment, may predict patient response to treatments. This approach opens new avenues to improve precision medicine when genomic and pathway alterations are not sufficient to guide the choice of the most promising treatment. Furthermore, we discuss the aspects of the 3D culture assays that need to be improved, such as the standardisation of growth conditions and the definition of in vitro responses that can be used as a cut-off for clinical implementation.

Results of an Open-label, Phase Ia/b Study of Pembrolizumab plus Olaratumab in Patients with Unresectable, Locally Advanced, or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

PURPOSE

The study evaluated safety and efficacy of olaratumab + pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable locally advanced/metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) with disease progression on standard treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized, phase Ia/Ib dose-escalation study followed by cohort expansion (olaratumab + pembrolizumab intravenous infusion). Primary objectives were safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The majority of patients enrolled (n = 41) were female [phase Ia: 9 of 13, phase Ib/dose-expansion cohort (DEC), 17 of 28], aged < 65 years. In phases Ia and Ib, 13 and 26 patients received prior systemic therapy, respectively. Patients received olaratumab 15 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 1) or 20 mg/kg (phase Ia; cohort 2 and phase Ib) and pembrolizumab 200 mg (phase Ia/Ib). The median (Q1-Q3) duration of therapy (olaratumab) was 6.0 (3.0-11.9; cohort 1), 14.4 (12.4-20.9; cohort 2), and 14.0 (6.0-21.8) weeks (DEC). No dose-limiting toxicities and few grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events [TEAE; 15 mg/kg: 2 (increased lipase); 20 mg/kg: 1 (increased lipase), 1 (colitis), 2 (diarrhea), 3 (anemia)] were reported. Two TEAEs (increased lipase) were related to study discontinuations. Twenty-one patients reported mild (grade ≤ 2) TEAEs [phase Ia, disease control rate (DCR):14.3% (1/7, cohort 1); 66.7% (4/6, cohort 2); no responses were reported; phase Ib, DCR: 53.6% (15/28); objective response rate: 21.4% (6/28; RECIST and irRECIST criteria)]. No response was observed in patients with programmed death ligand-1-positive tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

Antitumor activity was observed in some patients in DEC, and combination was well tolerated with manageable safety profile. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy and mechanistic impact of platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitors with immune checkpoint modulator coadministration.

Promise and Challenges of T Cell Immunotherapy for Osteosarcoma

The cure rate for metastatic or relapsed osteosarcoma has not substantially improved over the past decades despite the exploitation of multimodal treatment approaches, allowing long-term survival in less than 30% of cases. Patients with osteosarcoma often develop resistance to chemotherapeutic agents, where personalized targeted therapies should offer new hope. T cell immunotherapy as a complementary or alternative treatment modality is advancing rapidly in general, but its potential against osteosarcoma remains largely unexplored. Strategies incorporating immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) modified T cells, and T cell engaging bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are being explored to tackle relapsed or refractory osteosarcoma. However, osteosarcoma is an inherently heterogeneous tumor, both at the intra- and inter-tumor level, with no identical driver mutations. It has a pro-tumoral microenvironment, where bone cells, stromal cells, neovasculature, suppressive immune cells, and a mineralized extracellular matrix (ECM) combine to derail T cell infiltration and its anti-tumor function. To realize the potential of T cell immunotherapy in osteosarcoma, an integrated approach targeting this complex ecosystem needs smart planning and execution. Herein, we review the current status of T cell immunotherapies for osteosarcoma, summarize the challenges encountered, and explore combination strategies to overcome these hurdles, with the ultimate goal of curing osteosarcoma with less acute and long-term side effects.

Pembrolizumab in patients with rare and ultra-rare sarcomas (AcSé Pembrolizumab): analysis of a subgroup from a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2, basket trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of diseases with few treatment options. Immunotherapy has shown little activity in studies including unselected sarcomas, but immune checkpoint blockers have shown activity in specific histotypes. We evaluated the activity of pembrolizumab in rare and ultra-rare sarcomas.

METHODS

AcSé Pembrolizumab is an ongoing phase 2, basket, multitumour study investigating the activity of pembrolizumab monotherapy in rare cancers. Here, we report the results obtained in patients with selected histotypes of rare sarcomas (incidence of less than one case per 1 000 000 people per year) recruited at 24 French hospitals. Key inclusion criteria were age 15 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and advanced disease that was untreated and resistant to treatment. Patients were given pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously on day 1 of every 21-day cycle for a maximum of 24 months. The primary endpoint was objective response rate at week 12 using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, assessed by local investigators. The primary endpoint and safety were analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The AcSé Pembrolizumab study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03012620.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 4, 2017, and Dec 29, 2020, 98 patients were enrolled, of whom 97 received treatment and were included in analyses (median age 51 years [IQR 35-65]; 53 [55%] were male; 44 [45%] were female; no data were collected on race or ethnicity). 34 (35%) patients had chordomas, 14 (14%) had alveolar soft part sarcomas, 12 (12%) had SMARCA4-deficient sarcomas or malignant rhabdoid tumours, eight (8%) had desmoplastic small round cell tumours, six (6%) had epithelioid sarcomas, four (4%) had dendritic cell sarcomas, three (3%) each had clear cell sarcomas, solitary fibrous tumours, and myxoid liposarcomas, and ten (10%) had other ultra-rare histotypes. As of data cutoff (April 11, 2022), median follow-up was 13·1 months (range 0·1-52·8; IQR 4·3-19·7). At week 12, objective response rate was 6·2% (95% CI 2·3-13·0), with no complete responses and six partial responses in the 97 patients. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were anaemia (eight [8%] of 97), alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase increase (six [6%]), and dyspnoea (five [5%]). 86 serious adverse events were reported in 37 patients. Five deaths due to adverse events were reported, none of which were determined to be related to treatment (two due to disease progression, two due to cancer, and one due to unknown cause).

INTERPRETATION

Our data show the activity and manageable toxicity of pembrolizumab in some rare and ultra-rare sarcoma histotypes, and support the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway as a potential therapeutic target in selected histotypes. The completion of the basket study will provide further evidence regarding the activity and toxicity of pembrolizumab in identified rare types of cancer.

FUNDING

The Ligue contre le cancer, INCa, MSD.

TRANSLATION

For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.