Primary results from TAIL: a global single-arm safety study of atezolizumab monotherapy in a diverse population of patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

Incidence of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Containing Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used to treat many cancers, and cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) are among the most frequently encountered toxic effects. Understanding the incidence and prognostic associations of cirAEs is of importance as their uses in different settings, combinations, and tumor types expand. To evaluate the incidence of cirAEs and their association with outcome measures across a variety of ICI regimens and cancers, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published trials of anti-programmed death-1/ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) ICIs, both alone and in combination with chemotherapy, antiangiogenic agents, or other ICIs in patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and urothelial carcinoma. Key findings of our study include variable cirAE incidence among tumors and ICI regimens, positive association with increased cirAE incidence and response rate, as well as significant association between increased vitiligo incidence and overall survival. Across 174 studies, rash, pruritis, and vitiligo were the most reported cirAEs, with incidences of 16.7%, 18.0%, and 6.6%, respectively. Higher incidence of cirAEs was associated with ICI combination regimens and with CTLA-4-containing regimens, particularly with higher doses of ipilimumab, as compared to PD-1/L1 monotherapies. Outcome measures including response rate and progression-free survival were positively correlated with incidence of cirAEs. The response rate and incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash were associated with expected rises in incidence of 0.17% (p = 0.0238), 0.40% (p = 0.0010), and 0.18% (p = 0.0413), respectively. Overall survival was positively correlated with the incidence of pruritis, vitiligo, and rash; this association was significant for vitiligo (p = 0.0483). Our analysis provides benchmark incidence rates for cirAEs and links cirAEs with favorable treatment outcomes at a study level across diverse solid tumors and multiple ICI regimens.

Current and Emerging Treatment Options for Patients with Metastatic EGFR-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer After Progression on Osimertinib and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Podcast Discussion

Patients with metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are widely treated with osimertinib, the preferred first-line treatment option. However, disease progression inevitably occurs, driven by EGFR-dependent or EGFR-independent mechanisms of resistance. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the recommended treatment following progression with osimertinib but responses to platinum-based chemotherapy are transient. Salvage therapies, which are used after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy, have poor clinical outcomes in addition to substantial toxicity. In this podcast, we discuss the current treatment landscape and emerging therapeutic options for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC whose disease has progressed following treatment with osimertinib and platinum-based chemotherapy.Podcast audio available for this article.

Targeting tumor-associated macrophage: an adjuvant strategy for lung cancer therapy

The emergence of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various types of cancer. Nevertheless, lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide due to the development of resistance in most patients. As one of the most abundant groups of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play crucial and complex roles in the development of lung cancer, including the regulation of immunosuppressive TME remodeling, metabolic reprogramming, neoangiogenesis, metastasis, and promotion of tumoral neurogenesis. Hence, relevant strategies for lung cancer therapy, such as inhibition of macrophage recruitment, TAM reprograming, depletion of TAMs, and engineering of TAMs for drug delivery, have been developed. Based on the satisfactory treatment effect of TAM-targeted therapy, recent studies also investigated its synergistic effect with current therapies for lung cancer, including immunotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) treatment, or photodynamic therapy. Thus, in this article, we summarized the key mechanisms of TAMs contributing to lung cancer progression and elaborated on the novel therapeutic strategies against TAMs. We also discussed the therapeutic potential of TAM targeting as adjuvant therapy in the current treatment of lung cancer, particularly highlighting the TAM-centered strategies for improving the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (AID) have been traditionally excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) due to concerns for toxicity. As indications for ICI expand, more data are needed on the safety and efficacy of ICI treatment in cancer patients with AID.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies consisting of NSCLC, AID, ICI, treatment response, and adverse events. Outcomes of interest include incidence of autoimmune flare, irAE, response rate, and ICI discontinuation. Study data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 24 cohort studies, consisting of 11,567 cancer patients (3774 NSCLC patients and 1157 with AID). Pooled analysis revealed an AID flare incidence of 36% (95% CI, 27%-46%) in all cancers and 23% (95% CI, 9%-40%) in NSCLC. Preexisting AID was associated with an increased risk of de novo irAE in all cancer patients (RR 1.38, 95% CI, 1.16-1.65) and NSCLC patients (RR 1.51, 95% CI, 1.12-2.03). There was no difference in de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE and tumor response between cancer patients with and without AID. However, in NSCLC patients, preexisting AID was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE (RR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.01-3.75) but also better tumor response in achieving a complete or partial response (RR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.19-2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC patients with AID are at a higher risk of grade 3 to 4 irAE but are more likely to achieve treatment response. Prospective studies focused on optimizing immunotherapeutic strategies are needed to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients with AID.

Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab in Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy in Chinese patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, patients received atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was incidence of atezolizumab-related serious adverse events (SAEs). Secondary endpoints included other safety and efficacy measures. Patients with available tumor tissue and blood samples underwent biomarker analyses. Patients with available tumor biopsies underwent exome sequencing.

RESULTS

The safety and evaluable populations included 101 and 97 patients, respectively. Exome sequencing data were available for 31 patients. Median follow-up time was 27.43 months. Atezolizumab-related SAEs and immune-related adverse events occurred in 25.7% and 47.5% of the safety population, respectively, and in the following subgroups: central nervous system metastases (n = 14), 35.7% and 35.7%; squamous NSCLC (n = 39), 33.3% and 53.8%. The 24-month overall survival rate was 37.4%. Median overall survival and progression-free survival by RECIST v1.1 were 15.31 and 2.86 months, respectively; objective response rate was 16.5% in the evaluable population. PRRC2C (odds ratio: 12.780, P = 0.014) and ZMYND8 (odds ratio: 19.963, P = 0.016) gene mutations were significantly enriched in atezolizumab responders vs non-responders. Patients with CD8+ TILs > 10% vs ≤ 10% were significantly more likely to be atezolizumab responders.

CONCLUSION

No new safety concerns were raised, and clinically meaningful benefits of atezolizumab monotherapy were shown. The results of the biomarker analyses may guide future therapeutic strategies.

Pan-cancer efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor in refractory solid tumor: A single-arm, open-label, phase II trial

The combination of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of refractory solid tumor has not been well investigated. Thus, our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new regimen of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor to treat refractory solid tumor. APICAL-RST is an investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, phase II trial in patients with heavily treated, refractory, metastatic solid tumor. Eligible patients experienced disease progression during prior therapy without further effective regimen. All patients received anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitor. The primary endpoints were objective response and disease control rates. The secondary endpoints included the ratio of progression-free survival 2 (PFS2)/PFS1, overall survival (OS) and safety. Forty-one patients were recruited in our study; 9 patients achieved a confirmed partial response and 21 patients had stable disease. Objective response rate and disease control rate were 22.0% and 73.2% in the intention-to-treat cohort, and 24.3% and 81.1% in the efficacy-evaluable cohort, respectively. A total of 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 46.9%-77.4%) of the patients (26/41) presented PFS2/PFS1 >1.3. The median OS was 16.8 months (range: 8.23-24.4), and the 12- and 36-month OS rates were 62.8% and 28.9%, respectively. No significant association was observed between concomitant mutation and efficacy. Thirty-one (75.6%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism, hand-foot syndrome and malaise. This phase II trial showed that anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor exhibits favorable efficacy and tolerability in patients with refractory solid tumor.

Nivolumab or Atezolizumab in the Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? A Prognostic Index Based on Data from Daily Practice

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nivolumab and atezolizumab in advanced pre-treated NSCLC was documented in prospective trials. We aim to confirm the benefits and indicate predictive factors for immunotherapy in daily practice.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis. The median PFS and OS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used for comparisons. Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox regression method.

RESULTS

A total of 260 patients (ECOG 0-1) with advanced NSCLC (CS III-IV) were eligible to receive nivolumab or atezolizumab as second-line treatment. Median PFS and OS were three months (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.57-3.42) and 10 months (95% CI 8.03-11.96), respectively, for the overall population. The median OS for the atezolizumab arm was eight months (95% CI 5.89-10.1), while for the nivolumab group, it was 14 months (95% CI 10.02-17.97) (p = 0.018). The sum of all measurable changes >100.5 mm (p = 0.007; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005), PLT > 281.5 G/l (p < 0.001; HR = 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.003) and bone metastases (p < 0.004; HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04-2.38) were independent negative prognostic factors for OS in multivariate analysis. Based on preliminary analyses, a prognostic index was constructed to obtain three prognostic groups. Median OS in the subgroups was 16 months (95% CI 13.3-18.7), seven months (95% CI 4.83-9.17) and four months (95% CI 2.88-5.13), respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab and atezolizumab provided clinical benefit in real life. Clinical and laboratory factors may help to identify subgroups likely to benefit. The use of prognostic indices may be valuable in clinical practice.

Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients Affected by Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 80% of all lung cancers, and most NSCLC is diagnosed in the advanced stage. The advent of immune check point inhibitors (ICIs) changed the therapeutic scenario both in metastatic disease (in first and subsequent lines) and earlier settings. Comorbidities, reduced organ function, cognitive deterioration, and social impairment give reasons for a greater probability of adverse events, making the treatment of elderly patients challenging. The reduced toxicity of ICIs compared to standard chemotherapy makes this approach attractive in this population. The effectiveness of ICIs varies according to age, and patients older than 75 years may benefit less than younger patients. This may be related to the so-called immunosenescence, a phenomenon that refers to the reduced activity of immunity with older age. Elders are often under-represented in clinical trials, even if they are a large part of the patients in a clinical practice. In this review, we aim to explore the biological aspects of immunosenescence and to report and analyze the most relevant and recent literature findings on the role of immunotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC.

Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analyses of the Phase 3 IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 Randomized Clinical Trials

Importance

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) arising from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) cancer therapy may potentially predict improved outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate the association between irAEs and atezolizumab efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using pooled data from 3 phase 3 ICI studies.

Design, Setting, and Participants

IMpower130, IMpower132, and IMpower150 were phase 3, multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoimmunotherapy combinations involving atezolizumab. Participants were chemotherapy-naive adults with stage IV nonsquamous NSCLC. These post hoc analyses were conducted during February 2022.

Interventions

Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin plus nab-paclitaxel, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower130); 1:1 to receive atezolizumab with carboplatin or cisplatin plus pemetrexed, or chemotherapy alone (IMpower132); and 1:1:1 to receive atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, atezolizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, or bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (IMpower150).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Pooled data from IMpower130 (cutoff: March 15, 2018), IMpower132 (cutoff: May 22, 2018), and IMpower150 (cutoff: September 13, 2019) were analyzed by treatment (atezolizumab-containing vs control), irAE status (with vs without), and highest irAE grade (1-2 vs 3-5). To account for immortal bias, a time-dependent Cox model and landmark analyses of irAE occurrence at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of overall survival (OS).

Results

Of 2503 randomized patients, 1577 were in the atezolizumab-containing arm and 926 were in the control arm. The mean (SD) age of patients was 63.1 (9.4) years and 63.0 (9.3) years, and 950 (60.2%) and 569 (61.4%) were male, respectively, in the atezolizumab arm and the control arm. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between patients with irAEs (atezolizumab, n = 753; control, n = 289) and without (atezolizumab, n = 824; control, n = 637). In the atezolizumab arm, OS HRs (95% CI) in patients with grade 1 to 2 irAEs and grade 3 to 5 irAEs (each vs those without irAEs) in the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month subgroups were 0.78 (0.65-0.94) and 1.25 (0.90-1.72), 0.74 (0.63-0.87) and 1.23 (0.93-1.64), 0.77 (0.65-0.90) and 1.1 (0.81-1.42), and 0.72 (0.59-0.89) and 0.87 (0.61-1.25), respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this pooled analysis of 3 randomized clinical trials, longer OS was observed in patients with vs without mild to moderate irAEs in both arms and across landmarks. These findings further support the use of first-line atezolizumab-containing regimens for advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02367781, NCT02657434, and NCT02366143.

Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGF-β) and Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one the most lethal malignancies worldwide affecting around half a million individuals each year. The treatment of PC is relatively difficult due to the difficulty in making an early diagnosis. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) is a multifunctional factor acting as both a tumor promoter in early cancer stages and a tumor suppressor in advanced disease. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a ligand of programmed death-1 (PD-1), an immune checkpoint receptor, allowing tumor cells to avoid elimination by immune cells. Recently, targeting the TGF-β signaling and PD-L1 pathways has emerged as a strategy for cancer therapy. In this review, we have summarized the current knowledge regarding these pathways and their contribution to tumor development with a focus on PC. Moreover, we have reviewed the role of TGF-β and PD-L1 blockade in the treatment of various cancer types, including PC, and discussed the clinical trials evaluating TGF-β and PD-L1 antagonists in PC patients.

Adjuvant atezolizumab in Japanese patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (IMpower010)

The global phase 3 IMpower010 study evaluated adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care (BSC) following platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report a subgroup analysis in patients enrolled in Japan. Eligible patients had complete resection of histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IB (tumors ≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC. Upon completing 1-4 cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive atezolizumab (fixed dose of 1200 mg every 21 days; 16 cycles or 1 year) or BSC. The primary endpoint of the global IMpower010 study was investigator-assessed disease-free survival, tested hierarchically first in patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC whose tumors expressed programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) on ≥1% of tumor cells, then in all randomized patients with stage II-IIIA NSCLC, and finally in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA NSCLC). Safety was evaluated in all patients who received atezolizumab or BSC. The study comprised 149 enrolled patients in three populations: ITT (n = 117; atezolizumab, n = 59; BSC, n = 58), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (n = 113; atezolizumab, n = 56; BSC, n = 57), and PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (n = 74; atezolizumab, n = 41; BSC, n = 33). At the data cutoff date (January 21, 2021), a trend toward disease-free survival improvement with atezolizumab vs BSC was observed in the PD-L1 tumor cells ≥1% stage II-IIIA (unstratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-1.08), all-randomized stage II-IIIA (unstratified HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.11), and ITT (unstratified HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.34-1.10) populations. Atezolizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 16% of patients; no treatment-related grade 5 events occurred. Adjuvant atezolizumab showed disease-free survival improvement and a tolerable toxicity profile in Japanese patients in IMpower010, consistent with the global study results.

Final results from TAIL: updated long-term efficacy of atezolizumab in a diverse population of patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

In patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), atezolizumab therapy improves survival with manageable safety. The open-label, single-arm phase III/IV TAIL study (NCT03285763) evaluated atezolizumab monotherapy in patients with previously treated NSCLC, including those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, severe renal impairment, prior anti-programmed death 1 therapy, autoimmune disease, and age ≥75 years. Patients received atezolizumab intravenously (1200 mg) every 3 weeks. At data cut-off for final analysis, the median follow-up was 36.1 (range 0.0-42.3) months. Treatment-related (TR) serious adverse events (SAEs) and TR immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were the coprimary endpoints. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate, and duration of response. Safety and efficacy in key patient subgroups were also assessed. TR SAEs and TR irAEs occurred in 8.0% and 9.4% of patients, respectively. No new safety signals were documented. In the overall population, median OS and PFS (95% CI) were 11.2 months (8.9 to 12.7) and 2.7 months (2.3 to 2.8), respectively. TAIL showed that atezolizumab has a similar risk-benefit profile in clinically diverse patients with previously treated NSCLC, which may guide treatment decisions for patients generally excluded from pivotal clinical trials.

Phase II study of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel/atezolizumab combination therapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with impaired renal function: RESTART trial

Background

 First-line treatment of nonsquamous non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift to platinum combination therapy together with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, phase III studies of combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy and ICIs have included only patients with maintained organ function, not those with renal impairment.

Methods

Cytotoxic chemotherapy–naïve advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients aged 20 years or older with impaired renal function (creatinine clearance of 15 to 45 mL/min) are prospectively registered in this single-arm phase II study and receive combination therapy with carboplatin, nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab-) paclitaxel, and atezolizumab. Individuals with known genetic driver alterations including those affecting EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, RET, and NTRK are excluded. We plan to enroll 40 patients over 2 years at 32 oncology facilities in Japan. The primary end point is confirmed objective response rate.

Discussion

If the study demonstrates efficacy and safety of carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel/atezolizumab, then this combination regimen may become a treatment option even for nonsquamous NSCLC patients with impaired renal function.

Trial registration

Registered with Japan Registry for Clinical Trials on 25 February 2021 (jRCTs071200102).

Results from the IMpower132 China cohort: Atezolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The global Phase III IMpower132 study evaluating atezolizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin or cisplatin (APP) versus pemetrexed plus carboplatin or cisplatin (PP) for first-line treatment of non-squamous advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its co-primary progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint at the primary analysis in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Although the co-primary overall survival (OS) endpoint was not met, numerical OS improvement favoring APP over PP was observed at the final analysis. We report primary results for Chinese patients in IMpower132.

METHODS

Treatment-naive Chinese patients with non-squamous stage IV EGFR/ALK mutation-negative NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 or 6 cycles of APP or PP, followed by maintenance atezolizumab plus pemetrexed or pemetrexed. Co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS and OS.

RESULTS

The ITT population included 163 Chinese patients (82 in the APP arm and 81 in the PP arm). At data cutoff (median follow-up, 11.7 months), the median PFS in the APP and PP arms was 8.3 and 5.8 months, respectively; the unstratified hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.50, 1.08). At the interim OS analysis, median OS was not estimable in either arm; the unstratified HR was 0.70 (95% CI: 0.40, 1.24). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSION

Among Chinese patients in IMpower132, PFS benefit was seen with APP versus PP. Though interim OS data were immature, there was a trend toward OS benefit favoring APP versus PP. The safety profile of the APP was consistent with the known risks of the individual treatment components.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov: NCT02657434.

Real-life safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in older patients with cancer: An observational study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the real-world safety profile of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors between younger and older patients.

METHODS

All patients receiving pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab between September 2016 and September 2019 at Haga Teaching Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands were included in this retrospective study. Immune-related adverse drug reactions (irADRs) were manually retrieved from the electronic patient files. The cumulative incidence of irADRs were compared between younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients using a Pearsons Chi-square test.

RESULTS

We identified 217 patients who were treated with at least one dose of PD-(L)1 inhibitor. 58% were 65 years or older at the start of immunotherapy. 183 patients (84.3%) received monotherapy PD-(L)1 inhibitors and 34 (15.7%) received chemo-immunotherapy. A total of 278 irADRs were registered. Cutaneous irADRs (53.9%), thyroid gland disorders (20.3%), and non-infectious diarrhoea/colitis (17.5%) were the most frequently reported irADRs. The majority of the irADRs were mild to moderate and no fatal irADRs were observed. 61 (21.9%) of the irADRs needed systemic treatment, of which 19 (6.8%) required treatment with corticosteroids. 18 irADRs (6.5%) were severe and resulted in hospitalisation. The cumulative incidence of cutaneous irADRs was different between the age groups: 45.7% of the patients <65 years and in 60.0% of the patients ≥65 years (p = 0.036). No statistical difference was found in the cumulative incidence of other irADRs between the two age groups.

CONCLUSION

Advanced age is not associated with immune-related adverse drug reactions of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors.

Tumor immunotherapies by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the pros and cons

The main breakthrough in tumor immunotherapy was the discovery of immune checkpoint (IC) proteins, which act as a potent suppressor of the immune system by a myriad of mechanisms. After that, scientists focused on the immune checkpoint molecules mainly. Thereby, much effort was spent to progress novel strategies for suppressing these inhibitory axes, resulting in the evolution of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Then, ICIs have become a promising approach and shaped a paradigm shift in tumor immunotherapies. CTLA-4 plays an influential role in attenuation of the induction of naïve and memory T cells by engagement with its responding ligands like B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86). Besides, PD-1 is predominantly implicated in adjusting T cell function in peripheral tissues through its interaction with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and PD-L2. Given their suppressive effects on anti-tumor immunity, it has firmly been documented that ICIs based therapies can be practical and rational therapeutic approaches to treat cancer patients. Nonetheless, tumor inherent or acquired resistance to ICI and some treatment-related toxicities restrict their application in the clinic. The current review will deliver a comprehensive overview of the ICI application to treat human tumors alone or in combination with other modalities to support more desired outcomes and lower toxicities in cancer patients. Video Abstract.

Immunotherapy Versus Hospice: Treatment Decision-Making in the Modern Era of Novel Cancer Therapies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Modern advances in cancer treatment with immunotherapy have created substantial hope for patients and oncologists alike due to a new possibility of durable response which can verge on "cure." This, in combination with a more favorable toxicity profile, has led many oncologists to consider immunotherapy for patients who might have previously been recommended for hospice. In this narrative review, we discuss (1) the risks and benefits of immunotherapy in patients with far advanced cancer in the last months of life, (2) the role of supportive and palliative care, and (3) how to navigate complex treatment decisions for these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unfortunately, data on immunotherapy outcomes for patients with poor performance status and far advanced disease are quite limited. Where available, studies consistently report poorer survival outcomes compared to patients with preserved performance status. However, a minority of patients (15-30%) may achieve at least partial response with immunotherapy, which can be quite durable. Such prognostic uncertainty leads to additional challenges in treatment discussions and decision-making. Given such prognostic uncertainty, clinicians should individualize treatment with consideration for all the various factors that may inform each patient's expected outcome with immunotherapy. Early involvement of palliative care in the disease trajectory can help patients with advanced cancer to optimize their quality of life, improve illness understanding, navigate prognostic uncertainty, and facilitate complex decision-making regarding cancer treatments. With upfront, open discussions of immunotherapy expectations, oncologists can help ensure treatments are aligned with patient goals and optimize value outcomes.

Adjuvant atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (IMpower010): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Novel adjuvant strategies are needed to optimise outcomes after complete surgical resection in patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to evaluate adjuvant atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in these patients.

METHODS

IMpower010 was a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study done at 227 sites in 22 countries and regions. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with completely resected stage IB (tumours ≥4 cm) to IIIA NSCLC per the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (7th edition). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a permuted-block method (block size of four) to receive adjuvant atezolizumab (1200 mg every 21 days; for 16 cycles or 1 year) or best supportive care (observation and regular scans for disease recurrence) after adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (one to four cycles). The primary endpoint, investigator-assessed disease-free survival, was tested hierarchically first in the stage II-IIIA population subgroup whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells (SP263), then all patients in the stage II-IIIA population, and finally the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (stage IB-IIIA). Safety was evaluated in all patients who were randomly assigned and received atezolizumab or best supportive care. IMpower010 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02486718 (active, not recruiting).

FINDINGS

Between Oct 7, 2015, and Sept 19, 2018, 1280 patients were enrolled after complete resection. 1269 received adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 1005 patients were eligible for randomisation to atezolizumab (n=507) or best supportive care (n=498); 495 in each group received treatment. After a median follow-up of 32·2 months (IQR 27·4-38·3) in the stage II-IIIA population, atezolizumab treatment improved disease-free survival compared with best supportive care in patients in the stage II-IIIA population whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells (HR 0·66; 95% CI 0·50-0·88; p=0·0039) and in all patients in the stage II-IIIA population (0·79; 0·64-0·96; p=0·020). In the ITT population, HR for disease-free survival was 0·81 (0·67-0·99; p=0·040). Atezolizumab-related grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 53 (11%) of 495 patients and grade 5 events in four patients (1%).

INTERPRETATION

IMpower010 showed a disease-free survival benefit with atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resected stage II-IIIA NSCLC, with pronounced benefit in the subgroup whose tumours expressed PD-L1 on 1% or more of tumour cells, and no new safety signals. Atezolizumab after adjuvant chemotherapy offers a promising treatment option for patients with resected early-stage NSCLC.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.

Single dose of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in active psoriasis with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has been recognized as the standard of care in addition to chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Most immunotherapy trials, however, exclude patients with autoimmune disease owing to concerns of disease exacerbation.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and underlying active psoriasis who experienced a remarkable response, without developing psoriasis flares, following treatment with a single dose of atezolizumab and first-line chemotherapy.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient remained asymptomatic 10 months since treatment discontinuation, without disease progression, despite having received only a single dose of atezolizumab and six cycles of chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Little is known about the optimum duration required to achieve a durable response with immunotherapy. Patients with autoimmune disease are commonly excluded from immunotherapy trials owing to a higher risk of autoimmune disease flares or immune-related adverse events. The remarkable outcome observed in this case offers some insights into the possible durable response with limited doses of immunotherapy and a safer approach for administering immunotherapy in patients with autoimmune disease. Initiating chemotherapy to induce remission in active autoimmune disease prior to administering immunotherapy could potentially be an ideal approach that facilitates the use of immunotherapy in this patient population.

First-line immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with poor performance status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC), either as single agents or combined with chemotherapy. The evidence sustaining their role for poor performance status (ECOG PS ≥2) patients is limited.

METHODS

We search PubMed and the proceedings of international oncology meetings to perform a systematic review to assess the outcomes poor PS NSCLC patients who received ICIs as first-line treatment. A meta-analysis included retrospective studies focusing on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC. We reported the global objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and landmark progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) in ECOG PS ≥2 and 0-1 patients, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included in the systematic review. Thirty-two retrospective studies focused on pembrolizumab monotherapy in PD-L1 ≥50% cases. In total, 1,030 out of 5,357 (19%) of patients across 30 studies presented with a PS ≥2 at pembrolizumab initiation. In 18 studies with detailed clinical information, worse outcomes in poor PS compared to good PS patients were documented. The meta-analysis revealed that ORR and DCR within the PS ≥2 patient population were 30.9% and 41.5% respectively (55.2% and 71.5% in PS 0-1 patients). The rates of PFS (at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months) and OS (at 6, 12, 18 and 24 months) were approximately double in the good PS compared to the poor PS group of patients. In the three prospective trials where of ICIs in PS 2 populations, the diverse strictness in PS definition likely contributed to the differential outcomes observed. Six retrospective studies dealt with chemo-immunotherapy combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Still with limited prospective evidence sustaining the role of immunotherapy in previously untreated NSCLC with poor PS, 19% of patients in retrospective series dealing with pembrolizumab in PD-L1 ≥50% tumors had an ECOG PS ≥2. Clinical effort encompassing the definition of poor PS, of the factors conditioning it, and the development of dedicated treatment strategies is required to improve the outcomes in this patient population.